Barnes' Notes on the Bible · Romans Capitolo 8

Lettore del commentario ottimizzato

Commentario del capitolo

Romans Capitolo 8

서론

Romans 8 Introduction

Apri passaggio

本章是聖經中最有趣、最寶貴的部分之一。其中有些地方伴隨著極大的難解之處,但其主要脈絡與用意卻是眾人皆可明白的。它是前章所論主題的延續,主要是要表明福音能成就律法所不能成就的。在前一章,使徒已指出律法不能產生成聖或心裡的平安。他追溯了律法對處於不同光景之人心思的影響,指出無論在重生之前或之後,它同樣不能產生平安與聖潔。人就是這樣,他的性情就是這樣,律法的應用只會激起、刺激、產生衝突。誠然,良心為律法作見證說它是良善的;但事實仍然表明,律法並不適於產生心裡的聖潔與平安,反而產生動盪、衝突與罪被激起的狀態。與此相對,他在本章繼而指出福音的能力,能產生律法所不能產生的。在這件事上,他以幾項考量來闡明主題:

(1) 福音賜生命、救脫定罪,成就了律法所不能成就的 Romans 8:1-13。

(2) 福音產生兒子名分的靈,以及隨之而來、因我們能以兒女的信靠稱神為父而有的諸般福分;這與只產生恐懼驚惶的律法正相反 Romans 8:14-17。

(3) 福音以將來得救的盼望——身體從今生的諸惡中得著完全而終極的救贖——扶持那被罪擄掠、身處試煉中的心靈 Romans 8:18-25。

(4) 福音供應聖靈的幫助,在我們的軟弱與試煉中扶持我們 Romans 8:26-27。

(5) 福音給我們確據:萬事都互相效力,叫人得益處,因為萬事都與神的目的相連,凡能臨到基督徒身上的,都是那位定意要救他者的計劃的一部分 Romans 8:28-30。

(6) 福音從這樣的事實供給安慰:凡能影響人之幸福的,都站在基督徒一邊,並要為他的益處協力;例如:

(a) 神,祂賜下自己的兒子,並稱信徒為義 Romans 8:31-33;

(b) 基督,祂為基督徒死而復活,並為他們代求 Romans 8:34;

(c) 基督徒對救主的愛本身如此堅強,沒有甚麼能使他與這愛隔絕 Romans 8:35-39。

藉著這一切考量,福音對律法的優越得以顯明,信徒也得了他終必得救的確據。靠著這一連串引人入勝而確鑿的論證,使徒預備好以那得勝誇勝的話語,結束神話語中這極寶貴的一段。

Originale inglese

This chapter is one of the most interesting and precious portions of the Sacred Scriptures. Some parts of it are attended with great difficulties; but its main scope and design is apparent to all. It is a continuation of the subject discussed in the previous chapter, and is intended mainly to show that the gospel could effect what the Law was incapable of doing. In that chapter the apostle had shown that the Law was incapable of producing sanctification or peace of mind. He had traced its influence on the mind in different conditions, and shown that equally before regeneration and afterward, it was incapable of producing peace and holiness. Such was man, such were his propensities, that the application of law only tended to excite, to irritate, to produce conflict. The conscience, indeed, testified to the Law that it was good; but still it had shown that it was not adapted to produce holiness of heart and peace, but agitation, conflict, and a state of excited sin. In opposition to this, he proceeds to show in this chapter the power of the gospel to produce what the Law could not. In doing this, he illustrates the subject by several considerations.

(1) the gospel does what the Law could not do in giving life, and delivering from condemnation, Romans 8:1-13.

(2) it produces a spirit of adoption, and all the blessings which result from the filial confidence with which we can address God as our Father, in opposition to the Law which produced only terror and alarm, Romans 8:14-17.

(3) it sustains the soul amidst its captivity to sin, and its trials, with the hope of a future deliverance - a complete and final redemption, of the body from all the evils of this life, Romans 8:18-25.

(4) it furnishes the aid of the Holy Spirit to sustain us in our trials and infirmities, Romans 8:26-27.

(5) it gives the assurance that all things shall work together for good, since all things are connected with the purpose of God, and all that can occur to a Christian comes in as a part of the plan of him who has resolved to save him, Romans 8:28-30.

(6) it ministers consolation from the fact that everything that can affect the happiness of man is on the side of the Christian, and will cooperate in his favor; as, e. g.,

(a) God, in giving his Son, and in justifying the believer, Romans 8:31-33.

(b) Christ, in dying, and rising, and interceding for Christians, Romans 8:34.

(c) The love of a Christian to the Saviour is in itself so strong, that nothing can separate him from it, Romans 8:35-39.

By all these considerations the superiority of the gospel to the Law is shown, and assurance is given to the believer of his final salvation. By this interesting and conclusive train of reasoning, the apostle is prepared for the triumphant language of exultation with which he closes this most precious portion of the Word of God.

1

Romans 8:1

Apri passaggio

所以,如今——這與 Romans 7 末後幾節相連。使徒在那裡已指出,律法不能成就脫離罪惡的拯救,這拯救惟獨出於福音 Romans 7:23-25。這裡暗示:在律法之下原有定罪,若非福音的介入,至今仍必如此。

就不定罪了——這並不是說,信徒裡面的罪不必像在任何別處一樣受到譴責,因為聖經處處教導相反的事;它的意思是:

(1) 福音不像律法那樣宣告定罪。福音的職分是赦免;律法的職分是定罪。律法從不施拯救,只一味定罪;福音的宗旨卻是救人脫離定罪,使心靈得自由。

(2) 福音之下沒有最終的定罪。福音的功能、用意與趨向,正是使人脫離律法定罪的判決。這是福音最先、也是最榮耀的宣告:它使失喪沉淪的人脫離那極其可畏、可怖的定罪。

(本章第一節看來是前文整個討論所得的推論。使徒既已確立稱義的教義,並答覆了通常針對它提出的反對,如今便宣告他得勝的結論:「所以,如今……」;就是說,從前文論到信徒靠基督的義稱義、並完全脫離律法之約束——律法作為聖約——的一切,可以推出:他不能再被定罪。保羅的用意與其說是申明律法與福音的不同功能,不如說只是陳明某一類人——即在基督裡的人——光景的事實。對他們而言,無論何種定罪都沒有;不僅沒有最終的定罪,而且從他們與基督聯合、脫離律法咒詛的那一刻起,如今就沒有定罪。理由是:基督已替他們擔當了刑罰,並替他們遵行了律法的要求。

霍爾丹(Haldane)先生論到這段經文說:「這裡常有人指出,使徒並沒有說他們(信徒)裡面既無可指控之事,也無可定罪之因;然而這一切都包含在他所說的話裡面。而且他在後文中明言,他們既不能被指控,也不能被定罪;若二者有任何根據,他們原是可以的。他們裡面一切可被定罪的——就是罪——都已在他們的中保裡面被定罪了,正如第三節所顯明的。」)

在基督耶穌裡的——即與基督聯合的人。「在祂裡面」是新約中屢見的說法,表示緊密而親密的聯合 Philippians 1:1; Philippians 3:9; 2 Corinthians 5:17; Romans 16:7-11。基督與祂子民之間的聯合,被比作葡萄樹與枝子之間的聯合 John 15:1-6;因此,信徒被說成是在祂裡面,意義相似:從祂得著供養,並在情感、志向與命運上與祂相連。(見 Romans 8:10 的補充註釋。)行——指為人處世、度光陰。註釋見 Romans 4:12。不隨從肉體——即不為滿足肉體敗壞的慾望與情慾而活;註釋見 Romans 7:18。這是基督徒的特徵。何為隨從肉體而行,可見於 Galatians 5:19-21。由此可知,一個人生的目的既是滿足自己敗壞的私慾,他就不能是基督徒。除非他不是為滿足肉體而活,否則他不能有敬虔的憑據。這是一個易於應用的試驗;若每一個口稱信仰的人都誠實,就不會有誤判之虞,也不必懷疑他真實的為人。

只隨從聖靈——即照聖靈引導或感動而行。聖靈所結的是甚麼,可見於 Galatians 5:22-23。人若有聖靈這些果子,他就是基督徒;若沒有,無論他別有甚麼,他於信仰仍是外人。這試驗也是容易應用的。

Originale inglese

There is, therefore, now - This is connected with the closing verses of Romans 7. The apostle had there shown that the Law could not effect deliverance from sin, but that such deliverance was to be traced to the gospel alone; Romans 7:23-25. It is implied here that there was condemnation under the Law, and would be still, but for the intervention of the gospel.

No condemnation - This does not mean that sin in believers is not to be condemned as much as any where, for the contrary is everywhere taught in the Scriptures; but it means,

(1) That the gospel does not pronounce condemnation like the Law. Its function is to pardon; the function of the law is to condemn. The one never affords deliverance, but always condemns; the object of the other is to free from condemnation, and to set the soul at liberty.

(2) there is no final condemnation under the gospel. The function, design, and tendency of the gospel is to free from the condemning sentence of law. This is its first and its glorious announcement, that it frees lost and ruined people from a most fearful and terrible condemnation.

(The first verse of this chapter seems to be an inference from the whole preceding discussion. The apostle having established the doctrine of justification, and answered the objections commonly urged against it, now asserts his triumphant conclusion, "There is therefore, etc.; that is to say, it follows from all that has been said concerning the believer's justification by the righteousness of Christ, and his complete deliverance from the Law as a covenant, that to him there can be no condemnation. The design of Paul is not so much to assert the different functions of the Law and the gospel, as simply to state the fact in regard to the condition of a certain class, namely, those who are in Christ. To them there is no condemnation whatever; not only no final condemnation, but no condemnation now, from the moment of their union to Christ, and deliverance from the curse of the Law. The reason is this: that Christ hath endured the penalty, and obeyed the precept of the Law in their stead.

"Here," says Mr. Haldane on the passage, "it is often remarked that the apostle does not say, that there is in them (believers) neither matter of accusation, nor cause of condemnation; and yet this is all included in what he does say. And afterward, in express terms, he denies that they can be either accused or condemned, which they might be, were there any ground for either. All that was condemnable in them, which was sin, has been condemned in their Surety, as is shown in the third verse.")

Which are in Christ Jesus - Who are united to Christ. To be in him is an expression not seldom used in the New Testament, denoting close and intimate union. Philippians 1:1; Philippians 3:9; 2 Corinthians 5:17; Romans 16:7-11. The union between Christ and his people is compared to that between the vine and its branches John 15:1-6, and hence, believers are said to be in him in a similar sense, as deriving their support from him, and as united in feeling, in purpose, and destiny. (See the supplementary note at Romans 8:10.) Who walk. Who conduct, or live. Note, Romans 4:12. Not after the flesh. Who do not live to gratify the corrupt desires and passions of the flesh; Note, Romans 7:18. This is a characteristic of a Christian. What it is to walk after the flesh may be seen in Galatians 5:19-21. It follows that a man whose purpose of life is to gratify his corrupt desires, cannot be a Christian. Unless he lives not to gratify his flesh, he can have no evidence of piety. This is a test which is easily applied; and if every professor of religion were honest, there could be no danger of mistake, and there need be no doubts about his true character.

But after the Spirit - As the Holy Spirit would lead or prompt. What the Spirit produces may be seen in Galatians 5:22-23. If a man has these fruits of the Spirit, he is a Christian; if not, he is a stranger to religion, whatever else he may possess. And this test also is easily applied.

2

Romans 8:2

Apri passaggio

賜生命聖靈的律——「律」一詞在此意指「生命之靈」所產生的那「規則、命令或影響力」。它施行一種支配,在此被稱為律,因為律常指任何管轄或治理我們的事物;見 Romans 7:21, Romans 7:23 的註釋。「生命之靈」。我看這裏沒有理由懷疑這是指聖靈而言。顯然,在 Romans 8:1 結尾處,這詞正是此義。因此,「生命之靈」這片語的意思,就是產生或賜予生命的聖靈,即賜下平安、喜樂、活力與救恩的聖靈;與 Romans 7 所論那產生死亡與定罪的律相對。

在基督耶穌裏——即在基督教信仰之下;或說是基督差遣而來、要將祂的工作應用於人心的。John 16:7-14。聖靈是基督所差來的;祂的感化是基督救贖計劃的一部分;祂的大能成就了律法所不能成就的。

釋放了我——即救我脫離了罪那支配一切的影響與控制。這不可能是指他已經完全,因為他整個論證的走向都與此相反。但福音的宗旨、傾向與精神,正是要成就律法所不能帶來的這種自由;而他如今已被置於這救贖計劃的總體能力之下。從前他處於最痛苦難當的捆綁之下;Romans 7:7-11。如今,他已置身於一個以自由為旨歸、並且確實產生自由的計劃的影響之下。

罪和死的律——即罪那引人走向死亡與定罪的支配性影響;Romans 7:5-11。

Originale inglese

For the law - The word "law" here means that "rule, command, or influence" which "the Spirit of life" produces. That exerts a control which is here called a law, for a law often means anything by which we are ruled or governed; see the notes at Romans 7:21, Romans 7:23. Of the Spirit. I see no reason to doubt here that this refers to the Holy Spirit. Evidently, at the close of Romans 8:1, the word has this reference. The phrase "the Spirit of life" then means the Holy Spirit producing or giving life; that is, giving peace, joy, activity, salvation; in opposition to the law spoken of in Romans 7 that produced death and condemnation.

In Christ Jesus - Under the Christian religion; or sent by Christ to apply his work to people. John 16:7-14. The Spirit is sent by Christ; his influence is a part of the Christian scheme; and his power accomplishes what the Law could not do.

Hath made me free - That is, has delivered me from the predominating influence and control of sin. He cannot mean that he was perfect, for the whole tenor of his reasoning is opposed to that. But the design, the tendency, and the spirit of the gospel was to produce this freedom from what the Law could not deliver; and he was now brought under the general power of this scheme. In the former state he was under a most bitter and galling bondage; Romans 7:7-11. Now, he was brought under the influence of a scheme which contemplated freedom, and which produced it.

The law of sin and death - The controlling influence of sin, leading to death and condemnation; Romans 7:5-11.

3

Romans 8:3

Apri passaggio

律法有所不能行的——指神的律法,即道德律。它不能使人脫離罪與定罪。這一點,使徒在 Romans 7 已充分證明。

因——即「因為」。

軟弱——它軟弱而無功效;它不能成就這事。

因肉體——即由於罪的力量,以及未更新之心邪惡敗壞的私慾。過失不在律法——律法本是善的(Romans 7:12)——而在於天然情慾的力量和未更新之心的罪性;這影響在 Romans 7:7-11 有充分的解釋。

神就差遣自己的兒子——意思是,神藉著差遣祂的兒子,成就了律法所不能成就的事。要使語意完全,這裏必須補上「成就」一詞來理解。

成為罪身的形狀——即祂在取了肉身、即人性這一點上與罪身相似,卻完全沒有罪身的罪惡傾向或私慾。那並非不是人性;也不是如幻影派(Docetae)所教導的,僅在表象上為人性;乃是毫無敗壞的人性。

作了贖罪祭——邊註作「以贖罪的祭物」。這表達顯然意為:藉著為罪而獻的祭物;或說祂是因罪的緣故被賜下為祭物。祂的被賜下,乃是針對罪而有的。

在肉體中定了罪案——肉體被視為罪的源頭;見 Romans 7:18 的註釋。肉體既是過犯的所在與起源,贖罪的祭物就在罪身的形狀中被獻上,好使祂彷彿在罪自己的地盤上迎擊它,並將它毀滅。祂可說是以這方式定了罪的案:

(1) 因為祂為罪被賜下、又因罪的緣故而死,這一事實本身就是對罪的定罪。罪若蒙神認可,神就不會預備贖罪祭來確保它的毀滅。基督因罪所受之禍患的深重與劇烈,顯明神對罪的憎惡程度。

(2) 「定罪」一詞可用於毀滅、勝過或制服的意義;2 Peter 2:6,「又判定所多瑪、蛾摩拉,將二城傾覆,焚燒成灰」。在這意義上,基督的祭不僅定了罪的案、表明其為惡,更削弱了它的權勢、摧毀了它的影響,並要在凡因那死得救的人裏面,最終滅絕罪的存在。

(藉著基督的祭,神確實顯明了祂對罪的憎惡,並確保了罪的最終傾覆。然而,使徒在此所論的,似乎不是這祭使人成聖的影響,而是它稱義的大能。因此,其意義乃是:神在基督的位格中對罪作出了司法性的判決;由於這判決,律法所不能成就的(即稱義)便成就了。罪既已在基督的人性中被定罪,就不能在祂所代表之人的身上再被定罪、受刑罰。他們必蒙稱義。

這觀點使第一節至第四節整段經文首尾一貫。使徒在第一節斷言,在基督耶穌裏的人不定罪,顯然是以稱義為主題開始。若有人問:為何如此?第二節回答說,信徒已脫離律法作為行為之約的約束。(見前面的補充註釋。)若再問:這解脫從何而來?第三節指向基督的祭;第四節向我們保證,這祭的獻上正是為著「使律法的義成就在我們身上」這一宗旨。按照上文所立的解經原則,這子句不是論到信徒對律法公義要求的順服。使徒所注意的,是基督之祭更直接的宗旨。律法的權利或要求δικαίωμα dikaiōma,是對其受損之尊榮的滿足。律法的刑罰必須被承擔,正如它的誡命必須被遵守。基督的祭回應了每一項要求。信徒既與祂合一,律法的義便已「成就在他們身上」。

如此,整段經文便一貫地按稱義來解釋。)

Originale inglese

For what the law could not do - The Law of God, the moral law. It could not free from sin and condemnation. This the apostle had fully shown in Romans 7.

In that - Because.

It was weak - It was feeble and inefficacious. It could not accomplish it.

Through the flesh - In consequence of the strength of sin, and of the evil and corrupt desires of the unrenewed heart. The fault was not in the Law, which was good Romans 7:12, but it was owing to the strength of the natural passions and the sinfulness of the unrenewed heart; see Romans 7:7-11, where this influence is fully explained.

God, sending his own Son - That is, God did, or accomplished, that, by sending his Son, which the Law could not do. The word did, or accomplished, it is necessary to understand here, in order to complete the sense.In the likeness of sinful flesh - That is, he so far resembled sinful flesh that he partook of flesh, or the nature of man, but without any of its sinful propensities or desires. It was not human nature; not, as the Docetae taught, human nature in appearance only; but it was human nature Without any of its corruptions.

And for sin - Margin, "By a sacrifice for sin." The expression evidently means, by an Offering for sin, or that he was given as a Sacrifice on account of sin. His being given had respect to sin.Condemned sin in the flesh - The flesh is regarded as the source of sin; Note, Romans 7:18. The flesh being the seat and origin of transgression, the atoning sacrifice was made in the likeness of sinful flesh, that thus he might meet sin, as it were, on its own ground, and destroy it. He may be said to have condemned sin in this manner,

(1) Because the fact that he was given for it, and died on its account, was a condemnation of it. If sin had been approved by God he would not have made an atonement to secure its destruction. The depth and intensity of the woes of Christ on its account show the degree of abhorrence with which it is regarded by God.

(2) the word "condemn" may be used in the sense of destroying, overcoming, or subduing; 2 Peter 2:6, "And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes, condemned them with an overthrow." In this sense the sacrifice of Christ has no; only condemned sin as being evil, but has weakened its power and destroyed its influence, and will finally annihilate its existence in all who are saved by that death.

(By the sacrifice of Christ, God indeed showed his abhorrence of sin, and secured its final overthrow. It is not, however, of the sanctifying influence of this sacrifice, that the apostle seems here to speak, but of its justifying power. The sense, therefore, is that God passed a judicial sentence on sin, in the person of Christ, on account of which, that has been effected which the Law could not effect, (justification namely). Sin being condemned in the human nature of Christ, cannot be condemned and punished in the persons of those represented by him. They must be justified.

This view gives consistency to the whole passage, from the first verse to the fourth inclusive. The apostle clearly begins with the subject of justification, when, in the first verse, he affirms, that to them who are in Christ Jesus, there is no condemnation. If the question be put, Why is this? the second verse gives for answer, that believers are delivered from the Law as a covenant of works. (See the foregoing supplementary note). If the question again be put, Whence this deliverance? the third verse points to the sacrifice of Christ, which, the fourth verse assures us, was offered with the very design "that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us." This clause, according to the principle of interpretation laid down above, does not relate to the believer's obedience to the righteous requirements of the Law. The apostle has in view a more immediate design of the sacrifice of Christ. The right or demand of the Law δικαίωμα dikaiōma was satisfaction to its injured honor. Its penalty must be borne, as well as its precept obeyed. The sacrifice of Christ answered every claim. And as believers are one with him, the righteousness of the Law has been "fulfilled in them."

The whole passage is thus consistently explained of justification.)

4

Romans 8:4

Apri passaggio

律法的義——意即我們可以與律法相合,或順服它的要求,不再受肉體及其敗壞私慾的影響。

成就——即叫我們可以順服,或滿足它的要求。

隨從——註釋見 Romans 8:1。

Originale inglese

That the righteousness of the law - That we might be conformed to the Law, or be obedient to its requirements, and no longer under the influence of the flesh and its corrupt desires.

Might be fulfilled - That we might be obedient, or comply with its demands.

Who walk - Note, Romans 8:1.

5

Romans 8:5

Apri passaggio

隨從肉體的人——即受肉體敗壞而罪惡的慾望所影響的人;Galatians 5:19-21。就是那些未蒙更新的人。

體貼肉體的事——他們全然專注於滿足自己敗壞的慾望。

隨從聖靈的人——即受聖靈影響、蒙聖靈引導的人。

聖靈的事——就是聖靈所產生的、或祂在人心中所成就的事,Galatians 5:21-23。本節是為說明而設,目的是要表明:信仰的趨向,是使人對事奉神的全然奉獻,正如人從前對罪的投入一樣;也就是說,人必全然投身於自己所獻身的那事。因此,基督徒既已獻己於事奉聖靈、並已置於聖靈的影響之下,便可期待他以愛惜並培養聖靈所要生發的諸般恩德,為他偉大而唯一的目標。

Originale inglese

For they that are after the flesh - They that are under the influence of the corrupt and sinful desires of the flesh; Galatians 5:19-21. Those who are unrenewed.

Do mind the things of the flesh - They are supremely devoted to the gratification of their corrupt desires.

But they that are after the Spirit - Who are under its influence; who are led by the Spirit.

The things of the Spirit - Those things which the Spirit produces, or which he effects in the mind, Galatians 5:21-23. This verse is for the purpose of illustration, and is designed to show that the tendency of religion is to produce as entire a devotedness to the service of God as people had before rendered to sin; that is, that they Would be fully engaged in that to which they had devoted themselves. As the Christian therefore, had devoted himself to the service of the Spirit, and had been brought under his influence, it was to be expected that he would make it his great and only object to cherish and cultivate the graces which that Spirit would produce.

6

Romans 8:6

Apri passaggio

體貼肉體的——邊註作「肉體的思念」。意思是:隨從肉體的傾向、隨從我們本性敗壞的傾向,就把我們引到定罪與死亡。這是一個極有力的說法,表明這不僅引向死亡、引向痛苦,而且它本身就是死亡;在全心投於敗壞情慾的行動與目的本身之中,就有禍患與定罪。它惟一的趨向就是定罪與絕望。

就是死——即干犯律法的刑罰;定罪與永遠的沉淪;參 Romans 5:12 的註釋。

體貼聖靈的——邊註作「聖靈的思念」。就是以培養聖靈的諸般恩德、順服祂的影響,作為心中的對象、行動的目的與目標。體貼聖靈,就是尋求聖靈所生發的情感與觀點,並跟隨祂的引導。

乃是生命——這與 Romans 8:5 的死相對。它趨向生命,且實在就是真生命。因為擁有並培養聖靈的諸般恩德、受祂引導到祂要帶領我們去的地方,乃是我們存在的目的,也是惟一的幸福之路。

平安——參 Romans 6 的註釋。

Originale inglese

For to be carnally minded - Margin, "The minding of the flesh." The sense is, that to follow the inclinations of the flesh, or the corrupt propensities of our nature, leads us to condemnation and death. The expression is one of great energy, and shows that it not only leads to death, or leads to misery, but that it is death itself; there is woe and condemnation in the very act and purpose of being supremely devoted to the corrupt passions, Its only tendency is condemnation and despair.

Is death - The penalty of transgression; condemnation and eternal ruin; Note, Romans 5:12.

But to be spiritually minded - Margin, "The minding of the Spirit." That is, making it the object of the mind, the end and aim of the actions, to cultivate the graces of the Spirit, and to submit to his influence. To be spiritually minded is to seek those feelings and views which the Holy Spirit produces, and to follow his leadings.

Is life - This is opposed to death in Romans 8:5. It tends to life, and is in fact real life. For to possess and cultivate the graces of the spirit, to be led where he would guide us, is the design of our existence, and is the only path of happiness.

And peace - Note, Romans 6.

7

Romans 8:7

Apri passaggio

原來——這是 Romans 8:6 所說之話的理由。在那節裏,使徒斷言體貼肉體就是死,卻沒有說明為何如此。現在他解釋說:因為那是與神為仇,因而使罪人與神相爭,並招致祂的定罪。

體貼肉體的——這與 Romans 8:6 的說法相同,τὸ φρόνημα τὴς σαρκός to phronēma tēs sarkos。這不是指心思本身、悟性或意志;不是假定心思或靈魂在身體層面敗壞、或與神對立;而是說,思念肉體的事、以之為至上的關注,就是對神的敵意,使罪人陷入與神的爭執中,因而引到死亡與禍患。這節經文不應被引來證明靈魂在身體層面敗壞,只證明哪裏對肉體有至上的關注,哪裏就有對神的敵意。它並不直接證明全然敗壞的教義,只證明哪裏對靈魂的敗壞慾望有這樣的關注,哪裏就有對神的敵意。誠然,經文暗示這種對肉體的至上關注是本性上無處不在的,但這並沒有被明言。因為使徒在此的目的不是教導敗壞的教義,而是要表明:這樣的敗壞一旦實際存在,就使罪人陷入與神可畏的爭執之中。

就是仇敵——即敵意、仇恨。這話的意思是:這樣的體貼肉體實際上就是對神的敵意,因為它反對神的律法,反對祂潔淨人心的計劃;比較 James 4:4; 1 John 2:15。思念肉體的事也導致恨神自己,因為神反對它,並已表明對它的憎惡。

對神——即向著神,或關於神。這含有對神的敵意。

因為它——這裏的「它」指思念肉體的事。這不是說靈魂本身不服祂的律法,而是說思念這些事便是與祂的律法為敵。使徒對人形上學的能力不發表任何意見,也完全不討論那問題。他斷言的要點只是:體貼肉體——對肉體的要求和慾望給予至上的關注——不服神的律法,也不能服。兩者完全矛盾、無法調和,正如愛虛謊與真理之法不相容,正如放縱與節制之法不相容,正如姦淫違反第七誡。至於人本身能否順服律法、他有沒有能力順服,那是使徒沒有觸及的問題,本節也不應被引來論到它。因為「某一特定罪的法則與相反的德行是否全然無法調和」,與「罪人能否離棄那罪、走另一條路」,是截然不同的兩個問題。

不服神的律法——即不服神的命令。體貼肉體與那律法相對,這就顯明它是與神為敵的。

也是不能服——這是絕對而確定的。它不可能服從。在這一點上有極度的無能。這兩件事全然無法調和。但這斷言並不是說罪人的心不能順服神,不是說他的靈魂敗壞到身體層面以致不能順服,也不是說他不能遵守律法。關於這一點,使徒在此不表示意見;那不是討論的主題。這斷言只是說:對肉體的至上關注,即體貼肉體,與神的律法全然無法調和。兩者是不同的事,永不能使之相合;正如姦淫不能成為貞潔,虛謊不能成為真理,不誠實不能成為誠實,仇恨不能成為愛。因此,本節不應被引來證明人無力愛神的教義,因為它並非論到那件事;它只證明:對肉體之事的至上關注與神的律法全然不相容,永不能與之調和,並使罪人與他的創造主處於敵對之中。

(加爾文主義者(Calvinists)一直被大聲指控「為支持他們所愛的教義——未重生的全然無力——而對這話語作了不公平的利用」。有人辯稱,φρονημα της σαρκος phronēma tēs sarkos 指心思的傾向,恰當地應譯作「體貼肉體」。因此,與神為仇的是這傾向或情感,而不是心思本身。但譯法的這一改變並不影響本節的意思。因為使徒斷言,這體貼肉體乃是未重生者一貫而佔主導的傾向。「隨從肉體的人」——即未重生的人——「體貼肉體的事」。這是他們毫無例外的品格。那麼,天然的心思若一貫處於這敗壞傾向的影響之下,它豈不是與神為仇嗎?這樣,事實上,通行譯法與修訂譯法之間並無分別。斷言心思本身不敵對神、只有它的傾向敵對神,與形上學的詭辯相去無幾,不值得比一個惡人所能輕易提出的遁詞更多的尊重——那遁詞就是:宣稱敵對宗教與道德之法的,只是他的傾向,不是他自己。整體而論,很難想像使徒還能用甚麼更有力的方式,斷言天然之心對神的敵意。他先按著未重生者的品格或傾向描述他們,然後斷言這傾向正是對神敵意的本質——抽象的敵意。

對於不諳神學爭論之精微的人,道德無能的教義似乎是這種對天然之心的看法的明顯結論。Scott 先生論到本節說:「它在道德上無能,只能背逆神的律法,拒絕順服它。」然而我們被告知,這裏所討論的經文只斷言未重生的人持續在那狀態中時不能討神喜悅、不能順服祂的律法,而對另一個問題——體貼肉體的心能否脫去敵意的傾向、歸回順服——則未觸及。但即使使徒在此沒有明言體貼肉體的心沒有這能力,這至少也是他教義的一個相當明顯的推論。因為未重生者的傾向若是與神為仇,那麼,能使他厭惡那傾向、將其拋棄、代之以更好傾向的動機,要從何處生起呢?不能從裏面來,因為按假設,裏面只有敵意;愛不能從恨中生出。若從外面來——從聖靈的幫助與影響而來——那麼問題已經讓步,爭論也就終結了。

把加爾文主義者所持的人無能之教義抹黑的一個極常見方法,是把這教義說成涉及某種天然或身體性的缺陷。再沒有比這更不公平的了。天然無能與道德無能之間有天壤之別。前者出於「意志以外、在悟性、身體構造或外在對象中的某種缺陷或障礙」;後者出於「缺乏意願,或相反意願的強烈」。聖經沒有一處斷言——理性的加爾文主義者也從未主張——除了意志的敗壞偏向與傾向之外,還有這種身體性的無能,以致天然的人不能順服神的律法。但另一方面,聖經卻滿了關於道德無能的證據。即使我們放下本節,啟示的一般教義仍是:未重生的人死在過犯罪惡之中;而重生與成聖中所發生的全部改變,一貫地不是歸於「人自己」,而是歸於神聖靈的大能。那改變不僅由祂推進並完成,更是由祂開始。)

Originale inglese

Because - This is given as a reason for what is said in Romans 8:6. In that verse the apostle had affirmed that to be carnally minded was death, but he had not stated why it was. He now explains it by saying that it is enmity against God, and thus involves a sinner in conflict with him, and exposes to his condemnation.

The carnal mind - This is the same expression as occurs in Romans 8:6 τὸ φρόνημα τὴς σαρκός to phronēma tēs sarkos. It does not mean the mind itself, the intellect, or the will; it does not suppose that the mind or soul is physically depraved, or opposed to God; but it means that the minding of the things of the flesh, giving to them supreme attention, is hostility against God; and involves the sinner in a controversy with him, and hence, leads to death and woe. This passage should not be alleged in proof that the soul is physically depraved, but merely that where there is a supreme regard to the flesh there is hostility to God. It does not directly prove the doctrine of universal depravity; but it proves only that where such attention exists to the corrupt desires of the soul, there is hostility to God. It is indeed implied that that supreme regard to the flesh exists everywhere by nature, but this is not expressly affirmed. For the object of the apostle here is not to teach the doctrine of depravity, but to show that where such depravity in fact exists, it involves the sinner in a fearful controversy with God.

Is enmity - Hostility; hatred. It means that such a regard to the flesh is in fact hostility to God, because it is opposed to his Law, and to his plan for purifying the soul; compare James 4:4; 1 John 2:15. The minding of the things of the flesh also leads to the hatred of God himself, because he is opposed to it, and has expressed his abhorrence of it.

Against God - Toward God; or in regard to him. It supposes hostility to him.

For it - The word "it" here refers to the minding of the things of the flesh. It does not mean that the soul itself is not subject to his Law, but that the minding of those things is hostile to his Law. The apostle does not express any opinion about the metaphysical ability of man, or discuss that question at all. The amount of his affirmation is simply, that the minding of the flesh, the supreme attention to its dictates and desires, is not and cannot be subject to the Law of God. They are wholly contradictory and irreconcilable, just as much as the love of falsehood is inconsistent with the laws of truth; as intemperance is inconsistent with the law of temperance; and as adultery is a violation of the seventh commandment. But whether the man himself might not obey the Law, whether he has, or has not, ability to do it, is a question which the apostle does not touch, and on which this passage should not be adduced. For whether the law of a particular sin is utterly irreconcilable with an opposite virtue, and whether the sinner is able to abandon that sin and pursue a different path, are very different inquiries.

Is not subject - It is not in subjection to the command of God. The minding of the flesh is opposed to that law, and thus shows that it is hostile to God.

Neither indeed can be - This is absolute and certain. It is impossible that it should be. There is the utmost inability in regard to it. The things are utterly irreconcilable. But the affirmation does not mean that the heart of the sinner might not be subject to God; or that his soul is so physically depraved that he cannot obey, or that he might not obey the law. On that, the apostle here expresses no opinion. That is not the subject of the discussion. It is simply that the supreme regard to the flesh, t the minding of that, is utterly irreconcilable with the Law of God. They are different things, and can never be made to harmonize; just as adultery cannot be chastity; falsehood cannot be truth; dishonesty cannot be honesty; hatred cannot be love. This passage, therefore, should not be adduced to prove the doctrine of man's inability to love God, for it does not refer to that, but it proves merely that a supreme regard to the things of the flesh is utterly inconsistent with the Law of God; can never be reconciled with it; and involves the sinner in hostility with his Creator.

(Calvinists have been loudly accused of "taking an unfair advantage of this language, for the support of their favorite doctrine of the utter impotency of the unregenerate man, in appreciating, much less conforming to the divine injunctions." It is alleged that φρονημα της σαρκος phronēma tēs sarkos refers to the disposition of the mind, and is properly translated, "the minding of the flesh." Therefore, it is this disposition or affection, and not the mind itself, that is enmity against God. But the meaning of the passage is not affected by this change in the translation. For the apostle affirms that this minding of the flesh is the uniform and prevailing disposition of unregenerate people. "They that are after the flesh," that is, unregenerate people," do mind the things of the flesh." This is their character without exception. Now, if the natural mind be uniformly under the influence of this depraved disposition, is it not enmity to God. Thus, in point of fact, there is no difference between the received and the amended translation. To affirm that the mind itself is not hostile to God, and that its disposition alone is so, is little better than metaphysical trifling, and deserves no more regard than the plea which any wicked man might easily establish, by declaring that his disposition only, and not himself, was hostile to the laws of religion and morals. On the whole, it is not easy to conceive how the apostle could more forcibly have affirmed the enmity of the natural mind against God. He first describes unrenewed people by their character or bent, and then asserts that this bent is the very essence of enmity against God - enmity in the abstract.

To anyone ignorant of the subtleties of theological controversy, the doctrine of moral inability would seem a plain consequence from this view of the natural mind. "It is," says Mr Scott, on the passage "morally unable to do anything but revolt against the divine Law, and refuse obedience to it." We are told, however, that the passage under consideration affirms only, that unregenerate people, while they continue in that state, cannot please God, or yield obedience to his Law, and leaves untouched the other question. concerning the power of the carnal mind to throw off the disposition of enmity, and return to subjection. But if it be not expressly affirmed by the apostle here, that the carnal mind has not this power, it would seem at least to be a plain enough inference from his doctrine. For if the disposition of the unregenerate man be enmity against God: whence is the motive to arise that shall make him dislike that disposition, and throw it aside, and assume a better in its stead? From within it cannot come, because, according to the supposition, there is enmity only; and love cannot arise out of hatred. If it come from without, from the aids and influences of the Spirit, the question is ceded, and the dispute at an end.

A very common way of casting discredit on the view which Calvinists entertain of the doctrine of man's inability, is to represent it as involving some natural or physical disqualification. Nothing can be more unfair. There is a wide difference between natural and moral inability. The one arises from "some defect or obstacle extrinsic to the will, either in the understanding, constitution of the body, or external objects:" the other from "the want of inclination, or the strength of a contrary inclination." Now the Scriptures no where assert, nor have rational Calvinists ever maintained, that there is any physical incapacity of this kind, apart from the corrupt bias and inclination of the will, on account of which, the natural man cannot be subject to the Law of God. But on the other hand, the Scriptures are full of evidence on the subject of moral inability. Even were we to abandon this passage, the general doctrine of revelation is, that unregenerate people are dead in trespasses and in sins; and the entire change that takes place in regeneration and sanctification, is uniformly ascribed not to the "man himself," but to the power of the Spirit of God. Not only is the change carried on and perfected, but begun by him.

8

Romans 8:8

Apri passaggio

這樣看來——即由此可得;這引出如下的結論。

屬肉體的人——即未蒙重生的罪人,以肉體的慾望為至上追求的人;Romans 7:18。此處所指的,是那些隨從肉體的食慾和慾望、不受神聖靈引導的人。

不能得神的喜歡——就是說,當他們這樣屬肉體、這樣追求敗壞本性之慾望的時候,他們不能得神的喜歡。但這並不斷言他們有能力不能轉離這條路、去追求另一種生活方式。那是另一個問題。孩子可能固執、驕傲、悖逆;當他處於這狀態時,可以說他不能得父母的喜歡。但他能否不再固執、變為順從,卻是一個截然不同的問題;這兩個題目決不可混淆。由此可知:

(1) 未蒙重生的人是全然敗壞的,因為在這狀態中他們不能得神的喜歡。

(2) 他們在這狀態中的任何行為,都不能蒙神悅納,因為神只喜悅那些體貼聖靈的人。

(3) 處於這狀態的人應當毫不遲延地回轉,因為人人都當討神的喜悅。

(4) 罪人若不從他的路上回轉,就必滅亡。

以他現在的品格,他永不能討神的喜歡:健康時不能,病中不能;活著不能,死時不能;在地上不能,在地獄裏也不能。他正與神為敵;他若不自己離棄這敵意,這敵意就永無止息,並使他的靈魂陷於與全能之主個人的、正面的、永遠的爭戰的一切災禍之中。

Originale inglese

So then - It follows; it leads to this conclusion.

They that are in the flesh - They who are unrenewed sinners; who are following supremely the desires of the flesh; Romans 7:18. Those are meant here who follow fleshly appetites and desires, and who are not led by the Spirit of God.

Cannot please God - That is, while they are thus in the flesh; while they thus pursue the desires of their corrupt nature, they cannot please God. But this affirms nothing respecting their ability to turn from this course, and to pursue a different mode of life. That is a different question. A child may be obstinate, proud, and disobedient; and while in this state, it may be affirmed of him that he cannot please his parent. But whether he might not cease to be obstinate, and become obedient, is a very different inquiry; and the two subjects should never be be confounded. It follows from this,

(1) That those who are unrenewed are totally depraved, since in this state they cannot please God.

(2) that none of their actions while in this state can be acceptable to him, since he is pleased only with those who are spiritually minded.

(3) that those who are in this state should turn from it without delay; as it is desirable that every man should please God.

(4) that if the sinner does not turn from his course, he will be ruined.

With his present character he can never please him; neither in health nor sickness; neither in life nor death; neither on earth nor in hell. He is engaged in hostility against God; and if he does not himself forsake it, it will be endless, and involve his soul in all the evils of a personal, and direct, and eternal warfare with the Lord Almighty.

9

Romans 8:9

Apri passaggio

但你們——你們這些基督徒。這與他剛才所描述的品格正好相反,也顯出福音的大能。

不屬肉體——即不受敗壞的私慾與情慾的完全支配。

乃屬聖靈——意即你們是以屬靈的事為念,處於聖靈的引導和影響之下。

神的靈——即聖靈。

住在你們心裡——聖經常說聖靈住在基督徒的心裡(參 1 Corinthians 2:16;1 Corinthians 6:19;2 Corinthians 6:16;Ephesians 2:21-22;Galatians 4:6);其意思不是說聖靈有位格上的或有形的內住,而是說祂感化、引導、帶領基督徒,在他們裡面生出溫柔、愛、喜樂、平安、忍耐、恩慈、良善等(Galatians 5:22-23)。「住在人裡面」這說法表示緊密的聯合,意即聖靈的果子在人心中結出來。(見 Romans 8:10 的補充註釋。)

人若沒有基督的靈——「靈」這字在聖經中含義極多。在新約中,它多半指三位一體的第三位,即聖靈。但據我所信,「基督的靈」這說法除了 1 Peter 1:11 或許是例外,未見有別處用在祂身上。祂常稱為神的靈(Matthew 3:16;Matthew 12:28;1 Corinthians 2:11, 1 Corinthians 2:14;1 Corinthians 3:16;1 Corinthians 6:11;Ephesians 4:30),卻不稱為父的靈。「靈」這字也常用以指性情、氣質;正如我們說,某人有寬宏之靈,或有復仇之靈等。它在這裡也可能有這個意思,指人若沒有基督的性情或心腸,就不是屬祂的,就沒有敬虔的憑據。但按上下文,它應以類似「神的靈」和「叫耶穌從死裡復活者的靈」(Romans 8:11)的意義來理解;若是這樣,它就是指基督所賜下、所差來完成祂工作的靈(John 14:26),即聖靈——受差遣使我們像基督、使我們的心成聖的那靈。在這個意義上,它顯然指基督所差來的靈,要在我們裡面產生祂來所要建立的觀念與情感,並使我們與祂自己相似。若這是指聖靈,我們便看出使徒論到救主的方式:他看「這靈」既是神的靈,也是基督的靈,是從二者而出的;如此,他顯然相信父與子的本性合而為一。除非假定父與子為一——即基督是神——這樣的說法斷不可能使用。

就不是屬基督的——就不是基督徒。這是一個容易應用的敬虔試金石,並且一試便定案。人若不受主耶穌那溫柔、純潔、聖潔之靈的感化,若不效法祂的形像,若他的生活不像救主,他對信仰就是外人。沒有比這更容易應用的試驗,也沒有比這更決定性的試驗。他別的無論有甚麼都無關緊要:他可以高聲宣告信仰,性情可親,熱心大膽,或積極推進教會中自己黨派或宗派的利益;但他若沒有救主的心腸,不彰顯祂的靈,就不過是鳴的鑼、響的鈸一般。願所有讀到這話的人都誠實省察自己;願他們都得著那至純福樂之源——主耶穌的靈與心腸。

Originale inglese

But ye - You who are Christians. This is the opposite character to what he had been describing, and shows the power of the gospel.

Not in the flesh - Not under the full influence of corrupt desires and passions.

But in the Spirit - That is, you are spiritually minded; you are under the direction and influence of the Holy Spirit.

The Spirit of God - The Holy Spirit.

Dwell in you - The Holy Spirit is often represented as dwelling in the hearts of Christians (compare 1 Corinthians 2:16; 1 Corinthians 6:19; 2 Corinthians 6:16; Ephesians 2:21-22; Galatians 4:6); and the meaning is not that there is a personal or physical indwelling of the Holy Spirit, but that he influences, directs, and guides Christians, producing meekness, love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, etc. Galatians 5:22-23. The expression, to dwell in one, denotes intimacy of connection, and means that those things which are the fruits of the Spirit are produced in the heart. (See the supplementary note at Romans 8:10.)

Have not the Spirit of Christ - The word "Spirit" is used in a great variety of significations in the Scriptures. It most commonly in the New Testament refers to the third person of the Trinity, the Holy Spirit. But the expression "the Spirit of Christ" is not, I believe, any where applied to him, except it may be 1 Peter 1:11. He is called often the Spirit of God Matthew 3:16; Matthew 12:28; 1 Corinthians 2:11, 1 Corinthians 2:14; 1 Corinthians 3:16; 1 Corinthians 6:11; Ephesians 4:30, but not the Spirit of the Father. The word "spirit" is often used to denote the temper, disposition; thus we say, a man of a generous spirit, or of a revengeful spirit, etc. It may possibly have this meaning here, and denotes that he who has not the temper or disposition of Christ is not his, or has no evidence of piety. But the connection seems to demand that it should be understood in a sense similar to the expression "the Spirit of God," and "the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus" Romans 8:11; and if so, it means the Spirit which Christ imparts, or sends to accomplish his work John 14:26, the Holy Spirit, sent to make us like Christ, and to sanctify our hearts. And in this sense it evidently denotes the Spirit which Christ would send to produce in us the views and feelings which he came to establish, and which shall assimilate us to himself. If this refers to the Holy Spirit, then we see the manner in which the apostle spoke of the Saviour. He regarded "the Spirit" as equally the Spirit of God and of Christ, as proceeding from both; and thus evidently believed that there is a union of nature between the Father and the Son. Such language could never be used except on the supposition that the Father and Son are one; that is, that Christ is divine.

Is none of his - Is not a Christian. This is a test of piety that is easily applied; and this settles the question. If a man is not influenced by the meek, pure, and holy spirit of the Lord Jesus, if he is not conformed to his image, if his life does not resemble that of the Saviour, he is a stranger to religion. No test could be more easily applied, and none is more decisive. It matters not what else he may have. He may be loud in his professions, amiable in his temper, bold in his zeal, or active in promoting the interests of his own party or denomination in the church; but if he has not the temper of the Saviour, and does not manifest his Spirit, it is as sounding brass or a tinkling cymdal. May all who read this, honestly examine themselves; and may they have what is the source of the purest felicity, the spirit and temper of the Lord Jesus.

10

Romans 8:10

Apri passaggio

基督若在你們心裏——這顯然是一個比喻性的說法,「基督」一詞在這裏指祂的靈、祂的原則;意即祂影響這個人。按字面說,祂不能在一個基督徒裏面;但祂與基督徒之間緊密的聯合,以及他們完全在祂影響之下的事實,就用這有力的比喻語言來表達。這類說法並不罕見;參 Galatians 2:20;Colossians 1:27。

(基督與祂子民的聯合,有時被解釋為僅是相對的聯合,以與真實的聯合相對。代理者或保人與他所代替之人之間的聯合,常被用來解釋聖經在這題目上的用語。按這觀點,基督在法律上與祂的子民為一,因祂所作所成的,被算作他們所作所成的。另一種用來說明基督與信徒之聯合的相對聯合,是首領與隨從者的聯合,那只是宗旨、利益、情感、愛好、命運等方面的聯合。這些描述就其本身而言都是真實的,也提供許多有趣而有益的說明;然而它們未及聖經在這一點上的完備意思。基督與祂子民之間存在真實的、生命的聯合,這從受默示的作者論及此事的用語可以看出。

他們所用的特殊措辭,很難用任何相對的聯合來解釋。無論如何,這措辭之強,正如他們若要傳達最親密之聯合的意念時所能用的一樣強。經上說基督「在他們裏面」,他們又被描述為「在祂裏面」。祂「住在他們裏面,他們也住在祂裏面」。他們彼此內住(John 14:20;John 15:4;1 John 3:24;1 John 4:12)。再者,聖經對這題目的比喻也提供同樣效力的證據。這所謂奧祕的聯合,被比作建築物中石頭的聯合、葡萄樹上枝子的聯合、人身體上肢體的聯合,甚至父與子之間的聯合(1 Peter 2:4;Ephesians 2:20, Ephesians 2:22;John 15:1-8;1Co. 12:12-31;John 17:20-23)。這些既都是真實的聯合,這聯合豈不也是真實的嗎?若不是,這些比較的恰當與公理何在?它們非但不能引導我們對這題目形成準確的概念,反倒像是要誤導我們。

這真實而生命的聯合,是由基督的獨一之靈——就是貫穿奧祕身體之元首與眾肢體的聖靈——所形成的(1 Corinthians 6:17;1 Corinthians 12:13;1 John 3:24;1 John 4:13)。誠然,基督之靈的本質性臨在無所不在;但祂以特殊的方式臨在基督的肢體裏面,作屬靈影響力的泉源。這作為聯合之紐帶的屬靈臨在,在人因信接受基督的那一刻便立即顯明。從那時起,他就與基督為一,因為同一位靈住在二者裏面。其實,這聯合正是一切用來說明這題目的相對聯合的根基;沒有它,我們與基督就沒有任何拯救性的關係。這聯合是奧祕的,無可否認;使徒自己也如此斷言(Ephesians 5:32;Colossians 1:27)。我們雖知道這事實,卻不能解釋其方式;但不可因此拒絕它,正如我們不會因不明白聖靈本質性臨在的教義而拒絕它一樣。)

身體就因罪而死——這段經文曾被以很不相同的方式解釋。有人理解為:身體就罪而論是死的,即罪不再有能力激動邪情私慾;另有人理解為:身體必因罪而死,但靈性部分要活著,甚至身體在復活時也要活過來——加爾文(Calvin)、伯撒(Beza)、奧古斯丁(Augustine)持此見解。多德里奇(Doddridge)這樣理解:身體雖必因進入世界的初次之罪而死,靈卻是生命,並要藉著第二亞當所帶來的義永遠活著。這些解釋各有嚴重的難處,不必一一細述。我對這段經文的理解如下:「身體」是指使徒在前幾章已多方論及的——肉體、未歸正的人。它受敗壞的情慾與私慾所支配,可以說因此是死的,因為它毫無屬靈生命的元素;它處於罪與死的權下。原文的 μέν men(「誠然」、「實在」)一詞在我們的譯本中被略去了,這略去使意思隱晦。這話是使徒的一項承認,是對前面已證明之事的概括陳述:「誠然必須承認,未經更新的本性、未歸正的人,在肉體的影響之下,是屬靈上死的。罪以肉體的私慾為座位;整個身體可以被承認是這樣死或敗壞的。」

因罪——原文 δἰ ἁμαρτία di' hamartia;即藉著罪惡的情慾與私慾。

心靈——這與身體相對;意思是說,靈魂、不朽的部分、更新了的人,是活的,處於生命之原則的影響之下。它浸潤著福音所賜的生命,並在事奉神的事上活躍。這裏的「靈」不是指聖靈,而是指人的靈、那不朽的部分——在福音下被找回、更新並得著生命。

因義——原文 s διὰ δικαιοσύνην dia dikaiosunēn。這通常被解釋為「為著義」,或「使它成為義」。但我認為這說法是在本書信中如此常用的意義上使用的,指神的稱義計劃;見 Romans 1:17 註釋。「人的靈已藉著祂的稱義計劃被找回並活過來。這計劃傳達生命,把人從死在罪中挽回過來,歸於生命。」

(這段經文中的「身體」一般按字面理解,這無疑不應沒有充分理由就被拒絕。上下文沒有甚麼要求比喻的意義。使徒承認,儘管有聖靈的內住,身體仍必死。「它誠然(μεν men)因罪而死。」信徒未蒙拯救脫離今世的死亡。然而,有兩件事足以使他甘心暫時卸下這屬土的帳棚。「必死的身體」雖然如今要死,卻非註定永遠服在死亡的權下,乃要藉著那使耶穌從死裏復活之同一聖靈的大能,再度復起,成為不能朽壞而榮耀的。同時,「靈,即魂,因著義是生命」。由於保羅在本書信前文多方論及的那無瑕疵的義,信徒的靈魂即使現在也享受屬靈的生命,這生命要導入永生與榮耀。

那些在第10節按比喻理解 σῶμα sōma 的人,固然堅持第11節的復活也是比喻的。但布龍菲爾德(Bloomfield)說:「古今最優秀的注釋家都有理由偏好字面的看法,特別是因為 θνητα thnēta σῶματα sōmata(必死的身體)這片語似乎把它限於這個意義。」)

Originale inglese

And if Christ be in you - This is evidently a figurative expression, where the word "Christ" is used to denote his spirit, his principles; that is, he influences the man. Literally, he cannot be in a Christian; but the close connection between him and Christians, and the fact that they are entirely under his influence, is expressed by this strong figurative language. It is language which is not infrequently used; compare Galatians 2:20; Colossians 1:27.

(The union between Christ and his people is sometimes explained of a merely relative in opposition to a real union. The union which subsists between a substitute, or surety, and the persons in whose room he has placed himself, is frequently offered in explanation of the Scripture language on the subject. In this view, Christ is regarded as legally one with his people, inasmuch, as what he has done or obtained, is held as done and obtained by them. Another relative union, employed to illustrate that which subsists between Christ and believers, is the union of a chief and his followers, which is simply a union of design, interest, sentiment, affection, destiny, etc. Now these representations are true so far as they go; and furnish much interesting and profitable illustration. They fall short, however, of the full sense of Scripture on the point. That there is a real or vital union between Christ and his people, appears from the language of the inspired writers in regard to it.

The special phraseology which they employ, cannot well be explained of any relative union At all events, it is as strong as they could have employed, on the supposition, that they had wished to convey the idea of the most intimate possible connection. Christ is said to be "in them," and they are represented as "in him." He "abides in them, and they in him." They "dwelt" in each other; John 14:20; John 15:4; 1 John 3:24; 1 John 4:12. Moreover, the Scripture illustrations of the subject furnish evidence to the same effect. The mystical union, as it has been called, is compared to the union of stones in a building, branches in a vine, members in a human body, and even to what subsists between the Father and the Son; 1 Peter 2:4; Ephesians 2:20, Ephesians 2:22; John 15:1-8; 1Co. 12:12-31; John 17:20-23. Now if all these are real unions, is not this union real also? If not, where is the propriety or justice of the comparisons? Instead of leading us to form accurate notions on the subject, they would seem calculated to mislead.

This real and vital union is formed by the one Spirit of Christ, the Holy Spirit pervading the Head and the members of the mystical body; 1 Corinthians 6:17; 1 Corinthians 12:13; 1 John 3:24; 1 John 4:13. It is true, indeed, that the essential presence of Christ's Spirit is everywhere, but he is present in Christ's members, in a special way, as the fountain of spiritual influence. This spiritual presence, which is the bond of union, is manifested immediately upon a man's reception of Christ by faith. From that hour he is one with Christ, because the same Spirit lives in both. Indeed this union is the foundation of all the relative unions which have been employed to illustrate the subject; without it, we could have no saving relation to Christ whatever. That it is mysterious cannot be denied. The apostle himself affirms as much, Ephesians 5:32; Colossians 1:27. Although we know the fact, we cannot explain the manner of it, but must not on this account reject it, any more than we would the doctrine of the Spirit's essential presence, because we do not understand it.)

The body is dead - This passage has been interpreted in very different ways. Some understand it to mean that the body is dead in respect to sin; that is, that sin has no more power to excite evil passions and desires; others, that the body must die on account of sin but that the spiritual part shall live, and even the body shall live also in the resurrection. Thus, Calvin, Beza, and Augustine. Doddridge understands it thus: Though the body is to die on account of the first sin that entered into the world, yet the spirit is life, and shall continue to live on forever, through that righteousness which the second Adam has introduced." To each of these interpretations there are serious objections, which it is not necessary to urge. I understand the passage in the following manner: The body refers to that of which the apostle had said so much in the previous chapters - the flesh, the man before conversion. It is subject to corrupt passions and desires, and may be said thus to be dead, as it has none of the elements of spiritual life. It is under the reign of sin and death. The word μέν men, indeed, or truly, has been omitted in our translation, and the omission has obscured the sense. The expression is an admission of the apostle, or a summary statement of what had before been shown. "It is to be admitted, indeed, or it is true, that the unrenewed nature, the man before conversion, under the influence of the flesh, is spiritually dead. Sin has its seat in the fleshly appetites; and the whole body may be admitted thus to be dead or corrupt."

Because of sin - Through sin δἰ ἁμαρτία di' hamartia; by means of sinful passions and appetites.

But the spirit - This stands opposed to the body; and it means that the soul, the immortal part, the renovated man, was alive, or was under the influence of living principles. It was imbued with the life which the gospel imparts and had become active in the service of God. The word "spirit" here does not refer to the Holy Spirit, but to the spirit of man, the immortal part, recovered, renewed, and imbued with life under the gospel.

Because of righteousness - Through righteousness διὰ δικαιοσύνην dia dikaiosunēn. This is commonly interpreted to mean, with reference to righteousness, or that it may become righteous. But I understand the expression to be used in the sense in which the word is so frequently used in this Epistle, as denoting God's plan of justification; see the note at Romans 1:17. "The spirit of man has been recovered and made alive through his plan of justification. It communicates life, and recovers man from his death in sin to life."

The "body" in this passage has generally been understood in the literal sense, which, doubtless, ought not to be rejected without some valid reason. There is nothing in the connection that demands the figurative sense. The apostle admits that, notwithstanding of the indwelling of the Spirit, the body must die. "It indeed (μεν men ) is dead because of sin." The believer is not delivered from temporal death. Yet there are two things which may well reconcile him to the idea of laying aside for a while the clay tabernacle. The "mortal body," though it now die, is not destined to remain forever under the dominion of death, but shall be raised again incorruptible and glorious, by the power of the same Spirit that raised up Jesus from the dead. Meanwhile, "the spirit, or soul, is life, because of righteousness." In consequence of that immaculate righteousness, of which Paul had had said so much in the previous part of this Epistle, the souls of believers, even now, enjoy spiritual life, which shall issue in eternal life and glory.

Those who understand σῶμα sōma figuratively in the 10th verse, insist, indeed, that the resurrection in the 11th, is figurative also. But "the best commentators" says Bloomfield, "both ancient and modern, with reason prefer the literal view, especially on account of the phrase θνητα thnēta σῶματα sōmata which seems to confine it to this sense.")

11

Romans 8:11

Apri passaggio

叫耶穌從死裏復活者的靈……——即聖靈(Romans 8:9)。

那叫基督耶穌從死裏復活的……——那位有能力使祂復活的,也有能力賜生命給你們;那位實際上使祂復活的,也必使你們復活。這裏的論證似乎首先建立在神的大能上,其次建立在基督與祂子民的聯合上;參 John 14:19「因為我活著,你們也要活著」。

也必使之活過來——即使之活過來。

你們必死的身體——這裏所指的若理解為死人的復活,似乎並不恰當,因為那並不歸於聖靈的作為。我理解這是指那受肉體私慾與情慾支配的身體;它本性上服在死的權下,因此是必死的,即終必死亡的。其意是:在福音之下,藉著聖靈的影響,全人都必在事奉神的事上活過來。連那敗壞、屬肉體、必死的身體——長期伏在罪權之下的——也必活過來,歸回對神的事奉。這要藉著住在我們裏面的聖靈成就,因為那靈既已使我們的靈魂復生,又以祂潔淨的影響與我們同住,並且祂內住的宗旨與趨向,就是要潔淨全人,使一切歸回於神。基督徒這樣就在身體與心靈上都成為聖潔;因為連他們的身體——那邪情私慾的所在——也必在事奉神的事上活過來。

Originale inglese

But if the Spirit of him ... - The Holy Spirit, Romans 8:9.

He that raised up Christ ... - He that had power to restore him to life, has power to give life to you. He that did, in fact, restore him to life, will also restore you. The argument here seems to be founded, first, on the power of God; and, secondly, on the connection between Christ and his people; compare John 14:19, "Because I live, ye shall live also."

Shall also quicken - Shall make alive.

Your mortal bodies - That this does not refer to the resurrection of the dead seems to be apparent, because that is not attributed to the Holy Spirit. I understand it as referring to the body, subject to carnal desires and propensities; by nature under the reign of death, and therefore mortal; that is, subject to death. The sense is, that under the gospel, by the influence of the Spirit, the entire man will be made alive in the service of God. Even the corrupt, carnal, and mortal body, so long under the dominion of sin, shall be made alive and recovered to the service of God. This will be done by the Spirit that dwells in us, because that Spirit has restored life to our souls, abides with us with his purifying influence, and because the design and tendency of his indwelling is to purify the entire man, and restore all to God. Christians thus in their bodies and their spirits become sacred. For even their body, the seat of evil passions and desires, shall become alive in the service of God.

12

Romans 8:12

Apri passaggio

我們是欠債的人——我們欠下的是一項莊嚴的義務。這義務出於:

(1) 聖靈住在我們裏面這事實;

(2) 祂內住的目的是要潔淨我們;

(3) 我們因此從罪的死裏被救回,歸於敬虔的生命;那賜下生命者,就有權要求這生命用於事奉祂。

不是對肉體——即不是對那敗壞的傾向與情慾。我們沒有義務放縱它們,因為這樣放縱的結局是死亡與毀滅(Romans 7:21-22)。但我們有義務向神而活,順從祂聖靈的引導,因為那結局是生命與平安(Romans 7:22-23)。其理由記在下一節。

Originale inglese

We are debtors - We owe it as a matter of solemn obligation. This obligation arises,

(1) From the fact that the Spirit dwells in us;

(2) Because the design of his indwelling is to purify us;

(3) Because we are thus recovered from the death of sin to the life of religion; and he who has imparted life, has a right to require that it be spent in his service.

To the flesh - To the corrupt propensities and passions. We are not bound to indulge them because the end of such indulgence is death and ruin; Romans 7:21-22. But we are bound to live to God, and to follow the leadings of his Spirit, for the end is life and peace; Romans 7:22-23. The reason for this is stated in the following verse.

13

Romans 8:13

Apri passaggio

你們若順從肉體活着……——你們若放縱肉體的性情而活,就必沉淪於永死;Romans 7:23。

靠着聖靈——即靠聖靈的幫助,珍視並培養祂的感化。這裏所要求的,惟有靠聖靈的幫助才能成就。

治死——即處死、毀滅。罪當其權勢被摧毀、不再活動時,便是被治死了。

身體的惡行——即敗壞的傾向與情慾;稱之為身體的惡行,是因為它們被認為源於肉體的私慾。

必要活着——你們就必得福、得救。不是你們的罪死,就是你們死。若任憑罪活着,你們就必死;若把罪治死,你們就必得救。沒有人能帶着罪得救。至此,使徒論證福音在促進人的純潔上勝於律法的話就結束了。藉着這一連串的推理,他表明福音成就了律法所不能作的——使靈魂成聖,毀滅我們本性中敗壞的情慾,並使人歸回神。

Originale inglese

For if you live ... - If you live to indulge your carnal propensities, you will sink to eternal death; Romans 7:23.

Through the Spirit - By the aid of the Spirit; by cherishing and cultivating his influences. What is here required can be accomplished only by the aid of the Holy Spirit.

Do mortify - Do put to death; do destroy. Sin is mortified when its power is destroyed, and it ceases to be active.

The deeds of the body - The corrupt inclinations and passions; called deeds of the body, because they are supposed to have their origin in the fleshly appetites.

Ye shall live - You shall be happy and saved. Either your sins must die, or you must. If they are suffered to live, you will die. If they are put to death, you will be saved. No man can be saved in his sins. This closes the argument of the apostle for the superiority of the gospel to the Law in promoting the purity of man. By this train of reasoning, he has shown that the gospel has accomplished what the Law could not do - the sanctification of the soul, the destruction of the corrupt passions of our nature, and the recovery of man to God.

14

Romans 8:14

Apri passaggio

因為凡……——即無論何人;一切這樣被引導的人。這話引入一個新主題,說明福音的益處,就是:福音使人得著兒子的心,Romans 8:14-17。

被引導的——即順服祂的影響與管理的人。聖靈被描繪為施予影響、作出提示、施行管理的一位。敬虔的一個證據,是樂意順服那影響並降服於祂;敬虔缺乏的一個明確證據,則在於不願順服那影響,使聖靈擔憂並且抗拒祂。一切基督徒都順服祂的影響;一切罪人都斷然拒絕並反對它。人若跟隨聖靈的影響,它必引導每個人進天堂;但它被忽略、被拒絕、或被輕看時,人就下到地獄。人得救時,榮耀屬於那引導的聖靈;人沉淪時,過錯在於人。使徒在此並不探討神的百姓如何被聖靈引導、或為何別人抗拒時他們卻順服這問題。他的目的只是陳明事實:這樣被引導的人,是神的兒子,是有敬虔之證據的人。

都是神的兒子——即被收納入祂的家,作祂的兒女。這是一個滿有慈愛的名稱,意思是他們與祂維持這關係;他們是祂的朋友、門徒和效法者;他們是那蒙救贖之大家庭的一部分,祂是這家的父和保護者。聖經中這名稱常應用於基督徒;Job 1:6;John 1:12;Philippians 2:15;1 John 3:1-2;Matthew 5:9、Matthew 5:45;Luke 6:35。這是一個容易應用的敬虔試金石。

(1) 我們是否意識到,有一種從上頭來的影響,一直把我們從這世界敗壞的情慾和虛妄中拉出來?這是聖靈的工作。

(2) 我們是否意識到自己渴望順服那影響,被引到純潔與生命的路上?這是我們為神兒子的證據。

(3) 我們是否不加抗拒?我們是否甘心跟隨、順服這引導我們治死驕傲、制伏情慾、除滅私慾、降卑野心、並撲滅愛財與愛世之心的純潔影響?若是這樣,我們便是祂的兒女。神必不引我們入迷途;我們的平安與幸福,只在於把自己全然交託這影響,並甘願被這看不見的手引到「救恩可安歇的水邊」。

Originale inglese

For as many - Whosoever; all who are thus led. This introduces a new topic, illustrating the benefits of the gospel, to wit, that it produces a spirit of adoption, Romans 8:14-17.

As are led - As submit to his influence and control. The Spirit is represented as influencing, suggesting, and controlling. One evidence of piety is, a willingness to yield to that influence, and submit to him. One decided evidence of the lack of piety is, where there is an unwillingness to submit to that influence, but where the Holy Spirit is grieved and resisted. All Christians submit to his influence; all sinners decidedly reject it and oppose it. The influence of the Spirit, if followed, would lead every man to heaven. But when neglected, rejected, or despised, man goes down to hell. The glory belongs to the conducting Spirit when man is saved; the fault is man's when he is lost. The apostle here does not agitate the question how it is that the people of God are led by the Spirit, or why they yield to it when others resist it. His design is simply to state the fact, that they who are thus led are the sons of God, or have evidence of piety.

Are the sons of God - Are adopted into his family, and are his children. This is a name of endearment, meaning that they sustain to him this relation; that they are his friends, disciples, and imitators; that they are parts of the great family of the redeemed, of whom he is the Father and Protector. It is often applied to Christians in the Bible; Job 1:6; John 1:12; Philippians 2:15; 1 John 3:1-2; Matthew 5:9, Matthew 5:45; Luke 6:35. This is a test of piety which is easily applied.

(1) are we conscious that an influence from above has been drawing us away from the corrupting passions and vanities of this world? This is the work of the Spirit.

(2) are we conscious of a desire to yield to that influence, and to be conducted in the path of purity and life? This is an evidence that we are the sons of God.

(3) do we offer no resistance; do we follow cheerfully, and obey this pure influence, leading us to mortify pride, subdue passion, destroy lust, humble ambition, and annihilate the love of wealth and of the world? If so, we are his children. God will not lead us astray; and our peace and happiness consists only in yielding ourselves to this influence entirely, and in being willing to be conducted by this unseen hand "beside the still waters of salvation."

15

Romans 8:15

Apri passaggio

奴僕的心——即束縛你們的靈,或說只產生懼怕的奴僕之靈。奴僕是在持續的恐懼和驚惶之下。但宗教的靈乃是自由與確信的靈,是兒女的靈,不是奴僕的靈;比較 John 8:32-36 的註釋。

仍舊害怕——即叫你們再陷於懼怕,或服在奴僕式的恐懼之下。這暗示他們從前在律法之下的境況乃是奴僕的境況,其趨向只是產生驚惶。每個罪人都服於這樣的恐懼之下。他有一切當懼怕的事:神向他發怒,他的良心要攪擾他,在死亡和永恆裏他有一切可畏懼的事。基督徒卻不是這樣;比較 2 Timothy 1:7。

兒子的心——即屬於兒女的感情、愛與確信;不是奴僕那戰兢的靈,乃是兒子的性情和摯愛之情。收養是把陌生人接納為自己的兒女並待之如兒女。這詞用在基督徒身上,因為神待他們如同自己的兒女;他們本性上與祂疏遠、為敵,祂卻把他們接納到這關係之中。這意味着:

(1) 我們本性上對祂沒有任何權利;

(2) 因此這行為純粹出於恩慈——出於純全、主權的愛;

(3) 我們如今是在祂的保護和眷顧之下;

(4) 我們有責任向祂顯出兒女的心,並順服祂。見 John 1:12 的註釋;比較 Galatians 4:5;Ephesians 1:5。基督徒之所以常被稱為神的眾子,原因正在於此。

因此我們呼叫——像需要保護和幫助的兒女一樣。這顯明神兒女慣常的心靈,這樣的性情:

(1) 向祂表達兒女對父親當有的感情;

(2) 呼求祂,用親愛和信託的言語向祂說話;

(3) 尋求祂的保護和援助。

阿爸——這個詞是迦勒底文(אבא abba),意思是「父」。使徒為何用另一種語言重複這個詞,不得而知。敘利亞譯本讀作:「我們藉著祂稱父為我們的父。」這裏的重複大概只是表示強烈,意在表明基督徒以摯愛、柔順之子的心靈停留在這名號上時的懇切。這樣重複親愛的稱呼並非罕見;比較 Matthew 7:22;Psalm 8:1。這是容易應用的敬虔憑據。人若能以真誠和火熱的愛把這稱呼用於神,以兒子之心稱祂為父,他就是有了基督徒的心靈。神每個兒女都有這樣的心靈;沒有的,就與敬虔無分。

Originale inglese

The spirit of bondage - The spirit that binds you; or the spirit of a slave, that produces only fear. The slave is under constant fear and alarm. But the spirit of religion is that of freedom and of confidence; the spirit of children, and not of slaves; compare the note at John 8:32-36.

Again to fear - That you should again be afraid, or be subjected to servile fear - This implies that in their former state under the Law, they were in a state of servitude, and that the tendency of it was merely to produce alarm. Every sinner is subject to such fear. He has everything of which to be alarmed. God is angry with him; his conscience will trouble him; and he has everything to apprehend in death and in eternity. But it is not so with the Christian; compare 2 Timothy 1:7.

The spirit of adoption - The feeling of affection, love, and confidence which pertains to children; not the servile, trembling spirit of slaves, but the temper and affectionate regard of sons. Adoption is the taking and treating a stranger as one's own child. It is applied to Christians because God treats them as his children; he receives them into this relation, though they were by nature strangers and enemies. It implies,

(1) That we by nature had no claim on him;

(2) That therefore, the act is one of mere kindness - of pure, sovereign love;

(3) That we are now under his protection and care; and,

(4) That we are bound to manifest toward him the spirit of children, and yield to him obedience. See the note at John 1:12; compare Galatians 4:5; Ephesians 1:5. It is for this that Christians are so often called the sons of God.

Whereby we cry - As children who need protection and help. This evinces the habitual spirit of a child of God; a disposition,

(1) To express toward him the feelings due to a father;

(2) To call upon him; to address him in the language of affection and endearing confidence;

(3) To seek his protection and aid.

Abba This word is Chaldee (אבא abba), and means "father." Why the apostle repeats the word in a different language, is not known. The Syriac reads it. "By which we call the Father our Father." It is probable that the repetition here denotes merely intensity, and is designed to denote the interest with which a Christian dwells on the name, in the spirit of an affectionate, tender child. It is not unusual to repeat such terms of affection; compare Matthew 7:22; Psalm 8:1. This is an evidence of piety that is easily applied. He that can in sincerity, and with ardent affection apply this term to God, addressing him with a filial spirit as his Father, has the spirit of a Christian. Every child of God has this spirit; and he that has it not is a stranger to piety.

16

Romans 8:16

Apri passaggio

聖靈——指神的聖靈。這裡所指的乃是聖靈,這是明顯的:

(1) 因為這乃是這說法的自然含義;

(2) 因為使徒在此主要論述的正是聖靈;

(3) 因為若說得兒子名分的心境會作見證,那乃是不自然而牽強的解釋。

同證——即作證,提出證據。

與我們的心——即向我們的心。這是關乎得兒子名分的事;其意思是,聖靈向我們的心提供證據,證明我們已被收納入神的家中。這果效在聖經中並不罕見地歸於聖靈 2 Corinthians 1:22;1 John 5:10-11;1 Corinthians 2:12。若有人問這是如何作成的,我的回答是:不是藉著任何新真理的啟示,不是藉著默示,也不總是藉著確據,更不是單單藉著一種相信自己蒙揀選得永生的說服;乃是藉著在我們裡面產生祂影響所當有的合宜果效。使人心更新、使靈魂成聖、產生「仁愛、喜樂、和平、忍耐、恩慈、良善、信實、溫柔、節制」的,正是祂的工作 Galatians 5:22-23。人若有這些,就有聖靈與他的心同證的證據;若沒有,就沒有這樣的證據。因此,要查明我們是否有聖靈的這種見證,途徑就是以誠實而懇切的祈禱,省察這些聖靈的果子是否真實存在於我們心中。若它們存在,證據就是清楚的;若不存在,那麼一切自以為境況良好的虛妄自信、一切的異象、狂喜和想像出來的啟示,都不過是欺人的錯覺。還可以補充說,這些聖靈的果子在人心中的果效,乃是產生一種平靜而屬天的境界;當這種境界伴隨著聖潔生活中聖靈當有的果子時,我們便可以以之為敬虔的證據而喜樂。

我們是神的兒女——即我們已被收納入祂的家。

Originale inglese

The Spirit - The Holy Spirit. That the Holy Spirit here is intended, is evident,

(1) Because this is the natural meaning of the expression;

(2) Because it is of the Holy Spirit that the apostle is mainly treating here;

(3) Because it would be an unnatural and forced construction to say of the temper of adoption that it bore witness.

Beareth witness - Testifies, gives evidence.

With our spirit - To our minds. This pertains to the adoption; and it means that the Holy Spirit furnishes evidence to our minds that we are adopted into the family of God. This effect is not infrequently attributed to the Holy Spirit, 2 Corinthians 1:22; 1 John 5:10-11; 1 Corinthians 2:12. If it be asked how this is done, I answer, it is not by any revelation of new truth; it is not by inspiration; it is not always by assurance; it is not by a mere persuasion that we are elected to eternal life; but it is by producing in us the appropriate effects of his influence. It is his to renew the heart; to sanctify the soul; to produce "love, joy, peace, long-suffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance," Galatians 5:22-23. If a man has these, he has evidence of the witnessing of the Spirit with his spirit. If not, he has no such evidence. And the way, therefore, to ascertain whether we have this witnessing of the Spirit, is by an honest and prayerful inquiry whether these fruits of the Spirit actually exist in our minds. If they do, the evidence is clear. If not, all vain confidence of good estate; all visions, and raptures, and fancied revelations, will be mere delusions. It may be added, that the effect of these fruits of the Spirit an the mind is to produce a calm and heavenly frame; and in that frame, when attended with the appropriate fruits of the Spirit in a holy life, we may rejoice as an evidence of piety.

That we are the children of God - That we are adopted into his family.

17

Romans 8:17

Apri passaggio

既是兒女——即被收養入祂的家。

便是後嗣——意即祂必待我們如兒子。後嗣是承受產業的人。這裡的意思是:我們若與神保持兒子的關係,就必蒙這樣的對待,並被接納來分享祂的恩惠。被收養的兒子可得遺產的一部分 Numbers 27。

神的後嗣——這說法指我們將有分於神賜給祂百姓的產業。那產業在今世是祂的恩惠,在來世是永生。這是無限高於承受地上最君王般的產業、或作地上最顯赫君王之養子的尊榮。

和基督同作後嗣——基督卓越地是「神的兒子」。作為這樣的一位,祂是天上全部尊榮與榮耀的後嗣。基督徒與祂聯合,是祂的朋友,因此被描述為定規要與祂同享祂的榮耀。他們為神的兒女,與祂為神兒子的意義不同:祂是憑祂的本性和崇高的關係,他們則是憑著收養;然而兒子名分的觀念在兩者身上都存在;因此兩者都將有分於那永遠產業的榮耀;比較Philippians 2:8-9;Hebrews 2:9-10。基督與基督徒之間的聯結在新約中屢次提及。他們在這裡與祂聯合這一事實,常被引為他們將同在榮耀裡的理由 John 14:19,「因為我活著,你們也要活著」;2 Timothy 2:11-12,「我們若與基督同死,也必與他同活;我們若能忍耐,也必和他一同作王」;Revelation 3:21,「得勝的,我要賜他在我寶座上與我同坐」等;John 17:22-24。

如果——即這條件若存在。我們若不在今世顯出與祂聯合的憑據,就不會被待為與祂同作後嗣。

和他一同受苦——希臘文作「我們若一同受苦,也必一同得榮耀」。即為祂的緣故受苦;像祂那樣承受患難;因同樣的事受逼迫和試煉;從而顯明我們與祂聯合。這不是說我們受苦到祂所受的程度,而是說我們可以在受苦的種類和忍受受苦的心志上效法祂,從而顯明我們與祂聯合。

也必和他一同得榮耀——若在同一樣的受苦中聯合,那麼在一切受苦景象之外、在福樂與愛的國度裡,在命運上也聯合,乃是合宜的。

Originale inglese

And if children - If adopted into his family.

Then heirs - That is, he will treat us as sons. An heir is one who succeeds to an estate. The meaning here is, that if we sustain the relation of sons to God, that we shall be treated as such, and admitted to share his favors. An adopted son comes in for a part of the inheritance, Numbers 27.

Heirs of God - This expression means that we shall be partakers of that inheritance which God confers on his people. That inheritance is his favor here, and eternal life hereafter. This is an honor infinitely higher than to be heir to the most princely earthly inheritance; or than to be the adopted son of the most magnificent earthly monarch.

And joint heirs with Christ - Christ is by eminence the "Son of God." As such, he is heir to the full honors and glory of heaven. Christians are united to him; they are his friends; and they are thus represented as destined to partake with him of his glory. They are the sons of God in a different sense from what he is; he by his nature and high relation, they by adoption; but still the idea of sonship exists in both; and hence, both will partake in the glories of the eternal inheritance; compare Philippians 2:8-9; Hebrews 2:9-10. The connection between Christ and Christians is often referred to in the New Testament. The fact that they are united here is often alleged as a reason why they will be in glory, John 14:19, "Because I live, ye shall live also," 2 Timothy 2:11-12; "For if we be dead with him, we shall also live with him; if we suffer, we shall also reign with him, Revelation 3:21; "To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne," etc., John 17:22-24.

If so be - If this condition exist; We shall not be treated as co-heirs with him, unless we here give evidence that we are united to him.

That we suffer with him - Greek, "If we suffer together, that we may also be glorified together." If we suffer in his cause; bear afflictions as he did; are persecuted and tried for the same thing; and thus show that we are united to him. It does not mean that we suffer to the same extent that he did, but we may imitate him in the kind of our sufferings, and in the spirit with which they are borne; and thus show that we are united to him.

That we may be also glorified together - If united in the same kind of sufferings, there is propriety in being united in destiny beyond the scenes of all suffering, the kingdom of blessedness and love.

18

Romans 8:18

Apri passaggio

我想——即我認為、我判斷。本節開始主題的一個新分段,延續到 Romans 8:25。其目的是要顯明福音在試煉中扶持心靈的能力;這是整個計劃中一個非常重要而實在的部分。這一點前面已部分提過 Romans 5:3-5,但福音在榮耀不朽的指望中扶持心靈的全部能力,尚未充分討論。這題目在此似乎是由論得兒子名分的話引出的。使徒的心思立即轉到那名分的功效或益處;而那些益處中最重要的一項,就是福音在苦難中所賜那扶持人的恩典。應當記得,早期基督徒為數既少又軟弱,且暴露於許多試煉之中;因此這題目自然常被引入論他們特權和境況的討論中。

苦楚——即患難、逼迫、疾病等。這說法顯然不僅包括當時基督徒特殊的試煉,也包括信徒任何時代受召忍受的一切。

現在的——使徒大概特別想到當時所忍受的種種災禍。但這說法同樣適用於任何時代、任何地方的苦難。

不足介意——即相比較就算不得甚麼;一方遠超過對另一方的補償。

榮耀——即福樂,天上的尊榮。

要顯於我們的——即將向我們顯明的;或我們在天上將有分於的。聖經對天的慣常描述是榮耀、光輝、華美、或光;比較Revelation 21:10、Revelation 21:23-24;Revelation 22:5。基督徒可以靠這個得扶持。他們的苦難看來也許很大;但他們當記得,比起將來的榮耀,這就算不得甚麼。就程度而論,這算不得甚麼:因為比起他們所要「成就」的那「極重無比、永遠的榮耀」,這些算是至輕的 2 Corinthians 4:17。就持久而論,這也算不得甚麼:因為這些苦難不過是片刻的,那榮耀卻是永遠的。這些很快就會過去;那榮耀卻永不黯淡、永不減少;它要增益擴展,直到永永遠遠。

在我們——即向我們(εἰς ἡμᾶς eis hēmas)。

Originale inglese

For I reckon - I think; I judge. This verse commences a new division of the subject, which is continued to Romans 8:25. Its design is to show the power of the gospel in sustaining the soul in trials; a very important; and material part of the scheme. This had been partially noticed before Romans 5:3-5, but its full power to support the soul in the prospect of a glorious immortality had not been fully discussed. This topic seems here to have been suggested by what is said of adoption. The mind of the apostle instantly adverted to the effects or benefits of that adoption; and one of the most material of those benefits was the sustaining grace which the gospel imparted in the midst of afflictions. It should be borne in mind that the early Christians were comparatively few and feeble, and exposed to many trials, and that this topic would be often, therefore, introduced into the discussions about their privileges and condition.

The sufferings - The afflictions; the persecutions, sicknesses, etc. The expression evidently includes not only the special trials of Christians at that time, but all that believers are ever called to endure.

Of this present time - Probably the apostle had particular reference to the various calamities then endured. But the expression is equally applicable to afflictions of all times and in all places.

Are not worthy to be compared - Are nothing in comparison; the one is far more than an equivalent. in compensation for the other.

With the glory - The happiness; the honor in heaven.

Which shall be revealed in us - That shall be disclosed to us; or of which we shall be the partakers in heaven. The usual representation of heaven is that of glory, splendor, magnificence, or light; compare Revelation 21:10, Revelation 21:23-24; Revelation 22:5. By this, therefore, Christians maybe sustained. Their sufferings may seem great; but they should remember that they are nothing in comparison with future glory. They are nothing in degree. For these are light compared with that "eternal weight of glory" which they shall "work out." 2 Corinthians 4:17. They are nothing in duration. For these sufferings are but for a moment; but the glory shall be eternal. These will soon pass away; but that glory shall never become dim or diminished; it will increase and expand forever and ever.

In us - Unto us εἰς ἡμᾶς eis hēmas.

19

Romans 8:19

Apri passaggio

切望——ἀποκαραδοκία apokaradokia。這詞只在此處和 Philippians 1:20 出現,「照著我所切望、所盼望的」等。它本義指把頭伸向前、急欲看見某物時那種熱切渴想的狀態;強烈的焦慮;熱切的願望;因此用它來表達基督徒瞻望自己將來基業時那種熱切的關注,是十分恰當的。

受造之物——τῆς κτίσεως tēs ktiseōs。新約中大概沒有一段經文,比這 Romans 8:19-23 一段更被認為難於解釋;經過批評家們在它上面所下的一切工夫,至今仍沒有一個完全令人滿意、或眾註釋家一致同意的解釋提出來。這裏的目的,是要給出在筆者看來是真義的解釋,而不企圖反駁批評家們的意見。這段經文的主旨,是藉著神眾子將來的拯救和基業的盼望,顯明福音在試煉之中所有的支持力量。這段經文的這個範圍,當在解釋上引導我們。我想,以下就是這解說中的幾個要點:

(1) 「受造之物」一詞指基督徒更新了的性情,或指更新了的基督徒。

(2) 他正等候自己將來的榮耀;就是切望得著作神兒女所等待之榮耀的完全顯明;Romans 8:19。

(3) 他服在試煉與虛空的狀態之下,所得的安慰比較少,煩擾卻多。

(4) 這不合乎他心裏的願望,不是「甘心」的,乃是神智慧的安排;Romans 8:20。

(5) 在這狀態中,有得釋放進入榮耀自由的盼望;Romans 8:21。

(6) 這種事物的狀態不僅存在於基督徒身上,也是世界普遍的狀態。萬物都在嘆息、都在試煉之中,正如基督徒一樣。所以他不當看自己的境遇特別多受試煉。這是這裏萬物共同的分;Romans 8:22。但是,

(7) 惟獨基督徒有得釋放的盼望。向他們提出的是最終蒙拯救、並越過這一切苦難得永恆基業的盼望。所以他們等候兒子名分完全的益處,等候連身體也完全脫離罪的影響和今生的勞苦與試煉;這樣,他們便因盼望而得支持,而這正是使徒心中所想到的論證;Romans 8:23-24。有了這段經文總體範圍的這個看法,我們就可以逐一考查其中的字句。

(關於這段難解的經文,或許最普遍被採納的見解,是把 κτίσις ktisis 解作整個無理性的受造界。按這看法,使徒既已提到那等候基督徒的榮耀,作為現今苦難之下喜樂與安慰的根據,就再藉著把外在世界描繪為有分於這榮耀並等候這榮耀,把我們對它的觀念提得更高。「這解釋切合使徒的用意。保羅的目的不是要證實將來狀態的確定性,而是要使人對其榮耀的性質有強烈的印象。沒有甚麼比整個受造之物等候、切望神兒子榮耀的顯現和祂國度之成全這個宏偉而美麗的比喻,更適合這目的了。」Hodge。原文中交替譯作「creature(受造之物)」和「creation(受造之工)」的,是同一個詞。

而這段經文的意義,在很大程度上繫於這一個詞的意義。一般說來,它指任何受造之物。受造之物的特定種類,單單由上下文決定。當然,無論我們賦予它甚麼意義,都必須貫徹整段經文,因為我們不能設想使徒在同一處使用同一個詞、卻在毫無變更暗示之下而有兩個不同的意思。那麼 κτίσις ktisis 究竟指甚麼?採納上述見解的人主張:它不可能指天使——無論蒙揀選的或墮落的——因為前者從未服在敗壞的轄制之下,後者並不等候神眾子的顯現;它不可能指惡人,因為他們也不熱切仰望這顯現;它更不可能指聖徒或更新了的人,因為這些人在 Romans 8:23 中被明確地分別出來,自成一類;因此,它必須理解為指整個無生命與無理性的受造界。

他們更進一步辯稱,上下文的每一部分都可以與這看法一致地解釋。這段經文被認為展示了稱為擬人法(prosopopoeia)的一個非常大胆而美麗的例子——藉此修辭,無生命之物被賦予生命和感覺;這修辭在聖經中確實十分常見,在這樣多宏偉而高超的內容之中、在這裏遇到它,我們不必驚訝;Joel 1:10、Joel 1:20;Jeremiah 12:4;Isaiah 24:4、Isaiah 24:7。那麼,按著 κτίσις ktisis 的這個解釋,使徒的大意可以這樣表述:整個無理性的受造界都關切神眾子將來的榮耀,並熱切等候它。因為那時咒詛要從土地本身除去,低等動物要得脫壓迫與殘忍。正是這受造界,因人的罪服在咒詛之下,變得「虛妄」,或說在原有的設計上歸於無用,被置於人的邪惡目的與情慾的支配之下。

這服在虛空之下的狀態不是自願的,乃是出於攔阻。可以說,暴力是加諸外在自然的。但這不會一直如此。在這服於虛空之受造界的心中,有著盼望——ὅτι hoti——它必從這轄制得釋放,有分於神兒女榮耀的自由。這描繪或許顯得奇特而罕有,但使徒補充說,「我們知道」確是如此;就是「一切受造之物 πᾶσα ἡ κτίσις pasa hē ktisis」都在其中每一部分嘆息、勞苦。連我們這些神的聖徒、已蒙賜將來福分憑據的人,也感覺到普遍的重壓,在我們自己裏面嘆息,等候得贖的時期——那時連身體也要從墳墓被贖回,被造成與基督榮耀的身體相似。)

受造之物——這裏譯作「creature」的詞 κτίσις ktisis,在新約中出現十九次,用於以下各義:

(1) 創造,即創造的行動;Romans 1:20。

(2) 受造之物,即受造或被形成的東西;宇宙;Mark 10:6;Mark 13:19;2 Peter 3:4;Romans 1:25;Romans 8:39。

(3) 有理性的受造之物,即作為有理性者的真人;人類的世界;Mark 16:15;Colossians 1:23;1 Peter 2:13。

(4) 或許指教會,即集合來看的神的新造;Colossians 1:15;Revelation 3:14。

(5) 基督徒,即個別來看的新造,聖靈在更新了之心上的工作;新人。

在對這段經文所能給予的一切注意之後,我認為這就是此處的意義,理由如下,即:

(1) 因為惟獨這個解釋在我看來既合乎上下文,又能在論證中成立。這詞若照一些解經家所設想的那樣,或指天使,或指人的身體,或指物質的受造界,或指有理性的受造界——人類——就很難看出其中哪一個與論證有何相干。使徒正在論述福音在試煉之時給基督徒的益處;除非解釋字句的正當法則迫使我們不作此解,論證的走向要求我們把這解說理解為論到他們。

(2) 因為「creature」一詞曾被同一位使徒以相似的意思使用。如 2 Corinthians 5:17,「若有人在基督裏,他就是新造的人」καινὴ κτίσις kainē ktisis。Galatians 6:15,「在基督耶穌裏,受割禮不受割禮都無關緊要,要緊的就是作新造的人」。

(3) 因為「創造」這動詞也有這樣的用法。如 Ephesians 2:10,「我們原是他的工作,在基督耶穌裏造成的,為要叫我們行善」。Ephesians 2:15,「以自己的身體廢掉冤仇……為要將兩下藉著自己造成一個新人」:希臘文作「使祂可以將兩下創造 κτίσῃ ktisē 成一個新人」。Ephesians 4:24,「這新人是照著神的形像造的,有真理的仁義和聖潔」等。

(4) 因為聖經作者把基督徒說成一個新造、一個新的受造之物,再沒有比這更自然的了。神在他悔改歸正中所顯的大能,以及創造與賦予屬靈生命之間的強烈相似,自然引致這種語言的用法。

(5) 因為舊約中也有與此相似的語言,把它轉用到新約是自然的。猶太人被描繪為神為自己的事奉所造、所立的民;因此這說法可以用來指那些由祂這樣造成、為祂的事奉而受造的人。Deuteronomy 32:6,「祂不是造了你、建立了你嗎」?Isaiah 43:7,「……凡稱為我名下的人,是我為自己的榮耀創造的,是我做成、所造作的」。Isaiah 43:21,「這百姓是我為自己所造的,好述說我的美德」。從這一切理由看來,在我看來這裏的說法是用來指基督徒、指更新了的人。然而,它的意思在 Romans 8:22 中有所變化。

等候——即期望;不是在擁有的狀態中,而是帶著關注仰望它。

神眾子的顯出——即神兒子之益處的完全顯明;他們被承認、被接入兒子完全特權之中的時候。基督徒在此已有兒子名分的某些憑據。但他們身處一個罪惡的世界;他們暴露在試煉之下;他們遭遇許多災禍;雖然他們在此已有自己是神兒女的憑據,他們卻等候那完全脫離這一切試煉、蒙接入享受至高者兒女一切特權的時期。這事成就的時候,將在審判之日,那時他們要在聚集的宇宙面前被完全承認為祂的兒女。所有基督徒都被描繪為在這種姿態中,等候完全得著他們作神兒女的特權。1 Corinthians 1:7,「等候我們的主耶穌基督顯現」。2 Thessalonians 3:5;Galatians 5:5,「我們靠著聖靈,憑著信,等候所盼望的義」。1 Thessalonians 1:10。

Originale inglese

For the earnest expectation - ἀποκαραδοκία apokaradokia. This word occurs only here and in Philippians 1:20, "According to my earnest expectation and my hope," etc. It properly denotes a state of earnest desire to see any object when the head is thrust forward; an intense anxiety; an ardent wish; and is thus well employed to denote the intense interest with which a Christian looks to his future inheritance.

Of the creature - τῆς κτίσεως tēs ktiseōs." Perhaps there is not a passage in the New Testament that has been deemed more difficult of interpretation than this Romans 8:19-23; and after all the labors bestowed on it by critics, still there is no explanation proposed which is perfectly satisfactory, or in which commentators concur. The object here will be to give what appears to the writer the true meaning, without attempting to controvert the opinions of critics. The main design of the passage is, to show the sustaining power of the gospel in the midst of trials, by the prospect of the future deliverance and inheritance of the sons of God. This scope of the passage is to guide us in the interpretation. The following are, I suppose, the leading points in the illustration.

(1) the word "creature" refers to the renewed nature of the Christian, or to the Christian as renewed.

(2) he is waiting for his future glory; that is, desirous of obtaining the full development of the honors that await him as the child of God; Romans 8:19.

(3) he is subjected to a state of trial and vanity, affording comparatively little comfort and much disquietude.

(4) this is not in accordance with the desire of his heart, "not willingly," but is the wise appointment of God; Romans 8:20.

(5) in this state there is the hope of deliverance into glorious liberty; Romans 8:21.

(6) this condition of things does not exist merely in regard to the Christian, but is the common condition of the world. It all groans, and is in trial, as much as the Christian. He therefore should not deem his condition as especially trying. It is the common lot of all things here; Romans 8:22, But,

(7) Christians only have the prospect of deliverance. To them is held out the hope of final rescue, and of an eternal inheritance beyond all these sufferings. They wait, therefore, for the full benefits of the adoption; the complete recovery even of the body from the effects of sin, and the toils and trials of this live; and thus they are sustained by hope, which is the argument which the apostle has in view; Romans 8:23-24. With this view of the general scope of the passage, we may examine the particular phrases.

(The opinion which is perhaps most generally adopted of this difficult passage, is what explains κτίσις ktisis of the whole irrational creation. According to this view, the apostle, having adverted to the glory that awaited the Christian, as a ground of joy and comfort under present sufferings, exalts our idea of it still higher by representing the external world as participating in, and waiting for it. "This interpretation is suitable to the design of the apostle. Paul's object is not to confirm the certainty of a future state, but to produce a strong impression of its glorious character. Nothing could be better adapted to this object, than the grand and beautiful figure of the whole creation waiting and longing for the glorious revelation of the Son of God, and the consummation of his kingdom." Hodge. In the original it is the same word that is rendered alternately "creature" and "creation."

And the meaning of the passage depends, in great measure, on the sense of this single word. Generally speaking, it signifies anything created. The particular kind of creation is determined by the context alone. Of course, whatever sense we may attach to it, must be continued throughout the whole passage, as we cannot suppose the apostle uses the same word in two different senses, in one place, without any intimation of the change. To what then does κτίσις ktisis refer? It is maintained by those who adopt the view noticed above, that it cannot refer to angels, either elect or fallen, since the former have never been subject to the bondage of corruption, and the latter are not waiting for the manifestation of the sons of God; that it cannot allude to wicked people, for neither do they anxiously look out for this manifestation; that it can no more refer to saints or renewed people, since these are expressly distinguished as a separate class in Romans 8:23; and that, therefore, it must be understood of the whole manimate and irrational creation.

It is further argued, that every part of the context may be explained consistently with this view. The passage is supposed to present a very bold and beautiful instance of the figure called prosopopoeia, by which things inanimate are invested with life and feeling, a figure which is indeed very common in Scripture, and which we need not be surprised to find in this place, amid so much that is grand and elevating; Joel 1:10, Joel 1:20; Jeremiah 12:4; Isaiah 24:4, Isaiah 24:7. According to this interpretation of κτίσις ktisis then, the general sense of the apostle may be thus given. The whole irrational creation is interested in the future glory of the sons of God, and is anxiously waiting for it. For then the curse will be removed from the very ground, and the lower animals relieved from oppression and cruelty. The very creation, on account of the sin of man, has been subjected to the curse, and has become "vain" or useless in regard to the original design of it, having been made subservient to the evil purposes and passions of man.

This state of subjection to vanity is not willing, but by restraint. Violence is imposed, as it were, on external nature. But this shall not continue. There is hope in the heart of the subject world, that ὅτι hoti it shall be delivered from this bondage, and participate in the liberty of the children of God. This representation may seem strange and unusual, but "we know" certainly, adds the apostle, that it is so; that "the whole creation πᾶσα ἡ κτίσις pasa hē ktisis, groaneth and travaileth in pain throughout every part. Even we, who are saints of God, and have been favored with the earnests of future bliss, feel the general oppression, and groan within ourselves, while we wait for the period of deliverance, in which the very body shall be ransomed from the grave and fashioned like unto Christ's glorious body.)

Of the creature - The word here rendered "creature" κτίσις ktisis, occurs in the New Testament nineteen times, and is used in the following senses:

(1) Creation; the act of creating; Romans 1:20,

(2) The creature; what is created or formed; the universe; Mark 10:6; Mark 13:19; 2 Peter 3:4; Romans 1:25; Romans 8:39.

(3) the rational creation; man as a rational being; the world of mankind; Mark 16:15; Colossians 1:23; 1 Peter 2:13.

(4) perhaps the church, the new creation of God taken collectively; Colossians 1:15; Revelation 3:14.

(5) the Christian, the new creation, regarded individually; the work of the Holy Spirit on the renewed heart; the new man.

After all the attention which I can give to this passage, I regard this to be the meaning here, for the following reasons, namely.

(1) because this alone seems to me to suit the connection, and to make sense in the argument. If the word refers, as has been supposed by different interpreters; either to angels, or to the bodies of people, or to the material creation, or to the rational creation - to people (mankind); it is difficult to see what connection either would have with the argument. The apostle is discoursing of the benefits of the gospel to Christians in time of trial; and the bearing of the argument requires us to understand this illustration of them, unless we are compelled not to understand it thus by the proper laws of interpreting words.

(2) the word "creature" is used in a similar sense by the same apostle. Thus, 2 Corinthians 5:17, "If any man be in Christ, he is a new creature" καινὴ κτίσις kainē ktisis. Galatians 6:15, "for in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature."

(3) the verb create is thus used. Thus, Ephesians 2:10, "For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works." Ephesians 2:15, "having abolished in his flesh the enmity ...for to make in himself of twain one new man:" Greek, "That he might create κτίσῃ ktisē the two into one newman." Ephesians 4:24, "the new man, which is created in righteousness," etc.

(4) nothing was more natural than for the sacred writers thus to speak of a Christian as a new creation, a new creature. The great power of God involved in his conversion, and the strong resemblance between the creation and imparting spiritual life, led naturally to this use of the language.

(5) language similar to this occurs in the Old Testament, and it was natural to transfer it to the New. The Jewish people were represented as made or created by God for his service, and the phrase, therefore, might come to designate those who were thus formed by him to his service. Deuteronomy 32:6, "hath he not made thee, and established thee?" Isaiah 43:7, " ... Everyone that is called by my name; for I have created him for my glory, I have formed him; yea, I have made him." Isaiah 43:21, "this people have I formed for myself." From all which reasons, it seems to me that the expression here is used to denote Christians, renewed people. Its meaning, however, is varied in Romans 8:22.

Waiteth for - Expects; is not in a state of possession, but is looking for it with interest.

The manifestation of the sons of God - The full development of the benefits of the sons of God; the time when they shall be acknowledged, and received into the full privileges of sons. Here Christians have some evidence of their adoption. But they are in a world of sin; they are exposed to trials; they are subject to many calamities; and though they have evidence here that they are the sons of God, yet they wait for that period when they shall be fully delivered from all these trials, and be admitted to the enjoyment of all the privileges of the children of the Most High. The time when this shall take place will be at the day of Judgment, when they shall be fully acknowledged in the presence of an assembled universe as his children. All Christians are represented as in this posture of waiting for the full possession of their privileges as the children of God. 1 Corinthians 1:7, "waiting for the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ." 2 Thessalonians 3:5; Galatians 5:5, "for we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith." 1 Thessalonians 1:10.

20

Romans 8:20

Apri passaggio

因為受造之物——指更新了的受造之物;基督徒的心。這是它渴慕得著兒子名分完全特權的理由:現今的狀態不是出於選擇、不是它所偏好的狀態,而是神因智慧的理由使它服在其下的狀態。

服在虛空之下——「服在」一詞意思是處於這樣的狀態;是因他人的安排而服於其下,正如士兵在軍隊中被指派了等級和崗位。這裏的「虛空」一詞 ματαιότης mataiotēs,描寫基督徒現今的景況——軟弱而垂死;暴露於試煉、試探和憂慮之中;身處爭戰之中,身處一個可以斷然稱為虛空的世界之中。基督徒或多或少都被帶進這影響之下;他的喜樂被損毀;他的平安被攪擾;他的情感流離;他的一生是虛空與煩擾的一生。

不是自己願意——不是自願的。這不是出於選擇。這不合乎他更新了的性情。那性情的企望是完全的聖潔與平安。但這服屬是與之相逆的,是他渴望得脫的。這所描述的,實質上與 Romans 7:15-24 所描寫的是同一狀態。

乃是因——因那一位 διά dia。這是神的安排;祂選擇把祂的子民安置在這景況中,並為智慧的目的把他們留在其中。

那叫他如此的——就是那指派祂的子民進入這景況的。這是祂智慧的安排。在此我們可以觀察到:

(1) 基督徒出於本能的情感,引他們渴慕一個更純潔、更幸福的世界,Philippians 1:23。

(2) 服於今生的勞苦、這世界的試探和虛空之下,不是他們所願意的。他們嘆息求拯救。

(3) 他們一生的際遇、他們之服在這虛空的狀態下,乃是神的安排。為何如此,祂沒有認為該完全告訴我們。祂本可以在祂的子民一歸正時就把他們接上天去。雖然我們不知道他們為何被留在此虛空狀態中的全部理由,我們卻能看見其中幾個:

(a) 基督徒被置於這狀態中,是要向同為罪人的同伴行善。他們留在地上正是為此目的;這也當是他們的首要目標。

(b) 藉著他們留在此地,福音的能力得著顯明——勝過他們的罪、面對他們的試探、在試煉中扶持他們,並由此向世界提供那福音之能力與卓越的活證據。他們若立刻被接升天,這就不能成就了。

(c) 它為一些動人的品格表現提供機會——盼望、信心、愛心,以及不斷增長、漸進的卓越。

(d) 這是為上天所作的合宜訓練。它顯明基督徒的品格,並使之配得上諸天。基督徒在進入他最終安息的狀態以先,被置於一個勝過罪惡、生發對神之信靠的訓練過程中,這裏面可能有不勝估量的益處,是我們未必都看得見的。

(e) 他在這裏從事於那救贖他者的服事,是合宜而正當的。他既由基督的血所買贖,神在他今生可能服於其下的一切爭戰與勞苦、一切作工與服事上,對他都有最高的主權。

在指望中——見 Romans 5:4 的註釋。盼望是指向將來的;基督徒在這狀態中嘆息求拯救,並期待它。

Originale inglese

For the creature - The renewed creature; the Christian mind. This is given as a reason for its aspiring to the full privileges of adoption, that the present state is not one of choice, or one which is preferred, but one to which it has been subjected for wise reasons by God.

Subject to vanity - The word "subject to" means placed in such a state; subjected to it by the appointment of another, as a soldier has his rank and place assigned him in an army. The word "vanity" here ματαιότης mataiotēs is descriptive of the present condition of the Christian, as frail and dying; as exposed to trials, temptations, and cares; as in the midst of conflicts, and of a world which may be emphatically pronounced vanity. More or less, the Christian is brought under this influence; his joys are marred; his peace is discomposed; his affections wander; his life is a life of vanity and vexation.

Not willingly - Not voluntarily. It is not a matter of choice. It is not what is congenial to his renewed nature. That would aspire to perfect holiness and peace. But this subjection is one that is contrary to it, and from which he desires to be delivered. This describes substantially the same condition as Romans 7:15-24.

But by reason - By him διά dia. It is the appointment of God, who has chosen to place his people in this condition; and who for wise purposes retains them in it.

Who hath subjected the same - Who has appointed his people to this condition. It is his wise arrangement. Here we may observe,

(1) That the instinctive feelings of Christians lead them to desire a purer and a happier world, Philippians 1:23.

(2) that it is not what they desire, to be subjected to the toils of this life, and to the temptations and vanities of this world. They sigh for deliverance.

(3) their lot in life; their being subjected to this state of vanity, is the arrangement of God. Why it is, he has not seen fit to inform us fully. He might have taken his people at once to heaven as soon as they are converted. But though we know not all the reasons why they are continued here in this state of vanity, we can see some of them:

(a) Christians are subjected to this state to do good to their fellow sinners. They remain on earth for this purpose: and this should be their leading aim.

(b) By their remaining here the power of the gospel is shown in overcoming their sin; in meeting their temptations; in sustaining them in trial; and in thus furnishing living evidence to the world of the power and excellency of that gospel. This could not be attained if they were removed at once to heaven.

(c) It furnishes occasion for some interesting exhibitions of character - for hope, and faith, and love, and for increasing and progressive excellence.

(d) It is a proper training for heaven. It brings out the Christian character, and fits it for the skies. There may be inestimable advantages, all of which we may not see, in subjecting the Christian to a process of training in overcoming his sins, and in producing confidence in God, before he is admitted to his state of final rest.

(e) It is fit and proper that he should engage here in the service of Him who has redeemed him. He has been ransomed by the blood of Christ, and God has the highest claim on him in all the conflicts and toils, in all the labors and services to which he may be subjected in this life.

In hope - See the note at Romans 5:4. Hope has reference to the future; and in this state of the Christian, he sighs for deliverance, and expects it.

21

Romans 8:21

Apri passaggio

因為——這是他盼望的根據,也是如今扶持他的。神的旨意既是要賜下拯救,這就支撐著基督徒忍受他在此所受的試煉。這盼望就是:這同一個得了更新的人,必蒙拯救脫離今世的一切勞苦、憂慮與罪惡。

受造之物本身——即那得了更新的靈魂本身;是蒙了救贖的人,而無本質的改變。他仍將是同一個存在,只是得了潔淨;是同一個人,仍有同樣的身體與靈魂,只是脫離了人性的一切敗壞,被提升到現今景況的一切卑屈之上。處處呈現的觀念都是:這同一的位格,必無本質改變地被接進天國,1 Corinthians 15:35-38, 1 Corinthians 15:42-44。這是所有基督徒的盼望;見 2 Peter 3:13。

脫離敗壞的轄制——這與 Romans 8:20 的「虛空」並無實質差別。它暗示這狀態不是自願的狀態,不是出於選擇的景況,而是轄制或奴役的景況(見 Romans 7:15-24);並且它是敗壞的、不完全的、必朽壞的景況。這是導致罪、試探、爭戰與焦慮的景況。這景況常毀壞基督徒的平安、損毀他的福樂、暗淡他的盼望、削弱他的信心、使他的愛心衰弱,這就叫作敗壞的轄制。它也是身體之死掌權的景況;信徒與不信者一樣,都要被拘在這轄制之下。然而,神的兒女必蒙拯救脫離這一切的轄制。

神兒女自由的榮耀——希臘文作「神兒女榮耀的自由」。這自由是:

(1) 「自由」。這是脫離基督徒所歎息之轄制的自由。它將是脫離罪、脫離敗壞、脫離邪惡私慾、脫離災禍、脫離死的自由。宇宙中最高的「自由」,是在天上享受的那自由;得贖的人在那裏服在他們君王的主權與治理之下,卻行他們所願的,且只行他們所願的。除了事奉神,一切都是奴役;除了那與心靈至高意願相合、其命令與心中完全意願一致的法以外,一切都是轄制。

(2) 這是榮耀的自由。它以威嚴環繞,伴有尊榮,戴上光輝的冠冕。天上的世界常被描寫為榮耀的狀態;見 Romans 2:10 的註釋。

神兒女的——即神的兒女所要享受的。

Originale inglese

Because - This is the ground of his hope, and this sustains him now. It is the purpose of God that deliverance shall be granted, and this supports the Christian amidst the trials to which he is subjected here. The hope is, that this same renewed man shall be delivered from all the toils, and cares, and sins of this state.

The creature itself - The very soul that is renewed; the ransomed man without essential change. It will be the same being, though purified; the same man, possessed of the same body and soul, though freed from all the corruptions of humanity, and elevated above all the degradations of the present condition. The idea is everywhere presented, that the identical person shall be admitted to heaven without essential change, 1 Corinthians 15:35-38, 1 Corinthians 15:42-44. That this is the hope of all Christians, see 2 Peter 3:13.

From the bondage of corruption - This does not differ materially from "vanity," Romans 8:20. It implies that this state is not a willing state, or not a condition of choice, but is one of bondage or servitude (see Romans 7:15-24); and that it is a corrupt, imperfect, perishing condition. It is one that leads to sin, and temptation, and conflict and anxiety. It is a condition often which destroys the peace, mars the happiness, dims the hope, enfeebles the faith, and weakens the love of Christians, and this is called the bondage of corruption. It is also one in which temporal death has dominion, and in the bondage of which, believers as well as unbelievers shall be held. Yet from all this bondage the children of God shall be delivered.

The glorious liberty - Greek, The freedom of the glory of the children of God. This is,

(1) "Liberty." It is freedom from the bondage under which the Christian groans. It will be freedom from sin; from corruption; from evil desires; from calamity; from death. The highest "freedom "in the universe is that which is enjoyed in heaven, where the redeemed are under the sovereignty and government of their king, but where they do that, and that only, which they desire. All is slavery but the service of God; all is bondage but that law which accords with the supreme wish of the soul, and where commands accord with the perfect desires of the heart.

(2) this is glorious liberty. It is encompassed with majesty; attended with honor; crowned with splendor. The heavenly world is often described as a state of glory; Note, Romans 2:10.

Of the children of God - That the children of God shall enjoy.

22

Romans 8:22

Apri passaggio

我們知道——這一節的思想,是要說明剛才所說的話。

一切受造之物——邊註作「每一受造之物」。這說法通常被理解為與 Romans 8:20-21 的「受造之物」同義。但我認為它另有意義,是按「受造之物」或「創造」一詞自然而慣常的意義使用的。據我推想,它是指整個有生命的創造;指一切活物;指此間一切受造之物的景況——處於痛苦、混亂、歎息與死亡的狀態。我們所見的一切;每一活著的受造之物,都這樣服在奴役、痛苦、虛空與死亡的狀態之下。認為這是真解釋的理由是:

(1) 使徒明說「整個創造、每一受造之物」,並以「我們知道」一語限定這說法,彷彿他是在從一個眾所周知、普世公認的事實引出例證。

(2) 這解釋使全節有一貫的意義,並使這節與論證直接相關。「這正是從類比而來的論證。」

他已在 Romans 8:20-21 說過,基督徒的景況是轄制與奴役的景況。那是不完全、卑微的狀態;是伴有痛苦、憂傷與死亡的狀態。這或許被看為一幅憂鬱的圖畫,於是可能有人要問:基督徒為何不立刻蒙拯救脫離這景況?答案就在這一節。「這正是一切事物的景況。」這是神治理世界的明顯原則。整個創造正處於這樣的景況;因此,這若是信徒的景況,我們也不必驚訝。這是萬有普遍體系的一部分;它與我們所見的一切相符;教會既按同一施政的原則存在——處於轄制、不完全、憂傷與渴求得釋放的歎息之中——我們也不必驚訝。

歎息——希臘文作「一同歎息」。萬有都聯合在憂傷的狀態中。這說法表達相互而普遍的悲苦。這是一場廣大而響亮的哀號,一個垂死的世界在其中聯合;並且它「直到如今」一直在其中聯合。

一同勞苦——這說法本指分娩的極痛。它也指任何劇烈的苦楚、極度的受苦;它在這裏的意思是:萬有的景況一直處於劇烈、共同而持續的受苦之中;換言之,我們是在一個悲苦與死亡的世界裏。這受苦是共同的:萬物都有分;是劇烈的:萬物忍受極多;是不間斷的:每個時代都經歷同樣的事重複發生。

直到如今——直到使徒寫作的時候。自他寫作以來的各時代,這也同樣真實。這是每個時代的特徵。值得注意的是,使徒在此並沒有說「整個創造」有任何得釋放的盼望;這是表明上述解釋正確的另一個考量,Romans 8:20-21, Romans 8:23。論到那歎息受苦的宇宙,他沒有說到它將來的景況。他沒有說受苦的獸類創造將得補償、將得復元或復起。他只是提到它受苦這一事實,作為例證,說明基督徒的景況並非奇特例外。聖經對獸類創造將來的景況無所啟示。

Originale inglese

For we know - The sentiment of this verse is designed as an illustration of what had just been said.

That the whole creation - Margin, "every creature." This expression has been commonly understood as meaning the same as "the creature" in Romans 8:20-21. But I understand it as having a different signification; and as being used in the natural and usual signification of the word "creature," or "creation." It refers, as I suppose, to the whole animate creation; to all living beings; to the state of all created things here, as in a condition of pain and disorder, and groaning and death. Everything which we see; every creature which lives, is thus subjected to a state of servitude, pain, vanity, and death. The reasons for supposing that this is the true interpretation, are,

(1) That the apostle expressly speaks of "the whole creation, of every creature, qualifying the phrase by the expression "we know," as if he was drawing an illustration from a well-understood, universal fact.

(2) this interpretation makes consistent sense, and makes the verse have a direct bearing on the argument. "It is just an argument from analogy."

He had Romans 8:20-21 said that the condition of a Christian was one of bondage and servitude. It was an imperfect, humiliating state; one attended with pain, sorrow, and death. This might be regarded as a melancholy description, and the question might arise, why was not the Christian at once delivered from this? The answer is in this verse. "It is just the condition of everything." It is the manifest principle on which God governs the world. The whole creation is in just this condition; and we are not to be surprised, therefore, if it is the condition of the believer. It is a part of the universal system of things; it accords with everything we see; and we are not to be surprised that the church exists on the same principle of administration; in a state of bondage, imperfection, sorrow, and sighing for deliverance.

Groaneth - Greek, Groans together. All is united in a condition of sorrow. The expression denotes mutual and universal grief. It is one wide and loud lamentation, in which a dying world unites; and in which it has united "until now."

And travaileth in pain together - This expression properly denotes the extreme pain of parturition. It also denotes any intense agony, or extreme suffering; and it means here that the condition of all things has been that of intense, united, and continued suffering; in other words, that we are in a world of misery and death. This has been united; all have partaken of it: it has been intense; all endure much: it has been unremitted; every age has experienced the repetition of the same thing.

Until now - Until the time when the apostle wrote. It is equally true of the time since he wrote. It has been the characteristic of every age. It is remarkable that the apostle does not here say of "the whole creation," that it had any hope of deliverance; an additional consideration that shows that the interpretation above suggested is correct, Romans 8:20-21, Romans 8:23. Of the sighing and suffering universe, he says nothing with respect to its future state. He does not say that the suffering brutal creation shall be compensated, or shall be restored or raised up. He simply adverts to the fact that it suffers, as an illustration that the condition of the Christian is not singular and special. The Scriptures say nothing of the future condition of the brutal creation.

23

Romans 8:23

Apri passaggio

不但是他們——不但是一般的受造之物。「也是我們自己」,即基督徒。

有聖靈初結果子的——這裏所用的詞 ἀπαρχὴ aparchē,本指收成的初熟果子,就是最先收下、作為感恩的祭獻給神的那一份,Deuteronomy 26:2;Exodus 23:19;Numbers 18:13。因此,這詞指時間上最先的。據我推想,它在這裏的意思是:保羅所說的基督徒已經領受了聖靈最初的感化,或是最早領受祂感化的人之一。聖靈奉差降下,伴隨福音的傳講;而他們是最早領受這些感化的人。然而,也有人把這詞理解為將來喜樂的憑據、定金或預嘗。這觀念之所以連於這詞,是因為收成的初熟果子是豐收的憑據、成熟的記號等。但這詞在新約中似乎沒有這種用法。它出現之處僅有下列經文:Romans 8:23;Romans 11:16;Romans 16:5;1 Corinthians 15:20, 1 Corinthians 15:23;1 Corinthians 16:15;James 1:18;Revelation 14:4。

自己心裏歎息——我們為得釋放而歎息。這說法表達強烈的內心渴望;表達心受重壓、懇切企盼救助時靈裏的深切苦楚。

等候得著兒子的名分——即等候兒子名分的完全福分。基督徒在悔改歸正時即被收納(Romans 8:15),但尚未得著進入神家中兒子名分之一切特權。他們歸正時的收納是隱秘的,當時世人未必知道。收納的豐滿——他們完全得享神眾子特權——將在審判之日、在宇宙面前、在萬物最終完結的榮耀中臨到。這收納與起初的並無不同,乃是罪人被接進神家中那恩典作為的完成。

乃是我們的身體得贖——身體徹底脫離死亡與朽壞。審判之日收納之獨特而顯著的作為,將是身體從墳墓復起,成為不朽而永遠蒙福的身體。在這世上,收納的特別果效顯於靈魂;在末日,它的完成將特別顯於身體;這樣,整個人便得進神的恩寵,脫離他一切的罪與墮落的一切惡果。使徒在此說的是每一個基督徒的話語。基督徒有世人不知道的喜樂;但他也有憂傷;他為自己的敗壞歎息;他身在災禍之中;他正走向墳墓;他仰望那完全的拯救、那高升的狀態——那時,在聚集的宇宙面前,他必被承認為神的兒女。這高升的特權賦予基督教崇高的價值;在宇宙面前被承認為神兒女的盼望——最貧窮、最卑微之信徒的盼望——其價值無限超過最王侯的產業,或君王所戴過的最璀璨的冠冕。

Originale inglese

And not only they - Not only the creation in general. "But ourselves also." Christians.

Which have the first-fruits of the Spirit - The word used ἀπαρχὴ aparchē denotes properly the first-fruits of the harvest, the portion that was first collected and consecrated to God as an offering of gratitude, Deuteronomy 26:2; Exodus 23:19; Numbers 18:13. Hence, the word means what is first in order of time. Here it means, as I suppose, that the Christians of whom Paul was speaking had partaken of the first influences of the Spirit, or had been among the first partakers of his influences in converting sinners. The Spirit had been sent down to attend the preaching of the gospel, and they were among the first who had partaken of those influences. Some, however, have understood the word to mean a pledge, or earnest, or foretaste of joys to come. This idea has been attached to the word because the first-fruits of the harvest were a pledge of the harvest, an evidence that it was ripe, etc. But the word does not seem to be used in this sense in the New Testament. The only places where it occurs are the following; Romans 8:23; Romans 11:16; Romans 16:5; 1 Corinthians 15:20, 1 Corinthians 15:23; 1 Corinthians 16:15; James 1:18; Revelation 14:4.

Groan within ourselves - We sigh for deliverance. The expression denotes strong internal desire; the deep anguish of spirit when the heart is oppressed with anguish, and earnestly wishes for succor.

Waiting for the adoption - Waiting for the full blessings of the adoption. Christians are adopted when they are converted Romans 8:15, but they have not been yet admitted to the full privileges of their adoption into the family of God. Their adoption when they are converted is secret, and may at the time be unknown to the world. The fullness of the adoption, their complete admission to the privileges of the sons of God, shall be in the day of judgment, in the presence of the universe, and amidst the glories of the final consummation of all things. This adoption is not different from the first, but is the completion of the act of grace when a sinner is received into the family of God.

The redemption of the body - The complete recovery of the body from death and corruption. The particular and striking act of the adoption in the day of judgment will be the raising up of the body from the grave, and rendering it immortal and eternally blessed. The particular effects of the adoption in this world are on the soul. The completion of it on the last day will be seen particularly in the body; and thus the entire man shall be admitted into the favor of God, and restored from all his sins and all the evil consequences of the fall. The apostle here speaks the language of every Christian. The Christian has joys which the world does not know; but he has also sorrows; he sighs over his corruption; he is in the midst of calamity; he is going to the grave; and he looks forward to that complete deliverance, and to that elevated state, when, in the presence of an assembled universe, he shall be acknowledged as a child of God. This elevated privilege gives to Christianity its high value; and the hope of being acknowledged in the presence of the universe as the child of God - the hope of the poorest and the humblest believer - is of infinitely mere value than the prospect of the most princely inheritance, or of the brightest crown that a monarch ever wore.

24

Romans 8:24

Apri passaggio

我們得救是在乎盼望——不能說盼望是拯救的工具或條件。大多數註釋家把這話理解為:我們至今只在盼望中得著救恩;我們只是到達了一種盼望將來榮耀的狀態;我們正處於等候將來得兒子名分的姿態之中。但「得救」一詞在此或僅僅意為:我們在試煉中蒙保守、蒙護佑、蒙扶持,是靠盼望。我們的試煉如此沉重,若不是指望將來的拯救,沒有甚麼能支持我們;而這指望足以使我們忍耐承受。這正是「救」一詞的正當含義,新約中常這樣使用;見 Matthew 8:25;Matthew 16:25;Mark 3:4;Mark 8:35。敘利亞譯本作「我們靠盼望而活」。亞拉伯譯本作「我們靠盼望蒙保守」。盼望就這樣在試煉中扶持人的靈,使他能毫無怨言地忍受。

只是所見的盼望不是盼望——盼望是一種複合的情感,由懇切的願望與對獲得某對象的期待組成。因此,它關乎現今所未見的。但當對象已經看見、已在我們手中,就不能說它是盼望的對象了。這裏的「盼望」一詞指盼望的對象,即所盼望的事。

人所看見的——「看見」一詞在此取擁有、享受之意。人已經擁有的,就不能說是他所盼望的。

為甚麼還——即「怎麼還」。人實際已經擁有的,怎麼還能帶著期待向前仰望呢?

Originale inglese

For we are saved by hope - It cannot be said that hope is the instrument or condition of salvation. Most commentators have understood this as meaning that we have as yet attained salvation only in hope; that we have arrived only to a condition in which we hope for future glory; and that we are in an attitude of waiting for the future state of adoption. But perhaps the word "saved" may mean here simply, we are kept, preserved, sustained in our trials, by hope. Our trials are so great that nothing but the prospect of future deliverance would uphold us; and the prospect is sufficient to enable us to bear them with patience. This is the proper meaning of the word "save"; and it is often thus used in the New Testament; see Matthew 8:25; Matthew 16:25; Mark 3:4; Mark 8:35. The Syriac renders this, "For by hope we live." The Arabic, "We are preserved by hope." Hope thus sustains the soul in the midst of trims, and enables it to bear them without a complaint.

But hope that is seen - Hope is a complex emotion, made up of an earnest desire, and an expectation of obtaining an object. It has reference, therefore, to what is at present unseen. But when the object is seen, and is in our possession, it cannot be said to be an object of hope. The Word hope here means the object of hope, the thing hoped for.

What a man seeth - The word "seeth" is used here in the sense of possessing, or enjoying. What a man already possesses, he cannot be said to hope for.

Why - How. What a man actually possesses, how can he look forward to it with anticipation?

25

Traduzione in sospeso · Originale inglese

Romans 8:25

Apri passaggio

But if we hope ... - The effect here stated is one which exists everywhere. Where there is a strong desire for an object, and a corresponding expectation of obtaining it - which constitutes true hope - then we can wait for it with patience. Where there is a strong desire without a corresponding expectation of obtaining it, there is impatience. As the Christian has a strong desire of future glory, and as he has an expectation of obtaining it just in proportion to that desire, it follows that he may bear trials and persecutions patiently in the hope of his future deliverance. Compared with our future glory, our present sufferings are light, and but for a moment; 2 Corinthians 4:17. In the hope of that blessed eternity which is before him, the Christian can endure the severest trial, and bear the intensest pain without a complaint.

26

Traduzione in sospeso · Originale inglese

Romans 8:26

Apri passaggio

Likewise the Spirit - This introduces a new source of consolation and support, what is derived from the Spirit. It is a continuation of the argument of the apostle, to show the sustaining power of the Christian religion. The "Spirit" here undoubtedly refers to the Holy Spirit, who dwells in us, and who strengthens us.

Helpeth - This word properly means, to sustain with us; to aid us in supporting. It is applied usually to those who unite in supporting or carrying a burden. The meaning may be thus expressed: "he greatly assists or aids us."

Our infirmities - Assists us in our infirmities, or aids us to bear them. The word "infirmities" refers to the weaknesses to which we are subject, and to our various trials in this life. The Spirit helps us in this,

(1) By giving us strength to bear them;

(2) By exciting us to make efforts to sustain them;

(3) By ministering to us consolations, and truths, and views of our Christian privileges, that enable us to endure our trials.

For we know not ... - This is a specification of the aid which the Holy Spirit, renders us. The reasons why Christians do not know what to pray for may be,

(1) That they do not know what would be really best for them.

(2) they do not know what God might be willing to grant them.

(3) they are to a great extent ignorant of the character of God, the reason of his dealings, the principles of his government, and their own real needs.

(4) they are often in real, deep perplexity. They are encompassed with trials, exposed to temptations, feeble by disease, and subject to calamities. In these circumstances, if left alone, they would neither be able to bear their trials, nor know what to ask at the hand of God.

But the Spirit itself - The Holy Spirit; Romans 8:9-11.

Maketh intercession - The word used here ὑπερεντυνγχάνει huperentungchanei, occurs no where else in the New Testament. The word ἐντυνγχάνω entungchanō, however, is used several times. It means properly to be present with anyone for the purpose of aiding, as an advocate does in a court of justice; hence, to intercede for anyone, or to aid or assist in any manner. In this place it simply means that the Holy Spirit greatly assists or aids us; not by praying for us, but in our prayers and infirmities.

With groanings - With sighs, or that deep feeling and intense anxiety which exists in the oppressed and burdened heart of the Christian.

Which cannot be uttered - Or rather, perhaps, which is not uttered; those emotions which are too deep for utterance, or for expression in articulate language. This does not mean that the Spirit produces these groanings; but that in these deep-felt emotions, when the soul is oppressed and overwhelmed, he lends us his assistance and sustains us. The phrase may be thus translated: "The Spirit greatly aids or supports us in those deep emotions, those intense feelings, those inward sighs which cannot be expressed in language, but which he enables us to bear, and which are understood by Him that searcheth the hearts."

27

Traduzione in sospeso · Originale inglese

Romans 8:27

Apri passaggio

And he that searcheth the hearts - God. To search the heart is one of his attributes which cannot be communicated to a creature; Jeremiah 17:10.

Knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit - Knows the desires which the Holy Spirit excites and produces in the heart. He does not need that those deep emotions should be expressed in words; he does not need the eloquence of language to induce him to hear; but he sees the anxious feelings of the soul, and is ready to aid and to bless.

Maketh intercession for the saints - Aids and directs Christians.

According to the will of God - Greek, "According to God." It is according to his will in the following respects:

(1) The Spirit is given according to his will. It is his gracious purpose to grant his aid to all who truly love him.

(2) the desires which he excites in the heart of the Christian are those which are according to his will; they are such as God wishes to exist; the contrite, humble, and penitent pleading of sinners for mercy.

(3) he superintends and guards Christians in their prayers.

It is not meant that they are infallible, or that they never make an improper petition, or have an improper desire; but that he has a general superintendence over their minds, and that so far as they will yield themselves to his direction, they shall not be led into error That man is most safe who yields himself most entirely to the influence of the Holy Spirit. And the doctrine here stated is one that is full of consolation to the Christian. We are poor, and needy, and ignorant, and blind; we are the creatures of a day, and are crushed before the moth. But in the midst of our feebleness we may look to God for the aid of his Spirit, and rejoice in his presence, and in his power to sustain us in our sighings, and to guide us in our wanderings.

28

Traduzione in sospeso · Originale inglese

Romans 8:28

Apri passaggio

And we know - This verse introduces another source of consolation and support, drawn from the fact that all flyings are under the direction of an infinitely wise Being, who has purposed the salvation of the Christian, and who has so appointed all things that they shall contribute to it.

All things - All our afflictions and trials; all the persecutions and calamities to which we are exposed. Though they are numerous and long-continued yet they are among the means that are appointed for our welfare.

Work together for good - They shall cooperate; they shall mutually contribute to our good. They take off our affections from this world; they teach us the truth about our frail, transitory, and lying condition; they lead us to look to God for support, and to heaven for a final home; and they produce a subdued spirit. a humble temper, a patient, tender, and kind disposition. This has been the experience of all saints; and at the end of life they have been able to say it was good for them to be afflicted; Psalm 119:67, Psalm 119:71; Jeremiah 31:18-19; Hebrews 12:11.

For good - For our real welfare; for the promotion of true piety, peace, and happiness in our hearts.

To them that love God - This is a characteristic of true piety. To them, afflictions are a blessing. To others, they often prove otherwise. On others they are sent as chastisements; and they produce complaining, instead of peace; rebellion, instead of submission; and anger, impatience, and hatred, instead of calmness, patience, and love. The Christian is made a better man by receiving afflictions as they should be received, and by desiring that they should accomplish the purpose for which they are sent; the sinner is made more hardened by resisting them, and refusing to submit to their obvious intention and design.

To them who are the called - Christians are often represented as called of God. The word κλητός klētos is sometimes used to denote an external invitation, offer, or calling; Matthew 20:16; Matthew 22:14. But excepting in these places, it is used in the New Testament to denote those who had accepted the call, and were true Christians; Romans 1:6-7; 1 Corinthians 1:2, 1 Corinthians 1:24; Revelation 17:14. It is evidently used in this sense here - to denote those who were true Christians. The connection as well as the usual meaning of the word, requires us thus to understand it. Christians are said to be called because God has invited them to be saved, and has sent into their heart such an influence as to make the call effectual to their salvation. In this way their salvation is to be traced entirely to God.

According to his purpose - The word here rendered "purpose" πρόθεσις prothesis means properly a proposition, or a laying down anything in view of others; and is thus applied to the bread that was laid on the table of show-bread; Matthew 12:4; Mark 2:26; Luke 6:4. Hence, it means, when applied to the mind, a plan or purpose of mind. It implies that God had a plan, purpose, or intention, in regard to all who became Christians. They are not saved by chance or hap-hazard. God does not convert people without design; and his designs are not new, but are eternal. What he does. he always meant to do. What it is right for him to do, it was right always to intend to do. What God always meant to do, is his purpose or plan. That he has such a purpose in regard to the salvation of his people, is often affirmed; Romans 9:11; Ephesians 1:11; Ephesians 3:11; 2 Timothy 1:9; Jeremiah 51:29. This purpose of saving his people is,

(1) One over which a creature can have no control; it is according to the counsel of his own will; Ephesians 1:11.

(2) it is without any merit on the part of the sinner - a purpose to save him by grace; 2 Timothy 1:9.

(3) it is eternal; Ephesians 3:11.

(4) it is such as should excite lively gratitude in all who have been inclined by the grace of God to accept the offers of eternal life. They owe it to the mere mercy of God, and they should acknowledge him as the fountain and source of all their hopes of heaven.

29

Traduzione in sospeso · Originale inglese

Romans 8:29

Apri passaggio

For whom he did foreknow - The word used here προέγνω proegnō has been the subject of almost endless disputes in regard to its meaning in this place. The literal meaning of the word cannot be a matter of dispute. It denotes properly to "know beforehand;" to be acquainted with future events. But whether it means here simply to know that certain persons would become Christians; or to ordain, and constitute them to be Christians, and to be saved, has been a subject of almost endless discussion. Without entering at large into an investigation of the word, perhaps the following remarks may throw light on it.

(1) it does not here have reference to all the human family; for all are not, and have not, been conformed to the image of his Son. It has reference therefore only to those who would become Christians, and be saved.

(2) it implies "certain knowledge." It was certainly foreseen, in some way, that they would believe, and be saved. There is nothing, therefore, in regard to them that is contingent, or subject to doubt in the divine Mind, since it was certainly foreknown.

(3) the event which was thus foreknown must have been, for some cause, certain and fixed; since an uncertain event could not be possibly foreknown. To talk of a foreknowing a contingent event, that is, of foreknowing an event as certain which may or may not exist, is an absurdity.

(4) in what way such an event became certain is not determined by the use of this word. But it must have been somehow in connection with a divine appointment or arrangement, since in no other way can it be conceived to be certain. While the word used here, therefore, does not of necessity mean to decree, yet its use supposes that there was a purpose or plan; and the phrase is an explanation of what the apostle had just said, that it was "according to the purpose of God" that they were called. This passage does not affirm why, or how, or, "on what grounds" God foreknew that some of the human family would be saved. It simply affirms the fact; and the mode in which those who will believe were designated, must be determined from other sources. This passage simply teaches that he knew them; that his eye was fixed on them; that he regarded them as to be conformed to his Son; and that, thus knowing them, he designated them to eternal life. The Syriac renders it in accordance with this interpretation: "And from the beginning he knew them, and sealed them with the image of his Son," etc. As, however, none would believe but by the influences of his Spirit, it follows that they were not foreknown on account of any faith which they would themselves exercise, or any goodworks which they would themselves perform, but according to the purpose or plan of God himself.

He also did predestinate - See the meaning of the original of this word explained in the notes at Romans 1:4; see also the Acts 4:28 note; and 1 Corinthians 2:7 note. In these places the word evidently means to determine, purpose, or decree beforehand; and it must have this meaning here. No other idea could be consistent with the proper meaning of the word, or be intelligible. It is clear also that it does not refer to external privileges, but to real conversion and piety; since that to which they were predestinated was not the external privilege of the gospel, but conformity to his Son, and salvation; see Romans 8:30. No passage could possibly teach in stronger language that it was God's purpose to save those who will be saved. Ephesians 1:5, "having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ unto himself." Ephesians 1:11, being predestinated according to the purpose of Him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will."

To be conformed to the image of his Son - To resemble his Son; to be of like form with the image of his Son. We may learn here,

(1) That God does not determine to save people, whatever their character may be. The decree is not to save them in their sins, or whether they be sinful or holy. But it has primary respect to their char acter. It is that they "should be" holy; and, as a consequence of this, that they should be saved.

(2) the only evidence which we can have that we are the subjects of his gracious purpose is, that we are "in fact" conformed to the Lord Jesus Christ. For this was the design of the decree. This is the only satisfactory proof of piety; and by this alone can we determine that we are interested in his gracious plan of saving people.

That he might be the first-born - The first-born among the Hebrews had many special privileges. The idea here is,

(1) That Christ might be pre-eminent as the model and exemplar; that he might be clothed with special honors, and be so regarded in his church; and yet,

(2) That he might still sustain a fraternal relation to them; that he might be one in the same great family of God where all are sons; compare Hebrews 2:12-14.

Many brethren - Not a few. The purpose of God is that many of the human family shall be saved.

30

Traduzione in sospeso · Originale inglese

Romans 8:30

Apri passaggio

Moreover ... - In this verse, in order to show to Christians the true consolation to be derived from the fact that they are predestinated, the apostle states the connection between that predestination and their certain salvation. The one implied the other.

Whom he did predestinate - All whom he did predestinate.

Them he also called - Called by his Spirit to become Christians. He called, not merely by an external invitation, but in such a way as that they in fact were justified. This cannot refer simply to an external call of the gospel, since those who are here said to be called are said also to be justified and glorified. The meaning is, that there is a certain connection between the predestination and the call, which will be manifested in due time. The connection is so certain that the one infallibly secures the other.

He justified - See the note at Romans 3:24. Not that he justified them from eternity, for this was not true; and if it were, it would also follow that he glorified them from eternity, which would be an absurdity. It means that there is a regular sequence of events - the predestination precedes and secures the calling; and the calling precedes and secures the justification. The one is connected in the purpose of God with the other; and the one, in fact, does not take place without the other. The purpose was in eternity. The calling and justifying in time.

Them he also glorified - This refers probably to heaven. It means that there is a connection between justification and glory. The one does not exist without the other in its own proper time; as the calling does not subsist without the act of justification. This proves, therefore, the doctrine of the perseverance of the saints. There is a connection infallible and ever existing between the predestination and the final salvation. They who are subjects of the one are partakers of the other. That this is the sense is clear,

(1) Because it is the natural and obvious meaning of the passage.

(2) because this only would meet the design of the argument of the apostle. For how would it be a source of consolation to say to them that whom God foreknew he predestinated, and whom he predestinated he called, and whom he called he justified, and whom he justified "might fall away and be lost forever?"

31

Traduzione in sospeso · Originale inglese

Romans 8:31

Apri passaggio

What shall we then say ... - What fairly follows from the facts stated? or what conclusion shall we draw in regard to the power of the Christian religion to support us in our trials from the considerations which have been stated? What the influence is he proceeds to state.

If God be for us - Be on outside, or is our friend, as he has shown himself to be by adopting us Romans 8:15, by granting to us his Spirit Romans 8:16-17, Romans 8:26-27, and by his gracious purpose to save us, Romans 8:29-30).

Who can be against us? - Who can injure or destroy us? Sinners may be against us, and so may the great enemy of our souls, but their power to destroy us is taken away. God is more mighty than all our foes; and he can defend and save us; see Psalm 118:6. "The Lord is on my side; I will not fear what man can do unto me." The proposition advanced in this verse, Paul proceeds to illustrate by various specifications, which continue to the end of the chapter.

32

Traduzione in sospeso · Originale inglese

Romans 8:32

Apri passaggio

He that spared not - Who did not retain, or keep from suffering and death.

His own Son - Who thus gave the highest proof of love that a father could give, and the highest demonstration of his willingness to do good to those for whom he gave him.

But delivered him up - Gave him into the hands of men, and to a cruel death; Note, Acts 2:23.

For us all - For all Christians. The connection requires that this expression should be understood here with this limitation. The argument for the security of all Christians is here derived from the fact, that God had shown them equal love in giving his Son for them. It was not merely for the apostles; not only for the rich, and the great; but for the most humble and obscure of the flock of Christ. For them he endured as severe pangs, and expressed as much love, as for the rich and the great that shall be redeemed. The most humble and obscure believer may derive consolation from the fact that Christ died for him, and that God has expressed the highest love for him which we can conceive to be possible.

How shall he not - His giving his Son is a proof that he will give to us all things that we need. The argument is from the greater to the less. He that has given the greater gift will not withhold the less.

All things - All things that may be needful for our welfare. These things he will give freely; without money and without price. His first great gift, that of his Son, was a free gift; and all others that we may need will be given in a similar manner. It is not by money, nor by our merit, but it is by the mere mercy of God; so that from the beginning to the end of the work it is all of grace. We see here,

(1) The privilege of being a Christian. He has the friendship of God; has been favored with the highest proofs of divine love; and has assurance that he shall receive all that he needs.

(2) he has evidence that God will continue to be his friend. He that has given his Son to die for his people will not withdraw the lesser mercies that may be necessary to secure their salvation. The argument of the apostle here, therefore, is one that strongly shows that God will not forsake his children, but will keep them to eternal life.

33

Traduzione in sospeso · Originale inglese

Romans 8:33

Apri passaggio

Who shall lay anything to the charge - This expression is taken from courts of law, and means, who shall accuse, or condemn, or so charge with crime before the tribunal of God as to cause their condemnation?

God's elect - His chosen people. Those who have been chosen according to his eternal purpose; Note, Romans 8:28. As they are the chosen of God, they are dear to him; and as he purposed to save them, he will do it in such a way as that none can bring against them a charge that would condemn them.

It is God that justifieth - That is, who has pardoned them, and admitted them to his favor; and pronounced them just in his sight; Notes, Romans 1:17; Romans 3:24. It would be absurd to suppose that he would again condemn them. The fact that he has justified them is, therefore, a strong proof that they will be saved. This may be read with more force as a question, "Who shall lay anything to the charge of God's elect? Shall God who justifieth?" The Greek will bear either mode of rendering. The passage implies that there would be a high degree of absurdity in supposing that the same being would both justify and condemn the same individual. The Christian, therefore, is secure.

34

Traduzione in sospeso · Originale inglese

Romans 8:34

Apri passaggio

Who is he that condemneth? - Who shall pass sentence of condemnation, and consign to perdition? The function of passing sentence of condemnation on people shall pertain to Christ, the judge of quick and dead, and the apostle proceeds to say that it was certain that he would not condemn the elect of God. They were therefore secure.

It is Christ that died - Or as it may be rendered, "Shall Christ who has died, condemn them?" The argument here is, that as Christ died to save them, and not to destroy them, he will not condemn them. His death for them is a security that he will not condemn them. As he died to save them, and as they have actually embraced his salvation, there is the highest security that he will not condemn them. This is the first argument for their security from the death of Christ.

Yea rather, that is risen again - This is a second consideration for their security from his work. "He rose for their justification" (Note, Romans 4:25); and as this was the object which he had in view, it follows that he will not condemn them.

Who is even at the right hand of God - Invested with power, and dignity, and authority in heaven. This is a third consideration to show that Christ will not condemn us, and that Christians are secure. He is clothed with power; he is exalted to honor; he is placed at the head of all things. And this solemn enthronement and investiture with power over the universe, is with express reference to the salvation of his church and people; Matthew 28:18-19; John 17:2; Ephesians 1:20-23. The Christian is, therefore, under the protection of Christ, and is secure from being condemned by him.

Who also maketh intercession for us - Note, Romans 8:26. Who pleads our cause; who aids and assists us; who presents our interests before the mercy-seat in the heavens. For this purpose he ascended to heaven; Hebrews 7:25. This is the fourth consideration which the apostle urges for the security of Christians drawn from the work of Christ. By all these, he argues their complete security from being subject to condemnation by him who shall pronounce the doom of all mankind, and therefore their complete safety in the day of judgment. Having the Judge of all for our friend, we are safe.

35

Traduzione in sospeso · Originale inglese

Romans 8:35

Apri passaggio

Who shall separate us - That is, finally or entirely separate us. This is a new argument of the apostle, showing his strong confidence in the safety of the Christian.

From the love of Christ - This expression is ambiguous; and may mean either our love to Christ or his love to us. I understand it in the former sense, and suppose it means, "Who shall cause us to cease to love the Saviour?" In other words, the love which Christians have for their Redeemer is so strong, that it will surmount and survive all opposition and all trials. The reason for so understanding the expression is, that it is not conceivable how afflictions, etc. should have any tendency to alienate Christ's love "from us;" but their supposed tendency to alienate "our love" from him might be very strong. They are endured in his cause. They are caused, in a good degree, by professed attachment to him. The persecutions and trials to which Christians are exposed on account of their professed attachment to him, might be supposed to make them weary of a service that involved so many trials. But no, says the apostle. Our love for him is so strong that we are willing to bear all; and nothing that these foes of our peace can do, can alienate us from him and from his cause. The argument, therefore, is drawn from the strong love of a Christian to his Saviour; and from the assurance that nothing would be able to separate him from that love.

On the other hand, it is alleged that "the object of the apostle is to assure us, not so immediately of our love to God, as of his love to us, by directing our attention to his predestinating, calling, justifying, and glorifying us, and not sparing his own Son, but delivering him up for us; that in addition to this it contributes more to our consolation, to have our minds fixed upon God's love to us, than upon our love to him, which is subject to so many failings and infirmities." Haldane.

Indeed the whole of this passage proceeds, in its triumphing strain, on the ground of what God and Christ have done "for us," and not on the ground of anything belonging to us. It is therefore improbable, that the apostle, in the midst of such a strain, should introduce the love of the creature to God, as a just reason for such unparalleled confidence. It is more natural to the Christian to triumph in the love of Christ to him, than in any return he can make. He can glory in the strength of the former, while he mourns over the weakness of the latter. As to the objection that afflictions can have no tendency to alienate Christ's love, these are the "very things" that alienate people from us. There are persons who are called "summer friends" because they desert us in the winter of adversity. But the love of Christ is greatly exalted by the fact, that none of all possible adverse circumstances, of which the apostle enumerates not a few, shall ever change his love.

Shall tribulation - θλίψις thlipsis. Note, Romans 2:9. The word properly refers to pressure from without; affliction arising from external causes. It means, however, not infrequently, trial of any kind.

Or distress - στενοχωρία stenochōria. This word properly means "narrowness of place;" and then, great anxiety and distress of mind, such as arises when a man does not know where to turn himself or what to do for relief. It refers, therefore, to distress or anxiety "of mind," such as the early Christians were often subject to from their trials and persecutions; 2 Corinthians 7:5," Without were fightings, "within were fears;" see the note at Romans 2:9.

Or persecutions - Note, Matthew 5:11. To these the early Christians were constantly exposed.

Or famine - To this they were also exposed as the natural result of being driven from home, and of being often compelled to wander amidst strangers, and in deserts and desolate places.

Or peril - Danger of any kind.

Or sword - The sword of persecution; the danger of their lives to which they were constantly exposed. As all these things happened to them in consequence of their professed attachment to Christ, it might be supposed that they would tend to alienate their minds from him. But the apostle was assured that they had not this power, but that their love to the Saviour was so strong as to overcome all, and to bind them unalterably to his cause in the midst of the deepest trials. The fact is, that the more painful the trials to which they are exposed on his account, the more strong and unwavering is their love to him, and their confidence in his ability to save.

36

Traduzione in sospeso · Originale inglese

Romans 8:36

Apri passaggio

As it is written - Psalm 44:22. This passage the apostle quotes not as having originally reference to Christians, but as "aptly descriptive" of their condition. The condition of saints in the time of the psalmist was similar to that of Christians in the time of Paul. The same language would express both.

For thy sake - In thy cause; or on account of attachment to time.

We are killed - We are subject to, or exposed to death. We endure sufferings equivalent to dying; compare 1 Corinthians 4:9, "God hath set forth us the apostles last, "as it were appointed to death."

All the day long - Continually; constantly. There is no intermission to our danger, and to our exposure to death.

We are accounted - We are reckoned; we are regarded, or dealt with. That is, our enemies judge that we ought to die, and deem us the appropriate subjects of slaughter, with as little concern or remorse as the lives of sheep are taken.

37

Traduzione in sospeso · Originale inglese

Romans 8:37

Apri passaggio

Nay - But. Notwithstanding our severe pressures and trials.

In all these things - In the very midst of them; while we are enduring them we are able to triumph; compare 1 Corinthians 15:57.

We are more than conquerors - We gain the victory. That is, they have not power to subdue us; to alienate our love and confidence; to produce apostasy. We are the victors, not they. Our faith is not destroyed; our love is not diminished; our hope is not blasted. But it is not simple victory; it is not mere life, and continuance of what we had before; it is more than simple triumph; it augments our faith, increases our strength, expands our love to Christ. The word used here is a strong, emphatic expression, such as the apostle Paul often employs (compare 2 Corinthians 4:17), and which is used with great force and appropriateness here.

Through him ... - Not by their own strength or power. It was by the might of the Saviour, and by his power pledged to them, and confirmed by the love evinced when he gave himself for them; compare Philippians 4:13, "I can do all things through Christ who strengtheneth me."

38

Traduzione in sospeso · Originale inglese

Romans 8:38

Apri passaggio

For I am persuaded - I have a strong and unwavering confidence. Latin Vulgate, "I am certain." The expression here implies unwavering certainty.

Neither death - Neither the fear of death, nor all the pains and tortures of the dying scene, even in the most painful trials of persecution; death in no form.

Nor life - Nor the hope of life; the love of life; the offer of life made to us by our persecutors, on condition of abjuring our Christian faith. The words evidently refer to times of persecution; and it was not uncommon for persecutors to offer life to Christians, on condition of their renouncing attachment to the Saviour, and offering sacrifice to idols. All that was demanded in the times of persecution under the Roman emperors was, that they should throw a few grains of incense on the altar of a pagan god, as expressive of homage to the idol. But even this they would not do. The hope of life on so very easy terms would not, could not alienate them from the love of Christ.

Nor angels - It seems to be apparent that "good angels" cannot be intended here. The apostle was saying that nothing would separate Christians from the love of Christ. Of course, it would be implied that the things which he specifies might be supposed to have some power or tendency to do it. But it is not conceivable that good angels, who are "sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation" Hebrews 1:14, should seek to alienate the minds of Christians from the Saviour, or that their influence should have any such tendency. It seems to be clear, therefore, that he refers to the designs and temptations of evil spirits. The word "angels" is applied to evil spirits in Matthew 25:41; 1 Corinthians 6:3.

Nor principalities - (ἀρχαὶ archai). This word usually refers to magistrates and civil rulers. But it is also applied to evil angels, as having dominion over people; Ephesians 6:12, "For we wrestle against ...principalities;" Colossians 2:15, "And having spoiled principalities:" 1 Corinthians 15:24, "When he shall have put down all rule;" Greek, ἀρχήν archēn. Some have supposed that it refers here to magistrates and those in authority who persecuted Christians; but the connection of the word with angels seems to require us to understand it of evil spirits.

Nor powers - This word δυνάμεις dunameis is often applied to magistrates; but it is also applied to evil spirits that have dominion over men; 1 Corinthians 15:24. The ancient Rabbis also give the name powers to evil angels. (Schleusner.) There can be no doubt that the Jews were accustomed to divide the angels of heaven into various ranks and orders, traces of which custom we find often in the Scriptures. And there is also reason to suppose that they made such a division with reference to evil angels, regarding Satan as their leader, and other evil spirits, divided into various ranks, as subordinate to him; see Matthew 25:41; Ephesians 6:12; Colossians 2:15. To such a division there is probably reference here; and the meaning is, that no order of evil angels, however powerful, artful, or numerous, would be able to alienate the hearts of Christians from their Redeemer.

Nor things present - Calamities and persecutions to which we are now subject.

Nor things to come - Trials to which we may be yet exposed. It evinced strong confidence to say that no possible trials should be sufficient to destroy their love for Christ.

39

Traduzione in sospeso · Originale inglese

Romans 8:39

Apri passaggio

Nor height - This has been variously understood. Some have regarded it as referring to evil spirits in the air; others, to high and lofty speculation in doctrine; others, to heaven - to all that is in heaven. I regard it here as a synonymous with prosperity, honor, elevation in this life. The meaning is, that "no possible circumstances" in which Christians could be placed, though surrounded with wealth, honor, splendor, and though elevated to rank and function, could alienate them from the love of Christ. The tendency of these things to alienate the mind, to engross the affections, and to occupy the time, all know; but the apostle says that even these would not be sufficient to withdraw their strong love from the Lord Jesus Christ.

Nor depth - Nor the lowest circumstances of depression, poverty, contempt, and want; the very lowest rank of life.

Nor any other creature - Nor any other created thing; any other thing in the universe; anything that can occur. This expresses the most unwavering confidence that all who were Christians would certainly continue to love the Lord Jesus, and be saved.

Shall be able - Shall have power to do it. The love to Christ is stronger than any influence which they can exert on the mind.

The love of God - The love which we have to God.

Which is in Christ Jesus - Which is produced and secured by his work. Of which he is the bond, the connecting link. It was caused by his mediation; it is secured by his influence; it is in and through him, and him alone, that people love God. There is no true love of God which is not produced by the work of Christ. There is no man who truly loves the Father, who does not do it in, and by the Son.

Perhaps there is no chapter in the Bible on the whole so interesting and consoling to the Christian as this; and there certainly is not to be found any where a specimen of more elevated, animated, and lofty eloquence and argumentation. We may remark in view of it,

(1) That it is the highest honor that can be conferred on mortal man to be a Christian.

(2) our trials in this life are scarcely worth regarding in comparison with our future glory.

(3) calamities should be borne without a complaint; nay, without a sigh.

(4) the Christian has every possible security for his safety. The purposes of God, the work of Christ, the aid of the Holy Spirit, and the tendency of all events under the direction of his Father and Friend, conspire to secure his welfare and salvation.

(5) with what thankfulness, then, should we approach the God of mercy.

In the gospel, we have a blessed and cheering hope which nothing else can produce, and which nothing can destroy. Safe in the hands of God our Redeemer, we may commit our way to him, whether it lead through persecutions, or trials, or sickness, or a martyr's grave: and triumphantly we may wait until the day of our complete adoption, the entire redemption of soul and body, shall fully come.