Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
- 翻訳進捗
- 4,537 / 4,537
- 原文言語
- en
学習資料
複数のパブリックドメイン注解書と scripture.how の韓国語訳を、書巻と章ごとに閲覧できます。注解書を切り替えながら、訳文だけでなく原文と訳文を並べて読むこともできます。
現在の注解書
すべての注解書
23件の注解書
全項目
307,288
翻訳 81,431 件
ライセンス
出典ごとに表示
注解書ごとに原資料、著者、翻訳進捗、ライセンス情報を分けて表示します。scripture.how の韓国語訳・編集物は原文資料とは別に管理されます。
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871). CCEL expanded electronic edition states it is in the public domain.
Albert Barnes · 1834
Albert Barnes' Notes on Revelation Of St. John The Divine (New Testament, English original, public domain). Sourced from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library (CCEL). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes.
Adam Clarke · 1831
Public domain English commentary by Adam Clarke, normalized from Wikisource book pages for scripture.how. Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke.
John Gill · 1763
John Gill(1697-1771), Exposition of the Old and New Testament(1746-1763). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/gill.
John Calvin · 1850
종교개혁 신학 원천 (영역본 PD, 대부분 — 전권 아님)
Matthew Poole · 1685
간결 절별 전권 개혁주의 주석
ed. H.D.M. Spence & Joseph S. Exell · 1890
전권 강해·설교·예화 풍부 (항목 대량)
Carl F. Keil, Franz Delitzsch · 1866
구약 학술 표준 — 히브리어·문헌비평·고대근동 배경
ed. Charles J. Ellicott · 1878
학술+가독 균형 전권 주석
Cambridge (다저자) · 1900
준전권 준학술 (권별 저자·연도 확인)
Marvin R. Vincent · 1887
신약 헬라어 단어 연구
A.T. Robertson · 1933
헬라어 시제·문법 해설 결정판 (KR PD / US 1931+ 권별)
ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (다저자) · 1910
헬라어 신약 학술 (권별 저자 PD 확인 필요)
Heinrich A.W. Meyer · 1880
신약 학술 정밀주해 (독일 — K&D 대응)
John Wesley · 1755
간결 실용 전권(NT 1755 / OT 1765) 웨슬리안
Joseph Benson · 1815
웨슬리안 전권 주석
Charles H. Spurgeon · 1885
시편 주석 고전 (설교 자료 풍부)
Alexander Maclaren · 1910
설교형 강해 명저 (전권, 절별 가공 필요)
B.W. Johnson · 1891
평이 절별 신약 해설 (일반신자·모바일)
Thomas Coke · 1803
감리교 전권 주석
John Trapp · 1660
청교도 전권 주석 — Henry/Gill 보완
Charles Hodge · 1860
프린스턴 조직신학 관점 신약 정밀 주석 (롬·고전후·엡)
The similitude of the householder hiring laborers into his vineyard, to show that the Gentiles should be preferred to the Jews, according to what was hinted at the close of the last chapter, vv. 1-16. On the way going up to Jerusalem he predicts his sufferings and death, Matthew 20:17-19. The mother of Zebedee's children requests dignities for her sons, Matthew 20:20, Matthew 20:21. Christ, by his answer, shows that sufferings, not worldly honors, are to be the lot of his most faithful followers, and that seats in glory can be given only to those who are prepared for them, Matthew 20:22, Matthew 20:23. From this our Lord takes occasion to teach the necessity of humility, and to show that those who wished to be chief must be servants of all, Matthew 20:24-28. On his coming to Jericho, he restores sight to two blind men, who, being restored, follow him, Matthew 20:29-34.
CHAPTER 20.
PARABLE OF THE HOURS; TWO SONS OF ZEBEDEE; BLIND MAN AT JERICHO.
CHAPTER 20
Matthew 20:6. ὥραν] is, with Lachm. and Tisch., to be deleted as a supplement, following B D L א, vss. Or.
ἑστῶτας] Elz., Fritzsche, Scholz insert ἀργούς, which is not found in B C** D L א, vss. and Fathers. Interpolation taken from Matthew 20:3; Matthew 20:7.
Matthew 20:7. κ. ὅ ἐὰν ᾖ δίκαιον, λήψεσθε] is wanting in important codd. (B D L Z א), vss. and Fathers. Deleted by Lachm. and Tisch. For λήψεσθε, several vss. have dabo vobis. The words are a very ancient interpolation, in conformity with Matthew 20:4.
Matthew 20:8. Delete αὐτοῖς, with Tisch. 8, following C L Z א, Or. A supplement.
Matthew 20:10. πλείονα] Fritzsche, Lachm. and Tisch. 7 : πλεῖον, following B C* N Z Δ, min. vss. Or. The reading of the Received text is of the nature of an explanation (a greater number of denarii).
For ἀνά read τὸ ἀνά, with Tisch., following C L N Z א, 33. The article was omitted in conformity with Matthew 20:9.
Matthew 20:12. ὅτι] does not occur, it is true, in B C** D א, 1, Vulg. It. Syr., and is deleted by Lachm. and Tisch.; but how readily may it have been overlooked before οὗτοι!
Matthew 20:15. The first ἤ is deleted by Lachm., following B D L Z, Syrcur Arm. (in accordance with which evidence, as well as that of א, the arrangement ὃ θέλω ποιῆσαι should be restored). Correctly; an old interpolation for the purpose of marking the question. There would be no motive whatever for omitting the ἤ. For the second ἤ (in Elz.) we should, with Tisch. 7, read εἰ, following B** H S r, Chrys. Did. and many min. From not being understood, εἰ was all the more readily replaced by ἤ, owing to the pronunciation being much the same.
Matthew 20:16. πολλοὶ γάρ εἰσι κλητοὶ, ὀλίγοι δὲ ἐκλεκτοί] omitted in B L Z א, 36, Copt. Sahid., and deleted by Tisch. 8, with whom Keim concurs. But it is not at all likely that the words would be interpolated from Matthew 22:14; for, so far from there having been any occasion for so doing, they have here more the appearance of being out of place than otherwise. This apparent irrelevancy may have led to the omission of the saying, which is supported by testimony so old as that of C D, It. Syr., unless we suppose it to have been due rather to the simple homoeoteleuton ἐσχαΤΟΙ … ἐκλεκΤΟΙ.
Matthew 20:17. ἐν τῇ ὁδῷ καί] read with Lachm. and Tisch.: καὶ ἐν τῇ ὁδῷ, following B L Z א, min. Copt. Sahid. Arm. Persp. Or. (twice). At a very early period (Vulg. It. Hil.), ἐν τῇ ὁδῷ was omitted either accidentally, or because it is likewise awanting in the parallel passages in the other Synoptists. But, in restoring it, it would most naturally occur to those who did so to insert it after κατʼ ἰδίαν.
Matthew 20:19. ἀναστήσεται] Tisch.: ἐγερθήσεται, following C* L N Z א, Or. Chrys. The reading of the Received text is taken from the parallel passages.
Matthew 20:22. πίνειν;] Elz., Scholz insert: καὶ (Scholz: ἢ) τὸ βάπτισμα, ὃ ἐγὼ βαπτίζομαι, βαπτισθῆναι, against B D L Z א, 1, 22, the majority of vss. and Or. Epiph. Hilar. Jer. Ambr. Juv. Taken from Mark 10:38.
Matthew 20:23. πίεσθε] Elz., Scholz, in opposition to the same witnesses, insert: καὶ (Scholz: ἢ) τὸ βάπτισμα ὃ ἐγὼ βαπτίζομαι, βαπτισθήσεσθε.
Matthew 20:26. ἔσται ἐν ὑμῖν] for ἔσται, Lachm. has ἐστίν, following B D Z, Cant. Sahid. Correctly; the reading of the Received text is an alteration to suit what follows in this and the 27th verse, where, with Fritzsche, Lachm. Tisch. 8, we ought to read ἔσται instead of ἔστω, in accordance with preponderating evidence; ἔστω (likewise derived from Mark 10:43) is a gloss. But Fritzsche was scarcely warranted in restoring δέ after οὕτως, Matthew 20:26, for it is condemned by decisive evidence, and is a connecting particle borrowed from Mark.
Matthew 20:31. ἔκραζον] Lachm. Tisch. 8 : ἔκραξαν, following B D L Z א, min. Copt. Sahid. A repetition from Matthew 20:30.
Matthew 20:33. ἀνοιχθῶσιν ἡμ. οἱ ὀφθ.] Lachm. Tisch. 8 : ἀνοιγῶσιν οἱ ὀφθ. ἡμ., following B D L Z א, min. Or. Chrys. To be adopted, inasmuch as the first aorist was the more common tense, comp. Matthew 9:30, John 9:10.
Matthew 20:34. ὀφθαλμῶν] B D L Z, min. Or. have ὀμμάτων. So Lachm., Rinck, Tisch. 8. Correctly; the more usual term has been adopted from the context.
Lachm. and Tisch. 8 delete αὐτῶν οἱ ὀφθαλμοί after ἀνέβλεψαν. The words are not found in B D L Z א, min. vss. (also Vulg. It.) and a few Fathers, but they were left out as being superfluous and cumbersome. There was no motive whatever for inserting them.
REMARK.
After Matthew 20:28 there occurs in D (and in codd. of It. with many variations in detail) the following interpolation, apocryphal, no doubt, but akin to Luke 14:8 ff.: ὑμεῖς δὲ ζητεῖτε ἐκ μιχροῦ αὐξῆσαι κ. ἐκ μείζονος ἔλαττον εἶναι. Εἰσερχόμενοι δὲ καὶ παρακληθέντες δειπνῆσαι μὴ ἀνακλίνεσθε εἰς τοὺς ἐξέχοντας τόπους, μή ποτε ἐνδοξότερός σου ἐπέλθῃ, καὶ προσελθὼν ὁ δειπνοκλήτωρ εἴπῃ σοι· ἔτι κάτω χώρει, καὶ καταισχυνθήσῃ. Ἐὰν δὲ ἀναπέσῃς εἰς τὸν ἥττονα τόπον καὶ ἐπέλθῃ σου ἣττων, ἐρεῖ σοι ὁ δειπνοκλήωρ· σύναγε ἔτι ἄνω, καὶ ἔσται σοι τοῦτο χρήσιμον. Comp. Hilar., also Syrcur.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Mt 20:1-16.
ぶどう園の 労働者の たとえ。
マタイのみが記録するこのたとえは、第十九章の終わりと密接に結びついており、キリストのためにすべてを捨てた者たちに、ペテロ自身のように、どのような扱いを受けるかというペテロの問いに関連して語られた。それは、彼らが豊かに報いられる一方で、後の改宗者と奉仕における働き手に対しても一定の公平が守られることを示すよう意図されている。
1. 天の国は、ある家の主人に似ている等—天のために魂を育てること、そのために必要とされ備えられる栽培、および神がその全体の事柄において払われる配慮と労苦を表すぶどう園の姿は、聖書のすべての読者に親しい。
(Ps 80:8-16; Isa 5:1-7; Jer 2:21; Lu 20:9-16; Joh 15:1-8)。
WEBSTERとWILKINSONが述べるように、ぶどうの収穫時には労働力が不足し、主人たちはそれを確保するために市場に早く出かけなければならなかった。おそらく、福音の働きの切迫した性質と、労働者の比較的少なさが付随的に示唆されている。
Mt 9:37, 38。
Mt 9:38
における「労働者」は、第一に教会の公のしもべたちであるが、その後に、またそれとともに、キリストのすべてのしもべたちであり、彼らは主の奉仕において働くという最も重い義務を負わされている。
天の国は…――「というのは」という語は、この章が前の章と結び付けられていたはずであることを示している。このたとえは、前の章の最後の節の心情、すなわち「先になっている多くの者が後になり、後になっている者たちが先になる」を明らかに説明するために、特に語られたものである。ここで天の国とは、おそらくその現世と来世における状態を含めて、教会を意味する。Matthew 3:2 の注を参照。これは報いに関係しており、その意味は次のように表すことができる。「わたしの国において、すなわちわたしに従う者たちの上に報いが与えられるのは、ある家の主人が報いを与えたのと同じ仕方による。すなわち、後の者が先の者と等しくなり、先の者が後になるという仕方である。」
ある家の主人とは――一家の主人のことである。家庭の事柄のかしらに立つ者のことである。
彼のぶどう園は――ユダヤのかなりの部分が、ぶどうの栽培に充てられていた。それゆえ、ぶどう園は、肥沃な、あるいはよく耕された場所を表すのにしばしば用いられ、そこから、神がそれに注がれた配慮と栽培を表す教会を指すようになった。Isaiah 5:7 の注を参照。Jeremiah 12:10 と比較せよ。ぶどう園の構造のしかたについては、Matthew 21:33 の注を参照。
For the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man - a householder - The very commencement of this chapter shows it to be connected with the preceding. The manner of God's proceeding under the Gospel dispensation resembles a householder, who went out at day break, αμα πρωι, together with the morning; as the light began to go out of its chambers in the east, so he went out of his bed-room to employ laborers, that they might cultivate his vineyard. This was what was called, among the Jews and Romans, the first hour; answering to six o'clock in the morning.
To hire laborers - Some workmen, των εργατων - for he had not got all that was necessary, because we find him going out at other hours to hire more.
この章には四つの事柄が含まれている。一、ぶどう園の労働者たちに関するたとえ(マタイの福音書20:1-16)。二、キリストの迫り来る苦難についての予告(マタイの福音書20:17-19)。三、二人の弟子が母を通じて願った願いをとがめられたこと(マタイの福音書20:20-28)。四、二人の盲人の願いが聞き入れられ、彼らの目が開かれたこと(マタイの福音書20:29-34)。