Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
- 翻訳進捗
- 4,537 / 4,537
- 原文言語
- en
学習資料
聖書注解書
複数のパブリックドメイン注解書と scripture.how の韓国語訳を、書巻と章ごとに閲覧できます。注解書を切り替えながら、訳文だけでなく原文と訳文を並べて読むこともできます。
現在の注解書
すべての注解書
23件の注解書
全項目
307,288
翻訳 81,431 件
ライセンス
出典ごとに表示
出典とライセンス
注解書ごとに原資料、著者、翻訳進捗、ライセンス情報を分けて表示します。scripture.how の韓国語訳・編集物は原文資料とは別に管理されます。
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871). CCEL expanded electronic edition states it is in the public domain.
- 翻訳進捗
- 19,831 / 19,831
- 原文言語
- en
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Albert Barnes · 1834
Albert Barnes' Notes on Revelation Of St. John The Divine (New Testament, English original, public domain). Sourced from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library (CCEL). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes.
- 翻訳進捗
- 22,781 / 22,781
- 原文言語
- en
Adam Clarke's Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Adam Clarke · 1831
Public domain English commentary by Adam Clarke, normalized from Wikisource book pages for scripture.how. Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke.
- 翻訳進捗
- 21,603 / 22,101
- 原文言語
- en
John Gill's Exposition of the Bible
John Gill · 1763
John Gill(1697-1771), Exposition of the Old and New Testament(1746-1763). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/gill.
- 翻訳進捗
- 12,528 / 30,759
- 原文言語
- en
Calvin's Commentaries
John Calvin · 1850
종교개혁 신학 원천 (영역본 PD, 대부분 — 전권 아님)
- 翻訳進捗
- 144 / 7,385
- 原文言語
- en
Matthew Poole's Annotations upon the Holy Bible
Matthew Poole · 1685
간결 절별 전권 개혁주의 주석
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 31,092
- 原文言語
- en
The Pulpit Commentary
ed. H.D.M. Spence & Joseph S. Exell · 1890
전권 강해·설교·예화 풍부 (항목 대량)
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 25,592
- 原文言語
- en
Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
Carl F. Keil, Franz Delitzsch · 1866
구약 학술 표준 — 히브리어·문헌비평·고대근동 배경
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 2,044
- 原文言語
- en
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers
ed. Charles J. Ellicott · 1878
학술+가독 균형 전권 주석
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 23,497
- 原文言語
- en
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Cambridge (다저자) · 1900
준전권 준학술 (권별 저자·연도 확인)
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 27,176
- 原文言語
- en
Vincent's Word Studies in the New Testament
Marvin R. Vincent · 1887
신약 헬라어 단어 연구
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 5,763
- 原文言語
- en
Word Pictures in the New Testament
A.T. Robertson · 1933
헬라어 시제·문법 해설 결정판 (KR PD / US 1931+ 권별)
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 6,935
- 原文言語
- en
The Expositor's Greek Testament
ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (다저자) · 1910
헬라어 신약 학술 (권별 저자 PD 확인 필요)
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 7,010
- 原文言語
- en
Meyer's Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament
Heinrich A.W. Meyer · 1880
신약 학술 정밀주해 (독일 — K&D 대응)
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 5,340
- 原文言語
- en
Wesley's Explanatory Notes
John Wesley · 1755
간결 실용 전권(NT 1755 / OT 1765) 웨슬리안
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 5,643
- 原文言語
- en
Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments
Joseph Benson · 1815
웨슬리안 전권 주석
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 14,675
- 原文言語
- en
The Treasury of David
Charles H. Spurgeon · 1885
시편 주석 고전 (설교 자료 풍부)
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 2,290
- 原文言語
- en
MacLaren's Expositions of Holy Scripture
Alexander Maclaren · 1910
설교형 강해 명저 (전권, 절별 가공 필요)
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 1,144
- 原文言語
- en
The People's New Testament
B.W. Johnson · 1891
평이 절별 신약 해설 (일반신자·모바일)
- 翻訳進捗
- 7 / 3,477
- 原文言語
- en
Coke's Commentary on the Holy Bible
Thomas Coke · 1803
감리교 전권 주석
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 10,808
- 原文言語
- en
Trapp's Complete Commentary
John Trapp · 1660
청교도 전권 주석 — Henry/Gill 보완
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 26,397
- 原文言語
- en
Hodge's Commentary on the New Testament
Charles Hodge · 1860
프린스턴 조직신학 관점 신약 정밀 주석 (롬·고전후·엡)
- 翻訳進捗
- 0 / 1,011
- 原文言語
- en
The lot of the half tribe of Manasseh, Joshua 17:1, Joshua 17:2. Case of the daughters of Zelophehad, Joshua 17:3-6. The borders of Manasseh described, Joshua 17:7-11. The Canaanites dwell among them, but are laid under tribute, Joshua 17:12, Joshua 17:13. The children of Joseph complain of the scantiness of their lot, Joshua 17:14-16. Joshua authorizes them to possess the mountainous wood country of the Perizzites, and gives them encouragement to expel them, though they were strong and had chariots of iron, Joshua 17:17, Joshua 17:18.
INTRODUCTION TO Joshua 17
This chapter gives an account of the lot that fell to the half tribe of Manasseh, to the male children of Manasseh, and to the daughters of Zelophehad, Joshua 17:1; and describes the coast of that lot, Joshua 17:7; and relates the request of the sons of Joseph, to have their lot enlarged, which was granted, Joshua 17:14.
XVII.
(2) Shechem.—It is noteworthy that according to the boundary of Ephraim and Manasseh, described in Joshua 16, the town of Shechem appears to have lain within the border of Manasseh (Conder, p. 263), but as “the separate cities” of Ephraim were among the inheritance of Manasseh (Joshua 16:9), this may have been the case with Shechem, the first metropolis of the Israelites in Palestine.
(3) Daughters.—On the case of the daughters of Zelophehad, see Numbers 27, 36
(5) Ten portions—i.e., five for the sons named in Joshua 17:2, excepting Hepher, and five for Hepher’s five grand-daughters.
(7) From Asher to Michmethah.—Literally, from Asher-ham-Michmethah, a double name; Michmethah being taken as the plain of Mukhnah. The exact spot is not identified; but the plain of Mukhnah runs nearly due south from Shechem.
The inhabitants of En-tappuah—i.e., Yeshebi-En-tappuah, or Yasûf (sheet 14), otherwise Yeshepheh. From this place a line drawn westward will bring us into the Wâdy Kanah, and so on to the river ‘Aujeh, which falls into the sea north of Jaffa.
(10) In Asher on the north—i.e. (according to Conder) Asher-ham-Michmethah (Joshua 17:7), not the tribe of that name.
And in Issachar on the east—i.e., the tribe of Issachar. The joint border of Issachar and Manasseh is not described. But, having regard to the following verse, it seems more probable on the whole that the meaning is this: “Toward the south (of the brook Kanah) it belonged to Ephraim, and on the north to Manasseh, and the sea was his (Manasseh’s) border; and they (i.e., the Manassites) touched Asher on the north, and Issachar on the east.” For (by Joshua 19:26) the territory of Asher extended southwards as far as Carmel; and the tribe of Manasseh had in Issachar and Asher the cities specified in Joshua 17:11.
Territorially, the tribe of Manasseh had the largest share of Palestine.
(11) Even three countries.—The word for “countries” does not occur elsewhere. If taken as in our version, which follows the Targum, we may observe that the places named in this verse do happen to lie on three distinct sheets of the map—viz., Beth-shean (Beisan), Megiddo (Khurbet-el-Mujedda), and Endor (Endûr) on sheet 9; Taanach (Tana) and Ibleam (Bileam, 1Chronicles 6:70), Wâdy Bel’ameh, on sheet 8, and Dor (Tantûra) on sheet 7. Or it may mean the triple height—viz., Endor, Taanach, and Megiddo—three cities on hills in one district, which make very nearly an equilateral triangle.
(12) Could not drive.—Note the defalcation of Manasseh.
(14, 15) Why hast thou given me but one lot . . . seeing I am a great people . . . If thou be a great people, then get thee up . . . and cut down for thyself . . . in the land of the . . . giants.—The request and the answer are both characteristic. The words of the proud Ephraimites and the deeds of the humble Joshua, the true hero of the tribe of Ephraim, should never be forgotten. Joshua’s own greatness was emphatically of that kind which is proved by deeds, and not by words. There are not many famous sayings recorded from his lips. The arrogance of the Ephraimites, on the other hand, may be abundantly illustrated from Old Testament history, by the stories of their behaviour to Gideon and Jephthah, and even to David in later times. They were constantly asserting their right to the supremacy in Israel, without exhibiting any qualification for it.
But the incident in this chapter is the key to several difficulties in the Book of Joshua. It is plain, from what is here stated, that a large portion of the centre of Palestine consisted of uncleared forest: that the cities and inhabitants of that district were far fewer than those of the valley of Esdraelon, or of the territory assigned to Judah on the south. And this fact justifies the strategy of the attack of Israel under Joshua upon the centre of the country, so that the forces of the Canaanites were necessarily divided, and the Israelites could strike first with their whole force at the southern armies, and then turn round upon their enemies in the north. It helps to explain the ease with which they set up the law on Ebal at the commencement of the invasion, and the selection of Shechem for the capital afterwards.
(15) Perizzites and . . . Rephaim (giants) are mentioned together in Genesis 15:20. It is thought that a trace of the name Perizzite may be found in the name Ferasîn (? Ferâta), west of Shechem (sheet 11).
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Jos 17:1-6.
ヨシュア記 17:1-6。
マナセのくじ
1-6. マナセの部族にも割り当て地があった——エフライムは
(創世記 48:19, 20)
ヨセフの家族の、より数多く強い枝として先に記されたが、マナセはなお長子の権を保ち、別個の相続地を割り当てられた。
マキル——その子孫たち。
ギルアデの父——彼にはその名の息子がいた
(民数記 26:29； 27:1)
が、ヘブル語の定冠詞の用法から明らかなように、人物ではなくギルアデという地方について言及されている。「父」はここではギルアデの主、すなわち所有者を意味する。この見解は、ギルアデとバシャンを征服したのはマキル自身ではなく、その子孫であったという事実
(民数記 32:41； 申命記 3:13-15)
によって裏づけられる。これらのマキル人はヨルダンの東側に割り当てを持った。マナセ部族に割り当てられた西側の地は、十の部分に分けられた。息子のいた男子の子孫が五つの家族からなり、したがって五つの分け前が与えられ、第六の家族、すなわちヘペルの子孫はみな女性であったので、ツェロフハデの五人の娘たちは、評価者に申し出て、それぞれ土地の相続地を与えられた
(民数記 27:4
参照)。
マナセは「長子」として、マキルの人々の武勇によって勝ち取られたヨルダン川の東の領土のみならず、厳密な意味で約束された聖なる地であるヨルダン川の西においても、他の部族とともに一つの分け前を受けるべきであった。それゆえ、ヨセフの預言（Genesis 48:20）に従ってエフライムがマナセに先んじたとはいえ、マナセは長子に特有の特権である「二倍の分け前」を受けたのである（Deuteronomy 21:17）。
There was also a lot for the tribe of Manasseh - It was necessary to mark this because Jacob, in his blessing, (Genesis 48:19, Genesis 48:20), did in a certain sense set Ephraim before Manasseh, though the latter was the first-born; but the place here shows that this preference did not affect the rights of primogeniture.
For Machir - because he was a man of war - It is not likely that Machir himself was now alive; if he were, he must have been nearly 200 years old: It is therefore probable that what is spoken here is spoken of his children, who now possessed the lot that was originally designed for their father, who it appears had signalized himself as a man of skill and valor in some of the former wars, though the circumstances are not marked. His descendants, being of a warlike, intrepid spirit, were well qualified to defend a frontier country, which would be naturally exposed to invasion.
There was also a lot for the tribe of Manasseh,.... As well as for the tribe of Ephraim:
for he was the firstborn of Joseph; and therefore ought to have his part and share in the lot of the children of Joseph, though Ephraim was preferred before him in the blessing of Jacob. Some think this is given as a reason why he had a double portion, one on the other side Jordan, and another in the land of Canaan:
to wit, for Machir, the firstborn of Manasseh, the father of Gilead; who was the only son of Manasseh, and so through him, and by his son Gilead, the whole tribe sprung from that patriarch: and
because he was a man of war, therefore he had Gilead and Bashan; which were given to his posterity by Moses, and lay on the other side Jordan, see Deuteronomy 3:13. This Machir very likely had shown his warlike disposition and courage in Egypt, and had fought under the kings there against the common enemy of that country; for it is highly probable he was dead before the children of Israel came out from thence, but the same warlike spirit continued in his posterity; they had their part assigned them on the other side Jordan, to defend that country, while the tribes of Reuben and Gad attended to the care of their flocks and herds.
次にマナセの半部族が分け前を与えられる。
本章において、 一、 この部族のうちで分け前を受けるべき諸氏族（ヨシュア記17:1-6）。 二、 彼らの割り当て地となった地（ヨシュア記17:7-13）。 三、 ヨセフから出た二部族が、自分たちの割り当て地の拡張を求めた共同の願いと、それに対するヨシュアの答え（ヨシュア記17:14-18）。