1
Job 8:1
繁體中文
英文原文
Then answered Bildad the Shuhite - ; see the notes at Job 2:11.
2
Job 8:2
繁體中文
「這些話你要說到幾時」——所指是他前幾章所發那湧流不息的怨言與牢騷。
「你口中的言語如狂風」——敘利亞文與阿拉伯文譯本(據 Walton)譯作「驕傲之靈充滿你的口」。七十士譯本譯作「你口中之靈言語氾濫」——πολυῤῥῆμον polurrēmon。但通行的譯法無疑是正確的,而且這是一個極有力、極美的說法。他抱怨與發怨言的言語如同一場暴風,掃過一切攔阻,不顧一切約束。同樣的比喻見於 Aristophanes,Ran. 872(Schultens 所引):Τυφὼς ἐχβαίειν παρασκενάξεται Tuphōs ekbainein paraskeuacetai——一場言語的暴風正要爆發。又見 Silius Italicus,xxi. 581:
- qui tanta superbo Facta sonas ore, et spumanti turbine perflas Ignorantum aures.
迦勒底文譯本譯得正確:רבא זעפא——一場大暴風。
英文原文
How long wilt thou speak these things? - The flyings of murmuring and complaint, such as he had uttered in the previous chapters.
The words of thy mouth be like a strong wind? - The Syriac and Arabic (according to Walton) render this, "the spirit of pride fill thy mouth." The Septuagint renders it, "The spirit of thy mouth is profuse of words" - πολυῤῥῆμον polurrēmon. But the common rendering is undoubtedly correct, and the expression is a very strong and beautiful one. His language of complaint and murmuring was like a tempest. It swept over all barriers, and disregarded all restraint. The same figure is found in Aristophanes, Ran. 872, as quoted by Schultens, Τυφὼς ἐχβαίειν παρασκενάξεται Tuphōs ekbainein paraskeuacetai - a tempest of words is preparing to burst forth. And in Silius Italicus, xxi. 581:
- qui tanta superbo
Facta sonas ore, et spumanti turbine perflas
Ignorantum aures.
The Chaldee renders it correctly רבא זעפא - a great tempest.
3
Job 8:3
繁體中文
「神豈能偏離公平」——就是說,神是否會不義地苦待人?祂是否恩待惡人、刑罰善人?比勒達在此無疑是指約伯而說,並且以為約伯已對神提出了這樣的指控。但約伯並沒有用這樣明確的言辭如此行。他曾抱怨自己受苦的沉重,也曾放縱說出對神不敬的言語;但他並沒有公開提出神顛倒是非的指控。比勒達極力主張神必行公義。他的論證建立在這樣的假設上:神在今生必按人的品格待人;由此他推斷,約伯必定犯了某種大惡,刑罰才會這樣臨到他。
英文原文
Doth God pervert judgment? - That is, Does God afflict people unjustly? Does he show favor to the evil, and punish the good? Bildad here undoubtedly refers to Job, and supposes that he had brought this charge against God. But he had not done it in so many words. He had complained of the severity of his sufferings, and had indulged in irreverent language toward God. But he had not advanced the charge openly that God had perverted right. Bildad strenuously maintains that God would do right. His argument is based on the supposition that God would deal with people in this life according to their character; and thus he infers that Job must have been guilty of some great wickedness, that punishment should come upon him in this manner.
4
Job 8:4
繁體中文
「或者你的兒女得罪了他」——比勒達在此假定約伯的兒女素來邪惡,是死在罪中的。這必使約伯心如刀割,因為喪子的父親再沒有比這感受更痛切的事了。這裏的意思被「或者」一詞削弱了些。希伯來文אם 'ı̂m 與其說是「如果」,不如說應取「既然」之義——把它視為無可爭辯之點,視為當然。這不是假設他們如今若這樣行,便必有某些後果隨之而來;其意乃是:既然他們死在罪中,約伯即使如今以正確的靈尋求神,仍可重獲興旺,儘管他的起頭微小(Job 8:7)。
「他使他們受罪報」——比勒達認為他們已被神棄絕,已被處死。
「因他們的過犯」——邊註作「藉他們過犯之手」。希伯來文是「藉他們過犯之手」;即他們的罪成了原因,或說是藉着他們的罪而成。至於比勒達這看法有甚麼根據——是否出於約伯眾子的行事為人與品格——我們無從查考。不過,大概他風聞他們已被剪除;又按他所持守的一般原則——神在今生按人的品格待人——便推斷他們必定以罪大惡極著稱。當災禍突然臨到別人時,人也常常如此推論。
英文原文
If thy children have sinned against him - Bildad here assumes that the children of Job had been wicked, and had been cut off in their sins. This must have cut him to the quick, for there was nothing which a bereaved father would feel more acutely than this. The meaning here is somewhat weakened by the word "if." The Hebrew אם 'ı̂m is rather to be taken in the sense of "since" - assuming it as an indisputable point, or taking it for granted. It was not a supposition that if they should now do it, certain other consequences would follow; but the idea is, that since they had been cut off in their sins, if Job would even now seek God with a proper spirit, he might be restored to prosperity, though his beginning should be small; Job 8:7.
And he have cast them away - Bildad supposes that they had been disowned by God, and had been put to death.
For their transgression - Margin, in the hand of their. The Hebrew is, by the hand of their transgression; i. e, their sin has been the cause of it, or it has been by the instrumentality of their sin. What foundation Bildad had for this opinion, derived from the life and character of the sons of Job, we have no means of ascertaining. The probability is, however, that he had learned in general that they had been cut off; and that, on the general principle which he maintained, that God deals with men in this life according to their character, he inferred that they must have been distinguished for wickedness. Men not unfrequently argue in this way when sudden calamity comes upon others.
5
Job 8:5
繁體中文
「你若殷勤地尋求神」——意即你若如今就這樣行。即使假定你的眾子已經如此喪亡,神已出來向你全家施行審判,你若轉而仰望神,便可能重新得蒙恩寵。譯作「殷勤尋求」的字(שׁחר shâchar)字面意思是清晨尋求、及早尋求;進而指以此為首先要作的事。這字出於意為曙光(שׁחר shachar)的字,與清晨初現的亮光有關,故引申為及早的尋求。這既可指在人生早期尋求祂,也可指以尋求祂為第一要務——在需要幫助時立刻仰望祂,在向任何人求助之先便先轉向祂;參 Proverbs 7:15;Proverbs 8:17;Proverbs 13:24;Job 24:5;Psalm 63:1;Psalm 78:34;Isaiah 26:9;Hosea 5:15;並參以利法在 Job 5:8 的勸勉。
英文原文
If thou wouldest seek unto God betimes - If thou wouldest do it now. If even on the supposition that your sons have thus perished, and that God has come out in judgment against your family, you would look to God, you might be restored to favor. The word rendered "seek betimes" (שׁחר shâchar) means literally to seek in the morning, to seek early; and then, to make it the first business. It is derived from the word meaning aurora (שׁחר shachar) and has reference to the early light of the morning, and hence, to an early seeking. It may be applied to seeking him in early life, or as the first thing - looking to him immediately when help is needed, or before we apply to anyone else; compare Proverbs 7:15; Proverbs 8:17; Proverbs 13:24; Job 24:5; Psalm 63:1; Psalm 78:34; Isaiah 26:9; Hosea 5:15; compare the advice of Eliphaz, Job 5:8.
6
Job 8:6
繁體中文
「你若清潔正直」——比勒達這整篇言論格外嚴厲苛刻。他先假定約伯的兒女是因不敬虔而被剪除,接着又視約伯本人並非純正正直的人為理所當然。他這個推論,一部分似乎出於約伯遭遇如此沉重災禍的事實,一部分出於約伯親口表達的看法。然而,先假定他是偽君子,再照着彷彿已成定論的假設來論證,再沒有比這更不公、更嚴苛的了。他不是提出約伯或許有過失的設想——那原不為過——而是照着彷彿毫無疑問的定論來論證。
「他必定為你起來」——祂必為你的緣故奮起、振作自己(יעיר yā‛ı̂r)。這意象是從睡眠或不活動中奮起,去幫助另一人;其意思是:神彷彿對約伯的災禍打了盹,或任憑它們臨到而沒有插手阻止;但約伯若純正,祂就必奮起,在他呼求救助時應允他。
「使你公義的居所興旺」——意思是:你的居所如今若成為公義,祂必使它興旺。照比勒達的意思,那居所向來是邪惡的居所:你的兒女行事邪惡,如今已被剪除;你本人既是惡人,所以遭受苦難。你如今若願成為純正、尋求神,神就必使你的居所興旺。對受苦的人而言,還有甚麼比這樣冷酷無情的暗諷更考驗忍耐呢?還有甚麼比安然坐着聽這些話,更能美妙地闡明真禮讓的本質呢?約伯正是藉着在這樣情境下的克制,格外顯明了他非凡的忍耐。
英文原文
If thou wert pure and upright - There is something especially severe and caustic in this whole speech of Bildad. He first assumes that the children of Job were cut off for impiety, and then takes it for granted that Job himself was not a pure and upright man. This inference he seems to have derived partly from the fact that he had been visited with so heavy calamities, and partly from the sentiments which Job had himself expressed. Nothing could be more unjust and severe, however, than to take it for granted that he was a hypocrite, and then proceed to argue as if that were a settled point. He does not make it a supposition that possibly Job might have erred - which would not have been improper; but he proceeds to argue as if it were a point about which there could be no hesitation.
He would awake for thee - He would arouse or excite himself יעיר yā‛ı̂r on thy account. The image is that of arousing oneself from sleep or inactivity to aid another; and the idea is, that God had, as it were, slumbered over the calamities of Job, or had suffered them to come without interposing to prevent them, but that he would arouse himself if Job were pure, and would call upon him for aid.
And make the habitation of thy righteousness prosperous - That is, if thy habitation should become righteous now, he would make it prosperous. Hitherto, is the idea of Bildad, it has been a habitation of wickedness. Thy children have been wicked, and are now cut off. Thou thyself hast been a wicked man, and in consequence art afflicted. If now thou wouldest become pure and seek unto God, then God would make thy habitation prosperous. What could more try the patience of a sufferer than such cold and unfeeling insinuations? And what could more beautifully illustrate the nature of true courtesy, than to sit unmoved and hear such remarks? It was by forbearance in such circumstances eminently that Job showed his extraordinary patience.
7
Job 8:7
繁體中文
「你起初雖然微小」——這是假定約伯的兒女已被剪除,那麼他如今的家眷便微少。然而比勒達說,他若重新開始人生——縱使只有這樣微小的家眷,又處於這樣困頓試煉的境況——他若是義人,仍可指望繁盛復返。
「終久必甚興旺」——由此可見,約伯此時並不被看作老年人。他仍有再活許多年的指望。然而也有人認為,這裏的意思是:他先前的繁盛,與他日後若純全正直所將享受的相比,便顯得微小;Noyes 與 Rosenmuller 便是如此解釋。但在我看來,前一種解釋才是正確的。比勒達表達的是一個普遍的道理:人初入人生時縱然家眷微少、財產無幾,但他若是正直人,就必蒙興旺,家業必大增;參 Job 42:12:「這樣,耶和華後來賜福給約伯比先前更多。」
英文原文
Though thy beginning was small - On the supposition that the children of Job had been cut off, his family now was small. Yet Bildad says, that if he were to begin life again, even with so small a family, and in such depressed and trying circumstances, if he were a righteous man he might hope for returning prosperity.
Yet thy latter end - From this, it is evident that Job was not now regarded as an old man. He would still have the prospect of living many years. Some have supposed, however that the meaning here is, that his former prosperity should appear small compared with that which he would hereafter enjoy if he were pure and righteous. So Noyes and Rosenmuller interpret it. But it seems to me that the former interpretation is the correct one. Bildad utters a general sentiment, that though when a man begins life he has a small family and little property, yet if he is an upright man, he will be prospered and his possessions will greatly increase; compare Job 42:12 : "Yahweh blessed the latter end of Job more than the beginning."
8
Job 8:8
繁體中文
「請你考問前代」——即留意觀察的成果。要問那些已過的世代,他們在詩歌與箴言中留下了自己經驗的記錄。比勒達要以這訴求證實的論點是:惡人雖一時興旺,終必被剪除;義人雖一時受苦,若尋求神,終必亨通。向古人作這樣的訴求是常有的事。觀察的成果記載於箴言、比喻、寓言與詩篇斷片之中;凡最能運用這些觀察成果的,便被視為最有智慧的人。比勒達所訴求的正是這個,尤其是訴諸他隨即引述的一段古詩——那大概是以任何語言流傳至今最古老的詩篇。
「追念」——要下功夫,或殷勤留意。
「他們列祖所查究的」——即已過的世代,不僅是剛過去的一代,還有他們的列祖。他要把遙遠年代觀察所得的成果引來,證實他所提出的主張。
英文原文
For inquire thee of the former age - That is, attend to the results of observation. Ask the generations which have passed, and who in their poems and proverbs have left the records of their experience. The sentiment which Bildad proposes to confirm by this appeal is, that though the wicked should for a time flourish, yet they would be cut off, and that the righteous, though they may be for a time afflicted, yet if they seek God, they will ultimately prosper. It was common to make these appeals to the ancients. The results of observation were embodied in proverbs, parables, fables, and fragments of poems; and he was regarded as among the wisest of men who had the fruits of these observations most at command. To that Bildad appeals, and especially, as would appear, to the fragment of an ancient poem which he proceeds to repeat, and which, perhaps, is the oldest poem extant in any language.
And prepare thyself - Make an effort, or give diligent attention to it.
To the search of their fathers - Of the bygone generations, not only to the age immediately past, but to their ancestors. He would bring the results of the observation of far distant ages to confirm the sentiment which he had advanced.
9
Job 8:9
繁體中文
「我們不過是昨日纔有的」——意即:我們壽命短促。與前人相比,我們觀察的機會寥寥。無疑,比勒達在此是指遠古世代的長壽,與他那時代人的壽數相比;因此這段經文對確定本詩的年代頗為重要。它表明在約伯的時代,人的壽命已縮短到相當有限的範圍,其長短已發生重大變化。這縮短始於洪水後不久,大概逐漸持續,直到如今七十歲的界限。這段經文證明約伯不可能活在人最長壽的時代;比較導論第三節。
「一無所知」——邊註作「無」。希伯來文字面正是「我們不知道」。其意是:「我們觀察的機會相對稀少。我們壽命既短,所見世事進程甚微。我們的列祖活得長久,更能準確判別人行為的結局。」在此可以提出一點意見,或許對解釋本書的論證進程相當重要。約伯的朋友堅稱:義人必在今生得賞,惡人必遭災禍追上。他們既如此極力主張,而照我們如今所見事態的實際進程,這說法的事實根據又如此薄弱,這似乎令人驚奇。但這豈不可以由比勒達在本節的話解釋嗎?他們訴諸他們的列祖。
他們倚仗古時經驗的成果。當人活到九百或一千歲、一代抵得上如今十二代之時,這樣的事實便遠比在今日人生秩序之下更可能發生。萬事有時間水落石出。在那漫長的歲月裏,惡人很可能被恥辱與災禍追上;義人則能活得比仇敵的毀謗中傷更久,在年老時得着德行豐厚的賞賜。如今的人若也活過同樣長的年日,實質上同樣的事也會發生。一個人的品格,凡被人記念的,不到一千年便完全定論;後代對義人與惡人各還公道。人若在那段年日中親自活着,而不僅僅被記念,同樣的事也會發生:品格必得公斷,世界大致會把人當得的尊榮歸給他。這事實也許曾在洪水前人們的長壽中被人觀察到;觀察的成果或許便記載於箴言、詩篇斷片與口傳成語之中,被亞拉伯的智者記錄為無可置疑的格言。他們帶着這些格言來與約伯爭辯;既忘了人生壽命縮短所必然帶來的變化,便毫不留情地把他們的格言套在約伯身上:他既被災禍淹沒,便斷定他必是個惡人。
「我們在世的日子好像影兒」——這類比較在聖經中十分常見;見 Job 7:6 的註釋。1 Chronicles 29:15 也有類似的比喻:
我們在你面前是客旅,
是寄居的,與我們列祖一樣。
我們在世的日子如影兒,
不能長存。
Aeschylus《Agamemnon》488 行(見 Drusius 與 Good 博士所引)也有類似的說法:
——εἴδωλον σκιάς eidōlon skias——
——影子的影像——
Pindar 也稱人為 σκιάς ὄναρ skias onar——影之夢;Sophocles 則稱人為 καπνοῦ σκιά kapnou skia——煙之影。這些說法意思相同:人生短暫易逝。比勒達用這話,不是泛指一般的人,而是指他那時代的人——因壽命短促,不配作長期廣泛的觀察。
英文原文
For we are but of yesterday - That is, we are of short life. We have had but few opportunities of observation compared with those who have gone before us. There can be no doubt that Bildad here refers to the longevity of the antecedent ages compared with the age of man at the time when he lived; and the passage, therefore, is of importance in order to fix the date of the poem. It shows that human life had been reduced in the time of Job within comparatively moderate limits, and that an important change had taken place in its duration. This reduction began not long after the flood, and was probably continued gradually until it reached the present limit of seventy years. This passage proves that Job could not have lived in the time of the greatest longevity of man; compare the Introduction, Section 3.
And know nothing - Margin, not. So the Hebrew literally, "we do not know." The sense is, "we have had comparatively few opportunities for observation. From the comparative brevity of our lives, we see but little of the course of events. Our fathers lived through longer periods, and could mark more accurately the result of human conduct." One suggestion may be made here, perhaps of considerable importance in explaining the course of argument in this book. The friends of Job maintained that the righteous would be rewarded in this life, and that the wicked would be overtaken by calamity. It may seem remarkable that they should have urged this so strenuously, when in the actual course of events as we now see them, there appears to be so slender a foundation for it in fact. But may this not be accounted for by the remark of Bildad in the verse under consideration? They appealed to their fathers.
They relied on the results of experience in those ancient times. When people lived 900 or 1,000 years; when one generation was longer than twelve generations are now, this fact would be much more likely to occur than as human life is now ordered. Things would have time to work themselves right. The wicked in that long tract of time would be likely to be overtaken by disgrace and calamity, and the righteous would outlive the detractions and calumnies of their enemies, and meet in their old age with the ample rewards of virtue. Should people now live through the same long period, the same thing substantially would occur. A man's character, who is remembered at all, is fully established long before a thousand years have elapsed, and posterity does justice to the righteous and the wicked. If people lived during that time instead of being merely remembered, the same thing would be likely to occur. Justice would be done to character, and the world would, in general, render to a man the honor which he deserved. This fact may have been observed in the long lives of the people before the flood, and the result of the observation may have been embodied in proverbs, fragments of poems, and in traditionary sayings, and have been recorded by the sages of Arabia as indubitable maxims. With these maxims they came to the controversy with Job, and forgetful of the change necessarily made by the abbreviation of human life, they proceed to apply their maxims without mercy to him; and because he was overwhelmed with calamity, they assumed that therefore he must have been a wicked man.
Our days upon earth are a shadow - Comparisons of this kind are quite common in the Scriptures; see the notes at Job 7:6. A similar figure occurs in 1 Chronicles 29:15 :
For we are strangers before thee,
And sojourners, as were all our fathers:
Our days upon earth are as a shadow,
Yea, there is no abiding.
An expression similar occurs in Aeschylus, Agam. v. 488, as quoted by Drusius and Dr. Good:
-
εἴδωλον σκιᾶς eidōlon skias -
-
The image or semblance of a shade -
So in Pindar, man is called σκιᾶς ὄναρ skias onar - the dream of a shade; and so by Sophocles, καπνοῦ σκιὰ kapnou skia - the shadow of smoke. All these mean the same thing, that the life of man is brief and transitory. Bildad designs to apply it not to man in general, but to the age in which he lived, as being disqualified by the shortness of life to make extended observations.
10
Job 8:10
繁體中文
「他們豈不指教你」——指教你人行為的結果,以及神治理世界的偉大原則。
「從心裏發出言語來」——Good 博士譯作:「湧出他們智慧的言語」,並以為這話的意思是:智慧的言語要從他們發出,如水從泉源冒出一般。但我以為這純粹是一種巧思。真正的意思是:他們所發的,不是單單出於口中的話,不是不加思索、先浮上心頭的話——如希臘人所說的 λέγειν πᾶν ὅ τι ἐπὶ στόμα ἔλθῃ;或如拉丁人所說的 Quicquid in buccam venerit loqui——口裏冒出甚麼就說甚麼;他們所發的,乃是出於心的話——是真誠的,是深思熟慮、長久反省的結果。或許比勒達也是暗指:約伯所發的,正是他心中最先浮現的話,沒有留時間給思考。
英文原文
Shall not they teach thee - The results of human conduct, and the great principles on which God governs the world.
And utter words out of their heart - Dr. Good renders this,
"And well forth the sayings of their wisdom,"
And supposes it means that the words of wisdom would proceed from them as water bubbles from a fountain. But this, I think, is a mere conceit. The true sense is, that they would not speak that merely which comes from the mouth, or that which comes upper most, and without reflection - as the Greeks say, λέγειν πᾶν ὅ τι ἐπὶ στόμα ἔλθῃ legein pan ho ti epi stoma elthē; or, as the Latins, Quicquid in buccam venerit loqui - to speak whatever comes in the mouth; but they would utter that which came from the heart - which was sincere, and the result of deep and prolonged reflection. Perhaps, also, Bildad means to insinuate that Job had uttered what was uppermost in his mind, without taking time for reflection.
11
Job 8:11
繁體中文
「蒲草」——這段經文極像一首從古代流傳下來的詩的斷片。比勒達引它作為古人觀點的例證,而且照上下文所暗示的,作為人壽未縮短之前那些人心意的標本。在世界早期,人慣於以格言、道德箴言與諺語,以警句和世代相傳的詩歌,傳遞各樣的知識;智慧大半在於這樣積存的格言與諺語的多少,正如今日的智慧大半在於我們對往昔教訓的認識,以及將這認識應用於人生各樣事務的能力。歷代的記載構成一座龐大的智慧寶庫;當代的人比前人更有智慧,只因前人觀察的成果被保存下來,我們可以倚靠他們的經驗行事,並且可以從他們停步之處開始,受他們經驗的教導,避免他們所犯的錯誤。此處譯作「蒲草」的字 גמא gôme' 本指蒲草,尤指埃及的紙莎草——papyrus Nilotica;見 Isaiah 18:2 的註釋。它出自動詞 גמא gâmâ'——吸收、吸盡;這名稱歸於這植物,是因它吸收或吸盡水分。埃及人用它製造衣服、鞋、籃,尤其用來造小船或小艇;普林尼(Pliny),Nat. His. 13. 21-26;見 Isaiah 18:2 的註釋。他們也從它取得書寫的材料——我們的「紙」一詞即由此而來。七十士譯本在此譯作 πάπυρος papuros。
「無泥」——即無水分。它生長於尼羅河沿岸的沼澤地帶。
「蘆荻」——另一種性質相似的植物。格塞尼烏斯說,אחוּ 'âchû(蘆荻)一字是埃及字,意為沼草、蘆葦、蒲草、薹草,即一切生長於潮濕之地的植物。這字不僅被採入希伯來文,也被採入亞歷山大的希臘語,在那裏寫作 ἄχι achi, ἄχει achei。耶柔米(Jerome)論到它說:「當我向有學問的人請教這字的意思時,我從埃及人那裏聽說,在他們的語言中,這名稱包括一切生於池中之物。」這字與蒲草同義,指一種吸收大量水分的植物。這比喻所要表達的確切觀念,並不十分清楚。我想整個描述大概意在描繪偽君子,其意義是:他在生長上與這種蒲草或蘆葦有極大的相似。他的敬虔裏沒有堅實或扎實之物;它如同水草柔軟多孔的質地,在試煉之下必枯萎,正如紙莎草被奪去水分時一樣。
英文原文
Can the rush - This passage has all the appearance of being a fragment of a poem handed down from ancient times. It is adduced by Bildad as an example of the views of the ancients, and, as the connection would seem to imply, as a specimen of the sentiments of those who lived before the life of man had been abridged. It was customary in the early ages of the world to communicate knowledge of all kinds by maxims, moral sayings, and proverbs; by apothegms and by poetry handed down from generation to generation. Wisdom consisted much in the amount of maxims and proverbs which were thus treasured up; as it now consists much in the knowledge which we have of the lessons taught by the past, and in the ability to apply that knowledge to the various transactions of life. The records of past ages constitute a vast storehouse of wisdom, and the present generation is more wise than those which have gone before, only because the results of their observations have been treasured up, and we can act on their experience, and because we can begin where they left off, and, taught by their experience, can avoid the mistakes which they made. The word "rush" here גמא gôme' denotes properly a bulrush, and especially the Egyptian papyrus - papyrus Nilotica; see the notes at Isaiah 18:2. It is derived from the verb גמא gâmâ', to absorb, to drink up, and is given to this plant because it absorbs or drinks up moisture. The Egyptians used it to make garments, shoes, baskets, and especially boats or skiffs; Pithy, Nat. His. 13. 21-26; see the notes at Isaiah 18:2. They also derived from it materials for writing - and hence, our word paper. The Septuagint renders it here, πάπυρος papuros.
Without mire - Without moisture. It grew in the marshy places along the Nile.
Can the flag - Another plant of a similar character. The word אחוּ 'âchû, flag, says Gesenius, is an Egyptian word, signifying marsh-grass, reeds, bulrushes, sedge, everything which grows in wet grounds. The word was adopted not only into the Hebrew, but also into the Greek idiom of Alexandria, where it is written, ἄχι achi, ἄχει achei. Jerome says of it, "When I inquired of the learned what this word meant, I heard from the Egyptians, that by this name everything was intended in their language which grew up in a pool." The word is synonymous with rush, or bulrush, and denotes a plant which absorbs a great quantity of water. What is the exact idea which this figure is designed to convey, is not very clear. I think it probable that the whole description is intended to represent a hypocrite, and that the meaning is, that he had in his growth a strong resemblance to such a rush or reed. There was nothing solid or substantial in his piety. It was like the soft, spongy texture of the water-reed, and would wilt under trial, as the papyrus would when deprived of water.
12
Job 8:12
繁體中文
青綠的時候——即當它看似繁茂之時。
還沒有割下——即使未曾割下。若任它獨自存留,若無人攪擾,它也必枯萎。這話的應用明顯而美妙。這類植物沒有自持之力。它們倚賴水分維生。水分一旦斷絕,它們便枯萎死亡。昌盛的罪人與偽善者也是如此。他的敬虔與真實的敬虔相比,就如紙草鬆軟的組織與堅實的橡木相比。他在自稱的宗教上,靠外在的昌盛支撐,如同蘆葦靠水分滋養;他的昌盛一旦撤去,他的宗教便如無水的菖蒲一般枯萎凋零。
英文原文
Whilst it is yet in his greenness - That is, while it seems to be in its vigor.
And is not cut down - Even when it is not cut down. If suffered to stand by itself, and if undisturbed, it will wither away. The application of this is obvious and beautiful. Such plants have no self sustaining power. They are dependent on moisture for their support. If that is withheld, they droop and die. So with the prosperous sinner and the hypocrite. His piety, compared with that which is genuine, is like the spongy texture of the paper-reed compared with the solid oak. He is sustained in his professed religion by outward prosperity, as the rush is nourished by moisture; and the moment his prosperity is withdrawn, his religion droops and dies like the flag without water.
13
Job 8:13
繁體中文
凡忘記神的人,景況也是這樣——這顯然是引自古人言論之引文的一部分。此處的「道路」指行徑、行為、作為。忘記神的人好像紙草:看似繁茂,卻無一物堅實穩固。紙草速速枯乾,蒲草比百草先枯萎;惡人也是如此,儘管外表興旺。
不虔敬人的指望要滅沒——這重要的命題,看來在世上最早的時期便已為人知。倘若上文所作的假定不錯——即這是一首從遠古傳下的詩篇的斷片——那麼它大概在洪水以前便已為人所知。這節經文不需特別的文獻學解釋,卻極其重要。我們可就它留意以下幾點:
(1)在那世界尚早的時代,已有假冒為善的人。他們不專屬於任何時代、國家、宗派或職業。宗教中有假冒為善的——政治、商業、友誼和道德中也有。有虛假的朋友、虛假的愛國者、虛假的美德愛好者,他們的心虛偽而空洞,正如有宗教的假朋友一樣。哪裏有真幣,那裏便可能有人偽造;而偽造的事實,總是對錢幣內在價值的一種致敬——誰肯費力偽造毫無價值之物呢?教會中有假冒為善的人,這一事實正是對宗教之卓越的非自願的致敬。
(2)假冒為善的人有永生的指望。這指望建基於各樣的事上:或建於自己的道德;或建於指望自己能施行欺騙;或建於對神的性情與計劃某種全然錯謬、毫無根據的見解。或若把「假冒為善者」一詞取更廣的意義,指一切假稱有宗教而實無的人,這指望或建於他曾經歷、卻誤認為宗教的某種情感變化;或建於他以為自己見過十字架或救贖主的某個異象;或僅僅建於蒙醒悟的罪人所感受之恐懼的平息,以及隨之而來的相對平安。恐懼的止息本身就產生一種平安——如海洋在暴風後平靜而美麗——無論其原因何在,是真正的宗教還是別的緣故。許多罪人無論以何種方式失去了對罪的知覺,便把隨之而來的暫時平靜誤作真宗教,懷抱了假冒為善者的指望。
(3)那指望必滅沒。這可以多種方式發生。
(a)它可能在不知不覺間消逝,任憑那人只作宗教的掛名者——一個既無安慰、無用處、也無平安的形式主義者。
(b)它可能在神試煉靈魂的某場災禍中被奪去,那時他便看見自己沒有可支持他的宗教。
(c)它可能在福音傳講之下發生,那時假冒為善者或被說服,看出自己沒有生命的敬虔,對神也沒有真實的愛。
(d)它可能在臨終的床上——當神來收取靈魂,審判臺顯在眼前之時。
(e)或是在神的審判臺前。那時假冒為善者的指望必被滅絕。那時必顯明他並無真宗教,他必被交與那至可畏的結局——他在最莊嚴的境況中活着行騙,裝出那有最充分理由相信自己從未擁有之物的外表。啊!每一個承認宗教的人省察自己,好知道他天堂之指望的根基為何,這是何等要緊!
英文原文
So are the paths of all that forget God - This is clearly a part of the quotation from the sayings of the ancients. The word "paths" here means ways, acts, doings. They who forget God are like the paper-reed. They seem to flourish, but they have nothing that is firm and substantial. As the paper-reed soon dies, as the flag withers away before any other herb, so it will be with the wicked, though apparently prosperous.
And the hypocrite's hope shall perish - This important sentiment, it seems, was known in the earliest periods of the world; and if the supposition above be correct, that this is a fragment of a poem which had come down from far distant times, it was probably known before the flood. The passage requires no particular philological explanation, but it is exceedingly important. We may remark on it,
(1) That there were hypocrites even in that early age of the world. They are confined to no period, or country, or religious denomination, or profession. There are hypocrites in religion - and so there are in politics, and in business, and in friendship, and in morals. There arc pretended friends, and pretended patriots, and pretended lovers of virtue, whose hearts are false and hol ow, just as there are pretended friends of religion. Wherever there is genuine coin, it will be likely to be counterfeited; and the fact of a counterfeit is always a tribute to the intrinsic worth of the coin - for who would be at the pains to counterfeit that which is worthless? The fact that there are hypocrites in the church, is an involuntary tribute to the excellency of religion.
(2) The hypocrite has a hope of eternal life. This hope is founded on various things. It may be on his own morality; it may be on the expectation that he will be able to practice a deception; it may be on some wholly false and unfounded view of the character and plans of God. Or taking the word "hypocrite" in a larger sense to denote anyone who pretends to religion and who has none, this hope may be founded on some change of feeling which he has had, and which he mistook for religion; on some supposed vision which he had of the cross or of the Redeemer, or on the mere subsiding of the alarm which an awakened sinner experiences, and the comparative peace consequent on that. The mere cessation of fear produces a kind of peace - as the ocean is calm and beautiful after a storm - no matter what may be the cause, whether it be true religion or any other cause. Many a sinner, who has lost his convictions for sin in any way, mistakes the temporary calm which succeeds for true religion, and embraces the hope of the hypocrite.
(3) That hope will perish. This may occur in various ways.
(a) It may die away insensibly, and leave the man to be a mere professor of religion - a formalist, without comfort, usefulness, or peace.
(b) It may be taken away in some calamity by which God tries the soul, and where the man will see that he has no religion to sustain him.
(c) It may occur under the preaching of the gospel, when the hypocrite may be convinced that he is destitute of vital piety, and has no true love to God.
(d) It may be on a bed of death - when God comes to take away the soul, and when the judgment-seat appears in view.
(e) Or it will be at the bar of God. Then the hope of the hypocrite will certainly be destroyed. Then it will be seen that he had no true religion, and then he will be consigned to the awful doom of him who in the most solemn circumstances lived to deceive, and who assumed the appearance of that which he had the strongest reason to believe he never possessed. Oh! how important it is for every professor of religion to examine himself, that he may know what is the foundation of his hope of heaven!
14
Job 8:14
繁體中文
「看哪,主不信靠他的僕人, 並且指他的使者為愚昧; 何況那住在土房中、 根基在塵土裏、 被蛀蟲所毀壞的人呢!」(Job 4:18-19)
「他建造房屋如蟲做窩, 又如守望者所搭的棚。」(Job 27:18)
- 至於爬蟲,書中提到毒蛇與蝮蛇:
「他必吸飲虺蛇的毒氣; 蝮蛇的舌頭也必殺他。」(Job 20:16)
- 本書提到的鳥類繁多得多。以下所列的,幾乎都是因牠們的習性曾被仔細觀察而提及的。
鷹:
「礦中的路,鷙鳥不得知道; 鷹眼也未見過。」(Job 28:7)
烏鴉:
「誰為烏鴉預備食物呢? 當牠的雛鳥向神哀叫、 因無食物東飛西飛的時候?」(Job 38:41)
鸛鳥與鴕鳥:
「歡呼之鳥的翅膀歡然扇展! 那是鸛鳥的翅膀與羽毛嗎? 因為牠把蛋留在地上, 在塵土中使得溫暖; 牠想不到蛋會被踹碎, 或被野獸踐碎。 牠忍心待雛,似乎不是自己的; 雖然徒受勞苦,也不為雛懼怕; 因為神使牠忘記智慧, 也沒有賜牠聰明。 牠幾時挺身展開翅膀, 就嗤笑馬和騎馬的人。」
Job 8:14「他的希望要剪除」——舒爾滕斯認為,引自古人的引文到 Job 8:13 為止,以下是比勒達對所引經文的評註。羅森米勒和諾伊斯則認為引文延續到 Job 8:19 末;古德博士認為到 Job 8:13 為止。在筆者看來,引文比 Job 8:13 更長,大概應視為延續到 Job 8:18 末。本節開頭的譯法極為紛紜。古德博士說,這句話從未被人明白,並提議譯作「這樣,他的倚靠必要朽壞」。諾伊斯譯作「他的期待必歸於無有」;Gesenius 譯作「必被剪除」。耶柔米譯作 Non ei placebit vecordia sua——「他的狂亂必不能使他喜悅」。七十士譯本譯作「他的房屋必無人居住,他的帳棚必如蜘蛛網一樣消逝」。
譯作「剪除」的希伯來詞(יקט yāqōṭ)出於 קוט kūṭ,通常意為厭惡、作嘔、可憎。Gesenius認為,這詞在此與阿拉伯語的「被剪除」同義。但這意義不見於希伯來文其他地方,這是否就是此片語的真義,令人懷疑。在希伯來文中,這詞大概總帶有厭惡、可憎、可厭、令人作嘔的觀念;見 Psalm 95:10,「我厭煩」;Job 10:1,「厭煩」;Ezekiel 6:9,「必厭惡」;又 Ezekiel 20:43;Ezekiel 36:31;Ezekiel 16:47,「令人厭煩或作嘔的東西」。泰勒(Taylor,語詞索引)在此譯作「他的希望必厭惡或憎嫌——就是必厭惡或恨惡自己所指望之事的人」。筆者毫不懷疑,這裏的意思是:成為可厭、可憎、令人作嘔的;正確的意義是「他的希望必要朽壞」。這比喻延續自蒲草與荻的圖像——它們不久便朽壞;其觀念是:正如這些雜草在死水中變得可憎腐臭,偽善者的希望也必如此。
「他所倚靠的」——他的信靠,或他的期待。
「是蜘蛛網」——邊註作「房屋」。希伯來文是 בית bayith。蜘蛛的房屋就是牠所結的網——一種脆弱、輕飄、纖細的東西,幾乎承受不住什麼。風一吹就搖動,輕輕一拂便被除去。偽善者的希望也必如此。
英文原文
Behold, in his servants he putteth no confidence,
And his angels he chargeth with frailty;
How much more true is this of those who dwell in houses of clay,
Whose foundation is in the dust;
They are crushed before the moth-worm! Job 4:18-19.
He buildeth his house like the moth,
Or like a shed which the watchman maketh. Job 27:18.
- Of reptiles, we find the asp and the viper mentioned:
He shall suck the poison of asps;
The viper's tongue shall destroy him. Job 20:16.
- The birds or fowls that are mentioned in this book, are much more numerous. They are the following, nearly all so mentioned as their habits had been the subject of careful observation.
The vulture:
The path thereto no bird knoweth,
And the vulture's eye hath not seen it. Job 28:7.
The raven:
Who provideth for the raven his food,
When his young ones cry unto God,
And wander for lack of food? Job 38:41.
The stork and the ostrich:
A wing of exuiting fowls moves joyfully!
Is it the wing and plumage of the stork?
For she leaveth her eggs upon the ground,
And upon the dust she warmeth them,
And forgetteth that her foot may crush them,
And that the wild beast may break them.
She is hardened toward her young, as it they were not hers;
In vain is her travail, and without solicitude;
Because God hath withheld wisdom from her,
And hath not imparted to her understanding.
In the time when she raiseth herself up on high,
She laugheth at the horse and his rider.
Job 8:14Whose hope shall be cut off - Schultens supposes that the quotation from the ancients closes with Job 8:13, and that these are the comments of Bildad on the passage to which he had referred. Rosenmuller and Noyes continue the quotation to the close of Job 8:19; Dr. Good closes it at Job 8:13. It seems to me that it is extended further than Job 8:13, and probably it is to be regarded as continued to the close of Job 8:18. The beginning of this verse has been very variously rendered. Dr. Good says that it has never been understood, and proposes to translate it, "thus shall his support rot away." Noyes renders it, "whose expectation shall come to naught;" Gesenius, "shall be cut off." Jerome, Non ei placebit vecordia sua. "his madness (do age, rage, or frenzy) shall not please him?" The Septuagint, "his house shall be uninhabitable, and his tent shall pass away as the spider."
The Hebrew word translated "cut off" (יקט yāqôṭ) is from קוט kūṭ, usually meaning to loathe, to nauseate, to be offensive. Gesenius supposes that the word here is synonymous with the Arabic "to be cut off." But this sense does not occur elsewhere in the Hebrew, and it is doubtful whether this is the true sense of the phrase. In the Hebrew word there is probably always the idea of loathing, of being offensive, irksome, or disgusting; see Psalm 95:10, I was grieved; Job 10:1, is weary; Ezekiel 6:9, shall loathe; so Ezekiel 20:43; Ezekiel 36:31; Ezekiel 16:47, a tiresome, or disgusting object. Taylor (Concord) renders it here, "Whom his hope shall loathe or abominate, that is, who shall loathe or hate the thing that he hopes for." I have no doubt that the meaning here is, to be loathsome, offensive, or nauseous, and the correct sense is, "whose hope shall rot." The figure is continued from the image of the paper-reed and the flag, which soon decay; and the idea is, that as such weeds grow offensive and putrid in the stagnant water, so shall it be with the hope of the hypocrite.
And whose trust - Whose confidence, or expectation.
A spider's web - Margin, "house." So the Hebrew בית bayı̂th. The spider's house is the web which it forms, a frail, light, tenuous substance which will sustain almost nothing. The wind shakes it, and it is easily brushed away. So it will be with the hope of the hypocrite.
15
Job 8:15
繁體中文
他要倚靠房屋 - 這是暗指蜘蛛的網或巢。偽善者的盼望被稱為他為自己所建造的房屋——他的居所、他的避難所、他的倚靠。但它必使他失望。在試煉之時,他要倚靠它求支撐,它卻必顯出如蛛網一般脆弱。蜘蛛所吐出的輕細之絲,在危險之時對人的支撐能有多大用處呢!偽善者的盼望也必照樣脆弱而無實!難以想出還有甚麼形像,能比這更有力地描繪惡人之盼望的全然虛妄。《古蘭經》第 28 章 40 節也有類似的比較:「在神以外為自己另立保護者的人,如同蜘蛛營造自己的房屋;因為蜘蛛的房屋是最脆弱的。」
他要抓住房屋 - 或作:他抓住它以支撐自己,表明偽善者抓住自己盼望時的急切。這比喻仍取自蜘蛛,是細心觀察這種昆蟲習性的一個實例。其觀念是:當狂風或暴風颳起時,蜘蛛便抓住自己纖細的網以支撐自己。但那是不夠的。風把一切席捲而去。災難的暴風也照樣把偽善者席捲而去,儘管他抓住自己的盼望,想像蜘蛛在自己所吐的輕細之絲中尋求安全那樣,要在那盼望中求取安全。
英文原文
He shall lean upon his house - This is an allusion to the web or house of the spider. The hope of the hypocrite is called the house which he has built for himself; his home, his refuge, his support. But it shall fail him. In times of trial he will trust to it for support, and it will be found to be as frail as the web of the spider. How little the light and slender thread which a spider spins would avail a man for support in time of danger! So frail and unsubstantial will be the hope of the hypocrite! It is impossible to conceive any figure which would more strongly describe the utter vanity of the hopes of the wicked. A similar comparison occurs in the Koran, Sur. 28, 40: "They who assume any other patrons to themselves besides God, are like the spider building his house; for the house of the spider is most feeble."
He shall hold it fast - Or, he shall lay hold on it to sustain him, denoting the avidity with which the hypocrite seizes upon his hope. The figure is still taken from the spider, and is an instance of a careful observation of the habits of that insect. The idea is, that the spider, when a high wind or a tempest blows, seizes upon its slender web to sustain itself. But it is insufficient. The wind sweeps all away. So the tempest of calamity sweeps away the hypocrite, though he grasps at his hope, and would seek security in that, as a spider does in the light and tenuous thread which it has spun.
16
Job 8:16
繁體中文
他在日光之前發青 —— 武加大譯本作「在日頭來到之前」。迦勒底語譯本亦作「日頭升起之前」。Eichhorn 也這樣翻譯。按這看法——這大概是正確的解釋——本節的意思是:他在日頭升起之前青翠繁茂,卻受不了日頭的炎熱而枯乾。這裏引入了一個新的例證,目的是把偽善者比作一株迅速長大、枝條遠伸的茂盛植物,卻沒有深的根,當烈日的酷熱臨到,便枯萎了。這比較不是與能忍受日熱的樹木相比,而是與那些葉多枝繁、如瓜蔓或葡萄藤之類多汁的植物相比;它們經不起乾旱,也受不了烈日的炙烤。《圖解聖經》的編者(在 Psalm 37:35 的註釋中)說:「把人生希望與繁榮的短暫,比作那摧毀森林與花園榮華的驟然凋萎,這比較既如此優美又如此自然,歷代詩人都曾採用。」莎士比亞的作品中,便有一個這樣精雕細琢的比較:
這就是人的境況!今天他吐出 希望的嫩葉;明天開花, 又聽見緋紅的榮譽密密披掛在身: 第三天來了一場霜,一場殺人的霜, 正當他這善良安逸的人滿以為 自己的偉大正待成熟,便掐斷他的嫩枝, 於是他倒下,如同我一樣。
他的枝條發旺 —— 聖經中常把興盛的人或國家,比作這樣蔓延伸展的葡萄樹。見 Psalm 80:11:
「他發出枝子,長到大海; 發出蔓子,延到大河。」
比較 Isaiah 16:8 的註釋。類似的比喻見於 Psalm 37:35:
「我見過惡人大有勢力, 好像一棵青翠樹在本土生發。」
英文原文
He is green before the sun - Vulgate, "antequam veniat sol - before the sun comes." So the Chaldee, "before the rising of the sun." So Eichhorn renders it. According to this, which is probably the true interpretation, the passage means that he is green and flourishing before the sun rises, but that he cannot hear its heat and withers away. A new illustration is here introduced, and the object is to compare the hypocrite with a vigorous plant that grows up quick and sends its branches afar, but which has no depth of root, and which, when the intense heat of the sun comes upon it, withers away. The comparison is not with a tree, which would bear the heat of the sun, but rather with those succulent plants which have a large growth of leaves and branches, like a gourd or vine, but which will not bear a drought or endure the intense heat of the sun. "This comparison of the transitory nature of human hope and prosperity to the sudden blight which over throws the glory of the forest and of the garden," says the Editor of the Pictorial Bible (on Psalm 37:35), "is at once so beautiful and so natural, as to have been employed by poets of every age." One such comparison of exquisite finish occurs in Shakespeare:
This is the state of man! Today he puts forth
The tender leaves of hope; tomorrow blossoms,
And hears his blushing honours thick upon him:
The third day comes a frost, a killing frost,
And, when he thinks, good easy man, full surely
His greatness is a ripening, nips his shoot,
And then he falls, as Ido.
And his branch shooteth forth ... - A comparison of a prosperous person or nation with a vine which spreads in this manner, is common in the Scriptures. See Psalm 80:11 :
She sent out her boughs unto the sea,
And her branches unto the river.
Compare the note at Isaiah 16:8. A similar figure occurs in Psalm 37:35 :
I have seen the wicked in great power,
And spreading himself like a green bay tree.
17
Job 8:17
繁體中文
「他的根盤繞石堆」——這節經文的解釋,歷來眾說紛紜。耶柔米譯作「他的根密密盤繞在石堆之上」。Walton 作「super fontem——在泉源之上」。七十士譯本作「他躺臥(或睡,κοιμᾶται koimatai)在石堆之上;他活在燧石之中」。有人認為譯作「石堆」的字 גל gal 意為泉源;有人認為意為一堆或一垛石頭;Good 博士則認為意為岩石。照前一種看法,這是指假冒為善者或罪人興旺的境況,意即他像一棵把根伸到泉旁、靠泉滋養的樹。照另一些人的看法,這裏所指的事實是:假冒為善者像一棵沒有深土供根生長的植物,把根纏繞在甚麼東西上——甚至一堆石頭上——以支撐自己;結果在烈日之下很快枯萎。譯作「石堆」的字 גל gal,意為以下二者之一:
(一)一堆,如一堆石頭,出於 גלל gâlal——滾動,如滾石之類。它可以指一堆石頭(Joshua 7:26),但通常指城牆與城邑的廢墟(Jeremiah 9:11;Jeremiah 51:37;Isaiah 25:2)。它又意為
(二)泉源或泉,因水滾湧上騰而得名(Sol 4:12);進而指翻滾的波浪或巨濤(Psalm 42:7;Psalm 89:9;Psalm 107:25, Psalm 107:29)。單是平行體便要求此處採用其通常的意義;真正的意思是:興旺的惡人或假冒為善者,像一株立在岩石、碎石或古舊廢墟中的植物,而不像立於沃土、可深扎根的樹。這裏所指的事實是:生於石上或石間的樹木或植物,會把根遠伸以取養分,或把根纏繞岩石的突出處以求支撐。樹立於石上時,人人都觀察過這現象;而《Silliman's Journal》1840年1月號的下面摘錄,更充分說明此處所指的事實。
「約十五年前,在一塊直徑約十至十二英尺的巨大石灰岩漂礫頂上,發現一棵小樹生長着。那石頭僅淺淺埋在土中,幾個側面高出地面四至六英尺;但岩石頂部裂縫縱橫、粗糙不平,其一側向土面斜降的表面上覆着一層薄薄的腐植土。樹便從這層土中長出,把根插入岩石的裂縫,成功地長到約十二至十五英尺高。但約在此時,一側的根從附着處鬆脫,樹便漸漸向對側傾倒,直到樹身與地面平行。對側的根抓得更牢,供給了足以維持這植物的養分,卻不能單靠它保持樹的直立。在這情形下,那樹彷彿『意識到自己的需要』,採用了(若可用這說法)一種巧妙的方法,以恢復原先直立的姿勢。一條最壯健的鬆脫之根,從側面發出一枝;那枝繞過岩石的一處凸出部分,再與主幹結合,這樣便在凸出部周圍形成一個完整的環,使這根得到不能動搖的固着點。
「這樹隨即開始從彎曲的姿勢中恢復。它順着一切植物向上生長的天性,並得着這條根——它以非常的活力增長——的支撐,幾年之間便完全恢復了直立的姿勢;凡見過它的,都不能懷疑它是靠這條形成如此奇特附着的根給撐起來的。然而這棵奇樹所顯的能力還不止於此。
「直立之後,它茂盛地生長了多年。它的一些根沿着岩石的斜面追到土中,埋進下面的土壤裏;另一些根嵌進岩石的溝槽,把那些裂縫完全填滿了植物質。樹繼續生長,邊材與韌皮之間每年沉積一圈圈的同心植物質層;終於,單憑植物生長的力量,岩石從頂到底裂成近乎相等的三塊,不久便見根的分支穿過裂縫,向下伸入下面的土中。數月前我們去為這樹作畫時,發現它已高達五十英尺,基部圍長四英尺半。」
這個形象表明,這篇優美片段的作者是自然界的細心觀察者;這比喻也極其貼切而有力。對假冒為善者,還能有比這更美的描畫嗎?他的根不扎入土中;他的敬虔不是栽於沃壤,而是長在未重生之人心的堅硬岩石上。然而他把根遠伸;一時之間似乎茂盛;從遙遠之物吸取養分;攀住巖角或突出的岩石、或任何東西以求支撐——直到一場暴風把它掃落,永不再起!毫無疑問,比勒達的想法正是:約伯就是這樣的人。
「他扎入石地」——七十士譯本作「他活在燧石之中」,這譯法並非不當,也是對假冒為善者十分生動的描寫。Castellio 也譯作「existit inter lapides」(立於石間)。它惟一的養分,來自它所立足的多石之地貧瘠的薄土,或來自岩石的裂縫。
英文原文
His roots are wrapped about the heap - There has been great diversity of opinion in the interpretation of this passage. Jerome renders it, "over the heap of stones his roots are condensed." Walton, "super fontem - over a fountain." The Septuagint, "he lies down (or sleeps, κοιμᾶται koimatai) on a heap of stones; and he lives in the midst of flint-stones." According to some, the word rendered heap גל gal means a fountain; according to others, it means a heap or pile of stones; according to Dr. Good, it means a rock. According to the view of the former, it refers to the flourishing condition of a hypocrite or sinner, and means that he is like a tree that sends its roots by a fountain, and is nourished by it. According to others, the reference is to the fact that the hypocrite is like a plant that has no depth of earth for its roots, that wraps its rooks around anything, even a heap of stones, to support itself; and that consequently will soon wither under the intense heat of the sun. The word גל gal, rendered "heap," means either
(1.) A heap, as a heap of stones, from גלל gâlal - to roll, as e. g. stones. It may denote a heap of stones, Joshua 7:26, but it commonly refers to the ruins of walls and cities, Jeremiah 9:11; Jeremiah 51:37; Isaiah 25:2. It means
(2.) A fountain or spring, so called from the rolling or welling up of the waters, Sol 4:12, and hence, rolling waves or billows, Psalm 42:7; Psalm 89:9; Psalm 107:25, Psalm 107:29. The parallelism, if nothing else, demands that the usual signification should be given to it here; and the true sense is, that the prosperous wicked man or the hypocrite is like a plant which stands in the midst of rocks, rubbish, or old ruins, and not like one that stands in a fertile soil where it may strike its roots deep. The reference is to the fact that a tree or plant which springs up on a rock, or in the midst of rocks, will send its roots afar for nutriment, or will wrap them around the projecting points of rocks in order to obtain support. All have observed this in trees standing on rocks; but the following extract from Sillinian's Journal for January, 1840, wil illustrate the fact referred to here more fully.
"About fifteen years ago, upon the top of an immense boulder of limestone, some ten or twelve feet in diameter, a sapling was found growing. The stone was but slightly imbedded in the earth; several of its sides were raised from four to six feet above its surface; but the top of the rock was rough with crevices, and its surface, which was sloping off, on one side, to the earth, was covered with a thin mould. From this mould the tree had sprung up, and having thrust its roots into the crevices of the rock, it had succeeded in reaching the height of some twelve or fifteen feet. But about this period the roots on one side became loosened from their attachment, and the tree gradually declined to the opposite side, until its body was in a parallel line with the earth. The roots on the opposite side, having obtained a firmer hold, afforded sufficient nourishment to sustain the plant; although they could not, alone, retain it in its vertical position. In this condition of things, the tree as if 'conscious of its needs, ' adopted (if the term may be used) an ingenious process, in order to regain its former upright position. One of the most vigorous of the detached roots sent out a branch from its side, which, passing round a projection of the rock, again united with the parent stalk, and thus formed a perfect loop around this projection, which gave to the root an immovable attachment.
"The tree now began to recover from its bent position. Obeying the natural tendency of all plants to grow erect, and sustained by this root, which increased with unwonted vigor, in a few years it had entirely regained its vertical position, elevated, as no one could doubt who saw it, by the aid of the root which had formed this singular attachment. But this was not the only power exhibited by this remarkable tree.
"After its elevation it flourished vigorously for several years. Some of its roots had traced the sloping side of the rock to the earth, and were buried in the soil below. Others, having embedded themselves in its furrows, had completely filled these crevices with vegetable matter. The tree still continuing to grow, concentric layers of vegetable matter were annually deposited between the alburnum and liber, until by the force of vegetable growth alone, the rock was split from the top to the bottom, into three nearly equal divisions, and branches of the roots were soon found, extending down, through the divisions into the earth below. On visiting the tree a few months since, to take a drawing of it, we found that it had attained an altitude of fifty feet, and was four and a half feet in circumference at its base."
The image here shows that the author of this beautiful fragment was a careful observer of nature, and the comparison is exceedingly pertinent and striking. What more beautiful illustration of a hypocrite can there be? His roots do not strike into the earth. His piety is not planted in a rich soil. It is on the hard rock of the unconverted human heart. Yet it sends out its roots afar; seems to flourish for a time; draws nutriment from remote objects; clings to a crag or a projecting rock, or to anything for support - until a tempest sweeps it down to rise no more! No doubt the idea of Bildad was, that Job was just such a man.
Seeth the place of stones - Septuagint, "and lives in the midst of flints," not an unapt rendering - and a very striking description of a hypocrite. So Castellio, "existit inter lapides." Its only nutriment is derived from the scanty earth in the stony soil on which it stands, or in the crevices of the rocks.
18
Job 8:18
繁體中文
他若從本處被拔出——這裡譯作「若」的小品詞(אם 'ı̂m)常用以表示強調,在此意為「確實」——「他必被毀滅」。譯作「毀滅」的詞出自 בלע bela‛,字面意思是吞下(Job 7:19)、吞滅、吸收;引申為消耗、荒廢、毀滅。其大意是:惡人或偽善者必從他的本處全然被毀;但樹的意象或比喻仍然保留。有人認為這是說神要將他從本處毀滅;另一些人,如 Rosenmuller 和古德博士(Dr. Good),則認為所指的乃是樹所栽種的土壤——土壤會把一切養分完全吸盡,任憑樹枯死;也就是說,樹所植立的乾旱焦渴之土,非但不供給養分,反倒像「吸根」一般,把本可滋養樹木的汁液盡都吸去。在我看來,這很可能是正確的解釋。這是取自自然的解釋,也是保全本段勻稱之美的解釋。
那地必不承認他——就是那土壤、那地土,或它曾立於其上之處。這是以樹的形像描繪惡人。這比喻十分優美:大地要以它為恥——羞於曾扶持這樹,羞於曾供給它任何養分,並且拒絕承認它。偽善者也是如此。他必要逝去,彷彿大地拒絕承認他,不願留下對他的任何記憶。
我沒有見過你——即「我從不認識你」。那地必全然否認與它有任何相識。這裡與救主說祂在審判的日子論到偽善者時所用的話,有驚人的相似之處:「那時我必明明地告訴他們說:我從來不認識你們」(Matthew 7:23)。偽善者從未曾被人認作敬虔之人。大地要拒絕承認他是這樣的人,諸天也是如此。
英文原文
If he destroy him from his place - The particle here which is rendered "if (אם 'ı̂m) is often used to denote emphasis, and means here "certainly" - "he shall be certainly destroyed." The word rendered destroy, from בלע bela‛, means literally to swallow Job 7:19, to swallow up, to absorb; and hence, to consume, lay waste, destroy. The sense is, that the wicked or the hypocrite shall be wholly destroyed from his place, but the image or figure of the tree is still retained. Some suppose that it means that God would destroy him from his place; others, as Rosenmuller and Dr. Good, suppose that the reference is to the soil in which the tree was planted, that it would completely absorb all nutriment, and leave the tree to die; that is, that the dry and thirsty soil in which the tree is planted, instead of affording nutriment, acts as a "sucker," and absorbs itself all the juices which would otherwise give support to the tree. This seems to me to be probably the true interpretation. It is one drawn from nature, and one that preserves the concinnity of the passage.
Then it shall deny him - That is, the soil, the earth, or the place where it stood. This represents a wicked man under the image of a tree. The figure is beautiful. The earth will be ashamed of it; ashamed that it sustained the tree; ashamed that it ever ministered any nutriment, and will refuse to own it. So with the hypocrite. He shall pass away as if the earth refused to own him, or to retain any recollection of him.
I have not seen thee - I never knew thee. It shall utterly deny any acquaintance with it. There is a striking resemblance here to the language which the Savior says he will use respecting the hypocrite in the day of judgment: "and then will I profess to them, I never knew you;" Matthew 7:23. The hypocrite has never been known as a pious man. The earth will refuse to own him as such, and so will the heavens.
19
Job 8:19
繁體中文
看哪,這就是他道路中的喜樂——這顯然是譏諷的話。「看哪,他道路中的喜樂就是這樣!他像一切偽善者那樣誇耀喜樂,但他的喜樂只存片刻。這就是它的結局:他被砍倒、被挪去,地與天都不認他!」
以後必另有人從地而生——這意象仍取自樹或植物。其意是:這樣的植物必被取去,而有別的植物在原地長出來,地必不以它們為恥。偽善者也照樣被挪去,為真誠而有益於人的後來者讓路。教會中的偽善者與無用之人被除去,為熱心獻身於救贖主事業的人讓路。類似的思想見於 Job 27:16-17。照我看來,至此結束了比勒達對前代詩人的引文;在本章其餘部分,他陳述關於義人的另一項真理。這片段是隨處所能見到的最耐人尋味的片段之一。作為最早時代的遺存,它極其寶貴;作為眼前論證的例證,作為世間世事進程的例證,它優美無比。它在洪水之前說出時如何真實,如今也如何真實;如今用它來描述偽善者的結局,與當時同樣恰當。它可視為人事中的一個路標,表明神的治理與祂施行作為的方式,實質上始終如一。
英文原文
Behold, this is the joy of his way - This is evidently sarcastic. "Lo! such is the joy of his course! He boasts of joy, as all hypocrites do, but his joy endures only for a little time. This is the end of it. He is cut down and removed, and the earth and the heavens disown him!"
And out of the earth shall others grow - This image is still derived from the tree or plant. The meaning is, that such a plant would be taken away, and that others would spring up in its place which the earth would not be ashamed of. So the hypocrite is removed to make way for others who will be sincere, and who will be useful. Hypocrites and useless people in the church are removed to make way for others who will be active and devoted to the cause of the Redeemer. A similar sentiment occurs in Job 27:16-17. This closes, as I suppose, the quotation which Bildad makes from the poets of the former age, and in the remainder of the chapter he states another truth pertaining to the righteous. This fragment is one of the most interesting that can be found any where. As a relic of the earliest times it is exceedingly valuable; as an illustration of the argument in hand; and of the course of events in this world, it is eminently beautiful. It is as true now as it was when uttered before the flood, and may be used now as describing the doom of the hypocrite, with as much propriety as then, and it may be regarded as one of the way-marks in human affairs, showing that the government of God, and the manner of his dispensations, are always substantially the same.
20
Job 8:20
繁體中文
看哪,神必不丟棄完全人——「完全」一詞的意義,見Job 1:1的註釋。比勒達的論點,或他從整個論證所得的推論,是:神必作敬虔者的朋友,卻必不幫助惡人。這與約伯的朋友們辯論中一貫堅持的見解相符。
也不扶助邪惡的人——頁邊註作「不以手攙扶不敬虔的人」。這合乎希伯來文。其形象是為要扶持一個人而拉住他的手;見Isaiah 42:6。
英文原文
Behold, God will not cast away a perfect man - On the meaning of the word perfect, see the note at Job 1:1. The sentiment of Bildad, or the inference which he draws from the whole argument is, that God will be the friend of the pious, but that he will not aid the wicked. This accords with the general sentiment maintained in the argument of the friends of Job.
Neither will he help the evil doers - Margin, "Take the ungodly by the hand." This is in accordance with the Hebrew. The figure is that of taking one by the hand in order to assist him; see Isaiah 42:6.
21
Job 8:21
繁體中文
「他以喜笑充滿你的口」——直到他使你完全快樂。譯作「直到」的 עד ‛ad 一詞,古德博士(Dr. Good)譯作「如今還」。諾伊斯(Noyes)跟隨烏比干(Houbigant)、德韋特(DeWette)與米迦利斯(Michaelis),主張改換母音符號,不讀 עד ‛ad 而讀 עוד ‛ôd——意即「正當……的時候」。本節與下一節相連,這裏所用的虛詞顯然意為「正當……的時候」或「如今還」。因此整段經文的意思是:「你若歸向神,他還要使你滿有喜樂,那時恨你的人必披戴羞愧。神必向你施恩,惡人的住處卻必歸於無有。」這段話的目的,是以這保證勸勉約伯歸向神——他若歸回,神必向他施憐憫,惡人卻必滅亡。
「以歡呼充滿你的嘴」——邊註作「歡呼喜樂」。這裏所用的 תרוּעה terûʿâh 一詞,本義指號角的鳴響,或勝利與凱旋的吶喊。
英文原文
Till he fill thy mouth with laughing - Until he make thee completely happy. The word rendered "till" (עד ‛ad), is rendered by Dr. Good, "even yet." Noyes, following Houbigant, DeWette, and Michaelis, proposes to change the pointing, and to read עד ‛ôd, instead of עד ‛ad - meaning, "while." The verse is connected with that which follows, and the particle used here evidently means "while," or "even yet" - and the whole passage means, "if you return to God, he will even yet fill you with joy, while those who hate you shall be clothed with shame. God will show you favor, but the dwelling of the wicked shall come to naught." The object of the passage is to induce Job to return to God, with the assurance that if he did, he would show mercy to him, while the wicked should be destroyed.
With rejoicing - Margin, "Shouting for joy." The word used (תרוּעה terû‛âh) is properly that which denotes the clangor of a trumpet, or the shout of victory and triumph.
22
Job 8:22
繁體中文
「恨惡你的要披戴慚愧」——當他們看見你重獲興盛、看見神施恩的憑據時,便要如此。那時他們必羞愧,因為他們曾視你為偽君子,曾在你受試煉時譏責你。
「惡人的帳棚必歸於無有」——惡人必被毀滅,他的家必消逝。意即:神必恩待義人,懲罰惡人。約伯的朋友始終持守這見解,並藉此勸約伯離棄罪惡、悔改歸向神。
英文原文
They that hate thee shall be clothed with shame - When they see your returning prosperity, and the evidences of the divine favor. They will then be ashamed that they regarded you as a hypocrite, and that they reproached you in your trials.
And the dwelling-place of the wicked ... - The wicked shall be destroyed, and his family shall pass away. That is, God will favor the righteous, but punish the wicked. This opinion the friends of Job maintain all along, and by this they urge him to forsake his sins, repent, and return to God.
「書亞人比勒達回答說」——見 Job 2:11 的註釋。