Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
- 번역 진행
- 4,537 / 4,537
- 원문 언어
- en
학습 자료
성경 주석서
여러 공개 도메인 주석서와 성서하우 한글 번역을 책과 장별로 탐색합니다. 주석서를 전환하며 번역만 읽거나 원문과 번역을 나란히 볼 수 있습니다.
현재 주석서
전체 주석서
23개 주석서
전체 항목
307,288
번역 81,431건
라이선스
출처별 표시
출처와 라이선스
주석서 원문, 저자, 번역 진행률, 라이선스 정보를 출처별로 구분해 표시합니다. 성서하우의 한글 번역·편집물은 원문 자료와 별도로 관리됩니다.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871). CCEL expanded electronic edition states it is in the public domain.
- 번역 진행
- 19,831 / 19,831
- 원문 언어
- en
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Albert Barnes · 1834
Albert Barnes' Notes on Revelation Of St. John The Divine (New Testament, English original, public domain). Sourced from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library (CCEL). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes.
- 번역 진행
- 22,781 / 22,781
- 원문 언어
- en
Adam Clarke's Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Adam Clarke · 1831
Public domain English commentary by Adam Clarke, normalized from Wikisource book pages for scripture.how. Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke.
- 번역 진행
- 21,603 / 22,101
- 원문 언어
- en
John Gill's Exposition of the Bible
John Gill · 1763
John Gill(1697-1771), Exposition of the Old and New Testament(1746-1763). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/gill.
- 번역 진행
- 12,528 / 30,759
- 원문 언어
- en
Calvin's Commentaries
John Calvin · 1850
종교개혁 신학 원천 (영역본 PD, 대부분 — 전권 아님)
- 번역 진행
- 144 / 7,385
- 원문 언어
- en
Matthew Poole's Annotations upon the Holy Bible
Matthew Poole · 1685
간결 절별 전권 개혁주의 주석
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 31,092
- 원문 언어
- en
The Pulpit Commentary
ed. H.D.M. Spence & Joseph S. Exell · 1890
전권 강해·설교·예화 풍부 (항목 대량)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 25,592
- 원문 언어
- en
Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
Carl F. Keil, Franz Delitzsch · 1866
구약 학술 표준 — 히브리어·문헌비평·고대근동 배경
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 2,044
- 원문 언어
- en
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers
ed. Charles J. Ellicott · 1878
학술+가독 균형 전권 주석
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 23,497
- 원문 언어
- en
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Cambridge (다저자) · 1900
준전권 준학술 (권별 저자·연도 확인)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 27,176
- 원문 언어
- en
Vincent's Word Studies in the New Testament
Marvin R. Vincent · 1887
신약 헬라어 단어 연구
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 5,763
- 원문 언어
- en
Word Pictures in the New Testament
A.T. Robertson · 1933
헬라어 시제·문법 해설 결정판 (KR PD / US 1931+ 권별)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 6,935
- 원문 언어
- en
The Expositor's Greek Testament
ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (다저자) · 1910
헬라어 신약 학술 (권별 저자 PD 확인 필요)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 7,010
- 원문 언어
- en
Meyer's Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament
Heinrich A.W. Meyer · 1880
신약 학술 정밀주해 (독일 — K&D 대응)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 5,340
- 원문 언어
- en
Wesley's Explanatory Notes
John Wesley · 1755
간결 실용 전권(NT 1755 / OT 1765) 웨슬리안
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 5,643
- 원문 언어
- en
Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments
Joseph Benson · 1815
웨슬리안 전권 주석
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 14,675
- 원문 언어
- en
The Treasury of David
Charles H. Spurgeon · 1885
시편 주석 고전 (설교 자료 풍부)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 2,290
- 원문 언어
- en
MacLaren's Expositions of Holy Scripture
Alexander Maclaren · 1910
설교형 강해 명저 (전권, 절별 가공 필요)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 1,144
- 원문 언어
- en
The People's New Testament
B.W. Johnson · 1891
평이 절별 신약 해설 (일반신자·모바일)
- 번역 진행
- 7 / 3,477
- 원문 언어
- en
Coke's Commentary on the Holy Bible
Thomas Coke · 1803
감리교 전권 주석
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 10,808
- 원문 언어
- en
Trapp's Complete Commentary
John Trapp · 1660
청교도 전권 주석 — Henry/Gill 보완
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 26,397
- 원문 언어
- en
Hodge's Commentary on the New Testament
Charles Hodge · 1860
프린스턴 조직신학 관점 신약 정밀 주석 (롬·고전후·엡)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 1,011
- 원문 언어
- en
그리스도께서 승리의 행렬처럼 예루살렘에 들어가신다, 막 11:1-11. 열매 없는 무화과나무가 저주를 받는다, 막 11:12-14. 예수께서 성전을 깨끗하게 하신다, 막 11:15-17. 서기관들과 대제사장들이 분개한다, 막 11:18. 말라 버린 무화과나무에 관한 성찰, 막 11:19-23. 기도와 용서에 관한 지침, 막 11:24-26. 대제사장들 등이 예수께 무슨 권위로 이런 일을 하느냐고 묻는다, 막 11:27, 막 11:28. 예수께서 대답하시고 그들을 당황하게 하신다, 막 11:29-33.
CHAPTER 11.
ENTRY INTO JERUSALEM. OTHER INCIDENTS.
CHAPTER 11
Mark 11:1. Lachm. and Tisch. read (instead of εἰς Βηθφ. κ. Βηθ.) merely καὶ εἰς Βηθανίαν; but the evidence is not sufficient (D, Vulg. codd. It. Or. (twice) Jer.) to entitle us to derive the Recepta from Luke 19:29. An old clerical error, occasioned by the similar beginnings of the two local names; and καί was inserted to connect them. C א have εἰς Βηθφ. κ. εἰς Βηθ. If this were the original form, the omission would occur still more easily.
The form Ἱεροσόλυμα is to be adopted, with Fritzsche, Lachm. and Tisch., following B C D L Δ א, min. Sahid. Or. Ἱερουσαλήμ does not occur elsewhere in Mark, and only in Matthew at Matthew 23:37 (see in loc.); in Luke it is the usual form.
ἀποστέλλει] Lachm. reads ἀπέστειλεν, in opposition to decisive evidence. It is from the parallels.
Mark 11:2. οὐδείς] Lachm. has οὐδεὶς οὔπω; Fritzsche: οὐδέπω οὐδείς. The latter is much too weakly attested. The former has considerable attestation, but with a different position of the οὔπω (Tisch. οὐδ. ἀνθρ. οὔπω), instead of which A has πώποτε (from Luke). The Recepta is to be defended; the idea expressed in adhuc was very variously brought in.
λύσαντες αὐτὸν ἀγάγετε] B C L Δ א, Copt. Sahid. Vulg. It. Or. have λύσατε αὐτὸν καὶ φέρετε. Approved by Griesb., adopted by Tisch. (Lachm. has λύσατε αὐτ. κ. ἀγάγετε). Rightly; the Recepta is from Luke 19:30; comp. Matthew 21:2, whence also originated the reading of Lachm.
Mark 11:3. ἀποστέλλει] Elz. Fritzsche have ἀποστελεῖ, in opposition to decisive evidence. Comp. on Matthew 21:3.
πάλιν, which B C* D L Δ א, min. Verc. Colb. Or. (twice) read, although it is adopted by Tisch., is an addition from misunderstanding; the reader probably being misled by ὧδε, and taking the words as being still a portion of what was to be said by the disciples.
Mark 11:4. The article before πῶλον (Elz.) is, in accordance with decisive evidence, deleted.
Mark 11:6. Instead of εἶπεν (so also Lachm. and Tisch.) Elz. Scholz have ἐνετείλατο. But εἶπεν is so weightily attested by B C L Δ א, min. Or. Copt. Aeth. Sahid. Arm. Or. that ἐνετείλατο appears a gloss. D has εἰρήκει, which likewise tells in favour of εἶπεν, and is only a change into the pluperfect.
Mark 11:7. ἤγαγον] B L Δ א** Or. have φέρουσιν; approved by Griesb., adopted by Tisch. The Recepta is from the parallel passages.
ἐπέβαλον] B C D L Δ א, min. Vulg. Cant. 11 :Corb. Vind. Or. have ἐπιβάλλουσιν. Adopted by Griesb. Fritzsche, Lachm. Tisch. The Recepta was derived from the reading ἤγαγον.
ἐπʼ αὐτῷ] B C D L Δ א, min. have ἐπʼ αὐτόν, which Griesb. approved, Fritzsche, Lachm. Tisch. adopted. The Recepta is a mechanical repetition of the previous αὐτῷ.
Mark 11:8. δένδρων] B C L Δ א, Syr. p. (in the margin) Or. Sahid. have ἀγρῶν, which Fritzsche and Tisch. have rightly adopted. With Tisch., however, instead of the whole passage ἔκοπτον … ὁδόν we must read briefly and simply: κόψαντες ἐκ τῶν ἀγρῶν. The Recepta is an expansion from Matthew, whence also came λέγοντες; in Mark 11:9. This is wanting in B C L Δ א, min. Copt. Sahid. Colb. Corb. Or., is regarded as suspicious by Griesb. and Lachm., and is deleted by Tisch.
Mark 11:10. After βασιλεία Elz. has ἐν ὀνόματι κυρίου, against preponderating evidence. An awkward repetition from Mark 11:9.
Mark 11:11. καὶ εἰς τ. ἱερόν] καί is wanting in B C L M Δ א, min. Syr. Arr. Copt. Perss. Arm. Vulg. It. Or. Lachm. Tisch.; inserted by way of connection.
Mark 11:13. To μακρόθεν, with Griesb., Fritzsche, Lachm. Scholz, Tisch., there is to be added ἀπό, upon preponderating evidence. Comp. Mark 5:6.
Mark 11:14. The arrangement εἰς τ. αἰ. ἐκ. σ., as well as μηδείς (instead of οὐδείς in Elz.), is decisively attested.
Mark 11:17. λέγων αὐτοῖς] B C L Δ א, min. Copt. have καὶ ἔλεγεν αὐτοῖς. So Tisch. The Recepta is from Luke.
ἐποιήσατε] B L Δ, Or. have πεποιήκατε. Adopted by Tisch. The aorist, in itself more familiar, came from Luke. Comp. on Matthew 21:13.
Mark 11:18. The arrangement οἱ ἀρχιερεῖς κ. οἱ γραμμ. is decisively attested (Fritzsche, Lachm. Tisch.), as is also the subjunctive ἀπολέσωσιν (Fritzsche, Lachm. Tisch.) instead of ἀπολέσουσιν.
Mark 11:19. ὅτε] B C K L Δ א, min. have ὅταν. Wrongly adopted by Tisch. Comp. his Proleg. p. lvii. Unsuitable (otherwise at Mark 3:11), and to be regarded as an ancient clerical error.
ἐξεπορεύετο] A B K M Δ, min. vss. have ἐξεπορεύοντο. So Fritzsche, Lachm. But how natural it was here to bring in the same number, as in the case of παραπορ., Mark 11:20!
Mark 11:20. The order πρωῒ παραπορ. is not necessary (in opposition to Fritzsche), but suggested itself most naturally after Mark 11:19, on which account, however, παραπορ. πρωΐ (B C D L Δ א, min. 11 :Cant.) is precisely to be preferred, with Lachm. and Tisch.
Mark 11:23. γάρ] is wanting in B D U א, min. VSS. Deleted by Lachm. and Tisch. A connective addition.
λέγει] Lachm. and Tisch. have λαλεῖ, following B L N Δ א, min.; the more familiar λέγ. slipped in involuntarily.
ὃ ἐὰν εἴπῃ] is wanting in B C D L Δ א, min. Copt. Vulg. It. Deleted by Fritzsche and Tisch., condemned also by Griesb. A confusing gloss, following the foregoing ὃς ἂν εἴπῃ.
Mark 11:24. ἄν] is wanting in B C D L Δ א, min. An addition from Matthew 21:22.
προσευχόμενοι] B C D L Δ א, Cant. Verc. Colb. Corb. Cypr. have προσεύχεσθε καί. So Lachm. and Tisch. The participle is an emendation, because it was thought necessary (comp. Matthew 21:22) to make ὅσα dependent on αἰτεῖσθε.
λαμβάνετε] B C L Δ א, Copt. have ἐλάβετε. Commended by Griesb., adopted by Lachm. and Tisch. Rightly; the aorist was not understood, and was changed partly into the present, partly into the future (D).
Mark 11:25. στήκητε] A C D H L M, min. have στήκετε. So Lachm. and Tisch. The Recepta is an emendation introduced from ignorance.
Mark 11:26.[140]] is wanting in B L S Δ א, min. Copt. Arm. codd. It. Suspected by Fritzsche, deleted by Tisch. But the evidence in favour of omission is the less sufficient for its condemnation, that the words do not closely agree with Matthew 6:15, from which place they are said to have come in, but present deviations which are in no wise to be attributed to the mechanical transcribers. The omission is explained from the homoeoteleuton of Mark 11:25-26. But what M., min. further add after Mark 11:26 is an interpolation from Matthew 7:7-8.
Mark 11:28. Instead of ΚΑῚ ΤΊς read, with Tisch., Ἢ ΤΊς, which is considerably attested and is supplanted by ΚΑῚ ΤΊς in Matthew.
Mark 11:29. ΚἈΓΏ] Tisch. has deleted this, in accordance with B C? L Δ; and Lachm., following A K, min. Arm. Germ. 2, Goth., has placed it before ὑμᾶς. It has come in from the parallels.
Mark 11:30. Before Ἰωάνν. here, as in Matthew 21:25, τό is to be adopted, with Fritzsche, Lachm. Tisch., in accordance with important testimony. It was passed over as superfluous; in Luke it is too weakly attested.
Mark 11:31. ἐλογίζοντο] B C D G K L M Δ א** min. read: διελογίζοντο, which Griesb. has commended, Schulz has approved, Fritzsche, Lachm. have adopted. With this preponderance of evidence it is the less to be derived from Matthew 21:25, in proportion to the facility with which the syllable Δ l might be lost in the two last letters of the preceding ΚΑΙ. א* has the manifest clerical error προσελογίζοντο, which, however, does not presuppose the simple form.
οὖν] is wanting in A C* L M X Δ, min. vss. Deleted by Fritzsche, Lachm. It is from the parallels.
Elz. and Fritzsche have afterwards at Mark 11:32 : ἀλλʼ ἐὰν εἴπωμεν. But ἐάν has against it decisive evidence, and is an addition easily misunderstood,
ὅτι ὄντως] Tisch. has ὄντως ὅτι, following B C L א** min. The Recepta is a transposition for the sake of facility.
[140] Ver. 26 is wanting in all the original editions of Luther’s translation.
아직 번역이 없습니다.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Mr 11:1-11.
마가복음 11:1-11. 그리스도께서 주간 첫날 예루살렘에 승리의 입성을 하심(마태복음 21:1-9; 누가복음 19:29-40; 요한복음 12:12, 19와 병행). 누가복음 19:29-40 주석을 보라.
이 본문에 대한 해설은 마 21:1-16 주석을 보라.
제자 중 둘을 보내시며 - 이것은 유월절 며칠 전에 이루어진 일이다. 우리 주께서 예루살렘에 들어가신 일을 설명한 내용은 마 21:1-17 주석을 보라.
우리는 이제 고난주간(Passion-Week), 곧 그리스도께서 죽으신 그 주간과 그 주간에 일어난 큰 사건들에 이르렀다. I. 그리스도께서 예루살렘으로 개선하듯 입성하심(막 11:1-11). II. 열매 없는 무화과나무를 저주하심(막 11:12-14). III. 성전을 환전소로 만든 자들을 성전에서 쫓아내심(막 11:15-19). IV. 그가 저주하신 무화과나무가 말라 죽은 일을 계기로, 믿음의 능력과 기도의 효력에 관하여 제자들과 나누신 강론(막 11:20-26). V. 그의 권위에 대하여 따져 묻는 자들에게 주신 대답(막 11:27-33).