Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
- 翻译进度
- 4,537 / 4,537
- 原文语言
- en
学习资料
圣经注释书
按书卷和章节浏览多种公有领域注释书以及 scripture.how 的韩文译文。可以切换不同注释书，只阅读译文，也可以将原文与译文并排查看。
当前注释书
全部注释书
23 种注释书
全部条目
307,288
已翻译 81,431 条
许可
按来源显示
来源与许可
按注释书来源分别显示原始作品、作者、翻译进度和许可信息。scripture.how 的韩文译文和编辑内容与原文资料分开管理。
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871). CCEL expanded electronic edition states it is in the public domain.
- 翻译进度
- 19,831 / 19,831
- 原文语言
- en
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Albert Barnes · 1834
Albert Barnes' Notes on Revelation Of St. John The Divine (New Testament, English original, public domain). Sourced from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library (CCEL). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes.
- 翻译进度
- 22,781 / 22,781
- 原文语言
- en
Adam Clarke's Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Adam Clarke · 1831
Public domain English commentary by Adam Clarke, normalized from Wikisource book pages for scripture.how. Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke.
- 翻译进度
- 21,603 / 22,101
- 原文语言
- en
John Gill's Exposition of the Bible
John Gill · 1763
John Gill(1697-1771), Exposition of the Old and New Testament(1746-1763). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/gill.
- 翻译进度
- 12,528 / 30,759
- 原文语言
- en
Calvin's Commentaries
John Calvin · 1850
종교개혁 신학 원천 (영역본 PD, 대부분 — 전권 아님)
- 翻译进度
- 144 / 7,385
- 原文语言
- en
Matthew Poole's Annotations upon the Holy Bible
Matthew Poole · 1685
간결 절별 전권 개혁주의 주석
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 31,092
- 原文语言
- en
The Pulpit Commentary
ed. H.D.M. Spence & Joseph S. Exell · 1890
전권 강해·설교·예화 풍부 (항목 대량)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 25,592
- 原文语言
- en
Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
Carl F. Keil, Franz Delitzsch · 1866
구약 학술 표준 — 히브리어·문헌비평·고대근동 배경
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 2,044
- 原文语言
- en
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers
ed. Charles J. Ellicott · 1878
학술+가독 균형 전권 주석
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 23,497
- 原文语言
- en
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Cambridge (다저자) · 1900
준전권 준학술 (권별 저자·연도 확인)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 27,176
- 原文语言
- en
Vincent's Word Studies in the New Testament
Marvin R. Vincent · 1887
신약 헬라어 단어 연구
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 5,763
- 原文语言
- en
Word Pictures in the New Testament
A.T. Robertson · 1933
헬라어 시제·문법 해설 결정판 (KR PD / US 1931+ 권별)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 6,935
- 原文语言
- en
The Expositor's Greek Testament
ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (다저자) · 1910
헬라어 신약 학술 (권별 저자 PD 확인 필요)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 7,010
- 原文语言
- en
Meyer's Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament
Heinrich A.W. Meyer · 1880
신약 학술 정밀주해 (독일 — K&D 대응)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 5,340
- 原文语言
- en
Wesley's Explanatory Notes
John Wesley · 1755
간결 실용 전권(NT 1755 / OT 1765) 웨슬리안
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 5,643
- 原文语言
- en
Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments
Joseph Benson · 1815
웨슬리안 전권 주석
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 14,675
- 原文语言
- en
The Treasury of David
Charles H. Spurgeon · 1885
시편 주석 고전 (설교 자료 풍부)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 2,290
- 原文语言
- en
MacLaren's Expositions of Holy Scripture
Alexander Maclaren · 1910
설교형 강해 명저 (전권, 절별 가공 필요)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 1,144
- 原文语言
- en
The People's New Testament
B.W. Johnson · 1891
평이 절별 신약 해설 (일반신자·모바일)
- 翻译进度
- 7 / 3,477
- 原文语言
- en
Coke's Commentary on the Holy Bible
Thomas Coke · 1803
감리교 전권 주석
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 10,808
- 原文语言
- en
Trapp's Complete Commentary
John Trapp · 1660
청교도 전권 주석 — Henry/Gill 보완
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 26,397
- 原文语言
- en
Hodge's Commentary on the New Testament
Charles Hodge · 1860
프린스턴 조직신학 관점 신약 정밀 주석 (롬·고전후·엡)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 1,011
- 原文语言
- en
Porcius Festus being appointed governor of Judea, instead of Felix, the Jews beseech him to have Paul brought up to Jerusalem, that he might be tried there; they lying in wait to kill him on the way, Acts 25:1-3. Festus refuses, and desires those who could prove any thing against him, to go with him to Caesarea, Acts 25:4, Acts 25:5. Festus, having tarried at Jerusalem about ten days, returns to Caesarea, and the next day Paul is brought to his trial, and the Jews of Jerusalem bring many groundless charges against him, against which he defends himself, Acts 25:6-8. In order to please the Jews, Festus asks Paul if he be willing to go up to Jerusalem, and be tried there, Acts 25:9. Paul refuses, and appeals to Caesar, and Festus admits the appeal, Acts 25:10-13. King Agrippa, and Bernice his wife, come to Caesarea to visit Festus, and are informed by him of the accusations against Paul, his late trial, and his appeal from them to Caesar, Acts 25:14-21. Agrippa desires to hear Paul; and a hearing is appointed for the following day, Acts 25:22. Agrippa, Bernice, the principal officers and chief men of the city being assembled, Paul is brought forth, Acts 25:23. Festus opens the business with generally stating the accusations against Paul, his trial on these accusations, the groundless and frivolous nature of the charges, his own conviction of his innocence, and his desire that the matter might be heard by the king himself, that he might have something specifically to write to the emperor, to whom he was about to send Paul, agreeably to his appeal, Acts 25:24-27.
CHAPTER 25
Acts 25:2. ὁ ἀρχιερεύς] οἱ ἀρχιερεῖς is decidedly attested. Recommended by Griesb., adopted by Lachm. Tisch. Born. The singular arose from Acts 24:1.
Acts 25:4. εἰς Καισάρ.] so Lachm. Tisch. Born., according to preponderating testimony. Elz. Scholz have ἐν Καισαρείᾳ. An interpretation.
Acts 25:5. τούτῳ] A B C E א, min. Arm. Vulg. Lucifer, have ἄτοπον. So Lachm. and Born. But how easily, with the indefiniteness of the expression εἴ τι ἐστὶν ἐν κ.τ.λ., was ἄτοπον suggested as a gloss, perhaps from a recollection of Luke 23:41! This then supplanted the superfluous τούτῳ. Other codd. have τούτῳ ἄτοπον. And ἄτοπον is found variously inserted.
Acts 25:6. οὐ πλείους ὀκτὼ ἢ δέκα] so Griesb. Lachm. Tisch. Scholz, Born. But Elz. has πλείους ἢ δέχα, in opposition to A B C א, min. Copt. Arm. Vulg. As the oldest codd., in which the numbers are written as words, likewise all the oldest vss. (of which, however, several omit οὐ, and several οὐ πλείους), have ὀκτώ, it is very probable that in later witnesses the number written by the numeral sign η was absorbed by the following ἤ. Finally, the omission of οὐ was suggested by ἐν τάχει, Acts 25:4, as it was thought that διατρίψας δὲ … δέκα must be taken as a contrast to ἐν τάχει (he promised to depart speedily, yet he tarried, etc.).
Acts 25:7. αἰτιάματα] Griesb. Scholz, Lachm. Tisch. read αἰτιω̇ματα, which is so decidedly attested that, notwithstanding that this form does not occur elsewhere, it must be adopted.
φέροντες κατὰ τοῦ Παύλου] Lachm. Tisch. Born. read καταφέροντες, following A B C א, loti. 40, Vulg. Lucifer. The Recepta is one interpretation of this; another is ἐπιφέρ. τῷ Π. in E.
Acts 25:11. γάρ] A B C E א, min. Copt. Slav. Chrys. Theophyl. 2, have οὖν, which Griesb. has approved, and Lachm. Tisch. Born. have adopted. Rightly; εἰ μὲν οὖν ἀδικῶ seemed entirely at variance with the preceding οὐδὲν ἠδίκησα.
Acts 25:15. δίκην] A B א, min. Bas. have καταδίκην. Recommended by Griesb., adopted by Lachm. and Born. An interpretation.
Acts 25:16. After ἄνθρωπον Elz. Scholz have εἰς ἀπώλειαν. It is wanting in preponderating witnesses, and is an addition of the nature of a gloss.
Acts 25:18. ἐπέφερον] Lachm. Tisch. Born. read ἔφερον, according to decisive testimony.
After ὑπν. ἐγώ A C* have πονηράν (so Lachm.), and B E א** πονηρῶν (so Born.). Two different exegetical additions.
Acts 25:20. τούτων] has decisive attestation. But Elz. Scholz have τούτου, which (not to be taken with Grotius and others as the neuter) was occasioned by the preceding ὁ Παῦλος and the following εἰ βούλοιτο.
Acts 25:21. ἀναπέμψω is to be adopted, with Lachm. Tisch. Born., according to preponderating testimony, instead of πέμψω. The reference of the compound was overlooked.
Acts 25:22. ἔφη, and afterwards ὁ δέ, are deleted by Lachm. Tisch. Born., according to A B א; and rightly. They were added by way of completion.
Acts 25:25. καταλαβόμενος] Lachm. and Born. read κατελαβόμην, following A B C E א** loti. Vulg. Copt. Syr., which witnesses also omit καί before αὐτοῦ. A logical emendation.
Acts 25:26. σχῶ, τι γράψαι] Lachm. Tisch. Born, read σχῶ, τί γράψω, according to A B C, min. The Recepta is a mechanical repetition from the preceding.
暂无译文。
Ac 25:1-12.
非斯都 到了 耶路撒冷， 拒绝 将保罗 带到 那里 受审， 却在 回到 凯撒利亚后 给 双方 开庭—— 非斯都 问使徒 是否 愿意 到耶路撒冷 在他面前 再听一审， 他为 自己 案件的 公义 所迫， 只好 上诉 于皇帝。
1-3. 非斯都……过了三天……上耶路撒冷去——为要毫不迟延地认识他所治理的这一中心大城。
非斯都到了——参看 Acts 24:27 的注释。
到了省内——指犹太省；因为犹太当时是罗马的一个行省。
过了三天——即在该撒利亚停留了三天之后。
就上去——这是描述往耶路撒冷行程时惯用的说法。正如英国人因伦敦是首都，便说到伦敦是"上去"。参看 Acts 15:1 的注释。
上了耶路撒冷——当时犹太的巡抚通常住在该撒利亚；但耶路撒冷既是从前的首都，仍是宗教盛典的中心，公会在那里集会，而且伟人、富人、学者和祭司都住在那里，显然只有在那里才能充分了解全省的状况。因此，非斯都一就职，便早早上耶路撒冷去，为要熟悉这民族的事务。
Now when Festus was come into the province - By the province is meant Judea; for, after the death of Herod Agrippa, Claudius thought it imprudent to trust the government in the hands of his son Agrippa, who was then but seventeen years of age; therefore Cuspius Fadus was sent to be procurator. And when afterwards Claudius had given to Agrippa the tetrarchate of Philip, that of Batanea and Abila, he nevertheless kept the province of Judea more immediately in his own hands, and governed it by procurators sent from Rome. Joseph. Ant. lib. xx. cap. 7, sec. 1. Felix being removed, Porcius Festus is sent in his place; and having come to Caesarea, where the Roman governor generally had his residence, after he had tarried three days, he went up to Jerusalem, to acquaint himself with the nature and complexion of the ecclesiastical government of the Jews; no doubt, for the purpose of the better administration of justice among them.
Now when Festus was come into the province,.... Of Judea, which was a Roman province, over which he was made governor by Nero, the Roman emperor, in the room of Felix; he now being landed in some part of the province, namely, at Caesarea, and so might be said to have entered upon the government of it, as the phrase will bear to be rendered;
after three days he ascended from Caesarea to Jerusalem; he very likely came by sea from Italy to Judea, and landed at Caesarea; for though Joppa was the nearest port to Jerusalem, yet Caesarea was the safest, and most commodious port, being made so by Herod; See Gill on Acts 18:22, and besides, it seems to have been very much the residence of the kings and governors of Judea, Acts 12:19 here Festus stayed three days after his landing, to rest himself after the fatigue of the voyage, and then went up to Jerusalem, the metropolis of the province of Judea.
有人认为腓力斯被免职、由非斯都接替一事，发生在保罗被囚后不久，并以为前章末尾所提的两年应从尼禄即位之初算起；但更自然的方法，似乎是从保罗被交在腓力斯手中之时起算。无论如何，我们在本章所见保罗案件的审理，与前章大致相同。本章对此案的审理分为两部分：一、由巡抚非斯都审理。犹太人将案件呈到他面前（徒 25:1-3）；听审并未按犹太人所愿在耶路撒冷举行，而是定在凯撒利亚（徒 25:4-6）；犹太人出庭控告保罗（徒 25:7），保罗却坚称自己无罪（徒 25:8）；为避免案件被移至耶路撒冷（虽有人力劝他应允），他最终向凯撒上诉（徒 25:9-12）。二、由亚基帕王审理。非斯都向他陈述案情（徒 25:13-21），亚基帕表示愿亲自听审（徒 25:22）。于是法庭开庭，保罗被带到堂前（徒 25:23），非斯都陈述案由（徒 25:24-27），以此引出下一章中保罗的申辩。