Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
- 번역 진행
- 4,537 / 4,537
- 원문 언어
- en
학습 자료
성경 주석서
여러 공개 도메인 주석서와 성서하우 한글 번역을 책과 장별로 탐색합니다. 주석서를 전환하며 번역만 읽거나 원문과 번역을 나란히 볼 수 있습니다.
현재 주석서
전체 주석서
23개 주석서
전체 항목
307,288
번역 81,431건
라이선스
출처별 표시
출처와 라이선스
주석서 원문, 저자, 번역 진행률, 라이선스 정보를 출처별로 구분해 표시합니다. 성서하우의 한글 번역·편집물은 원문 자료와 별도로 관리됩니다.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871). CCEL expanded electronic edition states it is in the public domain.
- 번역 진행
- 19,831 / 19,831
- 원문 언어
- en
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Albert Barnes · 1834
Albert Barnes' Notes on Revelation Of St. John The Divine (New Testament, English original, public domain). Sourced from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library (CCEL). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes.
- 번역 진행
- 22,781 / 22,781
- 원문 언어
- en
Adam Clarke's Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Adam Clarke · 1831
Public domain English commentary by Adam Clarke, normalized from Wikisource book pages for scripture.how. Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke.
- 번역 진행
- 21,603 / 22,101
- 원문 언어
- en
John Gill's Exposition of the Bible
John Gill · 1763
John Gill(1697-1771), Exposition of the Old and New Testament(1746-1763). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/gill.
- 번역 진행
- 12,528 / 30,759
- 원문 언어
- en
Calvin's Commentaries
John Calvin · 1850
종교개혁 신학 원천 (영역본 PD, 대부분 — 전권 아님)
- 번역 진행
- 144 / 7,385
- 원문 언어
- en
Matthew Poole's Annotations upon the Holy Bible
Matthew Poole · 1685
간결 절별 전권 개혁주의 주석
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 31,092
- 원문 언어
- en
The Pulpit Commentary
ed. H.D.M. Spence & Joseph S. Exell · 1890
전권 강해·설교·예화 풍부 (항목 대량)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 25,592
- 원문 언어
- en
Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
Carl F. Keil, Franz Delitzsch · 1866
구약 학술 표준 — 히브리어·문헌비평·고대근동 배경
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 2,044
- 원문 언어
- en
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers
ed. Charles J. Ellicott · 1878
학술+가독 균형 전권 주석
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 23,497
- 원문 언어
- en
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Cambridge (다저자) · 1900
준전권 준학술 (권별 저자·연도 확인)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 27,176
- 원문 언어
- en
Vincent's Word Studies in the New Testament
Marvin R. Vincent · 1887
신약 헬라어 단어 연구
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 5,763
- 원문 언어
- en
Word Pictures in the New Testament
A.T. Robertson · 1933
헬라어 시제·문법 해설 결정판 (KR PD / US 1931+ 권별)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 6,935
- 원문 언어
- en
The Expositor's Greek Testament
ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (다저자) · 1910
헬라어 신약 학술 (권별 저자 PD 확인 필요)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 7,010
- 원문 언어
- en
Meyer's Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament
Heinrich A.W. Meyer · 1880
신약 학술 정밀주해 (독일 — K&D 대응)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 5,340
- 원문 언어
- en
Wesley's Explanatory Notes
John Wesley · 1755
간결 실용 전권(NT 1755 / OT 1765) 웨슬리안
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 5,643
- 원문 언어
- en
Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments
Joseph Benson · 1815
웨슬리안 전권 주석
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 14,675
- 원문 언어
- en
The Treasury of David
Charles H. Spurgeon · 1885
시편 주석 고전 (설교 자료 풍부)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 2,290
- 원문 언어
- en
MacLaren's Expositions of Holy Scripture
Alexander Maclaren · 1910
설교형 강해 명저 (전권, 절별 가공 필요)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 1,144
- 원문 언어
- en
The People's New Testament
B.W. Johnson · 1891
평이 절별 신약 해설 (일반신자·모바일)
- 번역 진행
- 7 / 3,477
- 원문 언어
- en
Coke's Commentary on the Holy Bible
Thomas Coke · 1803
감리교 전권 주석
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 10,808
- 원문 언어
- en
Trapp's Complete Commentary
John Trapp · 1660
청교도 전권 주석 — Henry/Gill 보완
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 26,397
- 원문 언어
- en
Hodge's Commentary on the New Testament
Charles Hodge · 1860
프린스턴 조직신학 관점 신약 정밀 주석 (롬·고전후·엡)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 1,011
- 원문 언어
- en
Luke 7:1-10. Matthew 8:5-13 주석을 보라.
그리스도께서 백부장의 종을 고치시며, 그 백부장은 그의 믿음으로 칭찬을 받는다(누가복음 7:1-10). 나인에서 한 과부의 아들을 살리신다(누가복음 7:11-17). 세례 요한이 그의 소문을 듣고, 그가 그리스도인지 묻도록 자기 제자 둘을 보낸다(누가복음 7:18-23). 그리스도께서 요한의 성격을 말씀하신다(누가복음 7:24-30). 유대인들의 완고한 눈멂과 변덕스러움(누가복음 7:31-35). 한 바리새인이 그를 자기 집에 초대하고, 거기서 한 여자가 그의 머리에 기름을 붓고 눈물로 그의 발을 씻는다(누가복음 7:36-38). 그 바리새인이 불쾌하게 여긴다(누가복음 7:39). 우리 주께서 비유로 그를 책망하시고 그 여자를 변호하신다(누가복음 7:40-46). 그리고 그녀의 죄가 사함 받았다고 선포하신다(누가복음 7:47-50).
CHAPTER 7.
THE CENTURION OF CAPERNAUM. THE WIDOW’S SON AT NAIN. THE BAPTIST. IN THE HOUSE OF SIMON.
CHAPTER 7
Luke 7:1. ἐπεὶ δέ] Lachm. and Tisch. have ἐπειδή, following A B C* X 254, 299. This evidence is decisive, especially as D (comp. codd. of It.) is not opposed, for it has καὶ ἐγένετο ὅτε. K has ἐπειδὴ δέ, whence is explained the rise of the Recepta.
Luke 7:4. παρέξῃ] So also Lachm. and Tisch. The Recepta is παρέξει, in opposition to decisive evidence.
Luke 7:10. ἀσθενοῦντα] is not found, indeed, in B L א, min. Copt. codd. of It. (deleted by Lachm. and Tisch.); but it is to be maintained, as the evidence in its favour is preponderating; the omission is very easily to be explained from the possibility of dispensing with the word, but there was no reason to suggest its addition.
Luke 7:11. Instead of ἐν τῷ ἑξῆς, which Griesb. has approved, and Lachm. has in the margin, the edd. have ἐν τῇ ἑξῆς. The evidence for the two readings is about equally balanced. We must come to a conclusion according to the usage of Luke, who expresses “on the following day” by τῇ ἑξῆς, always without ἐν (Acts 21:1; Acts 25:17; Acts 27:18; moreover, in Luke 9:37, where ἐν is to be deleted); we must therefore read in this place ἐν τῷ ἑξῆς. Comp. Luke 8:1. Otherwise Schulz.
ἱκανοί] is wanting in B D F L א, min. and most of the vss. Bracketed by Lachm. It is to be retained (even against Rinck, Lucubr. Crit. p. 321), the more so on account of the frequency of the simple οἱ μαθηταὶ αὐτοῦ, and the facility, therefore, wherewith ΙΚΑΝΟΙ might be passed over by occasion of the following letters ΚΑΙΟ.
Luke 7:12. After ἱκανός Elz. Scholz. Tisch. have ἦν, which is condemned by Griesb., deleted by Lachm.; it is wanting in authorities so important that it appears as supplementary, as also does the ἦν, which Lachm. Tisch. read before χήρα, although this latter has still stronger attestation.
Luke 7:16. ἐγήγερται] A B C L Ξ א, min. have ἠγέρθη, in favour of which, moreover, D bears witness by ἐξηγέρθη. On this evidence it is, with Lachm. and Tisch., to be preferred.
Luke 7:21. Instead of αὐτῇ δέ, Tisch. has ἐκείνῃ on evidence too feeble, and without sufficient internal reason.
Elz. Scholz have τὸ βλέπειν. This τό might, in consequence of the preceding ἐχαρίσα ΤΟ, have just as easily dropt out as slipped in. But on the ground of the decidedly preponderating counter evidence, it is by Lachm. and Tisch. rightly deleted.
Luke 7:22. ὅτι] is wanting, it is true, in important authorities (although they are not preponderating), and is deleted by Lachm.; but the omission is explained from Matthew 11:5.
Luke 7:24-26. Instead of ἐξεληλύθατε, A B D L Ξ א (yet in Luke 7:26 not A also) have ἐξήλθατε; so Lachm. It is from Matthew 11:7-9.
Luke 7:27. ἐγώ] is wanting in B D L Ξ א, min. Copt. Arm. Vulg. codd. of It. Marcion, and is left out by Lachm. and Tisch. An addition from Matth.
Luke 7:28. προφήτης] is deleted, indeed, by Lachm. (in accordance with B K L M X Ξ א, min. vss. and Fathers), but was omitted in accordance with Matthew 11:11, from which place, on the other hand, was added τοῦ βαπτιστοῦ (rightly deleted by Tisch.).
Luke 7:31. Before τίνι Elz. has εἶπε δὲ ὁ κύριος, in opposition to decisive evidence. An exegetical addition, in respect of which the preceding passage was taken as historical narration.
Luke 7:32. Instead of καὶ λέγουσιν, Tisch. has, on too feeble evidence, λέγοντες.
Luke 7:34. The arrangement φίλος τελων. is decisively attested. The reverse order (Elz.) is from Matth.
Luke 7:35. πάντων] Lachm. and Tisch. Synops. [not Tisch. 8] have this immediately after ἀπό, but in opposition to preponderating evidence. It was omitted in accordance with Matthew 11:19 (so still in D F L M X, min. Arm. Syr.), and then restored to the position suggested by the most ordinary use.
Luke 7:36. The readings τὸν οἶκον and κατεκλίθη (Lachm. Tisch.) are, on important evidence, to be adopted; ἀνακλ. was more familiar to the transcribers; Luke alone has κατακλ.
Luke 7:37. ἥτις ἦν] is found in different positions. B L Ξ א, vss. Lachm. Tisch. rightly have it after γυνή. In D it is wanting, and from this omission, which is to be explained from the possibility of dispensing with the words, arose their restoration before ἁμαρτ., to which they appeared to belong.
Instead of ἀνάκειται is to be read, with Lachm. and Tisch., κατάκειται. Comp. on Luke 7:36.
Luke 7:42. δέ, both here and at Luke 7:43, has authorities so important against it that it appears to have been inserted as a connective particle; it is deleted by Tisch.
εἰπέ is wanting in B D L Ξ א, min. Syr. Arr. Perss. Copt. Aeth. Vulg. It. Aug. Suspected by Griesb., deleted by Lachm. and Tisch. But why should it have been added? The entire superfluousness of it was the evident cause of its omission.
Luke 7:44. After θριξί Elz. has τῆς κεφαλῆς, in opposition to decisive evidence. An addition from Luke 7:38.
아직 번역이 없습니다.
이 장에서 우리는 다음 내용을 본다. I. 그리스도께서 앞 장에서 전하신 교훈을 두 가지 영광스러운 기적으로 확증하신다. 하나는 멀리 떨어진 곳에서 병을 고치신 일로, 백부장의 종을 고치신 사건이다(눅 7:1-10). 다른 하나는 죽은 자를 다시 살리신 일로, 나인 성 과부의 아들을 살리신 사건이다, 눅 7:11-18. II. 그리스도께서 지금 옥에 갇혀 있는 요한과 그의 제자들 몇 사람의 믿음을 굳게 하신다. 요한에게서 받은 질문에 답하여, 자신이 행하신 기적들에 대한 짧은 보고를 보내신 것이다(눅 7:19-23). 그리고 여기에 요한에 대한 존귀한 증언과, 그 세대 사람들이 요한과 그의 교훈을 멸시한 것에 대한 정당한 책망을 덧붙이신다, 눅 7:24-35. III. 그리스도께서 자신에게 나아온 한 가난한 회개자를 위로하신다. 그는 죄에 대한 경건한 슬픔으로 온통 눈물에 젖어 있었고, 그리스도께서는 그의 죄가 사함받았음을 확신시켜 주신다. 또한 교만한 바리새인이 그 여인에게 베푸신 은혜를 트집 잡자, 그 은혜가 정당함을 스스로 변호하신다, 눅 7:36-50.