Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
- Translation progress
- 4,537 / 4,537
- Source language
- en
Study Resources
Bible Commentaries
Browse multiple public-domain commentaries and scripture.how Korean translations by book and chapter. Switch between commentary sources, read the translation alone, or compare it side by side with the original text.
Active commentary
All commentaries
23 sources
Total entries
307,288
81,431 translated
License
Shown per source
Sources and licenses
Each commentary source keeps its original work, author, translation progress, and license information separate. Korean translations and editorial work by scripture.how are managed apart from the source text.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871). CCEL expanded electronic edition states it is in the public domain.
- Translation progress
- 19,831 / 19,831
- Source language
- en
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Albert Barnes · 1834
Albert Barnes' Notes on Revelation Of St. John The Divine (New Testament, English original, public domain). Sourced from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library (CCEL). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes.
- Translation progress
- 22,781 / 22,781
- Source language
- en
Adam Clarke's Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Adam Clarke · 1831
Public domain English commentary by Adam Clarke, normalized from Wikisource book pages for scripture.how. Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke.
- Translation progress
- 21,603 / 22,101
- Source language
- en
John Gill's Exposition of the Bible
John Gill · 1763
John Gill(1697-1771), Exposition of the Old and New Testament(1746-1763). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/gill.
- Translation progress
- 12,528 / 30,759
- Source language
- en
Calvin's Commentaries
John Calvin · 1850
종교개혁 신학 원천 (영역본 PD, 대부분 — 전권 아님)
- Translation progress
- 144 / 7,385
- Source language
- en
Matthew Poole's Annotations upon the Holy Bible
Matthew Poole · 1685
간결 절별 전권 개혁주의 주석
- Translation progress
- 0 / 31,092
- Source language
- en
The Pulpit Commentary
ed. H.D.M. Spence & Joseph S. Exell · 1890
전권 강해·설교·예화 풍부 (항목 대량)
- Translation progress
- 0 / 25,592
- Source language
- en
Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
Carl F. Keil, Franz Delitzsch · 1866
구약 학술 표준 — 히브리어·문헌비평·고대근동 배경
- Translation progress
- 0 / 2,044
- Source language
- en
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers
ed. Charles J. Ellicott · 1878
학술+가독 균형 전권 주석
- Translation progress
- 0 / 23,497
- Source language
- en
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Cambridge (다저자) · 1900
준전권 준학술 (권별 저자·연도 확인)
- Translation progress
- 0 / 27,176
- Source language
- en
Vincent's Word Studies in the New Testament
Marvin R. Vincent · 1887
신약 헬라어 단어 연구
- Translation progress
- 0 / 5,763
- Source language
- en
Word Pictures in the New Testament
A.T. Robertson · 1933
헬라어 시제·문법 해설 결정판 (KR PD / US 1931+ 권별)
- Translation progress
- 0 / 6,935
- Source language
- en
The Expositor's Greek Testament
ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (다저자) · 1910
헬라어 신약 학술 (권별 저자 PD 확인 필요)
- Translation progress
- 0 / 7,010
- Source language
- en
Meyer's Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament
Heinrich A.W. Meyer · 1880
신약 학술 정밀주해 (독일 — K&D 대응)
- Translation progress
- 0 / 5,340
- Source language
- en
Wesley's Explanatory Notes
John Wesley · 1755
간결 실용 전권(NT 1755 / OT 1765) 웨슬리안
- Translation progress
- 0 / 5,643
- Source language
- en
Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments
Joseph Benson · 1815
웨슬리안 전권 주석
- Translation progress
- 0 / 14,675
- Source language
- en
The Treasury of David
Charles H. Spurgeon · 1885
시편 주석 고전 (설교 자료 풍부)
- Translation progress
- 0 / 2,290
- Source language
- en
MacLaren's Expositions of Holy Scripture
Alexander Maclaren · 1910
설교형 강해 명저 (전권, 절별 가공 필요)
- Translation progress
- 0 / 1,144
- Source language
- en
The People's New Testament
B.W. Johnson · 1891
평이 절별 신약 해설 (일반신자·모바일)
- Translation progress
- 7 / 3,477
- Source language
- en
Coke's Commentary on the Holy Bible
Thomas Coke · 1803
감리교 전권 주석
- Translation progress
- 0 / 10,808
- Source language
- en
Trapp's Complete Commentary
John Trapp · 1660
청교도 전권 주석 — Henry/Gill 보완
- Translation progress
- 0 / 26,397
- Source language
- en
Hodge's Commentary on the New Testament
Charles Hodge · 1860
프린스턴 조직신학 관점 신약 정밀 주석 (롬·고전후·엡)
- Translation progress
- 0 / 1,011
- Source language
- en
The principal things in this chapter are fully explained in Matthew 24.
Adam Clarke's Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Mark 13 Introduction
Jesus predicts the destruction of the temple, Mark 13:1, Mark 13:2. His disciples inquire when this shall be, and what previous sign there shall be of this calamity, Mark 13:3, Mark 13:4; which questions he answers very solemnly and minutely, vv. 5-27; illustrates the whole by a parable, Mark 13:28, Mark 13:29; asserts the absolute certainty of the events, Mark 13:30, Mark 13:31; shows that the precise minute cannot be known by man, Mark 13:32; and inculcates the necessity of watchfulness and prayer, Mark 13:33-37.
CHAPTER 13.
THE APOCALYPTIC DISCOURSE.
This is the solitary instance in which the second evangelist has given at length a discourse of Jesus. The fulness with which the apocalyptic discourse is recorded is all the more striking, when contrasted with the very meagre reproduction of the anti-pharisaic discourse (Mark 12:38-40). The exception made in its favour was doubtless due to Mk.’s estimate of its interest and value for his first readers. Perhaps he was influenced in part by the fascinations of prediction. The real interest of the discourse and the key to its interpretation are to be found, as pointed out in the notes on the corresponding chapter in Mt., in its ethical aim—“to forewarn and forearm the representatives of a new faith, so that they might not lose their heads or their hearts in an evil perplexing time”: notes on Mt. For a full exposition of the discourse in the light of this aim readers are referred to these notes.
Meyer's Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament
Mark 13 Introduction
CHAPTER 13
Mark 13:2. ἈΠΟΚΡΙΘΕΊς] IS, WITH TISCH., TO BE DELETED, AS AT Mark 11:33, FOLLOWING B L א, MIN. VSS.
Mark 13:2. ὯΔΕ IS ADOPTED BEFORE ΛΊΘΟς BY GRIESB. FRITZSCHE, SCHOLZ, LACHM., IN ACCORDANCE DOUBTLESS WITH B D G L U Δ א, MIN. VSS., BUT IT IS AN ADDITION FROM Matthew 24:2. IT IS GENUINE IN MATTHEW ALONE, WHERE, MOREOVER, IT IS NOT WANTING IN ANY OF THE CODICES.
Mark 13:4. ΕἸΠΈ] B D L א, MIN. HAVE ΕἸΠΌΝ. SO FRITZSCHE, LACHM. TISCH. THIS RARER FORM IS TO BE ADOPTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SO CONSIDERABLE TESTIMONY; ΕἸΠΈ IS FROM MATTHEW.
WITH TISCH., FOLLOWING B L א, WE MUST WRITE ΤΑῦΤΑ ΣΥΝΤΕΛ. ΠΆΝΤΑ; DIFFERENT ATTEMPTS TO RECTIFY THE ORDER PRODUCED THE VARIATIONS.
Mark 13:8. BEFORE THE SECOND ἜΣΟΝΤΑΙ WE MUST, WITH TISCH., DELETE ΚΑΊ, IN ACCORDANCE WITH B L א**.
ΚΑῚ ΤΑΡΑΧΑΊ] SUSPECTED BY GRIESB., STRUCK OUT BY LACHM. AND TISCH., IN ACCORDANCE WITH B D L א, COPT. AETH. ERP. VULG. IT. VICT. BUT WHEREFORE AND WHENCE WAS IT TO HAVE BEEN INTRODUCED? ON THE OTHER HAND, IT WAS VERY EASILY LOST IN THE FOLLOWING ἈΡΧΑΊ.
Mark 13:9. ἈΡΧΑΊ] B D K L U Δ א, MIN. VSS. VULG. IT. ALSO HAVE ἈΡΧΉ, WHICH IS COMMENDED BY GRIESB., ADOPTED BY FRITZSCHE, SCHOLZ, LACHM. TISCH.; FROM Matthew 24:8.
Mark 13:11. INSTEAD OF ἌΓΩΣΙΝ ELZ. HAS ἈΓΆΓΩΣΙΝ, IN OPPOSITION TO DECISIVE EVIDENCE.
ΜΗΔῈ ΜΕΛΕΤᾶΤΕ] IS WANTING IN B D L א, MIN. COPT. AETH. AR. P. ERP. VULG. IT. VIGIL. CONDEMNED BY GRIESB., BRACKETED BY LACHM., DELETED BY TISCH. BUT THE HOMOIOTELEUTON THE MORE EASILY OCCASIONED THE OMISSION OF THE WORDS, SINCE THEY FOLLOW IMMEDIATELY AFTER ΤΊ ΛΑΛΉΣΗΤΕ. Luke 21:14, MOREOVER, TESTIFIES IN FAVOUR OF THEIR GENUINENESS.
Mark 13:14. AFTER ἘΡΗΜΏΣΕΩς ELZ. SCHOLZ, FRITZSCHE (LACHM. IN BRACKETS) HAVE: ΤῸ ῬΗΘῈΝ ὙΠῸ ΔΑΝΙῊΛ ΤΟῦ ΠΡΟΦΉΤΟΥ, WHICH WORDS ARE NOT FOUND IN B D L א, COPT. ARM. IT. VULG. SAX. AUG. THEY ARE FROM MATTHEW.
ἘΣΤΏς] LACHM. HAS ἙΣΤΗΚΌς, FOLLOWING D 28; TISCH. HAS ἙΣΤΗΚΌΤΑ, FOLLOWING B L א. FRITZSCHE: ἙΣΤΌς, ACCORDING TO A E F G H V Δ, MIN. UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES THE RECEPTA HAS PREPONDERANT EVIDENCE AGAINST IT; IT IS FROM Matthew 24:15. OF THE OTHER READINGS ἙΣΤΗΚΌς IS TO BE ADOPTED, BECAUSE B L א ALSO TESTIFY IN ITS FAVOUR BY ἙΣΤΗΚΌΤΑ;[153] WHILE ἙΣΤΌς LIKEWISE BETRAYS ITS ORIGIN FROM MATTHEW (VAR.; SEE THE CRITICAL REMARKS ON Matthew 24:15).
Mark 13:16. ὪΝ] IS WANTING IN B D L Δ ְ, MIN. LACHM. TISCH. BUT HOW EASILY IT DROPT OUT AFTER ἈΓΡΟΝ! THE MORE EASILY, BECAUSE ὪΝ STOOD ALSO IN Mark 13:15.
Mark 13:18. Ἡ ΦΥΓῊ ὙΜῶΝ] IS WANTING IN B D L Δ ְ * MIN. ARM. VULG. IT., AND IN OTHER WITNESSES IS REPRESENTED BY ΤΑῦΤΑ. CONDEMNED BY GRIESB. AND RINCK, DELETED BY FRITZSCHE, LACHM. TISCH. RIGHTLY SO; IT IS FROM Matthew 24:20, FROM WHICH PLACE ALSO CODD. AND VSS. HAVE AFTER ΧΕΙΜῶΝΟς ADDED: ΜΗΔῈ ΣΑΒΒΆΤῼ, OR ΜΗΔῈ ΣΑΒΒΆΤΟΥ, OR Ἢ ΣΑΒΒΆΤΟΥ, AND THE LIKE.
Mark 13:19. Ἧς] LACHM. TISCH. HAVE ἭΝ, FOLLOWING B C* L ְ, 28. A CORRECTION. THE OMISSION OF Ἧς ἜΚΤ. Ὁ ΘΕΌς IN D 27, ARM. CODD. IT. IS EXPLAINED BY THE SUPERFLUOUSNESS OF THE WORDS.
Mark 13:21. THE OMISSION OF Ἤ, WHICH GRIESB., FOLLOWING MILL, COMMENDED, AND FRITZSCHE AND TISCH. HAVE CARRIED OUT, IS TOO WEAKLY ATTESTED. IN ITSELF IT MIGHT AS WELL HAVE BEEN ADDED FROM MATTHEW AS OMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LUKE.
INSTEAD OF ΠΙΣΤΕΎΕΤΕ ELZ. HAS ΠΙΣΤΕΎΣΗΤΕ, IN OPPOSITION TO PREPONDERANT EVIDENCE; IT IS FROM Matthew 24:23.
Mark 13:22. ALTHOUGH ONLY ON THE EVIDENCE OF D, MIN. CODD. IT., ΨΕΥΔΌΧΡΙΣΤΟΙ ΚΑΊ IS TO BE DELETED, AND ΠΟΙΉΣΟΥΣΙΝ IS TO BE WRITTEN INSTEAD OF ΔΏΣΟΥΣΙ. MOREOVER (WITH TISCH.), ΚΑΊ IS TO BE OMITTED BEFORE ΤΟῪς ἘΚΛ. (B D ְ). THE RECEPTA IS A FILLING UP FROM MATTHEW.
Mark 13:23. ἸΔΟῦ] IS WANTING IN B L 28, COPT AETH. VERC. BRACKETED BY LACHM., DELETED BY TISCH. AN ADDITION FROM MATTHEW.
Mark 13:25. ΤΟῦ ΟὐΡΑΝΟῦ ἜΣΟΝΤΑΙ] A B C ְ, MIN. VSS. HAVE ἜΣΟΝΤΑΙ ἘΚ ΤΟῦ ΟὐΡΑΝΟῦ. SO FRITZSCHE, LACHM. TISCH. INSTEAD OF ἘΚΠΊΠΤ. B C D L ְ, MIN. CODD. IT. HAVE ΠΊΠΤΟΝΤΕς (SO FRITZSCHE, LACHM. TISCH.). THUS THE MOST IMPORTANT CODICES ARE AGAINST THE RECEPTA (D HAS ΟἹ ἘΚ ΤΟῦ ΟὐΡΑΝΟῦ ἜΣΟΝΤΑΙ ΠΊΠΤΟΝΤΕς), IN PLACE OF WHICH THE BEST ATTESTED OF THESE READINGS ARE TO BE ADOPTED. INTERNAL GROUNDS ARE WANTING; BUT IF IT HAD BEEN ALTERED FROM MATTHEW, ἈΠΌ WOULD HAVE BEEN FOUND INSTEAD OF ἘΚ.
Mark 13:27. ΑὐΤΟῦ] AFTER ἈΓΓΈΛ. IS WANTING IN B D L, COPT. CANT. VERC. VIND. CORB. BRACKETED BY LACHM., DELETED BY TISCH.; IT IS FROM MATTHEW.
Mark 13:28. THE VERBAL ORDER ἬΔΗ Ὁ ΚΛΆΔΟς ΑὐΤῆς (FRITZSCHE, LACHM.) HAS PREPONDERATING EVIDENCE, BUT IT IS FROM MATTHEW. THE MANIFOLD TRANSPOSITIONS IN THE CODICES WOULD HAVE NO MOTIVE, IF THE READING OF LACHM. HAD BEEN THE ORIGINAL, AS IN THE CASE OF MATTHEW NO VARIATION IS FOUND.
ΓΙΝΏΣΚΕΤΕ] A B** D L Δ, MIN. HAVE ΓΙΝΏΣΚΕΤΑΙ, WHICH IS APPROVED BY SCHULZ AND ADOPTED BY FRITZSCHE AND TISCH. THE RECEPTA IS FROM THE PARALLELS.
Mark 13:31. INSTEAD OF ΠΑΡΕΛΕΎΣΕΤΑΙ, ELZ. LACHM. TISCH. HAVE ΠΑΡΕΛΕΎΣΟΝΤΑΙ. THE PLURAL (B D K U Γ ְ) IS TO BE MAINTAINED HERE AND AT Luke 21:33; THE REMEMBRANCE OF THE WELL-KNOWN SAYING FROM MATTH. SUGGESTED ΠΑΡΕΛΕΎΣΕΤΑΙ IN THE SINGULAR. MOREOVER, IT TELLS IN FAVOUR OF THE PLURAL, THAT B L ְ, MIN. (TISCH.) HAVE ΠΑΡΕΛΕΎΣΟΝΤΑΙ AGAIN AFTERWARDS INSTEAD OF ΠΑΡΈΛΘΩΣΙ, ALTHOUGH THIS IS A MECHANICAL REPETITION.
Mark 13:32. INSTEAD OF Ἤ ELZ. HAS ΚΑΊ, IN OPPOSITION TO DECISIVE EVIDENCE.
Mark 13:33. ΚΑΊ ΠΡΟΣΕΎΧΕΣΘΕ] IS WANTING IN B D 122, CANT. VERC. COLB. TOLET. DELETED BY LACHM. RIGHTLY; AN ADDITION THAT EASILY OCCURRED (COMP. Matthew 24:41 AND THE PARALLELS).
Mark 13:34. ΚΑΊ IS TO BE DELETED BEFORE ἙΚΆΣΤῼ (WITH LACHM. AND TISCH.), IN CONFORMITY WITH B C* D L ְ, MIN. CODD. IT.
Mark 13:37. BETWEEN Ἅ IN ELZ. SCHOLZ, AND Ὅ WHICH GRIESB. HAS APPROVED, AND FRITZSCHE, LACHM. HAVE ADOPTED, THE EVIDENCE IS VERY MUCH DIVIDED. BUT Ὅ IS AN UNNECESSARY EMENDATION, ALTHOUGH IT IS NOW PREFERRED BY TISCH. (B C ְ, ETC.). D, CODD. IT. HAVE ἘΓῺ ΔῈ Λ. ὙΜ. ΓΡΗΓ.
[153] The masculine was introduced by the reference, frequent in the Fathers, to the statue (τὸν ἀνδριάντα) of the conqueror.
No translation yet.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Mr 13:1-37.
Mr 13:1-37.
CHRIST'S PROPHECY OF THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM, AND WARNINGS SUGGESTED BY IT TO PREPARE FOR HIS SECOND COMING. ( =
Mt 24:1-51; Lu 21:5-36).
Jesus had uttered all His mind against the Jewish ecclesiastics, exposing their character with withering plainness, and denouncing, in language of awful severity, the judgments of God against them for that unfaithfulness to their trust which was bringing ruin upon the nation. He had closed this His last public discourse
(Mt 23:1-39)
by a passionate lamentation over Jerusalem, and a solemn farewell to the temple. "And," says Matthew
(Mt 24:1),
"Jesus went out and departed from the temple"--never more to re-enter its precincts, or open His mouth in public teaching. With this act ended His public ministry. As He withdrew, says OLSHAUSEN, the gracious presence of God left the sanctuary; and the temple, with all its service, and the whole theocratic constitution, was given over to destruction. What immediately followed is, as usual, most minutely and graphically described by our Evangelist.
1. And as he went out of the temple, one of his disciples saith unto him--The other Evangelists are less definite. "As some spake," says Luke
(Lu 21:5);
"His disciples came to Him," says Matthew
(Mt 24:2).
Doubtless it was the speech of one, the mouthpiece, likely, of others.
Master--Teacher.
see what manner of stones and what buildings are here--wondering probably, how so massive a pile could be overthrown, as seemed implied in our Lord's last words regarding it. JOSEPHUS, who gives a minute account of the wonderful structure, speaks of stones forty cubits long [Wars of the Jews, 5.5.1.] and says the pillars supporting the porches were twenty-five cubits high, all of one stone, and that of the whitest marble [Wars of the Jews, 5.5.2]. Six days' battering at the walls, during the siege, made no impression upon them [Wars of the Jews, 6.4.1]. Some of the under-building, yet remaining, and other works, are probably as old as the first temple.
What manner of stones - The stones here referred to were those used in the building of the temple, and the walls on the sides of Mount Moriah, on which the temple stood. The temple was constructed of white marble, and the blocks were of a prodigious size. Josephus says that these stones were, some of them, 50 feet long, 24 feet broad, and 16 feet in thickness.
We have here the substance of that prophetical sermon which our Lord Jesus preached, pointing at the destruction of Jerusalem, and the consummation of all things; it was one of the last of his sermons, and not ad populum—to the people, but ad clerum—to the clergy; it was private, preached only to four of his disciples, with whom his secret was. Here is, I. The occasion of his prediction—his disciples' admiring the building of the temple (Mk 13:1,2), and their enquiry concerning the time of the desolation of them, Mk 13:3,4. II. The predictions themselves, 1. Of the rise of deceivers, Mk 13:5,6,21-23. 2. Of the wars of the nations, Mk 13:7,8. 3. Of the persecution of Christians, Mk 13:9-13. 4. Of the destruction of Jerusalem, Mk 13:14-20. 5. Of the end of the world, Mk 13:24-27. III. Some general intimations concerning the time of them, Mk 13:28-32. IV. Some practical inferences from all, Mk 13:33-37.