Barnes' Notes on the Bible · Psalms Chapter 58

Optimized commentary reader

Chapter commentary

Psalms Chapter 58

서론

Psalm 58 Introduction

Open passage

简体中文

本诗同样标明为大卫的诗。标题与内容都一致地把它的写作时间并缘由,定为与前面两篇诗相同。克纳普(Knapp)固然把它系于押沙龙时期,德维特(DeWette)则认为它写于巴比伦被掳时期。但没有理由背离标题正确的假设。诗中没有任何内容与它出于大卫之手、并写于扫罗逼迫时期的假设不合。至于标题中“交与伶长”一语的意思,参见 Psalm 4:1-8 引言的注释。至于“休要毁坏”一语,参见 Psalm 57:1-11 的引言。至于“金诗”一词,参见 Psalm 16:1-11 的引言。

本诗由三部分构成:

一、描绘诗人的仇敌,从而带出对恶人品格的一幅“概括”描述(Psalm 58:1-5)。诗人借一个有力的“问句”暗示地断言,他所指的那些人是恶人、是说谎的(Psalm 58:1-2);这引他对恶人的品格作概括的反思:

(a)他们从母胎便与神疏远;

(b)他们一出生便走迷;

(c)他们如蛇一样吐出致命的毒液;

(d)他们对良心、美德和宗教的一切呼吁充耳不闻——如同不听行法术之声音的蝮蛇(Psalm 58:3-5)。

二、求神出面干预、按他们所当受的对待他们的祷告(Psalm 58:6-9)。这祷告用不同的比喻表达:

(a)把他们比作狮子,求神敲断他们的牙齿(Psalm 58:6);

(b)把他们比作流水,求他们如水流逝、消失无踪(Psalm 58:7);

(c)把他们比作蜗牛,求他们如蜗牛看似的那般消融逝去(Psalm 58:8);

(d)把他们比作被丢弃的流产之子(Psalm 58:8);

(e)把他们比作感受荆棘火烧之热而速沸的锅——求神在他们尚未如此之前就把他们除去(Psalm 58:9)。

三、义人因这结局而欢腾(Psalm 58:10-11)。

(a)他们必因蒙拯救而欢喜(Psalm 58:10);

(b)他们必看见神是公义的神;祂并非恶的朋党,而是看重真理的事业;世上确实存在公义的道德治理;在地上确实有一位施行审判的神(Psalm 58:11)。

English original

This psalm is also inscribed as a psalm of David. Both the title and the contents agree in fixing the time of its composition, and the occasion, as being the same as in the two previous psalms. Knapp indeed refers it to the time of Absalom, and DeWette supposes that it was composed in the time of the Babylonian captivity. But there is no reason for departing from the supposition that the title is correct. There is nothing in the psalm inconsistent with the supposition that it was composed by David, and in the time of the persecutions under Saul. On the meaning of the expression in the title, "To the chief Musician," see the notes at the Introduction to Psalm 4:1-8. On the phrase "Al-taschith," see Introduction to Psalm 57:1-11. On the word "Michtam," see Introduction to Psalm 16:1-11.

The psalm consists of three parts:

I. A description of the enemies of the psalmist, suggesting a "general" description of the character of the wicked, Psalm 58:1-5. The psalmist, by an emphatic "question" impliedly affirms that those whom he referred to were wicked and false Psalm 58:1-2; and this leads him to a general reflection on the character of wicked people;

(a) as estranged from the womb;

(b) as going astray as soon as they are born;

(c) as resembling the serpent injecting deadly poison; and

(d) as deaf to all appeals of conscience, virtue, and religion - like an adder that will not listen to the voice of the charmer, Psalm 58:3-5.

II. A prayer that God would interpose and deal with them as they deserved, Psalm 58:6-9. This prayer is expressed in different illustrations: -

(a) by comparing them with lions, and praying that their teeth might be broken out, Psalm 58:6;

(b) by comparing them with water, and praying that they might disappear as waters flow off, Psalm 58:7;

(c) by comparing them with a snail, and praying that they might be dissolved, and pass away as a snail appears to do, Psalm 58:8;

(d) by comparing them with the untimely birth of a woman, that is cast away, Psalm 58:8;

(e) by comparing them with a pot which is made to feel the heat of thorns on fire, and made to boil quickly - praying that God would take them away before even that could be done, Psalm 58:9.

III. The exultation of the righteous at such a result, Psalm 58:10-11.

(a) They would rejoice at the deliverance, Psalm 58:10;

(b) they would see that God is a righteous God; that he is not a friend of wickedness, but that he regards the cause of truth; that there is in fact a just moral government in the world; that there is a God who is a judge in the earth, Psalm 58:11.

1

Psalm 58:1

Open passage

简体中文

世人哪,你们默然不语,真合公义吗?——路德译作:"你们这些世人哪,是哑的吗?竟不说正直的话,不判断合宜的事?"本节的含义极其隐晦;但全诗的意义很可能正系于此。译作"会众"的词 אלם 'êlem——仅见于此处及 Psalm 56:1-13 的标题"Jonath-elem-rechokim"之中。参见该标题的注释。这词的本义是"哑、沉默"。格塞尼乌斯(Gesenius,词典)在此译作"你们果真裁定哑的公义吗?"即"你们终于真的裁定那久已看似哑然的公义了吗?"亚历山大教授译作"你们当讲说公义的时候,果真是哑的吗?"这里所暗指的,显然是某种公开的审判行为;一纸判决;官长与统治者;那些"应当"作出公义裁决的人;那些掌权、"理当"对他人的行为作出公正评判的人。

这呼吁所依据的"事实",似乎是他们并"没有"这样行;他们的行为邪恶乖僻;他们的司法裁决无法信赖。罗森米勒(Rosenmuller)译作"事实上,公义沉默了";即公义没有被宣告或说出。这短语的意思或许可以这样表达:"你们说话的时候,公义真的是哑的或沉默的吗?世人哪,你们按公义施行审判吗?"意即:"你们确实说话;你们确实发表意见;你们宣布判决;但你们这样做时,公义事实上是哑的、沉默的。这事中没有正确或公正的判断。所宣布的意见基于错误,并源于一颗邪恶的心。"原文中没有任何表达与我们译本中的"会众"一词对应,除非是 אלם 'êlem 一词,但该词从未有这含义。任何译本都没有这样翻译。这问题所指的是"谁",并不容易确定。不可能如我们通行译本所暗示的,是指任何"会众"、任何为宣判而聚集的民众。然而,它显然是指某些人、或某些阶层的人——人们期待他们"审判",或审判乃属他们的职分;最自然的推测是,这指的是国家的统治者——扫罗和政府的首脑们。如果本诗如 Psalm 56:1-13、Psalm 57:1-11、Psalm 59 一样,写于扫罗迫害时期、属于同一"组"诗篇的推测是正确的,那么它就是指扫罗以及那些与扫罗一同迫害大卫的人。这样,本诗的主题便是他们对大卫所下的不义判决:把他当作国度的仇敌;视他为不法之徒;把他从藏身之所驱逐出去,仿佛猎取野兽一般追赶他。本诗的内容与这解释十分吻合。

你们施行审判,岂按正直吗?——你们判断的是正当的事吗?你们的判决与真理和公义相符吗?

世人哪——或许是指这样的事实:他们在审判中显明自己是人——受世人共有的情感所影响;换言之,他们显明自己在形成判断时,无法超越那通常左右并支配世人的败坏情感与偏见。

English original

Do ye indeed speak righteousness, O congregation? - Luther renders this, "Are you then dumb, that you will not speak what is right, and judge what is proper, ye children of men?" The meaning of the verse is exceedingly obscure; but probably the whole sense of the psalm turns on it. The word rendered "congregation," אלם 'êlem - occurs only in this place and in the title to Psalm 56:1-13, "Jonath-elem-rechokim." See the notes at that title. The word properly means "dumbness, silence." Gesenius (Lexicon) renders it here, "Do ye indeed decree dumb justice?" that is, "Do ye really at length decree justice, which so long has seemed dumb?" Professor Alexander renders it, "Are ye indeed dumb when ye should speak righteousness?" The allusion is clearly to some public act of judging; to a judicial sentence; to magistrates and rulers; to people who "should" give a righteous sentence; to those in authority who "ought" to pronounce a just opinion on the conduct of others.

The "fact" in the case on which the appeal is made seems to have been that they did "not" do this; that their conduct was wicked and perverse; that no reliance could be placed on their judicial decisions. Rosenmuller renders it, "There is, in fact, silence of justice;" that is, justice is not declared or spoken. Perhaps the meaning of the phrase may be thus expressed: "Is there truly a dumbness or silence of justice when ye speak? do you judge righteously, O ye sons of men?" That is, "You indeed speak; you do declare an opinion; you pronounce a sentence; but justice is, in fact, dumb or silent when you do it. There is no correct or just judgment in the matter. The opinion which is declared is based on error, and has its origin in a wicked heart." There is no expression in the original to correspond to the words "O congregation" in our translation, unless it is the word אלם 'êlem, which never has this signification.

It is not so rendered in any of the versions. It is not easy to determine "who" is referred to by this question. It cannot be, as is implied in our common version, that it is to any "congregation," any people gathered together for the purpose of pronouncing judgment. Yet it is evidently a reference to some persons, or classes of persons, who were expected to "judge," or to whom it pertained to pass judgment; and the most natural supposition is that the reference is to the rulers of the nation - to Saul, and the heads of the government. If the supposition is correct that the psalm was composed, like Psalm 56:1-13; Psalm 57:1-11; 59, in the time of the Sauline persecutions, and that it belongs to the same "group" of psalms, then it would have reference to Saul and to those who were associated with him in persecuting David. The subject of the psalm would then be the unjust judgments which they passed on him in treating him as an enemy of the commonwealth; in regarding him as an outlaw, and in driving him from his places of refuge as if hunting him down like a wild beast. The contents of the psalm well accord with this explanation.

Do ye judge uprightly? - Do you judge right things? are your judgments in accordance with truth and justice?

O ye sons of men - Perhaps referring to the fact that in their judgments they showed that they were people - influenced by the common passions of people; in other words, they showed that they could not, in forming their judgments, rise above the corrupt passions and prejudices which usually influence and sway mankind.

2

Psalm 58:2

Open passage

简体中文

你们心中作恶——无论外表如何,无论他们可能作出怎样秉公审判的托辞,事实上他们的心倾向于邪恶,而且他们自知所行的是错事。

你们在地上秤出你们手所行的强暴——很难给这话附上任何确定的含义;译者显然感到无法表达原文的意思,因此给出了一个似乎只是希伯来文直译的译法。七十士译本把它译作:"你们心中在地上行不义,你们的手编织出不义。"拉丁文武加大译本:"你们心中行不义;在地上你们的手预备不公。"路德:"你们甘愿在地上行不义,并且径直用手去作恶。"亚历山大教授(Alexander):"在地上,你们秤出你们手的强暴。"整节或许最好的译法是:"你们心中在地上行不义;你们秤出(衡量并交付)你们手的强暴";就是你们的手所行的强暴或恶行。"秤量"它们或"把它们秤出来"的观念,源自司法的执行。在各国之中,人们习惯于说"秤出"公义;用天平和秤来象征司法的执行;并以持守均平来表示施行公正。试参 Job 31:6 的注释;Daniel 5:27 的注释;Revelation 6:5 的注释。照这样解释,本节正如 Psalm 58:1 一样,是指宣判裁决的举动;其意是:他们非但没有宣判公义的裁决——没有持守均平的天平——反而裁定偏袒强暴——偏袒要由他们亲手施行的欺压与不义。他们所秤出、所分发的,不是公正的判决,而是强暴、不义、冤屈、罪行。

English original

Yea, in heart ye work wickedness - Whatever might be the outward appearances, whatever pretences they might make to just judgment, yet in fact their hearts were set on wickedness, and they were conscious of doing wrong.

Ye weigh the violence of your hands in the earth - It is difficult to attach any meaning to this language; the translators evidently felt that they could not express the meaning of the original; and they, therefore, gave what seems to be a literal translation of the Hebrew. The Septuagint renders it, "In heart you work iniquity in the land; your hands weave together iniquity." The Latin Vulgate: "In heart you work iniquity; in the land your hands prepare injustice." Luther: "Yea, willingly do you work iniquity in the land, and go straight through to work evil with your hands." Professor Alexander: "In the land, the violence of your hands ye weigh." Perhaps the true translation of the whole verse would be, "Yea, in heart ye work iniquity in the land; ye weigh (weigh out) the violence of your hands;" that is, the deeds of violence or wickedness which your hands commit. The idea of "weighing" them, or "weighing them out," is derived from the administration of justice. In all lands people are accustomed to speak of "weighing out" justice; to symbolize its administration by scales and balances; and to express the doing of it as holding an even balance. Compare Job 31:6, note; Daniel 5:27, note; Revelation 6:5, note. Thus interpreted, this verse refers, as Psalm 58:1, to the act of pronouncing judgment; and the idea is that instead of pronouncing a just judgment - of holding an equal balance - they determined in favor of violence - of acts of oppression and wrong to be committed by their own hands. That which they weighed out, or dispensed, was not a just sentence, but violence, wrong, injustice, crime.

3

Psalm 58:3

Open passage

简体中文

“恶人一出母胎就与神疏远”——这里的暗示,无疑是指本诗主要论到的那班人——大卫的仇敌。但他们对待大卫的行径,引发了一个关于“所有”恶人的更普遍的省思,因为恶人都有同样的特征。因此,诗人没有把他的评论局限于他们,而是使他的观察具有普遍性,其根据乃是:一切恶人在本质上都有相同的品格,尤其在本节所断言的这件事上——他们很早就偏离正路,从出生之时起就是背道而与神疏远的。这里“恶人”一词,并不必然指整个人类家族(尽管这里所断言的,对全人类而言也是真实的),而是指那些在一生中显出邪恶品格的人;关于他们的断言是:他们在人生很早的时候——从婴孩时期起——就走上了迷路。

因此,严格说来,不能证明诗人在这个宣告中是指着全人类说的,也不能证明他有意就人很早便与神疏远、隔绝这一点作出一个普遍的宣告;所以这段经文不能直接地、完全恰当地被引来证明“原罪”属于全人类的教义——无论这一点本身的真实与否。然而,如果从“其他”经文并从事实证明了所有人“都”是“邪恶”的、败坏的,那么这里的断言就成为一种证明,表明这是出于母胎——从他们出生之时起——他们一生下来就带有作恶的倾向,他们后来的一切行为,不过是与生俱来之败坏与腐朽的发展罢了。所以,只有在证明了人“是”败坏或“邪恶”的之后,这段经文才能被引用来支持原罪的教义。

译作“疏远”的词——זרוּ zorû——本义是“离开、转离或偏离”,继而有“成为陌生的”或“作外人”之意。这个词的正当观念是:一个人是外人、是异乡人;它恰当地用于指别支派或别国的人,类似拉丁文的 hostis 和希腊文的 ξείνος xeinos(外人)。见 Exodus 30:33;Isaiah 1:7;Isaiah 25:2;Isaiah 29:5;Psalm 44:20。如此解释的这个词,其含义是:从最早的孩提时期起,他们就“仿佛”属于另一个民族,而不是属神的子民;他们显出另一种灵;他们受另一种原则管辖,而非义人所遵循的原则。参 Ephesians 2:19。他们最初显出的品格特征,不是神儿女的特征,而是对祂“疏远、陌生、敌对”的。“一出母胎”这短语,无疑是指他们的出生;其观念是:他们一开始行动,行动就是错的;他们表明自己是与神隔绝的外人。严格说来,这段经文并没有直接断言人在“开始行动之前”心里存在什么,因为他们正是借着“说谎话”显出他们的疏远;然而我们尽可以“推断”:既然这是普遍的,其背后就“有”某种东西,使他们“必定”如此行事——正如一棵树若总是结同一种果子,我们就推断树里面“有”某种东西,先于果子实际“结出”的动作,使它“必定”结这种果子而非别的。孩童心里的这“某种东西”,就是通常所说的“原罪”。

“走错路”——此处所用的希伯来文词,意为走迷、游荡、犯错。它用于指醉酒之人东倒西歪(Isaiah 28:7);也用于指灵魂偏离真理与敬虔之路而漂泊迷途(Ezekiel 48:11;Psalm 95:10;Psalm 119:110;Proverbs 21:16)。这里所论到的人如此行的“方式”,由他们的“说谎话”表明出来。

“一离母腹”——边注如希伯来文作“从肚腹中”。其意思不是说他们“一”出生就立刻说谎——按字面说这不可能是真的——而是说这是“第一个行动”。人所“做”的头一件事,不是一个圣洁的行动,而是一个罪的行动——显明了心里的东西。

“说谎话”——他们的言语是虚假的,应许是虚假的,整个品格都是虚假的。这是罪的一种形态,表明天生的败坏;它在这里被选用,无疑是因为这正是大卫仇敌所特别显明的特征。他们是虚假的、背信弃义的,不可信任。因此,如果证明了所有人都是恶的,那么“这”段经文就成了一个恰当而重要的经文,可用来证明这种邪恶并非试探或榜样造成的结果,而是心中天生败坏的表达;证明人天性的倾向不是向善,而是向罪;证明品格最初的显发是罪恶的;证明在人里面、先于罪恶行为的存在,有某种东西使人必定照他们所行的而行;也证明这一点总在他们最初的行动中显明出来。

English original

The wicked are estranged from the womb - The allusion here undoubtedly is to the persons principally referred to in the psalm - the enemies of David. But their conduct toward him suggests a more general reflection in regard to "all" the wicked as having the same characteristics. The psalmist, therefore, instead of confining his remarks to them, makes his observations general, on the principle that all wicked men have essentially the same character, and especially in respect to the thing here affirmed, that they go astray early; that they are apostate and alienated from God from their very birth. The words, "the wicked," here do not necessarily refer to the whole human family (though what is thus affirmed is true of all the human race), but to people who in their lives develop a wicked character; and the affirmation in regard to them is that they go astray early in life - from their very infancy.

Strictly speaking, therefore, it cannot be shown that the psalmist in this declaration had reference to the whole human race, or that he meant to make a universal declaration in regard to man as being early estranged or alienated from God; and the passage, therefore, cannot directly, and with exact propriety, be adduced to prove the doctrine that "original sin" pertains to all the race - whatever may be true on that point. If, however, it is demonstrated from "other" passages, and from facts, that all men "are" "wicked" or depraved, then the assertion here becomes a proof that this is from the womb - from their very birth - that they begin life with a propensity to evil - and that all their subsequent acts are but developments of the depravity or corruption with which they are born. It is only, therefore, after it is proved that people "are" depraved or "wicked," that this passage can be cited in favor of the doctrine of original sin.

The word rendered are "estranged" - זרוּ zorû - means properly, "to go off, to turn aside," or "away, to depart;" and then it comes to mean "to be strange," or "a stranger." The proper idea in the word is that one is a stranger, or a foreigner, and the word would be properly applied to one of another tribe or nation, like the Latin "hostis," and the Greek ξείνος xeinos. Exodus 30:33; Isaiah 1:7; Isaiah 25:2; Isaiah 29:5; Psalm 44:20. The meaning of the term as thus explained is, that, from earliest childhood, they are "as if" they belonged to another people than the people of God; they manifest another spirit; they are governed by other principles than those which pertain to the righteous. Compare Ephesians 2:19. Their first indications of character are not those of the children of God, but are "alien, strange, hostile" to him. The phrase "from the womb," refers, undoubtedly, to their birth; and the idea is, that as soon as they begin to act they act wrong; they show that they are strangers to God. Strictly speaking, this passage does not affirm anything directly of what exists in the heart "before" people begin to act, for it is by their "speaking lies" that they show their estrangement; yet it is proper to "infer" that where this is universal, there "is" something lying back of this which makes it certain that they "will" act thus - just as when a tree always bears the same kind of fruit, we infer that there is something "in" the tree, back of the actual "bearing" of the fruit, which makes it certain that it "will" bear such fruit and no other. This "something" in the heart of a child is what is commonly meant by "original sin."

They go astray - The Hebrew word used here means to go astray, to wander, to err. It is used in reference to drunken persons who reel, Isaiah 28:7; and to the soul, as erring or wandering from the paths of truth and piety, Ezekiel 48:11; Psalm 95:10; Psalm 119:110; Proverbs 21:16. The "manner" in which the persons here referred to did this, is indicated here by their "speaking lies."

As soon as they be born - Margin, as in Hebrew, "from the belly." The meaning is, not that they speak lies "as soon as" they are born, which could not be literally true, but that this is the "first act." The first thing "done" is not an act of holiness, but an act of sin - showing what is in the heart.

Speaking lies - They are false in their statements; false in their promises; false in their general character. This is one of the forms of sin, indicating original depravity; and it is undoubtedly selected here because this was particularly manifested by the enemies of David. They were false, perfidious, and could not be trusted. If it be proved, therefore, that all people are wicked, then "this" passage becomes a proper and an important text to demonstrate that this wickedness is not the result of temptation or example, but that it is the expression of the depravity of the heart by nature; that the tendency of man by nature is not to goodness, but to sin; that the first developments of character are sinful; that there is something lying of sinful acts in people which makes it certain that they will act as they do; and that this always manifests itself in the first acts which they perform.

4

Psalm 58:4

Open passage

简体中文

他们的毒气——指他们的恶毒;他们的坏心性;他们从口中所吐出、所喷出之物。这里所指的乃是他们所说、所出之言(Psalm 58:3);其意是:这言语伤人且致命。

好像蛇的毒气——旁注与希伯来文一样,作“如同……的样子”。这一表达中,除“有毒的”蛇之外,并未特指哪一类蛇。

好像聋虺——旁注作“毒蛇”。这个词可以指蝰蛇、毒蛇或虺蛇。参见 Isaiah 11:8 的注释。这里特别的观念是:所指的蛇仿佛是“聋的”;它无法被驯服或施行法术;它仿佛塞住了自己的耳朵,以致没有办法使接近它成为安全之事。这里的假设是:世上“确实”有一些蛇,虽然毒液致命,却“可以”被施术驯服;但“这一”种蛇却“不能”。应用于恶人,其意是:没有办法胜过他们的邪恶倾向——无法拦阻他们发出如毒气般的话语,也无法拦阻他们伤害一切与他们接触的人。他们满怀恶意,没有办法遏制他们的恶毒。他们的毒是致命的,也没有可能约束他们不作恶。

塞耳的——即那“仿佛”塞住耳朵的蛇;它拒绝听那驯服、镇服别的蛇的言语与咒语。然而也有人把这解为指人自己,意思是:“如聋虺一般,他塞住自己的耳朵”;就是说,他自愿使自己像那不听、也不受驯的虺蛇。不过前一种解释更为可取。

English original

Their poison - Their malignity; their bad spirit; that which they utter or throw out of their mouth. The reference here is to what they speak or utter Psalm 58:3, and the idea is, that it is penetrating and deadly.

Like the poison of a serpent - Margin, as in Hebrew, "according to the likeness." In this expression no particular class of serpents is referred to except those which are "poisonous."

Like the deaf adder - Margin, "asp." The word may refer either to the viper, the asp, or the adder. See the notes at Isaiah 11:8. The "particular" idea here is, that the serpent referred to was as it were "deaf;" it could not be tamed or charmed; it seemed to stop its own ears, so that there was no means of rendering it a safe thing to approach it. The supposition is that there "were" serpents which, though deadly in their poison, "might" be charmed or tamed, but that "this" species of serpent could "not." The sense, as applied to the wicked, is, that there was no way of overcoming their evil propensities - of preventing them from giving utterance to words that were like poison, or from doing mischief to all with whom they came in contact. They were malignant, and there was no power of checking their malignity. Their poison was deadly, and there was no possibility of restraining them from doing evil.

That stoppeth her ear - Which "seems" to stop her ear; which refuses to hear the words and incantations by which other serpents are subdued and tamed. Others, however, refer this to the man himself, meaning, "like the deaf adder he stops his ear;" that is, he voluntarily makes himself like the adder that does not hear, and that will not be tamed. The former interpretation, however, is to be preferred.

5

Psalm 58:5

Open passage

简体中文

不听行法术的声音——译作“行法术”的词——לחשׁ lachash——本义为“低语者、喃喃者”,这里指使用符咒或咒术的人,即术士或行巫术者。参 Isaiah 8:19 的注释。这些咒术通常伴有低沉的喃喃声或轻柔的低语,仿佛为要安抚并控制受咒的对象。这种弄蛇的术士(或自称的术士)在古时极多,如今在印度仍比比皆是。这门技艺在印度已达极精之地步;许许多多的人靠这种或真或假的对付毒蛇的能力谋生。他们的生计或是靠在游历中“展示”他们随身携带之蛇身上的能力,或是靠以咒语把盘踞在园圃、房屋、篱笆墙壁中的蛇“引”出来。久居印度之人所引述的大量事实,似乎证实这能力是真实的。

虽然用极灵的咒语——旁注作“行法术的无论如何灵巧”。这里译作“行法术”的词——חובר chober——本义为捆绑、绑在一起。希伯来原文的“字面”意义是“捆绑智慧的”,即“狡黠的”咒语;换言之,就是使用他们咒术与法术中最狡黠、最精巧者。其意义是说,法术的最高技巧也不会成功。他们非任何这类技艺所能及。大卫所指的人也是如此。他们恶毒而含毒;没有什么能解除他们的恶意、销毁他们的毒。这里论到这些人的话,就某种意义而言对一切人也是真的。人心如此败坏,以致人所能动用的一切都不能制伏它。任何雄辩、任何劝说、任何命令、任何告诫、人所能施加的任何影响,都不能制伏它。

它不能被咒法降伏;无论人的技艺或能力多大,都不能将它除去。在巴勒斯坦度过了二十年的汤姆森博士(Dr. Thomson,The Land and the Book, vol. i. pp. 221-223)的以下论述,将说明这段经文:“我见过许多弄蛇的术士,他们确实对这些爬虫行使着某种非凡的能力。他们随身带着巨大——通常是黑色——的蛇,任凭蛇爬遍全身、钻入怀中;不过总要采取某些或是必要、或假称必要的防备措施。他们反复对着蛇的脸用力吹气,有时把唾沫或某种调了药的合物喷在蛇身上。他们所玩的江湖把戏无须描摹。我最无法解释的,是察觉屋中有蛇并将其诱‘惑’出屋的能力。这事太常见了,不能成为怀疑的对象。莱恩先生(Mr. Lane)的以下记述是对这事的公允陈述:‘术士自称不必亲眼察看(也许他凭一种独特的嗅觉)就能知道屋中是否有蛇;若有,就能把蛇引到自己这里来,正如捕鸟人以其声音的魅力把鸟诱入网中。

蛇既寻找最暗之处藏身,术士在多数情形下必须在幽暗的房间里施展技艺;在那样的房间里,他尽可轻易从怀中取出一条蛇,拿给门外的人看,声称是在房间里找到的,因为在一经确知屋内有这样一条爬虫之后,谁也不敢随他进去。但他也常须在白昼的亮光之下、在围观者的包围中施展技艺;存疑的人曾事先搜查他,甚至使他赤身,他的成功仍是完全的。他装出神秘的姿态,用一根短的棕榈木杖敲击墙壁,吹口哨,用舌头发出咯咯声,向地上吐唾沫,并且通常这样说——我凭神吩咐你们,你们或在上、或在下,都出来吧;你们若顺从,我凭至大之名吩咐你们,出来吧;你们若不顺从,就死吧!死吧!死吧!’蛇通常被他用木杖从墙缝或房间的顶棚中赶出来。

我曾听人断言,弄蛇术士在进入他要一试身手的屋子之前,总先买通那家的仆人放进一条或几条蛇;但我晓得一些不可能有这种情形的实例,故而我倾向于相信,上述那些托钵僧(dervishes)大都通晓某种物理方法,能不用眼看便察觉蛇的存在,并能把蛇从藏匿处引出来。这些‘物理方法’究竟是什么,至今仍是秘密,正如人们能用手拿活蝎子、能毫无畏惧或伤害地把它放进怀中的‘方法’一样。这样的事我一再见过,连小男孩也会。这一直引起我的好奇与惊异,因为蝎子是一切虫类中最恶毒、最易怒的。印度教徒,以及其后的埃及人,是最有名的弄蛇者、吃蝎子者等等;不过吉卜赛人、阿拉伯人等也间或有之,他们游走四方,以此等绝技震骇无知之人,借以维持流浪的生计。”

English original

Which will not hearken to the voice of charmers - The word rendered "charmers" - לחשׁ lachash - means properly "whisperers, mutterers," and it refers here to those who made use of spells or incantations - sorcerers or magicians. See the notes at Isaiah 8:19. These incantations were accompanied usually with a low, muttering sound, or with a gentle whisper, as if for the purpose of calming and controlling the object of the incantation. Such charmers of serpents (or pretended charmers) abounded among the ancients, and still abound in India. The art is carried in India to great perfection; and there are multitudes of persons who obtain a livelihood by this pretended or real power over venomous serpents. Their living is obtained either by "exhibiting" their power over serpents which they carry with them in their peregrinations, or by "drawing" them by their incantations from the walls of gardens, houses, and hedges, where they had taken up their abode. Multitudes of facts, referred to by those who have resided in India, seem to confirm the opinion that this power is real.

Charming never so wisely - Margin, "Be the charmer never so cunning." The word rendered here "charming" - חובר chober - means properly to bind; to bind together. The "literal" meaning of the original Hebrew is, "binding spells that are wise," or, that are "cunning;" in other words, making use of the most cunning or skillful of their incantations and charms. The meaning is, that the utmost skill of enchantment will be unsuccessful. They are beyond the reach of any such arts. So with the people referred to by David. They were malignant and venomous; and nothing would disarm them of their malignity, and destroy their venom. What is here affirmed of these men is true in a certain sense of all people. The depravity of the human heart is such that nothing that man can employ will subdue it. No eloquence, no persuasion, no commands, no remonstrances, no influence that man can exert, will subdue it.

It cannot be charmed down; it cannot be removed by any skill or power of man, however great. The following remarks from Dr. Thomson, who has spent twenty years in Palestine (land and the Book, vol. i. pp. 221-223), will illustrate this passage: "I have seen many serpent-charmers who do really exercise some extraordinary power over these reptiles. They carry enormous snakes, generally black, about them, allow them to crawl all over their persons and into their bosoms; always, however, with certain precautions, either necessary, or pretended to be so. They repeatedly breathe strongly into the face of the serpent, and occasionally blow spittle, or some medicated composition upon them. It is needless to describe the mountebank tricks which they perform. That which I am least able to account for is the power of detecting the presence of serpents in a house, and of enticing or 'charming' them out of it. The thing is far too common to be made a matter of scepticism. The following account, by Mr. Lane, is a fair statement of this matter: 'The charmer professes to discover, without ocular perception (but perhaps he does so by a unique smell), whether there be any serpents in the house, and if there be, to attract them to him, as the fowler, by the fascination of his voice, allures the bird into his net.

As the serpent seeks the darkest place in which to hide himself, the charmer has, in most eases, to exercise his skill in an obscure chamber, where he might easily take a serpent from his bosom, bring it to the people without the door, and affirm that he had found it in the apartment, for no one would venture to enter with him, after having been assured of the presence of one of these reptiles within. But he is often required to perform in the full light of day, surrounded by spectators; and incredulous persons have searched him beforehand, and even stripped him naked, yet his success has been complete. He assumes an air of mystery, strikes the walls with a short palm-stick, whistles, makes a clucking noise with his tongue, and spits upon the ground, and generally says - I adjure you, by God, if ye be above or if ye be below, that ye come forth; I adjure you by the most great name, if ye be obedient, come forth, and if ye be disobedient, die! die! die!' The serpent is generally dislodged by his stick from a fissure in the wall or from the ceiling of the room.

I have heard it asserted that a serpent-charmer, before he enters a house in which he is to try his skill, always employs a servant of that house to introduce one or more serpents; but I have known instances in which this could not be the case, and am inclined to believe that the dervishes above mentioned are generally acquainted with some physical means of discovering the presence of serpents without seeing them, and of attracting them from their lurking-places. What these 'physical means' may be is yet a secret, as also the 'means' by which persons can handle live scorpions, and can put them into their bosom without fear or injury. I have seen this done again and again, even by small boys. This has always excited my curiosity and astonishment, for scorpions are the most malignant and irascible of all insects. The Hindoos, and after them the Egyptians, are the most famous snake-charmers, scorpion-eaters, etc., etc., although gipsies, Arabs, and others are occasionally found, who gain a vagabond livelihood by strolling round the country, and confounding the ignorant with these feats."

6

Psalm 58:6

Open passage

简体中文

神啊,求你敲掉他们口中的牙——这里译作“敲掉”的词,本义是“拔出”。这是影射他的仇敌,把他们比作野兽;这祈求是愿神夺去他们害人的手段——正如野兽的牙齿被拔掉后便无害了一样。

耶和华啊,求你敲掉少壮狮子的大牙——这里所用的词,本义是“咬齿”或“磨齿”:Job 29:17; Proverbs 30:14; Joel 1:6。试比较 Psalm 3:7 的注释。这里译作“少壮狮子”的词,并不是单指幼狮,而是指已经长成、正当盛年、精力充沛的年轻狮子,与老狮或因年老而衰弱的狮子相对。其意是:他的仇敌属于最凶猛、最暴戾的一类。

English original

Break their teeth, O God, in their mouth - The word here rendered "break" means properly "to tear out." The allusion is to his enemies, represented as wild beasts; and the prayer is, that God would deprive them of the means of doing harm - as wild animals are rendered harmless when their teeth are broken out.

Break out the great teeth of the young lions, O Lord - The word used here means properly "biters" or "grinders:" Job 29:17; Proverbs 30:14; Joel 1:6. Compare the notes at Psalm 3:7. The word rendered "young lions" here does not refer to mere whelps, but to full-grown though young lions in their vigor and strength, as contrasted with old lions, or those which are enfeebled by age. The meaning is, that his enemies were of the most fierce and violent kind.

7

Psalm 58:7

Open passage

简体中文

愿他们消灭如急流的水一般——意即:愿他们如流走的水、如逝去的洪水一般消失无踪,不再得见。“或许”这里所暗指的,是暴涨的急流之水,流淌而去,没入沙中,以致完全消失。见 Job 6:15-19 的注释。这祷告所求的,是他的仇敌灭亡或被剪除,他可以因此从他们手中得救。

他们瞅准射箭的时候——字面意思是“他踏住他的箭”。见 Psalm 11:2 的注释。这里的意思是:当他预备攻击——或预备争战——的时候,正如人弯弓将箭搭在弦上一样。这里暗指寻索大卫性命的仇敌。

愿箭头仿佛砍断——意即:愿他的箭仿佛被砍断或“钝拙”了一般,以致毫无效用。愿它们成了不能穿透、不能伤人的箭。

English original

Let them melt away as waters which run continually - Let them vanish or disappear as waters that flow off, or floods that run by, and are no more seen. "Perhaps" the allusion here may be to the waters of a torrent that is swollen, which flow off and are lost in the sand, so that they wholly disappear. See the notes at Job 6:15-19. The prayer is, that his enemies might perish or be cut off, and that he might thus be saved from them.

When he bendeth his bow to shoot his arrows - literally, "he treads on his arrows." See the notes at Psalm 11:2. The meaning here is, When he prepares for an attack - or, prepares to make war, as one does who bends his bow, and places his arrow on the string. The allusion here is to the enemies of David, as seeking his life.

Let them be as cut in pieces - That is, Let his arrows be as if they were cut off or "blunted," so that they will produce no effect. Let them be such, that they will not penetrate and wound.

8

Psalm 58:8

Open passage

简体中文

愿他们像蜗牛消化而过去——更确切地说,是“像蜗牛边爬边融化”;就是说,蜗牛爬行时留下黏湿的痕迹,越前行就越消融,最终死去。参格泽纽斯《词典》(Gesenius, Lexicon)。这里所暗示的是蜗牛看似发生的事:它在爬行时仿佛融化或消解,又仿佛把自己的一部分留在它所流出的黏液之中。

又像妇人坠落未见天日的胎——希伯来文的这个词字面意思是“从妇人身上落下的”;因此这词用来指流产的胎儿。这里的祈求是:愿他们彻底消灭;愿他们变得如同从未有过真实生命的人一样;愿他们的势力完全消失。

未见天日——即不在活人之中。比较 Job 3:16 的注释。

English original

As a snail which melteth, let every one of them pass away - Or rather, As the snail which melteth as it goes; that is, which leaves a slimy trail as it moves along, and thus melts away the more as it advances, until at length it dies. Gesenius, Lexicon. The allusion is to what seems to occur to the snail; it seems to melt or to be dissolved as it moves along; or seems to leave a part of itself in the slime which flows from it.

Like the untimely birth of a woman - The Hebrew word means literally "that which falls from a woman;" and hence, the word is used to denote an abortion. The prayer is, that they might utterly pass away; that they might become like those who never had real life; that their power might wholly disappear.

That they may not see the sun - May not be among the living. Compare the notes at Job 3:16.

9

Psalm 58:9

Open passage

简体中文

你们的锅还未觉得荆棘烧熱——这里的“荆棘”一词,אטד 'âṭâd,指所谓“基督荆棘”,即南方的鼠李(Gesenius)。干荆棘所生的火迅猛炽烈,水很快就能烧热。其观念是:这里所指的事会“迅速”发生——甚至快过最急速猛烈的火对锅及其内容物发生作用。恶人的毁灭可说是转瞬之间。哈克特教授(Prof. Hackitt,Illustrations of Scripture,p. 135)的下面一段引文可以说明本节:“如今耶路撒冷附近极为常见的一种荆棘,名为 Spina Christi,即基督荆棘。当地的人收集这些灌木和植物,用作燃料。今日如此,古时也一样。‘锅下烧荆棘的爆声,好似愚昧人的笑声’(Ecclesiastes 7:6)。‘你们的锅还未觉得荆棘烧热’——即荆棘之火——‘他就要把它们统统刮去’(Psalm 58:9)。这一比喻取自旷野中的旅行者,或露宿野外的牧人:他们在露天生火,火暴露于风中;一阵突然的狂风刮起,燃料几乎还未开始燃烧就被卷走。‘他们必像已割的荆棘在火中焚烧’(Isaiah 33:12)。其意思是:恶人毫无价值——他们的毁灭必是突然且彻底的。”

他要把他们除去——译作“要把他们除去”的词,本义是“颤抖、战栗”,随后用来指暴风的骚动与狂怒。他们必像在一场使万物颤抖摇撼的暴风中那样被卷去(Job 27:21)。这事必“突然”且“彻底”地成就。神所差来的骤风暴然击打他们,他们顷刻之间就被扫除。

无论是活的,还是在他的怒气中——页边注作“仿佛活的,仿佛怒中”。这个表达极为晦涩。七十士译本(Septuagint)译作“他必吞灭他们,如同活的——如同在怒中”。拉丁文武加大译本(Latin Vulgate)作“他必吞灭他们,如同活的,也如此在怒中”。亚历山大教授(Prof. Alexander)译作“或是生的,或是熟的”。他认为其观念是:神必在他们策划阴谋的时候临到他们;其比喻取自“烹煮”的动作,意思是,无论那些计划成熟与否——即“煮熟”或“生”——神都必临到他们。在我看来,这是一种非常勉强的解经,希伯来文能否支持这种含义尚属疑问。译作“活的”的词——חי chay——本义是“活着的、有生命的”,继而指“有生气的、新鲜的、茁壮的”,因而适用于活着或青绿的植物。在这里,它“可以”指那为烧火而搜集、仍然青绿或活着的“荆棘”;“此处”的观念应当是:甚至当那些荆棘还活着、还青绿的时候——在它们被火点燃之前(或当人正要点燃它们的时候),一阵骤起的暴风就会来临,把它们全部卷走。

事实上,在东方的旷野中,这并非罕见之事:旅行者在旅途中停下来做饭,已经拾了燃料——荆棘或随手可得之物——并把锅架在火上,忽然旷野刮来一阵暴风,把一切都卷走(Rosenmuller in loc.)。这里所指的“可能”正是这样的事。译作“怒气”的词——חרון chârôn——本义是“燃烧”,继而用来指任何燃烧着的东西。它之所以用于忿怒或怒气,是因为忿怒似乎在“燃烧”(Numbers 25:4;Numbers 32:14;1 Samuel 28:18)。然而在这里,它可以按字面理解,指荆棘虽仍青绿、却开始被点燃时的状态。这些荆棘首先被看见是搜集起来放在锅下的;其次被看见仍是青绿的——尚未被燃起的火焰烤干;然后被看见着了火;而转瞬之间——锅还未受其影响——一阵突然的狂风就把一切都卷走了。其“观念”是:神突然出其不意地临到恶人,即使他们的诡计似乎周密完备、似乎稳操胜券,也要使其挫败。因此,这并不是说神要在恶人“活着”的时候剪除并惩罚他们,而是指这样一个事实:即使在他们以为万事顺利之时,他们的诡计也会突然挫败;在实际上尚未朝着目标取得任何进展之前就被击败,正如晚饭的各样预备,在锅还没有开始变热之前,就全都一扫而空。

English original

Before your pots can feel the thorns - The word "thorns" here - אטד 'âṭâd - refers to what is called "Christ's thorn," the southern buckthorn. "Gesenius." The fire made of such thorns when dry would be quick and rapid, and water would be soon heated by it. The idea is, that what is here referred to would occur "quickly" - sooner than the most rapid and intense fire could make an impression on a kettle and its contents. The destruction of the wicked would be, as it were, instantaneous. The following quotation from Prof. Hackitt (Illustrations of Scripture, p. 135) will explain this passage: "A species of thorn, now very common near Jerusalem, bears the name of Spina Christi, or Christ's thorn. The people of the country gather these bushes and plants, and use them as fuel. As it is now, so it was of old. 'As the crackling of thorns under a pot, so is the laughter of the fool,' Ecclesiastes 7:6 'Before your pots can feel the thorns,' namely, the fire of them, 'he shall sweep them away,' Psalm 58:9 The figure in this case is taken from travelers in the desert, or from shepherds tenting abroad, who build a fire in the open air, where it is exposed to the wind; a sudden gust arises and sweeps away the fuel almost before it has begun to burn. 'As thorns cut up shall they be burned in the fire' Isaiah 33:12. The meaning is that the wicked are worthless - their destruction shall be sudden and complete."

He shall take them away - The word rendered "shall take them away" means properly "to shiver, to shudder;" and it is then applied to the commotion and raging of a tempest. They shal be taken away as in a storm that makes everything shiver or tremble; Job 27:21. It would be done "suddenly" and "entirely." A sudden storm sent by God would beat upon them, and they would be swept away in an instant.

Both living and in his wrath - Margin, "as living as wrath." This expression is exceedingly obscure. The Septuagint renders it, "he shall devour them as it were living - as it were in wrath." The Latin Vulgate: "He shall devour them as living, so in wrath." Prof. Alexander: "Whether raw or done." He supposes that the idea is, that God would come upon them while forming their plans; and that the illustration is derived from the act of "cooking," and that the meaning is, that God would come upon them whether those plans were matured or not - "cooked" or "raw." This seems to me to be a very forced construction, and one which it is doubtful whether the Hebrew will bear. The word rendered "living" - חי chay - means properly "alive, living;" and then, "lively, fresh, vigorous;" and is applicable then to a plant that is living or green. It "may" be here applied to the "thorns" that had been gathered for the fire, still green or alive; and the idea "here" would be, that even while those thorns were alive and green - before they had been kindled by the fire (or while they were trying to kindle them), a sudden tempest would come and sweep them all away.

It is not, indeed, an uncommon occurrence in the deserts of the East, that while, in their journeyings, travelers pause to cook their food, and have gathered the fuel - thorns, or whatever may be at hand - and have placed their pot over the fire, a sudden tempest comes from the desert, and sweeps everything away. Rosenmuller in loc. Such an occurrence "may" be referred to here. The word rendered "wrath" - חרון chârôn - means properly "burning;" and then it is used to denote anything burning. It is applied to wrath or anger, because it seems to "burn." Numbers 25:4; Numbers 32:14; 1 Samuel 28:18. Here, however, it "may" be taken literally as applicable to thorns when they begin to be kindled, though still green. They are seen first as gathered and placed under the pots; then they are seen as still green - not dried up by the kindling flame; then they are seen as on fire; and, in a moment - before the pots could be affected by them - all is swept away by a sudden gust of wind. The "idea" is that of the sudden and unexpected descent of God on the wicked, frustrating their schemes even when they seemed to be well formed, and to promise complete success. This does not mean, therefore, that God would cut off and punish the wicked while "living," but it refers to the fact that their schemes would be suddenly defeated even while they supposed that all things were going on well; defeated before there was, in fact, any progress made toward the accomplishment, as the arrangements for the evening-meal would all be swept away before even the pot had begun to be warm.

10

Psalm 58:10

Open passage

简体中文

义人见仇敌遭报就欢喜——即看见恶人受到公正的刑罚时。他必认可这刑罚;必看出它是正当的;必因律法得以维护、邪恶未能得胜而欢喜;必因行义之人得享安全、脱离恶人的攻击与图谋而欢欣。各地的人都赞许法律的公正施行,即使它把违法者送进监狱或处以死刑;当公义的治理得以维持、邪恶受到遏制、公正得以在群体中施行时,一切热爱法律与秩序的人都引以为慰。这是政府与法律的目的;这是一切行政长官受任所要保障的;这是一切善良公民努力要成就的。没有证据表明诗篇作者说出本节的情感时怀有任何挟怨或复仇之心。参 Psalm 52:6 的注释。比较 Psalm 37:34;Psalm 40:3。

要在恶人的血中洗脚——比较 Psalm 68:23。这里的意象取自战场,即胜利者踏在被杀者的血中行走。这是强有力的语言,形容恶人被全然倾覆。然而,无可怀疑,这暗指胜利者走过这样一个战场时所感到的满足与得胜的"情感";他因仇敌被制服、自己得胜而有的欢腾。这里的"意思"是:当恶人被制服并受罚时,义人所怀的情感,在某些方面"类似"于行经铺满被杀者血迹之战场的胜利者的情感。然而,并无"必要"假定这两种情形中的情感都是报复性的;也无必要假定胜利者或义人以流血为乐、以他人的受苦为乐;也无必要假定他们不会宁愿被击败被杀的人"并非"恶人、"不曾"以这种方式受苦。这里"本质上"所含的意思只是:当律法得到维护、邪恶的得胜被阻止时,就有一种满足与认可的情感。要证明诗篇作者所表达的情感,比司法官员在忠实履行职责、确保违法者被捕受罚之后"可以"怀有、"应当"怀有、且"确实"怀有的情感"更"不正当,恐怕很难;或者要证明诗篇作者所表达的,超过了每一个看见有罪之人受"公正"刑罚的人所必有的感受,也同样困难。邪恶"不"得胜,确实是可喜之事;当它"被"制止时,是值得欢腾的事。

English original

The righteous shall rejoice when he seeth the vengeance - When he sees the just punishment inflicted on the wicked. He will approve of it; he will see that it is right; he will be glad that law is maintained, and that wickedness does not triumph; he will rejoice in the safety of those who do right, and in their deliverance from the assaults and the designs of the wicked. People everywhere approve of the just administration of law, even though it consigns the transgressors to prison or to death; and it is a matter of gratification to all who love law and order when a righteous government is maintained; when wickedness is checked; when justice is administered in a community. This is the end of government and of law; this is what all magistrates are appointed to secure; this is what all good citizens are aiming to accomplish. There is no evidence that the psalmist had any vindictive or revengeful feeling when he uttered the sentiment in this verse. See the notes at Psalm 52:6. Compare Psalm 37:34; Psalm 40:3.

He shall wash his feet in the blood of the wicked - Compare Psalm 68:23. The image here is taken from a battlefield, where the victor treads in the blood of the slain. It is strong language denoting the entire overthrow of the wicked. There can be no doubt, however, that the allusion is to the "feelings" of satisfaction and triumph with which a victor walks over such a field; the exultation which he has that his foes are subdued, and that he has triumphed. The "idea" is that the righteous will have emotions, when the wicked are subdued and punished, which in some respects "resemble" the feelings of the victor who walks over a field covered with the blood of the slain. Still it is not "necessary" to suppose that these are, in either case, vindictive feelings; or that either the victor or the righteous have pleasure in the shedding of blood, or in the sufferings of others; or that they would not have preferred that the discomfited and slain should "not" have been wicked, and should "not" have been made to suffer in this manner. All that is "essentially" implied in this is, that there is a feeling of satisfaction and approval when law is vindicated, and when the triumph of wickedness is prevented. It would be difficult to show that the feelings expressed by the psalmist are "less" proper than those which an officer of justice "may" have, and "ought" to have, and "does" have, when he has faithfully discharged his duty, and has secured the arrest and punishment of the violators of law; or that the psalmist has expressed anything more than every man must feel who sees "just" punishment inflicted on the guilty. Assuredly it is a matter of rejoicing that wickedness does "not" triumph; it is a thing to exult in when it "is" arrested.

11

Psalm 58:11

Open passage

简体中文

因此,人必说——就是说,每一个人都必说,或各处的人都要看见这事。这话表达了对神在人间作为的细致观察的结果。从这些作为所得的结论是:

(a) 总的来说,义人在世上有赏报,或者说,公义趋向于博得神的恩惠,并增进人的幸福;以及

(b) 世上有一位神——一位主持人类事务的公正的存在者。

义人诚然有善报——旁注按希伯来文作"义人的果子"。就是说,公义必结出它当有的"果子",如同受栽培的树必回报栽培的人。这里的观念是:在地上有一事物的运行趋势,即使其中混杂着许多奥秘,这趋势仍有利于德行;显明作义人确有"益处";证明存在一种道德的治理;确定神是德行之友、邪恶之敌;是圣洁之友、罪恶之敌。参较 1 Timothy 4:8 的注释。

在地上果有施行判断的神——或者说:实在的,地上有一位施行审判的神。换言之,事物的运行证明:世界的事务并非听凭机运、命运或单纯的物理法则。人的行为所产生的结果显明:有一位"心智"主宰一切;有一位自有其目的与计划;有一位"施行"治理,赏善罚恶。其论证是:世上事物的运行,无法用以下假设来解释——地上的事务听凭机运,或受命运支配,或仅由物理法则调节,或自行运转。在这些事务中,有神清楚干预的凭据,也有清楚的凭据表明,就整体和最终结果而言,那干预有利于公义、敌对罪恶。换言之,没有人能拿地上发生的"事实"来,在"世上有一位神"之外的任何假设下对它们作出满意的解释。一切其他的解释都归于失败;而且,尽管必须承认,即使在这个假设之下,仍有许多难处迎着我们而来,但一切其他的假设,要对发生在我们这个世界上的事给出任何可理解的说明,都全然无效。这一论证以无可驳倒的方式陈述于巴特勒主教(Bishop Butler)的《类比论》(Analogy)第一部分第三章。

English original

So that a man shall say - That is, every man shall say, or people everywhere shall see this. This expresses the result of a close observation of the divine dealings among people. The conclusion from those dealings is,

(a) that there is, on the whole, a reward for the righteous on earth, or that righteousness tends to secure the favor of God and to promote human happiness; and

(b) that there is a God - a just Being presiding over human affairs.

A reward for the righteous - Margin, as in Hebrew, "fruit for the righteous." That is, righteousness will produce its appropriate "fruits," as trees that are cultivated will reward the cultivator. The idea is, that there is a course of things on earth, even with all there is that is mixed and mysterious, which is favorable to virtue; which shows that there is an "advantage" in being righteous; which demonstrates that there is a moral government; which makes it certain that God is the friend of virtue and the enemy of vice; that he is the friend of holiness and an enemy of sin. Compare the notes at 1 Timothy 4:8.

Verily he is a God that judgeth in the earth - Or, Truly there is a God that judges in the earth. In other words, the course of things demonstrates that the affairs of the world are not left to chance, to fate, or to mere physical laws. There are results of human conduct which show that there is a "Mind" that presides over all; that there is One who has a purpose and plan of his own; that there is One who "administers" government, rewarding the good, and punishing the wicked. The argument is, that there is a course of things which cannot be explained on the supposition that the affairs of earth are left to chance; that they are controlled by fate; that they are regulated by mere physical laws; that they take care of themselves. There is a clear proof of divine interposition in those affairs, and a clear proof that, on the whole, and in the final result, that interposition is favorable to righteousness and opposed to sin. No man, in other words, can take the "facts" which occur on the earth, and explain them satisfactorily, except on the supposition that there is a God. All other explanations fail; and numerous as it must be admitted are the difficulties that meet us even on this supposition, yet all other suppositions utterly fail in giving any intelligible account of what occurs in our world. See this argument stated in a manner which cannot be confuted, in Bishop Butler's Analogy, part i. chap. iii.