서론
제목 없음
繁體中文
영문 원문
We have done with the visions, but not with the revelations of this book; the prophet sees no more such signs as he had seen, but still "the word of the Lord came to him." In this chapter we have, I. A case of conscience proposed to the prophet by the children of the captivity concerning fasting, whether they should continue their solemn fasts which they had religiously observed during the seventy years of their captivity, Zec 7:1-3. II. The answer to this question, which is given in this and the next chapter; and this answer was given not all at once, but by piece-meal, and, it should seem, at several times, for here are four distinct discourses which have all of them reference to this case, each of them prefaced with "the word of the Lord came," Zec 4:8,8:1,18. The method of them is very observable. In this chapter, 1. The prophet sharply reproves them for the mismanagements of their fasts, Zec 7:4-7. 2. He exhorts them to reform their lives, which would be the best way of fasting, and to take heed of those sins which brought those judgments upon them which they kept these fasts in memory of, Zec 7:8-14. And then in the next chapter, having searched the wound, he binds it up, and heals it, with gracious assurances of great mercy God had yet in store for them, by which he would turn their fasts into feasts.
1-7
An Enquiry Concerning Fasting; Hypocrisy Reproved (520 BC)
繁體中文
論禁食的詢問;責備虛偽(主前520年)
¹ 大利烏王第四年九月,就是基斯流月,初四日,耶和華的話臨到撒迦利亞。
² 那時伯特利人打發沙利色和利堅米勒,並他們的人,去懇求耶和華的恩,
³ 並問萬軍之耶和華殿中的祭司和先知說:我歷年以來在五月間哭泣齋戒,現在還當這樣行嗎?
⁴ 萬軍之耶和華的話就臨到我說:
⁵ 你要向這地的眾民和祭司說:你們這七十年在五月、七月禁食悲哀,豈是絲毫向我禁食嗎?
⁶ 你們吃喝,豈不是為自己吃、為自己喝嗎?
⁷ 當耶路撒冷和四圍的城邑有人居住、正興旺,南地高原也有人居住的時候,耶和華借從前的先知所宣告的話,你們不應當聽嗎?
先知所傳、記在本章和下一章的這篇應時講章,距前篇他報告自己異象的信息已逾兩年——這可由本篇日期(Zec 7:1,大利烏第四年九月)與前篇日期(Zec 1:1,大利烏第二年八月)相比較而得;這並非說撒迦利亞這段期間閒懶不前(經文明說他和哈該一直說預言,直到大利烏第六年聖殿完工;Ezr 6:14,15),而是說這段時間內他並未傳講後來發表並留存記錄的講章,如同此篇一般。神可以藉口傳受尊崇,他的工作得以成就,他的利益得以服事——正如藉着寫作一樣;也可藉着重申強調已有的教訓,正如藉着推陳出新一般。如今我們在此看見,
I. 關於禁食所提出的一個問題。有人被差遣到祭司和先知那裏去詢問:是否應當繼續守他們的年度禁食,特別是第五月的禁食,如同他們素來所行的。究竟是誰提出這問題尚未確定——是那些仍留在巴比倫的人嗎?他們因被剝奪了神設立之嚴肅節期的益處,便以神護理所招致的嚴肅禁食來補其缺乏;還是那些已歸回卻住在鄉間的人?有人寧可這樣想,因他們被稱為這地的眾民(Zec 7:5)。但關於這點,對被擄猶太人使者所作的回答,可以不限於他們,而是針對眾民。請觀察:
1. 來提出這問題的是誰——沙利色和利堅米勒,是有相當身分地位的人,因為他們帶着他們的人而來;他們不以此差使為卑,也不以此為損自己的尊榮,反倒以此為加添自己的尊榮:(1)在神的殿中伺候,在那裏盡本分、受命令。最偉大的人也小於基督最小的律例。(2)作神百姓的代理,辦理他們的事務。有產業的人比有事業的人有更多閒暇,理當以時間服事公眾;他們借行善使自己真正偉大;眾教會的使者就是基督的榮耀(2Co 8:23)。
2. 他們奉差而來是為何事。他們或許不是帶着金銀來(如 Zec 6:10,11 那些人),或縱然帶着也未提及;他們是為兩件當把我們都帶到神殿中的大差使而來:(1)為神的憐憫代求。他們受差去懇求耶和華的恩,並且有人以為(按當時的習慣)獻祭,在祭物中獻上他們的禱告。被擄中的猶太人朝向聖殿禱告(Da 6:10 可見);如今聖殿重建在望,他們便差代表到其中禱告,記得神曾說他的殿必稱為萬民禱告的殿(Isa 56:7)。在禱告中我們當在耶和華面前站定,看見他的眼目注視我們,我們的眼目也仰望他。(2)為尋求神的心意。須知,我們向神獻上祈求時,必須甘心受他的教導;因為我們若掩耳不聽他的律法,就不能期望我們的禱告蒙他悅納。所以我們當渴慕一生住在耶和華的殿中,為要在他殿中求問(Ps 27:4)——不僅問"主啊,你要為我作甚麼",更問"主啊,你要我作甚麼"。
3. 他們求問誰。他們對那在萬軍之耶和華殿中的祭司,並對先知說話;前者為尋常事件的默示,後者為特別之事;他們兩者皆有,便要試試看哪一方能使他們認識神在這事上的心意。須知,神既賜人各樣的恩賜,都是為彼此的益處,我們便當按需用各樣的恩賜。他們既不拘泥於祭司——他們常設的執事——而排斥先知(先知按所得恩賜顯然配在教會服事);也不迷戀先知而輕視祭司;他們對祭司和先知都說話,在求問兩者中,將榮耀歸給以色列的神,並那在眾人裏運行一切的事的一位靈。神可以借烏陵或借先知對他們說話(1Sa 28:6),所以他們不肯忽略任何一方。祭司和先知彼此不嫉妒,彼此之間也無分歧;那麼百姓就不可在他們之間製造分歧,反要感謝神兩者兼備。先知誠然責備了祭司中的不當之處,但同時告訴百姓:祭司的嘴唇當存知識,他們當從他口中尋求律法,因他是萬軍之耶和華的使者(Mal 2:7)。須知,凡要認識神心意的人當求問神的執事,在疑惑的事上向那些專以查考聖經為業的人請教。
4. 他們想要求得解答的問題是甚麼(Zec 7:3):我歷年以來在五月間哭泣齋戒,現在還當這樣行嗎? 請觀察:(1)他們過去的慣例——不僅在被擄的七十年間,直到今日——即他們得釋放之後二十年;他們持守定期的嚴肅禁食,為自卑和禱告,並按他們的機會,在密室、家中或所能有的敬拜聚會中虔守。本處只提一個——第五月的禁食;但由 Zec 8:19 可見他們守四個周年禁食:第四月(6月17日),為記念耶路撒冷城牆被攻破(Jer 52:6);第五月(7月4日),為記念聖殿被焚(Jer 52:12,13);第七月(9月3日),為記念基大利被殺,這完成了他們的分散;第十月(12月10日),為記念耶路撒冷開始被圍(2Ki 25:1)。他們守這些禁食,借此在這些使人謙卑的護理下自卑,是十分可稱讚的——神借這些護理呼召他們哭泣悲哀,他們如此使自己適應自己的苦難,並為得釋放作預備。這也是使兒女及早體會神攻擊他們的手的手段。(2)他們現今的疑惑——是否仍當繼續這些禁食。這問題如同一個人所問:我還當哭泣嗎? 但這是許多人的情形,一個人的答案就是眾人的答案。或者許多人已停止了,但提問者不肯被別人的實行所決定;神若要他繼續,他就繼續,無論別人如何。他的禁食以他的哭泣、齋戒來描述。宗教的禁食不僅要禁食——此處稱為將自己分別出來離開日常合法的慰藉——更要有為罪的敬虔憂愁,此處以哭泣表示。"我仍當這樣克苦己心如我這許多年所行的嗎?" Zec 7:5 說這是七十年,從末次被擄算起(如 Zec 1:12 所述)。這詢問暗示他情願繼續,神若如此命定,雖然於肉體是苦,他也在所不惜。[1] 關於繼續這些禁食,有所當說。禁食禱告無論何時都是善工,也都有益;我們常常有足夠的理由和足夠的需要在神面前自卑。丟棄這些禁食,便是他們過於安逸的證據,也是使他們更加安逸的原因。他們仍在困苦之中,仍在神不悅的記號之下;病人在尚覺病根未除之時就斷絕療程,是不智的。[2] 關於放下這些禁食,也有所當說。神已改變了他護理待他們的方法,以憐憫歸回他們;他們豈不當改變本分的方法嗎?如今新郎既已回來,伴郎豈可禁食呢? 凡事當按其時成為美好。至於第五月的禁食(他們特別詢問的),既為記念聖殿被焚而設,似乎比其他禁食更可視為已被廢止,因為聖殿如今重建在望。但他們既久守此禁食,就不願未經指教、未經求問並明白神心意而擅自停止。須知,凡我們所發現對自己和別人有益的宗教常規,不可無故、也不可不經深思而更改。
II. 對這問題所作的回答。看來,雖然這問題表面合理,提問者卻並不誠心;他們所關心的是禮儀過於實質;他們似乎以禁食自誇,並以此向全能神嗟怨,怪他未更早以憐憫歸向他們——"因為我們已行了這許多年。" 如 Isa 58:3 所載:我們禁食,你為何不看見呢? 又有人以為他們詢問背後藏著不信和對神應許的疑惑;因為他們若按當得的信任這些應許,便不必懷疑如今禁食的理由既已過去,就當放下了。所以他們問題的第一個回答,乃是對他們虛偽的嚴厲責備——不僅指向這地的眾民,更指向祭司——他們設立了這些禁食,其中有人或許為達自己的目的而堅持之。當叫他們都知道:他們以為借着這些禁食已大大使神欠他們的債,其實大大錯了,因為除非以更好的方式和更好的目的遵守,這些禁食並不蒙他悅納。
1. 他們所行的善事並未按正道而行(Zec 7:5):你們禁食悲哀。 他們不可被指控忽略本分,雖然那本分使肉體不快(你的禁食常在我面前,Ps 50:8),但他們未按正道管理。須知,凡來求問自己本分的人,必須甘心先受指責。凡似乎熱心於本分外表的人,當忠實省察自己,是否對其內裏有當有的尊重。(1)他們禁食時並沒有眼目向著神:你們豈是絲毫向我禁食嗎? 他向他們自己的良心呼籲;良心要起來作證他們並不誠心,何況神——他比心大,知道一切。你們很清楚你們根本不是向我禁食;你們禁食時是向著我嗎? 有本分的屍體和形式,卻沒有生命、靈魂與能力。是向我嗎? 重複表明在這事和其他聖潔操練中,這才是最要緊的——所行的當向著神,甚至向著他;以他的話為準則,以他的榮耀為目的,在其中討他的喜悅、得他的恩寵,並借誠意的用意向他表明自己的真誠。當這缺欠之時,每次禁食不過是兒戲。禁食卻不向著神禁食,就是嘲弄他、惹動他,不能討他喜悅。凡以禁食遮蓋罪惡的,如耶洗別的禁食;或借禁食向人取悅以求稱讚的,如法利賽人;或停留於外表謙卑而心未謙卑的,如亞哈——他們是向著神禁食嗎?是向他嗎? 我們禁食的嚴肅聚會,無論多麼頻繁、多麼長久、多麼刻苦,若不能使敬虔情感更加敏銳、使禱告更迫切、使敬虔憂愁加增、並使心思的性情和為人的道路改變得更好,就完全未達目的,神也不會視之為向著他、向著他所獻的。(2)他們在禁食中所存向自己的眼目,與他們在吃喝中所存的相同(Zec 7:6):你們吃喝的時候——其他日子(不,或許就在你們禁食的日子,你們見機便可自行寬待,取自由吃喝)——豈不是為自己吃、為自己喝嗎? 你們豈非常常隨己意而行?那麼為何如今假裝要認識神的心意?你們宗教的節期和感恩,並不比你們的禁食更向著神。或者更恰當地說,這話是指着他們平常的飲食;他們在自己吃喝上所設計為神榮耀的,並不多於他們在禁食禱告中所設計的;自己始終是一切行動——無論是天然、民事、宗教——的中心,眾線都匯於其中。除非他們更好地持守禁食,就不必為是否繼續而如此費心。須知,我們為自己吃、為自己喝時,就錯過了吃喝的目的;我們當為神的榮耀而吃喝(1Co 10:31),好叫我們的身體適於服事靈魂去服事他。
2. 他們本當行的首要善事卻未去行(Zec 7:7):耶和華借從前的先知所宣告的話,你們不應當聽嗎? 是的,那正是你們在禁食之日當作的;在你們禁食之日,僅僅哭泣、分別自己以表示你們為所受審判的憂愁是不夠的,你們更當查考先知的經卷,好使你們看見神與你們列祖爭論的緣由,並借他們的苦難受警戒,不踏他們罪惡的腳蹤。你們問:我們當像素來那樣禁食嗎?不,你們當作你們尚未作過的事;你們當悔改己罪、革新生活。這正是我們如今所呼召你們的,也正是從前的先知對你們列祖所呼召的。為更使他們感受罪惡所帶給他們的損害,以至於悔改,他提醒他們本國從前的繁盛景況:耶路撒冷那時有人居住、正興旺,如今卻荒涼困苦;那如今成為廢墟的四圍城邑,那時也有人居住、得享平安;鄉間也十分稠密:南地高原有人居住——那些地方毫無防禦,卻安然居住;那些地方肥沃,所以他們豐盛居住。但那時神借先知向他們宣告,如同懇切而不倦地催促他們改正道路行為,否則他們的興盛必快快完結。"如今",先知說,"你們當留意這事,並當推論:當日為阻止審判而向他們所要求的——他們未作的——如今為消除審判而向你們所要求的也是這個;你們若不作,一切的禁食哭泣都毫無意義。" 須知,後期先知的話與前期先知的相符;無論百姓在興盛或患難之中,當被召離棄己罪、盡上本分;這仍是每首歌的重擔。
영문 원문
An Enquiry Concerning Fasting; Hypocrisy Reproved (520 BC)
¹ And it came to pass in the fourth year of king Darius, that the word of the LORD came unto Zechariah in the fourth day of the ninth month, even in Chisleu;
² When they had sent unto the house of God Sherezer and Regem-melech, and their men, to pray before the LORD,
³ And to speak unto the priests which were in the house of the LORD of hosts, and to the prophets, saying, Should I weep in the fifth month, separating myself, as I have done these so many years?
⁴ Then came the word of the LORD of hosts unto me, saying,
⁵ Speak unto all the people of the land, and to the priests, saying, When ye fasted and mourned in the fifth and seventh month, even those seventy years, did ye at all fast unto me, even to me?
⁶ And when ye did eat, and when ye did drink, did not ye eat for yourselves, and drink for yourselves?
⁷ Should ye not hear the words which the LORD hath cried by the former prophets, when Jerusalem was inhabited and in prosperity, and the cities thereof round about her, when men inhabited the south and the plain?
This occasional sermon, which the prophet preached, and which is recorded in this and the next chapter, was above two years after the former, in which he gave them an account of his visions, as appears by comparing the date of this (Zec 7:1), in the ninth month of the fourth year of Darius, with the date of that (Zec 1:1), in the eighth month of the second year of Darius; not that Zechariah was idle all that while (it is expressly said that he and Haggai continued prophesying till the temple was finished in the sixth year of Darius; Ezr 6:14,15), but during that time he did not preach any sermon that was afterwards published, and left upon record, as this is. God may be honoured, his work done, and his interest served, by word of mouth as well as by writing; and by inculcating and pressing what has been taught, as well as by advancing something new. Now here we have,
I. A case proposed concerning fasting. Some persons were sent to enquire of the priests and prophets whether they should continue to observe their yearly fasts, particularly that in the fifth month, as they had done. It is uncertain whether the case was put by those that yet remained in Babylon, who, being deprived of the benefit of the solemn feasts which God's ordinance appointed them, made up the want by the solemn fasts which God's providences called them to; or by those that had returned, but lived in the country, as some rather incline to think, because they are called the people of the land, Zec 7:5. But, as to that, the answer given to the messengers of the captive Jews might be directed, not to them only, but to all the people. Observe,
1. Who they were that came with this enquiry—Sherezer and Regem-melech, persons of some rank and figure, for they came with their men, and did not think it below them, or any disparagement to them, to be sent on this errand, but rather an addition to their honour to be, (1.) Attendants in God's house, there to do duty and receive orders. The greatest of men are less than the least of the ordinances of Jesus Christ. (2.) Agents for God's people, to negotiate their affairs. Men of estates, having more leisure than men of business, ought to employ their time in the service of the public, and by doing good they make themselves truly great; the messengers of the churches were the glory of Christ, 2Co 8:23.
2. What the errand was upon which they came. They were sent perhaps not with gold and silver (as those, Zec 6:10,11), or, if they were, that is not mentioned, but upon the two great errands which should bring us all to the house of God, (1.) to intercede with God for his mercy. They were sent to pray before the Lord, and, some think (according to the usage then), to offer sacrifice, with which they offered up their prayers. The Jews, in captivity, prayed towards the temple (as appears Da 6:10); but now that it was in a fair way to be rebuilt they sent their representatives to pray in it, remembering that God had said that his house should be called a house of prayer for all people, Isa 56:7. In prayer we must set ourselves as before the Lord, must see his eye upon us and have our eye up to him. (2.) To enquire of God concerning his mind. Note, When we offer up our requests to God it must be with a readiness to receive instructions from him; for, if we turn away our ear from hearing his law, we cannot expect that our prayers should be acceptable to him. We must therefore desire to dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of our life that we may enquire there (Ps 27:4), asking, not only, Lord, what wilt thou do for me? but, Lord what wilt thou have me to do?
3. Whom they consulted. They spoke to the priests that were in the house of the Lord and to the prophets; the former were an oracle for ordinary cases, the latter for extraordinary; they were blessed with both, and would try if either could acquaint them with the mind of God in this case. Note, God having given diversities of gifts to men, and all to profit with, we should make use of all as there is occasion. They were not so wedded to the priests, their stated ministers, as to distrust the prophets, who appeared, by the gifts given them, well qualified to serve the church; nor yet were they so much enamoured with the prophets as to despise the priests, but they spoke both to the priests and to the prophets, and, in consulting both, gave glory to the God of Israel, and that one Spirit who works all in all. God might speak to them either by urim or by prophets (1Sa 28:6), and therefore they would not neglect either. The priests and the prophets were not jealous one of another, nor had any difference among themselves; let not the people then make differences between them, but thank God they had both. The prophets did indeed reprove what was amiss in the priests, but at the same time told the people that the priest's lips should keep knowledge, and they must enquire the law at his mouth, for he is the messenger of the Lord of hosts, Mal 2:7. Note, Those that would know God's mind should consult God's ministers, and in doubtful cases ask advice of those whose special business it is to search the scriptures.
4. What the case was which they desired satisfaction in (Zec 7:3): Should I weep in the fifth month, separating myself, as I have done these so many years. Observe, (1.) What had been their past practice, not only during the seventy years of the captivity but to this time, which was twenty years after the liberty proclaimed them; they kept up solemn stated fasts for humiliation and prayer, which they religiously observed, according as their opportunities were, in their closets, families, or such assemblies for worship as they had. In the case here, they mention only one, that of the fifth month; but it appears, by Zec 8:19, that they observed four anniversary fasts, one in the fourth month (June 17), in remembrance of the breaking up of the wall of Jerusalem (Jer 52:6), another in the fifth month (July 4), in remembrance of the burning of the temple (Jer 52:12,13), another in the seventh month (September 3), in remembrance of the killing of Gedaliah, which completed their dispersion, and another in the tenth month (December 10), in remembrance of the beginning of the siege of Jerusalem, 2Ki 25:1. Now it was very commendable in them to keep those fasts, thus to humble themselves under those humbling providences, by which God called them to weeping and mourning, thus to accommodate themselves to their troubles, and prepare themselves for deliverance. It would likewise be a means of possessing their children betimes with a due sense of the hand of the Lord gone out against them. (2.) What was their present doubt-whether they should continue these fasts or no. The case is put as by a single person: Should I weep? But it was the case of many, and the satisfaction of one would be a satisfaction to the rest. Or perhaps many had left it off, but the querist will not be determined by the practice of others; if God will have him continue it, he will, whatever others do. His fasting is described by his weeping, separating himself. A religious fast must be solemnized, not only by abstinence, here called a separating ourselves from the ordinary lawful comforts of life, but by a godly sorrow for sin, here expressed by weeping. "Should I still keep such days to afflict the soul as I have done these so many years?" It is said (Zec 7:5) to be seventy years, computed from the last captivity, as before, Zec 1:12. The enquiry intimates a readiness to continue it, if God so appoint, though it be a mortification to the flesh. [1.] Something is to be said for the continuance of these fasts. Fasting and praying are good work at any time, and do good; we have always both cause enough and need enough to humble ourselves before God. To throw off these fasts would be an evidence of their being too secure, and a cause of their being more so. They were still in distress, and under the tokens of God's displeasure; and it is unwise for the patient to break off his course of physic while he is sensible of such remains of his distemper. But, [2.] There is something to be said for the letting fall of these fasts. God had changed the method of his providences concerning them, and returned in ways of mercy to them; and ought not they then to change the method of their duties? Now that the bridegroom has returned, why should the children of the bride-chamber fast? Every thing is beautiful in its season. And as to the fast of the fifth month (which is that they particularly enquire about), that, being kept in remembrance of the burning of the temple, might seem to be superseded rather than any of the other, because the temple was now in a fair way to be rebuilt. But, having long kept up this fast, they would not leave it off without advice, and without asking and knowing God's mind in the case. Note, A good method of religious services, which we have found beneficial to ourselves and others, ought not to be altered without good reason, and therefore not without mature deliberation.
II. An answer given to this case. It should seem that, though the question looked plausible enough, those who proposed it were not conscientious in it, for they were more concerned about the ceremony than about the substance; they seemed to boast of their fasting, and to upbraid God Almighty with it, that he had not sooner returned in mercy to them; "for we have done it these so many years." As those, Isa 58:3, Wherefore have we fasted, and thou seest not? And some think that unbelief, and distrust of the promises of God, were at the bottom of their enquiry; for, if they had given them the credit that was due to them, they needed not to doubt but that their fasts ought to be laid aside, now that the occasion of them was over. And therefore the first answer to their enquiry is a very sharp reproof of their hypocrisy, directed, not only to the people of the land, but to the priests, who had set up these fasts, and perhaps some of them were for keeping them up, to serve some purpose of their own. Let them all take notice that, whereas they thought they had made God very much their debtor by these fasts, they were much mistaken, for they were not acceptable to him, unless they had been observed in a better manner and to better purpose.
1. What they did that was good was not done aright (Zec 7:5): You fasted and mourned. They were not chargeable with the omission or neglect of the duty, though it was displeasing to the body (thy fasts were continually before me, Ps 50:8), but they had not managed them aright. Note, Those that come to enquire of their duty must be willing first to be told of their faults. And those that seem zealous for the outside of a duty ought to examine themselves faithfully whether they have the regard they ought to have to the inside of it. (1.) They had not an eye to God in their fasting: Did you at all fast unto me, even to me? He appeals to their own consciences; they will witness against them that they had not been sincere in it, much more will God, who is greater than the heart and knows all things. You know very well that you did not at all fast to me; in fasting did you fast to me? There was the carcase and form of the duty, but none of the life, and soul, and power of it. Was it to me, even to me? The repetition intimates what a great deal of stress is laid upon this as the main matter, in that and other holy exercises, that they be done to God, even to him, with an eye to his word as our rule, and his glory as our end, in them, seeking to please him and to obtain his favour, and studious by the sincerity of our intention to approve ourselves to him. When this was wanting every fast was but a jest. To fast, and not fast to God, was to mock him and provoke him, and could not be pleasing to him. Those that make fasting a cloak for sin, as Jezebel's fast, or by it make their court to men for their applause, as the Pharisees, or that rest in outward expressions of humiliation while their hearts are unhumbled, as Ahab, do they fast to God, even to him? Is this the fast that God has chosen? Isa 58:5. If the solemnities of our fasting, though frequent, long, and severe, do not serve to put an edge upon devout affections, to quicken prayer, to increase godly sorrow, and to alter the temper of our minds and the course of our lives for the better, they do not at all answer the intention, and God will not accept them as performed to him, even to him. (2.) They had the same eye to themselves in their fasting that they had in their eating and drinking (Zec 7:6): "When you did eat, and when you did drink, on other days (nay, perhaps on your fast-days, in the observation of which you could, when you saw cause, dispense with yourselves, and take a liberty to eat and drink), did you not eat for yourselves and drink for yourselves? Have you not always done as you had a mind yourselves? Why then do you now pretend a desire to know the mind of God? In your religious feasts and thanksgivings you have had no more an eye to God than in your fasts." Or, rather, it refers to their common meals; they did no more design the honour of God in their fasting and praying than they did in their eating and drinking; but self was still the centre in which the lines of all their actions, natural, civil, and religious, met. They needed not be in such care about the continuance of their fasts, unless they had kept them better. Note, We miss our end in eating and drinking when we eat to ourselves and drink to ourselves, whereas we should eat and drink to the glory of God (1Co 10:31), that our bodies may be fit to serve our souls in his service.
2. The principal good thing they should have done was left undone (Zec 7:7): "Should you not hear the words which the Lord has cried by the former prophets? Yes, that you should have done on your fast-days; it was not enough to weep and separate yourselves on your fast-days, in token of your sorrow for the judgments you were under, but you should have searched the scriptures of the prophets, that you might have seen what was the ground of God's controversy with your fathers, and might have taken warning by their miseries not to tread in the steps of their iniquities. You ask, Shall we do as we have done, in fasting? No, you must do that which you have not yet done; you must repent of your sins and reform you lives. This is what we now call you to, and it is the same that the former prophets called your fathers to." To affect them the more with the mischief that sin had done them, that they might be brought to repent of it, he puts them in mind of the former flourishing state of their country: Jerusalem was then inhabited and in prosperity, that is now desolate and in distress. The cities round about, that are now in ruins, were then inhabited too and in peace. The country likewise was very populous: Men inhabited the south of the plain, which was not at all fortified, and yet they lived safely, and which was fruitful, and so they lived plentifully. But then God by the prophets cried to them, as one in earnest, and importunate with them, to amend their ways and doings, or else their prosperity would soon be at an end. "Now," says the prophet, "you should have taken notice of that, and have inferred that what was required of them for the preventing of the judgments, and which they did not, is required of you for the removal of the judgments; and, if you do it not, all your fasting and weeping signify nothing." Note, The words of the later prophets agree with those of the former; and, whether people are in prosperity or adversity, they must be called upon to leave their sins and do their duty; this must still be the burden of every song.
8-14
Wilful Disobedience of Israel; Consequences of Disobedience (520 BC)
繁體中文
以色列的故意不順從;不順從的後果(主前520年)
⁸ 耶和華的話臨到撒迦利亞,說:
⁹ 萬軍之耶和華曾對你們的列祖如此說:要按至理判斷,各人以慈繩憐憫弟兄。
¹⁰ 不可欺壓寡婦、孤兒、寄居的,和窮人;誰都不可心裡謀害弟兄。
¹¹ 他們卻不肯聽從,扭轉肩頭,塞耳不聽。
¹² 使心硬如金鋼石,不聽律法和萬軍之耶和華用靈藉從前先知所說的話。故此,萬軍之耶和華大發烈怒。
¹³ 萬軍之耶和華說:我曾呼喚他們,他們不聽;將來他們呼求我,我也不聽。
¹⁴ 我必以旋風吹散他們到素不認識的萬國中。這樣,他們的地在他們去後變為荒涼,甚至無人經過來往;因為他們使美好之地荒涼了。
Zec 7:7 所說他們 本應聽從從前先知的話,此處加以擴充,作為對這些虛偽求問者的警戒——他們在大發熱心地查問是否當繼續禁食的同時,卻持續在罪中。這位先知先前已經提醒他們,他們的列祖如何不順從先知的呼召,並其結果如何(Zec 1:4-6),如今再次提醒;因別人的損傷當作我們的鑑戒。神古時對以色列因罪所施的審判,是為我們基督徒的警戒而寫的(林前 10:11),我們對當日類似的護理也當如此利用。
I. 這位先知在此重述從前先知向他們列祖所傳信息的主要內容(Zec 7:9,10),因為如今所要求的正是同樣的事。「萬軍之耶和華 如今對你們說,他從前對你們列祖也如此說:要按至理判斷。」此處所要求他們的本分——本可使他們列祖的安寧延長、並必恢復他們自己的安寧的——不是守禁食獻祭,而是 行公義、好憐憫——這些本分他們受自然之光與自然之律約束,即使沒有先知來堅持也當行;這些本分直接趨向公眾福祉與平安,並且他們自己才是受惠者,不是神。1. 官長當照律法的準則與案情的真相無私地行審判,不看人情面:「按至理判斷,判斷了便執行。」2. 鄰舍當彼此關切體恤,不但彼此不害,更要隨時盡力彼此行各樣的善。他們要 各人以慈繩憐憫弟兄,視情形所需。別人的軟弱與他們的災禍一樣,當以憐憫相待。3. 他們不可對自己佔優勢、明知不能自衛的人苛待。他們不可在貿易或在法律程序上欺壓 寡婦、孤兒、寄居的和窮人,Zec 7:10。最軟弱的不可因軟弱被推到牆角。人不向那能討取、能奪回的人否認權利,算不得可稱;我們不但為怒氣、也為良心的緣故,當把那些不能強索的人所當得的歸給他們。或這暗示:對別人不過是嚴格的,對寡婦孤兒便是勒索;不,不照所當行的救濟幫助他們,實際就是欺壓他們。4. 他們不但不可向任何人行惡,更不可心懷惡念:「誰都不可心裡謀害弟兄。 不要謀劃;不要心願;甚至不要以此幻想自娛。」神的律法約束人心,禁止懷惡意的、懷恨的、惡性的思想。申 15:9:你要謹慎,不可讓你的惡心對你的弟兄懷惡念。
II. 他描述列祖的頑梗與不順從——他們雖屢奉神名受勸受戒,卻仍持續在各樣邪惡不義之中;此處堆積了種種表達(Zec 7:11,12),說明那 與神為敵、不服神的律、也是不能服 的肉體之心的頑梗。他們頑固悖逆,持續干犯律法,純然出於與律法相爭的靈。1. 他們若能避免,就不願進入先知的聽聞範圍,反而遠遠避開;或若不能避免聽見所說的,便決意不理會:他們不肯聽從,並轉臉他顧,如同未曾對他們說話。2. 他們若聽了所說的、起初似乎有意順從,一到認真實行之時便退縮,如同不慣負軛的牛犢 扭轉肩頭,不肯負神誡命那 容易的軛、輕省的擔子。他們 給一個退縮的肩頭(原文如此);似乎把肩頭靠上去,隨即又退縮,如耶 34:10,11 之人。他們如同詭詐的弓,又如那說 我去,卻不去 的兒子。3. 他們以偏見填滿自己的心反對神的話,每逢聽道都豫備了這樣那樣的反對,藉以自衛。他們塞耳不聽,如聾的虺(詩 58:4);無人如那不肯聽的人那樣聾——他們 使自己的耳朵沉重(原文如此)。4. 他們決意不讓任何為執行這些命令所說的話在他們身上留下印象:他們使心硬如金鋼石——如鑽石,是最難雕琢的石;或如火石,泥水匠不能像雕刻別的採石場的石頭那樣把它砍成形狀。無物如那膽大妄為的罪人之心那樣硬、那樣不可錘鍛、那樣不能屈;心硬的人要怪自己;是他們自己硬的,神把他們交給邪僻的心、交給他們自己的心的剛硬不悔改,是公義的。這些頑梗的罪人故意硬著心,免得聽見 神藉著成文的話語——藉摩西的律法——和 藉傳道給他們的先知的話 對他們所說的;他們 有摩西和先知,卻決意兩者都不聽,縱使有人從死裡復活奉差到他們那裡也不被勸服。先知的話 他們不尊重,雖是萬軍之耶和華所差遣、所指示的話,雖是他 藉他的靈 在先知裡面所立即傳的;所以輕蔑這些話便是侮辱神自己、抗拒聖靈。 注意,人所以不好,是因為他們不願好;不肯思想,不肯順從;故此 你若嗤笑,必獨自擔當。
III. 他指明其對列祖的致命後果:故此萬軍之耶和華大發烈怒。 神極其不悅他們,也是公義的;他所要求他們的,無不是合理且於他們有益的;他們卻以極傲慢的方式拒絕。哪個主人能容忍僕人如此虐待他?這種對律法和先知如此難以化解的敵意,正是把 極大的忿怒 帶到猶太教會最後一代身上的事,帖前 2:16。干犯 萬軍之耶和華——其權柄無可辯駁——的大罪,招致 萬軍之耶和華——其權能無可抗拒——的大怒。其果效是,1. 如他們對神的道掩耳不聽,神也對他們的禱告掩耳不聽,Zec 7:13。他 在他們興盛時 呼喚 他們離罪,他們不聽,卻持續在罪中;照樣 他們 在患難之日 呼求 他撤去他的審判,他也不聽,卻延長他們的災禍。那些在驕傲高峯藐視神的人,當痛苦臨到便呼求他。主啊,你在患難中他們才來就你。 但神已說了,也必持守:轉耳不聽律法的,他的祈禱也為可憎,箴 28:9, 箴 1:24 等。心裡注重罪孽,必敗壞禱告的果效,詩 66:18。2. 如他們從對神的本分與效忠上退縮、心思遊移不定,神也驅散他們,如旋風前的糠粃一般拋擲:他把他們吹散到素不認識的萬國中——他們不能指望從那些國得甚麼恩待,Zec 7:14。3. 如他們干犯本國的一切律法,神也奪去本國的一切榮耀:他們的地在他們去後變為荒涼,無人經過來往。 那屬兩個支派的國的全境,在殺了基大利之後、其餘猶太人被驅散之後,便全然無人居住;其中沒有男女老少,直到七十年被擄期滿猶太人歸回;不,看來連穿過該地的道路也荒廢了(無人經過往返)——這其中雖有憐憫的暗示(雖他們被趕出,地卻為他們的歸回留空),但眼下卻使審判顯得更加可怖;因為一個多年無人居住之地必是何等可怕的荒野!他們當怪自己;是他們自己的邪惡 使美好之地荒涼了。 作成這事的不全是迦勒底人。不;是他們自己作的。一地的荒涼歸咎於其居民的邪惡,詩 107:34。這是他們故意不順從神律法的結果。當代的人也看見罪使那美地變得何等荒涼,卻仍不引以為戒。
영문 원문
Wilful Disobedience of Israel; Consequences of Disobedience (520 BC)
⁸ And the word of the LORD came unto Zechariah, saying,
⁹ Thus speaketh the LORD of hosts, saying, Execute true judgment, and shew mercy and compassions every man to his brother:
¹⁰ And oppress not the widow, nor the fatherless, the stranger, nor the poor; and let none of you imagine evil against his brother in your heart.
¹¹ But they refused to hearken, and pulled away the shoulder, and stopped their ears, that they should not hear.
¹² Yea, they made their hearts as an adamant stone, lest they should hear the law, and the words which the LORD of hosts hath sent in his spirit by the former prophets: therefore came a great wrath from the LORD of hosts.
¹³ Therefore it is come to pass, that as he cried, and they would not hear; so they cried, and I would not hear, saith the LORD of hosts:
¹⁴ But I scattered them with a whirlwind among all the nations whom they knew not. Thus the land was desolate after them, that no man passed through nor returned: for they laid the pleasant land desolate.
What was said Zec 7:7, that they should have heard the words of the former prophets, is here enlarged upon, for warning to these hypocritical enquirers, who continued their sins when they asked with great preciseness whether they should continue their fasts. This prophet had before put them in mind of their fathers' disobedience to the calls of the prophets, and what was the consequence of it (Zec 1:4-6), and now here again; for others' harms should be our warnings. God's judgments upon Israel of old for their sins were written for admonition to us Christians (1Co 10:11), and the same use we should make of similar providences in our own day.
I. This prophet here repeats the heads of the sermons which the former prophets preached to their fathers (Zec 7:9,10), because the very same things were required of them now. "Thus does the Lord of hosts speak to you now, and thus he did speak to your fathers, saying, Execute true judgment." The duties here required of them, which would have been the lengthening of the tranquillity of their fathers and must be the restoring of their tranquillity, are not keeping fasts and offering sacrifices, but doing justly and loving mercy, duties which they were bound to by the light and law of nature, though there had been no prophets sent to insist upon them, duties which had a direct tendency to the public welfare and peace, and which they themselves would be the gainers by, and not God. 1. Magistrates must administer justice impartially, according to the maxims of the law and the merits of the cause, without respect of persons: "Judge judgment of truth, and execute it when you have judged it." 2. Neighbours must have a tender concern for one another, and must not only do one another no wrong, but must be ready to do one another all the good offices that lie in their power. They must show mercy and compassion every man to his brother, as the case called for it. The infirmities of others, as well as their calamities, are to be looked upon with compassion. Hanc veniam petimusque damusque vicissim—This kindness we ask and exercise. 3. They must not bear hard upon those whom they have advantage against, and who, they know, are not able to help themselves. They must not, either in commerce or in course of law, oppress the widow, the fatherless, the stranger, and the poor, Zec 7:10. The weakest must not be thrust to the wall because they are weakest. No thanks to men not to deny right to those who are in a capacity to demand it and recover it; but we must, not only for wrath, but also for conscience' sake, give those their own who have not power to force it from us. Or it intimates that that which is but exactness with others is exaction upon the widows and the fatherless; nay, that not relieving and helping them as we ought is, in effect, oppressing them. 4. They must not only not do wrong to any, but they must not so much as desire it nor think of it: "Let none of you imagine evil against his brother in your heart. Do not project it; do not wish it; nay do not so much as please yourself with the fancy of it." The law of God lays a restraint upon the heart, and forbids the entertaining, forbids the admitting, of a malicious, spiteful, ill-natured thought. De 15:9, Beware that there be not a thought in thy Belial heart against thy brother.
II. He describes the wilfulness and disobedience of their fathers, who persisted in all manner of wickedness and injustice, notwithstanding these exhortations and admonitions frequently given them in God's name; various expressions to this purport are here heaped up (Zec 7:11,12), setting forth the stubbornness of that carnal mind which is enmity against God, and is not in subjection to the law of God, neither indeed can be. They were obstinate and refractory, and persisted in their transgressions of the law purely from a spirit of contradiction to the law. 1. They would not, if they could help it, come within hearing of the prophets, but kept at a distance; or, if they could not avoid hearing what they said, yet they resolved they would not heed it: They refused to hearken, and looked another way as if they had not been spoken to. 2. If they did hear what was said to them, and, as it seemed, inclined at first to comply with it, yet they flew off when it came to the setting to, and, like a bullock unaccustomed to the yoke, they pulled away the shoulder, and would not submit to the easy yoke and the light burden of God's commandments. They gave a withdrawing shoulder (so the word is); they seemed to lay their shoulder to the work, but they presently withdrew it again, as those Jer 34:10,11. They were like a deceitful bow, as that son that said, I go, sir, but went not. 3. They filled their own minds with prejudices against the word of God, and had some objection or other ready wherewith to fortify themselves against every sermon they heard. They stopped their ears, that they should not hear, as the deaf adder (Ps 58:4), and none are so deaf as those that will not hear, that make their own ear heavy, as the word is. 4. They resolved that nothing which was said to them, for the enforcing of these injunctions, should make any impression upon them: They made their hearts as an adamant-stone, as a diamond, the hardest of stones to be wrought upon, or as a flint, which the mason cannot hew into shape as he can other stone out of the quarry. Nothing is so hard, so unmalleable, so inflexible, as the heart of a presumptuous sinner; and those whose hearts are hard may thank themselves; they are of their own hardening, and it is just with God to give them over to a reprobate sense, to the hardness and impenitence of their own hearts. These stubborn sinners hardened their hearts on purpose lest they should hear what God said to them by the written word, by the law of Moses, and by the words of the prophets that preached to them; they had Moses and the prophets, but resolved they would hear neither, nor would they have been persuaded though one had been sent to them from the dead. The words of the prophet were not regarded by them, though they were words which the Lord of hosts sent and directed to them, though he sent them immediately by his Spirit in the prophets; so that in despising them they affronted God himself and resisted the Holy Ghost. Note, The reason why men are not good is because they will not be so; they will not consider, will not comply; and therefore, if thou scornest, thou alone shalt bear it.
III. He shows the fatal consequences of it to their fathers: Therefore came great wrath from the Lord of hosts. God was highly displeased with them, and justly; he required nothing of them but what was reasonable in itself and beneficial to them; and yet they refused, and in a most insolent manner too. What master could bear to be so abused by his own servant? Such an implacable enmity to the gospel as this was to the law and the prophets was that which brought wrath to the uttermost upon the last generation of the Jewish church, 1Th 2:16. Great sins against the Lord of hosts, whose authority is incontestable, bring great wrath from the Lord of hosts, whose power is irresistible. And the effect was, 1. As they had turned a deaf ear to God's word, so God turned a deaf ear to their prayers, Zec 7:13. As he cried to them in their prosperity to leave their sins, and they would not hear, but persisted in their iniquities, so they cried to him in the day of their trouble to remove his judgments, and he would not hear, but lengthened out their calamities. Those that set God at defiance, in the height of their pride, when pangs came upon them cried unto him. Lord, in trouble have they visited thee. But God has said it, and will abide by it, He that turns away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer shall be an abomination, Pr 28:9, Pr 1:24, etc. Iniquity, regarded in the heart, will certainly spoil the success of prayer, Ps 66:18. 2. As they flew off from their duty and allegiance to God, and were of desultory and unsettled spirits, so God dissipated them and threw them about as chaff before a whirlwind: He scattered them among all the nations whom they knew not, and whom therefore they could not expect to receive any kindness from, Zec 7:14. 3. As they violated all the laws of their land, so God took away all the glories of it: Their land was desolate after them, and no man passed through or returned. All that country that was the kingdom of the two tribes, after the dispersion of the remaining Jews, upon the slaughter of Gedaliah, was left utterly uninhabited; there was not man, woman, or child, in it, till the Jews returned at the end of seventy years' captivity; nay, it should seem, the very roads that lay through the country were deserted (none passed or repassed), which, as it had an intimation of mercy in it (though they were cast out of it, yet it was kept empty for their return), so for the present it made the judgment appear much the more dismal; for what a horrid wilderness must a land be that had been so many years uninhabited! And they might thank themselves; it was they that by their own wickedness laid the pleasant land desolate. It was not so much the Chaldeans that did it. No; they did it themselves. The desolations of a land are owing to the wickedness of its inhabitants, Ps 107:34. This came of their wilful disobedience to the law of God. And the present generation saw how desolate sin had made that pleasant land, and yet would not take warning.
異象我們已經讀完了,但本書的啟示尚未完結;先知不再看見他先前所見的那些記號,但「耶和華的話仍臨到他」。本章內容如下:I. 一個良心案例,由被擄之人的子孫向先知提出——關乎禁食,他們是否應當繼續守他們在被擄七十年間所敬虔遵守的嚴肅禁食(亞7:1-3)。II. 對這問題的回答,記於本章及下一章;這回答並非一次賜下,而是零碎地、似乎分作數次賜下,因為此處有四篇明顯不同的講論,都與這案例有關,每一篇都以「耶和華的話臨到」為引言(亞4:8,8:1,8:18)。其脈絡十分值得留意。在本章中:1. 先知嚴嚴責備他們在禁食上的失當(亞7:4-7)。2. 他勸勉他們改正自己的生活——這才是最好的禁食——並要謹慎防備那些招致他們所記念之審判的罪(亞7:8-14)。然後在下一章,先察驗了傷口之後,他便加以包裹,用神為他們所仍存留的大憐憫的恩惠保證來醫治它——他要將他們的禁食變為節期。