Barnes' Notes on the Bible · Judges Capitolo 2

Lettore del commentario ottimizzato

Commentario del capitolo

Judges Capitolo 2

1

Judges 2:1

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

耶和華的使者(不是一位天使)——這說法用了將近六十次,指神同在的使者。見 Genesis 12:7 註釋。凡「耶和華的使者」傳達信息之處,他都是如同神親自說話一般,而沒有先知傳信息時所用的「耶和華如此說」作為引介。(參 Judges 6:8;Joshua 24:2。)

當以色列全軍從吉甲——即約旦河旁耶利哥的平原(Joshua 4:19)——上到以法蓮山地的示羅與示劍時,那在他們駐營吉甲時曾與他們同在的使者(Exodus 23:20-23;Exodus 33:1-4;Joshua 5:10-15)也隨行同去。因此,經文提及吉甲,便將這事件定位於營幕自吉甲遷移之後不久的時期,以及 Judges 1:1-36 所記的諸事件(其中 Judges 1:1-29 所記的發生於遷移之前,而 Judges 1:30-36 所記的則在遷移之後不久)。這也表明,正是 Judges 1(如 Joshua 16:1-10; 17)所載以色列人的行事,招來了這番斥責。

Originale inglese

The angel of the Lord (not an angel). - The phrase is used nearly 60 times to designate the Angel of God's presence. See Genesis 12:7 note. In all cases where "the angel of the Lord" delivers a message, he does it as if God Himself were speaking, without the intervening words "Thus saith the Lord," which are used in the case of prophets. (Compare Judges 6:8; Joshua 24:2.)

When the host of Israel came up from Gilgal in the plain of Jericho, near the Jordan Joshua 4:19 to Shiloh and Shechem, in the hill country of Ephraim, the Angel who had been with them at Gilgal Exodus 23:20-23; Exodus 33:1-4; Joshua 5:10-15 accompanied them. The mention of Gilgal thus fixes the transaction to the period soon after the removal of the camp from Gilgal, and the events recorded in Judges 1:1-36 (of which those related in Judges 1:1-29 took place before, and those in Judges 1:30-36, just after that removal). It also shows that it was the conduct of the Israelites, recorded in Judges 1 as in Joshua 16:1-10; 17, which provoked this rebuke.

2

Judges 2:2

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

這裡所列聖約的兩項條款(參邊註),正是以色列人此時已經違犯的。另一項重要的禁令(Deuteronomy 7:3)並未由使者提出,這表明使者說話之時,與 Judges 3:6 所提異教居民通婚的事尚未發生;而這又是本事件屬於早期年代的另一個證據。

Originale inglese

The two articles of the covenant here specified (compare margin references) are those which the Israelites had at this time broken. The other important prohibition Deuteronomy 7:3 is not specified by the Angel, and this is an indication that at the time the Angel spoke, intermarriages with the pagan spoken of Judges 3:6 had not taken place; and this again is another evidence of the early date of this occurrence.

3

Judges 2:3

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

「因此我又說」——實際是:因為你們行了 Judges 2:2 所提的事,「我如今已說定(即我如今宣告聲明)必不將他們從你們面前趕出」(參 Judges 19:29)。正是使者宣布了這一決定,百姓才放聲而哭。

本節中「荊棘」一詞,是欽定本根據約書亞記類似經文補入的(見邊註)。其他譯本對原文採用不同的讀法,偏好「他們必作你們的仇敵」之意(參 Numbers 33:55 末句)。

Originale inglese

"Wherefore I also said" - Rather because ye have done the things mentioned in Judges 2:2, "I have now said (i. e. I now protest and declare) that I will not drive them out from before you" (compare Judges 19:29). And it was the annonncement of this resolution by the Angel that caused the people to weep.

The word thorns in this verse is supplied by the King James Version from the similar passage in Joshua (see the marginal reference). Other versions adopt a different reading of the original text, and prefer the sense "they shall be to you for adversaries" (compare the last words of Numbers 33:55).

5

Judges 2:5

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

波金——意即「哭泣者」。它在示劍附近,但確實位置不詳。可比較 Genesis 35:8;Genesis 50:11 中因類似緣故而給地方起名的例子。

Originale inglese

Bochim - i. e. weepers. It was near Shechem, but the site is unknown. Compare the names given to places for similar reasons in Genesis 35:8; Genesis 50:11.

7

Judges 2:7

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

倘若約書亞進迦南時約八十歲,那麼再過三十年便到他離世之時。「長老」當指所有曾參與迦南戰爭、年紀足以入伍的人(Judges 3:1-2);因此,從二十歲算到七十歲,自進入迦南到這些長老去世,約可算為五十年,即約書亞死後二十年。

耶和華的作為——指祂傾覆迦南列族的大工。

Originale inglese

If Joshua was about 80 at the entrance into Canaan, 30 years would bring us to the close of his life. The "elders" would be all that were old enough to take part in the wars of Canaan Judges 3:1-2; and therefore, reckoning from the age of 20 to 70, a period of about 50 years may be assigned from the entrance into Canaan to the death of the elders, or 20 years after the death of Joshua.

The great works of the Lord - The overthrow of the Canaanite nations.

8

Judges 2:8

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

耶和華的僕人——這是特別用於摩西的稱號(Deuteronomy 34:5;Joshua 1:1)。在後期的書卷中則用「神的僕人」一語(1 Chronicles 6:49;Nehemiah 10:29;Daniel 9:11;Revelation 15:3)。用於約書亞的,僅此處與 Joshua 24:29。這稱號也用於大衛(Psalm 18 標題),並泛用於眾先知;而且與類似的「神人」一語一樣,被保羅轉用於新約之下基督的執事(2 Timothy 2:24;James 1:1)。

Originale inglese

The servant of the Lord - This is a title especially given to Moses Deuteronomy 34:5; Joshua 1:1. In later books, the phrase "the servant of God" is used 1 Chronicles 6:49; Nehemiah 10:29; Daniel 9:11; Revelation 15:3. It is applied to Joshua only here and in Joshua 24:29. It is spoken of David (Psalm 18, title), and generally of the prophets; and, like the analogous phrase, "man of God," is transferred by Paul to the ministers of Christ under the New Testament 2 Timothy 2:24; James 1:1.

10

Judges 2:10

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

那世代的人——即征服迦南之時已成年之人的主體。

Originale inglese

All that generation - i. e. the main body of those who were grown-up men at the time of the conquest of Canaan.

11

Judges 2:11

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

以色列人行耶和華眼中看為惡的事——這裡開始敘述「約書亞死後」真正發生的事,而 Judges 1 對此毫無暗示。約書亞在世的日子,以色列人事奉耶和華(Judges 2:7)。但約書亞死後……「以色列人行耶和華眼中看為惡的事,事奉諸巴力,離棄了列祖的神」。接著從 Judges 2:14 到本章末,是全書內容的總覽。

行耶和華眼中看為惡的事——在本書及所有歷史書中,這是論及陷入偶像崇拜的慣用語。它在士師記中出現七次,描述以色列的七次背道;這七次背道為他們招來七次欺壓:(一)古珊利薩田,(二)伊磯倫,(三)耶賓,(四)米甸,(五)亞比米勒的暴政,(六)亞捫人,(七)非利士人。這語句的反覆出現,表明本書出自同一位作者、同一卷書。相反的語句見 1 Kings 15:5、1 Kings 15:11 等。

巴力的複數「諸巴力」,指他們豎立敬拜的眾多巴力像;正如 Judges 2:13 的複數形式「亞斯他錄」,指女性神性亞斯他錄的眾像。

Originale inglese

And the children of Israel - Here begins the narrative of what really did happen "after the death of Joshua," but of which Judges 1 conveys no hint. Israel served the Lord all the days of Joshua Jdg 2:7. But when Joshua was dead ... "the children of Israel did evil in the sight of the Lord, and served Baalim, and forsook the God of their fathers." And then follows from Judges 2:14 to the end of the chapter, a summary of the whole contents of the book.

Did evil in the sight of the Lord - Through this book and all the historical books, this is the regular phrase for falling into idolatry. It occurs seven times in Judges, as descriptive of the seven apostasies of Israel, which drew down upon them the seven servitudes under

(1) Chushan-Rishathaim,

(2) Eglon,

(3) Jabin,

(4) Midian,

(5) the tyranny of Abimelech,

(6) the Ammonites,

(7) the Philistines.

The recurrence of the phrase marks the hand of one author and of one book. For the opposite phrase, see 1 Kings 15:5, 1 Kings 15:11, etc.

The plural of Baal, "Baalim," refers to the numerous images of Baal which they set up and worshipped, as does the plural form, "Ashtaroth" Judges 2:13, to those of the female divinity, Astarte.

12

Judges 2:12

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

惹耶和華發怒——這是論及偶像崇拜時常用的說法,尤其在申命記、列王紀和耶利米書中。

Originale inglese

Provoked the Lord to anger - A frequent expression in connection with idolatry, especially in Deuteronomy, in the Books of the Kings, and in Jeremiah.

14

Judges 2:14

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

請參看邊註的參考經文。「他把他們賣在……手中」等語,最早見於 Deuteronomy 32:30。

Originale inglese

Consult the marginal references. The phrase, "he sold them into the hands etc.," is first found in Deuteronomy 32:30.

16

Judges 2:16

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

然而——(更宜譯作「並且」)耶和華興起士師。「士師」一詞在此首次出現,本書之名即由此而來。(見士師記導論。)

Originale inglese

Nevertheless - (rather "and") the Lord raised up judges This is the first introduction of the term judge, which gives its name to the book. (See the introduction to the Book of Judges.)

18

Judges 2:18

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

耶和華便後悔——更宜譯作「耶和華動了憐恤」,或「因他們的呻吟而憂傷」。(參 Judges 21:15。)

Originale inglese

It repented the Lord - Rather, "the Lord was moved with compassion," or "was grieved," "because of their groanings." (Compare Judges 21:15.)

20

Judges 2:20

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

這一節與 Judges 2:13 相銜接。中間的幾節是指後得多的時代,看來是編纂者插入原有敘事之間的省思。然而 Judges 2:20 把線索重新拾起,卻又隨即放下。從那裡直到 Judges 3:7 末了的一切,看來是另一段插敘,以類似 Judges 2:13 的話結束。

經文並未顯示這信息是怎樣傳給以色列的——是藉天使、先知,還是烏陵;甚至也不能確定是否真有信息傳達。這些話也可以理解為僅在說明神心中所經過的意念,並表達那支配神作為的思想。

Originale inglese

This verse is connected with Judges 2:13. The intermediate verses refer to much later times; they have the appearance of being the reflections of the compiler interspersed with the original narrative. But Judges 2:20 catches up the thread only to let it fall immediately. All that follows, down to the end of Judges 3:7, seems to be another digression, closing with words like those of Judges 2:13.

It does not appear how this message was given to Israel, whether by Angel, or prophet, or Urim, nor indeed is it certain whether any message was given. The words may be understood as merely explaining what passed through the divine mind, and expressing the thoughts which regulated the divine proceeding.