Commentario del capitolo
Jonah Capitolo 1
서론
Introduction
简体中文
Originale inglese
INTRODUCTION
JONAH was the son of Amittai, of Gath-hepher in Zebulun (called Gittah-hepher in
Jos 19:10-13),
so that he belonged to the kingdom of the ten tribes, not to Judah. His date is to be gathered from
2Ki 14:25-27,
"He (Jeroboam II) restored the coast of Israel from the entering of Hamath unto the sea of the plain, according to the word of the Lord God of Israel, which He spake by the hand of His servant Jonah, the son of Amittai, the prophet, which was of Gath-hepher. For the Lord saw the affliction of Israel, that it was very bitter: for there was not any shut up, nor any left, nor any helper for Israel. And the Lord said not that He would blot out the name of Israel from under heaven: but He saved them by the hand of Jeroboam the son of Joash." Now as this prophecy of Jonah was given at a time when Israel was at the lowest point of depression, when "there was not any shut up or left," that is, confined or left at large, none to act as a helper for Israel, it cannot have been given in Jeroboam's reign, which was marked by prosperity, for in it Syria was worsted in fulfilment of the prophecy, and Israel raised to its former "greatness." It must have been, therefore, in the early part of the reign of Joash, Jeroboam's father, who had found Israel in subjection to Syria, but had raised it by victories which were followed up so successfully by Jeroboam. Thus Jonah was the earliest of the prophets, and close upon Elisha, who died in Joash's reign, having just before his death given a token prophetical of the thrice defeat of Syria
(2Ki 13:14-21).
Hosea and Amos prophesied also in the reign of Jeroboam II, but towards the closing part of his forty-one years' reign. The transactions in the Book of Jonah probably occurred in the latter part of his life; if so, the book is not much older than part of the writings of Hosea and Amos. The use of the third person is no argument against Jonah himself being the writer: for the sacred writers in mentioning themselves do so in the third person (compare
Joh 19:26).
Nor is the use of the past tense
(Jon 3:3,
"Now Nineveh was an exceeding great city") a proof that Nineveh's greatness was past when the Book of Jonah was being written; it is simply used to carry on the negative uniformly,--"the word of the Lord came to Jonah . . . so Jonah arose . . . now Nineveh was," &c.
(Jon 1:1; 3:3).
The mention of its greatness proves rather that the book was written at an early date, before the Israelites had that intimate knowledge of it which they must have had soon afterwards through frequent Assyrian inroads.
As early as JULIAN and PORPHYRY, pagans ridiculed the credulity of Christians in believing the deliverance of Jonah by a fish. Some infidels have derived it from the heathen fable of the deliverance of Andromeda from a sea monster by Perseus [APOLLODORUS, The Library, 2.4,3]; or from that of Arion the musician thrown into the sea by sailors, and carried safe to shore on a dolphin [HERODOTUS, History, 1.24]; or from that of Hercules, who sprang into the jaws of a sea monster, and was three days in its belly, when he undertook to save Hesione [DIODORUS SICULUS, Historical Library, 4.42; HOMER, The Iliad, 20.145; 21.442]. Probably the heathen fables are, vice versa, corruptions of the sacred narrative, if there be any connection. JEROME states that near Joppa lay rocks, pointed out as those to which Andromeda was bound when exposed to the sea monster. This fable implies the likelihood of the story of Jonah having passed through the Phœnicians in a corrupted form to Greece. That the account of Jonah is history, and not parable (as rationalists represent), appears from our Lord's reference to it, in which the personal existence, miraculous fate, and prophetical office of Jonah are explicitly asserted: "No sign shall be given but the sign of the prophet Jonas: for, as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly, so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth"
(Mt 12:39, 40).
The Lord recognizes his being in the belly of the fish as a "sign," that is, a real miracle, typical of a similar event in His own history; and assumes the execution of the prophet's commission to Nineveh, "The men of Nineveh . . . repented at the preaching of Jonas; and behold, a greater than Jonas is here"
(Mt 12:41).
It seemed strange to KIMCHI, a Jew himself, that the Book of Jonah is among the Scriptures, as the only prophecy in it concerns Nineveh, a heathen city, and makes no mention of Israel, which is referred to by every other prophet. The reason seems to be: a tacit reproof of Israel is intended; a heathen people were ready to repent at the first preaching of the prophet, a stranger to them; but Israel, who boasted of being God's elect, repented not, though warned by their own prophets at all seasons. This was an anticipatory streak of light before the dawn of the full "light to lighten the Gentiles"
(Lu 2:32).
Jonah is himself a strange paradox: a prophet of God, and yet a runaway from God: a man drowned, and yet alive: a preacher of repentance, yet one that repines at repentance. Yet Jonah, saved from the jaws of death himself on repentance, was the fittest to give a hope to Nineveh, doomed though it was, of a merciful respite on its repentance. The patience and pity of God stand in striking contrast with the selfishness and hard-heartedness of man.
Nineveh in particular was chosen to teach Israel these lessons, on account of its being capital of the then world kingdom, and because it was now beginning to make its power felt by Israel. Our Lord
(Mt 12:41)
makes Nineveh's repentance a reproof of the Jews' impenitence in His day, just as Jonah provoked Israel to jealousy
(De 32:21)
by the same example. Jonah's mission to Nineveh implied that a heathen city afforded as legitimate a field for the prophet's labors as Israel, and with a more successful result (compare
Am 9:7).
The book is prose narrative throughout, except the prayer of thanksgiving in the second chapter
(Jon 2:1-9).
The Chaldæisms in the original do not prove spuriousness, or a later age, but were natural in the language of one living in Zebulun on the borders of the north, whence Aramaic peculiarities would readily arise; moreover, his message to Nineveh implies acquaintance with Assyrian. Living as Jonah did in a part of Israel exposed to Assyrian invasions, he probably stood in the same relation to Assyria as Elijah and Elisha had stood to Syria. The purity of the language implies the antiquity of the book, and the likelihood of its being Jonah's own writing. Indeed, none but Jonah could have written or dictated such peculiar details, known only to himself.
The tradition that places the tomb of Jonah opposite to Mosul, and names it "Nebbi Junus" (that is, "prophet Jonah"), originated probably in the spot having been occupied by a Christian church or convent dedicated to him [LAYARD]. A more ancient tradition of JEROME'S time placed the tomb in Jonah's native village of Gath-hepher.
1
Jon 1:1-17.
简体中文
拿 1:1-17。
约拿奉差往尼尼微、逃避、受罚,并借奇事得保全。
- “约拿”——希伯来文意为“鸽子”。参创 8:8-9,那里鸽子离开挪亚和方舟之后徒然寻找安息之处:约拿也是如此。格劳修斯(Grotius)的解释并不贴切,认为它指“源自希腊”或伊奥尼亚的人,那里有被称为阿米塔奥尼代(Amythaonidæ)的先知。
“亚米太”——希伯来文意为“真理”、“说真话者”,对先知而言是相称之名。
Originale inglese
Jon 1:1-17.
JONAH'S COMMISSION TO NINEVEH, FLIGHT, PUNISHMENT, AND PRESERVATION BY MIRACLE.
1. Jonah--meaning in Hebrew, "dove." Compare
Ge 8:8, 9,
where the dove in vain seeks rest after flying from Noah and the ark: so Jonah. GROTIUS not so well explains it, "one sprung from Greece" or Ionia, where there were prophets called Amythaonidæ.
Amittai--Hebrew for "truth," "truth-telling"; appropriate to a prophet.
2
Senza titolo
简体中文
- “往尼尼微去”——位于底格里斯河东,与今日的摩苏尔相对。这是先知奉差到外邦人中间的唯一事例。然而约拿奉差往尼尼微去,并不单为尼尼微的益处,也是要使以色列羞愧——一座异教之城因一个陌生人约拿初次传道就悔改,而神的百姓虽有本国许多先知早晚传讲,却不肯悔改。尼尼微意为“尼努斯的居所”,即宁录的居所。创 10:11 的翻译应为“他(宁录)往亚述地去,建造尼尼微。”对楔形文字铭文的现代研究证实了圣经的记载:巴比伦早于尼尼微建成,两城皆为含的后裔所建,他们侵占了分给闪的地业(创 10:5-6、8、10、25)。
“大城”——周长四百八十斯达第,长一百五十斯达第,宽九十斯达第[狄奥多鲁斯·西库鲁斯(Diodorus Siculus),2.3]。在乌西雅约第七年、萨尔达纳帕勒斯在位时,被玛代人阿尔巴克斯攻取;主前625年又被巴比伦的那波帕拉萨尔与玛代人基亚克萨雷斯再次攻取。参拿 3:3 注释。
“呼喊”——(赛 40:6;58:1)。
“达到我面前”——(创 4:10;6:13;18:21;拉 9:6;启 18:5);意即他们的恶已经大到必须我公开介入施罚的地步。
Originale inglese
2. to Nineveh--east of the Tigris, opposite the modern Mosul. The only case of a prophet being sent to the heathen. Jonah, however, is sent to Nineveh, not solely for Nineveh's good, but also to shame Israel, by the fact of a heathen city repenting at the first preaching of a single stranger, Jonah, whereas God's people will not repent, though preached to by their many national prophets, late and early. Nineveh means "the residence of Ninus," that is, Nimrod.
Ge 10:11,
where the translation ought to be, "He (Nimrod) went forth into Assyria and builded Nineveh." Modern research into the cuneiform inscriptions confirms the Scripture account that Babylon was founded earlier than Nineveh, and that both cities were built by descendants of Ham, encroaching on the territory assigned to Shem
(Ge 10:5, 6, 8, 10, 25).
great city--four hundred eighty stadia in circumference, one hundred fifty in length, and ninety in breadth [DIODORUS SICULUS, 2.3]. Taken by Arbaces the Mede, in the reign of Sardanapalus, about the seventh year of Uzziah; and a second time by Nabopolassar of Babylon and Cyaxares the Mede in 625 B.C. See on
Jon 3:3.
cry--
(Isa 40:6; 58:1).
come up before me--
(Ge 4:10; 6:13; 18:21; Ezr 9:6; Re 18:5);
that is, their wickedness is so great as to require My open interposition for punishment.
3
Senza titolo
简体中文
- “逃”——约拿逃跑的动机在拿 4:2 有所暗示:他担心自己冒险向如此强大的异教之城宣告如此危险的职分之后,先知的威吓会因神“后悔不降所说的灾”而被撤回——正如神虽屡受激惹却长久宽容以色列一样——这样他就显得像假先知。此外,他也许觉得向一个外邦拜偶像的民族执行职分有失身份,因为他更愿他们灭亡而非悔改。先知受托传预言信息却把它隐藏,这是唯一的事例。
“躲避耶和华的面”——(参创 4:16)。约拿以为逃离耶和华特别临在的以色列地,就能脱离那赐预言感动的耶和华。他大概知道诗 139:7-10 所述的真理,实际上却把它撇在一边(参创 3:8-10;耶 23:24)。
“下到”——从陆地往海上去,用词贴切(诗 107:23)。
“约帕”——今雅法,在但的地业内;早在所罗门时代就是港口(代下 2:16)。
“他施”——西班牙的塔特苏斯;在距东方尼尼微最远的极西之地。
Originale inglese
3. flee--Jonah's motive for flight is hinted at in
Jon 4:2:
fear that after venturing on such a dangerous commission to so powerful a heathen city, his prophetical threats should be set aside by God's "repenting of the evil," just as God had so long spared Israel notwithstanding so many provocations, and so he should seem a false prophet. Besides, he may have felt it beneath him to discharge a commission to a foreign idolatrous nation, whose destruction he desired rather than their repentance. This is the only case of a prophet, charged with a prophetical message, concealing it.
from the presence of the Lord--(Compare
Ge 4:16).
Jonah thought in fleeing from the land of Israel, where Jehovah was peculiarly present, that he should escape from Jehovah's prophecy-inspiring influence. He probably knew the truth stated in
Ps 139:7-10,
but virtually ignored it (compare
Ge 3:8-10; Jer 23:24).
went down--appropriate in going from land to the sea
(Ps 107:23).
Joppa--now Jaffa, in the region of Dan; a harbor as early as Solomon's time
(2Ch 2:16).
Tarshish--Tartessus in Spain; in the farthest west at the greatest distance from Nineveh in the east.
4
Senza titolo
简体中文
- “抛出”——字面作使风突然发作。科弗代尔(Coverdale)译作“将一阵大风掷入海中”。
Originale inglese
4. sent out--literally, caused a wind to burst forth. COVERDALE translates, "hurled a greate wynde into the see."
5
Senza titolo
简体中文
- “水手便惧怕”——他们本是惯于风浪的人,可见危险必极其严重。
“各人哀求自己的神”——按腓尼基的惯例,各人呼求自己的守护神,但偶像却证明无力拯救。耶和华却显为有大能,外邦水手最终以献祭给他作为承认(拿 1:16)。
“底舱”——即船内深处(参撒上 24:3;赛 14:13、15)。自觉有罪的人从同伴面前退入隐藏之处。
“沉睡”——睡眠未必是无辜的证据,也可能是属肉体的安全感与麻木良心的果子。在加利利海上耶稣的睡眠何等不同!(可 4:37-39)有罪的约拿对恐惧的漠然,与无辜水手的惊慌形成对比。因此原文用独立主格的结构:“至于约拿,他”等。在属灵上参弗 5:14。
Originale inglese
5. mariners were afraid--though used to storms; the danger therefore must have been extreme.
cried every man unto his god--The idols proved unable to save them, though each, according to Phœnician custom, called on his tutelary god. But Jehovah proved able: and the heathen sailors owned it in the end by sacrificing to Him
(Jon 1:16).
into the sides--that is, the interior recesses (compare
1Sa 24:3; Isa 14:13, 15).
Those conscious of guilt shrink from the presence of their fellow man into concealment.
fast asleep--Sleep is no necessary proof of innocence; it may be the fruit of carnal security and a seared conscience. How different was Jesus' sleep on the Sea of Galilee!
(Mr 4:37-39).
Guilty Jonah's indifference to fear contrasts with the unoffending mariners' alarm. The original therefore is in the nominative absolute: "But as for Jonah, he," &c. Compare spiritually,
Eph 5:14.
6
Senza titolo
简体中文
- “求告你的神”——古时的外邦人在危难中除本族之神外也求告外邦的神(参诗 107:28)。莫勒(Maurer)把上一句译作“你这样沉睡是什么缘故?”
“顾念我们”——即为我们的好处而顾念(参创 8:1;出 2:25;3:7、9;诗 40:17)。
Originale inglese
6. call upon thy God--The ancient heathen in dangers called on foreign gods, besides their national ones (compare
Ps 107:28).
MAURER translates the preceding clause, "What is the reason that thou sleepest?"
think upon us--for good (compare
Ge 8:1; Ex 2:25; 3:7, 9; Ps 40:17).
7
Senza titolo
简体中文
- “掣签”——神有时在难断之事上认可这种决定方式。比较亚干的类似事例:他的罪使以色列陷入苦楚,直到神把罪犯显明出来,大概是借着掣签(箴 16:33;徒 1:26)。
原始传说与天赋的良知甚至使外邦人也相信,一个有罪的人虽其同伴无辜,却会把他们都牵连在刑罚之中。所以西塞罗(Cicero)[《论神的本性》(The Nature of the Gods),3.37]提到,与无神论者狄亚戈拉斯同船的水手们把所遭遇的风暴归咎于他在船上(参贺拉斯(Horace)的《颂诗》(Odes),3.2.26)。
Originale inglese
7. cast lots--God sometimes sanctioned this mode of deciding in difficult cases. Compare the similar instance of Achan, whose guilt involved Israel in suffering, until God revealed the offender, probably by the casting of lots
(Pr 16:33; Ac 1:26).
Primitive tradition and natural conscience led even the heathen to believe that one guilty man involves all his associates, though innocent, in punishment. So CICERO [The Nature of the Gods, 3.37] mentions that the mariners sailing with Diagoras, an atheist, attributed a storm that overtook them to his presence in the ship (compare HORACE'S Odes, 3.2.26).
8
Senza titolo
简体中文
- 有罪之人既被查明,就受盘问,好使他亲口完全承认。亚干的事例也是如此(书 7:19)。
Originale inglese
8. The guilty individual being discovered is interrogated so as to make full confession with his own mouth. So in Achan's case
(Jos 7:19).
9
Senza titolo
简体中文
- “我是希伯来人”——他不说“以色列人”。因为那是本族之内相互使用的名称,“希伯来人”是外族人使用的名称(创 40:15;出 3:18)。
“我敬畏耶和华”——就信仰宣告而言如此;但他的行为与他的宣告相违,他的宣告使他的罪更重。
“那……造……海的神”——这话贴切地表达,借此可解释为何海上起了风暴。外邦人为“天”、“海”、“地”分别立了不同的神。耶和华是这一切唯一又真又活的神。约拿终于被这猛烈的药方从昏迷中唤醒。约拿不过是以色列背道离神的写照,所以必须承受公义的刑罚。正如摩西的事例,仆人的罪咎是百姓之罪的结果(申 4:21)。
这正是约拿成为弥赛亚合宜预表的原因:弥赛亚担当了百姓归算在他身上的罪。
Originale inglese
9. I am an Hebrew--He does not say "an Israelite." For this was the name used among themselves; "Hebrew," among foreigners
(Ge 40:15; Ex 3:18).
I fear the Lord--in profession: his practice belied his profession: his profession aggravated his guilt.
God . . . which . . . made the sea--appropriately expressed, as accounting for the tempest sent on the sea. The heathen had distinct gods for the "heaven," the "sea," and the "land." Jehovah is the one and only true God of all alike. Jonah at last is awakened by the violent remedy from his lethargy. Jonah was but the reflection of Israel's backsliding from God, and so must bear the righteous punishment. The guilt of the minister is the result of that of the people, as in Moses' case
(De 4:21).
This is what makes Jonah a suitable type of Messiah, who bore the imputed sin of the people.
10
Senza titolo
简体中文
- 当水手知道约拿的逃亡招致如此大能之神的震怒时,“那些人便大大惧怕。”
“你作的是什么事呢?”——信仰的宣告者若行错事,必从不作这样宣告的人口中听见责备。
Originale inglese
10. "The men were exceedingly afraid," when made aware of the wrath of so powerful a God at the flight of Jonah.
Why hast thou done this?--If professors of religion do wrong, they will hear of it from those who make no such profession.
11
Senza titolo
简体中文
- “我们当向你怎样行呢?”——他们这样问,因为约拿本人最知道该如何平息他的神。“只要能办到,我们乐意救你,同时也要救我们自己”(拿 1:13-14)。
Originale inglese
11. What shall we do unto thee?--They ask this, as Jonah himself must best know how his God is to be appeased. "We would gladly save thee, if we can do so, and yet be saved ourselves"
(Jon 1:13, 14).
12
Senza titolo
简体中文
- “将我……抛入海中”——在此约拿是弥赛亚的预表:他是那为平息神震怒的狂涛(关于弥赛亚参赛 69:1-2)、自愿献身受死的那一人,否则那狂涛必吞灭其他所有的人。所以该亚法也凭灵宣告,一个人替百姓死,免得通国灭亡,是合宜的(约 11:50)。
约拿在此也是真悔改的一个榜样:真悔改使悔改者“接受自己罪孽的刑罚”(利 26:41、43),并使他对自己的罪比对自己的苦楚更愤慨。
Originale inglese
12. cast me . . . into the sea--Herein Jonah is a type of Messiah, the one man who offered Himself to die, in order to allay the stormy flood of God's wrath (compare
Ps 69:1, 2,
as to Messiah), which otherwise must have engulfed all other men. So Caiaphas by the Spirit declared it expedient that one man should die, and that the whole nation should not perish
(Joh 11:50).
Jonah also herein is a specimen of true repentance, which leads the penitent to "accept the punishment of his iniquity"
(Le 26:41, 43),
and to be more indignant at his sin than at his suffering.
13
Senza titolo
简体中文
- “他们却不能”——(箴 21:30)。
风与潮——神的不悦与神的旨意——都与他们作对。
Originale inglese
13. they could not--
(Pr 21:30).
Wind and tide--God's displeasure and God's counsel--were against them.
14
Senza titolo
简体中文
- “因这人的性命”——即因夺去这人的性命。
“无辜的血”——不要像惩罚流无辜血之人那样惩罚我们(参申 21:8)。
至于所预表的实体,本丢彼拉多也曾洗手并承认基督的无辜:“这义人的血,我不承担。”但牺牲品约拿有罪、水手无辜;而我们的祭物基督无辜,本丢彼拉多和我们众人都犯了罪。然而因我们的罪归他、他的义归我们这归算,无瑕疵的实体便与有罪的预表恰相对应。
“你……耶和华阿,你照你所喜悦的行了”——约拿上了这只船,海上起了狂风,掣签把他查出来,他又在自己身上宣判,这一切都是你所行的。我们勉强把他交于死地,但如此成就乃你的喜悦。
Originale inglese
14. for this man's life--that is, for taking this man's life.
innocent blood--Do not punish us as Thou wouldst punish the shedders of innocent blood (compare
De 21:8).
In the case of the Antitype, Pontius Pilate washed his hands and confessed Christ's innocence, "I am innocent of the blood of this just person." But whereas Jonah the victim was guilty and the sailors innocent, Christ our sacrificial victim was innocent and Pontius Pilate and nil of us men were guilty. But by imputation of our guilt to Him and His righteousness to us, the spotless Antitype exactly corresponds to the guilty type.
thou . . . Lord, hast done as it pleased thee--That Jonah has embarked in this ship, that a tempest has arisen, that he has been detected by casting of lots, that he has passed sentence on himself, is all Thy doing. We reluctantly put him to death, but it is Thy pleasure it should be so.
15
Senza titolo
简体中文
- “海就……平息了”——正如耶稣一句话所成就的(路 8:24)。
神保全祷告的悔改者;这一真理现在显于水手的事上,随即显于约拿的事上,第三显于尼尼微的事上。
Originale inglese
15. sea ceased . . . raging--so at Jesus' word
(Lu 8:24).
God spares the prayerful penitent, a truth illustrated now in the case of the sailors, presently in that of Jonah, and thirdly, in that of Nineveh.
16
Senza titolo
简体中文
- “献祭”——他们当即献上某种感恩祭,并许愿到了岸上再献更多。格拉修斯(Glassius)认为这不过指他们“应许献祭”。
Originale inglese
16. offered a sacrifice--They offered some sacrifice of thanksgiving at once, and vowed more when they should land. GLASSIUS thinks it means only, "They promised to offer a sacrifice."
17
Senza titolo
简体中文
- “安排一条大鱼”——并非为这目的特别创造,而是在他的护理中指定,一切受造之物都服在其下。这条鱼因太 12:40 的误译,从前被当作鲸鱼;那里和这里一样,原文都是“大鱼”。鲸鱼的喉咙太窄,容不下一个人。博沙尔(Bochart)认为是狗鲨,其胃大到曾发现里面有一具穿甲之人尸体[Hierozoicon(论圣经的动物志),2.5.12]。也有人认为是鲨鱼[杰布(Jebb)]。鲸鱼喉部的空腔据斯科斯比船长(Captain Scoresby)说,大到足以容纳一只满载水手的小艇。无论如何都需要奇事,我们没有更多资料可供推测。我们的主在太 12:39 明确称之为“神迹”或奇事。
在这样的处境下呼吸只能借奇事。这奇事性的介入并非没有充分理由;它的设计不仅要影响约拿,也要影响尼尼微和以色列。先知的一生常以各种经历为标记,使他因共鸣而最适合向听众和百姓履行先知的职分。那吞吃者变为约拿的保全者,预表了神在审判与怜悯两方面都无穷的资源。约拿在受罚之下的境况——与外界隔绝——尽可能成为死亡的象征:对尼尼微和以色列是罪的当下死亡的预表,正如他的获救是悔改时属灵复活的预表;也是耶稣为罪实实在在受死、并由神的灵复活的将来预表。
“三日三夜”——大概正如所预表的实体基督一样,约拿是在第三日被吐在旱地上(太 12:40);希伯来人把头一日和第三日的部分日子都算作完整的二十四小时一日。
Originale inglese
17. prepared a great fish--not created specially for this purpose, but appointed in His providence, to which all creatures are subservient. The fish, through a mistranslation of
Mt 12:40,
was formerly supposed to be a whale; there, as here, the original means "a great fish." The whale's neck is too narrow to receive a man. BOCHART thinks, the dog-fish, the stomach of which is so large that the body of a man in armor was once found in it [Hierozoicon, 2.5.12]. Others, the shark [JEBB]. The cavity in the whale's throat, large enough, according to CAPTAIN SCORESBY, to hold a ship's jolly boat full of men. A miracle in any view is needed, and we have no data to speculate further. A "sign" or miracle it is expressly called by our Lord in
Mt 12:39.
Respiration in such a position could only be by miracle. The miraculous interposition was not without a sufficient reason; it was calculated to affect not only Jonah, but also Nineveh and Israel. The life of a prophet was often marked by experiences which made him, through sympathy, best suited for discharging the prophetical function to his hearers and his people. The infinite resources of God in mercy as well as judgment are prefigured in the devourer being transformed into Jonah's preserver. Jonah's condition under punishment, shut out from the outer world, was rendered as much as possible the emblem of death, a present type to Nineveh and Israel, of the death in sin, as his deliverance was of the spiritual resurrection on repentance; as also, a future type of Jesus' literal death for sin, and resurrection by the Spirit of God.
three days and three nights--probably, like the Antitype, Christ, Jonah was cast forth on the land on the third day
(Mt 12:40);
the Hebrew counting the first and third parts of days as whole twenty-four hour days.
引言
约拿是西布伦的迦特希弗人亚米太的儿子(书 19:10-13 中称为迦特希弗),因此他属于十支派国,而不属于犹大。他的年代可从王下 14:25-27 推断:“他(耶罗波安二世)收回以色列边界之地,从哈马口直到亚拉巴海,正如耶和华以色列的神藉他仆人迦特希弗人亚米太的儿子先知约拿所说的话。因为耶和华看见以色列人甚是艰苦,无论为奴的、自由的都没有了,也无人帮助以色列人。耶和华并没有说要将以色列的名从天下涂抹,乃藉约阿施的儿子耶罗波安拯救他们。”约拿这一预言是在以色列处于最深的低谷时赐下的,那时“无论为奴的、自由的都没有了”,即被囚的或自由的,没有一人能作以色列的帮助者,因此它不可能是耶罗波安在位时所赐的,因为耶罗波安治期以繁荣为标志——其间叙利亚按预言被击败,以色列恢复到从前的“强盛”。因此它必是在耶罗波安之父约阿施在位初期所赐的。约阿施即位时以色列正臣服于叙利亚,却借着屡次得胜将它振兴,这些胜利又被耶罗波安极其成功地延续下去。这样,约拿是最早的先知,紧随以利沙之后;以利沙死于约阿施在位时,并在临终前赐下一个预示叙利亚将三度战败的兆头(王下 13:14-21)。
何西阿和阿摩司也在耶罗波安二世治下说预言,但已是其四十一年治期接近尾声之时。约拿书所载的事大概发生在他生平的后半期;若然,本卷并不比何西阿和阿摩司的部分著作早多少。使用第三人称并不能反驳约拿本人就是作者:因为圣经常作者在提到自己时也用第三人称(参约 19:26)。同样,过去时态的使用(拿 3:3,“尼尼微是极大的城”)也不能证明约拿书写成时尼尼微的伟大已成过去;它只是为使叙述的时态前后一致——“耶和华的话临到约拿……于是约拿起来……尼尼微是”等(拿 1:1;3:3)。提到它的伟大反而证明本卷成书于早期,在以色列人因日后频繁的亚述入侵而对它必然产生深入了解之前。
早在尤利安(Julian)和波菲利(Porphyry)的时候,异教徒就讥笑基督徒轻信约拿被鱼救出的故事。一些不信者认为它源自珀尔修斯从海怪手中救出安德洛墨达的异教神话[阿波罗多鲁斯(Apollodorus),《书库》(The Library),2.4.3];或音乐家阿里翁被水手抛入海中、由海豚安然驮到岸上的故事[希罗多德(Herodotus),《历史》(History),1.24];或赫拉克勒斯为救赫西俄涅跳入海怪口中、在其腹中三日的传说[狄奥多鲁斯·西库鲁斯(Diodorus Siculus),《历史丛书》(Historical Library),4.42;荷马(Homer),《伊利亚特》(The Iliad),20.145;21.442]。倘若其中真有关联,那么异教神话很可能反过来是圣叙述的讹传。耶柔米(Jerome)说约帕附近有一些礁石,被人指认为安德洛墨达被示众于海怪之前所系之处。这一神话暗示约拿的故事很可能经过腓尼基人,以讹传的形式传到了希腊。约拿的记叙是历史,而非(如唯理主义者所说的)比喻,这从主对该记叙的引用可以看出,其中明确肯定了约拿的位格存在、神奇遭遇以及先知职分:“除了先知约拿的神迹以外,再没有神迹给他们看。约拿三日三夜在大鱼肚腹中,人子也要这样三日三夜在地里头”(太 12:39-40)。主承认他在鱼腹中这一经历为“神迹”,即真实的奇事,预表他自己历史中相似的事件;并认定先知对尼尼微的职分已经执行:“尼尼微人……听了约拿所传的就悔改了;看哪,在这里有一人比约拿更大”(太 12:41)。
金奇(Kimchi)本人是犹太人,他也觉得约拿书被列入圣经颇为奇特,因为其中唯一的预言关乎异教之城尼尼微,并未提及以色列——而其他每一位先知都提及以色列。原因似乎在于:本卷有意含蓄地责备以色列——异教之民乐意在一位对他们而言是陌生人的先知初次传道时就悔改;而自夸为神选民的以色列,虽被自己历世历代的先知警戒,却不肯悔改。这是那完全“照亮外邦人的光”(路 2:32)破晓之前预先射出的一道光芒。
约拿本身是一个奇特的悖论:他是神的先知,却又是逃避神的人;溺亡却仍存活;传悔改之道,却对悔改心怀不快。然而约拿既因悔改而从死亡的口中被救出,也就最适合向虽已命定灭亡、却可在悔改时得蒙怜悯宽缓的尼尼微传递盼望。神的忍耐与怜悯,与人的自私和刚硬形成鲜明对比。
尼尼微之所以特别被拣选来教导以色列这些功课,是因为它是当时世界帝国的首都,也因为它此刻正开始让以色列感受到它的权势。我们的主(太 12:41)以尼尼微的悔改责备他当日犹太人的不悔改,正如约拿借同样的例子激起以色列的嫉妒一样(申 32:21)。约拿奉差往尼尼微去,意味着异教之城与以色列一样是先知劳苦的正当工场,且结出更丰硕的果子(参摩 9:7)。
本卷除第二章的感恩祷告(拿 2:1-9)外,通篇为散文叙述。
原文中的迦勒底语用法并不能证明本卷是伪作或属较晚期,因为对一位住在北方边境西布伦的人来说,这样的语言是很自然的,亚兰语的特色很容易由此产生;况且他给尼尼微的信息意味着他对亚述语有所认识。约拿既住在常受亚述侵犯的以色列一隅,他对亚述的关系大概就像以利亚和以利沙对叙利亚的关系一样。语言的纯度暗示本卷的古老,以及它很可能是约拿亲笔所写。事实上,除了约拿本人之外,没有人能写出或口述如此独特、只有他自己知道的细节。
把约拿的坟墓置于摩苏尔对岸,并称之为“内比尤努斯”(Nebbi Junus,意为“先知约拿”)的传说,大概源于该处曾有一座奉献给他的基督教教堂或修道院[莱亚德(Layard)]。耶柔米(Jerome)时代一个更古老的传说则把坟墓置于约拿的故乡迦特希弗。