Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary · Isaiah 第3章

注释阅读优化

章节注释

Isaiah 第 3 章

서론

无标题

打开经文

简体中文

先知在本章继续预言因犹大与耶路撒冷之罪而即将临到的荒凉——既包括借巴比伦人之手所施的,也包括借罗马人之手完成其毁灭的那场——并陈明神与他们争辩的部分缘由。神威胁要: I. 夺去他们生命与政权的一切倚靠,赛3:1-3。 II. 任凭他们陷入混乱与无序,赛3:4,5,12。 III. 不赐给他们官长之福,赛3:6-8。 IV. 剥去锡安女儿的装饰,赛3:17-24。 V. 借战争之刀剑使一切尽成荒凉,赛3:25,26。 激惹神如此待他们的罪乃是: 1. 他们对神的公然挑衅,赛3:8。 2. 他们的恬不知耻,赛3:9。 3. 滥用权柄以行欺压与暴虐,赛3:12-15。 4. 锡安女儿的骄傲,赛3:16。 在本章中间,先知受指示当如何向个人进言。 (1.) 向义人保证,尽管有这些普遍的灾祸,他们必仍得福,赛3:10。 (2.) 向恶人保证,无论神在审判中如何顾念怜悯,他们终必遭祸,赛3:11。 惟愿今日地上的列国,肯留心听从本章所发的责备与警告!

英文原文

The prophet, in this chapter, goes on to foretel the desolations that were coming upon Judah and Jerusalem for their sins, both that by the Babylonians and that which completed their ruin by the Romans, with some of the grounds of God's controversy with them. God threatens, I. To deprive them of all the supports both of their life and of their government, Isa 3:1-3. II. To leave them to fall into confusion and disorder, Isa 3:4,5,12. III. To deny them the blessing of magistracy, Isa 3:6-8. IV. To strip the daughters of Zion of their ornaments, Isa 3:17-24. V. To lay all waste by the sword of war, Isa 3:25,26. The sins that provoked God to deal thus with them were, 1. Their defiance of God, Isa 3:8. 2. Their impudence, Isa 3:9. 3. The abuse of power to oppression and tyranny, Isa 3:12-15. 4. The pride of the daughters of Zion, Isa 3:16. In the midst of the chapter the prophet is directed how to address particular persons. (1.) To assure good people that it should be well with them, notwithstanding those general calamities, Isa 3:10. (2.) To assure wicked people that, however God might, in judgment, remember mercy, yet it should go ill with them, Isa 3:11. O that the nations of the earth, at this day, would hearken to rebukes and warnings which this chapter gives!

1-8

Judgments Denounced (758 BC)

打开经文

简体中文

宣告审判(主前758年)

¹ 主万军之耶和华从耶路撒冷和犹大除掉众人所倚靠的,所仗赖的,就是所倚靠的粮,所仗赖的水;
² 除掉勇士和战士,审判官和先知,占卜的和长老,
³ 五十夫长和尊贵人,谋士和有巧艺的,以及妙行法术的。
⁴ 主说:『我必使孩童作他们的首领,使婴孩辖管他们。』
⁵ 百姓要彼此欺压,各人受邻舍的欺压;孩童要侮慢老人,卑贱人要侮慢尊贵人。
⁶ 人在父家拉住他弟兄的手,说:『你有衣服,可以作我们的掌权者,这败落的事归在你手下吧。』
⁷ 那时他必起誓说:『我不作医治的人;因我家中没有粮食,也没有衣服;你们不可立我作百姓的官长。』
⁸ 耶路撒冷败落,犹大倾倒;因为他们的舌头和行为得罪耶和华,惹了他荣光的眼目。

先知在前一章末了对众人提出了一个必要的警告——不要倚靠人,不要倚靠任何受造之物;他也为此提出了一个普遍的理由,取自人生命的脆弱和人力的虚空软弱。此处他为此提出了一个特别的理由——神如今要毁坏他们一切受造之物上的倚靠,使他们从其中所得的尽是失望(赛3:1):「众人所倚靠的,所仗赖的」必被除掉——他们一切的支持,无论何种,一切他们所信托、所指望得帮助和拯救的事物。他们的教会和国家如今已经老迈,正在衰残,他们(如老年人所行的,亚8:4)拄着杖;如今神威胁要取去他们的杖,那时他们自然要跌倒——要除掉城和乡、耶路撒冷和犹大的支持,它们彼此实在是互相支持的,一个失败,另一个就感觉到。行这事的是「主万军之耶和华」——「Adon」,主,他自己就是那支持或根基;那支持若离去,一切别的支持必在我们下面折断,因为他是它们一切的力量。那有主权行这事的主、那有能力行这事的主万军之耶和华,他要除掉众人和人所仗赖的。耶柔米(Jerome)将这话应用于他们钉了救主之后犹太民族的明显衰败(罗11:9,10)。我宁愿把它看作对万国的警告——不要惹神发怒;因为他们若使他为敌,他能、也必这样使他们受苦。让我们细看其中的细节。

一、他们的丰富是支持他们的吗?对任何百姓都是如此;粮是生命的杖:但神能「除掉众人所倚靠的粮,所仗赖的水」;并且当他这样行是公义的——当粮食饱足成为罪孽之时(结16:49),当那赐下作生命之供养的成了情欲之供养之时。他能借着不降雨来除掉粮和水(申28:23,24)。或者,他若允许它们,也能借着收回他的祝福——人活着不是单靠食物,那祝福是粮的杖(太4:4)——来除掉粮的依靠和水的依靠,那时粮不再滋养,水不再解渴(该1:6)。基督是生命的粮和生命的水;他若作我们的支持,我们必发现这是不能夺去的上好福分(约4:14、6:27)。

二、他们的军队是支持他们的吗——他们的将领、指挥官和军人?这些必被除掉,要么被刀剑所杀,要么因所遭遇的失败如此灰心,以致辞职不再任职;或因疾病或丧胆而不能胜任工作;「勇士和战士」,连下级军官「五十夫长」也必被除掉。一个国家的勇士丧失,是不祥之兆。所以勇士不可因他的力量夸口,任何百姓也不可过于信赖他们的勇士;当让强盛的「百姓荣耀神」,「可畏之国的城敬畏他」——他能使他们软弱可鄙(赛25:3)。

三、他们的国务大臣是支持他们的吗——他们的学者、政治家、教士、才子和鉴赏家?这些也要被除掉——「审判官」,精通律法、善于施行公义的——「先知」,他们在疑难之事上惯常求问的——「占卜的」,被推崇为远超众人的聪明机警之人,又是审判官的助手(原文如此;这些人用不正当的技艺,虽是朽烂的支持,却被人所倚靠)(但也可如我们所读的,取其好的意思)——「长老」,年高德劭、在位分的——「尊贵人」,他仪态的庄重使人起敬,他的年纪和经验使他适合作谋士。商业是国家的一大支持,连制造业和手工业也是;所以当整个支持断裂之时,「有巧艺的」也必被除掉;最后是「妙行法术的」,善于言辞的人,他在某些情况下能作好的服事,虽然他既不是占卜的,也不是长老,却能将别人的意思用好的语言表达出来。摩西不能善言,亚伦却能。神威胁要除掉这些,就是:1. 使他们不能服事国家,「使审判官变为愚妄人,使忠信人的口哑然无声,使老人的聪明被夺去」(伯12:17等)。每一受造之物对我们而言,就是神所使它成为的那样;我们也不能确定那些对我们有用的人会一直如此。2. 结束他们的日子;因为君王之所以不可信靠,是因为「他的气一断」(诗146:3,4)。注意,有用之人正在有用之时被死所除掉,对任何百姓都是极其可畏的征兆。

四、他们的治理是支持他们的吗?这本当如此;君王的本分就是支撑大地的柱子(诗75:3)。但此处威胁说这支持也要失败。当勇士和占卜的被除掉之后,「孩童要作他们的首领」——按年龄是孩童,必须受师傅和监护人的管教,他们必彼此相争,又掠夺幼王和他的国——按心智和性情是孩童,幼稚的人,在知识上是婴孩,并不比摇篮里的婴孩更适合掌权。这些人要辖管他们,带着孩童的一切愚昧、善变和顽梗。「邦国啊,你的王若是这样,你就有祸了!」(传10:16)。

五、臣民彼此之间的联合、他们的良好秩序以及彼此间所保持的美好相通和理解,是支持他们的吗?若有此事,一国即使君王不如所当有的,也能因此受益;但此处威胁说,神也要在他们中间差遣一个恶灵(如士9:23),使他们:1. 彼此伤害、彼此为敌(赛3:5):「百姓要彼此欺压,各人受邻舍的欺压」,他们的首领既是孩童,既不约束欺压者,也不解救被欺压者,向他们申诉也无用(这就试探各人自己报仇),所以他们「彼此相咬相吞」,不久就「彼此消灭」。那时「人成了人的狼;邪恶也得了法律的印记;客人和主人也彼此危险」。2. 对长辈傲慢悖逆。一国之中,新一代人普遍难驯、粗鲁、不服管教,「孩童侮慢老人」——其实他当在白发人面前起立,「敬老尊长」(利19:32)。年轻人若自高自大、轻慢无礼地对待长辈,他们的行为不仅是自己的羞辱,也对公众有不良后果;它松开了治理的缰绳,使持缰的手软弱无力。一国之中,尊贵之人不能维护自己的权威,反被卑贱贫穷的人所侮辱,审判官被暴民所侮辱、其权柄被藐视,这也是不妙的。行这事的人要担很大的责任。

六、虽然现今事情治理不善,但还能指望兴起别人治理得更好——这盼望也是一种支持吗?然而这指望也必落空,因为情况要变得如此绝望,以致凡有见识、有产业的人都不愿沾手。

  1. 治理之位要无人问津(赛3:6)。在此:(1)这里假定,要纠正这一切弊病、使事恢复秩序,唯有借着好的官长——他们借众人的同意而被赋予权柄,又为大众的利益运用那权柄。很可能这是许多地方治理的真正起源;人发觉必须同心合意地服从一个被认为适合受此信托的人,为着众人的福利和安全,意识到他们要么受治理,要么被毁灭。所以这里是原本的契约:「『可以作我们的掌权者』,我们必顺服你,『这败落的事归在你手下吧』——被修理、被恢复,然后被保存、被坚立,其利益被推进(赛58:12)。请以争战的刀剑保护我们免受外来的侵害,又以公义的刀剑防止我们彼此侵害,我们必向你尽忠效诚。」(2)情况被描述为极其可悲,事已到了可哀的地步;因为:[1] 孩童既作他们的首领,各人都要以为自己配得指定谁作官长,都要举荐自己的亲属;然而若是首领当如所当有的样子,这事就完全当留给首领来指定,本该如何。[2] 人甚至要被迫将权柄强塞进那些被认为适合之人的手中:「人要强拉」一人使他作官长,看出他有意抗拒这事;不但如此,他还要劝他的弟兄接受;然而通常人不愿与己平等的人作自己的上司,可参约瑟的众兄弟之嫉妒。[3] 举荐一人作官长,只要有衣服比邻舍好,就足以作为理由——这是推荐一人担任治理中受托之职的非常贫乏的资格。当一个有华美衣服的人极为罕见,或买得起一件市长袍或法官袍的人极为罕见时,这是国家极其贫困的记号;当人因「华美衣服、金戒指」(雅2:2,3)而如此尊重一个人,以致为此缘故要立他作官长,这足以证明百姓极不思想。若说「你有智慧、有正直、有经验,可以作我们的掌权者」,还有几分道理;但说「你有衣服,可以作我们的掌权者」,不过是笑话。「一个贫穷的智慧人」,虽身穿污衣,「救了一座城」(传9:15)。我们可以借此预表堕落之人处境何等绝望——当我们的主耶稣乐意成为我们的弟兄,虽然无人求他,他却自荐作我们的掌权者和救主,将这败落之事揽在他手下。

  2. 那些如此被强劝就职的人要起誓推辞,因为虽然他们被认为是有些产业的人,却知道自己无力担当职任的开支,也无法满足选举他们之人的期望(赛3:7):「他必起誓」(举手——古代起誓所用的仪式),『我不作医治的人;不可立我作官长。』注意,官长必须是医治的人,好官长也必如此;他们当设法使臣民合一,而不是扩大他们中间的分歧。唯有那具有温柔、安静、医治之灵的人才适合作治理。他们也当借着合适的手段,医治他们百姓利益所受的创伤。但他为何不愿作官长?因为「我家中没有粮食,也没有衣服」。(1)他若说的是实话,那就是人的产业已经败坏得可悲——当那些表面最好的人也实在缺乏必需品之时——这是常见的可哀情形。有些曾生活体面的人,愿意把好的方面展示给人看,但若真相为人所知,却是极其窘迫,因缺乏衣食而心事重重。(2)他若说的不是实话,那就是人的良心已经败坏得可悲——当人为躲避职务的开支,竟肯负起伪证之罪,而且(这是世上最大的疯狂)宁可灭亡灵魂来节省钱财(太16:26)。(3)无论如何,这就是国家情况极其糟糕的记号——无人愿意接受其中的官职,因为对从中可得的名声或利益都不抱指望,而这两样正是人通常谋求升迁所要追求的。

  3. 神使事情落到这可哀地步的原因(这话或是先知说的,或是那拒绝作官长的人说的);并非因他对国家没有善意,而是因为他看见情况绝望、无法挽救,企图挽救也是徒然(赛3:8):「耶路撒冷败落,犹大倾倒」;他们只能怪自己。他们把毁灭招到自己头上,因为「他们的舌头和行为得罪耶和华」;他们在言语和行为上都违背了神的律法,借此有意冒犯他;他们存心要得罪他,藐视他的权威,挑战他的公义。他们的舌头得罪耶和华,因为他们反驳他的先知;他们的行为也好不了多少,因为他们行如其言。他们的罪加重之处在于,神的眼目在他们身上,他的荣耀在他们中间显明;他们却当面惹他发怒,仿佛越知道他的荣耀,就越以轻忽它、将它变为羞辱为荣。正因如此——正因如此,耶路撒冷才败落。注意,人和国家的倾覆都归因于他们的罪。他们若不惹神,他就「不害他们」(耶25:6)。

英文原文

Judgments Denounced (758 BC)

¹ For, behold, the Lord, the LORD of hosts, doth take away from Jerusalem and from Judah the stay and the staff, the whole stay of bread, and the whole stay of water,
² The mighty man, and the man of war, the judge, and the prophet, and the prudent, and the ancient,
³ The captain of fifty, and the honourable man, and the counsellor, and the cunning artificer, and the eloquent orator.
⁴ And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.
⁵ And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable.
⁶ When a man shall take hold of his brother of the house of his father, saying, Thou hast clothing, be thou our ruler, and let this ruin be under thy hand:
⁷ In that day shall he swear, saying, I will not be a healer; for in my house is neither bread nor clothing: make me not a ruler of the people.
⁸ For Jerusalem is ruined, and Judah is fallen: because their tongue and their doings are against the LORD, to provoke the eyes of his glory.

The prophet, in the close of the foregoing chapter, had given a necessary caution to all not to put confidence in man, or any creature; he had also given a general reason for that caution, taken from the frailty of human life and the vanity and weakness of human powers. Here he gives a particular reason for it—God was now about to ruin all their creature-confidences, so that they should meet with nothing but disappointments in all their expectations from them (Isa 3:1): The stay and the staff shall be taken away, all their supports, of what kind soever, all the things they trusted to and looked for help and relief from. Their church and kingdom had now grown old and were going to decay, and they were (after the manner of aged men, Zec 8:4) leaning on a staff: now God threatens to take away their staff, and then they must fall of course, to take away the stays of both the city and the country, of Jerusalem and of Judah, which are indeed stays to one another, and, if one fail, the other feels from it. He that does this is the Lord, the Lord of hosts—Adon, the Lord that is himself the stay or foundation; if that stay depart, all other stays certainly break under us, for he is the strength of them all. He that is the Lord, the ruler, that has authority to do it, and the Lord of hosts, that has the ability to do it, he shall take away the stay and the staff. St. Jerome refers this to the sensible decay of the Jewish nation after they had crucified our Saviour, Ro 11:9,10. I rather take it as a warning to all nations not to provoke God; for if they make him their enemy, he can and will thus make them miserable. Let us view the particulars.

I. Was their plenty a support to them? It is so to any people; bread is the staff of life: but God can take away the whole stay of bread, and the whole stay of water; and it is just with him to do so when fulness of bread becomes an iniquity (Eze 16:49), and that which was given to be provision for the life is made provision for the lusts. He can take away the bread and the water by withholding the rain, De 28:23,24. Or, if he allow them, he can take away the stay of bread and the stay of water by withholding his blessing, by which man lives, and not by bread only, and which is the staff of bread (Mt 4:4), and then the bread is not nourishing nor the water refreshing, Hag 1:6. Christ is the bread of life and the water of life; if he be our stay, we shall find that this is a good part not to be taken away, Joh 4:14,6:27.

II. Was their army a support to them—their generals, and commanders, and military men? These shall be taken away, either cut off by the sword or so discouraged with the defeats they meet with that they shall throw up their commissions and resolve to act no more; or they shall be disabled by sickness, or dispirited, so as to be unfit for business; The mighty men, and the man of war, and even the inferior officer, the captain of fifty, shall be removed. It bodes ill with a people when their valiant men are lost. Let not the strong man therefore glory in his strength, nor any people trust too much to their mighty men; but let the strong people glorify God and the city of the terrible nations fear him, who can make them weak and despicable, Isa 25:3.

III. Were their ministers of state a support to them—their learned men, their politicians, their clergy, their wits and virtuoso? These also should be taken away—the judges, who were skilled in the laws, and expert in administering justice,—the prophets, whom they used to consult in difficult cases,—the prudent, who were celebrated as men of sense and sagacity above all others and were assistants to the judges, the diviners (so the word is), those who used unlawful arts, who, though rotten stays, yet were stayed on, (but it may be taken, as we read it, in a good sense),—the ancients, elders in age, in office,—the honourable man, the gravity of whose aspect commands reverence and whose age and experience make him fit to be a counsellor. Trade is one great support to a nation, even manufactures and handicraft trades; and therefore, when the whole stay is broken, the cunning artificer too shall be taken away; and the last is the eloquent orator, the man skilful of speech, who in some cases may do good service, though he be none of the prudent or the ancient, by putting the sense of others in good language. Moses cannot speak well, but Aaron can. God threatens to take these away, that is, 1. To disable them for the service of their country, making judges fools, taking away the speech of the trusty and the understanding of the aged, Job 12:17, etc. Every creature is that to us which God makes it to be; and we cannot be sure that those who have been serviceable to us shall always be so. 2. To put an end to their days; for the reason why princes are not to be trusted in is because their breath goeth forth, Ps 146:3,4. Note, The removal of useful men by death, in the midst of their usefulness, is a very threatening symptom to any people.

IV. Was their government a support to them? It ought to have been so; it is the business of the sovereign to bear up the pillars of the land, Ps 75:3. But it is here threatened that this stay should fail them. When the mighty men and the prudent are removed children shall be their princes—children in age, who must be under tutors and governors, who will be clashing with one another and making a prey of the young king and his kingdom-children in understanding and disposition, childish men, such as are babes in knowledge, no more fit to rule than a child in the cradle. These shall rule over them, with all the folly, fickleness, and frowardness, of a child. And woe unto thee, O land! when thy king is such a one! Ec 10:16.

V. Was the union of the subjects among themselves, their good order and the good understanding and correspondence that they kept with one another, a stay to them? Where this is the case a people may do better for it, though their princes be not such as they should be; but it is here threatened that God would send an evil spirit among them too (as Jdg 9:23), which would make them, 1. Injurious and unneighbourly one towards another (Isa 3:5): "The people shall be oppressed every one by his neighbour," and their princes, being children, will take no care to restrain the oppressors or relieve the oppressed, nor is it to any purpose to appeal to them (which is a temptation to every man to be his own avenger), and therefore they bite and devour one another and will soon be consumed one of another. Then homo homini lupus—man becomes a wolf to man; jusque datum sceleri—wickedness receives the stamp of law; nec hospes ab hospite tutus—the guest and the host are in danger from each other. 2. Insolent and disorderly towards their superiors. It is as ill an omen to a people as can be when the rising generation among them are generally untractable, rude, and ungovernable, when the child behaves himself proudly against the ancient, whereas he should rise up before the hoary head and honour the face of the old man, Le 19:32. When young people are conceited and pert, and behave scornfully towards their superiors, their conduct is not only a reproach to themselves, but of ill consequence to the public; it slackens the reins of government and weakens the hands that hold them. It is likewise ill with a people when persons of honour cannot support their authority, but are affronted by the base and beggarly, when judges are insulted and their powers set at defiance by the mob. Those have a great deal to answer for who do this.

VI. It is some stay, some support, to hope that, though matters may be now ill-managed, yet other may be raised up, who may manage better? Yet this expectation also shall be frustrated, for the case shall be so desperate that no man of sense or substance will meddle with it.

1. The government shall go a begging, Isa 3:6. Here, (1.) It is taken for granted that there is no way of redressing all these grievances, and bringing things into order again, but by good magistrates, who shall be invested with power by common consent, and shall exert that power for the good of the community. And it is probable that this was, in many places, the true origin of government; men found it necessary to unite in a subjection to one who was thought fit for such a trust, in order to the welfare and safety of them all, being aware that they must either be ruled or ruined. Here therefore is the original contract: "Be thou our ruler, and we will be subject to thee, and let this ruin be under thy hand, to be repaired and restored, and then to be preserved and established, and the interests of it advanced, Isa 58:12. Take care to protect us by the sword of war from being injured from abroad, and by the sword of justice from being injurious to another, and we will bear faith and true allegiance to thee." (2.) The case is represented as very deplorable, and things as having come to a sad pass; for, [1.] Children being their princes, every man will think himself fit to prescribe who shall be a magistrate, and will be for preferring his own relations; whereas, if the princes were as they should be, it would be left entirely to them to nominate the rulers, as it ought to be. [2.] Men will find themselves under a necessity even of forcing power into the hands of those that are thought to be fit for it: A man shall take hold by violence of one to make him a ruler, perceiving him ready to resist the motion: nay, he shall urge it upon his brother; whereas, commonly, men are not willing that their equals should be their superiors, witness the envy of Joseph's brethren. [3.] It will be looked upon as ground sufficient for the preferring of a man to be a ruler that he has clothing better than his neighbours—a very poor qualification to recommend a man to a place of trust in the government. It was a sign that the country was much impoverished when it was a rare thing to find a man that had good clothes, or could afford to buy himself an alderman's gown or a judge's robes; and it was proof enough that the people were very unthinking when they had so much respect to a man in gay clothing, with a gold ring (Jam 2:2,3), that, for the sake thereof, they would make him their ruler. It would have been some sense to have said, "Thou hast wisdom, integrity, experience; be thou our ruler." But it was a jest to say, Thou hast clothing; be thou our ruler. A poor wise man, though in vile raiment, delivered a city, Ec 9:15. We may allude to this to show how desperate the case of fallen man was when our Lord Jesus was pleased to become our brother, and, though he was not courted, offered himself to be our ruler and Saviour, and to take this ruin under his hand.

2. Those who are thus pressed to come into office will swear themselves off, because, though they are taken to be men of some substance, yet they know themselves unable to bear the charges of the office and to answer the expectations of those that choose them (Isa 3:7): He shall swear (shall lift up the hand, the ancient ceremony used in taking the oath) I will not be a healer; make not me a ruler. Note, Rulers must be healers, and good rulers will be so; they must study to unite their subjects, and not to widen the differences that are among them. Those only are fit for government that are of a meek, quiet, healing, spirit. They must also heal the wounds that are given to any of the interests of their people, by suitable applications. But why will he not be a ruler? Because in my house is neither bread nor clothing. (1.) If he said true, it was a sign that men's estates were sadly ruined when even those who made the best appearance really wanted necessaries—a common case, and a piteous one. Some who, having lived fashionably, are willing to put the best side outwards, are yet, if the truth were known, in great straits, and go with heavy hearts for want of bread and clothing. (2.) If he did not speak truth, it was a sign that men's consciences were sadly debauched, when, to avoid the expense of an office, they would load themselves with the guilt of perjury, and (which is the greatest madness in the world) would damn their souls to save their money, Mt 16:26. (3.) However it was, it was a sign that the case of the nation was very bad when nobody was willing to accept a place in the government of it, as despairing to have either credit or profit by it, which are the two things aimed at in men's common ambition of preferment.

3. The reason why God brought things to this sad pass, even among his own people (which is given either by the prophet or by him that refused to be a ruler); it was not for want of good will to his country, but because he saw the case desperate and past relief, and it would be to no purpose to attempt it (Isa 3:8): Jerusalem is ruined and Judah is fallen; and they may thank themselves. They have brought their destruction upon their own heads, for their tongue and their doings are against the Lord; in word and action they broke the law of God and therein designed an affront to him; they wilfully intended to offend him, in contempt of his authority and defiance of his justice. Their tongue was against the Lord, for they contradicted his prophets; and their doings were no better, for they acted as they talked. It was an aggravation of their sin that God's eye was upon them, and that his glory was manifested among them; but they provoked him to his face, as if the more they knew of his glory the greater pride they took in slighting it, and turning it into shame. And this, this, is it for which Jerusalem is ruined. Note, The ruin both of persons and people is owing to their sins. If they did not provoke God, he would do them no hurt, Jer 25:6.

9-15

Judgments Denounced. (758 BC)

打开经文

简体中文

宣告审判(主前758年)

⁹ 他们的面色证明自己的不正;他们宣告自己的罪恶,并不隐瞒,好像所多玛一样。他们有祸了!因为作恶自害。
¹⁰ 你们要论义人说,他必享福乐,因为要吃自己行为所结的果子。
¹¹ 恶人有祸了!他必遭灾难,因为要照自己手所行的受报应。
¹² 至于我的百姓,孩童欺压他们,妇女辖管他们。我的百姓啊,引导你的使你走错,毁坏你所行的道路。
¹³ 耶和华起来辩论,站着审判众民。
¹⁴ 耶和华必审问他民中的长老和首领,说:吃尽葡萄园果子的是你们,从贫穷人所夺的都在你们家中。
¹⁵ 主万军之耶和华说:你们为何压制我的百姓,搓磨贫穷人的脸呢?

在此神继续他与百姓的争辩。请观察,

一、他争辩的根据。神与他们相争乃是为了罪;他们若自取烦恼,让他们再往深一层看,就必看出他们只能归咎于自己:「他们有祸了!因为他们作恶自害。他们的灵魂有祸了!」(可如此读,作为叹息)「因为他们为自己招致了灾祸」(赛 3:9)。请注意,罪人的光景是悲惨的、十分可叹的。还要注意,受罪损害、陷入危险的正是灵魂。罪人也许在身外之物上兴旺发达,然而同时他们的灵魂却有祸了。更当注意,无论罪人遭遇何样的灾祸,都是自招的(耶 2:19)。此处所控告他们的,是:1. 那本可约束他们不犯罪的羞耻之心已完全抛弃,他们已变得厚颜无耻(赛 3:9)。这比什么都更能使人硬心不悔改,加速他们走向灭亡:「他们的面色证明自己的不正」——他们的心思虚妄、放荡、恶毒;他们的眼睛明明宣告他们「不能止住犯罪」(彼后 2:14)。人只要看他们的面色,就能猜出他们心中那极度的邪恶:「他们宣告自己的罪恶,好像所多玛一样」——他们的私欲如此急切、如此蛮横,对最轻微的责备也不能容忍,他们里面仅存的美德火花已完全熄灭。所多玛人宣告他们的罪,不但是因罪极其重大(创 13:13),使罪声闻于天(创 18:20),更是因他们无耻地公然承认那最可耻的事(创 19:5);犹大和耶路撒冷也是如此:他们不但不隐藏,反倒以此为荣,以他们对美德的大胆侵犯、对自己良知的胜过为荣。他们有「妓女的额头」(耶 3:3),不知羞惭(耶 6:15)。请注意,凡在罪中已不知羞耻的,就是到了灭亡的成熟之时。我们常说,凡过了羞耻这一关的,就是过了恩典这一关,于是也就过了盼望这一关。2. 他们的领袖,本应引导他们走正路,却使他们偏离正路(赛 3:12):「引导你的(君王、祭司和先知)误导了你;他们使你走错了路。」他们要么向他们传讲虚假败坏之道,要么即便传讲真实良善之道,也用自己的行为予以反驳,而百姓宁可追随坏的榜样,也不愿听从好的劝诫。如此他们「毁坏了你所行的道路」,用一只手拆掉另一只手所建造的。「那称你为有福的使你走错」——有人如此解读(拉丁文旧译)。他们的祭司称赞他们,好像他们中间毫无差错,向他们高呼「平安了,平安了」,好像他们毫无危险;如此便使他们在错谬中越走越远。3. 他们的审判官,本应庇护并保护受欺压之人,自己却是最大的欺压者(赛 3:14-15)。百姓的长老和首领,他们有学问,不能不知道更好的事;他们有丰厚的产业,并不受必要性的试探去侵占邻舍;他们又是尊贵之人,应当鄙视作卑鄙之事——然而「他们吃尽了葡萄园」。神的葡萄园,他们本被指派作栽种的人和看守的人,他们却将其焚烧(原文如此含意);他们对它所行的恶,与它最坏的仇敌所行的并无二致(诗 80:16)。或者,他们从穷人手中夺取了他们的葡萄园,如同耶洗别夺拿伯的葡萄园一样,或者吞吃了其中的果实,以那本该作困苦家庭必需食物的来喂养自己的私欲;穷人所被抢夺的财物都囤积在他们家中;当神来搜寻赃物时,就在那里发现了,这就成了定他们罪的见证。这本是可以归还的,他们也本可作出赔偿,却不愿意。神与这些大人物理论(赛 3:15):「你们为何将我的百姓打得粉碎?你们有什么缘故呢?这事对你们有何益处?」或者说:「他们伤害了你们什么?你们以为赐给你们的权柄是为这样的用途吗?」请注意,再没有比逼迫者和欺压者对神百姓所行的伤害与暴虐更不可理解,却又更必交账的事了。「你们搓磨贫穷人的脸」;你们使他们如同在磨盘中被磨一般疼痛惊恐,又用一次又一次的欺压行动将他们碾为尘土。或者说:「他们的脸因你们所加的击打而青肿破碎;你们不但毁了他们的产业,更对他们人身施暴。」我们的主耶稣也曾被人用手掌打脸(太 26:67)。

二、这场争辩的处理。1. 神自己就是原告(赛 3:13):「耶和华起来辩论」,他定意要辩论这事,他「站着审判众民」,要为那些被欺压受虐待的人施行审判;他必「与民中的长老和首领一同受审」(赛 3:14)。请注意,再伟大的人也不能免受神审判的审查与判语,也不能对天庭的管辖权提出异议。2. 控诉因事实昭然的证据而得证实:「看看那些欺压者,『他们的面色证明自己的不正』(赛 3:9);看看那些被欺压的,就看见他们的脸被殴打、被残害」(赛 3:15)。3. 这争辩已在治理的更换中开始了。为刑罚那些滥用权力行恶的人,神就设立了一些无力用权力行任何善事的人治理他们:「孩童欺压他们,妇女辖管他们」(赛 3:12),就是那些判断力如妇孺一般软弱、情感却如妇孺一般强烈的人:他们的统治者如此,原是他们的罪,而这罪也成了对他们的刑罚。

三、在这场争辩进行中,对个别人所要作的区分(赛 3:10-11):「你们要论义人说,他必享福乐。恶人有祸了,他必遭灾难。」他已说过(赛 3:9),他们「作恶自害」,为证明这一点,他在此表明神必照各人所行的报应各人。他们若为义人,必享福乐;但他们既遭灾祸,那是因他们自己邪恶,且定意要如此。神当年就是这样向该隐陈明这事,为要使他看出自己没有理由发怒(创 4:7)。或者可如此理解:神正在警告全国性的审判,那将毁掉公共利益。如今,1. 有些敬虔人可能担心自己也被卷入那毁灭之中,所以神吩咐先知在这些恐惧中安慰他们:「无论那不义的国民结局如何,要叫义人知道,他不会在罪人的群众中一同灭亡;『审判全地的主岂可不按公义审判,将义人与恶人同杀吗?』(创 18:25)断乎不可。要以神的名向他保证:『他必享福乐。』那苦难的性质对他而言要被改变,他必在耶和华发怒的日子被隐藏。他必得着神圣的扶持与安慰,并且这些安慰必随着苦难加增而更加丰盛,因此他必享福乐。」当全地的粮食全都断绝之时,然而在饥荒的日子义人必得饱足;他们「要吃自己行为所结的果子」——他们良心的见证为他们作证,证明他们保守自己不沾染这普遍的罪孽,因此这普遍的灾祸对他们而言,与对别人并不相同;他们没有给火焰添柴,所以自己也不致作火焰的燃料。2. 有些恶人可能希望自己能逃脱那毁灭,所以神吩咐先知打消他们虚妄的指望:「恶人有祸了!他必遭灾难」(赛 3:11)。对恶人而言,审判必带着毒钩,在患难困苦之中必有茵陈和苦胆。恶人有祸了,他们虽想躲避公众的审判,却必遭灾难;他们若不悔改,光景必每况愈下,而最坏的终必来到;因为「要照自己手所行的受报应」,就在各人于肉身中按自己所行的受报的那日。

英文原文

Judgments Denounced. (758 BC)

⁹ The show of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.
¹⁰ Say ye to the righteous, that it shall be well with him: for they shall eat the fruit of their doings.
¹¹ Woe unto the wicked! it shall be ill with him: for the reward of his hands shall be given him.
¹² As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.
¹³ The LORD standeth up to plead, and standeth to judge the people.
¹⁴ The LORD will enter into judgment with the ancients of his people, and the princes thereof: for ye have eaten up the vineyard; the spoil of the poor is in your houses.
¹⁵ What mean ye that ye beat my people to pieces, and grind the faces of the poor? saith the Lord GOD of hosts.

Here God proceeds in his controversy with his people. Observe,

I. The ground of his controversy. It was for sin that God contended with them; if they vex themselves, let them look a little further and they will see that they must thank themselves: Woe unto their souls! For they have rewarded evil unto themselves. Alas for their souls! (so it may be read, in a way of lamentation), for they have procured evil to themselves, Isa 3:9. Note, The condition of sinners is woeful and very deplorable. Note, also, It is the soul that is damaged and endangered by sin. Sinners may prosper in their outward estates, and yet at the same time there may be a woe to their souls. Note, further, Whatever evils befals sinners it is of their own procuring, Jer 2:19. That which is here charged upon then is, 1. That the shame which should have restrained them from their sins was quite thrown off and they had grown impudent, Isa 3:9. This hardens men against repentance, and ripens them for ruin, as much as anything: The show of their countenance doth witness against them that their minds are vain, and lewd, and malicious; their eyes declare plainly that they cannot cease from sin, 2Pe 2:14. One may look them in the face and guess at the desperate wickedness that there is in their hearts: They declare their sin as Sodom, so impetuous, so imperious, are their lusts, and so impatient of the least check, and so perfectly are all the remaining sparks of virtue extinguished in them. The Sodomites declared their sin, not only by the exceeding greatness of it (Ge 13:13), so that it cried to heaven (Ge 18:20), but by their shameless owning of that which was most shameful (Ge 19:5); and thus Judah and Jerusalem did: they were so far from hiding it that they gloried in it, in the bold attempts they made upon virtue, and the victory they gained over their own convictions. They had a whore's forehead (Jer 3:3) and could not blush, Jer 6:15. Note, Those that have grown impudent in sin are ripe for ruin. Those that are past shame (we say) are past grace, and then past hope. 2. That their guides, who should direct them in the right way, put them out of the way (Isa 3:12): "Those who lead thee (the princes, priests, and prophets) mislead thee; they cause thee to err." Either they preached to them that which was false and corrupt, or, if they preached that which was true and good, they contradicted it by their practices, and the people would soon follow a bad example than a good exhortation. Thus they destroyed the ways of their paths, pulling down with one hand what they built up with the other. Que te beatificant—Those that call thee blessed cause thee to err; so some read it. Their priests applauded them, as if nothing were amiss among them, cried Peace, peace, to them, as if they were in no danger; and thus they caused them to go on in their errors. 3. That their judges, who should have patronized and protected the oppressed, were themselves the greatest oppressors, Isa 3:14,15. The elders of the people, and the princes, who had learning and could not but know better things, who had great estates and were not under the temptation of necessity to encroach upon those about them, and who were men of honour and should have scorned to do a base thing, yet they have eaten up the vineyard. God's vineyard, which they were appointed to be the dressers and keepers of, they burnt (so the word signifies); they did as ill by it as its worst enemies could do, Ps 80:16. Or the vineyards of the poor they wrested out of their possession, as Jezebel did Naboth's, or devoured the fruits of them, fed their lusts with that which should have been the necessary food of indigent families; the spoil of the poor was hoarded up in their houses; when God came to search for stolen goods there he found it, and it was a witness against them. It was to be had, and they might have made restitution, but would not. God reasons with these great men (Isa 3:15): "What mean you, that you beat my people into pieces? What cause have you for it? What good does it do you?" Or, "What hurt have they done you? Do you think you had power given you for such a purpose as this?" Note, There is nothing more unaccountable, and yet nothing which must more certainly be accounted for, than the injuries and abuses that are done to God's people by their persecutors and oppressors. "You grind the faces of the poor; you put them to as much pain and terror as if they were ground in a mill, and as certainly reduce them to dust by one act of oppression after another." Or, "Their faces are bruised and crushed with the blows you have given them; you have not only ruined their estates, but have given them personal abuses." Our Lord Jesus was smitten on the face, Mt 26:67.

II. The management of this controversy. 1. God himself is the prosecutor (Isa 3:13): The Lord stands up to plead, or he sets himself to debate the matter, and he stands to judge the people, to judge for those that were oppressed and abused; and he will enter into judgment with the princes, Isa 3:14. Note, The greatest of men cannot exempt or secure themselves from the scrutiny and sentence of God's judgment, nor demur to the jurisdiction of the court of heaven. 2. The indictment is proved by the notorious evidence of the fact: "Look upon the oppressors, and the show of their countenance witnesses against them (Isa 3:9); look upon the oppressed, and you see how their faces are battered and abused," Isa 3:15. 3. The controversy is already begun in the change of the ministry. To punish those that had abused their power to bad purposes God sets those over them that had not sense to use their power to any good purposes: Children are their oppressors, and women rule over them (Isa 3:12), men that have as weak judgments and strong passions as women and children: this was their sin, that their rulers were such, and it became a judgment upon them.

III. The distinction that shall be made between particular persons, in the prosecution of this controversy (Isa 3:10,11): Say to the righteous, It shall be well with thee. Woe to the wicked; it shall be ill with him. He had said (Isa 3:9), they have rewarded evil to themselves, in proof of which he here shows that God will render to every man according to his works. Had they been righteous, it would have been well with them; but, if it be ill with them, it is because they are wicked and will be so. Thus God stated the matter to Cain, to convince him that he had no reason to be angry, Ge 4:7. Or it may be taken thus: God is threatening national judgments, which will ruin the public interests. Now, 1. Some good people might fear that they should be involved in that ruin, and therefore God bids the prophets comfort them against those fears: "Whatever becomes of the unrighteous nation, let the righteous man know that he shall not be lost in the crowd of sinners; the Judge of all the earth will not slay the righteous with the wicked (Ge 18:25); no, assure him, in God's name, that it shall be well with him. The property of the trouble shall be altered to him, and he shall be hidden in the day of the Lord's anger. He shall have divine supports and comforts, which shall abound as afflictions abound, and so it shall be well with him." When the whole stay of bread is taken away, yet in the day of famine the righteous shall be satisfied; they shall eat the fruit of their doings—they shall have the testimony of their consciences for them that they kept themselves pure from the common iniquity, and therefore the common calamity is not the same thing to them that it is to others; they brought no fuel to the flame, and therefore are not themselves fuel for it. 2. Some wicked people might hope that they should escape that ruin, and therefore God bids the prophets shake their vain hopes: "Woe to the wicked; it shall be ill with him, Isa 3:11. To him the judgments shall have sting, and there shall be wormwood and gall in the affliction and misery." There is a woe to wicked people, and, though they may think to shelter themselves from public judgments, yet it shall be ill with them; it will grow worse and worse with them if they repent not, and the worst of all will be at last; for the reward of their hands shall be given them, in the day when every man shall receive according to the things done in the body.

16-26

The Vanity of the Daughters of Zion (758 BC)

打开经文

简体中文

锡安女儿的虚空(公元前758年)

¹⁶ 耶和华又说:因为锡安的女子狂傲,走路挺直颈项,用媚眼吸引人,走路脚上叮当作响; ¹⁷ 所以主必使锡安女子头顶长秃疮;耶和华又使他们露出现赤。 ¹⁸ 到那日,主必除掉她们华美的脚钏、发网、月牙圈, ¹⁹ 耳坠、手镯、蒙帕, ²⁰ 冠冕、足链、华带、香盒、符囊, ²¹ 戒指、鼻环, ²² 吉服、外套、云肩、荷包, ²³ 手镜、细麻衣、裹头巾、蒙帕。 ²⁴ 必有臭烂代替馨香,绳子代替腰带,秃疮代替美发,麻衣束腰代替华服,烙伤代替美容。 ²⁵ 你的男丁必倒在刀剑之下,你的勇士必阵亡在战中。 ²⁶ 锡安的城门必悲伤、哀号;她必荒凉坐在地上。

先知的职责是向各阶层的人指出,他们对国家的罪有怎样的贡献,以及在即将到来的全国性审判中当有怎样的分。此处他责备并警告锡安的女子,向贵妇们指出她们的过失;摩西在律法中已宣告神对「那娇弱柔嫩的妇人」之烈怒(先知正是律法的注释,申28:56),他在此便告诉她们,她们将因即将临到的灾祸而受何等的苦。请留意,

一、加在锡安女子身上的罪状,赛3:16。先知明确地以神的权柄为他所说的话作担保,免得人以为他留意这样的事不相宜,又怕贵妇们因此怀恨:「这是耶和华说的。」「她们或听,或不听,总要叫她们知道,神留意并极其不悦骄傲妇人的愚妄与虚荣,他的律法甚至也鉴察她们的衣着。」她们在此被控告两点——骄傲与淫荡——与「女人当以廉耻、自守、端正为装饰」(提前2:9)的正命完全相反。她们借着走路的姿态、手势和轻浮的举止,暴露出她们心里的性情。她们骄傲,因为她们「走路挺直颈项」,要使自己显得高大,或者以为自己太高贵,不屑与任何人说话,或不屑给任何人一个眼神或微笑。她们的眼目淫荡,是「迷惑人的」(原文如此);她们用含情脉脉的目光引人落入她们的网罗。她们喜爱一种拘谨刻板的走法,好叫人注视她们、赞赏她们,并知道她们上过舞蹈学校,学过小步舞步。她们「走路脚上叮当作响」,细步轻盈地走着,因娇嫩与精致,连脚掌也不肯踏在地上。她们「脚上叮当作响」,有人以为她们的鞋上带有链子或小铃铛,发出响声;有人读作「她们如同被脚镣锁着」,如同马被绊着以学习溜蹄。亚甲也曾这样「娇柔地」而来(撒上15:32)。这样矫揉造作的步态,不仅勉强了天性,在人——尤其是在有见识的人——眼前可笑;而且作为虚浮之心的证据,它得罪神。此处有两件事加重了这罪:1. 这些人是锡安——圣山——的女子,本该以敬虔妇人当有的端庄行事为人。2. 从上下文看来,她们似乎是那些欺压穷人之首领的妻子和女儿(赛3:14、15),好借此维持他们家族的骄傲与奢侈。

二、因这罪而威吓要来的刑罚;这些刑罚与罪正相对,如同脸在镜中回应脸一样,赛3:17、18。1. 她们「走路挺直颈项」,但神必「使她们头顶长秃疮」,这要降低她们的高傲,使她们羞于见人,因这病被迫剃去头发。须知,可憎的疾病常常作为骄傲之罪的公义刑罚而被差来,有时乃是淫乱的直接后果,肉体与身体因此而被消耗。2. 她们不惜花费以各种华美衣服装扮自己;但神必使她们陷入如此贫穷困苦,以致衣不蔽体,她们的丑陋要透过她们的破衣而显露。3. 她们极其喜爱并以她们的饰物为傲;但当她们的房屋被劫、财宝被掠、她们自己被掳之时,神必剥去她们这一切饰物。先知在此具体列举了她们所用的许多饰物,其详尽仿佛他曾是她们衣橱的管家,或曾在她们的梳妆室里伺候一般。逐一考究这些饰物究竟是什么,以及译本是否准确地表达了原文的词汇,并无多大意义;也许再过一百年,我们自己国内现在所用的一些饰物的名称,也会和此处所提的一些如今同样少为人知。时尚会改变,它们的名称也随之改变;然而提及这些并非徒然,乃是为要揭露锡安女子的愚妄;因为:(1)这些东西中,我们可以料想,有许多非常古怪可笑,若不是流行起来,必会被人嘲笑。它们更适合作孩童的玩具,而不适合作成年人登上锡安山的饰物。(2)那些体面而合宜的东西,如「细麻衣、裹头巾、蒙帕」,本不必如此丰盛多样地预备。有衣服是必需的,各人按自己的身分都有衣服也是应当的;但是何必要那么多套「吉服」(赛3:22),好叫她们不至于连续两天穿同一套衣服出现呢?「她们必须(如反对衣着奢华的讲章所言)白天一件袍子,夜间又一件——一件长的,另一件短的——工作日一件,圣日又一件——这件这种颜色,那件那种颜色——这件布的,那件丝绸或锦缎的——饭前一套打扮,饭后又一套——一套西班牙式样,另一套土耳其式样——总不以为足。」这一切作为骄傲和虚浮好奇之心的证据,必然花费浩大,以满足一个卑劣的私欲,而这些钱本当用于敬虔和慈善之工;而且若不是向贫穷的租户横征暴敛,或欺骗贫穷的债主来支持,就算好的了。(3)逐一列举这些东西,表明她们在其中是何等操心,她们的心何等放在其上,对之记账何等精确,对之何等挑剔苛刻,对之的欲望何等难以满足,并把多少安慰系于其上。一个少女虽有许多饰物,却一件也不忘记(耶2:32),她们却像报账一样熟练地一一报出,并怀着极大的喜悦谈论它们,仿佛它们是最要紧的事物。先知论到这些东西,并非说它们本身有罪(它们可以合法地拥有和使用),而是说她们因这些而骄傲,因此必被剥夺。

三、她们对自己的衣着极其挑剔讲究;但神必使她们那些花了不少代价来美化、来使之舒适的身体,成为她们的羞辱和重担(赛3:24):「馨香之物」(就是那些香盒、香盒,原文称为「灵魂/气息之屋」,如赛3:20旁注所言)「必变为臭烂」——或是衣服因长久穿着而变脏,或是因某种可憎的疾病或为治病的膏药而发臭。「华美的腰带」——用来束紧衣服的——「必有绳子代替」,或因忧伤而撕裂衣服,或是破旧朽烂的衣服裂成破布。「美发」——精巧地编结、扑粉的头发——「必有秃疮代替」,头发被拔掉或剃去,正如大患难之时所常行的(赛15:2;耶16:6),或在重役之下(结29:18)。「华服」,或围巾、腰带,「必有麻衣束腰代替」,表示极深的自卑;「美容必有烙伤代替」。那些面容姣好、并以之自傲的人,被掳之时必被晒黑、灼伤;而且据观察,最好的面容最容易受天气损伤。从这一切让我们学习:1. 不要对自己的衣着挑剔讲究,不要喜爱华美贵重之物,也不要以此自傲。2. 不要在享受任何感官之乐上自以为稳妥,因为我们不知道何时会被剥夺,也不知道会陷入怎样的窘迫。

四、她们想用这些饰物迷住男士,赢得他们的爱慕(箴7:16、17),但将没有人可以被她们迷住(赛3:25):「你的男丁必倒在刀剑之下,你的勇士必阵亡在战中。」「火必吞灭他们」,于是「少女不得出嫁」,如诗78:63所言。当刀剑带着权柄而来时,勇士通常首先倒在其下,因为他们最勇于冒险。锡安的卫士既被剪除,难怪锡安的城门「悲伤哀号」(赛3:26),仇敌已经占据了它们;那城本身既已荒凉——既已被倒空、被扫除——必「坐在地上」,如同一个忧愁绝望的寡妇。罪若在城墙之内被宽容,哀号与悲痛就临近城门了。

英文原文

The Vanity of the Daughters of Zion (758 BC)

¹⁶ Moreover the LORD saith, Because the daughters of Zion are haughty, and walk with stretched forth necks and wanton eyes, walking and mincing as they go, and making a tinkling with their feet:
¹⁷ Therefore the Lord will smite with a scab the crown of the head of the daughters of Zion, and the LORD will discover their secret parts.
¹⁸ In that day the Lord will take away the bravery of their tinkling ornaments about their feet, and their cauls, and their round tires like the moon,
¹⁹ The chains, and the bracelets, and the mufflers,
²⁰ The bonnets, and the ornaments of the legs, and the headbands, and the tablets, and the earrings,
²¹ The rings, and nose jewels,
²² The changeable suits of apparel, and the mantles, and the wimples, and the crisping pins,
²³ The glasses, and the fine linen, and the hoods, and the veils.
²⁴ And it shall come to pass, that instead of sweet smell there shall be stink; and instead of a girdle a rent; and instead of well set hair baldness; and instead of a stomacher a girding of sackcloth; and burning instead of beauty.
²⁵ Thy men shall fall by the sword, and thy mighty in the war.
²⁶ And her gates shall lament and mourn; and she being desolate shall sit upon the ground.

The prophet's business was to show all sorts of people what they had contributed to the national guilt and what share they must expect in the national judgments that were coming. Here he reproves and warns the daughters of Zion, tells the ladies of their faults; and Moses, in the law, having denounced God's wrath against the tender and delicate woman (the prophets being a comment upon the law, De 28:56), he here tells them how they shall smart by the calamities that are coming upon them. Observe,

I. The sin charged upon the daughters of Zion, Isa 3:16. The prophet expressly vouches God's authority for what he said, lest it should be thought it was unbecoming in him to take notice of such things, and should be resented by the ladies: The Lord saith it. "Whether they will hear, or whether they will forbear, let them know that God takes notice of, and is much displeased with, the folly and vanity of proud women, and his law takes cognizance even of their dress." Two things that here stand indicted for—haughtiness and wantonness, directly contrary to that modesty, shamefacedness, and sobriety, with which women ought to adorn themselves, 1Ti 2:9. They discovered the disposition of their mind by their gait and gesture, and the lightness of their carriage. They are haughty, for they walk with stretched-forth necks, that they may seem tall, or, as thinking nobody good enough to speak to them or to receive a look or a smile from them. Their eyes are wanton, deceiving (so the word is); with their amorous glances they draw men into their snares. They affect a formal starched way of going, that people may look at them, and admire them, and know they have been at the dancing-school, and have learned the minuet-step. They go mincing, or nicely tripping, not willing to set so much as the sole of their foot to the ground, for tenderness and delicacy. They make a tinkling with their feet, having, as some think, chains, or little bells, upon their shoes, that made a noise: they go as if they were fettered (so some read it), like a horse tramelled, that he may learn to pace. Thus Agag came delicately, 1Sa 15:32. Such a nice affected mien is not only a force upon that which is natural, and ridiculous before men, men of sense; but as it is an evidence of a vain mind, it is offensive to God. And two things aggravated it here: 1. That these were the daughters of Zion, the holy mountain, who should have behaved with the gravity that becomes women professing godliness. 2. That it should seem, by the connexion, they were the wives and daughters of the princes who spoiled and oppressed the poor (Isa 3:14,15) that they might maintain the pride and luxury of their families.

II. The punishments threatened for this sin; and they answer the sin as face answers to face in a glass, Isa 3:17,18. 1. They walked with stretched-forth necks, but God will smite with a scab the crown of their head, which shall lower their crests, and make them ashamed to show their heads, being obliged by it to cut off their hair. Note, Loathsome diseases are often sent as the just punishment of pride, and are sometimes the immediate effect of lewdness, the flesh and the body being consumed by it. 2. They cared not what they laid out in furnishing themselves with great variety of fine clothes; but God will reduce them to such poverty and distress that they shall not have clothes sufficient to cover their nakedness, but their uncomeliness shall be exposed through their rags. 3. They were extremely fond and proud of their ornaments; but God will strip them of those ornaments, when their houses shall be plundered, their treasures rifled, and they themselves led into captivity. The prophet here specifies many of the ornaments which they used as particularly as if he had been the keeper of their wardrobe or had attended them in their dressing-room. It is not at all material to enquire what sort of ornaments these respectively were and whether the translations rightly express the original words; perhaps 100 years hence the names of some of the ornaments that are now in use in our own land will be as little understood as some of those here mentioned now are. Fashions alter, and so do the names of them; and yet the mention of them is not in vain, but is designed to expose the folly of the daughters of Zion; for, (1.) Many of these things, we may suppose, were very odd and ridiculous, and, if they had not been in fashion, would have been hooted at. They were fitter to be toys for children to play with than ornaments for grown people to go to Mount Zion in. (2.) Those things that were decent and convenient, as the linen, the hoods, and the veils, needed not be provided in such abundance and variety. It is necessary to have apparel and proper that all should have it according to their rank; but what occasion was there for so many changeable suits of apparel (Isa 3:22), that they might not be seen two days together in the same suit? "They must have (as the homily against excess of apparel speaks) one gown for the day, another for the night—one long, another short—one for the working day, another for the holy-day—one of this colour, another of that colour—one of cloth, another of silk or damask—one dress afore dinner, another after—one of the Spanish fashion, another Turkey—and never content with sufficient." All this, as it is an evidence of pride and vain curiosity, so must needs spend a great deal in gratifying a base lust that ought to be laid out in works of piety and charity; and it is well if poor tenants be not racked, or poor creditors defrauded to support it. (3.) The enumeration of these things intimates what care they were in about them, how much their hearts were upon them, what an exact account they kept of them, how nice and critical they were about them, how insatiable their desire was of them, and how much of their comfort was bound up in them. A maid could forget none of these ornaments, though they were ever so many (Jer 2:32), but they would report them as readily, and talk of them with as much pleasure, as if they had been things of the greatest moment. The prophet did not speak of these things as in themselves sinful (they might lawfully be had and used), but as things which they were proud of and should therefore be deprived of.

III. They were very nice and curious about their clothes; but God would make those bodies of theirs, which were at such expense to beautify and make easy, a reproach and burden to them (Isa 3:24): Instead of sweet smell (those tablets, or boxes, of perfume, houses of the soul or breath, as they are called, Isa 3:20, margin) there shall be stink, garments grown filthy with being long worn, or from some loathsome disease or plasters for the cure of it. Instead of a rich embroidered girdle used to make the clothes sit tight, there shall be a rent, a rending of the clothes for grief, or old rotten clothes rent into rags. Instead of well-set hair, curiously plaited and powdered, there shall be baldness, the hair being plucked off or shaven, as was usual in times of great affliction (Isa 15:2, Jer 16:6), or in great servitude, Eze 29:18. Instead of a stomacher, or a scarf or sash, there shall be a girding of sackcloth, in token of deep humiliation; and burning instead of beauty. Those that had a good complexion, and were proud of it, when they are carried into captivity shall be tanned and sun-burnt; and it is observed that the best faces are soonest injured by the weather. From all this let us learn, 1. Not to be nice and curious about our apparel, not to affect that which is gay and costly, nor to be proud of it. 2. Not to be secure in the enjoyment of any of the delights of sense, because we know not how soon we may be stripped of them, nor what straits we may be reduced to.

IV. They designed by these ornaments to charm the gentlemen, and win their affections (Pr 7:16,17), but there shall be none to be charmed by them (Isa 3:25): Thy men shall fall by the sword, and the mighty in the war, The fire shall consume them, and then the maidens shall not be given in marriage; as it is, Ps 78:63. When the sword comes with commission the mighty commonly fall first by it, because they are most forward to venture. And, when Zion's guards are cut off, no marvel that Zion's gates lament and mourn (Isa 3:26), the enemies having made themselves masters of them; and the city itself, being desolate, being emptied or swept, shall sit upon the ground like a disconsolate widow. If sin be harboured with in the walls, lamentation and mourning are near the gates.