Comentario del capítulo
Jude Capítulo 1
1
Sin título
繁體中文
Original en inglés
INTRODUCTION
AUTHOR.--He calls himself in the address "the servant of Jesus Christ, and brother of James." See
Introduction
to the Epistle of James, in proof of James the apostle, and James the Lord's brother, the bishop of Jerusalem, being one and the same person.
Ga 1:19
alone seems to me to prove this. Similarly, Jude the brother of our Lord, and Jude the apostle, seem to be one and the same. JEROME [Against Helvidius], rightly maintains that by the Lord's brethren are meant his cousins, children of Mary and Cleophas (the same as Alphæus). From
1Co 9:5
(as "brethren of the Lord" stands between "other apostles" and "Cephas"), it seems natural to think that the brethren of the Lord are distinguished from the apostles only because all his brethren were not apostles, but only James and Jude. Jude's reason for calling himself "brother of James," was that James, as bishop of Jerusalem, was better known than himself. Had he been, in the strict sense, brother of our Lord, he probably would have so entitled himself. His omission of mention of his apostleship is no proof that he was not an apostle; for so also James omits it in his heading; and Paul, in his Epistles to the Philippians, Thessalonians, and Philemon, omits it. Had the writer been a counterfeiter of the apostle Jude, he would doubtless have called himself an "apostle." He was called also Lebbæus and Thaddeus, probably to distinguish him from Judas Iscariot, the traitor. Lebbæus, from Hebrew "leeb," "heart," means courageous. Thaddeus is the same as Theudas, from Hebrew "thad," the "breast." Luke and John, writing later than Matthew, when there would be no confusion between him and Judas Iscariot, give his name Judas. The only circumstance relating to him recorded in the Gospels occurs in
Joh 14:22,
"Judas saith unto Him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that Thou wilt manifest Thyself unto us, and not unto the world?" JEROME [Commentary on Matthew] says that he was sent to Edessa, to Abgarus, king of Osroene, or Edessa, and that he preached in Syria, Arabia, Mesopotamia, and Persia, in which last country he suffered martyrdom. The story is told on EUSEBIUS' authority, that Abgarus, on his sickbed, having heard of Jesus' power to heal, sent to beg Him to come and cure him, to which the Lord replied, praising his faith, that though he had not seen the Saviour, he yet believed; adding, "As for what thou hast written, that I should come to thee, it is necessary that all those things for which I was sent should be fulfilled by Me in this place, and that having filled them I should be received up to Him that sent Me. When, therefore, I shall be received into heaven, I will send unto thee some one of My disciples who shall both heal thy distemper and give life to thee and those with thee." Thomas is accordingly said to have been inspired to send Thaddeus for the cure and baptism of Abgarus. The letters are said to have been shown Thaddeus among the archives of Edessa. It is possible such a message was verbally sent, and the substance of it registered in writing afterwards (compare
2Ki 5:1-27; and Mt 15:22).
HEGESIPPUS (in EUSEBIUS [Ecclesiastical History, 3.20]) states that when Domitian inquired after David's posterity, some grandsons of Jude, called the Lord's brother, were brought into his presence. Being asked as to their possessions, they said that they had thirty-nine acres of the value of nine thousand denarii, out of which they paid him taxes, and lived by the labor of their hands, a proof of which they gave by showing the hardness of their hands. Being interrogated as to Christ and His kingdom, they replied that it was not of this world, but heavenly; and that it would be manifested at the end of the world, when He would come in glory to judge the living and the dead.
AUTHENTICITY.--EUSEBIUS [Ecclesiastical History, 3.25], reckons it among the Antilegomena or controverted Scriptures, "though recognized by the majority." The reference to the contest of Michael, the archangel, with the devil, for the body of Moses, not mentioned elsewhere in the Old Testament, but found in the apocryphal "Book of Enoch," probably raised doubts as to its authenticity, as JEROME [On Illustrious Men, 4] says. Moreover, its not being addressed to one particular Church, or individual, caused it not to be so immediately recognized as canonical. A counterfeiter would have avoided using what did not occur in the Old Testament, and which might be regarded as apocryphal.
As to the book of Enoch, if quoted by Jude, his quotation of a passage from it gives an inspired sanction only to the truth of that passage, not to the whole book; just as Paul, by inspiration, sanctions particular sentiments from ARATUS, EPIMENIDES, and MENANDER, but not all their writings. I think, rather as there is some slight variation between Jude's statement and that of the book of Enoch, that Jude, though probably not ignorant of the book of Enoch, stamps with inspired sanction the current tradition of the Jews as to Enoch's prophecies; just as Paul mentions the names of the Egyptian magicians, "Jannes and Jambres"
(2Ti 3:8),
not mentioned in the Old Testament. At all events, the prophecy ascribed to Enoch by Jude was really his, being sanctioned as such by this inspired writer. So also the narration as to the archangel Michael's dispute with Satan concerning the body of Moses, is by Jude's inspired authority
(Jude 9)
declared true. The book of Enoch is quoted by JUSTIN MARTYR, IRENÆUS, CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA, &c. Bruce, the Abyssinian traveller, brought home three copies of it in Ethiopic, from Alexandria, of which Archbishop Lawrence, in 1821, gave an English translation. The Ethiopic was a version from the Greek, and the Greek doubtless a version from the Hebrew, as the names of the angels in it show. The Apostolic Constitutions, ORIGEN [Against Celsus], JEROME, and AUGUSTINE, pronounce it not canonical. Yet it is in the main edifying, vindicating God's government of the world, natural and spiritual, and contradicting none of the Scripture statements. The name Jesus never occurs, though "Son of man," so often given to Messiah in the Gospels, is frequent, and terms are used expressive of His dignity, character, and acts, exceeding the views of Messiah in any other Jewish book. The writer seems to have been a Jew who had become thoroughly imbued with the sacred writings of Daniel. And, though many coincidences occur between its sentiments and the New Testament, the Messianic portions are not distinct enough to prove that the writer knew the New Testament. Rather, he seems to have immediately preceded Christ's coming, about the time of Herod the Great, and so gives us a most interesting view of believing Jews' opinions before the advent of our Lord. The Trinity is recognized (Enoch 60:13,14). Messiah is "the elect One" existing from eternity (Enoch 48:2,3,5); "All kings shall fall down before Him, and worship and fix their hopes on this Son of man" (Enoch 61:10-13). He is the object of worship (Enoch 48:3,4); He is the supreme Judge (Enoch 60:10,11; 68:38,39). There shall be a future state of retribution (Enoch 93:8,9; 94:2,4; 95; 96; 99; 103); The eternity of future punishment (Enoch 103:5). VOLKMAR, in ALFORD, thinks the book was written at the time of the sedition of Barchochebas (A.D. 132), by a follower of Rabbi Akiba, the upholder of that impostor. This would make the book Antichristian in its origin. If this date be correct, doubtless it copied some things from Jude, giving them the Jewish, not the Christian, coloring.
EUSEBIUS [Demonstration of the Gospel, 3.5] remarks, it accords with John's humility that in Second and Third John he calls himself "the elder." For the same reason James and Jude call themselves "servants of Jesus Christ." CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA [Adumbrations, in Epistle of Jude, p. 1007] says, "Jude, through reverential awe, did not call himself brother, but servant, of Jesus Christ, and brother of James."
TERTULLIAN [On the Apparel of Women, 3] cites the Epistle as that of the apostle James. CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA in Miscellanies [3.2.11] quotes
Jude 8, 17
as Scripture, in The Instructor [3.8.44],
Jude 5.
The MURATORI fragment asserts its canonicity [ROUTH, Sacred Fragments, 1.306]. ORIGEN [Commentary on Matthew 13:55] says, "Jude wrote an Epistle of few lines, but one filled full of the strong words of heavenly grace." Also, in his Commentary on Matthew 22:23, ORIGEN quotes
Jude 6;
and on Matthew 18:10, he quotes
Jude 1.
He calls the writer "Jude the apostle," in the Latin remains of his works (compare DAVIDSON, Introduction to the New Testament, vol. 3, p. 498). JEROME [On Illustrious Men, 4] reckons it among the Scriptures. Though the oldest manuscripts of the Peschito omit it, EPHREM THE SYRIAN recognizes it. WORDSWORTH reasons for its genuineness thus: Jude, we know, died before John, that is, before the beginning of the second century. Now EUSEBIUS [Ecclesiastical History, 3.32] tells us that James was succeeded in the bishopric of Jerusalem by Symeon his brother; and also that Symeon sat in that see till A.D. 107, when as a martyr he was crucified in his hundred twentieth year. We find that the Epistle to Jude was known in the East and West in the second century; it was therefore circulated in Symeon's lifetime. It never would have received currency such as it had, nor would Symeon have permitted a letter bearing the name of an apostle, his own brother Jude, brother of his own apostolical predecessor, James, to have been circulated, if it were not really Jude's.
TO WHOM ADDRESSED.--The references to Old Testament history,
Jude 5, 7,
and to Jewish tradition,
Jude 14,
&c., make it likely that Jewish Christians are the readers to whom Jude mainly (though including also all Christians,
Jude 1)
writes, just as the kindred Epistle, Second Peter, is addressed primarily to the same class; compare
Introduction
to First Peter and
Introduction
to Second Peter.
The persons stigmatized in it were not merely libertines (as ALFORD thinks), though no doubt that was one of their prominent characteristics, but heretics in doctrine, "denying the only Lord God, and our Saviour Jesus Christ." Hence he urges believers "earnestly to contend for the faith once delivered unto the saints"
(Jude 3).
Insubordination, self-seeking, and licentiousness, the fruit of Antinomian teachings, were the evils against which Jude warns his readers; reminding them that, to build themselves in their most holy faith, and to pray in the Holy Ghost, are the only effectual safeguards. The same evils, along with mocking skepticism, shall characterize the last days before the final judgment, even as in the days when Enoch warned the ungodly of the coming flood. As Peter was in Babylon in writing
1Pe 5:13,
and probably also in writing Second Peter (compare
Introduction
to First Peter and
Introduction
to Second Peter), Jude addressed his Epistle primarily to the Jewish Christians in and about Mesopotamian Babylon (a place of great resort to the Jews in that day), or else to the Christian Jews dispersed in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia
(1Pe 1:1),
the persons addressed by Peter. For Jude is expressly said to have preached in Mesopotamia [JEROME, Commentary on Matthew], and his Epistle, consisting of only twenty-five verses, contains in them no less than eleven passages from Second Peter (see my
Introduction
to Second Peter for the list). Probably in
Jude 4
he witnesses to the fulfilment of Peter's prophecy, "There are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained (rather as Greek, "forewritten," that is, announced beforehand by the apostle Peter's written prophecy) to this condemnation, ungodly men denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ." Compare
2Pe 2:1,
"There shall be false teachers among you who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction." Also
Jude 17, 18
plainly refers to the very words of
2Pe 3:3,
"Remember the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus; how they told you there should be mockers in the last time who should walk after their own ungodly lusts." This proves, in opposition to ALFORD, that Jude's Epistle is later than Peter's (whose inspiration he thus confirms, just as Peter confirms Paul's,
2Pe 3:15, 16),
not vice versa.
TIME AND PLACE OF WRITING.--ALFORD thinks, that, considering Jude was writing to Jews and citing signal instances of divine vengeance, it is very unlikely he would have omitted to allude to the destruction of Jerusalem if he had written after that event which uprooted the Jewish polity and people. He conjectures from the tone and references that the writer lived in Palestine. But as to the former, negative evidence is doubtful; for neither does John allude in his Epistles, written after the destruction of Jerusalem, to that event. MILL fixes on A.D. 90, after the death of all the apostles save John. I incline to think from
Jude 17, 18
that some time had elapsed since the Second Epistle of Peter (written probably about A.D. 68 or 69) when Jude wrote, and, therefore, that the Epistle of Jude was written after the destruction of Jerusalem.
Jude 1-25.
ADDRESS: GREETING: HIS OBJECT IN WRITING: WARNING AGAINST SEDUCERS IN DOCTRINE AND PRACTICE FROM GOD'S VENGENANCE ON APOSTATES, ISRAEL, THE FALLEN ANGELS, SODOM AND GOMORRAH. DESCRIPTION OF THESE BAD MEN, IN CONTRAST TO MICHAEL: LIKE CAIN, BALAAM, AND CORE: ENOCH'S PROPHECY AS TO THEM: THE APOSTLES' FOREWARNING: CONCLUDING EXHORTATION AS TO PRESERVING THEIR OWN FAITH, AND TRYING TO SAVE OTHERS: DOXOLOGY.
1. servant of Jesus Christ--as His minister and apostle.
brother of James--who was more widely known as bishop of Jerusalem and "brother of the Lord" (that is, either cousin, or stepbrother, being son of Joseph by a former marriage; for ancient traditions universally agree that Mary, Jesus' mother, continued perpetually a virgin). Jude therefore calls himself modestly "brother of James." See my
Introduction.
to them . . . sanctified by God the Father--The oldest manuscripts and versions, ORIGEN, LUCIFER, and others read, "beloved" for sanctified. If English Version be read, compare
Col 1:12; 1Pe 1:2.
The Greek is not "by," but "in." God the Father's love is the element IN which they are "beloved." Thus the conclusion,
Jude 21,
corresponds, "Keep yourselves in the love of God." Compare "beloved of the Lord"
2Th 2:13.
preserved in Jesus Christ--"kept." Translate not "in," but as Greek, "FOR Jesus Christ." "Kept continually (so the Greek perfect participle means) by God the Father for Jesus Christ," against the day of His coming. Jude, beforehand, mentions the source and guarantee for the final accomplishment of believers' salvation; lest they should be disheartened by the dreadful evils which he proceeds to announce [BENGEL].
and called--predicated of "them that are beloved in God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ: who are called." God's effectual calling in the exercise of His divine prerogative, guarantees their eternal safety.
2
Sin título
繁體中文
2. 憐憫——在苦難之時。因此憐憫居首位。是基督的憐憫
(猶 21)。
平安——在聖靈裏
(猶 20)。
慈愛——神的
(猶 21)。
這三者對應神的三个位格。
多多的加給你們——在你們裏面,並向你們。
Original en inglés
2. Mercy--in a time of wretchedness. Therefore mercy stands first; the mercy of Christ
(Jude 21).
peace--in the Holy Ghost
(Jude 20).
love--of God
(Jude 21).
The three answer to the divine Trinity.
be multiplied--in you and towards you.
3
Sin título
繁體中文
3. 本書信的目的(參較
猶 20, 21)。
十分的殷勤——
(彼後 1:5)。
正如傳道人當盡一切的殷勤勸誡,照樣百姓也當照其勸誡盡一切的殷勤,以具備各樣基督徒的恩德,並使所蒙的恩召堅定不移。
同得的救恩——由基督成就。參見註解,論
彼後 1:1,
「得了同樣寶貴的信心」,這信心的共同性以及信心的對象——救恩——構成相互勸勉的根基,藉著訴諸共同的盼望與懼怕。
我不得不——較好的譯法是:「我覺得必須(現在立即;希臘文簡過式即此意;其前的現在不定式「寫信」僅表達寫信的一般事實)寫信勸勉你們。」他之所以覺得必須「寫信勸勉」,其理由見於
猶 4,
「因為有些人偷著進來」,云云。他原打算一般地論及「同得的救恩」,卻因教會中現存的罪惡,發現有必要特別寫信勸勉他們要為真道竭力爭辯以抵擋這些罪惡。
竭力地爭辯——參較
腓 1:27,
「為所信的福音齊心努力」。
一次,云云——希臘文,「一次交付」。再沒有別的信仰或啟示能取代它。這是抵抗異端創新者的有力論據
(猶 4)。
信徒如同尼希米的工人
(尼 4:17),
一手「在至聖的真道上建造自己」;另一手則抵擋真道的仇敵,「竭力地爭辯」。
聖徒——所有的基督徒,因著所蒙的呼召,並在神的旨意中,都是聖潔的(即分別為聖歸於神)。
Original en inglés
3. Design of the Epistle (compare
Jude 20, 21).
all diligence--
(2Pe 1:5).
As the minister is to give all diligence to admonish, so the people should, in accordance with his admonition, give all diligence to have all Christian graces, and to make their calling sure.
the common salvation--wrought by Christ. Compare Note, see on
2Pe 1:1,
"obtained LIKE precious faith," This community of faith, and of the object of faith, salvation, forms the ground of mutual exhortation by appeals to common hopes and fears.
it was needful for me--rather, "I felt it necessary to write (now at once; so the Greek aorist means; the present infinitive 'to write,' which precedes, expresses merely the general fact of writing) exhorting you." The reason why he felt it necessary "to write with exhortation," he states,
Jude 4,
"For there are certain men crept in," &c. Having intended to write generally of "the common salvation," he found it necessary from the existing evils in the Church, to write specially that they should contend for the faith against those evils.
earnestly contend--Compare
Php 1:27,
"striving together for the faith of the Gospel."
once, &c.--Greek, "once for all delivered." No other faith or revelation is to supersede it. A strong argument for resisting heretical innovators
(Jude 4).
Believers, like Nehemiah's workmen
(Ne 4:17),
with one hand "build themselves up in their most holy faith"; with the other they" contend earnestly for the faith" against its foes.
the saints--all Christians, holy (that is, consecrated to God) by their calling, and in God's design.
4
Sin título
繁體中文
4. 有些人——含有輕蔑之意。
偷著進來——偷偷地、不法地。見論
彼後 2:1,
「私自引進害人的異端」。
從前……被定——希臘文作「預先寫明」,即在彼得的預言中
猶 17, 18;
以及更早在保羅的書信中,
提前 4:1; 提後 3:1;
並暗含於臨到叛教天使的審判之中。不順服的以色列人、所多瑪與蛾摩拉、巴蘭與可拉——這些都是為「鑑戒」而記載下來的
(猶 7, 以及猶 5, 6, 11)。
神作為刑罰罪惡者的永恆性情,正如「自古」以來在聖經中所揭示的,乃是這類叛教之徒被定罪受刑罰的根據。聖經是神生命冊的反映,信徒在其中「記錄在活人之中」。「預先寫明」一詞亦用於
羅 15:4
中所記載於聖經的事。聖經本身反映了神從永遠以來的性情,這是他從永遠所定旨意的根基。本格爾(BENGEL)將其解釋為一個縮略的說法:「他們自古已為以諾所預言
(猶 14,
以諾並未將其預言寫下),其後又為書面的道所指明。」
受刑罰——猶大生動地將他們的審判呈現於眼前:「這等人」。以諾的預言既包括基督來審判之前末日的「不敬虔之人」,也包括他們的先驅,即洪水之前的「不敬虔之人」,即最後審判的預表
(太 24:37-39; 彼後 3:3-7)。
二者的性情與結局互相呼應。
我們神的恩——指福音的用語,對於那些將在基督裏的神據為「我們的神」的信徒尤為甘甜,因此也使那些將福音的恩典與自由狀態轉為放縱情慾之藉口——彷彿脫離律法就等於獲得犯罪的許可證——的人的卑劣乖謬更為可憎。
不認獨一的主——最古老的抄本、譯本與教父省略了英文欽定本中緊接其後的「神」字。當按希臘文譯作「獨一的主宰」;此處用於耶穌基督,他既是主宰又是「主」(另一個希臘文詞)。見論
彼後 2:1。
因著基督與父完全合而為一,他與父一樣被稱為「獨一的」神和「主宰」。希臘文「主宰」暗示神對其受造物擁有絕對的所有權,可隨己意處置。
Original en inglés
4. certain men--implying disparagement.
crept in unawares--stealthily and unlawfully. See on
2Pe 2:1,
"privily shall bring in damnable heresies."
before . . . ordained--Greek, "forewritten," namely, in Peter's prophecy
Jude 17, 18;
and in Paul's before that,
1Ti 4:1; 2Ti 3:1;
and by implication in the judgments which overtook the apostate angels. The disobedient Israelites, Sodom and Gomorrah, Balaam and Core, and which are written "for an example"
(Jude 7, and Jude 5, 6, 11).
God's eternal character as the Punisher of sin, as set forth in Scripture "of old," is the ground on which such apostate characters are ordained to condemnation. Scripture is the reflection of God's book of life in which believers are "written among the living." "Forewritten" is applied also in
Ro 15:4
to the things written in Scripture. Scripture itself reflects God's character from everlasting, which is the ground of His decrees from everlasting. BENGEL explains it as an abbreviated phrase for, "They were of old foretold by Enoch
(Jude 14,
who did not write his prophecies), and afterwards marked out by the written word."
to this condemnation--Jude graphically puts their judgment as it were present before the eyes, "THIS." Enoch's prophecy comprises the "ungodly men" of the last days before Christ's coming to judgment, as well as their forerunners, the "ungodly men" before the flood, the type of the last judgment
(Mt 24:37-39; 2Pe 3:3-7).
The disposition and the doom of both correspond.
the grace of our God--A phrase for the Gospel especially sweet to believers who appropriate God in Christ as "our God," and so rendering the more odious the vile perversity of those who turn the Gospel state of grace and liberty into a ground of licentiousness, as if their exemption from the law gave them a license to sin.
denying the only Lord--The oldest manuscripts, versions, and Fathers omit "God," which follows in English Version. Translate as the Greek, "the only Master"; here used of Jesus Christ, who is at once Master and "Lord" (a different Greek word). See on
2Pe 2:1.
By virtue of Christ's perfect oneness with the Father, He, as well as the Father, is termed "the ONLY" God and "MASTER." Greek, "Master," implies God's absolute ownership to dispose of His creatures as He likes.
5
Sin título
繁體中文
5.
(來 3:16; 4:13。)
雖然——其他最古老的抄本和*武加大譯本(Vulgate)*讀作「然而」;與不敬虔之人形成對比
猶 4。
你們雖然一次——較好的譯法是,「一次」。當譯作:「我想要提醒你們,作為知道一切的人(即我所指的事;最古老的抄本、譯本與教父均如此讀),一次全備地。」既然他們已經一次全備地知道一切事實,他只需「提醒」他們即可。
主——最古老的抄本和譯本讀作「耶穌」。因此說「基督」曾在曠野與以色列人同行;耶穌與以色列神權政治的神是如此完全地合而為一。
拯救了——安全地引導,並帶入安全與拯救的狀態。
後來——希臘文,「第二」;在第二個實例中「毀滅了那些不信從的人」,與他在第一個實例中的拯救他們形成對比。
Original en inglés
5.
(Heb 3:16; 4:13.)
therefore--Other oldest manuscripts and Vulgate read, "But"; in contrast to the ungodly
Jude 4.
though ye once--rather, "once for all." Translate, "I wish to remind you, as knowing ALL (namely, that I am referring to; so the oldest manuscripts, versions, and Fathers) once for all." As already they know all the facts once for all, he needs only to "remind" them.
the Lord--The oldest manuscripts and versions read, "Jesus." So "Christ" is said to have accompanied the Israelites in the wilderness; so perfectly is Jesus one with the God of the Israelite theocracy.
saved--brought safely, and into a state of safety and salvation.
afterward--Greek, "secondly"; in the next instance "destroyed them that believed not," as contrasted with His in the first instance having saved them.
6
Sin título
繁體中文
6.
(彼後 2:4。)
不守本位——武加大譯本(Vulgate)譯作「他們自己的主治權」,天使在其他地方也被稱為「主治的」這一事實支持此譯:「自己的」暗示他們不滿足於在神子之下一次永遠所派定的尊榮,而奢望更高的地位。阿爾福德(ALFORD)認為此處暗指
創 6:2
的記載,而非魔鬼及其使者的墮落,因他認為「放縱行淫」
(猶 7)
可資證明;參見希臘文,「與這些同樣地」,即與天使
(猶 6)。
在我看來,將「神的兒子們」
(創 6:2)
解作塞特的後裔,比解作「靈」——不能有肉體聯合的天使——更為自然。平行經文
彼後 2:4
明顯指叛教天使的墮落。而「與這些同樣地」,
猶 7,
指的是所多瑪蛾摩拉的居民,「周圍的城邑」與「他們」一樣犯罪[以斯提烏(ESTIUS)與加爾文(CALVIN)]。即便希臘文「這些」,
猶 7,
指天使,「與這些同樣地」的意思也不是說天使與人的女兒肉體上行淫,而是他們的野心——使他的情感離開神並墮落——在神看來,與所多瑪離開神所設的自然秩序去隨從逆性的肉體,在屬靈上是同類的罪。叛教天使按其種類所犯的罪,與人類所多瑪人按其種類所犯的罪相類似。參見淫亂的人與貪婪之間稍為相似的屬靈關聯。偽經以諾一書將
創 6:2
解作如阿爾福德(ALFORD)一樣。但猶大雖在某些細節上與之相符,並不意味著他在一切細節上都相符。希伯來人稱墮落天使為亞撒與亞撒色。
離棄——出於自願。
自己的——希臘文,「自己專有的」。
住處——天堂,光明榮耀的,與他們現今所被判定的「黑暗」相對。他們野心勃勃的計劃似乎與這地有特殊的關聯,撒但在墮落之前可能是神在這地上的代理,因此他後來與這地產生聯繫——先是作試探者,後作「這世界的王」。
拘留——既然希臘文用字相同,且明顯引用他們「不守本位」,當譯作「他拘留了」。意思大概是,他將他們拘留在他的旨意之中;那是他們必然的結局。再者,如今撒但及其魔鬼仍可在地上橫行。其結局的預表是他們被逐出天堂,已被限制於「這現今世界的黑暗」,即環繞地面的「空中」,現已成為他們特有的活動範圍。他們潛伏於幽暗與死亡之處,帶著痛苦的恐懼期盼無底坑中最終的折磨。他並非指字面的鎖鏈與黑暗,而是在這現今世界中的比喻說法,在那裏他們能力與自由受限、被拒於天門之外,如同已定罪的囚犯等候結局。
Original en inglés
6.
(2Pe 2:4.)
kept not their first estate--Vulgate translates, "their own principality," which the fact of angels being elsewhere called "principalities," favors: "their own" implies that, instead of being content with the dignity once for all assigned to them under the Son of God, they aspired higher. ALFORD thinks the narrative in
Ge 6:2
is alluded to, not the fall of the devil and his angels, as he thinks "giving themselves over to fornication"
(Jude 7)
proves; compare Greek, "in like manner to these," namely, to the angels
(Jude 6).
It seems to me more natural to take "sons of God"
(Ge 6:2)
of the Sethites, than of angels, who, as "spirits," do not seem capable of carnal connection. The parallel,
2Pe 2:4,
plainly refers to the fall of the apostate angels. And "in like manner to these,"
Jude 7,
refers to the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah, "the cities about them" sinning "in like manner" as "they" did [ESTIUS and CALVIN]. Even if Greek "these,"
Jude 7,
refer to the angels, the sense of "in like manner as these" will be, not that the angels carnally fornicated with the daughters of men, but that their ambition, whereby their affections went away from God and they fell, is in God's view a sin of like kind spiritually as Sodom's going away from God's order of nature after strange flesh; the sin of the apostate angels after their kind is analogous to that of the human Sodomites after their kind. Compare the somewhat similar spiritual connection of whoremongers and covetousness. The apocryphal book of Enoch interprets
Ge 6:2
as ALFORD. But though Jude accords with it in some particulars, it does not follow that he accords with it in all. The Hebrews name the fallen angels Aza and Azael.
left--on their own accord.
their own--Greek, "their proper."
habitation--heaven, all bright and glorious, as opposed to the "darkness" to which they now are doomed. Their ambitious designs seem to have had a peculiar connection with this earth, of which Satan before his fall may have been God's vicegerent, whence arises his subsequent connection with it as first the Tempter, then "the prince of this world."
reserved--As the Greek is the same, and there is an evident reference to their having "kept not their first estate," translate, "He hath kept." Probably what is meant is, He hath kept them in His purpose; that is their sure doom; moreover, as yet, Satan and his demons roam at large on the earth. An earnest of their doom is their having been cast out of heaven, being already restricted to "the darkness of this present world," the "air" that surrounds the earth, their peculiar element now. They lurk in places of gloom and death, looking forward with agonizing fear to their final torment in the bottomless pit. He means not literal chains and darkness, but figurative in this present world where, with restricted powers and liberties, shut out from heaven, they, like condemned prisoners, await their doom.
7
Sin título
繁體中文
7. 又如——阿爾福德(ALFORD)譯作,「我想要提醒你們
(猶 5)
,即。」
所多瑪,云云——
(彼後 2:6)。
放縱行淫——格外地隨從淫亂,即偏離自然秩序。關於「與他們一樣」(希臘文),參見註解,論
猶 6。
關於屬靈的淫亂,參見「遠離你而行淫」,
詩 73:27。
隨從逆性的情慾——偏離自然的常道,追求那違背自然的。在後世,最開化的外邦民族也毫無愧疚或羞恥地放縱所多瑪之罪。
作為鑑戒——呈現在我們眼前。
受——直到現在仍受;暗指死海周圍火山烈火的痕跡。
刑罰——希臘文,「公義的報應」。
永遠的火——那將這些城邑不可挽回地燒毀的烈火所留下的持久痕跡,是其居民被判歸入之永火的預表。本格爾(BENGEL)按希臘文所容許的譯作:「受(那)刑罰(他們所忍受的),作為永火(即將要吞噬惡人之火)的榜樣或標本。」
結 16:53-55
表明所多瑪作為一國所受的刑罰並非永遠。 另參較
彼後 2:6。
Original en inglés
7. Even as--ALFORD translates, "I wish to remind you
(Jude 5)
that."
Sodom, &c.--
(2Pe 2:6).
giving themselves over to fornication--following fornication extraordinarily, that is, out of the order of nature. On "in like manner to them" (Greek), compare Note, see on
Jude 6.
Compare on spiritual fornication, "go a whoring from thee,"
Ps 73:27.
going after strange flesh--departing from the course of nature, and going after that which is unnatural. In later times the most enlightened heathen nations indulged in the sin of Sodom without compunction or shame.
are set forth--before our eyes.
suffering--undergoing to this present time; alluding to the marks of volcanic fire about the Dead Sea.
the vengeance--Greek, "righteous retribution."
eternal fire--The lasting marks of the fire that consumed the cities irreparably, is a type of the eternal fire to which the inhabitants have been consigned. BENGEL translates as the Greek will admit, "Suffering (the) punishment (which they endure) as an example or sample of eternal fire (namely, that which shall consume the wicked)."
Eze 16:53-55
shows that Sodom's punishment, as a nation, is not eternal. Compare also
2Pe 2:6.
8
Sin título
繁體中文
8. 也——較好的譯法是,「然而,同樣地」(儘管有這些警戒性的實例)[阿爾福德(ALFORD)]。
這些……作夢的人——希臘文沒有英文欽定本中的「污穢」一詞。「這些人作夢」(即在他們的夢中)這子句適用於所有的動詞——「污穢」、「輕慢」、「毀謗」。所有罪人在屬靈上都是沉睡的,他們肉體的活動如同夢境
(帖前 5:6, 7)。
他們之所以毀謗在尊位的,是因為他們正在作夢,不知道自己所毀謗的是甚麼
(猶 10)。
「正如作夢的人自以為看見並接近許多事物,照樣屬血氣之人的私慾被喜樂、憂愁、恐懼和其他情感所激盪。但他對自制一無所知。因此,縱然他動用理性的一切能力,也無法體會那些清醒、在白晝之中的光明之子所享有的真自由」[本格爾(BENGEL)]。
污穢身體——
(猶 7)。
主治的——「主權」。
在尊位的——字面意義為「榮耀」。包括屬地與屬天的尊位。
Original en inglés
8. also--rather, "In like manner nevertheless" (notwithstanding these warning examples) [ALFORD].
these . . . dreamers--The Greek has not "filthy" of English Version. The clause, "these men dreaming" (that is, in their dreams), belongs to all the verbs, "defile," "despise," and "speak evil." All sinners are spiritually asleep, and their carnal activity is as it were a dream
(1Th 5:6, 7).
Their speaking evil of dignities is because they are dreaming, and know not what they are speaking evil of
(Jude 10).
"As a man dreaming seems to himself to be seeing and nearing many things, so the natural man's lusts are agitated by joy, distress, fear, and the other passions. But he is a stranger to self-command. Hence, though he bring into play all the powers of reason, he cannot conceive the true liberty which the sons of light, who are awake and in the daylight; enjoy" [BENGEL].
defile the flesh--
(Jude 7).
dominion--"lordship."
dignities--literally, "glories." Earthly and heavenly dignities.
9
Sin título
繁體中文
9. 天使長米迦勒——聖經中從未使用複數「天使長們」;只有獨一的「天使長」。新約中另一處出現該詞的經文是
帖前 4:16,
那裏基督與天使長有別,他要帶著天使長的聲音降臨以叫死人復活;因此將基督與米迦勒混為一談的人是錯誤的。這名的意思是*誰像神?*在
但 10:13
他被稱為「大君中的一位」(邊註作「首」)。他是以色列的護衛天使。在
啟 12:7
中,米迦勒與撒但之間的衝突再次被提及。
為摩西的屍首——指他字面的身體。撒但作為掌死權的,以摩西在米利巴的罪與他殺害埃及人為由,反對將這屍首復起。摩西的身體既已復起,可見於他在變像山上與以利亞和耶穌(他們都帶著身體)同時顯現:這是將來復活國度的標本與憑據,要由米迦勒為神的百姓站起來而引進。如此,在每個時代都賜下了將來復活的標本與憑據:族長時代有以諾,利未時代有摩西,先知時代有以利亞。值得注意的是,此處所記的責備,與主的使者、即第二位格的耶和華,在為猶太教會的代表約書亞辯護以抵擋撒但時所用的話相同,
亞 3:2;
因此有人認為此處「摩西的屍首」也是指被撒但在神面前控告的猶太教會,因為她的污穢,撒但據此要求神的公義對以色列施行,卻被那「揀選了耶路撒冷」的主所責備:如此,正如「基督的身體」是基督的教會,「摩西的屍首」就是猶太教會。但此處明顯是指字面的身體(雖然附帶地,猶太教會由摩西的屍首所預表,正如在那裏由大祭司約書亞所代表);而米迦勒一方面與耶和華—彌賽亞、另一方面與以色列的關係似乎如此密切,自然會使用與其主相同的語言。正如撒但(法庭上的對頭)或魔鬼(控告者)既控告整個教會,又個別地控告「弟兄們」,基督也作我們的辯護者為我們辯護。以色列和一切信徒的完全稱義,以及控告者最終被責備,仍是未來之事。約瑟夫(JOSEPHUS) [《猶太古史》(Antiquities), 4.8]記載,神隱藏了摩西的屍首,免得它若暴露於人前,便成為人敬拜的偶像。猶大在此一記載上,或取自偽經《摩西升天記(assumption of Moses)》(如俄利根(ORIGEN)[《論首要原理》(Concerning Principalities), 3.2]所主張),或取自該書所依據的古代傳統。猶大作為受靈感的人,能分辨傳統中何為真、何為假。我們沒有這種分辨的手段,因此除了書面的道中所載的之外,不能確信任何傳統。
不敢——因敬畏撒但先前的尊榮
(猶 8)。
毀謗的話——希臘文,「褻瀆的審判」,即惡言。彼得說,天使為了報仇,即使不得不與不敬虔的尊位者爭辯時,也不毀謗他們:猶大說,天使長米迦勒自己甚至在與魔鬼——即邪靈的首領——爭戰之時也沒有毀謗——不是因為怕他,而是出於對神的敬畏,因為撒但曾在這世上擁有神所委託的權力,甚至在某種程度上至今仍有。從「爭辯」一詞——即以辯論爭訟——可見這是一場法庭上的訴訟。
Original en inglés
9. Michael, the archangel--Nowhere in Scripture is the plural used, "archangels"; but only ONE, "archangel." The only other passage in the New Testament where it occurs, is
1Th 4:16,
where Christ is distinguished from the archangel, with whose voice He shall descend to raise the dead; they therefore err who confound Christ with Michael. The name means, Who is like God? In
Da 10:13
he is called "One ('the first,' Margin) of the chief princes." He is the champion angel of Israel. In
Re 12:7
the conflict between Michael and Satan is again alluded to.
about the body of Moses--his literal body. Satan, as having the power of death, opposed the raising of it again, on the ground of Moses' sin at Meribah, and his murder of the Egyptian. That Moses' body was raised, appears from his presence with Elijah and Jesus (who were in the body) at the Transfiguration: the sample and earnest of the coming resurrection kingdom, to be ushered in by Michael's standing up for God's people. Thus in each dispensation a sample and pledge of the future resurrection was given: Enoch in the patriarchal dispensation, Moses in the Levitical, Elijah in the prophetical. It is noteworthy that the same rebuke is recorded here as was used by the Angel of the Lord, or Jehovah the Second Person, in pleading for Joshua, the representative of the Jewish Church, against Satan, in
Zec 3:2;
whence some have thought that also here "the body of Moses" means the Jewish Church accused by Satan, before God, for its filthiness, on which ground he demands that divine justice should take its course against Israel, but is rebuked by the Lord who has "chosen Jerusalem": thus, as "the body of Christ" is the Christian Church, so "the body of Moses" is the Jewish Church. But the literal body is evidently here meant (though, secondarily, the Jewish Church is typified by Moses' body, as it was there represented by Joshua the high priest); and Michael, whose connection seems to be so close with Jehovah-Messiah on the one hand, and with Israel on the other, naturally uses the same language as his Lord. As Satan (adversary in court) or the devil (accuser) accuses alike the Church collectively and "the brethren" individually, so Christ pleads for us as our Advocate. Israel's, and all believers' full justification, and the accuser's being rebuked finally, is yet future. JOSEPHUS [*Antiquities,*4.8], states that God hid Moses' body, lest, if it had been exposed to view, it would have been made an idol of. Jude, in this account, either adopts it from the apocryphal "assumption of Moses" (as ORIGEN [Concerning Principalities, 3.2] thinks), or else from the ancient tradition on which that work was founded. Jude, as inspired, could distinguish how much of the tradition was true, how much false. We have no such means of distinguishing, and therefore can be sure of no tradition, save that which is in the written word.
durst not--from reverence for Satan's former dignity
(Jude 8).
railing accusation--Greek, "judgment of blasphemy," or evil-speaking. Peter said, Angels do not, in order to avenge themselves, rail at dignities, though ungodly, when they have to contend with them: Jude says that the archangel Michael himself did not rail even at the time when he fought with the devil, the prince of evil spirits--not from fear of him, but from reverence of God, whose delegated power in this world Satan once had, and even in some degree still has. From the word "disputed," or debated in controversy, it is plain it was a judicial contest.
10
Sin título
繁體中文
10.
(彼後 2:12。)
這些……的事——希臘文,「他們所不知道的一切事」,即屬靈世界的事。
但……本性——當如此連接:「凡(希臘文如此)按本性(即出於天然的、盲目的本能),如無理性的(希臘文如此)畜類一樣所知道的」,云云。前一個「知道」對應的希臘文暗示較深的認識;後一個「知道」則僅指「動物的感官與官能」的知覺。
Original en inglés
10.
(2Pe 2:12.)
those things which--Greek, "all things whatsoever they understand not," namely, the things of the spiritual world.
but what . . . naturally--Connect thus, "Whatever (so the Greek) things naturally (by natural, blind instinct), as the unreasoning (so the Greek) animals, they know," &c. The Greek for the former "know" implies deeper knowledge; the latter "know," the mere perception of the "animal senses and faculties."
11
Sin título
繁體中文
11. 他們有禍了——見論
彼後 2:14,
「被咒詛的兒女」。
該隱——殺人者:他的罪根在於對敬虔之人的恨與嫉妒,這也正是這些引誘者的罪。
奔跑——字面意義為「傾瀉而出」,如潰堤的洪流。不顧代價——失去神的恩與天堂——他們像巴蘭一樣為利奔走。
在可拉的背叛中滅亡了——(參見註解,論
猶 12)。
當我們讀到可拉因背叛而滅亡,實際上也是讀到這等人因同樣的背叛而同樣滅亡;因為同樣的種子結出同樣的收成。
Original en inglés
11. Woe--See on
2Pe 2:14,
"cursed children."
Cain--the murderer: the root of whose sin was hatred and envy of the godly, as it is the sin of these seducers.
ran greedily--literally, "have been poured forth" like a torrent that has burst its banks. Reckless of what it costs, the loss of God's favor and heaven, on they rush after gain like Balaam.
perished in the gainsaying of Core--(compare Note, see on
Jude 12).
When we read of Korah perishing by gainsaying, we read virtually also of these perishing in like manner through the same: for the same seed bears the same harvest.
12
Sin título
繁體中文
12. 玷污——如同
彼後 2:13,
希臘文作「spiloi」;但此處希臘文是spilades,在世俗作者的用法中意指礁石,即基督徒的愛筵(love-feast)有觸礁之虞的礁石。最古老的抄本加冠詞以示強調:「那些礁石」。「雲……風……海中的波浪」之喻與這礁石的意象相符。武加大譯本(Vulgate)似乎被發音相近的詞所誤導,如英文欽定本一樣譯作「玷污」;然而請參較
猶 23,
若希臘文可容許,此處支持英文譯本的譯法。兩份最古老的抄本,因抄寫者企圖使猶大與彼得說同樣的話,此處讀作「欺哄」而非「愛筵」,但份量最重的抄本和權威支持英文欽定本的讀法。愛筵與主的晚餐同時舉行
(林前 11:17-34,
末了)。利未人可拉不滿足於自己的職事,還覬覦獻祭的祭司職分:照樣在主晚餐中,有傳道人企圖將之變為獻祭,並自任獻祭的祭司,篡奪了我們唯一基督教大祭司基督耶穌的職分。他們當警惕可拉的結局!
餵養自己——希臘文,「牧養(看顧)自己」。他們所著眼的是自己的肥潤,而非餵養羊群。
無所懼怕——此詞不當如英文欽定本那樣連接,而當與「宴席」相連。聖潔的筵席尤其當以敬畏之心來守。筵席本身並非可責[本格爾(BENGEL)],但需伴以敬畏,以免忘記神,正如約伯在其眾子設筵之時所行。
雲——人們本可指望從中降下滋潤的雨。
彼後 2:17,
「無水的井」。有信仰之名而無實際行為的人。
飄蕩——最古老的抄本作「飄離」,即偏離正道(參較
弗 4:14)。
秋天……的樹——較好的譯法是,「深秋(或將盡之秋)的樹」,即樹上不再有葉子或果子的時候[本格爾(BENGEL)]。
沒有果子——沒有知識與行為的好果子;有時用以指實際上是壞的東西。
死了兩次——第一次是秋天落葉,冬天似乎死了,但春天又復甦;第二次是被「連根拔起」。照樣這些叛教者,曾死於不信之中,後來因信仰告白與洗禮從罪的死裏被提升到義的生命,如今卻因叛教再次成為死人,因而絕望地死了。此處層層遞進:不僅如深秋之樹那樣沒有葉子,更是沒有果子;不僅如此,更是死了兩次;最後登峰造極,「連根拔起」。
Original en inglés
12. spots--So
2Pe 2:13,
Greek, "spiloi"; but here the Greek is spilades, which elsewhere, in secular writers, means rocks, namely, on which the Christian love-feasts were in danger of being shipwrecked. The oldest manuscript prefixes the article emphatically, "THE rocks." The reference to "clouds . . . winds . . . waves of the sea," accords with this image of rocks. Vulgate seems to have been misled by the similar sounding word to translate, as English Version, "spots"; compare however,
Jude 23,
which favors English Version, if the Greek will bear it. Two oldest manuscripts, by the transcriber's effort to make Jude say the same as Peter, read here "deceivings" for "love-feasts," but the weightiest manuscript and authorities support English Version reading. The love-feast accompanied the Lord's Supper
(1Co 11:17-34,
end). Korah the Levite, not satisfied with his ministry, aspired to the sacrificing priesthood also: so ministers in the Lord's Supper have sought to make it a sacrifice, and themselves the sacrificing priests, usurping the function of our only Christian sacerdotal Priest, Christ Jesus. Let them beware of Korah's doom!
feeding themselves--Greek, "pasturing (tending) themselves." What they look to is the pampering of themselves, not the feeding of the flock.
without fear--Join these words not as English Version, but with "feast." Sacred feasts especially ought to be celebrated with fear. Feasting is not faulty in itself [BENGEL], but it needs to be accompanied with fear of forgetting God, as Job in the case of his sons' feasts.
clouds--from which one would expect refreshing rains.
2Pe 2:17,
"wells without water." Professors without practice.
carried about--The oldest manuscripts have "carried aside," that is, out of the right course (compare
Eph 4:14).
trees whose fruit withereth--rather, "trees of the late (or waning) autumn," namely, when there are no longer leaves or fruits on the trees [BENGEL].
without fruit--having no good fruit of knowledge and practice; sometimes used of what is positively bad.
twice dead--First when they cast their leaves in autumn, and seem during winter dead, but revive again in spring; secondly, when they are "plucked up by the roots." So these apostates, once dead in unbelief, and then by profession and baptism raised from the death of sin to the life of righteousness, but now having become dead again by apostasy, and so hopelessly dead. There is a climax. Not only without leaves, like trees in late autumn, but without fruit: not only so, but dead twice; and to crown all, "plucked up by the roots."
13
Sin título
繁體中文
13. 狂哮——兇猛。猶大心中所想的是
賽 57:20。
可恥——希臘文為複數「可恥之事」(參較
腓 3:19)。
流蕩的星——不在固定軌道上運行以為世界之光,反倒如乖戾的彗星——不如說如火焰的流星——以奇異的光芒突然閃現於世上,然後註定再墜回幽暗的漆黑之中。
Original en inglés
13. Raging--wild. Jude has in mind
Isa 57:20.
shame--plural in Greek, "shames" (compare
Php 3:19).
wandering stars--instead of moving on in a regular orbit, as lights to the world, bursting forth on the world like erratic comets, or rather, meteors of fire, with a strange glare, and then doomed to fall back again into the blackness of gloom.
14
Sin título
繁體中文
14. 見
緒論
論及猶大從何處取得這段以諾預言。聖靈藉著猶大,已對以諾一書中所載此部分內容的真實性加以印證,雖然那書大概與猶大一樣,也是取自傳統(參見註解,論
猶 9)。
有人提出理由認為以諾一書是抄自猶大書,而非反是。預言從一開始就如何急切趨向其成全,實令人驚異。關於救贖主最早的預言,著重於他第二次在榮耀中降臨,過於他第一次在卑微中降臨(參較
創 3:15 與羅 16:20)。
以諾未經死亡而被接去,彰顯了他一生向不信的世界所傳講的真理——主降臨的確定性與死人的復活,這是對他們的懷疑論及對自然永恆性自恃聰明的唯一有效解藥。
以諾——希臘文,「此外,以諾也」,云云。
亞當的七世孫——七是神聖的數字。在以諾身上,免死與神聖數字相結合:因為凡第七的對象都最為珍貴。猶大藉此表明這些預言的古老。參見註解,論
猶 4,
「自古」。以諾與亞當之間只有五位先祖。從亞當算起第七位的人,預言了要結束世界第七個時代的事[本格爾(BENGEL)]。
這等人——關於這等人。他的預言不僅針對洪水前的人,更是針對一切不敬虔之人
(猶 15)。
他的預言首先固然應驗於洪水,但最終應驗於最後的審判。
降臨——字面意義為「來了」(過去式)。預言視未來如同過去一般確定。
聖者——聖潔的天使(參較
申 33:2; 但 7:10; 亞 14:5; 太 25:31; 來 12:22)。
Original en inglés
14. See
Introduction
on the source whence Jude derived this prophecy of Enoch. The Holy Spirit, by Jude, has sealed the truth of this much of the matter contained in the book of Enoch, though probably that book, as well as Jude, derived it from tradition (compare Note, see on
Jude 9).
There are reasons given by some for thinking the book of Enoch copied from Jude rather than vice versa. It is striking how, from the first, prophecy hastened towards its consummation. The earliest prophecies of the Redeemer dwell on His second coming in glory, rather than His first coming in lowliness (compare
Ge 3:15 with Ro 16:20).
Enoch, in his translation without death, illustrated that truth which he all his life preached to the unbelieving world, the certainty of the Lord's coming, and the resurrection of the dead, as the only effectual antidote to their skepticism and self-wise confidence in nature's permanence.
And Enoch--Greek, "Moreover, also Enoch," &c.
seventh from Adam--Seven is the sacred number. In Enoch, freedom from death and the sacred number are combined: for every seventh object is most highly valued. Jude thus shows the antiquity of the prophecies. Compare Note, see on
Jude 4,
"of old." There were only five fathers between Enoch and Adam. The seventh from Adam prophesied the things which shall close the seventh age of the world [BENGEL].
of these--in relation to these. The reference of his prophecies was not to the antediluvians alone, but to all the ungodly
(Jude 15).
His prophecy applied primarily indeed to the flood, but ultimately to the final judgment.
cometh--literally, "came." Prophecy regards the future as certain as if it were past.
saints--Holy angels (compare
De 33:2; Da 7:10; Zec 14:5; Mt 25:31; Heb 12:22).
15
Sin título
繁體中文
15. 本節與以諾預言的開頭以希伯來文詩體平行法寫成,是現存最古老的範例。有人認為拉麥的話——同樣以詩體平行法寫成——是為了嘲弄以諾的預言而作:正如以諾預言耶和華來施行審判,拉麥自恃多妻與殺人可以免罪(正如殺人的該隱似乎逃過了懲罰)。
定——定罪。
剛愎的話*——即
猶 8, 10, 16; 瑪 3:13, 14
中所注意到的;與
羅 16:17
成對比。
不敬虔的罪人——不僅僅是罪人,更是驕傲地藐視神的人:不敬虔的。
攻擊他——凡攻擊神兒女說話的人,神都視為攻擊他自己說話。
Original en inglés
15. This verse and the beginning of Enoch's prophecy is composed in Hebrew poetic parallelism, the oldest specimen extant. Some think Lamech's speech, which is also in poetic parallelism, was composed in mockery of Enoch's prophecy: as Enoch foretold Jehovah's coming to judgment, so Lamech presumes on impunity in polygamy and murder (just as Cain the murderer seemed to escape with impunity).
convince--convict.
hard speeches--such as are noticed in
Jude 8, 10, 16; Mal 3:13, 14;
contrast
Ro 16:17.
ungodly sinners--not merely sinners, but proud despisers of God: impious.
against him--They who speak against God's children are regarded by God as speaking against Himself.
16
Sin título
繁體中文
16. 怨言——暗中:在教會與國家中對神的規條和傳道人咕噥抱怨。參見
猶 8,
「毀謗在尊位的」;
猶 15,
「剛愎的話」;攻擊主。
發怨言——對自己的境遇總不滿足
(民 11:1;
比較其刑罰,
申 28:47, 48)。
隨從自己的情慾——
(猶 18)。
他們抱怨和發怨言的祕密,在於其慾望無休止的不知足。
說誇大的話——
(彼後 2:18)。
人的外貌——僅指他們外在的儀表與地位。
為得便宜——為了從他們身上可得的利益。他們一面說誇大的話,實際上在財富與地位之人面前卻卑躬屈膝、阿諛奉承。
Original en inglés
16. murmurers--in secret: muttering murmurs against God's ordinances and ministers in Church and state. Compare
Jude 8,
"speak evil of dignities";
Jude 15,
"hard speeches"; against the Lord.
complainers--never satisfied with their lot
(Nu 11:1;
compare the penalty,
De 28:47, 48).
walking after their own lusts--
(Jude 18).
The secret of their murmuring and complaining is the restless insatiability of their desires.
great swelling words--
(2Pe 2:18).
men's persons--their mere outward appearance and rank.
because of advantage--for the sake of what they may gain from them. While they talk great swelling words, they are really mean and fawning towards those of wealth and rank.
17
Sin título
繁體中文
17. 親愛的弟兄啊……你們當——與那些被棄絕的人相對,
猶 20
再次出現。
記念——暗示他的讀者曾是使徒們的同時代人。因為彼得在提醒自己和其他使徒的同時代之人時,正是用了同樣的話。
曾說——從前已經說過的。
使徒——彼得(見論
彼後 3:2, 3),
以及彼得之前的保羅
(徒 20:29; 提前 4:1; 提後 3:1)。
猶大在此並未將自己排除在使徒之外,因為緊接著下文
猶 18
他說「他們曾對你們說」,而非對我們(按希臘文較好的譯法作「曾對你們說」,暗示猶大的讀者曾是使徒們的同時代人,使徒們曾對他們說)。
Original en inglés
17. But; beloved . . . ye--in contrast to those reprobates,
Jude 20,
again.
remember--implying that his readers had been contemporaries of the apostles. For Peter uses the very same formula in reminding the contemporaries of himself and the other apostles.
spoken before--spoken already before now.
the apostles--Peter (see on
2Pe 3:2, 3),
and Paul before Peter
(Ac 20:29; 1Ti 4:1; 2Ti 3:1).
Jude does not exclude himself from the number of the apostles here, for in
Jude 18,
immediately after, he says, "they told You," not us (rather as Greek, "used to tell you" implying that Jude's readers were contemporaries of the apostles, who used to tell them).
18
Sin título
繁體中文
18. 好譏誚的人——在平行經文
彼後 3:3
中,同一個希臘文詞譯作「譏誚的人」。此詞在新約中不見於他處。我無法想像阿爾福德(ALFORD)如何能否認
彼後 3:2, 3
(至少部分地)被引用,因為猶大明明引用了彼得的話,作為使徒們曾對他(猶大)的讀者所說的話。
隨從自己不敬虔的私慾而行——字面意義為「隨從(照著)自己不敬虔的私慾」。
Original en inglés
18. mockers--In the parallel,
2Pe 3:3,
the same Greek is translated, "scoffers." The word is found nowhere else in the New Testament. How ALFORD can deny that
2Pe 3:2, 3
is referred to (at least in part), I cannot imagine, seeing that Jude quotes the very words of Peter as the words which the apostles used to speak to his (Jude's) readers.
walk after their own ungodly lusts--literally, "after (according to) their own lusts of ungodliness."
19
Sin título
繁體中文
19. 這就是——表明他們的品性正是彼得與保羅所預言的那樣。
結黨——脫離教會相交那活的、屬靈的實質:因為他們表面上也參與教會的規條
(猶 12)。
某些最古老的抄本省略「自己」;那麼當理解為「分門結黨」——藉著逐出教會將教會的肢體趕出去
(賽 65:5; 66:5; 路 6:22; 約 9:34;
比較「把他們趕出教會」;
約叄 10)。
然而許多人按「自己」理解,的確,某些最古老的抄本中如此讀,正如英文欽定本一樣。所暗示的是傲慢地自抬身價,自以為擁有更大的聖潔、智慧以及與別人不同的獨特教義。
屬乎血氣——字面意義為「動物性魂」(animal-souled):與屬靈的,即「有聖靈的」相對。此詞譯作「屬血氣的人」,
林前 2:14。
在人存在的三分——體、魂、靈——之中,神旨意中的正當狀態應當是:「靈」——即接受聖靈、使人與神聯合的部分——居首位,並統管介於體與靈之間的魂;但在動物性或屬血氣的人裏面,靈下沉、服於動物性的魂之下,那魂在動機與目標上都是屬地的。「屬肉體的」更低一層,因為在這等人裏面,肉體——即人身體本性中最低的元素和敗壞的一面——作王掌權。
沒有聖靈——在動物性、屬血氣的人裏面,他的靈——本應作為接受聖靈之器皿的更高部分——並非如此;因此,他的靈不在正常狀態之中,就他被說成沒有靈(參較
約 3:5, 6)。
救贖完成之時,蒙救贖之人的各部分將各按其位;而在不敬虔之人裏面,與靈分離的魂將永遠只有動物的生命,沒有與神和天堂的聯合——活著的死亡。
Original en inglés
19. These be they--showing that their characters are such as Peter and Paul had foretold.
separate themselves--from Church communion in its vital, spiritual reality: for outwardly they took part in Church ordinances
(Jude 12).
Some oldest manuscripts omit "themselves": then understand it, "separate," cast out members of the Church by excommunication
(Isa 65:5; 66:5; Lu 6:22; Joh 9:34;
compare "casteth them out of the Church;"
3Jo 10).
Many, however, understand "themselves," which indeed is read in some of the oldest manuscripts as English Version has it. Arrogant setting up of themselves, as having greater sanctity and a wisdom and peculiar doctrine, distinct from others, is implied.
sensual--literally, "animal-souled": as opposed to the spiritual, or "having the Spirit." It is translated, "the natural man,"
1Co 2:14.
In the threefold division of man's being, body, soul, and spirit, the due state in God's design is, that "the spirit," which is the recipient of the Holy Spirit uniting man to God, should be first, and should rule the soul, which stands intermediate between the body and spirit: but in the animal, or natural man, the spirit is sunk into subserviency to the animal soul, which is earthly in its motives and aims. The "carnal" sink somewhat lower, for in these the flesh, the lowest element and corrupt side of man's bodily nature, reigns paramount.
having not the Spirit--In the animal and natural man the spirit, his higher part, which ought to be the receiver of the Holy Spirit, is not so; and therefore, his spirit not being in its normal state, he is said not to have the spirit (compare
Joh 3:5, 6).
In the completion of redemption the parts of redeemed man shall be placed in their due relation: whereas in the ungodly, the soul severed from the spirit shall have for ever animal life without union to God and heaven--a living death.
20
Sin título
繁體中文
20. 接續
猶 17。
建造自己——與「結黨」
(猶 19)
相反;
正如「在聖靈裏」與「沒有聖靈」相反。
在——如在根基之上。在真道上建造,等同於在基督——即信心的對象——之上建造。
在聖靈裏禱告——
(羅 8:26; 弗 6:18)。
聖靈教導我們當為何禱告,並如何禱告。除了在聖靈裏——即在他的影響範圍之內——無人能正確地禱告。屈梭多模(CHRYSOSTOM)指出,在新約時代之初所賜的諸般恩賜中,有禱告的恩賜,賜給某個以眾人之名禱告、並教導別人禱告的人。再者,這樣構思並常常使用的禱告,被基督徒接受並保存,從中制定出禱告的格式。這就是禮儀(liturgies)的由來[哈蒙德(HAMMOND)]。
Original en inglés
20. Resuming
Jude 17.
building up yourselves--the opposite to the "separate themselves"
(Jude 19):
as "in the Holy Ghost" is opposed to "having not the Spirit."
on--as on a foundation. Building on THE FAITH is equivalent to building on Christ, the object of faith.
praying in the Holy Ghost--
(Ro 8:26; Eph 6:18).
The Holy Spirit teaches what we are to pray for, and how. None can pray aright save by being in the Spirit, that is, in the element of His influence. CHRYSOSTOM states that, among the charisms bestowed at the beginning of the New Testament dispensation, was the gift of prayer, bestowed on someone who prayed in the name of the rest, and taught others to pray. Moreover, their prayers so conceived and often used, were received and preserved among Christians, and out of them forms of prayer were framed. Such is the origin of liturgies [HAMMOND].
21
Sin título
繁體中文
21. 在
猶 20, 21
中,猶大將父、子、聖靈,與信、望、愛結合在一起。
保守自己——不是靠自己的力量,而是「在神的愛裏」,即神對你和他一切信靠的兒女的愛中——這是保證他們得以保守安全的唯一憑據。人也當儆醒保守;同時,除非神在他的愛中保守他,否則他不能保守自己。
仰望——在盼望中。
我們主耶穌基督的憐憫——將在他降臨時完全顯明。憐憫通常歸於父;此處則歸於子;他們是如此完全地合而為一。
Original en inglés
21. In
Jude 20, 21,
Jude combines the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost: and faith, hope, and love.
Keep yourselves--not in your own strength, but "in the love of God," that is, God's love to you and all His believing children, the only guarantee for their being kept safe. Man's need of watching is implied; at the same time he cannot keep himself, unless God in His love keep him.
looking for--in hope.
the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ--to be fully manifested at His coming. Mercy is usually attributed to the Father: here to the Son; so entirely one are they.
22
Sin título
繁體中文
22, 23. 唯有那些「保守自己」的人,才有可能「拯救」別人。
憐憫——一份最古老的抄本如此讀。但兩份最古老的抄本、*武加大譯本(Vulgate)*等讀作「定罪」;「責備以使他們知罪」;「駁倒以使他們信服」。
分別——最古老的抄本和譯本將主格讀作受格,即「當他們自己分門結黨之時」[瓦爾(WAHL)],指
猶 19;
或「當他們與你們爭辯之時」,正如
猶 9
中希臘文的譯法。
Original en inglés
22, 23. None but those who "keep themselves" are likely to "save" others.
have compassion--So one oldest manuscript reads. But two oldest manuscripts, Vulgate, &c., read, "convict"; "reprove to their conviction"; "confute, so as to convince."
making a difference--The oldest manuscripts and versions read the accusative for the nominative, "when separating themselves" [WAHL], referring to
Jude 19;
or "when contending with you," as the Greek is translated,
Jude 9.
23
Sin título
繁體中文
23. 存懼怕的心拯救——最古老的抄本不在這位置讀「存懼怕的心」:而是在「從火中搶救出來」之後(參較
摩 4:11; 林前 3:15; 亞 3:2,
指極為僥倖的逃脫),加上以下的話,構成第三類人:「還有些人,要以敬畏之心憐憫他們。」三類病人需要三種不同的治療。傳道人和基督徒被稱為「拯救」他們被用作拯救之器皿的人;「拯救」一詞的希臘文是現在式,因此意為「努力拯救」。猶大已經
(猶 9)
提到同一段經文
(亞 3:1-3)。
三類人是:(1)與你們爭辯的人(最古老的抄本為受格),你們應當定他們的罪;(2)已如火中的火頭,地獄之火是其極致的,這些人你們當從火中搶救出來、努力拯救;(3)是憐憫對象的人,因此你們當憐憫他們(如有機會也當幫助),但同時不可讓憐憫退化為對他們錯誤的縱容。你們的憐憫當伴以「敬畏」,免得受他們任何污染。
恨惡——甚至恨也有其合法的運用範圍。罪是神所唯一恨惡的;我們也當如此。
連那衣裳*——一句格言式的用語:避免與罪有任何最微小的接觸,並恨惡一切與之毗連的東西。正如使徒的衣裳曾行醫病的善蹟,照樣罪人的衣裳——比喻上,即一切與他們的污穢接觸之物——都當避免。關於長大痲瘋的和其他不潔淨之人,參較
利 13:52-57; 15:4-17:
衣裳被視為不潔的;凡觸摸它們的,在被潔淨之前,都被排除於聖潔的以色列百姓的宗教和公民交往之外。基督徒在受洗時領受白衣作為潔淨的記號,不可因接近任何不潔之物而玷污之。
Original en inglés
23. save with fear--The oldest manuscripts do not read "with fear" in this position: but after "snatching them out of the fire" (with which, compare
Am 4:11; 1Co 3:15; Zec 3:2,
said of a most narrow escape), they add the following words, forming a THIRD class, "and others compassionate with (IN) fear." Three kinds of patients require three kinds of medical treatment. Ministers and Christians are said to "save" those whom they are made the instruments of saving; the Greek for "save" is present, therefore meaning "try to save." Jude already
(Jude 9)
had reference to the same passage
(Zec 3:1-3).
The three classes are: (1) those who contend with you (accusative case in oldest manuscripts), whom you should convict; (2) those who are as brands already in the fire, of which hell-fire is the consummation: these you should try to save by snatching them out; (3) those who are objects of compassion, whom accordingly you should compassionate (and help if occasion should offer), but at the same time not let pity degenerate into connivance at their error. Your compassion is to be accompanied "with fear" of being at all defiled by them.
hating--Even hatred has its legitimate field of exercise. Sin is the only thing which God hates: so ought we.
even the garment--a proverbial phrase: avoiding the most remote contact with sin, and hating that which borders on it. As garments of the apostles wrought miracles of good in healing, so the very garment of sinners metaphorically, that is, anything brought into contact with their pollution, is to be avoided. Compare as to lepers and other persons defiled,
Le 13:52-57; 15:4-17:
the garments were held polluted; and anyone touching them was excluded, until purified, from religious and civil communion with the sanctified people of Israel. Christians who received at baptism the white garment in token of purity, are not to defile it by any approach to what is defiled.
24
Sin título
繁體中文
24, 25. 結語頌讚。
能——希臘文,「但」。
你們——阿爾福德(ALFORD)依據較次的權威讀作「他們」。你們與上文所提及的那些不敬虔的人相對。
保守……不失腳——較好的譯法是,「護衛……(使之)不失腳」或不跌倒。
無瑕無疵——希臘文,「無可指責」。
他榮耀之前——即當他在榮耀中顯現時,在他自己面前。
歡歡喜喜——字面意義為「歡躍」,如那些因喜樂而跳躍的人。
Original en inglés
24, 25. Concluding doxology.
Now--Greek, "But."
you--ALFORD, on inferior authority, reads, "them." You is in contradistinction to those ungodly men mentioned above.
keep . . . from falling--rather, "guard . . . (so as to be) without falling," or stumbling.
faultless--Greek, "blameless."
before the presence of his glory--that is, before Himself, when He shall be revealed in glory.
with exceeding joy--literally, "with exultation" as of those who leap for joy.
25
Sin título
繁體中文
25. 獨一的……神我們的救主——最古老的抄本加上「通過我們主耶穌基督」。抄寫者以為「救主」一詞只適用於基督,便將這話省略。意思是:願榮耀藉著我們主耶穌基督(即藉著他的中保),歸與那獨一的神(父),就是我們的救主。
威嚴——希臘文,「大能」。
權柄——權柄:合法的權力。最古老的抄本和武加大譯本(Vulgate)在「權柄」之後有「萬世之前」,即就過去而言在一切時間之前;「並今時」,就現在而言;「並萬世無盡」,即就將來的時間而言永遠。
[目錄]
[上一頁]
[下一頁]
羅伯特·賈米森(Robert Jamieson)、A. R. 法烏塞特(A. R. Fausset)、大衛·布朗(David Brown)
《聖經全書評註與解釋》(Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible) (1871)
增補、勘誤、意見請寄給編者
Original en inglés
25. To the only . . . God our Saviour--The oldest manuscripts add, "through Jesus Christ our Lord." The transcribers, fancying that "Saviour" applied to Christ alone, omitted the words. The sense is, To the only God (the Father) who is our Saviour through (that is, by the mediation of) Jesus Christ our Lord.
dominion--Greek, "might."
power--authority: legitimate power. The oldest manuscripts and Vulgate, after "power," have "before all the age," that is, before all time as to the past: "and now," as to the present; "and to all the ages," that is, for ever, as to the time to come.
[Table of Contents]
[Previous] [Next]
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset and David Brown
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)
Send Addenda, Corrigenda, and Sententiae to the editor
緒論
作者。——他在稱呼中自稱為「耶穌基督的僕人,雅各的弟兄」。參見
雅各書書信緒論,
其中證明使徒雅各與主的弟兄雅各、即耶路撒冷的監督,本是同一人。
加 1:19
一節經文似乎就足以證明此點。同樣,我們主的弟兄猶大與使徒猶大,似乎也是同一人。耶柔米(JEROME)[《駁赫爾維迪烏斯》(Against Helvidius)]正確地主張,所謂「主的弟兄」乃指他的表兄弟,即馬利亞與革羅罷(即亞勒腓)的兒女。由
林前 9:5
(「主的弟兄」位於「其餘的使徒」與「磯法」之間),自然可推知,主的弟兄之所以與使徒有所區別,僅是因為他的眾弟兄並非全都作使徒,只有雅各和猶大作了使徒。猶大之所以自稱「雅各的弟兄」,是因為雅各作為耶路撒冷的監督比他自己更為人知曉。假若他嚴格而言是我們主的弟兄,他大概會如此自稱。他未提及自己的使徒職分,並不足以證明他不是使徒;因為雅各在其書信開端亦同樣省略之;而保羅在寫給腓立比人、帖撒羅尼迦人與腓利門的書信中亦同樣省略。假若作者是使徒猶大的偽造者,他無疑會自稱為「使徒」。他又稱為利拜烏和達太,可能是為了將他與賣主的加略人猶大區別開來。利拜烏源自希伯來文「leeb」,即「心」,意為勇敢。達太與提烏達相同,源自希伯來文「thad」,即「胸膛」。路加與約翰晚於馬太寫作,當他與加略人猶大之間不再有混淆之虞時,便記其名為猶大。福音書中關於他的唯一記載見於
約 14:22,
「猶大(不是加略人猶大)問他說:主啊,為甚麼要向我們顯現,不向世人顯現呢?」 耶柔米(JEROME)[《馬太福音註釋》(Commentary on Matthew)]說,他被差往伊德撒,到奧斯羅伊尼或伊德撒王阿布加魯那裏,並在敘利亞、阿拉伯、美索不達米亞和波斯傳道,在最後一國殉道。此事乃依優西比烏(EUSEBIUS)的權威而傳述:阿布加魯臥病在床,聽聞耶穌有醫治之能,便差人懇求他來治癒自己;主遂答覆,稱讚他的信心,說他雖未曾見過救主卻已相信;又說:「至於你寫信要我到你那裏去,我所奉差要成就的一切事,必須在此地由我成全,成全之後,我便被接回到差我來的那裏。因此,當我被接到天上之後,我必差遣我的一個門徒到你那裏去,他必醫治你的病,並將生命賜給你和你那裏的人。」於是據說多馬受感動,差遣達太去醫治並為阿布加魯施洗。據說這些書信在伊德撒的檔案庫中曾給達太看過。這信息可能先是口頭傳達,其要旨後來才以文字記錄下來(參較
王下 5:1-27; 及太 15:22)。
赫格西樸(HEGESIPPUS)(見於優西比烏(EUSEBIUS) [《教會史》(Ecclesiastical History), 3.20])記載,當多米田查問大衛的後裔時,被稱為主弟兄的猶大的幾個孫子被帶到他面前。當被問及他們的產業時,他們說自己有價值九千第納流的九英畝地,從中向他納稅,並靠雙手勞作度日;他們以雙手的粗糙作為明證。當被盤問關於基督和他的國度時,他們回答說,那國不屬這世界,而是屬天的;並且要到世界終末他才在榮耀中降臨審判活人死人時才顯現。
真實性。——優西比烏(EUSEBIUS) [《教會史》(Ecclesiastical History), 3.25]將本書列入安提勒格梅那(Antilegomena)即有爭議的經卷之中,「雖為多數所承認」。書中論及天使長米迦勒為摩西的屍首與魔鬼爭辯一事,在舊約他處並未提及,卻見於偽經《以諾一書(Book of Enoch)》中,這可能引起了對其真實性的疑問,正如耶柔米(JEROME)[《論顯赫人物》(On Illustrious Men), 4]所言。再者,由於本書並非寫給某一特定教會或個人,因此未能那樣迅速被承認為正典。偽造者必會避免使用不見於舊約、且可能被視為偽經的材料。
至於以諾一書,若為猶大所引用,他引用其中一段經文,只是對該段經文的真實性賦予靈感的印證,而非對全書的印證;正如保羅在靈感中認可了亞拉圖(ARATUS)、艾皮米尼得(EPIMENIDES)與米南德(MENANDER)的某些觀點,卻非認可他們的全部著作。我寧可這樣認為:既然猶大的記述與以諾一書之間略有差異,那麼猶大雖然大概並非不知有以諾一書,卻是對當時猶太人中流傳的關於以諾預言的傳統加以靈感的印證;正如保羅提及埃及術士的名字「雅尼和佯庇」
(提後 3:8),
此名亦不見於舊約。無論如何,猶大所歸於以諾的預言確實是出於以諾的,因為這位受靈感的作者已如此印證。同樣,關於天使長米迦勒為摩西的屍首與撒但爭辯的記述,也因猶大的靈感權威
(猶 9)
而被宣告為真實。以諾一書為殉道者游斯丁(JUSTIN MARTYR)、愛任紐(IRENÆUS)、亞歷山大的革利免(CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA)等所引用。阿比西尼亞旅行家布魯斯從亞歷山大帶回三份吉茲文(Ethiopic)抄本,勞倫斯大主教於 1821 年據此出版英譯本。吉茲文譯自希臘文,而希臘文無疑譯自希伯來文,正如書中天使之名所示。《使徒憲章》(Apostolic Constitutions)、俄利根(ORIGEN)[《駁塞爾索》(Against Celsus)]、耶柔米(JEROME)與奧古斯丁(AUGUSTINE)皆判其非正典。然而該書大體上有教化之效,維護神對自然世界與屬靈世界的治理,且與聖經的任何陳述皆不相悖。耶穌之名從未出現,雖然在福音書中常歸於彌賽亞的「人子」一詞頻繁出現,並使用了一些表達其尊貴、品格與作為的詞語,超越了任何其他猶太書籍中的彌賽亞觀。作者似乎是一位深受但以理聖經著作浸潤的猶太人。雖然其觀點與新約之間有許多相合之處,但彌賽亞相關的段落尚不足以證明作者認識新約。倒不如說,他似乎生活於基督降臨之前不久,即大希律時期前後,從而為我們展現了主降臨之前信主猶太人觀點的極為有趣的一面。三位一體得到承認(以諾一書 60:13,14)。彌賽亞是從永恆即存在的「那蒙揀選者」(以諾一書 48:2,3,5);「眾王都要在他面前俯伏敬拜,將希望寄託於這位人子」(以諾一書 61:10-13)。他是敬拜的對象(以諾一書 48:3,4);他是至高的審判者(以諾一書 60:10,11; 68:38,39)。將有未來的報應狀態(以諾一書 93:8,9; 94:2,4; 95; 96; 99; 103);未來刑罰的永恆性(以諾一書 103:5)。阿爾福德(ALFORD)中所引伏爾克馬(VOLKMAR)認為,該書寫於巴柯巴叛亂之時(主後 132 年),出自那個騙子的擁護者、拉比阿基巴的追隨者之手。這樣該書在其起源上就是反基督教的。若此年代正確,那麼該書無疑是從猶大書抄襲了某些內容,並染上猶太色彩而非基督教色彩。
優西比烏(EUSEBIUS)[《福音的明證》(Demonstration of the Gospel), 3.5] 指出,約翰在約翰貳書和約翰叄書中自稱「長老」,與他的謙卑相符。同樣,雅各和猶大也自稱「耶穌基督的僕人」。亞歷山大的革利免(CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA)[《要點》(Adumbrations),論《猶大書》, p. 1007]說:「猶大出於敬畏,不稱自己為耶穌基督的弟兄,而稱為僕人,並稱為雅各的弟兄。」
特土良(TERTULLIAN)[《論婦女的妝飾》(On the Apparel of Women), 3] 引用本書信時,歸之為使徒雅各的作品。 亞歷山大的革利免(CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA)在 《雜篇》(Miscellanies) [3.2.11] 中引用
猶 8, 17
為聖經,在*《導師》(The Instructor)* [3.8.44] 中引用
猶 5。
《穆拉多利(MURATORI)殘篇》肯定其正典地位 [勞斯(ROUTH),Sacred Fragments, 1.306]。 俄利根(ORIGEN)[《馬太福音註釋》(Commentary)論太 13:55]說: 「猶大寫了一封短短數行的書信,卻滿載著屬天恩典的強有力言辭。」又在論太 22:23 的註釋中,俄利根(ORIGEN)引用
猶 6;
論太 18:10 時引用
猶 1。
他在其著作的拉丁文殘卷中稱作者為「使徒猶大」(參較戴維森(DAVIDSON),Introduction to the New Testament, vol. 3, p. 498)。耶柔米(JEROME) [《論顯赫人物》(On Illustrious Men), 4]將本書列入聖經之中。雖然《伯西托(Peschito)》最古老的抄本略去本書,但敘利亞人以法蓮(EPHREM THE SYRIAN)卻承認之。華茲華斯(WORDSWORTH)如此論證其真實性:我們知道猶大在約翰之前離世,即二世紀開始之前。而優西比烏(EUSEBIUS)[《教會史》(Ecclesiastical History), 3.32]告訴我們,雅各在耶路撒冷監督之職上由其弟兄西面繼任;又說西面任該職直至主後 107 年,那時他以殉道者的身份於一百二十歲時被釘十字架。我們發現猶大書在二世紀已為東西方所知;因此該書是在西面在世時流傳的。倘若不是猶大的真作,它絕不可能得到那樣的通行;西面也絕不會容許一封署名為使徒——即他自己的弟兄猶大、他自己使徒前驅雅各的弟兄——的書信流傳。
收信人。——對舊約歷史的引用,
猶 5, 7,
以及對猶太傳統的引用,
猶 14,
等等,表明猶大主要寫信的讀者很可能是猶太基督徒(雖然也包括一切基督徒,
猶 1),
正如與本書相近的彼得後書主要是寫給同一群體的一樣;參見
彼得前書書信緒論
與
彼得後書書信緒論。
書中所斥責的人不僅僅是放縱派(如阿爾福德(ALFORD)所想),雖然這無疑是他們顯著的特徵之一,他們更是教義上的異端分子,「不認獨一的主神,與我們主耶穌基督」。因此他勸勉信徒「為真道竭力地爭辯,因為這道是一次交付聖徒的」
(猶 3)。
不服、自私和放縱,即反律法主義教訓的果子,是猶大警告讀者要防範的罪惡;他提醒他們,在至聖的真道上建造自己,並在聖靈裏禱告,才是唯一有效的保障。同樣的罪惡,連同譏誚的懷疑論,將成為最後審判之前末日的特徵,正如以諾警告不敬虔之人洪水將至的日子一樣。既然彼得寫
彼前 5:13
時身在巴比倫,寫彼得後書時大概也是如此(參見
彼得前書書信緒論
與
彼得後書書信緒論),猶大也主要是將其書信寫給美索不達米亞巴比倫城內及周邊的猶太基督徒(當時猶太人大量聚居之地),或是分散在本都、加拉太、加帕多家、亞細亞、庇推尼的猶太基督徒
(彼前 1:1),
即彼得所寫信的對象。因為據說猶大曾在美索不達米亞傳道[耶柔米(JEROME),《馬太福音註釋》],而其書信僅有二十五節,其中卻包含了不下十一處引自彼得後書的經文(見我的
彼得後書書信緒論中的列表)。也許在
猶 4
中他見證了彼得預言的應驗:「有些人偷著進來,是早已被定罪受刑罰的(希臘文作「預先寫明」,即藉使徒彼得書面的預言而預先宣告),是不虔誠的,將我們神的恩變作放縱情慾的機會,並且不認獨一的主神,與我們的主耶穌基督。」參較
彼後 2:1,
「將來在你們中間也必有假師傅,私自引進害人的異端,連買他們的主他們也不承認,自取速速的滅亡。」 又
猶 17, 18
明顯指向
彼後 3:3
的原話:「你們要記念我們主耶穌基督之使徒從前所說的話。他們曾對你們說過,末世必有好譏誚的人隨從自己不敬虔的私慾而行。」這證明——與阿爾福德(ALFORD)的看法相反——猶大書晚於彼得後書(他藉此印證了彼得的靈感,正如彼得印證了保羅的靈感一樣,
彼後 3:15, 16),
而非相反。
寫作時間與地點。——阿爾福德(ALFORD)認為,考慮到猶大是寫給猶太人,又引述神刑罰的顯著實例,若他是在耶路撒冷傾覆——那將猶太政體與百姓連根拔起的事件——之後寫作,不大可能不提及此事。他從語氣和引用推測作者住在巴比倫。但就前者而言,消極證據是可疑的;因為約翰寫於耶路撒冷傾覆之後的書信中,也未提及那事件。米爾(MILL)定為主後 90 年,即除約翰外一切使徒均已離世之後。我從
猶 17, 18
傾向於認為,猶大寫作時距彼得後書(大概寫於主後 68 或 69 年)已有一段時日,因此猶大書是寫於耶路撒冷傾覆之後。
猶 1-25.
稱呼: 問安: 寫作目的: 以神對叛教者、以色列、墮落天使、所多瑪與蛾摩拉的刑罰警告教義與行為上的引誘者: 以米迦勒為對照描述這些惡人: 像該隱、巴蘭、可拉一樣: 以諾關於他們的預言: 使徒的預先警告: 關於保守自己的信仰並努力拯救他人的結語勸勉: 頌讚。
1. 耶穌基督的僕人——作為他的僕役與使徒。
雅各的弟兄——雅各作為耶路撒冷的監督和「主的弟兄」(即表兄弟,或繼兄弟,為約瑟前次婚姻之子;因古代傳統一致認為耶穌的母親馬利亞終身為童貞女)更為人所知。因此猶大謙遜地自稱「雅各的弟兄」。見我的
緒論。
被神父所成聖……的人——最古老的抄本和譯本、俄利根(ORIGEN)、路西弗(LUCIFER)等人將「成聖」讀作「蒙愛」。若依英文欽定本讀法,參較
西 1:12; 彼前 1:2。
希臘文不是「被」,而是「在……裏」。神父的愛是他們在其中「蒙愛」的要素。因此結語
猶 21
相應地說:「保守自己在神的愛裏」。參較「主所愛的弟兄們」
帖後 2:13。
為耶穌基督保守的人——「蒙保守」。不要譯作「在……裏」,而要按希臘文譯作「為耶穌基督」。「神父為耶穌基督持續地(希臘文完成式分詞即此意)保守」,直等到他降臨之日。猶大事先提到信徒救恩最終成全的源頭與保證,免得他們因他接下來要宣告的可怖罪惡而灰心[本格爾(BENGEL)]。
*並蒙召的人——此處論及「在父神裏蒙愛、為耶穌基督保守的人,就是蒙召的人」。神在其主權的行使中所施有效的呼召,保證了他們永遠的安全。