Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible · Ecclesiastes Capitolo 1

Lettore del commentario ottimizzato

Commentario del capitolo

Ecclesiastes Capitolo 1

서론

Introduction

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

緒論

希伯來文的書名是 Koheleth,本卷書中講者以此自稱

(Ec 1:12):

「我 Koheleth 作過以色列的王。」其意為「招聚者」或「召集聚會之人」,亦是向此類聚會講道的「傳道者」。希伯來文該名詞為陰性形式,且有一次

(Ec 7:27)

與陰性動詞連用,表明此字不僅指所羅門——在眾人面前的講道者(此時動詞或名詞用陽性),也指藉著受感君王之口說話的屬天智慧(在希伯來文中智慧為陰性)。七例中有六例與陽性連用。所羅門蒙賜受感的智慧

(1Ki 3:5-14; 6:11, 12;9:1-9;11:9-11),

使他格外勝任此任。東方人喜好在聚會中談論嚴肅之事。從前阿拉伯人每年在奧卡德(Ocadh)舉行集會,聆聽並朗誦詩歌。可比對「會中之師」(參閱

Ec 12:11,

亦見

Ec 12:9)。

「傳道者……將知識教訓眾人」,可能是口授(「口頭」);

1Ki 4:34;10:2, 8, 24; 2Ch 9:1, 7, 23,

顯然指一種為文學研討而設的頗為公開的議事會。「講論」一詞重複三次

(1Ki 4:32, 33),

所指的不是筆寫成的著作,而是在為此目的而召集的聚會中口頭發表的講論。聖靈用此字無疑也表明,所羅門的教訓乃是為著「大會」——即歷代各地之教會——而設的

(Ps 22:25;49:2-4)。

所羅門顯然是作者 (Ec 1:12, 16;2:15;12:9)。

拉比們將本書歸於以賽亞或希西家之作,可以解釋為他們其中一位將本書編入正典。本書的風格與《箴言》、《雅歌》不同,乃因主題不同,且各卷寫成於他人生的不同時期:《雅歌》作於他對神起初之愛最熱烈之時;《箴言》大約同時或稍後;而《傳道書》則作於他晚年,作為他悔改的印記和見證,以彌補其間背道之過:

Ps 89:30, 33

證明了他的悔改。以 Koheleth 之名取代所羅門(即平安)一名,可能暗示他既曾攪擾了以色列,便一時失去了他「平安」之名

(1Ki 11:14, 23);

但如今既已悔改,他願今後作公義的傳道者。希伯來文中所謂的外來用語,可能因他在位多年與列國交往頻繁而輕易引入。再者,所謂迦勒底語成分,也可能是從那共同母語(希伯來語、敘利亞語、迦勒底語與阿拉伯語皆為其分支)所保留的片段。

《傳道書》的*宗旨*,在於顯明一切僅以人為追求、視之為首要目的之事盡都虛空,並與真智慧即真宗教所賜的真福作對照。靈魂的不朽只是附帶提及,作為輔助主旨之用。摩西律法以此為當然,但按照神治體制——即神作為以色列的現世君王,在特殊眷顧之下——其賞罰乃根據今生而非來世而設立。然而自從以色列擇立了屬世的君王,神便部分撤回了祂特殊的眷顧;因此在所羅門時代,今生的報賞未必隨德行而來,刑罰也不一定隨罪惡而至(參閱

Ec 2:16; 3:19;4:1;5:8;7:15;8:14;9:2, 11)。

故此有必要指明這些反常將來必得糾正,這便是全書「總結」的所在:既然將來的審判必臨,今生的福樂又不能滿足人心,那麼「人的一切本分就是敬畏神,謹守祂的誡命」

(Ec 12:13, 14),

同時,要以喜樂、寧靜而節制的心享用而非濫用今生

(Ec 3:12, 13)。

有人非議說,本書似乎教導享樂主義

(Ec 3:12, 13, 22

等);但書中所教導的,乃是以知足感恩之心享用神所賜今生的恩賜,反對埋怨、憂慮與貪婪之心,這可由

Ec 5:18

與

Ec 5:11-15

的比對得到證明——並非以這些為人生的首要目的;也不是輕浮愚妄之樂;為免誤解,他在

Ec 7:2-6;11:9;12:1

中特加防範。

再者,

Ec 7:16;9:2-10,

似乎教導宿命論與懷疑論。但這些話是置於反對者口中的;或更確切地說,是所羅門在自己背道之時所說,凡願作不信之人的縱慾者心中都與之共鳴,因他想要作不信者,於是就在周圍世界中找出足夠的難處來支撐他執意的不信。答案記在

(Ec 7:17, 18;9:11, 12;11:1, 6;12:13)。

即使將這些話視為所羅門本人所說,也應理解為禁止自定的「義」——即試圖以想像中的善行和外表的嚴苛來勉強神賜下救恩,自己反因此疲乏困倦;也禁止那企圖測透神一切難測之旨意的推究

(Ec 8:17),

以及那為明日憂慮的心,正如

Mt 6:25

所禁止的。

*至善*(CHIEF GOOD)乃指:那使我們幸福的擁有,當作為目的本身而尋求;而其他一切事物不過是達到此目的之手段。哲學家將此作為重大探究課題,卻將其局限於今生,視永世為虛幻,僅用以威嚇眾人。但所羅門指出,一切屬世之物(包括所謂的哲學)都不能滿足人心,唯有屬天的智慧才是至善。他年輕時已如此教導過

(Pr 1:20;8:1);

在《雅歌》中又以寓意將此題屬靈化;如今,他在長久親身體驗了世人為求幸福所嘗試的種種途徑之後,於晚年將他的經歷之果效陳明出來。

全書分為兩部分——

Ec 1:1-6:10

論屬地之事的虛空;

Ec 6:10-12:14

論屬天智慧的優越。各部分間雖有偏離嚴謹邏輯之處,但大體仍遵此序。這些偏離使全書不至過於刻板造作,而更適合於各種層次的讀者。全書以詩歌體寫成;多半遵守半句分行的格式,偶爾也有例外。形容詞的選用、意象的營造、詞序的倒置、省略法、平行體,或在平行體不出現時相似詞句的運用,都標示出詩歌的體裁。

Originale inglese

INTRODUCTION

The Hebrew title is Koheleth, which the speaker in it applies to himself

(Ec 1:12),

"I, Koheleth, was king over Israel." It means an Assembler or Convener of a meeting and a Preacher to such a meeting. The feminine form of the Hebrew noun, and its construction once

(Ec 7:27)

with a feminine verb, show that it not only signifies Solomon, the Preacher to assemblies (in which case it is construed with the verb or noun masculine), but also Divine Wisdom (feminine in Hebrew) speaking by the mouth of the inspired king. In six cases out of seven it is construed with the masculine. Solomon was endowed with inspired wisdom

(1Ki 3:5-14; 6:11, 12; 9:1-9; 11:9-11),

specially fitting him for the task. The Orientals delight in such meetings for grave discourse. Thus the Arabs formerly had an assembly yearly, at Ocadh, for hearing and reciting poems. Compare "Masters of assemblies" (see on

Ec 12:11,

also

Ec 12:9).

"The Preacher taught the people knowledge," probably viva voce ("orally");

1Ki 4:34; 10:2, 8, 24; 2Ch 9:1, 7, 23,

plainly refer to a somewhat public divan met for literary discussion. So "spake," thrice repeated

(1Ki 4:32, 33),

refers not to written compositions, but to addresses spoken in assemblies convened for the purpose. The Holy Ghost, no doubt, signifies also by the term that Solomon's doctrine is intended for the "great congregation," the Church of all places and ages

(Ps 22:25; 49:2-4).

Solomon was plainly the author

(Ec 1:12, 16; 2:15; 12:9).

That the Rabbins attribute it to Isaiah or Hezekiah is explicable by supposing that one or the other inserted it in the canon. The difference of its style, as compared with Proverbs and Song of Solomon, is due to the difference of subjects, and the different period of his life in which each was written; the Song, in the fervor of his first love to God; Proverbs, about the same time, or somewhat later; but Ecclesiastes in late old age, as the seal and testimony of repentance of his apostasy in the intervening period:

Ps 89:30, 33

proves his penitence. The substitution of the title Koheleth for Solomon (that is, peace), may imply that, having troubled Israel, meantime he forfeited his name of peace

(1Ki 11:14, 23);

but now, having repented, he wishes to be henceforth a Preacher of righteousness. The alleged foreign expressions in the Hebrew may have been easily imported, through the great intercourse there was with other nations during his long reign. Moreover, supposed Chaldaisms may be fragments preserved from the common tongue of which Hebrew, Syriac, Chaldee, and Arabic were offshoots.

THE SCOPE of Ecclesiastes is to show the vanity of all mere human pursuits, when made the chief end, as contrasted with the real blessedness of true wisdom, that is, religion. The immortality of the soul is dwelt on incidentally, as subsidiary to the main scope. Moses' law took this truth for granted but drew its sanctions of rewards and punishments in accordance with the theocracy, which was under a special providence of God as the temporal King of Israel, from the present life, rather than the future. But after Israel chose an earthly king, God withdrew, in part, His extraordinary providence, so that under Solomon, temporal rewards did not invariably follow virtue, and punishments vice (compare

Ec 2:16; 3:19; 4:1; 5:8; 7:15; 8:14; 9:2, 11).

Hence the need arises to show that these anomalies will be rectified hereafter, and this is the grand "conclusion," therefore, of the "whole" book, that, seeing there is a coming judgment, and seeing that present goods do not satisfy the soul, "man's whole duty is to fear God and keep his commandments"

(Ec 12:13, 14),

and meanwhile, to use, in joyful and serene sobriety, and not abuse, the present life

(Ec 3:12, 13).

It is objected that sensual epicurism seems to be inculcated

(Ec 3:12, 13, 22,

&c.); but it is a contented, thankful enjoyment of God's present gifts that is taught, as opposed to a murmuring, anxious, avaricious spirit, as is proved by

Ec 5:18,

compare with

Ec 5:11-15,

not making them the chief end of life; not the joy of levity and folly; a misunderstanding which he guards against in

Ec 7:2-6; 11:9; 12:1.

Again,

Ec 7:16; 9:2-10,

might seem to teach fatalism and skepticism. But these are words put in the mouth of an objector; or rather, they were the language of Solomon himself during his apostasy, finding an echo in the heart of every sensualist, who wishes to be an unbeliever, and, who, therefore, sees difficulties enough in the world around wherewith to prop up his wilful unbelief. The answer is given

(Ec 7:17, 18; 9:11, 12; 11:1, 6; 12:13).

Even if these passages be taken as words of Solomon, they are to be understood as forbidding a self-made "righteousness," which tries to constrain God to grant salvation to imaginary good works and external strictness with which it wearies itself; also, that speculation which tries to fathom all God's inscrutable counsels

(Ec 8:17),

and that carefulness about the future forbidden in

Mt 6:25.

THE CHIEF GOOD is that the possession of that which makes us happy, is to be sought as the end, for its own sake; whereas, all other things are but means towards it. Philosophers, who made it the great subject of inquiry, restricted it to the present life, treating the eternal as unreal, and only useful to awe the multitude with. But Solomon shows the vanity of all human things (so-called philosophy included) to satisfy the soul, and that heavenly wisdom alone is the chief good. He had taught so when young

(Pr 1:20; 8:1);

so also; in Song of Solomon, he had spiritualized the subject in an allegory; and now, after having long personally tried the manifold ways in which the worldly seek to reach happiness, he gives the fruit of his experience in old age.

It is divided into two parts--

Ec 1:1-6:10

showing the vanity of earthly things;

Ec 6:10-12:14,

the excellence of heavenly wisdom. Deviations from strict logical methods occur in these divisions, but in the main they are observed. The deviations make it the less stiff and artificial, and the more suited to all capacities. It is in poetry; the hemistichal division is mostly observed, but occasionally not so. The choice of epithets, imagery, inverted order of words, ellipses, parallelism, or, in its absence, similarity of diction, mark versification.

1

Ec 1:1-18.

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

Ec 1:1-18。

引言。

1. 傳道者——即召集聚會之人。參看我的

前言。

希伯來文為 Koheleth,是所羅門的象徵性名字,也是藉著他並與之認同的屬天智慧之名。

Ec 1:12

表明「耶路撒冷的王」是與「傳道者」同位,而非與「大衛」同位。

*在耶路撒冷*——宜譯作「在耶路撒冷」,因為這只是他的京城,並非他整個國度。

Originale inglese

Ec 1:1-18.

INTRODUCTION.

1. the Preacher--and Convener of assemblies for the purpose. See my

Preface.

Koheleth in Hebrew, a symbolical name for Solomon, and of Heavenly Wisdom speaking through and identified with him.

Ec 1:12

shows that "king of Jerusalem" is in apposition, not with "David," but "Preacher."

of Jerusalem--rather, "in Jerusalem," for it was merely his metropolis, not his whole kingdom.

2

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

2. 此爲他講論第一段所提出的主題。

*虛空的虛空*——希伯來語法,指極其虛空。正如「至聖所」

(Ex 26:33);

「奴僕的奴僕」

(Ge 9:25)。

重複使語氣加強。

*凡事*——希伯來文作「那一切」,無一例外,指屬地的事物。

*虛空*——並非事物本身如此,因爲神所造的無一虛空

(1Ti 4:4, 5),

而是當它們取代神的地位,被當作目的而非手段時便成爲虛空

(Ps 39:5, 6;62:9; Mt 6:33);

也是虛空,因爲它們因人墮落而被「服在」虛空之下

(Ro 8:20)。

Originale inglese

2. The theme proposed of the first part of his discourse.

Vanity of vanities--Hebraism for the most utter vanity. So "holy of holies"

(Ex 26:33);

"servant of servants"

(Ge 9:25).

The repetition increases the force.

all--Hebrew, "the all"; all without exception, namely, earthly things.

vanity--not in themselves, for God maketh nothing in vain

(1Ti 4:4, 5),

but vain when put in the place of God and made the end, instead of the means

(Ps 39:5, 6; 62:9; Mt 6:33);

vain, also, because of the "vanity" to which they are "subjected" by the fall

(Ro 8:20).

3

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

3. 人……勞碌有什麼益處呢*——指就至善*而言的「益處」

(Mt 16:26)。

勞碌在其本位上原有益處

(Ge 2:15;3:19; Pr 14:23)。

*日光之下*——指今生,與來世相對。此語屢見,但僅見於《傳道書》。

Originale inglese

3. What profit . . . labour--that is, "What profit" as to the chief good

(Mt 16:26).

Labor is profitable in its proper place

(Ge 2:15; 3:19; Pr 14:23).

under the sun--that is, in this life, as opposed to the future world. The phrase often recurs, but only in Ecclesiastes.

4

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

*4. 地卻永遠長存*——

(Ps 104:5)。

*地*始終不變,而人的世代卻不斷更替;那麼,作爲個體在地上寄居如此短暫之人,其勞碌能有何長久的益處呢?這裏的「永遠」是相對的,不是絕對的

(Ps 102:26)。

Originale inglese

4. earth . . . for ever--

(Ps 104:5).

While the earth remains the same, the generations of men are ever changing; what lasting profit, then, can there be from the toils of one whose sojourn on earth, as an individual, is so brief? The "for ever" is comparative, not absolute

(Ps 102:26).

5

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

5.

(Ps 19:5, 6)。

希伯來文「急歸」一詞意爲「喘息」;爲賽跑者之隱喻

(Ps 19:5

「勇士」),如同在「賽跑」中。這更適用於正在升起的太陽,它似乎費力地攀上天頂,而非日落的太陽;重音符號也支持 MAURER 所譯:「(也歸回)到它的去處,在那裏喘息着升起。」

Originale inglese

5.

(Ps 19:5, 6).

"Panting" as the Hebrew for "hasteth"; metaphor, from a runner

(Ps 19:5,

"a strong man") in a "race." It applies rather to the rising sun, which seems laboriously to mount up to the meridian, than to the setting sun; the accents too favor MAURER, "And (that too, returning) to his place, where panting he riseth."

6

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

*6. 轉向原道*——即它又重新回到原先的迴路,無論先前經過多少次轉折。在巴勒斯坦和埃及,北風與南風是兩股主要的風。

Originale inglese

6. according to his circuits--that is, it returns afresh to its former circuits, however many be its previous veerings about. The north and south winds are the two prevailing winds in Palestine and Egypt.

7

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

7. 藉着地下的洞穴,以及蒸發形成雨雲,衆泉源與河流由海得着供應,然後又流回海中。其連貫之意是:單個人不斷更替,而人類的世代卻延續不斷;正如日、風、河不斷周流運轉,而它們所行的循環卻恆久不變;它們回到所出發之處。因此,人如同這些與他類似的自然之物一樣,縱有種種看似的變化,卻「並沒有新事」

(Ec 1:9)。

Originale inglese

7. By subterraneous cavities, and by evaporation forming rain clouds, the fountains and rivers are supplied from the sea, into which they then flow back. The connection is: Individual men are continually changing, while the succession of the race continues; just as the sun, wind, and rivers are ever shifting about, while the cycle in which they move is invariable; they return to the point whence they set out. Hence is man, as in these objects of nature which are his analogue, with all the seeming changes "there is no new thing"

(Ec 1:9).

8

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

8. MAURER 譯作:「一切言語都疲乏了」,即都不足以表達,正如「人不能說盡」世上一切經歷這無休止、無變化的循環的事物:「眼看,看不飽」等等。但這明顯是回到

Ec 1:3

關於人的「勞碌」之意,那不過是疲乏而無益的;不能從中得着任何「新的」好處

(Ec 1:9);

因爲正如日頭等,人勞碌的作爲也運行在不變的循環之中。眼與耳是人所爲之勞碌的兩個監工。但它們永不得「滿足」

(Ec 6:7; Pr 27:20)。

將來也不能,因爲那時必沒有「新事」。至善——耶穌基督——則不然

(Joh 4:13, 14; Re 21:5)。

Originale inglese

8. MAURER translates, "All words are wearied out," that is, are inadequate, as also, "man cannot express" all the things in the world which undergo this ceaseless, changeless cycle of vicissitudes: "The eye is not satisfied with seeing them," &c. But it is plainly a return to the idea

(Ec 1:3)

as to man's "labor," which is only wearisome and profitless; "no new" good can accrue from it

(Ec 1:9);

for as the sun, &c., so man's laborious works move in a changeless cycle. The eye and ear are two of the taskmasters for which man toils. But these are never "satisfied"

(Ec 6:7; Pr 27:20).

Nor can they be so hereafter, for there will be nothing "new." Not so the chief good, Jesus Christ

(Joh 4:13, 14; Re 21:5).

9

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

9. 宜譯作「毫無新事」;如

Nu 11:6。

這不是泛指;而是說(就所論的主題而言),再不能發明任何新的幸福之源;那同樣的瑣碎樂趣、憂慮、事務、學問、戰爭等,反覆重演[HOLDEN]。

Originale inglese

9. Rather, "no new thing at all"; as in

Nu 11:6.

This is not meant in a general sense; but there is no new source of happiness (the subject in question) which can be devised; the same round of petty pleasures, cares, business, study, wars, &c., being repeated over and over again [HOLDEN].

10

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

*10. 以前的世代*——希伯來文作「衆世代」。

*是在我們以前的世代*——希伯來文複數不能與動詞單數相連。所以當譯作:「它在以前的衆世代中已有;在我們以前必已有」[HOLDEN]。

或如 MAURER:「在我們面前(已成的),在古時早已(成就了)。」(參

1Ch 16:33)

Originale inglese

10. old time--Hebrew, "ages."

which was--The Hebrew plural cannot be joined to the verb singular. Therefore translate: "It hath been in the ages before; certainly it hath been before us" [HOLDEN]. Or, as MAURER: "That which has been (done) before us (in our presence,

1Ch 16:33),

has been (done) already in the old times."

11

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

11. 有些事被當作「新事」,其實並非如此,其故在於後代對前代之事記錄不全。

*後來的人*——即比那些「事——更確切說是人或世代」

Ec 1:4

更晚生活的人;本節與

Ec 1:4

相連,中間六節只是

Ec 1:4

的說明[WEISS]——「那將要來的」

(Ec 2:16;9:5)。

Originale inglese

11. The reason why some things are thought "new," which are not really so, is the imperfect record that exists of preceding ages among their successors.

those that . . . come after--that is, those that live still later than the "things, rather the persons or generations,

Ec 1:4,

with which this verse is connected, the six intermediate verses being merely illustrations of

Ec 1:4

[WEISS], that are to come"

(Ec 2:16; 9:5).

12

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

12. 重接

Ec 1:1,

中間各節只是其論題的引言陳述。所以「傳道者」(Koheleth) 重複出現。

*曾作王*——不用「現在作王」,因他將要陳述其長期執政中過去經歷的成果。

*在耶路撒冷*——特意指明,以與大衛有別;大衛在希伯侖與耶路撒冷兩處作王,而所羅門只在耶路撒冷作王。「以色列的王在耶路撒冷」暗示他治理以色列與猶大合併之民;而大衛在希伯侖時只治理猶大,直到定居耶路撒冷之後才兼治以色列與猶大。

Originale inglese

12. Resumption of

Ec 1:1,

the intermediate verses being the introductory statement of his thesis. Therefore, "the Preacher" (Koheleth) is repeated.

was king--instead of "am," because he is about to give the results of his past experience during his long reign.

in Jerusalem--specified, as opposed to David, who reigned both in Hebron and Jerusalem; whereas Solomon reigned only in Jerusalem. "King of Israel in Jerusalem," implies that he reigned over Israel and Judah combined; whereas David, at Hebron, reigned only over Judah, and not, until he was settled in Jerusalem, over both Israel and Judah.

13

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

*13. 這極重的勞碌*——即「尋求查究日光之下所作的一切事」。不是泛指人一般的智慧(那在

Ec 2:12

以下才論及),而是勞苦地探求並推測人所行的作爲;例如政治學。正如人註定要汗流滿面才得餬口,照樣他的知識也須辛苦而得

(Ge 3:19)

[GILL]。

*練就*——即受管教;字面作「使他們可以因此受責罰、或自卑」。

Originale inglese

13. this sore travail--namely, that of "searching out all things done under heaven." Not human wisdom in general, which comes afterwards

(Ec 2:12,

&c.), but laborious enquiries into, and speculations about, the works of men; for example, political science. As man is doomed to get his bread, so his knowledge, by the sweat of his brow

(Ge 3:19)

[GILL].

exercised--that is, disciplined; literally, "that they may thereby chastise, or humble themselves."

14

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

14. 此處說明查究人「所作之事」之所以只是「極重的勞碌」

(Ec 1:13),

原因在於人一切的道路都是虛空

(Ec 1:18),

不能修正

(Ec 1:15)。

*捕風*——MAURER 譯作「追風」,如

Ec 5:16; Ho 12:1

「以法蓮喫風」。但古譯本支持英文譯本。

Originale inglese

14. The reason is here given why investigation into man's "works" is only "sore travail"

(Ec 1:13);

namely, because all man's ways are vain

(Ec 1:18)

and cannot be mended

(Ec 1:15).

vexation of--"a preying upon"

the Spirit--MAURER translates; "the pursuit of wind," as in

Ec 5:16; Ho 12:1,

"Ephraim feedeth on wind." But old versions support the English Version.

15

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

15. 查究

(Ec 1:13)

人的道路乃是徒勞,因爲它們已無可指望地「曲」了,「不能變直」

(Ec 7:13)。

唯有神——至善——能作這事

(Isa 40:4;45:2)。

*不足*——

(Da 5:27)。

*算*——以致湊成完整的數目;即「補足」[MAURER]。

或更恰當地說,人的狀態完全缺乏;那全然有缺的不能被數算或計算。探究者以爲他能用精確的數目列述人的缺乏;但這些缺乏,包括探究者本身勞碌中的缺陷,並非部分,而是全部。

Originale inglese

15. Investigation

(Ec 1:13)

into human ways is vain labor, for they are hopelessly "crooked" and "cannot be made straight" by it

(Ec 7:13).

God, the chief good, alone can do this

(Isa 40:4; 45:2).

wanting--

(Da 5:27).

numbered--so as to make a complete number; so equivalent to "supplied" [MAURER]. Or, rather, man's state is utterly wanting; and that which is wholly defective cannot be numbered or calculated. The investigator thinks he can draw up, in accurate numbers, statistics of man's wants; but these, including the defects in the investigator's labor, are not partial, but total.

16

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

*16. 我心裏議論*——

(Ge 24:45)。

*得了大智慧*——宜譯作「我已經增大且得了」(字面作「加了」,增多)等等。

*所有……在我以前在耶路撒冷的*——即祭司、士師,以及在所羅門以前的兩個王。他的智慧勝過以前一切人,直到耶穌基督——那預表性的 Koheleth,即「招聚人者」

(Lu 13:34),

與成肉身的「智慧」

(Mt 11:19;12:42)。

*經歷*——字面作「見過」

(Jer 2:31)。

當與這等屬世智慧的誇口相對照

(Jer 9:23, 24)。

Originale inglese

16. communed with . . . heart--

(Ge 24:45).

come to great estate--Rather, "I have magnified and gotten" (literally, "added," increased), &c.

all . . . before me in Jerusalem--namely, the priests, judges, and two kings that preceded Solomon. His wisdom exceeded that of all before Jesus Christ, the antitypical Koheleth, or "Gatherer of men,"

(Lu 13:34),

and "Wisdom" incarnate

(Mt 11:19; 12:42).

had . . . experience--literally, "had seen"

(Jer 2:31).

Contrast with this glorying in worldly wisdom

(Jer 9:23, 24).

17

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

*17. 智慧……狂妄*——即其果效,分別是屬人智慧與愚妄的作爲。「狂妄」字面作「誇耀的放縱」;

Ec 2:12;7:25

等支持英文譯本,勝過 DATHE 所譯「華美之事」。「愚妄」英文譯本按某些抄本讀作如此,取代現今希伯來文正文之「精明」。若保留希伯來文,則當解爲「僞稱之精明」

(1Ti 6:20),

即「詭詐」

(Da 8:25)。

Originale inglese

17. wisdom . . . madness--that is, their effects, the works of human wisdom and folly respectively. "Madness," literally, "vaunting extravagance";

Ec 2:12; 7:25,

&c., support English Version rather than DATHE, "splendid matters." "Folly" is read by English Version with some manuscripts, instead of the present Hebrew text, "prudence." If Hebrew be retained, understand "prudence," falsely so called

(1Ti 6:20),

"craft"

(Da 8:25).

18

Senza titolo

Apri passaggio

繁體中文

18. 智慧……知識*——不是泛指,因爲智慧等在其本位上原是最優秀的;而是指對人道路的推究之知*

(Ec 1:13, 17),

愈探究愈令人痛苦地發現它們何等「曲」、何等「缺乏」

(Ec 1:15;12:12)。

Originale inglese

18. wisdom . . . knowledge--not in general, for wisdom, &c., are most excellent in their place; but speculative knowledge of man's ways

(Ec 1:13, 17),

which, the farther it goes, gives one the more pain to find how "crooked" and "wanting" they are

(Ec 1:15; 12:12).