Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 4,537 / 4,537
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Risorse di studio
Commentari biblici
Sfoglia più commentari di pubblico dominio e le traduzioni coreane di scripture.how per libro e capitolo. Passa tra fonti di commentario, leggi solo la traduzione o confrontala affiancata al testo originale.
Commentario attivo
Tutti i commentari
23 fonti
Voci totali
307,288
81,431 tradotte
Licenza
Mostrata per fonte
Fonti e licenze
Ciascuna fonte di commentario mantiene separati opera originale, autore, avanzamento della traduzione e informazioni di licenza. Le traduzioni coreane e il lavoro editoriale di scripture.how sono gestiti a parte rispetto al testo di fonte.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871). CCEL expanded electronic edition states it is in the public domain.
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 19,831 / 19,831
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Albert Barnes · 1834
Albert Barnes' Notes on Revelation Of St. John The Divine (New Testament, English original, public domain). Sourced from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library (CCEL). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes.
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 22,781 / 22,781
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Adam Clarke's Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Adam Clarke · 1831
Public domain English commentary by Adam Clarke, normalized from Wikisource book pages for scripture.how. Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke.
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 21,603 / 22,101
- Lingua di fonte
- en
John Gill's Exposition of the Bible
John Gill · 1763
John Gill(1697-1771), Exposition of the Old and New Testament(1746-1763). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/gill.
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 12,528 / 30,759
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Calvin's Commentaries
John Calvin · 1850
종교개혁 신학 원천 (영역본 PD, 대부분 — 전권 아님)
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 144 / 7,385
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Matthew Poole's Annotations upon the Holy Bible
Matthew Poole · 1685
간결 절별 전권 개혁주의 주석
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 31,092
- Lingua di fonte
- en
The Pulpit Commentary
ed. H.D.M. Spence & Joseph S. Exell · 1890
전권 강해·설교·예화 풍부 (항목 대량)
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 25,592
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
Carl F. Keil, Franz Delitzsch · 1866
구약 학술 표준 — 히브리어·문헌비평·고대근동 배경
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 2,044
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers
ed. Charles J. Ellicott · 1878
학술+가독 균형 전권 주석
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 23,497
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Cambridge (다저자) · 1900
준전권 준학술 (권별 저자·연도 확인)
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 27,176
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Vincent's Word Studies in the New Testament
Marvin R. Vincent · 1887
신약 헬라어 단어 연구
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 5,763
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Word Pictures in the New Testament
A.T. Robertson · 1933
헬라어 시제·문법 해설 결정판 (KR PD / US 1931+ 권별)
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 6,935
- Lingua di fonte
- en
The Expositor's Greek Testament
ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (다저자) · 1910
헬라어 신약 학술 (권별 저자 PD 확인 필요)
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 7,010
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Meyer's Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament
Heinrich A.W. Meyer · 1880
신약 학술 정밀주해 (독일 — K&D 대응)
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 5,340
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Wesley's Explanatory Notes
John Wesley · 1755
간결 실용 전권(NT 1755 / OT 1765) 웨슬리안
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 5,643
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments
Joseph Benson · 1815
웨슬리안 전권 주석
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 14,675
- Lingua di fonte
- en
The Treasury of David
Charles H. Spurgeon · 1885
시편 주석 고전 (설교 자료 풍부)
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 2,290
- Lingua di fonte
- en
MacLaren's Expositions of Holy Scripture
Alexander Maclaren · 1910
설교형 강해 명저 (전권, 절별 가공 필요)
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 1,144
- Lingua di fonte
- en
The People's New Testament
B.W. Johnson · 1891
평이 절별 신약 해설 (일반신자·모바일)
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 7 / 3,477
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Coke's Commentary on the Holy Bible
Thomas Coke · 1803
감리교 전권 주석
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 10,808
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Trapp's Complete Commentary
John Trapp · 1660
청교도 전권 주석 — Henry/Gill 보완
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 26,397
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Hodge's Commentary on the New Testament
Charles Hodge · 1860
프린스턴 조직신학 관점 신약 정밀 주석 (롬·고전후·엡)
- Avanzamento della traduzione
- 0 / 1,011
- Lingua di fonte
- en
Adam Clarke's Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Luke 21 Introduction
The poor widow casting two mites into the treasury, Luke 21:1-4. The destruction of the temple foretold, Luke 21:5, Luke 21:6. The signs of this desolation, Luke 21:7. False Christs, Luke 21:8. Wars, Luke 21:9, Luke 21:10. Earthquakes and fearful sights, Luke 21:11. Persecutions against the godly, Luke 21:12-19. Directions how to escape, Luke 21:20-22. The tribulation of those times, Luke 21:23-28. The parable of the fig tree, illustrative of the time when they may expect these calamities, Luke 21:29-33. The necessity of sobriety and watchfulness, Luke 21:34-36. He teaches by day in the temple, and lodges by night in the mount of Olives, and the people come early to hear him, Luke 21:37, Luke 21:38.
CHAPTER 21.
THE WIDOW’S OFFERING. THE APOCALYPTIC DISCOURSE.
Meyer's Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament
Luke 21 Introduction
CHAPTER 21
Luke 21:2. Καί] bracketed by Lachm. It is wanting in B K L M Q X Π א, min. Or. But A E G H S U V Γ Δ Λ, min. have it after τινα. Thus Tisch. [not Tisch. 8]. This is correct. From ignorance objection was taken to this arrangement, and καί was sometimes placed before, and sometimes was struck out altogether.
Luke 21:3. πλεῖον] Lachm. and Tisch. have ̔πλείω, which would have to be adopted if it were not too feebly attested by D Q X, min.
Luke 21:4. τοῦ Θεοῦ] is wanting in B L X א, min. Copt. Syr.cu. Syr.jer. Deleted by Tisch. An exegetical addition.
Luke 21:6. After λίθῳ Lachm. and Tisch. [Tisch. synopa., but not Tisch. 8] have ὧδε, in accordance with B L א, min. Copt. Other authorities have it before λίθος. D, codd. of It. have ἐν τοίχῳ ὧδε. An addition from Matthew.
Luke 21:8. οὖν] is to be deleted, with Lachm. and Tisch., in accordance with B D L X א, min. vss. A connective addition.
Luke 21:14. The reading ἐν ταῖς καρδίαις (Lachm. Tisch.), instead of εἱς τὰς κ., is decisively attested.
Luke 21:15. Elz. Matth. Scholz have ἀντειπεῖν οὐδὲ ἁντιστῆναι. But instead of οὐδέ, A K M R, min. Slav. Brix. Or. Cyr. Didym. Griesb. have ἤ. Sometimes with ἤ, sometimes with οὐδέ, D L א, min. Ar. p. Erp. Arm. Slav. Vulg. Or. have the two verbs in the reverse order. Hence Lachm. has ἀντιστῆναι οὐδὲ ἀντειπεῖν, and Tisch. has ἀντιστῆναι ἤ ἀντειπεῖν. These variations are to be explained from the fact that ἀντειπεῖν, with ἤ or οὐδέ, on account of the similar beginning of the following verb, was passed over. So according to D, Syr. Pers.P. Vulg. ms. codd. of It. Cypr. Aug. Rinck. When the passage was restored, the verbs were placed in different order; and instead of ἤ after the previous οὐ, οὐδέ was inserted. Accordingly, read with Griesbach: ἀντειπεῖν ἢ ἀντιστ.
Luke 21:19. Elz. Matth. Scholz, Tisch. have κτήσασθε. But A B, min. Syr.omn. Arr. Aeth. Vulg. It. (not Vind. Cant.) Or. Macar. Marcion, according to Tertullian, have κτήσεσθε. Recommended by Griesb., approved by Rinck, adopted by Lachm. The Recepta is an interpretation of the future taken imperatively.
Luke 21:22. Elz. has πληρωθῆναι. But πλησθῆναι is decisively attested.
Luke 21:23. δέ] deleted by Lachm. and Tisch., following B D L, Arr. It. Theophyl. An addition from the parallels.
After ὀργή Elz. has ἐν, in opposition to decisive evidence.
Luke 21:24. ἄχρι] Lachm. Tisch. have ἄχρις (Tisch. ἄχρι) οὗ, on decisive evidence. Luke always joins ἄχρι to a genitive.
Luke 21:25. ἐν ἀπορίᾳ, ἠχούσης] Griesb. Lachm. Tisch. have ἐν ἀπορίᾳ ἤχους, on decisive evidence. The Recepta is an interpretation.
Luke 21:33. παρέλθωσι] Lachm. and Tisch. have παρελεύσονται, in accordance with B D L א, min. Rightly. See on Mark 13:31.
Luke 21:35. Lachm. and Tisch. place γάρ after ἐπελεύσεται, so that ὡς παγίς belongs to Luke 21:34. Thus B D L א, 157, Copt. It. Meth. Marcion, according to Tertull. I regard the Recepta as being right, as the preceding clause contains a qualifying word (αἰφνίδιος), but what follows in Luke 21:35 needed a similar qualification (ὡς παγίς). Through mistaking this, and attracting ὡς παγίς a correlative of αἰφνίδ. to the preceding clause, γάρ has been put out of its right place. Instead of ἐπελεύσεται, however, read with Lachm. and Tisch., in accordance with B D א, ἐπεισελεύσεται. The doubly compounded form disappeared through error on the part of the transcribers, as frequently happened.
Luke 21:36. καταξ.] Tisch. has κατισχύσητε, following B L X א, min. Copt. Aeth. Ar. p. Rightly; the Recepta is a very old gloss in accordance with Luke 20:35, comp. 2 Thessalonians 1:5.
ταῦτα is deleted by Matth. and Tisch. [Tisch.synops., not Tisch. 8]. But most of the principal MSS. [including אc] (not א) and vss. have it. Nevertheless, it remains doubtful whether it is to be read before (B D L X, [אc] Elz. Lachm. [Tisch. 8]) or after πάντα (A C* M). If πάντα ταῦτα τά is original, the omission of the superfluous ταῦτα is the more easily explained.
After Luke 21:38 four cursives have the section concerning the woman taken in adultery, John 7:53 to John 8:11.
Ancora nessuna traduzione.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Lu 21:1-4.
Lu 21:1-4.
THE WIDOW'S TWO MITES.
1. looked up--He had "sat down over against the treasury"
(Mr 12:41),
probably to rest, for He had continued long standing as he taught in the temple court
(Mr 11:27),
and "looking up He saw"--as in Zaccheus' case, not quite casually.
the rich, &c.--"the people," says
Mr 12:41
"cast money into the treasury, and many rich east in much"; that is, into chests deposited in one of the courts of the temple to receive the offerings of the people towards its maintenance
(2Ki 12:9; Joh 8:20).
See this explained in the notes at Mark 12:41-44.
The rich men casting their gifts into the treasury - See all this, from Luke 21:1-4, explained on Mark 12:41-44 (note).
In this chapter we have, I. The notice Christ took, and the approbation he gave, of a poor widow that cast two mites into the treasury, Lu 21:1-4. II. A prediction of future events, in answer to his disciples' enquiries concerning them, Lu 21:5-7. 1. Of what should happen between that and the destruction of Jerusalem—false Christs arising, bloody wars and persecutions of Christ's followers, Lu 21:8-19. 2. Of that destruction itself, Lu 21:20-24. 3. Of the second coming of Jesus Christ to judge the world, under the type and figure of that, Lu 21:25-33. III. A practical application of this, by way of caution and counsel (Lu 21:34-36), and an account of Christ's preaching and the people's attendance on it, Lu 21:37,38.