Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
- 번역 진행
- 4,537 / 4,537
- 원문 언어
- en
학습 자료
여러 공개 도메인 주석서와 성서하우 한글 번역을 책과 장별로 탐색합니다. 주석서를 전환하며 번역만 읽거나 원문과 번역을 나란히 볼 수 있습니다.
현재 주석서
전체 주석서
23개 주석서
전체 항목
307,288
번역 81,431건
라이선스
출처별 표시
주석서 원문, 저자, 번역 진행률, 라이선스 정보를 출처별로 구분해 표시합니다. 성서하우의 한글 번역·편집물은 원문 자료와 별도로 관리됩니다.
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871). CCEL expanded electronic edition states it is in the public domain.
Albert Barnes · 1834
Albert Barnes' Notes on Revelation Of St. John The Divine (New Testament, English original, public domain). Sourced from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library (CCEL). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes.
Adam Clarke · 1831
Public domain English commentary by Adam Clarke, normalized from Wikisource book pages for scripture.how. Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke.
John Gill · 1763
John Gill(1697-1771), Exposition of the Old and New Testament(1746-1763). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/gill.
John Calvin · 1850
종교개혁 신학 원천 (영역본 PD, 대부분 — 전권 아님)
Matthew Poole · 1685
간결 절별 전권 개혁주의 주석
ed. H.D.M. Spence & Joseph S. Exell · 1890
전권 강해·설교·예화 풍부 (항목 대량)
Carl F. Keil, Franz Delitzsch · 1866
구약 학술 표준 — 히브리어·문헌비평·고대근동 배경
ed. Charles J. Ellicott · 1878
학술+가독 균형 전권 주석
Cambridge (다저자) · 1900
준전권 준학술 (권별 저자·연도 확인)
Marvin R. Vincent · 1887
신약 헬라어 단어 연구
A.T. Robertson · 1933
헬라어 시제·문법 해설 결정판 (KR PD / US 1931+ 권별)
ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (다저자) · 1910
헬라어 신약 학술 (권별 저자 PD 확인 필요)
Heinrich A.W. Meyer · 1880
신약 학술 정밀주해 (독일 — K&D 대응)
John Wesley · 1755
간결 실용 전권(NT 1755 / OT 1765) 웨슬리안
Joseph Benson · 1815
웨슬리안 전권 주석
Charles H. Spurgeon · 1885
시편 주석 고전 (설교 자료 풍부)
Alexander Maclaren · 1910
설교형 강해 명저 (전권, 절별 가공 필요)
B.W. Johnson · 1891
평이 절별 신약 해설 (일반신자·모바일)
Thomas Coke · 1803
감리교 전권 주석
John Trapp · 1660
청교도 전권 주석 — Henry/Gill 보완
Charles Hodge · 1860
프린스턴 조직신학 관점 신약 정밀 주석 (롬·고전후·엡)
예수께서는 갈릴리에서 계속 머무르신다(요 7:1). 형제들은 예수께 초막절에 올라가시라고 권한다(요 7:2-5). 예수께서 그들에게 대답하신다(요 7:6-9). 예수께서 명절에 올라가시자 유대인들이 그분을 찾는다(요 7:10-13). 예수께서 성전에서 가르치신다(요 7:14-24). 유대인들은 그분의 가르침을 듣고 당혹해한다(요 7:25-27). 예수께서 계속 가르치시자 그들은 그분을 죽이려 한다(요 7:28-30). 무리 가운데 많은 사람이 그분을 믿는다(요 7:31). 바리새인들이 수군거리자 주께서 그들과 논증하신다(요 7:32-36). 명절 마지막 날에 예수께서 설교하신다(요 7:37-39). 무리는 그분에 대한 견해로 크게 나뉜다(요 7:40-44). 바리새인들이 예수를 붙잡으라고 보낸 관리들이 그분을 데려오지 않고 돌아오자, 그들을 보낸 자들이 노한다(요 7:45-49). 니고데모가 그들과 논증한다(요 7:50-53).
VII.
[(2) JESUS IS TRUTH AND LIGHT AND LOVE (7:1- 10:42).
(a)Jesus is Truth (John 8).
(α)The Feast of Tabernacles (John 7:1-13).
(β)The teaching of Jesus (John 7:14-39):
His doctrine is from the Father (John 7:15-24).
He is Himself from the Father (verses (25-31);
He will return to the Father (John 7:32-39).
(γ)The effect of the teaching. Division among the multitude, and in the Sanhedrin (John 7:40-52).]
“Chapter 7, like chapter 6, is very important for the estimate of the fourth Gospel. In it the scene of the Messianic crisis shifts from Galilee to Jerusalem; and, as we should naturally expect, the crisis itself becomes hotter. The divisions, the doubts, the hopes, the jealousies, and the casuistry of the Jews are vividly portrayed. We see the mass of the populace, especially those who had come up from Galilee, swaying to and fro, hardly knowing which way to turn, inclined to believe, but held back by the more sophisticated citizens of the metropolis. These meanwhile apply the fragments of Rabbinical learning at their command in order to test the claims of the new prophet. In the background looms the dark shadow of the hierarchy itself, entrenched behind its prejudices and refusing to hear the cause that it has already prejudged. A single timid voice is raised against this injustice, but is at once fiercely silenced.” S. p. 144.
As in chapters 5 and 6 Christ is set forth as the Source and Support of Life, so in chapters 7, 8, and 9. He is set forth as the Source of Truth and Light.
Chap. 7. Christ the Source of Truth and Light
Chapter 7 has three main divisions: 1. The controversy with His brethren (1–9); 2. His teaching at the Feast of Tabernacles (10–39); 3. The effect of His teaching; division both in the multitude and in the Sanhedrin (40–52).
CHAPTER 7.
At the Feast.
CHAPTER 7
John 7:1. μετὰ ταῦτα] B. C. D. G. K. L. X. א Cursivas, Verss. Cyr. Chrys. have these words before περιεπ. So Scholz, Lachm. Tisch. Considering the preponderance of testimonies, this arrangement is to be preferred. Were it an alteration in imitation of John 3:22, John 5:1, John 6:1, the καὶ deleted by Tisch. would be omitted to a greater extent, but it is wanting only in C.** D. א. and a few Cursives and Versions.
John 7:8. The first ταύτην is wanting in B. D. K. L. T. X. א.** Cursives, Verss. Cyr. Chrys. Rejected by Schulz and Rinck, deleted by Lachm. and Tisch.; a mechanical addition, in imitation of what follows.
οὐκ] Elz. Lachm. read οὔπω, according to the preponderance of Codd. indeed (only D. K. M. א. and three Cursives have οὐκ), but against the preponderance of Versions (even Vulg. It.), most of which have οὐκ. Of the Fathers, Epiph. Cyr. Chrys. Augustine, Jerome have οὐκ. Porphyry, in Jerome, c. Pelag. ii. 17, already found οὐκ, and inferred from it the accusation of vacillation. Just on account of this objection, οὔπω was introduced.
John 7:9. αὐτοῖς] Tisch. αὐτός, following D.* K. L. T. X. א. Cursives, Cyr. Augustine, and several Versions. Testimony preponderates in favour of the Received Text, and this all the more, that αὐτός might have been easily written on the margin as a gloss from John 7:10.-
John 7:12. After ἄλλοι, Elz. Lachm. have δέ, which has many important witnesses against it, and is an interpolation.
John 7:15. Instead of καὶ ἐθαύμαζ. we must, with Lachm. and Tisch., read ἐθαύμ. οὖν, and still more decisively is οὖν confirmed after ἀπεκρ., John 7:16 (which Elz. has not).
John 7:26. After ἐστιν Elz. has again ἀληθῶς, against decisive testimony. An interpolation (which displaced the first ἀληθ. in some witnesses); comp. John 4:42, John 6:14, John 7:40.
John 7:31. The arrangement ἐκ τοῦ ὄχλου δὲ πολλοὶ ἐπ. is, with Lachm., to be preferred. Tisch., following D. א., has πολλ. δὲ ἐπ. ἐκ τ. ὀ.
ὅτι] wanting indeed in B. D. L. T. U. X. א. Cursives, Verss. Cyr., and deleted by Lachm. and Tisch. But it was greatly exposed to the danger of being overlooked between ON and o, as well as because it was unnecessary.
For μήτι we must, with Lachm. Tisch., following decisive testimonies, read μή. In like manner, τούτων after σημ. is, with Lachm. Tisch., to be deleted. An addition to explain the genitive ὧν. For ἐποίησεν, ποιεῖ (Tisch.) is too weakly attested.
John 7:33. After οὖν Elz. has αὐτοῖς, against decisive testimony.
John 7:39. πιστεύοντες] Lachm. πιστεύσαντες, upon too weak and (in part) doubtful authority.
After πνεῦμα Elz. Scholz have ἅγιον, Lachm. δεδομένον (B. and a few Verss. and Fathers). Both additions are glosses; instead of δεδομ. there occur also δοθέν or acceptum, or ἐπʼ αὐτούς or ἐπʼ αὐτοῖς.
John 7:40. πολλοὶ οὖν ἐκ τ. ὄχλου] Lachm. Tisch.: ἐκ τοῦ ὄχλου οὖν, following B. D. L. T. X. א. Verss. Origen. Rightly; the Received reading is an interpretation.
τὸν λόγον] Lachm. Tisch.: τῶν λόγων τούτων, according to preponderating witnesses. The genitive and plural were certainly more strange to the transcribers.
John 7:41. ἄλλοι δέ] Lachm. οἱ δέ, following B. L. T. X. Cursives, Verss. Origen, Cyril; Tisch. also, following weighty witnesses (even D. E. א.): ἄλλοι. The original reading is οἱ δέ, instead of which ἄλλοι was mechanically repeated from what precedes, sometimes with, sometimes without δέ.
John 7:46. οὓτως ἐλάλ. ἄνθρ. ὡς οὗτος ὁ ἄνθρ.] Lachm. has merely: ἐλάλ. οὕτως ἄνθρ., following B. L. T. two Cursives, Copt. Origen, Cyr. Chrys. Aug. But how superfluous would have been the addition, and how easily might their omission have occurred in looking from the first ἄνθρ. at once to the second! The order, however, ἐλάλ. οὕτως (Tisch.), is attested by preponderating evidence.
John 7:49. ἐπικατάρατοι] Lachm. Tisch.: ἐπάρατοι, after B. T. א. 1, 33, Or. Cyr. Chrys. Rightly; the Received text is from the familiar passage, Galatians 3:10; Galatians 3:13.
John 7:50. ὁ ἐλθ. νυκτὸς πρὸς αὐτ.] Lachm.: ὁ ἐλθ. π. α. πρότερον (after B. L. T. א. al.). Νυκτὸς is certainly an explanatory addition (comp. John 19:39), which also has various positions in the Codd.; but πρότερον is so decisively attested, and so necessary, that Lachmann’s reading is to be regarded as the original one, although the whole ὁ ἐλθ.… αὐτόν is not to be deleted, as Tisch. (so א.*) thinks.
John 7:52. ἐγήγερται] Lachm. Tisch.: ἐγείρεται, following B. D. K. S. (in the margin) T. Γ. Δ. א. Cursives, Vulg. It. Syr. Goth. Aeth. Or. An early emendation of the historical error. Copt. Sahid. have the Future.
John 7:53, see on John 8:1.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
요 7:1-53. 초막절의 그리스도. 1, 2. 그 후에--곧 요 5:18 이후 기록된 모든 일 후에라는 뜻이다. 갈릴리에서 다니시고--예상되었을 법한 유대로 가는 대신, 거기서 계속 사역하셨다. 죽이고자 하였음이라--요 5:18로 거슬러 올라가는 말이다. 이로 보아 우리 주께서는 요 6:4에 언급된 유월절에 참석하지 않으셨음이 드러난다. 요 5:1에 언급된 절기가 유월절이었다면, 그것은 그분의 사역이 시작된 이후 세 번째 유월절이었다.
이 장에서 우리는 다음의 내용을 보게 된다. I. 그리스도께서 한동안 유대에서 공개적으로 나타나기를 삼가신 일(요 7:1). II. 초막절을 맞아 예루살렘으로 올라가시려는 그분의 뜻과, 갈릴리에서 이 절기에 올라가시는 일에 관하여 그분의 친족과 나누신 대화(요 7:2-13). III. 그 절기에 성전에서 공개적으로 가르치신 일. 1. 절기 중간에 있었던 일(요 7:14,15). 여기서 우리는 그분이 유대인들과 나누신 대화를 보게 되는데, (1.) 그분의 가르침에 관하여(요 7:16-18), (2.) 그분에게 씌워진 안식일 위반의 죄목에 관하여(요 7:19-24), (3.) 그분 자신에 관하여, 곧 어디에서 오셨으며 또 어디로 가시는지에 관하여(요 7:25-36) 나누신 대화이다. 2. 절기의 마지막 날에 있었던 일. (1.) 가난한 영혼들에게 자기에게로 나아오라고 베푸신 그분의 은혜로운 초청(요 7:37-39). (2.) 그 초청이 받은 반응. [1.] 많은 사람이 그것에 관하여 논쟁한 일(요 7:40-44). [2.] 대제사장들이 그것으로 인해 그분을 곤경에 빠뜨리려 하였으나, 먼저 자기들의 아랫사람들에게 좌절을 당하고(요 7:45-49) 다음에는 자기들의 공회에 속한 한 사람에 의해 잠잠하게 된 일(요 7:50-53).