scripture.how 聖書注解書

学習資料

聖書注解書

複数のパブリックドメイン注解書と scripture.how の韓国語訳を、書巻と章ごとに閲覧できます。注解書を切り替えながら、訳文だけでなく原文と訳文を並べて読むこともできます。

現在の注解書

すべての注解書

23件の注解書

全項目

307,288

翻訳 81,431 件

ライセンス

出典ごとに表示

出典とライセンス

注解書ごとに原資料、著者、翻訳進捗、ライセンス情報を分けて表示します。scripture.how の韓国語訳・編集物は原文資料とは別に管理されます。

全体ライセンスを見る

Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary

Matthew Henry · 1714

パブリックドメイン

Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.

翻訳進捗
4,537 / 4,537
原文言語
en

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871

パブリックドメイン

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871). CCEL expanded electronic edition states it is in the public domain.

翻訳進捗
19,831 / 19,831
原文言語
en

Barnes' Notes on the Bible

Albert Barnes · 1834

パブリックドメイン

Albert Barnes' Notes on Revelation Of St. John The Divine (New Testament, English original, public domain). Sourced from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library (CCEL). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes.

翻訳進捗
22,781 / 22,781
原文言語
en

Adam Clarke's Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

Adam Clarke · 1831

パブリックドメイン

Public domain English commentary by Adam Clarke, normalized from Wikisource book pages for scripture.how. Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke.

翻訳進捗
21,603 / 22,101
原文言語
en

John Gill's Exposition of the Bible

John Gill · 1763

パブリックドメイン

John Gill(1697-1771), Exposition of the Old and New Testament(1746-1763). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/gill.

翻訳進捗
12,528 / 30,759
原文言語
en

Calvin's Commentaries

John Calvin · 1850

パブリックドメイン

종교개혁 신학 원천 (영역본 PD, 대부분 — 전권 아님)

翻訳進捗
144 / 7,385
原文言語
en

Matthew Poole's Annotations upon the Holy Bible

Matthew Poole · 1685

パブリックドメイン

간결 절별 전권 개혁주의 주석

翻訳進捗
0 / 31,092
原文言語
en

The Pulpit Commentary

ed. H.D.M. Spence & Joseph S. Exell · 1890

パブリックドメイン

전권 강해·설교·예화 풍부 (항목 대량)

翻訳進捗
0 / 25,592
原文言語
en

Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament

Carl F. Keil, Franz Delitzsch · 1866

パブリックドメイン

구약 학술 표준 — 히브리어·문헌비평·고대근동 배경

翻訳進捗
0 / 2,044
原文言語
en

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers

ed. Charles J. Ellicott · 1878

パブリックドメイン

학술+가독 균형 전권 주석

翻訳進捗
0 / 23,497
原文言語
en

Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

Cambridge (다저자) · 1900

パブリックドメイン

준전권 준학술 (권별 저자·연도 확인)

翻訳進捗
0 / 27,176
原文言語
en

Vincent's Word Studies in the New Testament

Marvin R. Vincent · 1887

パブリックドメイン

신약 헬라어 단어 연구

翻訳進捗
0 / 5,763
原文言語
en

Word Pictures in the New Testament

A.T. Robertson · 1933

パブリックドメイン

헬라어 시제·문법 해설 결정판 (KR PD / US 1931+ 권별)

翻訳進捗
0 / 6,935
原文言語
en

The Expositor's Greek Testament

ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (다저자) · 1910

パブリックドメイン

헬라어 신약 학술 (권별 저자 PD 확인 필요)

翻訳進捗
0 / 7,010
原文言語
en

Meyer's Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament

Heinrich A.W. Meyer · 1880

パブリックドメイン

신약 학술 정밀주해 (독일 — K&D 대응)

翻訳進捗
0 / 5,340
原文言語
en

Wesley's Explanatory Notes

John Wesley · 1755

パブリックドメイン

간결 실용 전권(NT 1755 / OT 1765) 웨슬리안

翻訳進捗
0 / 5,643
原文言語
en

Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments

Joseph Benson · 1815

パブリックドメイン

웨슬리안 전권 주석

翻訳進捗
0 / 14,675
原文言語
en

The Treasury of David

Charles H. Spurgeon · 1885

パブリックドメイン

시편 주석 고전 (설교 자료 풍부)

翻訳進捗
0 / 2,290
原文言語
en

MacLaren's Expositions of Holy Scripture

Alexander Maclaren · 1910

パブリックドメイン

설교형 강해 명저 (전권, 절별 가공 필요)

翻訳進捗
0 / 1,144
原文言語
en

The People's New Testament

B.W. Johnson · 1891

パブリックドメイン

평이 절별 신약 해설 (일반신자·모바일)

翻訳進捗
7 / 3,477
原文言語
en

Trapp's Complete Commentary

John Trapp · 1660

パブリックドメイン

청교도 전권 주석 — Henry/Gill 보완

翻訳進捗
0 / 26,397
原文言語
en

Hodge's Commentary on the New Testament

Charles Hodge · 1860

パブリックドメイン

프린스턴 조직신학 관점 신약 정밀 주석 (롬·고전후·엡)

翻訳進捗
0 / 1,011
原文言語
en
表示方式
比較方式
翻訳言語
翻訳状態

Matthew 7章 서론

6件の注解を比較

6件の注解書を比較 本文を開く

Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary

無題

翻訳あり 本文を開く

この章は、キリストの山上の説教を続け、結ぶものである。それは純粋に実践的であり、神と人との両方に対して我々の歩みを正しく整えるように導く。キリスト教の目的は人を良くする—あらゆる点で良くする—ことであるから。ここに、一、非難と戒めに関するいくつかの規則がある(マタ7:1-6)。二、必要なものを神に祈るようにとの励ましが与えられている(マタ7:7-11)。三、歩みにおける厳格さの必要性が強調されている(マタ7:12-14)。四、偽預言者に気をつけるべきとの警告が与えられている(マタ7:15-20)。五、説教全体の結論があり、キリストの命令に対する普遍的な従順の必要性を示す。これがなければ、幸福であることを期待できない(マタ7:21-27)。六、キリストの教えが聞く者たちに与えた印象がある(マタ7:28,29)。

Adam Clarke's Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

Matthew 7 Introduction

原文のみ 本文を開く

Our Lord warns men against rash judgment and uncharitable censures, Matthew 7:1-5. Shows that holy things must not be profaned, Matthew 7:6; gives encouragement to fervent persevering prayer, Matthew 7:7-11. Shows how men should deal with each other, Matthew 7:12. Exhorts the people to enter in at the strait gate, Matthew 7:13, Matthew 7:14; to beware of false teachers, who are to be known by their fruits, Matthew 7:15-20. Shows that no man shall be saved by his mere profession of Christianity, however specious, Matthew 7:22, Matthew 7:23. The parable of the wise man who built his house upon a rock, Matthew 7:24, Matthew 7:25. Of the foolish man who built his house, without a foundation, on the sand, Matthew 7:26, Matthew 7:27. Christ concludes his sermon, and the people are astonished at his doctrine, Matthew 7:28, Matthew 7:29.

Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

Matthew 7 Introduction

原文のみ 本文を開く

Ch. 5–7. Sermon on the Mount

It is instructive to find the Sermon on the Mount following close upon the works of mercy which would open men’s hearts to receive the Saviour’s words. It is a discourse about the changed life or Metanoia, showing its conditions; and about the Kingdom or Basileia, showing its nature, legislation, and privileges.

The description of the Kingdom here given may be compared with the thoughts suggested by Satan in the Temptation. Jesus makes no promise to conquer the world, or to dazzle men by a display of power, or to satisfy bodily wants, making poverty cease.

In regard to heathenism the sermon is a contrast, in regard to the Jewish Law it is a sublime fulfilment Again, instead of curses there are blessings, instead of penalties, reward.

Two questions are raised in regard to the Sermon on the Mount (1) Is it a connected discourse, and not merely a collection of our Lord’s sayings? (2) Is it to be identified with the Sermon on the Plain, Luke 6:17-49?

It is probable that the answer should be in the affirmative to each question. 1. (a) This is the most natural inference from the Evangelist’s words and from the manner in which the discourse is introduced. (b) An analysis points to a close connection of thought and to a systematic arrangement of the different sections of the Sermon. (c) The objection that some of the sayings are found in a different connection in St Luke’s Gospel cannot have great weight. For it is more than probable that our Lord repeated on many occasions various portions of His teaching. 2. (a) The beginning and end are identical as well as much of the intervening matter. (b) The portions omitted—a comparison between the old and the new legislation—are such as would be less adapted for St Luke’s readers than for St Matthew’s. (c) The “mount” and the “plain” are not necessarily distinct localities. The plain is more accurately translated “a level place,” a platform on the high land. (d) The place in the order of events differs in St Luke, but it is probable that here as well as elsewhere St Matthew does not observe the order of time.

Here the question of time is important as bearing on a further question, whether Matthew was himself among the audience. Was the Sermon delivered after the call of the twelve (Luke) or before (Matthew)?

The following analysis may be of use in showing the connection.

A. The Subjects of the Kingdom, Matthew 5:3-16.

(1)  Their character and privileges, Matthew 5:3-12.

(2)  Their responsibility, Matthew 5:13-16.

B. The Kingdom of Heaven in relation (1) to the Law, Matthew 5:17-48; and (2) to Pharisaic rules, Matthew 6:1-34.

(1) It is the highest fulfilment of the law in regard to (a) The Decalogue, Matthew 5:21-37. (b) The law of Retaliation, 38–42. (c) Love or Charity, 43–48.

(2) It exceeds the righteousness of the Pharisees in regard to (a) Almsgiving, Matthew 6:1-4; (b) Prayer, Matthew 6:5-15; (c) Fasting, Matthew 6:16-18; (d) Earthly possessions and daily cares, Matthew 6:19-34.

C. Characteristics of the Kingdom, Matthew 7:1-27. (a) Judgment on others, Matthew 7:1-6. (b) The Father’s love for the Children of the Kingdom, 7–12. (c) The narrow entrance therein, 13, 14. (d) The danger of false guides to the narrow entrance, and the test of the true, 15–23. (e) A description of the true subjects of the Kingdom, as distinguished from the false, 24–27.

Ch. 7. C. Characteristics of the Kingdom, Matthew 7:1-27After contrasting the New Law with the Mosaic Law and with Pharisaic rules and conduct, Jesus proceeds to lay down rules for the guidance of His disciples in the Christian life.

The Expositor's Greek Testament

Matthew 7 Introduction

原文のみ 本文を開く

CHAPTER 7.

THE SERMON CONTINUED AND CLOSED.

The contents of this chapter are less closely connected and more miscellaneous than in the two preceding. In Matthew 7:1-12 the polemic against Pharisaism seems to be continued and concluded. Matthew 7:6-11 Weiss regards as an interpolation foreign to the connection. It seems best not to be too anxious about discovering connections, but to take the weighty moral sentences of the chapter as they stand, as embodying thoughts of Christ at whatever time uttered, on the hill or elsewhere, or in whatever connection. Section 1–5 certainly deals with a Pharisaic vice, that of exalting ourselves by disparaging others, a very cheap way of attaining moral superiority. Jesus would have His disciples rise above Pagans, publicans, Sadducees, Pharisees, but not by the method of detraction.

Meyer's Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament

Matthew 7 Introduction

原文のみ 本文を開く

CHAPTER 7

Matthew 7:2. μετρηθ.] In opposition to decisive testimony, Elz. has ἀντιμετρηθ., from Luke 6:38.

Matthew 7:4. For ἀπό, Lachm. Tisch. 8 read ἐκ, found only in B א, Curss. With ἐκβάλω and Matthew 7:5 before them, the copyists involuntarily wrote the ἐκ.

Matthew 7:6. Lachm. and Tisch. have the future καταπατήσουσιν, according to B C L X, 33. With such important testimony in its favour, it is to be preferred to the generally received aor. conj.

Matthew 7:9. The omission of ἐστιν in B* L, Curss. and several versions (Lachm.: ἤ τις), as well as the reading ὃν αἰτήσει which follows (Lachm. Tisch. 8), is meant to help out the construction.

Matthew 7:10. καὶ ἐὰν ἰχθὺν αἰτήσῃ] Lachm. Tisch. 8 : ἢ καὶ ἰχθὺν αἰτήσει, as in B C א, Curss. Verss., after Luke 11:11.

Matthew 7:13. ἡ πύλη] is deleted by Lachm. and bracketed by Tisch. 8, but only, however, after א Codd. of the It. and Fathers (Clem. Or. Cypr. Hilar. Lucif.). From its resemblance to πλατεῖα immediately preceding, this word was very liable to be omitted. The authority for its omission in Matthew 7:14 is decidedly weaker (א being in this case against it). Here also it is bracketed by Lachm. and Tisch. 8.

Matthew 7:14. τί] Elz. and Tisch., with a decided preponderance of testimony against them, prefer ὅτι, which owed its origin to ὅτι πλατεῖα, etc., Matthew 7:13, the meaning of τί not being understood.

Matthew 7:16. σταφυλήν] Schulz, Lachm. Tisch. 8 have σταφυλάς, according to B א and several Curss. and Verss. The plural originated in consequence of συλλέγ. and σῦκα.

Matthew 7:18. Tisch. 8. has ἐνεγκεῖν for ποιεῖν in both instances, against decisive testimony. After πᾶν Lachm. has οὖν in brackets (C** L Z, Curss. Verss.). An interpolation for the sake of connection, rendered in Brix. by enim, and in Germ. 2 by autem.

Matthew 7:21. After ἐν (Lachm. Tisch. 8 : ἐν τοῖς, according to B Z א) οὐρανοῖς, Fritzsche, following Bengel, inserts οὗτος εἰσελεύσεται εἰς τὴν βας. τῶν οὐρανῶν, but on far too slender authority. A supplementary gloss.

Matthew 7:24. ὁμοιώσω αὐτόν] B Z א, Curss. Verss. and several Fathers have ὁμοιωθήσεται. Derived from Matthew 7:26 for the sake of the nominat. πᾶς. Adopted by Lachm. and Tisch. 8.

Matthew 7:28. συνετέλεσεν] Lach. Tisch. read ἐτέλεσεν, according to B C Z? Γ א, Curss. Or. Chrys. But how easily might the syllable συν drop out between OTE ETE! especially as συντελεῖν occurs nowhere else in Matth.

Matthew 7:29. Lachm. inserts αὐτῶν καὶ οἱ Φαρισαῖοι after γραμματεῖς, on authorities of unequal value. The evidence is stronger in favour of αὐτῶν, which, moreover, is confirmed by א. Tisch. has adopted merely αὐτῶν after γραμματεῖς, in which, however, he is right; because, whilst there was no reason for adding αὐτῶν, the omission of it was natural in itself, and suggested by Mark 1:22.

Jesus warns (1) against judging, Matthew 7:1-6; urges (2) to prayer, Matthew 7:7-11; then (3) prepares for the transition, Matthew 7:12, to the exhortation to enter the Messianic kingdom through the strait gate, Matthew 7:13-14; warns (4) against false prophets, Matthew 7:15-23; and concludes with the powerful passage regarding the wise and the foolish man, Matthew 7:24-27.

The People's New Testament

無題

原文のみ 本文を開く
まだ翻訳がありません。

Matthew 7章 1

2件の注解を比較

2件の注解書を比較 本文を開く

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

無題

翻訳あり 本文を開く

山上の説教—結。

Mt 7:1-12.

雑多な 補足的 勧告。

これらの節が完全に補足的であるというのが、最も簡単で最も自然な見解である。直前の文脈との明らかな関連を見出そうとするあらゆる試みは、私たちの判断では、無理がある。しかし補足的であっても、これらの勧告は決して重要性が低いわけではない。むしろ、これらはキリストの生涯の最も繊細で不可欠な義務のいくつかを含む。ここで提示される生き生きとした形においては、おそらくこれらは前述のいずれの見出しの下でも同じ効果をもって導入され得なかったであろう。しかしこれらは同じ大原則から生じ、同じ福音的「義」の他の形態および現れにすぎない。

非難的なさばき

(Mt 7:1-5)。

1. さばいてはならない。さばかれないためである—ここで「さばく」とは、必ずしも有罪の宣告を下すことを意味するのではなく、好意的であれ不好意的であれ、単純なさばきのことでもない。文脈は、ここで非難されるものが、他者の性質や行動を好ましく見る性向であり、それが必然的に、軽率で不正で愛のないさばきを彼らに下すことにつながることを明らかにする。疑いなく、ここで語られるのはそのように下されたさばきである。しかし主がねらいとするのは、そこから生じる霊である。この愛のない霊を避ける限り、私たちは兄弟の性質や行動についてさばきの座に着くことを許されるだけでなく、必要な識別の行使において、しばしば自らの導きのためにそうすることを余儀なくされる。ここで非難されるのは、非難的な性向の行使に関わる愛の律法の違反だけである。そしてそれに対する論拠—「さばかれないためである」—はこれを裏付ける。「すなわち、あなたがた自身の性質と行動が同じ厳しさで宣告されないように」、大いなる日に。

Barnes' Notes on the Bible

Matthew 7:1

翻訳あり 本文を開く

さばいてはならない…――この命令は、軽率で、あら捜しを好み、不正なさばきのことを指している。Romans 2:1 を参照。ルカ(Luk 6:37)は、それを「罪に定めること」という意味で説明している。キリストは、裁判官としてさばくことを罪に定めてはいない。それは正義にかなう限りにおいて、合法かつ必要であるからである。また、他人の行いについて私たちが「意見を形成する」ことも罪に定めていない。悪であると知っている行いについて意見を持た「ない」ことは不可能だからである。しかし彼が指しているのは、酌量すべきあらゆる事情への考慮なしに、性急に、苛酷に判断を形成する習慣と、いったん形成されたそのような意見を、苛酷にかつ不必要に「表現する」習慣である。これは「司法的な」判断よりもむしろ個人的な判断を指しており、おそらくは主として、律法学者たちとファリサイ派の人々の慣習を指すものであろう。