Site des ressources théologiques

Schaff-Herzog Religious Encyclopaedia

샤프-헤르초크 종교백과

Encyclopédies Schaff et al. 1882 general

État des langues

EN KO1%

EN 6639/6639 source · KO 75/6639 traduits · 0 revus

6639 entrées

Vue parallèle coréen-anglais
CANZ, ISRAEL GOTTLIEB Canz, Israel Gottlieb

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CANZ,** cantz, **ISRAEL GOTTLIEB.** See WOLFF, CHRISTIAN, AND THE WOLFFIAN SCHOOL.
CAPECELATRO, ALFONSO Capecelatro, Alfonso

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPECELATRO,** ca-pê"chê-la'tro, ALFONSO: Cardinal priest; b. at Marseilles Feb. 5, 1824. He entered the oratory of St. Philip Neri, and in 1878 was appointed sublibrarian of the Holy See. Two years later he was consecrated archbishop of Capua, and in 1885 was created cardinal priest of Santi Nereo ed Achilleo. In the following year, however, he chose the church of Santa Maria del Popolo in preference to that of Santi Nereo ed Achilleo. He still retains his archiepiscopal see, and also remains the official librarian of the Holy See. In addition to a number of briefer contributions, he has written: *Storia di Santa Caterina e del papato del suo tempore * (2 vols., Naples, 1856); *Newman e la religione cattolica in Inghilterra * (2 vols., 1859); *La vita di Gesù Cristo* (1862); *Storia di San Pier Damiano e del suo tempore * (Florence, 1862); *Scritti Vari religiosi e sociali * (3d ed., Milan, 1873); *La dottrina cattolica* (3 vols., 2d ed., Sienna, 1879); *Vita di San Filippo Neri * (2 vols., Naples, 1879; Eng. transl., by T. A. Pope, London, 1882); *Prose sacre e morale * (Sienna, 1884); and *Nuove Prose * (2 vols., Milan, 1899). An edition of his works was published in eighteen volumes at Rome in 1886-93.
CAPE COLONY Cape Colony

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPE COLONY:** The most important of the British possessions in South Africa, comprising, in general, that portion of the continent south of the Orange River; area, 277,000 square miles; population (1904), 2,409,804, of whom less than one-fourth (not quite 580,000) are Europeans or whites; the remainder (still predominantly heathen) includes 1,114,100 Kafirs and Bechuanas, 310,720 half-breeds classed as Fingo stock, 91,260 Hottentots, 15,680 Malays, and 298,340 classed as half-breeds and of miscellaneous origin. The more important religious bodies of the colony are as follows: (1) The *Dutch Reformed Church,* with 399,500 members (1904), of whom 296,800 were white. It is the church of the original European (Dutch) settlers, who spread widely through the land by conquest from 1652 onward. Their Church is governed by a general synod, whose sessions are held every three years. The separate congregation is administered by a church council (*kerkeraad*), and six to twelve congregations constitute a congregational circuit ("ring"), whose chosen representatives become members of the General Synod. A standing committee of the Synod administers the principal affairs of the Church as a whole. The colored congregations are for the most part the result of missionary labor; only a small number of their clergy have a higher education. (2) The *Church of England, * 281,440 members (122,560 white). The diocese of Cape Town was founded in 1847; the incumbent has borne the title of archbishop since 1897 and is metropolitan of the province of South Africa, which comprises nine dioceses besides the metropolitan see, viz.: Bloemfontein (formerly the Orange Free State, formed 1863), Grahamstown (1853), Lebombo (1891), Mashonaland (1891), Natal (formerly Maritzburg, 1853), Pretoria (1878), St. Helena (1859), St. John's, Kaffraria (1873), and Zululand (a missionary bishopric, 1870). (3) The *Wesleyan Methodist Church of South Africa, * 277,300 members (35,900 white). This body very early employed colored teachers and has applied less rigorous tests of conversion than others; in 1891 it had about 1,250 lay helpers. Two other Methodist bodies have an inconsiderable aggregate membership. (4) *Congregationalists, * 112,200 members (5,000 Europeans), for the most part connected with the London Missionary Society. The Congregational Union of South Africa was formed in 1900 from the Union of South Africa (1877) and the Union of Natal and Southeastern Africa (1882). (5) *Presbyterians,* 88,660 members (26,360 of European origin). The Scotch Church began missionary activity in the east of the colony in 1821. (6) *Lutherans,* 37,050 members (13,100 Europeans), mostly of German origin. They are united in the German Evangelical Lutheran Synod of South Africa. (7) The *Rhenish Mission Church * has 20,800 members and (8) the *Moravians *23,100, nearly all colored. (9) The *African Methodist Episcopal Church * has 12,060 members; (10) the *Baptists* number 14,100, of whom 9,950 are white, their congregations being organized practically on a European basis; (11) the *Church of Christ * has 7,600 members (1,075 Europeans), and (12) the *South African Reformed Church * 6,210, nearly all Europeans. Further, there is a group of mission congregations, of which the largest is Dutch (4,790) and the smallest American (215), and more than forty additional sects or denominations witness the tendency to religious division which manifests itself in English-speaking lands. For further information concerning missionary activity, see AFRICA, II. The *Roman Catholic Church * has had a vigorous growth in the last ten years, and now counts more than 37,000 members (28,500 of European origin). The organization includes the apostolic vicariates of western and eastern Cape Colony, dating respectively from 1837 and 1847, with residence at Cape Town and Port Elizabeth, and the apostolic prefecture of central Cape Colony (1874), with residence at Cape Town. The Roman Catholic Church is active throughout South Africa and has established vicariates for Natal (1850), the Transvaal (1904), and Orange Free State (1886), and a prefecture of Basutoland (1894). The *Greek Orthodox Church *reckons 1,050 adherents, almost exclusively European. The *Israelites * have decreased on account of emigration; still 19,500 remain. *Mohammedanism * is represented by 22,630 members (among them 15,100 Malays), and 2,035 Hindus are enumerated. In spite of the missionary zeal of so many Christian sects, more than half the natives continue in heathenism, the official figures of colored heathen being 1,015,230. The number of illiterates, after deduction of children under school age, is 1,368,000. The religious bodies are engaged in active rivalry to meet the needs of education and thereby to increase their numbers, and the government has latterly applied itself to the building and equipment of schools on a scale of greatly increased expenditure. Attendance at school was made compulsory in 1905. WILHELM GOETZ. BIBLIOGRAPHY: For general facts and status, J. Bryce, *Impressions of South Africa, * London, 1899. For statistics, *South African Year Book, * annual, London. For phases of mission and other church work consult: A. T. Wirgman, *History of the English Church in South Africa, * London, 1895; A. G. S. Gibson, *Sketches of Church Work in the Diocese of Capetown, * Cape Town, 1900; *Mission Chronicle of the Scottish Church, with the Kaffrarian Diocesan Quarterly, * Edinburgh; *South African Catholic Magazine,* Cape Town; *Reports of the Wesleyan Missions in the Cape of Good Hope District, * annual, Cape Town; *Almanak voor de gerefoormeerde Kerk, * annual, Cape Town; *Handelingen [der Vergadering van de synode der gerefoormeerde Kerk,* Cape Town (published subsequent to the meeting of each synod); J. Mackenzie, *Day-Dawn in South Africa,* London, 1884: idem, *London Missionary Society in South Africa, * ib. 1888; A. Brigg, *Missionary Life in the South of the Dark Continent, * ib. 1888; W. S. Walton, *Cape General Mission, * ib. 1889; A. G. S. Gibson, *Eight Years in Kaffraria, * ib. 1891; T. Cook, *My Mission Tour in South Africa,* ib. 1895; Merensky, in *Missionszeitschrift, * 1897-1898; *Basler Missionsmagazin,* 1900.
CAPEN, ELMER HEWITT Capen, Elmer Hewitt

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPEN, ELMER HEWITT:** Universalist; b. at Stoughton, Mass., Apr. 5, 1838; d. at Medford, Mass., Mar. 22, 1905. He was graduated at Tufts College, 1860; admitted to the bar, 1863; was pastor of the Independent (Universalist) Christian Society of Gloucester, Mass., 1865-69; of the First Universalist Church of Providence, R. I., 1870-75; and after 1875 president of Tufts College, Medford, Mass. He belonged to the school of Universalists who make the final triumph of good over evil a corollary of the nature of God—a result to be wrought out through those moral processes which are seen in operation around us. He was member of the legislature from Stoughton, 1859-60. His publications consisted of sermons, addresses, reports, etc.
CAPERNAUM Capernaum

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPERNAUM,** ca-per'na-um: The name of a Galilean city, situated near the Sea of Galilee. The form of the word follows the *textus receptus, * though the best manuscripts give *Capharnaum. * It is a compound name meaning "village of Nahum" or "of consolation." Jesus made it the center of his Galilean activities and it was called "his own city" (Matt. iv. 13, ix. 1); his disciples Simon Peter and Andrew had a house there; he taught in the synagogue there, in Peter's house, and on the seashore, and performed a number of wonderful cures. There he obtained his disciples Peter, Andrew, and Levi-Matthew, and near-by James and John (Mark i. 16-17, 19, ii. 14). The city lay on the west shore of the sea, had a customs-office and royal collector and a garrison in command of a captain who was a friend of the Jews and had built them a synagogue. Josephus in describing the plain of Gennesaret (*War,* III. x. 8) speaks of a copious spring watering the plain which was called by the inhabitants Capernaum. There are still near the north of the plain two springs. One of these, the Ain-el-Tine, issues from the rock under the roots of a fig-tree not far from Khan Minyeh. But this can not be the one meant by Josephus, since it lies too low to water the plain. The other lies northwest of the first and outside the boundaries of the plain. This is the most copious spring in Galilee, stronger by far than the Banias source of the Jordan, known now as Ain-el-Tabigah, the waters of which are collected in a hexagonal reservoir of old masonry, showing that the spring was used for irrigation purposes. This is doubtless the spring mentioned by Josephus, and Capernaum must have been in the neighborhood, and, like the spring, not within the limits of the plain. Josephus states (*Life,* lxxii.), that in a skirmish against the troops of Agrippa II. which took place on the banks of the Jordan, he was thrown from his horse and wounded, and had himself carried to the village *Cepharnome * and in the following night to Taricheæ. In spite of different textual readings of the name of the place, it is probable that Josephus here meant Capernaum. Eusebius (*Onomasticon,* 273) discusses "in the borders of Zebulun and Naphtali" of Matt. iv. 13 in connection with Isa. ix. 1. The meaning of the phrase is "in the district of," not "on the boundary of." With Tel-Hum goes well Jerome's statement of two Roman miles as the distance between Chorazin and Capernaum (the "twelve miles" of Eusebius seems a copyist's error). Put alongside the foregoing that Capernaum and Bethsaida were adjacent (Epiphanius, *Hær.*, 1. 15), and early reports are quite exhausted. Tel-Hum is the one old site in the vicinity of the spring, forty minutes distant in a northwestern direction. E. Robinson in 1838 visited and described the ruins, some quite pretentious buildings, of black basalt and limestone, among which travelers have thought they identified the remains of a synagogue. The name of the fountain, even though forty minutes away, makes for the identification of Tel-Hum with Capernaum. And the form Tel-Hum may be an Arabic variation for Tenhum, abbreviated from the Talmudic *Kaf Tanhumim* ("Village of Consolation"). The Franciscan Quaresmio in 1616-26 identified Khan Minyeh near Ain-el-Tine as the site of Capernaum, and he has been followed by many scholars. On this site appear the traces of the larger streets which a garrison city seems to require. A conclusion has been urged that John vi. 1-21 and Mark vi. 45-53 imply that Capernaum was on the plain of Gennesaret, but this falls after close examination of the passages. Arguments drawn from the element "Minyeh" in the modern name have also no cogency. The ruins of Tel-Hum belong now to the Franciscans, who have enclosed them with a wall, intending to excavate there in the future. (H. GUTHE.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: Authorities and literature favoring TeI-Hum are: J. Wilson. *Lands of the Bible Visited and Described,* ii. 139-149, London, 1847; A. E. Wilson and W. Warren, *Recovery of Jerusalem, * pp. 375-387, ib. 1871; W. M. Thomson, *Land and the Book,* 3 vols., New York, 1880, i. 352-356 of London ed., 1873; V. Guérin, *Description . . . de la Palestine, * Part 3, *Galilée,* i. 227-228, Paris, 1880; F. Buhl, *Geographie des alten Palästina,* pp. 224-225, Freiburg, 1896. Favoring Khan Minyeh are: A. P. Stanley, *Sinai and Palestine, * London, 1866; E. Robinson, *Biblical Researches, * Boston, 1868; T. Keim, *Jesus of Nazara,* 2 vols., London, 1879; C. R. Conder, *Tent Work in Palestine,* ib. 1880; A. Henderson, *Palestine, * Edinburgh, 1885; G. A. Smith, *Historical Geography of the Holy Land,* pp, 456-457, London, 1897; *DB,* i. 350-351; *EB,* i. 696-698. **CAPEROLANI,** ca-pê"ro-la'nî. See FRANCIS, SAINT, OF ASSISI, AND THE FRANCISCAN ORDER, III., § 7.
CAPE VERDE ISLANDS Cape Verde Islands

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPE VERDE ISLANDS.** See AFRICA, III.
CAPERS, ELLISON Capers, Ellison

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPERS, ELLISON:** Protestant Episcopal bishop of South Carolina; b. in Charleston, S. C., Oct. 14, 1837; d, at Columbia, S. C., Apr. 22, 1908. He was graduated from the South Carolina Military Academy 1857, was assistant professor there 1858-60. On the outbreak of the Civil War he entered the Confederate Army, in which he attained the rank of brigadier-general. From the close of the war until 1868 he was secretary of the South Carolina Legislature, but in the mean time studied theology, and was ordained to the priesthood in 1867. He was then rector of Christ Church, Greenville, S. C., 1867-87, except for a year (1875-76) as rector of St. Paul's, Selma, Ala., and of Trinity, Columbia, S. C., 1887-93. In 1886 he had been tendered and had declined the bishopric of Easton, but in 1893 he was consecrated bishop of South Carolina. BIBLIOGRAPHY: W. S. Perry, *The Episcopate in America,* p. 355, New York, 1895.
CAPHTOR Caphtor

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPHTOR,** caf'ter: A locality provisionally identified with Crete, though the question can not be regarded as settled. According to Amos ix. 7 it was the original home of the Philistines; Jer. xlvii. 4 (Masoretic text) makes of it an island or coast-land; Deut. ii. 23 and Gen. x. 14 use the term "Caphtorim" of the inhabitants. The early tradition is indicated by the fact that the Septuagint, Vulgate, Peshito, and Targums use "Cappadocia" and "Cappadocians" in Amos ix. 7 and Deut. ii. 23; this was based, however, on a misunderstanding. Attempts to find the meaning have been made by investigating the word "Cherethites" (I Sam. xxx. 14-16; Zeph. ii. 5; Ezek. xxv. 16), used of a people in the Philistine region and of Philistine stock. The transliterations of the Hebrew in the Septuagint show that the latter did not understand the meaning. In the prophetical books the form *Kretes * is used by the Septuagint, implying immigration from Crete; but how far this rested upon data known to the interpreters is indeterminable. On Egyptian monuments of the time of Thothmes III. appears mention of a land the name of which takes a form corresponding to "Caphtor" minus the final consonant (*Kefti *). Ebers explained this by "Phenicians," only to have the explanation shown untenable by W. Max Müller. According to G. Steindorff, the Egyptian word connotes "islands of the Ægean"; and the same authority notes among the representations of tribute to Thothmes III. from the *Kefti * vessels of the Mycenæan type of about 1450-1250 B.C. The *Kefti * must have been within the sphere of influence of Mycenæan culture. But Müller connects them with Cilicia. Evans in his investigations in Crete has discovered numerous evidences of the existence there of Mycenæan culture, thus bringing Crete within the sphere of influence of that civilization. Alongside of them are articles of Egyptian workmanship, showing exchange of commodities between Egypt and Crete. Steindorff puts the two facts together, and equates Crete and the Egyptian *Kefti. * But this may prove superfluous provided success is attained in geographically defining the word *kptar * recently found at Ombos, a word which closely corresponds with the Hebrew Caphtor. The equation *Kefti* = *kptar * is not fully proved. (H. GUTHE.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: W. M. Müller, *Asien und Europa,* pp. 337 sqq., Leipsic, 1893; idem, in *Mittheilungen der vorderasiatischen Gesellschaft,* i. 1 sqq., 1900 (places Caphtor on the Lycian or Carian coast); G. Ebers, *Aegypten und die Bücker Mosis,* p. 130, Leipsic, 1868; G. A. Smith, *Historical Geography of the Holy Land,* p. 171, London, 1897; *DB,* i. 351-352; *EB,* i. 698-700; *JE,* iii. 553-554.
CAPISTRANO, GIOVANNI DI Capistrano, Giovanni di

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPISTRANO, GIOVANNI DI:** Franciscan; b. at Capistrano (22 m. s.e. of Aquila), in the Abruzzi, 1386; d. at Illok (Ujlak, 26 m. w. of Peterwardein), Slavonia, Oct. 23, 1456. He first studied jurisprudence, but joined the Franciscans in 1416 and in the school of Bernardin of Sienna became a theologian and preacher. After 1426 he acted as inquisitor against the Fratricelli and Jews, and by cruel measures attained a moderate success. His main achievement was the defense and extension of the order of the Observantines, of whom he was made vicar-general in Italy in 1446. In 1451 he was sent to Germany against the Hussites. Followed by large crowds, he went to Vienna, and is reported to have performed 320 miracles on the way, while the number of his hearers is said to have increased from 150 to 300,000. He intended now to go to Bohemia to destroy the heresy there; a disputation to which he was invited by the Utraquist bishop Rokyczana he managed to avoid, and finally he did venture to enter the country. Æneas Silvius states that he did, indeed, convert a few Hussites, but, considering the multitude of the heretics, they are hardly worth mentioning. At any rate Bohemia, in spite of his sermons, remained as it was before. By way of Bavaria, Saxony, and Lusatia, he went to Silesia and Poland, and on account of his sermons and miracles was everywhere revered like a saint. After the fall of Constantinople (1453) he tried to induce the princes of Germany at the Diets of Frankfort and Wiener-Neustadt to make war against the Turks, but failed, and was very little successful generally in preaching the cross. He went to Hungary in 1455 and when Mohammed II. advanced against Belgrade (1456) Capistrano, the papal legate Carjaval, and John Hunyadi were almost the only men who bestirred themselves to repel the foe. In spite of his age, Capistrano with a number of crusaders went to Belgrade and by a daring sally gave Hunyadi opportunity to beat the Turks. For this the friends of his order have celebrated him as savior of Europe. He died soon after, exhausted by hardships. Although revered in his lifetime as a saint, he was not canonized until 1690. Prominent contemporaries, among them the subsequent pope Pius II., expressed some doubts as to his miracles and had no favorable opinion of him because of his bragging self-glorification and choleric irritability. E. LEMPP. BIBLIOGRAPHY: The early Vitæ and some of John's letters are in *ASB*, Oct., x. 269-552, with which cf. L. Wadding, *Annales Minorum*, vols. iv.-vi., Leyden, 1648, or ix.-xiii., Rome, 1734 (an excellent source). The most comprehensive biography is by A. Hermann, *Capistranus triumphans*, Cologne, 1700; the first scientific life is by G. Voigt, in Sybel's *Historische Zeitschrift,* x. (1863) 19-96; cf. idem, *Enea Silvio di' Piccolomini*, vol. ii., Berlin, 1860; the latest life is by E. Jacob, *Johannes von Capistrano*, Breslau, 1903. A considerable list of literature is given in Potthast, *Wegweiser*, pp. 1396-97.
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT Capital Punishment

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

### CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. The Historical Development of Capital Punishment. In Primitive Society (§ 1). In Roman Law (§ 2). Attitude of the Church (§ 3). Place of Religious Ideas in the Question. Capital Punishment in Modern Times. ### I. The Historical Development of Capital Punishment: ### 1. In Primitive Society. It must be borne in mind that the killing of a person guilty of grievous crime does not, in primitive society, belong to the class of deliberate ordinances enacted by the community. It is rather a form of the impulse of revenge, which the primitive institutions of all the older civilized nations first tolerate, and then regulate and uphold or limit (see BLOOD-REVENGE). In primitive conditions revenge has a twofold operation. It is directed in some cases against offenses which affect the individual or the family (such as theft, adultery, and the murder of a freeman); in these cases the injured family proceeds against the offender or his family, and the community takes part only in the interests of public peace, by establishing a penalty on payment of which the offender is to be safe from revenge. Quite a different form of procedure is that against crimes which offend the consciousness of the whole community (sacrilege, unnatural vices, treason in war, etc.). Here the vengeance of the community is provoked, and it acts first by formal delivery of the offender to the will of the members or outlawry, then later by actual execution, in connection with which sacred ceremonies analogous to those of sacrifice are often found. As organized government grows stronger, it takes an official interest in crimes which were originally in the private sphere, withdraws them from individual vengeance, and subjects them to capital punishment. Religion has its influence here; the interference of government in such cases is usually, brought about by the conception that the crime, apart from the injury to the immediate victims, defiles the community and must be punished in order to retain peace with the deity. This can be clearly shown in the Greek law of the post-Homeric age, less clearly but still probably in ancient Roman law; and the same course was followed in Hebrew history. In the primitive law (cf. Ex. xxi. 12 sqq.) the murderer is exposed to the pursuit of the avenger of blood, and the elders of the community cooperate only to the extent of driving the fugitive from an asylum and delivering him to the avenger. In the case of the other crimes mentioned in Ex. xxi. the punishment of death is either private vengeance, or at most a sort of tribal vengeance or lynch law. As late as the period of Deut. xix. the blood-vengeance is mentioned; but by the side of it appears the idea that the whole community is affected with blood-guiltiness by a deliberate murder, and must be purified by the death of the offender. The same law began, when priestly influence increasingly dominated all departments of life, to be applied to other offenders (blasphemers, traitors, adulterers, etc.). The formal abandonment to the avenger was replaced by stoning, in which all the men of the community took part. ### 2. In Roman Law. In so far as the religious influence remained a permanent factor in the penal code, the Jewish State stands alone among the Mediterranean communities. In the others, especially the Greek and Roman, punishment became exclusively a matter of secular enactment. In the Roman the principle is continuously applied from the fifth century that the death penalty (whether by decapitation, burning, or throwing down a precipice) is due to all grave crimes (including murder, arson, perjury, treason, etc.); but in practise this was mitigated by the frequent substitution of the "interdiction of fire and water," i.e., banishment from the community, especially after the introduction of the *provocatio ad populum*, an appeal to the whole body of the people against the decision of consuls and other magistrates empowered to pronounce sentence of outlawry. In the last two centuries of the republic capital punishment was seldom applied, to members of the upper classes at least. But it was never abolished, and when the reorganization of the Roman system took place under imperial legislation it was again more frequently employed, even against Roman citizens. Thus at the beginning of the Christian era it was an accepted institution throughout the Roman Empire, though with variations in usage due to local law. The teaching of Christ made no substantial alteration in these conditions. Of his own recorded sayings, the only one directly bearing on the subject is Matt. xxvi. 52, which (like Gen. ix. 5) refers rather to the eternal working out of the divine justice in the abstract. But Paul speaks expressly in Rom. xiii. 1 sqq. of the legal death-penalty–although here it is merely designated as reconcilable with the divine law, not required or imposed as a duty upon the State. Accordingly Christian teaching made no change in the Roman law, and, when the Christians became dominant, after having been for two centuries frequent victims to its provisions, they still allowed it to take free course. In fact, it was applied with increasing frequency even to Roman citizens of the higher classes, and from the time of Constantine to a large number of minor offenses. ### 3. Attitude of the Church. Although the Church was more firmly and fully organized when it came into contact with the institutions of the new Germanic kingdoms, and assumed the right of extensive interference with their penal legislation on principles resembling those of the Jewish theocracy, its influence in the question of capital punishment was not decisive. Germanic law at first, like all primitive systems, made private vengeance and the mitigation of it by surrender of property on the part of the offender the principal factor in the punishment of crime. The Church undertook to regulate this to the extent of minimizing private vendettas, both by providing and supporting means of reconciliation between the contending parties and by strengthening orderly official justice. But in spite of the "horror of bloodshed" consistently emphasized by the Church, which from the tenth century on created an impressive mechanism against private vendettas in the Truce of God, it was obliged to give a general support to the gradual upbuilding of the secular system of corporal, including capital, punishment in the kingdoms of western Europe. When the death-penalty had been finally established as a regular part of settled secular law, the Church in theory took the position of a simple spectator of its exercise. It forbade the clergy to take any part in its administration, laid down the principle *Ecclesia non sitit sanguinem * ("The Church does not thirst for blood"), and admonished ecclesiastical authorities to provide asylums and in other ways to work for mercy to the offender in the hope of his improvement. This position was somewhat modified when the war against heresy began. Even in the eleventh century the State threatened heretics with death in isolated cases in France and Germany; and by the middle of the twelfth century the growth of heresy led to a formal alliance between Church and State, by which Frederick Barbarossa in 1184, and then other sovereigns of southern Europe, pledged the pope the support of the secular arm for the suppression of heresy. The penalties were at first outlawry, infamy, and confiscation of goods; but in 1224 Frederick II. approved of death by fire as the penalty in Lombardy; and this penalty, soon applied throughout Italy, was not only sanctioned but directly called for by Gregory IX. It was not long before the new principle was extended to Germany, France, England, and Spain, and the death-penalty, while theoretically administered by secular officials, was actually the consequence of an ecclesiastical condemnation. The teaching of the Reformers brought about no essential alteration in the general attitude toward capital punishment; it might seem that the Reformation strengthened the institution, but really this attitude is rather the result of contemporary conditions. The death-penalty had been more frequently employed in all European states since the fifteenth century as a result of violent proletarian risings and the increase of the dangerous unemployed and vagabond population, and the period from 1530 to 1630 is that in which the number of executions reached its high-water mark. When a reaction came about, it was directed primarily against an excessive use of this penalty, and then toward the establishment of penitentiaries (London 1580, Amsterdam 1596, Hamburg 1622, etc.), which brought about a decrease in the number of executions. The movement for the abolition of capital punishment did not proceed from a religious source. While Locke, Voltaire, Montesquieu, and Thomasius had all recognized it as a necessary part of the social system, and Rousseau in the *Contrat social * had left it theoretically free play, it was Cesare Beccaria in 1764 who, as a deduction from Rousseau's general ideas, proclaimed its irreconcilability with abstract justice. In modern times no agreement has been reached on the basis of religious convictions. ### II. Place of Religious Ideas in the Question: The historical outline given above shows clearly that the sanction and province of capital punishment in secular law can not be brought directly under religious control. The old philosophical doctrine of the "Christian State" is now no longer recognized. On modern principles, the State's justification for existence lies in its necessity to the unhampered development of human activity; and on this rests its power of punishing, and in particular its right to apply the death-penalty. The essential characteristics of a just and proper punishment will thus have to be determined by a course of empirical historical research. In the older development of the penal code of all nations, corporal punishment is found concurrently with penalties affecting the property of the offender; but the corporal is finally preferred because it is capable of application alike to all, while money fines have a varying effect according to the wealth of the offender. By degrees the permission of compounding for corporal penalties is abolished, with the gradual building up from the twelfth century of modern principles of government. The death-penalty is increasingly preferred as emphasizing the thought of the equality of all men before the law. It is misused for a time as the easiest way of ridding society of dangerous persons, and then, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the question is widely discussed how far it ought properly to be applied, sad the principle of justice is urged in favor of its restriction to very grave crimes. These arguments, however, produced no great effect until the reaction from the excessive use of it led to the creation of a third form of penalty in a regular system of imprisonment, thoroughly established about 1700. The considerations which moved John Howard and others in the' eighteenth century to agitate for prison reform on the ground of humanity led also to the more frequent discussion of the desirability of abolishing capital punishment, and finally to an almost universal recognition of the sole ground on which its maintenance can be defended. It is now admitted that on grounds of humanity the State has no right to annihilate the individual existence, and that so far as these grounds go, the heaviest penalty that may be inflicted is that of penal servitude for life. From the standpoint, however, of abstract justice, it is still possible to defend the death-penalty, not in the interest of terrifying offenders, nor yet on the basis of a *lex talionis*, but on that of a proportion between crime and penalty, which may fairly demand that the severity of the punishment shall correspond in some measure to the importance of the social function injured by the crime. With this is connected the requirement that the penalty shall be impressive—as much so as the crime—in order that the authority of the law shall be upheld, and equal, falling with the same severity on all classes of the community. The validity of this argument will be denied by those who reject the principle of equivalent compensation and, taking their stand exclusively on the principle of humanity, seek as the result of punishment the amelioration of the offender and the deterrence of him from any further crimes. But the fact that many of those who take this theoretical view acquiesce in the retention of capital punishment in practise shows that the traditional verdict of many centuries as to the relation of crime and punishment is still to be reckoned with in any discussion of this question. (RICHARD SCHMIDT.) ### III. Capital Punishment in Modern Times: In modern times the maintenance or abolition of the death-penalty has been considered mainly from the standpoint of social utility and social justice. In the history of penology the influence of Christian and humane sentiments has been distinctly felt; but many drastic punishments have been laid aside, not because they were cruel and severe, but because they were ineffective. As mutilation has been practically abandoned in civilized countries, so reliance upon capital punishment as a means of repressing crime has been greatly weakened. A conclusive proof of this is seen in the restriction of the number of offenses to which it is applied. Scarcely more than a century ago 200 offenses were included in the list of capital crime in England. Until 1894 twenty-five offenses were made capital under the military code of the United States, twenty-two under the naval code, and seventeen under the penal code. Under Federal laws the number of capital offenses has now been reduced to three. Many advocates of capital punishment today are willing to limit its application wholly to cases of murder. Publicity was formerly regarded as absolutely necessary for the deterrent effect of executions. Even after death the body of the criminal was exposed for weeks on the gibbet as a warning to malefactors. The practise of gibbeting has now been abandoned, and the practise of public execution is gradually following it. Within recent years seven or eight States of the Union, including New York, Massachusetts, New Mexico, North Dakota, have decided that attendance on executions should be limited to a number of legal or specified witnesses. The governors of Georgia and Kentucky have recommended similar legislation. In several States the electric chair has been substituted for the gallows with a view of mercifully rendering death instantaneous. Other States of the Union have abolished the death-penalty altogether. Michigan abolished it in 1847, Rhode Island in 1852, Wisconsin in 1853. Maine abolished it in 1876, restored it in 1883, and again abolished it in 1887. In 1903 New Hampshire abolished the death-penalty for murder in the first degree unless the jury should have fixed the same to the verdict; otherwise the sentence is for life imprisonment. In Kansas there have been no official executions since 1872, as no governor has exercised his power to order the execution of a prisoner. In 1907 the legislature amended the law by substituting life imprisonment for the death-penalty. The governor of Nebraska in 1903 urged the legislature to abolish capital punishment. Colorado abolished the death-penalty in 1897, but restored it 1901, as a result of a lynching outbreak in 1900. In its session 1906-07 the subject of the abolition of capital punishment occupied a prominent place in the discussions of the French parliament without final result. Russia, one of the first countries to respond to the appeal of Beccaria, abolished it in 1753, except for political offenses. It was abolished in Portugal in 1867, in Holland in 1870, in Italy in 1890; and it has been abolished in the majority of the Swiss cantons, in Costa Rica, Brazil, Ecuador, Guatemala, Venezuela, and three states of Mexico. Some countries which have not formally abolished it by legislative act have suppressed it in practise. This is true of Belgium, and of some states of Mexico. It remains yet to be proven that an increase in capital crimes has followed the abolition of the death-penalty in any country. On the contrary, the higher development of civilization in these countries, the growth of the, humane sentiment, and increased reliance upon educational and preventive measures, instead of upon drastic deterrent laws, have led to a gradual reduction of crimes of violence. SAMUEL J. BARROWS. BIBLIOGRAPHY: G. B. Cheever, *Punishment by Death: its Authority and Expediency,* New York, 1849 (one of the most vigorous defenses of the practise); H. Seeger, *Abhandlungen aus dem Strafrechte,* Tübingen, 1858; C. J. Mittermaier, *Die Todesstrafe nach den Ergebnissen der wissenschaftlichen Forschungen,* Heidelberg, 1862 (the standard work against capital punishment, Eng. condensation by J. M. Moir, *Capital Punishment,* London, 1865); R. E. John, *Ueber die Todesstrafe,* Berlin, 1867; H. Hetzel, *Todesstrafe in ihrer kulturgeschichtlichen Entwickelung,* ib. 1870; F. von Holtzendorff, *Das Verbrechen des Mordes und die Todesstrafe,* ib. 1875; L. von Bar, *Handbuch des deutschen Strafrechts,* vol. i., ib. 1882; H. Romilly, *The Punishment of Death,* London, 1886; A. J. Palm, *The Death Penalty, * New York, 1891; J. MacMaster, *The Divine Purpose of Capital Punishment,* London, 1892; S. R. D. K. Olivecroner, *De la peine de la mort,* Paris, 1893; R. Schmidt, *Aufgaben der Strafrechtspflege,* pp. 178 sqq., 224 sqq., Leipsic, 1895; R. Katzenstein, *Todesstrafe in einem neuen Reichsstrafgesetzbuch,* Berlin, 1902; D. P. D. Fabius, *De doodstraf,* Amsterdam, 1906. For the ancient enactments consult *Jurisprudentiæ anteiustinianæ,* ed. E. Huschke, 5th ed., Leipsic, 1886 (cf. Index under "Capite puniuntur"), and "The Institutes of Justinian," Book IV., title xviii., in Moyle's transl., 4th ed., pp. 205-207, Oxford, 1906; A. H. J. Greenidge, *Infamia; its Place in Roman Public and Private Law,* 1894.
CAPITO, WOLFGANG FABRICIUS Capito, Wolfgang Fabricius

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPITO, WOLFGANG FABRICIUS:** Reformer at Strasburg; b. at Hagenau) 16 m. n. of Strasburg) 1478; d. at Strasburg Nov., 1541. He was the son of a blacksmith named Koepfel, whence the Latin name *Capito*. Having passed the schools at Pforzheim and Ingolstadt, he studied at Freiburg first medicine, then law, and finally theology. In 1512 he became parish priest at Bruchsal and there made the acquaintance of Æcolampadius and Pellican. Called to Basel in 1515 as preacher and professor, he became intimate with the humanists, including Erasmus, and, abandoning scholasticism. betook himself to the study of the Bible. He published the Psalter in the original (1516), became personally acquainted with Zwingli and from 1518 corresponded with Luther. Contrary to all expectation, he was appointed in 1519 chaplain to Albert, elector and archbishop of Mainz. For a time he tried to mediate with humanistic liberality between the elector and Luther, but in 1522 he was brought over completely to the cause of the Reformation, and resigned his position at Mainz. In May, 1523, he went to Strasburg and as provost of St. Thomas (a position obtained by the favor of Leo X.) preached in accordance with his conviction. In 1524 he married and became pastor of the Jung-St. Petergemeinde. From this time on, he belonged, with Butzer and the burgomaster Jacob Sturm, to the leaders of the Strasburg Reformation. In his *Kinderbericht * (1527 and 1529) he prepared a catechism, which, by its peculiar arrangement and characteristic treatment of the matter, forms a noteworthy pendant to Luther's contemporaneous smaller catechism. With Butzer, Capito prepared the *Confessio Tetrapolitana * (1530). His most important reformatory work is the *Berner Synodus, * the result of the synod held at Bern in 1532, a kind of church-discipline and pastoral instruction, distinguished by apostolic power and unction, great simplicity, and practical wisdom. He took an active part in Butzer's efforts to bring together the Evangelicals of Germany, France, and Switzerland. He also had part in bringing about the Wittenberg Concordia of 1536. Toward the Anabaptists and other sectaries who disturbed the church at Strasburg he was more friendly and confiding than Butzer, and for a time sided with them, thus destroying the good understanding between himself and Butzer. But in 1534 he became convinced of the necessity of stricter measures against the Anabaptists. Characteristic of Capito were not only his mildness and large-heartedness, but also a certain timidity and uncertainty in his theological and ecclesiastical position. However, this was not due to diplomatic opportunism, but to a sincere repugnance to unfruitful theological controversy and a religious individuality which had more regard to the inner possession of the fruits of salvation than to a dogmatic definition of the doctrine of salvation. He died of the plague after having attended the Diet at Regensburg. PAUL GRÜNBERG. BIBLIOGRAPHY: J. W. Baum, *Capito and Butzer, * Elberfeld, 1860; *ADB* iii. 772-775; A. Baum, *Magistrat und Reformation in Strassburg bis 1529, * Strasburg, 1887; C. Gerbert, *Geschichte der Strassburger Sektenbewegung . . . 1524-1534,* ib. 1889; A. Ernst and J. Adam, *Katechetische Geschichte des Elsasses,* pp. 22-36, ib. 1897; S. M. Jackson, *Huldreich Zwingli, * passim, New York, 1903; J. Ficker, *Thesaurus Baumianus,* pp. 52-57, Strasburg, 1905; A. Hulshof, *Geschiedenis van de Doopsgezinden te Straatsburg van 1525 tot 1557, * Amsterdam, 1905.
CAPITULARIES Capitularies

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPITULARIES:** A term which designates a certain class of royal edicts in the Carolingian period, and which is frequently employed not only for the Carolingian *capitularia * but also for the *edicta, præceptiones, decreta, * or *decretiones * of the Merovingian kings and the mayors of the palace under Arnulf. They are distinguished from the other class of *diplomata * or *mandata, * not so much by the division into chapters, from which they get their name, or by the general nature of their provisions as by their form and by the absence of any attestation in the way of signatures or seal. This absence is explained by the fact that they were either put into execution by the kings in person or had to pass through the hands of officials. They attained their highest importance under Charlemagne, and were scarcely less used under Louis the Pious; after his death they ceased in the East Frankish kingdom, to be kept up for a while in the West Frankish and in Italy by his sons and grandsons, disappearing here also toward the end of the ninth century. They contain partly instructions for officials, especially the *missi dominici, * and partly supplements or modifications of the old tribal law; but to a still greater extent they are substantive regulations for all departments of both secular and ecclesiastical life. The former include the most diverse matters, of administration, commerce, the army, markets, coinage, tolls, protection against robbers, etc. These substantive regulations go deeply into not merely the external organization of the Church and its relation to the temporal power, but also the monastic system, education, church discipline, and even liturgical matters. The origin of the capitularies and the basis of their authority have been much discussed. The prevalent view, derived in the first instance from Boretius, distinguishes between *capitularia legibus addenda * and *per se scribenda, * which means practically a class of laws originating (like those specifically known as *leges*) in the assent of the whole people, and another class originating from the king alone, at most with the advice of the nobles assembled in a diet. But there seems to be no sufficient ground for this distinction between popular and royal law; in so far as there is any contrast between *leges* and *capitularia, * it may be fully explained by the special reverence which was felt for the ancient tribal law. In the cases in which the capitularies do not contain merely instructions to officials, they were less legislative enactments than promulgations of a law already existing. This law, so far as we can trace its origin, came into being with the assent of the temporal and spiritual lords, assembled in diets or synods. But the diet must not be conceived of as a representative assembly of the whole people; its decisions were held to be binding upon the individual by virtue of his allegiance to the sovereign, and the period of the capitularies is precisely that in which the oath of allegiance was most punctiliously required from all adults within the empire. The multiplication of capitularies led before long to the need of codification; for the collection made by Ansegis of Fontanella, see ANSEGIS, and for the forged capitularies appended to his collection by Benedictus Levita, see PSEUDO-ISIDORIAN DECRETALS. (SIEGFRIED RIETSCHEL.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: Critical editions of the *Capitularia regum Francorum, * ed. G. H. Pertz, are in *MGH, Legum,* i., ii., 1835, 1837; and, ed. A. Boretius and V. Krause, ib. *Leg., * sectio II. i., ii.,1883-97 (cf. A. Boretius, in *GGA, * 1882, pp. 65 sqq., 1884, pp. 713 sqq.). Consult: A. Boretius, *Die Kapitularien im Langobardenreich, * Halle, 1864; idem, *Beiträge sur Kapitularienkritik, * Leipsic, 1874; R. Sohm, *Die fränkische Reichs- und Gerichtsverfassung,* pp. 102 sqq., Weimar, 1871; Fustel de Coulanges, *De la confection des lois au temps des Carolingiens, in Revue historique,* iii. (1878) 3 sqq.; M. Thévenin, *Lex et capitula, * in *Mélanges de l'école des hautes études,* pp. 137 sqq., 1878; H. Brunner, *Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte,* i. 539 sqq., Leipsic, 1906; E. Glasson, *Histoire du droit et des institutions politiques et administratives de la France,* i. 281 sqq., Paris, 1890; G. Seeliger, *Die Kapitularien der Karolinger,* Munich, 1893; R. Schröder, *Lehrbuch der deutschen Rechtsgeschichte,* pp. 253 sqq., Leipsic, 1902.
CAPPADOCIA Cappadocia

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPPADOCIA,** cap"pa-do'shi-a. See ASIA MINOR IN THE APOSTOLIC TIME, XI.
CAPPEL (CAPPELLUS) Cappel (Cappellus)

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPPEL (CAPPELLUS):** A French family which produced many noteworthy statesmen and scholars between the fifteenth and seventeenth centuries, as well as three theologians, Louis Cappel the Elder, Jacques Cappel the Third, and Louis Cappel the Younger. **1. Louis Cappel the Elder:** Reformed theologian; b. at Paris Jan. 15, 1534; d. at Sédan Jan. 6, 1586. Despite the early death of his father, he received an excellent education, and in his twenty-second year went to Bordeaux to study law, but before long accepted a professorship of Greek. Becoming acquainted with certain of the Reformers, he was converted to their doctrines, and went to study theology at Geneva, where Calvin controlled the Church. Returning to Paris about 1560, he won the confidence of his coreligionists by his zeal for the interests of the Reformed, and was finally ordained pastor. He officiated successively at Meaux, Antwerp, and Clermont, but the constant outbreak of disturbances rendered any continuous activity impossible, and he was repeatedly obliged to retire to Sédan, where he was safe, since it lay in the duchy of Bouillon. In 1575 he was appointed professor of theology at the University of Leyden, but was recalled in the following year to France and made preacher and professor of theology at Sédan, holding these positions until his death. **2. Jacques Cappel the Third:** Nephew of the preceding; b. at Rennes Mar., 1570; d. at Sédan Sept. 7, 1624. After completing his theological education at Sédan, he went in 1593 to his ancestral estate le Tilloi, where he preached for several years. In 1599 he accepted a call to Sédan as professor of Hebrew, and eleven years later was appointed professor of theology. His learning, piety, and charity won him high esteem. Among his numerous works special mention may be made of his *Observationes in selecta Pentateuchi loca* (ed. J. Cappel, in his *Commentarii et notæ criticæ in Vetus Testamentum,* Amsterdam, 1689) and his *Historia sacra et exotica ab Adamo usque ad Augusti ortum* (Sédan,1612). **3. Louis Cappel the Younger:** Youngest brother of the preceding; b. at St. Élier (a village near Sédan) Oct. 15, 1585; d. at Saumur June 18, 1658. His father, Jacques Cappel the Younger, who had been a parliamentary counselor at Rennes, had been forced to resign on account of his conversion to the Reformed Church and had been driven by the adherents of the League from his estates of le Tilloi. During his flight to his brother Louis Cappel the Elder at Sédan, his son was born and named for his uncle. After his father's death in 1586, the boy was taken by his mother to le Tilloi, where he was educated by Roman Catholics until his brother Jacques Cappel took him from their charge. He then studied theology in Sédan, and in 1609 received from the church in Bordeaux the means to study four years in England, Belgium, and Germany. On his return he was appointed professor of Hebrew at Saumur, but in 1621 the war forced him to take refuge with his brother at Sédan, where he remained three years. In 1626 he became professor of theology, and through him, together with Moïse Amyraut and Josué de la Place, Saumur attained high fame. Of his five sons two died in early youth, the eldest, Jean, became a convert to the Roman Catholic Church, and the youngest, Jacques the Fourth, when eighteen years of age succeeded his father as professor of Hebrew at Saumur. Louis Cappel was a man of piety, sincerity, courage, energy, and learning. His life-work was devoted to the study of the history of the text of the Old Testament and the refutation of false views concerning it. His first book, *Arcanum punctationis revelatum,* was completed in 1623, and sought to prove that the Hebrew punctuation did not originate with Moses and the other Biblical authors, but had been introduced by Jewish scholars after the completion of the Babylonian Talmud. The novelty of the book is not its assertion, but its logical proof. The work was sent by its author to various scholars for their opinions, but while Buxtorf at Basel counseled caution, Erpenius at Leyden had it printed anonymously on his own responsibility in 1624. The book found a friendly reception in many quarters, but twenty years later Buxtorf's son attacked the author bitterly in his *Tractatus de punctorum origine * (Basel, 1648). Cappel replied with his *Vindiciæ arcani punctationis, * although it first appeared thirty years after his death in the *Commentarii et notæ criticæ in Vetus Testamentum* edited by his son, Jacques Cappel the Fourth (Amsterdam, 1689). His second famous work was the *Critica sacra * (Paris, 1650), based on the theory of the integrity of the text and completed in 1634, although it remained unprinted for many years on account of the opposition of the Protestants in Geneva, Leyden, and Sédan. The work is divided into six books with the following subjects: parallel passages in the Old Testament; citations from the Old Testament in the New; the various readings of the *keri * and *kethibh, *the manuscripts of the Oriental and Occidental Jews, printed Bibles, and the Masoretic and Samaritan texts of the Pentateuch; deviations in the Septuagint from the Masoretic text; variants in other ancient translations, the Talmud, and early Jewish writings; the choice of readings and the restoration of the original text. Cappel was obliged to meet repeated attacks. Even when his work first appeared, it contained a defense against the younger Buxtorf, who had learned the contents of the book before it was printed, and had combated it in the *Tractatus * already mentioned. Certain passages which had been omitted in the original edition against his will were added by Cappel in his *Epistola apologetica * (Saumur, 1651), another work in his own defense. A new edition of the *Critica* *sacra * was prepared by G. J. L. Vogel and J. G. Scharfenberg (3 vols., Halle, 1775-86). His third important writing was the *Diatriba de veris et antiquis Hebræorum literis * (Amsterdam, 1645), in which he proved the priority of the Samaritan script over the square characters and thus refuted the treatise of the younger Buxtorf, *De litterarum Hebraicarum genuina antiquitate * (1643). In these writings Cappel discussed problems which were of the utmost importance to the Protestants in their controversy with the Roman Catholics. Of his opponents the younger Buxtorf was the most important, and had practically all the theologians of Germany and Switzerland on his side, while many prominent scholars of France, England, and Holland defended the views of Cappel. The first sentences of the Helvetic Consensus Formula of 1675 are directed against Cappel, the greater number of the rest being aimed at Amyraut. In later times a fairer and calmer judgment prevailed concerning the investigations of Cappel, and his results are now generally accepted. A list of his printed and unprinted works is given by his son Jacques in the *Commentarii * noted above. Special mention may also be made of his *Templi Hierosolymitani delineatio triplex * and *Chronologia sacra * both contained in Walton's Polyglot), as well as of his *Historia apostolica illustrata * (Geneva, 1634). [His *Pivot de la foi et religion * (Saumur, 1643) was translated into English by P. Marinel (London, 1660).] CARL BERTHEAU. BIBLIOGRAPHY: Nicéron, *Mémoires, *vol. xxii.; *Biographie universelle,* vii. 75-80, Paris, 1813; I. A. Dorner, *Geschichte der protestantischen Theologie,* pp. 450 sqq., Munich, 1867, Eng. transl., Edinburgh, 1880; L. Diestel, *Geschichte des Alten Testaments in der christlichen Kirche,* pp. 336 sqq., 346 sqq., Jena, 1868; G. Schnedermann, *Die Controverse des L. Cappellus mit den Buxtorfen, * Leipsic, 1878; C. A. Briggs, *Study of Holy Scripture,* pp. 222 sqq., New York, 1899.
CAPREOLUS, JOHANNES Capreolus, Johannes

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPREOLUS, JOHANNES:** The most distinguished Thomist theologian of the fifteenth century; d. 1444. Little is known of his life. According to Quétif, he joined the Dominican order at Rodez. The subscriptions of the four books of his *Defensiones * (first printed in Venice, 1483), where he is described as of Toulouse, tell that he finished the first book in 1409 at Paris, where he was then lecturing, the others at Rodez in 1426, 1428, and 1433. So, at least, Quétif asserts; but an extant copy of the *editio princeps * assigns the composition of the first three books to 1409, and the fourth to 1432, no place given; and the second edition (Venice, 1514-15) gives 1409 for the first two, 1428 and 1432 for the others, all in Paris. The diversity renders all the dates uncertain; nor can we be sure of the date (Apr. 6, 1444) assigned to his death by an inscription on his tomb at Rodez, of evidently later composition. The Dominicans of Toulouse assert that he was for some time at the head of their *studium generale.* (A. HAUCK.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: J. Quétif and J. Échard, *Scriptores ordinis prædicatorum,* i. 795 sqq., Paris, 1719: K. Werner, *Der heilige Thomas von Aquino,* iii, 151 sqq., Regensburg, 1859.
CAPTIVITY OF THE JEWS Captivity of the Jews

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPTIVITY OF THE JEWS.** See ISRAEL, HISTORY OF, I, § 9.
CAPUCHINS Capuchins

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPUCHINS:** A branch of the order of Franciscans, founded in the third decade of the sixteenth century by Matteo di Bassi, an Observantine Franciscan. Repeated attempts had been made since the fourteenth century to restore the primitive strength and simplicity of the Franciscan rule, and one of these movements was concerned especially with the habit of the order. In connection with this attempted reform, Matteo was told by a brother monk that the cowl worn by St. Francis differed essentially from that adopted by his order. ### Early History. Matteo thereupon left his monastery of Montefalcone and hastened to Rome, where in 1526 he obtained permission from Clement VII. to wear a pyramidal hood and a beard, to live as a hermit, and to preach wheresoever he wished, on condition that he should report annually to the provincial chapter of the Observantines. Matteo's example was followed by his fellow Observantines Lodovico and Raffaelle di Fossombrone, both of whom received similar privileges from the pope; and the three, soon joined by a fourth, found a home with the Camaldolites and the duke of Camerino. Through the duke's influence, they were received among the Conventuals in 1527, whereupon Lodovico and Raffaelle returned to Rome and obtained from the pope the bull of May 18, 1528, by which they were permitted to preach repentance, have the care of souls, especially of abandoned sinners, and form a congregation with the privileges already granted them. They were freed, moreover, from the Observantines and placed under the control of the Conventuals, since their vicar-general must be confirmed by the general of the Conventuals, while they were to receive visitations from the Conventuals and were obliged in their processions to march under the cross either of the Conventuals or the parish clergy. The members of the new order speedily became conspicuous by their long beards and pointed hoods or capuches, whence they were termed Capuchins in ecclesiastical documents as early as 1536 ( *Capucini ordinis fratrum minorum * or *Fratres minores Capucini*). Their first monastery was given them by the duchess of Camerino, but by 1529 they possessed four houses and in the same year their first chapter was convened. At the same time the rules of the order were drawn up, and thenceforth remained essentially unchanged. ### Rule. The Capuchins were required to preserve the primitive service, to refuse all compensation for singing mass, to devote two hours daily to silent prayer, to observe silence throughout the day with the exception of two hours, to practise flagellation, to beg only what was necessary for each day, to provide only for three or at most seven days, and never to touch money. The use of meat and wine in strict moderation was allowed, but the friars were forbidden to beg for meat, eggs, or cheese, although they might accept them when they were offered. The habit was to be poor and coarse, and the brothers, who might ride neither on horseback nor in wagons, were required to go barefoot, sandals being allowed only in special cases. The monasteries, which were to contain at most ten or twelve friars each, were to be fitted in the most meager manner possible. In addition to the general, the Capuchins had provincials, custodians, and guardians, but no procurators or syndics. Elections were held annually, except in the case of the general, who was elected by the chapter triennially. ### Since the Reformation. The first vicar-general was Matteo di Bassi himself, but two months after his election in 1529 he resigned, and in 1537 returned to the Observantines. He was succeeded by Lodovico di Fossombrone, who failed of reelection in 1535 and was expelled for exciting dissatisfaction within the order. The next heads of the Capuchins were Giovanni de Fano and Bernardino Ochino. The defection of the latter to Protestantism in 1543 caused Paul III. to contemplate the dissolution of the order, and for a number of years the Capuchins were forbidden to preach. The result of Ochino's act was the transformation of the Capuchins into a rigidly ultramontane order which renounced all independent judgment in matters of faith and doctrine. After the middle of the sixteenth century the spread of the order was rapid. Originally restricted to Italy, it was established in France at the request of Charles IX. in 1573, and in 1593 entered Germany, after having already been implanted in Switzerland. In 1606 it was in Spain, and thirteen years later was freed from the Conventuals and received its own general, as well as the right to march in processions under its own cross. The Capuchins, who then had 1,500 monasteries and fifty provinces, followed the Spaniards and Portuguese across the sea, and toiled valiantly for the Church in America, Africa, and Asia beside their great rivals, the Jesuits. In the suppression of the monastic orders in France and Germany at the end of the eighteenth century, the Capuchins suffered severely, and had also to endure much south of the Pyrenees. In the nineteenth century, however, they again prospered, and at its close numbered fifty provinces with 534 monasteries and 294 hospices. The twenty-five Italian provinces are officially suppressed, but retain a limited existence. Of the other twenty-five, Germany contains two, Austria and Hungary seven Switzerland two, Belgium and Holland one each, France five, Great Britain three, Russia and Poland two, and the United States two, that of Detroit with sixty-eight fathers and that of Pittsburg with sixty-five. Capuchin nuns were founded at Naples in the first half of the sixteenth century, although, strictly speaking, they are a branch of the Clares. They now have a number of houses in France, Italy, Spain, and America, and are subject, when the nunnery contains the full number of thirty-three, to the jurisdiction of the general of the Capuchins, and in other cases to the bishop of the diocese in which they live. Capuchin scholars have been authors of works of edification, practical exegesis, moral theology, and sermons. Among their most famous preachers have been Ochino, John Forbes, St. Laurence of Brindisi, Jacques Bolduc, Conrad of Salzburg, and Martin of Cochem. Father Joseph, the confidant and adviser of Richelieu, and Father Matthew, the noted temperance lecturer, were Capuchins. (O. ZÖCKLER.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: Sources for the history are: Z. Boverius, *Annales . . . ordinis minorum sive Francisci qui Capucini nuncupantur, * vols. i.-ii., Leyden, 1632-39, vol. iii., by Marcellin de Pisa, 1676; Michael a Tugio, *Bullarium ordinis fratrum minorum . . . Capucinorum, * 7 vols., Rome, 1740-52; *Ordinationes et decisiones capitulorum generalium Capucinorum, * ib. 1851; *Analecta Capucinorum, * an annual, ib. 1884 sqq. Consult further: Heimbucher, *Orden und Kongregationen,* i. 279, 315-328, 359, 361-362; L. Wadding, *Annales Minorum, * 2d ed. by J. M. Fonseca, xvi. 207, 24 vols., Rome, 1731-1860; Helyot, *Ordres * *monastiques, vii. * 164-180; P. Lechner, *Leben der Heiligen . . . der Kapuziner, * 3 vols., Munich, 1863; A. M. Ilg, *Geist des . . . Franz von Assisi dargestellt in Lebensbildern aus der Geschichte des Kapuziner-Ordens, * Augsburg, 1876; K. Benrath, *B. Ochino, * passim, Leipsic, 1892; Currier, *Religious Orders,* pp. 244-248.
CAPUTIATI Caputiati

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAPUTIATI,** ca-pu'tî-a"tî ("hooded," "capuched"; also known as *Paciferi* and *Blancs Chaperons*): A society founded in 1183 at Puy-en Velay (Le Puy, 68 m. s.w. of Lyons) in the Auvergne by a poor artisan called Durand to oppose the fearful devastations caused by the mercenary and predatory bands of the "Brabancons" or "Cotereaux." Durand claimed that the Madonna had authorized him to do this; the members of the society were to wear a white dress with a capuche and a leaden image of the wonder-working Madonna of Puy. Organized after the manner of an ecclesiastical brotherhood, the Caputiati followed the royal troops and took bloody vengeance on the destroyers of peace. The society did not last long. Later reports, but little reliable, make its members rebels against State and Church, who, as is alleged, were routed about 1186 and condemned to do penance. Even in late times, from too implicit reliance on these reports, the Caputiati have been considered a sect opposed to the Church. HERMAN HAUPT. BIBLIOGRAPHY: A. Kluekhohn, *Geschichte des Gottesfriedens,* pp. 126 sqq., Leipsic, 1857; E. Sémichon, *La Paix et la trève de Dieu,* pp. 194, 390, Paris, 1857; L. Huberti, *Studien zur Rechtsgeschichte des Gottes-und Landfriedens,* i. 462 sqq., Ansbach, 1892; Legrand d'Aussy, in *Notices et extraits des manuscrits de la Bibliothèque Nationale, * tom, v., anno vii., pp. 290-293, Paris, 1798-99.
CARACCIOLI, GALEAZZO Caraccioli, Galeazzo

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARACCIOLI,** ca-ra'chî-o"lî, **GALEAZZO** (*Marchese di Vico*): Italian Protestant; b. at Naples 1517; d. at Geneva July 5, 1586. He was the most distinguished of the Italians who sought a refuge at Geneva when the reaction came over Italy; his mother was a sister of Pope Paul IV., he was in the royal service, and his wife was a Cáraffa. At Naples he became acquainted with Juan de Valdès and Peter Vermigli, who at that time preached there, and was deeply impressed by these reformatory men. The evangelical ideas which he imbibed at Naples and which caused him many struggles in his family and in society, were deepened by a journey to Germany in 1544. He found it impossible to make open profession at Naples; the efforts to introduce the Inquisition after the Spanish pattern were frustrated by the resistance of the people in 1547 bordering on a revolution; but, nevertheless, the vice-regent urged the suppression of every anti-Roman opinion. Caraccioli decided to forsake fatherland, position, and possessions rather than to continue as a hypocrite. Pretending to go to the imperial court at Augsburg, he left Italy, his wife refusing to follow him. He reached Geneva June 8, 1551, and joined the Italian community which was founded there in 1542. All efforts of his people to bring him back, renewed by Paul IV., after his accession in 1555, were in vain. Toward the end of 1555 he became a citizen of Geneva. He kept up correspondence with his wife and his son and in 1558 met them once more in a little isle of the Adriatic Sea and in the paternal castle at Vico; as they refused to follow him, in spite of his entreaties, he left them forever. The consistories of Geneva and other places declared his marriage dissolved, and in 1560 he married again. K. BENRATH. BIBLIOGRAPHY: His life was written by N. Balbani, *Historia della Vita di G. Caraccioli, * Geneva, 1587, republished, Florence, 1875.
CARAFFA, GIOVANNI PIETRO Caraffa, Giovanni Pietro

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARAFFA,** ca-raf'fa, **GIOVANNI PIETRO.** See PAUL IV., Pope.
CARCHEMISH Carchemish

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARCHEMISH,** car'che-mish (modern Jerabis): A city situated on the right bank of the Euphrates in the upper part of its course. In the cuneiform inscriptions the name denotes either a Hittite state or the capital of that state, which long maintained itself against the Assyrians. Its earlier identification with Circesium, at the confluence of the Chebar with the Euphrates, is obsolete. The earliest mention dates from Ammi-zaduga (about 2200 B.C.), which speaks of the weight (measure) of Carchemish, a mention which agrees with a later Assyrian note of the "Mina of Carchemish," and with the city's location on one of the most important routes of commerce. It appears first in Assyrian annals in the accounts of Tiglath-Pileser I. about 1110 B.C. The Hittite power was at that early date already breaking under the pressure of the northern immigrations then going on, and was completed later by the Aramean migrations. King Sangara paid tribute to Asshurnasirpal (about 880 B.C.), was worsted in a conflict with Shalmaneser II., and was compelled again to pay heavy tribute and to send his daughter to the Assyrian's harem. Its last king, Pisiris, was taken prisoner by Sargon II., 717 B.C., and under Sennacherib the region was made an Assyrian province. Near it was fought the battle between Nebuchadrezzar and Necho which decided the fate of western Asia. (A. JEREMIAS.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: G. Maspéro, *De Carchemis oppidi situ, *Leipsic, 1872; idem, *Struggle of the Nations,* pp. 144-145, London 1896; J. Menant, *Kar-Kamis, sa position, * an appendix to the Fr. transl. of A. H. Sayce's *Hittites, * Paris, 1891; W. M. Müller, *Asien und Europa nach altägyptischen Denkmälern,* p. 263, Leipsic, 1893; *DB, * i. 353; *EB,* i. 702-703.
CARDALE, JOHN BATE Cardale, John Bate

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARDALE, JOHN BATE:** Apostle of the Catholic Apostolic Church; b. in London Nov. 2, 1802; d. at Albury (26 m. s.w. of London), Surrey, July 18, 1877. After his schooling at Rugby he was admitted to the bar in 1822, became head of a London firm of solicitors, and retired with a competency in 1834. He had already become interested in the religious movement, originating in Scotland, known as the "Catholic Apostolic Church", whose distinguishing feature is its belief in the revival of the ministries and gifts seen in the apostolic age of the Church, especially of the ministries of apostles and prophets. Mr. Cardale was the first called of the twelve "apostles" of the Church, Henry Drummond being the second. This was in 1832, although it was not until July 14, 1835, when the number was completed, that the twelve were formally set apart to their work as an Apostolic College. Mr. Cardale was the author of a number of anonymous religious publications, the most noteworthy of which was *Readings upon the Liturgy, * London, vol. i., 1849-51, vol. ii., 1852-78. G. C. Boase, in the *Dictionary of National Biography, * says of him: "His strength of will, calmness and clearness of judgment, and kindness of heart and manner, added to the prestige of his long rule, made him a tower of strength. He was indefatigable in labour, of which he accomplished a vast amount; besides Latin and Greek, he was a good French and German scholar, and late in life learned Danish." SAMUEL J. ANDREWS. BIBLIOGRAPHY: *DNB, *ix. 38-38.
CARDINAL Cardinal

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARDINAL.** See CURIA, § 1.
CAREY, WILLIAM Carey, William

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAREY, WILLIAM:** Baptist missionary and Orientalist; b. at Paulerspury, Northamptonshire, Eng., Aug. 17, 1761; d. at Serampur, India, June 9, 1834. By baptism a member of the Established Church, he was early in life convinced of the Scriptural authority for the Baptist views, and joined this sect, in which he soon became a preacher. His congregations were very poor, and he supported himself and family by shoemaking. But his thirst for knowledge was strong; and he managed, notwithstanding the pressure of poverty, to acquire Latin, Greek, Hebrew, and a goodly amount of other useful learning, especially in natural history and botany. His attention was turned to the heathen, and he saw plainly his duty to go to them. On Oct. 2, 1792, largely through his exertions, the first Baptist missionary society was founded; and on June 13, 1793, he and his family sailed for India, accompanied by John Thomas, who had formerly lived in Bengal. On reaching Bengal early in 1794, Carey and his companion lost all their property in the Hugli; but, having received the charge of an indigo-factory at Malda, he cut off his pecuniary connection with the missionary society, and began in earnest what, instead of regular missionary labor, was to be the work of his life—the study of and translation both from and into the languages of India. In 1799 the factory was closed; and he went with Thomas to Kidderpur, where he had purchased a small indigo-plantation. Here, joined by Marshman and Ward, he started, under bright hopes a mission, but soon encountered the opposition of the Indian government, which forbade the mission's enlargement, and compelled its removal, at a great pecuniary loss, to Serampur, a Danish settlement (1800), where it took a fresh lease of life. For some time Carey and Thomas had been diligently at work upon a version of the New Testament in Bengali. In 1801 it was published by the press Carey instituted. About the same time the Marquis of Wellesley appointed him professor of Oriental languages in the Fort William College, which the marquis had founded at Calcutta for the instruction of the younger members of the British Indian civil service. Carey held this position for thirty years, and taught Bengali, Mahrati, and Sanskrit. He wrote articles upon the natural history and botany of India for the Asiatic Society, to which he was elected, 1805, and thus made practical application of acquisitions of former years; but this was only a part, and by far the less valuable part, of his work. That which has given him his undying fame was his translation of the Bible, in whole or in part, either alone or with others, into some twenty-six Indian languages. The Serampur press, under his direction, rendered the Bible accessible to more than three hundred million human beings. Besides, he prepared grammars and dictionaries of several tongues; e.g., *Mahratta Grammar, * 1805; *Sanscrit Grammar, * 1806; *Mahratta Dictionary, * 1810; *Bengalee Dictionary, * 1818; and a dictionary of all Sanskrit-derived languages, which unhappily was destroyed by a fire in the printing establishment in 1812. Later students have discovered errors and omissions in these works; but all honor is due to Carey for "breaking the way," and every inhabitant of India is his debtor. BIBLIOGRAPHY: John Taylor, *Biographical and Literary Notices of William Carey. Bibliographical Notices of Works *. . . , Northampton, 1886; J. C. Marshman. *Life and Times of Carey, Marshman and Ward,* 2 vols., London, 1859; J. Culross, *William Carey, * New York, 1882; George Smith, *Life of William Carey, * London, 1887; H. O. Dwight, H. A. Tupper, and E. M. Bliss, *Encyclopædia of Missions,* pp. 133-134, New York, 1904; *DNB,* ix. 77.
CARGILL, DONALD (DANIEL) Cargill, Donald (Daniel)

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARGILL, DONALD** (or **DANIEL**): One of the leaders of the Scotch Covenanters; b. in the parish of Rattray, Perthshire, 1619; beheaded at Edinburgh July 27, 1681. He was educated at Aberdeen and St. Andrews; and about 1650 he became pastor of the Barony Church, Glasgow. In 1661, when Episcopacy was established in Scotland, he refused to accept his charge from the archbishop, and was banished (1662) beyond the Tay; but he did not go; instead he became one of the "field preachers," who, deprived of their churches, preached in the open air. In 1679 he joined Cameron, Douglas, Hamilton, and others in the rebellion against prelacy, which arose out of the "Rutherglen Declaration" of May 29 of that year, and with his fellow Covenanters endured the defeat of Bothwell Bridge, June 22. He fled to Holland, but soon returned. The next year he and Cameron, with their adherents, drew up the "Sanquhar Declaration," June 22. The government set a price upon the leaders' heads. They were attacked at Ayrsmoss, July 22, and Cameron was slain; but Cargill succeeded to the leadership, and, as if to testify in the most signal manner his abhorrence of the tyrannical persecutors, he publicly excommunicated the king and several of the nobles at a field-preaching held at Torwood in Stirlingshire in September. When the Duke of York, one of the " excommunicated," came to Scotland, the persecution of the followers of Cargill increased. He himself was hunted from place to place; but on July 11, 1681, he was captured between Clydesdale and Lothian, and taken to Edinburgh for trial. He readily confessed that he had done what the council had called treason. The council were equally divided whether to imprison him for life or to execute him; but the vote of the Duke of Argyle decided in favor of the latter—a vote which cost Argyle, later on, the support of the Covenanters, to say nothing of deep remorse. Accordingly Cargill was put to death. See COVENANTERS. BIBLIOGRAPHY: *Biographia presbyteriana,* vol. ii., Edinburgh, 1827 (life of Cargill); R. Wodrow, *Hist. of the Sufferings of the Church of Scotland, * 2 vols., ib. 1721-22; T. McCrie, *Sketches of Scottish Church Hist., * ib. 1875; J. Cunningham, *Church Hist. of Scotland,* 2 vols., ib. 1883; *DNB,* ix. 79-80.
CARLILE, WILSON Carlile, Wilson

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARLILE, WILSON:** Church of England; founder of the Church Army; b. at Brixton (a suburb s.w. of London) Jan. 14, 1847. He was educated at Highbury College, London, but did not take a degree. He entered commercial life in 1862, but in 1878 matriculated at the London College of Divinity, and was ordered deacon in 1880 and ordained priest in the following year. He was curate of Kensington from 1880 to 1882, when he founded the Church Army in the Westminster slums, and in 1890 established the Social System of Church Army in Marylebone. He was also rector of Netteswell, Essex, in 1890-91, and since the latter year has been rector of St. Mary-at-Hill, Eastcheap, London. He was appointed a prebendary of St. Paul's Cathedral, London, in 1906, and has written: *The Church and Conversion * (London, 1882); *Spiritual Difficulties * (1885), and *The Continental Outcast* (in collaboration with V. W. Carlile; 1906).
CARLSTADT (KARLSTADT, CAROLSTADT), ANDREAS RUDOLF BODENSTEIN VON Carlstadt (Karlstadt, Carolstadt), Andreas Rudolf Bodenstein von

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARLSTADT,** carl'stat (**KARLSTADT, CAROLSTADT**), **ANDREAS RUDOLF BODENSTEIN VON:** Protestant Reformer; b. at Karlstadt (14 m. n.w. of Würzburg), Bavaria, c. 1480; d. at Basel Dec. 24, 1541. The assumption that he pursued his academical studies at foreign universities rests upon a confusion with his later journey to Rome. In the winter term of 1499-1500 he entered the University of Erfurt, where he remained until 1503, and then removed to Cologne. In 1504 he turned to the newly established University of Wittenberg, in which he acquired considerable fame as a teacher of philosophy. He was a zealous adherent of scholasticism, advocating the unconditional authority of Thomas Aquinas. ### Training and Life to 1518. By 1510 he had obtained all the higher academical degrees. In 1508 he received a canonry at the collegiate church in Wittenberg and in 1510 became archdeacon. As such he had to preach and read mass once a week and to lecture at the university. In 1515 he left Wittenberg, without the permission of the university and the elector, and went to Rome, where he studied law and took a degree, hoping to obtain the first prelacy at Wittenberg, for which legal training was necessary. He did not succeed, however, in obtaining the position after his return. His journey to Rome brought about a rupture with scholasticism. The evidence of the worldliness of the papacy which Carlstadt saw in Rome may have been the chief factor in the change of his religious views. His 151 theses of Sept., 1516, contain the fundamental traits of his later theology. He combats the scholastics and Aristotle (theses xxxvii., cxliii.), and even anticipates Luther, on the basis of Augustine, concerning the inability of the human will to attain unto God and in attributing the act of redemption exclusively to the work of divine grace. Thus no direct dependence of Carlstadt upon Luther can be assumed; each influenced the other after 1516, although a bond of personal friendship never united them. ### Deviates from Church Teachings. In the spring of 1518 Carlstadt published a comprehensive collection of theses, on the occasion of Eck's attack upon the ninety-five theses of Luther. Here he affirms for the Bible the most absolute authority as a source of religious knowledge and adheres to its literal interpretation. In June and July a disputation took place between Carlstadt and Eck, and although the former was always equal to the dialectic cleverness of his opponent, he became more and more conscious of the impossibility of reconciling his convictions with the ruling doctrine of the Church. He emphasized more and more the efficacy of divine grace alone in the redemption of humanity, and wrote polemical treatises against the church doctrine of justification by works and against indulgences. In 1521 he went to Denmark by invitation of King Christian II. and helped in the establishment of ecclesiastical laws, but after a few weeks in Copenhagen he had to give way before the united resistance of nobility and clergy. In June he was again at Wittenberg, where he expressed his views concerning the Lord's Supper in a treatise *Von den Empfahern Zeichen und Zusag des heiligen Sacraments. * In this treatise he still clings to the corporal presence of Christ in the sacrament, but looks upon it only as a sign of divine promise. In another treatise Carlstadt places beside the literal explanation of Scripture a spiritual interpretation which penetrates its deeper sense and rests upon divine interpretation. Here are to be found certain points of contact between the views of Carlstadt and those of the enthusiasts. ### The Reformation at Wittenberg, 1521-22. The attitude of Carlstadt in the Wittenberg disturbances and his doings there during Luther's stay at the Wartburg have frequently been represented in an erroneous light. When the Augustinians, in Oct., 1521, refused to hold mass and demanded the administration of the Lord's Supper in both kinds, the university appointed a commission of four theologians, among them Carlstadt, to investigate. Against the more decided attitude of Melanchthon, Carlstadt conceded that the abolition of the mass could only be accomplished with the consent of the magistracy. A letter, expressing the same spirit and signed by seven professors, was sent to the elector. As the excitement did not abate, Carlstadt tried to quiet the more strenuous by emphasizing the Gospel as the proper guide in all actions. Nevertheless, the disturbances continued until on Christmas day he administered the Lord's Supper in both kinds. His action was approved by all Evangelicals. From this moment he was silently acknowledged as the leader of the reformatory movement in Wittenberg. He did not stop with the reformation of the Lord's Supper. At the end of 1521 and at the beginning of 1522 auricular confession, the elevation of the host, and the injunctions concerning fasting were abolished. Jan. 19, 1522, Carlstadt married. On being informed of the events in Wittenberg, the so-called Zwickau prophets arrived (see ANABAPTISTS, II., § 1; ZWICKAU PROPHETS), but Carlstadt kept aloof; it was only at the end of 1522 that he began to correspond with Thomas Münzer. He proceeded in his reforms in entire conformity with the Council of Wittenberg, in which he saw the supreme authority in the ecclesiastical affairs of the city. He soon opened the battle against pictures in the churches, in which he was assisted by the council. Some small excesses occurred, which, however, were severely condemned by both the council and Carlstadt. These ecclesiastical changes had aroused the displeasure of Frederick the Wise, who was especially offended by the abolition of the mass. Carlstadt and Melanchthon were called to account. Melanchthon immediately showed himself submissive; Carlstadt also promised in Feb., 1522, to renounce further innovations after he had carried through the reforms which he deemed essential. But Frederick desired an entire rehabilitation of the Old Church usages. The course of events made it impossible for Luther to remain at the Wartburg. He did not agree with Carlstadt's radical measures, believing that forbearance ought to be shown toward the weak. After his arrival at Wittenberg, on Mar. 6, he succeeded in shaking the dominating position of Carlstadt and counteracting his reforms. The Lord's Supper *sub una specie * was restored, also the elevation of the host. Carlstadt remained as professor in the university, but lost all his influence. As he was thus deprived of the possibility of being active in a practical way, he devoted himself to speculative theology. His views were somewhat mystical, but, unlike the true mystics, Carlstadt was not satisfied with the contemplative rapture in the union of the soul with God, and set up ethical standards for the practical realization of his new convictions. In his desire to do away with all intermediary agencies in the religious communication between God and man, he denied the indelible character of orders and did not even acknowledge the ministry as a special profession. He called himself after 1523 "ein neuer Lai," put off his clerical robes, and lived for some time as a peasant in Segrena, near Wittenberg, with relatives of his wife. ### At Orlamünde, 1524. In 1524 Carlstadt became preacher in Orlamünde, where he carried on the reform of the church service as he had done two years before in Wittenberg. He expounded the book of Acts daily to his congregation, and on Sundays and holidays the Gospel of John. In the course of his development Carlstadt arrived at the conviction that baptism and the Lord's Supper are not sacraments. At the same time be strongly attacked the mass. Against Luther he wrote *Verstand des Worts Pauli Ich begeret ein Verbannter sein. * Without mentioning Luther's name, he shows the dangerous consequences to which the exaggeration of the principle concerning forbearance for the weak might lead. Apart from his controversial writings, Carlstadt emphasized the necessity of personal devotion and sanctification. ### Hardships of his Later Life. Carlstadt did not derive his political or social principles from his theological views. When Münzer's revolutionary measures in Allstädt became threatening, Carlstadt cautioned him, and he induced the people of Orlamünde to separate themselves formally from those of Allstädt. Nevertheless, the points of difference between Wittenberg and Orlamünde were so considerable that the university took active measures against Carlstadt. Luther met Carlstadt at Jena, in Aug., 1524, and thence proceeded to Orlamünde; he was not successful, however, in settling the difficulties. In September Carlstadt with his family, his adherents Martin Reinhard, preacher in Jena, and Gerhard Westerburg, his brother-in-law, were expelled from the territory of the elector. Carlstadt now encountered a time full of hardships and dangers, but he developed an extraordinary activity as a writer. The assumption of the corporal presence of Christ in the Lord's Supper is, according to him, in contradiction to the fundamental presuppositions of Christian doctrine. He found adherents to these ideas not only among the people, but many even in the clergy. In Oct., 1524, he sojourned at Strasburg, then lived temporarily in Heidelberg, Zurich, Basel, Schweinfurt, Kitzingen, and Nördlingen. He was active for a considerable time in Rothenburg-on-the-Tauber, where his sermons carried away the great majority of the citizens. It was at this time that the Peasants' War broke out in Rothenburg. Carlstadt was sent as envoy to the peasants, thus making himself unpopular among them. After the defeat of the South German peasants and the capture of Rothenburg by Margrave Casimir, Carlstadt escaped from the town with difficulty. The collapse of his hopes broke down his power of resistance. He wrote humbly to Luther to open the way for his return to Saxony. Luther took pity upon him, and Carlstadt returned to Wittenberg after he had recanted to some degree his doctrine concerning the Lord's Supper; but he had to pledge himself not to teach or preach. He lived at first in Segrena, after 1528 is Bergwitz, where he had to earn his living like a peasant. Before the close of the year he was reduced almost to poverty, and he removed to the little town of Kemberg and kept a small store. He soon retracted his former recantation and was compelled to flee. In Mar., 1529, he was with Melchior Hofmann, the Anabaptist, in Holstein. Being expelled hence also, he wandered with Hofmann to East Friesland, where he remained until the beginning of 1530 and gathered a great number of adherents. Thence he went to Switzerland, where he was kindly received by Zwingli, who secured for him a position as assistant preacher in Zurich. In Sept., 1531, he became preacher in Altstätten in the valley of the Rhine, but the unfortunate battle near Kappel (Oct. 11) compelled him after a few months to return to Zurich, where he lived in close union with the Reformers of that city. The preachers of Zurich took Carlstadt's part when Luther renewed his attacks. In 1534 he was called to Basel as preacher and professor in the university. Here he became involved in disputes with Myconius; the people took Carlstadt's part, but he estranged himself from his friends in Zurich. He fulfilled his last public task in 1536, when the government of Basel sent him with Grynæus to Strasburg to negotiate with the theologians of that city concerning a reconciliation with the Wittenberg theologians on the question of the Lord's Supper. He showed a very conciliatory spirit, which was not approved by the Swiss theologians. ### Writings. Carlstadt's earliest writings, *De intentionibus * (1507), *Distinctiones sive formalilates Thomistæ * (1508), were of a scholastic nature. His journey to Rome occasioned his treatise *Von päpstlicher Heiligkeit* (1520), in which he criticized the abuses of popery. In *De canonicis scripturis* (1520) he laid down the results of his investigations of the Old and the New Testament writings; he shows himself a free and independent critic, but does not shake the authority of the literal sense. In 1521 appeared *Von den Empfahern Zeichen und Zusag des heiligen Sacraments * and *Von Gelübden Unterrichtung;* in the latter treatise he advocated the abolition of monastic vows, especially the vow of celibacy. In Sept., 1521, appeared *De legis litera sive carne et spiritu; * here Carlstadt propounded for the first time an entirely new principle of interpretation which became of much importance in the further development of his theology—the spiritual interpretation of the words of Scripture. Against pictures in churches he wrote in 1522 *Von Abthuung der Bilder. * In 1524 he published *Priestertum und Opfer Christi. * After his expulsion from Saxony in 1524 appeared the most radical of his writings, *Ob man gemach faren soll, * in which he denies the corporeal presence of Christ in the Lord's Supper, and *Anzeig etlicher Hauptartikel christlicher Lehre, * which contains a comprehensive summary of his views. He combats the central position which the conception of sin had assumed in Luther's theology, as he understood it, and emphasizes the necessity that Christian liberty and justice must produce fruits in good works. (HERMANN BARGE.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: The authoritative biography is H. Barge, *Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt,* 2 vols., Leipsic, 1905. Among the older literature the following may be consulted: Mayer, *Dissertatio de Karolstadio, * Greifswald, 1703; Füsslin, *Lebensgeschichte des A. B. von Karlstadt, * Frankfort, 1776; J. F. Köhler, *Beiträge zur Ergänzung der deutschen Litteratur,* i. 1-162, ii. 239-269, 2 vols., Leipsic, 1792-94; M. Kirchhofer, *Oswald Myconius, * pp. 153, 316-343, Zurich, 1813. More modern treatment will be found in: A. W. Dieckhoff, *De Carolstadio Lutheranæ doctrinæ contra Eckium defensore,* Göttingen, 1850; idem, *Die evangelische Abendmahlslehre im Reformationszeitalter, * ib. 1854; Jáger, *A. B. von Karlstadt,* Stuttgart, 1856; G. P. Fisher, *The Reformation,* pp. 93, 113, New York, 1873; W. Walker, *The Reformation,* passim, ib. 1900; J. Köstlin, *Martin Luther,* passim, 2 vols., Berlin, 1903 (important); *Cambridge Modern History, * vol. ii., *The Reformation,* passim, ib. 1904; Moeller, *Christian Church,* vol. iii. passim, especially pp. 27-35; Schaff, *Christian Church,* vol. vi. passim. Consult also: G. Bauch, in *ZKG,* xi. (1890) 448 sqq. * (on Carlstadt's scholasticism); D. Schäfer, ib. xiii. (1892) 311 (on the De legis litera).
CARLSTADT, JOHANN Carlstadt, Johann

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARLSTADT, JOHANN.** See DRACONITES.
CARLYLE, THOMAS Carlyle, Thomas

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARLYLE, THOMAS:** Historian, biographer, and essayist; b. at Ecclefechan (60 m. s. of Edinburgh), Dumfriesshire, Scotland, Dec. 4, 1795; d. in London Feb. 5, 1881. ### Life and Writings. He was early noted for his extraordinary memory, and for his love of reading. He entered the University of Edinburgh in 1810, and distinguished himself as a mathematician, but declared that he owed nothing to the university but the miscellaneous reading afforded by its library. Having abandoned the study of theology, he taught mathematics in the high school at Annan for two years. In 1816 he was appointed rector of the Burgh School at Kirkcaldy. Here he devoted himself to the study of German, and translated Legendre's *Geometry, * adding an introductory essay on proportion. Carlyle removed to Edinburgh in 1818, where he supported himself by literary work, pursued a large and varied course of reading, and devoted much time to the study of German. From 1820 to 1823 he contributed a number of articles to the *Edinburgh Encyclopædia * and the *Edinburgh Review. * In 1824 he introduced Goethe to English readers by the translation of *Wilhelm Meister's Lehrjahre, * and in 1825 published the *Life of Schiller. * He married Jane Welsh in 1826, and removed in 1828 to Craigenputtoch, where he wrote his *Critical and Miscellaneous Essays, * and *Sartor Resartus, * a philosophic romance in the form of a treatise on dress, containing his views on the problems of religion and life; it was published during 1833-34, in *Fraser's Magazine.* In 1834 he removed to London, to the house in Cheyne Row, Chelsea, where he resided until his death. In 1837 appeared *The French Revolution, * the first of his works to which his name was formally attached. In the same year he began lecturing, and, during 1837-43, delivered courses on *German Literature, The Periods of European Culture, the Revolutions of Modern Europe, * and *Heroes and Hero-Worship, * besides publishing *Chartism, * a political treatise, and *Past and Present.* One of his most important works, *Oliver Cromwell's Letters and Speeches, * was issued in 1845, and produced a great revolution of sentiment in favor of Cromwell. In 1840 Carlyle inaugurated the movement which resulted in the London Library, of which he was afterward elected president. During 1848-50 he wrote a number of political and social treatises, notably *The Latter Day Pamphlets, * the ultimate and most violent expression of his political creed. The *Life of John Sterling, * especially valuable as a partial expression of his own religious views, appeared in 1851. His *magnum opus, The History of Frederick the Great, * was begun in 1858, and finished in 1865. It is a monument of patient industry and minute research, and contains a complete political history of the eighteenth century. In 1866 Carlyle was chosen rector of the University of Edinburgh, and delivered an inaugural on *The Choice of Books. * Mrs. Carlyle died during his absence on this occasion (Apr. 21). A few newspaper articles, with *Historical Sketches of the Early Kings of Norway, * and *The Portraits of John Knox, * marked the next five years, and completed his literary labors. Carlyle's life is marked by great unity of purpose and concentration of energy. He lived for literature. With his imaginative genius, his poetic insight, and his opulent diction, he was a poet by constitution; but his lack of the sense of form and proportion, and his impatience of measured expression, made him despise poetry. He is a preacher and a prophet rather than an artist. His keen sense of the grotesque, with the real depth of his nature, made him a humorist at once racy, subtle, and satirical; but this element developed itself disproportionately, and ran into cynicism as he grew older. ### Ethics and Philosophy. Notwithstanding the large admixture of ethics and philosophy in his writings, it is well-nigh impossible to define accurately his position as a philosopher, moralist, or religionist. Veracity is the basis of his ethical conceptions, by which he means the disposition to go behind appearances to facts, and the assertion of reality as against mere symbols and conventionalities. His hatred of shams is intense, and often leads him into needless roughness of speech. His ethical ideal is defective from its identification of physical and moral order, of might and right. It is too subjective, lodging the teat of right in each man's moral consciousness. Hence his fundamental fallacy, expounded in *Hero-Worship,* and applied in *Frederick* the reverence for strength, regardless of moral quality. He is a dangerous guide, therefore, as a historian and political philosopher. His conception of history as only the record of the world's great men is radically false. He has no sense of the popular power in the solution of political problems. The moral teaching of his histories is unsound in blinding the reader to vice through the admiration of greatness. The logical outcome of his political philosophy is slavery and despotism. As a historian he is distinguished by exact and laborious attention to detail. He studies folios and pasquinades alike; and no detail of topography, feature, or costume escapes him. His histories are a series of striking portraits or pictures. He stands committed to no philosophical system. With much talk about the real and practical, his philosophy is intuitional and sentimental, emphasizing feeling above reason. ### Religious Views. Theologically he can not be accurately placed. The *Life of Sterling* throws most light upon his religious views. He may fairly be regarded as a theist. He is mainly silent on the truth of creeds, always reverential toward Christ, and, while agreeing that Christianity is the supreme religion, denies that it embraces all truth. He seems to hold that responsibility to God is the essential truth foreshadowed in all religions, and that the essence of all religion is to keep conscience alive and shining. He believes in retribution as the natural outcome of wrong. He revered genuine piety, and his own moral life was singularly pure. As a critic he has great knowledge and keen discernment, but is too liable to be swayed by his personal prejudices. His earlier style, as in the essays on Burns and Scott, was natural, simple, dignified, and vigorous. His later style is figurative, abrupt, enigmatical, sometimes turgid and involved, inverted, declamatory, and at times coarse, yet withal often beautiful, rich, and powerful, and always picturesque. M. R. VINCENT. BIBLIOGRAPHY: *DNB,* ix. 127 appends to account of Carlyle's life a list of the uncollected writings as well as of his books. R. H. Shepherd has published a *Bibliography of Thomas Carlyle,* London, 1881, and in *Notes and Queries,* 6th series, iv. 145, 201, 226 are lists of articles referring to Carlyle. The authorities for Carlyle's life are his *Reminiscences,* ed. J. A. Froude, London, 1881; J. A. Froude, *Thomas Carlyle, a History of the First Forty Years of his Life,* 2 vols., 1882, and *History of his Life in London,* 2 vols., 1884; *Correspondence of Thomas Carlyle and Ralph Waldo Emerson,* ed. C. E. Norton, Boston, 1883; *Letters arid Memorials of Jane Welsh Carlyle, prepared . . . by Thomas Carlyle and edited by J. A. Froude,* 3 vols., London, 1883. For accounts of his life and estimates of his writings and activities consult: G. MacCrie, *The Religion of our Literature, Essays upon Thomas Carlyle,* London, 1875; M. D. Conway, *Thomas Carlyle,* ib 1881; E. D. Mead, *The Philosophy of Carlyle,* Boston, 1881; R. H. Shepherd, *Memoirs of the Life and Writings of Thomas Carlyle,* London, 1881; H. James, *Literary Remains, Some Personal Recollections of Carlyle,* Boston, 1884; D. Masson, *Carlyle personally and in his Writings,* London, 1885; A. S. Arnold, *The Story of Thomas Carlyle,* ib. 1888; E. Flügel, *T. Carlyles religiose und sittliche Entwicklung und Weltanschauung,* Leipsic, 1887, Eng. transl., London, 1891; J. M. Robertson, *Modern Humanists, Sociological Studies of Carlyle,* ib. 1891; David Wilson, *Mr. Froude and Carlyle,* New York, 1898; May Alden Ward, *Prophets of the Nineteenth Century,* Boston. 1900; J. M. Sloan, *The Carlyle Country,* Philadelphia, 1903; H. Paul, *Life of Froude,* London, 1905; *Illustrated Memorial Volume of the Carlyle's House Purchase Fund Committee, with Catalogue of Carlyle's Books, MSS., Pictures, and Furniture,* London, 1897.
CARLYLE, THOMAS Carlyle, Thomas

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARLYLE, THOMAS:** Apostle of the Catholic Apostolic Church; b. at King's Grange (90 m. s.w. of Edinburgh), Kirkcudbrightshire, Scotland, July 17, 1803; d. at Albury (26 m. s.w. of London) Jan. 28, 1855. After studying at Edinburgh University he was called to the Scottish bar in 1824. The same year by the death of a relative the dormant title of Baron Carlyle passed over to him. In 1831 he figured as legal counsel of the Rev. John McLeod Campbell in the famous Row heresy case. He believed that the revival in Scotland of the speaking in prophecy and tongues was a true work of the Spirit, and in Apr., 1835, was himself called to the apostolate. Thereupon he gave up his practise at the bar and settled with his wife at Albury, where was the seat of the Apostolic College, and the center of its work. He was much in Germany, and made the acquaintance of many theologians, among them H. W. J. Thiersch and C. J. T. Boehm. In 1845 he published at London *The Moral Phenomena of Germany, * which introduced him to King Frederick William IV. of Prussia. He wrote many pamphlets, among which may be mentioned *Pleadings with my Mother, the Church of Scotland * (1854). A volume of his collected writings was published in 1878. SAMUEL J. ANDREWS.
CARMEL Carmel

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARMEL:** The mountain in the west of Palestine which separates the Plain of Acre from the Plain of Sharon. I Kings xviii. 40-46 locates it near the Kishon and between the Mediterranean and Jezreel; Joshua xix. 26 and Jer. xlvi. 18 locate it as the southern boundary of Asher and as abutting on the sea. Jabal Karmal is the name it still bears, and it is also called "Mount of the Holy Elijah." In the Hebrew the name has the article, and means "wooded garden," setting forth the contrast between the greenness of Carmel and the bareness of the hills of central Palestine. This fact is often referred to in Scripture, the wooded Bashan, Lebanon, and Carmel being named together, though the bushy rather than forest growth of the last is sometimes noted. The mountain is wedge-shaped, with the edge toward the sea; the western extension turning toward the south runs approximately parallel to the coast, while the northern cliffs curve gently along the plain of the Kishon. Its stone is a gray limestone, and caves are numerous. It is about thirteen miles in length and eight and a half broad at its eastern end. It is marked off by the Wadi-al-Milh, emptying into the Kishon, and the Wadi-al-Matabin, which flows to the coast plain. The northern point is occupied by the convent of the Carmelites and a shelter provided for pilgrims. The situation affords an unobstructed view both of the coast to the south and of that to the north as far as Acre. There are at present only two villages on the mountain, both in the southern part and inhabited by Druses. In earlier times the mountain was more densely populated, as is shown by the remains of cisterns and oil- and wine-presses. In 1820 the Druses made seventeen settlements there, but in the Turco-Egyptian war all were destroyed but two. From its striking characteristics of position, form, and abundance of tree-growth, it is hardly to be wondered at that Carmel was a sacred place. I Kings xviii. connects this fact with the memory of Elijah. The site of the episode related there is given by tradition as El-Mahraka, "the Place of Burning," a terrace, 1,600 feet above the sea, where are a [Druse] chapel and some ruins. Beneath this on the bank of the Kishon is a little mound to which the name "Hill of the Priests" is given, pointed out as the place where the priests of Baal were slain. Tradition locates also the place where Elijah dwelt, in a valley, in which there is a spring known as Ain-al-Sih, about two miles south of the convent. The Mohammedans regard the place as sacred, and point out the site of Elijah's garden, where appear numbers of "Elijah's melons," geodes which characterize the Carmel formation. Near it the first monastery was built about 1200, replaced by a new one somewhat later, which was destroyed by Abdallah Pasha in 1821 that it might not be used as a fort by his enemies. It was reconstructed about 1828, and the church is built over an "Elijah-grotto"; that is, a cave in which Elijah is said to have lived. The Old Testament does not determine to which of the tribes Carmel belonged, whether to Asher, Zebulun, or Manasseh. At various times it was counted to Galilee and to Phenicia. Tacitus, asserts that "Carmel" was the name of a mountain and a deity, and Vespasian had the oracle there consulted. The coast at the foot of the mountain is about 100 yards wide, broadening north and south. At the foot of the bay of Akko there was an old city called Sycaminum by Greeks and Romans and Haifa in the Talmud, coins of which are known. The place was destroyed and the material used to build the present Haifa at the mouth of the Mahon, 1780, the growth of which in recent years has been quite rapid. (H. GUTHE.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: C. R. Conder and H. H. Kitchener, *Survey of Western Palestine, Memoirs,* i. 264 sqq., London, 1881; G. A. Smith, *Historical Geography of the Holy Land, * 337-340, 7th ed., London, 1897; E. Robinson, *Biblical Researches in Palestine,* iii. 189, Boston, 1841; A. Reland, *Palæstina, * 2 vols., Utrecht 1714; J. de S. Thérèse, *Le Sanctuaire du Mont Carmel depuis son origine jusqu'à nos jours, * Marseilles, 1876; T. Saunders, *Introduction to the Survey of Western Palestine. * London, 1881; *PEF, Quarterly Statements, * particularly for the years 1882-86; G. Ebers and H. Guthe, *Palästina in Bild und Wort,* ii. 106 sqq., 1884; C. R. Conder, *Tent-work in Palestine,* new ed., London, 1889.
CARMELITES Carmelites

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

### CARMELITES. Origin and Early History (§ 1). Habit and Scapular (§ 2). Reforms Within the Order (§ 3). Controversies with Other Orders (§ 4). Present Status (§ 5). 1. Origin and Early History. Carmelites *(Ordo fratrum Beatæ Virginis Mariæ de monte Carmelo) * is the name of a Roman Catholic order founded in the twelfth century by a certain Berthold (d. after 1185) on Mount Carmel, whence the order receives its name. Carmelite tradition traces the origin of the order to a community of hermits on Mount Carmel that succeeded the schools of the prophets in ancient Israel, although there are no certain records of monks on this mountain before the ninth decade of the twelfth century. Berthold, who had gone to Palestine from Calabria either as a pilgrim or as a crusader, chose Mount Carmel as the seat of his community because it was the traditional home of Elijah. It was but natural that this community of Eastern hermits in the Holy Land should gain constant accessions from pilgrims, and in 1209 they received a rule from the patriarch Albert of Jerusalem. This consisted of sixteen articles, which enjoined strict obedience to their prior, residence in individual cells, constancy in prayer, the hearing of mass every morning in the oratory of the community, poverty and toil, daily silence from vespers until terce the next morning, abstinence from all forms of meat except in cases of severe illness, and fasting from Holy Cross Day (Sept. 14) to Easter of the following year. This rule received the approval of Honorius III. in 1226. With the increasing cleavage between the West and the East, however, the Carmelites found it advisable to leave their original home, and in 1238 they settled in Cyprus and Sicily. In 1240 they were in England, and four years later in southern France, while by 1245 they were so numerous that they were able to hold their first general chapter at Aylesford, England, where Simon Stock, then eighty years of age, was chosen general. During his rule of twenty years the order prospered, especially by the establishment of a monastery at Paris by St. Louis in 1259. 2. Habit and Scapular. The original rule of the order was now changed to conform to that of the mendicant orders on the initiative of Simon Stock and at the command of Innocent IV. Their former habit of a mantle with black and white or brown and white stripes was discarded, and they wore the same habit as the Dominicans, except that the cloak was white. They also borrowed much from the Dominican and Franciscan rules. Their distinctive garment was a scapular of two strips of gray cloth, worn on the breast and back, and fastened at the shoulders. This, according to the traditions of the order, was given to Simon Stock by the Virgin herself, who descended from heaven and promised that all who wear it in this world, or at least in the hour of death, should be saved, she herself going each Saturday to purgatory to rescue those to whom this might apply. Thus arose a sodality of the scapular, which affiliated a large number of laymen with the Carmelites. The order speedily became infected with arrogance, however, contesting the invention of the rosary with the Dominicans, terming themselves the brothers of the Virgin, and asserting, on the basis of their traditional association with Elijah, that all the prophets of the Old Testament, as well as the Virgin and the Apostles, had been Carmelites. Their second general, Nicholas of Narbonne (1265-70), protested in vain, only to be deposed from his office. 3. Reforms Within the Order. In the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries the Carmelites, like other monastic orders, declined, and reform became imperative. Shortly before 1433 three monasteries in Valais, Tuscany, and Mantua were reformed by the preaching of Thomas Conecte of Rennes and formed the congregation of Mantua, which, was declared independent of the order by Eugenius IV. In 1431 or 1432 the same pope sanctioned certain modifications of the Carmelite rule, and in 1459 Pius II. left the regulation of fasts to the discretion of the general. Soreth, who was then general, and had already established the order of Carmelite nuns in 1452, accordingly sought to restore the primitive asceticism, but died of poison at Nantes in 1471. In 1476 a bull of Sixtus IV. founded the Carmelites of the Third Order, who received a special rule in 1635, which was amended in 1678. The sixteenth century saw a number of short-lived reforms, but it was not until the second half of the same century that a thorough reformation of the Carmelites was carried out by St. Theresa, who, together with St. John of the Cross, established the Discalced Carmelites. In conscious opposition to Protestantism the order was now inspired with an asceticism and a devotion hitherto unknown to it. In 1593 the Discalced Carmelites had their own general, and by 1600 they were so numerous that it became necessary to divide them into the two congregations of Spain and of Italy, or St. Elise, the latter including all provinces except Spain. Henceforth there were four Carmelite generals: the general of the Observantines, of the independent congregation of Mantua, and of the two congregations of the Diacalced Carmelites. 4. Controversies with Other Orders. By the middle of the seventeenth century the Carmelites had reached their zenith. At this period, however, they became involved in controversies with other orders, particularly with the Jesuits. The special objects of attack were the traditional origin of the Carmelites and the source of their scapular. The Sorbonne, represented by Jean Launoy, joined the Jesuits in their polemics against the Carmelites. Papebroch, the Bollandist editor of the *Acta Sanctorum*, was answered by the Carmelite Sebastian of St. Paul, who made such serious charges against the orthodoxy of his opponent's writings that the very existence of the Bollandists was threatened. The peril was averted, however, and in 1696 a decree of Rocaberti, archbishop of Valencia and inquisitor-general of the holy office, forbade all further controversies between the Carmelites and Jesuits. Two years later, on Nov. 20, 1698, Innocent XII. issued a brief which definitely ended the controversy on pain of excommunication, and placed all writings in violation of the brief upon the Index. 5. Present Status. The French Revolution and the sequestration of monasteries in southern Europe were heavy blows to the Carmelites. At the present time there are five provinces of Calced Carmelites (Rome, Malta, Iceland, England, and Galicia) and eight of Discalced (Rome, Genoa, Lombardy, Venice, Tuscany, Piedmont, Aquitaine, and Avignon), in addition to a number of isolated cloisters and priories of both Calced and Discalced Carmelites in various countries. (O. ZÖCKLER†.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: For sources consult: *ASB *for Mar. 6 and 29, and Apr. 8; D. Papebroch, *Responsio ad expositionem errorum per Sebastianum a S. Paulo evulgatam, * 3 vols., Antwerp, 1696-99; *Chroniques de l'ordre des Carmélites de la Réforme de Ste. Thérèse . . . en France, * 5 vols., Troyes, 1846-65, second series, 4 vols., Poitiers, 1888-89. Consult further: Heimbucher, *Orden und Kongregationen, * ii. 1-32; Helyot, *Ordres monastiques, *i. 282-399; H. E. Manning, *Life of St. Teresa, *London, 1865; H. J. Coleridge, *Life and Letters of St. Teresa, *3 vols., ib. 1881-88; F. H. Reusch, *Index der verbotenen Bücher, *ii. 267-276, 520-521, 691, Bonn, 1885; H. H. Koch, *Die Karmelitenklöster der niederdeutschen Provinz, *Freiburg, 1889; C. W. Currier, *Carmel in America, *Baltimore, 1890; idem. *Religious Orders, *pp. 284-304; L. A. le Moyne de la Borderie, *Histoire des Carmes en Bretagne, *Rennes, 1896; J. P. Rushe, *Carmel in Ireland: Narrative of the Irish Province of Carmelites, *London, 1897; B. Zimmermann, *Carmel in England. Hist. of the Eng. Mission of the Carmelites, 1615-1849, *London, 1899; *Life of St. John of the Cross, *transl. and ed. by David Lewis, London, 1897.
CARNESECCHI, PIETRO Carnesecchi, Pietro

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARNESECCHI**, car'nê-sêc"chî, **PIETRO.** See ITALY, THE REFORMATION IN.
CAROLINE BOOKS Caroline Books

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

### CAROLINE BOOKS Origin of the Caroline Books (§ 1). Manuscripts and Editions (§ 2). Problem of Authorship (§ 3). The Work Sent to Pope Adrian (§ 4). Relation of Original Work to Larger Recension (§5). Book I. (§ 6). Book II. (§ 7). Book III. (§ 8). Book IV. (§ 9). Characterization of the Caroline Books (§ 10). Importance of the Work (§ 11). Theological Standpoint (§ 12). Later Influence of the Caroline Books (§ 13). ### 1. Origin of the Caroline Books. "Caroline Books" is the name given to a criticism of the proceedings of the Second Council of Nicæa (787), which appeared under the name of Charlemagne toward the end of the eighth century. The acts of the council had been sent to Charlemagne in a very imperfect Latin version. Already displeased with the attitude of the Byzantine court and the equivocal policy of Pope Adrian I., he took occasion to have the whole question of the iconoclastic controversy and of the validity of the council's action discussed by his theologians, and sent on the report of its proceedings to King Offa in England, with a request for the opinion of his bishops. Alcuin, then in England, drew up their reply, and brought it to Charlemagne. It has been lost, and thus it is not now known in what relation it stands to the work which the emperor caused to be written about the same time (790 or soon after), and promulgated as having the assent of the bishops of his realm, under the title *Opus inlustrissimi et excellentissimi seu spectabilis viri Caroli, nutu Dei regis Francorum . . . contra Synodum, quæ in partibus Græciæ pro adorandis imaginibus stolide et arroganter gesta est. * ### 2. Manuscripts and Editions The work, whose contents and spirit are sufficiently indicated by this title, consists of four books containing 120 chapters. It is preserved in two manuscripts, the *Codex Parisinus* and the *Codex Vaticanus, * the latter somewhat defective and apparently dating from the beginning of the tenth century. Two more were known in the sixteenth century, but have since been lost. One was said then to be extant in Rome, and a chapter from it was quoted by Steuchi, the papal librarian, in a polemical work against Laurentius Valla. The other, then extant in France, was the basis of the *editio princeps *of 1549, printed probably in Paris and edited by Jean du Tillet, later bishop of St. Brieux and of Meaux. This edition, which the subsequent ones followed, was used by the Protestants (Flacius, Calvin, Chemnitz, and others) in their attacks on the Roman Catholic Church, and, therefore, put on the Index by the popes from 1564, which accounts for its rarity. Of the subsequent editions the best is that published by Heumann in 1731, which makes use of all the materials at his command and gives the introductions and notes of previous editors. The less perfect edition of Goldast (1608) is followed in *MPL*, xcviii. ### 3. Problem of Authorship. The authenticity of the work was denied by many of the older Roman Catholic theologians, such as Surius (who thought it a sixteenth-century forgery), Bellarmine, Suarez, Baronius, and as recently as 1860 by Floss of Bonn, who succeeded in convincing Baur that it was at least doubtful. But these doubts have long since been abandoned by Catholic theologians (the Jesuit Sirmond, Natalis Alexander, Du Pin, Hefele). The oldest external evidence in its favor is the letter of Adrian himself (printed by Mansi, Migne, and Jaffé); the next is that of Hincmar of Reims, who says he has seen the book in the imperial palace, and quotes a chapter (iv. 26) from it. If, however, the origin of the work from Charlemagne's immediate entourage and by his authority is indubitable, the question as to the actual author is still unsolved. This can not, of course, have been Charlemagne himself, though his name is used, but must have been one (if not more than one) of the most prominent theologians of his court. The majority of scholars are inclined to favor Alcuin; but there is some reason to think that it may have been Abbot Angilbert of St. Riquier, who stood in close relations to Charlemagne and was entrusted by him with negotiations at Rome regarding this controversy. ### 4. The Work Sent to Pope Adrian. The composition of the work was begun, as appears from the preface to the first book, not earlier than the winter of 789-790 and not later than the summer of 791. When it was completed is not now known, but Charlemagne was not likely to have granted his theologians more time than was necessary, so that it may have been finished in 790 or 791. It was intended to affect public opinion in favor of Charlemagne's rejection of the Nicene decrees. He endeavored to obtain like action from Pope Adrian, and sent Angilbert to Rome for this purpose. Adrian's answer referred to above discusses and controverts eighty-five chapters somewhat fully. The question arises whether Angilbert laid before him the whole work or only these chapters, and whether these eighty-five were the basis for a revised and enlarged edition, or a condensation of the larger work. A supplementary question also arises as to the date of Angilbert's mission, whether it was before or after the Synod of Frankfort in 794. The answer to the first question is determined by Adrian's assertion that he has answered each chapter *seriatim, * and by a similar assertion of the Council of Paris (825). Hincmar was probably in error when he said that the "not small volume" which he saw had been sent to Rome. ### 5. Relation of Original Work to Larger Recension. The second question involves more difficulty. The theory, recently supported by Hampe, that Adrian's answer led to the expansion of the original document into the present Caroline Books is invalidated by the fact that in their present shape they contain no reference to Adrian's answer, and make no attempt to rebut it. It is more likely that the eighty-five chapters consisted of extracts from the larger work. Adrian was asked to condemn certain propositions, not to confirm Charlemagne's official pronouncement. As to the date of this proceeding, it must have been before the Synod of Frankfort, whose decision was taken in the presence of papal legates and its validity never questioned, while the rejection of the eighty-five chapters would have been tantamount to a condemnation of it. Angilbert was in Rome in 792, and the occurrence probably took place then—possibly not till the next year. In consequence Charlemagne laid the matter before the synod. ### 6. Book I. We come now to the contents and character of the *Libri Carolini. * Each book has its own preface. That of Book I. begins with a rhetorical eulogy of the Church as the ark of safety, Charlemagne's duty to which leads him to take up this question. Pride and ambition have led the Eastern princes and bishops to introduce innovations into the true doctrine "by notorious and senseless synods." The Council of Constantinople (754) erred in one direction, by abolishing the pictures which had from of old served to adorn the churches and commemorate past events, referring what God had spoken of idols to images. The Nicene Council, on the other hand, three years before the date of writing, had erred not less, by exhorting the people to worship such images. Both perverted the teaching of the fathers, who allowed the possession of images, but forbade the worship of them. We, however, resting on the foundation of the Scriptures, the orthodox fathers, and the six ecumenical councils, reject all innovations, especially those of the Nicene Council, whose acts have reached us. We have undertaken to combat these errors with the assistance of the clergy of our kingdom. Neither of these councils deserves the name of ecumenical; and in contrast with both, the *via media *must be followed, which consists in neither breaking down the images nor worshiping them, but retaining them as ornaments and memorials, adoring God alone and rendering due veneration to the saints. The standpoint being thus set forth in the preface, the polemic of Book I. is directed first against the imperial summons to the Nicene Council, whose phraseology is condemned in four several points. The council itself is accused of erroneous exposition of the Scriptures and erroneous employment of patristic citations. The author thinks it necessary (i. 6) to express his acknowledgment of the authority of the Roman Church, both in faith and in worship, founded not on human ordinances but on divine prescription. The section i. 7-ii. 12 examines the passages of Scripture alleged by the council, and ii. 15-20 the patristic passages, some of which are not authentic and others inconclusive. ### 7. Book II. In ii. 26 the conclusion is drawn that, as the whole of Scripture proclaims in thunder-tones, "God alone is to be worshiped and adored," the "cultus of images" is altogether to be reprobated, as contrary to the Christian religion; whether or not pictures are retained in the churches is a matter of indifference, though, indeed, visible memorials of Christ and the saints are unnecessary. The friends of images (obviously including the pope) are warned not to disturb the peace of the Church and the prosperity of Charles's kingdom by their councils. The apostles never taught the veneration of images by word or example; it is an error to compare them with the ark of the covenant, and an absurdity to place them in the same category with the eucharistic host; nor must they be likened to the cross of Christ, the sacred vessels, or the Scriptures, all of which are venerated in their own way and measure for different reasons. ### 8. Book III. Book III. begins with a confession of faith, for the purpose of evincing the orthodoxy of the Frankish Church. This is supposed to be taken from Jerome, but is really almost verbally the profession of Pelagius (the *Libellus fidei ad Innocentium * of 417), which throughout the Middle Ages was received as orthodox, under the name of *Symbolum Hieronymi * or *Sermo Augustini. * The author then attacks the patriarch Tarasius on the ground of the irregularity of his consecration and the error of his teaching on the procession of the Holy Ghost. The latter reproach and that of further doctrinal aberrations are brought against the other members of the council, and one chapter attacks the impropriety of the empress Irene's assumption of the teaching office. A special onslaught is made on a proposition assumed to have been uttered by one of the bishops which clearly rests upon a gross mistranslation. A distinction is drawn between images and relics; and even if it is true that some of the former have worked miracles, no adoration is therefor due them. Still less can dreams and visions, or absurd apocryphal inventions, be adduced in favor of the "adoration of images." Not this, but the keeping of the divine precepts, is the beginning of the fear of the Lord. ### 9. Book IV. Book IV. continues the attack upon expressions of individual members of the council, and upon its authority as a whole. It can in no wise be compared with the First Nicene Council; that asserted the equality of the Son with the Father, while this places pictures on a level with the Trinity. Apart from all the unseemly, obscure, perverted, absurd, illogical, and untheological expressions to be found in the acts of the latter, it does not deserve the name of ecumenical given to it by the Greeks, because it neither utters the pure Catholic faith nor is recognized by all the churches. ### 10. Characterization of the Caroline Books. The Caroline Books, then, in their fundamental conceptions, attempt to preserve the golden mean indicated by Gregory the Great in his letter to Serenus of Massilia: "We approve unreservedly because you have forbidden to worship them [images]; but we do not approve of their being broken; if any one wants to make images, at least forbid him; but shun in every way the worshiping of them." But their polemic (apart from its vehement, almost passionate tone) does material injustice to the Nicene Fathers by ignoring their distinction between *latreia * [worship] which is due to God alone, and *proskunesis timetike;* [honoring obeisance] which may be given to creatures, and in ascribing to them the blasphemous proposition that the same "servitude of adoration" is due to the images as to the Holy Trinity. This is explained by the imperfection of the version of the acts sent to Charles, which always renders the Greek *proskunesis * by *adoratio,* and by a particular misunderstanding or wrong reading already referred to. ### 11. Importance of the Work. The work as a whole, however, may be taken as giving a good general view of Frankish and Anglo-Saxon theology in its day, of considerable importance for the dogmatic, exegetical, dialectic, and critical attainments of the age. Of special interest is the attitude assumed toward the great fundamental questions of medieval theology—the relations of Scripture and tradition, authority and reason, the Roman and the universal Church. In spite of all its recognition of the teaching authority of the Church, and particularly of the Roman Church, the work postulates the right of critical examination in a way seldom found in the Middle Ages—though it will not do to interpret this tendency in terms of modern views. ### 12. Theological Standpoint. The theological standpoint of the book as a whole is that of Gregory the Great, a somewhat weakened Augustinianism which allows the author to accept the profession of Pelagius as "the Confession of the Catholic Faith." He follows Gregory, as in the question of images, so also in the doctrines of original sin, of the replacing of the fallen angels by an equal number of redeemed men, of purgatory and prayers for the dead. Other patristic authorities cited are especially Augustine and Jerome, and sometimes Ambrose and Sedulius. The author attempts to show his universal culture by all sorts of grammatical, rhetorical, philosophical, historical, and literary remarks; by quotations from Plato and Aristotle, Vergil and Cicero, Macrobius and Apuleius, Cato and Josephus; and by the use of scientific terminology and logical formulas. The work, however, has not the character of a theological treatise written by a private person; it is a state document, an official protest on the part of the Frankish Church against Byzantine and Roman superstition and against the unjustified anathemas pronounced by both the Greek and the Roman Church on all who differed from them as well as on their own purer past. ### 13. Later Influence of the Caroline Books. The effect of this protest can not here be followed out in detail. Adrian was clearly much disturbed by it, and sent his defense to Charlemagne with many conciliatory expressions, declaring that he had not as yet given an answer to the Byzantine emperor, because the latter still persisted in his usurpation of what belonged to the Roman See, but that he must, following the ancient tradition of his predecessors, condemn those who refused to venerate the sacred images. Charles's answer was the Synod of Frankfort, the presence at which of the papal legates betokened Adrian's submission. The pope died on Christmas day, 795, and the question slumbered until it came up once more, under Louis the Pious and Eugenius II., at the Synod of Paris in 825. This synod adhered to the position of the *Libri Carolini * and the Synod of Frankfort, venturing openly to condemn Adrian for encouraging superstition, though unconsciously, in the cultus of images. It was mainly through the influence of the Caroline Books that the Frankish Church excluded this cultus all through the ninth century. Even in the tenth we find the Nicene Council spoken of as "The pseudo-synod falsely called the Seventh," and the principle adopted that pictures are tolerated in the churches "only for the instruction of the ignorant," without any attempt on the part of Rome to enforce its anathema. Charles and his theologians must thus have the credit of holding back for a time the influx of superstition into the West, while at the same time they asserted the rights of Christian art and its value for ecclesiastical decoration. When in the sixteenth century Tridentine Catholicism reaffirmed the proposition assailed in the Caroline Books, that veneration was paid not to the pictures but to their subjects ("honos refertur ad prototypa"), and on the other hand Swiss Protestantism, in its abhorrence of idolatry, renewed the tumults of iconoclasm, the Lutheran controversialists, especially Flacius and Chemnitz, with cheerful confidence "went back to the moderation of Charlemagne." (A. HAUCK.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: A luminous discussion is found in Hefele, *Conciliengeschichte,* iii. 695-717. Consult: H. J. Floss, *Commentatio de suspecta librorum Carolinorum fide,* Bonn, 1860; R. Baxmann, *Die Politik der Päpste,* i. 29 sqq., 297-299, Elberfeld, 1868; H. Reuter, *Geschichte der Aufklärung,* i. 11 sqq., Berlin, 1877; F. H. Reusch, *Index der verbotenen Bücher, * i. 255, Bonn, 1883; O. Leist, *Die litterarische Bewegung des Bilderstreits,* vol. i., Magdeburg, 1871; Neander, *Christian Church, * iii. 235-243 (still of great value, though supplementary reading is necessary); Schaff, *Christian Church, * iv. 467-468; Hauck, *KD* ii. 105, 110, 316 sqq.; *DCB,* i. 405-406; *KL,* vii. 190-196; and the literature on Charlemagne.
CARPENTER, J(OSEPH) ESTLIN Carpenter, J(oseph) Estlin

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARPENTER, J(OSEPH) ESTLIN:** English Unitarian; b. at Ripley (22 m. s.w. of London), Surrey, Oct. 5, 1844. He was educated at University College, London (1860-63), and Manchester New College (1860-66; B.A., University of London, 1863), and was successively minister of Oakfield Road Church, Clifton, Gloucestershire (1866-69), and Mill Hill Chapel, Leeds (1869-75). From 1875 to 1906, he was a lecturer on Hebrew, Old Testament literature, and comparative religion in Manchester New College, first in London, then at Oxford, where he was appointed principal in 1906. He has edited the third, fourth, and fifth volumes of Ewald's *History of Israel * (London, 1871-74), a portion of the *Sumangala Vilasini* (1886), and the *Digha Nikaya * (2 vols., 1890-1903; both in collaboration with Rhys Davids); and *The Hexateuch According to the Revised Version * (2 vols., 1900; in collaboration with G. Harford-Battersby); and has translated C. P. Tiele's *Geschiedenis van den Godsdienst tot aan de heerschappij der Wereldgodsdiensten * (Amsterdam, 1876) under the title *Outlines of the History of Religion * (London, 1878). His independent works include: *Life and Work of Mary Carpenter * (London, 1879); *Life in Palestine when Jesus Lived * (1889); *The First Three Gospels, Their Origin and Relations * (1890); *Composition of the Hexateuch * (1902); *The Bible in the Nineteenth Century * (1903); *Studies in Theology * (1903; in collaboration with P. H. Wicksteed); *The Place of Christianity Among the Religions of the World * (1904); and *James Martineau, Theologian and Teacher * (1905).
CARPENTER, LANT Carpenter, Lant

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARPENTER, LANT:** English Unitarian; b. at Kidderminster (15 m. s.w. of Birmingham), Worcestershire, Sept. 2, 1780; lost overboard from a steamer between Naples and Leghorn Apr. 5, 1840: He studied at Glasgow College 1798-1801; became a popular and successful school-teacher and preacher; was minister at Exeter 1805-17, and at Bristol 1817-39. He did much to broaden his denomination and to consolidate its scattered congregations; was a leader in philanthropic work; and was one of the most efficient of English schoolmasters. His publications were numerous, the most noteworthy being: *An Introduction to the Geography of the New Testament * (London, 1805); *Unitarianism the Doctrine of the Gospel * (1809; 3d ed., with alterations, Bristol, 1823); *Systematic Education, * in collaboration with William Shepherd and Jeremiah Joyce (2 vols., 1815); *An Examination of the Charges Made Against Unitarians by the Right Rev. Dr. Magee * (Bristol, 1820); *Principles of Education * (London, 1820); *A Harmony of the Gospels* (Bristol, 1835). After his death appeared a volume of *Sermons on Practical Subjects * (Bristol, 1840), edited by his son, Russell Lant Carpenter. BIBLIOGRAPHY: R. L. Carpenter, *Memoirs of the Life of Rev. Lant Carpenter, with Selections from his Correspondence, * Bristol, 1842; *DNB,* ix. 157-159.
CARPENTER, MARY Carpenter, Mary

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARPENTER, MARY:** Philanthropist; b. at Exeter, England, Apr. 3, 1807; d. at Bristol June 14, 1877. She was the eldest child of Lant Carpenter, and received an excellent education in her father's school; she taught for several years; became interested in reformatory movements in India through the visit to Bristol of the Rajah Rammohun Roy in 1833, and also in work for destitute children in England through the instrumentality of Joseph Tuckerman, of Boston. She opened "ragged schools" and developed and set in operation a plan for reformatory schools which was legalized by Parliament in 1854; she was also one of the chief promoters of the Industrial Schools Act passed in 1857. She visited India four times between 1866 and 1876, and came to America in 1873. Prison reform also received her attention, and she was earnest in advocacy of the higher education of women. She wrote much in behalf of her projects, and her reports and memorials to Parliament had no little influence in shaping legislation. BIBLIOGRAPHY: J. E. Carpenter, *Life and Work of Mary Carpenter, * London, 1879; *DNB,* ix. 159-161.
CARPENTER, WILLIAM BOYD Carpenter, William Boyd

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARPENTER, WILLIAM BOYD:** Church of England bishop of Ripon; b. at Liverpool Mar. 26, 1841. He was educated at St. Catherine's College, Cambridge (B.A., 1864), and was ordered deacon in 1864 and ordained priest in the following year. He was successively curate of All Saints', Maidstone, Kent (1864-66), of St. Paul's, Clapham (1866-67), and of Holy Trinity, Lee (1867-70). He was then vicar of St. James's, Holloway (1870-79), and of Christ Church, Lancaster Gate (1879-84). He was chaplain to the bishop of London from 1879 to 1884 and canon of Windsor from 1882 to 1884, while he was also honorary chaplain to Queen Victoria in 1879-83, and chaplain in ordinary in 1883-84. In 1884 he was consecrated the bishop of Ripon. He was select preacher at Cambridge in 1875 and 1877, and at Oxford in 1883-84, and was also Hulsean Lecturer at Cambridge in 1878, Bampton Lecturer at Oxford in 1887, Pastoral Lecturer on theology at Cambridge in 1895, and Noble Lecturer at Harvard University in 1904. He has been a clerk of the closet since 1903, and is also a knight of the Prussian Order of the Royal Crown. In addition to numerous volumes of sermons, he has written: *Thoughts on Prayer * (London, 1871); *Narcissus, a Tale of Early Christian Times * (1879); *The Witness of the Heart to Christ * (1879; the Hulsean Lectures for 1878); *District Visitor's Companion * (1881); *My Bible* (1884); *Nature and Man * (1888); *Permanent Elements of Religion * (Bampton Lectures for 1887, 1889); *The Burning Bush *(1893); *Twilight Dreams *(1893); *Lectures on Preaching *(1895); *Thoughts on Reunion * (1895); *Religious Spirit in the Poets* (1900); *Popular History of the Church of England * (1900); and *Witness to the Influence of Christ *(Noble Lectures for 1904; 1905). He likewise contributed the notes on Revelation in C. J. Ellicott's *New Testament Commentary *(London, 1879).
CARPOCRATES AND THE CARPOCRATIANS Carpocrates and the Carpocratians

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARPOCRATES,** car-pec'ra-tîz, **AND THE CARPOCRATIANS:** An Alexandrian Gnostic of the first half of the second century and the sect which he founded. His teachings rested upon a Platonic basis, and were interspersed with Christian ideas. According to Irenæus (*Hær.,* i. 25), supplemented here and there by Epiphanius (*Hær.,* xxvii.), he taught that in the beginning was the divine primitive source, "the father of all," "the one beginning " (Gk. *arche*). Angels, far removed from this source, have created the world. The world-builders have imprisoned in bodies the fallen souls, who originally worked with God, and now have to go through every form of life and every act to regain their freedom. To accomplish this a long series of transmigrations through the bodies is needed. The words of Jesus in Luke xii. 58 (Matt. v. 25) expressed this thought very clearly in Carpocrates's view; the "adversary" is the devil, who drags the souls to the highest of the world-builders; the latter delivers them to another angel, his messenger, to be incarcerated in bodies until they have paid the last farthing, i.e., have won freedom, and can rise to the highest God. During their transmigrations the souls have retained the power of remembering (Gk. *anamnesis*), though in different degree. The soul of Jesus, son of Joseph, possessed the power of remembering God in greatest purity. Therefore God bestowed upon him power to escape the world-builders and to despise the Jewish customs in which he was brought up. Whosoever thinks and acts like him obtains the same power; whosoever is still more perfect can reach higher. This is the faith and the love through which we are saved; everything else, essentially indifferent, is good or bad, godless or shameless only according to human conceptions; for by nature nothing is bad. This is the teaching which Jesus himself gave to his disciples, "privately in a mystery," ordering them to disseminate it among the faithful ("the worthy and believing"). The Carpocratians rendered divine honor to Jesus as to the other secular sages (Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle). They claimed for themselves the power of ruling the world-builders: magic arts, exorcism, philters and love-potions, dreams and cures were at their command, and like other secret societies they had a special mark of recognition, which they burned with a hot iron on the back of the lobe of the right ear. Later writers follow Irenæus. Clement alone adds new matter in some quotations from a Carpocratian manuscript. He says that Carpocrates had a son, Epiphanes, whose mother was Alexandria of Cephalonia; that this son became an author, died when seventeen years old, and was honored as a god at Same in Cephalonia. This story has been declared mythical (cf. Volkmar; in the *Monatsschrift des wissenschaftlichen Vereins in Zürich, * 1858, pp. 276-277; Lipsius, *Zur Quellenkritik des Epiphanius,* pp. 161-162, Leipsic, 1865), and it is maintained that traits of the moon-god worshiped at Same (Gk. *theos epiphanes*) were transferred to Epiphanes, the Gnostic. Though this suggestion is striking, there is hardly reason for making a myth of the entire statement of Clement, so much the more as he has filled out his account by a long extract from a work of Epiphanes "On Righteousness." In this work the young idealist advocated community of goods and women without the intention of preaching general immorality. Even Irenæus had written: "I can hardly believe that all the ungodly, unlawful, and forbidden things of which we read in their books are really done among them." One needs only to reflect how inconsistently highly endowed advocates of similar views think and act nowadays, though of course it must be admitted that such conceptions in earlier times might have caused in immature minds the same troubles as they do to-day. At all events, Carpocratianism can not be called Christianity. It is a specifically ethnic phenomenon, easily explicable from the religious syncretism of the second century. G. KRÜGER. BIBLIOGRAPHY: The sources are accessible in Eng. in *ANF,* i. 350, ii. 382-404, iii. 216, 651, v. 113; *NPNF,* i. 114, 179, 199. Consult also: C. W. F. Walch, *Historie der Ketzereien,* i. 302-335, Leipsic, 1762; A. Neander, *Genetische Entwickelung der vornehmsten gnostischen Systeme,* pp. 355-360, Berlin, 1818; idem, *Christian Church,* i. 292, 399, 449-451, 484; W. Möller, *Geschichte der Kosmologie,* pp. 335-343, Halle, 1860; A. Hilgenfeld, *Ketsergeschichte des Urchristentums, *pp. 397-408, Leipsic, 1884; Harnack, *Litteratur,* i. 161-162.
CARPZOV Carpzov

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARPZOV:** A family of German lawyers and theologians, of which the following are the most important members: **1. Benedikt Carpzov:** Lawyer; b. at Wittenberg May 27, 1595; d. at Leipsic Aug. 30, 1666. He was educated at Wittenberg, Leipsic, and Jena, and after a tour through Italy, France, and England became a member of the court of sheriffs at Leipsic, where he remained with little interruption for forty years. He was later appointed assessor of the supreme court in Leipsic and counselor of the Dresden court of appeals. In 1645 he was made professor in the faculty of law at Leipsic, and was for eight years a member of the privy council of Dresden, but returned to Leipsic in 1661. Although he had not a creative mind, his diligence, judgment, and system enabled him to become the founder of German jurisprudence, and in his *Practica nova imperialis Saxonica rerum criminalium * (Wittenberg, 1638) he formulated the first system of German criminal law, while his *Jurisprudentia ecclesiastica seu consistorialis * (Leipsic, 1649) formed the earliest complete system of Protestant ecclesiastical law. He distinguished carefully between ecclesiastical and canon law, and was the first to use the ordinances of the Evangelical Church, the rescripts of the sovereigns, and the decisions of the consistories, thus summarizing the legal development of Protestantism since the Reformation. **2. Johann Benedikt Carpzov the Elder:** Theologian, brother of the preceding; b. at Rochlitz (16 m. n.n.w. of Chemnitz) June 22, 1607; d. at Leipsic Oct. 22, 1657. He studied at the University of Wittenberg from 1623 to 1627, and then entered the University of Leipsic. In 1632 he was appointed pastor at Meuselwitz and five years later became deacon at the Church of St. Thomas at Leipsic. In ten years he rose to the archdeaconry and received the additional appointments of assessor of the consistory and canon, having become professor of theology at the university in 1641, although his pastoral duties allowed him little time for teaching. He maintained a certain reserve in the syncretistic controversies of the period, and though in harmony with his colleague Hülsemann, he carried on a friendly correspondence with Calixtus and later with his pupil Titius. His most important work, which has won him the title of the father of symbolics, was his *Isagoge in libros ecclesiarum Lutheranarum symbolicos * (Leipsic, 1665), which was completed after his death by Olearius, general superintendent of Magdeburg. Still more famous, however, is his *Hodegeticum brevibus aphorismis olim pro collegio concionatorio conceptum et nunc revisum * (1656), which gives 100 methods of arranging sermons. **3. Johann Benedikt Carpzov the Younger:** Theologian, son of the preceding; b. at Leipsic Apr. 24, 1639; d. there Mar. 23, 1699. He was educated in his native city and at Jena, and was also influenced by Buxtorf in Basel and by Johann Schmid in Strasburg. In 1659 be became privat-docent at Leipsic, and in 1665 was appointed professor of ethics. Three years later he was made licentiate of theology and professor of Oriental languages. In 1684 he became professor of theology, having already been made deacon in 1671, archdeacon in 1674, and pastor of St. Thomas's in 1679. His pastoral duties forbade extensive literary activity, and he therefore restricted himself to editing the works of others, such as the *Jus regium * of Wilhelm Schickhard (Leipsic, 1674), the *In Prophetas Minores commentarius * of Johann Tarnov (1688), the *Horæ Talmudicæ et Hebraicæ * of John Lightfoot (1674), and an enlarged edition of his father's *Hodegeticum * (1689). Through this last-named work an interest was aroused in homiletics which completely overshadowed philosophy and exegesis. There was gradually evolved, therefore, an antagonism between Carpzov and Spener, which increased in bitterness until in 1691 three programs assailed Pietism, and five years later Carpzov attacked Thomasius in his *De jure decidendi controrversias theologicas * (1696), vainly attempting to support a failing cause. **4. Samuel Benedikt Carpzov:** Theologian, son of Johann Benedikt the Elder; b. at Leipsic Jan. 17, 1647; d. at Dresden Aug. 31, 1707. After studying philosophy and philology at the university of his native city from 1663 to 1668, he went to Wittenberg, where he became a close friend of Calov and Aegidius Strauch. In 1674 he was called to Dresden as court-preacher, and five years later he was transferred to the *Kreuzkirche, * being also appointed superintendent and thus given the right to attend the sessions of the high consistory. He conducted the negotiations for the call of Spener, and proved himself a true friend of the Pietist until his brother at Leipsic became the leader of the opposition and persuaded him to change his attitude. After the retirement of Spener and the death of Green, Carpzov was chosen to succeed them, and he accepted with much hesitation, although he held the position for the remainder of his life. **5. Johann Gottlob Carpzov:** Theologian, son of the preceding; b. at Dresden Sept. 26, 1679; d. at Lübeck Apr. 7, 1767. He was educated at Leipsic and Altdorf, and though the most learned theologian of his family, was indoctrinated with reactionary principles by his father and uncle. In 1708 he went from Dresden to Leipsic as deacon. He ranked among the foremost of Old Testament scholars, although in the preface to his *Introductio in libros Veteris Testamenti * (Leipsic, 1721) he declared that only the entire absence of such a work had rendered it possible for him to publish his own. This book, like his *Critica sacra * (1728), is characterized by clear arrangement, deep knowledge, and thorough criticism. Equally valuable was his *Apparatus historico-criticus antiquitatum Veteris Testamenti * (1748). His chief attacks were reserved for R. Simon, Clericus, and Spinoza, as representatives of the new criticism, and his point of view was that of Buxtorf and Hottinger, so that he postulated the verbal inspiration of the text of the Bible, and admitted no error whatsoever. He was, moreover, a consistent opponent of Pietism and the Moravians, and gladly accepted a call as superintendent to the orthodox city of Lübeck in 1730, after having been obliged to decline a similar invitation to go to Danzig. There he continued his polemics against the Moravians, publishing in 1742 one of the sharpest of all attacks on them in his *Religionsuntersuchung der böhmischen und mährischen Brüder von Anbeginn ihrer Gemeinden bis auf gegenwärtige Zeiten.* **6. Johann Benedikt Carpzov:** Classical scholar and theologian, grandson of Johann Benedikt the Younger; b. at Leipsic May 20, 1720; d. at Königslutter (9 m. w.n.w. of Helmstädt) Apr. 18, 1803. He was educated at the university of his native city, where he was appointed associate professor in 1747, but was called in the following year as professor of Greek to Helmstädt, and in 1757 became abbot of Königslutter. Adhering to the orthodoxy of his family, he was commissioned by the duke to save the reputation of the university, endangered by the rationalism of Albrecht Teller, and he accordingly published his *Liber doctrinalis theologiæ purioris* (Brunswick, 1768). His philological learning was shown in his editions of the classics and in his *Sacræ exercitationes in epistolam ad Hebræos ex Philone Alexandrino * (Helmstädt, 1750); *Stricturæ theologicæ in epistolam S. Pauli ad Romanos * (1756); and *Epistolarum catholicarum septenarius * (Halle, 1790). His lectures, which he delivered in Latin, were devoted to classics, the New Testament, patristics, and Dolscius's Greek translation of the Augsburg Confession. (GEORG MUELLER.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: On the family consult: *ADB,* iv. 10-26; R. Stintzing, *Geschichte der deutschen Rechtswissenschaft,* i. 723, ii. 56, Munich, 1880. On Benedikt Carpsov consult: K. Ricker, *Die rechtliche Stellung der evangelischen Kirche Deutschlands,* pp. 218-220, Leipsic, 1893. On Johann the Elder consult: A. H. Kreysig, *Album der evangelisch-lutherischen Geistlichen in . . . Sachsen, * pp. 265-267, Dresden, 1883; T. Spizel, *Vetus academia Jesu Christi,* pp. 227-233, Augsburg, 1671. On Johann the Younger consult: H. Pipping, *Sacer decadum septenarius memoriam theologorum* . . . , pp. 763-784, Leipsic, 1705; K. Rieker, ut sup., pp. 220-222; A. H. Kreysig, ut sup., pp. 265, 277. On Samuel Benedikt consult: J. A. Gleich, *Annalium ecclesiasticorum,* ii. 522-550, Dresden, 1730; G. L. Zeissler, *Geschichte der sächsischen Oberhofprediger, * pp. 111-119, Leipsic, 1856. On Johann Gottlob consult: A. H. Kreysig, ut sup., pp. 108, 266; L. Diestel, *Geschichte des Alten Testaments in der christlichen Kirche,* p. 352, Jena, 1869. On Johann Benedikt consult: F. Koldewey, *Geschichte der klassischen Philologie, * pp.165-168, Brunswick, 1897 (gives further literature).
CARRANZA, BARTOLOMÉ Carranza, Bartolomé

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARRANZA,** car-ran'tha, **BARTOLOMÉ:** Archbishop of Toledo; b. at Miranda (175 m. n.e. of Madrid), Navarre, 1503; d. at Rome May 2, 1576. He entered the order of the Dominicans and from 1528 lectured on philosophy and scholastic theology at Alcala, afterward at Valladolid. Charles V. offered him the bishopric of Cuzco in Peru, but he declined. At the request of the emperor he took part in the deliberations of the Council of Trent after 1546, and insisted that the bishops should reside in their own dioceses. Strange to say, Carranza came into conflict with the Roman theologians because he asserted that the bishops had their rights *jure divino, * not by papal appointment. When the council was suspended he might have gone to Flanders as confessor of the infante Philip, but he declined this influential position to work in Spain as provincial of his order. He accompanied Philip to England (1554) when the latter was married to Mary Tudor, and shared in the persecution of the Protestants there. For this he was rewarded by Philip in 1557 and made archbishop of Toledo, which proved the culmination of his career. When Charles V. was dying (1558), Carranza gave him the sacrament. His opponents circulated the report that the emperor had not died in the faith of the Church and that this was owing to Carranza. The Inquisition had statements made by prisoners, which offered sufficient material to justify intervention, and his enemies, especially the inquisitor-general Valdez and Melchior Cano, called attention to his catechism (*Comentarios del reverendissimo Fray Bartolomé Carranza sobre el Catechismo Christiano, * Antwerp, 1558), which contained anything but Protestant doctrines, but deviated in some expressions from the Roman tradition. Carranza was imprisoned, his papers were confiscated, and some further material for charges was found. The examinations of Protestants in Valladolid which he held in 1558 and 1559 were especially scrutinized, and it was found that on the doctrine of justification and purgatory he had made oral statements which were not Catholic. In spite of his appeal to the pope, the Spanish Inquisition kept him in prison eight years and when he was transferred in 1567 to Rome at the behest of Pius V. be was kept there under examination nine years longer. The Roman process ended with a solemn abjuration of fourteen statements especially taken from his writings and with canonical punishment. He was suspended for five years and died in Rome without returning to Spain. The court of inquisition had overcome in his person the highest episcopal dignitary, but Gregory XIII. allowed a laudatory epitaph to be set up in Santa Maria sopra Minerva. K. BENRATH. BIBLIOGRAPHY: Carranza's most noted work, *Summa conciliorum et pontificum* (a church history to Julius III.), was published at Venice, 1546 and often. His life, by H. Laugwitz, *Bartholomeo Carranza, Erzbischof von Toledo,* was published at Kempten, 1870. Consult also: J. Quétif and J. Échard, *Scriptores ordinis Prædicatorum,* vol. ii., Paris, 1721; F. H. Reusch, *Der Index der verbotenen Bücher,* i. 254, 398, 588 et passim, Bonn, 1883; Moeller, *Christian Church,* iii. 317; H. C. Lea, *Inquisition in Spain,* ii. 45-87, iv. 15, 486, 502, New York, 1906.
CARRASCO, ANTONIO Carrasco, Antonio

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARRASCO,** car-ras'co, **ANTONIO:** Spanish Protestant; b. in Malaga. Jan. 19, 1843; lost with the steamer "Ville du Havre" Nov. 22, 1873, while returning home from the Sixth General Conference of the Evangelical Alliance held in New York Oct., 1873. He was converted at sixteen and joined a band of Bible-readers in Malaga connected with Manuel Matamoros; was imprisoned for two years (1860-62), and then condemned to the galleys for a term of nine years, but at the solicitation of the Evangelical Alliance, supported by representations of the Prussian government, the sentence was changed to banishment (1863). He studied theology in Geneva; on the downfall of Queen Isabella in 1868 he returned to Spain and undertook the work of evangelization; at the time of his death he was pastor of the Free Church in Madrid, with a membership of 700, and president of the Protestant Synod of Spain. BIBLIOGRAPHY: A brief sketch of his life may be found in the *History, etc., of the Sixth General Conference of the Evangelical Alliance,* p. 764, New York, 1874.
CARROLL, HENRY KING Carroll, Henry King

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARROLL, HENRY KING:** Methodist Episcopalian; b. at Dennisville, N. J., Nov. 15, 1848. He was self-taught, and early entered journalism, being successively editor of the *Havre Republican, * Havre, Md. (1868-69), and assistant editor of *The Methodist, * New York (1869-70), and of the *Hearth and Home, * New York (1870-71). From 1876 to 1898 he was religious and political editor of *The Independent, * New York, but resigned in the latter year to accept the appointment of special commissioner of President McKinley to Porto Rico. In 1881 he was a delegate to the Ecumenical Methodist Conference in London, and in 1884 was organizing secretary of the Methodist Centennial Conference, of which he edited the proceedings (New York, 1885), while in 1890 he was special commissioner of the United States census for religious denominations. In 1900 he was elected corresponding secretary of the Methodist Missionary Society, and was reelected four years later. He is a member of the Methodist Historical Society, a manager of the Methodist Sunday School Union and of the American Sabbath Observance Society, and a trustee of the United Society of Christian Endeavor. In theology he is in thorough accord with the doctrinal position of the Methodist Episcopal Church. In addition to a number of minor contributions, he has written: *Religious Forces of the United States * (New York, 1893, 2d and enlarged ed., 1895).
CARROLL, JOHN Carroll, John

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARROLL, JOHN:** First Roman Catholic bishop in the United States; b. at Upper Marlborough, Prince George's County, Md., Jan. 8, 1735; d. in Baltimore Dec. 3, 1815. He studied with the Jesuits at Bohemia, on the east shore of Maryland, and at the College of St. Omer, France; joined the Jesuits in 1753; was ordained priest in 1759; taught at St. Omer, Liége, and Bruges; traveled through Europe as tutor to the son of a Roman Catholic nobleman; returned to America in 1774 and became missionary and priest of his native region with headquarters at his mother's residence at Rock Creek, not far from Washington. Like his kinsman Charles Carroll of Carrollton, he warmly supported the cause of the colonies in the Revolutionary war. When the Roman Catholic Church in the United States was organized as a distinct body, free from the authority of the vicar apostolic of London, he was made prefect apostolic in 1784; in 1789 he was chosen bishop of Baltimore and consecrated in England in 1790; in 1808 he became archbishop. He founded Georgetown College in 1791. BIBLIOGRAPHY: John G. Shea gives *Carroll's Life and Times * in *History of the Catholic Church in the U. S.*, vol. ii., New York, 1888.
CARROLL, JOHN JOSEPH Carroll, John Joseph

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARROLL, JOHN JOSEPH:** American Roman Catholic; b. at Enniscrone, County Sligo, Ireland, June 24, 1856. He was educated at St. Michael's College, Toronto (B.A., 1876), and St. Joseph's Provincial Theological Seminary, Troy, N. Y., from which he was graduated in 1879. In the following year he was ordained priest, and was appointed assistant rector of the Cathedral of the Holy Name, Chicago, and since 1887 has been rector of St. Thomas Church in the same city. In 1898 he was elected chairman of Gaelic history in the Gaelic League of America, and in 1902 was chosen national librarian of the same organization. He has written: *Notes and Observations on the Aryan Race and Tongue * (Chicago, 1900); *Tale of the Wanderings of the Red Lance * (1902); and *Prechristian Occupation of Ireland by the Gaelic Aryans * (2 vols., 1903-06).
CARSON, ALEXANDER Carson, Alexander

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARSON, ALEXANDER:** Irish Baptist; b. at Annahone, near Stewartstown (30 m. w. of Belfast), County Tyrone, Ireland, 1776; d. at Belfast Aug. 24, 1844. He studied at Glasgow and was ordained a Presbyterian minister at Tobermore, near Coleraine, County Londonderry, 1798. After a few years he left the Presbyterians and published as justification of his action *Reasons for Separating from the General Synod of Ulster * (Edinburgh, 1804); a portion of his congregation followed him, and for ten years he preached in barns or the open air. A stone church was built for him in 1814. In the early part of his independent career, while studying the New Testament in order to confute the Baptists, he became a Baptist himself, and thenceforth advocated their views with the exception of close communion. His *Baptism in Its Mode and Subjects Considered * (Edinburgh, 1831; enlarged ed., 1844) is a Baptist classic. His other writings were numerous and treat topics of Bible interpretation, philosophy, doctrinal and practical theology, and the like. He was a bitter controversialist. His collected works were published in six volumes at Dublin, 1847-64. BIBLIOGRAPHY: G. C. Moore, *Life of Alexander Carson, * New York, 1851; John Douglas, *A Biographical Sketch of . . . A. Carson, * London, 1884; *DNB,* ix. 186.
CARSTARES, WILLIAM Carstares, William

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARSTARES, WILLIAM:** Scotch clergyman and political leader; b. at Cathcart (5 m. w.n.w. of Glasgow) Feb. 11, 1649; d. in Edinburgh Dec. 28, 1715. He studied at Edinburgh (graduated 1667) and at Utrecht, whither he went because of the political troubles at home, in which his father was implicated. Toward the close of 1674 he was arrested in London, being suspected of having a hand in the distribution of a seditious pamphlet and of being the bearer of despatches to the disaffected in Scotland from their sympathizers in Holland; he was kept in confinement till Aug., 1679. When released he entered actively into the plots which were then rife, and appears at different times in Ireland, England, Scotland, and Holland. After the discovery of the Rye House plot (a scheme to assassinate Charles II.) in July, 1683, he was caught in Kent, and was sent to Edinburgh and examined under torture before the Scottish Council, but displayed "great discretion" in the disclosures which he made. In 1686 or 1687 he settled at Leyden, and thenceforth was seldom separated from William of Orange, whom he had known from his student days in Utrecht and who trusted him implicitly and often took his advice, especially on Scotch affairs. After William became king of England, he made Carstares chaplain for Scotland, and the latter rendered valuable services both to his country and his king, especially in reconciling the Scotch Presbyterians to the new regime. His personal influence at court ceased with the death of William, and thenceforth he resided in Edinburgh, where he was made principal of the university in 1703; he also became minister of the Gray Friars' Church, and distinguished himself in both capacities. He retained his position as royal chaplain under Anne, and at the accession of George I. was chosen by the General Assembly to make the usual congratulatory speech. He was four times moderator of the General Assembly. BIBLIOGRAPHY: *State-Papers and Letters Addressed to William Carstares, * with life by J. M'Cormick, Edinburgh, 1774; R. H. Story, *William Carstares, a character and career of the revolutionary epoch, 1649-1715, * London, 1874; *DNB,* ix. 187-190.
CARTER, JAMES Carter, James

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARTER, JAMES:** American Presbyterian; b. in New York Oct. 1, 1853. He graduated at Columbia College in 1882, and at Union Theological Seminary in 1885. He was pastor at Williamsport, Pa., from 1889 till 1905, when he became professor of church history and sociology in Lincoln University, Pa. He has written the biography of his father, Walter Carter (New York, 1901), and two volumes of poems.
CARTER, THOMAS HENRY Carter, Thomas Henry

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARTER, THOMAS HENRY:** United Brethren; b. in Carroll Co., Tenn., Jan. 1, 1851; entered the ministry, 1869; elected bishop, 1905.
CARTESIANISM Cartesianism

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARTESIANISM.** See DESCARTES, RENÉ
CARTHAGE, SYNODS OF Carthage, Synods of

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

### CARTHAGE, SYNODS OF. Synods before and under Cyprian. Synods during the Donatist Controversy. Synods in Connection with the Pelagian Controversy. Concluding Synods. Carthage, the ancient rival of Rome, preserved a remnant of its former greatness in the commanding position assumed by its bishops, at least from the beginning of the third century, in the North-African Church. By right of their see, they were *ex officio* primates of their province, while this position in Numidia, and later in the other provinces of North Africa, went by seniority. But many bishops of these provinces paid great heed to the counsels of the bishop of the capital, at least in Cyprian's time, and even earlier than that had formed the habit of meeting there for conference. The decisions taken in regard to the controversies agitating the African Church, especially the Donatist and Pelagian, were of permanent and far-reaching importance for the development of theology. ### I. Synods before and under Cyprian: (1) That under Bishop Agrippinus (c. 220), to whose decision Cyprian appealed in the controversy about baptism by heretics. (2) That held c. 240 at Lambese in Numidia (or Carthage), which condemned the heretic Privatus. (3) The first under Cyprian after his return to Carthage, just after Easter, 251. After a long debate, it decided that the lapsed, especially those who had offered sacrifice, should be restored only on an extended penance, except in danger of death, while the *libellatici* (see LAPSED) might, provisionally at least, be at once received. It seems to have been customary at this time to hold an annual Easter synod; and at least one (4) is known in 252, to which probably the letter of Gyprian and sixty-six bishops to Fidus (*Epist.,* lxiv.) refers; here Privatus attempted to have his case reopened, but was refused and joined the opposition that set up Fortunatus as a rival bishop. (5) In 253, with reference to the new persecution under Gallus, the procedure in the case of the lapsed was modified, so that, if truly penitent, they might be at once restored (*Epist.,* lvii.). Subsequent synods dealt with baptism by heretics, concerning which the African bishops held strict views: (6) One attended by thirty-one bishops in 255 (*Epist.,* lxx.). (7) A more general one, of seventy-one bishops, from Numidia as well, in the spring of 256 (*(Epist.,* lxxiii.). (8) One of eighty-seven bishops, this time including the Mauritanians, in September of the same year. The views expressed in the last-named were controverted by Augustine, *De baptismo contra Donatistas,* vi., vii. ### II. Synods during the Donatist Controversy: (1) In 312, composed of seventy bishops, opponents of Cæcilian, who was excommunicated. (2) One of 270 Donatist bishops, about 330, which showed a conciliatory spirit, and sanctioned the admission of traditores to communion. The succeeding synods for some time are all on the Catholic side, and show a more or less severe attitude toward the Donatiats according to the position taken at the time by the schismatics. (3) The so-called "First Council of Carthage," between 345 and 348, attended by fifty bishops, at the close of a heavy persecution. This, like 8, 10, 11, 15, and 20, dealt only cursorily with the Donatist question, while 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 18, as far as we know, did not touch upon it at all. Under Bishop Genethlius of Carthage, who was much esteemed by the Donatists, took place (4) a synod in the "Prætorium," and a year later, or in 390, (5) the so-called "Second Council of Carthage," attended by sixty bishops. Under his successor, Aurelius, twenty synods are said to have been held, in the most important of which Augustine participated. In a general African council held at Hippo in 393 it was decided that the various provinces should take turns in holding such general gatherings; but this system was difficult of execution, since Mauritania and Tripolis were too distant, and the latter had only five episcopal sees. Among such general councils may be reckoned, besides that of Hippo which began the series, that of Hadrumetum, 394, those numbered here 3, 5, 8, 11, 12, 15, and 20, and that of Mileve, 402. In 407 it was decided to abandon the attempt and call them when and where it seemed expedient, while the provincial synods were to go on as before. (6) and (7) Two synods held respectively on June 26, 394, and June 26, 397, of which little is known. What is known as the *Breviarium canonum Hipponensium * corresponds substantially with (8) the *Carthaginiense III.* of the Spanish collection, Aug. 28, 397. The canons of 393 and 397, confirmed at Mileve in 402, give a comprehensive view of the church life of the time. The most famous is that containing the list of Scriptural books, and dealing with the reading of the martyrologies. The position of the presbyters in relation to the bishops is restricted, aggressions by bishops on neighboring dioceses reprobated, and the whole conduct of the clergy within the bounds of the Church regulated. In regard to the Donatist matter, a change is made, allowing clerics coming from the schism to exercise their function, under certain conditions, where formerly they had been relegated to lay communion. Legations from the court often appeared, as at (9) a synod of Apr. 27, 399, when the right of asylum in churches was considered. From 401 on more attention is paid to the Donatist controversy, at first in a conciliatory spirit; in that year two synods were held (10) on June 16 and (11) on Sept. 13, both of which occupied themselves also with the removal of the remains of paganism. (12) The general synod of Aug. 25, 403, laid down a formula to be accepted by the Donatists which only increased the bitterness, and the following synod (13) of June 16, 404, appealed to the emperor to repress the schismatics by legal measures. This was done, and the next synod (14), Aug. 23, 405, returned thanks to him. At the general synod (15) of June 13, 407, measures were adopted to facilitate the reception into the Church of entire schismatic communities; and, after the issue of an imperial decree which mitigated the former severity, both on (16) June 16 and (17) Oct. 13, 408, delegations were sent to impress the ecclesiastical view on the emperor. The only extant provision of (18) the provincial synod of June 15, 409, has no direct connection with the burning question; but after the issue of a decree of toleration, the next (19), on June 14, 410, sent another delegation to the emperor, and this time with success. (20) The synod of May 1, 418, is occupied again with the reception of Donatist communities and the duty of the conversion of heretics; while some of its provisions look forward to the next division. ### III. Synods in Connection with the Pelagian Controversy. For these see PELAGIUS, PELAGIANISM. ### IV. Concluding Synods: At the head of these comes the frequently cited synod of 419, attended by 217 bishops, which held two sessions, May 25 and 30 (designated in the *Hispana * as *Carthaginiense VI.* and *VII.*). It codified and to some extent shortened the preceding legislation. Part of its work dealt with the claims of the Roman See, based improperly on the decrees of the First Council of Nicæa. It drew up also a reply to a letter of Pope Boniface, who had laid four points before it—the question of appeals, the journeys of the African bishops to the imperial court, the right of excommunicated clerics to apply for restoration to neighboring bishops, and the conduct of the bishop of Sicca, in deposing a priest who had appealed to Rome. The council temporized on the first and third points, agreed to the restoration of the priest, though not in the same diocese. A still firmer tone was taken toward Rome by the synod which (after 422) wrote to pope Celestine in connection with the priest above mentioned, which showed that the ancient independence and conciliar spirit of the African Church were still unbroken. But with the invasion of the Vandals from the west, threatening Carthage in 439, the existence of the Church of North Africa drew to a close. In the face of such dangers as the persecutions of the Arian kings brought upon the Christians of those parts, minor differences disappeared. The conference on religion held in 484 did not give them much relief; but more was accomplished by the synod of Feb. 5, 525, in the reign of Hilderic, attended by sixty bishops from different provinces. After the annexation of North Africa by the Byzantine government, Bishop Reparatus held a synod of 217 bishops in 535; it dealt with Rome about the reception of converted Arians into the service of the Church, regulated the relation of monasteries to the bishops, and sent a deputation to Justinian to ask the restoration of property and privileges. Thenceforth the history of the North-African Church is merged in the general development of the state religion, and has no more separate importance before its final extinction by the Arabs. (EDGAR HENNECKE.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: For the canons of the synods consult: W. Beveridge, *Synodikon, sive pandectæ canonum. * Oxford, 1672 (includes the canons of the African synods); G. D. Fuchs, *Bibliothek der Kirchenversammlungen,* iii. 1-476, Leipsic, 1783. On the general question consult: F. Maassen, *Geschichte der Quellen und der Literatur des kanonischen Rechts,* i. 149 sqq., Graz, 1870; J. Lloyd, *The North African Church, * London, 1870; O. Ritschl, *Cyprian von Karthago,* pp. 153 sqq., Göttingen, 1885; Hefele, *Conciliengeschichte, * vols. i., ii. passim, Eng. transl., vols. i., ii. passim; the brothers Ballerini in Appendix to the *Opera *of Leo I., vol. i., chapp. iii., xxi.-xxix., Venice, 1757. Detailed treatment may be found in Neander, *Christian Church,* vols. i., ii. passim, consult *Index * under "Councils and Synods." Short discussions are also in Schaff, *Christian Church,* iii. 793, 798; Moeller, *Christian Church,* i. 263, 267, 332, 447, 452-453, 457; *DCA,* i. 36-39; and literature under DONATISM.
CARTHUSIANS Carthusians

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

### CARTHUSIANS. The Life of St. Bruno (§ 1). Foundation of Chartreuse (§ 2). Carthusians in Italy (§ 3). Growth of the Order (§ 4). Organization (§ 5). Scholarship (§ 6). The Carthusians are a Roman Catholic order founded by St. Bruno of Cologne at Grande Chartreuse (14 m. n. of Grenoble) in Dauphiné in the latter part of the eleventh century. The period was particularly favorable to the formation of new monastic orders. The monastery of Cluny inspired a tendency to the religious life throughout the surrounding regions, but this cloister, which had adopted the cenobitic monasticism of St. Benedict, gave no impetus to eremitic life. In the course of time, however, the longing for meditation in solitude peopled the wastes of Burgundy and Lorraine, apparently gaining inspiration from Italy by way of Dauphiné. To this period belonged Hugo, bishop of Grenoble (1080-1132), who had barely ascended the episcopal chair when he renounced it to bury himself in the monastery of Chaise-Dieu, whence he was recalled to his high office by the mandate of Gregory VII. In a like spirit two canons of St. Rufus in Dauphiné retired to the north of France, returning after some years with Bruno. ### 1. The Life of St. Bruno. He was born of noble parentage at Cologne before the middle of the eleventh century, and educated at the cathedral school of Reims. Successively canon of St. Cunibert at Cologne and scholastic of the cathedral of Reims, Bruno had held this latter office with distinction for some twenty years and had diligently inculcated the stern principles of Hildebrand and the monks of Cluny. Appointed chancellor of the archbishopric of Reims in 1075, Bruno relaxed his energies as a teacher to assail the simony of his own archbishop, Manasseh of Gourney (1067-80). After a long struggle, in which Bruno was seconded by the best element in his chapter, as well as by the neighboring clergy, Manasseh was deposed. His antagonist, however, had become disheartened with the condition of the Church. In equal despair regarding the theology to which he devoted himself, he resolved to abandon the world and live the life of a hermit. Where he met the two canons who were later to take him to the Chartreuse is uncertain, but at all events he retired with a few friends of like sympathies to Molesme in the diocese of Langres to live the life of an anchorite in the center of French asceticism. He there joined the adherents of Robert, then abbot of Molesme and later founder of the Cistercians, and with his permission established a small community of hermits in the neighboring Sêche-Fontaine. Feeling that this refuge was insufficiently sundered from the world, Bruno left all his followers but six in Sêche-Fontaine, pushed southward, and in 1084 reached Grenoble, where the little company was welcomed by Hugo, who had but recently resumed his episcopal office. ### 2. Foundation of Chartreuse. Partly through the influence of the abbot of Chaise-Dieu, Bruno and his companions received from Hugo the lofty and almost inaccessible valley of Cartusia as their place of refuge, and on June 24, 1084, they began the construction of the hermitage, originally consisting of three wretched huts, each to be occupied by two anchorites, and a chapel. At first the new community had no special rule, although they seem to have been influenced by the Italian Camaldolites in many respects. They were clad in white, and were bound to perpetual silence, to the observance of the monastic hours, to the most rigorous renunciation and mortification, and to the copying of books of devotion. After directing his little colony of hermits for six years, Bruno was summoned to Rome by Urban II., who had once been his pupil at Reims. Bruno obeyed with reluctance, but went accompanied by some of his monks, while others remained in their hermitage, although for some time they proved restive under the administration of Landuin, whom Bruno had placed at their head. In Rome the hermits found themselves longing for their mountain valley, and Bruno obtained permission for them to return, bearing letters of commendation from the pope to Hugo of Grenoble and Hugo, archbishop of Lyons. Bruno, however, remained in Rome, although he was neither energetic enough nor polemical enough to exercise an influence on Urban's rule of the Church. ### 3. Carthusians in Italy. He declined the proffered archbishopric of Reggio in Calabria, and shortly before the first crusade, apparently in 1091, he retired to the wild region of La Torre near Squillace in Calabria, where he gathered about him a number of hermits and formed a community like that at the Chartreuse. In 1097 Count Roger of Calabria gave him La Torre and Santo Stefano in Bosco, and two years later presented him with San Jacobo de Mentauro, so that he was able to establish two large cloisters for his order. He was buried in Santo Stefano in 1101, but the monastery, which then contained thirty monks, soon passed into the hands of the Cistercians, nor was it until 1137 that the Carthusian cloisters even reached the number of four, all situated in France. ### 4. Growth of the Order. After the middle of the twelfth century the order steadily increased, and in 1170 the Carthusians were deemed worthy of the special protection of the pope and were officially recognized by Alexander III. In 1258 the monasteries of the order numbered fifty-six, but in 1378 the Carthuaians were obliged to contend with a division corresponding to the papal schism and lasting until the Council of Pisa. The entire body of Carthusians recognized Martin V. as pope, and the two generals of the order resigned in favor of John of Greiffenberg, the prior of the Carthusian monastery of Paris, who thus became sole general. In 1420 Martin V, granted the order exemption from tithes for all its estates, and in 1508 Julius II. issued a bull enacting that the prior of the mother house should always be the general of the order, and that the annual chapters should be held there. Five years later the Calabrian monastery of Santo Stefano, where the founder of the order was buried, was restored to the Carthusians, and in 1514 Bruno was canonized. At the beginning of the eighteenth century the Carthusian monasteries numbered 170, of which seventy-five were in France. The Revolution struck the order a heavy blow, but it survived and in 1819 the mother house near Grenoble was again occupied. In 1905, in consequence of the legislation enacted in France concerning religious orders, the Grande Chartreuse of Grenoble as well as the other Carthusian monasteries was again vacated, and most of the monks retired to Spain. ### 5. Organization. The Carthusian spirit may be learned from its rule. Until 1130 the order had no special regulations, but in that year Guigo de Castro, the fifth prior of Chartreuse, prepared the *Consuetudines Cartusiæ.* In 1258 the resolutions of the chapters from 1141 were collected by Bernard de la Tour and designated *Statuta antiqua,* while additional collections were made in 1367, 1509, and 1581. The chief aim of them all was the most absolute detachment, not only from the world and all its attractions and interests, but even from the brother monks of the order and the monastery. The lay brothers, who are divided into the three classes of *conversi, donati,* and *redditi, * are sharply distinguished from the professed. Each monastery is strictly separated from the surrounding population and from all other orders, while every form of ecclesiastical and secular influence, whether active or passive, is carefully avoided. The faithful adherence of the Carthusians to their rule spared them the necessity of reform felt by many orders in the transition from the Middle Ages to modern times. The Carthusians now control twenty-six monasteries, and still retain their absolute retirement from the world. The order likewise includes Carthusian nuns, who are said to have existed as early as the twelfth century, although in the eighteenth only five nunneries were known, all dating from the thirteenth or fourteenth century. Over these convents Carthusian monks presided, who as vicars ranked above the prioresses and lived in separate houses with other professed and lay brothers. The nuns, who were first permitted to become professed by the Council of Trent in the sixteenth century, may eat together and converse more frequently than is allowed to the monks. ### 6. Scholarship. Although in scholarship the Carthusians can not rival the Benedictines, Dominicans, or Jesuits, they are not without their men of fame. From the pre-Reformation period mention may be made, in addition to the Guigo already noted, of such authors of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries as Ludolf of Saxony, Hendrik of Coesfeld, Gerhard of Schiedam, and Henry of Kalkar, as well as of Jacob of Jülterbogk and Dionysius of Rickel. Noteworthy names of later date are the hagiographers Lorenz Surius and H. Murer, and such historians of the order as Petræus, Le Vasseur, and Le Couteulx. In recent times, moreover, the order entered upon a revival of literary activity. (O. ZÖCKLER.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: Heimbucher, *Orden und Kongregationen, * i. 251-263; Le Vasseur, *Ephemerides ordinis Carthusiensis, * 2 vols., Montreuil, 1892 (a biography arranged by the calendar, goes only to July 31; the author died 1693); Helyot, *Ordres monastiques,* vii 366-405; *Magna Vita S. Hugonis, * ed. J. F. Dimock for *Rolls Series, * no. 37, London, 1864; F. A. Lefebure, *S. Bruno et l'ordre des Chartreux. * 2 vols., Paris, 1883; idem, *La Chartreuse de Nôtre-Dame-des-Pres à Neuville, * Neuville, 1890; C. Reichenlechner, *Der Karthauserorden in Deutschland, * Würzburg, 1885; C. le Couteulx, *Annales ordinis Cartusiensis,* 1084-1429, 2 vols., Montreuil, 1887-88; C. Boutrais, *The Monastery of the Grande Chartreuse, * London, 1893; *Vie de S. Bruno, * Montreuil, 1898; H. Löbbel, *Der Stifter des Karthäuserordens, . . . Bruno aus Köln, * Münster, 1899; Currier, *Religious Orders,* pp. 153-161. On the Eng. Carthusians consult: W. H. Brown, *Charterhouse, Past and Present; a Brief History, * London, 1876; W. D. Parish, *List of Carthusians, 1800-1879,* ib. 1880; T. Mozley, *Reminiscences of Towns, Villages, and Schools, * i. 376-436, ib. 1885; D. L. Hendriks, *London Charterhouse, Its Monks and Martyrs, * ib. 1889.
CARTWRIGHT, PETER Cartwright, Peter

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARTWRIGHT, PETER:** American Methodist; b. in Amherst County, Va., Sept. 1, 1785; d. near Pleasant Plains, Sangamon County, Ill., Sept. 25, 1872. His parents removed to Kentucky while he was a child, and there he was "converted" in 1801; he was licensed as an exhorter in 1802, and spent eight years in the old Western conference, four in the Kentucky, eight in the Tennessee, and forty-eight in the Illinois. He is said to have received more than 10,000 members into the Church, baptized more than 12,000 persons, and preached more than 15,000 sermons. He was known as the "backwoods preacher," and it is reported that when moral suasion proved ineffective with the rough characters with whom he had to deal he was able and willing to quiet them by physical force. He was once a member of the Illinois legislature and was defeated for Congress by Abraham Lincoln in 1846. BIBLIOGRAPHY: He wrote several tracts, an *Autobiography, * ed. W. P. Strickland, New York, 1856, and *Fifty Years a Presiding Elder, * ed. W. S. Hooper, Cincinnati, 1872.
CARTWRIGHT, THOMAS Cartwright, Thomas

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

### CARTWRIGHT, THOMAS. Leader of the Puritan Party (§ 1). Controversial Writings (§ 2). Minister in Antwerp (§ 3). Again in England (§ 4). Attitude Toward the Brownists (§ 5). ### 1. Leader of the Puritan Party. Thomas Cartwright, English Puritan and Presbyterian, was born in Hertfordshire 1535; d. at Warwick Dec. 27, 1603. He was matriculated as a sizar of Clare Hall, Nov., 1547, and as a scholar at St. John's College, Cambridge, Nov. 5, 1550. Being a Protestant and refusing to return to the Roman Church, he was debarred from the university during Mary's reign (1553-59). In 1560 he became a minor fellow of Trinity College, and on Apr. 6 of the same year a fellow of St. John's College; in Apr., 1562, a major fellow of Trinity College. In 1567 he took his bachelor's degree, and in 1569 was chosen Lady Margaret professor of divinity, and began to lecture on the Acts of the Apostles. His lectures were exceedingly popular, and made a profound impression in favor of his distinctively Puritan views, but created a storm of opposition from the Prelatical party, headed by Dr. Whitgift. This conflict, under these two great champions, continued to grow more and more severe, and was continued by their successors in two great parties in the Church of England—the Presbyterian and the Prelatical. The Puritan platform is well stated in the six propositions which Cartwright delivered under his own hand to the vice-chancellor, the grounds of his persecution by the Prelatists: 1. That the names and functions of archbishops and archdeacons ought to be abolished. 2. That the offices of the lawful ministers of the Church, viz., bishops and deacons, ought to be reduced to their apostolical institution: bishops to preach the word of God, and pray, and deacons to be employed in taking care of the poor. 3. That the government of the Church ought not to be entrusted to bishop's chancellors, or the officials of archdeacons; but every church ought to be governed by its own ministers and presbyters. 4. That ministers ought not to be at large, but every one should have the charge of a particular congregation. 5. That no man ought to solicit, or to stand as a candidate for the ministry. 6. That ministers ought not to be created by the sole authority of the bishop, but to be openly and fairly chosen by the people. ### 2. Controversial Writings. Having been deprived of his professorship Dec. 11, 1570, and of his fellowship at Trinity College in Sept. 1571, Cartwright went to the Continent, and in Geneva conferred with Beza and other chiefs of the Reformed Churches. He was prevailed upon by his friends to return in Nov., 1572. *An Admonition to Parliament for the Reformation of Church Discipline * had been issued by his friends John Field and Thomas Wilcox, for which they had been cast into prison. Cartwright espoused their cause, and issued *The Second Admonition,* with an Humble Petition to Both Houses of Parliament for Relief Against Subscription, 1572. Whitgift replied in *An Answere to a Certen Libell, Intituled An Admonition to the Parliament, * 1572. Cartwright rejoined in *A Replye to an Answere Made of M. Doctor Whitegifte Againste the Admonition to the Parliament, * 1573. This was a renewal of the old discussion on a larger scale, going to the roots of difference; Cartwright and the Puritans contending that the church government and the discipline, as well as the doctrine, must be reformed according to the Scriptures. The discussion took a wide range—as to the standard of church government, the choice of ministers, the offices of the Christian Church, clerical habits, bishops, archbishops, the authority of princes in matters ecclesiastical, confirmation, etc. Whitgift replied in *A Defense of the Ecclesiasticall Regiment in Englande Defaced by T. C. in his Replie againste D. Whitgifte, * 1574, and also *The Defense of the Answere to the Admonition, against the Replye of T. C.,* 1574, pp. 812, folio. ### 3. Minister in Antwerp. An order for Cartwright's apprehension was issued Dec. 11, 1574; but he fled to the Continent, and became minister of the English congregation of merchants at Antwerp and Middelburg. In 1576 he went to the isles of Jersey and Guernsey, aided the Puritans there in settling the discipline of their churches, later returning to Antwerp, where he preached for several years. While abroad, he wrote the *Second Replie of Thomas Cartwright Agaynst Maister Doctor Whitgiftes Second Answer Touching the Churche Discipline, * 1575, and also *The Rest of the Second Replie, * 1577. He, in 1574, prepared also a preface to the Latin work of William Travers, and translated it under the title *A Full and Plaine Declaration of Ecclesiasticall Discipline owt off the Word off God and off the Declininge off the Churche off England from the Same, * 1574, which still more embittered his foes. In 1583, at the solicitation of the Earl of Leicester, and Lord Treasurer Burleigh, and a large number of Puritan friends, he undertook to write a confutation of the Rhemish version of the Scriptures, which took him many years; but he was prevented by the ecclesiastical authorities of England from publishing his work. The year before his death, however, his *Answere to the Preface of the Rhemish Testament, * 1602, was issued; but the work itself, not until 1618, under the title *A Confutation of the Rhemists Translation, Glosses, and Annotations on the New Testament, so farre as they containe Manifest Impieties, Heresies, Idolatries, etc., * fol., pp. lviii., 761, xviii., Leyden. In 1584 he was invited to the divinity chair in St. Andrews, Scotland, but declined. ### 4. Again in England. In 1585 Cartwright returned to England without the royal permission, and was apprehended by Bishop Aylmer of London and cast into prison, where he remained from April until June, when he was released through the influence of his powerful friends, and the Earl of Leicester appointed him master of a hospital which he had founded at Warwick. His preaching was opposed by his enemies, but without success, until 1590. During this time he went over a great part of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes. The latter was published in 1604 under the title *Metaphrasis et homiliæ in librum Solomonis, qui inscribitur Ecclesiastes, * 4to; the former in 1617, *Commentarii succincti et delucidi in Proverbia Solomonis, * 4to. He is said to have been the first preacher in England who practised extempore prayer before sermon, although he usually employed forms of prayer. During this period the ecclesiastical conflicts waxed hotter and hotter. The Puritans had been making rapid progress. The first presbytery was organized at Wandsworth within the Church of England in 1572. Classes were rapidly organized in all parts of England, but secretly. In 1583 a rough draft of a book of discipline was drawn up by Thomas Cartwright and Walter Travers, and at an assembly held either at London or Cambridge it was resolved to put it in practise. It was revised at a national synod in London (1584), and referred to Mr. Travers "to be corrected and ordered by him." It was then passed around the various classes. It was adopted and subscribed by an assembly of all the classes of Warwickshire in 1588, and then by a provincial synod in Cambridge; and by 1590 the Directory had spread all over England, and was subscribed to by as many as 500 ministers. The episcopal party were greatly alarmed, and determined to arrest Cartwright with the other leaders and to destroy as large a number of copies of the *Holy Discipline * as possible. A few copies were, however, preserved, two copies in manuscript, one in the British Museum, another in Lambeth Palace, in Latin, entitled *Disciplina ecclesiæ sacra. * These were discussed and the Lambeth manuscript published by F. Paget in his *Introduction to the Fifth Book of Hooker's Treatise, * London, 1899, pp. 238 sqq. An edition in English with slight modifications was issued in 1644 by authority of the Long Parliament, entitled *A Directory of Church Government anciently contended for, and as farre as the Times would suffer, practised by the first Non-Conformists in the Daies of Queen Elizabeth. Found in the study of the most accomplished Divine, Mr. Thomas Cartwright, after his decease; and reserved to be published for such a time as this. * ### 5. Attitude Toward the Brownists. The discussion between the Presbyterians and the Prelatists was complicated by the Brownist party and the Marprelate tracts, which bitterly satirized the bishops. Cartwright took strong ground against the Brownists and their doctrine of separation, and opposed the Marprelate method of controversy; but it was the policy of the Prelatists to make the Puritans bear all the odium of the weaker and more obnoxious party. Manuscripts of Cartwright against the Brownists are preserved and lately published (see BROWNE, ROBERT). In May, 1590, he was summoned before the High Commission, and committed to the Fleet. He and his associates were confronted with thirty-one articles of charges, afterward increased to thirty-four, besides articles of inquiry. He was willing to reply to the charges, but refused to give testimony against his brethren. He was then summoned before the Star Chamber with Edmund Snape and others; but the case never reached an issue. Powerful friends worked in his behalf, and he was finally released from prison in 1592, on the promise of quiet and peaceable behavior, in broken health. From 1595 to 1598 he lived on the island of Guernsey, and afterward at Warwick. To a bitter attack, he wrote *A Brief Apologie of Thomas Cartwright against all such slaunderous Accusations as it pleaseth Mr. Sutcliffe in his Severall pamphlets most injuriously to load him with, etc., * 4to, pp. 28, 1596. In the main, the Presbyterian churches of Great Britain and America still stand by his principles. Other works besides those mentioned in their historical connections were published after Cartwright's death by his disciples: *A Catechisme, * 1611; *A Treatise of the Christian Religion, * 1611 (anonymous), 2d ed., 4to, 1616, edited by William Bradshaw; *A Commentary on the Epistle to the Colossians, * 1612; *Harmonia Evangelica, * Amsterdam, 4to, 1627; *Commentaria Practica in totam Historiam Evangelicam, * 1630, 3 vols., 4to. See also PURITANS, PURITANISM, § 7. C. A. BRIGGS. BIBLIOGRAPHY: C. H. and T. Cooper, *Athenæ Cantabrigienses,* ii. 360-366, London, 1861; B. Brook, *Lives of the Puritans, * ii. 138 sqq., 3 vols., ib. 1813; idem, *Memoir of the Life and Writings of Thomas Cartwright,* ib. 1845; F. L. Colvile, *Worthies of Warwickshire, * pp. 92-100, 878, ib. 1870; J. B. Mullinger, *History of the University of Cambridge, * ib. 1888; *DNB, * ix. 226-230.
CARUS, PAUL Carus, Paul

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARUS, PAUL:** Philosopher and student of comparative religion; b. at Ilsenburg (27 m. s.e. of Brunswick), Germany, July 18, 1852. He was educated at the universities of Tübingen, Greifswald, and Strasburg (Ph.D., Tübingen, 1876), and after teaching in two realgymnasia in Dresden and in the Royal Saxon Cadet Corps, he came to America in 1883, and since 1887 has been editor of *The Open Court, *Chicago, also editing *The Monist, *Chicago, since 1890. He has been secretary of the Religious Parliament Extension since its inception, and has shown an active interest in the knowledge and appreciation of ethnic religion by the West. He is also a member of the Leopoldina, Germany, the Press Club, Chicago, the American Oriental Society, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. In theology he holds that religion is to be purified by scientific criticism and ultimately to be based upon the facts of experience. He has written, in addition to a large number of minor articles and contributions: *Helgi und Sigrun, ein episches Gedicht der nordischen Sage * (Dresden, 1880); *Metaphysik in Wissenschaft, Ethik und Religion * (1881); *Algenor, eine epischlyrische Dichtung * (1882); *Gedichte * (1882); *Lieder eines Buddhisten * (1882); *Ursache, Grund und Zweck * (1883); *Aus dem Exil * (1884); *Monism and Meliorism * (New York, 1885); *Fundamental Problems * (Chicago, 1889); *The Ethical Problem * (1890); *The Soul of Man * (1891); *Homilies of Science * (1892); *Primer of Philosophy * (1893); *The Religion of Science * (1893); *Truth in Fiction * (1893); *The Gospel of Buddha, According to Old Records * (1894); *De rerum natura, philosophisches Gedicht * (1895); *Religion of Enlightenment * (1896); *Buddhism and its Christian Critics * (1897); *Chinese Philosophy * (1898); *Kant and Spencer: A Study of the Fallacies of Agnosticism * (1899); *Sacred Tunes for the Consecration of Life * (1899); *The Dawn of a New Era, and Other Essays On Religion * (1899); *Whence and Whither: An Inquiry into the Nature of the Soul, Its Origin and Its Destiny * (1900); *The History of the Devil and the Idea of Evil * (1900); *The Surd of Metaphysics * (1903); *Friedrich Schiller * (1905); *Magic Squares * (1906); and *The Rise of Man * (1906). His works of fiction include: *Karma: A Story of Early Buddhism * (Chicago, 1895); *Nirvana: A Story of Buddhist Psychology * (1897); *The Chief's Daughter: A Legend of Niagara * (1901); *The Crown of Thorns: A Story of the Time of Christ * (1901); and *Amitabha * (1906). He has also translated from Latin the *Eros and Psyche of Apuleius* (Chicago, 1900), and from German the *Xenions * of Goethe and Schiller (1896) and Kant's *Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics * (1902), while he has edited and translated the Chinese texts of Lâotse's *Tao-Teh-King * (Chicago, 1898), as well as the *Kan Ying P'ien * (1906) and the *Yin Chih Wen * (1906).
CARY, ALICE Cary, Alice

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARY, ALICE:** Poet and hymn-writer; b. on a farm 8 m. n. of Cincinnati Apr. 26, 1820; d. in New York Feb. 12, 1871. Her name is inseparably connected with that of her sister, Phoebe, b. Sept. 4, 1824; d. at Newport, R. I., July 31, 1871. Both began to write verses early and published jointly a volume of *Poems * in 1850. In 1850-51 they removed to New York, where they supported themselves by literary work and gathered a wide circle of friends. Alice was the more productive writer and published stories and novels as well as poems. *Ballads, Lyrics, and Hymns * (Boston, 1865) is her most important volume of verse. Phoebe published independently *Poems and Parodies * (1854) and *Poems of Faith, Hope, and Love * (1868); with Dr. Charles F. Deems she compiled *Hymns for all Christians * (1869). The poems of both sisters are collected in the "Household Edition" (Boston, 1882) and *Early and Late Poems * (1887). The most familiar of their hymns is Phoebe's "One sweetly solemn thought comes to me o'er and o'er." BIBLIOGRAPHY: Mary Clemmer Ames, *Memorial of Alice and Phoebe Cary, * New York, 1872; S. W. Duffield, *English Hymns, *pp. 447-449, ib. 1886; Julian, *Hymnology,* p. 214.
CARY, GEORGE LOVELL Cary, George Lovell

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARY, GEORGE LOVELL:** Unitarian; b. at Medway, Mass., May 10, 1830. He was educated at Harvard College (B.A., 1852), and was acting professor of Greek in Antioch College, Yellow Springs, O., in 1856-57, being appointed full professor of Greek and Latin in the following year and serving in this capacity until 1862. In the latter year he was made professor of New Testament language and literature in Meadville Theological School, where he remained until 1902, when he became professor emeritus. He was also acting president of the institution in 1890-91 and president in 1891-1902. His theological position is, in general, that of modern Unitarianism. He has written: *An Introduction to the Greek of the New Testament * (Andover, Mass., 1878) and *The Synoptic Gospels, Together with a Chapter on the Text-Criticism of the New Testament * (New York, 1900).
CARY, HENRY FRANCIS Cary, Henry Francis

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARY, HENRY FRANCIS:** Translator of Dante; b. at Gibraltar Dec. 6, 1772; d. in London Aug. 14, 1844. He studied at Christ Church, Oxford (M.A., 1796), took orders, and became vicar of Abbot's Bromley, Staffordshire. In 1800 he removed to Kingsbury, Warwickshire, and after 1807 lived in London. He was assistant keeper of printed books in the British Museum, 1826-37. His translation of Dante was begun in May, 1800, and finished twelve years later; the *Inferno * was published in 1805 and the completed work in 1814. It attracted little attention at first, but was commended by Coleridge in his lectures in 1818, and Southey afterward pronounced it "one of the most masterly productions in modern times." Four editions were issued during Cary's life, and it still remains the standard translation in English blank verse. BIBLIOGRAPHY: Henry Cary, *Memoir of Rev. H. F. Cary,* 2 vols., London, 1847; *DNB,* ix. 242-244.
CARYL, JOSEPH Caryl, Joseph

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CARYL, JOSEPH:** English Independent clergyman; b. in London 1602; d. there Mar. 10, 1673. He studied at Exeter College, Oxford, and became preacher at Lincoln's Inn; was appointed minister of St. Magnus' Church near London Bridge, 1645; ejected by the Act of Uniformity, 1662, but gathered a new congregation and continued to preach in the same neighborhood. He was a member of the Westminster Assembly and one of the triers for the approbation of ministers in 1653. He is remembered for his *Exposition with Practical Observations on the Book of Job* (12 vols., 4to, London, 1664-66; 2d ed., 2 vols., folio, 1676-77; abridged ed. by Berrie, Edinburgh, 1836).
CASALI DEL DRAGO, GIOVANNI BAPTISTA Casali del Drago, Giovanni Baptista

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASALI DEL DRAGO,** ca-sa'lî del dra'go, **GIOVANNI,** jo-van'nî, **BAPTISTA,** bap-tis'ta: Cardinal; b. at Rome Jan. 30, 1838. He was educated at the Roman Seminary, and was ordained to the priesthood in 1860. Six years later he was appointed chamberlain by Pope Pius IX., and was then canon successively of the Lateran (1867-71) and of St. Peter's (1871-78). In 1878 he became domestic prelate, and in 1895 Leo XIII. created him titular Latin patriarch of Constantinople. He received the cardinal's hat in 1899, being created cardinal priest with the title of Santa Maria della Vittoria.
CASAÑAS Y PAGÈS, SALVATORE Casañas y Pagès, Salvatore

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASAÑAS Y PAGÈS,** ca-sa'nyas î pa-Hêz, **SALVATORE,** sal"va-to'rê: Cardinal, b. at Barcelona, Spain, Sept. 5, 1834. He was educated in his native city, and in 1879 was consecrated titular bishop of Keramus and seven months later became bishop of Urgel. In 1901 he was translated to his present see of Barcelona, and in 1895 was created cardinal priest of Santi Quirico a Giulitta.
CASAS, BARTOLOME DE LAS Casas, Bartolome de Las

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASAS, BARTOLOME DE LAS**. See LAS CASAS
CASAUBON, ISAAC Casaubon, Isaac

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASAUBON,** ca-so'bon or, ca"zo"bon', **ISAAC:** Scholar; b. in Geneva Feb. 18, 1559; d. in London July 12, 1614. His father was a poor Huguenot preacher, who could give his son little education, nevertheless he came to be considered the most learned man in Europe after Joseph Scaliger. He was professor of Greek at Geneva, 1582-96, at Montpellier, 1596-99; in 1600 he went to Paris, where he might have been professor in the university if he had embraced Roman Catholicism; this, however, he refused to do, although he offended the rigid Calvinists by denying their extreme positions. He was given a pension by Henry IV. (1600), and in 1604 became sublibrarian of the royal library. In 1610 he went to England, where he was well received by King James and the Anglican bishops and was made prebendary of Canterbury and Westminster. His works belong for the most part to the field of classical scholarship, but he edited a Greek New Testament (Geneva, 1587), and published some minor pamphlets of theological interest; his criticism of the *Annales *of Baronius, begun at the request of King James, was left unfinished. His letters (in Latin), with life, were published by D'Almeloveen (Rotterdam, 1709); his diary, *Ephemerides, * ed. Russell, was printed at Oxford, 1850. BIBLIOGRAPHY: Mark Pattison, *Isaac Casaubon,* London, 1875, 2d ed., by Nettleship, 1892.
CASELIUS, JOHANNES Caselius, Johannes

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASELIUS,** ca-sê'li-Us, **JOHANNES,** yo-han'es: German scholar; b. at Göttingen 1533; d. at Helmstädt Apr. 9, 1613. He belonged to the Dutch family of Chessel, which during the Reformation period had emigrated on account of its faith. His father, Matthias Bracht von Chessel, found a refuge at Göttingen and became a teacher there. Johannes studied at Wittenberg under Melanchthon and at Leipsic under Joachim Camerarius. Under their guidance he became one of the most distinguished humanists of Germany; he was made a doctor of law at Pisa in 1566, and was ennobled in 1567 by the emperor Maximilian II. From 1563 to 1589 he labored at Rostock and then accepted a call to Helmstädt. He enjoyed there the favor of his prince, Duke Henry Julius of Brunswick, and the fame of his learning made him a kind of European celebrity. But the orthodox theologians in the university, who opposed Melanchthonianism, soon attacked Caselius. The leader of the orthodox was Professor Daniel Hoffmann, who considered all use of reason and philosophy in theology as dangerous, because the revealed truth is injured thereby. In this and similar tendencies Caselius saw the approach of a new barbarism, and he was not far wrong. He had the encouragement of a few bright pupils, including the young Georg Calixtus, and comforting messages came to him from friends abroad. But unfortunately his material circumstances became more and more wretched, and for this reason his life ended in discord and darkness. In the barbarism which came over Germany with the Thirty Years' War his numerous writings, distinguished by spirited contents and elegant form, were soon almost forgotten. As far as they are printed, they can only be found in larger libraries. They refer to Greek authors, ancient grammar, hermeneutics, and rhetoric, as well as to pedagogics and political science. Caselius was the first to separate political science from the Roman jurisprudence and raise it to a distinct discipline. PAUL TSCHACKERT. BIBLIOGRAPHY: For the letters consult: J. a Dransfeld, *Opus epistolicum I. Caselii,* Frankfort, 1887; *Commercium literarum clarorum virorum e museo R. A. Noltenii, * Bremen, 1737. See CALIXTUS. Consult: E. L. T. Henke, *Calixtus' Briefwechsel,* Halle, 1833; idem, *G. Calixtus und seine Zeit,* vol. i., Halle, 1856; *ADB,* iv. 40 sqq. F. Koldewey has projected a monograph on Caselius, for which he has access to the best sources.
CASPARI, CARL PAUL Caspari, Carl Paul

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASPARI,** cas'pa-rî, **CARL PAUL:** Norwegian Lutheran; b. at Dessau Feb. 8, 1814; d. at Christiania Apr. 11, 1892. He was of Jewish parentage and was brought up in the faith of his fathers. From 1834 to 1838 he studied at Leipsic, where he acquired a knowledge of Arabic and Persian under Fleischer. Partly from the influence of fellow students, among whom was Franz Delitzsch, he adopted Christianity and was baptized in 1838. His Jewish training naturally fitted him for work in Old Testament exegesis, and he spent two years at Berlin under Hengstenberg. In 1842 he became doctor of philosophy at Leipsic, and in 1847 he accepted a call to Christiania, where he remained from choice the rest of his life, declining calls to Rostock in 1850, to Dorpat in 1856, and to Erlangen in 1857 and again in 1867. His linguistic ability enabled him speedily to master the Norwegian language, so that he could begin lectures in less than a year. He was made full professor in 1857. In his university work Caspari interpreted various books of the Old and New Testaments and treated Old Testament introduction. His lectures were inspiring, thorough, earnest, and bore evidence of a living Christian faith. In his exegesis and apologetics he followed Hengstenberg, and he remained to the end an opponent of modern critical scholarship. But his work and interest were not confined to the Old Testament field. In 1825 a Danish preacher, Nicolai Frederik Severin Grundtvig, propounded peculiar views, viz., that the baptismal formula, the renunciation, the Lord's Prayer, and the words of the Lord's Supper come directly from the Lord, have never been changed, and therefore stand above the Scriptures. The view found adherents in Denmark and Norway, and fear was felt that the formal principle of the Lutheran Church was in danger. Caspari undertook a careful investigation of the questions connected with the baptismal formula, and its history and thus was led on to extensive ecclesiasticopatristic studies. He published a long series of articles and books as the result, most of them in the Norwegian language. Under the auspices of the Norwegian Bible Society he assisted in making a new translation of the Old Testament, which was completed for the seventy-fifth anniversary of the Society, May 26, 1891; at the time of his death he was working on the New Testament (see BIBLE VERSIONS, B, XV., § 2). He was a member of the central committee of the Bible Society, president of the Norwegian mission among the Jews, and belonged to numerous learned and honorary societies. His most important publications were: A commentary on Obadiah (in Delitzsch and Caspari's *Exegetisches Handbuch zu den Propheten des Alten Bundes,* Leipsic, 1842); *Grammatica Arabica *(2 parts, Leipsic, 1844-48; 5th Germ. ed., by August Müller, Halle, 1887; Eng. ed., by W. Wright, London, 1859-62, 1874-75; by W. Robertson Smith and M. J. de Goeje, Cambridge, 1896-98); *Beiträge zur Einleitung in das Buch Jesaia und zur Geschichte der jesaianischen Zeit* (vol. ii, of Delitzseh and Caspari's *Biblisch-theologische und apologetisch-kritische Studien,* Berlin, 1848); *Ueber den syrischephraimitischen Krieg unter Jotham und Ahas* (Christiania, 1849); *Ueber Micha den Morasthiten und seine prophetische Schrift* (2 parts, 1851-52); *Ungedruckte, unbeachtete und wenig beachtete Quellen zur Geschichte des Taufsymbols und der Glaubensregel* (3 vols., 1866-75); *Zur Einführung in das Buch Daniel* (Leipsic, 1869); *Alte und neue Quellen zur Geschichte des Taufsymbols und der Glaubensregel* (Christiania, 1879); an edition of Martin of Bracara's *De correctione rusticorum* (1883); *Kirchenhistorische Anecdota nebst neuen Ausgaben patristischer und kirchlich-mittelalterlicher Schriften * (1883); *Eine Augustin fälschlich beigelegte Homilia de sacrilegiis* (1886); *Briefe, Abhandlungen und Predigten aus den zwei letzten Jahrhunderten des kirchlichen Alterthums und dem Anfang des Mittelalters* (1891); *Das Buch Hiob in Hieronymus's Uebersetzung* (Christiania, 1893). *Der Glaube an der Trinität Gottes in der Kirche des ersten christlichen Jahrhunderts nachgewiesen* (Leipsic, 1894). In Norwegian he published a translation of the Book of Concord (Christiania, 1861); an essay upon the Wandering Jew (1862); a commentary on the first six chapters of Isaiah (1867); a historical essay on the confession of faith at baptism (1871); on Abraham's trial and Jacob's wrestling with God (1871); on Abraham's call and meeting with Melchizedek (1872); a volume of Bible essays (1884); etc. With his friend G. C. Johnson he established in 1857 the *Theologisk Tidskrift for den evangelisk-lutherske Kirke i Norge,* of which a volume appeared annually till shortly before Caspari's death. Most of the articles were written by the editors, and in this and other periodicals a large number of Caspari's writings were originally published. J. BELSHEIM.
CASPARI, WALTER Caspari, Walter

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASPARI, WALTER:** German theologian; b. at Sommerhausen (a village of Lower Franconia) June 19, 1847. He was educated at the universities of Munich, Erlangen, and Leipsic from 1864 to 1868, after which he was pastor in Memmingen and Ansbach until 1885. In the last-named year he was appointed associate professor of practical theology, pedagogics, and dogmatics, and university preacher at Erlangen, and became full professor two years later. In addition to contributions to the Hauck-Herzog *RE* and briefer studies, he has written: *Ausgewählte Lesestücke der ausländischen Literatur * (Munich, 1877); *Die epistolischen Perikopen nach der Auswahl von Dr. Thomasius exegetisch-homiletisch erklärt * (Erlangen, 1883); *Die evangelische Konfirmation * (Leipsic, 1890); and *Die geschichtliche Grundlage des gegenwärtigen evangelischen Gemeindelebens * (1894).
CASSANDER, GEORGIUS Cassander, Georgius

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CAS-SAN'DER, GEORGIUS:** Roman Catholic theologian; b. at Pitthem (15 m. s.e. of Bruges) Aug. 24, 1513; d. in Cologne Feb. 3, 1566. He lectured at Bruges and Ghent on antiquities, theology, and canon law, but retired to Cologne in 1549 and devoted himself to study. The Duke of Cleves employed him in an effort to win back the Anabaptists in Duisburg, and still more important was the charge of the Emperor Ferdinand I., who endeavored to unite the Catholics and Protestants in his territories. Cassander had already published anonymously an irenic writing, *De officio pii ac publicæ tranquillitatis vere amantis viri in hoc religionis dissidio * (Basel, 1561), which elicited a sharp rejoinder from Calvin. Strict Roman Catholics also disliked the work, and it was placed on the Lisbon Index in 1581. At the emperor's request Cassander prepared a *Consultatio de articulis inter Catholicos et Protestantes controversis, * which he presented to Maximilian II. in 1564, Ferdinand having died in the mean time (published at Lyons, 1608; ed. H. Grotius, Amsterdam, 1642). To bring about a union Cassander starts with the "consensus" of the most ancient church, expressed in the Apostles' Creed. Though the Holy Scripture is to be authoritative, he wishes to maintain the importance of tradition, especially of the great Church Fathers (down to Gregory I.); only a difference which concerns the position to Christ himself, not "opiniones" or "ritus," may become a cause of division, but the bond of "caritas" is by no means to be violated. In the doctrine of original sin, the Lord's Supper, and justification, he tries to mediate. He is even inclined to give the cup to the laity, and he will also admit of the marriage of the clergy as a makeshift. In the other controversial questions (worship of saints, monasticism, indulgences, papal power) he tries to soften the difficulties and do away with exaggerations. A recantation before his death has been imputed to him. It is hard to save him for the Roman Catholics, however, and still less can he be claimed by the Protestant side. Seckendorf is correct when he says in the *Commentarius * (Frankfort and Leipsic, 1680, p. 347): "Georgius Cassander, a good theologian, to be sure not a Lutheran, but a lover of truth." K. BENRATH. BIBLIOGRAPHY: The *Opera * appeared Paris, 1616. Consult F. H. Reusch, *Index der verbotanen Bucher,* i. 361 sqq., Bonn, 1883.
CASSEL, CONFERENCE OF Cassel, Conference of

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASSEL, CONFERENCE OF: ** A religious colloquy at Cassel, July 1-9, 1661, between certain Reformed theologians from the University of Marburg and Lutheran theologians from the University of Rinteln, arranged by Landgrave William VI. of Hesse. The aim was to bring about agreement or at least mutual toleration. They succeeded in finding some not unessential points, in the doctrines of the Lord's Supper, predestination, the person of Christ, and baptism, on which both parties agreed. It was resolved, moreover, not to revile one another in the future because of the differences still remaining, to free sermons from the burden of confessional polemics, and in any case no longer to attack an opponent personally. But this peaceful agreement did not meet with a kind reception in the rest of Germany. Frederick William, the Great Elector of Brandenburg, was, to be sure, an exception, and the Reformed party in France and Holland were inclined to come half-way; but the Lutherans rejected the arrangement absolutely. The union became the subject of lively literary combats, and the final result was a further intensification of confessional differences. CARL MIRBT. BIBLIOGRAPHY E. L. T. Henke, *Das Unionskolloquium zu Cassel* 1661, Marburg, 1861; H. Heppe, *Kirchengeschichte beider Hessen,* vol. ii., ib. 1876; H. Landwehr, *Die Kirchenpolitik Friedrich Wilhelms, * Berlin, 1894.
CASSEL, PAULUS STEPHANUS (SELIG) Cassel, Paulus Stephanus (Selig)

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASSEL, PAULUS STEPHANUS (SELIG): ** German Protestant theologian; b. at Gross-Glogau (55 m. n.w. of Breslau), Silesia, Feb. 27, 1821; d. at Friedenau, a suburb of Berlin, Dec. 23, 1892. He was of Jewish parentage, studied history at Berlin, and from 1850 to 1856 edited a newspaper at Erfurt. On May 28, 1855, he was baptized at Büssleben near Erfurt, and the next year became librarian of the Royal Library at Erfurt. In 1859 he settled at Berlin, where he acted as tutor and devoted himself to literary work. In 1866-67 he was a member of the Prussian Parliament, then he entered the service of the London Jewish Missionary Society and became its minister at the Christuskirche in Berlin. In 1891 he resigned his position and died shortly afterward. Cassel was a most prolific writer, and his article on the history of the Jews from the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus to the year 1847, written while still a Jew for Ersch and Gruber's *Allgemeine Encyklopädie, * sect. II., vol. xxvii., pp. 1-238, Leipsic, 1850, is still valuable. By public lectures delivered in different cities of Germany, he tried to influence the educated Jews in favor of Christianity, and baptized many. He also combated anti-Semitism. Other works by him include the commentaries on Judges and Ruth in Lange's Commentary; also *Weihnachten, Ursprünge, Bräuche und Aberglauben * (Berlin, 1862); *Altkirchlicher Festkalender nach Ursprüngen und Bräuchen * (1869); *Vom Wege nach Damaskus * (Gotha, 1872); *Die Gerechtigkeit aus dem Glauben * (1874); *Das Buch Esther * (Berlin, 1878); and *Die Symbolik des Blutes* (1882). (H. L. STRACK.)
CASSETTA, FRANCESCO DI PAOLA Cassetta, Francesco di Paola

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASSETTA, **cas-set'ta, **FRANCESCO DI PAOLA: ** Italian cardinal; b. at Rome Aug. 12, 1841. He was educated at the Roman Seminary and was ordained to the priesthood in 1865. In 1884 he was consecrated titular bishop of Amiata and appointed canon of Santa Maria Maggiore, and three years later became titular archbishop of Nicomedia and grand almoner to Pope Leo XIII. As titular patriarch of Antioch he was nominated vicegerent of Rome, in which capacity he acted as the deputy of the cardinal vicar. He was created cardinal priest of Santi Vito, Modesto a Crescenzia in 1899, and is titular bishop of Sabina, perpetual abbot of Farfa, apostolic visitor of the Hospice of the Catechumens, commissioner for the apostolic visitation of the Italian dioceses, and a member of the Congregations of Bishops and Regulars, the Council, the Index, the Consistory, the Propaganda, the Propaganda for the Oriental Rite, and Indulgences.
CASSIAN Cassian

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASSIAN:** A martyr whose death is described by Prudentius in the ninth hymn of his *Peristephanon. * The poet says that he saw the martyr's grave at Forum Cornelii (Imola), with a picture of him, and that the custodian related that Cassian had been stabbed by his own pupils with their styli and otherwise cruelly handled. Gregory of Tours gives substantially the same account. The *Martyrologium Hieronymianum * names Aug. 11 as the day of his death. The fact of his martyrdom at Forum Cornelii need not be doubted, but the manner related by Prudentius is improbable, and it is impossible to fix the date. (A. HAUCK.)
CASSIANUS, JOHANNES Cassianus, Johannes

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASSIANUS,** cas"sî-a'nus, **JOHANNES:** Monk of the fifth century and the real founder of Semi-Pelagianism; b. probably in Provence c. 360; d. at Marseilles c. 435. He received a thorough education, and then visited the East with an older friend named Germanus. At Bethlehem he entered a cloister, but the desire to know the famous Egyptian hermits led him and Germanus to Egypt, where they remained seven years, after which they revisited Bethlehem, but soon returned to Egypt. Thence Cassianus went to Constantinople, where he became the pupil of John Chrysostom, who ordained him deacon. The exile of Chrysostom in 403, however, obliged Cassianus and Germanus to take refuge with Innocent I. When Cassianus was ordained priest and returned home is unknown, and the fate of Germanus is equally uncertain. At Marseilles Cassianus founded two cloisters, one for monks and the other for nuns, and seems to have died shortly after completing his polemic against Nestorius. His earliest work, written before 426, was entitled *De institutis cœnobiorum et de octo principalium vitiorum remediis libri duodecim, * and was composed at the request of Castor, bishop of Apta Julia, who wished to introduce the Oriental and especially the Egyptian rules into the monastery which he had founded. His second work was his *Collationes viginti-quattuor, * completed before 429. Both were widely spread throughout the Occident; Benedict of Nursia commanded that they be read to the monks in the refectory; Cassiodorus esteemed them highly, although he warned his monks against the heretical views of the author concerning the freedom of the will; and Gregory of Tours mentions them as used, together with other Oriental rules, in the monastery of St. Yririx. A brief compend was made by the friend of Cassianus, Eucherius, bishop of Lyons, which served as a source for the *Concordia regularum * of Benedict of Aniane. The thirteenth collation of Cassianus is important in the controversy on Augustine's doctrine of grace. Against his enemies, who were centered in Marseilles, the latter addressed, shortly before his death, his *De prædestinatione sanctorum * and *De dono perseverantiæ, * his chief opponent being Cassianus, who in this collation had enunciated the doctrine called Semi-Pelagianism in the Middle Ages, although it might more properly be termed Semi-Augustinianism, since Cassianus separated himself sharply from Pelagius and branded him as a heretic, while he felt himself in complete harmony with Augustine. His Greek training, however, rendered it impossible for him to accept Augustine's doctrine of unconditional predestination, particular grace, and the absolute denial of the freedom of the will. Casaianus, on the other hand, recognized the necessity of divine grace throughout the process of salvation, while postulating the existence of free will as a necessary condition for the operation of grace, and asserting that God never destroys the freedom of the will, even in such an extraordinary case as the conversion of Paul. He regarded it as a religious axiom, therefore, that salvation through Christ is not restricted to a small number of the elect, but is intended for all. This non-Augustinian concept of the process of salvation conditions Cassianus's view of original sin. He believed that the fall of Adam had brought destruction on the whole human race, although it still retained the power to seek goodness in virtue of its original state of immortality, wisdom, and complete freedom of the will. After the victory of a modified Augustinianism at the Synod of Orange in 529, the doctrines of Cassianus were generally regarded as heterodox, although this did not injure his fame as a monastic author, and in southern Gaul he was officially honored as a saint. See SEMI-PELAGIANISM. In the latter part of his life Cassianus became involved in the Nestorian controversy, and at the request of the archdeacon Leo (later Pope Leo I.) wrote his *De incarnatione Domini contra Nestorium libri septem, * the date being subsequent to the letters written by Nestorius to Pope Celestine in 430. The work lacks the importance which it would otherwise possess as the only extensive contribution of an Occidental to the Nestorian controversy, through its restriction to personal attacks on the opponent of its author and a complete omission of positive and independent Christological statements. Cassianus sought to prove that the divinity of Christ had existed from eternity and had never been renounced, so that Mary must be called not merely the mother of Christ, as Nestorius taught, but the mother of God. The work is especially valuable as showing the close sympathy of the interests and methods of Nestorianism and Pelagianism, while Cassianus, following the Gallic monk Leporius, who had renounced Pelagianism in 426, held that Christ possessed in a single person the two coexistent substances of God and man. (G. GRÜTZMACHER.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: The *Opera, * ed. A. Gazäus, were published at Douai, 1616, reprinted in *MPL,* xlix., l.; best ed. by M. Petschenig, in *CSEL, * 2 vols., 1886-88. An Eng. transl., with a well-written *Life,* is contained in *NPNF,* 2d series, xi. 183 sqq. Consult: G. F. Wiggers, *Pragmatische Darstellung des Augustinismus und Pelagianismus, * ii. 7-153, Berlin, 1833; A. Harnack, *Dogmengeschichte,* iii. 154, Tübingen, 1897, Eng. transl., v. 246 sqq., 253 sqq., Boston, 1899; A. Hoch, *Die Lehre des J. Cassians von Natur and Gnade, *Freiburg, 1895.
CASSIANUS, JULIUS Cassianus, Julius

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASSIANUS, JULIUS.** See DOCETISM; ENCRATITES.
CASSIODORUS (CASSIODORIUS), MAGNUS AURELIUS Cassiodorus (Cassiodorius), Magnus Aurelius

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASSIODORUS,** cas"si-o-do'rus **(CASSIODORIUS), MAGNUS AURELIUS:** Roman historian, statesman, and monk; b. at Scylacium (the modern Squillace, on the gulf of the same name, 40 m. s.s.e. of Cosenza), Calabria, c. 480; d. in the monastery of Vivarium, near Scylacium, c. 570. Owing to the esteem in which his father was held by Theodoric, a public career was early open to him; and he pursued it until he had reached the highest dignities under the Ostrogothic monarchs. He stood in close personal relations with Theodoric, with whose efforts to bring about a fusion between the Germanic and Roman elements among his subjects he thoroughly sympathized. About 540 he retired from public life to the peace and quiet of the monastery founded by him on his own estates at Vivarium. Here he devoted himself to literary work, of which he had already made a beginning amidst his political activity, and pursued it zealously until his ninety-third year. He insisted on the duty of intellectual labor for his monks, helped their studies by every means in his power, of which his own example was not the least, and so contributed largely to the establishment of the tradition which made the monasteries, especially of the Benedictine order, the homes of learning throughout the dark ages. His literary work, like his life, falls into two periods. To the first belong a consular chronicle written in 519; twelve books of Gothic history, composed in the spirit of the policy of fusion already referred to, known to us only in the recast version of Jordanes, *De origine actibusque Getarum* (the work of Cassiodorus seems to have borne the same title); panegyrics on the kings and queens of the Goths, of which only dubious fragments remain; a collection (made about 538) of rescripts composed by him during his long and varied official life, and formulas of appointment to a great variety of offices, in twelve books, under the title *Variæ; *a small philosophical work, *De anima,* written immediately after the completion of the *Variæ, *at the request of friends, whose questions about the soul he answers, following Claudianus Mamertus and Augustine. The last-named work forms a sort of transition to those of the second period. The most important of these, composed probably in 544, is the *Institutiones divinarum et sæcularium litterarum* (or better *lectionum*). The first book is devoted to spiritual learning, the second to secular; and both together form the first part of a complete course of instruction designed by Cassiodorus for the Western clergy, and especially for his own monks. The first book is only an introduction to the study of theology, explaining the most important preliminary knowledge required and the literary helps at the student's command for his further education; the second gives brief compendiums of various branches of secular learning. To this the last work of Cassiodorus, *De orthographia,* forms a supplement. Another voluminous theological work, begun before the *Institutiones* but finished long after, was a full explanation of the Psalms in their threefold aspect, spiritual, historical, and symbolic. He wrote other exegetical works, of which his *Complexiones in epistolas et acta apostolorum et apocalypsin* is still extant. Of much greater value to posterity is his *Historia ecclesiastica tripartita* in twelve books, composed of extracts from the Greek historians Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodoret, whose works he had translated by Epiphanius. It is in no sense an original work, and is put together in a patchwork fashion; but it filled up a great gap in the general Western knowledge of church history, and, incomplete as it is, was the principal handbook used in the Middle Ages for its period. (A. HAUCK.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: The Variæ and *Orationum reliquiæ, * with introduction, are in *MGH, Auct. ant., * xii. 1-385, 459-484; the *Variæ * are also in *MPL,* lxix. *The Letters of Cassiodorus, a Condensed Transl. of the Variæ, * ed. T. Hodgkin, appeared London, 1886. Consult: A. Olleris, *Cassiodore, conservateur des livres de l'antiquité latine,* Paris, 1841; R. Köpke, *Deutsche Forschungen. Die Anfänge des Königtums,* pp. 78-94, Berlin, 1859; A. Thorbecke, *Cassiodorus Senator, * Heidelberg, 1867; A. Franz, *M. Aurelius Cassiodorius Senator, * Breslau, 1872; H. von Sybel, *Entstehung des deutschen Königtums,* pp. 184-208, Frankfort, 1881; A. Ebert, *Geschichte der Literatur des Mittelalters,* i. 198, 498-514, Leipsic, 1889. For further literature consult Potthast, *Wegweiser, * p. 198.
CASSOCK Cassock

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASSOCK.** See VESTMENTS AND INSIGNIA, ECCLESIASTICAL.
CASTELL, EDMUND Castell, Edmund

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASTELL, EDMUND:** English Orientalist; b. at East Hatley (12 m. s.w. of Cambridge), Cambridgeshire, 1606; d. at Higham Gobion (10 m. s.s.e. of Bedford), Bedfordshire, 1685. He studied at Emmanuel and St. John's colleges, Cambridge (B.A., 1625; M.A., 1628; B.D., 1635; D.D., 1661). He assisted Walton on his *Polyglot* (1657), contributing the editions of the Samaritan, Syriac, Arabic, and Ethiopic versions, and other (unacknowledged) portions, and also spent freely of his own fortune for the work. In 1669 he brought out in two volumes, folio, at London, his *Lexicon Heptaglotton, Hebraicum, Chaldaicum, Syriacum, Samaritanum, Æthiopicum, Arabicum, conjunctim; et Persicum separatim,* specially prepared to supplement the *Polyglot.* This work was the result of eighteen years of the most unremitting labor, cost the author £12,000, and left him ruined in fortune and health. His work was enthusiastically received on the Continent, but neglected in England. Late in life he received some favor from the king, was appointed chaplain in ordinary in 1666, prebendary of Canterbury and professor of Arabic at Cambridge 1667, and was successively vicar of Hatfield Peverell, Essex; rector of Wodeham Walter, Essex; and rector of Higham Gobion. BIBLIOGRAPHY: A. à Wood, *Athenæ Oxonienses, * ed. P. Bliss, iii. 883, 4 vols., London, 1813-20; twenty-three of his letters appear in J. Lightfoot, *Whole Works,* ed. J. R. Pitman, 13 vols., London, 1822-25. Consult *DNB,* ix, 271-272.
CASTELLIO(N), SEBASTIANUS (SEBASTIEN CHÂTEILLON) Castellio(n), Sebastianus (Sebastien Châteillon)

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASTELLIO(N), SEBASTIANUS (SEBASTIEN CHÂTEILLON):** French Reformer; b. at Saint-Martin du Fresne (30 m. w. of Geneva) 1515; d. at Basel Dec. 29, 1563. He pursued his studies under difficult circumstances until he became tutor to three young noblemen. In 1540 he went to Strasburg, lived in Calvin's house, and accompanied him to Geneva, where on Calvin's recommendation he became rector of the high school. But disagreement soon arose between him and the great Reformer, Castellio holding views of his own concerning election and Christ's descent into hell, and regarding the Song of Solomon as an erotic poem which should be excluded from the canon. He left Geneva in 1544 and settled in Basel, where he lived in great poverty till 1552, when he was appointed professor of Greek literature. His first publication was *Dialogi sacri* (Geneva, 1543; Eng. transl., *The History of the Bible, collected into 119 dialogues,* London, 1715; again under the title, *Youth's Scripture Remembrancer, *1743), much used as a school-book. In 1551 he published in Basel his chief work, an elegant annotated Latin translation of the Bible, which he dedicated to Edward VI. of England (12th ed., Leipsic, 1778). The notes gave offense, as they betrayed skepticism as to the attainability of religious truth, and the dedication, a noble plea for religious toleration, was unacceptable to the age. In 1555 he published at Basel a complete French translation of the Bible, with a dedication to Henry II. of France. He was violently attacked by Calvin and Beza because of his criticism of their conduct in burning Servetus, but defended himself vigorously in his *De hæreticis* (Basel, 1554); and in *Contra libellum Calvini, in quo ostendere conatur hæreticos jure gladii coercendos esse. *Calvin's influence suppressed the latter, and it was not published till 1612. BIBLIOGRAPHY: F. Buisson, *Séb. Castellion, sa vie et son œuvre,* 2 vols., Paris. 1892 (i., p. xvii. gives literature concerning him; ii. 341 sqq. gives list of his writings); C. Jarrin, *Deux oubliés; Séb. Castellion, Léonard Racle, *Paris, 1895.
CASTLE, NICHOLAS Castle, Nicholas

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASTLE, NICHOLAS:** United Brethren; b. at Bristol, Ind., Oct. 4, 1837; entered the ministry, 1857; elected bishop, 1877; emeritus, 1905.
CASTOR, SAINT Castor, Saint

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASTOR, SAINT:** According to legend, a companion of St. Maximin of Treves, who had an influential career as a missionary and ascetic on the lower Moselle. His relics are said to have been miraculously discovered under Bishop Weomad (d. 791). They were first placed at Carden on the Moselle; but in 836 a part of them was translated to Coblenz (of which city Castor has since been known as the patron) by Archbishop Hetti of Treves, and preserved in the minster founded there by him. (A. HAUCK.)
CASUISTRY Casuistry

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASUISTRY:** The name of a special form of discipline, or branch of ethics, constituting a somewhat elaborated scheme of doctrine concerning proper moral action in single and concrete instances. The evaluation of this kind of activity evolves itself generally as consequence of a lawful and rightful apprehension of the moral walk, whereby we accentuate external conduct according to definite prescriptive rules. Coordinately with a fundamental moral cede for this action, certain ethical norms with legal adjuncts were in practical operation so far back as the Jewish "scribes and Pharisees." ### Teaching of Jesus and Paul. Jesus came forward in sharpest contrast with this casuistical doctrine of morals. As he suffered his disciples to become derivately participant of his integral community with God, he kindled in them a love to God, which was to verify itself in love to men. To this love he brought back the conception of the Law fulfilled; and accordingly he teaches in the place of casuistry a direction of life spontaneously individual. Even where he appears himself to set up casuistical requirements ( Matt. v. 21 sqq., vi. 1 sqq., xxii. 17 sqq.; Luke xiv. 3 sqq.) it is always expressly in order to lay emphasis upon the spiritual interpretation of the Law, over against legalizing constructiveness. These thoughts were but dialectically expanded through Paul's epistles, inasmuch as he teaches that faith in God's grace in Christ has its operation in the love which fulfils the requirements of God's will in agreement with the spirit of the Law. Yet he knew that even though faith and love be present, still the certainty is not immediately vouchsafed as to what is right in this or that particular instance ( Rom. xii. 2; Phil. i. 9, 10). He, therefore, dwells on a persistently proving examination of God's will, and gives corresponding instructions to his own congregations; which instructions now and then through their touching upon particular conditions have a certain casuistic stamp about them (cf. I Cor. vii. 8, 10); but, in distinction from every form of casuistic legalism by means of morally postulated direction, they seek to develop the proper moral consciousness of the congregations themselves. ### Development of Casuistry. But even early in the postapostolic age, the tendency set in, coordinately with a one-sided intellectualizing conception of the faith, to regulate by outward legalism the moral life as thus robbed of its religious mainspring; and the same tendency involved the casuistical treatment of ethics. Still further was this disposition fostered in Western theology through the influence of Stoicism, and in part through the legalizing development of ecclesiastical doctrine. It shows itself even in Augustine, despite his obliteration of ethics, and continued to be characteristic of the entire Western Catholic ethical system. What ministered still more widely to the development of casuistry was the very early and momentously elaborated ecclesiastical institution of penance, with the infliction of ecclesiastical penalties for individual sins. The appertaining customary rules of the ancient forms of procedure and the relevantly codified decrees of separate synods were brought together, supplemented, and arranged by the compilers. There thus arose the definite manuals on penance for the use of confessors; among which the best known were those attributed to Archbishop Theodore of Canterbury (d. 690) and the Venerable Bede (d. 735). A still greater amplification of casuistry was promoted by the entire method of the scholastic ethics, with its subtle disputations; by the influence of the canonical repetition; and by the universally obligatory institution of auricular confession (1215). Under such influences there arose a distinctive systematic discipline, which in contradistinction to the philosophic and legal came to be designated as theological casuistry. The scholars who cultivated the same constituted, under the name of casuists or schemists, both in the Middle Ages and at Roman Catholic universities much later still, a special class of teachers, notably so as against the canonists. The writings which embodied this discipline were the so-called "*summæ* of cases of conscience " (*summæ casuum conscientiæ*). Of these the most ancient was compiled in the thirteenth century by Raymond of Peñaforte (printed at Lyons, 1719). There then followed a good many such writings while scholasticism was approaching the term of its decay through the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. The most renowned of these *summæ,* which are usually designated in brief by the author's name or birthplace, are the following: the *Astesana* (printed 1468, and often); *Pisanella* (written 1338; printed, Paris, 1470); *Pacifica* (written c. 1470; printed, Venice, 1576); *Rosella; Angelica;* and lastly the one usually known as *summa summarum;* properly the compilation merely of Sylvester Prierias, which dates from the beginning of the Reformation period. ### Casuistry in Protestantism. As the Reformers revived the Pauline idea of a free motive power in faith, casuistry proper was fundamentally set aside, and they even occasionally declared themselves expressly opposed to it (Calvin, "Institutes," IV. x. 1 sqq.; Luther, *Resol. i. concl. Ecc.,* ii.). Existing conditions nevertheless gave rise to a certain evangelical counterpart to the Roman Catholic casuistry. The Reformatory movement introduced a multitude of new problems in morality. So in difficult contingencies people frequently appealed for enlightenment to the Reformers and other persons of esteem, or in turn to the theological faculties. In this way the collected letters of Luther and Calvin, as well as Melanchthon's counsels (*Berathschlagungen, * etc., issued by Petzel, 1601), have furnished copious illustrations at large in the matter of evangelical resolutions of conscience. The systematic collections of faculty decisions (*Thesaurus consiliorum, * etc., by Dedekenn; Gerhard's *In richtigerer Ordnung, * 1676) even early denote the transition to a distinctive evangelical casuistry. The more legalizing spirit of the post-Reformation era became thus practically effective. Even here, however, the various particular moral transactions were not viewed, in their development, as in the Roman Catholic casuistry, but as fruits of faith, of knowledge in part, and of the life according to the spirit of Christ. The Reformed theology took precedence in the elaboration of casuistry. The first treatise of this kind is that of the Cambridge professor William Perkins (d. 1602; see PERKINS, WILLIAM), *A Case of Conscience * (originally in English; Latin by Meyer, 1603), of a strict Puritan tone. A similar book of kindred thought was written by his pupil the Scotchman William Ames (*De conscientia, * Amsterdam, 1630). Somewhat prior to this, the German theologian Alstedt had published a work on casuistry (*Theologia casuum, * Hanover, 1621). But although he represented casuistry as a singularly important science, there were in the Reformed Church only a few English theologians that still espoused casuistry. The first Lutheran work on casuistry grew out of lectures delivered by Professor Baldwin at Wittenberg in opposition to the Roman Catholic casuistry, and with the design of systematically setting forth the import of the faculty's opinions. His manuscript was published after his death by the Wittenberg Theological Faculty (*Tractatus de casibus conscientiæ, * Frankfort, 1659). Of the remaining Lutheran writings of this nature; there should still be noted the works of Dannhauer (1679), Bechmann (1692), and Johannes Olearius (1699). Pietism, although Spener's views on moral questions (*Theologische Bedenken, *1700; *Letzte theologische Bedenken, * 1711) have a casuistical tone, still contributed not a little to the shelving of casuistry, in that it deepened the understanding with reference to the interdependency of the Christian's total transactions with his religious-moral basic intuitions. After Buddeus in his moral theology had shown casuistry to be superfluous, only isolated works on the subject appeared in the Lutheran Church. In the Roman Catholic Church, on the contrary, the ethics of the Jesuits came to be out and out casuistical. And even apart from them, in that quarter, casuistry was cultivated (cf. P. Lambertini, *Casus conscientiæ, * Augsburg, 1763; S. Sobiech, *Compendium theologiæ moralis, * Breslau, 1822). F. SIEFFERT. BIBLIOGRAPHY: F. D. Maurice, *The Conscience: Lectures on Casuistry, * London, 1872; K. F. Stäudlin, *Geschichte der christlichen Moral, * Göttingen, 1808; W. M. L. de Wette, *Christliche Sittenlehre, * vol. ii., part 2, Berlin, 1821; S. Pike and S. Hayward, *Religious Cases of Conscience, * new ed., Philadelphia, 1859; C. Beard, *Port Royal,* pp. 262-291, London, 1861; J. Cook, *The Conscience,* Boston, 1879; W. Gass, *Geschichte der christlichen Ethik,* i., ii., parts 1-2, Berlin, 1881-87; W. T. Davison, *The Christian Conscience, a Contribution to Ethics, * London 1888; C. E. Luthardt, *Geschichte der christlichen Ethik, * 2 vols., Leipsic, 1888-93. Many of the treatises on ethics deal with the subject of casuistry.
CASUS RESERVATI ( Casus Reservati

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASUS RESERVATI** ("Reserved Cases")**:** In the Roman Catholic Church, cases in which absolution can be given only by a priest specially authorized. The practise of such reservation is defended on the ground that Christ granted the power of absolution only to the apostles and their successors (John xx. 21-23), and that the pope and bishops have thus the right to reserve to themselves as much of this power as in their judgment the good of the Church requires. This view is formally sanctioned by the Council of Trent (Sess. XIV., cap. vii., *de pænitentia,* 11). The cases in question are "certain graver cases of offense," "certain more atrocious and graver offenses"—grave external sins, definitely completed and specifically determined by the legislator, i.e., by the pope or bishop. The details were gradually fixed in practise. Ordinarily speaking, the popes reserved to themselves only sins for which excommunication was the penalty, from which only the apostolic see could release the culprit, though there are some to which this did not apply. The principal instances are these named in the bull *In cœna Domini *. Where, in these cases, the sin is not matter of public knowledge, the bishops are allowed to absolve (in person or by deputy) *in foro conscientiæ; *and other cases reserved to the pope are placed in their jurisdiction by their quinquennial faculties (see FACULTIES). The constitution *Apostolicæ sedis * of Pius IX. (1869) gives precise details on the different classes of reserved cases at the present day. The cases reserved to the bishops vary according to the locality; in general, they include a number of the graver sins, certain forms of unchastity, homicide, breach of the seal of confession by priests, etc. Bishops commonly depute their powers over a number of these cases to subordinates, either permanently or for special seasons. In all kinds of reserved cases, however, a penitent may be absolved by any priest in case of urgent necessity, such as approaching death. (E. FRIEDBERG.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: M. Hausmann, *Geschichte der päpstlichen Reservatfälle, * New York, 1868; H. C. Lea, *History of Auricular Confession and Indulgences in the Latin Church, * i. 312 sqq., Philadelphia, 1896.
CASWALL, EDWARD Caswall, Edward

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CASWALL, EDWARD:** Hymn writer; b. at Yateley (35 m. w.s.w. of London), Hampshire, July 15, 1814; d. at the Oratory, Edgbaston, near Birmingham, Jan. 2, 1878. He studied at Brasenose College, Oxford (B.A., 1836; M.A., 1838); was curate of Stratford-sub-Castle, near Salisbury, 1840-47; in 1850 he joined the Oratory of St. Philip Neri under Newman, to whose influence his conversion to Roman Catholicism was due. He wrote original poems, but is best known for his translations from the Roman breviary and other Latin sources, which are marked by faithfulness to the original and purity of rhythm. They were published in *Lyra Catholica, containing all the breviary and missal hymns *(London, 1849); *The Masque of Mary * (1858); and *A May Pageant * (1865). *Hymns and Prose * (1873) is the three books combined with many of the hymns rewritten or revised.
CATACOMBS Catacombs

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CATACOMBS.** See CEMETERIES, I; II., 3; III., 1.
CATAFALQUE Catafalque

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CATAFALQUE:** A structure erected to represent a corpse lying in state, decorated with emblems of mourning (also called *tumba, castrum doloris*). The custom of erecting such structures arose in the Catholic Church when the corpse of the deceased was no longer brought into the church, where, according to the Roman rite, the office of the dead, the requiem-mass, and the *Libera * were to be sung, before the interment. The object of the catafalque was to keep the older custom in mind, and to add greater solemnity to the service. The bier is covered with black hangings, and surrounded with lights. The officiating priest sprinkles it with holy water, as a symbol of the purifying blood of Christ and the water of eternal life, and then censes it as a token of honor to the body of the deceased, which has been the temple of the Holy Ghost, and as a symbol of the prayers for the departed soul which are to go up as a sweet savor before the Lord.
CATALDUS Cataldus

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CA-TAL'DUS:** According to legend, a native of Ireland and bishop there of a place called Rachan, otherwise unknown. He is said to have made a pilgrimage to Jerusalem and to have been directed in a vision to preach the Gospel to the heathen at Tarentum. With signs and wonders he performed his mission, became bishop of Tarentum or even archbishop, and converted the entire region before his death. The historical fact which underlies the legend is probably that a pious Irishman named Cataldus or Cathaldus ( = Cathal or Cathald, a real Irish name) preached in Lower Italy. His time can not be earlier than the sixth or seventh century. The veneration of Cataldus begins in the early Middle Ages. His relics were discovered in 1071, and many churches are dedicated to him in Lower Italy, and also in France, where he is honored as St. Carthauld or St. Catas. He is commemorated on Mar. 8, May 8, and May 10, the last being the day of his death according to the *Martyrologium Romanum.* (O. ZÖCKLER†.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: *ASB*, May, ii. 568-577; J. Colgan, *Acta sanctorum veteris et majoris Scotiæ sive Hiberniæ,* pp. 544-562, Louvain 1645; Lanigan, *Eccl. Hist.,* iii. 121-128; J. Healy, *Insula Sanctorum,* pp. 457-465, Dublin, 1890.
CATECHESIS, CATECHETICS Catechesis, Catechetics

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

### **CATECHESIS, CATECHETICS.** Origin and Signification of the Terms (§ 1). Divergent Views of the Object of Catechesis (§ 2). True Aim of Catechesis (§ 3). Methods of Catechesis (§ 4). Practical Application of Catechesis (§ 5). Relation of Catechesis to Confirmation (§ 6). ### 1. Origin and Signification of the Terms. The education which the Christian Church imparts to its immature members through its chosen servants, and the theory of this education, is called catechesis. The Greek word *katechein * means literally "to sound downward." Hippocrates, connecting it with the accusative of the person, signified by it the oral instruction which the physician imparts to the layman concerning the nature and treatment of disease. Lucian applied the word in a similar sense to the relation of the dramatic poet to his audience. Thus it gradually came to denote the making of an oral communication to another (Acts xxi. 21, 24), or the instruction of another. It is used in the sense of religious instruction in Luke i. 4; Acts xviii. 25; Rom. ii. 18; I Cor. xiv. 19; Gal. vi. 6. In ecclesiastical usage it signified preparation of adults for baptism (see CATECHUMENATE). Here instruction was the principal, but not the only factor; heart, will, and conduct were to be influenced. The word catechesis, therefore, properly covers the whole training given by the Church to its children. It is distinguished from Christian pedagogics in that it furnishes only an elementary knowledge of Christian truth, while pedagogics leads to a detailed and scientific knowledge. In the ancient Church ecclesiastical education began as soon as a heathen announced his willingness to be received into the Church. He was then accepted among the catechumens and bore the name of Christian. Nowadays Christian education is concerned no longer primarily with the heathen, but with the children of Christians. They are baptized in infancy, on condition that their parents promise to give them a Christian education. Moreover, the baptized, when they come to years of discretion, must evince a desire for the blessings of the Church, and give promise of Christian conduct. ### 2. Divergent Views of the Object of Catechesis. It is more difficult to define the aim of ecclesiastical education. This can not be intellectual only; for catechesis is to lead to Christian feeling, to a Christian formation of will and conduct. Nor is it merely to inculcate obedience to the teachings and commandments of the Church; for catechesis is intended to lead to personal conviction. Others have considered qualification for the Lord's Supper as its aim, but this definition begs the question; for who is really qualified for the Lord's Supper? Others regard living faith as the aim of Christian education; but children of Christian parents can not be regarded as unbelievers. They come from Christian surroundings and possess already a certain unconscious faith in God and the Savior; ecclesiastical education is rather to confirm this implicit faith and develop it into Christian conviction and conduct. Thus faith is the presupposition of ecclesiastical education, but not its aim. As to what this really is, Scripture does not give a definite answer; the distinction, however, between immature and mature Christians ( I Cor. iii. 1; Eph. iv. 13; Heb. v. 12) brings nearer to a solution of the problem. There is a childlike faith in the Lord which is still ignorant and without a firm hold, and there is a faith of the adult who has attained a convinced knowledge of Christian truth and a certain perfection in Christian conduct. ### 3. True Aim of Catechesis. Whoever of his own will and upon the basis of his faith seeks communion with Christ in the means of grace and in prayer is mature, and ecclesiastical education exists for the purpose of attaining that maturity. It is evident that no definite age can be laid down for such an attainment, because faith and Christian conduct are based upon moral freedom. Maturity depends altogether upon the individual, and can not be affirmed of any one because the heart can not be read. On that account every person must be considered mature who possesses a sufficient knowledge of Christian truth and who promises to lead a Christian life. Maturity is, therefore, more than a qualification for the reception of the Lord's Supper; a child of ten years may have the faith and knowledge necessary for receiving the sacrament in a becoming manner, but he is not mature. Ecclesiastical education must be continued after the first communion. This further growth may be gradually attained by the continuation of Christian fellowship in the family and in the Church; but since this, under the conditions of modern life, is not always applicable, theologians usually lay down the necessity of special institutions whose educational work shall continue until the attainment of maturity. ### 4. Methods of Catechesis. Instruction is the principal although not the only means of education. Religious instruction is first and foremost instruction of the heart, intended to lead to a knowledge of God. But this knowledge is based upon inner experiences, and these experiences again have their foundation in observation. God has revealed himself in nature, but more completely in the spiritual life. This, as manifested in Christ, is the perfect revelation of God; and as the record of this life is found in Holy Scripture, the Bible is the principal book of instruction. Owing to the wealth of material contained therein, it has been considered advisable to condense and select certain stories specially adapted for the young without paying particular attention to their connection as a whole. From this book of stories the pupil is gradually led to the Bible itself. He is to memorize certain passages and read different portions of it in order to penetrate its spirit and attain practise in its use. The Gospels, some historical sections of the Old Testament, and the Psalms are best adapted for this purpose. Another source of material for religious instruction is found in the Church hymns, which awaken religious sentiment and enable the pupil to participate intelligently in public worship. After the pupil has acquired a number of religious truths from the selections or from the Bible itself, it is possible to present these truths in their most concise form and in their connection. This is necessary in order to give the pupil a clear survey of the Christian truths and to strengthen his conviction. Such an epitome is given in the catechism. The part of it longest in use is the Apostles' Creed; next followed the Lord's Prayer, and in the Middle Ages the decalogue was added as a basis of instruction, to give a proper understanding of sin. These three articles form the main portions of the Evangelical catechism; from the law the pupil learns the greatness of his sin, in the creed he professes his faith in the means of salvation from it, and in the Lord's Prayer he expresses his longing for Christian conduct as a disciple of Christ. Since the immediate aim of religious instruction is, participation in the Lord's Supper, the doctrine of the sacrament forms the fourth division of the Catechism. This is the order of the Reformation catechisms; and though objections have been made to it, they may be shown to be unfounded. As the catechist has not only to communicate knowledge, but to move the heart and will, the instruction must be oral and personal. No book ought to be used in religious instruction, except the Bible at the time fixed for reading it. Biblical stories, hymn-books, and catechisms are only aids to be used at home. As children like to hear stories, the teacher should begin his instruction with telling them. Verses of hymns, texts and answers from the catechism are to be used mainly in illustration of the Biblical story. As the child's attention is attracted only a short time by the talk of the teacher, his interest has to be retained by asking him questions. There is a distinction made between analytical and synthetical instruction. In analytical instruction the material is ready at hand, as in the Biblical story, in Scripture-reading, and hymns, and the religious truth is developed from it. In synthetical instruction only the theme is given, as in the catechism and Bible texts, and the material has to be gathered elsewhere. Owing to the amount of material, religious instruction must be spread over several years. In the German system it covers eight, during the first four of which the Bible story forms the basis of instruction. In the fifth year hymns are treated in connection with the church year, and Bible-reading and instruction, in the catechism are begun. The pupils receive practise in the use of the Bible, and some portions of the historical books are read in connection with the Biblical stories. The decalogue, the creed, and the Lord's Prayer are briefly explained and thus stamped upon the memory. The last two years place Bible-reading and the catechism in the foreground. The instruction should be imparted by both pastor and teacher. It is advisable that the pastor should instruct the pupils at least two years; he should confine himself mainly to the catechism in connection with Bible-reading, and leave the Biblical stories and hymns to the teacher. On any arrangement it is essential that pastor and teacher should work in harmony, each with an eye to the special instruction imparted by the other. ### 5. Practical Application of Catechesis. As religious education addresses itself to the heart as well as to the mind, the cultivation of the former is not less the duty of the catechist. Common devotional exercises are held, consisting of the singing of hymns, reading of Scripture, and an extempore prayer by the teacher. Moreover, observance of Sunday and regular attendance on the Church services should be required of the children. As the sermons at those services can not be sufficiently grasped by younger children, special services are to be arranged for them. With the religious practise moral practise must go hand in hand. Order, diligence, modesty, obedience, truth, and other virtues must be inculcated. While the pupil must be taught obedience and respect, the teacher should not be immoderate and unjust in his demands or irascible. If he shows the least partiality or injustice, he weakens his authority. Reproof should come before punishment, and should be made to suffice as long as possible, so that the teacher shall not come too soon to the end of his resources. Older scholars should be won by private exhortation where necessary, and led to self-examination and self-judgment, so that they may find the path of goodness for themselves. ### 6. Relation of Catechesis to Confirmation. Christianity as a spiritual religion demands a definite religious conviction and moral sentiment. The Christian Church, therefore, receives as members only those who make their confession of faith and promise Christian conduct. In the early Church a profession of faith and a vow were made before baptism, and the first communion followed after it. When infant baptism became general, the need was felt of bringing in this profession and vow later as a preliminary to the first communion. In this way originated the rite of confirmation in the Protestant churches. Confirmation is not a declaration of maturity. The faith of a child may be of such a kind as to admit him or her to the Lord's Supper, but not yet to a life that may dispense with all further religious aid. The profession and the vow must be spontaneous, they must proceed from the candidate's own moral decision; therefore, the child should not be forced to confirmation at a fixed age. The custom of confirming children as a matter of course at the age of fourteen has led to insincerity and hypocrisy, and it is the duty of the Church to check it as much as possible, which can to a certain extent be accomplished by emphasizing the purely voluntary character of the act, and by having an intervening time between the examination in religious knowledge and the profession of faith. If the confirmed are still immature in the religious sense, their education must be continued. The influence of the Christian home and of church fellowship are hardly sufficient for this. Our ancestors in both the Lutheran and the Reformed churches demanded that the children should continue to participate, even after their first communion, in the regular catechetical instruction of the Church until their eighteenth year or until their marriage. These customs have disappeared in the last century because confirmed children have been considered mature, but this is a grave mistake, in view of the diminution of wholesome family influence and the observance of Sunday, and the reform of these conditions is an urgent necessity of our modern Church. (E. SACHSSE.) The preceding article is written from the standpoint of a subject of Germany, where Church and State are united and religious instruction is consequently a part of the curriculum of the schools. A treatment of catechetics from a more general point of view is given by implication in Catechisms. BIBLIOGRAPHY: The bibliographies under CATECHISMS and CATECHUMENATE should be consulted; C. I. Nitzsch, *Praktische Theologie,* ii. 133-235 Bonn, 1860; C. Palmer, *Evangelische Katechetik,* Stuttgart, 1875; R. Kübel, *Katechetik,* Barmen, 1877; J. G. Wenham, *The Catechumen, * London, 1881; E. Daniel, *How to Teach the Church Catechism, * ib. 1882; T. Harnack, *Katechetik,* Erlangen, 1882; S. J. Hulme, *Principles of the Catechism of the Church of England,* Stow-on-the-Wold, 1882; N. Hass, *Wie soll der Religionslehrer öffentlich katechisieren?* Regensburg, 1885; E. Bather, *Hints on the Art of Catechising,* London, 1888; K. Buchrucker, *Grundlinien des kirchlichen Katechismus,* Berlin, 1889; J. E. Denison, *Catechising on the Catechism,* London, 1889; F. A. P. Dupanloup, *The Ministry of Catechising,* ib. 1891; P. Schaff, *Theological Propædeutic,* part ii., pp. 500-504, New York, 1893; K. Schultze, *Evangelische Volksschulkunde,* Gotha, 1893; G. R. Crooks and J. F. Hurst, *Theological Encyclopædia,* pp. 514-526, New York, 1894; E. Sachsse, *Die Lehre von der kirchlichen Erziehung,* Berlin, 1897; E. C. Achelis, *Praktische Theologie,* ii. 1-176, Leipsic, 1898; J. Lütkemann, *Anleitung zur Katechismuslehre,* Hermannsburg, 1898; R. Staude, *Der Katechismusunterricht, Präparationen,* 3 vols., Dresden, 1900-01.
CATECHISMS Catechisms

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

The Middle Ages. Need of Catechetical Instruction (§ 1). Influence of Confession (§ 2). Pre-Reformation Catechisms (§3). The Post-Reformation Period. Early Lutheran Catechisms (§ 1). Gradual Supremacy of Luther's Smaller Catechism (§ 2). Early Catechisms Based on Luther's Work (§ 3). Orthodox and Pietistic Catechisms (§ 4). Rationalistic Catechisms of the Eighteenth Century (§ 5). Modern German Lutheran Catechisms (§ 6). Modern German Reformed Catechisms (§ 7). Switzerland (§ 8). Austria-Hungary (§ 9). Slavic Countries (§ 10). Scandinavian Countries (§ 11). Holland (§ 12). England (§ 13). France (§ 14). Italy (§ 15). American Lutheran Catechisms (§ 16). The Moravians and Bohemian Brethren (§ 17). Methodist Catechisms (§ 18). Baptist and Irvingite Catechisms (§ 19). Unitarian Catechisms (§ 20). Roman Catholic and Old Catholic Catechisms (§ 21). The Greek Church (§ 22). Catechisms are written or printed summaries of the principal doctrines of the Christian faith, intended for the instruction of the unlearned and the young. These formal aids to systematic instruction are of comparatively modern growth. For the system of the primitive Church, See ### I. The Middle Ages: ### 1. Need of Catechetical Instruction. The beginnings of modern catechetical instruction, as to the development of which see CATECHESIS, CATECHETICS, are found principally in the Germanic Churches. Here, as in primitive days and for the same reason, it originally addressed itself chiefly to adults. Sometimes whole tribes had been converted to Christianity in which the individuals did not possess the most elementary knowledge of the Christian faith, and it was necessary to impart by further teaching what had been neglected at the time of baptism. The Anglo-Saxon Church, and afterward Charlemagne, under the influence of his Anglo-Saxon adviser Alcuin, decreed that every baptized person should know by heart the Creed and the Lord's Prayer. But the rising generation was not left altogether out of view. There was from the beginning an indefinite feeling among the Teutonic Churches that the Church, by its acceptance of infant baptism, was bound to care for the instruction of the children thus brought into its fold. It was naturally impossible, in view of the widely scattered parishes and the necessity of instruction being almost exclusively oral, to undertake the actual teaching; but the need was to some extent indirectly met by the requirement that no sponsor should present a child for baptism without being able to recite the Creed and the Lord's Prayer, and that sponsors should teach the same articles to their godchildren. ### 2. Influence of Confession. Another influence that helped to enforce a certain amount of Christian knowledge was the system of regular confession, especially after an annual confession was made obligatory by the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215. With the act of confession was usually connected a recitation of the articles which the sponsors were supposed to have impressed upon their godchildren. The system further led to an enlargement of the scope of regular instruction. As the Creed and the Lord's Prayer hardly formed a suitable basis for the confession of sins, there originated lists of the sins which required ecclesiastical penance; and these, with corresponding lists of virtues, were often ordered to be learned by heart; in this connection the decalogue was redeemed from oblivion. It became a regular practise to preach sermons on the Ten Commandments in Lent, the most usual time for confession; and thus catechetical preaching developed. The reformers of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, such as Gerson and Geiler von Kaisersberg, were strong advocates of these sermons on the foundations of Christian doctrine. The Ave Maria was included among the articles to be learned, and came to take equal rank with the Creed and the Lord's Prayer. The tendency was to enlarge the material, though some attempts were made, on the other hand, to condense it; thus Johann Wolf of Frankfort showed that all the articles used in confession could be traced to the decalogue. He also laid special emphasis upon the religious instruction of youth in a period when the councils of the Church paid no particular attention to it as a distinct branch of church work. ### 3. Pre-Reformation Catechisms. The beginning of a reformation in this respect was the work of humanists like Jakob Wimpheling and Erasmus. Colet in England drew up a manual of religious instruction under the title of *Catechyzon * for the boys of St. Paul's School, which Erasmus put into Latin hexameters, thereby perhaps giving the impulse to Petrus Tritonius to produce a similar work. Outside, however, of such efforts, which were rather scholastic than ecclesiastical, catechisms in the modern sense, or compilations of the principal articles of faith for children, were practically unknown to the medieval Church. There were, indeed, such compilations for the clergy, which with the invention of printing began to circulate widely among the laity. The *Tafel des christlichen Lebens* (c. 1480) is in more ways than one a direct predecessor of Luther's smaller catechism, but a comparison shows the characteristic difference between the medieval and the Evangelical Church. In the Catholic table are found numerous pieces without any explanatory word, sacred formulas that were frequently repeated without comprehension; in Luther's catechism appear the five main articles, with the emphasis laid upon the explanation. Great importance was attached to the religious instruction of youth by the Bohemian Brethren and the Waldenses. The *Interrogacions menors *of the Waldenses date from the end of the fifteenth, or at least from the beginning of the sixteenth, century. The *Kinderfragen * of the Bohemian Brethren are still older, since they served as a model for the *Interrogacions. * ### II. The Post-Reformation Period: From the beginning of the Reformation care was taken to provide for the religious instruction of youth. Almost simultaneously the two places where the movement had its origin established institutions which were followed as models; in 1521 Johann Agricola was appointed catechist at Wittenberg, and in 1522 systematic instruction of youth in the Christian faith was established in Zurich in place of the Roman confirmation. ### 1. Early Lutheran Catechisms. Luther's popular expositions of the Ten Commandments, the Creed, and the Lord's Prayer, especially his *Kurze Form * and his *Betbüchlein, * are not catechisms in the proper sense of the word, but rather prepared the way for them. Several adaptations of the *Kinderfragen * of the Bohemian Brethren, German translations of Melanchthon's *Enchiridion * and *Scholia, * and numerous other compilations of the Christian truth adapted for children show the demand for an Evangelical text-book. Toward the end of 1524 Justus Jonas and Agricola were ordered to write such a book; they did not execute their commission, but toward the end of 1525 there was published the *Büchlein für die Laien und Kinder * (possibly by Bugenhagen), which provisionally at least supplied the want. About the same time Luther urged, in his *Deutsche Messe, * the introduction of religious instruction for children. His appeal called forth numerous expositions of the articles of faith, and in many places systematic teaching was begun. In 1529 Luther published his Smaller Catechism (sometimes known as *Enchiridion*), and with it the material of the catechism was firmly established for the future (see LUTHER'S TWO CATECHISMS). In some places, especially under the influence of the Nuremberg *Kinderpredigten* (1533), the power of the keys was added as a sixth article, and is still used as such in some of the churches of Germany. ### 2. Gradual Supremacy of Luther's Smaller Catechism. At first Luther's catechism was merely one among several others, though it was almost universally adopted in both parts of Saxony, in Brandenburg, and in Pomerania. Apart from manuals produced under the influence of the Swiss theology, like those of Leo Jud and Bullinger, there are others which follow Luther's doctrine, among them Kaspar Löwer's *Unterricht des Glaubens* (1529), Johann Brenz's *Fragestücke* (1535), which is still used in Württemberg, Butzer's catechisms for Strasburg (1534 and 1537), and others. It was only by degrees that Luther's work assumed the supremacy over other catechisms of the same tendency, until it finally attained the importance of a standard of doctrine. It was treated as such for the first time in 1561 in the articles of Lüneburg, where it had its place beside the Augsburg Confession, the Apology, and the Schmalkald Articles (see CORPUS DOCTRINÆ). It attained a still stronger position in contradistinction to the Heidelberg Catechism. The latter, which from the first was considered in the light of a confession of faith, was compiled in 1563 by Olevianus and Ursinus from the catechisms of Leo Jud and Bullinger, from the Emden catechism of 1554, from Calvin's catechism of 1542 (see below), and from two catechisms used among Low-German emigrant churches of the sixteenth century, and was soon introduced in all countries where the Reformed faith prevailed. In 1580 the Smaller Catechism was included in the Book of Concord, and took rank everywhere as the corresponding standard of Lutheran doctrine. While the Heidelberg Catechism, as the more comprehensive work, retained everywhere its old form, Luther's *Enchiridion * formed frequently only the basis for fuller expositions, in connection, e.g., with Brenz's *Fragestücke* of 1535 and a booklet printed in 1549 at Erfurt under Luther's name, though really compiled by Johann Lang, entitled *Fragestücke fur die, so zum Sacrament gehen wöllen. * ### 3. Early Catechisms Based on Luther's Work. No little influence on the development of a traditional form for catechisms was exercised by the Latin ones prepared for the Latin schools. The material of these, based partly upon the *Loci* of Melanchthon, grew to such an extent that they almost formed regular dogmatic works. Among the catechisms which originated from such sources on the basis of Luther's *Encheiridion* the *Kleiner Catechismus D. M. Lutheri,* by Nicolaus Herco (1554) shows a fairly definite form already assumed by the development. A wider circulation was attained by the *Fragestücke * of Bartholomæus Rosinus (1580). The first regular catechism with expositions was the *Goldene Kleinod * of Johann Tetelbach (1568); and the first of such to receive official sanction was the Nuremberg *Kinderlehrbüchlein*. (1628). ### 4. Orthodox and Pietistic Catechisms. During this whole period catechetical instruction consisted of nothing more than the memorizing by the children of the catechisms. Further explanations were left to the catechetical sermons which gradually became more common, modeled after Luther's Larger Catechism and the Nuremberg *Kinderpredigten * of 1533. Frequently it was decided that the children should be questioned on these sermons. On the other hand, efforts were early made to guard children against a mechanical memorizing by making the text intelligible to them. A school edition of the Heidelberg Catechism (1610) gives four rules in this respect; (1) difficult passages are to be explained; (2) a long paragraph is to be condensed by the pupil; (3) the text of the catechism is to be analyzed by the teacher, putting questions which the children have to answer from the text; (4) the catechism is to be confirmed and proved by Bible texts and stories. The method laid down in these rules dominated catechetical instruction until a late time in the eighteenth century. Orthodox and pietistic catechists agreed in the use of the analytical method; but the latter emphasized more strongly the cultivation of the heart, and in formulating the questions and answers of the catechism laid stress upon the practical side of life, as may be seen from Philipp Jakob Spener's *Tabulæ catecheticæ * (Frankfort, 1683). The two principal pietistic catechisms are Spener's *Erklärung der christlichen Lehre* (1677) and the Dresden *Kreuz-Katechismus * (1688). But even Pietism could not hinder the gradual degeneration of catechetical instruction into mere formalism. ### 5. Rationalistic Catechisms of the Eighteenth Century. A fresh impulse was received from the new methods introduced by the rationalist school. Starting from rationalistic premises, Johann Bernhard Basedow demanded in his *Abhandlung vom Unterricht der Jugend in der Religion * (Lübeck, 1764) that children should not be forced to memorize anything but what they already understood, and that they should be left to acquire new knowledge only by their own thinking, with the help of instructive questions. Basedow laid down these views in his catechism for two grades entitled *Grundriss der Religion, welche durch Nachdenken und Bibelforschen erkannt wird* (1764). This, which gradually became known as the Socratic method, was developed further by Karl Friedrich Bahrdt in his *Philanthropinischer Erziehungsplan * (Frankfort, 1776) and confirmed from the philosophy of Kant by Johann Friedrich Christian Graeffe in his *Vollständiges Lehrbuch der allgemeinen Katechetik * (Göttingen, 1799). Its most prominent representatives were Johann Peter Miller, Johann Christian Dolz, and especially Gustav Friedrich Dinter. With these new ideas new manuals appeared which either dropped altogether the old catechisms based on the articles of faith or relegated them to an appendix. Johann Gottfried Herder attempted to explain the smaller catechism of Luther according to the new principles (Weimar, 1800). The weak point of the Socratic method is its inseparable connection with rationalist theology. Pestalozzi criticized this method because it tried to elicit from children what is not in them. Schleiermacher pointed out that the Socratic method ignored the revelation of the Christian religion and its history. Marheinecke, Nitzsch, Kraussold, Harms, and Hüffell followed him is opposition to it. The modern method of catechizing has retained from the Socratic method its feature of development; it does not, however, consider human reason and natural religion as the basis of this development, but rather the documents of revelation and the history of the Church. ### 6. Modern German Lutheran Catechisms. The catechisms used in the different territories of Germany are too numerous to mention. In the territories of the Evangelical Union as well as among the orthodox Lutherans the Smaller Catechism of Luther forms the basis of instruction. But in accordance with their peculiar doctrines the Unionists have made concessions to the Reformed teachings, so that their manuals represent more or less a compromise between Luther's Smaller Catechism and the Heidelberg Catechism. The chief country of the Union is Prussia, and here the consistories in agreement with their respective provincial synods have selected a number of compendiums to be used in instruction. Manuals of the same sort are found in the other Unionistic territories, Anhalt, Baden, Hesse, Waldeck, Hanau, the Rhenish Palatinate, Nassau, and Birkenfeld. In the distinctively Lutheran territories Luther's Smaller Catechism is used everywhere, in Hesse in connection with the so-called *Hessische Fragestücke, * in Württemberg with Brenz's catechism. The text is at present formulated after the revision proposed by the Evangelical conference held at Eisenach in 1882. In the selection of aids to be used besides the text a certain freedom exists in Saxe-Coburg, in the Lutheran Church of Alsace-Lorraine, in Hamburg, in the Lutheran Church of the province of Hanover, and in Frankfort-on-the-Main. In certain places besides the text of the Smaller Catechism are mostly *Spruchbücher, * that is, collections of Bible texts and hymns. The use of such books for the explanation of Luther's catechism has been made obligatory in the kingdom of Saxony, in Altenburg, Meiningen, the principalities of Reuse, in Sleswick-Holstein and Eutin, in Oldenburg and Schaumburg-Lippe. Besides the *Spruchbücher, * various expositions of Luther's catechisms have been introduced, the use of which has been made obligatory in Mecklenburg-Schwerin, Lübeck, Mecklenburg-Strelitz, Brunswick, Schwarzburg-Sondershausen, Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt, the former county of Schaumburg, Weimar, Bavaria, and in the Free Lutheran Church of Prussia. ### 7. Modern German Reformed Catechisms. As regards the Reformed territories, the Heidelberg Catechism is used in the Reformed Church of Lippe-Detmold, in the Reformed congregations of East Friesland, in the former county of Bentheim, in the synodal district of Bovenden (near Göttingen), and in the confederation of Reformed Churches in Lower Saxony. In the Reformed territories of the consistorial district of Cassel (Lower Hesse) and in the synodal district of Hamburg the *Hessischer Landeskatechismus, *a Reformed revision of Luther's Smaller Catechism with the *Hessische Fragestücke * inserted, is used. In Bremen and in the Reformed Church of Alsace-Lorraine no special manual for religious instruction is prescribed. ### 8. Switzerland. In Switzerland there appeared at St. Gallen in 1527 a compilation of the *Kinderfragen * of the Bohemian Brethren. About the same time Œcolampadius published his *Kinderbericht * for Basel. In 1534 Leo Jud published his catechism for Zurich. An epitome of it followed in the next year, which in 1598 was declared obligatory to the exclusion of the catechisms of Heinrich Bullinger (1559) and Burckhardt Leemann (1583), and was introduced also in Grisons and Schaffhausen. In 1536 Kaspar Grossmann (Megander) revised Jud's catechism for Bern; as in the course of time it was made to serve the views of Zwingli, it had to be revised anew, and in this form became known as the Bern Catechism. These old catechisms were either superseded or influenced by the Heidelberg Catechism. The Zurich Catechism of 1609, the work of Marcus Bäumlein, originated in a combination of the Heidelberg Catechism with those used in Zurich. It was introduced in different cantons and used until 1839. Under the influence of rationalism most of the cantons adopted new catechisms between 1830 and 1850. Basel took the lead in 1832, then followed Zurich with a new catechism (1839). In French Switzerland Calvin's *Catechismus Genevensis * (1542) was used at the beginning. In the canton of Vaud it was replaced in 1552 by a translation of the Bern Catechism, which gave way to that of Heidelberg in the eighteenth century. In 1734 there appeared in Geneva the small catechism of Jean Frédéric Osterwald, which, after revision, was also adopted in Vaud. About 1620 Stephen Gabriel, pastor at Ilanz, compiled a catechism for the Romance districts which remained in use even after a translation of Osterwald's catechism had appeared. But entire freedom exists as to the choice of religious manuals in Switzerland. In many cases the individual preachers write their own books of instruction. ### 9. Austria-Hungary. Since the edict of toleration of Joseph II., the Lutheran Church in Austria has used Luther's Smaller Catechism and the Reformed Church the Heidelberg Catechism. According to the constitution of the Evangelical Church in Austria, all further guides in religious instruction have to be sanctioned by the Evangelical Supreme Church Council in Vienna, and approved by the ministry of ecclesiastical affairs and public instruction. Some of the approved manuals are, in German, Buchrucker's and Ernesti's editions of Luther's Smaller Catechism, in Bohemian that of Molmar. Among those approved for the Reformed Church may be mentioned the enlarged German edition of the Heidelberg Catechism by Franz (Vienna, 1858), and the Bohemian by Von Tardy (Prague, 1867), and by Vesely (1885). In Hungary and Transylvania the same conditions exist as in Austria. ### 10. Slavic Countries. In the Baltic provinces of Russia an Esthonian translation of the Smaller Catechism seems to have appeared as early as in 1553. In 1586 a Lettish translation by J. Rivius was printed at Königsberg. It was revised in 1689 by E. Glück and used a long time among the Lettish congregations of Livonia. Another by H. Adolphi appeared in 1685 and found a large circulation in Courland. In accordance with a resolution of the Synod of Livonia and Courland in 1898, a new Lettish standard text has been established (Riga, 1898), which has supplanted all earlier translations. An Esthonian exposition of the Smaller Catechism was introduced in Esthonia in 1673 as the official catechism, and used almost exclusively until 1866. The catechism of Martin Körber (1864), modeled after the official catechism of Neustrelitz, has found a considerable circulation. The Germans in the Baltic provinces also produced numerous interpretations of their own; Jodocus Holst, *Einfältige Auslegung des Kleinen Katechismus Luthers * (Riga, 1596); Immanuel von Essen, *Christliche Katechismusübung * (1781); Werbatus, *Dr. Martin Luthers Kleiner Katechismus * (1895); and many others. For the Lutheran congregations of Poland there has been recently approved *Maly Katechizm Doktora Marcina Lutra * (Lublin, 1900). It is an exposition of the Smaller Catechism by Alexander Schönaich, preacher at Lublin. An official text of the Smaller Catechism has been published for the Russian-speaking Lutherans (St. Petersburg, 1865). ### 11. Scandinavian Countries. The first catechetical writings in Sweden were a working-over of Luther's *Betbüchlein, * a translation of the revision of the *Kinderfragen * of the Bohemian Brethren published at Magdeburg in 1524, and a translation of the *Handbüchlein für junge Christen * by Johann Toltz. The Smaller Catechism was translated by Laurentius Petri into Swedish perhaps as early as 1548; the oldest extant copy dates from 1572. 1n 1595 the Smaller Catechism was officially introduced, but came into general use only after the Church Order of 1686. An official translation of Luther's Larger Catechism dates from 1746. The exposition of the Smaller by Olaf Swebelius, which had been in use for some time, was revised in 1811 by Archbishop J. Axel Lindblom and introduced as an official catechism. In 1843 a new revision appeared, but in 1878 the *Doktor Mårten Luthers Lilla Katekes med kort utveckling, stadfäst af konungen den 11. Oktober 1878 * took its place and is still used. In 1532 the Smaller Catechism was translated into Danish by Jorgen Jensen Sadolin. In 1537 there appeared almost simultaneously two further translations, *Den lille danske Catechismus * by Franz Wormodson and *Luthers lille Katekismus * by Petrus Palladius. The latter was republished in 1538 as *Enchiridion sive Manuale ut vocant * and officially recognized. H. P. Petersen edited the Latin text of the Smaller Catechism side by side with a Danish translation for the use of schools (1608). In 1627 he used the Danish text for a manual destined for popular instruction. The text deviates frequently from the original, and these variants have crept into other compilations modeled after it. It retained its authority in Denmark until 1813, in Norway until 1843. The standard work for Norway is at present *Dr. M. Luthers Lille Katekismus * (9th ed., Christiania, 1897), and for Denmark C. F. Balslev's *Luthers Katekismua meden kort Forklaring * (Copenhagen, 1899). ### 12. Holland. In the Dutch Reformed Church absolute freedom exists in the choice of guides to be used in religious instruction. Besides the Geneva and Heidelberg catechisms, Abraham Hellenbroek's *Vorbeeld der goddelyke Waarheden * has been used. ### 13. England. The Established Church of England uses to-day the catechism from the Book of Common Prayer, with but slight changes from the original form of 1552. An exposition of it by John Palmer (London, 1894) shows the text of the original catechism in prominent type and provides each individual paragraph with an introduction. The Congregationalists have also adopted the catechism of the Established Church, but besides this they use a manual by Samuel Palmer, *A Catechism for Protestant Dissenters * (London, 1772, 29th ed., 1890), which contains a brief history of non-conformity and treats of the reasons for it. In the Sunday-schools the Congregationalists use a catechism by J. Hilton Stowell revised by A. M. Fairbairn (1892). The Presbyterian Church of England and the Church of Scotland have accepted the Westminster Catechism as the basis of their instruction. It is divided into the doctrines we are to believe and the duties we are to perform (The Moral Law; Faith and Repentance; Sacraments; Prayer). The form of religious instruction chiefly cultivated in England is the Sunday-school, for which the Sunday-school Union furnishes manuals. Dr. Watt's first and second catechisms have also found a large circulation; the former contains a short survey of the doctrines of Christian salvation and especially a catechism on Scriptural names, the latter an interpretation of the decalogue and information on the sacraments and prayers. Before the catechism of the Book of Common Prayer appeared, Luther's Smaller Catechism was used for several years in England; at the instance of Cranmer the Nuremberg *Kinderpredigten * which interpret it was in 1548 translated into English under the title *A Short Introduction into the Christian Religion.* ### 14. France. In the French Reformed Church Calvin's catechism of 1542 was at one time almost universally used, later with Osterwald's smaller catechism, but has now been superseded by Bonnefon's *Nouveau catéchisme élémentaire * (14th ed., Alais, 1900) and Decoppet's *Catéchisme populaire * (Paris). Less popular are Babut's *Cours de religion chrétienne * (6th ed., 1897) and Nyegaard's *Catéchisme à l'usage des Églises evangéliques * (13th ed., 1900). The Free Church uses the same catechisms. In the "Église de la Confession d'Augsbourg" Luther's Smaller Catechism has always been in use. The *Petit catéchisme de Luther* (Chateauroux) has added to Luther's text Bible texts and stories and renders the Ten Commandments exactly as they are found in Ex. xx. 1-17, combining the ninth and tenth commandments and treating the prohibition of the worship of images as a separate commandment. 15. Italy. As a result of the Evangelical movement in Italy, there originated about 1535 the "Christian Instruction for Children" by Juan de Valdés, apparently first written in Spanish, but published first in Italian and then translated into various languages (cf. the polyglot edition of E. Böhmer under the title *Instruction cristiana para los niños por Juan de Valdés, * Bonn, 1883). To-day the "Free Church" uses *Il catechismo ossia sunto della dottrina cristiana secondo la parola di Dio,* by G. P. Meille (Florence, 6th ed., 1895). Of a similar nature are the catechisms used by the Waldenses, *Catechismo della Chiesa evangelica Valdese o Manuale d'istruzione cristiana ad uso dei catecumeni di detta Chiesa* (1866) and *Catechismo evangelico ossia sunto della dottrina christiana* (1895). 16. American Lutheran Catechisms. The Lutherans in the United States use Luther's Smaller Catechism, which exists in many German, English, and German-English editions. In the Synodical Conference the Dresden *Kreuzkatechismus* of 1688 has a large circulation, in the Missouri Synod *Dr. M. Luthers Kleiner Katechismus in Frage und Antwort gründlich ausgelegt* by J. K. Dietrich (St. Louis, Mo.) and a condensed edition of the same are much used; the former also in English. In the Ohio Synod originated *Der Kleine Catechismus Dr. M. Luthers mit erklärenden und beweisenden Bibelstellen,* also in English (Allentown, Pa.). It contains besides the Smaller Catechism the "Order of Salvation," that is, a survey of the whole contents of Christian doctrine, an analysis of the catechism formed like Spener's catechetical tables, and the Württemberg *Konferenz-Examen, * which is an epitome of the *Kinderlehre* introduced in 1682 in Württemberg. Prof. M. Loy, Prof. F. W. Stellhorn, and Rev. C. H. Rohe wrote an exposition of the Smaller Catechism on the basis of Dietrich's, under the title *Dr. M. Luthers Kleiner Katechismus, in Frage und Antwort ausgelegt* (Columbus, O., 1882). On the basis of Caspari's catechetical exposition, W. J. Mann and G. F. Krotel, of the Synod of Pennsylvania, published *Luthers Kleiner Katechismus in Fragen und Antworten zum Gebrauch in Kirche, Schule and Haus* (Allentown, 1863). The General Council uses also a catechism which contains the Württemberg *Konferenz-Examen * as an appendix. It appeared under the title *Dr. M. Luthers Kleiner Katechismus mit Erklärung für die evangelisch-lutherlische Kirche in den Vereinigten Staaten,* also in English (New York). A recent addition explains Luther's text by Bible texts and stories—*Luthers Kleiner Katechismus mit Bibelsprüchen * (Philadelphia). The German-Evangelical synod, which is akin to the Evangelical Union in Germany, has published its own official catechism, *Kleiner evangelischer Katechismus, * also an edition with German and English on parallel pages (St. Louis). It is a free revision of the Smaller Catechism, differing from it especially in the doctrine of the sacraments. The German Reformed Church uses a catechism prepared in 1862 by Philip Schaff and entitled *Christlicher Katechismus: ein Leitfaden zum Religionsunterricht in Schule und Haus *(Philadelphia). These rather comprehensive books are intended for the school and especially for young people to be confirmed. In the numerous Sunday-schools the children are frequently instructed only in Biblical stories. A catechism intended for that purpose is *The Little Lamb's Catechism * by J. R. Lauritzen (Knoxville, Tenn.). The same author wrote another manual which has become very popular—*Dr. M. Luther's Kleiner Katechismus,* also in English (Knoxville, Tenn.). The German-Evangelical Synod possesses an excellent manual for the instruction of Sunday-schools in *Kurze Katechismuslehre* (St. Louis, 1899), which extends its material over three grades and is considered a preparation for the catechism proper. 17. The Moravians and Bohemian Brethren. In the German Moravian congregations the department for churches and schools under the direction of the Unitas Fratrum has reserved to itself the right of selecting manuals to be used is instruction. Luther's Smaller Catechism is chiefly used, in some places also *Hauptinhalt der christlichen Heilslehre zum Gebrauch bei dem Unterricht der Jugend in den evangelischen Brüdergemeinden* (8th ed., Gnadau, 1891), compiled by Samuel Lieberkühn in 1769. Among the Bohemian Brethren the *Katechismus der christlichen Lehre zum Gebrauch bei dem Unterricht der Jugend in den evangelischen Brüdergemeinden * (Dauba) has become the standard. It is based upon a catechism written by L. T. Reichel for the American congregations of Brethren. Among the earlier catechisms which are out of use now may be mentioned Zinzendorf's works—his strange production *Lautere Milch der Lehre von Jesu Christo * (1723) and his *Gewisser Grund christlicher Lehre nach Anleitung des einfachen Catechismi seel. Herrn Dr. Luthers * (1725). 18. Methodist Catechisms. Among the German-speaking Methodists of the United States the only books used are the manuals written at the order of the General Conference in 1868 by Wilhelm Nast in Cincinnati, especially with the aid of Schaff's catechism, *Der grössere* [*kleinere*] *Katechismus für die deutschen Gemeinden der Bischöflichen Methodistenkirche * (Cincinnati). The English Methodists use *A Brief Catechism for the Use of Methodists Compiled by Order of the Conference * (London) and *The Catechism of the Wesleyan Methodists * (ib.). The latter work consists really of three catechisms, arranged in gradation for pupils of different ages. 19. Baptist and Irvingite Catechisms. The manuals used among the Baptists in Germany are Rode's *Christlicher Religionsunterricht für die reifere Jugend * (Hamburg, 1882) and Kaiser's *Leitfaden für den Religionsunterricht, * which first appeared in English under the title of *Prize Catechism. * Besides these, Weert's *Katechismus, ein *Leitfaden für den Religionsunterricht * (Cassel, 1899) is used. [Several catechisms were prepared by English Particular Baptists in the seventeenth century: *A Soul Searching Catechism, * by Christopher Blackwood (1653); *Catechism for Children, * by Henry Jersey (1673); *The Child's Instructor: a New and Easy Primer, * by Benjamin Krach (1664). The General Assembly of the Particular Baptists at its session in London in June, 1693, requested William Collins to draw up a catechism "containing the substance of the Christian religion, for the instruction of children and servants." It has been reproduced in authentic form in *Confessions of Faith, and other Documents, edited for the Hanserd Knollys Society, by E. B. Underhill * (London, 1854). Among the Baptists of the United States in the South and Southwest *Question Books * (four series) by A. C. Dayton, and a *Catechism * by J. A. Broadus, have been widely used.* A H. N.] The catechism of the Irvingites contains three chapters; the first two represent practically the Prayer-book catechism; the third part treats of the doctrines peculiar to the Irvingites, the doctrine of the Church and its offices. [For the catechisms used in most Presbyterian communions see WESTMINISTER STANDARDS.] 20. Unitarian Catechisms. The English Unitarians use especially two small manuals—*Ten Lessons in Religion * by Charles Beard (London, 2d ed., 1897) and *A Catechism of Religion * by H. W. Hawkes. While the former contains only an exposition of the Lord's Prayer and instruction on the Bible, the latter treats in fifty-two questions of the most important terms in Christian faith and interprets them in the Unitarian sense. The latter is in some respects dependent on *An Evangelical Free Church Catechism for Use in Home and School * (London), which is used by Unitarians, Methodists, Baptists, Congregationalists, Presbyterians, and some smaller denominations. 21. Roman Catholic and Old Catholic Catechisms. The Roman Catholic Church learned from the Evangelicals its solicitude for the religious instruction of youth. Numerous manuals appeared as imitations of Evangelical catechisms. The catechism of John Dietenberger, a very popular book, was in some passages copied verbatim from Luther's. But all the catechisms previously published were far surpassed in popularity by the *Summa doctrinæ christianæ, per quæstiones tradita et ad capitum rudiorum accommodata * (1556) by the Jesuit Peter Canisius. It forms an epitome of his *Summa doctrinæ christianæ * of 1555 and was translated into all European languages. It was used even in India and remained for about two centuries the principal catechism of the Roman Catholic Church. In 1559 Canisius enlarged it under the title *Parvus Catechismus catholicorum, * which became the model for numerous expositions of the *Summa. * In 1566 appeared the *Catechismus ex decreto Concilii Tridentini ad Parochos Pii V. Pontificis Maximi iussu editus, * intended as a homiletical and catechetical handbook for the clergy; but the influence of the Jesuits was so great that it could not compete with the catechisms of Canisius; and even those of Bellarmin, which appeared in 1598, did not attain equal popularity with them. The Roman Catholic books of instruction, like the Evangelical catechisms, did not escape the influence of rationalism, at first in method and then even to some extent in contents. A return to the stricter teaching of the Church made itself felt in the first decades of the nineteenth century. Since 1847 J. Deharbe's catechisms have been generally recognized as standard works. They include *Katholischer Katechismus für Stadt- und Landschulen * (Regensburg, 1847); and *Kleiner katholischer Katechismus zunächst für solche Landschulen, welche nur während des Sommer-oder Wintersemesters besucht werden * (1847). In the United States the Catholic Church provides manuals of catechetical instruction, such as those edited by W. Faerber in German and English (St. Louis, 1897 and often), and *Catechisms of Catholic Teaching * (New York, n.d.). The Old Catholic Church has two official catechisms, the *Katholische Katechismus, herausgegeben im Auftrage der altkatholischen Synode * (Bonn) and *Leitfaden für den katholischen Religionsunterricht an höheren Schulen, herausgegeben im Auftrage der altkatholischen Synode * (Bonn, 1877). 22. The Greek Church. In 1721 the synod of the Russian Orthodox Church decreed that three small manuals for the instruction of youth and the common people should be made, one on the principal doctrines of faith and on the decalogue, a second on the special duties of each class, and a third containing sermons on the principal doctrines, virtues, and vices. On the strength of this order there appeared a book entitled "First Instruction of Youth, Containing a Primer and a Short Exposition of the Decalogue, the Lord's Prayer and the Creed, by order of his Majesty Peter L, emperor of all the Russias," which is probably the first real catechism in the Greek Church. The catechism used at the present time, the "Complete Christian Catechism of the Ortho dox Catholic Eastern Church," first published in 1839, originated under the influence of a manual composed by Jeromonach Platon in 1765 for the heir to the throne, the Grand Duke Paul Petrovitch, which is influenced in the arrangement of material by the *Confessio orthodoxa * of Peter Mogilas (1643). Like the latter, it groups its material under the three Christian virtues of faith, hope, and love. After an introduction on revelation, Holy Scripture, and catechetical teaching, it begins with an exposition of the Nicene Creed, followed by the Lord's Prayer and the Beatitudes, the union between faith and love, and an exposition of the Ten Commandments. The book closes with the application of the doctrine of faith and of piety. (FERDINAND COHRS.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: The works under CATECHESIS, CATECHETICS; CATECHUMENATE; LUTHER'S TWO CATECHISMS; and HEIDELBERG CATECHISM should be consulted. Collections of early catechisms are made in *Monumenta Germaniæ pædagogica, * ed. C. Kehrbach, vols. 4, 20-33, 39, Berlin, 1887-1907, and in *Katechetische Handbibliothek, * ed. F. Walk, Kempten, 1891-1905 (containing not only catechisms but works on catechetics). On the catechisms of the Middle Ages consult: G. Langemack, *Historia catechetica,* vol. i., Stralsund, 1729; J. Geffeken, *Der Bilderkatechismus des fünfzehnten Jahrhunderts und die katechetischen Hauptstücke in dieser Zeit bis auf Luther,* vol. i., Leipsic, 1855; H. Brück, *Der religiöse Unterricht . . . in Deutschland,* Mainz, 1876; P. Göbl, *Geschichte der Katechese im Abendlande vom Verfall des Katechumenats bis zum Ende des Mittelalters,* Kempten, 1880; F. Probst, *Geschichte der katholischen Katechese,* Breslau, 1887; F. Falk, *Der Unterricht des Volks in den katechetischen Hauptstücken am Ende des Mittelalters, in Historisch-politische Blätter,* cviii (1891), 553 sqq., 682 sqq., cix (1892) 81 sqq., 721 sqq.; P. Bahlmann, *Deutschlands katholische Katechismen bis zum Ende des sechszehnten Jahrhunderts,* Münster, 1894; Hauck, *KD*, vols. i.-iii. For collections of catechisms in post-Reformation times in Germany consult, besides the collections of Kehrbach and Walk, ut sup.: J. Hartmann, *Aelteste katechetische Denkmale der evangelischen Kirche,* Stuttgart, 1844; F. W. Bodemann, Katechetische Denkmale der evangelisch-lutherischen Kirche, Harburg, 1861; G. Kawerau, *Zwei älteste Katechismen der lutherischen Reformation,* Halle, 1890. For a bibliography of newer literature consult: F. Schneider, *Kritischer Wegweiser durch die Litteratur des Konfirmandenunterrichts und der öffentlichen Christenlehre,* Stuttgart, 1899. The history of catechisms is treated in: G. Langemack, ut sup., vols. ii.-iii., Stralssund, 1730-40; K. J. Löschke, *Die religiöse Bildung der Jugend und der sittliche Zustand der Schulen im 16. Jahrhundert, * Breslau, 1846; F. R. Ehrenfeuchter, *Zur Geschichte des Katechismus.* Göttingen, 1857: K. Neumann, *Der evangelische Religionsunterricht im Zeitalter der Reformation,* Berlin, 1899. On other than German lands consult: S. Hess, *Geschichte des Zürcher-Katechismus, *Zurich, 1811; *Tercentenary Monument. In Commemoration of the Three Hundredth Anniversary of the Heidelberg Catechism, * Philadelphia, 1863; C. A. Toren, *Der evangelische Religions-Unterricht in Deutschland, Grossbritannien and Dänemark,* Gotha, 1865; H. Bonar, *Catechisms of the Scottish Reformation, * London, 1866; A. T. Mitchell, *Catechisms of the Second Reformation . . . with Historical Introduction,* London, 1886; A. C. Bang, *Dokumenter og studier vedrörende den lutherske katekismus' historie in Nordens kirker,* 2 vols., Christiania, 1893-99; I. Moschakes, *Catechism of the Orthodox Eastern Church,* London, 1894; J. Poynet, *The Real Reformation Catechism of 1553,* ib. 1894; W. Eames, *Early New England Catechisms. A bibliographical Account of some Catechisms published before 1800, *Worcester, 1898. The literature on Roman Catholic catechisms is very voluminous; the following may be consulted: *The Catechism of John Hamilton,* Oxford, 1844; C. Moufang, *Die Mainzer Katechismen von der Erfindung der Buchdruckerkunst bis zum Ende des achtzehnten Jahrhunderts,* Mainz, 1877; *Commentaire sur le catéchisme des provinces ecclésiastiques de Quebec, Montréal, Ottawa,* Montreal, 1897; F. X. Thalhofer, *Entwickelung des katholischen Katechismus in Deutschland von Canisius bis Deharbe,* Freiburg, 1899; F. Spirago, *The Catechism Explained,* New York,1899; T. E. Cox, *Biblical Treasury of the Catechism,* ib. 1900; T. L. Kinkead, *Explanation of the Baltimore Catechism,* ib. 1902; J. Perry, *Explanation of the Catechism,* St. Louis, 1902.
CATECHUMENATE Catechumenate

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

Earliest Data (§ 1). According to the Church Fathers (§ 2). First Period of Development (§ 3). Second Period of Development (§ 4). Decline of the Catechumenate (§ 5). Ritual Survivals (§ 6). ### 1. Earliest Data. Catechumenate is a term applied to the method of receiving and instructing, in preparation for baptism, those who applied for membership in the early Christian Church. As soon as the apostolic mission had reached the stage of founding a Christian society, it was natural that those who wished to enter it should be required to go through a course of instruction as to the meaning of the hopes which it held out and the demands which it made of its members. Our information as to the method pursued in the earliest period is very scanty. Apparently the gatherings of the disciples were at first freely opened to any one (I Cor. xiv. 24) who desired to know more of their faith and practise; and baptism was probably often administered with but a short delay. As time went on, more care was exercised; the need of it was demonstrated by cases of relapse into heathenism and of the seeking of membership from interested or treacherous motives. We find traces of this greater caution as early as the first Apology of Justin (c. 150). A demand is made for some security as to the belief and conduct of the candidate, who is not apparently admitted to the assembly of the faithful until he has been adjudged worthy of baptism. How this security was obtained is not clear; the preparation seems to have been private, and the one who conducted it probably answered for the candidate, as at once sponsor and catechist. ### 2. According to the Church Fathers. Tertullian portrays a somewhat different system; though catechumens are still excluded from the assembly, the application of this name to them implies that they were already reckoned as in a sense belonging to the Church and under its care. This is still more clearly the case in Origen's account. The much discussed passage *Contra Celsum,* iii. 51 shows plainly that there was a definite system of examination and of instruction. It gives also the fact that at this period, besides the class which (as in Justin and Tertullian) is excluded from the assembly, there is another which has advanced far enough to claim the privilege of admission, and is only waiting for the last decisive step of baptism. It is a mistake to attempt to deduce from his words three classes divided by a hard and fast line, or to apply to these classes the names *audientes* ( *Gk. akroomenoi*), *genuflectente* ( *gonuklinontes*), and *competentes* ( *Photizomenoi*). The last occurs in the Apostolic Constitutions, and in Cyril of Jerusalem passim, for the candidates approaching baptism, who are definitely distinguished from the catechumens. The name *akroomenoi * occurs for the first time in the passage of Origen referred to, but without a distinct meaning; its use later in the proclamation of the deacon in the liturgy, summoning those not entitled to be present to depart, relates to a class of penitents not allowed to hear a part of the service to which catechumens were admitted. In like manner the application of *gonuklinontes * to a class of catechumens rests on a misunderstanding of the corrupt Greek text of the fifth canon of the Synod of Neocæsarea (314), which really means that catechumens falling into sin are to be put among the penitents, and expelled altogether if they do not amend. ### 3. First Period of Development. To sum up, then, what has been said, Origen shows a development of the catechumenate from what Justin gives, while Tertullian exhibits an intermediate stage. We must, however, remember that these witnesses are from different parts of the Church. The development was probably largely influenced by local conditions. In Tertullian's time, Septimius Severua had forbidden conversions to Christianity, and formal arrangements for the preparation of converts would have been direct rebellion. In Origen's day, on the other hand, the Church had enjoyed a long period of peace, and was not afraid to allow trusted catechumens to be present at its services; but the large number of converts made it more probable that some unworthy ones would be among them, and so to the original examination before baptism, a second and earlier one was added. Origen's account of the catechumenate gives all the essential features of the institution, as we meet with it when fully established, after persecution had ceased. Christianity had become the state religion, and it was possible to work out in detail institutions which had been carefully planned in the dark days preceding. ### 4. Second Period of Development. This second or established period covers roughly the fourth and early fifth centuries. The candidate, accompanied by a sponsor, announces his desire, normally to a deacon, who informs the bishop or presbyter. The grounds of his desire are investigated; people of certain sinful or dubious occupations are *ipso facto *excluded unless they will abandon them. If the candidate is acceptable, he receives a preliminary instruction, and is then set apart by the sign of the cross, laying on of hands, and (in the West) with blessed salt, as a catechumen. For a time he receives no special instruction, sharing that which the whole congregation gets in the *missa catechumenorum, * though departing before the later and more solemn part of the liturgy. After two (or three) years, he may ask for baptism; he enters the class of *competentes, * and his name is inscribed on the church list. The immediate preparation includes special instructions, usually given by the bishop; certain ceremonies, especially of exorcism, which show the influence of the pagan mysteries; and finally the *traditio symboli, * or instruction in the precise words of the baptismal creed, whose general sense has long been known to him. After learning and repeating this, he is taught the words of the Lord's Prayer, which has also been withheld from him until now by the *Arcani disciplina*. The recitation of the creed as a solemn act and the final renunciation of paganism accompany the act of baptism, which usually takes place in the night before Easter. During the following week the neophyte receives further instructions, and on the next Sunday, still wearing his white baptismal robe, he takes his place among the congregation as a baptized Christian, and joins in the recitation of the Lord's Prayer, the prayer of the children of God. As to the matter contained in the instructions to the catechumen in this period, fullest information comes from Augustine in the West and Cyril of Jerusalem in the East. ### 5. Decline of the Catechumenate. The decline of the institution was brought about by the constantly increasing numbers of those who sought admission to the Church. A thorough examination of them all became impossible; the preliminary instruction was gradually dropped, and the catechumenate was reduced to the immediate preparation for baptism. The growing practise of baptizing infants and young children completed the process, since there was no place for instruction in their case. Something still remained, however, of the ancient procedure. ### 6. Ritual Survivals. On the Monday after the third Sunday in Lent, notice was given to present the children who were to be baptized at Easter. On the following Wednesday their sponsors brought them to the church, where their names were registered. The ceremonies of signing with the cross, laying on of hands, exorcism, giving of salt, and a final prayer made them catechumens. Seven masses were said on succeeding days, five containing similar ceremonies, while the last two were especially solemn. The sixth contained the "opening of the ears," a reminder of the ancient *traditio symboli;* the book of the Gospels was borne in procession to the altar and a short extract from each Gospel read, after which the creed was given to the candidates, and an acolyte brought forward two children, a boy and a girl, and recited the creed for them (the ancient *redditio symboli*); with the subsequent communication of the Lord's Prayer were usually connected short expositions of each clause. The last "scrutiny" took place the day before Easter, and followed much the same order, but more solemnly and formally; and baptism took place at the traditional time. When the time came that nothing remained of the original institutions of the catechumenate except the outward ceremonies, these were more and more condensed, until they formed but a single rite leading up to the baptism which immediately followed them. In the *Ordo baptismi * of the Roman Ritual the order of the ancient preparations for baptism may still be traced without difficulty, and not a few relics of it remain in the evangelical baptismal ceremonies (see BAPTISM). (FERDINAND COHRS.) A very interesting survival of the ancient catechumenate is found in the Armenian work found among the modern Paulicians, translated and edited by F. C. Conybeare (*The Key of Truth: A Manual of the Paulician Church of Armenia,* Oxford, 1898) and believed by the editor to have been written not later than the ninth century and to represent an almost primitive form of Oriental Christianity. It is adoptionist in its Christology and drastic in its opposition to infant-baptism. It provides for a solemn consecration of the infant of Christian parents by the minister when it is seven days old, the careful training by parents and church until maturity is reached, the thorough testing of the candidates for baptism in life and in knowledge of Christian doctrine and morals, and the administration of baptism with considerable ceremony to those who have fulfilled all the conditions and have attained to the age at which Christ was baptized. A brief catechism, embracing the points of doctrine in which catechumens must be grounded, is given at the end. A. H. N. BIBLIOGRAPHY: The sources are to be found in the works of Justin Martyr, Origen's *Contra Celsum,* the "Catechetical Lectures" of Cyril of Jerusalem, Augustine's *De catechizandis rudibus,* and the *Didache,* all of which are accessible in Eng. transl. The history of the institution is traced in: G. von Zezschwitz, *System der christlichen Katechetik, * 2 vols., Leipsic, 1863-72; J. Mayer, *Geschichte des Katechumenats . . . in den ersten sechs Jahrhunderten,* Kempten, 1866 (Roman Catholic); A. Weiss, *Die altkirchliche Paedagogik . . . der ersten sechs Jahrhunderte,* Freiburg, 1869; F. X. Funk, in *Tübinger Theologische Quartalschrift,* 1883, pp. 41-77, 1886, pp. 353 sqq., 1899, pp. 434 sqq.; E. Hatch, *Organization of the Early Churches,* London, 1888; J. Heron, *Church of Sub-Apostolic Age; its Life, Worship, and Organization,* London, 1888; E. Sachsse, *Evangelische Katechetik; die Lehre von der kirchlichen Erziehung,* Berlin, 1897; F. Wiegand, *Die Stellung des apostolischen Symbols im kirchlichen Leben des Mittelalters,* i. *Symbol und Katechumenat,* Leipsic, 1899; Neander, *Christian Church,* vols. i. and ii. contain much valuable matter, consult the Index; Schaff, *Christian Church, * ii. 255-257; Bingham, *Origines,* books x., xi., xiv.; *DCA,* i. 317-319; the literature on the *Didache* usually discusses the catechetics of the early Church.
CATENÆ Catenæ

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

Origin (§ 1). Meaning of the Term (§ 2). Sources (§ 3). Value (§ 4). Method (§ 5). Form (§ 6). Catenæ Previous to the Fourteenth Century (§ 7). Medieval Catenæ (§ 8). Post-Reformation Catenæ (§ 9). The term catena, "a chain" (plural, catenæ), designates a commentary on Holy Scripture made up by piecing together short extracts from the Fathers and older writers. This plan of construction was suggested by the accumulation of exegetical materials made both by Origen and his school and by the theologians of Antioch in the third and fourth centuries. ### 1. Origin. The principal motive which impelled later scholars to collect and examine the early utterances was a dogmatic one. After the conversion of Constantine, the Church was anxious to put together in a clear and systematic form the results of previous theological work, and to emphasize the connection of the past with the present. For this purpose in regard to doctrine the decrees of the ecumenical councils answered admirably; but it was not so easy to attain the same result in the exposition of Scripture. The problem was to represent the results arrived at by the recognized commentators in propositions that had a unity of scheme and an admitted authority. The principles of its solution are laid down in the nineteenth canon of the Quinisext (Second Trullan) Council: that Holy Scripture is the standard of truth, that the limits of doctrine already fixed and the traditions of the Fathers are not to be transgressed, and that if any question concerning the Scripture comes up, it is to be expounded in no other way than as the great teachers of the past have given it in their works. The exposition of the Scripture was thus firmly attached to the recognized orthodox doctrine. The second canon of the same council had named some of the "lights and doctors" who were to be followed, and the first canon had given warning against all heretics, not merely against Arius, Macedonius, Apollinaris, and Nestorius, but also against Theodore of Mopsuestia, Origen, Didymus, Evagrius, and Theodoret. It was, however, found impossible to carry out these principles strictly. The writings of the authors suspected of heresy offered material too valuable to be neglected; and it was found impossible to arrive at a unity of results in an anthology of this kind without doing violence to the individuality of the authors and damaging their authority, so that nothing could be done but to put together what was selected. ### 2. Meaning of the Term. In this manner arose the collections of extracts which are so characteristic of Byzantine theology, covering all the books of the Bible (especially Genesis, Job, the Psalms, Canticles, Isaiah, Matthew, and John) by extracts from patristic commentators, and setting an example of method which was widely followed in Western and medieval commentaries. These collections are usually known as *Catenæ* (*Seirai*). The origin of the name is obscure, but its meaning is plain. It refers to collections of material put together in a purely external but visible connection, and strung upon the thread of the text. There may have been originally a mystical significance attached to it. As the hermetic chain of the later Neoplatonists symbolized the harmonious conjunction of the bearers of wisdom to the world, hand joined in hand from the earliest to later times, so the line of the Fathers was to hand down the approved expositions of the one true Church. ### 3. Sources. The first compilers have no fixed phrases to describe their process; but their lengthy titles give an idea of the plan they set before them. They collected their material according to the maxim of Seneca, *Quod verum est, meum est* ("What is true is mine"). The manner in which literary property was handled in the ancient world permitted not only straightforward appropriation of other people's work, but the utmost freedom in adaptation to the borrower's special purpose. The retention of the original authors' names here is an evidence of the weight attached to their testimony as authoritative expositors; where the compiler adds comments of his own, he is usually careful to distinguish his additions. Great variety is found in the manner of reproduction and in the extent of the material included. In the Catena of Possinus on Matthew we have one constructed on the exact lines laid down by the Quinisext Council—a mosaic of verbal citations from commentaries or other writings of orthodox Fathers. Where the compiler, like Nicetas of Serræ, added reflections of his own, he generally put them at the head of the group of quotations following a fresh section of the text. Where he adapted and condensed, he either kept to the serial order, or worked over all the material he had accumulated without making divisions for the separate authors. This is the manner adopted by Procopius, (Œcumenius, and Theophylact, who emphasize at the same time the fact that they are not originators but transmitters. There is no sharp dividing line between this kind of Catena and the Byzantine commentary; for the latter also patristic tradition is the standard, though the sources are not indicated in the margin as is usually the case in the Catenæ, and the exposition proceeds without a break. ### 4. Value. The value of the Catenæ is measured by their judgment in selecting and their skill in combining the material they borrow. The difficulty of choice is increased by the dogmatic limitations, which are sometimes in inevitable conflict with the scholarly interest. Origen, for instance, the first great Christian critic and commentator, was of inestimable value to exegesis; and for the Old Testament Catenæ both Philo, who had been studied by all learned theologians from Origen down, and Josephus were invaluable authorities. A compromise was reached in the principle (still followed by Roman Catholic commentators) of Cyril of Alexandria: "We need not avoid or question everything that heretics have said; for they confess many things which we also confess." Another difficulty was found in the occasionally conflicting expositions; their diversity was explained by Drungarius, with reference to the obscurity of the text, as providential. He contents himself with placing side by side the varying renderings and explanations of Isaiah, leaving the reader to form his own judgment. ### 5. Method. The simplest method of making a Catena was to follow one principal authority, to whose exposition shorter scholia are added from other sources. Thus Chrysostom is the main source in the Catena of Possinus on Matthew, as well as in the Gospel commentaries of Euthymius and Theophylact, though all of these differ in the additions they make to what they take from him. Other Catenæ are indiscriminate anthologies, no one authority being preferred. Of this type are those of Procopius and Nicetas, and most of those on the Epistles. ### 6. Form. The external form of the Catenæ differed according to their extent. Where they were not too extensive, the text was placed in the middle of the page, surrounded by the exposition, usually in smaller characters, sometimes even in tachygraphy. The names of the authorities are sometimes in the margin, sometimes in the body of the exposition, as a rule abbreviated. Occasionally diacritical marks show the connection between text and commentary. If the Catena is too extensive to allow this arrangement, the sections of the text are followed by the commentary, in separate paragraphs, with the authors' names on the margin, or else written without a break. The manuscripts, of which few date further back than the tenth century, differ much in execution. Some are of admirable workmanship, with illustrations; others are plain copies for students, with the marks of long use upon them, and some seem to have been hastily and carelessly made to supply the demand of the bookselling trade. Besides the commentaries, the Catenæ contain a good deal of introductory or illustrative matter. Thus the Gospels are frequently prefaced by the canons of Eusebius and his epistle to Carpianus, as well as by arguments and biographies of the evangelists; the Pauline epistles have a life of Paul, a list of his journeys, and an account of his martyrdom. ### 7. Catenæ Previous to the Fourteenth Century. Whether the beginnings of the manufacture of Catenæ can be traced back to the patristic period it is impossible to say with certainty, though it seems not improbable. After Eusebius the work of theologians to a great extent took the direction of codifying and criticizing what had been handed down. But Procopius (d. 528) is the first who can be demonstrated to have made Catenæ. The value of his work, which rests not only upon the Fathers from the third to the fifth century but upon Josephus and Philo and upon some of the teachers before Origen, gave it an epoch-making position. From the manner in which he speaks of his task in the prefaces to Genesis and Isaiah, we may conjecture that he was not an imitator of others but an originator in this line. Other extant Catenæ were compiled by Andreas the presbyter (seventh to tenth century); Johannes Drungarius (tenth century); Michael Psellus, and Nicetas, bishop of Serræ, later metropolitan of Heraclea in Thrace (eleventh century); Nicolaus Muzalon and Neophytus Eucleistus (twelfth century); and Macarius Chrysocephalus (fourteenth century). To these may be added not only the commentaries arranged more or less in catena style, though without names of authorities: Œcumenius, of whose date and personality we know nothing certain, though he was probably a contemporary of Arethas of Cappadocia; and the Gospel commentaries of Theophylact and Euthymius, composed under the Comneni. There is, however, a much larger number of anonymous Catenæ; and this fact is surprising, since Byzantine theologians were not given to hiding their light under a bushel. It may possibly be explained by the theory that these Catenæ were produced not by any one man but by a group of collaborators. Their dates are very hard to determine; the surest way to reach conclusions on this point is by examining their relations to those whose dates we know, which requires a good deal more investigation than has yet been given to them. In fact, what has been done in the way of scientific study of the Catenæ in general has only covered certain specific points; and those which have been printed cover only a small part of the extant material, and that not always selected with judgment. ### 8. Medieval Catenæ. The catena form impressed itself as a model upon medieval exegesis in the West, which also imitated the spirit in which the Eastern compilers went about their work. Here too the aim was to preserve the tradition of the Church in a uniform arrangement of Scriptural exposition, "so that the line of prophetic and apostolic interpretation may follow the norm of the ecclesiastical and catholic sense" (Vincent of Lerins). The principal sources were Ambrose, Hilary, Augustine, and Jerome; less often the Greek Fathers, such as Origen, Chrysostom, and Cyril of Alexandria, are cited. The prototypes of the medieval catena commentaries may be seen in the expositions of Cassiodorus and Isidore of Seville. On the Carolingian period the numerous commentaries of Bede exercised a decisive influence. He knew Greek, and shows some feeling for textual criticism; but he was not an exegetical individuality. He collects his fragments of exposition mainly from Jerome, Ambrose, Augustine, and Gregory, and lays his chief stress on the edifying explanation of the moral and mystical sense. In this tendency he was followed by Alcuin, Rabanus Maurus, Walafried Strabo, Dietrich of Hersfeld, Haimo, and Remigius of Auxerre, all less careful in the reproduction of their sources than Bede, with whom it was a matter of principle to designate clearly the intellectual property of his authorities. Among later commentaries of the catena sort especial influence was exerted by that of Peter Lombard on the Pauline epistles, which made no pretense of indicating sources, and the *Catena Aurea * of Thomas Aquinas on the Gospels, which makes use of some Greek Fathers as well as of Augustine, Jerome, Rabanus, and Remigius. Mention should also be made of the "glosses"—the *Glossa ordinaria * of Walafried Strabo, the *Glossa interlinealis* of Anselm of Laon (1110), and the *Postillæ perpetuæ * of Nicholas of Lyra (1340; see GLOSSES, BIBLICAL AND ECCLESIASTICAL). ### 9. Post-Reformation Catenæ. These works lead up to the exegetical collections which were made after the Reformation and under its influence. The expository standpoint was different, but the method of compilation remained the same. They either gave the observations of certain selected expositors side by side without change, or they made groups of extracts from as large a number as possible. Instances of the first method are the *Biblia magna * of De la Haye (Paris, 1643), the *Biblia maxima * (ib. 1660), the English *Annotations upon all the Books of the Old and New Testament * (London, 1645), and the *Critici sacri * edited by J. Pearson and others (ib. 1660). The second class is represented by Matthew Pole's *Synopsis criticorum aliorumque scripturæ sacræ interpretum et commentatorum * (London, 1669), which contains the most varied extracts from more than eighty theologians of all ages and beliefs, even including the Jewish. The Roman Catholic expositors, such as Cornelius a Lapide, Estius, and Calmet, followed the lines laid down by the older Catenæ, to which, however, with their uncritical subservience to a tradition presupposed as authoritative, they are far inferior. (G. HEINRICI.)
CATHARI Cathari

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CATHARI.** See NEW MANICHEANS, II.
CATHARINE, SAINT, OF ALEXANDRIA Catharine, Saint, of Alexandria

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CATHARINE, SAINT, OF ALEXANDRIA**. See CATHARINE, SAINT, THE MARTYR.
CATHARINE, SAINT, OF BOLOGNA Catharine, Saint, of Bologna

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CATHARINE, SAINT, OF BOLOGNA:** Roman Catholic saint; b. at Bologna or, according to other accounts, at Verona Sept. 8, 1413; d. at Bologna Mar. 9, 1463. About 1430 she entered the order of the Poor Clares at Ferrara after having been a lady of honor at the court of Princess Margaret of Este for about two years. She later became abbess of a convent of her order which was founded at Bologna. Her name was included in the Roman martyrology in 1592, and she was canonized by Benedict XIII. in 1724. Later tradition wove many legends about her name, and her body was preserved undecayed in her convent until recent years. To St. Catherine is ascribed a prophetic work entitled *Revelationes, sive de septem armis spiritualibus, * composed about 1438 and first edited probably at Bologna in 1475 and repeatedly since. In art she is represented in the habit of the Poor Clares, carrying the Christ-child, since the Virgin is said to have appeared to her and to have placed in her arms the infant Jesus in his swaddling-clothes. (O. ZÖCKLER.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: The *Vita *which is the earliest source was published at Bologna, 1502, from which a number of biographies were drawn in the next century. Consult: J. Görres, *Die christliche Mystik,* ii. 53 sqq., 158-159, 4 vols., Regensburg, 1836-42.
CATHARINE, SAINT, OF GENOA Catharine, Saint, of Genoa

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CATHARINE, SAINT, OF GENOA:** Roman Catholic saint; b. at Genoa 1447; d. there Sept. 14, 1510. She was the daughter of Roberto Fieschi, who had been viceroy of Naples under René of Anjou. Despite her desire for a life of religion, she was obliged to marry a nobleman of her native city named Giuliano Adorno, whence she is often called Catharina Flisca Adurna. After a life of extravagance her husband died in 1474, but not before he had been converted by his wife's piety and had become a Franciscan of the third order. For the remainder of her life his widow, as a member of the order of the Annunciation of St. Marcellina, was distinguished both for her care of the sick in the Genoese hospital Pammatone (especially during the plagues of 1497 and 1501) and by her extreme asceticism. For twenty-three years during the seasons of Lent and Advent she is said to have fasted absolutely, taking at most a glass of water with salt and vinegar "to cool the raging flame within." She was formally canonized by Clement XII. in 1737, and the following pope, Benedict XIV., placed her name in the Roman martyrology, appointing her feast for Mar. 22. St. Catherine was one of the numerous mystic and prophetic authors of the latter part of the Middle Ages and wrote *Demonstratio purgatorii *or *Tractatus de purgatorio *(ed. C. Marabotto and E. Vernazza in their biography of St. Catherine, Genoa, 1551; Eng. transl., London, 1858), *Dialogus animam inter et corpus, amorem proprium, spiritum, humanitatem ac Deum,* and a treatise on the Christian life (both contained in the edition already mentioned). Her visions were assailed by Adrian Baillet in his *Vies des saints* (Paris, 1701) from the Gallican point of view, but other Roman Catholic authorities, such as St. Francis of Sales and the modern Jesuit Christian Pesch, have esteemed them highly. (O. ZÖCKLER.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: The anonymous *Vita * with commentary is in *ASB, * Sept., v. 123-176, and was translated into French by the Abbé Piot, Paris, 1840. Consult: P. Lechner, *Leben und Schriften der heiligen Katharina von Genua, * Regensburg, 1859; T. de Bussière, *Vie et æuvres de S. Catherine de Gênes, * Paris, 1873; P. Fliche, *S. Catherine de Gênes, * Paris, 1880; F. von Hügel, in *The Hampstead Annual, * 1898, pp. 70 sqq.
CATHARINE, SAINT, THE MARTYR (SAINT CATHARINE OF ALEXANDRIA) Catharine, Saint, the Martyr (Saint Catharine of Alexandria)

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CATHARINE, SAINT, THE MARTYR (SAINT CATHARINE OF ALEXANDRIA):** One of the most honored saints both of the Eastern and the Western Church. Many modern hagiographers identify her with a wealthy and noble Christian lady of Alexandria who, according to Eusebius (*Hist. eccl., *VIII. xiv. 15), resisted the licentious advances of the emperor Maximinus, and was consequently deprived of her estates and banished. This identification, however, does not agree with the statement of Rufinus ( *Hist. eccl.,* viii. 17) that this lady was named Dorothea, nor does it harmonize with the legend of St. Catherine as given both by Simeon Metaphrastes and the Roman martyrology. According to these sources, St. Catharine was a maiden of royal birth (the daughter of King Konstos, in the Greek *Officium*), and of extraordinary wisdom and beauty. At the age of eighteen, she engaged in a controversy, at the command either of Maximinus or Maxentius (although the latter never ruled Alexandria), with fifty pagan philosophers, whom she converted so signally that they remained faithful to Christianity even to martyrdom. In prison, a few days before her own execution, she converted the empress, the general Porphyrius, and his 200 soldiers, all of whom suffered death by the sword for their faith. Resisting both the pleadings and the threats of the tyrant, Catharine remained unharmed by torture, even on a machine of sharp-pointed wheels, until she was finally beheaded by the command of Maximinus. The day of St. Catharine is celebrated either on Nov. 25 or on Mar. 5. Her body is said to have been borne by angels to Mount Sinai, where Justinian I. built a cloister in her honor and where her bones were said to have been discovered by Egyptian Christians in the eighth century, thus giving rise to the feast of the discovery of the body of St. Catharine on May 13 or 26. About 1027 Simeon, a monk from Sinai, is said to have carried a portion of the relics of St. Catharine to Rouen, and her monastery on Mount Sinai now retains only her head and one hand. [These are enclosed in a marble sarcophagus.] Inspired by the tradition of her victory over the philosophers of Alexandria, the philosophical faculty of the University of Paris later chose her as their patron saint. According to Occidental tradition, she is one of the fourteen "helpers in need," the only other feminine members of this band being SS. Barbara and Margaret. See HELPERS IN NEED. In Christian art, both of the East and the West, St. Catharine is an important figure. Her usual attributes are a sword and a wheel (either entire or broken), through which curved knives are thrust. To these are frequently added a palm of victory, a book in token of her learning, and occasionally a crown, or, more often, a bridal ring which the Christ-child himself is said to have placed on her finger in emblem of betrothal. The oldest Oriental picture of this saint is a mosaic over the apse of the basilica of the Transfiguration in the monastery on Sinai, which represents simply a female head without attributes. In a picture by Simon of Sienna (d. 1344) she bears in her hand a palm and a book. Among the numerous representations of St. Catherine in Western art, special mention may be made of the works of Altichiero da Zevio (c. 1380) in the frescos of the chapel of St. George at Padua, the frescos of Masaccio (c. 1420) in the upper church of St. Clement at Rome, eleven marble bas-reliefs (probably dating from the fourteenth century) in the church of Santa Chiara in Naples, nine pictures of 1385 in the cloister of St. Paul at Leipsic, and the miniatures in the *Vie de Sainte Catherine d' Alexandrie * by Jean Mielot, secretary of Philip the Good, duke of Burgundy (c. 1462). After the middle of the fifteenth century the most noteworthy artists of Italy, Flanders, and Germany, such as Fiesole, Raffael, Carlo Dolce, Jan van Eyck, Hans Memling, and Lukas Cranach, vied with one another in the production of pictures of St. Catharine, and the medieval Christian drama repeatedly represented the legend of the saint in mysteries, the earliest being that of the Norman Geoffrey, abbot of St. Albans, which was played at Dunstable about 1120. (O. ZÖCKLER†.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: *The Legend of St. Katherine, ed. from a MS. in the Cotton Library by J. Morton for the Abbotsford Club, * London, 1841; *Life and Martyrdom of St. Katherine of Alexandria, * Roxburghe Club publications, no. 99, ib. 1884; *Life of St. Katherine, * ed. E. Einenkel for Early Text Society, ib. 1884; *The Life Metrical, * by J. Capgrave, ed. F. C. Hingeston, is in *Rolls Series, * no. 1, pp. 337-354, ib. 1858. Consult: C. Hardwick, *Historical Inquiry Touching St. Catharine of Alexandria, * Cambridge, 1849; H. Knust, *Geschichte der Legenden der heiligen Catherina, * Halle, 1890. On the art side, consult: Mrs. Jameson, *Sacred and Legendary Art,* ii. 74-97, Boston, 1893; J. Wipfli and J. J. von Ah, *Das Leben der heiligen Katharina von Alexandrien, * Einsiedeln, 1898.
CATHARINE DE' RICCI, SAINT Catharine de' Ricci, Saint

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CATHARINE DE' RICCI,** rît'chî, **SAINT:** Roman Catholic saint; b. at Florence [Apr. 23] 1522; d. at Prato (11 m. n.w. of Florence) Feb. 2 [1590]. She was educated in a convent at Monticelli and at the wish of her father lived in the world for a short time, after which she took the veil and entered the Dominican nunnery of St. Vincent at Prato. At the age of twenty-five she became prioress, and spiritual counsel was sought from her by bishops, cardinals, and princes. She was also a close friend of St. Philip Neri, with whom she maintained an active correspondence. The intensity of her meditation on the Passion was such that she actually felt the sufferings of Christ and frequently shed blood as if from scourgings and wounds. St. Catharine was canonized by Benedict XIV. in 1746 and her feast was appointed for Feb. 13. In art she has the attributes of the crown of thorns and a marriage ring. The elegant style of her letters ranks her as one of the best Italian classics of the second half of the sixteenth century [ed. A. Gherardi, Florence, 1890]. (O. ZÖCKLER†.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: F. M. Capes. *Life of St. Catherine de' Ricci,* London, 1905, which gives a transl. of a number of her letters.
CATHARINE, SAINT, OF SIENNA Catharine, Saint, of Sienna

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CATHARINE, SAINT, OF SIENNA:** Roman Catholic saint; b. at Sienna [Mar. 25] 1347; d. at Rome Apr. 29, 1380. She was the twenty-third child of a dyer named Jacomo Benincasa. ### Early Life. Her early home in the vicinity of a Dominican monastery made a deep impression on the sensitive child, and she believed that St. Dominic himself appeared to her in a dream and urged her to enter his order. Disregarding her mother's wish that she should marry, Catherine, then about twelve years of age, cut off her long blond hair to escape unwelcome attentions. Three years later smallpox destroyed her beauty and she was able to fulfil her heart's desire, to which her mother had consented sometime previously, by entering the order of penitents of St. Dominic. She no longer drank wine, while her only food was uncooked herbs, taken as a salad, or with oil, fruit, and bread. She scourged herself thrice daily according to the most rigid Dominican custom, once for herself, once for the living, and once for the dead. Under her habit she wore a shirt of haircloth for which she substituted later an iron chain about her waist. She passed the night in prayer until the bells on the monastery called to matins and then lay down between boards which symbolized her coffin. This asceticism she practised in a tiny room in her father's house which she scarcely left for three years except to attend mass in the neighboring Dominican church. After 1366, however, she appeared more frequently in public and became conspicuous for her deeds of mercy to the poor and sick, especially during the plague of 1374. Through her devotion and her piety she gathered around her a spiritual household of about twenty persons of both sexes, chiefly members of the Dominican order. ### Visions. The chief cause of St. Catharine's fame was her reputation for visions and for prophecy. Even during the time of her novitiate she believed that Christ often appeared to her and, toward the end of this period of preparation, that he himself betrothed her formally as he had the first St. Catharine (see CATHARINE, SAINT, THE MARTYR), by placing a ring upon her finger. This marriage symbol, she declared, was always visible to her, although no other eyes might see it. Her union with Christ was further sanctified by an interchange of hearts and finally by the divine stigmata, beginning with the print of a nail on her hand and ending with the painful impress of the four other wounds. This stigmatization also, as in the case of her German contemporary, Margareta Ebner of Medingen, always remained invisible, whereas in St. Francis and the majority of the stigmatists, the wounds might be seen of all. She likewise believed that she associated much with the Virgin and with Christ, not only being convinced that she drank the blood from the wounded side of the Lord, and the milk from Mary's breast, but also that she received divine instruction, admonition, and comforts, which she was frequently able to communicate to others in her ecstasies. Many of her letters and writings, especially her "Dialogues," were dictated by her in trances. She once fasted during the forty days from Easter to Ascension, being supported solely by the Eucharist and thus becoming a model for later saints, particularly for the two Catharines of the fifteenth century. ### Political Activity. Despite her death to the world, St. Catharine was compelled, during the closing years of her life, to take part repeatedly in the political and ecclesiastical affairs of her country. After 1374 she frequently left Sienna for the promotion of peace between the hostile nobles of Tuscany. In 1375 she was in Pisa, where she wrote Queen Joan of Naples to undertake a crusade to free the Holy Land. A year later she went to Avignon to reconcile the republic of Florence with Gregory XI., but was unsuccessful on account of the treachery of the Florentines. Later, however, after she had in great measure been instrumental in securing the return of the pope to Rome, she effected her purpose by a journey to Florence in 1378. The schism between Urban VI. in Italy and Clement VII. in Avignon also engaged her attention. She was a firm partizan of the former, who summoned her to Rome and after listening to her exhortations of peace sent her to the court of Joan together with St. Catharine of Sweden to win the queen from Clement to himself. The mission failed, since Bridget's daughter would not be subordinate to her sister saint, but Catherine of Sienna lived to see the longed-for, though brief, adherence of Naples to her pope. She was recalled to Rome by this turmoil and struggle and there died. She was buried in the Dominican Church of Minerva in Rome, although her skull is said to be in the Dominican Church of her native city. She was canonized by Pius II., in 1461, while Urban VIII. appointed her feast for Apr. 30. She is represented in art as carrying a crucifix with stigmata on her hands, as well as with the bridal ring. Occasionally she carries in her hand a lily or a book. ### Writings. The chief writings of St. Catharine of Sienna are 373 letters (best separate edition by N. Tommaseo, *Le Lettere di Santa Caterina da Siena,* 4 vols., Florence, 1860), many of them addressed to popes, cardinals, princes, and nobles, and important for the history of the period. She likewise wrote twenty-six prayers, various short prophetic oracles, and a dialogue between herself and God the Father, dictated in a trance in 1378, under the title *Libro della Divina Dottrina *(Eng. transl., by A. Thorold, *Dialogue of the Seraphic Virgin Catharine of Sienna, * London, 1896), later divided by G. Gigli into four treatises on religious wisdom, prayer, providence, and obedience; an older division is into six treatises under the title *Dialogi de providentia Dei. *Historically, the most interesting of these treatises is the one on prayer, in which St. Catherine emphasizes the value of the prayer of the heart, which needs no words, in contradistinction to mere formalism. In her criticisms she spared neither priests, cardinals, nor pope, sternly reproving them for their derelictions and admonishing them of their high duty. Yet though she proclaimed the necessity of reformation, she desired it to be within the Church and was unswerving in her orthodoxy and in her allegiance to the Roman Catholic faith. Her complete works were first edited by Aldus at Venice in 1500, but the best of the older editions is that of G. Gigli, *L'Opere della Serafica Santa Caterina da Siena *(5 vols., Sienna, 1707-26). (O. ZÖCKLER†.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: The early *Vita *and other documents are collected in *ASB,* April, iii. 853-978. For later lives and criticism consult: A. Capecelatro, *Storia di Caterina da Siena e del Papato del suo tempo,* 4th ed., Sienna, 1878; Augusta T. Drane, *Hist. of St. Catherine of Siena and her Companions, *2 vols., London, 1887; A. H. Chirat, *S. Catherine de Sienne et l'église au 14. siècle,* Paris, 1888; Josephine E. Butler, *Catherine of Siena,* London, 1895; Comtesse de Flavigny, *S. Catherine de Sienne,* Paris, 1895; Vida D. Scudder, *St. Catherine of Siena as seen in her Letters, * New York, 1905; *St. Catherine of Siena and Her Times, * London, 1906; E. G. Gardner, *St. Catherine of Siena, * London and New York, 1907. Also L. Gazet, *Le Grand Schisme d'Occident,* 2 vols., Florence, 1889.
CATHARINE, SAINT, OF SWEDEN Catharine, Saint, of Sweden

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CATHARINE, SAINT, OF SWEDEN:** Roman Catholic saint; b. in Sweden 1331 or 1332; d. at Vadstena (130 m. s.w. of Stockholm) Mar. 24, 1381. She was the second daughter of St. Bridget, the founder of the Brigittines (see BRIDGET, SAINT, OF SWEDEN). At the age of thirteen or fourteen she married a young nobleman of German extraction named Eggart of Kürnen—the marriage was, however, by mutual consent only nominal, and both parties preserved a lifelong virginity. During the lifetime of her husband, Catherine accompanied her mother on the last-named's first journey to Rome, where through a vision of St. Bridget she learned of her husband's death in Sweden. She then made a pilgrimage with her mother to the Holy Land, but was in Rome with her brother Birger when St. Bridget died there in 1373. She was one of those who escorted her mother's bones to Sweden, and she then took up her abode at Vadstena, the mother house of the Brigittines, where she ruled as the successor of St. Bridget. About the time of the return of the popes from Avignon, St. Catherine again resided for some years in Italy and twice secured papal confirmation of the rule of her order, first from Gregory XI. in 1377 and again from Urban VI. two years later. The day appointed for her feast in the Roman martyrology is Mar. 22. In art her attribute is a hind. She wrote a "Consolation of the Soul," which has been lost. According to the preface, it was a compilation from many books and treated of the ten commandments, the seven benedictions, the seven joys of Mary, the seven gifts of the Holy Spirit, and the seven deadly sins. (O. ZÖCKLER†.) BIBLIOGRAPHY: The early *Vita * with commentary is in *ASB, * March, ii. 503-531, and in E. M. Fant, *Script. rer. Suecicarum, * iii., section 2, pp. 244-275; cf. A. Butler, *Lives of the Fathers, Martyrs, and Other Saints, * Nov. 25th, London, 1860; *KL,* vii. 344-345.
CATHARINUS, AMBROSIUS Catharinus, Ambrosius

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CATHARINUS, AMBROSIUS:** The monastic name of Lancelotto Politi, Dominican, bishop of Minori and archbishop of Conza; b. in Sienna 1487; d. in Naples Nov. 8, 1553. In 1517 he entered in Florence the monastery of Savonarola, against whom he wrote a polemic treatise in 1548. Eager in opposing every form of heresy, he appeared against Luther in 1520 with an *Apologia pro veritate catholicæ ac apostolicæ fidei.* Luther replied in 1521 (*Ad librum A. Catharini responsio*), and Catharinus answered. Then he went to France, and wrote in Paris against a member of his own order, Cardinal Cajetan, *Annotationes in commentaria Cajetani.* After returning to his country he wrote against his fellow townsman Bernardino Ochino, who in the mean while had fled from Italy to live according to his own belief (see OCHINO, BERNARDINO). A little later Catharinus issued two treatises against Italian Protestant works; viz., *Trattato utilissimo del benefizio di Gesu Cristo crocifisso* and *Sommario della Sacra Scrittura.* The polemic theologian was present at the Council of Trent. He arrived in 1545 with the legate Del Monte and made a speech at the third session. As a reward for his services Paul III. made him bishop of Minori in 1546. Julius III. made him archbishop of Conza in 1552, and was on the point of naming him cardinal when Catharinus died. The earliest of the works of Catharinus are collected in his *Opuscula* (Leyden, 1542), but there is no complete edition. K. BENRATH. BIBLIOGRAPHY: The life and writings of Catharinus are discussed in: J. Quétif and J. Échard, *Script. ordinis prædicatorum,* ii. 144 sqq., 332, 885; K. Werner, *Geschichte der apologetischen und polemischen Literatur,* vol. iv. passim, Schaffhausen, 1865; F. H. Reusch, *Der Index der verbotenen Bücher,* vol. i. passim, Bonn, 1883.
CATHCART, WILLIAM Cathcart, William

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CATHCART, WILLIAM:** American Baptist; b. at Londonderry, Ireland, Nov. 8, 1826. He was educated at Glasgow University and Horton (now Rawdon) Baptist Theological College, Yorkshire, England, from which he was graduated in 1850. He was minister of a Baptist church at Barnsley, near Sheffield, from 1850 to 1853, when he went to the United States, and accepted a call to Mystic River, Conn., where he remained four years. He was then pastor of the Second Baptist Church, Philadelphia, from 1857 to 1884, and was also president of the American Baptist Historical Society from 1876 to 1884. He has written: *The Papal System, from Its Origin to the Present Time * (Philadelphia, 1872); *The Baptists and the American Revolution* (1876); and *The Baptism of the Ages and of the Nations* (1878), and edited *The Baptist Encyclopædia * (Philadelphia, 1881). Since 1884 he has held no regular charge, his health not permitting him to accept a pastorate, although he has been able to devote part of his time to literary labors.
CATHEDRA Cathedra

KO

Aucun texte traduit disponible pour le moment.

EN

**CATHEDRA:** The ancient Latin title for the special seat occupied by the bishop in Christian churches. Even in the catacombs such seats were used, either cut out of the solid rock or portable. In the basilicas the cathedra stood at the back of the semicircular apse, behind the altar, which was on the chord of the arc; but when it became customary to place the altar back against the wall, the bishop's seat was brought down into the choir and placed on the north or gospel side. The early Church preserved with great reverence the seats of its first bishops; thus it is learned from Eusebius (*Hist. eccl.,* VII. xix. 32) that the church of Jerusalem preserved that of James, and the church of Alexandria that of Mark. A very ancient chair traditionally believed to be that of Peter is preserved in St. Peter's at Rome, and was used for many centuries for the enthronement of new popes, until Alexander VII. (1655-67), for its better preservation, had Bernini enclose it in a colossal bronze throne. At the celebration of the eighteenth centenary of the apostle's martyrdom in 1867, Plus IX. had it again exposed to view; an exact description and picture of it may be found in Kraus, *Roma sotterranea, * Freiburg, 1873. The bishop's seat was often used as a symbol of the teaching office of the Church, exercised through him; this is frequently referred to in the mosaics and carving of extant chairs dating from the fifth to the ninth century. Thus in the definition of the doctrine of papal infallibility, the pope is said to speak *ex cathedra * when he proclaims a doctrine "in the exercise of his office as pastor and teacher of all Christians."
Source: public_domain