Chapter commentary
Luke Chapter 16
서론
Untitled
繁體中文
English original
The scope of Christ's discourse in this chapter is to awaken and quicken us all so to use this world as not to abuse it, so to manage all our possessions and enjoyments here as that they may make for us, and may not make against us in the other world; for they will do either the one or the other, according as we use them now. I. If we do good with them, and lay out what we have in works of piety and charity, we shall reap the benefit of it in the world to come; and this he shows in the parable of the unjust steward, who made so good a hand of his lord's goods that, when he was turned out of his stewardship, he had a comfortable subsistence to betake himself to. The parable itself we have (Lu 16:1-8); the explanation and application of it (Lu 16:9-13); and the contempt which the Pharisees put upon the doctrine Christ preached to them, for which he sharply reproved them, adding some other weighty sayings, Lu 16:14-18. II. It, instead of doing good with our worldly enjoyments, we make them the food and fuel of our lusts, of our luxury and sensuality, and deny relief to the poor, we shall certainly perish eternally, and the things of this world, which were thus abused, will but add to our misery and torment. This he shows in the other parable of the rich man and Lazarus, which has likewise a further intention, and that is, to awaken us all to take the warning given us by the written word, and not to expect immediate messages from the other world, Lu 16:19-31.
1-18
The Unjust Steward
繁體中文
不義的管家
¹ 耶穌又對門徒說:有一個財主的管家,別人向他主人告他浪費主人的財物。 ² 主人叫他來,對他說:我聽見你這事怎麼樣呢?把你所經管的交代明白,因你不能再作管家了。 ³ 那管家心裡說:主人辭我,不用我再作管家,我將來作甚麼?鋤地呢,無力;討飯呢,怕羞。 ⁴ 我知道怎麼行,好叫人在我不作管家之後,接我到他們家裡去。 ⁵ 於是把欠他主人債的,一個一個的叫了來,問頭一個說:你欠我主人多少? ⁶ 他說:一百簍油。管家說:拿你的賬,快坐下,寫五十。 ⁷ 又問一個說:你欠多少?他說:一百石麥子。管家說:拿你的賬,寫八十。 ⁸ 主人就誇獎這不義的管家作事聰明;因為今世之子,在世事之上,較比光明之子更加聰明。 ⁹ 我又告訴你們:要藉著那不義的錢財結交朋友,到了錢財無用的時候,他們可以接你們到永存的帳幕裡去。 ¹⁰ 人在最小的事上忠心,在大事上也忠心;在最小的事上不義,在大事上也不義。 ¹¹ 倘若你們在不義的錢財上不忠心,誰還把那真實的錢財託付你們呢? ¹² 倘若你們在別人的東西上不忠心,誰還把你們自己的東西給你們呢? ¹³ 一個僕人不能事奉兩個主;不是惡這個愛那個,就是重這個輕那個。你們不能又事奉神,又事奉瑪門。 ¹⁴ 法利賽人是貪愛錢財的,他們聽見這一切話,就嗤笑耶穌。 ¹⁵ 耶穌對他們說:你們是在人面前自稱為義的;你們的心,神卻知道;因為人所尊貴的,是神所憎惡的。 ¹⁶ 律法和先知到約翰為止;從此神國的福音傳開了,人人努力要進去。 ¹⁷ 天地廢去,較比律法的一點一畫落空還容易。 ¹⁸ 凡休妻另娶的,就是犯姦淫;凡娶被休之妻的,也是犯姦淫。
我們若以為基督的教訓與聖潔宗教的目的,不過是用神聖奧祕的觀念來迷惑我們,或用神聖憐憫的觀念來娛樂我們,那我們就錯了。不,福音對這兩者的啟示,都是要激發並催促我們實行基督徒的本分——其中尤以行善、向一切有所需要而我們有力所能及幫助的人施恩,最為要緊。我們的救主在此正是以此勸勉我們,提醒我們不過是百般恩賜的神的管家;我們既在多方面不忠,已經喪失了主的喜悅,便當運用智慧,想出別的辦法,使我們在世上所有的轉為有益。比喻不可勉強引申超過其本意,因此我們不可從此推論說,任何人能在我們得罪主的時候幫助我們;而是泛指我們當在敬虔與慈善的善工上使用我們所有的,好使我們在死亡與墳墓的那一邊能帶著安慰再遇見它。我們若要行事明智,就當勤奮殷勤,把財富用在敬虔與慈善的行動上,以促進我們將來永遠的福祉——正如屬世的人把財富用在最大的今世利益上,藉此為自己結交朋友,並保障其他屬世的利益。克拉克博士(Dr. Clarke)如此說。如今我們當思想,
一、比喻的本身,其中所有世人都被描繪為他們在世上所有的管家——我們不過是管家。我們所有的,其主權都是神的;我們只有使用權,且要按照我們偉大之主的指示,並為他的榮耀而用。金奇拉比(Rabbi Kimchi,萊特富特博士所引)說:「這世界是一座房子;天是屋頂;星是燈火;地和其上的果實是陳設的筵席;這家的主人是聖而可稱頌的神;人就是管家,這家的財物交在他手中;他若行得好,必在主眼前蒙恩;若不然,就要被免去管家的職分。」如今,
1. 這管家的不忠。他「浪費主人的財物」,或侵吞,或誤用,或因疏忽任其損失;為此他「被人向主人告發」(路 16:1)。我們都難免受同樣的控告。我們沒有把神在世上交託給我們的加以正當的運用,反而違背了他的旨意;我們為免因此被主審判,便當審判自己。
2. 他被免去職任。他的主人「叫他來」,說:「我怎麼聽見你這事呢?我本期望你更好。」他說話像一個因在他身上失望、不得不辭退他而惋惜的人:聽見這事使他憂愁;但管家不能否認,於是別無他法,他必須結清賬目,不久便要離去(路 16:2)。這是要教導我們:(1) 我們不久都必被免去在世上的管家職分;我們不能永遠享受如今所享受的。死亡將至,要免去我們的管家職分,要剝奪我們如今行善的才能與機會,別人將接替我們的地位,得著同樣的機會。(2) 我們死時被免去管家職分是公義的,也是我們當得的,因為我們浪費了主的財物,因而喪失了所託,所以我們不能抱怨受了任何委屈。(3) 當我們的管家職分被取去時,我們必須向主交賬:死後有審判。我們既已被清楚地警告,既將被免職、又將要交賬,便當常常思想這些事。
3. 他事後的智慧。他如今開始思想:「我要怎麼行呢?」(路 16:3)他若早些思想,本可不至於因不忠而如此愚蠢地丟掉好職位;但晚思想總比不思想好。當注意:我們既都已接到通知,不久就要被免去管家職分,便當思想那時我們要怎麼行。他總要活著;他將靠甚麼過活?(1) 他知道自己沒有那種勤勞的本領,可以靠作工謀生:「我不能鋤地,我不能靠勞力賺餬口。」但他為何不能鋤地?看不出他又老又瘸;其實真相是:他懶惰。他的「不能」就是「不肯」;這不是天然的限制,而是道德的障礙;他的主人若在免去他管家職分之後仍留他作苦工,派一個工頭監管他,他便能叫他鋤地。他「不能鋤地」,因為他從未習慣。這暗示我們不能靠任何為今世的勞力為我們的靈魂謀生路,也不能靠自己的能力為靈魂作任何切實的事。(2) 他知道自己沒有那種謙卑,可以靠討飯過活:「討飯呢,怕羞。」這是他驕傲的話,正如前一句是他懶惰的話。那些在神護理之中失去自助能力的人,不應羞於向別人求助。這管家本更當為欺騙主人而羞愧,而不是為討飯而羞愧。(3) 因此他決定要與他主人的債戶,就是那些拖欠租金、並曾親手立下字據的佃戶結交:「我知道怎麼行了」(路 16:4)。「我主人把我趕出他的家。我自己又無家可歸。我熟悉我主人的佃戶,從前常給他們好處,如今我要再給他們一個好處,使他們這樣欠我的人情,必歡迎我到他們家裡,以最好的款待相待;我活著的日子,至少在我能更好安頓自己之前,我要投靠他們,從一家好房子走到另一家。」而他要使他們成為朋友的方法,就是把他們欠他主人的一大筆債勾銷,在賬上少報。於是他叫了一個欠主人一百簽油的來(他用這種貨物交租):「拿你的賬,」他說,賬在這裡,「快坐下,寫五十」(路 16:2)——他把債務減了一半。當注意,他急於把這事辦妥:「快坐下,免得我們被人發現有勾當,引人疑心。」他又叫了一個欠主人一百石麥子的來,從他的賬上勾去五分之一,叫他寫八十(路 16:7);也許他對別人也照樣行,或多或少地削減,全看他期望從他們得多少恩惠而定。看這裡我們的世物是何等不穩妥;對那些擁有最多的人尤其如此,他們把一切有關的事都推給別人去管,便給了別人欺騙他們的機會,因為他們不肯親自過目。也要看甚至在人所信任的人當中,也有何等的背信。要找一個可託付信任的人何等困難!*神是真實的,人都是虛謊的。*這管家雖因不誠實被辭退,卻仍照樣行。人因過失受罰之後仍不肯悔改,何等罕見。
4. 對此事的稱許:「主人就誇獎這不義的管家作事聰明」(路 16:8)。這可指他的主人——那僕人的主人——他雖不能不惱怒他的詭詐,卻仍欣賞他為自己著想的機智與謀略;但若如此理解,本節後半便必是我們的主的話,因此我認為整節都是指基督說的。基督彷彿說:「如今請給我舉薦這樣一個人——他懂得怎樣為自己打算,懂得怎樣把握眼前的機會,並為將來的需要未雨綢繆。」他不是因為對主人不忠而稱讚他,而是因為他為自己作得聰明。不過也許他這樣作對主人也是好的,對佃戶也是公道的。他知道他曾給他們定了何等苛刻的條件,以致他們無力交租,被他嚴苛壓榨之後便落後了,他們和他們的家眷眼看就要敗落;想到這一層,他如今離任之時,便作了他在公義和憐憫上所當作的,不但免去他們一部分欠租,還減少他們將來的租金。「你欠多少?」可意為「你坐著多少地?來,我給你定一個較輕鬆的條件,卻不輕於你當得的。」他從前凡事為主人,如今卻開始顧念佃戶,好在他失去主人的歡心之時,可以得著他們的歡心。減免租金乃是長久的恩惠,比僅僅減免欠租更能得著他們的心。他這樣為今世舒適生活的未雨綢繆,正暴露了我們對來世的疏忽:「今世之子」——那些選擇並以今世為分的人——「在世事上較比光明之子更加聰明」,他們行事更為周到,更善為自己的世俗利益和好處著想;而「光明之子」——那些享有福音的人——在他們自己的世代,就是在關乎靈魂和永遠的事上,卻不如他們。當注意:(1) 屬世的人在世事上的智慧,我們當在靈魂的事上效法:他們的原則是把握機會,把最要緊的事放在最前,在夏秋之時為冬天積蓄,見有好交易便把握,信任忠誠的而不信任虛謊的。巴不得我們在屬靈的事上也能如此智慧!(2) 光明之子往往被今世之子勝過。這不是說今世之子真有智慧;他們不過「在他們的世代」有智慧。但在那方面,他們比光明之子在自己的世代更有智慧;因為我們雖被告知不久就要被免去管家職分,卻不像那些永遠住在這裡、好像沒有來生的人那樣預備,也沒有像這管家為將來籌謀那樣殷勤。我們雖作光明之子——福音已經把生命與不朽彰顯出來的那光——不能不在我們面前看見另一個世界,卻不為之預備,不把我們最好的財寶與最好的情感送到那裡去,正如我們所當作的。
二、這比喻的應用,以及從其中所推論出來的教訓(路 16:9):「我又告訴你們——你們我的門徒」(因為這比喻是對門徒說的,路 16:1)——「雖然你們在今世所有的不多,卻當思想怎樣用這不多的行善。」請留意,
1. 我們的主耶穌在此勸勉我們甚麼:要藉著在今世善用我們的所有,為自己在另一個世界的福樂豫備安舒的歡迎。「要藉著那不義的錢財結交朋友」,正如那管家用他主人的財物使他主人的佃戶成了他的朋友。今世之子如此管理錢財,為的是日後可以從中得利,不僅為眼前;所以他們放債取利,買地,把錢投入這個或那個基金。我們當向他們學習,使用我們的錢財,使我們在另一個世界能因此得益,正如他們盼望在今世日後得益一般;當當將糧食撒在水面,因為日久必能得著(傳 11:1)。在我們的情形,我們所有的雖都是我們主的財物,但只要我們分給我們主的佃戶,為他們的益處而用,這不但不算對主不義,反而是對主應盡的本分,也是為我們自己的明智之舉。當注意:(1) 今世的事物是「不義的錢財」,或稱虛謊的瑪門,不僅因為常常是靠欺詐不義而得,更因為那些以之為滿足和幸福之所託的人,必定受騙;因為財富是會朽壞的,必定叫那些向它有所期望的人失望。(2) 雖然這「不義的錢財」不當信賴為幸福的根源,卻可以、也必須使用,作為我們追求真幸福的輔助。我們雖不能在其中找到真正的滿足,卻可以藉此結交朋友——不是藉著購買或功德,而是推薦;如此我們可以使神與基督成為我們的朋友,使善良的天使和聖徒成為我們的朋友,使窮人成為我們的朋友;在將來的賬上和境況中得著朋友的幫助,乃是可羨慕的事。(3) 死時我們都要過去——hotan eklipēte——當你們遭遇日蝕之時。死亡使我們黯然失色。商人倒閉就是他成了破產者。我們不久都要如此過去;死亡關上店門,封了手。我們在地上的安慰和享受都要過去;肉體和心腸都要衰殘。(4) 我們當以極大的關切確保,當我們在死時過去之時,可以被接到永存的帳幕裡——天上。天上的帳幕是永遠的,不是人手所造的,而是永遠的(林後 5:1)。基督已經先去,為屬他的人預備地方,並在那裡迎接他們;亞伯拉罕的懷已經豫備好迎接他們,當一隊天使護送他們前往時,便有一群天使在那裡迎接他們。那些已經先到榮耀裡去的貧窮聖徒,要迎接那些在世上賙濟他們需要的人。(5) 這是我們當在世上善用所有的、為神的榮耀和弟兄的益處而用的好理由:這樣我們便可與他們一同為自己積成美好的根基,就是為將來——為永遠的將來*——積成*美好的憑據。參看提摩太前書六章十七至十九節,那裡正是解釋此處。
2. 他用甚麼論據來催促人多結敬虔和慈善的果子。
(1) 我們若不正當地使用神護理的恩賜,怎能指望從他得著那些現在與將來的安慰——就是他屬靈恩典的恩賜呢?我們的救主在此把兩者比較,表明我們雖不能因忠心使用今世之物而算為在神面前配得任何恩惠,但我們在使用上的不忠,卻可正當地算為喪失那帶領我們進入榮耀所必需的恩典——這正是我們的救主在此所表明的(路 16:10-14)。
[一] 今世的財富是小事;恩典與榮耀是大事。我們若在小事上不忠——若把今世之物用作別的用途,而非神賜予的用途——便可正當地恐怕我們在神恩典的恩賜上也會如此,也會徒然領受,因此便要被拒絕:「人在最小的事上忠心,在大事上也忠心。」用錢財事奉神、行善的人,也必用那更寶貴的智慧、恩典、屬靈恩賜以及天國的憑據來事奉神、行善;但那把今世財富這一錠銀子埋藏了的人,永不能增進屬靈財富那五錠。神向貪愛世俗的人扣留恩典,比我們所意識到的更多。[二] 今世的財富是迷惑人的、不確定的;它是「不義的錢財」,正迅速離我們而去,我們若要從中得任何益處,就必須趕緊行動;若不如此,怎能指望被託付那唯一的真實的錢財——屬靈的財富呢?(路 16:11)讓我們確信:那些在信心上富足、向神富足、在基督裡富足、在應許上富足、在天國憑據上富足的人,才是真正富足、極其富足的人;因此我們當把財寶積蓄在其中,從其中期望我們的分,並首先顧念它——神的國和他的義;然後,若有別的事物加給我們,便in ordine ad spiritualia——帶著屬靈的用意——而用,使我們因善用它而更緊地抓住真實的錢財,並有資格領受神更多的恩典;因為神喜悅誰,就給誰智慧、知識和喜樂(傳 2:26)——就是說,對那在不義的錢財上忠心的人,神就把真實的錢財賜給他。[三] 今世的財富是別人的東西。它是ta allotria——不是我們自己的;因為它與靈魂及其本性與利益無關。它不是我們自己的;因為它是神的;他對它的主權在我們之先,且高於我們;主權仍在他手中,我們不過有使用權。它是別人的;我們從別人得著,也為別人使用,財物加多的人,主人從中得甚麼益處呢?不過是眼看而已;而且我們不久就要把它留給別人,卻不知是給誰。但屬靈與永遠的財富是我們自己的(它進入那得著它的靈魂之內),且不能分開;它是那不能從我們奪去的上好之分。我們若使基督成為我們自己的,使應許成為我們自己的,使天堂成為我們自己的,我們便有了真正可稱為我們自己的東西。但我們若不以我們所僅僅代管的世物來事奉神,怎能指望神以這些豐富我們呢?
(2) 我們沒有別的方法可以證明自己是神的僕人,除非我們完全獻上自己歸他使用,甚至使瑪門——就是我們一切屬世的利益——在我們事奉他的事上成為有用(路 16:13):「一個僕人不能事奉兩個主」,當這兩個主的命令如神與瑪門的命令那樣互相矛盾時。人若要愛世界,依附世界,便不能不恨神、輕看神。他要使自己在信仰上一切的聲稱都屈從於屬世的利益和計畫,神的物要被他用來幫助他事奉和追求世界。反過來說,人若要愛神,堅守神,便(每逢神與世界相爭之時)相對地恨世界,並輕看世界,使他在世上一切的事業和成功,都以某種方式有助於他在信仰事業上的長進;世上的事物要被他用來幫助他事奉神、作成他得救的工夫。這事如今清清楚楚擺在我們面前:「你們不能又事奉神,又事奉瑪門。」這兩者的利益如此分歧,以致它們的事奉永不能妥協。因此我們若定意事奉神,就必須拒絕並棄絕事奉世界。
3. 此處我們被告知,基督這教訓在法利賽人中得到怎樣的對待,以及他怎樣責備他們。
(1) 他們惡意地嗤笑他(路 16:14)。「法利賽人是貪愛錢財的,他們聽見這一切話」,不能反駁他,卻「嗤笑耶穌」。我們當思想這事,[一] 作為他們的罪,並作為他們貪婪的果子——貪婪是他們轄管他們的罪,是他們自己的罪孽。當注意:許多在信仰上大有所表現、大有知識、並在敬虔操練上豐富的人,卻因愛世界而滅亡;沒有甚麼比這更能使人心向基督的話剛硬了。這些貪婪的法利賽人不能忍受有人碰他們的大利拉——他們所寵愛的罪;為此他們嗤笑他,exemyktērizon auton——他們向他皺鼻子,或向他噴鼻子。這是極盡輕蔑鄙夷之能事的表情;耶和華的話對他們成了羞辱(耶 6:10)。他們笑他行事與世人的意見和道路如此背道而馳,笑他努力要拯救他們脫離一個他們決意持守的罪。當注意:那些決意不受神的話管轄的人,常常把神的話當作笑話;但他們至終必發現,這是推不掉的。[二] 作為他的受苦。我們的主耶穌所忍受的,不僅是罪人的反對,更是他們的輕蔑;他們終日把他當作笑柄。那說話從不像世人那樣說話的,竟被人嘲弄譏笑,好叫他那忠心的僕人——他們的講道不公正地被人嗤笑——不至因此灰心。被人譏笑並不是人的羞辱,配被人譏笑才是。基督的使徒被嘲笑,也不足為奇;僕人不能大於主人。
(2) 他公正地責備他們;不是責備他們嗤笑他(他知道怎樣輕看羞辱),而是責備他們以敬虔的表象和顏色自欺,其實他們對敬虔的能力一無所知(路 16:15)。此處,
[一] 他們體面的外表;不,那是輝煌的外表。第一,他們「在人的面前自稱為義」;他們否認一切加在他們身上的壞話,即使是基督自己加的。他們自稱是被視為具有非凡聖潔和敬虔的人,並為這樣的自稱辯護:「你們這些人,所作的無人能及,你們以博取人的意見為業,不論對錯,都要在人面前稱義;你們這方面是出了名的。」第二,他們「被人所尊貴」。人不僅免他們的罪,還稱讚他們,尊敬他們,不僅視為好人,更視為最好的人。他們的意見被當作神諭,他們的指引被當作律法,他們的行事被當作不可違犯的規條。
[二] 他們可憎的內裡,這是在神眼中所看見的:「他知道你們的心,你們的心在他眼中是可憎之物;因為其中滿了各樣的邪惡。」當注意:第一,在人面前自稱為義是愚昧的,以為這便足以在大日的審判中支持我們、為我們脫罪——人以為我們無惡;但那知道我們心的神,知道我們身上那別人所不能知道的惡。這當遏制我們對自己的自重和自信,因為神知道我們的心,其中有多少詭詐——我們實在當謙卑自己、不信任自己。第二,憑人對人和事物的意見來判斷人和事,並隨從流俗的評價,是愚昧的;因為那些在人眼中被尊貴的——人憑外貌判斷——也許在神眼中是可憎之物,神看事物本相如何,他的判斷我們確知是按照真理的。反過來說,也有那些被人輕看、定罪的人,卻為神所悅納、所稱許(林後 10:18)。
(3) 他從他們轉向稅吏和罪人,因為他們比那些貪婪自負的法利賽人更可能被他的福音感化(路 16:16):「律法和先知到約翰為止——那局限在你們猶太人中間的舊約時代,持續到施洗約翰出來為止;你們似乎壟斷了義和救恩;你們也正因此而自高,並因此得人的尊崇——你們是律法和先知的學者;但自從施洗約翰出來,神國的福音傳開了——新約時代來到,這時代不因人是律法師就看重他們,而是人人努力要進福音的國,外邦人和猶太人都是如此;誰也不認為出於禮貌當讓比自己強的人先進去,或當等官長和法利賽人先領他走那條路。這不像猶太體制那樣是一個政治的、民族的制度——那時救恩是從猶太人出來的;如今卻成了個人的事,因此每一個確信自己有靈魂要救、有永遠要預備的人,都奮力擠進去,免得因輕忽客套而失落。」也有人這樣解:他們嗤笑基督貶低財富,因為他們心想,律法和先知裡豈不是有許多關於財富和其他今世福分的應許嗎?神的許多好僕人,如亞伯拉罕、大衛,豈不是非常富足嗎?基督說:「誠然如此,但如今神國的福音既已開始傳講,事情便有了新的轉變;如今貧窮的人、哀哭的人、受逼迫的人有福了。」法利賽人為報答百姓對他們的高度敬意,便容讓百姓持守一種廉價、輕易、形式的宗教。但基督說:「如今福音傳開了,百姓的眼睛開了;他們既不能再像從前那樣尊敬法利賽人,也不能再滿足於他們從小所受的那種對宗教的冷漠,便努力以聖潔的奮力進入神的國。」當注意:那些要進天國的人,必須盡力,必須逆流而上,必須在逆向而行的人群中奮力擠進去。
(4) 然而他仍聲明自己無意廢除律法(路 16:17):天地廢去較比律法的一點一畫落空還容易——parelthein——過去,雖然地的根基和天的柱石如此穩固地建立。道德律被確認並堅立,其中一點一畫都不廢去;它所吩咐的本分仍是本分;它所禁止的罪惡仍是罪惡。不但如此,律法的誡命更被福音所解釋和強化,顯得更為屬靈。禮儀律在福音的榮光中被成全;其中一點一畫都不廢去,因為它在福音中被印出來——其作為律法的效力雖已除去,但其作為預表的影像卻照耀得極其明亮,希伯來書便是明證。律法曾因防止更大的惡而對某些事睜一隻眼閉一隻眼,這些寬容福音確實已經除去,卻對律法毫無損害和貶抑,因為福音這樣作,是把它們帶回到律法當初的本意,如休妻一事便是如此(路 16:18)——這事我們從前已經讀過(太 5:32,19:9)。基督不容許休妻,因為他的福音要擊中人敗壞情慾和私慾的苦根,要殺死它、拔除它;因此那些情慾不可像那寬容所縱容的那樣被放縱,因為越放縱,它們就越發猛烈、越發不可遏制。
English original
The Unjust Steward
¹ And he said also unto his disciples, There was a certain rich man, which had a steward; and the same was accused unto him that he had wasted his goods.
² And he called him, and said unto him, How is it that I hear this of thee? give an account of thy stewardship; for thou mayest be no longer steward.
³ Then the steward said within himself, What shall I do? for my lord taketh away from me the stewardship: I cannot dig; to beg I am ashamed.
⁴ I am resolved what to do, that, when I am put out of the stewardship, they may receive me into their houses.
⁵ So he called every one of his lord's debtors unto him, and said unto the first, How much owest thou unto my lord?
⁶ And he said, A hundred measures of oil. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and sit down quickly, and write fifty.
⁷ Then said he to another, And how much owest thou? And he said, A hundred measures of wheat. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and write fourscore.
⁸ And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.
⁹ And I say unto you, Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness; that, when ye fail, they may receive you into everlasting habitations.
¹⁰ He that is faithful in that which is least is faithful also in much: and he that is unjust in the least is unjust also in much.
¹¹ If therefore ye have not been faithful in the unrighteous mammon, who will commit to your trust the true riches?
¹² And if ye have not been faithful in that which is another man's, who shall give you that which is your own?
¹³ No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
¹⁴ And the Pharisees also, who were covetous, heard all these things: and they derided him.
¹⁵ And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God.
¹⁶ The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.
¹⁷ And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.
¹⁸ Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery.
We mistake if we imagine that the design of Christ's doctrine and holy religion was either to amuse us with notions of divine mysteries or to entertain us with notions of divine mercies. No, the divine revelation of both these in the gospel is intended to engage and quicken us to the practice of Christian duties, and, as much as any one thing, to the duty of beneficence and doing good to those who stand in need of any thing that either we have or can do for them. This our Saviour is here pressing us to, by reminding us that we are but stewards of the manifold grace of God; and since we have in divers instances been unfaithful, and have forfeited the favour of our Lord, it is our wisdom to think how we may, some other way, make what we have in the world turn to a good account. Parables must not be forced beyond their primary intention, and therefore we must not hence infer that any one can befriend us if we lie under the displeasure of our Lord, but that, in the general, we must so lay out what we have in works of piety and charity as that we may meet it again with comfort on the other side death and the grave. If we would act wisely, we must be diligent and industrious to employ our riches in the acts of piety and charity, in order to promote our future and eternal welfare, as worldly men are in laying them out to the greatest temporal profit, in making to themselves friends with them, and securing other secular interests. So Dr. Clarke. Now let us consider,
I. The parable itself, in which all the children of men are represented as stewards of what they have in this world, and we are but stewards. Whatever we have, the property of it is God's; we have only the use of it, and that according to the direction of our great Lord, and for his honour. Rabbi Kimchi, quoted by Dr. Lightfoot, says, "This world is a house; heaven the roof; the stars the lights; the earth, with its fruits, a table spread; the Master of the house is the holy and blessed God; man is the steward, into whose hands the goods of this house are delivered; if he behave himself well, he shall find favour in the eyes of his Lord; if not, he shall be turned out of his stewardship." Now,
1. Here is the dishonesty of this steward. He wasted his lord's goods, embezzled them, misapplied them, or through carelessness suffered them to be lost and damaged; and for this he was accused to his lord, Lu 16:1. We are all liable to the same charge. We have not made a due improvement of what God has entrusted us with in this world, but have perverted his purpose; and, that we may not be for this judged of our Lord, it concerns us to judge ourselves.
2. His discharge out of his place. His lord called for him, and said, "How is it that I hear this of thee? I expected better things from thee." He speaks as one sorry to find himself disappointed in him, and under a necessity of dismissing him from his service: it troubles him to hear it; but the steward cannot deny it, and therefore there is no remedy, he must make up his accounts; and be gone in a little time, Lu 16:2. Now this is designed to teach us, (1.) That we must all of us shortly be discharged from our stewardship in this world; we must not always enjoy those things which we now enjoy. Death will come, and dismiss us from our stewardship, will deprive us of the abilities and opportunities we now have of doing good, and others will come in our places and have the same. (2.) That our discharge from our stewardship at death is just, and what we have deserved, for we have wasted our Lord's goods, and thereby forfeited our trust, so that we cannot complain of any wrong done us. (3.) That when our stewardship is taken from us we must give an account of it to our Lord: After death the judgment. We are fairly warned both of our discharge and our account, and ought to be frequently thinking of them.
3. His after-wisdom. Now he began to consider, What shall I do? Lu 16:3. He would have done well to have considered this before he had so foolishly thrown himself out of a good place by his unfaithfulness; but it is better to consider late than never. Note, Since we have all received notice that we must shortly be turned out of our stewardship, we are concerned to consider what we shall do then. He must live; which way shall he have a livelihood? (1.) He knows that he has not such a degree of industry in him as to get his living by work: "I cannot dig; I cannot earn by bread by my labour." But why can he not dig? It does not appear that he is either old or lame; but the truth is, he is lazy. His cannot is a will not; it is not a natural but a moral disability that he labours under; if his master, when he turned him out of the stewardship, had continued him in his service as a labourer, and set a task-master over him, he would have made him dig. He cannot dig, for he was never used to it. Now this intimates that we cannot get a livelihood for our souls by any labour for this world, nor indeed do any thing to purpose for our souls by any ability of our own. (2.) He knows that he has not such a degree of humility as to get his bread by begging: To beg I am ashamed. This was the language of his pride, as the former of his slothfulness. Those whom God, in his providence, has disabled to help themselves, should not be ashamed to ask relief of others. This steward had more reason to be ashamed of cheating his master than of begging his bread. (3.) He therefore determines to make friends of his lord's debtors, or his tenants that were behind with their rent, and had given notes under their hands for it: "I am resolved what to do, Lu 16:4. My lord turns me out of his house. I have none of my own to go to. I am acquainted with my lord's tenants, have done them many a good turn, and now I will do them one more, which will so oblige them that they will bid me welcome to their houses, and the best entertainment they afford; and so long as I live, at least till I can better dispose of myself, I will quarter upon them, and go from one good house to another." Now the way he would take to make them his friends was by striking off a considerable part of their debt to his lord, and giving it in his accounts so much less than it was. Accordingly, he sent for one, who owed his lord a hundred measures of oil (in that commodity he paid his rent): Take thy bill, said he, here it is, and sit down quickly, and write fifty (Lu 16:6); so he reduced his debt to the one half. Observe, he was in haste to have it done: "Sit down quickly, and do it, lest we be taken treating, and suspected." He took another, who owed his lord a hundred measures of wheat, and from his bill he cut off a fifth part, and bade him write fourscore (Lu 16:7); probably he did the like by others, abating more or less according as he expected kindness from them. See here what uncertain things our worldly possessions are; they are most so to those who have most of them, who devolve upon others all the care concerning them, and so put it into their power to cheat them, because they will not trouble themselves to see with their own eyes. See also what treachery is to be found even among those in whom trust is reposed. How hard is it to find one that confidence can be reposed in! Let God be true, but every man a liar. Though this steward is turned out for dealing dishonestly, yet still he does so. So rare is it for men to mend of a fault, though they smart for it.
4. The approbation of this: The lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely, Lu 16:8. It may be meant of his lord, the lord of that servant, who, though he could not but be angry at his knavery, yet was pleased with his ingenuity and policy for himself; but, taking it so, the latter part of the verse must be the words of our Lord, and therefore I think the whole is meant of him. Christ did, as it were, say, "Now commend me to such a man as this, that knows how to do well for himself, how to improve a present opportunity, and how to provide for a future necessity." He does not commend him because he had done falsely to his master, but because he had done wisely for himself. Yet perhaps herein he did well for his master too, and but justly with the tenants. He knew what hard bargains he had set them, so that they could not pay their rent, but, having been screwed up by his rigour, were thrown behindhand, and they and their families were likely to go to ruin; in consideration of this, he now, at going off, did as he ought to do both in justice and charity, not only easing them of part of their arrears, but abating their rent for the future. How much owest thou? may mean, "What rent dost thou sit upon? Come, I will set thee an easier bargain, and yet no easier than what thou oughtest to have." He had been all for his lord, but now he begins to consider the tenants, that he might have their favour when he had lost his lord's. The abating of their rent would be a lasting kindness, and more likely to engage them than abating their arrears only. Now this forecast of his, for a comfortable subsistence in this world, shames our improvidence for another world: The children of this world, who choose and have their portions in it, are wiser for their generation, act more considerately, and better consult their worldly interest and advantage, than the children of light, who enjoy the gospel, in their generation, that is, in the concerns of their souls and eternity. Note, (1.) The wisdom of worldly people in the concerns of this world is to be imitated by us in the concerns of our souls: it is their principle to improve their opportunities, to do that first which is most needful, in summer and harvest to lay up for winter, to take a good bargain when it is offered them, to trust the faithful and not the false. O that we were thus wise in our spiritual affairs! (2.) The children of light are commonly outdone by the children of this world. Not that the children of this world are truly wise; it is only in their generation. But in that they are wiser than the children of light in theirs; for, though we are told that we must shortly be turned out of our stewardship, yet we do not provide as we were to be here always and as if there were not another life after this, and are not so solicitous as this steward was to provide for hereafter. Though as children of the light, that light to which life and immortality are brought by the gospel, we cannot but see another world before us, yet we do not prepare for it, do not send our best effects and best affections thither, as we should.
II. The application of this parable, and the inferences drawn from it (Lu 16:9): "I say unto you, you my disciples" (for to them this parable is directed, Lu 16:1), "though you have but little in this world, consider how you may do good with that little." Observe,
1. What it is that our Lord Jesus here exhorts us to; to provide for our comfortable reception to the happiness of another world, by making good use of our possessions and enjoyments in this world: "Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness, as the steward with his lord's goods made his lord's tenants his friends." It is the wisdom of the men of this world so to manage their money as that they may have the benefit of it hereafter, and not for the present only; therefore they put it out to interest, buy land with it, put it into this or the other fund. Now we should learn of them to make use of our money so as that we may be the better for it hereafter in another world, as they do in hopes to be the better for it hereafter in this world; so cast it upon the waters as that we may find it again after many days, Ec 11:1. And in our case, though whatever we have are our Lord's goods, yet, as long as we dispose of them among our Lord's tenants and for their advantage, it is so far from being reckoned a wrong to our Lord, that it is a duty to him as well as policy for ourselves. Note, (1.) The things of this world are the mammon of unrighteousness, or the false mammon, not only because often got by fraud and unrighteousness, but because those who trust to it for satisfaction and happiness will certainly be deceived; for riches are perishing things, and will disappoint those that raise their expectations from them. (2.) Though this mammon of unrighteousness is not to be trusted to for a happiness, yet it may and must be made use of in subserviency to our pursuit of that which is our happiness. Though we cannot find true satisfaction in it, yet we may make to ourselves friends with it, not by way of purchase or merit, but recommendation; so we may make God and Christ our friends, the good angels and saints our friends, and the poor our friends; and it is a desirable thing to be befriended in the account and state to come. (3.) At death we must all fail, hotan eklipete—when ye suffer an eclipse. Death eclipses us. A tradesman is said to fail when he becomes a bankrupt. We must all thus fail shortly; death shuts up the shop, seals up the hand. Our comforts and enjoyments on earth will all fail us; flesh and heart fail. (4.) It ought to be our great concern to make it sure to ourselves, that when we fail at death we may be received into everlasting habitations in heaven. The habitations in heaven are everlasting, not made with hands, but eternal, 2Co 5:1. Christ is gone before, to prepare a place for those that are his, and is there ready to receive them; the bosom of Abraham is ready to receive them, and, when a guard of angels carries them thither, a choir of angels is ready to receive them there. The poor saints that are gone before to glory will receive those that in this world distributed to their necessities. (5.) This is a good reason why we should use what we have in the world for the honour of God and the good of our brethren, that thus we may with them lay up in store a good bond, a good security, a good foundation for the time to come, for an eternity to come. See 1Ti 6:17-19, which explains this here.
2. With what arguments he presses this exhortation to abound in works of piety and charity.
(1.) If we do not make a right use of the gifts of God's providence, how can we expect from him those present and future comforts which are the gifts of his spiritual grace? Our Saviour here compares these, and shows that though our faithful use of the things of this world cannot be thought to merit any favour at the hand of God, yet our unfaithfulness in the use of them may be justly reckoned a forfeiture of that grace which is necessary to bring us to glory, and that is it which our Saviour here shows, Lu 16:10-14.
[1.] The riches of this world are the less; grace and glory are the greater. Now if we be unfaithful in the less, if we use the things of this world to other purposes than those for which they were given us, it may justly be feared that we should be so in the gifts of God's grace, that we should receive them also in vain, and therefore they will be denied us: He that is faithful in that which is least is faithful also in much. He that serves God, and does good, with his money, will serve God, and do good, with the more noble and valuable talents of wisdom and grace, and spiritual gifts, and the earnests of heaven; but he that buries the one talent of this world's wealth will never improve the five talents of spiritual riches. God withholds his grace from covetous worldly people more than we are aware of. [2.] The riches of this world are deceitful and uncertain; they are the unrighteous mammon, which is hastening from us apace, and, if we would make any advantage of it, we must bestir ourselves quickly; if we do not, how can we expect to be entrusted with spiritual riches, which are the only true riches? Lu 16:11. Let us be convinced of this, that those are truly rich, and very rich, who are rich in faith, and rich towards God, rich in Christ, in the promises, and in the earnests of heaven; and therefore let us lay up our treasure in them, expect our portion from them, and mind them in the first place, the kingdom of God and the righteousness thereof, and then, if other things be added to us, use them in ordine ad spiritualia—with a spiritual reference, so that by using them well we may take the faster hold of the true riches, and may be qualified to receive yet more grace from God; for God giveth to a man that is good in his sight, that is, to a free-hearted charitable man, wisdom, and knowledge, and joy (Ec 2:26); that is, to a man that is faithful in the unrighteous mammon, he gives the true riches. [3.] The riches of this world are another man's. They are ta allotria, not our own; for they are foreign to the soul and its nature and interest. They are not our own; for they are God's; his title to them is prior and superior to ours; the property remains in him, we are but usufructuaries. They are another man's; we have them from others; we use them for others, and what good has the owner from his goods that increase, save the beholding of them with his eyes, while still they are increased that eat them; and we must shortly leave them to others, and we know not to whom? But spiritual and eternal riches are our own (they enter into the soul that becomes possessed of them) and inseparably; they are a good part that will never be taken away from us. If we make Christ our own, and the promises our own, and heaven our own, we have that which we may truly call our own. But how can we expect God should enrich us with these if we do not serve him with our worldly possessions, of which we are but stewards?
(2.) We have no other way to prove ourselves the servants of God than by giving up ourselves so entirely to his service as to make mammon, that is, all our worldly gain, serviceable to us in his service (Lu 16:13): No servant can serve two masters, whose commands are so inconsistent as those of God and mammon are. If a man will love the world, and hold to that, it cannot be but he will hate God and despise him. He will make all his pretensions of religion truckle to his secular interests and designs, and the things of God shall be made to help him in serving and seeking the world. But, on the other hand, if a man will love God, and adhere to him, he will comparatively hate the world (whenever God and the world come in competition) and will despise it, and make all his business and success in the world some way or other conducive to his furtherance in the business of religion; and the things of the world shall be made to help him in serving God and working out his salvation. The matter is here laid plainly before us: Ye cannot serve God and mammon. So divided are their interests that their services can never be compounded. If therefore we be determined to serve God, we must disclaim and abjure the service of the world.
3. We are here told what entertainment this doctrine of Christ met with among the Pharisees, and what rebuke he gave them.
(1.) They wickedly ridiculed him, Lu 16:14. The Pharisees, who were covetous, heard all these things, and could not contradict him, but they derided him. Let us consider this, [1.] As their sin, and the fruit of their covetousness, which was their reigning sin, their own iniquity. Note, Many that make a great profession of religion, have much knowledge, and abound in the exercise of devotion, are yet ruined by the love of the world; nor does any thing harden the heart more against the word of Christ. These covetous Pharisees could not bear to have that touched, which was their Delilah, their darling lust; for this they derided him, exemykterizon auton—they snuffled up their noses at him, or blew their noses on him. It is an expression of the utmost scorn and disdain imaginable; the word of the Lord was to them a reproach, Jer 6:10. They laughed at him for going so contrary to the opinion and way of the world, for endeavouring to recover them from a sin which they were resolved to hold fast. Note, It is common for those to make a jest of the word of God who are resolved that they will not be ruled by it; but they will find at last that it cannot be turned off so. [2.] As his suffering. Our Lord Jesus endured not only the contradiction of sinners, but their contempt; they had him in derision all the day. He that spoke as never man spoke was bantered and ridiculed, that his faithful ministers, whose preaching is unjustly derided, may not be disheartened at it. It is no disgrace to a man to be laughed at, but to deserve to be laughed at. Christ's apostles were mocked, and no wonder; the disciple is not greater than his Lord.
(2.) He justly reproved them; not for deriding him (he knew how to despise the shame), but for deceiving themselves with the shows and colours of piety, when they were strangers to the power of it, Lu 16:15. Here is,
[1.] Their specious outside; nay, it was a splendid one. First, They justified themselves before men; they denied whatever ill was laid to their charge, even by Christ himself. They claimed to be looked upon as men of singular sanctity and devotion, and justified themselves in that claim: "You are they that do that, so as none ever did, that make it your business to court the opinion of men, and, right or wrong, will justify yourselves before the world; you are notorious for this." Secondly, They were highly esteemed among men. Men did not only acquit them from any blame they were under, but applauded them, and had them in veneration, not only as good men, but as the best of men. Their sentiments were esteemed as oracles, their directions as laws, and their practices as inviolable prescriptions.
[2.] Their odious inside, which was under the eye of God: "He knows your heart, and it is in his sight an abomination; for it is full of all manner of wickedness." Note, First, It is folly to justify ourselves before men, and to think this enough to bear us out, and bring us off, in the judgment of the great day, that men know no ill of us; for God, who knows our hearts, knows that ill of us which no one else can know. This ought to check our value for ourselves, and our confidence in ourselves, that God knows our hearts, and how much deceit is there, for we have reason to abase and distrust ourselves. Secondly, It is folly to judge of persons and things by the opinion of men concerning them, and to go down with the stream of vulgar estimate; for that which is highly esteemed among men, who judge according to outward appearance, is perhaps an abomination in the sight of God, who sees things as they are, and whose judgment, we are sure, is according to truth. On the contrary, there are those whom men despise and condemn who yet are accepted and approved of God, 2Co 10:18.
(3.) He turned from them to the publicans and sinners, as more likely to be wrought upon by his gospel than those covetous conceited Pharisees (Lu 16:16): "The law and the prophets were indeed until John; the Old-Testament dispensation, which was confined to you Jews, continued till John Baptist appeared, and you seemed to have the monopoly of righteousness and salvation; and you are puffed up with this, and this gains you esteem among men, that you are students in the law and the prophets; but since John Baptist appeared the kingdom of God is preached, a New-Testament dispensation, which does not value men at all for their being doctors of the law, but every man presses into the gospel kingdom, Gentiles as well as Jews, and no man thinks himself bound in good manners to let his betters go before him into it, or to stay till the rulers and the Pharisees have led him that way. It is not so much a political national constitution as the Jewish economy was, when salvation was of the Jews; but it is made a particular personal concern, and therefore every man that is convinced he has a soul to save, and an eternity to provide for, thrusts to get in, lest he should come short by trifling and complimenting." Some give this sense of it; they derided Christ or speaking in contempt of riches, for, thought they, were there not many promises of riches and other temporal good things in the law and the prophets? And were not many of the best of God's servants very rich, as Abraham and David? "It is true," saith Christ, "so it was, but now that the kingdom of God is begun to be preached things take a new turn; now blessed are the poor, and the mourners, and the persecuted." The Pharisees, to requite the people for their high opinion of them, allowed them in a cheap, easy, formal religion. "But," saith Christ, "now that the gospel is preached the eyes of the people are opened, and as they cannot now have a veneration for the Pharisees, as they have had, so they cannot content themselves with such an indifferency in religion as they have been trained up in, but they press with a holy violence into the kingdom of God." Note, Those that would go to heaven must take pains, must strive against the stream, must press against the crowd that are going the contrary way.
(4.) Yet still he protests against any design to invalidate the law (Lu 16:17): It is easier for heaven and earth to pass, parelthein—to pass by, to pass away, though the foundations of the earth and the pillars of heaven are so firmly established, than for one tittle of the law to fail. The moral law is confirmed and ratified, and not one tittle of that fails; the duties enjoined by it are duties still; the sins forbidden by it are sins still. Nay, the precepts of it are explained and enforced by the gospel, and made to appear more spiritual. The ceremonial law is perfected in the gospel colours; not one tittle of that fails, for it is found printed off in the gospel, where, though the force of it is as a law taken off, yet the figure of it as a type shines very brightly, witness the epistle to the Hebrews. There were some things which were connived at by the law, for the preventing of greater mischiefs, the permission of which the gospel has indeed taken away, but without any detriment or disparagement to the law, for it has thereby reduced them to the primitive intention of the law, as in the case of divorce (Lu 16:18), which we had before, Mt 5:32,19:9. Christ will not allow divorces, for his gospel is intended to strike at the bitter root of men's corrupt appetites and passions, to kill them, and pluck them up; and therefore they must not be so far indulged as that permission did indulge them, for the more they are indulged the more impetuous and headstrong they grow.
19-31
The Rich Man and Lazarus
繁體中文
财主与拉撒路
¹⁹ 有一個財主穿著紫色袍和細麻布衣服,天天奢華宴樂。 ²⁰ 又有一個討飯的,名叫拉撒路,渾身生瘡,被人放在財主門口, ²¹ 要得財主桌子上掉下來的零碎充飢;並且狗來餂他的瘡。 ²² 後來那討飯的死了,被天使帶去放在亞伯拉罕的懷裏。財主也死了,並且埋葬了。 ²³ 他在陰間受痛苦,舉目遠遠地望見亞伯拉罕,又望見拉撒路在他懷裏, ²⁴ 就喊著說:我祖亞伯拉罕哪,可憐我吧!打發拉撒路來,用指頭尖蘸點水,涼涼我的舌頭;因為我在這火焰裏,極其痛苦。 ²⁵ 亞伯拉罕說:兒啊,你該回想你生前享過福,拉撒路也受過苦;如今他在這裏得安慰,你倒受痛苦。 ²⁶ 不但這樣,並且在你我之間,有深淵限定,以致人要從這邊過到你們那邊是不能的;要從那邊過到我們這邊也是不能的。 ²⁷ 財主說:我祖啊,既是這樣,求你打發拉撒路到我父家去; ²⁸ 因為我還有五個弟兄,他可以對他們作見證,免得他們也來到這痛苦的地方。 ²⁹ 亞伯拉罕說:他們有摩西和先知的話可以聽從。 ³⁰ 他說:我祖亞伯拉罕哪,不是的,若是有一個從死裏復活的,到他們那裏去的,他們必要悔改。 ³¹ 亞伯拉罕說:若不聽從摩西和先知的話,就是有一個從死裏復活的,他們也是不聽勸。
浪子的比喻把鼓勵我們眾人的福音之恩擺在我們眼前,這個比喻則把「將來的忿怒」擺在我們眼前,為要喚醒我們;那些在罪中沉睡、不被它喚醒的人,實在睡得極熟。法利賽人拿基督責備世俗之心的講道作笑談;這比喻就是要使這些譏誚者嚴肅起來。基督的福音,其傾向既是要使我們與貧窮和苦難和好,又要武裝我們抵擋世俗和肉慾的試探。這比喻藉著揭開帷幕,讓我們看見兩者在另一個世界的結局,在推進這兩大旨趣上大有功效。這個比喻與基督別的比喻不同——別的比喻是用世上事物的相似物來描述屬靈之事(如撒種和種子的比喻,綿羊和山羊的比喻除外),浪子的比喻,其實除這個以外所有的比喻都是如此。但此處是「屬靈事物本身」,藉著對善惡之人在今生和來世不同景況的敘述或描寫來呈現。然而我們不必稱之為某一具體事件的歷史,而是每日都真實發生的「事實」——貧窮敬虔的人被人輕忽踐踏,死了脫離苦難,進入天上的福樂喜樂,因先前的憂愁而更加甘甜;而奢華的富人,生活奢靡,對窮人無憐憫,死了,進入無法忍受的痛苦景況,因他們所過的肉慾生活而更加沉重可怕;並且他們無法從痛苦中得著解救。這是比喻嗎?其中有甚麼相似之處呢?亞伯拉罕與財主之間的對話,其實只是對描述的說明,使之更為感人,如約伯記中神與撒但之間的對話一般。我們救主來,是要使我們認識另一個世界,向我們顯明「這」世界與「那」世界的關係;他在這裏正是如此作。在這個描述(我寧可如此稱之)中,我們可觀察:
一、一個「邪惡的財主」與一個「敬虔的窮人」在今世不同的景況。我們知道,正如近代有些人,古時的猶太人也容易把興盛當作真教會、好人並天上寵兒的標記之一,以致他們對「窮人」幾乎不能存好感。這個錯誤基督在各種場合都設法糾正,此處尤為徹底,我們看見:
- 一個邪惡的人、一個將永遠悲慘的人,卻在興盛的頂峰(路 16:19):「有一個財主」。我們從拉丁文通常稱他為 Dives——「財主」;但正如 Tillotson 主教所說,他沒有名字,如窮人那樣,因為在這樣的描述中點任何具體財主的名,會令人不快,也易惹怒招怨。但另有人觀察說,基督不肯給這財主如此尊榮提名,雖然他也許用自己的名稱呼自己的田地,以為這名必長久比那在他門口乞討者的名更長久;然而那乞討者的名在此得蒙保存,財主的名卻埋沒於被遺忘之中。論到這財主,我們得知:
(1.) 他「穿著紫色袍和細麻布衣服」,這就是他的「裝飾」。他有「細麻布衣服」為「享樂」,毫無疑問每日都潔白;有睡衣、有日間的衣裳。他有「紫色袍」為「威儀」,因為那是君王所穿的,這使人猜想基督在此暗指希律。他每次出外都極盡奢華。
(2.) 他「天天奢華宴樂」。他的席上供備著自然和技藝所能供應的各樣珍饈美味;他的旁席用銀器裝飾得富麗堂皇;在席上伺候的僕人穿著華麗的號衣;席上的客人毫無疑問都是他所認為能「增光」的人。好,這一切有甚麼錯處呢?富有並不是罪,穿紫色袍和細麻布衣服、設豐盛的席也不是罪,只要人的產業能負擔。我們也未被得知他是藉詭詐、欺壓或勒索得產業的,更不知道他喝醉或使人喝醉;但是,[1.] 基督要藉此顯明,人可能擁有大量這世界的財富、排場和享樂,卻仍伏在神的怒氣和咒詛下永遠沉淪。我們不能從人活得風光推論神愛他們而賜他們這麼多,也不能推論他們愛神而領受這麼多;幸福不在於這些事物。[2.] 豐富和享樂對許多人而言是極「危險」、且「致命」的試探,引人放縱、肉慾,並忘記神和來世。這人若沒有大量產業和享受,本可以得福。[3.] 放縱身體、講求身體的安逸和享樂,是許多靈魂及其利益的毀滅。喫好的肉、穿好的衣服固然合法;但這些常成為驕傲和放縱的食物和燃料,因而對我們成為罪,這也是真的。[4.] 我們自己和朋友宴樂,同時卻忘記窮人和受苦之人的困苦,是大大惹神發怒、使靈魂滅亡的。這財主的罪不在於衣著或飲食,而在於只為自己預備。
- 此處是一個敬虔的人、一個將永遠有福的人,卻在逆境和困苦的深處(路 16:20):「又有一個討飯的,名叫拉撒路」。一個這樣著名敬虔、極其困苦的乞討者,在當時的好人中大概人所共知:一個名叫以拉撒或拉撒路的乞討者。有人以為以拉撒是任何窮人的通用名,因為其意為「神的幫助」,凡缺乏「別的幫助」的人都必須投靠神。這窮人已被推到絕境,論外在事物而言,在這世上你所能輕易設想的悲慘境地不過如此。
(1.) 他的身體「渾身生瘡」,如約伯。身體患病軟弱是大苦難;但瘡對病人更「痛」,對周圍的人更「可憎」。
(2.) 他被迫乞食,只得在富人的門口討些殘羹剩飯。他因瘡和瘸不能自行前往,乃由某些慈悲的手抬去,「放在財主門口」。請注意,那些不能以「錢財」幫助窮人的,當以「勞力」幫助他們;不能借他們「一分錢」的,當借他們「一臂之力」;自己沒有可贈送之物的,當帶他們去、或為他們去找那些有之物的人。拉撒路在困苦中自己毫無賴以維生之物,也無親屬可投靠,本堂也不照顧他。此時猶太教會如此敗壞,竟任憑像拉撒路這樣敬虔的人因缺必要食物而死,實為明證。如今請看:
[1.] 他對富人席上的期望:「要得財主桌子上掉下來的零碎充飢」(路 16:21)。他並不指望從他席上得一份——雖然他本當得最好的那份——卻肯為桌下掉下的碎渣感恩,就是富人剩下的;甚至是他的狗所剩下的。「窮人只能苦苦哀求」,並當滿足於所能得的。此處特別記下這事,為要顯明:第一,這窮人的困苦和性情如何。他是「貧窮的」,卻「心裏貧窮」,貧窮而知足。他並非躺在富人門口抱怨、叫嚷、吵鬧,而是默默謙遜地想要「得零碎充飢」。這悲慘的人是個好人,在神眼前蒙恩。請注意,神一些最親愛的聖徒和僕人在這世上常受大苦,惡人卻興旺、得豐富;見詩 73:7,10,14。此處一個可怒之子、地獄之嗣坐在屋裏奢華宴樂;一個蒙愛之子、天國之嗣躺在門口因飢餓將死。那麼人的屬靈光景可以憑外在境況判斷嗎?第二,富人對他的態度如何。我們未被告知他虐待他、不准他用他的門口、或加害於他,但暗示他輕看他;他對他毫不關心,也毫不照料。此處有一個「真實」的慈善對象,且極其「動人」,自己已經為自己說話;這對象擺在「他自己的門口」。這窮人有好名聲、好行為,以及一切可以推薦他的條件。「少許」東西對他便是「極大」的恩慈,他卻不察看他的情形,不吩咐把他抬進穀倉或外屋住宿,卻任他躺在那裏。請注意,不欺壓踐踏窮人還不夠;在審判大日,我們若不救濟扶助他們,便要被發現為不忠心的管家。最可怕判決的理由是:「我餓了,你們不給我喫」。我希奇那些讀過基督的福音、又自稱相信的富人,怎能對窮苦之人的需要和苦難如此漠不关心,如他們常所作的。
[2.] 狗對他的對待:「狗來餂他的瘡」。富人為娛樂、為討好自己的幻想,或許養了一群獵犬或其他狗,這些狗都餵得飽飽的,而可憐的拉撒路卻得不著足夠維生的食物。請注意,那些餵狗卻忽略窮人的,日後必大有交代。許多富人的不慈善之處,極其可惡的一點,是他們把那本可供應許多困苦基督徒的需要、並使他們心喜樂的,花費在自己的幻想和愚行上。那些嬌養自己的狗和馬,卻任憑窮鄰舍的家庭餓死的,既得罪神,更是輕看人性。如今那些狗「來餂」可憐拉撒路的瘡,這可以理解為:第一,作為他痛苦的加重。他的瘡「流血」,這吸引狗來餂,如同牠們餂拿伯和亞哈的血一般(王上 21:19)。我們也讀到「狗的舌頭蘸」「仇敵的血」(詩 68:23)。牠們在他還活著時就攻擊他,似乎他已死了;他自己沒有力量趕走牠們,僕人中也没有一個人有禮貌地制止牠們。狗與牠們的主人一樣,以為餂人血便是盛宴。或者,第二,作為他痛苦中的一點解救;alla kai——主人對他「心硬」,「但是」狗「來餂他的瘡」,軟化並減輕了痛苦。經文不是說牠們「吮」瘡,而是「餂」,這對他是有益的。狗比主人對他更仁慈。
二、此處是這「敬虔窮人」和這「邪惡財主」在死時和死後的「不同景況」。至今看來惡人似乎佔了優勢,但 Exitus acta probat——「讓我們稍候,看其結局如何」。
-
他們二人都死了(路 16:22):「討飯的死了」;「財主也死了」。死是貧富、敬虔和不敬虔之人的共同分;在那裏他們相遇。一個「氣力十足」而死,另一個「心中痛苦」而死;卻要「一同躺臥在塵土中」(伯 21:26)。死既不偏袒富人為他的富,也不偏袒窮人為他的窮。聖徒死,為要終止憂愁,進入喜樂。罪人死,為要去交帳。富足和貧窮的人都當為死預備,因為死正等著他們二者。Mors sceptra ligonibus æquat——「死使權杖與鏟子齊平」。
-
乞討者「先死」。神常把敬虔人接走,卻仍任憑惡人興旺。乞討者的苦難如此迅速地了結,對他是益處;他既找不到別的避難所或安息之處,便「在墳墓中被隱藏」,在那裏「疲乏人得安息」。
-
財主「死了,並且埋葬了」。窮人的安葬卻隻字未提。他們隨處挖個洞,把他的身體丟進去,毫無儀式;他「像驢一樣被葬」;況且,若讓狗餂他瘡的人,也任憑狗啃他的骨頭,那也不奇怪。但財主卻有風光的葬禮,遺體陳列,有送葬行列送他到墳地,並有宏偉的紀念碑立在上面;或許還有人致悼詞稱讚他,並他慷慨的生活方式和所設的豐盛宴席——那些曾在他席上作客的人必加以稱讚。論到惡人,他「被送到墳墓」並不省事,「被安放在墓中」,「山谷的土塊」若可能,「也對他甘甜」(伯 21:32,33)。葬禮的儀式與那人的幸福何其無關!
-
乞討者死了,被「天使帶去放在亞伯拉罕的懷裏」。他的靈魂得此護送歸回安息,其尊榮遠超財主身體被如此隆重送往墳地所得的尊榮!請看:(1.) 他的靈魂「存在」於與身體分離的狀態中。它並未隨身體「死去」或「沉睡」;他的燈並未與他一同熄滅;而是活著、行動,知道自己所行的,也知道所發生在自己身上的。(2.) 他的靈魂「轉移」到另一個世界,到靈界;它歸回賜靈的神,歸回本鄉;這包含在「被帶去」之中。人的靈是向上的。(3.) 天使照顧它;它「被天使帶去」。天使是救恩之承繼者的服役之靈,不僅在他們活著時,也在他們死時,並且奉命關於他們,「用手托著」他們——不僅在地上往返的旅程中,更在那通往天上長遠家鄉的大旅程中,作他們經過陌生不安全地區的引導者和護衛者。人的靈魂若不被今世束縛纏累(如未成聖之靈魂那樣),其本身有一種彈力,一脫離身體便「向上彈升」;但基督不願將屬他的人交託於此,所以差遣特使去接他們到自己這裏來。一個天使本已足夠,此處卻有許多,正如為以利亞所差的那樣。埃及王亞瑪西斯的車由君王拉著;但與此相比,那尊榮算得甚麼?聖徒是憑基督升天的功勞升天;但加上這天使的護送,乃為排場和體統。聖徒必被帶回家,不僅安全,且得尊榮。財主葬禮上的抬喪者,縱然可能是頭一流的,與拉撒路的抬喪者相比又如何?天使並不嫌觸摸他,因為他的瘡在「身體」上,不在「靈魂」上;「那」靈魂獻給神,「毫無玷污皺紋等類的病」。「如今,蒙福的天使啊,」一位即將斷氣的好人說,「如今來盡你們的職任吧。」(4.) 它被帶到「亞伯拉罕的懷裏」。猶太人用三種說法形容義人死時的幸福:他們去「伊甸園」;他們去「在榮耀寶座之下」;他們去「亞伯拉罕的懷裏」——這正是我們救主此處所用的。亞伯拉罕是「信真之人的父」;信真之人的靈魂不歸到他懷裏,又當歸到哪裏呢?他如同慈父,把他們「放在懷裏」,尤其在他們剛到之時,歡迎他們、慰勞他們——他們剛從這世界的憂愁和疲乏中出來。他被帶「到他懷裏」,就是與他同席,因為在席上客人彼此靠胸;天上的聖徒「與亞伯拉罕、以撒、雅各同坐」。亞伯拉罕是個大財主,但在天上他並不鄙棄把可憐的拉撒路放在懷裏。富聖徒和窮聖徒在天上相遇。這個可憐的拉撒路,富人之門不准他進入,如今卻被引進天宮的餐廳、內室;「他」被放在亞伯拉罕的懷裏,而那奢華的財主卻不屑於「把他與狗群同列」。
-
關於「財主」,你聽見的下一個消息,就在關於他「死」和「埋葬」的記述之後,是「他在陰間受痛苦,舉目」(路 16:23)。
(1.) 他的景況極其悲慘。他「在陰間」,在 hades,在與身體分離的靈魂的狀態中,在那裏他處於可能的最大「痛苦」和「折磨」之中。正如信實之人的靈魂「一脫離肉體的重擔,便在喜樂和福樂之中」,照樣邪惡未成聖之靈魂,一被死從肉體的享樂中取去,便處於無用、無救、無盡的痛苦折磨中,並在復活時大大加增、完全。這個「財主」既已完全獻身於「感官世界」的享樂,全然被其「佔據」,以之為自己的份,便全然不適於「靈界」的享樂;像他那樣屬肉體的心,對那些享樂確實無味,也不能有任何品味,所以當然被排除在外。然而這還不是全部;他對神的窮人硬心,所以他不僅被割斷憐憫,並且受「無憐憫的審判」,落在「感覺之罰」和「虧損之罰」之下。
(2.) 他景況的痛苦因他知道拉撒路的幸福而加重:他「舉目」,「遠遠地望見亞伯拉罕,又望見拉撒路在他懷裏」。受痛苦的是那「靈魂」,舉目的是心思的眼。他如今開始回想拉撒路成了怎樣。他沒有在自己所在之處找到他,卻清楚地看見他——如同用身體的眼看見一般確實——遠遠在亞伯拉罕的懷裏。受咒詛者的痛苦有同樣的加重,我們先前已見(路 13:28):「你們要看見亞伯拉罕、以撒、雅各、和眾先知,在神的國裏,你們卻被趕到外面。」[1.] 他看見「亞伯拉罕遠遠地」。看見亞伯拉罕我們本以為是令人愉悅的景象;但看見他遠遠的,卻是折磨人的景象。近處他看見魔鬼和同受咒詛的夥伴,可怖而痛苦;遠處他看見亞伯拉罕。請注意,陰間的一切景象都是加增痛苦的。[2.] 他看見「拉撒路在他懷裏」。那個他曾以極度輕蔑鄙視、以為不配他理會的拉撒路,如今他看見被高抬,令人羨慕。看見他便想起自己對他殘忍野蠻的對待;看見他在那幸福中,更使自己的痛苦加重。
三、此處記載財主和亞伯拉罕在分離狀態中——彼此分離、又都與這世界分離的狀態中——所發生的事。雖然將來未必有、現在也未必有這類得榮聖徒與受咒詛罪人之間的對話,但這樣作在描述中(尤其在那些為要感人的描述中)藉這類對話表達雙方的心思和感想,是十分恰當的、也是慣常的作法。既然我們看見受咒詛的罪人「在羔羊面前」受痛苦(啟 14:10),又看見神忠心的僕人觀看那些「背約的」,在那裏「他們的蟲不死,火也不滅」之處(賽 66:23,24),那麼設想這樣一段對話並非不合宜。在這對話中我們看見:
- 財主向亞伯拉罕請求稍減他目前的痛苦(路 16:24)。他遠遠看見亞伯拉罕,「就喊著說」,大聲喊,如同懇切的人,又如在痛苦中的人,將呼號摻入懇求之中,藉感動憐憫來加強。那素來大聲「吩咐」人的,如今大聲「乞求」,比拉撒路在他門口所作的更響亮。他放蕩歡宴的歌聲如今全變為哀號。此處請看:
(1.) 他對亞伯拉罕的稱呼:「我祖亞伯拉罕」。請注意,陰間有許多人能稱亞伯拉罕為「父」,他們按肉體是亞伯拉罕的後裔,甚至有許多按名義和認信是與亞伯拉罕所立之約的兒女。也許這財主在屬肉體的歡樂中曾嘲笑亞伯拉罕和亞伯拉罕的故事,如末世的譏誚者所作的;但如今他用尊稱稱呼他:「我祖亞伯拉罕」。請注意,那日子將到,惡人必樂意與義人拉上關係,自認與他們有親,雖然他們如今輕視義人。亞伯拉罕在這描述中代表基督,因為審判全交與他,亞伯拉罕在此所說的,正是基督的心意。如今輕看基督的人,不久必向他求情:「主啊,主啊」。
(2.) 他向他陳明自己目前可悲的景況:「我在這火焰裏,極其痛苦」。他所訴的是靈魂的痛苦,所以是能作用於靈魂的火;「神的忿怒」正是這樣的火,緊貼有罪的良心;心靈的恐懼、並自責自定罪之心的責備,也是這樣的火。對身體而言,沒有甚麼比被火折磨更痛苦更可怕;所以受咒詛之靈魂的痛苦和掙扎藉此表達。
(3.) 他因這痛苦向亞伯拉罕所求的:「可憐我吧」。請注意,那日子將到,那些輕看神憐憫的人,必苦苦求憐憫。哦,求「憐憫、憐憫」,而憐憫之日已過,憐憫的提供不再發出!他對拉撒路沒有憐憫,卻指望拉撒路對他有憐憫;因為他想:「拉撒路比我從前更善心」。他所求的特別恩惠是:「打發拉撒路來,用指頭尖蘸點水,涼涼我的舌頭」。[1.] 此處他特別訴舌頭的痛苦,似乎那裏比別處更痛——刑罰與罪相稱。「舌頭」是說話的器官之一,藉著舌頭受苦,他便被提醒想起自己所說一切頂撞神和人的壞話,他的咒詛、起誓和褻瀆,他一切「剛硬的話」、和「污穢的話」;他因「自己的話」「被定罪」,所以舌頭受折磨。舌頭也是「嘗味」的器官之一,所以舌頭的痛苦也會提醒他,他從前對感官享樂的不正常愛好,那些他曾「在舌下輾轉」的東西。[2.] 他想要「一滴水涼涼舌頭」。他不是說:「我祖亞伯拉罕,求你下令釋放我脫離這痛苦,救我出這坑」;因為他對此完全「絕望」了;他所求的是所能求的最小之事:「一滴水」涼涼舌頭片刻。[3.] 我們有時猜疑他對拉撒路有惡意,盼望若能把拉撒路弄到可及之處,便阻止他歸回亞伯拉罕的懷裏。滿了對神怒氣的心,也滿了對神百姓的怒氣。但我們對受咒詛的罪人情願作更善意的設想,以為他有意向拉撒路表示尊敬,如今樂意受他的恩惠。他「提名」他,因為他「認識」他,又想拉撒路不會不願為舊識之情為他作這善事。Grotius 此處引述柏拉圖描述惡人靈魂受折磨的話,其中他說:他們「不斷哀怨」那些被他們「謀害」或曾以任何方式「加害」的人,呼求他們「饒恕」他們所行的惡。請注意,那日子將到,如今恨惡藐視神百姓的人,必樂意從他們受恩。
- 亞伯拉罕對這請求的回答。總之,他不答應。他不允許他「一滴水」「涼涼」舌頭。請注意,陰間受咒詛的人必不得其痛苦有絲毫減輕或緩和。我們如今若善用機會之日,便可在憐憫的江河中得著充分持久的滿足;但我們如今若輕看這供應,在陰間指望最少的憐憫一滴也是徒然。看這財主是何等公道地以自己的錢幣償還。拒絕碎渣的,被拒絕一滴。如今對我們說的是:「你們祈求,就給你們」;但我們若讓這悅納的時候溜走,我們可以求,卻得不著。然而這還不是全部;亞伯拉罕若只說:「你的痛苦一無所減」,已經夠悲慘了;他卻說了許多加增他痛苦的話,使火焰更加猛烈,因為陰間的一切都是折磨。
(1.) 他稱他為「兒」,這是親切客氣的稱呼,但此處只是加重拒絕他的請求,把為父的憐憫心腸向他關閉。他本為兒子,卻是悖逆的,如今是被撇棄被剝奪產業的。請看那些倚靠「我們以亞伯拉罕為父」這「託辭」的人何等愚昧,我們在此看見一個人在陰間,且可能永遠在那裏,亞伯拉罕卻稱他為「兒」。
(2.) 他提醒他記念他和拉撒路在「生前」的景況:「兒啊,你該回想」;這是極其扎心的話。受咒詛之靈魂的記憶將成為他們的折磨者,良心那時要被喚醒、激動起來盡其職,他們在此世卻不容它如此行。沒有甚麼比「兒啊,你該回想」更能為地獄的火焰添油。如今罪人被勸戒「回想」,他們卻不回想,不肯回想,總有法子避免。「『兒啊,你當記念』你的造物主、你的救贖主,記念你的結局」;他們卻能塞耳不聽這些「警語」,忘記他們當記念的事;所以他們永遠的痛苦公道地出自一句他們不能塞耳不聽的「兒啊,你該回想」。這話在我們耳中將響起何等可怕的鐘聲:「『兒啊,你該回想』那許多警告你不要到這痛苦之處的話,你卻不肯留意;回想那擺在你面前的永生和榮耀的應許,你卻不肯接受!」但他在此被提醒的是:[1.]「『你生前享過福。』」他不告訴他他曾「濫用」,只說他曾「領受」:「回想神對你是何等豐富的施恩者,他何等樂意賜福給你;你不能說他欠你甚麼,連『一滴水』也不欠。他賜給你的,你『領受了』,如此而已;你從未為此開收據,以感謝承認,更不用說為此有任何感恩的回報或善用;你作了神福氣的墳墓,把福氣埋葬了,不是作福氣的田地,把福氣撒種。你『享過你的福』;你領受了,又使用,似乎它們是『你自己的』,你完全不必為此交帳。或者更確切地說,那些是你所揀選作為『你的福分』的東西,是在你眼中看為『最好』的東西,是你用以自滿、自分的。你有美好的飲食,有最精美昂貴的衣服,這些便是你所放在幸福中的;它們是你的『賞賜』、你的『安慰』、你所『講定的那工錢』,你已經得著了。你只顧『今生的福氣』,毫不想及來世更好的福氣,所以也無理由期望那些。你的『福氣』之日已過,如今是你『受禍』之日,為你一切惡行受報。你已經得了所能指望的『憐憫之瓶』的最後一滴;除了毫無攙雜的『忿怒之瓶』,再沒有別的。」[2.]「也要回想『拉撒路受了禍』。你如今羨慕他的幸福;但要想想他在『生前』受了多少苦難。你這樣壞的人所得的『好處』已是所能想到的極限,他那樣好的人所得的『壞處』也是所能想到的極限。他『受過』他的苦難;他忍耐地忍受,從神手中接受,如約伯所作的(路 2:10——「我們從神手裏得福,不也受禍嗎?」)——他『接受』這些如同為醫治他屬靈疾病而開的藥,並且醫治生效了。」惡人只在今生得「福」,死時便永遠與一切福分隔絕;照樣敬虔人只在「今生」受「禍」,死時便永遠脫離其範圍。亞伯拉罕把這兩樣一起提醒他,喚醒他的良心,使他記起自己在奢華「享福」、拉撒路在呻吟受「禍」之時,他怎樣對待拉撒路;他不能忘記那時他不肯幫助拉撒路,那麼如今怎能指望拉撒路幫助他呢?拉撒路若在死後成了富人,他成了窮人,拉撒路必以為救濟他是自己的本分,並不提起從前他的無情;但在將來報應的景況中,那些如今在神和人手下所得超過所配的人,必被「照各人所行的」報應。
(3.) 他提醒他記念拉撒路目前的福樂,並他自己的痛苦:「但是如今」局面翻了,且必永遠如此;「如今他在這裏得安慰,你倒受痛苦。」他不需被提醒他「受痛苦」;他親身感覺到了。他也知道在亞伯拉罕懷裏的必在其中得安慰;然而亞伯拉罕提醒他,好叫他在兩相比較之下,看出「神的公義」——「將患難報應那加患難給你們的人」,又「使你們這受患難的人得安息」(帖後 1:6,7)。請看,[1.] 天堂是「安慰」,陰間是「痛苦」:天堂是「喜樂」,陰間是「哀哭、哀號」、並極致的疼痛。[2.] 靈魂一離身體,便立即或到天堂、或到陰間,或得安慰、或受痛苦,並不睡覺,也不到煉獄。[3.] 天堂對那些在世上經歷許多大災難而進去的人,才是真正的天堂;那些有恩典、卻少有其安慰的人(或許他們的靈魂不肯受安慰),當他們在基督裏睡去之後,你可以真實地說:「如今『他們得安慰了』;如今『他們的眼淚全被擦去』,一切的恐懼都消失了。」天堂有永遠的安慰。反之,陰間對那些從享盡感官一切喜樂愉悅之中而去的人,才是真正的陰間。對他們而言,折磨更大,正如時代的災難被形容對那「嬌嫩柔弱、連腳掌都不肯踏地」的婦人更為可怕(申 28:56)。
(4.) 他向他保證,想藉拉撒路的事奉得任何解救都是徒然的;因為(路 16:26)「不但這樣」,更糟的是,「在你我之間,有深淵限定」,無法越過的,「一個大裂口」,以致得榮聖徒與受咒詛罪人之間不能相通。[1.] 天上最仁慈的聖徒也不能到死人和受咒詛者的會中探訪,去安慰或解救其中任何一位曾是朋友的人。「『他們要從這邊過到你們那邊,是不能的』;他們不能離開仰望他們父的面、和寶座前的事奉,去為你打水;那不是他們的本分。」[2.] 陰間最膽大的罪人也不能強行逃出那監獄,不能越過那大深淵。「『要從那邊過到我們這邊的,也是不能的。』這是不能期望的,因為憐憫之門已關,橋已收起;不能憑假釋或保釋出來,連一個鐘頭也不能。」在這世上,感謝神,自然景況和恩典景況之間沒有深淵限定,我們可以從一個過到另一個,從罪過到神;但我們若死在罪中,若自己投在毀滅坑裏,就再也不能出來。那是個「無水的坑」,也是「無救贖的坑」。神的旨意和籌算立定了這深淵,全世界也不能廢除。這便將這可憐的受造之物交給絕望;他的景況如今改變已經太遲,連最少的解救也不可能:「在時機之內」原可避免,如今「在永世裏」卻無法挽救。受咒詛罪人的景況已由不可逆轉、不可更改的判決所定。一塊石頭已滾到坑門口,不能再滾回來。
- 他向他祖亞伯拉罕另有所求,不是為自己——他的口已被堵住,對亞伯拉罕拒絕賜他一滴水,他無話可答。受咒詛的罪人被使他們知道所受的判決是公義的,他們不能以任何反對來減輕自己的痛苦。他既不能得著一滴水「涼涼舌頭」,我們可以想像他因疼痛而「咬舌頭」,如那些倒下「神忿怒之瓶」之一的人所作的(啟 16:10)。我們可以想像他此時所發的尖叫喊叫何等可怖;但他既有機會與亞伯拉罕說話,便要利用這機會為他所留下的親屬,因為不能為自己利用。如今論到這事:
(1.) 他求拉撒路被打發「到他父家去」,在那裏辦一件事:「我祖啊,既是這樣,求你」(路 16:27)。他又稱呼亞伯拉罕,這次求得很懇切:「『求你』。哦,這個不要拒絕我。」他在地上時本可以禱告並蒙垂聽,如今卻禱告無用。「『既是這樣』,因為你拒絕了我前一個請求,想必你不會如此無情,連這個也拒絕」;或者:「『既是這樣』,因為『有深淵限定』,既已進來便無法出去,求你打發去防止他們來」;或者:「雖然你我之間『有深淵限定』,但你與他們之間既沒有這樣的深淵限定,求你差他到他們那裏去。打發他回『我父家去』;他清楚知道那在哪裏,曾多次去過——他曾被拒於桌子掉下碎渣之外。他知道我在那裏有『五個弟兄』;他若向他們顯現,他們必『認得他』,也必尊重他所說的,因為他們知道他是個誠實人。求你讓他『對他們作見證』;讓他告訴他們我如今在何種景況,並告訴他們我是因自己的奢華、肉慾、以及對窮人的無憐憫,把自己帶到這地步。求你讓他警告他們不要跟從我的腳蹤,不要繼續走我所引領他們、又留他們在其中的路,『免得他們也來到這痛苦的地方』」(路 16:28)。有人觀察他只說「五個弟兄」,由此推斷他「沒有兒女」,否則他必提起他們,這樣他沒有兒女要供養,便更顯出他的無情。如今他願意他們在罪路上被攔阻。他不說:「容我去見他們,使我可以對他們作見證」;因為他知道「有深淵限定」,也不指望如此恩待自己;他親自前去會把他們嚇得「魂飛魄散」;而是「打發拉撒路去,他的出現沒那麼可怕,但他的見證足以把他們從『罪』中嚇出來。」如今他願意防止他們的滅亡,一部分是出於對「他們」的慈愛——他不能不對他們存「天然的情感」;他知道他們的性情、試探、無知、不信、不思想,並願意阻止他們正奔向的毀滅:但一部分也是出於對「自己」的慈愛——因為他們若來到他這裏、到這「痛苦的地方」,只會加重他的痛苦,因他曾幫助指他們這條路,正如看見拉撒路加重他的痛苦一般。罪的夥伴在災禍中成為同受者,如成捆為火預備的稗子,彼此成為驚嚇。
(2.) 亞伯拉罕也拒絕他這個恩惠。陰間沒有任何請求蒙允。那些把財主向亞伯拉罕禱告當作向已故聖徒禱告之根據的人,不但要費力尋找憑據(竟要以一個受咒詛罪人的行為為榜樣),而且效法這榜樣也毫無鼓勵,因他一切禱告都「歸於徒然」。亞伯拉罕把他們交給摩西和先知的見證,就是感悟和歸正的尋常方法;他們有寫下的道,可以閱讀、可以聽人宣讀。「『讓他們』留意那『確實的預言』,因為神不會為他們偏離他恩典的常規。」這是他們的特權:「他們有摩西和先知的話」;也是他們的本分:「『讓他們聽從』,並以信心調和,這便足以保守他們不至這痛苦的地方。」由此可知,舊約——摩西和「先知」——裏有足夠的證據,使那些肯不偏不倚聽的人確信今世之後另有生命,且有為善人惡人設想的賞罰景況;因為那正是財主要他兄弟確信的事,而為此事他們被交給摩西和先知。
(3.) 他進一步懇求(路 16:30):「『不,我祖亞伯拉罕』,容我強求這事。誠然他們有摩西和先知,他們若肯正當尊重,便已足夠;但他們不肯,不願;然而可以盼望,『若有一個從死裏復活的,到他們那裏去,他們必要悔改』,那對他們會是更明顯的感悟。他們對摩西和先知已司空見慣,所以越發輕看;但這是一件『新事』,更令人驚心;這必能使他們『悔改』,改變他們邪惡的習慣和生活的道路。」請注意,愚昧人常以為任何感悟的方法都比神所選擇所設立的那個更好。
English original
The Rich Man and Lazarus
¹⁹ There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day:
²⁰ And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores,
²¹ And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores.
²² And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;
²³ And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.
²⁴ And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.
²⁵ But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.
²⁶ And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence.
²⁷ Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father's house:
²⁸ For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment.
²⁹ Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.
³⁰ And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent.
³¹ And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.
As the parable of the prodigal son set before us the grace of the gospel, which is encouraging to us all, so this sets before us the wrath to come, and is designed for our awakening; and very fast asleep those are in sin that will not be awakened by it. The Pharisees made a jest of Christ's sermon against worldliness; now this parable was intended to make those mockers serious. The tendency of the gospel of Christ is both to reconcile us to poverty and affliction and to arm us against temptations to worldliness and sensuality. Now this parable, by drawing the curtain, and letting us see what will be the end of both in the other world, goes very far in prosecuting those two great intentions. This parable is not like Christ's other parables, in which spiritual things are represented by similitudes borrowed from worldly things, as those of the sower and the seed (except that of the sheep and goats), the prodigal son, and indeed all the rest but this. But here the spiritual things themselves are represented in a narrative or description of the different state of good and bad in this world and the other. Yet we need not call it a history of a particular occurrence, but it is matter of fact that is true every day, that poor godly people, whom men neglect and trample upon, die away out of their miseries, and go to heavenly bliss and joy, which is made the more pleasant to them by their preceding sorrows; and that rich epicures, who live in luxury, and are unmerciful to the poor, die, and go into a state of insupportable torment, which is the more grievous and terrible to them because of the sensual lives they lived: and that there is no gaining any relief from their torments. Is this a parable? What similitude is there in this? The discourse indeed between Abraham and the rich man is only an illustration of the description, to make it the more affecting, like that between God and Satan in the story of Job. Our Saviour came to bring us acquainted with another world, and to show us the reference which this world has to that; and here is does it. In this description (for so I shall choose to call it) we may observe,
I. The different condition of a wicked rich man, and a godly poor man, in this world. We know that as some of late, so the Jews of old, were ready to make prosperity one of the marks of a true church, of a good man and a favourite of heaven, so that they could hardly have any favourable thoughts of a poor man. This mistake Christ, upon all occasions, set himself to correct, and here very fully, where we have,
1. A wicked man, and one that will be for ever miserable, in the height of prosperity (Lu 16:19): There was a certain rich man. From the Latin we commonly call him Dives—a rich man; but, as Bishop Tillotson observes, he has no name given him, as the poor man has, because it had been invidious to have named any particular rich man in such a description as this, and apt to provoke and gain ill-will. But others observe that Christ would not do the rich man so much honour as to name him, though when perhaps he called his lands by his own name he thought it should long survive that of the beggar at his gate, which yet is here preserved, when that of the rich man is buried in oblivion. Now we are told concerning this rich man,
(1.) That he was clothed in purple and fine linen, and that was his adorning. He had fine linen for pleasure, and clean, no doubt, every day; night-linen, and day-linen. He had purple for state, for that was the wear of princes, which has made some conjecture that Christ had an eye to Herod in it. He never appeared abroad but in great magnificence.
(2.) He fared deliciously and sumptuously every day. His table was furnished with all the varieties and dainties that nature and art could supply; his side-table richly adorned with plate; his servants, who waited at table, in rich liveries; and the guests at his table, no doubt, such as he thought graced it. Well, and what harm was there in all this? It is no sin to be rich, no sin to wear purple and fine linen, nor to keep a plentiful table, if a man's estate will afford it. Not are we told that he got his estate by fraud, oppression, or extortion, no, nor that he was drunk, or made others drunk; but, [1.] Christ would hereby show that a man may have a great deal of the wealth, and pomp, and pleasure of this world, and yet lie and perish for ever under God's wrath and curse. We cannot infer from men's living great either that God loves them in giving them so much, or that they love God for giving them so much; happiness consists not in these things. [2.] That plenty and pleasure are a very dangerous and to many a fatal temptation to luxury, and sensuality, and forgetfulness of God and another world. This man might have been happy if he had not had great possessions and enjoyments. [3.] That the indulgence of the body, and the ease and pleasure of that, are the ruin of many a soul, and the interests of it. It is true, eating good meat and wearing good clothes are lawful; but it is true that they often become the food and fuel of pride and luxury, and so turn into sin to us. [4.] That feasting ourselves and our friends, and, at the same time, forgetting the distresses of the poor and afflicted, are very provoking to God and damning to the soul. The sin of this rich man was not so much his dress or his diet, but his providing only for himself.
2. Here is a godly man, and one that will be for ever happy, in the depth of adversity and distress (Lu 16:20): There was a certain beggar, named Lazarus. A beggar of that name, eminently devout, and in great distress, was probably well known among good people at that time: a beggar, suppose such a one as Eleazar, or Lazarus. Some think Eleazar a proper name for any poor man, for it signifies the help of God, which they must fly to that are destitute of other helps. This poor man was reduced to the last extremity, as miserable, as to outward things, as you can lightly suppose a man to be in this world.
(1.) His body was full of sores, like Job. To be sick and weak in body is a great affliction; but sores are more painful to the patient, and more loathsome to those about him.
(2.) He was forced to beg his bread, and to take up with such scraps as he could get at rich people's doors. He was so sore and lame that he could not go himself, but was carried by some compassionate hand or other, and laid at the rich man's gate. Note, Those that are not able to help the poor with their purses should help them with their pains; those that cannot lend them a penny should lend them a hand; those that have not themselves wherewithal to give to them should either bring them, or go for them, to those that have. Lazarus, in his distress, had nothing of his own to subsist on, no relation to go to, nor did the parish take care of him. It is an instance of the degeneracy of the Jewish church at this time that such a godly man as Lazarus was should be suffered to perish for want of necessary food. Now observe,
[1.] His expectations from the rich man's table: He desired to be fed with the crumbs, Lu 16:21. He did not look for a mess from off his table, though he ought to have had one, one of the best; but would be thankful for the crumbs from under the table, the broken meat which was the rich man's leavings; nay, the leavings of his dogs. The poor use entreaties, and must be content with such as they can get. Now this is taken notice of to show, First, What was the distress, and what the disposition, of the poor man. He was poor, but he was poor in spirit, contentedly poor. He did not lie at the rich man's gate complaining, and bawling, and making a noise, but silently and modestly desiring to be fed with the crumbs. This miserable man was a good man, and in favour with God. Note, It is often the lot of some of the dearest of God's saints and servants to be greatly afflicted in this world, while wicked people prosper, and have abundance; see Ps 73:7,10,14. Here is a child of wrath and an heir of hell sitting in the house, faring sumptuously; and a child of love and an heir of heaven lying at the gate, perishing for hunger. And is men's spiritual state to be judged of then by their outward condition? Secondly, What was the temper of the rich man towards him. We are not told that he abused him, or forbade him his gate, or did him any harm, but it is intimated that he slighted him; he had no concern for him, took no care about him. Here was a real object of charity, and a very moving one, which spoke for itself; it was presented to him at his own gate. The poor man had a good character and good conduct, and every thing that could recommend him. A little thing would be a great kindness to him, and yet he took no cognizance of his case, did not order him to be taken in and lodged in the barn, or some of the out-buildings, but let him lie there. Note, It is not enough not to oppress and trample upon the poor; we shall be found unfaithful stewards of our Lord's goods, in the great day, if we do not succour and relieve them. The reason given for the most fearful doom is, I was hungry, and you gave me no meat. I wonder how those rich people who have read the gospel of Christ, and way that they believe it, can be so unconcerned as they often are in the necessities and miseries of the poor and afflicted.
[2.] The usage he had from the dogs; The dogs came and licked his sores. The rich man kept a kennel of hounds, it may be, or other dogs, for his diversion, and to please his fancy, and these were fed to the full, when poor Lazarus could not get enough to keep him alive. Note, Those will have a great deal to answer for hereafter that feed their dogs, but neglect the poor. And it is a great aggravation of the uncharitableness of many rich people that they bestow that upon their fancies and follies which would supply the necessity, and rejoice the heart, of many a good Christian in distress. Those offend God, nay, and they put a contempt upon human nature, that pamper their dogs and horses, and let the families of their poor neighbours starve. Now those dogs came and licked the sores of poor Lazarus, which may be taken, First, As an aggravation of his misery. His sores were bloody, which tempted the dogs to come, and lick them, as they did the blood of Naboth and Ahab, 1Ki 21:19. And we read of the tongue of the dogs dipped in the blood of enemies, Ps 68:23. They attacked him while he was yet alive, as if he had been already dead, and he had not strength himself to keep them off, nor would any of the servants be so civil as to check them. The dogs were like their master, and thought they fared sumptuously when they regaled themselves with human gore. Or, it may be taken, Secondly, as some relief to him in his misery; alla kai, the master was hard-hearted towards him, but the dogs came and licked his sores, which mollified and eased them. It is not said, They sucked them, but licked them, which was good for them. The dogs were more kind to him than their master was.
II. Here is the different condition of this godly poor man, and this wicked rich man, at and after death. Hitherto the wicked man seems to have the advantage, but Exitus acta probat—Let us wait awhile, to see the end hereof.
1. They both died (Lu 16:22): The beggar died; the rich man also died. Death is the common lot of rich and poor, godly and ungodly; there they meet together. One dieth in his full strength, and another in the bitterness of his soul; but they shall lie down alike in the dust, Job 21:26. Death favours not either the rich man for his riches or the poor man for his poverty. Saints die, that they may bring their sorrows to an end, and may enter upon their joys. Sinners die, that they may go to give up their account. It concerns both rich and poor to prepare for death, for it waits for them both. Mors sceptra ligonibus æquat—Death blends the sceptre with the spade.
2. The beggar died first. God often takes godly people out of the world, when he leaves the wicked to flourish still. It was an advantage to the beggar that such a speedy end was put to his miseries; and, since he could find no other shelter or resting-place, he was hid in the grave, where the weary are at rest.
3. The rich man died and was buried. Nothing is said of the interment of the poor man. They dug a hole any where, and tumbled his body in, without any solemnity; he was buried with the burial of an ass: nay, it is well if they that let the dogs lick his sores did not let them gnaw his bones. But the rich man had a pompous funeral, lay in state, had a train of mourners to attend him to his grave, and a stately monument set up over it; probably he had a funeral oration in praise of him, and his generous way of living, and the good table he kept, which those would commend that had been feasted at it. It is said of the wicked man that he is brought to the grave with no small ado, and laid in the tomb, and the clods of the valley, were it possible, are made sweet to him, Job 21:32,33. How foreign is the ceremony of a funeral to the happiness of the man!
4. The beggar died and was carried by angels into Abraham's bosom. How much did the honour done to his soul, by this convoy of it to its rest, exceed the honour done to the rich man, by the carrying of his body with so much magnificence to its grave! Observe, (1.) His soul existed in a state of separation from the body. It did not die, or fall asleep, with the body; his candle was not put out with him; but lives, and acted, and knew what it did, and what was done to it. (2.) His soul removed to another world, to the world of spirits; it returned to God who gave it, to its native country; this is implied in its being carried. The spirit of a man goes upward. (3.) Angels took care of it; it was carried by angels. They are ministering spirits to the heirs of salvation, not only while they live, but when they die, and have a charge concerning them, to bear them up in their hands, not only in their journeys to and fro on earth, but in their great journey to their long home in heaven, to be both their guide and their guard through regions unknown and unsafe. The soul of man, if not chained to this earth and clogged by it as unsanctified souls are, has in itself an elastic virtue, by which it springs upward as soon as it gets clear of the body; but Christ will not trust those that are his to that, and therefore will send special messengers to fetch them to himself. One angel one would think sufficient, but here are more, as many were sent for Elijah. Amasis king of Egypt had his chariot drawn by kings; but what was that honour to this? Saints ascend in the virtue of Christ's ascension; but this convoy of angels is added for state and decorum. Saints shall be brought home, not only safely, but honourably. What were the bearers at the rich man's funeral, though, probably, those of the first rank, compared with Lazarus's bearers? The angels were not shy of touching him, for his sores were on his body, not on his soul; that was presented to God without spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing. "Now, blessed angels," said a good man just expiring, "now come and do your office." (4.) It was carried into Abraham's bosom. The Jews expressed the happiness of the righteous at death three ways:—they to go to the garden of Eden: they go to be under the throne of glory; and they go to the bosom of Abraham, and it is this which our Saviour here makes use of. Abraham was the father of the faithful; and whither should the souls of the faithful be gathered but to him, who, as a tender father, lays them in his bosom, especially at their first coming, to bid them welcome, and to refresh them when newly come from the sorrows and fatigues of this world? He was carried to his bosom, that is, to feast with him, for at feasts the guests are said to lean on one another's breasts; and the saints in heaven sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob. Abraham was a great and rich man, yet in heaven he does not disdain to lay poor Lazarus in his bosom. Rich saints and poor meet in heaven. This poor Lazarus, who might not be admitted within the rich man's gate, is conducted into the dining-room, into the bed-chamber, of the heavenly palace; and he is laid in the bosom of Abraham, whom the rich glutton scorned to set with the dogs of his flock.
5. The next news you hear of the rich man, after the account of his death and burial, is, that in hell he lifted up his eyes, being in torment, Lu 16:23.
(1.) His state is very miserable. He is in hell, in hades, in the state of separate souls, and there he is in the utmost misery and anguish possible. As the souls of the faithful, immediately after they are delivered from the burden of the flesh, are in joy and felicity, so wicked and unsanctified souls, immediately after they are fetched from the pleasures of the flesh by death, are in misery and torment endless, useless, and remediless, and which will be much increased and completed at the resurrection. This rich man had entirely devoted himself to the pleasures of the world of sense, was wholly taken up with them, and took up with them for his portion, and therefore was wholly unfit for the pleasures of the world of spirits; to such a carnal mind as his they would indeed be no pleasure, nor could he have any relish of them, and therefore he is of course excluded from them. Yet this is not all; he was hard-hearted to God's poor, and therefore he is not only cut off from mercy, but he has judgment without mercy, and falls under a punishment of sense as well as a punishment of loss.
(2.) The misery of his state is aggravated by his knowledge of the happiness of Lazarus: He lifts up his eyes, and sees Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. It is the soul that is in torment, and they are the eyes of the mind that are lifted up. He now began to consider what was become of Lazarus. He does not find him where he himself is, nay, he plainly sees him, and with as much assurance as if he had seen him with his bodily eyes, afar off in the bosom of Abraham. This same aggravation of the miseries of the damned we had before (Lu 13:28): Ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God, and yourselves thrust out. [1.] He saw Abraham afar off. To see Abraham we should think a pleasing sight; but to see him afar off was a tormenting sight. Near himself he saw devils and damned companions, frightful sights, and painful ones; afar off he saw Abraham. Note, Every sight in hell is aggravating. [2.] He saw Lazarus in him bosom. That same Lazarus whom he had looked upon with so much scorn and contempt, as not worthy his notice, he now sees preferred, and to be envied. The sight of him brought to his mind his own cruel and barbarous conduct towards him; and the sight of him in that happiness made his own misery the more grievous.
III. Here is an account of what passed between the rich man and Abraham in the separate state—a state of separation one from another, and of both from this world. Though it is probable that there will not be, nor are, any such dialogues or discourses between glorified saints and damned sinners, yet it is very proper, and what is usually done in descriptions, especially such as are designed to be pathetic and moving, by such dialogues to represent what will be the mind and sentiments both of the one and of the other. And since we find damned sinners tormented in the presence of the Lamb (Re 14:10), and the faithful servants of God looking upon them that have transgressed the covenant, there where their worm dies not, and their fire is not quenched (Isa 66:23,24), such a discourse as this is not incongruous to be supposed. Now in this discourse we have,
1. The request which the rich man made to Abraham for some mitigation of his present misery, Lu 16:24. Seeing Abraham afar off, he cried to him, cried aloud, as one in earnest, and as one in pain and misery, mixing shrieks with his petitions, to enforce them by moving compassion. He that used to command aloud now begs aloud, louder than ever Lazarus did at his gate. The songs of his riot and revels are all turned into lamentations. Observe here,
(1.) The title he gives to Abraham: Father Abraham. Note, There are many in hell that can call Abraham father, that were Abraham's seed after the flesh, nay, and many that were, in name and profession, the children of the covenant made with Abraham. Perhaps this rich man, in his carnal mirth, had ridiculed Abraham and the story of Abraham, as the scoffers of the latter days do; but now he gives him a title of respect, Father Abraham. Note, The day is coming when wicked men will be glad to scrape acquaintance with the righteous, and to claim kindred to them, though now they slight them. Abraham in this description represents Christ, for to him all judgment is committed, and it is his mind that Abraham here speaks. Those that now slight Christ will shortly make their court to him, Lord, Lord.
(2.) The representation he makes to him of his present deplorable condition: I am tormented in this flame. It is the torment of his soul that he complains of, and therefore such a fire as will operate upon souls; and such a fire the wrath of God is, fastening upon a guilty conscience; such a fire horror of mind is, and the reproaches of a self-accusing self-condemning heart. Nothing is more painful and terrible to the body than to be tormented with fire; by this therefore the miseries and agonies of damned souls are represented.
(3.) His request to Abraham, in consideration of this misery: Have mercy on me. Note, The day is coming when those that make light of divine mercy will beg hard for it. O for mercy, mercy, when the day of mercy is over, and offers of mercy are no more made. He that had no mercy on Lazarus, yet expects Lazarus should have mercy on him; "for," thinks he, "Lazarus is better natured than ever I was." The particular favour he begs is, Send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue. [1.] Here he complains of the torment of his tongue particularly, as if he were more tormented there than in any other part, the punishment answering the sin. The tongue is one of the organs of speech, and by the torment of that he is put in mind of all the wicked words that he had spoken against God and man, his cursing, and swearing, and blasphemy, all his hard speeches, and filthy speeches; by his words he is condemned, and therefore in his tongue he is tormented. The tongue is also one of the organs of tasting, and therefore the torments of that will remind him of his inordinate relish of the delights of sense, which he had rolled under his tongue. [2.] He desires a drop of water to cool his tongue. He does not say, "Father Abraham, order me a release from this misery, help me out of this pit," for he utterly despaired of this; but he asks as small a thing as could be asked, a drop of water to cool his tongue for one moment. [3.] He sometimes suspected that he had herein an ill design upon Lazarus, and hoped, if he could get him within his reach, he should keep him from returning to the bosom of Abraham. The heart that is filled with rage against God is filled with rage against the people of God. But we will think more charitably even of a damned sinner, and suppose he intended here to show respect to Lazarus, as one to whom he would now gladly be beholden. He names him, because he knows him, and thinks Lazarus will not be unwilling to do him this good office for old acquaintance' sake. Grotius here quotes Plato describing the torments of wicked souls, and among other things he says, They are continually raving on those whom they have murdered, or been any way injurious to, calling upon them to forgive them the wrongs they did them. Note, There is a day coming when those that now hate and despise the people of God would gladly receive kindness from them.
2. The reply which Abraham gave to this request. In general, he did not grant it. He would not allow him one drop of water, to cool his tongue. Note, The damned in hell shall not have any the least abatement or mitigation of their torment. If we now improve the day of our opportunities, we may have a full and lasting satisfaction in the streams of mercy; but, if we now slight the offer, it will be in vain in hell to expect the least drop of mercy. See how justly this rich man is paid in his own coin. He that denied a crumb is denied a drop. Now it is said to us, Ask, and it shall be given you; but, if we let slip this accepted time, we may ask, and it shall not be given us. But this is not all; had Abraham only said, "You shall have nothing to abate your torment," it had been sad; but he says a great deal which would add to his torment, and make the flame the hotter, for every thing in hell will be tormenting.
(1.) He calls him son, a kind and civil title, but here it serves only to aggravate the denial of his request, which shut up the bowels of the compassion of a father from him. He had been a son, but a rebellious one, and now an abandoned disinherited one. See the folly of those who rely on that plea, We have Abraham to our father, when we find one in hell, and likely to be there for ever, whom Abraham calls son.
(2.) He puts him in mind of what had been both his own condition and the condition of Lazarus, in their life-time: Son, remember; this is a cutting word. The memories of damned souls will be their tormentors, and conscience will then be awakened and stirred up to do its office, which here they would not suffer it to do. Nothing will bring more oil to the flames of hell than Son, remember. Now sinners are called upon to remember, but they do not, they will not, they find ways to avoid it. "Son, remember thy Creator, thy Redeemer, remember thy latter end;" but they can turn a deaf ear to these mementos, and forget that for which they have their memories; justly therefore will their everlasting misery arise from a Son, remember, to which they will not be able to turn a deaf ear. What a dreadful peal will this ring in our ears, "Son, remember the many warnings that were given thee not to come to this place of torment, which thou wouldest not regard; remember the fair offers made thee of eternal life and glory, which thou wouldest not accept!" But that which he is here put in mind of is, [1.] That thou in thy life-time receivedst thy good things. He does not tell him that he had abused them, but that he had received them: "Remember what a bountiful benefactor God has been to thee, how ready he was to do thee good; thou canst not therefore say he owes thee any thing, no, not a drop of water. What he gave thee thou receivedst, and that was all; thou never gavest him a receipt for them, in a thankful acknowledgment of them, much less didst thou ever make any grateful return for them or improvement of them; thou hast been the grave of God's blessings, in which they were buried, not the field of them, in which they were sown. Thou receivedst thy good things; thou receivedst them, and usedst them, as if they had been thine own, and thou hadst not been at all accountable for them. Or, rather, they were the things which thou didst choose for thy good things, which were in thine eye the best things, which thou didst content thyself with, and portion thyself in. Thou hadst meat, and drink, and clothes of the richest and finest, and these were the things thou didst place thy happiness in; they were thy reward, thy consolation, the penny thou didst agree for, and thou hast had it. Thou wast for the good things of thy life-time, and hadst no thought of better things in another life, and therefore hast no reason to expect them. The day of thy good things is past and gone, and now is the day of thy evil things, of recompence for all thy evil deeds. Thou hast already had the last drop of the vials of mercy that thou couldest expect to fall to thy share; and there remains nothing but vials of wrath without mixture." [2.] "Remember too what evil things Lazarus received. Thou enviest him his happiness here; but think what a large share of miseries he had in his life-time. Thou hast as much good as could be thought to fall to the lot of so bad a man, and he as much evil as could be thought to fall to the lot of so good a man. He received his evil things; he bore them patiently, received them from the hand of God, as Job did (Lu 2:10, Shall we receive good at the hand of the Lord, and shall we not receive evil also?)—he received them as physic appointed for the cure of his spiritual distempers, and the cure was effected." As wicked people have good things in this life only, and at death they are for ever separated from all good, so godly people have evil things only in this life, and at death they are for ever put out of the reach of them. Now Abraham, by putting him in mind of both these together, awakens his conscience to remind him how he had behaved towards Lazarus, when he was reveling in his good things and Lazarus groaning under his evil things; he cannot forget that then he would not help Lazarus, and how then could he expect that Lazarus should now help him? Had Lazarus in his life-time afterwards grown rich, and he poor, Lazarus would have thought it his duty to relieve him, and not to have upbraided him with his former unkindness; but, in the future state of recompence and retribution, those that are now dealt with, both by God and man, better than they deserve, must expect to be rewarded every man according to his works.
(3.) He puts him in mind of Lazarus's present bliss, and his own misery: But now the tables are turned, and so they must abide for ever; now he is comforted, and thou art tormented. He did not need to be told that he was tormented; he felt it to his cost. He knew likewise that one who lay in the bosom of Abraham could not but be comforted there; yet Abraham puts him in mind of it, that he might, by comparing one thing with another, observe the righteousness of God, in recompensing tribulation to them who trouble his people, and to those who are troubled rest, 2Th 1:6,7. Observe, [1.] Heaven is comfort, and hell is torment: heaven is joy, hell is weeping, and wailing, and pain in perfection. [2.] The soul, as soon as it leaves the body, goes either to heaven or hell, to comfort or torment, immediately, and does not sleep, or go into purgatory. [3.] Heaven will be heaven indeed to those that go thither through many and great calamities in this world; of those that had grace, but had little of the comfort of it here (perhaps their souls refused to be comforted), yet, when they are fallen asleep in Christ, you may truly say, "Now they are comforted: now all their tears are wiped away, and all their fears are vanished." In heaven there is everlasting consolation. And, on the other hand, hell will be hell indeed to those that go thither from the midst of the enjoyment of all the delights and pleasures of sense. To them the torture is the greater, as temporal calamities are described to be to the tender and delicate woman, that would not set so much as the sole of her foot to the ground, for tenderness and delicacy. De 28:56.
(4.) He assures him that it was to no purpose to think of having any relief by the ministry of Lazarus; for (Lu 16:26), Besides all this, worse yet, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed, an impassable one, a great chasm, that so there can be no communication between glorified saints and damned sinners. [1.] The kindest saint in heaven cannot make a visit to the congregation of the dead and damned, to comfort or relieve any there who once were their friends. "They that would pass hence to you cannot; they cannot leave beholding the face of their Father, nor the work about his throne, to fetch water for you; that is no part of their business." [2.] The most daring sinner in hell cannot force his way out of that prison, cannot get over that great gulf. They cannot pass to us that would come thence. It is not to be expected, for the door of mercy is shut, the bridge is drawn; there is no coming out upon parole or bail, no, not for one hour. In this world, blessed be God, there is no gulf fixed between a state of nature and grace, but we may pass from the one to thee other, from sin to God; but if we die in our sins, if we throw ourselves into the pit of destruction, there is no coming out. It is a pit in which there is no water, and out of which there is no redemption. The decree and counsel of God have fixed this gulf, which all the world cannot unfix. This abandons this miserable creature to despair; it is now too late for any change of his condition, or any the least relief: it might have been prevented in time, but it cannot now be remedied to eternity. The state of damned sinners is fixed by an irreversible and unalterable sentence. A stone is rolled to the door of the pit, which cannot be rolled back.
3. The further request he had to make to his father Abraham, not for himself, his mouth is stopped, and he has not a word to say in answer to Abraham's denial of a drop of water. Damned sinners are made to know that the sentence they are under is just, and they cannot alleviate their own misery by making any objection against it. And, since he cannot obtain a drop of water to cool his tongue, we may suppose he gnawed his tongue for pain, as those are said to do on whom one of the vials of God's wrath is poured out, Re 16:10. The shrieks and outcries which we may suppose to be now uttered by him were hideous; but, having an opportunity of speaking to Abraham, he will improve it for his relations whom he has left behind, since he cannot improve it for his own advantage. Now as to this,
(1.) He begs that Lazarus might be sent to his father's house, upon an errand thither: I pray thee therefore, father, Lu 16:27. Again he calls upon Abraham, and in this request he is importunate: "I pray thee. O deny me not this." When he was on earth he might have prayed and been heard, but now he prays in vain. "Therefore, because thou hast denied me the former request, surely thou wilt be so compassionate as not to deny this:" or, "Therefore, because there is a great gulf fixed, seeing there is no getting out hence when they are once here, O send to prevent their coming hither:" or, "Though there is a great gulf fixed between you and me, yet, since there is no such gulf fixed between you and them, send them hither. Send him back to my father's house; he knows well enough where it is, has been there many a time, having been denied the crumbs that fell from the table. He knows I have five brethren there; if he appear to them, they will know him, and will regard what he saith, for they knew him to be an honest man. Let him testify to them; let him tell them what condition I am in, and that I brought myself to it by my luxury and sensuality, and my unmercifulness to the poor. Let him warn them not to tread in my steps, nor to go on in the way wherein I led them, and left them, lest they also come into this place of torment," Lu 16:28. Some observe that he speaks only of five brethren, whence they infer that he had no children, else he would have mentioned them, and then it was an aggravation of his uncharitableness that he had no children to provide for. Now he would have them stopped in their sinful course. He does not say, "Give me leave to go to them, that I may testify to them;" for he knew that there was a gulf fixed, and despaired of a permission so favourable to himself: his going would frighten them out of their wits; but, "Send Lazarus, whose address will be less terrible, and yet his testimony sufficient to frighten them out of their sins." Now he desired the preventing of their ruin, partly in tenderness to them, for whom he could not but retain a natural affection; he knew their temper, their temptations, their ignorance, their infidelity, their inconsideration, and wished to prevent the destruction they were running into: but it was partly in tenderness to himself, for their coming to him, to that place of torment, would but aggravate the misery to him, who had helped to show them the way thither, as the sight of Lazarus helped to aggravate his misery. When partners in sin come to be sharers in woe, as tares bound in bundles for the fire, they will be a terror to one another.
(2.) Abraham denies him this favour too. There is no request granted in hell. Those who make the rich man's praying to Abraham a justification of their praying to saints departed, as they have far to seek for proofs, when the practice of a damned sinner must be valued for an example, so they have little encouragement to follow the example, when all his prayers were made in vain. Abraham leaves them to the testimony of Moses and the prophets, the ordinary means of conviction and conversion; they have the written word, which they may read and hear read. "Let them attend to that sure word of prophecy, for God will not go out of the common method of his grace for them." Here is their privilege: They have Moses and the prophets; and their duty: "Let them hear them, and mix faith with them, and that will be sufficient to keep them from this place of torment." By this it appears that there is sufficient evidence in the Old Testament, in Moses and the prophets, to convince those that will hear them impartially that there is another life after this, and a state of rewards and punishments for good and bad men; for that was the thing which the rich man would have his brethren assured of, and for that they are turned over to Moses and the prophets.
(3.) He urges his request yet further (Lu 16:30): "Nay, father Abraham, give me leave to press this. It is true, they have Moses and the prophets, and, if they would but give a due regard to them, it would be sufficient; but they do not, they will not; yet it may be hoped, if one went to them from the dead, they would repent, that would be a more sensible conviction to them. They are used to Moses and the prophets, and therefore regard them the less; but this would be a new thing, and more startling; surely this would bring them to repent, and to change their wicked habit and course of life." Note, Foolish men are apt to think any method of conviction better than that which God has chosen and appointed.
基督在本章的論述,其宗旨是要喚醒並激發我們眾人,善用這世界而不濫用它,妥善管理我們在這裏所有的一切財物與享受,使它們在來世於我們有益,而非於我們有害;因為這二者必居其一,全看我們如今如何使用。一、我們若用這些來行善,將自己所有的用於敬虔與慈善之工,就必在來世收穫其益處;這一點他在不義管家的比喻中說明了——那管家妥善運用主人的財物,以致當他被免去管家的職分時,仍有一個安舒的出路可以投靠。比喻本身記於路十六1-8;其解釋與應用記於路十六9-13;而法利賽人對基督所傳之道的輕視,以及基督因此對他們的嚴厲責備,並加上其他一些重要的話,記於路十六14-18。二、我們若不用屬世的享受來行善,反而使之成為我們情慾——奢華與感官放縱——的養料與燃料,並拒絕賙濟窮人,就必永遠滅亡,而這樣被濫用的今世事物,只會加增我們的悲慘與痛苦。這一點他在另一個財主與拉撒路的比喻中說明了;這比喻還有更深的用意,就是要喚醒我們眾人留心聖經所給我們的警告,不要指望從另一個世界直接差來的信息(路十六19-31)。