Chapter commentary
Romans Chapter 7
서론
Untitled
繁體中文
English original
We may observe in this chapter, I. Our freedom from the law further urged as an argument to press upon us sanctification, Ro 7:1-6. II. The excellency and usefulness of the law asserted and proved from the apostle's own experience, notwithstanding, Ro 7:7-14. III. A description of the conflict between grace and corruption in the heart, Ro 7:14-25.
1-6
Observations Respecting the Law (58 AD)
繁體中文
關乎律法的觀察(公元58年)
¹ 弟兄們,我現在對明白律法的人說,你們豈不曉得律法管人是在活着的時候嗎? ² 就如女人有了丈夫,丈夫還活着,就被律法約束;丈夫若死了,他就脫離了丈夫的律法。 ³ 所以丈夫活着,他若歸於別人,便叫淫婦;丈夫若死了,他就脫離了丈夫的律法,雖然歸於別人,也不是淫婦。 ⁴ 我的弟兄們,這樣說來,你們藉着基督的身體,在律法上也是死了,叫你們歸於別人,就是歸於那從死裏復活的,叫我們結果子給神。 ⁵ 因為我們屬肉體的時候,那因律法而生的惡慾就在我們肢體中發動,以致結成死亡的果子; ⁶ 但我們既然在捆我們的律法上死了,現今就脫離了律法,叫我們服事主要按着心靈的新樣,不按着儀文的舊樣。
在前一章中,為要勸我們不犯罪、追求聖潔,使徒用了一個論證(羅6:14):我們不在律法之下;這論證在此進一步被強調和解釋(羅7:6):我們就脫離了律法。 這是甚麼意思呢?它又如何成為一個論據,說明罪不該在我們身上作王、我們當在新生命中行事為人?1. 我們從律法因我們所犯的罪而咒詛和定我們罪的權勢中得了釋放。律法對我們的判決,因着基督的死,在一切真信徒身上被撤銷和推翻。律法說:犯罪的靈魂必死;但我們已經脫離了律法。耶和華已經除掉你的罪,你必不死。 我們已經贖出律法的咒詛(加3:13)。2. 我們從律法那激動和惹動那住在我們裏頭的罪的權勢中得了釫放。這一點使徒似乎特別指着說的(羅7:5):那因律法而生的惡慾。 律法藉着命令、禁止、威脅敗壞墮落的人,卻不提供醫治和剛強的恩典,只不過激動敗壞,如同日頭照在糞堆上,激發和吸引污穢的蒸氣。我們既因墮落而瘸了,律法來指引我們,卻沒有提供甚麼來醫治幫助我們的瘸腿,於是使我們更加跛腳跌倒。當明白這是指律法不是作為法則,而是作為行為之約。如今這兩樣都是我們當聖潔的論據;因為這裏對努力有鼓勵,雖然我們在許多事上虧欠。我們是在恩典之下——這恩典應許力量去遵行它所命令的,又在犯錯悔改時賜下赦免。這幾節經文總體的要旨是:在認信和特權上,我們是在恩典之約下,不在行為之約下——是在基督的福音之下,不在摩西的律法之下。律法狀態和福音狀態的區別,他先前已用升入新生命和服事新主人的比方說明;如今在此他用嫁給新丈夫的比方來說明。
一、我們的第一次婚姻是與律法的,按照婚姻的律法,這婚姻只在律法的有效期內持續。婚姻的律法約束力持續到雙方中一方死亡為止——無論哪一方,不再延長。任一方的死亡便使雙方都得釋放。關於這一點他訴諸他們自己——作為認識律法的人(羅7:1):我現在對明白律法的人說。 與有知識的人交談是大有益處的,因為這樣的人更容易理解和領會真理。羅馬許多基督徒曾經是猶太人,所以十分熟悉律法。對有知識的人總有所掌握。律法管人是在活着的時候;特別是婚姻的律法有管轄權;或者,一般而言,每條律法都如此有限度——列國的、親屬的、家族的律法等。1. 律法的約束力不過如此;藉着死亡,那活着時負軛的僕人便得了自由,脫離主人(伯3:19)。2. 律法的定罪也不過如此;死亡是律法的終結。Actio moritur cum personâ——訴訟隨人終止。 最嚴厲的律法也不過能殺身體,此外再無能為。如此,當我們向律法活着時,我們就在其權下——當我們仍在舊約狀態中、在福音進入世界之前、並在福音帶着能力進入我們心中之前。婚姻的律法也是如此(羅7:2),女人在丈夫活着時受約束歸屬他,且受約束到不能嫁給別人;若如此行,她便要被算為淫婦(羅7:3)。與別人結婚不僅是因被玷污而成為淫婦,更是因嫁給別人而成為淫婦;因為這事更糟,因為它濫用了神所設立的制度,使之為不潔撐腰。我們與律法的婚姻也是如此(羅7:5):我們屬肉體的時候——即在屬肉體的狀態中、在罪和敗壞的轄制下——屬肉體如同在其中的元素裏——那時那因律法而生的惡慾就在我們肢體中發動——我們被罪的潮流沖走,律法不過像一道不完美的堤壩,反使潮流更加高漲、更加洶湧。我們的慾望趨向罪,如同妻子的慾望趨向丈夫;罪在我們身上作王。我們擁抱它、愛它、將一切獻給它、天天與它交往、以取悅它為念。我們處在罪和死的律法之下,如同妻子在婚姻律法之下;這婚姻的產物就是結成死亡的果子——即原罪的敗壞產生了實際的過犯——那些當死的過犯。情慾既藉着律法(律法是罪的能力,林前15:56)受了孕,就生出罪來;罪既長成,就生出死來(雅1:15)。這就是從這與罪和律法的婚姻中所出的後裔。這些便是我們肢體中運行的惡慾所帶來的。這在一生中持續,只要律法對我們活着、我們向律法活着。
二、我們的第二次婚姻是與基督的:這是怎麼發生的呢?為何如此呢?
-
我們因着死,從律法作為約的約束中得了釋放,正如妻子從對丈夫的約束中得了釋放(羅7:3)。這比方並不十分貼切,也不需要十分貼切。你們在律法上也是死了(羅7:4)。他沒有說「律法死了」(有人認為因為他要避免得罪那些仍為律法熱心的人),而是說——這兩者其實一樣——你們向律法死了。 正如世界向我們釘十字架、我們向世界釘十字祭,是一件事;照樣律法死和我們向律法死,也是一件事。我們脫離了律法(羅7:6)——katergethemen——我們在律法上被廢除了;我們對它作為丈夫的約束被撤銷失效。然後他論到律法作為束縛我們的律法已死:在捆我們的律法上死了;不是律法本身,而是它在刑罰上的約束和在罪上的激動。它死了,失去了能力;而這是(羅7:4)藉着基督的身體——即藉着基督在他身體中所受的苦難,藉着他被釘的身體——這身體廢除了律法、滿足了律法的要求、為我們違犯律法作出了補贖,為我們買得了恩典之約——在其中為我們存留了義和能力,這些是律法所不能有、也不能提供的。我們因與基督奧秘的身體聯合,向律法死了。藉着在洗禮中表面上歸入基督、在信心中實質上有效地歸入基督,我們就向律法死了,與律法不再有關——正如那死了的僕人既已脫離主人,就與主人的軛不再有關。
-
我們嫁給了基督。我們相信的那日,便是我們與主耶穌訂婚之日。我們進入了一個倚靠他、對他盡本分的生活:歸於別人,就是歸於那從死裏復活的——這是對基督的婉稱,在此十分貼切;因為正如我們向罪和律法死,是與基督的死和他身體被釘相符;照樣我們在新生命中歸屬於基督,是與基督的復活相符。我們嫁給了那復活升天的耶穌——這是極其尊榮的婚姻。比較林後11:2;弗5:29。如今我們既如此嫁給基督:(1)叫我們結果子給神(羅7:4)。婚姻的目的之一是結果子:神設立這制度,為要尋求敬虔的後裔(瑪2:15)。妻子被比為結果子的葡萄樹,兒女被稱為腹中的果子。如今我們與基督婚姻的大目的,是我們在愛心、恩典和一切善事上多結果子。這是歸給神的果子——蒙神喜悅、照他旨意、以他榮耀為目標。正如我們從前與罪的婚姻結出死亡的果子,照樣我們第二次與基督的婚姻結出歸給神的果子——義的果子。善行是新性情的兒女,是我們與基督聯合的產物,正如葡萄樹的果子是它與根聯合的產物。無論我們有何認信和託辭,在我們嫁給基督之前,沒有歸給神的果子;惟有在基督耶穌裏,我們才被造成為要行善(弗2:10)。惟有在基督裏結出的果子才算得數。這將信徒的善行與假冒為善者和自以為義者的善行區分開來——前者是在婚姻中結出的,是在與基督的聯合中、奉主耶穌的名作的(西3:17)。這毫無疑問是敬虔的極大奧秘之一。(2)叫我們服事主要按着心靈的新樣,不按着儀文的舊樣(羅7:6)。既嫁了新丈夫,就當改變我們的方式。我們仍要服事,但這服事是完全的自由,而服事罪是完全的苦役:我們如今要按着心靈的新樣服事——照新的屬靈規則、從新的屬靈原則、在靈和真理中(約4:24)。我們的靈必須被神的靈更新,在其中我們服事。不按着儀文的舊樣;即我們不可停留在僅僅外表的服事上,如同屬肉體的猶太人——他們以遵守律法的字句為傲,卻不理會敬拜的屬靈部分。字句以其束縛和恐怖被說為殺人,但我們已經脫離那軛,可以終身在神面前,坦然無懼地用聖潔、公義事奉他(路1:74-75)。我們是在聖靈的體制之下,所以必須屬靈,並在靈裏服事。比較林後3:3、6等。我們當在幔內敬拜,不再在外院。
English original
Observations Respecting the Law (58 AD)
¹ Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth?
² For the woman which hath a husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband.
³ So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man.
⁴ Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.
⁵ For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death.
⁶ But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.
Among other arguments used in the foregoing chapter to persuade us against sin, and to holiness, this was one (Ro 6:14), that we are not under the law; and this argument is here further insisted upon and explained (Ro 7:6): We are delivered from the law. What is meant by this? And how is it an argument why sin should not reign over us, and why we should walk in newness of life? 1. We are delivered from the power of the law which curses and condemns us for the sin committed by us. The sentence of the law against us is vacated and reversed, by the death of Christ, to all true believers. The law saith, The soul that sins shall die; but we are delivered from the law. The Lord has taken away thy sin, thou shalt not die. We are redeemed from the curse of the law, Ga 3:13. 2. We are delivered from that power of the law which irritates and provokes the sin that dwelleth in us. This the apostle seems especially to refer to (Ro 7:5): The motions of sins which were by the law. The law, by commanding, forbidding, threatening, corrupt and fallen man, but offering no grace to cure and strengthen, did but stir up the corruption, and, like the sun shining upon a dunghill, excite and draw up the filthy steams. We being lamed by the fall, the law comes and directs us, but provides nothing to heal and help our lameness, and so makes us halt and stumble the more. Understand this of the law not as a rule, but as a covenant of works. Now each of these is an argument why we should be holy; for here is encouragement to endeavours, though in many things we come short. We are under grace, which promises strength to do what it commands, and pardon upon repentance when we do amiss. This is the scope of these verses in general, that, in point of profession and privilege, we are under a covenant of grace, and not under a covenant of works—under the gospel of Christ, and not under the law of Moses. The difference between a law-state and a gospel-state he had before illustrated by the similitude of rising to a new life, and serving a new master; now here he speaks of is under the similitude of being married to a new husband.
I. Our first marriage was to the law, which, according to the law of marriage, was to continue only during the life of the law. The law of marriage is binding till the death of one of the parties, no matter which, and no longer. The death of either discharges both. For this he appeals to themselves, as persons knowing the law (Ro 7:1): I speak to those that know the law. It is a great advantage to discourse with those that have knowledge, for such can more readily understand and apprehend a truth. Many of the Christians at Rome were such as had been Jews, and so were well acquainted with the law. One has some hold of knowing people. The law hath power over a man as long as he liveth; in particular, the law of marriage hath power; or, in general, every law is so limited—the laws of nations, of relations, of families, etc. 1. The obligation of laws extends no further; by death the servant who, while he lived, was under the yoke, is freed from his master, Job 3:19. 2. The condemnation of laws extends no further; death is the finishing of the law. Actio moritur cum personâ—The action expires with the person. The severest laws could but kill the body, and after that there is no more that they can do. Thus while we were alive to the law we were under the power of it—while we were in our Old-Testament state, before the gospel came into the world, and before it came with power into our hearts. Such is the law of marriage (Ro 7:2), the woman is bound to her husband during life, so bound to him that she cannot marry another; if she do, she shall be reckoned an adulteress, Ro 7:3. It will make her an adulteress, not only to be defiled by, but to be married to, another man; for that is so much the worse, upon this account, that it abuses an ordinance of God, by making it to patronise the uncleanness. Thus were we married to the law (Ro 7:5): When we were in the flesh, that is, in a carnal state, under the reigning power of sin and corruption—in the flesh as in our element—then the motions of sins which were by the law did work in our members, we were carried down the stream of sin, and the law was but as an imperfect dam, which made the stream to swell the higher, and rage the more. Our desire was towards sin, as that of the wife towards her husband, and sin ruled over us. We embraced it, loved it, devoted all to it, conversed daily with it, made it our care to please it. We were under a law of sin and death, as the wife under the law of marriage; and the product of this marriage was fruit brought forth unto death, that is, actual transgressions were produced by the original corruption, such as deserve death. Lust, having conceived by the law (which is the strength of sin, 1Co 15:56), bringeth forth sin, and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death, Jam 1:15. This is the posterity that springs from this marriage to sin and the law. This comes of the motions of sin working in our members. And this continues during life, while the law is alive to us, and we are alive to the law.
II. Our second marriage is to Christ: and how comes this about? Why,
1. We are freed, by death, from our obligation to the law as a covenant, as the wife is from her obligation to her husband, Ro 7:3. This resemblance is not very close, nor needed it to be. You are become dead to the law, Ro 7:4. He does not say, "The law is dead" (some think because he would avoid giving offence to those who were yet zealous for the law), but, which comes all to one, You are dead to the law. As the crucifying of the world to us, and of us to the world, amounts to one and the same thing, so doth the law dying, and our dying to it. We are delivered from the law (Ro 7:6), katergethemen—we are nulled as to the law; our obligation to it as a husband is cassated and made void. And then he speaks of the law being dead as far as it was a law of bondage to us: That being dead wherein we were held; not the law itself, but its obligation to punishment and its provocation to sin. It is dead, it has lost its power; and this (Ro 7:4) by the body of Christ, that is, by the sufferings of Christ in his body, by his crucified body, which abrogated the law, answered the demands of it, made satisfaction for our violation of it, purchased for us a covenant of grace, in which righteousness and strength are laid up for us, such as were not, nor could be, by the law. We are dead to the law by our union with the mystical body of Christ. By being incorporated into Christ in our baptism professedly, in our believing powerfully and effectually, we are dead to the law, have no more to do with it than the dead servant, that is free from his master, hath to do with his master's yoke.
2. We are married to Christ. The day of our believing is the day of our espousals to the Lord Jesus. We enter upon a life of dependence on him and duty to him: Married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, a periphrasis of Christ and very pertinent here; for as our dying to sin and the law is in conformity to the death of Christ, and the crucifying of his body, so our devotedness to Christ in newness of life is in conformity to the resurrection of Christ. We are married to the raised exalted Jesus, a very honourable marriage. Compare 2Co 11:2, Eph 5:29. Now we are thus married to Christ, (1.) That we should bring forth fruit unto God, Ro 7:4. One end of marriage is fruitfulness: God instituted the ordinance that he might seek a godly seed, Mal 2:15. The wife is compared to the fruitful vine, and children are called the fruit of the womb. Now the great end of our marriage to Christ is our fruitfulness in love, and grace, and every good work. This is fruit unto God, pleasing to God, according to his will, aiming at his glory. As our old marriage to sin produced fruit unto death, so our second marriage to Christ produces fruit unto God, fruits of righteousness. Good works are the children of the new nature, the products of our union with Christ, as the fruitfulness of the vine is the product of its union with the root. Whatever our professions and pretensions may be, there is no fruit brought forth to God till we are married to Christ; it is in Christ Jesus that we are created unto good works, Eph 2:10. The only fruit which turns to a good account is that which is brought forth in Christ. This distinguishes the good works of believers from the good works of hypocrites and self-justifiers that they are brought forth in marriage, done in union with Christ, in the name of the Lord Jesus, Col 3:17. This is, without controversy, one of the great mysteries of godliness. (2.) That we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter, Ro 7:6. Being married to a new husband, we must change our way. Still we must serve, but it is a service that is perfect freedom, whereas the service of sin was a perfect drudgery: we must now serve in newness of spirit, by new spiritual rules, from new spiritual principles, in spirit and in truth, Joh 4:24. There must be a renovation of our spirits wrought by the spirit of God, and in that we must serve. Not in the oldness of the letter; that is, we must not rest in mere external services, as the carnal Jews did, who gloried in their adherence to the letter of the law, and minded not the spiritual part of worship. The letter is said to kill with its bondage and terror, but we are delivered from that yoke that we may serve God without fear, in holiness and righteousness, Lu 1:74,75. We are under the dispensation of the Spirit, and therefore must be spiritual, and serve in the spirit. Compare with this 2Co 3:3,6, etc. It becomes us to worship within the veil, and no longer in the outward court.
7-14
Excellency of the Law; Usefulness of the Law (58 AD)
繁體中文
律法的優越;律法的功用(主後五十八年)
⁷ 這樣,我們可說甚麼呢?律法是罪嗎?斷乎不是!只是非因律法,我就不知何為罪。非律法說「不可起貪心」,我就不知何為貪心。
⁸ 然而罪趁著機會,就藉著誡命叫諸般的貪心在我裏頭發動;因為沒有律法,罪是死的。
⁹ 我以前沒有律法是活著的;但是誡命來到,罪又活了,我就死了。
¹⁰ 那本來叫人活的誡命,反倒叫我死;
¹¹ 因為罪趁著機會,就藉著誡命引誘我,並且殺了我。
¹² 這樣看來,律法是聖潔的,誡命也是聖潔、公義、良善的。
¹³ 既然如此,那良善的是叫我死嗎?斷乎不是!叫我死的乃是罪。但罪藉著那良善的叫我死,就顯出真是罪,叫罪因著誡命更顯出是惡極了。
¹⁴ a 我們原曉得律法是屬乎靈的,——
使徒在前一段所說的話上,於此提出一個異議,並十分充分地回答:*這樣,我們可說甚麼呢?律法是罪嗎?*當他論到罪的統治時,曾如此多論到律法作為聖約對那統治的影響,以致很容易被誤解為對律法的影射。為防止這一點,他從自己的經歷說明律法(不是作為聖約,而是作為嚮導)的極大優越和功用,並進一步揭示罪如何藉著誡命得著機會。特別留意,
I. 律法本身的極大優越。保羅決非影射律法;不,他尊榮地論到它。1. 律法是聖潔、公義、良善的,Ro 7:12。律法總體如此,每一條特定的誡命也如此。律法如何,制定律法者亦如何。神這位偉大的賜律者是聖潔、公義、良善的,所以他的律法必是如此。它的內容是聖潔的:它命令聖潔、鼓勵聖潔;它是聖潔的,因為它符合聖潔之源——神聖潔的旨意。它是公義的,因為它合乎公平和正理的規則:耶和華的道路是正直的。它的目的是良善的;它是為人類的益處、為維持世界的和平和秩序而賜的。它使遵守的人變為善;它的意圖是要改善和改革人類。哪裏有真恩典,那裏就同意這一點——律法是聖潔、公義、良善的。2. 律法是屬乎靈的(Ro 7:14),不僅就其功效而言——作為使我們成為屬靈之人的手段,更就其範圍而言;它觸及我們的靈,約束並引導內心之人的動態;它是能辨明心中的思念和主意的,Heb 4:12。它禁止屬靈的邪惡、心中的殺人和心中的姦淫。它命令屬靈的敬拜,要求內心,使我們有義務在靈裏敬拜神。它是屬靈的律法,因為它是由神——是靈、是眾靈之父——所賜的;它是賜給人的,而人的主要部分是屬靈的;靈魂是人最好的部分,也是主導的部分,所以給人的律法必然是給靈魂的律法。神的律法在此超越一切別的律法——它是屬靈的律法。別的律法可以禁止圖謀和構想等心中的叛國,卻不能對此加以追究,除非有某種公開的行為;但神的律法注意到心中所存留的罪孽,縱然它沒有更進一步。你心當洗除邪惡,耶 4:14。我們原曉得:哪裏有真恩典,那裏就有對神的律法屬靈性的經歷性認識。
II. 他從律法所得的極大益處。1. 律法是揭示性的:只是非因律法,我就不知何為罪,Ro 7:7。正如直的能顯出彎曲的,正如照鏡子讓我們看見自己天然臉面的一切斑點和瑕疵,照樣,除了將我們的內心和行為與律法對照,沒有別的方法可以達到那為悔改所必需、因而也是為平安和赦罪所必需的對罪的認識。特別地,他藉著第十條誡命認識了貪心的罪惡。他所說的貪心是指住在我們裏面的罪,在其最初的動態和運作中的罪,那敗壞的原則。當律法說不可起貪心時,他就認識了這一點。律法所說的,與文士和法利賽人所曲解的語言不同;律法是按其屬靈的意義和含義說話。藉此他知道貪心是罪,且是極有罪的罪——那些從未付諸行動的、向著罪的心中動態和欲望是有罪的,且是極有罪的。保羅有非常敏銳透徹的判斷力,有教育的一切優勢和長進,卻直到聖靈藉著律法向他啟示時,才認識住在他裏頭的罪。關於原初的敗壞,屬血氣的人沒有比這更瞎眼的了;對此理智全然在黑暗中,直到聖靈藉著律法啟示並使之為人所知。如此,律法是我們訓蒙的師傅,引我們到基督那裏,它揭開並探查傷口,從而預備它得醫治。如此罪藉著誡命就顯為罪(Ro 7:13);它顯出本色,顯出它的真面目,你不能用比它自己的名字更壞的名字來稱呼它。如此藉著誡命它就成為惡極了;即顯為如此。我們直到將罪與律法、與律法的屬靈性質對照時,才看見罪中那絕望的毒和惡毒,那時我們就看見它是邪惡苦澀的事。2. 律法是使人謙卑的(Ro 7:9):我以前是活著的。他以為自己處於很好的狀態;他按自己的意見和想法是活著的,對自己狀態的美好十分安全和自信。如此他從前,pote——從前,當他是法利賽人的時候;因為那一代人的普遍脾氣是對自己極有好感;保羅當時與其餘的人一樣,原因是那時他沒有律法。雖然他在律法師迦瑪列腳前長大,雖然他自己也是律法的偉大學者、嚴格的遵守者、為律法熱心的捍衛者,卻沒有律法。他有律法的字句,卻沒有律法的屬靈意義——有殼而無仁。他手中和頭腦中有律法,心中卻沒有;有律法的概念,卻沒有律法的大能。有許多在罪中屬靈死亡的人,卻在自己看來是活著的,而他們對律法的陌生正是這錯誤的原因。但是誡命來到——以它的大能來到(不僅到他的眼中,更是到他的心中),罪又活了——如同房間中的塵埃在陽光照入時升起(即顯出來)。保羅那時看見了他在罪中所從未看見的;他看見了罪的成因——苦根、敗壞的傾向、退後的偏向;罪的顏色——使變形、玷污、破壞公義的律法、冒犯可畏的威嚴者、褻瀆主權的冠冕並將其摔在地上;罪的後果——罪後面緊跟著死亡、罪和咒詛相連。「如此罪活了,我就死了;我失去了先前對自己的好評,變得另有看法。罪活了,我就死了;即聖靈藉著誡命使我知罪——我在罪中,因罪而死。」律法的這優越功用就是如此;它是燈,是光;它甦醒靈魂,開啟眼睛,在曠野預備主的道路,裂開磐石,夷平山嶺,為主預備合用的百姓。
III. 然而他敗壞的本性卻濫用了律法。1. 罪趁著機會,就藉著誡命叫諸般的貪心在我裏頭發動,Ro 7:8。當留意,保羅裏面有諸般的貪心,雖然他是從未有過的最好的未重生之人之一;就律法上的義說,是無可指責的,卻仍感到諸般的貪心。是罪作了這事——住在他裏面的罪,他敗壞的本性(他說到一個作罪的罪),它藉著誡命得了機會。敗壞的本性若沒有律法的約束,就不會如此膨脹和猖獗;如同身體中有病的液體因不夠強烈到足以清除它們的瀉藥而被激發,更加發炎。敗壞的本性傾向於in vetitum niti——傾向於被禁止的事。自從亞當吃了禁果以來,我們都愛好被禁止的道路;有病的食慾最強烈地趨向那有害和被禁止的。沒有律法罪是死的,如同冬天的蛇,律法的陽光使它甦醒和激怒。2. 它引誘了人。罪對罪人行了欺騙,而這是致命的欺騙,Ro 7:11。藉著它(藉著誡命)殺了我。因為律法中沒有如此明確地對付罪的私慾的威嚇,罪——即他自己敗壞的本性——就藉此應許他免受刑罰,並如蛇對我們始祖所說的:你們不一定死。如此它引誘了他並殺了他。3. 它藉著那良善的在我裏頭作了死,Ro 7:13。那產生諸般貪心的也產生死亡,因為罪生出死。沒有一樣東西好到敗壞邪惡的本性不會曲解它、使之成為犯罪的緣由;沒有一朵花甜到罪不會從中吸出毒來。如此罪就顯為罪。罪所作的最壞的事,也是與它自己最相似的,就是曲解律法,並藉此機會變得更加惡毒。如此那本來叫人活的誡命——本意是作為通往安慰和幸福之路的嚮導——因本性的敗壞,反倒成為死,Ro 7:10。許多寶貴的靈魂在救恩的磐石上撞碎;同一個道對一些人是作生死的緣由,對另一些人是作死死的緣由。使花園更芬芳的同一太陽,使糞堆更臭;使蠟變軟的同一熱度,使泥變硬;同一個孩子被立定為以色列中許多人跌倒和興起的緣由。防止這損害的方法,是使我們的靈魂順服神的道和律法的權威,不與之相爭,而順服於它。
English original
Excellency of the Law; Usefulness of the Law (58 AD)
⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
⁸ But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead.
⁹ For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.
¹⁰ And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.
¹¹ For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.
¹² Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.
¹³ Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.
¹⁴ a For we know that the law is spiritual:—
To what he had said in the former paragraph, the apostle here raises an objection, which he answers very fully: What shall we say then? Is the law sin? When he had been speaking of the dominion of sin, he had said so much of the influence of the law as a covenant upon that dominion that it might easily be misinterpreted as a reflection upon the law, to prevent which he shows from his own experience the great excellency and usefulness of the law, not as a covenant, but as a guide; and further discovers how sin took occasion by the commandment. Observe in particular,
I. The great excellency of the law in itself. Far be it from Paul to reflect upon the law; no, he speaks honourably of it. 1. It is holy, just, and good, Ro 7:12. The law in general is so, and every particular commandment is so. Laws are as the law-makers are. God, the great lawgiver, is holy, just, and good, therefore his law must needs be so. The matter of it is holy: it commands holiness, encourages holiness; it is holy, for it is agreeable to the holy will of God, the original of holiness. It is just, for it is consonant to the rules of equity and right reason: the ways of the Lord are right. It is good in the design of it; it was given for the good of mankind, for the conservation of peace and order in the world. It makes the observers of it good; the intention of it was to better and reform mankind. Wherever there is true grace there is an assent to this—that the law is holy, just, and good. 2. The law is spiritual (Ro 7:14), not only in regard to the effect of it, as it is a means of making us spiritual, but in regard to the extent of it; it reaches our spirits, it lays a restraint upon, and gives a direction to, the motions of the inward man; it is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart, Heb 4:12. It forbids spiritual wickedness, heart-murder, and heart-adultery. It commands spiritual service, requires the heart, obliges us to worship God in the spirit. It is a spiritual law, for it is given by God, who is a Spirit and the Father of spirits; it is given to man, whose principal part is spiritual; the soul is the best part, and the leading part of the man, and therefore the law to the man must needs be a law to the soul. Herein the law of God is above all other laws, that it is a spiritual law. Other laws may forbid compassing and imagining, etc., which are treason in the heart, but cannot take cognizance thereof, unless there be some overt act; but the law of God takes notice of the iniquity regarded in the heart, though it go no further. Wash thy heart from wickedness, Jer 4:14. We know this: Wherever there is true grace there is an experimental knowledge of the spirituality of the law of God.
II. The great advantage that he had found by the law. 1. It was discovering: I had not known sin but by the law, Ro 7:7. As that which is straight discovers that which is crooked, as the looking-glass shows us our natural face with all its spots and deformities, so there is no way of coming to that knowledge of sin which is necessary to repentance, and consequently to peace and pardon, but by comparing our hearts and lives with the law. Particularly he came to the knowledge of the sinfulness of lust by the law of the tenth commandment. By lust he means sin dwelling in us, sin in its first motions and workings, the corrupt principle. This he came to know when the law said, Thou shalt not covet. The law spoke in other language than the scribes and Pharisees made it to speak in; it spoke in the spiritual sense and meaning of it. By this he knew that lust was sin and a very sinful sin, that those motions and desires of the heart towards sin which never came into act were sinful, exceedingly sinful. Paul had a very quick and piercing judgment, all the advantages and improvements of education, and yet never attained the right knowledge of indwelling sin till the Spirit by the law made it known to him. There is nothing about which the natural man is more blind than about original corruption, concerning which the understanding is altogether in the dark till the Spirit by the law reveal it, and make it known. Thus the law is a schoolmaster, to bring us to Christ, opens and searches the wound, and so prepares it for healing. Thus sin by the commandment does appear sin (Ro 7:13); it appears in its own colours, appears to be what it is, and you cannot call it by a worse name than its own. Thus by the commandment it becomes exceedingly sinful; that is, it appears to be so. We never see the desperate venom or malignity there is in sin, till we come to compare it with the law, and the spiritual nature of the law, and then we see it to be an evil and a bitter thing. 2. It was humbling (Ro 7:9): I was alive. He thought himself in a very good condition; he was alive in his own opinion and apprehension, very secure and confident of the goodness of his state. Thus he was once, pote—in times past, when he was a Pharisee; for it was the common temper of that generation of men that they had a very good conceit of themselves; and Paul was then like the rest of them, and the reason was he was then without the law. Though brought up at the feet of Gamaliel, a doctor of the law, though himself a great student in the law, a strict observer of it, and a zealous stickler for it, yet without the law. He had the letter of the law, but he had not the spiritual meaning of it—the shell, but not the kernel. He had the law in his hand and in his head, but he had it not in his heart; the notion of it, but not the power of it. There are a great many who are spiritually dead in sin, that yet are alive in their own opinion of themselves, and it is their strangeness to the law that is the cause of the mistake. But when the commandment came, came in the power of it (not to his eyes only, but to his heart), sin revived, as the dust in a room rises (that is, appears) when the sun-shine is let into it. Paul then saw that in sin which he had never seen before; he then saw sin in its causes, the bitter root, the corrupt bias, the bent to backslide,—sin in its colours, deforming, defiling, breaking a righteous law, affronting an awful Majesty, profaning a sovereign crown by casting it to the ground,—sin in its consequences, sin with death at the heels of it, sin and the curse entailed upon it. "Thus sin revived, and then I died; I lost that good opinion which I had had of myself, and came to be of another mind. Sin revived, and I died; that is, the Spirit, but the commandment, convinced me that I was in a state of sin, and in a state of death because of sin." Of this excellent use is the law; it is a lamp and a light; it converts the soul, opens the eyes, prepares the way of the Lord in the desert, rends the rocks, levels the mountains, makes ready a people prepared for the Lord.
III. The ill use that his corrupt nature made of the law notwithstanding. 1. Sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence, Ro 7:8. Observe, Paul had in him all manner of concupiscence, though one of the best unregenerate men that ever was; as touching the righteousness of the law, blameless, and yet sensible of all manner of concupiscence. And it was sin that wrought it, indwelling sin, his corrupt nature (he speaks of a sin that did work sin), and it took occasion by the commandment. The corrupt nature would not have swelled and raged so much if it had not been for the restraints of the law; as the peccant humours in the body are raised, and more inflamed, by a purge that is not strong enough to carry them off. It is incident to corrupt nature, in vetitum niti—to lean towards what is forbidden. Ever since Adam ate forbidden fruit, we have all been fond of forbidden paths; the diseased appetite is carried out most strongly towards that which is hurtful and prohibited. Without the law sin was dead, as a snake in winter, which the sunbeams of the law quicken and irritate. 2. It deceived men. Sin puts a cheat upon the sinner, and it is a fatal cheat, Ro 7:11. By it (by the commandment) slew me. There being in the law no such express threatening against sinful lustings, sin, that is, his won corrupt nature, took occasion thence to promise him impunity, and to say, as the serpent to our first parents, You shall not surely die. Thus it deceived and slew him. 3. It wrought death in me by that which is good, Ro 7:13. That which works concupiscence works death, for sin bringeth forth death. Nothing so good but a corrupt and vicious nature will pervert it, and make it an occasion of sin; no flower so sweet by sin will such poison out of it. Now in this sin appears sin. The worst thing that sin does, and most like itself, is the perverting of the law, and taking occasion from it to be so much the more malignant. Thus the commandment, which was ordained to life, was intended as a guide in the way to comfort and happiness, proved unto death, through the corruption of nature, Ro 7:10. Many a precious soul splits upon the rock of salvation; and the same word which to some is an occasion of life unto life is to others an occasion of death unto death. The same sun that makes the garden of flowers more fragrant makes the dunghill more noisome; the same heat that softens wax hardens clay; and the same child was set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel. The way to prevent this mischief is to bow our souls to the commanding authority of the word and law of God, not striving against, but submitting to it.
14-25
Conflict between Grace and Corruption (58 AD)
繁體中文
恩典與敗壞之間的衝突(主後五十八年)
¹⁴ b——我是屬乎肉體的,是已經賣給罪了。
¹⁵ 因為我所作的,我自己不明白;我所願意的,我並不作;我所恨惡的,我倒去作。
¹⁶ 若我所作的,是我所不願意的,我就應承律法是善的。
¹⁷ 既是這樣,就不是我作的,乃是住在我裏頭的罪作的。
¹⁸ 我也知道在我裏頭,就是我肉體之中,沒有良善;因為,立志為善由得我,只是行出來由不得我。
¹⁹ 故此,我所願意的善,我反不作;我所不願意的惡,我倒去作。
²⁰ 若我去作所不願意作的,就不是我作的,乃是住在我裏頭的罪作的。
²¹ 我覺得有個律,就是我願意為善的時候,便有惡與我同在。
²² 因為按著我裏面的人,我是喜歡神的律;
²³ 但我覺得肢體中另有個律和我心中的律交戰,把我擄去,叫我附從那肢體中犯罪的律。
²⁴ 我真是苦啊!誰能救我脫離這取死的身體呢?
²⁵ 感謝神,靠著我們的主耶穌基督就能脫離了。這樣看來,我以內心順服神的律;我肉體卻順服罪的律了。
此處描述了心中恩典與敗壞之間、神的律和罪的律之間的衝突。這可兩方面應用:1. 應用於一個知罪卻仍未重生之靈魂中的掙扎——有人認為保羅是以那人的身分說話。2. 應用於一個更新成聖但仍在不完全狀態中之靈魂的掙扎——如另有人所想。對於我們在此當理解為哪一種,有極大的爭論。此處當他論到一個賣給罪的人、行罪、不作善時,惡如此盛行,以致看來難以將之應用於重生的人——他們被描述為不隨從肉體、而隨從聖靈而行;然而此處當他恨惡罪、同意律法、以律法為樂、以內心事奉神的律時,善又如此盛行,以致更難將之應用於那死在過犯罪惡中的未重生者。
I. 應用於一個知罪卻仍處於罪中之靈魂所感受的掙扎——知道主人的旨意卻不去行,從律法受了教訓喜愛那美好的事,卻經常違背它,Ro 2:17-23。雖然他裏面有見證反對他所犯之罪的東西,他犯罪也不是沒有極大的勉強——較高的官能加以反對,天然的良心在犯罪前警告、犯罪後責備——然而那人仍是轄制他之私慾的奴隸。並非每一個未重生的人都是如此,唯獨那些被律法知罪、卻未被福音改變的人如此。使徒曾說(Ro 6:14),罪必不能作你們的主,因你們不在律法之下,乃在恩典之下;為證明這一點,他在此表明一個在律法之下、不在恩典之下的人,可能、並確實是在罪的統治之下。律法能發現罪、使人知罪,卻不能征服和制伏罪——見證是許多有極強律法之知罪的人中罪的盛行。它發現污穢,卻不會洗除。它使人勞苦擔重擔(Mt 11:28),以他的罪為負擔;然而若以它為滿足,它對卸下那負擔毫無幫助;這只能在基督裏得著。律法可能使人呼喊,我真是苦啊!誰能救我?卻仍留他如此被捆綁和擄掠,因為太弱而不能救他(Ro 8:3),給他奴僕的心使他懼怕,Ro 8:15。如此被律法推進到這地步的靈魂,正處於靠基督得自由的康莊大道上,雖然許多人停在此處不再前進。腓力斯恐懼,卻從未到基督那裏。一個人可能睜著眼睛走向地獄(民 24:3,4),被普通的知罪所照亮,甚至在事奉魔鬼中帶著自責的良心。他可能應承律法是善的,樂意知道神的道(如他們,賽 58:2),可能裏面有見證反對罪、為聖潔的東西;然而這一切都被轄制之罪的愛所壓倒。醉酒和污穢的人有一些模糊的願望要離開他們的罪,卻仍然在其中堅持——這是他們知罪的無能和不足。有許多人堅持要將這一切如此理解,並為之懇切爭辯:雖然很難想像,若使徒意在如此,他為何始終以自己的身分說話;不僅如此,更以現在時態說話。關於他自己知罪之下的狀態,他曾詳盡論述,作為已過之事(Ro 7:7 等):我死了;誡命我發現是叫我死;如果他在此論到同一狀態為他現在的狀態、他如今所處的光景,他當然不打算如此被理解;所以,
II. 這看起來更當理解為成聖的靈魂中恩典與敗壞之間所維持的掙扎。即使在有活潑的恩典原則之處,也有住在他裏頭之敗壞的殘餘,這是無可爭辯的;這敗壞每日在軟弱的罪中爆發(與恩典的狀態相符),也同樣確定。我們若說自己沒有罪,就是自欺,約壹 1:8,10。真恩典與這些罪和敗壞爭戰、不容忍它們、恨惡它們、為它們哀嘆、以它們為負擔而嘆息,也同樣確定(Ga 5:17):*情慾和聖靈相爭,聖靈和情慾相爭,這兩個彼此相敵,使你們不能作所願意作的。*這些是我認為包含在使徒這段論述中的真理。他的目的是進一步揭示成聖的性質——它在今生不能達到無罪的完全;所以激發我們、並在我們與殘餘敗壞的衝突中鼓勵我們。我們的情形並非獨一無二,我們所真誠抗爭的必不歸在我們賬上,靠恩典至終的勝利是確定的。此處的爭戰如同雅各和以掃在母腹中、迦南人和以色列人在那地中、掃羅家和大衛家之間的爭戰;然而真理至大、必勝。如此理解,我們在此可留意,
1. 他所抱怨的——住在他裏頭之敗壞的殘餘,他在此論到,為要表明律法連一個重生的人也不能稱義,世上最好的人若神照律法對待他,他裏面也有足夠定他罪的東西——這不是律法的錯,而是我們自己敗壞的本性,它不能成全律法。在這段論述中同樣的事反覆重複,表明保羅的心何等受他所寫的影響,他的感受何等深刻。當留意這抱怨的細節。(1.) 我是屬乎肉體的,是已經賣給罪了,Ro 7:14。他論到哥林多人是屬肉體的,林前 3:1。即使哪裏有屬靈的生命,也有屬肉體之情感的殘餘,在這意義上人可以說是賣給罪了;他不像亞哈那樣自賣行惡(王上 21:25),而是當亞當犯罪跌倒時被亞當所賣——賣了,如可憐的奴隸違背自己意志行主人的旨意——賣給罪,因在罪孽中成孕、在罪中生出。(2.) 我所願意的,我並不作;我所恨惡的,我倒去作,Ro 7:15。同一意思,Ro 7:19,21,*我願意為善的時候,便有惡與我同在。*敗壞如此強烈,使他不能達到他所渴望和追求的聖潔完全。如此,他雖然向著完全竭力追求,卻承認他尚未得著、也尚未完全,Php 3:12。他情願脫離一切罪,完全遵行神的旨意——這是他定意的判斷;但他敗壞的本性將他拉向另一個方向:它如同阻礙物,當他要向上飛翔時卻阻止他、壓住他,如同球中的偏向,當球被直投時卻將它拉偏。(3.) 在我裏頭,就是我肉體之中,沒有良善,Ro 7:18。他在此解釋他所稱為肉體的敗壞本性;就那方面而言,沒有良善可期,正如人不會期望在磐石上、或在海邊的沙上長出好莊稼。正如新本性就其本身而言不能犯罪(約壹 3:9),照樣肉體——舊本性——就其本身而言也不能盡一個善的本分。怎能呢?因為肉體事奉罪的律(Ro 7:25),在那律的引導和管治之下;當它如此時,就不可能行善。敗壞的本性在別處被稱為肉體(創 6:3,Joh 3:6);雖然在那些有這肉體的人裏面可能有良善,然而就肉體本身而言沒有良善,肉體不是能容受任何善的主體。(4.) 我覺得肢體中另有個律和我心中的律交戰,Ro 7:23。敗壞而犯罪的傾向在此被比作律法,因為它在好的動態中控制和阻止他。說它位於他的肢體中,因為基督既在他心中設立寶座,只是身體叛逆的肢體才是犯罪的工具——在感官的食慾中;或我們可更廣泛地理解為那一切的敗壞本性——它不僅是感官的、更是更精緻之私慾的所在。這與心中的律——新本性——交戰;它向相反方向拉,推動相反的利益,這敗壞的傾向和癖好對靈魂是如同最壞的苦役和擄掠一般的重擔和憂愁。*把我擄去。*同一意思(Ro 7:25),我肉體卻順服罪的律了;即敗壞的本性、未重生的部分不斷地向罪工作。(5.) 他的總體抱怨我們在 Ro 7:24 有,*我真是苦啊!誰能救我脫離這取死的身體呢?*他所抱怨的是取死的身體——或是肉體的身體,那是必死垂死的身體(我們帶著這身體時必受敗壞的攪擾;我們死了,才從罪中得釋放,在那之前不會),或是罪的身子——舊人,敗壞的本性,它趨向死——即靈魂的毀壞。或將之比作死屍——按禮儀律觸摸它是污穢的——若本罪是死行(Heb 9:14),原罪就是死屍。這對保羅如同他身上綁著一個死屍、必須帶著它四處走一般麻煩。這使他呼喊,*我真是苦啊!*一個學會了在任何狀態下知足的人,卻如此抱怨他的敗壞本性。若要我論到保羅,我會說:「你這有福的人啊——基督的大使、天上的寵兒、千萬人的屬靈父親!」但在他自己看來他是苦的人,因為本性的敗壞,因為他不如他情願的那樣好,尚未得著,也尚未完全。如此他悲慘地抱怨。*誰能救我?*他說得如同一個厭倦了的人、願付任何代價擺脫它,左右觀望尋找某位朋友能在他和他的敗壞之間分開。住在他裏頭之罪的殘餘對恩慈的靈魂是極重的負擔。
2. 他所用以安慰自己的。情形是可悲的,卻有一些緩解。三件事安慰了他:
(1.) 他的良心為他作見證,他有一個好的原則在其中管轄並盛行,雖然如此。當一切不全走一條路時,是好的。他所擁有之這好原則的準則是神的律,他在此說到他對律法有三重的尊重,這無疑在一切成聖的人中可尋見,在別人中則不能。[1.] 我就應承律法是善的,Ro 7:16,symphemi——我對律法投贊成票;這是判斷的贊同。哪裏有恩典,哪裏就不僅有對律法嚴厲的敬畏,更有對律法之善的同意。「它在本身是善的,對我也是善的。」這是律法寫在心上的記號,是靈魂被澆奠於其模型中。同意律法就是如此贊同它,以至於不願它有別的構成。成聖的判斷不僅同意律法的公平,更同意其卓越——確信與律法相符是人性的最高完全、我們所能有的最大尊榮和幸福。[2.] 按著我裏面的人,我是喜歡神的律,Ro 7:22。他的良心見證他在律法中有喜樂。他不僅喜歡道的應許,更喜歡道的誡命和禁令;synedomai表達一種合宜的喜歡。他在此與一切聖徒同感。一切蒙拯救性地重生或重生的人確實喜歡神的律——喜歡認識它、遵行它——樂意順服它的權柄,並在這順服中得滿足,當心和生命與神的律和旨意最嚴格地相符時最為喜樂。按著我裏面的人;即,第一,心思或理性的官能,相對於肉體的感官食慾和意志。靈魂是裏面的人,那是恩惠喜樂的所在——因此是真誠嚴肅的,卻是隱秘的;這是裏面的人一天新似一天,林後 4:16。第二,新本性。新人被稱為裏面的人(Eph 3:16),隱藏在心裏的人,彼前 3:4。保羅就他被成聖的程度而言,喜歡神的律。[3.] 我以內心順服神的律,Ro 7:25。僅僅同意律法、喜歡律法是不夠的,我們必須事奉律法;我們的靈魂必須完全交出順服它。保羅的心思就是如此;每一個成聖更新的心思也是如此;這是尋常的途徑和方向;靈魂的傾向就是如此。我內心——autos ego,明顯暗示他以自己的身分說話,而非以別人的身分。
(2.) 過失在於他本性的敗壞——他確實為之哀嘆並與之爭戰:就不是我作的,乃是住在我裏頭的罪作的。他兩次提及此(Ro 7:17,20),不是作為他罪咎的藉口(若我們在律法之下,那作惡的罪住在我們裏面就足以定我們的罪),而是作為他的證據的保全,免得他在絕望中沉淪,而從恩典之約中得安慰——這約悅納靈魂的願意,並為肉體的軟弱預備了赦免。他在此也對這住在他裏頭之罪所產生的一切提出抗議。他既承認同意神的律,在此也聲明不同意罪的律。「不是我作的;我不認這事;那是違背我的心意而作的。」正如在參議院中多數是壞的、把每件事都帶錯方向時,那誠然是參議院的行動,但誠實的一方反對它、為所作的哀嘆、並提出抗議;所以那不再是他們作的。——住在我裏頭,如同迦南人在以色列人中,雖然他們被征了貢:住在我裏頭,而且當我活著時還要住在那裏。
(3.) 他的大安慰在於耶穌基督(Ro 7:25):*感謝神,靠著我們的主耶穌基督。*在他的抱怨中他爆發為讚美。多在讚美中是對抗恐懼和憂愁的特效藥:許多可憐的低沉的靈魂已發現如此。在我們一切的讚美中,這當是歌的重擔:「為耶穌基督稱頌神。」*誰能救我?*他說(Ro 7:24),如同喪失幫助的人。至終他找到一位全足的朋友,就是耶穌基督。當我們感受到罪和敗壞之殘餘權勢時,我們必看見理由藉著基督稱頌神(因他既是我們一切禱告的中保,也是我們一切讚美的中保)——為基督稱頌神;是他站在我們和因這罪當歸給我們的忿怒之間。若不是為著基督,這住在我們裏頭的罪孽必是我們的毀壞。他是我們與父那裏的中保,藉著他神憐憫、寬容、赦免,不將我們的罪孽歸在我們賬上。是基督及時為我們買贖了拯救。藉著基督,死將終止這一切的抱怨,並將我們送往一個沒有罪、沒有嘆息的永恆。感謝神,使我們藉著我們的主耶穌基督得勝!
English original
Conflict between Grace and Corruption (58 AD)
¹⁴ b—But I am carnal, sold under sin.
¹⁵ For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
¹⁶ If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.
¹⁷ Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
¹⁸ For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.
¹⁹ For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
²⁰ Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
²¹ I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.
²² For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
²³ But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.
²⁴ O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
²⁵ I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
Here is a description of the conflict between grace and corruption in the heart, between the law of God and the law of sin. And it is applicable two ways:—1. To the struggles that are in a convinced soul, but yet unregenerate, in the person of whom it is supposed, by some, that Paul speaks. 2. To the struggles that are in a renewed sanctified soul, but yet in a state of imperfection; as other apprehend. And a great controversy there is of which of these we are to understand the apostle here. So far does the evil prevail here, when he speaks of one sold under sin, doing it, not performing that which is good, that it seems difficult to apply it to the regenerate, who are described to walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit; and yet so far does the good prevail in hating sin, consenting to the law, delighting in it, serving the law of God with the mind, that it is more difficult to apply it to the unregenerate that are dead in trespasses and sins.
I. Apply it to the struggles that are felt in a convinced soul, that is yet in a state of sin, knows his Lord's will, but does it not, approves the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law, and yet lives in the constant breach of it, Ro 2:17-23. Though he has that within him that witnesses against the sin he commits, and it is not without a great deal of reluctancy that he does commit it, the superior faculties striving against it, natural conscience warning against it before it is committed and smiting for it afterwards, yet the man continues a slave to his reigning lusts. It is not thus with every unregenerate man, but with those only that are convinced by the law, but not changed by the gospel. The apostle had said (Ro 6:14), Sin shall not have dominion, because you are not under the law, but under grace, for the proof of which he here shows that a man under the law, and not under grace, may be, and is, under the dominion of sin. The law may discover sin, and convince of sin, but it cannot conquer and subdue sin, witness the predominancy of sin in many that are under very strong legal convictions. It discovers the defilement, but will not wash it off. It makes a man weary and heavy laden (Mt 11:28), burdens him with his sin; and yet, if rested in, it yields no help towards the shaking off of that burden; this is to be had only in Christ. The law may make a man cry out, O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me? and yet leave him thus fettered and captivated, as being too weak to deliver him (Ro 8:3), give him a spirit of bondage to fear, Ro 8:15. Now a soul advanced thus far by the law is in a fair way towards a state of liberty by Christ, though many rest here and go no further. Felix trembled, but never came to Christ. It is possible for a man to go to hell with his eyes open (Nu 24:3,4), illuminated with common convictions, and to carry about with him a self-accusing conscience, even in the service of the devil. He may consent to the law that it is good, delight to know God's ways (as they, Isa 58:2), may have that within him that witnesses against sin and for holiness; and yet all this overpowered by the reigning love of sin. Drunkards and unclean persons have some faint desires to leave off their sins, and yet persist in them notwithstanding, such is the impotency and such the insufficiency of their convictions. Of such as these there are many that will needs have all this understood, and contend earnestly for it: though it is very hard to imagine why, if the apostle intended this, he should speak all along in his own person; and not only so, but in the present tense. Of his own state under conviction he had spoken at large, as of a thing past (Ro 7:7, etc.): I died; the commandment I found to be unto death; and if here he speaks of the same state as his present state, and the condition he was now in, surely he did not intend to be so understood: and therefore,
II. It seems rather to be understood of the struggles that are maintained between grace and corruption in sanctified souls. That there are remainders of indwelling corruption, even where there is a living principle of grace, is past dispute; that this corruption is daily breaking forth in sins of infirmity (such as are consistent with a state of grace) is no less certain. If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, 1Jo 1:8,10. That true grace strives against these sins and corruptions, does not allow of them, hates them, mourns over them, groans under them as a burden, is likewise certain (Ga 5:17): The flesh lusteth against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary the one to the other, so that you cannot do the things that you would. These are the truths which, I think, are contained in this discourse of the apostle. And his design is further to open the nature of sanctification, that it does not attain to a sinless perfection in this life; and therefore to quicken us to, and encourage us in, our conflicts with remaining corruptions. Our case is not singular, that which we do sincerely strive against, shall not be laid to our charge, and through grace the victory is sure at last. The struggle here is like that between Jacob and Esau in the womb, between the Canaanites and Israelites in the land, between the house of Saul and the house of David; but great is the truth and will prevail. Understanding it thus, we may observe here,
1. What he complains of—the remainder of indwelling corruptions, which he here speaks of, to show that the law is insufficient to justify even a regenerate man, that the best man in the world hath enough in him to condemn him, if God should deal with him according to the law, which is not the fault of the law, but of our own corrupt nature, which cannot fulfil the law. The repetition of the same things over and over again in this discourse shows how much Paul's heart was affected with what he wrote, and how deep his sentiments were. Observe the particulars of this complaint. (1.) I am carnal, sold under sin, Ro 7:14. He speaks of the Corinthians as carnal, 1Co 3:1. Even where there is spiritual life there are remainders of carnal affections, and so far a man may be sold under sin; he does not sell himself to work wickedness, as Ahab did (1Ki 21:25), but he was sold by Adam when he sinned and fell—sold, as a poor slave that does his master's will against his own will—sold under sin, because conceived in iniquity and born in sin. (2.) What I would, that I do not; but what I hate, that do I, Ro 7:15. And to the same purport, Ro 7:19,21, When I would do good, evil is present with me. Such was the strength of corruptions, that he could not attain that perfection in holiness which he desired and breathed after. Thus, while he was pressing forward towards perfection, yet he acknowledges that he had not already attained, neither was already perfect, Php 3:12. Fain he would be free from all sin, and perfectly do the will of God, such was his settled judgment; but his corrupt nature drew him another way: it was like a clog, that checked and kept him down when he would have soared upward, like the bias in a bowl, which, when it is thrown straight, yet draws it aside. (3.) In me, that is in my flesh, dwelleth no good, Ro 7:18. Here he explains himself concerning the corrupt nature, which he calls flesh; and as far as that goes there is no good to be expected, any more than one would expect good corn growing upon a rock, or on the sand which is by the sea-side. As the new nature, as far as that goes, cannot commit sin (1Jo 3:9), so the flesh, the old nature, as far as that goes, cannot perform a good duty. How should it? For the flesh serveth the law of sin (Ro 7:25), it is under the conduct and government of that law; and, while it is so, it is not likely to do any good. The corrupt nature is elsewhere called flesh (Ge 6:3, Joh 3:6); and, though there may be good things dwelling in those that have this flesh, yet, as far as the flesh goes, there is no good, the flesh is not a subject capable of any good. (4.) I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind, Ro 7:23. The corrupt and sinful inclination is here compared to a law, because it controlled and checked him in his good motions. It is said to be seated in his members, because, Christ having set up his throne in his heart, it was only the rebellious members of the body that were the instruments of sin—in the sensitive appetite; or we may take it more generally for all that corrupt nature which is the seat not only of sensual but of more refined lusts. This wars against the law of the mind, the new nature; it draws the contrary way, drives on a contrary interest, which corrupt disposition and inclination are as great a burden and grief to the soul as the worst drudgery and captivity could be. It brings me into captivity. To the same purport (Ro 7:25), With the flesh I serve the law of sin; that is, the corrupt nature, the unregenerate part, is continually working towards sin. (5.) His general complaint we have in Ro 7:24, O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? The thing he complains of is a body of death; either the body of flesh, which is a mortal dying body (while we carry this body about with us, we shall be troubled with corruption; when we are dead, we shall be freed from sin, and not before), or the body of sin, the old man, the corrupt nature, which tends to death, that is, to the ruin of the soul. Or, comparing it to a dead body, the touch of which was by the ceremonial law defiling, if actual transgressions be dead works (Heb 9:14), original corruption is a dead body. It was as troublesome to Paul as if he had had a dead body tied to him, which he must have carried about with him. This made him cry out, O wretched man that I am! A man that had learned in every state to be content yet complains thus of his corrupt nature. Had I been required to speak of Paul, I should have said, "O blessed man that thou art, an ambassador of Christ, a favourite of heaven, a spiritual father of thousands!" But in his own account he was a wretched man, because of the corruption of nature, because he was not so good as he fain would be, had not yet attained, neither was already perfect. Thus miserably does he complain. Who shall deliver me? He speaks like one that was sick of it, that would give any thing to be rid of it, looks to the right hand and to the left for some friend that would part between him and his corruptions. The remainders of indwelling sin are a very grievous burden to a gracious soul.
2. What he comforts himself with. The case was sad, but there were some allays. Three things comforted him:—
(1.) That his conscience witnessed for him that he had a good principle ruling and prevailing in him, notwithstanding. It is well when all does not go one way in the soul. The rule of this good principle which he had was the law of God, to which he here speaks of having a threefold regard, which is certainly to be found in all that are sanctified, and no others. [1.] I consent unto the law that it is good, Ro 7:16, symphemi—I give my vote to the law; here is the approbation of the judgment. Wherever there is grace there is not only a dread of the severity of the law, but a consent to the goodness of the law. "It is a good in itself, it is good for me." This is a sign that the law is written in the heart, that the soul is delivered into the mould of it. To consent to the law is so far to approve of it as not to wish it otherwise constituted than it is. The sanctified judgment not only concurs to the equity of the law, but to the excellency of it, as convinced that a conformity to the law is the highest perfection of human nature, and the greatest honour and happiness we are capable of. [2.] I delight in the law of God after the inward man, Ro 7:22. His conscience bore witness to a complacency in the law. He delighted not only in the promises of the word, but in the precepts and prohibitions of the word; synedomai expresses a becoming delight. He did herein concur in affection with all the saints. All that are savingly regenerate or born again do truly delight in the law of God, delight to know it, to do it—cheerfully submit to the authority of it, and take a complacency in that submission, never better pleased than when heart and life are in the strictest conformity to the law and will of God. After the inward man; that is, First, The mind or rational faculties, in opposition to the sensitive appetites and wills of the flesh. The soul is the inward man, and that is the seat of gracious delights, which are therefore sincere and serious, but secret; it is the renewing of the inward man, 2Co 4:16. Secondly, The new nature. The new man is called the inner man (Eph 3:16), the hidden man of the heart, 1Pe 3:4. Paul, as far as he was sanctified, had a delight in the law of God. [3.] With the mind I myself serve the law of God, Ro 7:25. It is not enough to consent to the law, and to delight in the law, but we must serve the law; our souls must be entirely delivered up into the obedience of it. Thus it was with Paul's mind; thus it is with every sanctified renewed mind; this is the ordinary course and way; thitherward goes the bent of the soul. I myself—autos ego, plainly intimating that he speaks in his own person, and not in the person of another.
(2.) That the fault lay in that corruption of his nature which he did really bewail and strive against: It is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. This he mentions twice (Ro 7:17,20), not as an excuse for the guilt of his sin (it is enough to condemn us, if we were under the law, that the sin which does the evil dwelleth in us), but as a salvo for his evidences, that he might not sink in despair, but take comfort from the covenant of grace, which accepts the willingness of the spirit, and has provided pardon for the weakness of the flesh. He likewise herein enters a protestation against all that which this indwelling sin produced. Having professed his consent to the law of God, he here professes his dissent from the law of sin. "It is not I; I disown the fact; it is against my mind that it is done." As when in the senate the major part are bad, and carry every thing the wrong way, it is indeed the act of the senate, but the honest party strive against it, bewail what is done, and enter their protestation against it; so that it is no more they that do it.—Dwelleth in me, as the Canaanites among the Israelites, though they were put under tribute: dwelleth in me, and is likely to dwell there, while I live.
(3.) His great comfort lay in Jesus Christ (Ro 7:25): I thank God, through Jesus Christ our Lord. In the midst of his complaints he breaks out into praises. It is a special remedy against fears and sorrows to be much in praise: many a poor drooping soul hath found it so. And, in all our praises, this should be the burden of the son, "Blessed be God for Jesus Christ." Who shall deliver me? says he (Ro 7:24), as one at a loss for help. At length he finds an all-sufficient friend, even Jesus Christ. When we are under the sense of the remaining power of sin and corruption, we shall see reason to bless God through Christ (for, as he is the mediator of all our prayers, so he is of all our praises)—to bless God for Christ; it is he that stands between us and the wrath due to us for this sin. If it were not for Christ, this iniquity that dwells in us would certainly be our ruin. He is our advocate with the Father, and through him God pities, and spares, and pardons, and lays not our iniquities to our charge. It is Christ that has purchased deliverance for us in due time. Through Christ death will put an end to all these complaints, and waft us to an eternity which we shall spend without sin or sigh. Blessed be God that giveth us this victory through our Lord Jesus Christ!
在本章中我們可以留意:一、進一步以從律法得了自由作為論據,勸勉我們追求成聖(羅7:1-6)。二、儘管如此,仍從使徒自己的經歷證明律法的卓越和功用(羅7:7-14)。三、描繪心中恩典與敗壞之間的爭戰(羅7:14-25)。