Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary · Mark Chapter 2

Optimized commentary reader

Chapter commentary

Mark Chapter 2

서론

Untitled

Open passage

简体中文

在本章中我们有:一、基督医治一个患瘫痪病的人(可2:1-12)。二、他从税关上呼召马太,并因此与税吏和罪人同席,又为如此行而为自己分诉(可2:13-17)。三、他为门徒在安息日掐麦穗、不像那样多禁食之事而为自己分诉(可2:23-28)。这一切事迹我们先前已有(太9:1-38,12:1-50)。

English original

In this chapter, we have, I. Christ's healing a man that was sick of a palsy, Mk 2:1-12. II. His calling of Matthew from the receipt of custom, and his eating, upon that occasion, with publicans and sinners, and justifying himself in so doing, Mk 2:13-17. III. His justifying his disciples in not fasting so much as those plucking the ears of corn on the sabbath day, Mk 2:23-28. All which passages we had before, Mt 9:1-38,12:1-50

1-12

The Healing of a Paralytic

Open passage

简体中文

治愈瘫子

¹ 过了些日子,耶稣又进了迦百农。人听见他在房子里, ² 就有许多人聚集,甚至连门前都没有空地;耶稣就对他们讲道。 ³ 有人带着一个瘫子来,是由四个人抬来的。 ⁴ 因为人多,不得近前,就把耶稣所在的房子拆了房顶,既拆通了,就把瘫子连所躺卧的褥子都缒下来。 ⁵ 耶稣见他们的信心,就对瘫子说:「小子,你的罪赦了。」 ⁶ 有几个文士坐在那里,心里议论,说: ⁷ 「这个人为什么这样说呢?他说僭妄的话了。除了神一位之外,谁能赦罪呢?」 ⁸ 耶稣心中知道他们心里这样议论,就说:「你们心里为什么这样议论呢? ⁹ 或对瘫子说『你的罪赦了』,或说『起来!拿你的褥子行走』,哪一样容易呢? ¹⁰ 但要叫你们知道,人子在地上有赦罪的权柄。」就对瘫子说: ¹¹ 「我吩咐你,起来!拿你的褥子回家去吧。」 ¹² 那人就起来,立刻拿着褥子,当众人面前出去了,以致众人都惊奇,归荣耀与神,说:「我们从来没有见过这样的事!」

基督在乡间讲道一些时日之后,此处回到他的总部迦百农,在那里露面,盼望此时议论和人群已稍稍平息。现在请看,

一、当时向他蜂拥而至的人。虽然他「在房子里」——是彼得的家,或是他自己所租的住处——可他一到镇上的消息一传开,人就向他涌来;他们并不等到他在会堂里露面——他们明知安息日他必会在那里——而是「立刻有许多人聚集」到他那里。王在哪里,朝廷也在那里;细罗在哪里,「万民都必归顺」。在把握机会造就我们灵魂的事上,当留心不要虚掷光阴。一个邀请一个(「来,我们去看耶稣」),以致他的房子容不下来访者。「再也没有地方容他们」,人如此之多,「连门前也没有」。一幅蒙福的景象——众人如此如云飞集到基督的房子——虽然那不过是一间简陋的房子——「如同鸽子飞向它们的窗户」!

二、基督赐给他们的美好款待——是他的房子所能提供的上好之物,且胜过任何别处所能提供的;他「对他们讲道」(可 2:2)。他们当中许多人或许只为求医治而来,许多人或许只出于好奇,想看他一眼;但他既把他们聚在一起,就对他们讲道。虽然会堂的门在适当时候向他敞开,他却毫不介意在一所房子里、在一个工作日讲道;尽管有人也许认为这既不是合适的场所,也不是合适的时候。「播种在诸水之旁的有福了」(赛 32:20)。

三、把一个可怜的瘫子带到他面前,求他帮助。病患是一个「瘫子」,看来不像马太福音 8:6 所记那般「痛苦甚大」,而是完全不能动弹,所以「由四个人抬来」,是「用褥子」抬来的,仿佛抬在棺架上一般。需要这样被抬是他的不幸,说明人世间多有灾祸;而肯这样抬他乃是这些人的善心,说明在人之同胞遭遇患难时,理当在其中存有同情——因为我们不知这患难何时会临到我们自己。这些好亲属或邻舍心想,只要能把这可怜人抬到基督面前一次,以后就不必再抬他了;因此想方设法把他带到他面前;既然不能从别处就近他,他们就「拆了耶稣所在房子的房顶」(可 2:4)。我并不认为必须断定基督是在楼上讲道——尽管拥有华美宅第的犹太人在楼上设祷告处;因为若是如此,众人又何必「站在门前」,如同智慧的座上客常做的(箴 8:34)呢?我倒推测,他所在的房子既小又简陋(与他眼前的光景相称),根本没有楼上,而底层直通屋顶:这些为瘫子求恩的人,决意不要空手而归,既挤不过门前的人群,就想方设法把他们的朋友弄到房顶上,掀开几片瓦,用绳子连褥子把他缒到基督讲道的房子里。这既表明他们在向基督求助时的信心,也表明他们的恳切。由此显出他们是认真的,绝不空走,「不蒙祝福不让基督去」(创 32:26)。

四、基督对这可怜病患所说的恩言;「耶稣见他们的信心」——或许不太多是这瘫子本人的信心,因为他的病妨碍他运用信心,而是抬他来之人的信心。在医治百夫长的仆人时,基督留意他的信心——他不把仆人带到基督面前,却相信他能远距离医治;此处他称赞他们的信心——因为他们竟克服这么多困难把朋友抬了来。请注意,真信心和强信心可以有不同的作为——有时胜过理性的难处,有时胜过感官的难处;但无论以何种方式显出,都必蒙耶稣基督悦纳称许。基督说:「小子,你的罪赦了。」这称呼何等温柔——「小子」;表明一种为父的关怀与顾念。基督认信徒为他的儿子:「儿子」,却瘫了。在此「神待你们如同待儿子一般」。这副良药何等丰盛;「你的罪赦了。」请注意,1. 罪是我们一切痛苦疾病的根源。基督这话是要把他的心思从那疾病——即结果——上挪开,引到罪——即原因——上,好叫他更关心罪,以求罪得赦免。2. 当神赦免罪的时候,他才恩慈地除去疾病的毒钩和恶性;唯有罪得赦免,病得痊愈才是真正的怜悯(参赛 38:17、诗 103:3)。除掉结果的方法,是除掉原因。罪的赦免直击一切疾病的根源,或医治它,或改变它的性质。

五、文士对基督这话的吹毛求疵,以及对他们这论断之无理的驳正。文士是律法的解经者,他们的教训是对的——任何受造之物若自称能赦罪,便是僭妄,因为那是神独有的特权(赛 43:25)。但正如这类教师所常行的,他们的应用是错的,是出于他们对基督的无知与敌意。「除了神一位之外,没有人能赦罪」——这话不错;但由此推论基督不能赦罪,便是错的,因为他已经充充足足地证明自己拥有属神的权能。但「耶稣心中知道他们心里这样议论」;这就证明他是神,因而印证了所要证明的——他有权柄赦罪;因为他「察看人心」,「知道人里面有什么」(启 2:23)。神的尊荣是不可分的,那能知道人心意念的,就能赦罪。这更显基督在赦罪上的恩典——他知道人的心思意念,所以比任何人都更知道他们诸罪的邪恶与详情,却仍乐于赦免。如今他借着显明自己有治病的能力,来证明他赦罪的权能(可 2:9-11)。他若不能行那一件,就不会假装要行这一件;「但要叫你们知道,人子——弥赛亚——「在地上有赦罪的权柄」,叫你知道我有这权柄——「你这瘫子,『起来,拿你的褥子』。」如今,1. 这本身是一个恰当的论证。他若不能除掉罪——那原因——就不能医治疾病——那结果。况且他医治疾病,正是他赦罪的表号,因为罪是灵魂的疾病;罪既赦免,就是痊愈。那能凭一句话成就记号的,无疑也能成就记号所指的事。2. 这对他们也合适。这些属肉体的文士,比起赦罪后更属灵的结果,更容易被治病这样眼见的功效所触动,也更容易因此信服;所以这样问最是恰当:「说『你的罪赦了』容易,还是说『起来行走』容易呢?」刑罚既被挪去,罪也就被免去;那能在医治上走到这一步的,无疑能完成全功(参赛 33:24)。

六、病患得医治,以及这事在百姓中所产生的印象(可 2:12)。他不但从褥子上起来,完全康复,而且为了表明他的力气已完全恢复,他「拿起褥子」——因为它挡在路上——「当众人面前出去了」;「众人都惊奇」——他们理当如此——并「归荣耀与神」——这是他们当做的;说:「*我们从来没有见过这样的事!*在我们这个时代,从未行过这样的奇事。」请注意,基督的工作是前无古人的。当我们看见他在医治灵魂上所行的,就必承认我们「从来没有见过这样的事」。

English original

The Healing of a Paralytic

¹ And again he entered into Capernaum after some days; and it was noised that he was in the house.
² And straightway many were gathered together, insomuch that there was no room to receive them, no, not so much as about the door: and he preached the word unto them.
³ And they come unto him, bringing one sick of the palsy, which was borne of four.
⁴ And when they could not come nigh unto him for the press, they uncovered the roof where he was: and when they had broken it up, they let down the bed wherein the sick of the palsy lay.
⁵ When Jesus saw their faith, he said unto the sick of the palsy, Son, thy sins be forgiven thee.
⁶ But there were certain of the scribes sitting there, and reasoning in their hearts,
⁷ Why doth this man thus speak blasphemies? who can forgive sins but God only?
⁸ And immediately when Jesus perceived in his spirit that they so reasoned within themselves, he said unto them, Why reason ye these things in your hearts?
⁹ Whether is it easier to say to the sick of the palsy, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and take up thy bed, and walk?
¹⁰ But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (he saith to the sick of the palsy,)
¹¹ I say unto thee, Arise, and take up thy bed, and go thy way into thine house.
¹² And immediately he arose, took up the bed, and went forth before them all; insomuch that they were all amazed, and glorified God, saying, We never saw it on this fashion.

Christ, having been for some time preaching about in the country, here returns to Capernaum his head-quarters, and makes his appearance there, in hopes that by this time the talk and crowd would be somewhat abated. Now observe,

I. The great resort there was to him. Though he was in the house, wither Peter's house, or some lodgings of his own which he had taken, yet people came to him as soon as it was noised that he was in town; they did not stay till he appeared in the synagogue, which they might be sure he would do on the sabbath day, but straightway many were gathered together to him. Where the king is, there is the court; where Shiloh is, there shall the gathering of the people be. In improving opportunities for our souls, we must take care not to lose time. One invited another (Come, let us go see Jesus), so that his house could not contain his visitants. There was no room to receive them, they were so numerous, no not so much as about the door. A blessed sight, to see people thus flying like a cloud to Christ's house, though it was but a poor one, and as the doves to their windows!

II. The good entertainment Christ gave them, the best his house would afford, and better than any other could; he preached the word unto them, Mk 2:2. Many of them perhaps came only for cures, and many perhaps only for curiosity, to get a sight of him; but when he had them together he preached to them. Though the synagogue-door was open to him at proper times, he thought it not at all amiss to preach in a house, on a week day; though some might reckon it both an improper place and an improper time. Blessed are ye that sow beside all waters, Isa 32:20.

III. The presenting of a poor cripple to him, to be helped by him. The patient was one sick of the palsy, it should seem not as that, Mt 8:6, grievously tormented, but perfectly disabled, so that he was borne of four, was carried upon a bed, as if he had been upon a bier, by four persons. It was his misery, that he needed to be so carried, and bespeaks the calamitous state of human life; it was their charity, who did so carry him, and bespeaks the compassion that it is justly expected should be in the children of men toward their fellow-creatures in distress, because we know not how soon the distress may be our own. These kind relations or neighbours thought, if they could but carry this poor man once to Christ, they should not need to carry him any more; and therefore made hard shift to get him to him; and when they could not otherwise get to him, they uncovered the roof where he was, Mk 2:4. I see no necessity to conclude that Christ was preaching in an upper room, though in such the Jews that had stately houses, had their oratories; for then to what purpose should the crowd stand before the door, as wisdom's clients used to do? Pr 8:34. But I rather conjecture that the house he was in, was so little and mean (agreeable to his present state), that it had no upper room, but the ground-floor was open to the roof: and these petitioners for the poor paralytic, resolving not to be disappointed, when they could not get through the crowd at the door, got their friend by some means or other to the roof of the house, took off some of the tiles, and so let him down upon his bed with cords into the house where Christ was preaching. This bespoke both their faith and their fervency in this address to Christ. Hereby it appeared that they were in earnest, and would not go away, nor let Christ go without a blessing. Ge 32:26.

IV. The kind word Christ said to this poor patient; He saw their faith; perhaps not so much his, for his distemper hindered him from the exercise of faith, but theirs that brought him. In curing the centurion's servant, Christ took notice of it as an instance of his faith, that he did not bring him to Christ, but believed he could cure him at a distance; here he commended their faith, because they did bring their friend through so much difficulty. Note, True faith and strong faith may work variously, conquering sometimes the objections of reason, sometimes those of sense; but, however manifested, it shall be accepted and approved by Jesus Christ. Christ said, Son, thy sins be forgiven thee. The compellation is very tender-Son; intimating a fatherly care of him and concern for him. Christ owns true believers as his sons: a son, and yet sick of the palsy. Herein God deals with you as with sons. The cordial is very rich; Thy sins are forgiven thee. Note, 1. Sin is the procuring cause of all our pains and sicknesses. The word of Christ was to take his thoughts off from the disease, which was the effect, and to lead them to the sin, the cause, that he might be more concerned about that, to get that pardoned. 2. God doth then graciously take away the sting and malignity of sickness, when he forgives sin; recovery from sickness is then a mercy indeed, when way is made for it by the pardon of sin. See Isa 38:17, Ps 103:3. The way to remove the effect, is, to take away the cause. Pardon of sin strikes at the root of all diseases, and either cures them, or alters their property.

V. The cavil of the scribes at that which Christ said, and a demonstration of the unreasonableness of their cavil. They were expositors of the law, and their doctrine was true—that it is blasphemy for any creature to undertake the pardon of sin, and that it is God's prerogative, Isa 43:25. But, as is usual with such teachers, their application was false, and was the effect of their ignorance and enmity to Christ. It is true, None can forgive sins but God only; but it is false that therefore Christ cannot, who had abundantly proved himself to have a divine power. But Christ perceived in his spirit that they so reasoned within themselves; this proves him to be God, and therefore confirmed what was to be proved, that he had authority to forgive sins; for he searched the heart, and knew what was in man, Re 2:23. God's royalties are inseparable, and he that could know thoughts, could forgive sins. This magnifies the grace of Christ, in pardoning sin, that he knew men's thoughts, and therefore knows more than any other can know, both of the sinfulness of their sins and the particulars of them, and yet is ready to pardon. Now he proves his power to forgive sin, by demonstrating his power to cure the man sick of the palsy, Mk 2:9-11. He would not have pretended to do the one, if he could not have done the other; that ye may know that the Son of man, the Messiah, has power on earth to forgive sin, that I have that power, Thou that art sick of the palsy, arise, take up thy bed. Now, 1. This was a suitable argument in itself. He could not have cured the disease, which was the effect, if he could not have taken away the sin, which was the cause. And besides, his curing diseases was a figure of his pardoning sin, for sin is the disease of the soul; when it is pardoned, it is healed. He that could by a word accomplish the sign, could doubtless perform the thing signified, 2. It was suited to them. These carnal scribes would be more affected with such a suitable effect of a pardon as the cure of the disease, and be sooner convinced by it, than by any other more spiritual consequences; therefore it was proper enough to appeal, whether it is easier to say, Thy sins are forgiven thee, or to say, Arise, and walk? The removing of the punishment as such, was the remitting of the sin; he that could go so far in the cure, no doubt could perfect it. See Isa 33:24.

VI. The cure of the sick man, and the impression it made upon the people, Mk 2:12. He not only arise out of his bed, perfectly well, but, to show that he had perfect strength restored to him, he took up his bed, because it lay in the way, and went forth before them all; and they were all amazed, as well they might, and glorified God, as indeed they ought; saying, "We never saw it on this fashion; never were such wonders as these done before in our time." Note, Christ's works were without precedent. When we see what he does in healing souls, we must own that we never saw the like.

13-17

Christ among Publicans and Sinners

Open passage

简体中文

基督与税吏罪人同席

¹³ 耶稣又出到海边去,众人都就了他来,他便教训他们。 ¹⁴ 耶稣经过的时候,看见亚勒腓的儿子利未坐在税关上,就对他说:「你跟从我来。」他就起来,跟从了耶稣。 ¹⁵ 耶稣在利未家里坐席的时候,有好些税吏和罪人与耶稣并门徒一同坐席;因为这样的人多,他们也跟随耶稣。 ¹⁶ 法利赛人中的文士看见耶稣和罪人并税吏一同吃饭,就对他门徒说:「他和税吏并罪人一同吃喝吗?」 ¹⁷ 耶稣听见,就对他们说:「康健的人用不着医生,有病的人才用得着。我来本不是召义人,乃是召罪人。」

此处,

一、基督在海边讲道(可 2:13);他到那里去为着宽敞,因为经过第二次尝试,他发现没有一间房子、没有一条街道足以容纳他的听众;而在沙滩上,要来多少人都可。由此可见,我们的主耶稣嗓音洪亮,能以大声讲话,也确曾如此;因为「智慧在街市上呼喊,在宽阔处发声」。无论他到哪里,即使到海边,众人也都就近他。基督的教训无论在哪里忠实地传讲,即使被赶到角落或荒野,我们也当跟随。

二、他呼召利未;这人就是马太,他在迦百农的税关有一席之地,由此被称为税吏;他的位置把他定在水边,基督便往那里去遇见他,给他有效的呼召。此处说这利未是「亚勒腓」或作「革罗罢」的儿子——革罗罢是那位童女马利亚的姐妹或近亲马利亚的丈夫;若是如此,他就是小雅各、犹大和迦南人西门的亲兄弟,那么他们中间便有四兄弟是使徒。马太大概本来是个放荡奢靡的青年,否则既为犹太人,断不致作税吏。然而基督呼召他来「跟从」他。保罗虽是法利赛人,本是「罪人中的罪魁」,却蒙召作使徒。在神那里,借着他,有赦免最大之罪的怜悯,也有使最大罪人为圣的恩典。马太从前是税吏,却成了福音作者,是头一个执笔的,也是记载基督生平最详细的。归正前的大罪、大丑闻,并不拦阻归正后的大恩赐、大恩典、大高升;不,神反而可能因此更显荣耀。基督以这呼召在他以先临到他;在身体的医治上,通常是人来寻求他,但在这些属灵的医治上,他却被「没有寻找他的人遇见」。因为罪的疾病,其大恶与大险正在于此:在它权下的人,并不愿意痊愈。

三、他与税吏和罪人相熟相交(可 2:15)。此处告诉我们:1. 基督在利未家里坐席——利未请了他和他的门徒赴他辞别亲友的筵席,那时他撇下一切来跟从基督:他摆设这样的筵席,正如以利沙所作的(王上 19:21),为要表明他是何等乐意、又何等感谢神地撇下一切,以顺服基督的呼召。他正当把他「与基督订婚」的日子作为节期。这亦是为了向基督致敬,并表示他深知基督的厚恩——把他如「火中抽出来的一根柴」从税关里救出来。2. 「有好些税吏和罪人」与基督同坐利未家中(因为属那税关的人多);「他们也跟随耶稣」。有人解作:他们跟随利未——设想利未如撒该一样,是「税吏长」,又「很富足」,所以那些低一等的为有所得而附从他。我倒以为他们之所以「跟随耶稣」,是因为听见过他的名声。他们并非为良心的缘故撇下一切来跟从他,而是为好奇的缘故来赴利未的筵席,要看他;然而不论因何而来,他们竟与耶稣和他的门徒同坐。税吏在此处和别处都被列在罪人,最坏的罪人之中。(1)因为通常他们就是如此;那职分在执行上败坏得如此普遍——欺压、强索、收受贿赂或苛敛的规费、「讹诈人」(路 3:13-14)。一个忠心、公道的税吏极其罕见,连在罗马也是如此,所以一个名叫萨比努的、在职分上保持清白名声的人,死后竟得这样的铭刻:Kalos telōnēsanti——「这里躺着一个诚实的税吏」。(2)因为犹太人特别憎恶他们和他们的职分,视为对民族自由的侮辱、为奴的标记,所以给它们冠以恶名,以为与他们同伙是可耻的。我们蒙福的主既「成为罪身的形状」,就乐意与这样的人交往。

四、文士和法利赛人对此所起的反感(可 2:16)。他们不肯来听他讲道——本来他们可能因此受感动得益;他们却要亲自来看他与税吏罪人同席,这必然激怒他们。他们设法使门徒对他们的夫子失去好感,看他不是像他身份所当有的那样圣洁、那样严肃的人;所以把问题摆在他们面前:「他和税吏并罪人一同吃喝吗?」请注意,一件既行得好、又设计得好的事,被人曲解、变为对最智慧、最善良之人的毁谤,这并非新事。

五、基督在此事上为自己的辩护(可 2:17)。他坚持自己所行的,不肯退让,虽然法利赛人见怪——后来彼得却曾如此行(加 2:12)。请注意,那些为要向一些挑剔之人保全自己好名声而肯放下善工的人,对自己好名声过于爱惜。基督却不如此。他们以为税吏当被恨恶。基督说:「不,他们当被怜悯,他们是病人,需要医生;他们是罪人,需要救主。」他们以为基督的品格当使他远离他们。基督说:「不,我所奉的差遣正是要我去寻找他们:『我来本不是召义人,乃是召罪人。』世人若是义人,我本不必来——既不必来传悔改,也不必来买赎赦免。我所奉差遣的,正是到有罪的世界来;所以我的事工最要紧的,正是在这世上最大的罪人身上。」或如此解:「我来本不是召义人」——不是那些自以为义的骄傲法利赛人,他们问说:「我们如何才是转向呢?」(玛 3:7)「我们当悔改什么?」而是那些自认为罪人的穷税吏,他们乐于受邀请、受勉励去悔改。与有指望的人打交道是好的;而「愚昧人比心中自以为是的人更有指望」(箴 26:12)。

English original

Christ among Publicans and Sinners

¹³ And he went forth again by the sea side; and all the multitude resorted unto him, and he taught them.
¹⁴ And as he passed by, he saw Levi the son of Alphæus sitting at the receipt of custom, and said unto him, Follow me. And he arose and followed him.
¹⁵ And it came to pass, that, as Jesus sat at meat in his house, many publicans and sinners sat also together with Jesus and his disciples: for there were many, and they followed him.
¹⁶ And when the scribes and Pharisees saw him eat with publicans and sinners, they said unto his disciples, How is it that he eateth and drinketh with publicans and sinners?
¹⁷ When Jesus heard it, he saith unto them, They that are whole have no need of the physician, but they that are sick: I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.

Here is,

I. Christ preaching by the sea-side (Mk 2:13), whither he went for room, because he found, upon second trial, no house or street large enough to contain his auditory; but upon the strand there might come as many as would. It should seem by this, that our Lord Jesus had a strong voice, and could and did speak loud; for wisdom crieth without in the places of concourse. Wherever he goes, though it be to the sea-side, multitudes resort to him. Wherever the doctrine of Christ is faithfully preached, though it be driven into corners or into deserts, we must follow it.

II. His calling Levi; the same with Matthew, who had a place in the custom-house at Capernaum, from which he was denominated a publican; his place fixed him by the water-side, and thither Christ went to meet with him, and to give him an effectual call. This Levi is here said to be the son of Alpheus or Cleophas, husband to that Mary who was sister or near kinswoman to the virgin Mary and if so, he was own brother to James the less, and Jude, and Simon the Canaanite, so that there were four brothers of them apostles, It is probable that Matthew was but a loose extravagant young man, or else, being a Jew, he would never have been a publican. However, Christ called him to follow him. Paul, though a Pharisee, had been one of the chief of sinners, and yet was called to be an apostle. With God, through Christ, there is mercy to pardon the greatest sins, and grace to sanctify the greatest sinners. Matthew, that had been a publican, became an evangelist, the first that put pen to paper, and the fullest in writing the life of Christ. Great sin and scandal before conversion, are no bar to great gifts, graces, and advancements, after; nay, God may be the more glorified. Christ prevented him with this call; in bodily cures, ordinarily, he was sought unto, but in these spiritual cures, he was found of them that sought him not. For this is the great evil and peril of the disease of sin, that those who are under it, desire not to be made whole.

III. His familiar converse with publicans and sinners, Mk 2:15. We are here told, 1. That Christ sat at meat in Levi's house, who invited him and his disciples to the farewell-feast he made to his friends, when he left all to attend on Christ: such a feast he made, as Elisha did (1Ki 19:21), to show, not only with what cheerfulness in himself, but with what thankfulness to God, he quitted all, in compliance with Christ's call. Fitly did he make the day of his espousals to Christ a festival day. This was also to testify his respect to Christ, and the grateful sense he had of his kindness, in snatching him from the receipt of custom as a brand out of the burning. 2. That many publicans and sinners sat with Christ in Levi's house (for there were many belonging to that custom-house); and they followed him. They followed Levi; so some understand it, supposing that, like Zaccheus, he was chief among the publicans, and was rich; and for that reason, the inferior sort of them attended him for what they could get. I rather take it, that they followed Jesus because of the report they had heard of him. They did not for conscience-sake leave all to follow him, but for curiosity-sake they came to Levi's feast, to see him; whatever brought them thither, they were sitting with Jesus and his disciples. The publicans are here and elsewhere ranked with sinners, the worst of sinners. (1.) Because commonly they were such; so general were the corruptions in the execution of that office, oppressing, exacting, and taking bribes or fees to extortion, and accusing falsely, Lu 3:13,14. A faithful fair-dealing publican was so rare, even at Rome, that one Sabinus, who kept a clean reputation in that office, was, after his death, honoured with this inscription, Kalos telonesanti—Here lies an honest publican. (2.) Because the Jews had a particular antipathy to them and their office, as an affront to the liberty of their nation and a badge of their slavery, and therefore put them into an ill name, and thought it scandalous to be seen in their company. Such as these our blessed Lord was pleased to converse with, when he appeared in the likeness of sinful flesh.

IV. The offence which the scribes and Pharisees took at this, Mk 2:16. They would not come to hear him preach, which they might have been convinced the edified by; but they would come themselves to see him sit with publicans and sinners, which they would be provoked by. They endeavoured to put the disciples out of conceit with their Master, as a man not of such sanctity and severe morals as became his character; and therefore put the question to them. How is it, that he eateth and drinketh with publicans and sinners? Note, It is no new thing for that which is both well-done, and well-designed, to be misrepresented, and turned to the reproach of the wisest and best of men.

V. Christ's justification of himself in it, Mk 2:17. He stood to what he did, and would not withdraw, though the Pharisees were offended, as Peter afterwards did, Ga 2:12. Note, Those are too tender of their own good name, who, to preserve it with some nice people, will decline a good work. Christ would not do so. They thought the publicans were to be hated. "No," saith Christ, "they are to be pitied, they are sick and need a physician; they are sinners, and need a Saviour." They thought Christ's character should separate him from them; "No," saith Christ, "my commission directs me to them; I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance. If the world had been righteous, there had been no occasion for my coming, either to preach repentance, or to purchase remission. It is to a sinful world that I am sent, and therefore my business lies most with those that are the greatest sinners in it." Or thus; "I am not come to call the righteous, the proud Pharisees that think themselves righteous, that ask, Wherein shall we return? (Mal 3:7), Of what shall we repent? But poor publicans, that own themselves to be sinners, and are glad to be invited and encouraged to repent." It is good dealing with those that there is hope of; now there is more hope of a fool than of one that is wise in his own conceit, Pr 26:12.

18-28

The Hypocritical Rigour of the Pharisees

Open passage

简体中文

法利赛人假冒为善的苛求

¹⁸ 当下约翰的门徒和法利赛人禁食。他们来问耶稣说,约翰的门徒和法利赛人的门徒禁食,你的门徒倒不禁食,这是为什么呢。 ¹⁹ 耶稣对他们说,新郎和陪伴之人同在的时候,陪伴之人岂能禁食呢。新郎还同在,他们不能禁食。 ²⁰ 但日子将到,新郎要离开他们,那日他们就要禁食。 ²¹ 没有人把新布缝在旧衣服上。恐怕所补上的新布,带坏了旧衣服,破的就更大了。 ²² 也没有人把新酒装在旧皮袋里。恐怕酒把皮袋裂开,酒和皮袋就都坏了。惟把新酒装在新皮袋里。 ²³ 耶稣当安息日,从麦地经过。他门徒行路的时候,掐了麦穗。 ²⁴ 法利赛人对耶稣说,看哪,他们在安息日为什么作不可作的事呢。 ²⁵ 耶稣对他们说,经上记着大卫和跟从他的人,缺乏饥饿之时所作的事,你们没有念过么。 ²⁶ 他当亚比亚他作大祭司的时候,怎么进了 神的殿,吃了陈设饼,又给跟从他的人吃。这饼除了祭司以外,人都不可吃。 ²⁷ 又对他们说,安息日是为人设立的,人不是为安息日设立的。 ²⁸ 所以人子也是安息日的主。

基督既曾被迫为自己与税吏并罪人一同坐席辩白,此处他又要为他的门徒辩白;凡他们照他旨意所行的,他必为他们辩白,并为他们撑腰。

一、他为门徒不禁食辩白——这事被法利赛人转为他们的羞辱。法利赛人和约翰的门徒为什么禁食呢?他们素来禁食,法利赛人一礼拜禁食两次(路18:12),约翰的门徒大概也是如此;看来正是基督和他的门徒在利未家里坐席的那一天,正是他们的禁食日,因为原文是nesteuousi——他们正在禁食,这就加重了那冒犯。严格的信仰者正是如此易于以自己的行为为标准,去非难、定罪一切不完全达到这标准的人。他们不怀好意地暗示:若基督到罪人中去是为行善——如他所分诉的——那么门徒去却是放纵食欲,因为他们从不知禁食或舍己为何物。当知:恶意总是猜想最坏。

基督为门徒不禁食提出两点理由。

  1. 如今对他们是安逸的日子,禁食如今并不如日后那样合时(可2:19-20)。凡事都有定时。进入婚姻之境的人,必预料到有挂虑和肉身受苦,但在婚筵的期间他们仍是欢乐的,并以为理当如此;参孙的新妇在筵席的日子之内在他面前哭泣,是极不合宜的(士14:17)。基督和他的门徒不过是新近结合,新郎仍与他们同在,婚筵仍在举行(特别是马太的筵席);当新郎被接去离开他们,往远方去办理自己的事,那时才宜于如寡妇独坐,在孤独与禁食之中度日。

  2. 如今对他们是起头的日子,他们尚不如日后那样能担当宗教的严谨操练。法利赛人久已习惯于这样的禁欲;施洗约翰自己也是不吃不喝而来的。他的门徒从起初就习惯于艰苦,所以觉得严格频繁的禁食更易担当;但基督的门徒却不然;他们的夫子是也吃也喝而来的,并未将他们培养到如今难以胜任的宗教服事,因为这一切都要按时分。起头便要他们如此频繁禁食,必使他们灰心,或许还把他们从跟从基督的路上赶走;其恶果必如把新酒装在旧皮袋里,或将新布缝在那穿得稀疏破旧的衣上(可2:21-22)。当知: 神恩惠地体恤那软弱幼嫩之年轻基督徒的光景,我们也当如此;我们也不可期望过于当日之工在当日而成,而那日子又要照着力量,因为赐力量使我们能承当那日子,并不在我们的手中。许多人在年幼时因吃了某种本来可好的食物过量而厌恶它;照样,许多人在起头之时被重担压住、被勉强带着祭物来服事,便对敬虔的操练心怀成见。软弱的基督徒当谨防过分勉强自己,也不可把基督的轭变成别的样子,而当保持其容易、甘甜、令人愉悦的本相。

二、他为门徒在安息日掐麦穗辩白——我敢说,法利赛人的门徒绝不敢如此行;因为这与他们长老明确的遗传相悖。在这一件事上,正如在前一件事上,他们挑剔基督学房的规矩,仿佛它不如他们的严谨:那些否认敬虔的能力的人,偏偏热心于仪文,又好非难那些不效法他们仪文的人,正是如此普遍。当知:

  1. 基督的门徒在一个安息日早晨去聚会之时(可2:23),早饭何等简陋——他们掐了麦穗,这就是他们最好的食物。他们专心于属灵的美食,竟忘了自己必需的饮食;基督的话在他们里面代替了它;他们为道的热心甚至把他们吞噬了。犹太人视在安息日吃美味为敬虔的一部分,门徒却以任何食物为足。

  2. 法利赛人连这也嫉妒,以为在安息日掐麦穗是不合宜的,这与收割同样是作工(可2:24):「他们在安息日为什么作不可作的事呢?」 当知:基督的门徒若作不合法的事,基督必被牵连,被以此事责备——正如他在此被责备一样——他的名也必蒙羞。值得注意的是:法利赛人以为基督行得不妥时,他们告诉门徒(可2:16);如今他们以为门徒行得不妥时,却向基督说——可见他们是好挑拨是非的人,尽力要在基督和他的门徒之间散播不和,在家里制造破口。

  3. 基督如何为他们所行的辩护。

(1)以例证。大卫在饥饿之时吃陈设饼,又没有别的饼可得,他们对此有好的先例(可2:25-26);「你们没有念过么?」 当知:我们若肯回想自己在圣经里所读过的,许多误解就得以纠正,对别人不公正的非难也得以改正;诉诸圣经是最有说服力的。「你们念过大卫——合 神心意的人——饥饿之时并不迟疑吃陈设饼,而按律法除了祭司和他们一家之外,无人可吃。」当知:仪文的遵守当让位于道德的本分;在必要情形中,原本不可行的,那时也可行。大卫这事,经上说是在大祭司亚比亚他的日子作的;或作在亚比亚他日子之前不久——他随即接续他父亲亚希米勒任大祭司职,那时大概是他父亲职任上的副手或助手;逃脱屠杀的就是他,他把以弗得带到大卫那里。

(2)以论证。为叫他们能接纳门徒掐麦穗,让他们考虑:

[1] 安息日是为谁设立的(可2:27);安息日是为人设立的,人不是为安息日设立的。 这话我们在马太福音里没有。安息日是神圣属神的制度;但我们当以它为特权、为益处来领受和接受,而不是当作任务和苦役。第一, 神从未设计它成为对我们的重担,所以我们也不可使之成为自己的重担。人不是为安息日设立的,因为人在安息日设立之前一日就被造了。人是为神造的,为他的荣耀和事奉而造,他宁可死也不可否认他;但他并不是为安息日造的,以致被安息日的律法捆绑,不能行那维持生命所必需的事。第二, 神的确设计它成为对我们的益处,所以我们当如此看待并加以善用。他为人设立了它。1. 在这制度里,他对我们的身体有几分顾念,使它们可以歇息,不被这世界不断的业务所累(申5:14):「使你的仆婢可以歇息。」 那设立安息日之安息为叫我们身体得歇息的,当然从未打算在必要情形下禁止我们去取身体所必需的供应;安息日的解释当不与自身相悖——是为建立,不是为毁坏。2. 他对我们的灵魂更是大有顾念。安息日被立为安息之日,只是为要使它成为圣工之日、与 神相交之日、赞美感恩之日;所以歇下属世的业务是必要的,好叫我们能专心从事这工,并在公众和私下都用全部时间在其中;但那时也容许我们花时间作身体所需的事——就是使我们的身体适于服事灵魂事奉 神,并使身体能在那事工中与灵魂同步伐而行。在此可见:(1)我们事奉的主何等良善,他的一切制度都是为我们自己的益处,我们若智慧地遵守,便是为自己有智慧;借着我们的事奉得利的不是他,而是我们。(2)我们当在安息日的事工中瞄准什么——就是我们自己灵魂的益处。安息日若为人而设,那么到了夜间我们当问自己:「我借着这安息日得了什么益处呢?」(3)我们当何等谨慎,不可把 神所立定为祝福的宗教操练,变成自己或别人的重担——既不可借不合理的严苛加添诫命,也不可放纵那些与诫命相悖的肉体私欲;因为我们如此行,便是把本来可作快乐的敬虔操练变成了苦修。

[2] 安息日是借谁设立的(可2:28);「人子也是安息日的主」;所以他不愿见设立安息日的美意被你们的强加所败坏。当知:安息日是人子的日子;他是那日的主,那日当为尊荣他而遵守; 神借着他创造诸世界,所以安息日最初是借他设立的; 神借他在西奈山颁布律法,所以第四条诫命是他的律法;不久将有的那一点改动——把那日向前挪一周的第一日——是为记念他的复活,所以基督徒的安息日称为主日(启1:10),就是主基督的日子;而人子基督作为中保,当常被视为安息日之主。这一论证他在为自己被控犯安息日之时大力引用(约5:16)。

English original

The Hypocritical Rigour of the Pharisees

¹⁸ And the disciples of John and of the Pharisees used to fast: and they come and say unto him, Why do the disciples of John and of the Pharisees fast, but thy disciples fast not?
¹⁹ And Jesus said unto them, Can the children of the bridechamber fast, while the bridegroom is with them? as long as they have the bridegroom with them, they cannot fast.
²⁰ But the days will come, when the bridegroom shall be taken away from them, and then shall they fast in those days.
²¹ No man also seweth a piece of new cloth on an old garment: else the new piece that filled it up taketh away from the old, and the rent is made worse.
²² And no man putteth new wine into old bottles: else the new wine doth burst the bottles, and the wine is spilled, and the bottles will be marred: but new wine must be put into new bottles.
²³ And it came to pass, that he went through the corn fields on the sabbath day; and his disciples began, as they went, to pluck the ears of corn.
²⁴ And the Pharisees said unto him, Behold, why do they on the sabbath day that which is not lawful?
²⁵ And he said unto them, Have ye never read what David did, when he had need, and was an hungred, he, and they that were with him?
²⁶ How he went into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest, and did eat the showbread, which is not lawful to eat but for the priests, and gave also to them which were with him?
²⁷ And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath:
²⁸ Therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath.

Christ had been put to justify himself in conversing with publicans and sinners: here he is put to justify his disciples; and in what they do according to his will he will justify them, and bear them out.

I. He justifies them in their not fasting, which was turned to their reproach by the Pharisees. Why do the Pharisees and the disciples of John fast? They used to fast, the Pharisees fasted twice in the week (Lu 18:12), and probably the disciples of John did so too; and, it should seem, this very day, when Christ and his disciples were feasting in Levi's house, was their fast-day, for the word is nesteuousi—they do fast, or are fasting, which aggravated the offence. Thus apt are strict professors to make their own practice a standard, and to censure and condemn all that do not fully come up to it. They invidiously suggest that if Christ went among sinners to do them good, as he had pleaded, yet the disciples went to indulge their appetites, for they never knew what it was to fast, or to deny themselves. Note, Ill-will always suspects the worst.

Two things Christ pleads in excuse of his disciples not fasting.

1. That these were easy days with them, and fasting was not so seasonable now as it would be hereafter, Mk 2:19,20. There is a time for all things. Those that enter into the married state, must expect care and trouble in the flesh, and yet, during the nuptial solemnity, they are merry, and think it becomes them to be so; it was very absurd for Samson's bride to weep before him, during the days that the feast lasted, Jdg 14:17. Christ and his disciples were but newly married, the bridegroom was yet with them, the nuptials were yet in the celebrating (Matthew's particularly); when the bridegroom should be removed from them to the far country, about his business, then would be a proper time to sit as a widow, in solitude and fasting.

2. That these were early days with them, and they were not so able for the severe exercises of religion as hereafter they would be. The Pharisees had long accustomed themselves to such austerities; and John Baptist himself came neither eating nor drinking. His disciples from the first inured themselves to hardships, and thus found it easier to bear strict and frequent fasting, but it was not so with Christ's disciples; their Master came eating and drinking, and had not bred them up to the difficult services of religion as yet, for it was all in good time. To put them upon such frequent fasting at first, would be a discouragement to them, and perhaps drive them off from following Christ; it would be of as ill consequence as putting new wine into old casks, or sewing new cloth to that which is worn thin and threadbare, Mk 2:21,22. Note, God graciously considers the frame of young Christians, that are weak and tender, and so must we; nor must we expect more than the work of the day in its day, and that day according to the strength, because it is not in our hands to give strength according to the day. Many contract an antipathy to some kind of food, otherwise good, by being surfeited with it when they are young; so, many entertain prejudices against the exercises of devotion by being burthened with them, and made to serve with an offering, at their setting out. Weak Christians must take heed of over-tasking themselves, and of making the yoke of Christ otherwise than as it is, easy, and sweet, and pleasant.

II. He justifies them in plucking the ears of corn on the sabbath day, which, I will warrant you, a disciples of the Pharisees would not dare to have done; for it was contrary to an express tradition of their elders. In this instance, as in that before, they reflect upon the discipline of Christ's school, as if it were not so strict as that of theirs: so common it is for those who deny the power of godliness, to be jealous for the form, and censorious of those who affect not their form.

Observe, 1. What a poor breakfast Christ's disciples had on a sabbath-day morning, when they were going to church (Mk 2:23); they plucked the ears of corn, and that was the best they had. They were so intent upon spiritual dainties, that they forgot even their necessary food; and the word of Christ was to them instead of that; and their zeal for it even ate them up. The Jews made it a piece of religion, to eat dainty food on sabbath days, but the disciples were content with any thing.

2. How even this was grudged them by the Pharisees, upon supposition that it was not lawful to pluck the ears of corn on the sabbath day, that that was as much a servile work as reaping (Mk 2:24); Why do they on the sabbath day that which is not lawful? Note, If Christ's disciples do that which is unlawful, Christ will be reflected upon, and upbraided with it, as he was here, and dishonour will redound to his name. It is observable, that when the Pharisees thought Christ did amiss, they told the disciples (Mk 2:16); and now when they thought the disciples did amiss, they spoke to Christ, as make-bates, that did what they could to sow discord between Christ and his disciples, and make a breach in the family.

3. How Christ defended them in what they did.

(1.) By example. They had a good precedent for it in David's eating the show-bread, when he was hungry, and there was no other bread to be had (Mk 2:25,26); Have ye never read? Note, Many of our mistakes would be rectified, and our unjust censures of others corrected, if we would but recollect what we have read in the scripture; appeals to that are most convincing. "You have read that David, the man after God's own heart, when he was hungry, made no difficulty of eating the show-bread, which by the law none might eat of but the priests and their families." Note, Ritual observances must give way to moral obligations; and that may be done in a case of necessity, which otherwise may not be done. This, it is said, David did in the days of Abiathar the High-Priest; or just before the days of Abiathar, who immediately succeeded Abimelech his father in the pontificate, and, it is probable, was at that time his father's deputy, or assistant, in the office; and he it was that escaped the massacre, and brought the ephod to David.

(2.) By argument. To reconcile them to the disciples' plucking the ears of corn, let them consider,

[1.] Whom the sabbath was made for (Mk 2:27); it was made for man, and not man for the sabbath. This we had not in Matthew. The sabbath is a sacred and divine institution; but we must receive and embrace it as a privilege and a benefit, not as a task and a drudgery. First, God never designed it to be an imposition upon us, and therefore we must not make it so to ourselves. Man was not made for the sabbath, for he was made a day before the sabbath was instituted. Man was made for God, and for his honour and service, and he just rather die than deny him; but he was not made for the sabbath, so as to be tied up by the law of it, from that which is necessary to the support of his life. Secondly, God did design it to be an advantage to us, and so we must make it, and improve it. He made if for man. 1. He had some regard to our bodies in the institution, that they might rest, and not be tired out with the constant business of this world (De 5:14); that thy man-servant and thy maid-servant may rest. Now he that intended the sabbath-rest for the repose of our bodies, certainly never intended it should restrain us, in a case of necessity, from fetching in the necessary supports of the body; it must be construed so as not to contradict itself—for edification, and not for destruction. 2. He had much more regard to our souls. The sabbath was made a day of rest, only in order to its being a day of holy work, a day of communion with God, a day of praise and thanksgiving; and the rest from worldly business is therefore necessary, that we may closely apply ourselves to this work, and spend the whole time in it, in public and in private; but then time is allowed us for that which is necessary to the fitting of our bodies for the service of our souls in God's service, and the enabling of them to keep pace with them in that work. See here, (1.) What a good Master we serve, all whose institutions are for our own benefit, and if we be so wise as to observe them, we are wise for ourselves; it is not he, but we, that are gainers by our service. (2.) What we should aim at in our sabbath work, even the good of our own souls. If the sabbath was made for man, we should then ask ourselves at night, "What am I the better for this sabbath day?" (3.) What care we ought to take not to make those exercises of religion burthens to ourselves or others, which God ordained to be blessings; neither adding to the command by unreasonable strictness, nor indulging those corruptions which are adverse to the command, for thereby we make those devout exercises a penance to ourselves, which otherwise would be a pleasure.

[2.] Whom the sabbath was made by (Mk 2:28); "The Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath; and therefore he will not see the kind intentions of the institution of it frustrated by your impositions." Note, The sabbath days are days of the Son of man; he is the Lord of the day, and to his honour it must be observed; by him God made the worlds, and so it was by him that the sabbath was first instituted; by him God gave the law at mount Sinai, and so the fourth commandment was his law; and that little alteration that was shortly to be made, by the shifting of it one day forward to the first day of the week, was to be in remembrance of his resurrection, and therefore the Christian sabbath was to be called the Lord's day (Re 1:10), the Lord Christ's day; and the Son of man, Christ, as Mediator, is always to be looked upon as Lord of the sabbath. This argument he largely insists upon in his own justification, when he was charged with having broken the sabbath, Joh 5:16.