Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
- 翻译进度
- 4,537 / 4,537
- 原文语言
- en
学习资料
圣经注释书
按书卷和章节浏览多种公有领域注释书以及 scripture.how 的韩文译文。可以切换不同注释书，只阅读译文，也可以将原文与译文并排查看。
当前注释书
全部注释书
23 种注释书
全部条目
307,288
已翻译 81,431 条
许可
按来源显示
来源与许可
按注释书来源分别显示原始作品、作者、翻译进度和许可信息。scripture.how 的韩文译文和编辑内容与原文资料分开管理。
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871). CCEL expanded electronic edition states it is in the public domain.
- 翻译进度
- 19,831 / 19,831
- 原文语言
- en
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Albert Barnes · 1834
Albert Barnes' Notes on Revelation Of St. John The Divine (New Testament, English original, public domain). Sourced from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library (CCEL). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes.
- 翻译进度
- 22,781 / 22,781
- 原文语言
- en
Adam Clarke's Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Adam Clarke · 1831
Public domain English commentary by Adam Clarke, normalized from Wikisource book pages for scripture.how. Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke.
- 翻译进度
- 21,603 / 22,101
- 原文语言
- en
John Gill's Exposition of the Bible
John Gill · 1763
John Gill(1697-1771), Exposition of the Old and New Testament(1746-1763). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/gill.
- 翻译进度
- 12,528 / 30,759
- 原文语言
- en
Calvin's Commentaries
John Calvin · 1850
종교개혁 신학 원천 (영역본 PD, 대부분 — 전권 아님)
- 翻译进度
- 144 / 7,385
- 原文语言
- en
Matthew Poole's Annotations upon the Holy Bible
Matthew Poole · 1685
간결 절별 전권 개혁주의 주석
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 31,092
- 原文语言
- en
The Pulpit Commentary
ed. H.D.M. Spence & Joseph S. Exell · 1890
전권 강해·설교·예화 풍부 (항목 대량)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 25,592
- 原文语言
- en
Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
Carl F. Keil, Franz Delitzsch · 1866
구약 학술 표준 — 히브리어·문헌비평·고대근동 배경
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 2,044
- 原文语言
- en
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers
ed. Charles J. Ellicott · 1878
학술+가독 균형 전권 주석
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 23,497
- 原文语言
- en
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Cambridge (다저자) · 1900
준전권 준학술 (권별 저자·연도 확인)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 27,176
- 原文语言
- en
Vincent's Word Studies in the New Testament
Marvin R. Vincent · 1887
신약 헬라어 단어 연구
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 5,763
- 原文语言
- en
Word Pictures in the New Testament
A.T. Robertson · 1933
헬라어 시제·문법 해설 결정판 (KR PD / US 1931+ 권별)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 6,935
- 原文语言
- en
The Expositor's Greek Testament
ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (다저자) · 1910
헬라어 신약 학술 (권별 저자 PD 확인 필요)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 7,010
- 原文语言
- en
Meyer's Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament
Heinrich A.W. Meyer · 1880
신약 학술 정밀주해 (독일 — K&D 대응)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 5,340
- 原文语言
- en
Wesley's Explanatory Notes
John Wesley · 1755
간결 실용 전권(NT 1755 / OT 1765) 웨슬리안
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 5,643
- 原文语言
- en
Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments
Joseph Benson · 1815
웨슬리안 전권 주석
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 14,675
- 原文语言
- en
The Treasury of David
Charles H. Spurgeon · 1885
시편 주석 고전 (설교 자료 풍부)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 2,290
- 原文语言
- en
MacLaren's Expositions of Holy Scripture
Alexander Maclaren · 1910
설교형 강해 명저 (전권, 절별 가공 필요)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 1,144
- 原文语言
- en
The People's New Testament
B.W. Johnson · 1891
평이 절별 신약 해설 (일반신자·모바일)
- 翻译进度
- 7 / 3,477
- 原文语言
- en
Coke's Commentary on the Holy Bible
Thomas Coke · 1803
감리교 전권 주석
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 10,808
- 原文语言
- en
Trapp's Complete Commentary
John Trapp · 1660
청교도 전권 주석 — Henry/Gill 보완
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 26,397
- 原文语言
- en
Hodge's Commentary on the New Testament
Charles Hodge · 1860
프린스턴 조직신학 관점 신약 정밀 주석 (롬·고전후·엡)
- 翻译进度
- 0 / 1,011
- 原文语言
- en
The transfiguration of Christ, Matthew 17:1-8. Christ's discourse with his disciples on the subject, Matthew 17:9-13. He heals a lunatic, Matthew 17:14-18. His discourse with his disciples on this subject also, Matthew 17:19-21. He foretells his own sufferings and death, Matthew 17:22, Matthew 17:23. He is required to pay tribute at Capernaum, Matthew 17:24-26; and provides the money by a miracle, Matthew 17:27.
CHAPTER 17.
THE TRANSFIGURATION; THE EPILEPTIC BOY; THE TEMPLE TRIBUTE.
Three impressive tableaux connected by proximity in time, a common preternatural aspect, and deep moral pathos.
CHAPTER 17
Matthew 17:3. ὤφθησαν] Lachm. and Tisch.: ὤφθη, after B D א, Curss. and Codd. of the It. The plural is a grammatical correction; the sing. can scarcely be taken from Mark 9:4.
Matthew 17:4. ποιήσωμεν] Lachm. and Tisch.: ποιῇσω, after B C א, 17 :Corb. 1, Germ. 1. Correctly; the plural is from Mark and Luke.
The arrangement Ἠλίᾳ μίαν (Lachm. Tisch.) is supported by decisive testimony.
Matthew 17:5. φωτεινή] Only on the authority of a few Curss. and Ephr. Griesb. and Fritzsche have φωτός, which Olshausen also prefers. An interpretation for the purpose of defining the wonderful nature of the cloud.
The order ἀκούετε αὐτοῦ (inverted in Elz.) is, with Lachm. and Tisch. 8, after B D א, 1, 33, to be preferred. The reading of the Received text is according to the LXX.
Matthew 17:7. Lachm. and Tisch. 8 : καὶ προσῆλθεν ὁ Ἰ. καὶ ἁψάμενος αὐτῶν εἶπεν, after B (in the first half of the sentence also D) א, Verss. Seeing how much the reading fluctuates in the various authorities, the Received text, from having the balance of testimony in its favour, is not to be abandoned.
Matthew 17:9. ἐκ] Elz.: ἀπό. Approved by Scholz, against decisive testimony. From Mark 9:9, for the sake of conformity with the ordinary usage.
ἀναστή] Lachm. and Tisch: ἐγερθῇ, after B D, Sahid. The reading of the Received text is from Mark 9:9.
Matthew 17:11. On important testimony, Ἰησοῦς and αὐτοῖς are, with Lachm. and Tisch., to be deleted. Common interpolations.
πρῶτον] is omitted after ἔρχ. in B D א, Curss. Verss. Aug. Hil.; L inserts it after ἀποκατ. Suspected by Griesb., deleted by Fritzsche, Lachm., Tisch. Repetition from Matthew 17:10, in accordance with Mark 9:12.
Matthew 17:14. αὐτῶν] which Lachm. and Tisch. have deleted, is omitted in B Z א, 1, 124, 245, Sahid.; it might easily have been overlooked from coming, as it does, immediately after ἐλθόνΤΩΝ.
αὐτόν] Elz.: αὐτῷ, against decisive testimony.
Matthew 17:15. πάσχει] Lachm.: ἔχει, after B L Z א, Or. Either an involuntary alteration occasioned by the current use of the expression κακῶς ἔχειν (Matthew 4:24, Matthew 8:16, Matthew 9:12, Matthew 14:35), or intentional, on account of the apparent pleonasm.
Matthew 17:17. The order μεθʼ ὑμῶν ἔσομαι (Lachm. Tisch.) is supported by the preponderating testimony of B C D Z א, Curss. Or., and ought to be adopted. Comp. Mark and Luke.
Matthew 17:20. ἀπιστίαν] Lachm. Tisch. 8 : ὀλιγοπιστίαν, after B א, Curss. Syrcur Sahid. Copt. Arm. Aeth. Or. Chrys. An ancient emendation to soften the expression, ἀπιστίαν, after Matthew 17:17 especially, may have offended pious sensibilities.
The reading μετάβα ἔνθεν (Lachm. Tisch.) is neither satisfactory nor has it uniform testimony in its favour.
Matthew 17:21. Tisch. 8 has deleted the whole verse, but only after B א* 33, and a few Verss. The great preponderance of testimony is in favour of retaining it, although Weiss likewise rejects it. It might have been regarded as inserted from Mark 9:29 had the terms of the two passages coincided more fully. Why it was omitted, it is really impossible to say; it may only have happened accidentally, and the omission remains an isolated instance.
Matthew 17:22. ἀναστρεφ.] Lachm. and Tisch. 8 : συστρεφ., after B א, 1, Vulg. Codd. of the It. A gloss, in order that ἀναστρεφ. might not be taken in the sense of return.
Matthew 17:23. ἐγερθήσεται] Lachm.: ἀναστήσεται, after B, Curss. Or. Chrys. From Mark 9:31.
Matthew 17:25. ὅτε εἰσῆλθεν] Lachm. and Tisch. 8 : εἰσελθόντα, which is found in א*; in B it is: ἐλθόντα; in C: ὅτε ἦλθον; in D: εἰσελθόντι. Others have: ὃτε εἰσῆλθον, εἰσελθόντων, εἰσελθόντος. Seeing there is such variety in the readings, we ought to prefer, not the simple verb, which B and C concur in adopting, but the compound form, which is supported by D א and the numerous authorities in favour of the reading of the Received text; further, the plural is to be rejected, inasmuch as it is without adequate testimony and has been inserted from Matthew 17:24; and finally, the reading ὅτε is to be regarded as an analysis of the participle. Consequently the reading εἰσελθόντα should be adopted.
Matthew 17:26. For λέγει αὐτῷ ὁ Πέτρος read, with Lachm. and Tisch. 8, simply εἰπόντος δέ, after B C L א, Verss. Or. Chrys. The reading of the Received text is somewhat of a gloss.
暂无译文。
Mt 17:1-13.
耶稣改变形像——关于以利亚的谈论。 （ =
Mr 9:2-13；Lu 9:28-36）。
释经请参见
Lu 9:28-36。
Matthew 17:1-9。另见Mark 9:2-10；Luke 9:28-36。
过了六天——即前章所记那次谈话之后的六天。
路加（Luke 9:28）说"约有八天"。马太提到的是谈话之日与登山变像之间相隔的六天；路加把两端的日子都包括在内，因而算为八天。况且路加也并非要确定精确的时间，他只说"约有八天"。
带着彼得、雅各、约翰——这三门徒在客西马尼园中也是与主同在的，Mark 14:33。主有意借着预先彰显自己的荣耀，并彰显自己在受苦中的忍耐，使他们在卓越的程度上预备好承担福音事工的工作。
上了一座高山——即与其他门徒分开。人们通常认为这是他泊山，即加利利的一座高山。然而新约并未提到这座山的名字。路加在Luke 9:28补充说，他上去是要祷告。我们的救主常常祷告。他祷告时总拣选独处。为这目的，他常常上山或进入旷野。高山的孤寂与深邃庄严的静谧之中，有某种利于灵修的因素。
After six days - Mark 9:2, has the same number; but Luke says, Luke 9:28, after eight days. The reason of this difference seems to be the following: Matthew and Mark reckon the days from that mentioned in the preceding chapter, to that mentioned in this; Luke includes both days, as well as the six intermediate: hence, the one makes eight, the other six, without any contradiction.
Peter, James, and John - He chose those that they might be witnesses of his transfiguration: two or three witnesses being required by the Scripture to substantiate any fact. Eminent communications of the Divine favor prepare for, and entitle to, great services and great conflicts. The same three were made witnesses of his agony in the garden, Matthew 26:37.
A high mountain - This was one of the mountains of Galilee; but whether Mount Tabor or not, is uncertain. Some think it was Mount Hermon. St. Luke says, Christ and his disciples went up into the mountain to pray, Luke 9:28.
本章记载：一、基督在荣光中荣耀地改变形像（太 17:1-3）；二、基督以大能与恩典，从一个孩子身上赶出鬼（太 17:14-21）；三、基督在贫穷与极大的降卑中——1. 预言自己的受苦（太 17:22-23），2. 缴纳丁税（太 17:24-27）。因此此处所见的基督，乃是他父荣耀的光辉，亲自洁净我们的罪、偿还我们的债，并为我们败坏那掌死权的，就是魔鬼。基督恩典旨意的种种标记如此奇妙地交织在一起。