Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
- 번역 진행
- 4,537 / 4,537
- 원문 언어
- en
학습 자료
성경 주석서
여러 공개 도메인 주석서와 성서하우 한글 번역을 책과 장별로 탐색합니다. 주석서를 전환하며 번역만 읽거나 원문과 번역을 나란히 볼 수 있습니다.
현재 주석서
전체 주석서
23개 주석서
전체 항목
307,288
번역 81,431건
라이선스
출처별 표시
출처와 라이선스
주석서 원문, 저자, 번역 진행률, 라이선스 정보를 출처별로 구분해 표시합니다. 성서하우의 한글 번역·편집물은 원문 자료와 별도로 관리됩니다.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871). CCEL expanded electronic edition states it is in the public domain.
- 번역 진행
- 19,831 / 19,831
- 원문 언어
- en
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Albert Barnes · 1834
Albert Barnes' Notes on Revelation Of St. John The Divine (New Testament, English original, public domain). Sourced from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library (CCEL). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes.
- 번역 진행
- 22,781 / 22,781
- 원문 언어
- en
Adam Clarke's Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Adam Clarke · 1831
Public domain English commentary by Adam Clarke, normalized from Wikisource book pages for scripture.how. Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke.
- 번역 진행
- 21,603 / 22,101
- 원문 언어
- en
John Gill's Exposition of the Bible
John Gill · 1763
John Gill(1697-1771), Exposition of the Old and New Testament(1746-1763). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/gill.
- 번역 진행
- 12,528 / 30,759
- 원문 언어
- en
Calvin's Commentaries
John Calvin · 1850
종교개혁 신학 원천 (영역본 PD, 대부분 — 전권 아님)
- 번역 진행
- 144 / 7,385
- 원문 언어
- en
Matthew Poole's Annotations upon the Holy Bible
Matthew Poole · 1685
간결 절별 전권 개혁주의 주석
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 31,092
- 원문 언어
- en
The Pulpit Commentary
ed. H.D.M. Spence & Joseph S. Exell · 1890
전권 강해·설교·예화 풍부 (항목 대량)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 25,592
- 원문 언어
- en
Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
Carl F. Keil, Franz Delitzsch · 1866
구약 학술 표준 — 히브리어·문헌비평·고대근동 배경
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 2,044
- 원문 언어
- en
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers
ed. Charles J. Ellicott · 1878
학술+가독 균형 전권 주석
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 23,497
- 원문 언어
- en
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Cambridge (다저자) · 1900
준전권 준학술 (권별 저자·연도 확인)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 27,176
- 원문 언어
- en
Vincent's Word Studies in the New Testament
Marvin R. Vincent · 1887
신약 헬라어 단어 연구
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 5,763
- 원문 언어
- en
Word Pictures in the New Testament
A.T. Robertson · 1933
헬라어 시제·문법 해설 결정판 (KR PD / US 1931+ 권별)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 6,935
- 원문 언어
- en
The Expositor's Greek Testament
ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (다저자) · 1910
헬라어 신약 학술 (권별 저자 PD 확인 필요)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 7,010
- 원문 언어
- en
Meyer's Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament
Heinrich A.W. Meyer · 1880
신약 학술 정밀주해 (독일 — K&D 대응)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 5,340
- 원문 언어
- en
Wesley's Explanatory Notes
John Wesley · 1755
간결 실용 전권(NT 1755 / OT 1765) 웨슬리안
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 5,643
- 원문 언어
- en
Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments
Joseph Benson · 1815
웨슬리안 전권 주석
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 14,675
- 원문 언어
- en
The Treasury of David
Charles H. Spurgeon · 1885
시편 주석 고전 (설교 자료 풍부)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 2,290
- 원문 언어
- en
MacLaren's Expositions of Holy Scripture
Alexander Maclaren · 1910
설교형 강해 명저 (전권, 절별 가공 필요)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 1,144
- 원문 언어
- en
The People's New Testament
B.W. Johnson · 1891
평이 절별 신약 해설 (일반신자·모바일)
- 번역 진행
- 7 / 3,477
- 원문 언어
- en
Coke's Commentary on the Holy Bible
Thomas Coke · 1803
감리교 전권 주석
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 10,808
- 원문 언어
- en
Trapp's Complete Commentary
John Trapp · 1660
청교도 전권 주석 — Henry/Gill 보완
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 26,397
- 원문 언어
- en
Hodge's Commentary on the New Testament
Charles Hodge · 1860
프린스턴 조직신학 관점 신약 정밀 주석 (롬·고전후·엡)
- 번역 진행
- 0 / 1,011
- 원문 언어
- en
군대 귀신에 사로잡힌 사람이 고침을 받는다, 1-20절. 그리스도께서 야이로의 딸을 살리시고, 혈루증 앓던 여자를 고치신다, 21-43절.
CHAPTER 5.
THE GERASENE DEMONIAC. THE DAUGHTER OF JAIRUS. THE WOMAN WITH AN ISSUE.
This group of incidents is given in the same order in all three synoptists, but in Matthew not in immediate sequence.
CHAPTER 5
Mark 5:1. Γαδαρηνῶν] Here also, as in Matthew 8:28, occur the various readings Γερασηνῶν (B D א* Vulg. Sax. Nyss., so Lachm. and Tisch.) and Γεργεσηνῶν (L Δ א** min. Arr. Copt. Aeth. Arm. Or.). The Recepta is to be retained, according to A C E, etc., with Fritzsche and Scholz. See on Matt.
Mark 5:2. ἐξελθόντος αὐτοῦ] is here more strongly attested (B C L Δ א, min. 5 :Brix., to which D also with ἐξελθόντων αὐτῶν falls to be added) than in Matthew 8:28. To be adopted, with Lachm. and Tisch.; ἐξελθόντι αὐτῷ (Elz.) is from the parallel passages.
εὐθέως] which Lachm. has deleted, is only wanting in B, Syr. Arm. 5 :Brix. Vind. Colb. Corb. 2. The omission is explained from the parallels, from which also has arisen the reading ὑπήντησεν (B C D L Δ א, min. Lachm.).
Mark 5:3. οὔτε] B C D L Δ א 33 have οὐδέ. So Fritzsche, Lachm. Tisch.; and of necessity rightly.
ἁλύσεσιν] Lachm. and Tisch. have ἁλύσει, following B C L 33, Colb.; the Recepta is from what follows.
οὐδείς] Lachm. and Tisch. have οὐκέτι οὐδείς, following B C * D L Δ א, min. Vulg. It. Arm. Looking to the peculiarity of this notice and the accumulation of the negatives, we must recognise this as correct.
Mark 5:7. εἶπε] λέγει has preponderating evidence; approved by Griesb., adopted by Fritzsche, Lachm. and Tisch.; εἶπε is from Luke 8:28. But Mark is fond of the historical present. In Mark 5:9 also the simple λέγει αὐτῷ (instead of ἀπεκρίθη λέγων in Elz.) is rightly adopted by Griesb. on preponderant evidence.
Mark 5:9. Λεγεών] B* C D L Δ א* 69, Syr. Copt. It. Vulg. have Λεγιών, and this Lachm. and Tisch. have adopted. The Recepta is from Luke.
Mark 5:11. Instead of πρὸς τῷ ὄρει, Elz. has πρὸς τὰ ὄρη, in opposition to decisive evidence.
Mark 5:12. After αὐτόν Elz. Matt. have πάντες, which Lachm. brackets and Tisch. deletes. It is wanting in B C D K L M Δ א, min. vss. Afterwards Elz. Matth. Scholz, Lachm. have οἱ δαίμονες, which Griesb. rejected, and Fritzsche and Tisch. have deleted, following B C L Δ א, min. Copt. Aeth. The Recepta πάντες οἱ δαίμονες is to be maintained; these words were omitted in accordance with the parallels; but they are quite in keeping with Mark’s graphic manner.
Mark 5:13. ἦσαν δέ] is on considerable evidence to be deleted as supplied (Tisch.).
Mark 5:14. Instead of ἀπήγγ. Elz. has ἀνήγγ. But the former is decisively attested.
ἐξῆλθον] has come in from Matt. and Luke instead of the genuine ἦλθον (A B K L M U א** min. vss.), which Griesb. approved, Lachm. and Tisch. have adopted.
Mark 5:15. The omission of the καί before ἱματ. (Tisch.) proceeded from Luke.
Mark 5:18. ἐμβάντος] A B C D K L M Δ א, min. Vulg. It. have ἐμβαίνοντος. Approved by Griesb., adopted by Fritzsche, Lachm. and Tisch. The Recepta is from Luke 8:37.
Mark 5:19. Instead of καὶ οὐκ, Elz. has ὁ δὲ Ἰησοῦς οὐκ, against decisive evidence.
ἀνάγγειλον] Lachm. Tisch. have ἀπάγγειλον, following B C Δ א 50, 258. A mechanical change in conformity to Mark 5:14.
Instead of πεποίηκε, Elz. has ἐποίησε, contrary to decisive evidence.
Mark 5:22. ἰδού] before ἔρχ. is wanting in B D L Δ א 102, vss. (also Vulg. It.). Suspected by Griesb., bracketed by Lachm., deleted by Fritzsche and Tisch. From Luke 8:41, contrary to the usage of Mark.
Mark 5:23. παρεκάλει] A C L א, min. have παρεκαλεῖ. Recommended by Griesb. and Scholz, adopted by Fritzsche and Tisch. The imperfect is from Luke 8:41; the present is in keeping with Mark’s manner.
The reading ἵνα σωθῇ καὶ ζήσῃ has preponderant attestation by B C D L Δ א, min. (adopted by Lachm. and Tisch.); ὅπως (Elz. Fritzsche, Scholz) instead of ἵνα may be suspected of being an amendment of style, and the more current ζήσεται flowed easily from Matthew 9:18.
Mark 5:25. τις] is wanting in A B C L Δ א, min. Vulg. 5 :Vind. Colb. Corb. Condemned by Griesb., deleted by Fritzsche and Lachm., and justly so; the weight of evidence is too strong against it, to admit of the omission of a word so indifferent for the sense being explained from the parallels.
Mark 5:26. Instead of αὐτῆς, Elz. Tisch. have ἑαυτῆς, against so preponderant evidence that it is manifestly the result of a gloss, as also is the omission of παρʼ (D, min. Syr. utr. Vulg. It.).
Instead of περί, Tisch. has τὰ περί. So B C* Δ א. τά, being superfluous, dropped out after the preceding syllables.
Mark 5:33. ἐπʼ αὐτῇ] ἐπʼ is wanting in B C D L א, min. Syr. Copt. Verc. Bracketed by Lachm., deleted by Tisch. That ΑΥΤΗ is not the nominative belonging to the following verb (as it is understood in Cant. Corb. Vind.) was noted in the form of gloss, sometimes by ἐπʼ, sometimes by ἐν (F Δ).
Mark 5:36. εὐθέως] deleted by Tisch. following B D L Δ א, min. Syr. Arr. Perss. Copt. Aeth. Arm. Vulg. It. But regarded as superfluous, nay, as disturbing and incompatible with the following reading παρακούσας, it became omitted the more easily in accordance with Luke 8:50.
ἀκούσας] B L Δ א have παρακούσας. So Tisch. and Ewald also. Rightly; although the attestation of the vss. is wanting (only one Cod. of the It. has neglexit). The difficulty of the not understood compound occasioned the substitution for it of the current simple form.
Mark 5:38. ἔρχεται] A B C D F Δ א, min. vss. have ἔρχονται. So Lachm. and Tisch. The plural might just as well have been introduced from what precedes, as the singular from what follows and Matthew 9:23. But the preponderance of the witnesses is decisive in favour of the plural.
After θόρυβον Griesb. Scholz, Lachm. Tisch. have, on preponderant evidence, added καί. Being superfluous, it was the more easily absorbed by the first syllable of κλαίοντας.
Mark 5:40. ὁ δέ] Lachm. has αὐτὸς δέ, on evidence considerable doubtless, but not decisive. From Luke 8:54.
After παιδίον Elz. and Scholz have ἀνακείμενον, which Lachm. has bracketed, Tisch. has deleted. It is wanting in B D L Δ א, min. vss. An addition by way of gloss, instead of which are also found κείμενον, κατακείμενον, and other readings.
아직 번역이 없습니다.
가다라 지방 귀신 들린 자의 영광스러운 치유 (막 5:1-20). 1. 예수께서 바다 건너편 가다라인의 지방에 이르시니라.
귀신 들린 자들에 대한 이 기록의 자세한 설명은 마 8:28-34 주석을 보라.
가다라인들 — 어떤 사본들에는 게르게사인들로, 또 어떤 사본들에는 거라사인들로 되어 있다. 그리스바흐는 후자를 선호하는 듯하다. 마태복음 8:28의 주석을 보라.
가다라인들은 게르게사인들의 경계 안에 포함되어 있었다. 라이트풋 박사는 여기 언급된 두 귀신 들린 사람 가운데 하나는 가다라 사람, 따라서 이방인이었고, 다른 하나는 게르게사 사람, 따라서 유대인이었다고 본다. 그리고 그는 마가와 누가가 가다라의 귀신 들린 사람을 언급한 것은 그의 사례가 특이했기 때문이라고 생각한다. 곧 수로보니게 여인의 딸을 제외하면, 그는 우리 주께 고침 받은 유일한 이방인이었다는 것이다.
이 장에서 우리는 다음과 같은 내용을 보게 된다. I. 그리스도께서 귀신 들린 사람에게서 군대 귀신을 쫓아내시고, 그것들이 돼지 떼에게 들어가도록 허락하신 일(막 5:1-20). II. 그리스도께서 야이로의 딸을 살리러 가시는 도중에 혈루증 앓는 여인을 고치신 일(막 5:21-43). 이 세 가지 기적의 이야기는 앞에서 이미 다룬 바 있으나(마 8:28, 마 9:18 등 참조), 여기서는 더욱 상세히 기술되어 있다.