Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
- 번역 진행
- 4,537 / 4,537
- 원문 언어
- en
학습 자료
여러 공개 도메인 주석서와 성서하우 한글 번역을 책과 장별로 탐색합니다. 주석서를 전환하며 번역만 읽거나 원문과 번역을 나란히 볼 수 있습니다.
현재 주석서
전체 주석서
23개 주석서
전체 항목
307,288
번역 81,431건
라이선스
출처별 표시
주석서 원문, 저자, 번역 진행률, 라이선스 정보를 출처별로 구분해 표시합니다. 성서하우의 한글 번역·편집물은 원문 자료와 별도로 관리됩니다.
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871). CCEL expanded electronic edition states it is in the public domain.
Albert Barnes · 1834
Albert Barnes' Notes on Revelation Of St. John The Divine (New Testament, English original, public domain). Sourced from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library (CCEL). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes.
Adam Clarke · 1831
Public domain English commentary by Adam Clarke, normalized from Wikisource book pages for scripture.how. Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke.
John Gill · 1763
John Gill(1697-1771), Exposition of the Old and New Testament(1746-1763). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/gill.
John Calvin · 1850
종교개혁 신학 원천 (영역본 PD, 대부분 — 전권 아님)
Matthew Poole · 1685
간결 절별 전권 개혁주의 주석
ed. H.D.M. Spence & Joseph S. Exell · 1890
전권 강해·설교·예화 풍부 (항목 대량)
Carl F. Keil, Franz Delitzsch · 1866
구약 학술 표준 — 히브리어·문헌비평·고대근동 배경
ed. Charles J. Ellicott · 1878
학술+가독 균형 전권 주석
Cambridge (다저자) · 1900
준전권 준학술 (권별 저자·연도 확인)
Marvin R. Vincent · 1887
신약 헬라어 단어 연구
A.T. Robertson · 1933
헬라어 시제·문법 해설 결정판 (KR PD / US 1931+ 권별)
ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (다저자) · 1910
헬라어 신약 학술 (권별 저자 PD 확인 필요)
Heinrich A.W. Meyer · 1880
신약 학술 정밀주해 (독일 — K&D 대응)
John Wesley · 1755
간결 실용 전권(NT 1755 / OT 1765) 웨슬리안
Joseph Benson · 1815
웨슬리안 전권 주석
Charles H. Spurgeon · 1885
시편 주석 고전 (설교 자료 풍부)
Alexander Maclaren · 1910
설교형 강해 명저 (전권, 절별 가공 필요)
B.W. Johnson · 1891
평이 절별 신약 해설 (일반신자·모바일)
Thomas Coke · 1803
감리교 전권 주석
John Trapp · 1660
청교도 전권 주석 — Henry/Gill 보완
Charles Hodge · 1860
프린스턴 조직신학 관점 신약 정밀 주석 (롬·고전후·엡)
엘리후는 욥의 친구들에게 권면하는 말로 시작한다(욥 34:1-4). 그는 욥이 하나님을 불의하게 행하신다고 비난했다고 지적하고, 그것이 불가능함을 보인다(욥 34:5-12). 전능자의 능력과 심판을 지적한다(13-30절). 사람들이 하나님께 어떻게 말해야 하는지, 그리고 욥이 얼마나 불경하게 행동했는지를 보인다(욥 34:31-37).
INTRODUCTION TO Job 34
In this chapter Elihu reassumes his discourse, and proceeds in his answer to Job, in which are first a preface exciting attention, Job 34:1; then a charge is brought against Job, expressed in or extracted from some words that dropped from his lips, not so well guarded, Job 34:5; a refutation of these expressions of his in a variety of arguments, Job 34:10; and the chapter is closed with some good advice to Job, Job 34:31; and with an earnest request of Elihu to men of understanding, to join with him in trying him to the uttermost, Job 34:34.
Chap. 34. Elihu’s Second Reply to Job. Job’s complaint that God afflicts him unjustly is without reason. A motive for injustice in him who is Creator of all alike cannot be found; and injustice in the Highest Ruler is inconceivable
Having in ch. 33 replied to Job’s charge that God’s afflictions were examples of an arbitrary hostility to men, Elihu in this chapter replies to, another charge, that God was unjust in the afflictions which He laid on him. His answer is, That a motive for injustice in Him who is Creator of all cannot be found; and, That injustice in the Ruler of all is inconceivable—shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?
The line of thought in the chapter is something as follows:
First, Job 34:1-4, in a brief introduction Elihu invites his intelligent hearers to listen further to him, and to unite with him in seeking to discover what was the right, the just state of the case, in Job’s cause with God and his charges against Him.
Second, Job 34:5-9, these charges he then recites: Job had said that God perverted his right, and that he was incurably afflicted though he had done no wrong (Job 34:5-6). Elihu cannot mention such charges without expressing his detestation of them: Job has not his parallel for impiety (Job 34:7-8). He has even gone the length of saying that it was no advantage to a man to be religious (Job 34:9). This last sentiment Elihu does not deal with in the present chapter, its discussion follows in ch. 35.
Third, Job 34:10-20, coming to his argument, Elihu, first expresses his reprobation of such sentiments as those of Job, they are contrary to right thoughts of God; such ways of acting are not to be thought of in connexion with the Almighty (Job 34:10-12). Second, this reproof of Job’s charges from God’s nature in general Elihu then particularizes into two distinct thoughts: (1) a motive for injustice in Him who is the Creator of all cannot be discovered; on the contrary His calling all things into being and upholding them by sending forth His spirit is evidence of unselfish goodness, for were He to set His mind on Himself and withdraw His spirit all flesh would perish (Job 34:13-15). (2) The foundation of government is justice, without which rule would come to an end. Injustice in the highest Ruler is inconceivable. And in truth His rule approves itself, by its impartiality, to be just (Job 34:16-20).
Fourth, Job 34:21-28, this justice is secured by God’s omniscient insight into men, and by His goodness which is the spring and motive of His rule of mankind.
Fifth, Job 34:29-33, shall any one then murmur at this absolute disposing of all things by the hand of God? To murmur is to usurp the rule of God, and to claim to dictate how He should dispense His recompences.
Finally Job 34:34-37, Elihu, having shewn what is involved in Job’s charges of injustice against God, draws the conclusion, in which he is confident all reflecting minds who listen to him will concur with him, that Job speaks without wisdom; to the sin of his life he has added a defiant and mocking impiety, which one must wish to see purified out of him in the furnace of severer afflictions.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
욥기 34:1-37. 1. 대답하여--말을 이어 갔다는 뜻이다.
또한 엘리후가 대답하여 이르되 - 즉, 분명히, 욥에게 대답할 것이 있는지 보려고 잠시 멈춘 후의 일이다. 성경에서 “대답하다”라는 단어는, 다른 이들이 아무 말도 하지 않았더라도, 흔히 “강론을 시작하다”를 뜻한다. 욥기 3:2, 이사야 14:10, 스가랴 1:10, 스가랴 3:4, 스가랴 4:11-12를 보라. 때로는 어떤 주제와 관련하여 사용되어, 반대편에서 제기될 수 있는 바에 응답한다는 뜻이 되기도 한다. 여기서는 일반적인 의미로 강론을 시작한다는 뜻으로 이해할 수도 있고, 혹은 더 그럴듯하게는, 욥이 친구들과의 논쟁에서 개진한 견해에 응답하는 것으로 이해할 수도 있다.
Furthermore Elihu answered and said. It is reasonable to suppose that Elihu made a considerable pause, to see whether Job would make any reply to what he had delivered, or object to what he had said; which he gave him free liberty to do, if he had anything upon his mind: but perceiving he was not inclined to return any answer to him, he went on with his discourse; and which is called a further answer to him: for though Joh had made no reply to which this could be called an answer, yet as there were several things remaining for Elihu to answer to, and which he proposed to answer and did, it may with great propriety here be said that he answered him.
He accuseth Job for charging God with injustice, Job 34:1-9. God, the almighty Disposer, Governor, and Judge of the world, cannot be unjust, Job 34:10-17. It is not fit to say of kings and princes they are unjust, much less of God: his power over and observance of man, who cannot hide from God, Job 34:18-22. He exerciseth his power and justice over them, Job 34:23-30. Man’s duty under God’s afflictions, Job 34:31,32. He reproveth Job’s words against God, Job 34:33-37.
No text from Poole on this verse.
엘리후는 앞 장에서 한 담론에 욥이 반박할 말이 있는지 알아보려고 잠시 멈추었던 듯하다. 그러나 욥은 침묵했고, 아마 계속 말하기를 바란다는 뜻도 보였으므로 엘리후가 여기서 말을 이어 간다. I. 그는 모인 사람들에게 경청뿐 아니라 도움도 요청한다(욥 33:2-4). II. 욥의 입에서 나온 몇 가지 부적절한 표현을 더 지적한다(욥 33:5-9). III. 다음 사실을 매우 충분히 보여 줌으로써 욥이 잘못 말했다고 설득하려 한다. 1. 논박할 수 없는 하나님의 정의이다(욥 33:10-12, 17, 19, 23). 2. 하나님의 주권적 통치이다(욥 33:13-15). 3. 하나님의 전능하신 능력이다(욥 33:20, 24). 4. 하나님의 전지하심이다(욥 33:21-22, 25). 5. 죄인을 엄중히 다루시는 하나님이다(욥 33:26-28). 6. 모든 일을 주관하시는 하나님의 섭리이다(욥 33:29-30). IV. 욥이 마땅히 해야 할 말을 가르친다(욥 33:31-32). 마지막으로 문제를 욥 자신의 양심에 맡기고, 욥의 까다로운 태도와 불만을 날카롭게 책망하며 마친다(욥 33:33-37). 욥은 이 모든 말을 인내하며 견딘 데 그치지 않고 호의적으로 받아들였다. 엘리후가 선한 뜻으로 말한다는 사실을 알았기 때문이다. 다른 친구들은 욥 자신의 양심이 무죄라고 판단한 일을 고발했지만, 엘리후는 욥이 이제 되돌아보며 자기 마음에 가책을 느끼기 시작했을 법한 일만 지적했다.