Comentario del capítulo
Matthew Capítulo 25
1
Mt 25:1-13.
Original en inglés
Mt 25:1-13.
PARABLE OF THE TEN VIRGINS.
This and the following parable are in Matthew alone.
1. Then--at the time referred to at the close of the preceding chapter, the time of the Lord's Second Coming to reward His faithful servants and take vengeance on the faithless. Then
shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom--This supplies a key to the parable, whose object is, in the main, the same as that of the last parable--to illustrate the vigilant and expectant attitude of faith, in respect of which believers are described as "they that look for Him"
(Heb 9:28),
and "love His appearing"
(2Ti 4:8).
In the last parable it was that of servants waiting for their absent Lord; in this it is that of virgin attendants on a Bride, whose duty it was to go forth at night with lamps, and be ready on the appearance of the Bridegroom to conduct the Bride to his house, and go in with him to the marriage. This entire and beautiful change of figure brings out the lesson of the former parable in quite a new light. But let it be observed that, just as in the parable of the Marriage Supper
(Lu 14:15-24),
so in this--the Bride does not come into view at all in this parable; the Virgins and the Bridegroom holding forth all the intended instruction: nor could believers be represented both as Bride and Bridal Attendants without incongruity.
2
Sin título
2. 五個是愚拙的,五個是聰明的——正如 TRENCH 所觀察的,他們不是被分為好與壞,而是"聰明"與"愚拙"——正如在
Mt 7:25-27
那些為永世建造房屋的人被分為"聰明"與"無知"的建造者;因為在兩種情形下都假設了對真理有某種程度的善意。要把兩類人的相等數目解出甚麼意義來,在我們看來是靠不住的,只是為要警告我們:那些直到末了與愛慕基督顯現的人如此相近的人當中,將有何等大的一部分,當他來的時候要被他否認。
Original en inglés
2. And five of them were wise, and five were foolish--They are not distinguished into good and bad, as TRENCH observes, but into "wise" and "foolish"--just as in
Mt 7:25-27
those who reared their house for eternity are distinguished into "wise" and "foolish builders"; because in both cases a certain degree of goodwill towards the truth is assumed. To make anything of the equal number of both classes would, we think, be precarious, save to warn us how large a portion of those who, up to the last, so nearly resemble those that love Christ's appearing will be disowned by Him when He comes.
3
Sin título
3. 愚拙的拿着燈,卻不預備油;
Original en inglés
3. They that were foolish took their lamps, and took no oil with them:
4
Sin título
4. 聰明的拿着燈,又預備油在器皿裏——這些"燈"和這"油"是甚麼?答案已多。但既然愚拙的和聰明的都拿着燈、拿着它們出去迎接新郎,這些點着的燈並與聰明的人一同前行一段路,必是指那一切承擔基督之名的人所共有的基督徒承認;而這若沒有別的甚麼便不足夠——他們從未自備那別的——這顯示"愚拙的"是指那些雖有與真基督徒相同的一切,卻缺乏迎見基督所需之基本預備的人。那麼,既然"聰明的"之智慧在於他們帶着燈又在器皿裏帶了油的供應,使燈一直燃燒直到新郎來到,從而使他們適於與他同進婚筵,這油的供應必是指那唯獨當那眼目如火焰的他顯現之時才能站住的內在的恩典實際。但這太普遍;因為此處這內在的恩典以熟悉的油的象徵表明,決非無故——在聖經中那賜諸般恩的聖靈常常如此被代表。毫無疑問,這正是那寶貴的膏油所象徵的——亞倫和他的兒子們藉那膏油被獻為祭司
(Ex 30:23-25, 30);
"彌賽亞被膏以勝過同伴的喜樂油"
(Ps 45:7; Heb 1:9),
正如明說的:"神賜聖靈給他,是沒有限量的"
(Joh 3:34);
以及撒迦利亞異象中那盛滿金油的碗,從兩旁的兩棵橄欖樹得着供應,藉着七個金管將油倒入金燈臺,使其持續明亮
(Zec 4:1-14)——
因為先知明明被告知,這是要宣告那大真理:"不是倚靠勢力,不是倚靠才能,乃是倚靠我的靈,萬軍之耶和華說[這殿必得建造]。大山哪[指反對這事的],你算甚麼?你在所羅巴伯面前必成為平地[或被掃除],他必搬出一塊石頭[殿的頭一塊石頭],人就歡呼[喊着]說,願恩惠恩惠歸與這石頭。"所以這油的供應,代表那將聰明的分別出來的內在恩典,必更特指"耶穌基督之靈的供應"——它既是最初屬靈新生命的源頭,也是其持久性情的秘訣。比這短少的一切,都可能為"愚拙的"所有;而正是因為有這個,才使"聰明的"在新郎顯現之時"預備好了",並適於"與他同進婚筵"。正如撒種的比喻中,石頭地的聽者"沒有深根"、"裏面沒有根"
Mt 13:5; Mr 4:17),
雖然他們發苗、甚至抽穗,卻永不成熟,而好土裏的卻結出寶貴的穀粒。
Original en inglés
4. But the wise took oil in their vessels with their lamps--What are these "lamps" and this "oil"? Many answers have been given. But since the foolish as well as the wise took their lamps and went forth with them to meet the Bridegroom, these lighted lamps and this advance a certain way in company with the wise, must denote that Christian profession which is common to all who bear the Christian name; while the insufficiency of this without something else, of which they never possessed themselves, shows that "the foolish" mean those who, with all that is common to them with real Christians, lack the essential preparation for meeting Christ. Then, since the wisdom of "the wise" consisted in their taking with their lamps a supply of oil in their vessels, keeping their lamps burning till the Bridegroom came, and so fitting them to go in with Him to the marriage, this supply of oil must mean that inward reality of grace which alone will stand when He appears whose eyes are as a flame of fire. But this is too general; for it cannot be for nothing that this inward grace is here set forth by the familiar symbol of oil, by which the Spirit of all grace is so constantly represented in Scripture. Beyond all doubt, this was what was symbolized by that precious anointing oil with which Aaron and his sons were consecrated to the priestly office
(Ex 30:23-25, 30);
by "the oil of gladness above His fellows" with which Messiah was to be anointed
(Ps 45:7; Heb 1:9),
even as it is expressly said, that "God giveth not the Spirit by measure unto Him"
(Joh 3:34);
and by the bowl full of golden oil, in Zechariah's vision, which, receiving its supplies from the two olive trees on either side of it, poured it through seven golden pipes into the golden lamp-stand to keep it continually burning bright
(Zec 4:1-14)
--for the prophet is expressly told that it was to proclaim the great truth, "Not by might, nor by power, but by MY SPIRIT, saith the Lord of hosts [shall this temple be built]. Who art thou, O great mountain [of opposition to this issue]? Before Zerubbabel thou shalt become a plain [or, be swept out of the way], and he shall bring forth the head stone [of the temple], with shoutings [crying], GRACE, GRACE unto it." This supply of oil, then, representing that inward grace which distinguishes the wise, must denote, more particularly, that "supply of the Spirit of Jesus Christ," which, as it is the source of the new spiritual life at the first, is the secret of its enduring character. Everything short of this may be possessed by "the foolish"; while it is the possession of this that makes "the wise" to be "ready" when the Bridegroom appears, and fit to "go in with Him to the marriage." Just so in the parable of the Sower, the stony-ground hearers, "having no deepness of earth" and "no root in themselves"
Mt 13:5; Mr 4:17),
though they spring up and get even into ear, never ripen, while they in the good ground bear the precious grain.
5
Sin título
5. 新郎遲延的時候——如同在
Mt 24:48
「我的主人必來得遲」;又如彼得論到升天的救主所說的壯語:「天必留祂,等到萬物復興的時候」(見
Ac 3:21,
並參
Lu 19:11, 12)。
基督「遲延」的原因之一,是要試驗祂百姓的信心和忍耐。
她們都打盹睡著了——聰明的和愚拙的都是如此。「打盹」一詞,簡言之就是「打瞌睡」,或「變得睏倦」;而「睡著」一詞則是躺下睡覺的常用詞,表示靈性退後的兩個階段——第一,那種半不由自主的昏沉或睏倦,容易偷襲陷入怠惰的人;然後是在無效的抵抗之後,有意識地、自願地順服於它。聰明的童女和愚拙的童女都是如此,直到新郎快到的呼聲喚醒了她們。同樣,在不義的寡婦的比喻中:「人子來的時候,遇得見世上有信德嗎?」(見
Lu 18:8)。
Original en inglés
5. While the bridegroom tarried--So in
Mt 24:48,
"My Lord delayeth His coming"; and so Peter says sublimely of the ascended Saviour, "Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things"
(Ac 3:21,
and compare
Lu 19:11, 12).
Christ "tarries," among other reasons, to try the faith and patience of His people.
they all slumbered and slept--the wise as well as the foolish. The world "slumbered" signifies, simply, "nodded," or, "became drowsy"; while the world "slept" is the usual word for lying down to sleep, denoting two stages of spiritual declension--first, that half-involuntary lethargy or drowsiness which is apt to steal over one who falls into inactivity; and then a conscious, deliberate yielding to it, after a little vain resistance. Such was the state alike of the wise and the foolish virgins, even till the cry of the Bridegroom's approach awoke them. So likewise in the parable of the Importunate Widow: "When the Son of man cometh, shall He find faith on the earth?"
(Lu 18:8).
6
Sin título
6. 半夜——即新郎最意想不到的時候;因為「主的日子來到,好像夜間的賊一樣」(見
1Th 5:2)。
有呼聲說:新郎來了,你們出來迎接他——即預備好迎接祂。
Original en inglés
6. And at midnight--that is, the time when the Bridegroom will be least expected; for "the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night"
(1Th 5:2).
there was a cry made, Behold, the Bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet him--that is, Be ready to welcome Him.
7
Sin título
7. 那些童女就都起來收拾燈——愚拙的和聰明的都是如此。這兩種人看起來何等長久地相同——幾乎直到決定的時刻!僅就比喻的形式來看,很明顯「愚拙的」之愚拙並不在於完全沒有油;因為她們燈裡的油必須足以讓燈燃燒到此時此刻:她們的愚拙在於沒有為油的耗盡作預備,沒有帶一個油器以備不時補充燈油,使燈一直燃燒到新郎來到。那麼我們是否要——和某些高明解經家一樣——結論說愚拙的童女和聰明的一樣都代表真基督徒,因為只有真基督徒才有聖靈,而兩類人的差別僅僅在於一類有所需的警醒,另一類沒有?當然不是。既然這比喻是要顯明預備好和未預備好迎接基督再來的人,以及未預備好的人如何直到最後一刻都可能與預備好的人混淆——比喻的結構就必須遷就這一點,讓愚拙人的燈和聰明人的燈一樣燃燒到某個時刻,直到那時才因缺乏新油而無法繼續燃燒。但這顯然只是一個結構上的設計;兩類宣稱愛慕主顯現的人之間真正的差別是根本性的——一類擁有持久屬靈生命的原則,另一類卻沒有。
Original en inglés
7. Then all those virgins arose, and trimmed their lamps--the foolish virgins as well as the wise. How very long do both parties seem the same--almost to the moment of decision! Looking at the mere form of the parable, it is evident that the folly of "the foolish" consisted not in having no oil at all; for they must have had oil enough in their lamps to keep them burning up to this moment: their folly consisted in not making provision against its exhaustion, by taking with their lamp an oil-vessel wherewith to replenish their lamp from time to time, and so have it burning until the Bridegroom should come. Are we, then--with some even superior expositors--to conclude that the foolish virgins must represent true Christians as well as do the wise, since only true Christians have the Spirit, and that the difference between the two classes consists only in the one having the necessary watchfulness which the other wants? Certainly not. Since the parable was designed to hold forth the prepared and the unprepared to meet Christ at His coming, and how the unprepared might, up to the very last, be confounded with the prepared--the structure of the parable behooved to accommodate itself to this, by making the lamps of the foolish to burn, as well as those of the wise, up to a certain point of time, and only then to discover their inability to burn on for want of a fresh supply of oil. But this is evidently just a structural device; and the real difference between the two classes who profess to love the Lord's appearing is a radical one--the possession by the one class of an enduring principle of spiritual life, and the want of it by the other.
8
Sin título
8. 愚拙的對聰明的說:請分點油給我們,因為我們的燈要滅了——更確切地說,如旁注所載,「漸漸滅了」;因為油不能點亮已經熄滅的燈,卻能使燃燒的燈不致熄滅。啊!如今她們終於不但發現了自己的愚拙,也發現了另一類人的智慧,並向之致敬。她們先前或許並不輕視她們,只是覺得她們過分敬虔;如今她們卻被迫帶著痛苦的羞愧,巴不得自己能像她們一樣。
Original en inglés
8. And the foolish said unto the wise, Give us of your oil; for our lamps are gone out--rather, as in the Margin, "are going out"; for oil will not light an extinguished lamp, though it will keep a burning one from going out. Ah! now at length they have discovered not only their own folly, but the wisdom of the other class, and they do homage to it. They did not perhaps despise them before, but they thought them righteous overmuch; now they are forced, with bitter mortification, to wish they were like them.
9
Sin título
9. 聰明的回答說:恐怕不夠你我用的——可以看出,「不夠」並非原文所有,原文的回答非常省略——「萬一不夠你我用的」。這是一個真正明智的回答。「那麼,如果我們與你們分享呢?那麼,雙方都會不夠。」
不如你們到賣油的那裡去自己買吧——這裡同樣不能將比喻推到其正當設計之外,說人可以在本應已經得著救恩之後再去獲得救恩。這不過是一個友善的提醒方式,提醒他們獲取這個必需而寶貴之物的正當途徑,同時也對他們現在才去尋找這件事加以反思。此外,當比喻說到「賣」和「買」那個貴重之物時,意思很簡單:「去,以唯一正當的方式獲得它。」然而「買」這個詞是有意義的;因為我們在別處被吩咐:「你們要買酒和奶,不用銀錢,不用價值」,並要「向基督買火煉的金子」等(見
Isa 55:1; Re 3:18)。
如今,既然我們付了所求的代價而得到的東西就成為我們自己的產業,我們這樣從神手中白白领受的救恩,在祂所說的「買」的意義上被買了,便成為不可剝奪的擁有。(關於這種措辭,參見
Pr 23:23; Mt 13:44)。
Original en inglés
9. But the wise answered, Not so; lest there be not enough for us and you--The words "Not so," it will be seen, are not in the original, where the reply is very elliptical--"In case there be not enough for us and you." A truly wise answer this. "And what, then, if we shall share it with you? Why, both will be undone."
but go ye rather to them that sell, and buy for yourselves--Here again it would be straining the parable beyond its legitimate design to make it teach that men may get salvation even after they are supposed and required to have it already gotten. It is merely a friendly way of reminding them of the proper way of obtaining the needed and precious article, with a certain reflection on them for having it now to seek. Also, when the parable speaks of "selling" and "buying" that valuable article, it means simply, "Go, get it in the only legitimate way." And yet the word "buy" is significant; for we are elsewhere bidden, "buy wine and milk without money and without price," and "buy of Christ gold tried in the fire," &c.
(Isa 55:1; Re 3:18).
Now, since what we pay the demanded price for becomes thereby our own property, the salvation which we thus take gratuitously at God's hands, being bought in His own sense of that word, becomes ours thereby in inalienable possession. (Compare for the language,
Pr 23:23; Mt 13:44).
10
Sin título
10. 她們去買的時候,新郎到了;那些預備好了的,同他進去坐席,門就關了——她們意識到自己過去的愚拙;她們接受了好的勸告;她們正在取得她們唯一所缺的;再過一點點,她們也就預備好了。但新郎到了;預備好的被請進去;「門就關了」,她們便全然完了。這幅描繪一個*幾乎得救——卻失喪了!*之人的畫面,何等生動而駭人!
Original en inglés
10. And while they went to buy, the Bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage: and the door was shut--They are sensible of their past folly; they have taken good advice: they are in the act of getting what alone they lacked: a very little more, and they also are ready. But the Bridegroom comes; the ready are admitted; "the door is shut," and they are undone. How graphic and appalling this picture of one almost saved--but lost!
11
Sin título
11. 其餘的童女隨後也來了,說:主啊,主啊,給我們開門!——在
Mt 7:22
中,這個名字的重複更多是出於驚訝的呼喊;在這裡則是迫切而近乎絕望的哀求。啊!如今她們的眼睛終於完全睜開了,她們意識到了自己過去愚拙的一切後果。
Original en inglés
11. Afterward came also the other virgins, saying, Lord, Lord, open to us--In
Mt 7:22
this reiteration of the name was an exclamation rather of surprise; here it is a piteous cry of urgency, bordering on despair. Ah! now at length their eyes are wide open, and they realize all the consequences of their past folly.
12
Sin título
12. 他回答說:我實在告訴你們,我不認識你們——有人在這裡的「我不認識你們」和
Mt 7:23
的「我從來不認識你們」之間企圖找出區別——仿佛這裡較為溫和,因而暗示一個較輕的命運,是為這個比喻中的「愚拙的」保留的——這種企圖應當抵制,雖然它得到奧爾肖森、施蒂爾和阿爾福德等批評家的支持。除了與這類話的整體基調不一致之外,特別是與整個比喻的莊嚴道德教訓(見
Mt 25:13)
不一致之外,這是一種竄改某些關於將來最可怕警告的批評。如果有人問,為何在前一個比喻中,不配的客人被准許參加王子的婚筵,而在這個比喻中愚拙的童女卻被拒之門外,我們可以用特倫奇所引用的格哈德那些優美的話來回答:那些慶典是在今生、在爭戰的教會中舉行的;這些是在末日、在得勝的教會中舉行的;在那些中,連沒有穿禮服的人也被准許進入;但在這些中,只有那些蒙恩得穿潔白細麻衣的才可以——這細麻衣就是聖徒的義(見
Re 19:8);
在那些中,人被福音的號筒所召;在這些中,被天使長的號筒所召;在那些中,進去的人可以從其中出來,或被趕出來;被引進這些中的人,卻永不再出來,也不被趕出來:因此說,「門就關了。」
Original en inglés
12. But he answered and said, Verily I say unto you, I know you not--The attempt to establish a difference between "I know you not" here, and "I never knew you" in
Mt 7:23
--as if this were gentler, and so implied a milder fate, reserved for "the foolish" of this parable--is to be resisted, though advocated by such critics as OLSHAUSEN, STIER, and ALFORD. Besides being inconsistent with the general tenor of such language, and particularly the solemn moral of the whole
(Mt 25:13),
it is a kind of criticism which tampers with some of the most awful warnings regarding the future. If it be asked why unworthy guests were admitted to the marriage of the King's Son, in a former parable, and the foolish virgins are excluded in this one, we may answer, in the admirable words of GERHARD, quoted by TRENCH, that those festivities are celebrated in this life, in the Church militant; these at the last day, in the Church triumphant; to those, even they are admitted who are not adorned with the wedding garment; but to these, only they to whom it is granted to be arrayed in fine linen clean and white, which is the righteousness of saints
(Re 19:8);
to those, men are called by the trumpet of the Gospel; to these by the trumpet of the Archangel; to those, who enters may go out from them, or be cast out; who is once introduced to these never goes out, nor is cast out, from them any more: wherefore it is said, "The door is shut."
13
Sin título
13. 所以,你們要警醒;因為那日子,那時辰,你們不知道——這整個比喻的道德或實踐教訓,不需要註解。
Original en inglés
13. Watch therefore; for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh--This, the moral or practical lesson of the whole parable, needs no comment.
14
Mt 25:14-30.
Mt 25:14-30.
按才幹受責任的比喻。
這個比喻雖然與路加(見
Lu 19:11-27)
中十錠銀子的比喻十分相似,卻是另一個比喻;雖然加爾文、奥爾肖森、邁爾等人將二者等同——但德維特和尼安德不認同。關於兩個比喻的區別,見十錠銀子比喻的開場評論。
正如特倫奇以他一貫的巧妙所觀察的:「童女被描繪為等候她們的主,我們在這裡看到僕人為祂做工;那裡描繪的是忠信之人的內在屬靈生命,這裡是他的外在活動。因此,它們以實際的次序出現並非沒有充分的理由——先是童女的比喻,接著是才幹的比喻——因為神的生命在心中被勤勉持守,是為神國有益的外在活動的唯一條件。」
14. 因為天國又好比一個人——這個省略在馬可的平行經文(見
Mr 13:34)
中由我們的譯者更好地補上了:「〔因為人子〕如同一個人」等。
往外國去——更簡潔地說,「出國」。長久「逗留」的觀念在這裡肯定是隱含的,因為它在
Mt 25:19
中被明確表達。
叫了僕人來,把他的家業交給他們——在古代,主人與奴僕之間這樣做並不少見。基督的「僕人」在這裡指所有因著基督徒的宣告而與祂處於完全順服關係的人。祂的「家業」指他們一切的恩賜和才幹,無論是原有的還是後得的,天然的還是屬靈的。正如奴僕所有的一切都屬於主人,照樣基督對屬於祂百姓的一切——一切可用於行善的事物——都有主權,祂要求將其用於祂的服事;或者換個角度看,他們先將其獻上給祂,因為「不是自己的人,因為……重價買來的」(見
1Co 6:19, 20),
而祂再「交給他們」以便在祂的服事中使用。
Original en inglés
Mt 25:14-30.
PARABLE OF THE TALENTS.
This parable, while closely resembling it, is yet a different one from that of THE POUNDS, in
Lu 19:11-27;
though CALVIN, OLSHAUSEN, MEYER, and others identify them--but not DE WETTE and NEANDER. For the difference between the two parables, see the
opening remarks
on that of The Pounds.
While, as TRENCH observes with his usual felicity, "the virgins were represented as waiting for their Lord, we have the servants working for Him; there the inward spiritual life of the faithful was described; here his external activity. It is not, therefore, without good reason that they appear in their actual order--that of the Virgins first, and of the Talents following--since it is the sole condition of a profitable outward activity for the kingdom of God, that the life of God be diligently maintained within the heart."
14. For the kingdom of heaven is as a man--The ellipsis is better supplied by our translators in the corresponding passage of Mark
(Mr 13:34),
"[For the Son of man is] as a man," &c.,
travelling into a far country--or more simply, "going abroad." The idea of long "tarrying" is certainly implied here, since it is expressed in
Mt 25:19.
who called his own servants, and delivered unto them his goods--Between master and slaves this was not uncommon in ancient times. Christ's "servants" here mean all who, by their Christian profession, stand in the relation to Him of entire subjection. His "goods" mean all their gifts and endowments, whether original or acquired, natural or spiritual. As all that slaves have belongs to their master, so Christ has a claim to everything which belongs to His people, everything which, may be turned to good, and He demands its appropriation to His service, or, viewing it otherwise, they first offer it up to Him; as being "not their own, but bought with a price"
(1Co 6:19, 20),
and He "delivers it to them" again to be put to use in His service.
15
Sin título
15. 按著各人的才幹給他們銀子:一個給了五千,一個給了二千,一個給了一千——雖然每個人的恩賜比例不同,但同樣的忠心被要求於所有人,也同樣被賞賜。因此,這是完全公平的。
一個給了五千,一個給了二千,一個給了一千——按著各人的才幹——即他在基督服事中所投入的天然能力,以及神的護理中賜給他使用恩賜的機會。
就往外國去了——比較
Mt 21:33,
那裡同樣的離開被歸於神——在設立了古舊律法體系之後。在兩種情況下,它都表示將人留在他們被恩慈地置於其下的、為他們自己的拯救和他們主的國度之推進的一切屬靈律法和影響之下。
Original en inglés
15. And unto one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one--While the proportion of gifts is different in each, the same fidelity is required of all, and equally rewarded. And thus there is perfect equity.
to every man according to his several ability--his natural capacity as enlisted in Christ's service, and his opportunities in providence for employing the gifts bestowed on him.
and straightway took his journey--Compare
Mt 21:33,
where the same departure is ascribed to God, after setting up the ancient economy. In both cases, it denotes the leaving of men to the action of all those spiritual laws and influences of Heaven under which they have been graciously placed for their own salvation and the advancement of their Lord's kingdom.
16
Sin título
16. 那領五千的隨即拿去做買賣——表明他所發出的活力與所付出的勞碌。
又賺了五千。
Original en inglés
16. Then he that had received the five talents went and traded with the same--expressive of the activity which he put forth and the labor he bestowed.
and made them other five talents.
17
Sin título
17. 那領二千的也照樣另賺了二千——各人都將所領的翻倍,因此二人同樣忠心。
Original en inglés
17. And likewise he that had received two he also gained other two--each doubling what he received, and therefore both equally faithful.
18
Sin título
18. 但那領一千的去掘開地,把主人的銀子埋藏了——他不是揮霍,只是完全不用。不,他的行動倒像一個殷切希望這恩賜不被誤用或失落、能原封不動歸還的人。
Original en inglés
18. But he that had received one went and digged in the earth, and hid his lord's money--not misspending, but simply making no use of it. Nay, his action seems that of one anxious that the gift should not be misused or lost, but ready to be returned, just as he got it.
19
Sin título
19. 過了許久,那些僕人的主人來了,和他們算帳——任何人——至少在使徒有生之年內——既然有這樣的話擺在眼前,竟會認為耶穌曾給予理由使他們期望祂的第二次顯現發生在那段時期之內,這看來似乎奇怪;除非我們知道,那種對祂顯現的狂熱而失當的愛慕,總是會走這條路線。
Original en inglés
19. After a long time the lord of those servants cometh and reckoneth with them--That any one--within the lifetime of the apostles at least--with such words before them, should think that Jesus had given any reason to expect His Second Appearing within that period, would seem strange, did we not know the tendency of enthusiastic, ill-regulated love of His appearing ever to take this turn.
20
Sin título
20. 主阿,祢交給我五千銀子;請看,我又賺了五千——這何等美好地說明了蒙愛的門徒論及「在審判的日子坦然無懼」的話,以及他的心願:「當祂顯現的時候,我們可以坦然無懼,在祂面前也不至於慚愧」!(1Jo 4:17;2:28)。
Original en inglés
20. Lord, thou deliveredst unto me five talents; behold, I have gained besides them five talents more--How beautifully does this illustrate what the beloved disciple says of "boldness in the day of judgment," and his desire that "when He shall appear we may have confidence, and not be ashamed before Him at His coming!"
(1Jo 4:17; 2:28).
21
Sin título
21. 主人說:好——這是單一個字,不是僅僅表示滿意,而是充滿熱情和欣喜的稱讚。而且是出自何等的口!
你這又良善又忠心的僕人;你在不多的事上有忠心,我要把許多事派你管理等。
Original en inglés
21. His lord said unto him, Well done--a single word, not of bare satisfaction, but of warm and delighted commendation. And from what Lips!
thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things, &c.
22
Sin título
22. 那領二千的也來……好、你這又良善又忠心的僕人;你在不多的事上有忠心,我要把許多事派你管理——二人以同樣的話蒙稱讚,二人的賞賜也完全相同。(見 Mt 25:15 註釋)。
也請注意對比:「你作為僕人既已忠心;如今要作管家——你既受託管理少許的事;如今要管轄許多的事。」
可以進來享受你主人的快樂——你主人自己的快樂。(見 Joh 15:11;Heb 12:2)。
Original en inglés
22. He also that had received two talents came . . . good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things--Both are commended in the same terms, and the reward of both is precisely the same. (See on
Mt 25:15).
Observe also the contrasts: "Thou hast been faithful as a servant; now be a ruler--thou hast been entrusted with a few things; now have dominion over many things."
enter thou into the joy of thy lord--thy Lord's own joy. (See
Joh 15:11; Heb 12:2).
24
Sin título
24. 那領一千的也來,說:主阿,我知道你是忍心的人——嚴苛。路加(Lu 19:21)作「嚴厲」。
沒有種的地方要收割,沒有散的地方要聚斂——意思明顯:「我知道你是個不可能事奉的人,沒有甚麼能討你喜悅的:苛求不可能的,對可得的又不滿意。」
人如此在心中暗暗把神當作嚴苛的主人,實際上是將自己不結果子之咎推到祂身上。
Original en inglés
24. Then he which had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew thee that thou art an hard man--harsh. The word in Luke
(Lu 19:21)
is "austere."
reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strawed--The sense is obvious: "I knew thou wast one whom it was impossible to serve, one whom nothing would please: exacting what was impracticable, and dissatisfied with what was attainable." Thus do men secretly think of God as a hard Master, and virtually throw on Him the blame of their fruitlessness.
25
Sin título
25. 我就害怕——怕因任何插手而使事情更糟。
去把祢的一千銀子埋藏在地裏——這描繪了所有那些將自己的恩賜封閉、不加用於事奉基督之人的行徑——他們並未實際將恩賜用於不配的用途。所以,至少可以恰當地包括 TRENCH 所指的那些人——在早期教會中,他們辯稱只顧自己的靈魂已經夠忙的了,害怕因試圖救別人而失喪自己的;於是,他們不願作世上的鹽,反而在有時退入洞穴和曠野中、遠離那些本可藉以服事弟兄的愛心積極事奉,只顧保持自己的鹹味。
你這又惡又懶的僕人——「惡」即「虛假的心」,與其餘被明確稱為「好僕人」的相對。「懶」的加上是為標明他邪惡的確切性質:看來他的惡不在於他作了任何反對主人的事,而只在於他為主人一無所為。
你既知道我沒有種的地方要收割,沒有散的地方要聚斂——祂採用僕人自己對祂要求的描述,因其足以生動表達——不是他所卑劣地歸咎於祂的嚴苛,而只是祂對所託恩賜要得利潤回報的要求。
Original en inglés
25. And I was afraid--of making matters worse by meddling with it at all.
and went and hid thy talent in the earth--This depicts the conduct of all those who shut up their gifts from the active service of Christ, without actually prostituting them to unworthy uses. Fitly, therefore, may it, at least, comprehend those, to whom TRENCH refers, who, in the early Church, pleaded that they had enough to do with their own souls, and were afraid of losing them in trying to save others; and so, instead of being the salt of the earth, thought rather of keeping their own saltness by withdrawing sometimes into caves and wildernesses, from all those active ministries of love by which they might have served their brethren.
Thou wicked and slothful servant--"Wicked" or "bad" means "falsehearted," as opposed to the others, who are emphatically styled "good servants." The addition of "slothful" is to mark the precise nature of his wickedness: it consisted, it seems, not in his doing anything against, but simply nothing for his master.
Thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed--He takes the servant's own account of his demands, as expressing graphically enough, not the hardness which he had basely imputed to him, but simply his demand of a profitable return for the gift entrusted.
27
Sin título
27. 就當把我的銀子放給兌換銀錢的人——銀行家。
到我來的時候,可以連本帶利收回——利息。
Original en inglés
27. thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers--the bankers.
and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury--interest.
29
Sin título
29. 因為凡有的,還要加給他等——見 Mt 13:12 註釋。
Original en inglés
29. For unto every one that hath shall be given, &c.--See on
Mt 13:12.
30
Sin título
30. 把這無用的僕人——那對主人毫無用處的僕人。
丟在外面——趕出去。
黑暗裏——外面的黑暗。關於這措辭見 Mt 22:13 註釋。
在那裏必要哀哭切齒了——見 Mt 13:42 註釋。
Original en inglés
30. And cast ye--cast ye out.
the unprofitable servant--the useless servant, that does his Master no service.
into outer darkness--the darkness which is outside. On this expression see on
Mt 22:13.
there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth--See on
Mt 13:42.
31
Mt 25:31-46.
Mt 25:31-46。
最後的審判
這莊嚴的場景——只見於馬太——與前兩個比喻之間的緊密聯繫,太過明顯,不必指出。
31. 當人子在祂榮耀裏——祂本位格的榮耀。
同著眾天使降臨的時候——見 De 33:2;Da 7:9-10;Jude 14;與 Heb 1:6;1Pe 3:22。
要坐在祂榮耀的寶座上——祂審判權柄的榮耀。
Original en inglés
Mt 25:31-46.
THE LAST JUDGMENT.
The close connection between this sublime scene--peculiar to Matthew--and the two preceding parables is too obvious to need pointing out.
31. When the Son of man shall come in his glory--His personal glory.
and all the holy angels with him--See
De 33:2; Da 7:9, 10; Jude 14; with Heb 1:6; 1Pe 3:22.
then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory--the glory of His judicial authority.
32
Sin título
32. 萬民都要聚集在祂面前——或作「所有的列國」。若將此理解為外邦列國,或一切除信基督者之外的人,在單純的讀者看來會很驚奇。
然而這是 OLSHAUSEN、STIER、KEIL、ALFORD(雖然後來帶些保留)以及許多(雖非全部)相信基督將於千禧年前第二次再來、聖徒將在祂顯現前被提到空中與祂相遇之人的解釋。他們的主要論據是:凡認識主耶穌的人,在審判之日都不可能驚訝自己竟被認為作了——或未作——甚麼「在基督身上」作的。
這一點我們到時候會論及。但此處我們只要說:如果這場景不描述一次對人的親身、公開、最終的審判——按照他們如何對待基督而審判——因此是基督教範圍內的人——我們便要重新考慮,我們主關於人類最大關切之主題的教導,是否確實具有普世公認其所有的、無與倫比的簡單和意義的透明。
若有人說:但這若只包括基督教範圍內的人,怎麼能是一般性審判呢?——我們回答:此處所描述的,既然確實不能涵蓋亞當全家族的情形,當然就這方面而言不是一般性的。但我們無權斷定整個「大日的審判」將局限於此處所呈現的角度。在解經過程中還會有其他解釋出現。
祂要把他們分別出來——這是頭一次;在這可畏的時刻之前,這兩類人一直是混合的。
好像牧羊的分別綿羊山羊一般——(見 Eze 34:17)。
Original en inglés
32. And before him shall be gathered all nations--or, "all the nations." That this should be understood to mean the heathen nations, or all except believers in Christ, will seem amazing to any simple reader. Yet this is the exposition of OLSHAUSEN, STIER, KEIL, ALFORD (though latterly with some diffidence), and of a number, though not all, of those who hold that Christ will come the second time before the millennium, and that the saints will be caught up to meet Him in the air before His appearing. Their chief argument is, the impossibility of any that ever knew the Lord Jesus wondering, at the Judgment Day, that they should be thought to have done--or left undone--anything "unto Christ." To that we shall advert when we come to it. But here we may just say, that if this scene does not describe a personal, public, final judgment on men, according to the treatment they have given to Christ--and consequently men within the Christian pale--we shall have to consider again whether our Lord's teaching on the greatest themes of human interest does indeed possess that incomparable simplicity and transparency of meaning which, by universal consent, has been ascribed to it. If it be said, But how can this be the general judgment, if only those within the Christian pale be embraced by it?--we answer, What is here described, as it certainly does not meet the case of all the family of Adam, is of course so far not general. But we have no right to conclude that the whole "judgment of the great day" will be limited to the point of view here presented. Other explanations will come up in the course of our exposition.
and he shall separate them--now for the first time; the two classes having been mingled all along up to this awful moment.
as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats--(See
Eze 34:17).
33
Sin título
33. 把綿羊安置在右邊——尊榮的一邊(1Ki 2:19;Ps 45:9;110:1 等)。
山羊在左邊——因此是不榮耀的一邊。
Original en inglés
33. And he shall set the sheep on his right hand--the side of honor
(1Ki 2:19; Ps 45:9; 110:1,
&c.).
but the goats on the left--the side consequently of dishonor.
34
Sin título
34. 於是王——宏偉的頭銜,主耶穌在此頭一次也是惟一一次(除比喻性語言外)用於自己,而且是在祂最深的降卑的前夕!這是要表明:在向國度的後嗣說話時,祂要穿上祂全部的王族威嚴。
要向那右邊的說:你們——這與祂長久以來邀請一切疲乏擔重擔的人到祂那裏得安息所用的甜蜜字眼相同。如今這話只對那些已經來到並尋得安息的人說。仍是「來」,也是來「安息」;卻是更高層次的安息,在另一個境界。
這蒙我父賜福的,可來承受那創世以來為你們所預備的國——使徒以似乎不過是這些話之表達的言語,說出了他們這蒙福的整個故事:「願頌讚歸與我們主耶穌基督的父神!祂在基督裏曾賜給我們天上各樣屬靈的福氣;就如神從創立世界以前,在基督裏揀選了我們,使我們在祂面前成為聖潔,無有瑕疵;又因愛我們,就按著自己意旨所喜悅的,預定我們藉著耶穌基督得兒子的名分。」他們從永遠被揀選,為要在基督裏得著並享受一切屬靈的福氣,如此被揀選,為要成為聖潔、無有瑕疵地活在愛中。這就是那聖潔的愛——王即將詳細複述其實際表現;如此我們看見,他們整個愛基督的生命,是神在基督裏對他們永恆之愛旨意的果子。
Original en inglés
34. Then shall the King--Magnificent title, here for the first and only time, save in parabolical language, given to Himself by the Lord Jesus, and that on the eve of His deepest humiliation! It is to intimate that in then addressing the heirs of the kingdom, He will put on all His regal majesty.
say unto them on his right hand, Come--the same sweet word with which He had so long invited all the weary and heavy laden to come unto Him for rest. Now it is addressed exclusively to such as have come and found rest. It is still, "Come," and to "rest" too; but to rest in a higher style, and in another region.
ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world--The whole story of this their blessedness is given by the apostle, in words which seem but an expression of these: "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ; according as He hath chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love." They were chosen from everlasting to the possession and enjoyment of all spiritual blessings in Christ, and so chosen in order to be holy and blameless in love. This is the holy love whose practical manifestations the King is about to recount in detail; and thus we see that their whole life of love to Christ is the fruit of an eternal purpose of love to them in Christ.
35
Sin título
35. 因為我餓了……渴了……作客旅等等。
Original en inglés
35. For I was an hungered . . . thirsty . . . a stranger, &c.
36
Sin título
36. 赤身露體……病了……在監裏,你們來看我。
Original en inglés
36. Naked . . . sick . . . prison, and ye came unto me.
37
Sin título
37-39. 義人就回答說等等。
Original en inglés
37-39. Then shall the righteous answer him, &c.
40
Sin título
40. 王要回答說:我實在告訴你們等等——這在坐在榮耀寶座上的王與祂詫異的百姓之間,是一段令人驚奇的對話!「我餓了,你們給我吃」等等——「不是我們」,他們回答。「主啊,我們從未做過這樣的事:我們是在不正常的時候出生的,沒有享有服事你的特權。」「但你們對如今在你們旁邊的、被投在你們愛心之上的這些我的弟兄,就是這樣做的。」「誠然如此,主啊,但那樣做就是做在你身上嗎?你的名的確為我們所寶貴,我們也以為為它受辱是極大的榮耀。當我們在窮困缺乏的人中認出信心之家的人時,我們不否認我們的心在發現時就跳躍起來,當他們敲我們住處的門時,『我們的心腸便被感動』,好像『我們的良人自己從門洞裏伸進手來』。我們與他們的相交何等甘甜,彷彿我們『不知不覺接待了天使』;在你那使我們連結的愛之光芒中,施與受之間的一切差別不知怎地都消融了;不,與其說當他們帶著對我們微薄饋贈的感謝離開時,我們才像是欠債的人——不是他們。但主啊,我們那一切時間都是在與你同在嗎?……是的,那一幕全是與我同在,」王回答說——「我在我貧窮之人的偽裝中。別人向我關閉的門,你們卻打開了——『你們留我住』。被真理的仇敵捉拿並囚禁時,你們這些真理所釋放的人殷勤地尋找我並找到了我;冒著自己性命的危險,在我孤寂的囚室中探望我,安慰我的孤獨;你們給我一件外衣,因為我發抖;然後我便覺得溫暖了。你們用涼水的水杯潤濕我乾渴的嘴唇;當我飢餓難當時,你們供給我碎餅,我的精神便甦醒過來——『你們就是做在我身上了。』」當我們聆聽這樣一幅末日審判景象的描述時,有多少意念湧上心頭!而按照這天上的對話的這一觀點來看,我們在開頭所提到的那種觀點——把它當作基督與從未聽過祂名的外邦人之間的對話,他們當然也從未在心中感受過祂愛的任何感動——顯得何等貧乏而可悲,更不用說是不合聖經了!在我們看來,對本段的基督教觀點提出基督徒不可能被假定會問出此處「蒙天父賜福之人」所問的這類問題,這是一個貧乏而膚淺的反對。即使解釋這一點有任何困難,另一觀點的困難也大到至少使它令人無法忍受。但其實並沒有真正的困難。他們所表達的詫異,不是因為被告知他們是出於對基督的愛而行動,而是因為基督自己乃是他們一切作為的親身對象:他們發現祂餓了,便供給祂食物;他們拿水給祂,解了祂的渴;他們看見祂赤身發抖,便給祂穿上溫暖的衣服,在祂為真理下監時探望祂,在祂臥病在床時坐在祂床邊。這正是耶穌說「王」將對他們在地上行為所給出的驚人解釋。會有任何基督徒回答說:「這怎麼會使他們驚訝呢?難道每一個基督徒不知道,他做這些事的時候——只要他做的話——正是這裏所描述的嗎?」不,倒不如說,他們不驚訝、幾乎懷疑自己的耳朵,聽見審判者親口這樣述說他們在地上的行為,這才是可以想像的嗎?並且要記住,那審判者已經帶著祂的榮耀降臨,如今坐在祂榮耀的寶座上,眾聖天使與祂同在;而正是從那榮耀的口中說出的話:「你們這一切都是做在我身上。」啊,我們能想像這樣的話是對我們自己說的,然後設想自己回答說:「我們當然做了——我們還能做在誰身上呢?受話的必定是別人而不是我們,他們在一切善行中從不知道自己所作的是甚麼?」倒不如說,我們能想像自己不為之驚愕不已、幾乎難以相信王為我們所作的見證嗎?
Original en inglés
40. And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, &c.--Astonishing dialogue this between the King, from the Throne of His glory, and His wondering people! "I was an hungered, and ye gave Me meat," &c.--"Not we," they reply. "We never did that, Lord: We were born out of due time, and enjoyed not the privilege of ministering unto Thee." "But ye did it to these My brethren, now beside you, when cast upon your love." "Truth, Lord, but was that doing it to Thee? Thy name was indeed dear to us, and we thought it a great honor to suffer shame for it. When among the destitute and distressed we discerned any of the household of faith, we will not deny that our hearts leapt within us at the discovery, and when their knock came to our dwelling, 'our bowels were moved,' as though 'our Beloved Himself had put in His hand by the hole of the door.' Sweet was the fellowship we had with them, as if we had 'entertained angels unawares'; all difference between giver and receiver somehow melted away under the beams of that love of Thine which knit us together; nay, rather, as they left us with gratitude for our poor givings, we seemed the debtors--not they. But, Lord, were we all that time in company with Thee? . . . Yes, that scene was all with Me," replies the King--"Me in the disguise of My poor ones. The door shut against Me by others was opened by you--'Ye took Me in.' Apprehended and imprisoned by the enemies of the truth, ye whom the truth had made free sought Me out diligently and found Me; visiting Me in My lonely cell at the risk of your own lives, and cheering My solitude; ye gave Me a coat, for I shivered; and then I felt warm. With cups of cold water ye moistened My parched lips; when famished with hunger ye supplied Me with crusts, and my spirit revived--/YE DID IT UNTO ME.'" What thoughts crowd upon us as we listen to such a description of the scenes of the Last Judgment! And in the light of this view of the heavenly dialogue, how bald and wretched, not to say unscriptural, is that view of it to which we referred at the outset, which makes it a dialogue between Christ and heathens who never heard of His name, and of course never felt any stirrings of His love in their hearts! To us it seems a poor, superficial objection to the Christian view of this scene, that Christians could never be supposed to ask such questions as the "blessed of Christ's Father" are made to ask here. If there were any difficulty in explaining this, the difficulty of the other view is such as to make it, at least, insufferable. But there is no real difficulty. The surprise expressed is not at their being told that they acted from love to Christ, but that Christ Himself was the Personal Object of all their deeds: that they found Him hungry, and supplied Him with food: that they brought water to Him, and slaked His thirst; that seeing Him naked and shivering, they put warm clothing upon Him, paid Him visits when lying in prison for the truth, and sat by His bedside when laid down with sickness. This is the astonishing interpretation which Jesus says "the King" will give to them of their own actions here below. And will any Christian reply, "How could this astonish them? Does not every Christian know that He does these very things, when He does them at all, just as they are here represented?" Nay, rather, is it conceivable that they should not be astonished, and almost doubt their own ears, to hear such an account of their own actions upon earth from the lips of the Judge? And remember, that Judge has come in His glory, and now sits upon the throne of His glory, and all the holy angels are with Him; and that it is from those glorified Lips that the words come forth, "Ye did all this unto ME." Oh, can we imagine such a word addressed to ourselves, and then fancy ourselves replying, "Of course we did--To whom else did we anything? It must be others than we that are addressed, who never knew, in all their good deeds, what they were about?" Rather, can we imagine ourselves not overpowered with astonishment, and scarcely able to credit the testimony borne to us by the King?
41
Sin título
41. 王又要向那左邊的說:你們這被咒詛的人,離開我等等——「至於你們這在左邊的,你們沒有為我做過任何事。我也曾到你們那裏,但你們不認識我:你們既沒有溫暖的感情,也沒有善行可以施與我:我在你們眼中如同被藐視的一位。」「在我們眼中嗎,主?我們從未見過你,也從未如此待過你。」「但你們卻這樣對待這些信我的小子,他們如今站在我的右邊。我在這些貧窮肢體的偽裝中來乞求你們的憐憫,你們卻向我塞住了憐憫的心腸:我求救濟,你們卻無物可以給我。所以,把你們自己的冷漠、你們自己的輕蔑距離收回去吧:你們叫我離開你們的面,如今我叫你們離開我的——你們這被咒詛的人,離開我!」
Original en inglés
41.Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, &c.--As for you on the left hand, ye did nothing for Me. I came to you also, but ye knew Me not: ye had neither warm affections nor kind deeds to bestow upon Me: I was as one despised in your eyes." "In our eyes, Lord? We never saw Thee before, and never, sure, behaved we so to Thee." "But thus ye treated these little ones that believe in Me and now stand on My right hand. In the disguise of these poor members of Mine I came soliciting your pity, but ye shut up your bowels of compassion from Me: I asked relief, but ye had none to give Me. Take back therefore your own coldness, your own contemptuous distance: Ye bid Me away from your presence, and now I bid you from Mine--Depart from Me, ye cursed!"
46
Sin título
46. 這些人要往永刑裏去——這些「被咒詛」的人。判決似乎先是對義人——在惡人聽得見的範圍內——宣判的;於是義人隨即作為陪審官審判惡人(1Co 6:2);但判決似乎先在義人眼前對惡人執行——這樣義人的榮耀便不會被惡人看見,而他們降入「自己的地方」卻要被義人看見,正如 BENGEL 所註。
進入永刑——或如
Mt 25:41
所說,「那為魔鬼和他的使者所預備的永火」。試比較
Mt 13:42;2Th 1:9
等處。這被說成是「為魔鬼和他的使者所預備的」,因為他們「最先犯罪」。但兩者結局相同,因為其不聖潔的性情相同。
那些義人要往永生裏去——即「永遠的生命」。兩子句中的詞在原文既同,在翻譯中也應當相同。這樣,這可畏之日的判決將是終局的、不可逆轉的、無盡的。
Original en inglés
46. And these shall go away--these "cursed" ones. Sentence, it should seem, was first pronounced--in the hearing of the wicked--upon the righteous, who thereupon sit as assessors in the judgment upon the wicked
(1Co 6:2);
but sentence is first executed, it should seem, upon the wicked, in the sight of the righteous--whose glory will thus not be beheld by the wicked, while their descent into "their own place" will be witnessed by the righteous, as BENGEL notes.
into everlasting punishment--or, as in
Mt 25:41,
"everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels." Compare
Mt 13:42; 2Th 1:9,
&c. This is said to be "prepared for the devil and his angels," because they were "first in transgression." But both have one doom, because one unholy character.
but the righteous into life eternal--that is, "life everlasting." The word in both clauses, being in the original the same, should have been the same in the translation also. Thus the decisions of this awful day will be final, irreversible, unending.
Mt 25:1-13.
十個 童女的 比喻。
這個比喻和接下去的一個,只在馬太福音中。
1. 那時——即上章末了所提的時候,即主第二次再臨以賞賜他忠心僕人、向不忠的人報應之時。那時
天國好比十個童女,拿着燈,出去迎接新郎——這為比喻提供了鑰匙,其大目的與上一個比喻相同——即說明信心的警醒期待態度,論到這態度,信徒被描寫為"那些等候他的人"
(Heb 9:28),
並"愛慕他顯現的人"
(2Ti 4:8)。
在上一個比喻中是僕人等候他們不在的主;在此則是陪伴新婦的童女,她們的本分是在夜間拿着燈出去,預備好了當新郎出現時引導新婦到他家裡,與他一同進去赴婚筵。這整個美麗的比喻變化,以全新的角度帶出上一個比喻的教訓。但要注意,正如在婚筵的比喻中
(Lu 14:15-24),
如此在這裡——新婦在這比喻中根本不出現;童女和新郎帶出一切所要教的教訓:信徒不能同時被表為新婦又為陪嫁的使女,否則就不一致。