Kapitel-Kommentar
Jonah Kapitel 1
서론
Introduction
繁體中文
Englisches Original
INTRODUCTION
JONAH was the son of Amittai, of Gath-hepher in Zebulun (called Gittah-hepher in
Jos 19:10-13),
so that he belonged to the kingdom of the ten tribes, not to Judah. His date is to be gathered from
2Ki 14:25-27,
"He (Jeroboam II) restored the coast of Israel from the entering of Hamath unto the sea of the plain, according to the word of the Lord God of Israel, which He spake by the hand of His servant Jonah, the son of Amittai, the prophet, which was of Gath-hepher. For the Lord saw the affliction of Israel, that it was very bitter: for there was not any shut up, nor any left, nor any helper for Israel. And the Lord said not that He would blot out the name of Israel from under heaven: but He saved them by the hand of Jeroboam the son of Joash." Now as this prophecy of Jonah was given at a time when Israel was at the lowest point of depression, when "there was not any shut up or left," that is, confined or left at large, none to act as a helper for Israel, it cannot have been given in Jeroboam's reign, which was marked by prosperity, for in it Syria was worsted in fulfilment of the prophecy, and Israel raised to its former "greatness." It must have been, therefore, in the early part of the reign of Joash, Jeroboam's father, who had found Israel in subjection to Syria, but had raised it by victories which were followed up so successfully by Jeroboam. Thus Jonah was the earliest of the prophets, and close upon Elisha, who died in Joash's reign, having just before his death given a token prophetical of the thrice defeat of Syria
(2Ki 13:14-21).
Hosea and Amos prophesied also in the reign of Jeroboam II, but towards the closing part of his forty-one years' reign. The transactions in the Book of Jonah probably occurred in the latter part of his life; if so, the book is not much older than part of the writings of Hosea and Amos. The use of the third person is no argument against Jonah himself being the writer: for the sacred writers in mentioning themselves do so in the third person (compare
Joh 19:26).
Nor is the use of the past tense
(Jon 3:3,
"Now Nineveh was an exceeding great city") a proof that Nineveh's greatness was past when the Book of Jonah was being written; it is simply used to carry on the negative uniformly,--"the word of the Lord came to Jonah . . . so Jonah arose . . . now Nineveh was," &c.
(Jon 1:1; 3:3).
The mention of its greatness proves rather that the book was written at an early date, before the Israelites had that intimate knowledge of it which they must have had soon afterwards through frequent Assyrian inroads.
As early as JULIAN and PORPHYRY, pagans ridiculed the credulity of Christians in believing the deliverance of Jonah by a fish. Some infidels have derived it from the heathen fable of the deliverance of Andromeda from a sea monster by Perseus [APOLLODORUS, The Library, 2.4,3]; or from that of Arion the musician thrown into the sea by sailors, and carried safe to shore on a dolphin [HERODOTUS, History, 1.24]; or from that of Hercules, who sprang into the jaws of a sea monster, and was three days in its belly, when he undertook to save Hesione [DIODORUS SICULUS, Historical Library, 4.42; HOMER, The Iliad, 20.145; 21.442]. Probably the heathen fables are, vice versa, corruptions of the sacred narrative, if there be any connection. JEROME states that near Joppa lay rocks, pointed out as those to which Andromeda was bound when exposed to the sea monster. This fable implies the likelihood of the story of Jonah having passed through the Phœnicians in a corrupted form to Greece. That the account of Jonah is history, and not parable (as rationalists represent), appears from our Lord's reference to it, in which the personal existence, miraculous fate, and prophetical office of Jonah are explicitly asserted: "No sign shall be given but the sign of the prophet Jonas: for, as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly, so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth"
(Mt 12:39, 40).
The Lord recognizes his being in the belly of the fish as a "sign," that is, a real miracle, typical of a similar event in His own history; and assumes the execution of the prophet's commission to Nineveh, "The men of Nineveh . . . repented at the preaching of Jonas; and behold, a greater than Jonas is here"
(Mt 12:41).
It seemed strange to KIMCHI, a Jew himself, that the Book of Jonah is among the Scriptures, as the only prophecy in it concerns Nineveh, a heathen city, and makes no mention of Israel, which is referred to by every other prophet. The reason seems to be: a tacit reproof of Israel is intended; a heathen people were ready to repent at the first preaching of the prophet, a stranger to them; but Israel, who boasted of being God's elect, repented not, though warned by their own prophets at all seasons. This was an anticipatory streak of light before the dawn of the full "light to lighten the Gentiles"
(Lu 2:32).
Jonah is himself a strange paradox: a prophet of God, and yet a runaway from God: a man drowned, and yet alive: a preacher of repentance, yet one that repines at repentance. Yet Jonah, saved from the jaws of death himself on repentance, was the fittest to give a hope to Nineveh, doomed though it was, of a merciful respite on its repentance. The patience and pity of God stand in striking contrast with the selfishness and hard-heartedness of man.
Nineveh in particular was chosen to teach Israel these lessons, on account of its being capital of the then world kingdom, and because it was now beginning to make its power felt by Israel. Our Lord
(Mt 12:41)
makes Nineveh's repentance a reproof of the Jews' impenitence in His day, just as Jonah provoked Israel to jealousy
(De 32:21)
by the same example. Jonah's mission to Nineveh implied that a heathen city afforded as legitimate a field for the prophet's labors as Israel, and with a more successful result (compare
Am 9:7).
The book is prose narrative throughout, except the prayer of thanksgiving in the second chapter
(Jon 2:1-9).
The Chaldæisms in the original do not prove spuriousness, or a later age, but were natural in the language of one living in Zebulun on the borders of the north, whence Aramaic peculiarities would readily arise; moreover, his message to Nineveh implies acquaintance with Assyrian. Living as Jonah did in a part of Israel exposed to Assyrian invasions, he probably stood in the same relation to Assyria as Elijah and Elisha had stood to Syria. The purity of the language implies the antiquity of the book, and the likelihood of its being Jonah's own writing. Indeed, none but Jonah could have written or dictated such peculiar details, known only to himself.
The tradition that places the tomb of Jonah opposite to Mosul, and names it "Nebbi Junus" (that is, "prophet Jonah"), originated probably in the spot having been occupied by a Christian church or convent dedicated to him [LAYARD]. A more ancient tradition of JEROME'S time placed the tomb in Jonah's native village of Gath-hepher.
1
Jon 1:1-17.
繁體中文
拿 1:1-17.
約拿受差往尼尼微、逃跑、受罰,並藉神蹟得保全。
1. 約拿——希伯來文意為「鴿子」。比較
創 8:8, 9,
在那裏鴿子逃離挪亞與方舟之後,徒然尋找安息之處:約拿也是如此。格羅修斯解釋為「來自希臘或愛奧尼亞的人」,並不恰當,那裏有稱為阿米塔奧尼迪(Amythaonidae)的先知。
亞米太——希伯來文意為「真理」、「說真話」,正適合先知。
Englisches Original
Jon 1:1-17.
JONAH'S COMMISSION TO NINEVEH, FLIGHT, PUNISHMENT, AND PRESERVATION BY MIRACLE.
1. Jonah--meaning in Hebrew, "dove." Compare
Ge 8:8, 9,
where the dove in vain seeks rest after flying from Noah and the ark: so Jonah. GROTIUS not so well explains it, "one sprung from Greece" or Ionia, where there were prophets called Amythaonidæ.
Amittai--Hebrew for "truth," "truth-telling"; appropriate to a prophet.
2
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
2. 往尼尼微去——位於底格里斯河以東,今摩蘇爾對面。先知被差到外邦人中的唯一事例。然而約拿被差往尼尼微,不單是為尼尼微的益處,也是要藉一個異教城邑因一位陌生人——約拿——初次傳道就悔改的事實,來使以色列羞愧,因為神的百姓雖有本國許多先知從早到晚傳講,卻不悔改。尼尼微意為「尼努斯的居所」,即寧錄的居所。
創 10:11
應譯作「他(寧錄)往亞述地去,建造尼尼微」。對楔形文字銘文的現代研究證實聖經的記載:巴比倫早於尼尼微建立,兩城皆由含的後裔建造,侵入了分給閃的地業
創 10:5, 6, 8, 10, 25。
大城——周圍四百八十斯他底,長一百五十,寬九十〔狄奧多羅斯,2.3〕。約烏西雅第七年,在撒丹拿帕魯斯治下為米底亞人亞巴塞攻取;主前 625 年再度被巴比倫的尼波帕拉薩與米底亞人基亞克薩雷攻取。見
拿 3:3
註解。
呼喊——
賽 40:6; 58:1。
達到我面前——
創 4:10; 6:13; 18:21; 拉 9:6; 啟 18:5;
即他們的惡已大到需要我公開介入施罰的地步。
Englisches Original
2. to Nineveh--east of the Tigris, opposite the modern Mosul. The only case of a prophet being sent to the heathen. Jonah, however, is sent to Nineveh, not solely for Nineveh's good, but also to shame Israel, by the fact of a heathen city repenting at the first preaching of a single stranger, Jonah, whereas God's people will not repent, though preached to by their many national prophets, late and early. Nineveh means "the residence of Ninus," that is, Nimrod.
Ge 10:11,
where the translation ought to be, "He (Nimrod) went forth into Assyria and builded Nineveh." Modern research into the cuneiform inscriptions confirms the Scripture account that Babylon was founded earlier than Nineveh, and that both cities were built by descendants of Ham, encroaching on the territory assigned to Shem
(Ge 10:5, 6, 8, 10, 25).
great city--four hundred eighty stadia in circumference, one hundred fifty in length, and ninety in breadth [DIODORUS SICULUS, 2.3]. Taken by Arbaces the Mede, in the reign of Sardanapalus, about the seventh year of Uzziah; and a second time by Nabopolassar of Babylon and Cyaxares the Mede in 625 B.C. See on
Jon 3:3.
cry--
(Isa 40:6; 58:1).
come up before me--
(Ge 4:10; 6:13; 18:21; Ezr 9:6; Re 18:5);
that is, their wickedness is so great as to require My open interposition for punishment.
3
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
3. 躲避——約拿逃走的動機暗示於
拿 4:2:
他怕在向如此強大的異教城邑擔當這樣危險的使命之後,他的先知性警告會因神「轉意不降那災」而被撤銷——正如神雖有如此多的惹動,卻長久容忍以色列一樣——結果他便看似假先知。此外,他可能覺得向一個外邦拜偶像的民族履任有失身分,因他所願的是他們的傾覆而非悔改。先知受了預言的信息卻將之隱藏,這是唯一的事例。
躲避耶和華的面——比較
創 4:16。
約拿以為逃出耶和華特別臨在的以色列地,便可擺脫耶和華賜預言之靈的影響。他大概知道
詩 139:7-10
所陳述的真理,卻實際上置之不理(比較
創 3:8-10; 耶 23:24)。
下到——由陸地往海上正合此語
詩 107:23。
約帕——今雅法,屬但境內;早在所羅門時即為港口
代下 2:16。
他施——西班牙的他特蘇,在極西,與東方的尼尼微相距最遠。
Englisches Original
3. flee--Jonah's motive for flight is hinted at in
Jon 4:2:
fear that after venturing on such a dangerous commission to so powerful a heathen city, his prophetical threats should be set aside by God's "repenting of the evil," just as God had so long spared Israel notwithstanding so many provocations, and so he should seem a false prophet. Besides, he may have felt it beneath him to discharge a commission to a foreign idolatrous nation, whose destruction he desired rather than their repentance. This is the only case of a prophet, charged with a prophetical message, concealing it.
from the presence of the Lord--(Compare
Ge 4:16).
Jonah thought in fleeing from the land of Israel, where Jehovah was peculiarly present, that he should escape from Jehovah's prophecy-inspiring influence. He probably knew the truth stated in
Ps 139:7-10,
but virtually ignored it (compare
Ge 3:8-10; Jer 23:24).
went down--appropriate in going from land to the sea
(Ps 107:23).
Joppa--now Jaffa, in the region of Dan; a harbor as early as Solomon's time
(2Ch 2:16).
Tarshish--Tartessus in Spain; in the farthest west at the greatest distance from Nineveh in the east.
4
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
4. 拋出——字面作使風迸發。科弗代爾譯作「將大風拋入海中」。
Englisches Original
4. sent out--literally, caused a wind to burst forth. COVERDALE translates, "hurled a greate wynde into the see."
5
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
5. 水手便懼怕——他們原是慣於風暴的人,可見危險必極大。
各人哀求自己的神——按照腓尼基習俗,各人求自己的守護神,偶像卻顯出無力拯救。但耶和華卻顯為能,最終異教水手藉著向祂獻祭而承認了這一點
拿 1:16。
底艙——即內部深處(比較
撒上 24:3; 賽 14:13, 15)。自覺有罪的人躲避同伴的面而藏匿。
沉睡——沉睡並不必然證明無辜;它可能是屬肉體的安全感與麻木良知的果子。耶穌在加利利海上的睡何等不同
可 4:37-39!
有罪的約拿對恐懼的無動於衷,與無辜水手的驚慌形成對比。所以原文用獨立主格:「至於約拿,他」等。屬靈上的比較見
弗 5:14。
Englisches Original
5. mariners were afraid--though used to storms; the danger therefore must have been extreme.
cried every man unto his god--The idols proved unable to save them, though each, according to Phœnician custom, called on his tutelary god. But Jehovah proved able: and the heathen sailors owned it in the end by sacrificing to Him
(Jon 1:16).
into the sides--that is, the interior recesses (compare
1Sa 24:3; Isa 14:13, 15).
Those conscious of guilt shrink from the presence of their fellow man into concealment.
fast asleep--Sleep is no necessary proof of innocence; it may be the fruit of carnal security and a seared conscience. How different was Jesus' sleep on the Sea of Galilee!
(Mr 4:37-39).
Guilty Jonah's indifference to fear contrasts with the unoffending mariners' alarm. The original therefore is in the nominative absolute: "But as for Jonah, he," &c. Compare spiritually,
Eph 5:14.
6
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
6. 求告你的神——古時異教徒在危難中,除了本國的神之外,也求告外國的神(比較
詩 107:28)。毛勒譯前句作:「你睡覺的緣故是甚麼?」
顧念我們——即為我們的好處(比較
創 8:1; 出 2:25; 3:7, 9; 詩 40:17)。
Englisches Original
6. call upon thy God--The ancient heathen in dangers called on foreign gods, besides their national ones (compare
Ps 107:28).
MAURER translates the preceding clause, "What is the reason that thou sleepest?"
think upon us--for good (compare
Ge 8:1; Ex 2:25; 3:7, 9; Ps 40:17).
7
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
7. 掣籤——神有時認可在難決之事上以此方式定奪。比較亞干的類似事例:他的罪使以色列受苦,直到神將罪犯顯明——大概是藉著掣籤
箴 16:33; 徒 1:26。
原始的傳統與天然的良心,使異教徒也相信一個有罪的人會使全體同伴——雖然無辜——一同受罰。故西塞羅〔《論神的本性》,3.37〕記載,與無神論者狄亞哥拉斯同船的水手,將他們遭遇的風暴歸因於他在船上(比較賀拉斯,《頌歌》,3.2.26)。
Englisches Original
7. cast lots--God sometimes sanctioned this mode of deciding in difficult cases. Compare the similar instance of Achan, whose guilt involved Israel in suffering, until God revealed the offender, probably by the casting of lots
(Pr 16:33; Ac 1:26).
Primitive tradition and natural conscience led even the heathen to believe that one guilty man involves all his associates, though innocent, in punishment. So CICERO [The Nature of the Gods, 3.37] mentions that the mariners sailing with Diagoras, an atheist, attributed a storm that overtook them to his presence in the ship (compare HORACE'S Odes, 3.2.26).
8
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
8. 有罪者既被查明,便被盤問,好使他親口完全承認。亞干的案子也是如此
書 7:19。
Englisches Original
8. The guilty individual being discovered is interrogated so as to make full confession with his own mouth. So in Achan's case
(Jos 7:19).
9
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
9. 我是希伯來人——他不說「以色列人」。因為這是他們彼此之間使用的名稱;而「希伯來人」是外人對他們的稱呼
創 40:15; 出 3:18。
我敬畏耶和華——在口頭承認上如此:他的行為卻否定了他的承認;他的承認加重了他的罪責。
那……造……海的神——說得恰到好處,因為風暴正是臨到海上。異教徒為「天」、「海」、「地」各有不同的神。耶和華卻是這一切獨一無二的真神。約拿終於被這猛烈的療法從遲鈍中喚醒。約拿不過是以色列背道的縮影,因此必須擔當公義的刑罰。事奉者的罪是百姓之罪的結果,如摩西的事例
申 4:21。
這正是約拿適合作彌賽亞預表的原因:彌賽亞擔當了百姓歸算的罪。
Englisches Original
9. I am an Hebrew--He does not say "an Israelite." For this was the name used among themselves; "Hebrew," among foreigners
(Ge 40:15; Ex 3:18).
I fear the Lord--in profession: his practice belied his profession: his profession aggravated his guilt.
God . . . which . . . made the sea--appropriately expressed, as accounting for the tempest sent on the sea. The heathen had distinct gods for the "heaven," the "sea," and the "land." Jehovah is the one and only true God of all alike. Jonah at last is awakened by the violent remedy from his lethargy. Jonah was but the reflection of Israel's backsliding from God, and so must bear the righteous punishment. The guilt of the minister is the result of that of the people, as in Moses' case
(De 4:21).
This is what makes Jonah a suitable type of Messiah, who bore the imputed sin of the people.
10
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
10. 「那些人便大大懼怕」,因為得知約拿逃跑竟惹動如此大能之神的怒氣。
你做的是甚麼事呢?——信仰的宣認者若行錯,必從不作此宣認的人那裏聽見責備。
Englisches Original
10. "The men were exceedingly afraid," when made aware of the wrath of so powerful a God at the flight of Jonah.
Why hast thou done this?--If professors of religion do wrong, they will hear of it from those who make no such profession.
11
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
11. 我們當向你怎樣行?——他們如此問,因為約拿本人最清楚當如何平息他的神。「只要能辦到,我們情願救你,同時也要救我們自己」\n拿 1:13, 14。
Englisches Original
11. What shall we do unto thee?--They ask this, as Jonah himself must best know how his God is to be appeased. "We would gladly save thee, if we can do so, and yet be saved ourselves"
(Jon 1:13, 14).
12
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
12. 將我……拋在海中——在這點上約拿是彌賽亞的預表:他是那為平息神怒氣的洪流(比較論彌賽亞的
詩 69:1, 2)——否則必吞噬所有其他人——而自獻己身的那一人。所以該亞法也憑靈說,一個人死、通國不滅亡是好的
約 11:50。
約拿在此也是真悔改的範例:真悔改引導悔改者「接受自己罪孽的刑罰」
利 26:41, 43,
並對自己的罪比對自己的受苦更為憤慨。
Englisches Original
12. cast me . . . into the sea--Herein Jonah is a type of Messiah, the one man who offered Himself to die, in order to allay the stormy flood of God's wrath (compare
Ps 69:1, 2,
as to Messiah), which otherwise must have engulfed all other men. So Caiaphas by the Spirit declared it expedient that one man should die, and that the whole nation should not perish
(Joh 11:50).
Jonah also herein is a specimen of true repentance, which leads the penitent to "accept the punishment of his iniquity"
(Le 26:41, 43),
and to be more indignant at his sin than at his suffering.
13
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
13. 他們卻不能——
箴 21:30。
風與潮——神的不悅與神的旨意——都與他們作對。
Englisches Original
13. they could not--
(Pr 21:30).
Wind and tide--God's displeasure and God's counsel--were against them.
14
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
14. 因這人的性命——即因取這人的性命。
無辜的血——不要像刑罰流無辜血者那樣刑罰我們(比較
申 21:8)。
在原型所對應的實體之事中,本丟·彼拉多洗手並承認基督的無辜:「這義人的血,我是無辜的。」但受害者約拿有罪、水手無辜,而我們的祭物基督無辜、本丟·彼拉多與我們眾人都有罪。但藉著我們的罪歸於祂、祂的義歸於我們的歸算,這無瑕無疵的實體與有罪的預表恰好相符。
你……耶和華啊,隨自己的意旨行事了——約拿上了這船,風暴興起,他被掣籤查出,他自己判了自己的刑,這一切都是你所行的。我們不情願地將他交於死,但這是你的旨意如此。
Englisches Original
14. for this man's life--that is, for taking this man's life.
innocent blood--Do not punish us as Thou wouldst punish the shedders of innocent blood (compare
De 21:8).
In the case of the Antitype, Pontius Pilate washed his hands and confessed Christ's innocence, "I am innocent of the blood of this just person." But whereas Jonah the victim was guilty and the sailors innocent, Christ our sacrificial victim was innocent and Pontius Pilate and nil of us men were guilty. But by imputation of our guilt to Him and His righteousness to us, the spotless Antitype exactly corresponds to the guilty type.
thou . . . Lord, hast done as it pleased thee--That Jonah has embarked in this ship, that a tempest has arisen, that he has been detected by casting of lots, that he has passed sentence on himself, is all Thy doing. We reluctantly put him to death, but it is Thy pleasure it should be so.
15
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
15. 海的……狂浪就平息了——正如耶穌一發令
路 8:24。
神饒恕禱告的悔改者;這真理如今在水手的事上得著例證,繼而在約拿的事上,第三在尼尼微的事上。
Englisches Original
15. sea ceased . . . raging--so at Jesus' word
(Lu 8:24).
God spares the prayerful penitent, a truth illustrated now in the case of the sailors, presently in that of Jonah, and thirdly, in that of Nineveh.
16
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
16. 獻祭——他們立刻獻上某種感恩祭,並許願在上岸之後獻更多。格拉修斯認為這只是指他們「應許要獻祭」。
Englisches Original
16. offered a sacrifice--They offered some sacrifice of thanksgiving at once, and vowed more when they should land. GLASSIUS thinks it means only, "They promised to offer a sacrifice."
17
Ohne Titel
繁體中文
17. 預備了一條大魚——不是為此目的特別創造,而是在祂的護理中指定——萬物都服於這護理。這魚因
太 12:40
的誤譯,從前被認為是鯨;其實那裏與此處一樣,原文作「大魚」。鯨的喉太窄,容不下一個人。博夏特認為是狗鯊,其胃甚大,曾有一次在其中發現一個穿盔甲之人的身體〔《聖經動物誌》,2.5.12〕。也有人認為是鯊魚〔傑布〕。鯨喉中的空腔,據斯科斯比船長所言,大到足以容納一艘載滿人的船艇。無論如何都需要神蹟,我們也沒有資料進一步推測。我們的主在
太 12:39
明明稱之為「神蹟」即奇事。在這樣的位置中呼吸只能憑神蹟。這神蹟性的介入並非沒有充分理由:它不僅影響約拿,也影響尼尼微與以色列。先知的一生常以種種經歷為標記,使其因同情而成為最適合向聽者與百姓履行先知職分的人。吞吃者化為約拿的保全者,預表了神在審判與憐憫上的無限資源。約拿在刑罰之下與外界隔絕的狀態,被盡量作成死亡的象徵——對尼尼微與以色列是現今在罪中死的預表,正如他的獲救是悔改時屬靈復活的預表;同時也是將來耶穌為罪而死、並藉神的靈復活的預表。
三日三夜——大概正如其原型基督,約拿是在第三日被吐在陸地上
太 12:40;
因為希伯來的算法將首日與第三日的部分都算作完整的二十四小時。
Englisches Original
17. prepared a great fish--not created specially for this purpose, but appointed in His providence, to which all creatures are subservient. The fish, through a mistranslation of
Mt 12:40,
was formerly supposed to be a whale; there, as here, the original means "a great fish." The whale's neck is too narrow to receive a man. BOCHART thinks, the dog-fish, the stomach of which is so large that the body of a man in armor was once found in it [Hierozoicon, 2.5.12]. Others, the shark [JEBB]. The cavity in the whale's throat, large enough, according to CAPTAIN SCORESBY, to hold a ship's jolly boat full of men. A miracle in any view is needed, and we have no data to speculate further. A "sign" or miracle it is expressly called by our Lord in
Mt 12:39.
Respiration in such a position could only be by miracle. The miraculous interposition was not without a sufficient reason; it was calculated to affect not only Jonah, but also Nineveh and Israel. The life of a prophet was often marked by experiences which made him, through sympathy, best suited for discharging the prophetical function to his hearers and his people. The infinite resources of God in mercy as well as judgment are prefigured in the devourer being transformed into Jonah's preserver. Jonah's condition under punishment, shut out from the outer world, was rendered as much as possible the emblem of death, a present type to Nineveh and Israel, of the death in sin, as his deliverance was of the spiritual resurrection on repentance; as also, a future type of Jesus' literal death for sin, and resurrection by the Spirit of God.
three days and three nights--probably, like the Antitype, Christ, Jonah was cast forth on the land on the third day
(Mt 12:40);
the Hebrew counting the first and third parts of days as whole twenty-four hour days.
引言
約拿是亞米太的兒子,屬於西布倫的迦特希弗(在
書 19:10-13
中稱為基他弗),因此他是屬於十支派王國的人,不屬於猶大。他的時代可由
王下 14:25-27
推斷:「他(耶羅波安二世)照以色列的神耶和華藉祂僕人迦特希弗人亞米太的兒子先知約拿所說的話,恢復以色列的邊界,從哈馬口直到亞拉巴海。因為耶和華看見以色列人甚是苦苦,無論被困的、自由的都沒有了,也無人幫助以色列人。耶和華卻沒有說要將以色列的名從天下塗抹,乃藉約阿施的兒子耶羅波安拯救他們。」這約拿的預言既然是在以色列最為困苦、「無論被困的、自由的都沒有了」——即無論被囚的、在外的都沒有人能幫助以色列——之時賜下的,就不可能是耶羅波安治下所賜,因那時以繁榮為標誌,敘利亞在預言應驗中被擊敗,以色列恢復了先前的「大」。所以,那必定是在耶羅波安的父親約阿施治下早期;約阿施即位時以色列正受制於敘利亞,卻藉著屢次勝利將其振興,這些勝利又由耶羅波安成功地延續下去。因此約拿是最早期的先知,緊隨以利沙之後;以利沙死於約阿施治下,死前不久曾給出一個預表敘利亞三度被擊敗的記號
王下 13:14-21。
何西阿與阿摩司雖也在耶羅波安二世治下說預言,卻是在他四十一年的統治接近尾聲之時。約拿書中的事件大概發生於約拿生平的後期;若然,本書並不比何西阿與阿摩司部分著作早許多。用第三人稱並不構成約拿本人並非作者的論據:因為聖經作者提到自己時也用第三人稱(比較
約 19:26)。
過去式的運用(
拿 3:3
「尼尼微是個極大的城」)也不能證明約拿書寫成時尼尼微的偉大已屬過去;這只是為延續敘述的語態而用的——「耶和華的話臨到約拿……於是約拿起來……尼尼微是」等
拿 1:1; 3:3。
提及它的大,反倒證明本書寫於早期,早於以色列人因屢受亞述入侵而必然對其有親密認識之前。
早在尤利安(Julian)與波菲里烏斯(Porphyry)的時代,異教徒就譏笑基督徒輕信約拿被魚所救。有些不信者將此追溯自珀爾修斯從海怪手中救出安德洛墨達的異教神話〔阿波羅多羅斯,《書庫》,2.4.3〕;或音樂家阿里昂被水手拋入海中、由海豚馱至岸上的故事〔希羅多德,《歷史》,1.24〕;或赫拉克勒斯為救赫西俄涅跳入海怪口中、在其腹中三日的故事〔狄奧多羅斯,《歷史叢書》,4.42;荷馬,《伊利亞特》,20.145;21.442〕。若有任何關聯,多半是異教神話反過來為神聖記述的訛傳。耶柔米(Jerome)說約帕附近有巖石,被指為安得洛墨達被縛暴露於海怪之前的地方。這神話暗示約拿的故事可能經由腓尼基人以訛傳的形式傳到希臘。約拿的記述是歷史而非寓言(如唯理論者所言),這一點從我們的主對它的引用可見:在引用中,約拿的位格性存在、奇妙的遭遇與先知職分都被明確肯定:「除了先知約拿的神蹟以外,再沒有神蹟給他看;約拿三日三夜在大魚肚腹中,人子也要這樣三日三夜在地裏頭」
太 12:39, 40。
主承認他在魚腹中是一個「神蹟」,即一個真實的奇事,為祂自己歷史中類似事件的預表;並且假定先知向尼尼微的使命確已執行:「尼尼微人……聽了約拿所傳的就悔改了;看哪,在這裏有一人比約拿更大」
太 12:41。
猶太人金奇(Kimchi)自己也以為奇:約拿書竟列於聖經之中,因其中唯一的預言論及尼尼微這異教城邑,並未提及以色列,而其他所有先知都論及以色列。原因似乎是:意在含蓄地責備以色列;一個異教民族在一位陌生先知初次傳道時就肯悔改,而自詡為神選民的以色列,雖有本國眾先知不時警告,卻不悔改。這是在那照亮外邦人的「光」
路 2:32
完全破曉之前預先照射的一線光芒。
約拿本身就是一個奇特的矛盾:是神的先知,卻又逃離神;被淹沒,卻仍活著;傳悔改的道,卻又懊惱悔改。然而約拿既因悔改而從死亡的口中被救出,便最適合向那注定滅亡的尼尼微傳達:悔改即可得著憐憫的寬免。神的忍耐與憐憫,與人的自私與剛硬形成鮮明對比。
尼尼微之所以被特別揀選來教導以色列這些功課,是因為它是當時世界帝國的首都,並且此時正開始讓以色列感受到它的勢力。我們的主
太 12:41
以尼尼微的悔改責備祂那時代猶太人的不悔改,正如同約拿以同一例子激動以色列發憤
申 32:21。
約拿之被差往尼尼微,意味著異教城邑與以色列同樣是先知勞苦的正當禾場,且結果子更多
摩 9:7。
本書除第二章的感恩禱告
拿 2:1-9
外,通篇為散文敘事。
原文中的迦勒底語風並不證明是偽作或較晚的著作,而是一個住在北方邊境西布倫的人語言中自然會有的現象,亞蘭文的特色在那裏很容易產生;此外,他對尼尼微的信息暗示他熟悉亞述語。約拿住在以色列受亞述入侵威脅的地區,他對亞述的關係,可能正如以利亞和以利沙對敘利亞的關係一樣。語言的純正表明本書的古老,以及它很可能是約拿本人的著作。事實上,除約拿外,無人能寫出或口述這樣只為他所知的獨特細節。
將約拿的墳墓置於摩蘇爾對面、稱之為「尼比尤努斯」(即「先知約拿」)的傳統,可能源於該地曾有一所獻給他的基督教教堂或修道院〔萊亞德〕。耶柔米時代更早的傳統則將墳墓置於約拿的家鄉迦特希弗。