Commentario del capitolo
Romans Capitolo 7
서론
Romans 7 Introduction
Originale inglese
Few chapters in the bible have been the subject of more decidedly different interpretations than this. And after all that has been written on it by the learned, it is still made a matter of discussion, whether the apostle has reference in the main scope of the chapter to his own experience before he became a Christian; or to the conflicts in the mind of a man who is renewed. Which of these opinions is the correct one I shall endeavor to state in the notes at the particular verses in the chapter. The main design of the chapter is not very difficult to understand. It is, evidently, to show the insufficiency of the Law to produce peace of mind to a troubled sinner. In the previous chapters he had shown that it was incapable of producing justification, Romans 1-3. He had shown the way in which people were justified by faith; Romans 3:21-31; Romans 4. He had shown how that plan produced peace, and met the evils introduced by the fall of Adam; Romans 5.
He had shown that Christians were freed from the Law as a matter of obligation, and yet that this freedom did not lead to a licentious life; Romans 6. And he now proceeds still further to illustrate the tendency of the Law on a man both in a state of nature and of grace; to show that its uniform effect in the present condition of man, whether impenitent and under conviction, or in a state of grace under the gospel, so far from promoting peace, as the Jew maintained, was to excite the mind to conflict, and anxiety, and distress. Nearly all the special opinions of the Jews the apostle had overthrown in the previous argument. He here gives the finishing stroke, and shows that the tendency of the Law, as a practical matter, was everywhere the same. It was not in fact to produce peace, but agitation, conflict, distress. Yet this was not the fault of the Law, which was in itself good, but of sin, Romans 6:7-14.
I regard this chapter as not referring exclusively to Paul in a state of nature, or of grace. The discussion is conducted without particular reference to that point. It is rather designed to group together the actions of a man's life, whether in a state of conviction for sin, or in a state of grace, and to show that the effect of the Law is everywhere substantially the same. It equally fails everywhere in producing peace and sanctification. The argument of the Jew respecting the efficacy of the Law, and its sufficiency for the condition of man, is thus overthrown by a succession of proofs relating to justification, to pardon, to peace, to the evils of sin, and to the agitated and conflicting moral elements in man's bosom. The effect is everywhere the same. The deficiency is apparent in regard to all the great interests of man. And having shown this, the apostle and the reader are prepared for the language I of triumph and gratitude, that deliverance from all these evils is to be traced to the gospel of Jesus Christ the Lord; Romans 7:25; Romans 8.
1
Romans 7:1
豈不曉得——這是訴諸他們自己對夫妻關係的觀察。Romans 7:2-3 的比方,只是要表明:正如人死了、他與妻子之間的連繫便告解除,他的律法便不再約束她;照樣,基督徒與律法之間也已發生了分離,他們向著律法已經死了,如今不當再企圖從律法汲取生命與平安,而當從那藉福音與他們相連的新源頭汲取 Romans 7:4。
我對明白律法的人說……——使徒在此大概特別指羅馬教會中的猶太成員,他們特別有資格明白律法的性質、賞識這論證。羅馬教會中有許多猶太人,這點已經說明(見導論);但這比方並非專指他們而言。他所訴諸的律法足夠普遍,使這比方對一切人都易於明白。
律法——這裡直接所指的大概是摩西律法。但這裡所斷言的,對一切法律同樣成立。
管——原文是「統治」、「行使主權」的意思。律法在此被擬人化,被描述為在人身上樹立主權、索求順服。
人——即在律法之下的人。
是在他活著的時候——這裡的希臘文既可意為「他活著的時候」,也可意為「它活著的時候」,即律法存續的時候。但我們的譯本顯然已把意思表達出來了。其意義是:死亡把人從他生前所受束縛的各樣律法中釋放出來。這是一條通則,適用於國家的法律、父母的律、契約的法等。使徒便把這通則應用到神的律法上。
Originale inglese
Know ye not - This is an appeal to their own observation respecting the relation between husband and wife. The illustration Romans 7:2-3 is designed simply to show that as when a man dies, and the connection between him and his wife is dissolved, his Law ceases to be binding on her, so also a separation has taken place between Christians and the Law, in which they have become dead to it, and they are not now to attempt to draw their life and peace from it, but from that new source with which they are connected by the gospel, Romans 7:4.
For I speak to them ... - Probably the apostle refers here more particularly to the Jewish members of the Roman church, who were qualified particularly to understand the nature of the Law, and to appreciate the argument. That there were many Jews in the church at Rome has been shown (see Introduction); but the illustration has no exclusive reference to them. The Law to which he appeals is sufficiently general to make the illustration intelligible to all people.
That the law - The immediate reference here is probably to the Mosaic Law. But what is here affirmed is equally true of all laws.
Hath dominion - Greek, Rules; exercises lordship. The Law is here personified, and represented as setting up a lordship over a man, and exacting obedience.
Over a man - Over the man who is under it.
As long as he liveth - The Greek here may mean either "as he liveth," or" as it liveth," that is, the law. But our translation has evidently expressed the sense. The sense is, that death releases a man from the laws by which he was bound in life. It is a general principle, relating to the laws of the land, the law of a parent, the law of a contract, etc. This general principle the apostle proceeds to apply in regard to the Law of God.
2
Romans 7:2
女人——本節是 Romans 7:1 一般原理的具體例證,即死亡解除了那些使律法在生前具有約束力的連結與關係。這是一個簡單的例證;若把這一點謹記在心,許多註釋家所感受的諸多困惑,以及他們力圖證明「人是妻子,前夫的律法是丈夫,基督是新夫」,或「舊人是妻子,罪惡的私慾是丈夫,眾罪是兒女」時所陷入的種種荒誕奇想,原都可免去許多。伯撒。(見斯圖爾特。)這類解釋足以使我們謙卑下來,並為連智慧良善之人也常常加諸聖經的幼稚而虛幻的解釋而哀嘆。
被律法約束——同樣的意思見 1 Corinthians 7:39。
歸於丈夫——她與他聯合,並作為一家之主而處於他的權柄之下。家庭的元首地位特別託付給他,妻子在主裏面順服他的律法,Ephesians 5:23, Ephesians 5:33。
脫離了丈夫的律法——丈夫不再有權柄。那產生義務的連結已經解除。
Originale inglese
For the woman - This verse is a specific illustration of the general principle in Romans 7:1, that death dissolves those connections and relations which make law binding in life. It is a simple illustration; and if this had been kept in mind, it would have saved much of the perplexity which has been felt by many commentators, and much of their wild vagaries in endeavoring to show that "men are the wife, the law of the former husband, and Christ the new one;" or that "the old man is the wife, sinful desires the husband, sins the children." Beza. (See Stuart.) Such expositions are sufficient to humble us, and to make us mourn over the puerile and fanciful interpretations which even wise and good people often give to the Bible.
Is bound by the law ... - See the same sentiment in 1 Corinthians 7:39.
To her husband - She is united to him; and is under his authority as the head of the household. To him is particularly committed the headship of the family, and the wife is subject to his law, in the Lord, Ephesians 5:23, Ephesians 5:33.
She is loosed ... - The husband has no more authority. The connection from which obligation resulted is dissolved.
3
Romans 7:3
所以,若……——可比較 Matthew 5:32。
她便被稱為——她將要如此。這裏所用的詞χρηματίσει chrēmatisei,常用以表示藉神諭或神的啟示而被稱呼。但它在此是按簡單的意義使用,即通常被如此稱呼,或被如此看待。
Originale inglese
So then if ... - compare Matthew 5:32.
She shall be called - She will be. The word used here χρηματίσει chrēmatisei is often used to denote being called by an oracle or by divine revelation. But it is here employed in the simple sense of being commonly called, or of being so regarded.
4
Romans 7:4
這樣說來——本節包含了對前兩節例證的應用。那裏的思想是:死亡解除那產生義務的連結。這是該例證惟一的要點,因此無需追問使徒以妻子是指舊人、還是指基督徒等。其意義是:正如死亡解除妻子與丈夫之間的連結、以及當然由那連結所產生的律法義務,照樣,就此處論證的範圍而論,基督徒向律法死也解除了那連結,並為另一個聯合——與基督的聯合——預備了道路,從這聯合產生出一個新的、更有效的義務。其用意是要表明:新的連結將成就比舊的更重要的果效。
在律法上也是死了——註釋見 Romans 6:3-4、Romans 6:8。就使徒論證的範圍而論,我們與律法之間的連結已經解除。他並不是說,我們向律法死了、或從律法得了釋放,是就它作為義務的準則、或作為當順服的義務而言;因為這樣的釋放既不存在,也不可能存在;我們乃是向它作為稱義與成聖的方式死了。在蒙神悅納這一大事上,我們既已向律法死、不再倚靠律法,便接受了另一個方案。
藉着基督的身體——即藉着他被釘十字架的身體;換言之,就是藉着他的死;參較 Ephesians 2:15,「以自己的身體廢掉了冤仇」等,即是藉着他的死。Colossians 1:22,「藉着基督的肉身受死」等。Colossians 2:14;1 Peter 2:24,「他被掛在木頭上,親身擔當了我們的罪」。因此,其意義乃是:藉着基督這贖罪祭的死,藉着他為我們受苦、足以滿足律法的要求,藉着他取了我們的地位,他已釋放我們脫離律法作為稱義的方式,使我們自由脫離它的刑罰,並救我們脫離它的咒詛。這樣得了釋放,我們便得了自由,可以聯於那用自己的血買了我們之人的律法。
叫你們歸於別人——叫你們可以聯合於另一位,並服在他的律法之下。這是 Romans 7:2-3 例證的完成。正如那因丈夫死而脫離丈夫律法的婦人,再嫁時便歸於另一位的權下;照樣,我們這因基督的死而得脫離律法及其咒詛的人,便被置於對那與我們如此聯合之人的忠貞與順服的新律法之下。基督與他子民的聯合,並不罕有地以地上一切連結中最溫柔的連結——丈夫與妻子的連結——來說明,Ephesians 5:23-30;Revelation 21:9。「我要將新婦,就是羔羊的妻,指給你看」,Revelation 19:7。
就是歸於那從死裏復活的——這一點的力量,見 Romans 6:8 的解釋。
叫我們結果子給神——即叫我們過聖潔的生活。這就是這一切例證的要點與範圍。新的連結乃是能使我們成聖的連結。這裏也暗指律法的趨勢只是結出死亡的果子(Romans 7:5),而福音的趨勢乃是使人成聖、純潔;參較 Galatians 5:22-23。
Originale inglese
Wherefore - This verse contains an application of the illustration in the two preceding. The idea there is, that death dissolves a connection from which obligation resulted. This is the single point of the illustration, and consequently there is no need of inquiring whether by the wife the apostle meant to denote the old man, or the Christian, etc. The meaning is, as death dissolves the connection between a wife and her husband, and of course the obligation of the law resulting from that connection, so the death of the Christian to the Law dissolves that connection, so far as the scope of the argument here is concerned, and prepares the way for another union, a union with Christ, from which a new and more efficient obligation results. The design is to show that the new connection would accomplish more important effects than the old.
Ye also are become dead to the law - Notes, Romans 6:3-4, Romans 6:8. The connection between us and the Law is dissolved, so far as the scope of the apostle's argument is concerned. He does not say that we are dead to it, or released from it as a rule of duty, or as a matter of obligation to obey it; for there neither is, nor can be, any such release, but we are dead to it as a way of justification and sanctification. In the great matter of acceptance with God, we have ceased to rely on the Law, having become dead to it, and having embraced another plan.
By the body of Christ - That is, by his body crucified; or in other words, by his death; compare Ephesians 2:15, "Having abolished in his flesh the enmity," etc. that is, by his death. Colossians 1:22, "in the body of his flesh through death," etc. Colossians 2:14; 1 Peter 2:24, "who bare our sins in his own body on the tree." The sense, is, therefore, that by the death of Christ as an atoning sacrifice; by his suffering for us what would be sufficient to meet the demands of the Law; by his taking our place, he has released us from the Law as a way of justification; freed us from its penalty; and saved us from its curse. Thus released, we are at liberty to be united to the law of him who has thus bought us with his blood.
That ye should be married to another - That you might be united to another, and come under his law. This is the completion of the illustration in Romans 7:2-3. As the woman that is freed from the law of her husband by his death, when married again comes under the authority of another, so we who are made free from the Law and its curse by the death of Christ, are brought under the new law of fidelity and obedience to him with whom we are thus united. The union of Christ and his people is not unfrequently illustrated by the most tender of all earthly connections, that of a husband and wife, Ephesians 5:23-30; Revelation 21:9. "I will show thee the bride, the Lamb's wife," Revelation 19:7.
Even to him who is raised ... - See the force of this explained, Romans 6:8.
That we should bring forth fruit unto God - That we should live a holy life. This is the point and scope of all this illustration. The new connection is such as will make us holy. It is also implied that the tendency of the Law was only to bring forth fruit unto death Romans 7:5, and that the tendency of the gospel is to make man holy and pure; compare Galatians 5:22-23.
5
Romans 7:5
因為……的時候——本節與下節的例證,目的是要更詳細地說明律法無論何時何地被應用,其效果如何;無論是在自然狀態或恩典狀態中,其效果始終是一樣的。律法成了在人自己心中引發激盪與衝突的因由。罪人處於知罪的光景時是這樣,人成了基督徒之後也是這樣。律法一旦應用於人敗壞的心,無論處於何種境況,都產生這種激盪與衝突。甚至在基督徒心中,律法也產生這種激盪 Romans 7:14-24,正如它在知罪之罪人心中曾經產生、也將要產生的一樣 Romans 7:7-12;因此,除了福音那拯救人、使人成聖的大能以外,再無得釋放的指望 Romans 7:25; Romans 8:1-3。
在肉體中的時候——即未歸信、仍受敗壞性情中種種轄制性情慾與傾向支配的光景;比較 Romans 8:8-9。文脈顯示這裡必是此義,而這例證的目的,是要顯明律法在人未歸信之前所生的效果,Romans 7:5-12。這是明顯的意思,一切解釋的法則都要求我們如此理解。
那惡慾——(τα παθήματα ta pathēmata。)這譯法並不恰當;這樣的表達不能傳達任何觀念。原文只是指情慾、邪惡的情感、敗壞的慾望;見邊註。「諸罪的情慾」這說法是希伯來語法,意即罪惡的情慾,這裡指未蒙更新之心中敗壞的傾向與嗜好。
因律法而生的——這不是說它們由律法發起或創造;因為律法並不產生邪惡的傾向,聖潔的律法也不會引起罪惡的情慾;而是說它們被那禁止放縱的律法所激發、喚起、煽動。
在我們的肢體中發動——即在我們的身體裡運行,也就是在我們裡面運行。那些罪惡的傾向利用我們的肢體作為工具,以求得滿足;參 Romans 6:12-13 的註釋;比較 Romans 6:23。
以致結成死亡的果子——即產生罪行、激盪、衝突、痛苦,並引人至死。我們被置於死亡的權勢之下;放縱那些情慾的後果必是致命的;比較 Romans 6:21 的註釋。
Originale inglese
For when ... - The illustration in this verse and the following is designed to show more at length the effect of the Law, whenever and whereever applied; whether in a state of nature or of grace. It was always the same. It was the occasion of agitation and conflict in a man's own mind. This was true when a sinner was under conviction; and it was true when a man was a Christian. In all circumstances where the Law was applied to the corrupt mind of man, it produced this agitation and conflict. Even in the Christian's mind it produced this agitation Romans 7:14-24, as it had done and would do in the mind of a sinner under conviction Romans 7:7-12, and consequently there was no hope of release but in the delivering and sanctifying power of the gospel Romans 7:25; Romans 8:1-3.
In the flesh - Unconverted; subject to the controlling passions and propensities of a corrupt nature; compare Romans 8:8-9. The connection shows that this must be the meaning here, and the design of this illustration is to show the effect of the Law before a man is converted, Romans 7:5-12. This is the obvious meaning, and all the laws of interpretation require us so to understand it.
The motions of sins - (τα παθήματα ta pathēmata.) This translation is unhappy. The expression "motions of sins" conveys no idea. The original means simply the passions, the evil affections, the corrupt desires; see the margin. The expression, passions of sins, is a Hebraism meaning sinful passions, and refers here to the corrupt propensities and inclinations of the unrenewed heart.
Which were by the law - Not that they were originated or created by the Law; for a law does not originate evil propensities, and a holy law would not cause sinful passions; but they were excited, called up, inflamed by the Law, which forbids their indulgence.
Did work in our members - In our body; that is, in us. Those sinful propensities made use of our members as instruments, to secure gratification; Note, Romans 6:12-13; compare Romans 6:23.
To bring forth fruit unto death - To produce crime, agitation, conflict, distress, and to lead to death. We were brought under the dominion of death; and the consequence of the indulgence of those passions would be fatal; compare the note at Romans 6:21.
6
Romans 7:6
但如今——即在福音之下。本節陳述福音的後果,以別於律法的效果。這事成就的方式,使徒在 Romans 8 有更詳細的說明;本節其實正當與那一章相連。Romans 7 其餘的部分,用於說明 Romans 7:5 所述律法的效果;他既已表明律法的效果總是增加罪惡與痛苦,便在 Romans 8 準備回頭拿起本節的命題,表明福音在產生平安上的優越。
我們已得釋放——即我們這些基督徒。從律法下得了釋放:不再以它為稱義的手段,不再以它為成聖的根源,不再受它那易於產生痛苦與死亡的捆綁。這並不是說基督徒已脫離律法作為本分的準則。
既已死了——邊註作「向那律法死了」。這裏抄本互有出入。有的抄本如正文那樣,讀作律法死了;有的如邊註那樣,讀作我們死了。多數抄本支持邊註的讀法,文脈也要求我們這樣理解。敘利亞文譯本、亞拉伯文譯本、武加大譯本(Vulgate)、埃提阿伯文譯本也是如此。我們向律法死了這一思想,正是 Romans 7:4 所表達的。
那捆綁我們的——即如俘虜、如奴僕一般被捆住。我們曾受它的轄制;Romans 7:1。
叫我們服事——叫我們如今可以事奉、順從神。
按著心靈的新樣——即以新的靈,或以新的、屬靈的方式。這說法含有兩層意思:
(1) 福音之下的服事是一種新的服事,與前一時代之下的不同。
(2) 它是屬靈性質的,有別於猶太人所實行的;比較 2 Corinthians 3:6;參 Romans 2:28-29 的註釋。
福音之下所要求的敬拜,一貫被描述為靈與心的敬拜,而非形式與儀文的敬拜;John 4:23,「那真正拜父的,要用心靈和誠實拜他」;Philippians 3:3。
不按著儀文的舊樣——不按舊的儀文。這裏暗示:
(1) 這裏所描述的敬拜形式,屬於如今已經過去的舊時代;
(2) 那是停留在儀文之中的敬拜。
要明白這一點,必須記得:在使徒看來,那規定猶太人敬拜形式的律法,缺乏他歸之於福音的更新人心的功效與能力。那是外在形式與儀文的服事,是按律法字面的要求獻祭焚香,而不是出於內心真誠的奉獻;2 Corinthians 3:6,「那字句是叫人死,精意是叫人活」;John 6:63; Hebrews 10:1-4; Hebrews 9:9-10。不能否認,律法之下有許多聖徒,也獻過許多屬靈的祭;但同樣真實的是,百姓中的大多數只停留在形式上,所獻的服事只是儀文的服事,不是心的服事。主要的思想是:福音之下的服事是純粹而完全屬靈的,是心的奉獻,不是靠外在形式與禮儀所行的服事。
(但這裏的對照,並不是律法時代與福音時代各自所要求之服事之間的對照,而是在自然狀態與恩典狀態這兩種相反狀態中所獻之服事之間的對照。在前一狀態中,我們縱然生活在福音時代,仍是「在律法之下」;在後一狀態中,我們則「從律法中得了釋放」——是就律法作為行為之約、或生命之約而論——正如敬虔的猶太人縱然生活在摩西的時代之下,也可能如此。神救我們脫離律法的目的,是要我們「按著心靈的新樣服事,不按著儀文的舊樣」;就是說,以新狀態所要求的屬靈方式、以新狀態所供應的屬靈動機與助力來服事,而不是照我們在受律法轄制的舊光景中所慣行的方式——在那舊光景中,我們只能獻上外在而被迫的順從。Hodge 教授說:「顯然,『按著儀文的舊樣』一語是使徒用來代替『在律法之下』和『在肉體之中』的;這一切說法,他都用來描述人尚未憑信接受福音時那律法而敗壞的狀態。」)
Originale inglese
But now - Under the gospel. This verse states the consequences of the gospel, in distinction from the effects of the Law. The way in which this is accomplished, the apostle illustrates more at length in Romans 8 with which this verse is properly connected. The remainder of Romans 7 is occupied in illustrating the statement in Romans 7:5, of the effects of the Law; and after having shown that its effects always were to increase crime and distress, he is prepared in Romans 8 to take up the proposition in this verse, and to show the superiority of the gospel in producing peace.
We are delivered - We who are Christians. Delivered from it as a means of justification, as a source of sanctification, as a bondage to which we were subjected, and which tended to produce pain and death. It does not mean that Christians are freed from it as a rule of duty.
That being dead - Margin, "Being dead to that." There is a variation here in the manuscripts. Some read it, as in the text, as if the Law was dead; others, as in the margin. as if we were dead. The majority is in favor of the reading as in the margin; and the connection requires us to understand it in this sense. So the Syriac, the Arabic, the Vulgate, AEthiopic. The sentiment here, that we are dead to the Law, is what is expressed in Romans 7:4.
Wherein we were held - That is, as captives, or as slaves. We were held in bondage to it; Romans 7:1.
That we should serve - That we may now serve or obey God.
In newness of spirit - In a new spirit; or in a new and spiritual manner. This is a form of expression implying,
(1) That their service under the gospel was to be of a new kind, differing from that under the former dispensation.
(2) that it was to be of a spiritual nature, as distinguished from that practiced by the Jews; compare 2 Corinthians 3:6; Note, Romans 2:28-29.
The worship required under the gospel is uniformly described as that of the spirit and the heart, rather than that of form and ceremony; John 4:23, "The true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth; Philippians 3:3.
And not in the oldness of the letter - Not in the old letter. It is implied here in this,
(1) That the form of worship here described pertained to an old dispensation that had now passed away; and,
(2) That that was a worship that was in the letter.
To understand this, it is necessary to remember that the Law which prescribed the forms of worship among the Jews, was regarded by the apostle as destitute of that efficacy and power in renewing the heart which he attributed to the gospel. It was a service consisting in external forms and ceremonies; in the offering of sacrifices and of incense, according to the literal requirements of the Law rather than the sincere offering of the heart; 2 Corinthians 3:6, "The letter killeth; the spirit giveth life;" John 6:63; Hebrews 10:1-4; Hebrews 9:9-10. It is not to be denied that there were many holy persons under the Law, and that there were many spiritual offerings presented, but it is at the same time true that the great mass of the people rested in the mere form; and that the service offered was the mere service of the letter, and not of the heart. The main idea is, that the services under the gospel are purely and entirely spiritual, the offering of the heart, and not the service rendered by external forms and rites.
(But the contrast here is not between services required under the legal and gospel dispensations respectively, but between service yielded in the opposite states of nature and grace. In the former state, we are "under the law" though we live in gospel times, and in the latter, we are "delivered from the law" as a covenant of works, or of life, just as pious Jews might be though they lived under the dispensation of Moses. The design of God in delivering us from the Law, is, that we might "serve him in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter," that is, in such a spiritual way as the new state requires, and from such spiritual motives and aids as it furnishes; and not in the manner we were accustomed to do, under our old condition of subjection to the Law, in which we could yield only an external and forced obedience. "It is evident," says Prof. Hodge that the clause "in the oldness of the letter is substituted by the apostle, for 'under the law' and 'in the flesh;' all which he uses to describe the legal and corrupt condition of people, prior to the believing reception of the gospel.")
7
Romans 7:7
這樣,我們可說甚麼呢?——此處所提出的反論,是很自然會產生的,我們可以設想它會帶著不小的憤慨被提出來。猶太人會問:「這樣,我們豈不是要認為,神聖潔的律法不僅不足以使我們成聖,反倒只是罪惡加增的機會嗎?它的趨向就是產生罪惡的情慾,使人比先前更壞嗎?」對這反論,使徒以極大的智慧回答,表明問題不在律法,而在人;雖然這些效果常常隨之而來,律法本身卻是良善純潔的。
律法是罪麼?——它是罪惡的嗎?是邪惡的嗎?因為若如 Romans 7:5 所說,罪惡的情慾是「因律法」而生的,人就自然會問:律法本身豈不是一件惡物嗎?
斷乎不是——參 Romans 3:4 的註釋。
只是非因律法,我就不知何為罪——譯作「只是」的詞 ἀλλὰ alla 更恰當的意思是「然而」;這樣表達會更準確:「我否認律法是罪。我的教訓並不引向這個結論,我也沒有斷言它是惡的;我斷然拒絕這指控。然而,儘管如此,我仍堅持律法確有激發罪惡的效果,只是其方式使我認出律法本身是良善的」;Romans 7:8-12。因此,律法雖因攔阻人心的傾向而成了激發罪惡情感的機會,過錯卻不能歸於律法。使徒在這幾節裏,無疑是指他還未尋得福音藉赦罪所賜的平安之前,自己心中的光景。
乃是因律法——見 Romans 3:20。這裏的「律法」,使徒顯然是指神的每一條律法,無論以何種方式賜下。他是要說,他所描述的效果伴隨著一切律法;這效果他用第十條誡命中的一個實例來說明。他說他本不認識罪,顯然是要斷言:若不是某些事情被禁止,他就不會明白那些事是罪惡的;他既說了這一點,便進而說明這些事既被禁止,在他心中所生的效果。他不是僅僅抽象地知道罪的性質和存在、知道何事因被禁止而構成罪,他更意識到這知識在他心中所生的某種效果,以及那些強烈、洶湧的慾望受攔阻時所生的效果,Romans 7:8-9。
我就不知何為貪心——我就不會認識貪心這罪的性質。慾望或許仍會存在,但他不會知道它是罪惡的,也不會經歷那在他發現它被禁止時所經歷的洶湧、劇烈、不受約束的傾向。沒有律法的人可以有強烈的慾望;他可以貪戀別人所有的,可以奪取財物、悖逆父母,但他不知道那是惡。律法給他的慾望定下界限,教導他何為是、何為非,教導他合法的享受到何處為止、罪從何處開始。這裏的「貪心」一詞,不像我們今日的用法那樣狹窄;它指一切貪婪的慾望,一切對我們被禁止之物的企求。
非律法說——即在第十條誡命中;Exodus 20:17。
不可起貪心——這是那誡命的開頭,其餘的一切都包含在內。使徒知道不必重複全部,人也必明白。他選這條誡命,是因為它比別的更切合他的目的。別的誡命特別關乎外表的行為,但他的目的是要顯明罪在人心和良心中的效果,因此他選了一條特別關乎心中慾望的誡命。
Originale inglese
What shall we say then? - The objection which is here urged is one that would very naturally rise, and which we may suppose would be urged with no slight indignation. The Jew would ask, "Are we then to suppose that the holy Law of God is not only insufficient to sanctify us, but that it is the mere occasion of increased sin? Is its tendency to produce sinful passions, and to make people worse than they were before?" To this objection the apostle replies with great wisdom, by showing that the evil was not in the Law, but in man; that though these effects often followed, yet that the Law itself was good and pure.
Is the law sin? - Is it sinful? Is it evil? For if, as it is said in Romans 7:5, the sinful passions were "by the law," it might naturally be asked whether the Law itself was not an evil thing?
God forbid - Note, Romans 3:4.
Nay, I had not known sin - The word translated "nay" ἀλλὰ alla means more properly but; and this would have more correctly expressed the sense, "I deny that the Law is sin. My doctrine does not lead to that; nor do I affirm that it is evil. I strongly repel the charge; but, notwithstanding this, I still maintain that it had an effect in exciting sins, yet so as that I perceived that the Law itself was good;" Romans 7:8-12. At the same time, therefore, that the Law must be admitted to be the occasion of exciting sinful feelings, by crossing the inclinations of the mind, yet the fault was not to be traced to the Law. The apostle in these verses refers, doubtless, to the state of his mind before he found that peace which the gospel furnishes by the pardon of sins.
But by the law - Romans 3:20. By "the law" here, the apostle has evidently in his eye every law of God, however made known. He means to say that the effect which he describes attends all law, and this effect he illustrates by a single instance drawn from the Tenth Commandment. When he says that he should not have known sin, he evidently means to affirm, that he had not understood that certain things were sinful, unless they had been forbidden; and having stated this, he proceeds to another thing, to show the effect of their being thus forbidden on his mind. He was not merely acquainted abstractly with the nature and existence of sin, with what constituted crime because it was forbidden, but he was conscious of a certain effect on his mind resulting from this knowledge, and from the effect of strong, raging desires when thus restrained, Romans 7:8-9.
For I had not known lust - I should not have been acquainted with the nature of the sin of covetousness. The desire might have existed, but he would not have known it to be sinful, and he would not have experienced that raging, impetuous, and ungoverned propensity which he did when he found it to be forbidden. Man without law might have the strong feelings of desire He might covet what others possessed. He might take property, or be disobedient to parents; but he would not know it to be evil. The Law fixes bounds to his desires, and teaches him what is right and what is wrong. It teaches him where lawful indulgence ends, and where sin begins. The word "lust" here is not limited as it is with us. It refers to all covetous desires; to all wishes for what is forbidden us.
Except the law had said - In the tenth commandment; Exodus 20:17.
Thou shalt not covet - This is the beginning of the command, and all the rest is implied. The apostle knew that it would be understood without repeating the whole. This particular commandment he selected because it was more pertinent than the others to his purpose. The others referred particularly to external actions. But his object was to show the effect of sin on the mind and conscience. He therefore chose one that referred particularly to the desires of the heart.
8
Romans 7:8
然而罪——為說明律法在人心中所生的效果,使徒在本節描繪律法在激起邪惡慾望與企圖上的影響。也許他在別處都不曾像在此處那樣,顯出對人心如此透徹的認識。他舉出一個大多數人可能忽略的例證,卻直接確立了他的論點:律法不足以促進人的救恩。罪在此被擬人化。它不是指真實的實體,不是指物質性的存在,不是指獨立於心思之外、自有其存在而藏於靈魂中的某物,而是指心思本身敗壞的情慾、傾向與慾望。正如我們說情慾焚燒、野心激盪、嫉妒蠶蝕人心,並非說情慾、野心或嫉妒是甚麼獨立的物質存在,而是說那懷野心或嫉妒的心思受了這樣的激動。
趁著機會——「機會」一詞 ἀφορμὴν aphormēn 本指為成就某事而預備的材料或準備,繼而指作成那事的機會、緣由等。此處的意思是:律法成了罪的激發原因,是把心中罪的原理喚起付諸行動的東西。若沒有這個,這裏所描述的效果便不會存在。正如我們說,一個誘人的慾望對象擺在眼前,是貪婪的激發原因;一個野心的對象,是野心原理的激發原因;財富、或別人有而我們沒有的利益一經呈現,可能激發貪婪或嫉妒;擺在夏娃面前的果子是罪的激發原因;那塊金子激起了亞干的貪心。若不是這些對象擺在眼前,心中的惡念也許仍在沉睡,永不被喚醒。因此,若不是某個對象出現、把天性的傾向喚起成為明確的行動,就沒有人能領悟自己天賦傾向的全部力量。在保羅心中把這些喚起的緣由,就是那攔在他路上、刺激並煽動他心中強烈天賦傾向的律法。
藉著誡命——即藉著一切為約束、管制人心而設立的律法。
在我裏頭發動——即在我裏面生出、運行。這裏所用的詞常指以有力而有效的方式運作。(Doddridge)
諸般的——希臘文作「各樣的慾望」,即各類不正當的慾望。它不限於某一種慾望,而是擴及律法宣告為錯的一切。
貪心——即不正當、越軌的慾望,對非法享受的傾向。這詞與 Romans 7:7 譯作「貪心」的是同一個詞。若問律法怎樣導致這結果,可以這樣回答:這裏的主要意思是,律法對惡人慾望與情慾的攔阻,只會使它們更加熾烈、更加激憤。各樣的罪都是如此。想以強力攔阻它,以法律和刑罰譴責它,攔住罪惡的去路,往往只會刺激那本來潛伏在胸中的東西,把它喚起成為活躍的力量。其原因如下:
(1) 它攔住罪人的去路,抵擋他的意圖,抵擋他情感與生活的潮流。
(2) 律法扮演偵察者的角色,把胸中本來隱藏的東西揭露出來。
(3) 人心中之罪如此深重頑固,以致攔阻它的企圖往往只會使人更加激憤,驅使他犯更大的罪惡。法律的禁制激起狂亂的情慾,驅使人作出更墮落的行為,使罪人頑固、剛硬、更加不顧一切。要在罪人身上建立權威的企圖,反使他擺出抵抗的姿態,使他自成一黨,激起一切黨派的怒火。任何人都可能在頑劣孩童的心中屢屢見到這種效果。
(4) 這對罪人尤其真實。他常常平靜,表面安寧。但讓神的律法直抵他的良心,他就狂亂暴怒。他踐踏律法的權柄,良心卻告訴他那是對的;他企圖甩掉它,卻在它的能力面前戰兢;而為了顯示自己的獨立或犯罪的決心,他就投身於不義之中,成為更可怕、更頑梗的罪人。這成了爭勝的鬥爭;在與神的爭辯中,他決意不被征服。因此,許多人在被罪責知罪的時候,比平時更褻瀆、更妄瀆神名、更絕望。在信仰復興時期,常見人們顯出在教會屬靈死亡的狀態中所沒有的暴戾、怒氣與咒詛;人若在反對神的事上變得特別兇暴、辱罵、狂亂,那往往是他正被罪責知罪的很確定的記號。
(5) 使徒在此注意到的效果,是歷代、各類作家都曾觀察到的。加圖(Cato)說(Livy, xxxiv. 4):「羅馬人哪,不要以為往後會像法律頒布以前那樣。惡人不被告發,比他被判無罪更安全;未曾被挑動的奢靡,比如今被這鎖鏈激怒挑動如野獸一般時,更可忍受。」塞涅卡(Seneca)說(de Clementia, i. 23):「弒親之罪是隨法律開始的。」賀拉斯(Horace)說(Odes, i. 3):「人類膽敢承受萬事,奔向被禁的罪惡。」奧維德(Ovid)說(Amor. iii. 4):「我們總是力求得著被禁止的,渴望被拒絕的。」(這些段落引自 Tholuck。)另見 Proverbs 9:17,「偷來的水是甜的,暗吃的餅是美的。」律法的效果若是這樣,那麼使徒的推論便無可避免:律法並不適合拯救並成聖世人。
因為沒有律法——即在律法頒賜之前,或在律法未曾施於人心的地方。
罪是死的——即它是無效的、不活躍的、未被激動的。這顯然是就比較的意義說的。文脈要求我們只就律法所激動的範圍來理解。人的情慾仍會存在;但沒有律法,人就不會知道它們是惡的,它們也不會被激成狂亂的騷動。
Originale inglese
But sin - To illustrate the effect of the Law on the mind, the apostle in this verse depicts its influence in exciting to evil desires and purposes. Perhaps no where has he evinced more consummate knowledge of the human heart than here. He brings an illustration that might have escaped most persons, but which goes directly to establish his position that the Law is insufficient to promote the salvation of man. Sin here is personified. It means not a real entity; not a physical subsistence; not something independent of the mind, having a separate existence, and lodged in the soul, but it means the corrupt passions, inclinations, and desires of the mind itself. Thus, we say that lust burns, and ambition rages, and envy corrodes the mind, without meaning that lust, ambition, or envy are any independent physical subsistences, but meaning that the mind that is ambitious, or envious, is thus excited.
Taking occasion - The word "occasion" ἀφορμὴν aphormēn properly denotes any material, or preparation for accomplishing anything; then any opportunity, occasion, etc. of doing it. Here it means that the Law was the exciting cause of sin; or was what called the sinful principle of the heart into exercise. But for this, the effect here described would not have existed. Thus, we say that a tempting object of desire presented is the exciting cause of covetousness. Thus, an object of ambition is the exciting cause of the principle of ambition. Thus, the presentation of wealth, or of advantages possessed by others which we have not, may excite covetousness or envy. Thus, the fruit presented to Eve was the exciting cause of sin; the wedge of gold to Achan excited his covetousness. Had not these objects been presented, the evil principles of the heart might have slumbered, and never have been called forth. And hence, no one understand the full force of their native propensities until some object is presented that calls them forth into decided action. The occasion which called these forth in the mind of Paul was the Law crossing his path, and irritating and exciting the native strong inclinations of the mind.
By the commandment - By all law appointed to restrain and control the mind.
Wrought in me - Produced or worked in me. The word used here means often to operate in a powerful and efficacious manner. (Doddridge.)
All manner of - Greek, "All desire." Every species of unlawful desire. It was not confined to one single desire, but extended to everything which the Law declared to be wrong.
Concupiscence - Unlawful or irregular desire. Inclination for unlawful enjoyments. The word is the same which in Romans 7:7 is rendered "lust." If it be asked in what way the Law led to this, we may reply, that the main idea here is, that opposition by law to the desires and passions of wicked men only tends to inflame and exasperate them. This is the case with regard to sin in every form. An attempt to restrain it by force; to denounce it by laws and penalties; to cross the path of wickedness; only tends to irritate, and to excite into living energy, what otherwise would be dormant in the bosom. This it does, because,
(1) It crosses the path of the sinner, and opposes his intention, and the current of his feelings and his life.
(2) the Law acts the part of a detector, and lays open to view that which was in the bosom, but was concealed.
(3) such is the depth and obstinacy of sin in man, that the very attempt to restrain often only serves to exasperate, and to urge to greater deeds of wickedness. Restraint by law rouses the mad passions; urges to greater deeds of depravity; makes the sinner stubborn, obstinate, and more desperate. The very attempt to set up authority over him throws him into a posture of resistance, and makes him a party, and excites all the feelings of party rage. Anyone may have witnessed this effect often on the mind of a wicked and obstinate child.
(4) this is particularly true in regard to a sinner. He is calm often, and apparently tranquil. But let the Law of God be brought home to his conscience, and he becomes maddened and enraged. He spurns its authority, yet his conscience tells him it is right; he attempts to throw it off, yet trembles at its power; and to show his independence, or his purpose to sin, he plunges into iniquity, and becomes a more dreadful and obstinate sinner. It becomes a struggle for victory; in the controversy with God he re solves not to be overcome. It accordingly happens that many a man is more profane, blasphemous, and desperate when under conviction for sin than at other times. In revivals of religion it often happens that people evince violence, and rage, and cursing, which they do not in a state of spiritual death in the church; and it is often a very certain indication that a man is under conviction for sin when he becomes particularly violent, and abusive, and outrageous in his opposition to God.
(5) the effect here noticed by the apostle is one that has been observed at all times, and by all classes of writers. Thus, Cato says (Livy, xxxiv. 4,) "Do not think, Romans, that it will be hereafter as it was before the Law was enacted. It is more safe that a bad man should not be accused, than that he should be absolved; and luxury not excited would be more tolerable than it will be now by the very chains irritated and excited as a wild beast." Thus, Seneca says (de Clementia, i. 23,) "Parricides began with the law." Thus, Horace (Odes, i. 3,) "The human race, bold to endure all things, rushes through forbidden crime." Thus, Ovid (Amor. iii. 4,) "We always endeavour to obtain what is forbidden, and desire what is denied." (These passages are quoted from Tholuck.) See also Proverbs 9:17, "Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant." If such be the effect of the Law, then the inference of the apostle is unavoidable, that it is not adapted to save and sanctify man.
For without the law - Before it was given; or where it was not applied to the mind.
Sin was dead - It was inoperative, inactive, unexcited. This is evidently in a comparative sense. The connection requires us to under stand it only so far as it was excited by the Law. People's passions would exist; but without law they would not be known to be evil, and they would not be excited into wild and tumultuous raging.
9
Romans 7:9
我——使徒在這裡所指為自己過去的經歷,似乎無可置疑。然而在此他是說出所有未歸正、倚靠自己之義的人的心聲。
以前是活著的——這與他隨即補充論到的另一狀態——他死了——正好相反。因此,這必是說他擁有某種平安;他自認穩妥;他不受良心的責備與驚恐的攪擾。他在這裡所指的狀態,無疑就是他在別處親自提及的:那時他自以為義,倚靠自己的行為,並看自己是無可指摘的(Philippians 3:4-6;Acts 23:1;Acts 26:4-5)。這就是說,他當時還未經歷後來因罪知罪時所受的那些攪擾與驚恐。那時他雖然擁有律法,也努力遵守,卻不認識律法屬靈而聖潔的本質。他所追求的只是外在的遵從;律法對人心的要求,他毫無感覺。這正是每一個自恃的罪人、每一個未曾甦醒之人的光景。
沒有律法——這不是說保羅曾經真的沒有律法,即沒有摩西的律法;而是說在律法尚未以其屬靈的意義和能力臨到內心之前。
但是誡命來到——即誡命臨到內心和良心。這是這說法唯一可理解的意思,因為它不可能指律法頒佈之時。這事發生在何時,使徒沒有說明。但這說法表示:無論何時,當律法帶著能力與功效被應用到他的良心上,要約束、轄制、警告他時,就產生了這樣的果效。我們對他早年內心的活動、他與良心和本分之間的掙扎,所知有限。然而,就他歸正之前的情形,我們所知的足以確定他是驕傲、急躁、不甘受約束的;見 Acts 8;9。在他自恃己義、意氣激昂的狀態下,我們不難設想,那為要約束情慾、降卑人心、斥責驕傲而設的神聖律法,只會激起他的惱怒、對約束的不耐與反叛。
罪又活了——即再活過來。這是說罪先前是潛伏的(Romans 7:8),如今卻被挑動,活了過來。這字通常用於生命的復甦(Romans 14:19;Luke 15:24, Luke 15:32),但在這裡,它的意思實質上與 Romans 7:8 的說法相同,即「罪……在我裡面發動諸般的貪心」。先前潛伏的罪的能力,如今被挑動而活躍起來。
我就死了——意即我因它陷入更重的罪咎與痛苦。這與「我是活著的」相對,意思必是其反面;顯然是指誡命的果效,使他落入他所稱為「死」的境況中(參 Romans 5:12, Romans 5:14-15);即罪作王、肆虐,產生其枯萎與定罪的果效,導致更重的罪咎與悲苦。這也可能包含這樣的意思:他從前自恃而自覺穩妥,但藉著誡命,他被擊打而降卑,他的自信被摧毀,他的指望傾覆於塵土。或許再沒有別的話,比「我就死了」這句意味深長的話,更能表達一個知罪之罪人那謙卑、降服、憂傷而無助的光景。這裡的核心意思是:律法並不能達成猶太人對它所宣稱的目的——使人心成聖、賜人安慰;律法對人心的一切影響,只足以產生更重、未蒙赦免的罪咎與禍患。
Originale inglese
For I-- There seems to be no doubt that the apostle here refers to his own past experience. Yet in this he speaks the sentiment of all who are unconverted, and who are depending on their own righteousness.
Was alive - This is opposed to what he immediately adds respecting another state, in which he was when he died. It must mean, therefore, that he had a certain kind of peace; he deemed himself secure; he was free from the convictions of conscience and the agitations of alarm. The state to which he refers here must be doubtless that to which he himself alludes elsewhere, when he deemed himself to be righteous, depending on his own works, and esteeming himself to be blameless, Philippians 3:4-6; Acts 23:1; Acts 26:4-5. It means that he was then free from those agitations and alarms which he afterward experienced when he was brought under conviction for sin. At that time, though he had the Law, and was attempting to obey it, yet he was unacquainted with its spiritual and holy nature. He aimed at external conformity. Its claims on the heart were unfelt. This is the condition of every self-confident sinner, and of everyone who is unawakened.
Without the law - Not that Paul was ever really without the Law, that is, without the Law of Moses; but he means before the Law was applied to his heart in its spiritual meaning, and with power.
But when the commandment came - When it was applied to the heart and conscience. This is the only intelligible sense of the expression; for it cannot refer to the time when the Law was given. When this was, the apostle does not say. But the expression denotes whenever it was so applied; when it was urged with power and efficacy on his conscience, to control, restrain, and threaten him, it produced this effect. We are unacquainted with the early operations of his mind, and with his struggles against conscience and duty. We know enough of him before conversion, however, to be assured that he was proud, impetuous, and unwilling to be restrained; see Acts 8; 9. In the state of his self-confident righteousness and impetuosity of feeling, we may easily suppose that the holy Law of God, which is designed to restrain the passions, to humble the heart, and to rebuke pride, would produce only irritation, and impatience of restraint, and revolt.
Sin revived - Lived again. This means that it was before dormant Romans 7:8, but was now quickened into new life. The word is usually applied to a renewal of life, Romans 14:19; Luke 15:24, Luke 15:32, but here it means substantially the same as the expression in Romans 7:8, "Sin ...wrought in me all manner of concupiscence." The power of sin, which was before dormant, became quickened and active.
I died - That is, I was by it involved in additional guilt and misery. It stands opposed to "I was alive," and must mean the opposite of that; and evidently denotes that the effect of the commandment was to bring him under what he calls death, (compare Romans 5:12, Romans 5:14-15;) that is, sin reigned, and raged, and produced its withering and condemning effects; it led to aggravated guilt and misery. It may also include this idea, that before, he was self-confident and secure, but that by the commandment he was stricken down and humbled, his self-confidence was blasted, and his hopes were prostrated in the dust. Perhaps no words would better express the humble, subdued, melancholy, and helpless state of a converted sinner than the expressive phrase "I died." The essential idea here is, that the Law did not answer the purpose which the Jew would claim for it, to sanctify the soul and to give comfort, but that all its influence on the heart was to produce aggravated, unpardoned guilt and woe.
10
Romans 7:10
那誡命——即他前面所提的律法。
本來叫人活的——即原是要產生生命或幸福的。這裏的「生命」與「死亡」相對,意即福樂、平安、永恆的福祉;見 John 3:36 註釋。使徒說誡命本來叫人活,大概是想到舊約中許多以這方式論到律法的經文:Leviticus 18:5「所以,你們要守我的律例典章;人若遵行,就必因此活著」;Ezekiel 20:11, Ezekiel 20:13, Ezekiel 20:21;Ezekiel 18:9, Ezekiel 18:21。這些經文與保羅這宣告連起來看,意思可表述如下:
(1) 律法是善的;它沒有惡,本身也不會產生惡。
(2) 人若是純全的,律法若被完全遵守,它就只會產生生命與幸福。對那些在天上遵守它的人,它只產生了幸福。
(3) 律法正是為此而設立的;它適合於此;完全被遵守時,它不會產生別的果效。但是,
(4) 人是罪人;他沒有遵守它;在這種情形下,律法就降禍。
律法與人的傾向相抵觸;它不像對完全聖潔者那樣產生平安與生命,反倒只產生禍患與罪。父母的家規可以是善的,是為促進兒女幸福而設的;若人人順服,它也極其適合達成這目的;然而家中若有一個固執、任性、頑梗的孩子,決意放縱他的惡情,那麼對他而言,結果就是禍患與絕望。那為全家福祉而設、本適合促進他們福利的家規,惟獨他在眾人之中發現是「致死的」。
我發現——即對我而言,它產生了這樣的果效。
叫我死——即產生更重的罪咎與定罪(Romans 7:9)。
Originale inglese
And the commandment - The Law to which he had referred before.
Which was ordained to life - Which was intended to produce life, or happiness. Life here stands opposed to death, and means felicity, peace, eternal bliss; Note, John 3:36. When the apostle says that it was ordained to life, he probably has reference to the numerous passages in the Old Testament which speak of the Law in this manner, Leviticus 18:5, "Ye shall keep my statutes and my judgments; which if a man do, he shall live in them," Ezekiel 20:11, Ezekiel 20:13, Ezekiel 20:21; Ezekiel 18:9, Ezekiel 18:21. The meaning of these passages, in connection with this declaration of Paul, may be thus expressed:
(1) The Law is good; it has no evil, and is itself suited to produce no evil.
(2) if man was pure, and it was obeyed perfectly, it would produce life and happiness only. On those who have obeyed it in heaven, it has produced only happiness.
(3) for this it was ordained; it is adapted to it; and when perfectly obeyed, it produces no other effect. But,
(4) Man is a sinner; he has not obeyed it; and in such a case the Law threatens woe.
It crosses the inclination of man, and instead of producing peace and life, as it would on a being perfectly holy, it produces only woe and crime. The law of a parent may be good, and may be appointed to promote the happiness of his children; it may be admirably suited to it if all were obedient; yet in the family there may be one obstinate, self-willed, and stubborn child, resolved to indulge his evil passions, and the results to him would be woe and despair. The commandment, which was ordained for the good of the family, and which would be adapted to promote their welfare, he alone, of all the number, would find to be unto death.
I found - It was to me. It produced this effect.
Unto death - Producing aggravated guilt and condemnation, Romans 7:9.
11
Romans 7:11
罪——本節是 Romans 7:8 之意義帶少許變化的重複。
引誘我——這裏所用的字本義指引人偏離、誘離正路;繼而指欺騙、引誘人犯罪、使人偏離德行之路(Romans 16:18;1 Corinthians 3:18;2 Corinthians 11:3「蛇用詭詐誘惑了夏娃」;2 Thessalonians 2:3)。這裏的意思似乎是說:他那敗壞而悖逆的傾向,既被律法挑動,就引他走入歧途,使他越犯越深,並以一種欺哄的方式待他,催他不假思索、不顧一切地陷入加重的過犯。在這個意義上,一切罪人都受了欺哄。他們的情慾催逼他們,迷惑他們,引他們離幸福越來越遠,並在他們不知不覺之間把他們捲入罪惡與死亡。在宇宙中,再沒有比放縱惡情的罪人更受迷惑的了。所羅門對一個具體案例的描述可以適用於所有人(Proverbs 7:21-23):
淫婦用許多巧言誘他隨從,
用諂媚的嘴逼他同行。
少年人立刻跟隨她,
好像牛往宰殺之地,
又像愚昧人帶鎖鍊去受刑罰,
直等箭穿他的肝,
如同雀鳥急入網羅。
藉著誡命——即藉著律法(Romans 7:8)。
殺了我——意思與 Romans 7:8 的「我就死了」相同。
Originale inglese
For sin - This verse is a repetition, with a little variation of the sentiment in Romans 7:8.
Deceived me - The word used here properly means to lead or seduce from the right way; and then to deceive, solicit to sin, cause to err from the way of virtue, Romans 16:18; 1 Corinthians 3:18; 2 Corinthians 11:3, "The serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty," 2 Thessalonians 2:3. The meaning here seems to be, that his corrupt and rebellious propensities, excited by the Law, led him astray; caused him more and more to sin; practiced a species of deception on him by urging him on headlong, and without deliberation, into aggravated transgression. In this sense, all sinners are deceived. Their passions urge them on, deluding them, and leading them further and further from happiness, and involving them, before they are aware, in crime and death. No being in the universe is more deladed than a sinner in the indulgence of evil passions. The description of Solomon in a particular case will apply to all, Proverbs 7:21-23.
"With much fair speech she caused him to yield,
With the flattering of her lips she forced him.
He goeth after her straightway,
As an ox goeth to the slaughter,
Or as a fool to the correction of the stocks;
Till a dart strike through his liver,
As a bird hasteth to the snare."
By it - By the Law, Romans 7:8.
Slew me - Meaning the same as "I died," Romans 7:8.
12
Romans 7:12
這樣看來——即由此可知。我們所得的結論是:雖然律法在現存的情形下有這些效果,律法卻不當受責備。這一切的源頭不是律法,而是人敗壞的本性。律法是善的;然而使徒的立場也是真的:它並不適合潔淨墮落之人的心。它的趨向是激起更重的罪咎、爭戰、驚恐與絕望。本節回答了 Romans 7:7 的問題:「律法是罪嗎?」
是聖潔的——不是罪;參 Romans 7:7。它在本性上是純潔的。
誡命——「誡命」一詞在此與律法同義。它本義指所命令的事。
聖潔——純潔。
公義——在其要求與刑罰上是公義的;它的要求並不偏頗。
良善——本身是善的,其本性傾向於產生幸福。罪人的罪與定罪不是律法的過失。律法若被遵守,就必處處產生幸福。見 Psalm 19:7-11 對神律法一段極美的描述。
Originale inglese
Wherefore - So that. The conclusion to which we come is, that the Law is not to be blamed, though these are its effects under existing circumstances. The source of all this is not the Law, but the corrupt nature of man. The Law is good; and yet the position of the apostle is true, that it is not adapted to purify the heart of fallen man. Its tendency is to excite increased guilt, conflict, alarm, and despair. This verse contains an answer to the question in Romans 7:7, "Is the law sin?"
Is holy - Is not sin; compare Romans 7:7. It is pure in its nature.
And the commandment - The word "commandment" is here synonymous with the Law. It properly means what is enjoined.
Holy - Pure.
Just - Righteous in its claims and penalties. It is not unequal in its exactions.
Good - In itself good; and in its own nature tending to produce happiness. The sin and condemnation of the guilty is not the fault of the Law. If obeyed, it would produce happiness everywhere. See a most beautiful description of the law of God in Psalm 19:7-11.
13
Romans 7:13
那良善的是……——這是使徒接着回答的另一個反對。反對是這樣:「凡被承認為良善純潔的,難道可能變成邪惡嗎?那引向生命的,難道可能成為人的死亡嗎?」為回答這一點,使徒重申:過錯不在律法,而是在他自己,在他罪惡的性情傾向。
叫我死——見 Romans 7:8, Romans 7:10。
斷乎不是——註釋見 Romans 3:4。
但罪——這是把罪擬人化,如 Romans 7:8 一樣。
顯出真是罪——即叫它顯明自己真實的本性,不再潛伏於心中。神的律法常常應用於人的良心,好叫他看見自己敗壞得何等深重、何等絕望。直到律法這樣橫過他的道路、把他自己的本相顯給他看以前,沒有人認識自己的心。
藉着誡命——註釋見 Romans 7:8。
更顯出是惡極了——在原文中,這是一個十分有力的表達,是保羅用以表示強烈強調或程度的說法之一:καθ ̓ ὑπερβολὴν kath huperbolēn,即「以誇張之法」。意即到過分的程度、到可能的最大限度;1 Corinthians 12:31; 2 Corinthians 1:8; 2 Corinthians 4:7; 2 Corinthians 12:7; Galatians 1:13——這說法在以上各處都出現。這裏的意思是:藉着誡命的賜下及其應用於人心,罪就完全顯明出來;它被挑動、被點燃、被加重,並顯出是極度惡毒而致命的。它不是一種潛伏、沉睡的原理;它乃是可怕地與神和祂的律法為敵。加爾文把這意思表達得很好:「罪的巨大可憎藉着律法顯明出來,這是合宜的;因為除非罪以某種可怕而巨大的過度(如人所說)爆發出來,否則它就不會被認出是罪。這過度當它把生命變為死亡時,就愈發猛烈地顯露出來。」全段的大意是:律法的趨向,是把胸中潛伏的罪激發成活躍的存在,並顯明其真實的本性。這樣的顯明是合乎期望的;而律法所成就的既然僅止於此,它便不足以使靈魂成聖。要表明這正是使徒的意思:罪這樣在它的真實本性中被看見,乃是合乎期望的,原因如下:
(1) 人當認識自己真實的本相,不當自欺。
(2) 顯明心中的隱情、並向一切受造之物顯明他們的本相,是神計劃的一部分。
(3) 惟有知道這一點,罪人才會受促動去取用救治之法、並力求得救。所以神常常容讓人陷入罪中,行出他們的本性,好叫他們看見自己,並因自己罪行的後果而驚懼。
Originale inglese
Was then that which is good ... - This is another objection which the apostle proceeds to answer. The objection is this, "Can it be possible that what is admitted to be good and pure, should be changed into evil? Can what tends to life, be made death to a man?" In answer to this, the apostle repeats that the fault was not in the Law, but was in himself, and in his sinful propensities.
Made death - Romans 7:8, Romans 7:10.
God forbid - Note, Romans 3:4.
But sin - This is a personification of sin as in Romans 7:8.
That it might appear sin - That it might develope its true nature, and no longer be dormant in the mind. The Law of God is often applied to a man's conscience, that he may see how deep and desperate is his depravity. No man knows his own heart until the Law thus crosses his path, and shows him what he is.
By the commandment - Note, Romans 7:8.
Might become exceeding sinful - In the original this is a very strong expression, and is one of those used by Paul to express strong emphasis, or intensity καθ ̓ ὑπερβολὴν kath huperbolēn by hyperboles. In an excessive degree; to the utmost possible extent, 1 Corinthians 12:31; 2 Corinthians 1:8; 2 Corinthians 4:7; 2 Corinthians 12:7; Galatians 1:13. The phrase occurs in each of these places. The sense here is, that by the giving of the command, and its application to the mind, sin was completely developed; it was excited, inflamed, aggravated, and showed to be excessively malignant and deadly. It was not a dormant, slumbering principle; but it was awfully opposed to God and His Law. Calvin has well expressed the sense: "It was proper that the enormity of sin should be revealed by the Law; because unless sin should break forth by some dreadful and enormous excess (as they say,) it would not be known to be sin. This excess exhibits itself the more violently, while it turns life into death." The sentiment of the whole is, that the tendency of the Law is to excite the dormant sin of the bosom into active existence, and to reveal its true nature. It is desirable that that should be done, and as that is all that the Law accomplishes, it is not adapted to sanctify the soul. To show that this was the design of the apostle, it is desirable that sin should be thus seen in its true nature, because,
(1) Man should be acquainted with his true character. He should not deceive himself.
(2) because it is one part of God's plan to develope the secret feelings of the heart, and to show to all creatures what they are.
(3) because only by knowing this, will the sinner be induced to take a remedy, and strive to be saved. So God often allows people to plunge into sin; to act out their nature, so that they may see themselves, and be alarmed at the consequences of their own crimes.
14
Romans 7:14
本章餘下的部分,一直是不少爭論的主題。問題在於:它所描述的,是保羅悔改以前的光景,還是以後的光景。這些註釋的目的並非要進入爭論或冗長的討論。但在我對這段經文所能給予的一切注意之後,我認為它所描述的,是一個人在福音之下的光景,是保羅悔改以後心靈活動的描寫。採納這解釋,有以下的理由:
(1) 因為它在我看來最為明顯。這是平常的人——沒有理論要維護、按語言的通常意義去理解的人——會看為自然意義的解釋。
(2) 因為它與使徒的目的相符;他的目的,是要表明律法並不適於產生成聖與平安。關於人未悔改以前,他已經表明了這一點。這段若論及同一時期,那就是對已經討論過的論點作無用的重複;而它若僅僅關乎那個時期,就仍有一大片領域——包括人歸信基督教以後的整個時期——在其中,「律法在那裏是否適於使人成聖」的問題仍可能懸而未決。因此,使徒把他的論證作得徹底,表明律法的運用在任何地方都是一樣的。
(3) 因為這裏所用的一些表達,不可能理解為指一個未悔改的罪人;見 Romans 7:15、Romans 7:21 的註釋。
(4) 因為它與論到基督徒心中爭戰狀態的平行表達相符。
(5) 因為這裏從過去時態轉為現在時態。在 Romans 7:7 等處,他用的是過去時態,顯然描述某種從前的狀態;在 Romans 7:14 則轉為現在時態——這轉換除非假定他有意描述一種與前面所描述者不同的狀態,便無法解釋。那不可能是別的,只能是:把他的例證向前推進,表明律法在一個已更新的人身上也無功效;或者表明那人身上殘餘的敗壞性質如此之強,以致產生與先前狀態中實質相同的效果。
(6) 因為它與基督徒的經歷相符,而不是與罪人的經歷相符。這正是熟悉自己內心的平常基督徒用來表達感受的語言。我承認,這最後一點考慮本身不是決定性的;但若這語言與基督徒世界的經歷不符,那就會成為反對任何所提出解釋的有力情由。這裏對本章所表達的見解——即前一部分 Romans 7:7-13 指一個未重生狀態中的人,其餘部分描述律法對一個已更新之人心中的效果——是單單藉著研究本章本身、沒有倚賴任何作者而採納的。然而我很高興發現,這樣表達的見解與已故的 John.P.Wilson 博士的見解相符;在解釋聖經的事上,恐怕沒有人比他更有資格。他說:「在第四節,他(保羅)轉用第一人稱複數,因為他有意論到那些曾作猶太人的基督徒從前的經歷。在第七節,他用第一人稱單數,但用過去時態說話,因為他描述自己作未悔改的法利賽人時的經歷。從第十四節到本章末了,他用第一人稱單數和現在時態,因為他陳明自己成為基督徒和使徒以後的經歷。」
我們原曉得——即我們承認。這是一個公認的、眾所明白的論點。
律法是屬乎靈的——這不是說律法被設計來管理靈、以與身體相對;而是一個聲明,表明他正在論到的那些惡,不是律法的過錯。律法按其本性不是屬感官的、敗壞的、屬地的、屬肉體的;它乃是純淨而屬靈的。所描述的效果不是律法的過錯,而是那賣給罪之人的過錯。「屬靈的」一詞常用來指純淨而聖潔的、與屬肉體的相對的事物,Romans 8:5-6;Galatians 5:16-23。肉體被描述為邪惡情慾與私慾的源頭;靈則被描述為純潔的源頭,或與聖靈應有的影響相合的事物。
但我是——現在時態表明,他是描述自己寫作當時的光景。這是自然而明顯的解釋;若不是這個意思,他就無法解釋為何把 Romans 7:7 的過去時態改為現在時態。
屬乎肉體的——即屬肉體的、屬感官的,與屬靈的相對。用這詞,是因為在聖經中,肉體被說成感官情慾和癖性的源頭,Galatians 5:19-21。這裏的意思是:這些敗壞的情慾,仍對他的心保持著強烈、摧殘而痛苦的影響。已更新的人暴露在他與生俱來的強烈慾望所引來的試探之中;這些情慾的能力,因他悔改以前長期的習慣而得加強,並且延展侵入他的信仰生活之中,至今仍影響他、使他痛苦。這不是說他完全在它們的影響之下;而是說他天然傾向的趨勢是趨向放縱。
是已經賣給罪了——這表達常被人引來證明,使徒所說的不可能是一個已更新的人。論證是:不可以對基督徒斷言他是賣給罪了的。對此充分的回答可以是:事實上,這正是基督徒現今常用來表達他們所抗爭的天生敗壞之能力的語言,沒有別的語言能表達得更好。這不是說他們選擇或喜愛罪。它強烈暗示他們心中主導的傾向是反對罪的;只是那敗壞性的能力如此之大,以致把他們帶入對它的奴役之中。這裏所用「賣給罪」的表達,是「從戰爭中把俘虜賣作奴隸的慣例借用而來的」(Stuart.)。因此,它的意思是交付在某人的權勢之下,以致他須倚賴那人的意志與控制(Schleusner.)。重點不在「賣」字上,好像真發生過甚麼賣的行為;而是其效果如同他被賣了一樣,就是說,他服於它的權下、受它的控制。它的意思是:罪與他心中主導的傾向相反(Romans 7:15-17),卻對他有這樣的影響力,以致引他犯罪,從而產生爭戰與憂傷的狀態,Romans 7:19-24。接下去的幾節,就是對這意義、並對他「賣給罪了」之方式的解釋。
Originale inglese
The remainder of this chapter has been the subject of no small degree of controversy. The question has been whether it describes the state of Paul before his conversion, or afterward. It is not the purpose of these notes to enter into controversy, or into extended discussion. But after all the attention which I have been able to give to this passage, I regard it as describing the state of a man under the gospel, as descriptive of the operations of the mind of Paul subsequent to his conversion. This interpretation is adopted for the following reasons:
(1) Because it seems to me to be the most obvious. It is what will strike plain people as being the natural meaning; people who do not have a theory to support, and who understand language in its usual sense.
(2) because it agrees with the design of the apostle, which is to show that the Law is not adapted to produce sanctification and peace. This he had done in regard to a man before he was converted. If this relates to the same period, then it is a useless discussion of a point already discussed, If it relates to that period also, then there is a large field of action, including the whole period after a man's conversion to Christianity, in which the question might still be unsettled, whether the Law there might not be adapted to sanctify. The apostle therefore makes thorough work with the argument, and shows that the operation of the Law is everywhere the same.
(3) because the expressions which occur are such as cannot be understood of an impenitent sinner; see the notes at Romans 7:15, Romans 7:21.
(4) because it accords with parallel expressions in regard to the state of the conflict in a Christian's mind.
(5) because there is a change made here from the past tense to the present. In Romans 7:7, etc. he had used the past tense, evidently describing some former state. In Romans 7:14 there is a change to the present, a change inexplicable, except on the supposition that he meant to describe some state different from that before described. That could be no other than to carry his illustration forward in showing the inefficacy of the Law on a man in his renewed state; or to show that such was the remaining depravity of the man, that it produced substantially the same effects as in the former condition.
(6) because it accords with the experience of Christians, and not with sinners. It is just such language as plain Christians, who are acquainted with their own hearts, use to express their feelings. I admit that this last consideration is not by itself conclusive; but if the language did not accord with the experience of the Christian world, it would be a strong circumstance against any proposed interpretation. The view which is here expressed of this chapter, as supposing that the previous part Romans 7:7-13 refers to a man in his unregenerate state, and that the remainder describes the effect of the Law on the mind of a renewed man, was adopted by studying the chapter itself, without aid from any writer. I am happy, however, to find that the views thus expressed are in accordance with those of the late Dr. John P. Wilson, than whom, perhaps, no man was ever better quailfled to interpret the Scriptures. He says, "In the fourth verse, he (Paul) changes to the first person plural, because he intended to speak of the former experience of Christians, who had been Jews. In the seventh verse, he uses the first person singular, but speaks in the past tense, because he describes his own experience when he was an uncoverted Pharisee. In the fourteenth verse, and unto the end of the chapter, he uses the first person singular, and the present tense, because he exhibits his own experience since he became a Christian and an apostle."
We know - We admit. It is a conceded, well understood point.
That the law is spiritual - This does not mean that the Law is designed to control the spirit, in contradistinction from the body, but it is a declaration showing that the evils of which he was speaking were not the fault of the Law. That was not, in its nature, sensual, corrupt, earthly, carnal; but was pure and spiritual. The effect described was not the fault of the Law, but of the man, who was sold under sin. The word "spiritual" is often thus used to denote what is pure and hoy, in opposition to that which is fleshly or carnal; Romans 8:5-6; Galatians 5:16-23. The flesh is described as the source of evil passions and desires; The spirit as the source of purity; or as what is agreeable to the proper influences of the Holy Spirit.
But I am - The present tense shows that he is describing himself as he was at the time of writing. This is the natural and obvious construction, and if this be not the meaning, it is impossible to account for his having changed the past tense Romans 7:7 to the present.
Carnal - Fleshly; sensual; opposed to spiritual. This word is used because in the Scriptures the flesh is spoken of as the source of sensual passions and propensities, Galatians 5:19-21. The sense is, that these corrupt passions still retained a strong and withering and distressing influence over the mind. The renewed man is exposed to temptations from his strong native appetites; and the power of these passions, strengthened by long habit before he was converted, has traveled over into religion, and they continue still to influence and distress him. It does not mean that he is wholly under their influence; but that the tendency of his natural inclinations is to indulgence.
Sold under sin - This expression is often adduced to show that it cannot be of a renewed man that the apostle is speaking. The argument is, that it cannot be affirmed of a Christian that he is sold under sin. A sufficient answer to this might be, that in fact, this is the very language which Christians often now adopt to express the strength of that native depravity against which they struggle, and that no language would better express it. It does not, mean that they choose or prefer sins. It strongly implies that the prevailing bent of their mind is against it, but that such is its strength that it brings them into slavery to it. The expression used here, "sold under sin," is "borrowed from the practice of selling captives taken in war, as slaves." (Stuart.) It hence, means to deliver into the power of anyone, so that he shall be dependent on his will and control. (Schleusner.) The emphasis is not on the word "sold," as if any act of selling had taken place, but the effect was as if he had been sold; that is, he was subject to it, and under its control, and it means that sin, contrary to the prevailing inclination of his mind Romans 7:15-17, had such an influence over him as to lead him to commit it, and thus to produce a state of conflict and grief; Romans 7:19-24. The verses which follow this are an explanation of the sense, and of the manner in which he was "sold under sin."
15
Romans 7:15
因為我所做的——即我所做的惡,我所自覺、並使我痛苦的罪。
我自己不明白——我不贊同它;我不願意它;我的意向和目的的主要傾向是反對它的。希臘原文作「我不認識」,見旁註。然而「認識」一詞有時用於贊同的意義:Revelation 2:24「沒有認識(沒有贊同)撒但深奧之理」;比較 Psalm 101:4「惡人我不認識」;Jeremiah 1:5。
我所願意的——即我所贊同的,是我一貫而確立的意願,是我盼望常常去行的。
我所恨惡的——即我所不贊同的,與我的判斷、我一貫的傾向、我確立的行為原則相反的。
我倒去做——這是在罪惡的傾向、屬肉體的意向和慾望的影響之下做的。這表明人向罪的天生傾向何等強烈,甚至表明在福音約束的影響之下,敗壞的傾向仍有的力量。關於這段值得注意、十分重要的經文,我們可以觀察:
(1) 基督徒心中一貫的傾向——那習慣而固定的意向——是行正直的事。惡的道路為他所恨,正的道路為他所愛。這是敬虔之心的特徵,把聖徒與罪人分別出來。
(2) 所犯的惡是他所不贊同的,是他憂傷的根源;他心中一貫的願望是逃避它、成為純潔。這也把基督徒與罪人分別出來。
(3) 這裡不必因「這怎麼可能」的任何形而上學難題或探究而困惑,因為:
(a) 這實際上是所有基督徒的經歷。他們心中習慣而固定的意向和願望是事奉神。他們對罪有確定的憎惡;然而他們又意識到不完全、錯誤和罪,這正是他們不安和痛苦的根源。天然情感的強烈力量,可能在一個不防備的時刻勝過他們。先前長久思想習慣的勢力可能攪擾他們。一個從前不信、心中充滿懷疑、挑剔和褻瀆的人,歸正之後會發現,從前思想習慣的影響仍留在心裡,多年攪擾他的平安。這些思想會如閃電般迅速浮現。各樣的惡習和各樣的見解都是如此。這是習慣的後果之一。「不潔的思想單是從心中經過,也留下污染」;罪既長期被放縱,就在歸正許久之後,仍對心靈留下枯萎荒涼的影響,並產生每個基督徒都熟悉的那種交戰狀態。
(b) 相近的效果,人人都感受得到。人人都意識到:在情感和偏見的激動之下,作了良心和更好的判斷所不贊同的事。於是有一種衝突存在,其伴隨的形而上學困難,不下於此處所說基督徒心中的掙扎。
(c) 同樣的事,在異教作者的著作中也曾被觀察和描述。這樣,在 Xenophon(Cyrop. vi. 1)裏,波斯人 Araspes 為自己的叛逆計謀辯護說:「無疑我必有兩個靈魂;因為又惡又善、同時既想做一件事又不想做它的,顯然不可能是同一個。可見確有兩個靈魂;善的佔上風時就行善,惡的佔上風時就行惡。」Epictetus(Enchixid. ii. 26)也說:「犯罪的人所做的,不是他所願意的;他所不願意的,他倒去做。」與這段話對照,保羅似乎幾乎是熟悉它,並在寫作時心中想着它。還有 Ovid(Meta. vii. 9)那段著名的話也是如此:
Aliudque Cupido,
Mens aliud suadet. Video meliora, proboque,
Deteriora sequor.
「慾望催促一件事,理智卻勸另一件事。我看見善,也贊同善,卻隨從了惡。」——類似意義的其他段落,見 Grotius 與 Tholuck 所引。
Originale inglese
For that which I do - That is, the evil which I do, the sin of which I am conscious, and which troubles me.
I allow not - I do not approve; I do not wish it; the prevailing bent of my inclinations and purposes is against it. Greek, "I know not;" see the margin. The word "know," however, is sometimes used in the sense of approving, Revelation 2:24, "Which have not known (approved) the depths of Satan;" compare Psalm 101:4, I will not know a wicked person." Jeremiah 1:5.
For what I would - That which I approve; and which is my prevailing and established desire. What I would wish always to do.
But what I hate - What I disapprove of: what is contrary to my judgment; my prevailing inclination; my established principles of conduct.
That do I-- Under the influence of sinful propensities, and carnal inclinations and desires. This represents the strong native propensity to sin; and even the power of corrupt propensity under the restraining influence of the gospel. On this remarkable and important passage we may observe,
(1) That the prevailing propensity; the habitual fixed inclination of the mind of the Christian, is to do right. The evil course is hated, the right course is loved. This is the characteristic of a pious mind. It distinguishes a holy man from a sinner.
(2) the evil which is done is disapproved; is a source of grief; and the habitual desire of the mind is to avoid it, and be pure. This also distinguishes the Christian from the sinner.
(3) there is no need of being embarrassed here with any metaphysical difficulties or inquiries how this can be; for.
(a) it is in fact the experience of all Christians. The habitual, fixed inclination and desire of their minds is to serve God. They have a fixed abhorrence of sin; and yet they are conscious of imperfection, and error, and sin, that is the source of uneasiness and trouble. The strength of natural passion may in an unguarded moment overcome them. The power of long habits of previous thoughts may annoy them. A man who was an infidel before his conversion, and whose mind was filled with scepticism, and cavils, and blasphemy, will find the effect of his former habits of thinking lingering in his mind, and annoying his peace for years. These thoughts will start up with the rapidity of lightning. Thus, it is with every vice and every opinion. It is one of the effects of habit. "The very passage of an impure thought through the mind leaves pollution behind it," and where sin has been long indulged, it leaves its withering, desolating effect on the soul long after conversion, and produces that state of conflict with which every Christian is familiar.
(b) An effect somewhat similar is felt by all people. All are conscious of doing that, under the excitement of passion and prejudice, which their conscience and better judgment disapprove. A conflict thus exists, which is attended with as much metaphysical difficulty as the struggle in the Christian's mind referred to here.
(c) The same thing was observed and described in the writings of the heathen. Thus, Xenophon (Cyrop. vi. 1), Araspes, the Persian, says, in order to excuse his treasonable designs," Certainly I must have two souls; for plainly it is not one and the same which is both evil and good; and at the same time wishes to do a thing and not to do it. Plainly then, there are two souls; and when the good one prevails, then it does good; and when the evil one predominates, then it does evil." So also Epictetus (Enchixid. ii. 26) says, "He that sins does not do what he would, but what he would not, that he does." With this passage it would almost seem that Paul was familiar, and had his eye on it when he wrote. So also the well-known passage from Ovid, Meta. vii. 9.
Aliudque Cupido,
Mens aliud suadet. Video meliora, proboque,
Deteriora sequor.
"Desire prompts to one thing, but the mind persuades to another. I see the good, and approve it, and yet pursue the wrong." - See other passages of similar import quoted in Grotius and Tholuck.
16
Romans 7:16
我就應承律法——與罪惡爭戰這一事實本身,就表明罪惡並非被人所愛、所贊同,而那定罪為惡的律法倒是真正被人所愛。基督徒可以在這裡找到敬虔的試金石。與罪惡爭戰的事實、想要脫離並勝過它的願望、它所引起的焦慮與憂傷,都證明我們並不愛它,因此證明我們是神的朋友。在各樣邪惡的情慾和慾望上長久持續、痛苦地爭戰,並且心靈渴慕蒙拯救脫離罪的權勢與轄制——大概沒有甚麼比這更能作為敬虔的決定性試金石了。
Originale inglese
I consent unto the law - The very struggle with evil shows that it is not loved, or approved, but that the Law which condemns it is really loved. Christians may here find a test of their piety. The fact of struggling against evil, the desire to be free from it, and to overcome it, the anxiety and grief which it causes, is an evidence that we do not love it, and that there. fore we are the friends of God. Perhaps nothing can be a more decisive test of piety than a long-continued and painful struggle against evil passions and desires in every form, and a panting of the soul to be delivered from the power and dominion of sin.
17
Romans 7:17
就不是我做的——這顯然是比喻性的說法,因為惡行作出之時,真正犯罪的原是那人自己。但使徒在罪與他以代名詞「我」所指的事物之間作出區分。前者顯然指他敗壞的本性;後者指他更新的本性,即他的基督徒原則。他的意思是說,在現今的狀態中,他並不認可它、也不愛它;它乃是他天生性情與情慾的結果。在他的心、良心和慣常的情感裡,他並不選擇犯罪,反而恨惡它。照樣,每一個基督徒都能說,他不選擇作惡,倒願完全;他恨惡罪,然而他敗壞的情慾卻使他偏離正路。
乃是罪——即我的敗壞情慾和天生的性情。
住在我裡頭的——以我為它的居所,住在我裡面。這是一個強烈的說法,表明罪已在心中安頓居住,存留在那裡;它尚未被完全逐出。這說法與另一處所說「神的靈住」在基督徒裡面的話相對照 Romans 8:9;1 Corinthians 3:16。其意思是:他一方面受罪的強烈影響,另一方面受聖靈的強烈影響。基督徒中十分通行的說法——內住的罪——便是從這表達而來的。
Originale inglese
It is no more I that do it - This is evidently figurative language, for it is really the man that sins when evil is committed. But the apostle makes a distinction between sin and what he intends by the pronoun "I". By the former he evidently means his corrupt nature. By the latter he refers to his renewed nature, his Christian principles. He means to say that he does not approve or love it in his present state, but that it is the result of his native propensities and passions. In his heart, and conscience, and habitual feeling, he did not choose to commit sin, but abhorred it. Thus, every Christian can say that he does not choose to do evil, but would wish to be perfect; that he hates sin, and yet that his corrupt passions lead him astray.
But sin - My corrupt passions and native propensities.
That dwelleth in me - Dwelling in me as its home. This is a strong expression, denoting that sin had taken up its habitation in the mind, and abode there. It had not been yet wholly dislodged. This expression stands in contrast with another that occurs, where it is said that "the Spirit of God dwells" in the Christian, Romans 8:9; 1 Corinthians 3:16. The sense is, that he is strongly influenced by sin on the one hand, and by the Spirit on the other. From this expression has arisen the phrase so common among Christians, in-dwelling sin.
18
Romans 7:18
我也知道——這是為要說明他剛才所說的,就是罪住在他裡面。
就是我肉體之中——即在我未更新的人性裡;在我歸正以前的癖性和傾向裡。這個限制性的說法,豈不表明他在這段討論中,是以已更新之人的身分論到自己嗎?因此他留意暗示:那時他裡面有一些在神看為對、蒙神悅納的東西,但那不是他按本性所有的。
住著——他的心靈完全被惡佔據了。惡完全佔有了它。
沒有良善——對全然敗壞教義的信念,再沒有比這更強的表述了。這是保羅對自己的親筆描述。它證明他的心全然是惡的。這若在他身上是真實的,在一切別人身上也是真實的。省察自己的一個好方法,就是問:我們對自己天生的品格,是否持有這樣的見解,以致能說我們知道,在我們的肉體之中沒有良善住著。此處的意思是:就肉體而論——即就他天生的傾向和慾望而論——沒有良善,全是惡。在他歸正以前的全部行為中,這是真實的,那時肉體的慾望肆無節制地作王奔放;在歸正以後,就肉體天生的傾向和癖性而論,這也是真實的。這一切活動在每一種狀態中都是惡的,並不因為是在福音的光下、在福音的影響中經歷的,就少一些惡。
立志——即行善的決意或打算。
由得我——我能作那件事。那是可能的;是在我的能力之內。這說法也可以暗示它離他不遠 παράκειται parakeitai,就是說,它常在他面前;如今已成了他心裡習慣的傾向和目的。行正直的事,乃是基督徒之心一貫、經常、習慣的目的。
怎樣——譯者若不引入「怎樣」這個詞,意思本可保留得更好。困難不在於作成的方式,而在於去作那件事本身。
我找不著——即我發現它不在我的能力之內;或說我發現有強烈、持續的障礙,以致我行不出來。這些障礙不是天然的,乃是長久放縱罪惡所生的,是那向惡的強烈天生意向。
Originale inglese
For I know - This is designed as an illustration of what he had just said, that sin dwelt in him.
That is, in my flesh - In my unrenewed nature; in my propensities and inclinations before conversion. Does not this qualifying expression show that in this discussion he was speaking of himself as a renewed man? Hence, he is careful to imply that there was at that time in him something that was right or acceptable with God, but that that did not pertain to him by nature.
Dwelleth - His soul was wholly occupied by what was evil. It had taken entire possession.
No good thing - There could not be possibly a stronger expression of belief of the doctrine of total depravity. It is Paul's own representation of himself. It proves that his heart was wholly evil. And if this was true of him, it is true of all others. It is a good way to examine ourselves, to inquire whether we have such a view of our own native character as to say that we know that in our flesh there dwelleth no good thing. The sense here is, that so far as the flesh was concerned, that is, in regard to his natural inclinations and desires, there was nothing good; all was evil. This was true in his entire conduct before conversion, where the desires of the flesh reigned and rioted without control; and it was true after conversion, so far as the natural inclinations and propensities of the flesh were concerned. All those operations in every stake were evil, and not the less evil because they are experienced under the light and amidst the influences of the gospel.
To will - To purpose or intend to do good.
Is present with me - I can do that. It is possible; it is in my power. The expression may also imply that it was near to him παράκειται parakeitai, that is, it was constantly before him; it was now his habitual inclination and purpose of mind. It is the uniform, regular, habitual purpose of the Christian's mind to do right.
But how - The sense would have been better retained here if the translators had not introduced the word "how." The difficulty was not in the mode of performing it, but to do the thing itself.
I find not - I do not find it in my power; or I find strong, constant obstacles, so that I fail of doing it. The obstacles are not natural, but such as arise from long indulgence in sin; the strong native propensity to evil.
19
Romans 7:19
故此,我所願意的善……——這實質上是重複 Romans 7:15 所說的話。這重複表明使徒的心何等充滿這題目;他又何等傾向於在其中停留,以各種形式把它陳述出來。保羅這樣把一個題目擺出許多不同的方面,甚至不惜大量重複,來表達自己對它的深切關注,這在他是常有的事。
Originale inglese
For the good ... - This is substantially a repetition of what is said in Romans 7:15. The repetition shows how full the mind of the apostle was of the subject; and how much inclined he was to dwell upon it, and to place it in every variety of form. It is not uncommon for Paul thus to express his intense interest in a subject, by placing it in a great variety of aspects, even at the hazard of much repetition.
20
Romans 7:20
若我去作……——這一節也是 Romans 7:16-17 所說之話的重複。
Originale inglese
Now if I do ... - This verse is also a repetition of what was said in Romans 7:16-17.
21
Romans 7:21
我覺得有個律——每當我想要行善時,就經歷到一個律在運行。關於「律」一詞在此處的意義,歷來眾說紛紜。顯然,它在這裏的用法多少有些特殊。但它保留了這詞通常所含的束縛、控制之觀念。他所指的這東西,既不是由上位者所加——那是律的通常觀念——就這點而言它與律不同;但它束縛、控制、影響人,或說他正服在它之下,就這點而言,它具有律的意義。他在此所指的,無疑是他屬肉體而敗壞的本性,就是那些引他走入歧途的邪惡傾向與性情。他把這描繪為一個律,正與他論到它的一切話相合:它是奴役,他受它的捆綁,它攔阻他成為聖潔純淨的努力。其意義是:「我發現一種習慣、一種傾向、一種敗壞情慾與私慾的影響力,每當我要行正時,它就攔阻我的進路,使我不能成就我所願的。」參 Galatians 5:17。每一個基督徒對這事的認識,都不亞於使徒保羅。
願意為善的時候——即行正直的事、求完全的時候。
便有惡——即某種敗壞的私慾、不正當的情感,或邪惡的傾向。
與我同在——即在近旁;在身邊。它不請自來,不召即現。它就在路上,決不離開我們,隨時攔阻我們的前行,使我們轉離善良的計劃;參 Psalm 65:3:「罪孽勝了我」。其意義是:作惡與我們強烈的天性傾向與情慾是相合的。
Originale inglese
I find then a law - There is a law whose operation I experience whenever I attempt to do good. There have been various opinions about the meaning of the word "law" in this place. It is evident that it is used here in a sense somewhat unusual. But it retains the notion which commonly attaches to it of what binds, or controls. And though this to which he refers differs from a law, inasmuch as it is not imposed by a superior, which is the usual idea of a law, yet it has so far the sense of law that it binds, controls, influences, or is that to which he was subject. There can be no doubt that he refers here to his carnal and corrupt nature; to the evil propensities and dispositions which were leading him astray. His representing this as a law is in accordance with all that he says of it, that it is servitude, that he is in bondage to it, and that it impedes his efforts to be holy and pure. The meaning is this, "I find a habit, a propensity, an influence of corrupt passions and desires, which, when I would do right, impedes my progress, and prevents my accomplishing what I would." Compare Galatians 5:17. Every Christian is as much acquainted with this as was the apostle Paul.
Do good - Do right. Be perfect.
Evil - Some corrupt desire, or improper feeling, or evil propensity.
Is present with me - Is near; is at hand. It starts up unbidden, and undesired. It is in the path, and never leaves us, but is always ready to impede our going, and to turn us from our good designs; compare Psalm 65:3, "Iniquities prevail against me.' The sense is, that to do evil is agreeable to our strong natural inclinations and passions.
22
Romans 7:22
我是喜歡——這裏所用的詞 Συνήδομαι Sunēdomai 在新約別處沒有出現。它本意是與人同樂;它不僅表達悟性的贊同——如 Romans 7:16「我承認律法是善的」那種說法——更進而表達心中實在的喜樂。它不僅指理智的同意,更指情感,即在默想律法時一種喜樂的情感。這表明使徒所說的不是未經更新的人。論到那樣的人,或可說他的良心贊同律法,他的悟性確信律法是善的;但從未有過一個不悔改的罪人,在默想神純淨屬靈的律法時感到喜樂的情感。若這說法可以應用在未經更新的人身上,那麼敬虔心的一切標記,恐怕就沒有一樣不可以同樣恰當地這樣應用了。這是表達敬虔之情感最自然、最明顯、最通常的方式:贊同神的律法,隨之而在默想中生發實在喜樂的情感。參 Psalm 119:97:「我何等愛慕你的律法,終日不住地思想」;Psalm 1:2:「惟喜愛耶和華的律法」;Psalm 19:7-11;Job 23:12。
神的律——「律」一詞在此取廣義,指神為約束人所賜下的一切啟示。其意義是:使徒以這一切為樂。真敬虔的一個標記,就是以神全部的要求為樂。
按著我裏面的意思——即就著裏面的人而言。「裏面的人」這說法,有時用以指人與感官相對的理性部分,有時指與身體相對的心思(參 2 Corinthians 4:16;1 Peter 3:4)。希臘古典作家也是如此使用。它在這裏顯然是與那屬肉體而敗壞的本性相對;與那未經更新之靈魂的邪惡情慾與私慾相對;與別處所稱「因私慾的迷惑漸漸變壞的舊人」(Ephesians 4:22)相對。「裏面的人」在別處稱為「新人」(Ephesians 4:24);它不是單指智力或良心,而是基督徒所受支配之行動原則的擬人化;是新的本性;是聖潔的性情;是那得了更新之心的傾向。
Originale inglese
For I delight - The word used here Συνήδομαι Sunēdomai, occurs no where else in the New Testament. It properly means to rejoice with anyone; and expresses not only approbation of the understanding, as the expression, "I consent unto the law," in Romans 7:16, but more than that it denotes sensible pleasure in the heart. It indicates not only intellectual assent, but emotion, an emotion of pleasure in the contemplation of the Law. And this shows that the apostle is not speaking of an unrenewed man. Of such a man it might be said that his conscience approved the Law; that his understanding was convinced that the Law was good; but never yet did it occur that an impenitent sinner found emotions of pleasure in the contemplation of the pure and spiritual Law of God. If this expression can be applied to an unrenewed man, there is, perhaps, not a single mark of a pious mind which may not with equal propriety be so applied. It is the natural, obvious, and usual mode of denoting the feelings of piety, an assent to the divine Law followed with emotions of sensible delight in the contemplation. Compare Psalm 119:97, "O how love I thy law; it is my meditation all the day." Psalm 1:2, "but his delight is in the law of the Lord." Psalm 19:7-11; Job 23:12.
In the law of God - The word "law" here is used in a large sense, to denote all the communications which God had made to control man. The sense is, that the apostle was pleased with the whole. One mark of genuine piety is to be pleased with the whole of the divine requirements.
After the inward man - In respect to the inward man. The expression "the inward man" is used sometimes to denote the rational part of man as opposed to the sensual; sometimes the mind as opposed to the body (compare 2 Corinthians 4:16; 1 Peter 3:4). It is thus used by the Greek classic writers. Here it is used evidently in opposition to a carnal and corrupt nature; to the evil passions and desires of the soul in an unrenewed state; to what is called elsewhere "the old man which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts." Ephesians 4:22. The "inward man" is called elsewhere "the new man" Ephesians 4:24; and denotes not the mere intellect, or conscience, but is a personification of the principles of action by which a Christian is governed; the new nature; the holy disposition; the inclination of the heart that is renewed.
23
Romans 7:23
但我覺得另有個律——見 Romans 7:21 的註釋。
在我肢體中——即在我身體中;在我肉體中;在我敗壞而屬罪的傾向中;見 Romans 6:13 的註釋;參 1 Corinthians 6:15;Colossians 3:5。身體由許多肢體組成;肉體既被視為罪的源頭(Romans 7:18),罪的律就說是在肢體中,即在身體本身之中。
交戰——即與之作戰;或抵擋。
我心中的律——這與敗壞本性流行的傾向相對。它的意思與「裏面的人」一語所表達的相同,指那得了更新之心的願望與志向。
把我擄去——使我成為囚徒,或俘虜。這是那爭戰比喻的完成。戰爭中被擄的俘虜,任憑得勝者處置。照樣,使徒把自己描繪為從事爭戰、卻被克服、成了心中邪惡傾向的不甘心俘虜的人。這說法強烈,表明敗壞傾向的頑強。它雖強烈,但相信一切真誠的基督徒都能以此描述自己,表達他們與心中天生傾向爭戰時,胸中那痛苦而屢遭挫敗的衝突。
Originale inglese
But I see another law - Note, Romans 7:21.
In my members - In my body; in my flesh; in my corrupt and sinful propensities; Note, Romans 6:13; compare 1 Corinthians 6:15; Colossians 3:5. The body is composed of many members; and as the flesh is regarded as the source of sin Romans 7:18, the law of sin is said to be in the members, that is, in the body itself.
Warring against - Fighting against; or resisting.
The law of my mind - This stands opposed to the prevailing inclinations of a corrupt nature. It means the same as was expressed by the phrase "the inward man," and denotes the desires and purposes of a renewed heart.
And bringing me into captivity - Making me a prisoner, or a captive. This is the completion of the figure respecting the warfare. A captive taken in war was at the disposal of the victor. So the apostle represents himself as engaged in a warfare; and as being overcome, and made an unwilling captive to the evil inclinations of the heart. The expression is strong; and denotes strong corrupt propensities. But though strong, it is believed it is language which all sincere Christians can adopt of themselves, as expressive of that painful and often disastrous conflict in their bosoms when they contend against the native propensities of their hearts.
24
Romans 7:24
我真是苦啊!——這哀歎所含的情感,是這痛苦爭戰與屢屢屈服於罪惡傾向的結果。這爭戰的效果是:
(1) 產生痛苦與愁煩。那常是善與惡之間一場煎熬的鬥爭;一場攪擾平安、使人生悲苦的鬥爭。
(2) 它使人謙卑。人處於邪惡情慾的影響之下,是令他羞慚的事。這有辱他的本性;是他的榮耀上的污點;他既受這些傾向的控制,又屢屢放縱它們,這就使他低到塵土。在這樣的境況中,心被悲苦淹沒,本能地渴求解脫。律法能幫助嗎?人能幫助嗎?良心或理性的任何天賦力量能幫助嗎?這一切都試過而歸於徒然;於是基督徒便平靜而感恩地默然接受使徒的安慰:幫助惟有藉著耶穌基督才能獲得。
誰能救我——即誰能搭救我;這是一顆深陷愁苦、自覺軟弱、正尋求幫助之心靈的狀態。
脫離這取死的身體——邊註作「這死的身體」。「身體」一詞在此大概與肉體同義,指靈魂敗壞而邪惡的傾向;見 Romans 7:18 的註釋。它如此用以指肢體中之罪的律,因為那是使徒正與之搏鬥、並渴望從中得釋放的。「這取死的身體」這說法是希伯來語法,指其趨勢致命的身體;全句可指人敗壞的性情原則;指那些引致死亡或定罪的屬肉體的邪惡情感。這說法極其有力,深具使徒保羅的特徵。它表明:
(1) 它就在他身旁,伴隨著他,其本性令他痛苦。
(2) 渴望從其中得釋放。
有人以為他是指古時暴君的一種刑罰習俗:把一具屍體縛在俘虜身上,強迫他無論往哪裏去,都拖著這累贅可憎的重擔。我看不出有任何證據表明使徒心中想著這事。但這樣的事實未嘗不可用作鮮明、也許並不失當的例證,說明使徒在此的意思。再強烈的言辭也不能表達更深的情感;再貼切的話語也不能更動人地表明:要成就那無助之人能力所不及的事,神的恩典是必需的。
Originale inglese
O wretched man that I am! - The feeling implied by this lamentation is the result of this painful conflict; and this frequent subjection to sinful propensities. The effect of this conflict is,
(1) To produce pain and distress. It is often an agonizing struggle between good and evil; a struggle which annoys the peace, and renders life wretched.
(2) it tends to produce humility. It is humbling to man to be thus under the influence of evil passions. It is degrading to his nature; a stain on his glory; and it tends to bring him into the dust, that he is under the control of such propensities, and so often gives indulgence to them. In such circumstances, the mind is overwhelmed with wretchedness, and instinctively sighs for relief. Can the Law aid? Can man aid? Can any native strength of conscience or of reason aid? In vain all these are tried, and the Christian then calmly and thankfully acquiesces in the consolations of the apostle, that aid can be obtained only through Jesus Christ.
Who shall deliver me - Who shall rescue me; the condition of a mind in deep distress, and conscious of its own weakness, and looking for aid.
The body of this death - Margin, "This body of death." The word "body" here is probably used as equivalent to flesh, denoting the corrupt and evil propensities of the soul; Note, Romans 7:18. It is thus used to denote the law of sin in the members, as being that with which the apostle was struggling, and from which he desired to be delivered. The expression "body of this death" is a Hebraism, denoting a body deadly in its tendency; and the whole expression may mean the corrupt principles of man; the carnal, evil affections that lead to death or to condemnation. The expression is one of vast strength, and strongly characteristic of the apostle Paul. It indicates,
(1) That it was near him, attending him, and was distressing in its nature.
(2) an earnest wish to be delivered from it.
Some have supposed that he refers to a custom practiced by ancient tyrants, of binding a dead body to a captive as a punishment, and compelling him to drag the cumbersome and offensive burden with him wherever he went. I do not see any evidence that the apostle had this in view. But such a fact may be used as a striking and perhaps not improper illustration of the meaning of the apostle here. No strength of words could express deeper feeling; none more feelingly indicate the necessity of the grace of God to accomplish that to which the unaided human powers are incompetent.
25
Traduzione in sospeso · Originale ingleseRomans 7:25
I thank God - That is, I thank God for effecting a deliverance to which I am myself incompetent. There is a way of rescue, and I trace it altogether to his mercy in the Lord Jesus Christ. What conscience could not do, what the Law could not do, what unaided human strength could not do, has been accomplished by the plan of the gospel; and complete deliverance can be expected there, and there alone. This is the point to which all his reasoning had tended; and having thus shown that the Law was insufficient to effect this deliverance. he is now prepared to utter the language of Christian thankfulness that it can be effected by the gospel. The superiority of the gospel to the Law in overcoming all the evils under which man labors, is thus triumphantly established; compare 1 Corinthians 15:57.
So then - As the result of the whole inquiry we have come to this conclusion.
With the mind - With the understanding, the conscience, the purposes, or intentions of the soul. This is a characteristic of the renewed nature. Of no impenitent sinner could it be ever affirmed that with his mind he served the Law of God.
I myself - It is still the same person, though acting in this apparently contradictory manner.
Serve the law of God - Do honor to it as a just and holy law Romans 7:12, Romans 7:16, and am inclined to obey it, Romans 7:22, Romans 7:24.
But with the flesh - The corrupt propensities and lusts, Romans 7:18,
The law of sin - That is, in the members. The flesh throughout, in all its native propensities and passions, leads to sin; it has no tendency to holiness; and its corruptions can be overcome only by the grace of God. We have thus,
(1) A view of the sad and painful conflict between sin and God. They are opposed in all things.
(2) we see the raging, withering effect of sin on the soul. In all circumstances it tends to death and woe.
(3) we see the feebleness of the Law and of conscience to overcome this. The tendency of both is to produce conflict and woe. And,
(4) We see that the gospel only can overcome sin. To us it should be a subject of everincreasing thankfulness, that what could not be accomplished by the Law, can be thus effected by the gospel; and that God has devised a plan that thus effects complete deliverance, and which gives to the captive in sin an everlasting triumph.
聖經中幾乎沒有幾章像本章這樣,成為截然不同之解釋的對象。儘管學者們對它已寫了這麼多,使徒在本章主要脈絡中所指的,究竟是他成為基督徒以前的自身經歷,還是一位蒙更新之人內心的掙扎,至今仍是爭論的問題。這兩種見解哪一種正確,我將在本章各節的註釋中努力說明。本章的主要用意不難明白。它顯然是要指出,律法不足以使一個痛苦的罪人得著心裡的平安。在前幾章,他已指出律法不能使人稱義 Romans 1-3;他已指明人因信稱義的道路 Romans 3:21-31; Romans 4;他也已說明這方案如何產生平安、並對付亞當墮落所帶進的諸惡 Romans 5。
他已指出基督徒在義務上已從律法得了釋放,而這自由並不引致放縱的生活 Romans 6。如今他更進一步闡明律法對一個處於屬血氣狀態與恩典狀態之人的影響;要表明就人現今的處境而言——無論是尚未悔改、正處於知罪的覺醒之中,還是處於福音之下的恩典狀態——律法一貫的效應,非但不如猶太人所主張的那樣促進平安,反倒激起內心的衝突、焦慮與痛苦。使徒在前面的論證中,已推翻了猶太人幾乎一切特殊的見解。他在這裡補上最後一擊,指出律法的趨向,就實際而論,到處都是一樣的:它事實上不是產生平安,而是產生動盪、衝突與痛苦。然而這不是律法的過失——律法本身是良善的——而是罪的過失 Romans 6:7-14。
我認為本章並非單指保羅處於屬血氣的狀態或恩典的狀態而言。整個討論並未特別針對那一點;它更是要把人一生的行動——無論是處於知罪的狀態,還是處於恩典的狀態——彙集起來,表明律法的效應在處處本質上都是一樣的。它在產生平安與成聖上,同樣在處處失敗。猶太人關於律法的功效及其足以應付人之處境的論證,便這樣被一系列關乎稱義、赦免、平安、罪之諸惡、以及人胸中動盪衝突之道德要素的證明所推翻。效應到處相同。就人一切重大的利益而言,這缺失是顯而易見的。既已表明這一點,使徒與讀者便預備好發出那得勝與感恩的話語:從這一切惡中得蒙拯救,當歸功於主耶穌基督的福音 Romans 7:25; Romans 8。