Study Resources
Browse multiple public-domain commentaries and scripture.how Korean translations by book and chapter. Switch between commentary sources, read the translation alone, or compare it side by side with the original text.
Active commentary
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871
Total entries
19,831
19,831 translated
Each commentary source keeps its original work, author, translation progress, and license information separate. Korean translations and editorial work by scripture.how are managed apart from the source text.
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871). CCEL expanded electronic edition states it is in the public domain.
Daniel Chapter 6 1 Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Daniel Chapter 6 3 Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
3. Daniel was preferred--probably because of his having so wonderfully foretold the fall of Babylon. Hence the very expression used by the queen mother on that occasion
(Da 5:12)
is here used, "because an excellent spirit was in him."
king thought to set him over the whole realm--Agreeing with Darius' character, weak and averse to business, which he preferred to delegate to favorites. God overruled this to the good both of Daniel, and, through him, of His people.
Daniel Chapter 6 4 Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
4. occasion . . . concerning the kingdom--pretext for accusation in his administration
(Ec 4:4).
Daniel Chapter 6 5 Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
5. It is the highest testimony to a godly man's walk, when his most watchful enemies can find no ground of censure save in that he walks according to the law of God even where it opposes the ways of the world.
Daniel Chapter 6 6 Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
6. assembled together--literally, "assembled hastily and tumultuously." Had they come more deliberately, the king might have refused their grant; but they gave him no time for reflection, representing that their test-decree was necessary for the safety of the king.
live for ever--ARRIAN [Alexander, 4] records that Cyrus was the first before whom prostration was practised. It is an undesigned mark of genuineness that Daniel should mention no prostration before Nebuchadnezzar or Darius (see on
Da 3:9).
Daniel Chapter 6 7 Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
7. The Persian king was regarded as representative of the chief god, Ormuzd; the seven princes near him represented the seven Amshaspands before the throne of Ormuzd; hence Mordecai
(Es 3:4)
refused such homage to Haman, the king's prime minister, as inconsistent with what is due to God alone. A weak despot, like Darius, much under the control of his princes, might easily be persuaded that such a decree would test the obedience of the Chaldeans just conquered, and tame their proud spirits. So absolute is the king in the East, that he is regarded not merely as the ruler, but the owner, of the people.
All . . . governors . . . counsellors, &c.--Several functionaries are here specified, not mentioned in
Da 6:4, 6.
They evidently exaggerated the case of the weak king, as if their request was that of all the officers in the empire.
den of lions--an underground cave or pit, covered with a stone. It is an undesigned proof of genuineness, that the "fiery furnace" is not made the means of punishment here, as in
Da 3:20;
for the Persians were fire-worshippers, which the Babylonians were not.
Daniel Chapter 6 8 Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
8. decree--or, "interdict."
that it be not changed--
(Es 1:19; 8:8).
This immutability of the king's commands was peculiar to the Medes and Persians: it was due to their regarding him infallible as the representative of Ormuzd; it was not so among the Babylonians.
Medes and Persians--The order of the names is an undesigned mark of genuineness. Cyrus the Persian reigned subordinate to Darius the Mede as to dignity, though exercising more real power. After Darius' death, the order is "the Persians and Medes"
(Es 1:14, 19,
&c.).
Daniel Chapter 6 9 Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
9. Such a despotic decree is quite explicable by remembering that the king, as the incarnation of Ormuzd, might demand such an act of religious obedience as a test of loyalty. Persecuting laws are always made on false pretenses. Instead of bitter complaints against men, Daniel prays to God. Though having vast business as a ruler of the empire, he finds time to pray thrice a day. Daniel's three companions
(Da 3:12),
are not alluded to here, nor any other Jew who conscientiously may have disregarded the edict, as the conspirators aimed at Daniel alone
(Da 6:5).
Da 6:1-28.
DARIUS' DECREE: DANIEL'S DISOBEDIENCE, AND CONSEQUENT EXPOSURE TO THE LIONS: HIS DELIVERANCE BY GOD, AND DARIUS' DECREE.
1. Darius--GROTEFEND has read it in the cuneiform inscriptions at Persepolis, as Darheush, that is, "Lord-King," a name applied to many of the Medo-Persian kings in common. Three of that name occur: Darius Hystaspes, 521 B.C., in whose reign the decree was carried into effect for rebuilding the temple
(Ezr 4:5; Hag 1:1);
Darius Codomanus, 336 B.C., whom Alexander overcame, called "the Persian"
(Ne 12:22),
an expression used after the rule of Macedon was set up; and Darius Cyaxares II, between Astyages and Cyrus [&AELig;SCHYLUS, The Persians, 762, 763].
hundred and twenty--satraps; set over the conquered provinces (including Babylon) by Cyrus [XENOPHON, Cyropædia, 8.6.1]. No doubt Cyrus acted under Darius, as in the capture of Babylon; so that Daniel rightly attributes the appointment to Darius.