Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible · 1 John Capítulo 1

Leitor de comentário otimizado

Comentário do capítulo

1 John Capítulo 1

서론

Introduction

Abrir passagem

繁體中文

緒論

作者。約翰的門徒坡旅甲(Polycarp)〔《致腓立比人書》(Epistle to the Philippians)7〕引用約壹四3。優西比烏(Eusebius)〔《教會史》(Ecclesiastical History)3.39〕論及帕皮亞(Papias)——約翰的聽者、坡旅甲的朋友——說:「他使用出自約翰一書的見證。」據優西比烏〔《教會史》5.8〕所載,愛任紐(Irenaeus)常引用本書信。故在其《反異端》(Against Heresies)〔3.15; 5, 8〕中他以約翰之名引用

約壹二18

等處;而在〔3.16, 7〕中引用

約壹四1-3; 五1

及約貳7、8。亞歷山大的革利免(Clement of Alexandria)〔《雜篇》(Miscellanies)2.66, p. 464〕提及

約壹五16

為約翰「較大的書信」中之語。其他引用見〔《雜篇》3.32, 42; 4.102〕。特土良(Tertullian)〔《反馬吉安》(Against Marcion)5.16〕引用

約壹四1

等處;〔《反帕克西亞》(Against Praxeas)15〕引用

約壹一1。

另見其其他引用〔《反帕克西亞》28; 《反諾斯底派》(Against the Gnostics)12〕。居普良(Cyprian)〔《書信》(Epistles)28(24)〕以約翰之名引用

約壹二3、4;

〔《論主禱文》(On the Lord's Prayer)5〕引用

約壹二15-17;

〔《論善行與賙濟》(On Works and Alms)3〕引用

約壹一8;

〔《論忍耐之益》(On the Advantage of Patience)2〕引用

約壹二6。

穆拉多利(Muratorian)的《正典殘篇》(Fragment on the Canon of Scripture)記載:「約翰的兩卷(福音書與書信?)被尊為大公書信」,並引用

約壹一3。

《別西大敘利亞文譯本》(Peschito Syriac)收錄本書。俄利根(Origen)(見優西比烏〔《教會史》6.25〕)稱約翰一書為真品,「第二、第三卷也大概是,雖然並非所有人都承認後兩卷」;於約翰福音註釋〔《約翰福音註釋》(Commentary on John)13.2〕中他引用

約壹一5。

俄利根的門生亞歷山大的狄奧尼修斯(Dionysius of Alexandria),將本書信的話語當作福音書作者約翰的話語引用。優西比烏〔《教會史》3.24〕說,約翰一書與福音書為今人及古人「毫無疑問地」承認。耶柔米(Jerome)〔《論顯赫人物》(On Illustrious Men)〕亦然。第六世紀的科斯馬斯·印迪科普勒斯泰斯(Cosmas Indicopleustes)的反對,以及馬吉安(Marcion)因本書與其觀點不合而反對,在如此不可反駁的見證面前均無足輕重。

內在證據同樣有力。福音書與本書信均不能被斷定為仿作;二者在文體與思想方式上顯然出自同一心思。個人性提示不如保羅書信那樣眾多或明顯——這在大公書信中原可預期;但既有的均與約翰的身分相符。他暗示自己的使徒身分,或亦暗示自己的福音書,以及他作為「年邁」牧者與屬靈「兒女」之間的慈愛紐帶;在

約壹二18、19; 四1-3

他提及讀者所認識的假教師;在

約壹五21

他警告他們防備周遭世界的偶像。有人因「道」——即永恆存在的神聖第二位格,屆時成為肉身——的教義既出現於本書信亦出現於福音書中,看似反對第二世紀幻影說(Docetæ)異端,而質疑本書的真實性,此說並非反對理由;因同一教義出現於

西一15-18;

提前三16;

來一1-3;

且幻影說之雛形雖至二世紀才完全發展,於一世紀即已存在。聖靈藉約翰預先使教會防備將臨的異端。

收信人。奥古斯丁(Augustine)〔《福音書問題》(The Question of the Gospels)2.39〕稱本書信寫給帕提亞人(Parthians)。比德(Bede)於七封大公書信序言中稱亞他那修(Athanasius)亦作同樣證。所謂帕提亞人可能指住在羅馬帝國之外、幼發拉底河彼岸帕提亞境內的基督徒,即「與(你們)同蒙揀選的巴比倫教會」,以弗所地區的眾教會——彼得致書的區域

(彼前五12)。

正如彼得致書於約翰後來牧養(而保羅先前曾服事過)的羊群,照樣約翰——升天後彼得的親密同伴——致書於彼得寫信時所在的羊群。故「蒙揀選的太太」

(約貳1)

對應「同蒙揀選的教會」

(彼前五13)。

進一步印證見約翰二書《緒論》。約翰未曾親自在帕提亞境內服事此一事實,未必是反對此說的理由。因彼得也未曾親自在本都、加拉太、加帕多家、亞西亞、庇推尼的教會服事,卻致書於他們。況且在約翰漫長的一生中,不能僅因缺乏現存證據就斷言他在彼得停止服事之後未曾探訪帕提亞基督徒。此見解與阿爾福德(Alford)之說同樣可能——阿爾福德主張修改奥古斯丁語錄中「致帕提亞人」一語(揣測性校訂),認為本書致書於以弗所及其周圍的教會,理由是書中父親般的慈愛口吻暗示他曾親自在其讀者中服事。然而,他作為可能唯一存活的使徒的身分,與他以大公書信的形式、憑其對一切教會的一般使徒監督權,向他未必親自特別服事過的一群教會發出慈愛父親般的勸勉,頗為相合。

寫作時間與地點。本書信似寫於其福音書之後,因其假定讀者熟悉福音書的事實與基督的言論,也熟悉成為肉身之「道」——即「神在肉身顯現」

(提前三16)——

的特殊層面,此層面在其福音書中闡述更為詳盡。以父親對「小子們」(the "little children",屢次出現的稱謂,

約壹二1、12、13、18、28;

三7、18; 四4; 五21)

說話的口吻,與本書寫於約翰晚年(約主後九十年)之說相符。

約壹二18

的「如今是末時」,大概不是指任何特定事件(如已過多年的耶路撒冷毀滅),而是指藉敵基督教師的興起——末時的記號——所證明的主快來到的迫近。聖靈的旨意是使教會常存基督隨時可來的期待。整個基督徒時代都是「末時」,意即基督再來之前不會有別的時代興起。比較來一2的「這末世」。寫作地點可推測為以弗所。書中對諾斯底主義異端雛形的論戰性暗示,與小亞細亞為地點、使徒時代末期為寫作時間相吻合。

內容。全書的主題是與父並子相交

(約壹一3)。

可分兩大段:(一)

約壹一5-二28:

此段主題開宗明義:「神就是光,在祂毫無黑暗」;故為與祂相交,我們必須「在光明中行」

(約壹一7);

與此相連的是藉基督的挽回祭與中保而有的認罪與隨後的罪得赦免——無此赦免便無光明或與神相交。在光明中行的更進一步,積極方面是遵守神的誡命,其總綱就是愛,與恨——違背神話語之極致——相對立;消極方面,他按著屬靈成長的各階段——小子們、父老們、青年們——照著他們的特權(罪得赦免、認識父、勝了那惡者)勸他們不要愛世界(愛世界與父之愛的內住不能並存),並要防備已在世界中的敵基督教師——他們不屬教會而屬世界——對此,真正的防衛在於他那受了神膏抹的信徒讀者應「繼續住在子裏面並在父裏面」。(二)第二大段

(約壹二29-五5)

討論其開首的主題:祂是公義的;故(如第一大段)「凡行公義之人都是從祂生的」。我們裏面的兒子名分包含我們當像祂純潔那樣潔淨自己,正如我們盼望看見主顯現時要像祂;在第二大段中,與第一大段一樣,「像祂是公義的那樣行公義」的積極面與消極面同時呈現,涉及神兒女與魔鬼兒女的對比。恨標誌後者;愛標誌前者。這愛給予我們關乎自己與自己的禱告蒙悅納的確據,因為我們的禱告

(約壹三23)

伴隨對祂那大誡命——「信耶穌並彼此相愛」——的順服;祂住在我們裏面並向我們的心確證此一的印記

(約壹三24),

就是祂所賜給我們的聖靈。與此相對照(如第一大段),他警告防備邪靈,其特徵為否認基督、依附世界。隨後兒子名分(即從神而生)更充分地被描述:其本質特徵為非奴僕式、自由的對神的愛——因為神先愛我們,並賜下祂的兒子為我們死——以及隨之而來對弟兄的愛(建基於他們也同樣是神的兒子),以及勝過世界;這勝利唯獨由信耶穌是神兒子的人獲得。(三)結論確立這最後的中心真理——我們與神相交所依憑的——即基督曾藉洗禮的「水」、贖罪的「血」以及為「真理」的見證之「聖靈」而來。正如開首時他將此基要真理建立於使徒們眼、耳、手的見證上,如今在結尾時他建立於神的見證上——信徒接受此見證,與不信者(使神成為說謊的)相反。接著是他寫作目的的結語

(約壹五13;

比較卷首對應的

約壹一4),

即「叫信奉神兒子之名的人知道他們(如今已經)有永生」(永生是「喜樂」之源,

約壹一4;

比較他寫福音書的目的類似,

約二十31),

因而對自己的禱告蒙應允有確據(對應第二部分中的

約壹三22);

例如他們為犯罪的弟兄代求(除非他的罪是「至於死的罪」)。他以簡短總結全書教訓作結:神的兒女相對於有罪的世界所具有的崇高尊嚴、聖潔、免於兇惡的安全,以及對有形與屬靈偶像崇拜的警告:「你們要自守,遠避偶像。」

本書信雖非直接論戰性的,但促使他執筆的場合大概是敵基督教師的興起;並且因為他知道他所稱呼的各階層——小子們、青年們、父老們——的屬靈性情,他覺得必須寫信堅固他們,使他們在信仰及與父並子喜樂的相交中站立得穩,並向他們保證他們所信之事的實在,好叫他們得享信心的豐滿特權。

文體。其特徵在於喜用格言與重複。傾向重複自己的語句,部分出於本書信慈愛勸勉的性質;部分出於其希伯來式形式——富含平行子句,有別於保羅的希臘式、更合邏輯的文體;也出於他那孩子般的單純靈性——滿懷一個偉大主題,以欣喜與熱情重複、駐留其上。況且如阿爾福德所言,表面的劃一性常因釋經不夠深入、未能發現看似相同的段落中的真正差異而產生。他是默觀式的而非辯論式的,較著重一般而非特殊,內在的基督徒生活而非外在的。某些基本真理他屢屢回到,時而加以發揮應用,時而以濃縮的單純重述。思想不如保羅的邏輯文體那樣按相繼步驟前進,而是在圍繞一個中心思想所畫的圓中運行,重述、不斷回到它,如今從積極面、如今從消極面觀看。許多在福音書中作為基督之語的用詞,在書信中作為約翰所喜愛的表達出現——自然地從主領受而來。故對比詞「肉體」與「靈」、「光」與「暗」、「生命」與「死」、「住在祂裏面」。「與父並子、並彼此相交」也是他所喜愛的用語,未見於福音書,而見於使徒行傳與保羅書信。在他身上出現對立元素的和諧結合,使他適合在神國度中的崇高職事——默觀的性格安息,同時伴有熱切的熱心,加上燃燒的、囊括一切的愛:較不適合如保羅那樣的積極外在事工,而更適合屬靈的服事。他處理基督徒真理,不作抽象的教條,而作在與神在基督裏、並與弟兄的相交中親身經歷的活潑實在。他的寫作單純而同時深邃,與他的靈相符——不重修辭、不重辯證,溫柔、安慰、充滿愛:這是在最後晚餐時他所靠其胸懷的那位、他為其所愛之門徒的那位之靈的反映。阿爾福德所引的埃瓦爾德(Ewald),論及本書信所特有的「不為所動的屬天安息」時說:「這語調看來不如說是一位得榮的聖徒從更高的世界向人類說話,過於一位父親與他所愛的兒女交談。在任何著作中,那在安靜中運行、永不疲倦、永不枯竭的屬天之愛的教義,從未如在本書信中那樣徹底地證明了自己。」

約翰在建立教會中的地位。若說彼得奠基、保羅擴展,那麼約翰完成了屬靈的建造。舊約突出地擺出對神的「敬畏」,新約最後一位作者約翰則突出神的「愛」。然而正如舊約並非僅限於呈現敬畏神,也彰顯祂的「愛」,照樣新約的代表約翰,雖不斷吐露愛的靈,同時也照其本性「半尼其」——「雷子」——發出最清晰、最可畏的對罪的警告。他的母親是西庇太兒子的母親撒羅米,可能是耶穌母親的姐妹(比較

約十九25

「祂母親的姐妹」與

太二十七56;

可十五40),

故他是主的表親;在神之下,他或許從母親領受了最初的嚴肅印象。撒羅米如她的請求所顯示

(太二十20-23)

那樣期待榮耀中的彌賽亞國度,無疑嘗試以同樣的盼望充滿他那年輕熱切的心。尼安德(Neander)區分基督教義發展中的三大趨勢——保羅派、雅各派(彼得派在其間形成中間環節),與約翰派。約翰與雅各一樣,較少傾向保羅所特有的理智與辯證思想。他不像外邦人的使徒那樣經過激烈衝突而達到信仰與平安,而是像雅各那樣經過安靜的發展達到他的基督徒個體性:不過雅各先前曾經過猶太教的塑造,這在聖靈之下使他將基督徒真理與律法相連——律法就其靈意(雖非字句)而言是永久的,在福音之下不是被廢除而是被堅立。但約翰從一開始就從親自觀看模範的人——基督——並與祂交往中汲取其全部屬靈發展。故在他的著作中,一切都圍繞一個簡單的對照:與基督交通中的屬神「生命」,與祂分離中的「死亡」——如他的特徵性用語「生命、光、真理;死亡、黑暗、虛謊」所示。「正如雅各與彼得標誌著從屬靈化的猶太教到基督徒信仰獨立發展的漸進過渡,而保羅代表基督徒信仰相對於猶太立場的獨立發展,照樣約翰的默觀元素調和二者,並形成使徒教會訓練的終結點」〔尼安德〕。

Original em inglês

INTRODUCTION

AUTHORSHIP.--POLYCARP, the disciple of John [Epistle to the Philippians, 7], quotes

1Jo 4:3.

EUSEBIUS [Ecclesiastical History, 3.39] says of PAPIAS, a hearer of John, and a friend of POLYCARP, "He used testimonies from the First Epistle of John." IRENÆUS, according to EUSEBIUS [Ecclesiastical History, 5.8], often quoted this Epistle. So in his work Against Heresies [3.15; 5, 8] he quotes from John by name,

1Jo 2:18,

&c.; and in [3.16,7], he quotes

1Jo 4:1-3; 5:1, and 2Jo 7, 8.

CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA [Miscellanies, 2.66, p. 464] refers to

1Jo 5:16,

as in John's larger Epistle. See other quotations [Miscellanies, 3.32,42; 4.102]. TERTULLIAN [Against Marcion, 5.16] refers to

1Jo 4:1,

&c.; [Against Praxeas, 15], to

1Jo 1:1.

See his other quotations [Against Praxeas, 28; Against the Gnostics, 12]. CYPRIAN [Epistles, 28 (24)], quotes as John's,

1Jo 2:3, 4;

and [On the Lord's Prayer, 5] quotes

1Jo 2:15-17;

and [On Works and Alms, 3],

1Jo 1:8;

and [On the Advantage of Patience, 2] quotes

1Jo 2:6.

MURATORI'S Fragment on the Canon of Scripture states, "There are two of John (the Gospel and Epistle?) esteemed Catholic," and quotes

1Jo 1:3.

The Peschito Syriac contains it. ORIGEN (in EUSEBIUS [Ecclesiastical History, 6.25]) speaks of the First Epistle as genuine, and "probably the second and third, though all do not recognize the latter two"; on the Gospel of John, [Commentary on John, 13.2], he quotes

1Jo 1:5.

DIONYSIUS OF ALEXANDRIA, ORIGEN'S scholar, cites the words of this Epistle as those of the Evangelist John. EUSEBIUS [Ecclesiastical History, 3.24], says, John's first Epistle and Gospel are acknowledged without question by those of the present day, as well as by the ancients. So also JEROME [On Illustrious Men]. The opposition of COSMAS INDICOPLEUSTES, in the sixth century, and that of MARCION because our Epistle was inconsistent with his views, are of no weight against such irrefragable testimony.

The internal evidence is equally strong. Neither the Gospel, nor this Epistle, can be pronounced an imitation; yet both, in style and modes of thought, are evidently of the same mind. The individual notices are not so numerous or obvious as in Paul's writings, as was to be expected in a Catholic Epistle; but such as there are accord with John's position. He implies his apostleship, and perhaps alludes to his Gospel, and the affectionate tie which bound him as an aged pastor to his spiritual "children"; and in

1Jo 2:18, 19; 4:1-3,

he alludes to the false teachers as known to his readers; and in

1Jo 5:21

he warns them against the idols of the surrounding world. It is no objection against its authenticity that the doctrine of the Word, or divine second Person, existing from everlasting, and in due time made flesh, appears in it, as also in the Gospel, as opposed to the heresy of the Docetæ in the second century, who denied that our Lord is come in the flesh, and maintained He came only in outward semblance; for the same doctrine appears in

Col 1:15-18; 1Ti 3:16; Heb 1:1-3;

and the germs of Docetism, though not fully developed till the second century, were in existence in the first. The Spirit, presciently through John, puts the Church beforehand on its guard against the coming heresy.

TO WHOM ADDRESSED.--AUGUSTINE [The Question of the Gospels, 2.39], says this Epistle was written to the Parthians. BEDE, in a prologue to the seven Catholic Epistles, says that ATHANASIUS attests the same. By the Parthians may be meant the Christians living beyond the Euphrates in the Parthian territory, outside the Roman empire, "the Church at Babylon elected together with (you)," the churches in the Ephesian region, the quarter to which Peter addressed his Epistles

(1Pe 5:12).

As Peter addressed the flock which John subsequently tended (and in which Paul had formerly ministered), so John, Peter's close companion after the ascension, addresses the flock among whom Peter had been when he wrote. Thus "the elect lady"

(2Jo 1)

answers "to the Church elected together"

(1Pe 5:13).

See further confirmation of this view in

Introduction

to Second John. It is not necessarily an objection to this view that John never is known to have personally ministered in the Parthian territory. For neither did Peter personally minister to the churches in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, Bithynia, though he wrote his Epistles to them. Moreover, in John's prolonged life, we cannot dogmatically assert that he did not visit the Parthian Christians, after Peter had ceased to minister to them, on the mere ground of absence of extant testimony to that effect. This is as probable a view as ALFORD'S, that in the passage of AUGUSTINE, "to the Parthians," is to be altered by conjectural emendation; and that the Epistle is addressed to the churches at and around Ephesus, on the ground of the fatherly tone of affectionate address in it, implying his personal ministry among his readers. But his position, as probably the only surviving apostle, accords very well with his addressing, in a Catholic Epistle, a cycle of churches which he may not have specially ministered to in person, with affectionate fatherly counsel, by virtue of his general apostolic superintendence of all the churches.

TIME AND PLACE OF WRITING.--This Epistle seems to have been written subsequently to his Gospel as it assumes the reader's acquaintance with the Gospel facts and Christ's speeches, and also with the special aspect of the incarnate Word, as God manifest in the flesh

(1Ti 3:16),

set forth more fully in his Gospel. The tone of address, as a father addressing his "little children" (the continually recurring term,

1Jo 2:1, 12, 13, 18, 28; 3:7, 18; 4:4; 5:21),

accords with the view that this Epistle was written in John's old age, perhaps about A.D. 90. In

1Jo 2:18,

"it is the last time," probably does not refer to any particular event (as the destruction of Jerusalem, which was now many years past) but refers to the nearness of the Lord's coming as proved by the rise of Antichristian teachers, the mark of the last time. It was the Spirit's purpose to keep the Church always expecting Christ as ready to come at any moment. The whole Christian age is the last time in the sense that no other dispensation is to arise till Christ comes. Compare "these last days,"

Heb 1:2.

Ephesus may be conjectured to be the place whence it was written. The controversial allusion to the germs of Gnostic heresy accord with Asia Minor being the place, and the last part of the apostolic age the time, of writing this Epistle.

CONTENTS.--The leading subject of the whole is, fellowship with the Father and the Son

(1Jo 1:3).

Two principal divisions may be noted: (1)

1Jo 1:5-2:28:

the theme of this portion is stated at the outset, "God is light, and in Him is no darkness at all"; consequently, in order to have fellowship with Him, we must walk in light

(1Jo 1:7);

connected with which in the confession and subsequent forgiveness of our sins through Christ's propitiation and advocacy, without which forgiveness there could be no light or fellowship with God: a farther step in thus walking in the light is, positively keeping God's commandments, the sum of which is love, as opposed to hatred, the acme of disobedience to God's word: negatively, he exhorts them according to their several stages of spiritual growth, children, fathers, young men, in consonance with their privileges as forgiven, knowing the Father, and having overcome the wicked one, not to love the world, which is incompatible with the indwelling of the love of the Father, and to be on their guard against the Antichristian teachers already in the world, who were not of the Church, but of the world, against whom the true defense is, that his believing readers who have the anointing of God, should continue to abide in the Son and in the Father. (2) The second division

(1Jo 2:29-5:5)

discusses the theme with which it opens, He is righteous; consequently (as in the first division), "every one that doeth righteousness is born of Him." Sonship in us involves our purifying ourselves as He is pure, even as we hope to see, and therefore to be made like our Lord when He shall appear; in this second, as in the first division, both a positive and a negative side are presented of "doing righteousness as He is righteous," involving a contrast between the children of God and the children of the devil. Hatred marks the latter; love, the former: this love gives assurance of acceptance with God for ourselves and our prayers, accompanied as they are

(1Jo 3:23)

with obedience to His great commandment, to "believe on Jesus, and love one another"; the seal

(1Jo 3:24)

of His dwelling in us and assuring our hearts, is the Spirit which He hath given us. In contrast to this (as in the first division), he warns against false spirits, the notes of which are, denial of Christ, and adherence to the world. Sonship, or birth of God, is then more fully described: its essential feature is unslavish, free love to God, because God first loved us, and gave His Son to die for us, and consequent love to the brethren, grounded on their being sons of God also like ourselves, and so victory over the world; this victory being gained only by the man who believes in Jesus as the Son of God. (3) The conclusion establishes this last central truth, on which rests our fellowship with God, Christ's having come by the water of baptism, the blood of atonement, and the witnessing Spirit, which is truth. As in the opening he rested this cardinal truth on the apostles' witness of the eye, the ear, and the touch, so now at the close he rests it on God's witness, which is accepted by the believer, in contrast with the unbeliever, who makes God a liar. Then follows his closing statement of his reason for writing

(1Jo 5:13;

compare the corresponding

1Jo 1:4,

at the beginning), namely, that believers in Christ the Son of God may know that they have (now already) eternal life (the source of "joy,"

1Jo 1:4;

compare similarly his object in writing the Gospel,

Joh 20:31),

and so have confidence as to their prayers being answered (corresponding to

1Jo 3:22

in the second part); for instance, their intercessions for a sinning brother (unless his sin be a sin unto death). He closes with a brief summing up of the instruction of the Epistle, the high dignity, sanctity, and safety from evil of the children of God in contrast to the sinful world, and a warning against idolatry, literal and spiritual: "Keep yourselves from idols."

Though the Epistle is not directly polemical, the occasion which suggested his writing was probably the rise of Antichristian teachers; and, because he knew the spiritual character of the several classes whom he addresses, children, youths, fathers, he feels it necessary to write to confirm them in the faith and joyful fellowship of the Father and Son, and to assure them of the reality of the things they believe, that so they may have the full privileges of believing.

STYLE.--His peculiarity is fondness for aphorism and repetition. His tendency to repeat his own phrase, arises partly from the affectionate, hortatory character of the Epistle; partly, also, from its Hebraistic forms abounding in parallel clauses, as distinguished from the Grecian and more logical style of Paul; also, from his childlike simplicity of spirit, which, full of his one grand theme, repeats, and dwells on it with fond delight and enthusiasm. Moreover as ALFORD well says, the appearance of uniformity is often produced by want of deep enough exegesis to discover the real differences in passages which seem to express the same. Contemplative, rather than argumentative, he dwells more on the general, than on the particular, on the inner, than on the outer, Christian life. Certain fundamental truths he recurs to again and again, at one time enlarging on, and applying them, at another time repeating them in their condensed simplicity. The thoughts do not march onward by successive steps, as in the logical style of Paul, but rather in circle drawn round one central thought which he reiterates, ever reverting to it, and viewing it, now under its positive, now under its negative, aspect. Many terms which in the Gospel are given as Christ's, in the Epistle appear as the favorite expressions of John, naturally adopted from the Lord. Thus the contrasted terms, "flesh" and "spirit," "light" and "darkness," "life" and "death," "abide in Him": fellowship with the Father and Son, and with one another," is a favorite phrase also, not found in the Gospel, but in Acts and Paul's Epistles. In him appears the harmonious union of opposites, adapting him for his high functions in the kingdom of God, contemplative repose of character, and at the same time ardent zeal, combined with burning, all-absorbing love: less adapted for active outward work, such as Paul's, than for spiritual service. He handles Christian verities not as abstract dogmas, but as living realities, personally enjoyed in fellowship with God in Christ, and with the brethren. Simple, and at the same time profound, his writing is in consonance with his spirit, unrhetorical and undialectic, gentle, consolatory, and loving: the reflection of the Spirit of Him on whose breast he lay at the last supper, and whose beloved disciple he was. EWALD in ALFORD, speaking of the "unruffled and heavenly repose" which characterizes this Epistle, says, "It appears to be the tone, not so much of a father talking with his beloved children, as of a glorified saint addressing mankind from a higher world. Never in any writing has the doctrine of heavenly love--a love working in stillness, ever unwearied, never exhausted--so thoroughly approved itself as in this Epistle."

JOHN'S PLACE IN THE BUILDING UP OF THE CHURCH.--As Peter founded and Paul propagated, so John completed the spiritual building. As the Old Testament puts prominently forward the fear of God, so John, the last writer of the New Testament, gives prominence to the love of God. Yet, as the Old Testament is not all limited to presenting the fear of God, but sets forth also His love, so John, as a representative of the New Testament, while breathing so continually the spirit of love, gives also the plainest and most awful warnings against sin, in accordance with his original character as Boanerges, "son of thunder." His mother was Salome, mother of the sons of Zebedee, probably sister to Jesus' mother (compare

Joh 19:25,

"His mother's sister," with

Mt 27:56; Mr 15:40),

so that he was cousin to our Lord; to his mother, under God, he may have owed his first serious impressions. Expecting as she did the Messianic kingdom in glory, as appears from her petition

(Mt 20:20-23),

she doubtless tried to fill his young and ardent mind with the same hope. NEANDER distinguishes three leading tendencies in the development of the Christian doctrine, the Pauline, the Jacobean (between which the Petrine forms an intermediate link), and the Johannean. John, in common with James, was less disposed to the intellectual and dialectic cast of thought which distinguishes Paul. He had not, like the apostle of the Gentiles, been brought to faith and peace through severe conflict; but, like James, had reached his Christian individuality through a quiet development: James, however, had passed through a moulding in Judaism previously, which, under the Spirit, caused him to present Christian truth in connection with the law, in so far as the latter in its spirit, though not letter, is permanent, and not abolished, but established under the Gospel. But John, from the first, had drawn his whole spiritual development from the personal view of Christ, the model man, and from intercourse with Him. Hence, in his writings, everything turns on one simple contrast: divine life in communion with Christ; death in separation from Him, as appears from his characteristic phrases, "life, light, truth; death, darkness, lie." "As James and Peter mark the gradual transition from spiritualized Judaism to the independent development of Christianity, and as Paul represents the independent development of Christianity in opposition to the Jewish standpoint, so the contemplative element of John reconciles the two, and forms the closing point in the training of the apostolic Church" [NEANDER].

1

1Jo 1:1-10.

Abrir passagem

繁體中文

約壹一1-10。作者作為福音事的目擊者的權威,即他曾看見、聽見、摸過那從起初原有的;他的寫作目的;他的信息。我們若要與祂相交,就必須像祂在光明中那樣在光明中行。

1. 約翰採用實質的(而非形式的)稱呼(參

約壹一4)。

向讀者祝「安」是古代慣用的稱呼。始於

約壹一1

的句子,被

約壹一2

的括號打斷,至

約壹一3

重複

約壹一1

中部分字詞後恢復。

論到——譯作「傳給」如

約壹一3,

(參

約壹一5)。

傳是一般用詞;寫是其特定方式

(約壹一4)。

那永遠的生命——希臘文「那永遠的生命」。本書信以「永生」開始,亦以「永生」結束;我們將與「那永遠的生命」之主永遠一同享受、在祂裏面享受。

這——希臘文「這」,即前述

(約壹一1)

那從起初與父同在的生命(比較

約一1)。

這證明一位神格中第一位與第二位的區別。

Original em inglês

1Jo 1:1-10.

THE WRITER'S AUTHORITY AS AN EYEWITNESS TO THE GOSPEL FACTS, HAVING SEEN, HEARD, AND HANDLED HIM WHO WAS FROM THE BEGINNING: HIS OBJECT IN WRITING: HIS MESSAGE. IF WE WOULD HAVE FELLOWSHIP WITH HIM, WE MUST WALK IN LIGHT, AS HE IS LIGHT.

1. Instead of a formal, John adopts a virtual address (compare

1Jo 1:4).

To wish joy to the reader was the ancient customary address. The sentence begun in

1Jo 1:1

is broken off by the parenthetic

1Jo 1:2,

and is resumed at

1Jo 1:3

with the repetition of some words from

1Jo 1:1.

That which was--not "began to be," but was essentially (Greek, "een," not "egeneto") before He was manifested

(1Jo 1:2);

answering to "Him that is from the beginning"

(1Jo 2:13);

so John's Gospel,

Joh 1:1,

"In the beginning was the Word."

Pr 8:23,

"I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was."

we--apostles.

heard . . . seen . . . looked upon . . . handled--a series rising in gradation. Seeing is a more convincing proof than hearing of; handling, than even seeing. "Have heard . . . have seen" (perfect tenses), as a possession still abiding with us; but in Greek (not as English Version "have," but simply) "looked upon" (not perfect tense, as of a continuing thing, but aorist, past time) while Christ the incarnate Word was still with us. "Seen," namely, His glory, as revealed in the Transfiguration and in His miracles; and His passion and death in a real body of flesh and blood. "Looked upon" as a wondrous spectacle steadfastly, deeply, contemplatively; so the Greek. Appropriate to John's contemplative character.

hands . . . handled--Thomas and the other disciples on distinct occasions after the resurrection. John himself had leaned on Jesus' breast at the last supper. Contrast the wisest of the heathen feeling after (the same Greek as here; groping after WITH THE HANDS") if haply they might find God (see

Ac 17:27).

This proves against Socinians he is here speaking of the personal incarnate Word, not of Christ's teaching from the beginning of His official life.

of--"concerning"; following "heard." "Heard" is the verb most applying to the purpose of the Epistle, namely the truth which John had heard concerning the Word of life, that is, (Christ) the Word who is the life. "Heard," namely, from Christ Himself, including all Christ's teachings about Himself. Therefore he puts "of," or "concerning," before "the word of life," which is inapplicable to any of the verbs except "heard"; also "heard" is the only one of the verbs which he resumes at

1Jo 1:5.

2

Sem título

Abrir passagem

繁體中文

2. 這生命——耶穌,「生命之道」。

已經顯現出來——先前「與父同在」的那位。

顯現——如

約壹一3

譯作「傳給」(參

約壹一5)。

傳是一般用詞;寫是其特定方式

(約壹一4)。

那永遠的生命——希臘文「那永遠的生命」。本書信以「永生」開始,亦以「永生」結束;我們將與「那永遠的生命」之主永遠一同享受、在祂裏面享受。

這——希臘文「這」,即前述

(約壹一1)

那從起初與父同在的生命(比較

約一1)。

這證明一位神格中第一位與第二位的區別。

Original em inglês

2. the life--Jesus, "the Word of life."

was manifested--who had previously been "with the Father."

show--Translate as in

1Jo 1:3,

"declare" (compare

1Jo 1:5).

Declare is the general term; write is the particular

(1Jo 1:4).

that eternal life--Greek, "the life which is eternal." As the Epistle begins, so it ends with "eternal life," which we shall ever enjoy with, and in, Him who is "the life eternal."

which--Greek, "the which." the before-mentioned

(1Jo 1:1)

life which was with the Father "from the beginning" (compare

Joh 1:1).

This proves the distinctness of the First and Second Persons in the one Godhead.

3

Sem título

Abrir passagem

繁體中文

3. 我們所看見、所聽見的——從

約壹一1

恢復,那裏句子因

約壹一2

的括號而未完成。

傳給你們——最古抄本加「也」,即給你們也——你們這未曾看見或聽見祂的人。

使你們也與我們相交——使你們這未曾看見的,也能與我們這看見過的所有的相交;那相交是甚麼他接著說明:「我們的相交是與父並祂兒子耶穌基督的。」信使我們所未見的成為屬靈上可見的;直等我們也憑信看見,我們才知道真所羅門的一切卓越。祂自己是我們的;祂在我們裏面、我們在祂裏面。我們是「有分於神性」的人。我們唯有藉與神相交才能認識神;祂可以被認識,卻不能被完全理解。在「子」之前重複「與」,區分位格,而與父並子雙方的相交暗示他們的合一。沒有加上「並與聖靈」相交;因為我們能與父並子相交,是藉著在我們裏面父與子的靈(聖靈)

(比較

約壹三24)。

信徒享受與聖靈的相交從(OF)聖靈而來,而非與(WITH)聖靈相交。「藉著基督,神將那將自己與人類隔開的鴻溝填補,並在神聖生命的交通中將自己賜給他們」〔尼安德〕。

Original em inglês

3. That which we have seen and heard--resumed from

1Jo 1:1,

wherein the sentence, being interrupted by

1Jo 1:2,

parenthesis, was left incomplete.

declare we unto you--Oldest manuscripts add also; unto you also who have not seen or heard Him.

that ye also may have fellowship with us--that ye also who have not seen, may have the fellowship with us which we who have seen enjoy; what that fellowship consists in he proceeds to state, "Our fellowship is with the Father and with His Son." Faith realizes what we have not seen as spiritually visible; not till by faith we too have seen, do we know all the excellency of the true Solomon. He Himself is ours; He in us and we in Him. We are "partakers of the divine nature." We know God only by having fellowship with Him; He may thus be known, but not comprehended. The repetition of "with" before the "Son," distinguishes the persons, while the fellowship or communion with both Father and Son, implies their unity. It is not added "and with the Holy Ghost"; for it is by the Holy Ghost or Spirit of the Father and Son in us, that we are enabled to have fellowship with the Father and Son (compare

1Jo 3:24).

Believers enjoy the fellowship OF, but not WITH, the Holy Ghost. "Through Christ God closes up the chasm that separated Him from the human race, and imparts Himself to them in the communion of the divine life" [NEANDER].

4

Sem título

Abrir passagem

繁體中文

4. 這些事——並非別的,即本書信全部。

我們寫給你們——部分最古抄本省略「給你們」而強調「我們」。故對照在於「我們」(使徒與目擊者)與「你們」之間。我們如此寫,是為叫你們的喜樂可以滿足。其他最古抄本與譯本讀作「我們的喜樂」,即藉著將你們也帶入與父並子的相交,使我們的喜樂得以滿足(比較

約四36

末;

腓二2

「使我的喜樂滿足」,

腓二16; 四1;

約貳8)。

「你們的」可能是抄寫者為使本節與

約十五11; 十六24

一致而作的修正;然而,因約翰常重複所喜用的片語,他也可能在此如此行,故「你們的」也可能出自他本人。如

約貳12

最古抄本為「你們的」。此處雙方抄本與譯本的權威幾乎平衡。基督自己是祂百姓喜樂的源頭、對象、中心(比較

約壹一3

末);在與祂的相交中我們才有信心的果子——喜樂。

Original em inglês

4. these things--and none other, namely, this whole Epistle.

write we unto you--Some oldest manuscripts omit "unto you," and emphasize "we." Thus the antithesis is between "we" (apostles and eye-witnesses) and "your." We write thus that your joy may be full. Other oldest manuscripts and versions read "OUR joy," namely, that our joy may be filled full by bringing you also into fellowship with the Father and Son. (Compare

Joh 4:36,

end;

Php 2:2,

"Fulfil ye my joy,"

Php 2:16; 4:1; 2Jo 8).

It is possible that "your" may be a correction of transcribers to make this verse harmonize with

Joh 15:11; 16:24;

however, as John often repeats favorite phrases, he may do so here, so "your" may be from himself. So

2Jo 12,

"your" in oldest manuscripts. The authority of manuscripts and versions on both sides here is almost evenly balanced. Christ Himself is the source, object, and center of His people's joy (compare

1Jo 1:3,

end); it is in fellowship with Him that we have joy, the fruit of faith.

5

Sem título

Abrir passagem

繁體中文

5. 書信正文的第一段(比較《緒論》)。

宣告——希臘文「傳報」;將所聽見的依次傳報;與

約壹一3

的希臘文是另一個詞。如子作為父的使徒,將所聽見於父的信息傳報,照樣子的使徒將所聽見於子的傳報。約翰從不用「福音」一詞;而是用見證或見證、道、真理,以及此處的信息。

神就是光——光在自然界中所是的,那即為物質光之源的神在屬靈界中所是——智慧、純潔、美、喜樂、榮耀的泉源。如一切物質生命與生長依賴光,一切屬靈生命與生長依賴神。如此處神那樣,基督在

約壹二8

被稱為「真光」。

毫無黑暗——強烈否定;希臘文「連一點黑暗也沒有」;沒有無知、錯謬、虛假、罪或死亡。約翰是從基督所聽見的——不僅在明確的話語中,也在祂以行動表達的話語中,即祂以「父之榮耀的光輝」在肉身中顯現的全部過程中。基督自己是那「信息」的具體化身,在祂一切的言論、行動與受苦中,完全地彰顯了那位是「光」的。

Original em inglês

5. First division of the body of the Epistle (compare

Introduction).

declare--Greek, "announce"; report in turn; a different Greek word from

1Jo 1:3.

As the Son announced the message heard from the Father as His apostle, so the Son's apostles announce what they have heard from the Son. John nowhere uses the term "Gospel"; but the witness or testimony, the word, the truth, and here the message.

God is light--What light is in the natural world, that God, the source of even material light, is in the spiritual, the fountain of wisdom, purity, beauty, joy, and glory. As all material life and growth depends on light, so all spiritual life and growth depends on GOD. As God here, so Christ, in

1Jo 2:8,

is called "the true light."

no darkness at all--strong negation; Greek, "No, not even one speck of darkness"; no ignorance, error, untruthfulness, sin, or death. John heard this from Christ, not only in express words, but in His acted words, namely, His is whole manifestation in the flesh as "the brightness of the Father's glory." Christ Himself was the embodiment of "the message," representing fully in all His sayings, doings, and sufferings, Him who is LIGHT.

6

Sem título

Abrir passagem

繁體中文

6. 說——宣稱。

與祂相交——

(約壹一3)。

基督徒生命的本質。

行——在內外行動中,無論我們轉向何處〔本格爾〕。

在黑暗——希臘文「在那黑暗裏」,與「那光」相對(比較

約壹二8、11)。

說謊——

(約壹二4)。

不行——在實行上,不論我們所說的。

真理——

(弗四21;

約三21)。

Original em inglês

6. say--profess.

have fellowship with him--

(1Jo 1:3).

The essence of the Christian life.

walk--in inward and outward action, whithersoever we turn ourselves [BENGEL].

in darkness--Greek, "in the darkness"; opposed to "the light" (compare

1Jo 2:8, 11).

lie--

(1Jo 2:4).

do not--in practice, whatever we say.

the truth--

(Eph 4:21; Joh 3:21).

7

Sem título

Abrir passagem

繁體中文

7. 比較

弗五8、11-14。

「我們行」;「神(本質上在祂作為『光』的性情的核心中,

約壹一5)

在光明中。」在光明中行——即神自己所處的要素——構成與祂相交的試驗。基督也像我們一樣在光明中行

(約壹二6)。

阿爾福德指出,在光明中行如祂在光明中,不僅是對神的模仿,更是我們日常行事為人的核心要素與神永恆存在的核心要素之認同。

我們就彼此相交——當然也與神相交(當從

約壹一6

理解)。沒有與神的相交,就不可能有真實而屬基督的彼此相交(比較

約壹一3)。

並——作為「在光明中行,如祂在光明中」的結果。

耶穌的血……洗淨我們一切的罪——即因肉體罪的軟弱與撒但和世界的勢力而每日招致的罪。他所說的不是藉祂的血一勞永逸地稱義,而是信徒在光明中行並與神和聖徒相交時作為特權所享受的當下的成聖(「洗淨」是現在時態)。比較

約十三10

希臘文,「凡洗過澡的,只要洗腳,就完全潔淨了。」又比較

約壹一9

「洗淨我們一切的不義」,是在「赦免我們的罪」之外的進一步。基督的血是潔淨的媒介,藉此已稱義並與神相交的我們,逐漸從一切有損我們與神相交的罪中得潔淨。信心應用那潔淨、淨化的血。部分最古抄本省略「基督」;別的抄本保留它。

Original em inglês

7. Compare

Eph 5:8, 11-14.

"WE WALK"; "God is (essentially in His very nature as 'the light,'

1Jo 1:5)

in the light." WALKING in the light, the element in which God Himself is, constitutes the test of fellowship with Him. Christ, like us, walked in the light

(1Jo 2:6).

ALFORD notices, Walking in the light as He is in the light, is no mere imitation of God, but an identity in the essential element of our daily walk with the essential element of God's eternal being.

we have fellowship one with another--and of course with God (to be understood from

1Jo 1:6).

Without having fellowship with God there can be no true and Christian fellowship one with another (compare

1Jo 1:3).

and--as the result of "walking in the light, as He is in the light."

the blood of Jesus . . . cleanseth us from all sin--daily contracted through the sinful weakness of the flesh, and the power of Satan and the world. He is speaking not of justification through His blood once for all, but of the present sanctification ("cleanseth" is present tense) which the believer, walking in the light and having fellowship with God and the saints, enjoys as His privilege. Compare

Joh 13:10,

Greek, "He that has been bathed, needeth not save to wash his feet, but is clean every whit." Compare

1Jo 1:9,

"cleanse us from all unrighteousness," a further step besides "forgiving us our sins." Christ's blood is the cleansing mean, whereby gradually, being already justified and in fellowship with God, we become clean from all sin which would mar our fellowship with God. Faith applies the cleansing, purifying blood. Some oldest manuscripts omit "Christ"; others retain it.

8

Sem título

Abrir passagem

繁體中文

8. 認罪是「在光明中行」

(約壹一7)

的必然結果。「你若承認自己是罪人,真理就在你裏面;因為真理本身就是光。你的生命尚未成為完全的光,因罪仍在你裏面,但你已經開始被光照,因為你裏面有認罪」〔奥古斯丁〕。

說自己沒有罪——「有」,不是「曾有」,必然不是指未信前過去罪惡的生活,而是信徒現今仍**有罪的現狀。注意「罪」是單數;「(承認我們的)罪」

(約壹一9)

是複數。罪指仍存於我們裏面的舊人的敗壞,以及由我們裏面那舊本性所發的實際罪所造成的污點。承認我們需要從現今的罪得潔淨,是「在光明中行」所不可或缺的;某些罪的存在與我們大體上在光明中行並非不相容。但信徒恨惡、承認並渴望從一切罪——即黑暗——中得釋放。「為自己罪辯護的人,到那大日將看到自己的罪能否為自己辯護。」

欺騙自己——我們不能欺騙神;我們只是使自己偏離正路。

真理——

(約壹二4)。

真信仰。「關乎神的聖潔與我們的罪惡的真理——這原是我們裏面最初的光之火花——在我們裏面沒有地位」〔阿爾福德〕。

Original em inglês

8. The confession of sins is a necessary consequence of "walking in the light"

(1Jo 1:7).

"If thou shalt confess thyself a sinner, the truth is in thee; for the truth is itself light. Not yet has thy life become perfectly light, as sins are still in thee, but yet thou hast already begun to be illuminated, because there is in thee confession of sins" [AUGUSTINE].

that we have no sin--"HAVE," not "have had," must refer not to the past sinful life while unconverted, but to the present state wherein believers have sin even still. Observe, "sin" is in the singular; "(confess our) sins"

(1Jo 1:9)

in the plural. Sin refers to the corruption of the old man still present in us, and the stain created by the actual sins flowing from that old nature in us. To confess our need of cleansing from present sin is essential to "walking in the light"; so far is the presence of some sin incompatible with our in the main "walking in light." But the believer hates, confesses, and longs to be delivered from all sin, which is darkness. "They who defend their sins, will see in the great day whether their sins can defend them."

deceive ourselves--We cannot deceive God; we only make ourselves to err from the right path.

the truth--

(1Jo 2:4).

True faith. "The truth respecting God's holiness and our sinfulness, which is the very first spark of light in us, has no place in us" [ALFORD].

9

Sem título

Abrir passagem

繁體中文

9. 承認——以嘴唇,從憂傷痛悔的心發出;也包含向所得罪的人承認對他們所犯的過犯。

祂——神。

信實——對祂自己的應許;對祂的話「真實」。

公義——在基督裏救贖悔改的信者一事上,所彰顯的不僅是神的憐憫,更是神的公義或義。祂所信實遵守的憐憫應許與祂的公義相符。

要——希臘文「為要」。祂赦免我們的罪並洗淨我們等,是為促進祂永恆信實與公義的目的。

赦免——免除罪疚。

洗淨——從一切污穢中淨化,使我們藉成聖之靈愈來愈從罪的臨在中得自由(比較

來九14;

並見上文

約壹一7

註釋)。

不義——冒犯那「是公義的」或義的那位;在

約壹一7

稱為「罪」,因為「罪就是違背律法」,而律法是神之義的表達,故罪就是不義。

Original em inglês

9. confess--with the lips, speaking from a contrite heart; involving also confession to our fellow men of offenses committed against them.

he--God.

faithful--to His own promises; "true" to His word.

just--Not merely the mercy, but the justice or righteousness of God is set forth in the redemption of the penitent believer in Christ. God's promises of mercy, to which He is faithful, are in accordance with His justice.

to--Greek, "in order that." His forgiving us our sins and cleansing us, &c., is in furtherance of the ends of His eternal faithfulness and justice.

forgive--remitting the guilt.

cleanse--purify from all filthiness, so that henceforth we more and more become free from the presence of sin through the Spirit of sanctification (compare

Heb 9:14;

and above, see on

1Jo 1:7).

unrighteousness--offensive to Him who "is just" or righteous; called "sin,"

1Jo 1:7,

because "sin is the transgression of the law," and the law is the expression of God's righteousness, so that sin is unrighteousness.

10

Sem título

Abrir passagem

繁體中文

10. 與

約壹一8

平行。

說自己沒有犯過罪——指重生與歸信之後實際罪的犯;而

約壹一8

「我們沒有罪」指的是由所犯的實際罪留下的(直到潔淨為止的)現存的罪疚,以及仍附著於我們的舊敗壞性情的罪。「犯了」這完成式把罪的犯下延伸到現今,不僅是歸信前所犯的,更包括歸信後的。

以神為說謊的——遞進:

約壹一6

「我們說謊」;

約壹一8

「我們欺騙自己」;最壞的是「我們以祂為說謊的」——否認祂說眾人都是罪人的話(比較

約壹五10)。

祂的道也不在我們裏面——作為「真理」

(約壹一8)

的「祂的道」真實地指控我們;我們否認它,就將它從我們心中趕出(比較

約五38)。

我們在自己是罪人一事上拒絕「祂的道」,意味著隨之而來我們拒絕律法與福音整體中所啟示的祂的道與旨意;因為這一切始終建立在我們犯了罪並有罪的事實上。

Original em inglês

10. Parallel to

1Jo 1:8.

we have not sinned--referring to the commission of actual sins, even after regeneration and conversion; whereas in

1Jo 1:8,

"we have no sin," refers to the present GUILT remaining (until cleansed) from the actual sins committed, and to the SIN of our corrupt old nature still adhering to us. The perfect "have . . . sinned" brings down the commission of sins to the present time, not merely sins committed before, but since, conversion.

we make him a liar--a gradation;

1Jo 1:6,

"we lie";

1Jo 1:8,

"we deceive ourselves"; worst of all, "we make Him a liar," by denying His word that all men are sinners (compare

1Jo 5:10).

his word is not in us--"His word," which is "the truth"

(1Jo 1:8),

accuses us truly; by denying it we drive it from our hearts (compare

Joh 5:38).

Our rejection of "His word" in respect to our being sinners, implies as the consequence our rejection of His word and will revealed in the law and Gospel as a whole; for these throughout rest on the fact that we have sinned, and have sin.