Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary · Mark Chapter 12

Optimized commentary reader

Chapter commentary

Mark Chapter 12

서론

Untitled

Open passage

繁體中文

在本章中,我們看到:一、關於把葡萄園租給忘恩戶之園戶的比喻,預表猶太教會的罪與毀滅(可十二 1-12)。二、基督使那些想要用納稅給凱撒的問題網羅他的人啞口無言(可十二 13-17)。三、他使那些企圖混淆復活道理的撒都該人啞口無言(可十二 18-27)。四、他與一個文士論及律法中那首要而最大的誡命(可十二 28-34)。五、他以一個關於基督乃大衛子孫的問題,使文士們困惑(可十二 35-37)。六、他警戒眾人要防備文士(可十二 38-40)。七、他稱讚那把兩個小錢投入庫裏的窮寡婦(可十二 41-44)。

English original

In this chapter, we have, I. The parable of the vineyard let out to unthankful husbandmen, representing the sin and ruin of the Jewish church, Mk 12:1-12. II. Christ's silencing those who thought to ensnare him with a question about paying tribute Cæsar, Mk 12:13-17. III. His silencing the Sadducees, who attempted to perplex the doctrine of the resurrection, Mk 12:18-27. IV. His conference with a scribe about the first and great command of the law, Mk 12:28-34. V. His puzzling the scribes with a question about Christ's being the Son of David, Mk 12:35-37. VI. The caution he gave the people, to take heed of the scribes, Mk 12:38-40. VII. His commendation of the poor widow that cast her two mites into the treasury, Mk 12:41-44.

1-12

The Vineyard and Husbandmen

Open passage

繁體中文

葡萄園與園戶

¹ 耶穌就用比喻對他們說:有一個人栽了一個葡萄園,周圍圈上籬笆,挖了一個壓酒池,蓋了一座樓,租給園戶,就往外國去了。 ² 到了時候,打發一個僕人到園戶那裏,要從園戶收葡萄園的果子。 ³ 園戶拿住他,打了他,叫他空手回去。 ⁴ 再打發一個僕人到他們那裏。他們打傷他的頭,並且凌辱他。 ⁵ 又打發一個僕人去。他們就殺了他。後又打發好些僕人去,有被他們打的,有被他們殺的。 ⁶ 園主還有一位,是他的愛子,末後又打發他去,說:他們必尊敬我的兒子。 ⁷ 不料,那些園戶彼此說:這是承受產業的。來吧,我們殺他,產業就歸我們了。 ⁸ 於是拿住他,殺了他,把他丟在葡萄園外。 ⁹ 這樣,葡萄園的主人要怎樣辦呢?他要來除滅那些園戶,將葡萄園轉給別人。 ¹⁰ 經上寫着你們沒有念過嗎:匠人所棄的石頭,已成了房角的頭塊石頭; ¹¹ 這是主所作的,在我們眼中看為希奇。 ¹² 他們看出這比喻是指着他們說的,就想要捉拿他,只是懼怕百姓,於是離開他走了。

基督從前曾用比喻說明他怎樣要建立福音教會;如今他開始用比喻說明他將怎樣廢棄猶太教會——福音教會本可以接在它的本幹上,卻是建立在它的廢墟之上。這個比喻我們在太 21:33 已經見過,內容與此處相同。我們在此可以觀察到,

一、那些享受有形教會特權的人,就是有一個葡萄園租給他們;這葡萄園能大大改良,並且理當向佔用者收取當納的租。當神將他的道指示雅各,將他的律例典章指示以色列(詩 147:19),當他在他們中間設立他的聖殿、祭司和典章之時,他就是把他所栽種的葡萄園租給了他們;這葡萄園他圈上籬笆,又在其中蓋了一座樓(可 12:1)。教會的會員就是神的佃戶,他們既有一位好地主,又得了好交易,只要不是自己的錯,就可以靠它活得很好。

二、神把葡萄園租給誰,就差遣他的僕人到他們那裏去,提醒他們記念他對他們公義的期望(可 12:2)。他在催討上並不急躁,要求也不苛刻,因為他直等到他們能交出果子之時才來收租,就是到了時候;他也不給他們添麻煩要他們把果子變賣成錢,而是情願以實物收取。

三、想到神的忠心傳道人在歷世歷代從那些享受教會特權、卻沒有結出相稱果子的人手中受了何等卑劣的對待,實在令人傷痛。舊約的先知遭受逼迫,甚至逼迫他們的人正是那些打着舊約教會名號的人。他們打了他們,並叫他們空手回去(可 12:3)——這已經不好了;他們打傷了他們,並凌辱他們趕回去(可 12:4)——這更糟了;不但如此,他們終於到了一個邪惡的地步,甚至殺了他們(可 12:5)。

四、那些苦待先知的人若也苦待基督自己,那就不足為奇了。神終於差遣他的兒子,他的愛子到他們那裏去;因此他差遣他,更是極大的恩情,正如雅各差遣約瑟去看望他哥哥們一樣(創 37:14)。我們也可以料想,他們的主所愛的,他們也當尊重並敬愛(可 12:6);他們必尊敬我的兒子,並因尊敬他而交納當納的果子。然而他們不但不因他是兒子、是承受產業的而尊敬他,反倒因此恨他(可 12:7)。因為基督在呼召人悔改歸正時,比先知們更有權柄地提出要求,他們就越發惱恨他,決意要治死他,好把教會的權力獨攬在自己手中,使百姓所有的尊敬和順服都單單歸於他們;產業就歸我們了,我們要作至高的主,獨攬一切大權。其實有一份產業,他們若真尊敬那兒子,原可以成為他們的,就是屬天的產業;他們卻輕看那產業,寧可要在這世界的財富、奢華和權勢中得他們的產業。於是他們拿住他,殺了他;這事他們雖尚未行,卻不久就要行;他們又把他丟在葡萄園外——他去了之後,他們拒絕接納他的福音;這福音與他們的計劃全然不合,於是他們就以輕蔑和憎惡之心把它拋棄了。

五、這樣罪惡可恥的作為,除了可怕的結局之外,別無可期(可 12:9);*這樣,葡萄園的主人要怎樣辦呢?*要說他怎樣辦是容易的,因為再沒有甚麼比這更惹動怒氣的了。

  1. 他要來除滅那些園戶——他們原是他所要拯救的人。當他們只是不交果子之時,他並沒有為租金而查封,也沒有因他們不納而剝奪他們、趕逐他們;但當他們殺了他的僕人和他的兒子之時,他就定意要除滅他們了;這事在耶路撒冷被毀、猶太民族被剪除成為荒場之時應驗了。

  2. 他要將葡萄園轉給別人。他若不能從他們收取果子,就要從別的百姓收取,因為神總不因任何人之故受虧損。這事在收納外邦人、並福音在普天下結出豐盛的果子(西 1:6)之時應驗了。倘若我們原寄以厚望的人顯為敗壞,這並非意味着別人不會更好。基督在他的工作上以此自勉;雖然以色列不被聚集——不是聚集歸他,而是聚集反對他——我卻仍要得榮耀(賽 49:5–6),作照亮外邦人的光。

  3. 他們對基督被升高的反對,斷不能攔阻這升高(可 12:10–11);匠人所棄的石頭,雖被棄絕,卻成了房角的頭塊石頭,被高高舉起作為頭塊石頭,又作為房角石有不可少的用處和影響。神要設立基督作王,在他聖錫安山上,不管那些想要掙斷他的繩索的人怎樣籌算。全世人都必看見並承認這是主所作的——對猶太人是公義,對外邦人是憐憫。基督的被升高是主所作的,而他在我們心中被升高、在我們心裏設立他的寶座,也是他的作為;這事若作成了,在我們眼中就不能不看作希奇。

那麼,這個比喻對那些原是要藉之知罪的大祭司和文士發生了甚麼效果呢?他們知道這比喻是指着他們說的(可 12:12)。他們不能不在這比喻的鏡子中看見自己的面目;人必以為這比喻既向他們顯明他們的罪惡何等重大,又顯明他們的敗亡何等確實、何等可怕,本應使他們戰兢而順服基督和他的福音,本應能使他們悔改,至少使他們不再對他存惡意的圖謀:然而實際上,(1.) 他們想要捉拿他,立刻把他下在監裏,這樣就要應驗他剛才所說他們要向他行的事(可 12:8)。(2.) 攔阻他們這樣行的,不過是懼怕百姓而已;他們並不敬畏基督,眼中也沒有對神的敬畏,只是怕若公開捉拿基督,群眾會暴動,把他們捉拿下獄,把他救出來。(3.) 他們離開他走了;他們既不能加害於他,就決意不容他對他們行善,於是趕快離開他大有能力的講論,免得他們悔改得醫治。當注意,人的偏見若不被真理的證據所勝過,反而更得堅定;人心中的敗壞若不因忠心的責備而屈服,反倒更被激怒惹動。福音若不是作了活的香氣叫人活,就必成為死的香氣叫人死。

English original

The Vineyard and Husbandmen

¹ And he began to speak unto them by parables. A certain man planted a vineyard, and set a hedge about it, and digged a place for the winefat, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country.
² And at the season he sent to the husbandmen a servant, that he might receive from the husbandmen of the fruit of the vineyard.
³ And they caught him, and beat him, and sent him away empty.
⁴ And again he sent unto them another servant; and at him they cast stones, and wounded him in the head, and sent him away shamefully handled.
⁵ And again he sent another; and him they killed, and many others; beating some, and killing some.
⁶ Having yet therefore one son, his wellbeloved, he sent him also last unto them, saying, They will reverence my son.
⁷ But those husbandmen said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and the inheritance shall be ours.
⁸ And they took him, and killed him, and cast him out of the vineyard.
⁹ What shall therefore the lord of the vineyard do? he will come and destroy the husbandmen, and will give the vineyard unto others.
¹⁰ And have ye not read this scripture; The stone which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner:
¹¹ This was the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?
¹² And they sought to lay hold on him, but feared the people: for they knew that he had spoken the parable against them: and they left him, and went their way.

Christ had formerly in parables showed how he designed to set up the gospel church; now he begins in parables to show how he would lay aside the Jewish church, which it might have been grafted into the stock of, but was built upon the ruins of. This parable we had just as we have it here, Mt 21:33. We may observe here,

I. They that enjoy the privileges of the visible church, have a vineyard let out to them, which is capable of great improvement, and from the occupiers of which rent is justly expected. When God showed his word unto Jacob, his statutes and judgments unto Israel (Ps 147:19), when he set up his temple among them, his priesthood, and his ordinances, then he let out to them the vineyard he had planted; which he hedged, and in which he built a tower, Mk 12:1. Members of the church are God's tenants, and they have both a good Landlord and a good bargain, and may live well upon it, if it be not their own fault.

II. Those whom God lets out his vineyard to, he sends his servants to, to put them in mind of his just expectations from them, Mk 12:2. He was not hasty in his demands, nor high, for he did not send for the rent till they could make it, at the season; nor did he put them to the trouble of making money of it, but was willing to take it in specie.

III. It is sad to think what base usage God's faithful ministers have met with, in all ages, from those that have enjoyed the privileges of the church, and have not brought forth fruit answerable. The Old-Testament prophets were persecuted even by those that went under the name of the Old-Testament church. They beat them, and sent them empty away (Mk 12:3); that was bad: they wounded them, and sent them away shamefully entreated (Mk 12:4); that was worse: nay, at length, they came to such a pitch of wickedness, that they killed them, Mk 12:5.

IV. It was no wonder if those who abused the prophets, abused Christ himself. God did at length send them his Son, his well-beloved; it was therefore so much the greater kindness in him to send him; as in Jacob to send Joseph to visit his brethren, Ge 37:14. And it might be expected that he whom their Master loved, they also should respect and love (Mk 12:6); "They will reverence my son, and, in reverence to him, will pay their rent." But, instead of reverencing him because he was the son and heir, they therefore hated him, Mk 12:7. Because Christ, in calling to repentance and reformation, made his demands with more authority than the prophets had done, they were the more enraged against him, and determined to put him to death, that they might engross all church power to themselves, and that all the respect and obedience of the people might be paid to them only; "The inheritance shall be ours, we will be lords paramount, and bear all the sway." There is an inheritance, which, if they had duly reverenced the Son, might have been theirs, a heavenly inheritance; but they slighted that, and would have their inheritance in the wealth, and pomp, and powers, of this world. So they took him, and killed him; they had not done it yet, but they would do it in a little time; and they cast him out of the vineyard, they refused to admit his gospel when he was gone; it would by no means agree with their scheme, and so they threw it out with disdain and detestation.

V. For such sinful and shameful doings nothing can be expected but a fearful doom (Mk 12:9); What shall therefore the Lord of the vineyard do? It is easy to say what, for nothing could be done more provoking.

1. He will come, and destroy the husbandmen, whom he would have saved. When they only denied the fruit, he did not distrain upon them for rent, nor disseize them and dispossess them for non-payment; but when they killed his servants, and his Son, he determined to destroy them; and this was fulfilled when Jerusalem was laid waste, and the Jewish nation extirpated and made a desolation.

2. He will give the vineyards to others. If he have not the rent from them, he will have it from another people, for God will be no loser by any. This was fulfilled in the taking in of the Gentiles, and the abundance of fruit which the gospel brought forth in all the world, Col 1:6. If some from whom we expected well, prove bad, it doth not follow but that others will be better. Christ encouraged himself with this in his undertaking; Though Israel be not gathered, not gathered to him, but gathered against him, yet shall I be glorious (Isa 49:5,6), as a Light to lighten the Gentiles.

3. Their opposition to Christ's exaltation shall be no obstruction to it (Mk 12:10,11); The stone which the builders rejected, notwithstanding that, is become the Head of the corner, is highly advanced as the Head-stone, and of necessary use and influence as the Corner-stone. God will set Christ as his King, upon his holy hill of Zion, in spite of their project, who would break his bands asunder. And all the world shall see and own this to be the Lord's doing, in justice to the Jews, and in compassion to the Gentiles. The exaltation of Christ was the Lord's doing, and it is his doing to exalt him in our hearts, and to set up his throne there; and if it be done, it cannot but be marvellous in our eyes.

Now what effect had this parable upon the chief priests and scribes, whose conviction was designed by it? They knew he spoke this parable against them, Mk 12:12. They could not but see their own faces in the glass of it; and one would think it showed them their sin so very heinous, and their ruin so certain and great, that it should have frightened them into a compliance with Christ and his gospel, should have prevailed to bring them to repentance, at least to make them desist from their malicious purpose against him: but, instead of that, (1.) They sought to lay hold on him, and make him their prisoner immediately, and so to fulfil what he had just now said they would do to him, Mk 12:8. (2.) Nothing restrained them from it but the awe they stood in of the people; they did not reverence Christ, nor had an fear of God before their eyes, but were afraid, if they should publicly lay hold on Christ, the mob would rise, and lay hold on them, and rescue them. (3.) They left him, and went their way; if they could not do hurt to him, they resolved he should not do good to them, and therefore they got out of the hearing of his powerful preaching, lest they should be converted and healed. Note, If men's prejudices be not conquered by the evidence of truth, they are but confirmed; and if the corruptions of the heart be not subdued by faithful reproofs, they are but enraged and exasperated. If the gospel be not a savour of life unto life, it will be a savour of death unto death.

13-17

The Question Respecting Tribute

Open passage

繁體中文

論納稅給凱撒的問題

¹³ 後來,他們打發幾個法利賽人和幾個希律黨的人到耶穌那裏,要在他的話上抓把柄。 ¹⁴ 他們來了,就對他說:夫子,我們知道你是誠實的,甚麼人你都不顧忌;因為你不看人的外貌,乃是誠誠實實傳神的道。納稅給凱撒可以不可以? ¹⁵ 我們該納不該納?耶穌知道他們的假意,就對他們說:你們為甚麼試探我?拿一個銀錢來給我看。 ¹⁶ 他們就拿了來。耶穌說:這像和這號是誰的?他們說:是凱撒的。 ¹⁷ 耶穌說:凱撒的物當歸給凱撒,神的物當歸給神。他們就甚希奇他。

當基督的仇敵——他們渴慕他的血——不能從他所說反對他們的話中找到把柄之時,就嘗試藉着向他發問來陷害他。我們在此看到他受試探——或不如說,被人試探——所問的是關於納稅給凱撒是否合法的問題。這段記載我們在太 22:15 已見過。

一、他們所差遣的人是法利賽人和希律黨人(可 12:13)——在這事上彼此意見相反的人,卻聯合反對基督。法利賽人極力堅持猶太人的自由,他若說納稅給凱撒是合法的,他們就要煽動百姓反對他,希律黨人要在暗中協助他們。希律黨人極力堅持羅馬的權柄,他若不贊成納稅給凱撒,他們就要煽動巡撫反對他,連法利賽人也要違反自己的原則與他們聯合。在別的事上彼此相爭的人,竟聯合起來反對基督,這並非新鮮事。

二、他們所託的藉口是,他們想要他為他們解決一個良心問題,這在當前的局勢中十分重要;他們裝作對他解決這問題的能力有極高的評價(可 12:14)。他們極力奉承他,稱他為夫子,承認他是教導神之道的,是按真理教導的,是教導善事並根據真理的原則教導的,不會因人的笑容或怒容而偏離公義和善良的法則一步;你不顧忌任何人,也不看人的外貌——你不怕得罪這邊嫉妒的君王,也不怕得罪那邊嫉妒的百姓;你是對的,總是對的,並以正當的方式宣斷善惡、真假。他們若說我們知道你是對的之時是憑良心說話,那麼他們迫害他、把他當作騙子處死,就是明知故犯的罪;他們認識他,卻仍把他釘十字架。然而人的見證要最有力地定他自己的罪,他們要被自己的口所審斷;他們明知他按真理教導神之道,卻在自己身上棄絕了神的旨意。假冒為善者的宣告和託辭,必在審判時作為定他們罪的證據,他們必被自己定罪。倘若他們並不知道也不相信這話,他們就是用口諂媚神,用舌頭說謊。

三、他們所問的問題是:納稅給凱撒可以不可以?他們想要表現為渴望知道自己的本分。作為行義的邦國,他們求問神公義的律例,其實他們所渴望的,無非是要知道他會說甚麼,盼望他無論選擇問題的哪一面,他們都可藉機控告他。再沒有甚麼比把傳道人捲入關於公民權利的爭論,並在君王和臣民之間定下界線,更易陷害傳道人了——這事當作,卻完全不當由他們來作。他們似乎把這事的裁決交給基督;他誠然宜於裁決,因為君王藉他定規,王子藉他定公義;他們公正地提出問題:*我們該納不該納?*他們似乎決定要聽從他的判斷;「你若說我們必須納稅,我們就納,縱然因此成為乞丐。你若說我們不可納,我們就不納,縱然因此成為叛徒。」許多人似乎渴望如此行,正如耶 42:20 那些驕傲人一樣。

四、基督裁決了這問題,並避開了陷阱——他引他們去看本國已經作出的民族性讓步,藉此他們被排除在這事上爭論的餘地之外(可 12:15–17)。他知道他們的假意——他們心中對他的惡意,雖口裏說出這一切的愛。假冒為善無論如何巧妙地掩飾,總不能向主耶穌隱藏。他看見那蓋在銀渣之下的瓦器。他知道他們有意陷害他,所以如此安排,使他們反被自己的話所困,並被迫去作他們所不願意作的事——就是誠實安靜地納稅;同時又使自己免受他們的非難。他使他們承認他們本國通用的錢幣是羅馬錢,一面有皇帝的像,另一面有他的年號;若是這樣,1. 凱撒可以為公益要求他們的金錢,因為他掌管並治理國家,理當有人分擔他的費用;凱撒的物當歸給凱撒。錢幣的流通以他為源頭,所以必須歸回於他。在它是他的範圍之內,就要歸給他;而它在何範圍內是他的,可由他命令,就要按政府的體制來判斷——按其現狀以及所確立的君王特權和臣民產業來判斷。2. 凱撒不能管轄他們的良心,他也不假裝如此;他並未提出要更改他們的宗教。「所以,你們當納稅,不要發怨言,也不要爭論,但要謹記神的物當歸給神。」也許他是引用他剛才所設的比喻——在那比喻裏他責備他們不把果子交給葡萄園的主(可 12:2)。許多人看似小心把人所當得的歸給人,卻毫不關心把當歸給他名的榮耀歸給神;其實我們的心和至高的愛,理當歸給神,正如地租理當歸給地主,或貢物理當歸給君王一樣。凡聽見基督的人都希奇他回答的明辨,並希奇他如何巧妙地避開了陷阱;但我懷疑沒有人因此被帶到——本當被帶到的——將自己和自己敬虔的奉獻歸給神的地步。許多人會稱讚一篇講章的巧思,卻不肯被講章中屬神的律法所管轄。

English original

The Question Respecting Tribute

¹³ And they send unto him certain of the Pharisees and of the Herodians, to catch him in his words.
¹⁴ And when they were come, they say unto him, Master, we know that thou art true, and carest for no man: for thou regardest not the person of men, but teachest the way of God in truth: Is it lawful to give tribute to Cæsar, or not?
¹⁵ Shall we give, or shall we not give? But he, knowing their hypocrisy, said unto them, Why tempt ye me? bring me a penny, that I may see it.
¹⁶ And they brought it. And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? And they said unto him, Cæsar's.
¹⁷ And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Cæsar the things that are Cæsar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him.

When the enemies of Christ, who thirsted for his blood, could not find occasion against him from what he said against them, they tried to ensnare him by putting questions to him. Here we have him tempted, or attempted rather, with a question about the lawfulness of paying tribute to Cæsar. We had this narrative, Mt 22:15.

I. The persons they employed were the Pharisees and the Herodians, men that in this matter were contrary to one another, and yet concurred against Christ, Mk 12:13. The Pharisees were great sticklers for the liberty of the Jews, and, if he should say, It is lawful to give tribute to Cæsar, they would incense the common people against him, and the Herodians would, underhand, assist them in it. The Herodians were great sticklers for the Roman power, and, if he should discountenance the paying of tribute to Cæsar, they would incense the governor against hum, yea, and the Pharisees, against their own principles, would join with them in it. It is no new thing for those that are at variance in other things, to join in a confederacy against Christ.

II. The pretence they made was, that they desired him to resolve them a case of conscience, which was of great importance in the present juncture; and they take on them to have a high opinion of his ability to resolve it, Mk 12:14. They complimented him at a high rate, called him Master, owned him for a Teacher of the way of God, a Teacher of it in truth, one who taught what was good, and upon principles of truth, who would not be brought by smiles or frowns to depart a step from the rules of equity and goodness; "Thou carest for no man, nor regardest the person of men, thou art not afraid of offending either the jealous prince on one hand, or the jealous people on the other; thou art right, and always in the right, and dost in a right manner declare good and evil, truth and falsehood." If they spoke as they thought concerning Christ, when they said, We know that thou art right, their persecuting him, and putting him to death, as a deceiver, was sin against knowledge; they knew him, and yet crucified him. However, a man's testimony shall be taken most strongly against himself, and out of their own mouths are they judged; they knew that he taught the way of God in truth, and yet rejected the counsel of God against themselves. The professions and pretences of hypocrites will be produced in evidence against them, and they will be self-condemned. But if they did not know or believe it, they lied unto God with their mouth, and flattered him with their tongue.

III. The question they put was, Is it lawful to give tribute to Cæsar, or not? They would be thought desirous to know their duty. As a nation that did righteousness, they ask of God the ordinances of justice, when really they desired nothing but to know what he would say, in hopes that, which side soever he took of the question, they might take occasion from it to accuse him. Nothing is more likely to ensnare ministers, than bringing them to meddle with controversies about civil rights, and to settle land-marks between the prince and the subject, which it is fit should be done, while it is not at all fit that they should have the doing of it. They seemed to refer the determining of this matter to Christ; and he indeed was fit to determine it, for by him kings reign, and princes decree justice; they put the question fairly, Shall we give, or shall we not give? They seemed resolved to stand to his award; "If thou sayest that we must pay tribute, we will do it, thou we be made beggars by it. If thou sayest that we must not, we will not, though we be made traitors for it." Many seemed desirous to do it; as those proud men, Jer 42:20.

IV. Christ determined the question, and evaded the snare, by referring them to their national concessions already made, by which they were precluded from disputing this matter, Mk 12:15-17. He knew their hypocrisy, the malice that was in their hearts against him, while with their mouth they showed all this love. Hypocrisy, though ever so artfully managed, cannot be concealed from the Lord Jesus. He sees the potsherd that is covered with the silver dross. He knew they intended to ensnare him, and therefore contrived the matter so as to ensnare them, and to oblige them by their own words to do what they were unwilling to do, which was, to pay their taxes honestly and quietly, and yet at the same time to screen himself against their exceptions. He made them acknowledge that the current money of their nation was Roman money, had the emperor's image on one side, and his superscription on the reverse; and if so, 1. Cæsar might command their money for the public benefit, because he had the custody and conduct of the state, wherein he ought to have his charges borne; Render to Cæsar the things that are Cæsar's. The circulation of the money is from him as the fountain, and therefore it must return to him. As far as it is his, so far it must be rendered to him; and how far it is his, and may be commanded by him, is to be judged by the constitution of the government, according as it is, and hath settled the prerogative of the prince and the property of the subject. 2. Cæsar might not command their consciences, nor did he pretend to it; he offered not to make any alteration in their religion. "Pay your tribute, therefore, without murmuring or disputing, but be sure to render to God the things that are God's." Perhaps he referred to the parable he had just now put forth, in which he had condemned them for not rendering the fruits to the Lord of the vineyard, Mk 12:2. Many that seem careful to give to men their due, are in no care to give God the glory due to his name; whereas our hearts and best affections are as much due to him as ever rent was to a landlord, or tribute to a prince. All that heard Christ, marvelled at the discretion of his answer, and how ingenuously he avoided the snare; but I doubt none were brought by it, as they ought to be, to render to God themselves and their devotions. Many will commend the wit of a sermon, that will not be commanded by the divine laws of a sermon.

18-27

The Question of the Sadducees

Open passage

繁體中文

撒都該人的問題

¹⁸ 撒都該人常說沒有復活的事。他們來問耶穌說: ¹⁹ 夫子,摩西為我們寫着說:人若死了,撇下妻子,沒有孩子,他兄弟當娶他的妻,為哥哥生子立後。 ²⁰ 有弟兄七人,第一個娶了妻,死了,沒有留下孩子。 ²¹ 第二個娶了她,也死了,沒有留下孩子;第三個也是這樣。 ²² 那七個人都娶過她,沒有留下孩子。末了,那婦人也死了。 ²³ 當復活的時候,她是哪一個的妻子呢?因為他們七個人都娶過她。 ²⁴ 耶穌說:你們所以錯了,豈不是因為不明白聖經,也不曉得神的大能嗎? ²⁵ 人從死裏復活,也不娶也不嫁,乃像天上的使者一樣。 ²⁶ 論到死人,當他們復活:你們沒有念過摩西的書上論到荊棘篇嗎?神如何對他說:我是亞伯拉罕的神,以撒的神,雅各的神。 ²⁷ 神不是死人的神,乃是活人的神。所以你們是大錯了。

撒都該人是那時代的自然神論者,他們在此攻擊我們的主耶穌——看來與文士、法利賽人和祭司長不同,他們對他本人並無惡意的計謀;他們不是狂熱者和逼迫者,而是懷疑派和不信派,他們的目標是他的教訓,為要阻擋它的傳播:他們否認有復活、有屬靈的世界、有死後的賞罰狀態;而這些他們所否認的偉大而基本的真理,正是基督所致力建立和證明的,並且把對這些真理的概念推到前所未有的高度;所以他們就起來擾亂他的教訓。

一、且看他們所採用的方法來糾纏這教訓;他們引用古時的律法——按此律法,人若死而無子,他的兄弟就當娶他的寡嫂為妻(可 12:19)。他們假定一個照着那律法而發生的情形:七個兄弟先後作了一個婦人的丈夫(可 12:20)。也許這些撒都該人照着他們素常的褻瀆,有意藉此譏笑那律法,藉此使摩西制度的整個體系遭人輕視,視其在實行上是荒謬不便的。那些否認屬神真理的人,通常也致力於貶低神的律法和典章。但這不過是順帶提及;他們的目的是要羞辱復活的教訓;因為他們假定若有將來的狀態,就必是這樣的狀態,於是他們以為這教訓就被這無可辯駁的荒謬所困——一個婦人在那狀態中必有七個丈夫;或被這無法解決的難題所困——她究竟是誰的妻子。當看這些異端分子是何等詭詐地暗暗破壞真理;他們不否認它,不說不可能有復活;不,他們似乎並不懷疑它,也不說若有復活,她是誰的妻子呢——如魔鬼對基督說:你若是神的兒子。倒是這些田野的獸比那蛇自己還更詭詐,他們假裝承認真理,彷佛自己並不是撒都該人——不,不是他們;誰說他們否認復活呢?他們把有復活這事視為當然,並要使人以為他們渴望在這事上受教,其實他們正圖謀給它致命的一擊,並以為必能作到。當注意,異端分子和撒都該人的常用詭計,就是把所沒有厚顏否認的真理,加以困惑和糾纏。

二、且看基督所採用的方法,來澄清並確立他們企圖抹黑並動搖的真理。這是重要的事,所以基督並不輕輕放過,反倒詳加論述,使他們縱然不肯回轉,別人卻可得着堅固。

  1. 他控告撒都該人錯謬,並把這錯謬歸咎於他們的無知。那些如我們這時代某些人那樣嘲笑復活道理的人,想要被看作惟一有見識的人,因為是惟一的自由思想者,其實他們是以色列中的愚昧人,是世上最受奴役、最有偏見的思想者。你們所以錯了嗎?你們自己不能不覺察這一點,並且你們錯謬的原因是,(1.) 因為你們不明白聖經。並非撒都該人沒有讀過聖經,也許他們還相當熟練;然而他們確可被說為不明白聖經,因為他們不明白聖經的意義和意思,倒加以謬誤的解釋;或者他們不以聖經為神的話,反倒用自己敗壞的推論來反對聖經,凡他們所不能看見的就不肯相信。當注意,對聖經的正確認識——聖經如今是一切啟示宗教所流出的泉源,也是它所建立的根基——是抵擋錯謬的最佳保障。持守真理,持守聖經的真理,它就必保守你。(2.) 因為你們不曉得神的大能。他們不能不知道神是全能的,卻不肯把這教訓應用在這事上,反而因這事看來不可能的反對而放棄了真理——倘若他們持守神全能的教訓,這一切反對就都可得到答覆了,因為在全能者沒有難成的事。所以神這一次所說過的話,我們當留意聽兩次——聽而信之,聽而用之——大能屬於神(詩 62:11,羅 4:19–21)。那造了靈魂和身體、並在二者同在之時加以保守的大能,能在二者分離之時保守身體安全、保守靈魂活潑,並能使二者重新聯合;因為看哪,耶和華的膀臂並沒有縮短。神的大能——見於春天的歸回(詩 104:30),見於穀物的復甦(約 12:24),見於受苦的百姓復興(結 37:12–14),見於舊約和新約中許多人奇妙地從死裏復活,特別是見於基督的復活(弗 1:19–20)——這一切都是我們也要因同樣的大能而復活的憑據(腓 3:21);照着他在自己裏面所運行、能以制服萬有歸己的大能。

  2. 他駁回他們一切反對的力量,把將來狀態的教訓擺在真光中(可 12:25);當他們從死裏復活之後,也不娶也不嫁。問她在七個人中是哪一個的妻子呢,乃是愚昧的;因為夫妻的關係,雖是在地上的樂園中所設立的,在天上的樂園中卻不被知道。土耳其人和不信的人在他們愚昧的樂園中期望感官的享樂,基督徒卻曉得更美的事——血肉之體不能承受神的國(林前 15:50);並且期望更美的事——就是在神的愛和神的形像中得着完全的滿足(詩 17:15);他們如天上的使者,而我們知道天使既無妻也無子。我們若以這感官世界的事來量度我們對屬靈世界的觀念,就必把自己纏繞在無盡的荒謬之中,這並不奇怪。

三、他把將來狀態的教訓,以及義人在那狀態中的福氣,建立在神與亞伯拉罕所立的約上——這約是神在亞伯拉罕死後樂意承認的(可 12:26–27)。他訴諸聖經;摩西的書上你們沒有念過嗎?我們與那些讀過聖經的人打交道,多少有些便利,雖然許多讀過聖經的人,如這些撒都該人所作的,曲解聖經,自取滅亡。如今他所引他們去看的,是神在荊棘中對摩西所說的話:我是亞伯拉罕的神——不但是說我曾是,更是說我是;我是亞伯拉罕的產業和福氣,是向他全然充足的神。當注意,若說亞伯拉罕已經消滅了,神與亞伯拉罕的關係卻仍延續並如此莊嚴地被承認,那是荒謬的;又或說永生神竟是一個已死、並要永遠如此之人的產業和福氣,也是荒謬的;所以你們必須斷定:1. 亞伯拉罕的靈魂存在並活動於與身體分離的狀態中。2. 因此,或早或晚,身體必須復活;因為人的靈魂對其身體有一種天生的傾向,會使完全而永遠的分離與靈魂的安息和平靜不相合——更不用說與那些以主為他們的神的靈魂的福氣和喜樂不相合了。總而言之,他斷定:所以你們是大錯了。那些否認復活的人是大錯了,並且應當被告知如此。

English original

The Question of the Sadducees

¹⁸ Then come unto him the Sadducees, which say there is no resurrection; and they asked him, saying,
¹⁹ Master, Moses wrote unto us, If a man's brother die, and leave his wife behind him, and leave no children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.
²⁰ Now there were seven brethren: and the first took a wife, and dying left no seed.
²¹ And the second took her, and died, neither left he any seed: and the third likewise.
²² And the seven had her, and left no seed: last of all the woman died also.
²³ In the resurrection therefore, when they shall rise, whose wife shall she be of them? for the seven had her to wife.
²⁴ And Jesus answering said unto them, Do ye not therefore err, because ye know not the scriptures, neither the power of God?
²⁵ For when they shall rise from the dead, they neither marry, nor are given in marriage; but are as the angels which are in heaven.
²⁶ And as touching the dead, that they rise: have ye not read in the book of Moses, how in the bush God spake unto him, saying, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob?
²⁷ He is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living: ye therefore do greatly err.

The Sadducees, who were the deists of that age, here attack our Lord Jesus, it should seem, not as the scribes, and Pharisees, and chief-priests, with any malicious design upon his person; they were not bigots and persecutors, but sceptics and infidels, and their design was upon his doctrine, to hinder the spreading of that: they denied that there was any resurrection, and world of spirits, any state of rewards and punishments on the other side of death: now those great and fundamental truths which they denied, Christ had made it his business to establish and prove, and had carried the notion of them much further that ever it was before carried; and therefore they set themselves to perplex his doctrine.

I. See here the method they take to entangle it; they quote the ancient law, by which, if a man died without issue, his brother was obliged to marry his widow, Mk 12:19. They suppose a case to happen that, according to that law, seven brothers were, successively, the husbands of one woman, Mk 12:20. Probably, these Sadducees, according to their wonted profaneness, intended hereby to ridicule that law, and so to bring the whole frame of the Mosaic institution into contempt, as absurd and inconvenient in the practice of it. Those who deny divine truths, commonly set themselves to disparage divine laws and ordinances. But this was only by the by; their design was to expose the doctrine of the resurrection; for they suppose that if there be a future state, it must be such a one as this, and then the doctrine, they think, is clogged either with this invincible absurdity, that a woman in that state must have seven husbands, or else with this insolvable difficulty, whose wife must she be. See with what subtlety these heretics undermine the truth; they do not deny it, nor say, There can be no resurrection; nay, they do not seem to doubt of it, nor say, If there be a resurrection, whose wife shall she be? as the devil to Christ, If thou be the Son of God. But, as though these beasts of the field were more subtle than the serpent himself, they pretend to own the truth, as if they were not Sadducees, no not they; who said that they denied the resurrection? They take it for granted that there is a resurrection, and would be thought to desire instruction concerning it, when really they are designing to give a fatal stab, and think that they shall do it. Note, It is the common artifice of heretics and Sadducees to perplex and entangle the truth, which they have not the impudence to deny.

II. See here the method Christ takes to clear and establish this truth, which they attempted to darken, and give a shock to. This was a matter of moment, and therefore Christ does not pass it over lightly, but enlarges upon it, that, if they should not be reclaimed, yet others might be confirmed.

1. He charges the Sadducees with error, and charges that upon their ignorance. They who banter the doctrine of the resurrection as some do in our age, would be thought the only knowing men, because the only free thinkers, when really they are the fools in Israel, and the most enslaved and, prejudiced thinkers in the world. Do ye not therefore err? Ye cannot but be sensible of it yourselves, and that the cause of your error is, (1.) Because ye do not know the scriptures. Not but that the Sadducees had read the scriptures, and perhaps were ready in them; yet they might be truly said not to know the scriptures, because they did not know the sense and meaning of them, but put false constructions upon them; or they did not receive the scriptures as the word of God, but set up their own corrupt reasonings in opposition to the scripture, and would believe nothing but what they could see. Note, A right knowledge of the scripture, as the fountain whence all revealed religion now flows, and the foundation on which it is built, is the best preservative against error. Keep the truth, the scripture-truth, and it shall keep thee. (2.) Because ye know not the power of God. They could not but know that God is almighty, but they would not apply that doctrine to this matter, but gave up the truth to the objections of the impossibility of it, which would all have been answered, if they had but stuck to the doctrine of God's omnipotence, to which nothing is impossible. This therefore which God hath spoken once, we are concerned to hear twice, to hear and believe, to hear and apply—that power belongs to God, Ps 62:11, Ro 4:19-21. The same power that made soul and body and preserved them while they were together, can preserve the body safe, and the soul active, when they are parted, and can unite them together again; for behold, the Lord's arm is not shortened. The power of God, seen in the return of the spring (Ps 104:30), in the reviving of the corn (Joh 12:24), in the restoring of an abject people to their prosperity (Eze 37:12-14), in the raising of so many to life, miraculously, both in the Old Testament and in the New, and especially in the resurrection of Christ (Eph 1:19,20), are all earnests of our resurrection by the same power (Php 3:21); according to the mighty working whereby he is able to subdue all things to himself.

2. He sets aside all the force of their objection, by setting the doctrine of the future state in a true light (Mk 12:25); When they shall rise from the dead, they neither marry, nor are given in marriage. It is a folly to ask, Whose wife shall she be of the seven? For the relation between husband and wife, though instituted in the earthly paradise, will not be known in the heavenly one. Turks and infidels expect sensual pleasures in their fools' paradise, but Christians know better things—that flesh and blood shall not inherit the kingdom of God (1Co 15:50); and expect better things—even a full satisfaction in God's love and likeness (Ps 17:15); they are as the angels of God in heaven, and we know that they have neither wives nor children. It is no wonder if we confound ourselves with endless absurdities, when we measure our ideas of the world of spirits by the affairs of this world of sense.

III. He builds the doctrine of the future state, and of the blessedness of the righteous in that state, upon the covenant of God with Abraham, which God was pleased to own, being after Abraham's death, Mk 12:26,27. He appeals to the scriptures; Have ye not read in the book of Moses? We have some advantage in dealing with those that have read the scriptures, though many that have read them, wrest them, as these Sadducees did, to their own destruction. Now that which he refers them to is, what God says to Moses at the bush, I am the God of Abraham; not only, I was so, but I am so; I am the portion and happiness of Abraham, a God all-sufficient to him. Note, It is absurd to think that God's relation to Abraham should be continued, and thus solemnly recognised, if Abraham was annihilated, or that the living God should be the portion and happiness of a man that is dead, and must be for ever so; and therefore you must conclude, 1. That Abraham's soul exists and acts as a state of separation from the body. 2. That therefore, some time or other, the body must rise again; for there is such an innate inclination in a human soul towards its body, as would make a total and everlasting separation inconsistent with the ease and repose, much more with the bliss and joy of those souls that have the Lord for their God. Upon the whole matter, he concludes, Ye therefore do greatly err. Those that deny the resurrection, greatly err, and ought to be told so.

28-34

The Hopeful Scribe

Open passage

繁體中文

有盼望的文士

28 有一個文士來,聽見他們辯論,曉得耶穌回答的好,就問他說:「誡命中哪是第一要緊的呢?」 29 耶穌回答說:「第一要緊的就是說:『以色列啊,你要聽,主我們神是獨一的主。 30 你要盡心、盡性、盡意、盡力愛主你的神。』 31 其次就是說:『要愛人如己。』再沒有比這兩條誡命更大的了。」 32 那文士對耶穌說:「夫子說,神是一位,實在不錯;除了他以外,再沒有別的神; 33 並且盡心、盡智、盡力愛他,又愛人如己,就比一切燔祭和各樣祭祀好的多。」 34 耶穌見他回答的有智慧,就對他說:「你離神的國不遠了。」從此以後,沒有人敢再問他甚麼。

文士和法利賽人(無論別處如何不好)乃是撒都該人的仇敵;如今人或以為,當他們聽見基督如此有力地反駁撒都該人,便會嘉許他,正如他們對保羅對付撒都該人時所作的一樣(徒23:9);然而這事並沒有如此果效:因為他未在宗教的禮儀上與他們苟同,所以即使他在要端上與他們一致,也絲毫不能博得他們的尊重。只是此處我們看見他們當中有一个人,是個文士,他颇有禮節,留意到基督對撒都該人的回答,並承認他回答得好,且十分中肯(可12:28);我們有理由盼望他並未與其他文士一同逼迫基督;因為此處我們看見他來就基督求教,並且所問的正合他的身分——不是要試探基督,而是要增進對他的認識。

一、他問:「誡命中哪是第一要緊的呢?」(可12:28)。他所指的不是次序上的第一,而是分量與尊貴上的第一;「哪一條誡命是我們當特別留意的,我們對它的順服便是我們對其餘一切順服的根基呢?」神的誡命沒有一條是小的(都是大神的誡命),只是有的比別的更大——道德的誡命比禮儀的更大——而有的我們可以說是最大的。

二、基督對這問題作了直接的回答(可12:29-31)。凡誠心渴望受教知道自己本分的人,基督必以公平引導他,教導他當行的道。他告訴他,

  1. 那包含一切的至大誡命,乃是盡心愛神。(1.) 靈魂中若有那統管的原則,便有履行一切其他本分的傾向。愛是靈魂中首要的情感;對神的愛是更新之靈魂中首要的恩典。(2.) 若沒有這個,別的善事便不能行,不能行得正確,不能蒙悅納,也不能持久。盡心愛神,必有效地使我們脫離並武裝我們抵擋一切與他爭奪靈魂寶座的事物,又使我們盡力作一切可尊榮他、可討他喜悅的事;當這原則發號施令、佔上風之時,便沒有誡命會成為重擔。如今在馬可福音中,我們的救主在這誡命之前,先加上它所依據的偉大教義真理(可12:29);「以色列啊,你要聽,主我們神是獨一的主」;我們若堅信這話,便必盡心愛他。他是耶和華,在自己裏面有一切可愛的完全;他是我們的神,我們與他有關係、對他有本分;因此我們當愛他,以感情歸向他,以渴望趨向他,以他為樂;他是獨一的主,因此必須以我們全人來愛他;他對我們有獨一的權利,因此當獨佔我們。他既是一,我們的心也當與他為一;既然除他之外再無別神,寶座上便不容有與他並列的對手。

  2. 第二大誡命乃是愛人如己(可12:31),正如我們真誠地愛自己,並在同樣的事例中,藉己所欲而施於人來表明。我們因神是耶和華,是無限比我們更好的那位,故當愛他勝過愛自己,並因他是獨一的主,無可比擬,故當盡心愛他;照樣,我們當愛人如己,因為人與我們同有一個本性;我們的心是一樣造的,我和我的鄰舍同屬一個身體,一個社會,就是人類的世界;若是同為基督徒,同屬那神聖的社會,責任便更加強固。「我們豈不都是一位父嗎?」(瑪2:10)。豈不也是同一位基督救贖了我們嗎?基督說,「再沒有比這兩條誡命更大的了」,誠然如此;因為律法都總結在這兩條上,我們若謹守遵行,其餘各樣順服自然隨之而來。

三、文士贊同基督所說的,並加以闡述(可12:32、33)。1. 他稱讚基督對這問題的判定;「夫子說,實在不錯。」 基督的斷言原不需要文士的佐證;但這位文士既是有權柄的人,便以為由他加以稱讚,或許能為基督的話增色;而這也將成為那些逼迫基督、稱他為騙子之人的證據——因為他們自己的人中,甚至他們的一個文士,也承認他說的是真理,而且說得好。我們也當如此附和基督的話,蓋上我們的印記,證明其為真。2. 他加以闡釋。基督曾引用那大教訓——「主我們神是獨一的主」;他不僅贊同,還加上,「除了他以外,再沒有別的神」,所以我們除了他不可有別的神。這就排除了一切與他相爭的對手,保全了心中寶座完全為他。基督曾定下那大律法——盡心愛神;他也加以解釋——就是以悟性愛他,如同知道我們有何等充足的理由當愛他的人。我們對神的愛,既當是整全的,也當是明達的;我們當以全悟性愛他——ex holēs tēs syneseōs——從全悟性而發;我們一切理性的功能和能力,都當用來引領我們靈魂的情感歸向神。基督曾說:「愛神和愛鄰舍是最大的誡命。」 「誠然,」文士說,「這比一切燔祭和各樣祭祀更好」——更蒙神悅納,對我們自己也有更好的結局。從前有人主張獻祭之律是最大的誡命;但這文士欣然與我們的救主同意——愛神和愛鄰舍之律,比獻祭之律更大,甚至比那純粹為尊榮神而設的全牲燔祭更大。

四、基督贊同他所說的,並鼓勵他繼續求問(可12:34)。1. 他承認就他所到的地步而言,他明白得好——至此為止,甚好。耶穌見他回答的有智慧,便越發喜悅,因為近來他所遇見的文士——許多有學問的人——多是無知地回答,如同心中無聰明、也不願有聰明的人。他回答得nounechōs——如同一個有心思的人;如同一個理性通達的人,一個有見識的人;如同一個其理性未被偏見蒙蔽、判斷未被成見左右、深思未被成見捆綁的人——其他文士卻深受這些偏見所轄制。他回答如同一個容讓自己有自由和閒暇去思考的人,如同一個已經思考過的人。2. 他承認他站在進一步前進的有利位置上;「你離神的國不遠了」——離恩典和榮耀的國不遠了;你正處在很可能成為基督徒、成為基督門徒的路上。因為基督的教訓最注重這些事,正是為要引你達到這地步而設計,也正有這趨勢。注意,凡善用自己所有的亮光、盡其所能而行的,我們對他們可以存有盼望——靠著神的恩典,他們必被引導更進一步,得著神所要賜的更清楚啟示。這文士後來如何,我們不被告知,卻情願盼望他抓住了基督在此所給的暗示;既已從他口中得知律法最大的誡命而心滿意足,他便進而求問他——或他的使徒——福音最大的誡命又是甚麼。然而,縱然他沒有如此行,卻到此為止、不再前進,我們也不以為奇;因為有許多人離神的國不遠,卻始終未曾進去。如今,人或以為這事當吸引許多人來請教他;但效果相反;從此以後,沒有人敢再問他甚麼;他所說的一切都帶著如此權柄威嚴,人人都敬畏他;那些想要學習的,羞於發問;那些想要為難他的,不敢發問。

English original

The Hopeful Scribe

²⁸ And one of the scribes came, and having heard them reasoning together, and perceiving that he had answered them well, asked him, Which is the first commandment of all?
²⁹ And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:
³⁰ And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.
³¹ And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.
³² And the scribe said unto him, Well, Master, thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he:
³³ And to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the soul, and with all the strength, and to love his neighbour as himself, is more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices.
³⁴ And when Jesus saw that he answered discreetly, he said unto him, Thou art not far from the kingdom of God. And no man after that durst ask him any question.

The scribes and Pharisees were (however bad otherwise) enemies to the Sadducees; now one would have expected that, when they heard Christ argue so well against the Sadducees, they would have countenanced him, as they did Paul when he appeared against the Sadducees (Ac 23:9); but it had not the effect: because he did not fall in with them in the ceremonials of religion, he agreeing with them in the essentials, gained him no manner of respect with them. Only we have here an account of one of them, a scribe, who had so much civility in him as to take notice of Christ's answer to the Sadducees, and to own that he had answered well, and much to the purpose (Mk 12:28); and we have reason to hope that he did not join with the other scribes in persecuting Christ; for here we have his application to Christ for instruction, and it was such as became him; not tempting Christ, but desiring to improve his acquaintance with him.

I. He enquired, Which is the first commandment of all? Mk 12:28. He doth not mean the first in order, but the first in weight and dignity; "Which is that command which we ought to have in a special manner an eye to, and our obedience to which will lay a foundation for our obedience to all the rest?" Not that any commandment of God is little (they are all the commands of a great God), but some are greater than others, moral precepts than rituals, and of some we may say, They are the greatest of all.

II. Christ gave him a direct answer to this enquiry, Mk 12:29-31. Those that sincerely desire to be instructed concerning their duty, Christ will guide in judgment, and teach his way. He tells him,

1. That the great commandment of all, which is indeed inclusive of all, is, that of loving God with all our hearts. (1.) Where there is a commanding principle in the soul, there is a disposition to every other duty. Love is the leading affection of the soul; the love of God is the leading grace in the renewed soul. (2.) Where this is not, nothing else that is good is done, or done aright, or accepted, or done long. Loving God with all our heart, will effectually take us off from, and arm us against, all those things that are rivals with him for the throne in our souls, and will engage us to every thing by which he may be honoured, and with which he will be pleased; and no commandment will be grievous where this principle commands, and has the ascendant. Now here in, Mark, our Saviour prefixes to this command the great doctrinal truth upon which it is built (Mk 12:29); Hear, O Israel, The Lord our God is one Lord; if we firmly believe this, it will follow, that we shall love him with all our heart. He is Jehovah, who has all amiable perfections in himself; he is our God, to whom we stand related and obliged; and therefore we ought to love him, to set our affections on him, let out own desire toward him, and take a delight in him; and he is one Lord, therefore he must be loved with our whole heart; he has the sole right to us, and therefore ought to have the sole possession of us. If he be one, our hearts must be one with him, and since there is no God besides, no rival must be admitted with him upon the throne.

2. That the second great commandment is, to love our neighbour as ourselves (Mk 12:31), as truly and sincerely as we love ourselves, and in the same instances, and we must show it by doing as we would be done by. As we must therefore love God better than ourselves, because he is Jehovah, a being infinitely better than we are, and must love him with all our heart, because he is one Lord, and there is no other like him; so we must love our neighbour as ourselves, because he is of the same nature with ourselves; our hearts are fashioned alike, and my neighbour and myself are of one body, of one society, that of the world of mankind; and if a fellow-Christian, and of the same sacred society, the obligation is the stronger. Hath not one God created us? Mal 2:10. Has not one Christ redeemed us? Well might Christ say, There is no other commandment greater than these; for in these all the law is fulfilled, and if we make conscience of obedience to these, all other instances of obedience will follow of course.

III. The scribe consented to what Christ said, and descanted upon it, Mk 12:32,33. 1. He commends Christ's decision of this question; Well, Master, thou hast said the truth. Christ's assertions needed not the scribe's attestations; but this scribe, being a man in authority, thought it would put some reputation upon what Christ said, to have it commended by him; and it shall be brought in evidence against those who persecuted Christ, as a deceiver, that one of themselves, even a scribe of their own, confessed that he said the truth, and said it well. And thus must we subscribe to Christ's sayings, must set to our seal that they are true. 2. He comments upon it. Christ had quoted that great doctrine, that the Lord our God is one Lord; and this he not only assented to, but added, "There is none other but he; and therefore we must have no other God besides." This excludes all rivals with him, and secures the throne in the heart entire for him. Christ had laid down that great law, of loving God with all our hearts; and this also he explains—that it is loving him with the understanding, as those that know what abundant reason we have to love him. Our love to God, as it must be an entire, so it must be an intelligent, love; we must love him with all the understanding, ex holes tes syneseos—out of the whole understanding; our rational powers and faculties must all be set on work to lead out the affections of our souls toward God. Christ has said, "To love God and our neighbour is the greatest commandment of all;" "Yea," saith the scribe, "it is better, it is more than all whole-burnt-offerings and sacrifices, more acceptable to God, and will turn to a better account to ourselves." There were those who held, that the law of sacrifices was the greatest commandment of all; but this scribe readily agreed with our Saviour in this—that the law of love to God and our neighbour is greater than that of sacrifice, even than that of whole-burnt-offerings, which were intended purely for the honour of God.

IV. Christ approved of what he said, and encouraged him to proceed in his enquiries of him, Mk 12:34. 1. He owned that he understood well, as far as he went; so far, so good. Jesus saw that he answered discreetly, and was the more pleased with it, because he had of late met with so many even of the scribes, men of letters, that answered indiscreetly, as those that had no understanding, nor desired to have any. He answered nounechos—as one that had a mind; as a rational intelligent man, as one that had his wits about him; as one whose reason was not blinded, whose judgment was not biassed, and whose forethought was not fettered, by the prejudices which other scribes were so much under the power of. He answered as one that allowed himself liberty and leisure to consider, as one that had considered. 2. He owned that he stood fair for a further advance; "Thou art not far from the kingdom of God, the kingdom of grace and glory; thou art in a likely way to be a Christian, a disciple of Christ. For the doctrine of Christ insists most upon these things, and is designed, and has a tendency direct, to bring thee to this." Note, There is hope of those who make a good use of the light they have, and go as far as that will carry them, that by the grace of God they will be led further, by the clearer discoveries God has to make to them. What became of this scribe we are not told, but would willingly hope that he took the hint Christ hereby gave him, and that, having been told by him, so much to his satisfaction, what was the great commandment of the law, he proceeded to enquire of him, or his apostles, what was the great commandment of the gospel too. Yet, if he did not, but took, up here, and went no further, we are not to think it strange; for there are many who are not far from the kingdom of God, and yet never come thither. Now, one would think, this should have invited many to consult him: but it had a contrary effect; No man, after that, durst ask him any question; every thing he said, was spoken with such authority and majesty, that every one stood in awe of him; those that desired to learn, were ashamed to ask, and those that designed to cavil, were afraid to ask.

35-40

Christ the Son and Lord of David

Open passage

繁體中文

基督乃大衛之子與大衛之主

³⁵ 耶穌在殿裡教訓人,就問他們說:文士怎麼說基督是大衛的子孫呢?
³⁶ 大衛自己被聖靈感動說:主對我主說,你坐在我的右邊,等我使你仇敵作你的腳凳。
³⁷ 大衛既自己稱他為主,他怎麼又是大衛的子孫呢?眾人都喜歡聽他。
³⁸ 耶穌在教訓之間,又說:你們要防備文士;他們好穿長衣遊行,喜愛人在街市上問他們的安,
³⁹ 又喜愛會堂裡的高位,筵席上的首座;
⁴⁰ 他們侵吞寡婦的家產,假意作很長的禱告。這些人要受更重的刑罰。

此處:一、基督向百姓指出文士在講道上是何等薄弱、何等有缺陷,對於他們所宣稱要詮釋的舊約聖經中所遇到的難題,又是何等無能解答。他舉了一個例子——這事在此處不如在馬太福音中所記的詳盡。當時基督正在殿裡教訓人;他說了許多未經記載的話,但這話被記下了,因為它能激發我們查考基督、並向他查問;因為除了從他自己那裡,無人能對他有正確的認識;這認識不能從文士得來——他們很快就要走投無路。

1. 他們告訴百姓,彌賽亞將是大衛的子孫(可 12:35),他們說得對——他不但要從大衛的腰中生出來,還要坐他的寶座(路 1:32):*主神要把他祖大衛的寶座給他。*聖經屢次這樣說,百姓卻當作文士的話來領受;其實神的真理當從我們的聖經引用,而不是從我們的傳道人引用,因為聖經才是這些真理的源頭。甘甜的水,從源頭直接汲取的最為甘甜。

2. 然而他們卻不能告訴百姓:大衛在靈裡——在預言之靈裡——稱他為主,這是何等合宜的事(詩 110:1)。他們所教訓百姓關於彌賽亞的,只是有關他們民族之榮耀的——他將是他們王室的後裔;卻未曾用心教訓他們那關乎彌賽亞自身之榮耀的——他將是神的兒子,正因如此、也唯獨因如此,他才是大衛的主。如此他們以不義壓制真理,在舊約的福音上與在律法上一樣偏待人。他們能說、也能證明——基督將是大衛的子孫;但若有人反問:*那麼大衛自己為何又稱他為主呢?*他們便不知如何回避這反問的力量了。當留意:那些雖能傳講真理、卻不能在傳講之後稍微為真理辯護、並說服反對者的人,不配坐在摩西的位上。

這話刺痛了文士,因為他們的無知如此被暴露出來,無疑更激起了他們對基督的仇視;然而眾人都喜歡聽他(可 12:37)。他所傳的令人驚奇、令人感動;雖然暗指文士,卻於百姓有益,他們從未聽過這樣的講論。或許他的聲音和宣講方式之中,有些異乎尋常的威嚴與魅力,使他贏得了平民百姓的心;然而我們並未看見有人因此受感動信他、跟從他;他對他們不過如同善於奏樂之人所唱的雅歌——正如以西結之於他的聽眾一樣(結 33:32)。他們當中或許有些人後來也喊著說:釘他十字架,正如希律樂意聽施洗約翰的話,卻仍斬了他。

二、他警告百姓,當防備被文士欺哄、受他們的驕傲和假冒為善所感染:他在教訓之間對他們說:「你們要防備文士」(可 12:38);當站立得穩,既不要接受他們獨特的見解,也不要接受百姓對他們的評論。」在平行經文(太 23:1–39)中,對他們的指控寫得很長;此處則加以簡縮。

1. 他們愛顯得偉大:他們好穿長衣——衣裳直垂到腳——穿着這些衣裳在街上遊行,如同君王、士紳、或穿長袍的官員一般。穿這樣的衣裳本身並不是罪,但他們愛穿,以此自誇,引以為榮,藉此要求人的尊敬——他們對自己的長衣,正如掃羅對撒母耳所說:求你在百姓面前尊榮我——這便是驕傲的果子。基督卻要他的門徒束上腰。

2. 他們愛顯得敬虔:他們祈禱,作很長的禱告,彷彿與天非常親密,在那裡有許多事務。他們留意讓人知道他們禱告、禱告得很長;有人以為這暗示他們不僅為自己禱告,也為別人禱告,並且十分詳細、十分冗長;他們如此行是故意的,為要顯得他們喜愛禱告——不但是為神的緣故,假裝藉此榮耀神,也是為鄰舍的緣故,假裝藉此服事人。

3. 他們在此企圖高抬自己:他們貪圖掌聲,喜愛人的稱讚;他們喜愛街市上的問安、會堂裡的高位、筵席上的首座;這些迎合了虛榮之心。他們以為別人如此待他們,正表明認識他們的人對他們的重視,又為不認識他們的人贏得尊敬。

4. 他們在此企圖使自己富足。他們侵吞寡婦的家產,用這樣或那樣的詭計據為己有;他們之所以戴上敬虔的面具,正是為了掩飾自己不誠實的嫌疑。為免被人看為最壞,他們便努力要顯得最好。當讓欺詐與壓迫因他們褻瀆並玷辱了長篇禱告而更被人唾棄;卻不可因有人如此濫用禱告——甚至是長篇禱告——便以為出於謙卑與真誠的禱告也因此貶值。然而罪惡既以敬虔的外貌掩飾,便是雙重的罪惡,其刑罰也必加倍沉重:這些人要受更重的刑罰——比那些全不禱告的人更重,也比他們若非如此掩飾、僅僅欺壓可憐的寡婦所當受的更重。當留意:在一切人中,假冒為善之人的刑罰將是最重的。

English original

Christ the Son and Lord of David

³⁵ And Jesus answered and said, while he taught in the temple, How say the scribes that Christ is the Son of David?
³⁶ For David himself said by the Holy Ghost, The LORD said to my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool.
³⁷ David therefore himself calleth him Lord; and whence is he then his son? And the common people heard him gladly.
³⁸ And he said unto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and love salutations in the marketplaces,
³⁹ And the chief seats in the synagogues, and the uppermost rooms at feasts:
⁴⁰ Which devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayers: these shall receive greater damnation.

Here, I. Christ shows the people how weak and defective the scribes were in their preaching, and how unable to solve the difficulties that occurred in the scriptures of the Old Testament, which they undertook to expound. Of this he gives an instance, which is not so fully related here as it was in Matthew. Christ was teaching in the temple: many things he said, which were not written; but notice is taken of this, because it will stir us up to enquire concerning Christ, and to enquire of him; for none can have the right knowledge of him but from himself; it is not to be had from the scribes, for they will soon be run aground.

1. They told the people that the Messiah was to be the Son of David (Mk 12:35), and they were in the right; he was not only to descend from his loins, but to fill his throne (Lu 1:32); The Lord shall give him the throne of his father David. The scripture said it often, but the people took it as what the scribes said; whereas the truths of God should rather be quoted from our Bibles than from our ministers, for there is the original of them. Dulcius ex ipso fonte bibuntur aquæ—The waters are sweetest when drawn immediately from their source.

2. Yet they could not tell them how, notwithstanding that it was very proper for David, in spirit, the spirit of prophecy, to call him his Lord, as he doth, Ps 110:1. They had taught the people that concerning the Messiah, which would be for the honour of their nation—that he should be a branch of their royal family; but they had not taken care to teach them that which was for the honour of the Messiah himself—that he should be the Son of God, and, as such, and not otherwise, David's Lord. Thus they held the truth in unrighteousness, and were partial in the gospel, as well as in the law, of the Old Testament. They were able to say it, and prove it—that Christ was to be David's son; but if any should object, How then doth David himself call him Lord? they would not know how to avoid the force of the objection. Note, Those are unworthy to sit in Moses's seat, who, though they are able to preach the truth, are not in some measure able to defend it when they have preached it, and to convince gainsayers.

Now this galled the scribes, to have their ignorance thus exposed, and, no doubt, incensed them more against Christ; but the common people heard him gladly, Mk 12:37. What he preached was surprising and affecting; and though it reflected upon the scribes, it was instructive to them, and they had never heard such preaching. Probably there was something more than ordinarily commanding and charming in his voice and way of delivery, which recommended him to the affections of the common people; for we do not find that any were wrought upon to believe in him, and to follow him, but he was to them as a lovely song of one that could play well on an instrument; as Ezekiel was to his hearers, Eze 33:32. And perhaps some of these cried, Crucify him, as Herod heard John Baptist gladly, and yet cut off his head.

II. He cautions the people to take heed of suffering themselves to be imposed upon by the scribes, and of being infected with their pride and hypocrisy; He said unto them in his doctrine, "Beware of the scribes (Mk 12:38); stand upon your guard, that you neither imbibe their peculiar opinions, nor the opinions of the people concerning them." The charge is long as drawn up against them in the parallel place (Mt 23:1-39); it is here contracted.

1. They affect to appear very great; for they go in long clothing, with vestures down to their feet, and in those they walk about the streets, as princes, or judges, or gentlemen of the long robe. Their going in such clothing was not sinful, but their loving to go in it, priding themselves in it, valuing themselves on it, commanding respect by it, saying to their long clothes, as Saul to Samuel, Honour me now before this people, this was a product of pride. Christ would have his disciples go with their loins girt.

2. They affect to appear very good; for they pray, they make long prayers, as if they were very intimate with heaven, and had a deal of business there. They took care it should be known that they prayed, that they prayed long, which, some think, intimates that they prayed not for themselves only, but for others, and therein were very particular and very large; this they did for a pretence, that they might seem to love prayer, not only for God's sake, whom hereby they pretended to glorify, but for their neighbour's sake, whom hereby they pretended to be serviceable to.

3. They here aimed to advance themselves: they coveted applause, and were fond of it; they loved salutations in the marketplaces, and the chief seats in the synagogues, and the uppermost rooms at feasts; these pleased a vain fancy; to have these given them, they thought, expressed the value they had for them, who did know them, and gained them respect for those who did not.

4. They herein aimed to enrich themselves. They devoured widows' houses, made themselves masters of their estates by some trick or other; it was to screen themselves from the suspicion of dishonesty, that they put on the mask of piety; and that they might not be thought as bad as the worst, they were studious to seem as good as the best. Let fraud and oppression be thought the worse of for their having profaned and disgraced long prayers; but let not prayers, no nor long prayers, be thought the worse of, if made in humility and sincerity, for their having been by some thus abused. But as iniquity, thus disguised with a show of piety, is double iniquity, so its doom will be doubly heavy; These shall receive great damnation; greater than those that live without prayer, greater than they would have received for the wrong done to the poor widows, if it had not been thus disguised. Note, The damnation of hypocrites will be of all others the greatest damnation.

41-44

Christ Commendeth the Poor Widow

Open passage

繁體中文

主耶穌稱讚窮寡婦

⁴¹ 耶穌對銀庫坐著,看眾人怎樣投錢入庫。有好些財主往裡投了若干的錢。
⁴² 有一個窮寡婦來,往裡投了兩個小錢,就是一個大錢。
⁴³ 耶穌叫門徒來,說:我實在告訴們,這窮寡婦投入庫裡的,比眾人所投的更多。
⁴⁴ 因為他們都是自己有餘,拿出來投在裡頭;但這寡婦是自己不足,把她一切養生的都投上了。

這段記事未見於馬太福音,卻見於本書與路加福音。這是主耶穌對那位投入兩個小錢的窮寡婦的稱讚。我們的主雖然講道事務繁忙,仍留意觀察到這件事。當留意:

一、當時有一個為慈善而設的公共基金,眾人將捐項投入其中,再從其中分發給窮人——即一個奉獻箱,且設於聖殿之中;因為慈善之事與敬虔之工本極相稱,可以並行。在神藉我們的敬拜得榮耀之處,也宜藉賙濟他的窮人來尊榮他。我們常見祈禱與賙濟並列,如徒 10:2、4。設立公共的慈善收納之處,以引導並指引個人樂捐,乃是美事;甚至有能力的人,自己也當預備款項,照神所賜的昌盛而積存(林前 16:2),好在有慈善的對象出現時,隨時有所奉獻,因這些款項早已分別為聖歸此用途。

二、耶穌基督留意這事:*他對著銀庫坐著,看眾人怎樣投錢入庫;*他既不因自己無錢可投而埋怨,也不因無權支配所投之錢而不滿,只是觀察人所投入的是甚麼。當留意:我們的主耶穌留意我們為敬虔與慈善之用所奉獻的;是慷慨還是吝嗇;是甘心還是勉強、不情願;他更察看人心,觀察我們施捨時憑甚麼原則、抱甚麼動機——是為主而作,還是只求在人前顯露。

三、他看見許多財主投入許多錢:富人行善,乃是可喜的景象;看見許多富人如此行,並且不僅僅投入,更是投入許多。當留意:富足的人理當豐厚地奉獻;神既豐富賜予我們,也期望我們豐富地賙濟窮人。富人不可僅以為自己與別人奉獻相同便已足夠——那些人或許遠不及他們富有——他們必須照自己的產業按比例奉獻;若沒有需要這般大筆的慈善對象出現,他們就當主動尋找,並籌劃慷慨之事。

四、有一位窮寡婦投入兩個小錢,就是一個大錢(可 12:42),我們的主耶穌卻極力稱讚她:他叫門徒來,要他們留意這事(可 12:43),並告訴他們,她所獻的幾乎難以割捨,因她連自己都不敷所需——這是她一切養生的,是她當日賴以為生的全部,或許其中大部分還是前一日辛勤勞碌所得的。他既知道她是出於真誠的慈善之心而作,便算她所獻的比眾財主所投的全部加起來更多;因為他們是自己有餘而投入,她卻是在自己不足之中投入(可 12:44)。如今許多人或許會輕易責備這位窮寡婦,以為她行得不當:自己幾乎不夠,何必還賙濟別人?慈善當由自家起;或者,她若要奉獻,為何不送給她所認識的某個窮人?何必帶到銀庫,任由祭司長分發——而我們有理由恐怕他們在分發上存有偏私?不責備這位寡婦的人已屬罕見,要效法她的人更難尋見;然而我們的主稱讚她,因此我們確信她行得又善又智。基督若說「好」,旁人說甚麼都無關緊要。我們當由此學到:1. 施捨乃極美善之事,深為主耶穌所喜悅;我們若存謙卑真誠的心而作,他便恩慈地悅納,即使在某些情境中未必有十足的審慎。2. 那些所有不多的人,也當從自己微薄之中施捨。靠勞力餬口、僅足朝夕的人,也當分給那缺少的人(弗 4:28)。3. 克己節用,好能更多地賙濟窮人,乃是極美之事;不僅放棄奢華,甚至為慈善之故放棄安逸。在許多情形中,我們當勒緊自己,好供應別人的急需;這就是愛鄰舍如同自己了。4. 公共慈善當受鼓勵,因它能為一國帶來公共的福分;其中或許有管理不善之處,但這並非我們不當盡自己份額的正當理由。5. 我們在慈善上雖只能奉獻少許,但若照自己的力量、以正直的心獻上,基督必悅納;因為他所要求的,是照人所有的,並不是照人所無的。兩個小錢若以正確的態度獻上,也必記在賬上、被算為賬,如同兩磅一般。6. 我們施捨不僅盡力,甚至盡力之外,更是極可稱讚的——如馬其頓的眾教會,他們的極度貧窮,卻格外顯出樂捐的厚恩(林後 8:2、3)。當我們能從自己本已必需的用度中,甘心為別人預備——如撒勒法的寡婦之於以利亞,基督之於他那五千賓客——並信靠神會用別的方式供應自己,這乃是可稱讚的。

English original

Christ Commendeth the Poor Widow

⁴¹ And Jesus sat over against the treasury, and beheld how the people cast money into the treasury: and many that were rich cast in much.
⁴² And there came a certain poor widow, and she threw in two mites, which make a farthing.
⁴³ And he called unto him his disciples, and saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That this poor widow hath cast more in, than all they which have cast into the treasury:
⁴⁴ For all they did cast in of their abundance; but she of her want did cast in all that she had, even all her living.

This passage of story was not in Matthew, but is here and in Luke; it is Christ's commendation of the poor widow, that cast two mites into the treasury, which our Saviour, busy as he was in preaching, found leisure to take notice of. Observe,

I. There was a public fund for charity, into which contributions were brought, and out of which distributions were made; a poor's-box, and this in the temple; for works of charity and works of piety very fitly go together; where God is honoured by our worship, it is proper he should be honoured by the relief of his poor; and we often find prayers and alms in conjunction, as Ac 10:2,4. It is good to erect public receptacles of charity for the inviting and directing of private hands in giving to the poor; nay it is good for those who are of ability to have funds of their own, to lay by as God has prospered them (1Co 16:2), that they might have something ready to give when an object of charity offers itself, which is before dedicated to such uses.

II. Jesus Christ had an eye upon it; He sat over against the treasury, and beheld now the people cast money into it; not grudging either that he had none to cast in, or had not the disposal of that which was cast in, but observing what was cast in. Note, Our Lord Jesus takes notice of what we contribute to pious and charitable uses; whether we give liberally or sparingly; whether cheerfully or with reluctance and ill-will; nay, he looks at the heart; he observes what principles we act upon, and what our views are, in giving alms; and whether we do it as unto the Lord, or only to be seen of men.

III. He saw many that were rich cast in much: and it was a good sight to see rich people charitable, to see many rich people so, and to see them not only cast in, but cast in much. Note, Those that are rich, ought to give richly; if God give abundantly to us, he expects we should give abundantly to the poor; and it is not enough for those that are rich, to say, that they give as much as others do, who perhaps have much less of the world than they have, but they must give in proportion to their estates; and if objects of charity do not present themselves, that require so much, they ought to enquire them out, and to devise liberal things.

IV. There was a poor widow that cast in two mites, which make a farthing (Mk 12:42); and our Lord Jesus highly commended her; called his disciples to him, and bid them take notice of it (Mk 12:43); told them that she could very ill spare that which she gave, she had scarcely enough for herself, it was all her living, all she had to live upon for that day, and perhaps a great part of what she had earned by her labour the day before; and that forasmuch as he knew she did it from a truly charitable disposition, he reckoned it more than all that put together, which the rich people threw in; for they did cast in of their abundance, but she of her want, Mk 12:44. Now many would have been ready to censure this poor widow, and to think she did ill; why should she give to others, when she had little enough for herself? Charity begins at home; or, if she would give it, why did she not bestow it upon some poor body that she knew? What occasion was there for her bringing it to the treasury to be disposed of by the chief priests, who, we have reason to fear, were partial in the disposal of it? It is so rare a thing to find any that would not blame this widow, that we cannot expect to find any that will imitate her; and yet our Saviour commends her, and therefore we are sure that she did very well and wisely. If Christ saith, Well-done, no matter who saith otherwise; and we must hence learn, 1. That giving alms, is an excellent good thing, and highly pleasing to the Lord Jesus; and if we be humble and sincere in it, he will graciously accept of it, though in some circumstances there may not be all the discretion in the world. 2. Those that have but a little, ought to give alms out of their little. Those that live by their labour, from hand to mouth, must give to those that need, Eph 4:28. 3. It is very good for us to straiten and deny ourselves, that we may be able to give the more to the poor; to deny ourselves not only superfluities, but even conveniences, for the sake of charity. We should in many cases pinch ourselves, that we may supply the necessities of others; this is loving our neighbours as ourselves. 4. Public charities should be encouraged, for they bring upon a nation public blessings; and though there may be some mismanagement of them, yet that is not a good reason why we should not bring in our quota to them. 5. Though we can give but a little in charity, yet if it be according to our ability, and be given with an upright heart, it shall be accepted of Christ, who requires according to what a man has, and not according to what he has not; two mites shall be put upon the score, and brought to account, if given in a right manner, as if they had been two pounds. 6. It is much to the praise of charity, when we give not only to our power, but beyond our power, as the Macedonian churches, whose deep poverty abounded to the riches of their liberality, 2Co 8:2,3. When we can cheerfully provide for others, out of our own necessary provision, as the widow of Sarepta for Elijah, and Christ for his five thousand guests, and trust God to provide for us some other way, this is thank-worthy.