Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
- 번역 진행
- 4,537 / 4,537
- 원문 언어
- en
학습 자료
여러 공개 도메인 주석서와 성서하우 한글 번역을 책과 장별로 탐색합니다. 주석서를 전환하며 번역만 읽거나 원문과 번역을 나란히 볼 수 있습니다.
현재 주석서
전체 주석서
23개 주석서
전체 항목
307,288
번역 81,431건
라이선스
출처별 표시
주석서 원문, 저자, 번역 진행률, 라이선스 정보를 출처별로 구분해 표시합니다. 성서하우의 한글 번역·편집물은 원문 자료와 별도로 관리됩니다.
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871). CCEL expanded electronic edition states it is in the public domain.
Albert Barnes · 1834
Albert Barnes' Notes on Revelation Of St. John The Divine (New Testament, English original, public domain). Sourced from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library (CCEL). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes.
Adam Clarke · 1831
Public domain English commentary by Adam Clarke, normalized from Wikisource book pages for scripture.how. Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke.
John Gill · 1763
John Gill(1697-1771), Exposition of the Old and New Testament(1746-1763). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/gill.
John Calvin · 1850
종교개혁 신학 원천 (영역본 PD, 대부분 — 전권 아님)
Matthew Poole · 1685
간결 절별 전권 개혁주의 주석
ed. H.D.M. Spence & Joseph S. Exell · 1890
전권 강해·설교·예화 풍부 (항목 대량)
Carl F. Keil, Franz Delitzsch · 1866
구약 학술 표준 — 히브리어·문헌비평·고대근동 배경
ed. Charles J. Ellicott · 1878
학술+가독 균형 전권 주석
Cambridge (다저자) · 1900
준전권 준학술 (권별 저자·연도 확인)
Marvin R. Vincent · 1887
신약 헬라어 단어 연구
A.T. Robertson · 1933
헬라어 시제·문법 해설 결정판 (KR PD / US 1931+ 권별)
ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (다저자) · 1910
헬라어 신약 학술 (권별 저자 PD 확인 필요)
Heinrich A.W. Meyer · 1880
신약 학술 정밀주해 (독일 — K&D 대응)
John Wesley · 1755
간결 실용 전권(NT 1755 / OT 1765) 웨슬리안
Joseph Benson · 1815
웨슬리안 전권 주석
Charles H. Spurgeon · 1885
시편 주석 고전 (설교 자료 풍부)
Alexander Maclaren · 1910
설교형 강해 명저 (전권, 절별 가공 필요)
B.W. Johnson · 1891
평이 절별 신약 해설 (일반신자·모바일)
Thomas Coke · 1803
감리교 전권 주석
John Trapp · 1660
청교도 전권 주석 — Henry/Gill 보완
Charles Hodge · 1860
프린스턴 조직신학 관점 신약 정밀 주석 (롬·고전후·엡)
세리와 죄인들이 우리 주의 말씀을 들으려고 가까이 나아오자 바리새인들이 이에 불쾌하게 여긴다, 눅 15:1, 눅 15:2. 그리스도께서는 잃은 양의 비유로 그들을 영접하신 자신의 행위를 변호하신다, 눅 15:3-7. 잃은 드라크마의 비유, 눅 15:8-10. 그리고 감동적인 탕자의 비유, 11-32절.
Luke 15. Parables for Publicans and Sinners. The Love And Free Forgiveness Of God.
CHAPTER 15.
PARABLES TEACHING THE JOY OF FINDING THINGS LOST.
Nothing is gained by insisting anxiously on historical connection here. The introduction of these beautiful parables of grace at this point is a matter of tact rather than of temporal sequence, so far as the conscious motive of the evangelist is concerned. They are brought in as a set-off to the severe discourse in the closing section of the previous chapter, in which Jesus seems to assume a repellent attitude towards those who desired to follow Him. Here, in happy contrast, He appears as One who graciously received the sinful, regardless of unfavourable comments. The parables of the Lost Sheep, the Lost Coin, and the Lost Son are here given as a self-defence of Jesus against Pharisaic faultfinding. Whether they were first spoken in that connection, or uttered in that connection alone, cannot be determined. So far as their main drift is concerned they might have been spoken to any audience; to critical Pharisees, to disciples (the first is given in Matthew 18:12-14 as spoken to the Twelve), to synagogue audiences, or to a gathering of publicans and sinners like that in Capernaum (Luke 5:29-32); controversial, didactic, or evangelic, as the case might be. Quite possibly the original setting of these parables was a synagogue discourse, or better still the address to the Capernaum gathering. That they are all three authentic utterances of Jesus need not be doubted. The first has synoptical attestation, being found in Mt. also; the second has value only as a supplement to the first, and was hardly worth inventing as an independent parable; the third is too good to have been an invention by Lk. or any other person, and can only have proceeded from the great Master. Wendt (L. J.) accepts all three as authentic, and taken from the Logia of Mt.
CHAPTER 15
Luke 15:2. οἱ Φαρισ.] With Lachm. and Tisch. read οἵ τ. Φαρισ., in accordance with B D L א. The τε is certainly not an addition of the transcribers.
Luke 15:9. Instead of συγκαλεῖται Tisch. has συγκαλεῖ, on important yet not preponderating evidence [Tisch. 8 has συνκαλεῖ]. It is from Luke 15:6, where συγκαλεῖ is decisively attested.
Luke 15:14. ἱσχυρός] A B D L R א, min. have ἱσχυρά. Recommended by Griesbach, adopted by Lachm. and Tisch. Those MSS. preponderate, and the masculine is an amendment, in accordance with customary usage, and according to Luke 4:25. Comp. on Acts 11:28.
Luke 15:16. γεμίσαι τὴν κοιλίαν αὐτοῦ ἀπό] B D L R א, min. vss. have χορτασθῆναι ἐκ. An interpretation.
Luke 15:17. περισσεύουσιν] A B P and a few min. Tit. have περισσεύονται-g0-. Rightly; the active was introduced, in accordance with the wonted usage.
The ὧδε added by Griesb. is not found, indeed, in important authorities, and it stands in B L א, Lachm. after λιμῷ, but it has plainly been absorbed by ἐγὼ δέ; hence also the placing of it before λιμῷ, in accordance with D R U, min. vss. Chrys., is, with Griesb. Scholz, Tisch., to be preferred [Tisch. 8 has λιμῷ ὧδε].
Luke 15:19. Before οὐκέτι Elz. has καί, but in opposition to decisive evidence. Moreover, at Luke 15:21 this καί is to be deleted, on preponderating evidence.
Luke 15:22. Lachm. and Tisch. [not Tisch. 8] have ταχύ before ἐξενέγκατε, in accordance with B L X א, vss., also Vulg. It. Jer. D also adds weight to the evidence with ταχέως. ταχύ is to be regarded as genuine. Copyists would have added a more familiar word as εὐθέως, or at least as, with D, ταχέως (Luke 14:21). ταχύ does not occur at all elsewhere in Luke; still the omission is not to be explained by this fact, but simply as an old clerical error.
τὴν στολήν] τήν has decisive MSS. against it, and is, according to Lachm. and Tisch., to be deleted as an addition.
Luke 15:23. ἐνέγκαντες] B L R X א, Vulg. It. Copt. Sahid. have φέρετε. So Tisch. The participle is an attempt to improve the style. D also testifies in favour of the imperative by ἐνέγκατε (Luke 15:22).
Luke 15:24 καὶ ἀπολ.] καί is rightly condemned by Griesb., on decisive evidence, and deleted by Lachm. and Tisch. The second ἦν, however, has against it, in D Q, min., evidence too feeble for it to be deleted. Yet, according to A B L א*, it must be placed before ἀπολ. (Lachm. Tisch.). The position after ἀπολ. is a harmonizing of it with νεκρ. ἦν.
Luke 15:32. Instead of ἀνέζησεν, read with Tisch., following B L R Δ א, min., ἔζησεν. The former is from Luke 15:24.
In the same manner is to be explained the omission of καί before ἀπολ. in Tisch. (following D X א). But ἦν is here to be deleted, on decisive MSS. (Lachm. Tisch.; condemned also by Griesb.).
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
눅 15:1-32. 세리와 죄인들이 그리스도께 환영받음, 이를 설명하는 세 비유. 1. 모든 세리와 죄인들이 가까이 나아오니, 등: 그들의 처지에 놀랍게 맞는 그분의 가르침에 끌려 그분 주위로 모여든 것이다. 그분, 적어도 그분의 선구자가 나타나기 전까지 그들은 “내 영혼을 돌보는 자가 없다”고 말할 만했다.
세리와 죄인들 - 마태복음 9:10에 대한 주석을 보라.
우리는 악한 풍습이 좋은 법을 낳는다고 말한다. 이 장에서도 서기관들과 바리새인들이 그리스도의 은혜와 그가 세리와 죄인들에게 베푸신 호의에 대해 수군거린 일이 계기가 되어, 어쩌면 그렇지 않았다면 우리가 얻지 못했을 그 은혜가 이 장의 세 비유를 통해 더욱 충만하게 드러났다. 이 세 비유의 목적은 모두 같다. 곧 하나님께서 구약에서 말씀하시고 맹세하신 것처럼, 죄인들의 죽음과 멸망을 기뻐하지 않으실 뿐 아니라, 그들이 돌아와 회개하는 것을 크게 기뻐하시며, 그 결과 그들을 은혜롭게 맞아들이시는 일을 즐거워하신다는 것을 보여 주는 것이다. 여기에는, I. 그리스도께서 이방인들과 세리들과 함께하시고 그들에게 복음을 전하신 일에 대해 바리새인들이 걸려 넘어진 일이 나온다, 눅 15:1,2. II. 그리스도께서 그 일의 의도와 마땅한 경향으로 자신을 변호하신 일이 나온다. 실제로 많은 사람에게서 그 결과가 나타났으니, 곧 그들이 회개하고 삶을 고치게 된 것이다. 하나님께 이보다 더 기쁘고 받으실 만한 섬김은 있을 수 없었다. 그리스도께서는 이것을 비유들로 보여 주신다. 1. 잃어버린 양을 기쁨으로 집에 데려온 비유, 눅 15:4-7. 2. 잃어버린 은전을 기쁨으로 찾은 비유, 눅 15:8-10. 3. 탕자였으나 아버지의 집으로 돌아와 큰 기쁨으로 맞아들여진 잃어버린 아들의 비유, 다만 그의 형은 이 서기관들과 바리새인들처럼 그 일을 못마땅하게 여겼다, 눅 15:11-32.