Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary · Romans 第7章

注释阅读优化

章节注释

Romans 第 7 章

서론

无标题

打开经文

简体中文

在本章中我们可以看到:一、进一步以脱离律法的自由作为论据,督促我们追求成圣(罗7:1-6)。二、尽管如此,仍从使徒亲身的经历来论证并肯定律法的卓越与功用(罗7:7-14)。三、描写心中恩典与败坏之间的争战(罗7:14-25)。

英文原文

We may observe in this chapter, I. Our freedom from the law further urged as an argument to press upon us sanctification, Ro 7:1-6. II. The excellency and usefulness of the law asserted and proved from the apostle's own experience, notwithstanding, Ro 7:7-14. III. A description of the conflict between grace and corruption in the heart, Ro 7:14-25.

1-6

Observations Respecting the Law (58 AD)

打开经文

简体中文

关于律法的几点观察 (58 AD)

¹ 弟兄们,我现在对明白律法的人说,你们岂不晓得律法管人是在活着的时候吗?
² 就如女人有了丈夫,丈夫还活着,就被律法约束;丈夫若死了,他就脱离了丈夫的律法。
³ 所以丈夫活着,他若归于别人,便叫淫妇;丈夫若死了,他就脱离了丈夫的律法,虽然归于别人,也不是淫妇。
⁴ 我的弟兄们,这样说来,你们借着基督的身体,在律法上也是死了,叫你们归于别人,就是归于那从死里复活的,叫我们结果子给神。
⁵ 因为我们属肉体的时候,那因律法而生的恶欲就在我们肢体中发动,以致结成死亡的果子,
⁶ 但我们既然在捆我们的律法上死了,现今就脱离了律法,叫我们服事主,要按着心灵的新样,不按着仪文的旧样。

在前一章为劝我们离罪归圣所用的众论据中,有一个是(罗6:14):「我们不在律法之下」;这论据在此进一步被坚持、被说明(罗7:6):「我们脱离了律法。」这话是什么意思?它如何成为罪不应管辖我们、我们当在新生的样式里行走的论据呢?1. 我们脱离了律法咒诅、定我们为有罪的那权势——因我们所犯的罪。律法对我们所宣告的判语,借基督之死已对一切真信徒撤销、推翻。律法说:「犯罪的灵魂必死」;但我们「脱离了律法」。「耶和华已经除掉你的罪,你必不死。」我们「赎出律法的咒诅」(加3:13)。2. 我们脱离了律法刺激、惹动住在我们里面之罪的那权势。这一点使徒似乎特别指的(罗7:5):「那因律法而生的恶欲。」律法借吩咐、禁止、威吓,对败坏堕落的人——却不提供医治和加力的恩典——只是挑动败坏,如同太阳照在粪堆上,激起并引出污秽的蒸气。我们因堕落而瘸腿,律法来指引我们,却未提供什么来医治、帮助我们这瘸腿,于是使我们更为踉跄、更为跌倒。当把这律法理解为:不是作为准则,而是作为行为之约。如今这两点都是我们当圣洁的论据;因为在此有对努力的鼓励,尽管我们在许多事上亏缺。我们在恩典之下,它应许赐力量去行所命令的,并在我们行错时,悔改即蒙赦免。这就是这些经文的大旨:在信仰表白和特权上,我们乃在恩典之约下,不在行为之约下——在基督的福音下,不在摩西的律法下。他从前曾借复活进入新生命、服事新主人的比喻来说明律法状态与福音状态的分别;如今他在此借嫁给新丈夫的比喻来说明。

一、我们第一次的婚姻是与律法,而按婚姻之律,这婚姻只在律法的「有生之年」延续。婚姻之律约束双方直到一方死去——无论哪一方——且仅此而已。任何一方的死都解除双方。为此他诉诸他们自己,作为明白律法的人(罗7:1):「我对明白律法的人说。」与有知识的人交谈是大益处,因为这样的人能更 readily 明白并把握一个真理。罗马的许多基督徒从前是犹太人,因此对律法十分熟悉。对明白人,话总能抓住一些。「律法管人是在活着的时候」;特别是婚姻之律有约束力;或者,概括而言,每一条律法都是如此有限——国家的律法、亲属的律法、家族的律法等等。1. 律法的约束不更进一步;借着死,那活着时服在轭下的仆人便「脱离了他的主人」(伯3:19)。2. 律法的定罪不更进一步;死是律法的完结。Actio moritur cum personâ——诉讼权随人而死。最严苛的律法也不过是杀身体,过后它再不能作什么。如此,当我们「向律法活」时——当我们仍处于旧约状态,在福音进入世界之前,并在福音带着能力进入我们心中之前——我们就在律法的权下。婚姻之律也是如此(罗7:2):女人在丈夫活着时受约束,受约束到不能另嫁;若另嫁,便算为淫妇(罗7:3)。不仅被别人污秽使她成为淫妇,嫁给别人更使她成为淫妇;因为如此更为严重:妄用了神所设立的制度,使之成为不洁的庇护。如此我们曾与律法「结了婚」(罗7:5):「我们属肉体的时候」——即在属肉体的状态中、在罪和败坏掌权之时——「属肉体」为元素——那时「因律法而生的恶欲在我们肢体中发动」,我们被罪的潮流冲走,律法不过像一道不完全的堤坝,反而使水势更高、怒涛更猛。我们的心愿朝向罪,如同妻子的心愿朝向丈夫;罪管辖我们。我们拥抱它、爱它,凡事献给它为它而活,日日与它相交,以讨它喜悦为我们所顾念。我们在罪和死的律法之下,如同妻子在婚姻的律法之下;这婚姻所结的果子,是「结成死亡的果子」,即由原始的败坏产生出实际犯的罪——这些罪该受死。私欲既因律法怀了孕(律法是罪的能力,林前15:56),就「生出罪来;罪既长成,就生出死来」(雅1:15)。这就是与罪和律法结婚所生的后裔。这就是恶欲在我们肢体中发动所产生的。这事在有生之年——律法向我们活、我们向律法活之时——一直延续。

二、我们的第二次婚姻是嫁给基督:这事如何发生呢?

  1. 我们借死脱离了对律法作为约的本分,正如妻子脱离了对丈夫的本分(罗7:3)。这一比拟并不十分紧密,也无需十分紧密。「你们在律法上也是死了」(罗7:4)。他没有说:「律法死了」(有人以为这是因为要避免冒犯那些仍为律法大发热心的人),但他说「你们向律法死了」,其实一码事。世界向我们死、我们向世界死,是一回事;律法死、我们向律法死,也是一回事。我们「脱离了律法」(罗7:6),katergethemen——「我们在律法上被作废了」;我们作为妻子对它的本分被取消、归于无效。他接着论到律法的死,是就它作为捆绑我们的律法而言:「那拘束我们的既死」;不是律法本身,而是它对刑罚的本分和它对罪的刺激。它死了,失了能力;而这是(罗7:4)「借着基督的身体」,即借基督在他身体中所受的苦,借他被钉的身体——这身体废除了律法,满足了律法的要求,为我们对律法的干犯作了满足,为我们买赎了恩典之约,其中为我们存留了义和能力——那是律法所没有、也不能有的。我们借着与基督奥秘的身体联合,便向律法死了。借着受洗在表面上归入基督,借着信心大有能力、有效地归入基督,我们便向律法死了,再与它无干——如同死了的仆人脱离主人,与主人的轭无干。

  2. 我们嫁给了基督。我们信的那日,便是许配给主耶稣的那日。我们开始一种倚靠他、向她尽本分的生活:「归于别人,就是归于那从死里复活的」——这是对基督的一种迂回说法,在此非常贴切;因为我们向罪和律法死,是与基督的死和他身体的钉十字架相合;照样我们以新生献给基督,是与基督的复活相合。我们嫁给了那位复活、升天的耶稣——何等尊荣的婚姻。参林后11:2;弗5:29。如今我们如此嫁给了基督,(1)「叫我们结果子给神」(罗7:4)。婚姻的目的之一是结果子:神设立这制度,为要使他得「敬虔的后裔」(玛2:15)。妻子被比作结果子的葡萄树,儿女被称为腹中的果子。我们嫁给基督的伟大目的,便是在爱心、恩典、各样善工上多结果子。这是「归于神的果子」——蒙神悦纳、合他旨意、以他荣耀为目的的果子。正如我们从前与罪的婚姻结出「归于死亡」的果子,照样我们第二次与基督的婚姻结出「归于神」的果子——就是义的果子。善工是新本性的儿女,是我们与基督联合的产物,正如葡萄树结果子的丰盛是它与根联合的产物。无论我们的认信和声称如何,未嫁给基督之前,没有归给神的果子;乃是在基督耶稣里,我们「为要叫我们行善」而被造(弗2:10)。惟一「算账」得益处的果子,是在基督里结出的。这把信徒的善工与假冒为善者和自以为义者的善工分别开来:前者是在婚姻里结出的,是在与基督联合里行的,是奉主耶稣的名行的(西3:17)。这无疑是敬虔的奥秘之一。(2)「叫我们按着心灵的新样服事,不按着仪文的旧样」(罗7:6)。既嫁了新夫,便当改变生活方式。我们仍要服事,但这服事乃是完全的自由;而服事罪是完全的苦工:我们如今要按着心灵的新样服事——按新的属灵规则,从新的属灵原则,在灵和真理里服事(约4:24)。我们的灵必须先被神的灵更新,我们才能在其中服事。「不按着仪文的旧样」;即我们不可仅停留在外在的服事上,像属肉体的犹太人那样——他们以自己 adherence 于律法的字句为荣,却不留意敬拜中属灵的部分。字句以其束缚和威吓被称为「杀人的」,但我们已脱离那轭,为要叫我们「可以坦然无惧地……事奉他」(路1:74,75)。我们在圣灵的施行之下,所以必须属灵,在灵里服事。请与林后3:3,6等处比较。我们理当在幔内敬拜,不再在外院。

英文原文

Observations Respecting the Law (58 AD)

¹ Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth?
² For the woman which hath a husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband.
³ So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man.
⁴ Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.
⁵ For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death.
⁶ But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.

Among other arguments used in the foregoing chapter to persuade us against sin, and to holiness, this was one (Ro 6:14), that we are not under the law; and this argument is here further insisted upon and explained (Ro 7:6): We are delivered from the law. What is meant by this? And how is it an argument why sin should not reign over us, and why we should walk in newness of life? 1. We are delivered from the power of the law which curses and condemns us for the sin committed by us. The sentence of the law against us is vacated and reversed, by the death of Christ, to all true believers. The law saith, The soul that sins shall die; but we are delivered from the law. The Lord has taken away thy sin, thou shalt not die. We are redeemed from the curse of the law, Ga 3:13. 2. We are delivered from that power of the law which irritates and provokes the sin that dwelleth in us. This the apostle seems especially to refer to (Ro 7:5): The motions of sins which were by the law. The law, by commanding, forbidding, threatening, corrupt and fallen man, but offering no grace to cure and strengthen, did but stir up the corruption, and, like the sun shining upon a dunghill, excite and draw up the filthy steams. We being lamed by the fall, the law comes and directs us, but provides nothing to heal and help our lameness, and so makes us halt and stumble the more. Understand this of the law not as a rule, but as a covenant of works. Now each of these is an argument why we should be holy; for here is encouragement to endeavours, though in many things we come short. We are under grace, which promises strength to do what it commands, and pardon upon repentance when we do amiss. This is the scope of these verses in general, that, in point of profession and privilege, we are under a covenant of grace, and not under a covenant of works—under the gospel of Christ, and not under the law of Moses. The difference between a law-state and a gospel-state he had before illustrated by the similitude of rising to a new life, and serving a new master; now here he speaks of is under the similitude of being married to a new husband.

I. Our first marriage was to the law, which, according to the law of marriage, was to continue only during the life of the law. The law of marriage is binding till the death of one of the parties, no matter which, and no longer. The death of either discharges both. For this he appeals to themselves, as persons knowing the law (Ro 7:1): I speak to those that know the law. It is a great advantage to discourse with those that have knowledge, for such can more readily understand and apprehend a truth. Many of the Christians at Rome were such as had been Jews, and so were well acquainted with the law. One has some hold of knowing people. The law hath power over a man as long as he liveth; in particular, the law of marriage hath power; or, in general, every law is so limited—the laws of nations, of relations, of families, etc. 1. The obligation of laws extends no further; by death the servant who, while he lived, was under the yoke, is freed from his master, Job 3:19. 2. The condemnation of laws extends no further; death is the finishing of the law. Actio moritur cum personâ—The action expires with the person. The severest laws could but kill the body, and after that there is no more that they can do. Thus while we were alive to the law we were under the power of it—while we were in our Old-Testament state, before the gospel came into the world, and before it came with power into our hearts. Such is the law of marriage (Ro 7:2), the woman is bound to her husband during life, so bound to him that she cannot marry another; if she do, she shall be reckoned an adulteress, Ro 7:3. It will make her an adulteress, not only to be defiled by, but to be married to, another man; for that is so much the worse, upon this account, that it abuses an ordinance of God, by making it to patronise the uncleanness. Thus were we married to the law (Ro 7:5): When we were in the flesh, that is, in a carnal state, under the reigning power of sin and corruption—in the flesh as in our element—then the motions of sins which were by the law did work in our members, we were carried down the stream of sin, and the law was but as an imperfect dam, which made the stream to swell the higher, and rage the more. Our desire was towards sin, as that of the wife towards her husband, and sin ruled over us. We embraced it, loved it, devoted all to it, conversed daily with it, made it our care to please it. We were under a law of sin and death, as the wife under the law of marriage; and the product of this marriage was fruit brought forth unto death, that is, actual transgressions were produced by the original corruption, such as deserve death. Lust, having conceived by the law (which is the strength of sin, 1Co 15:56), bringeth forth sin, and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death, Jam 1:15. This is the posterity that springs from this marriage to sin and the law. This comes of the motions of sin working in our members. And this continues during life, while the law is alive to us, and we are alive to the law.

II. Our second marriage is to Christ: and how comes this about? Why,

1. We are freed, by death, from our obligation to the law as a covenant, as the wife is from her obligation to her husband, Ro 7:3. This resemblance is not very close, nor needed it to be. You are become dead to the law, Ro 7:4. He does not say, "The law is dead" (some think because he would avoid giving offence to those who were yet zealous for the law), but, which comes all to one, You are dead to the law. As the crucifying of the world to us, and of us to the world, amounts to one and the same thing, so doth the law dying, and our dying to it. We are delivered from the law (Ro 7:6), katergethemen—we are nulled as to the law; our obligation to it as a husband is cassated and made void. And then he speaks of the law being dead as far as it was a law of bondage to us: That being dead wherein we were held; not the law itself, but its obligation to punishment and its provocation to sin. It is dead, it has lost its power; and this (Ro 7:4) by the body of Christ, that is, by the sufferings of Christ in his body, by his crucified body, which abrogated the law, answered the demands of it, made satisfaction for our violation of it, purchased for us a covenant of grace, in which righteousness and strength are laid up for us, such as were not, nor could be, by the law. We are dead to the law by our union with the mystical body of Christ. By being incorporated into Christ in our baptism professedly, in our believing powerfully and effectually, we are dead to the law, have no more to do with it than the dead servant, that is free from his master, hath to do with his master's yoke.

2. We are married to Christ. The day of our believing is the day of our espousals to the Lord Jesus. We enter upon a life of dependence on him and duty to him: Married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, a periphrasis of Christ and very pertinent here; for as our dying to sin and the law is in conformity to the death of Christ, and the crucifying of his body, so our devotedness to Christ in newness of life is in conformity to the resurrection of Christ. We are married to the raised exalted Jesus, a very honourable marriage. Compare 2Co 11:2, Eph 5:29. Now we are thus married to Christ, (1.) That we should bring forth fruit unto God, Ro 7:4. One end of marriage is fruitfulness: God instituted the ordinance that he might seek a godly seed, Mal 2:15. The wife is compared to the fruitful vine, and children are called the fruit of the womb. Now the great end of our marriage to Christ is our fruitfulness in love, and grace, and every good work. This is fruit unto God, pleasing to God, according to his will, aiming at his glory. As our old marriage to sin produced fruit unto death, so our second marriage to Christ produces fruit unto God, fruits of righteousness. Good works are the children of the new nature, the products of our union with Christ, as the fruitfulness of the vine is the product of its union with the root. Whatever our professions and pretensions may be, there is no fruit brought forth to God till we are married to Christ; it is in Christ Jesus that we are created unto good works, Eph 2:10. The only fruit which turns to a good account is that which is brought forth in Christ. This distinguishes the good works of believers from the good works of hypocrites and self-justifiers that they are brought forth in marriage, done in union with Christ, in the name of the Lord Jesus, Col 3:17. This is, without controversy, one of the great mysteries of godliness. (2.) That we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter, Ro 7:6. Being married to a new husband, we must change our way. Still we must serve, but it is a service that is perfect freedom, whereas the service of sin was a perfect drudgery: we must now serve in newness of spirit, by new spiritual rules, from new spiritual principles, in spirit and in truth, Joh 4:24. There must be a renovation of our spirits wrought by the spirit of God, and in that we must serve. Not in the oldness of the letter; that is, we must not rest in mere external services, as the carnal Jews did, who gloried in their adherence to the letter of the law, and minded not the spiritual part of worship. The letter is said to kill with its bondage and terror, but we are delivered from that yoke that we may serve God without fear, in holiness and righteousness, Lu 1:74,75. We are under the dispensation of the Spirit, and therefore must be spiritual, and serve in the spirit. Compare with this 2Co 3:3,6, etc. It becomes us to worship within the veil, and no longer in the outward court.

7-14

Excellency of the Law; Usefulness of the Law (58 AD)

打开经文

简体中文

律法的卓越;律法的功用(公元58年)

⁷ 这样,我们可说什么呢?律法是罪吗?断乎不是!只是非因律法,我就不知何为罪。非律法说「不可起贪心」,我就不知何为贪心。 ⁸ 然而罪趁着机会,就借诫命叫诸般的贪心在我里头发动;因为没有律法,罪是死的。 ⁹ 我以前没有律法是活着的;但是诫命来到,罪又活了,我就死了。 ¹⁰ 那本来叫人活的诫命,反倒叫我死; ¹¹ 因为罪趁着机会,就借诫命引诱我,并且杀了我。 ¹² 这样看来,律法是圣洁的,诫命也是圣洁、公义、良善的。 ¹³ 既然如此,那良善的是叫我死吗?断乎不是!叫我死的乃是罪。但罪借那良善的叫我死,就显出真是罪,借诫命罪更显出是恶极了。 ¹⁴ (上)我们原晓得律法是属乎灵的——

针对他在前一段所说的话,使徒在此提出一个异议,并详加回答:「这样,我们可说什么呢?律法是罪吗?」当他论到罪的统治,并说到律法作为约对此统治的影响时,他所说的可能容易被人误解为对律法的非难;为防止这一点,他借自己的经历说明律法作为准则(不是作为约)的极大卓越与功用,并进一步指出罪如何借诫命「趁机」。请特别留意——

一、律法本身极大的卓越。保罗断不至于非难律法;不,他尊敬地论到它。1. 它是「圣洁、公义、良善的」(罗7:12)。律法总体如此,每一条具体的诫命也如此。律法如何,端视立法者如何。神这位大立法者是圣洁、公义、良善的,所以他的律法也必如此。律法的内容是圣洁的:它命令圣洁,鼓励圣洁;它是圣洁的,因为它与圣洁之神的圣洁旨意——圣洁的本源——相符。它是公义的,因为它合乎公平与正理的规则:「耶和华的道是正直的。」它在设计上是良善的;它是为人类的福祉而赐的,为世上保守和平与秩序。它使遵守的人变好;其用意正是要改良并改革人类。哪里有真实的恩典,那里便有这样的同意——律法是圣洁、公义、良善的。2.「律法是属乎灵的」(罗7:14),不仅就其效用而言——作为使我们属灵的手段——更是就其范围而言;它达于我们的灵,对里面之人的动向加以约束并指引;它是「连心中的思念和主意都能辨明」的(来4:12)。它禁止属灵的恶行、心中的凶杀、心中的淫乱。它命令属灵的事奉,要求心,要我们在灵里敬拜神。它是属灵的律法,因为它是神——他是灵,也是赐诸灵之父——所赐的;它是赐给人的,而人的主要部分是属灵的;灵魂是人最好、为首的部分,所以给人的律法,必是给灵魂的律法。在此,神的律法超过一切别的律法——它是属灵的律法。别的律法可以禁止「图谋并想象」等心中的叛逆,却不能对此加以审理,除非有公开的行为;但神的律法留意那在心中所存的不义,即使不再向前。「你当洗去心中的恶」(耶4:14)。「我们原晓得」:哪里有真实的恩典,那里就有对神律法属灵性质的经历性的认识。

二、他从律法所得的极大益处。1. 它是显明的:「非因律法,我就不知何为罪」(罗7:7)。正如直的显出弯的,正如照镜子把我们本来的面貌连同其中一切斑点和瑕疵显出来,照样,要达到那为悔改所必需、并因此为平安与赦免所必需的对罪的认识,除了把我们的心和生活与律法相比较之外,别无他法。特别地,他是借着第十条诫命来到贪心之罪的认识。所谓贪心,他指的是住在我们里头的罪,罪最初的动向与运行,那败坏的原则。这一点他是当律法说「不可起贪心」之时才认识的。律法所说的话,与文士和法利赛人所叫它说的话不同;律法是按其属灵的意义和含义说的。借此他知道贪心就是罪,并且是非常有罪的罪——那些从未付诸行动的向罪之心动与欲望也是有罪的,并且极其有罪。保罗有非常敏锐而深入的判断力,有教育所带来的一切优势与上进,却仍未曾达到对内住之罪的真正认识,直到圣灵借律法向他显明。属血气的人对什么事比对原初败坏更瞎眼呢?关于这事,悟性全然在黑暗中,直到圣灵借律法启示并显明它。这样,「律法是我们训蒙的师傅,引我们到基督那里」,律法开启并探查伤口,从而预备它得医治。这样,罪借诫命确实「显出真是罪」(罗7:13);它显出自己的本色,显出它实在是什么,你不能用比它自己更坏的名字称呼它。这样,借诫命它「更显出是恶极了」;即它显为如此。我们从未看见罪中那绝望的毒与恶,直到我们把它与律法、与律法的属灵性质相比较,那时我们才看见它是「苦的事、恶的事」。2. 它是使人谦卑的(罗7:9):「我是活着的。」他以为自己光景很好;他按自己的意见与判断是活着的,对自己的状态之好十分稳妥自信。他「以前」如此——原文 pote,即「从前」,他作法利赛人之时;因为那一代人普遍的脾气,是自视甚高;保罗那时与别人一样,原因是那时他「没有律法」。他虽在律法师迦玛列门下受教,自己虽是律法的大学者、严紧的遵守者、为律法大发热心的人,却仍「没有律法」。他有律法的字句,却没有律法的属灵意义——有壳,却没有仁。他手中有律法,头脑中有律法,心中却没有律法;有律法的概念,却没有律法的大能。有许多在罪中属灵死了的人,在自己的意见中却是活着的,他们之误,乃因对律法的陌生。「但是诫命来到」——带着能力来到(不是仅来到眼前,而是来到心中),「罪又活了」,如同房中的尘埃在阳光照入之时飞扬起来(即显现出来)。保罗那时看见了罪中他前所未见之事;那时他看见了罪的根源——苦根、败坏的偏向、退后的倾向——罪的本色:使人变形、玷污、破坏公义之律、冒犯可畏之威严、把主权之冠抛在地上而亵渎它——罪的后果:罪之后随着死,罪与咒诅相连。「这样罪又活了,我就死了」;我失去先前对自己所存的良好意见,而变为另一种心思。「罪又活了,我就死了」;即圣灵借诫命使我确信我是在罪的状态中,并因罪而在死的状态中。」律法的功用如此卓越:它是「灯」,是「光」;它「苏醒人心」,开启眼睛,在旷野预备主的道路,裂开磐石,削平大小山冈,「为主预备合用的百姓」。

三、尽管如此,他的败坏本性对律法所作的不善之用。1.「罪趁着机会,就借诫命叫诸般的贪心在我里头发动」(罗7:8)。请注意,保罗里头有诸般的贪心,虽然他是世上最好的未重生者之一;「就律法上的义说,我是无可指责的」,却仍感觉有诸般的贪心。而发动这事的是罪——内住的罪、他的败坏本性(他所说的乃是一种发动罪的罪)——并且它「借诫命趁机」。若不是律法的约束,败坏的本性便不会如此高涨并发怒;正如身体中致病的体液,因泻药之力不足而不能把它们排出,反被激起更加发炎。败坏的本性易于「向所禁的倾斜」。自从亚当吃了禁果,我们都偏爱禁路;病态的胃口最强烈地倾向那有害而被禁之物。「没有律法罪是死的」,如同冬天的蛇,律法的日光使之苏醒并激怒。2. 它「引诱人」。罪给罪人设下骗局,那是一个致命的骗局(罗7:11)。「借它」(借诫命)「杀了我」。因为律法中并没有明说针对罪恶情欲的威吓,罪——即他自己的败坏本性——便趁机向他应许免责,并对他说,如同蛇对我们始祖所说:「你们不一定死。」如此它欺骗了他,并杀了他。3. 它「借那良善的叫我死」(罗7:13)。发动贪心的,也发动死,因为罪生出死。再没有比败坏邪恶的本性更能曲解再好的事、并使之成为罪的因由的了;再香的花,罪也能从中吸出毒来。如此罪显为罪。罪所做的最坏、最像它自己的事,乃是曲解律法,并借此趁机更显恶毒。如此那「本来叫人活的」诫命——原是引人在通向安慰与幸福之路上作向导的——因本性的败坏,反倒「叫我死」(罗7:10)。许多宝贵的灵魂在救恩的磐石上撞碎;同一的话语,对一些人是「叫人活出生命」的因由,对别人却是「叫人死出死亡」的因由。同一的太阳,既使花园的芬芳更显芬芳,也使粪堆的臭气更臭;同一的热,既使蜡软化,也使泥土刚硬;同一的婴孩,「叫以色列中许多人跌倒,许多人兴起」。防止这危害之法,是使我们的灵魂向神话语与律法的命令权柄屈膝,不与之相争,乃顺服之。

英文原文

Excellency of the Law; Usefulness of the Law (58 AD)

⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
⁸ But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead.
⁹ For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.
¹⁰ And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.
¹¹ For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.
¹² Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.
¹³ Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.
¹⁴ a For we know that the law is spiritual:—

To what he had said in the former paragraph, the apostle here raises an objection, which he answers very fully: What shall we say then? Is the law sin? When he had been speaking of the dominion of sin, he had said so much of the influence of the law as a covenant upon that dominion that it might easily be misinterpreted as a reflection upon the law, to prevent which he shows from his own experience the great excellency and usefulness of the law, not as a covenant, but as a guide; and further discovers how sin took occasion by the commandment. Observe in particular,

I. The great excellency of the law in itself. Far be it from Paul to reflect upon the law; no, he speaks honourably of it. 1. It is holy, just, and good, Ro 7:12. The law in general is so, and every particular commandment is so. Laws are as the law-makers are. God, the great lawgiver, is holy, just, and good, therefore his law must needs be so. The matter of it is holy: it commands holiness, encourages holiness; it is holy, for it is agreeable to the holy will of God, the original of holiness. It is just, for it is consonant to the rules of equity and right reason: the ways of the Lord are right. It is good in the design of it; it was given for the good of mankind, for the conservation of peace and order in the world. It makes the observers of it good; the intention of it was to better and reform mankind. Wherever there is true grace there is an assent to this—that the law is holy, just, and good. 2. The law is spiritual (Ro 7:14), not only in regard to the effect of it, as it is a means of making us spiritual, but in regard to the extent of it; it reaches our spirits, it lays a restraint upon, and gives a direction to, the motions of the inward man; it is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart, Heb 4:12. It forbids spiritual wickedness, heart-murder, and heart-adultery. It commands spiritual service, requires the heart, obliges us to worship God in the spirit. It is a spiritual law, for it is given by God, who is a Spirit and the Father of spirits; it is given to man, whose principal part is spiritual; the soul is the best part, and the leading part of the man, and therefore the law to the man must needs be a law to the soul. Herein the law of God is above all other laws, that it is a spiritual law. Other laws may forbid compassing and imagining, etc., which are treason in the heart, but cannot take cognizance thereof, unless there be some overt act; but the law of God takes notice of the iniquity regarded in the heart, though it go no further. Wash thy heart from wickedness, Jer 4:14. We know this: Wherever there is true grace there is an experimental knowledge of the spirituality of the law of God.

II. The great advantage that he had found by the law. 1. It was discovering: I had not known sin but by the law, Ro 7:7. As that which is straight discovers that which is crooked, as the looking-glass shows us our natural face with all its spots and deformities, so there is no way of coming to that knowledge of sin which is necessary to repentance, and consequently to peace and pardon, but by comparing our hearts and lives with the law. Particularly he came to the knowledge of the sinfulness of lust by the law of the tenth commandment. By lust he means sin dwelling in us, sin in its first motions and workings, the corrupt principle. This he came to know when the law said, Thou shalt not covet. The law spoke in other language than the scribes and Pharisees made it to speak in; it spoke in the spiritual sense and meaning of it. By this he knew that lust was sin and a very sinful sin, that those motions and desires of the heart towards sin which never came into act were sinful, exceedingly sinful. Paul had a very quick and piercing judgment, all the advantages and improvements of education, and yet never attained the right knowledge of indwelling sin till the Spirit by the law made it known to him. There is nothing about which the natural man is more blind than about original corruption, concerning which the understanding is altogether in the dark till the Spirit by the law reveal it, and make it known. Thus the law is a schoolmaster, to bring us to Christ, opens and searches the wound, and so prepares it for healing. Thus sin by the commandment does appear sin (Ro 7:13); it appears in its own colours, appears to be what it is, and you cannot call it by a worse name than its own. Thus by the commandment it becomes exceedingly sinful; that is, it appears to be so. We never see the desperate venom or malignity there is in sin, till we come to compare it with the law, and the spiritual nature of the law, and then we see it to be an evil and a bitter thing. 2. It was humbling (Ro 7:9): I was alive. He thought himself in a very good condition; he was alive in his own opinion and apprehension, very secure and confident of the goodness of his state. Thus he was once, pote—in times past, when he was a Pharisee; for it was the common temper of that generation of men that they had a very good conceit of themselves; and Paul was then like the rest of them, and the reason was he was then without the law. Though brought up at the feet of Gamaliel, a doctor of the law, though himself a great student in the law, a strict observer of it, and a zealous stickler for it, yet without the law. He had the letter of the law, but he had not the spiritual meaning of it—the shell, but not the kernel. He had the law in his hand and in his head, but he had it not in his heart; the notion of it, but not the power of it. There are a great many who are spiritually dead in sin, that yet are alive in their own opinion of themselves, and it is their strangeness to the law that is the cause of the mistake. But when the commandment came, came in the power of it (not to his eyes only, but to his heart), sin revived, as the dust in a room rises (that is, appears) when the sun-shine is let into it. Paul then saw that in sin which he had never seen before; he then saw sin in its causes, the bitter root, the corrupt bias, the bent to backslide,—sin in its colours, deforming, defiling, breaking a righteous law, affronting an awful Majesty, profaning a sovereign crown by casting it to the ground,—sin in its consequences, sin with death at the heels of it, sin and the curse entailed upon it. "Thus sin revived, and then I died; I lost that good opinion which I had had of myself, and came to be of another mind. Sin revived, and I died; that is, the Spirit, but the commandment, convinced me that I was in a state of sin, and in a state of death because of sin." Of this excellent use is the law; it is a lamp and a light; it converts the soul, opens the eyes, prepares the way of the Lord in the desert, rends the rocks, levels the mountains, makes ready a people prepared for the Lord.

III. The ill use that his corrupt nature made of the law notwithstanding. 1. Sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence, Ro 7:8. Observe, Paul had in him all manner of concupiscence, though one of the best unregenerate men that ever was; as touching the righteousness of the law, blameless, and yet sensible of all manner of concupiscence. And it was sin that wrought it, indwelling sin, his corrupt nature (he speaks of a sin that did work sin), and it took occasion by the commandment. The corrupt nature would not have swelled and raged so much if it had not been for the restraints of the law; as the peccant humours in the body are raised, and more inflamed, by a purge that is not strong enough to carry them off. It is incident to corrupt nature, in vetitum niti—to lean towards what is forbidden. Ever since Adam ate forbidden fruit, we have all been fond of forbidden paths; the diseased appetite is carried out most strongly towards that which is hurtful and prohibited. Without the law sin was dead, as a snake in winter, which the sunbeams of the law quicken and irritate. 2. It deceived men. Sin puts a cheat upon the sinner, and it is a fatal cheat, Ro 7:11. By it (by the commandment) slew me. There being in the law no such express threatening against sinful lustings, sin, that is, his won corrupt nature, took occasion thence to promise him impunity, and to say, as the serpent to our first parents, You shall not surely die. Thus it deceived and slew him. 3. It wrought death in me by that which is good, Ro 7:13. That which works concupiscence works death, for sin bringeth forth death. Nothing so good but a corrupt and vicious nature will pervert it, and make it an occasion of sin; no flower so sweet by sin will such poison out of it. Now in this sin appears sin. The worst thing that sin does, and most like itself, is the perverting of the law, and taking occasion from it to be so much the more malignant. Thus the commandment, which was ordained to life, was intended as a guide in the way to comfort and happiness, proved unto death, through the corruption of nature, Ro 7:10. Many a precious soul splits upon the rock of salvation; and the same word which to some is an occasion of life unto life is to others an occasion of death unto death. The same sun that makes the garden of flowers more fragrant makes the dunghill more noisome; the same heat that softens wax hardens clay; and the same child was set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel. The way to prevent this mischief is to bow our souls to the commanding authority of the word and law of God, not striving against, but submitting to it.

14-25

Conflict between Grace and Corruption (58 AD)

打开经文

简体中文

恩典与败坏之间的争战(公元58年)

¹⁴ (注:但我是属肉体的,已经卖给了罪。 ¹⁵ 因为我所作的,我自己不明白;我所愿意的,我并不作;我所恨恶的,我倒去作。 ¹⁶ 我若所作的是我所不愿意的,我就应承律法是善的。 ¹⁷ 既是这样,就不是我作的,乃是住在我里头的罪作的。 ¹⁸ 我也知道在我里头,就是我肉体之中,没有良善;因为立志为善由得我,只是行出来由不得我。 ¹⁹ 故此,我所愿意的善,我反不作;我所不愿意的恶,我倒去作。 ²⁰ 我若去作所不愿意作的,就不是我作的,乃是住在我里头的罪作的。 ²¹ 我觉得有个律,就是我愿意为善的时候,便有恶与我同在。 ²² 因为按着我里面的人,我是喜欢神的律; ²³ 但我觉得肢体中另有个律和我心中的律交战,把我掳去,叫我附从那肢体中犯罪的律。 ²⁴ 我真是苦啊!谁能救我脱离这取死的身体呢? ²⁵ 感谢神,靠着我们的主耶稣基督就能脱离了。这样看来,我以内心顺服神的律;我肉体却顺服罪的律了。

此处描述了心中恩典与败坏之间、神的律与罪的律之间的争战。这可以两方式应用:1. 应用于一个被 conviction 之灵魂、却仍未重生之人里面的挣扎——有人以为保罗就是以这人的身份说话。2. 应用于一个更新成圣、却仍在「不完全」状态中的灵魂里面的挣扎——如另一些人所认为。使徒在此到底指两者中的何者,存在很大争议。此处当他说到那人被卖在罪下、行罪、不能行善之时,恶势力如此占上风,似乎难以应用在重生者身上——他们被描述为「不随从肉体,只随从圣灵而行」;然而当他论到恨罪、赞同律法、以律法为乐、以内心服事神的律之时,善势力如此占上风,更难应用在「死在过犯罪恶之中」的未重生者身上。

一、应用在一个被 conviction、却仍处在罪状态中的灵魂所感受的挣扎——这人晓得他主的旨意却不去行,从律法受了教导便「喜爱那超越的事」,却仍时常违犯它(罗2:17-23)。虽然他里头有见证反对他所犯之罪的东西,并且他犯罪并非没有极大的 reluctancy——较高的功能正在反对它,天然的良心在罪未犯之前警告,在罪已犯之后责备——然而这人继续作他辖制之私欲的奴仆。并非每个未重生者都是如此,只是那些被律法 conviction、却未被福音改变的人才是如此。使徒曾说(罗6:14):「罪必不能作你们的主,因你们不在律法之下,乃在恩典之下」;为证明这话,他指出:在律法之下、不在恩典之下的人,可能、并且实在在罪的辖制之下。律法能发现罪、使人 conviction 于罪,却不能征服制服罪——那些在极强律法 conviction 之下的人中间罪仍占优势,便是明证。它能发现污秽,却不愿洗去它。它使人「劳苦担重担」(太11:28),把罪担加在他身上;然而若仅以它为止息之处,它对脱去那担子毫无帮助;这只能在基督里得着。律法能使人呼叫:「我真是苦啊!谁能救我?」却仍把他留在如此捆绑被掳之中——因它太弱不能释放他(罗8:3),给他「奴仆的心」「仍旧害怕」(罗8:15)。如今一个借律法进步到这地步的灵魂,是处于借着基督得以自由的「好途径」上,虽然许多人停留在此不再前进。腓力斯「战战兢兢」,却从未到基督那里。一个人「眼目睁开」(民24:3-4),仅被一般的 conviction 所光照,并带着自责的良心去服事魔鬼,仍可能下地狱。他可能「应承律法是善的」,「乐意知道神的道」(如他们,赛58:2),可能里头有那反对罪、为圣洁作见证的东西;然而这一切都被那辖制的爱罪之心所压制。醉酒和淫乱的人有时也有一些模糊的愿望想要改掉他们的罪,却仍坚持在其中——他们的 conviction 如此无力,如此不足。有许多人非要如此理解这一切,并为这事力争不可;虽然很难想象,使徒若有意如此,为何全程以「自己」的身份说话;不仅如此,还用「现在时态」。关于他自己在 conviction 之下的状态,他曾作为一件「过去」之事详细说过(罗7:7等):「我死了……诫命……我发现是叫死的」;若他在此说的是同一状态,作为他现在的状态、他如今所处的情况,他当然不是有意被如此理解:因此——

二、这更当被理解为成圣灵魂中恩典与败坏之间所维持的争战。那里有内住的败坏之残余——即使那里有活的恩典之律——这是无可争议的;这败坏每日在「软弱的罪」中显明出来(这与恩典状态相符)也同样确实。我们若说自己没有罪,便是自欺(约壹1:8、10)。真恩典与这些罪和败坏相争、不容许它们、恨恶它们、为它们忧伤、把它们当作重担叹息——这也同样确实(加5:17):「肉体情欲抗拒圣灵,圣灵抗拒肉体;这两个彼此相敌,使你们不能作所愿意作的事」。这些就是我认为使徒在这段论述中所含的真理。他的目的是进一步开启成圣的本性——它在今生不能达到无罪的完全;因此为激发我们、并鼓励我们与残余的败坏争战。我们的情形并非独特,我们真诚与之相争的,必不归在我们账上,并且借恩典至终必胜。这里的争战如同以扫雅各在母腹中的相争,迦南人与以色列人在那地中的相争,扫罗家与大卫家的相争;但「真理伟大,必得胜」。如此理解,我们可以在此观察到——

  1. 他所抱怨的——内住败坏的残余——他在此论及此事,为要表明律法不足以称义,连重生者也不能;世上最好的人,若神按律法待他,他里头也足以定他罪——这不是律法的错,而是我们自己败坏的本性之错,因它不能成全律法。在这段论述中同样的话反复重申,表明保罗的心何等被他所写的所感动,他的 sentiment 何等深。请注意这抱怨的细节。(1)「我是属肉体的,已经卖给了罪」(罗7:14)。他曾论到哥林多人是「属肉体的」(林前3:1)。即使有属灵的生命,仍有属肉体情感的残余;在这意义上,人可能「卖给了罪」——他并非像亚哈那样「自卖行恶」(王上21:25),而是当亚当犯罪堕落之时被亚当卖了——被卖,如同一个可怜的奴隶违背自己意愿行主人的旨意——卖在罪下,因为是「在罪孽里生的,在罪中怀的」。(2)「我所愿意的,我并不作;我所恨恶的,我倒去作」(罗7:15)。与此同义,罗7:19、21:「我愿意为善的时候,便有恶与我同在」。败坏的势力如此之大,他不能达到他所愿望所渴慕的圣洁完全。如此,他虽「向着标竿直跑」要得完全,却承认自己「不是已经得着了,已经完全了」(腓3:12)。他巴不得脱离一切罪,完全行神的旨意——这是他固定的判断;但他的败坏本性把他拉向另一条路:它如一个 clog,当他要向上飞翔时拦阻他、压住他;又如碗中的 bias,虽把它直掷,却把它拉歪。(3)「在我里头,就是我肉体之中,没有良善」(罗7:18)。在此他解释他所谓的「败坏本性」——他称之为「肉体」;就那一方面而言,不能期望有任何良善,正如不能期望在磐石上、或海边沙土上长出好麦子来。新性情就那一方面而言不能犯罪(约壹3:9),照样肉体——旧性情——就那一方面而言不能行一件善的本分。怎能呢?因为「肉体服事罪的律」(罗7:25),它在那个律的引导和治理之下;既如此,它不太可能行任何善。败坏本性在别处被称为「肉体」(创6:3;约3:6);虽然那些有这肉体的人里头可能有良善之事,但就肉体而言没有良善,肉体不是任何良善的合格主体。(4)「我觉得肢体中另有个律和我心中的律交战」(罗7:23)。那败坏有罪的倾向在此被比作一个律,因为它在他好的动议上「管制」他、拦阻他。它被称为「在我肢体中」,因为基督既在他心中设立宝座,只有身体悖逆的肢体是作罪的工具——在感官的食欲中;或我们可更一般地把它理解为一切败坏的本性——那是不仅感官之欲,更是精炼之欲的 seat。这「与心中的律交战」——与新性情相争;它拉相反的方向,推进相反的利益,这败坏的性情和倾向对灵魂而言是极大的重担和忧伤,如同最坏的奴役和被掳一般。「把我掳去」。同义的话(罗7:25):「我肉体却顺服罪的律」——即败坏本性、未重生的部分,不断向罪工作。(5) 他总体的抱怨见于罗7:24:「我真是苦啊!谁能救我脱离这取死的身体呢?」他所抱怨的是「取死的身体」;或是肉体的身体——那是会死、正在死的身体(只要我们带着这身体,就必受败坏之扰;当我们死了,才得脱离罪,不到那时不行);或是「罪的身体」——旧人、败坏的本性,它倾向于死——即灵魂的毁灭。或者,把它比作一具死尸——按礼仪律凡摸它的便不洁——若实际的过犯是「死行」(来9:14),本性的败坏便是「死尸」。它对保罗如同他身上绑着一具死尸必须随身携带那样麻烦。这使他呼喊:「我真是苦啊!」一个学会了「无论在什么景况都可以知足」的人,仍如此抱怨他的败坏本性。若要我论到保罗,我便会说:「你这人有福啊——基督的大使、天上的宠儿、千万人的属灵父亲!」但在他自己看来,他是个「苦」人,因为本性的败坏——因为他不如他所巴望的那样好,还未得着,还未完全。他如此悲苦地抱怨。「谁能救我?」他说话像一个对这事 sick 的人,愿意付任何代价来摆脱它,向左右观看是否有朋友愿意把他与他的败坏分开。内住之罪的残余,对蒙恩的灵魂是极重的重担。

  2. 他用以自慰的事。情形可悲,但也有几分缓解。三件事安慰他——

(1) 他的良心为他作见证:尽管如此,他里头有一个良善的原则在管治并在「得胜」。当灵魂中并非一切都朝一个方向走时,这是好的。他这良善原则的规则,是「神的律」——他在此说自己对它有「三重的」态度,这必定见于一切成圣之人,不见于别人。[1]「我应承律法是善的」(罗7:16),原文作 symphemi——「我对律法投赞成票」;这是判断上的认可。凡有恩典之处,不仅有对律法严厉的畏惧,更有对律法之善的赞同。「它在本身是善的,对我也是善的。」这是律法写在心里的标记,是灵魂被模成它的形状。「应承律法」是如此地认可它,以至于不愿望它另作别样的构成。成圣的判断不仅同意律法的公正,更同意律法的卓越——确信与律法相符是人性的最高完全,是我们所能有的最大尊荣与福乐。[2]「按着我里面的人,我是喜欢神的律」(罗7:22)。他的良心见证他对律法有一种「complacency」。他不仅喜悦话语中的应许,更喜悦话语中的诫命和禁令;原文作 synedomai,表达一种合宜的「喜悦」。他在此与一切圣徒在情感上相同。凡蒙拯救重生、从上面生的人,都真正喜悦神的律法——喜悦认识它、行它——甘心顺服它的权柄,并以此顺服为乐,再没有比心和生活在最严格地与神的律法旨意相符之时更为喜悦的了。「按着里面的人」;即——第一,心思或理性的功能,与肉体的感官食欲和意志相对。灵魂就是「里面的人」,那是恩典喜悦的 seat,因此这些喜悦真诚而严肃,却也隐秘;它是「里面的人」的更新(林后4:16)。第二,新性情。新人被称为「里面的人」(弗3:16),「心里隐藏的人」(彼前3:4)。保罗就他成圣的程度而言,是喜悦神的律法的。[3]「我以内心顺服神的律」(罗7:25)。仅仅同意律法、喜悦律法还不够,我们必须「服事」律法;我们的灵魂必须完全交托于顺服它。保罗的心思如此;每一个成圣更新的心思也是如此;这是平常的进程和道路;灵魂的倾向朝那个方向。「我以内心」——原文作 autos ego——明明暗示他以自己的身份说话,不是以别人的身份。

(2) 错失在于他本性的败坏——那他确实为之悲伤并与之相争的:「就不是我作的,乃是住在我里头的罪作的」。这话他提了两次(罗7:17、20),不是作为他罪咎的借口(若我们在律法之下,那作恶的罪住在我们里头,便足以定我们罪),而是作为他证据的 salvage——使他不至在绝望中沉没,而从恩典之约中得安慰——这约悦纳「心灵所愿」,并为「肉体的软弱」预备了赦免。他借此也 protest 反对这内住之罪所产生的一切。既已宣认他同意神的律法,他在此宣认他不同意罪的律。「不是我;我不承认这行为;它是违背我心意而作的。」正如在元老院中多数是坏的、把每件事都带错方向之时,那确实是元老院的 act,但诚实的一方相争、为所做的哀伤、并 protest 反对它;如此便不再是「他们」所做的了。「住在我里头」——如同迦南人在以色列人中间,虽被纳贡:住在我里头,并且只要我活着,就 likely 住在那里。

(3) 他最大的安慰在于耶稣基督(罗7:25):「感谢神,靠着我们的主耶稣基督」。在抱怨之中他爆发为赞美。作为对付恐惧忧愁的特别良药,便是多在赞美之中:许多可怜消沉的灵魂都如此经验了。在我们一切赞美中,这应当是那「儿子」的负担:「神是应当称颂的,因他赐下耶稣基督。」「谁能救我?」他说(罗7:24),如同一个「不知所措」的人。至终他找到了一位「全能的朋友」——就是耶稣基督。当我们感到内住的罪与败坏之残余势力之时,我们必看见理由借着基督称颂神(因为正如他是一切祷告的中保,他也是一切赞美的中保)——为基督称颂神;是他站在我们与因这罪当受的震怒之间。若没有基督,这住在我们里头的罪孽必成为我们无可挽回的灭亡。他是我们在父那里的「 advocate 」,借着他神怜悯、宽容、赦免,并不将我们的罪孽归在我们身上。正是基督为我们「购」了在适当之时的拯救。借基督,死将结束这一切的抱怨,并把我们渡到一个无罪恶、无叹息的永远之中。「感谢神,使我们借着我们的主耶稣基督得胜!」

英文原文

Conflict between Grace and Corruption (58 AD)

¹⁴ b—But I am carnal, sold under sin.
¹⁵ For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
¹⁶ If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.
¹⁷ Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
¹⁸ For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.
¹⁹ For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
²⁰ Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
²¹ I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.
²² For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
²³ But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.
²⁴ O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
²⁵ I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

Here is a description of the conflict between grace and corruption in the heart, between the law of God and the law of sin. And it is applicable two ways:—1. To the struggles that are in a convinced soul, but yet unregenerate, in the person of whom it is supposed, by some, that Paul speaks. 2. To the struggles that are in a renewed sanctified soul, but yet in a state of imperfection; as other apprehend. And a great controversy there is of which of these we are to understand the apostle here. So far does the evil prevail here, when he speaks of one sold under sin, doing it, not performing that which is good, that it seems difficult to apply it to the regenerate, who are described to walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit; and yet so far does the good prevail in hating sin, consenting to the law, delighting in it, serving the law of God with the mind, that it is more difficult to apply it to the unregenerate that are dead in trespasses and sins.

I. Apply it to the struggles that are felt in a convinced soul, that is yet in a state of sin, knows his Lord's will, but does it not, approves the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law, and yet lives in the constant breach of it, Ro 2:17-23. Though he has that within him that witnesses against the sin he commits, and it is not without a great deal of reluctancy that he does commit it, the superior faculties striving against it, natural conscience warning against it before it is committed and smiting for it afterwards, yet the man continues a slave to his reigning lusts. It is not thus with every unregenerate man, but with those only that are convinced by the law, but not changed by the gospel. The apostle had said (Ro 6:14), Sin shall not have dominion, because you are not under the law, but under grace, for the proof of which he here shows that a man under the law, and not under grace, may be, and is, under the dominion of sin. The law may discover sin, and convince of sin, but it cannot conquer and subdue sin, witness the predominancy of sin in many that are under very strong legal convictions. It discovers the defilement, but will not wash it off. It makes a man weary and heavy laden (Mt 11:28), burdens him with his sin; and yet, if rested in, it yields no help towards the shaking off of that burden; this is to be had only in Christ. The law may make a man cry out, O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me? and yet leave him thus fettered and captivated, as being too weak to deliver him (Ro 8:3), give him a spirit of bondage to fear, Ro 8:15. Now a soul advanced thus far by the law is in a fair way towards a state of liberty by Christ, though many rest here and go no further. Felix trembled, but never came to Christ. It is possible for a man to go to hell with his eyes open (Nu 24:3,4), illuminated with common convictions, and to carry about with him a self-accusing conscience, even in the service of the devil. He may consent to the law that it is good, delight to know God's ways (as they, Isa 58:2), may have that within him that witnesses against sin and for holiness; and yet all this overpowered by the reigning love of sin. Drunkards and unclean persons have some faint desires to leave off their sins, and yet persist in them notwithstanding, such is the impotency and such the insufficiency of their convictions. Of such as these there are many that will needs have all this understood, and contend earnestly for it: though it is very hard to imagine why, if the apostle intended this, he should speak all along in his own person; and not only so, but in the present tense. Of his own state under conviction he had spoken at large, as of a thing past (Ro 7:7, etc.): I died; the commandment I found to be unto death; and if here he speaks of the same state as his present state, and the condition he was now in, surely he did not intend to be so understood: and therefore,

II. It seems rather to be understood of the struggles that are maintained between grace and corruption in sanctified souls. That there are remainders of indwelling corruption, even where there is a living principle of grace, is past dispute; that this corruption is daily breaking forth in sins of infirmity (such as are consistent with a state of grace) is no less certain. If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, 1Jo 1:8,10. That true grace strives against these sins and corruptions, does not allow of them, hates them, mourns over them, groans under them as a burden, is likewise certain (Ga 5:17): The flesh lusteth against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary the one to the other, so that you cannot do the things that you would. These are the truths which, I think, are contained in this discourse of the apostle. And his design is further to open the nature of sanctification, that it does not attain to a sinless perfection in this life; and therefore to quicken us to, and encourage us in, our conflicts with remaining corruptions. Our case is not singular, that which we do sincerely strive against, shall not be laid to our charge, and through grace the victory is sure at last. The struggle here is like that between Jacob and Esau in the womb, between the Canaanites and Israelites in the land, between the house of Saul and the house of David; but great is the truth and will prevail. Understanding it thus, we may observe here,

1. What he complains of—the remainder of indwelling corruptions, which he here speaks of, to show that the law is insufficient to justify even a regenerate man, that the best man in the world hath enough in him to condemn him, if God should deal with him according to the law, which is not the fault of the law, but of our own corrupt nature, which cannot fulfil the law. The repetition of the same things over and over again in this discourse shows how much Paul's heart was affected with what he wrote, and how deep his sentiments were. Observe the particulars of this complaint. (1.) I am carnal, sold under sin, Ro 7:14. He speaks of the Corinthians as carnal, 1Co 3:1. Even where there is spiritual life there are remainders of carnal affections, and so far a man may be sold under sin; he does not sell himself to work wickedness, as Ahab did (1Ki 21:25), but he was sold by Adam when he sinned and fell—sold, as a poor slave that does his master's will against his own will—sold under sin, because conceived in iniquity and born in sin. (2.) What I would, that I do not; but what I hate, that do I, Ro 7:15. And to the same purport, Ro 7:19,21, When I would do good, evil is present with me. Such was the strength of corruptions, that he could not attain that perfection in holiness which he desired and breathed after. Thus, while he was pressing forward towards perfection, yet he acknowledges that he had not already attained, neither was already perfect, Php 3:12. Fain he would be free from all sin, and perfectly do the will of God, such was his settled judgment; but his corrupt nature drew him another way: it was like a clog, that checked and kept him down when he would have soared upward, like the bias in a bowl, which, when it is thrown straight, yet draws it aside. (3.) In me, that is in my flesh, dwelleth no good, Ro 7:18. Here he explains himself concerning the corrupt nature, which he calls flesh; and as far as that goes there is no good to be expected, any more than one would expect good corn growing upon a rock, or on the sand which is by the sea-side. As the new nature, as far as that goes, cannot commit sin (1Jo 3:9), so the flesh, the old nature, as far as that goes, cannot perform a good duty. How should it? For the flesh serveth the law of sin (Ro 7:25), it is under the conduct and government of that law; and, while it is so, it is not likely to do any good. The corrupt nature is elsewhere called flesh (Ge 6:3, Joh 3:6); and, though there may be good things dwelling in those that have this flesh, yet, as far as the flesh goes, there is no good, the flesh is not a subject capable of any good. (4.) I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind, Ro 7:23. The corrupt and sinful inclination is here compared to a law, because it controlled and checked him in his good motions. It is said to be seated in his members, because, Christ having set up his throne in his heart, it was only the rebellious members of the body that were the instruments of sin—in the sensitive appetite; or we may take it more generally for all that corrupt nature which is the seat not only of sensual but of more refined lusts. This wars against the law of the mind, the new nature; it draws the contrary way, drives on a contrary interest, which corrupt disposition and inclination are as great a burden and grief to the soul as the worst drudgery and captivity could be. It brings me into captivity. To the same purport (Ro 7:25), With the flesh I serve the law of sin; that is, the corrupt nature, the unregenerate part, is continually working towards sin. (5.) His general complaint we have in Ro 7:24, O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? The thing he complains of is a body of death; either the body of flesh, which is a mortal dying body (while we carry this body about with us, we shall be troubled with corruption; when we are dead, we shall be freed from sin, and not before), or the body of sin, the old man, the corrupt nature, which tends to death, that is, to the ruin of the soul. Or, comparing it to a dead body, the touch of which was by the ceremonial law defiling, if actual transgressions be dead works (Heb 9:14), original corruption is a dead body. It was as troublesome to Paul as if he had had a dead body tied to him, which he must have carried about with him. This made him cry out, O wretched man that I am! A man that had learned in every state to be content yet complains thus of his corrupt nature. Had I been required to speak of Paul, I should have said, "O blessed man that thou art, an ambassador of Christ, a favourite of heaven, a spiritual father of thousands!" But in his own account he was a wretched man, because of the corruption of nature, because he was not so good as he fain would be, had not yet attained, neither was already perfect. Thus miserably does he complain. Who shall deliver me? He speaks like one that was sick of it, that would give any thing to be rid of it, looks to the right hand and to the left for some friend that would part between him and his corruptions. The remainders of indwelling sin are a very grievous burden to a gracious soul.

2. What he comforts himself with. The case was sad, but there were some allays. Three things comforted him:—

(1.) That his conscience witnessed for him that he had a good principle ruling and prevailing in him, notwithstanding. It is well when all does not go one way in the soul. The rule of this good principle which he had was the law of God, to which he here speaks of having a threefold regard, which is certainly to be found in all that are sanctified, and no others. [1.] I consent unto the law that it is good, Ro 7:16, symphemi—I give my vote to the law; here is the approbation of the judgment. Wherever there is grace there is not only a dread of the severity of the law, but a consent to the goodness of the law. "It is a good in itself, it is good for me." This is a sign that the law is written in the heart, that the soul is delivered into the mould of it. To consent to the law is so far to approve of it as not to wish it otherwise constituted than it is. The sanctified judgment not only concurs to the equity of the law, but to the excellency of it, as convinced that a conformity to the law is the highest perfection of human nature, and the greatest honour and happiness we are capable of. [2.] I delight in the law of God after the inward man, Ro 7:22. His conscience bore witness to a complacency in the law. He delighted not only in the promises of the word, but in the precepts and prohibitions of the word; synedomai expresses a becoming delight. He did herein concur in affection with all the saints. All that are savingly regenerate or born again do truly delight in the law of God, delight to know it, to do it—cheerfully submit to the authority of it, and take a complacency in that submission, never better pleased than when heart and life are in the strictest conformity to the law and will of God. After the inward man; that is, First, The mind or rational faculties, in opposition to the sensitive appetites and wills of the flesh. The soul is the inward man, and that is the seat of gracious delights, which are therefore sincere and serious, but secret; it is the renewing of the inward man, 2Co 4:16. Secondly, The new nature. The new man is called the inner man (Eph 3:16), the hidden man of the heart, 1Pe 3:4. Paul, as far as he was sanctified, had a delight in the law of God. [3.] With the mind I myself serve the law of God, Ro 7:25. It is not enough to consent to the law, and to delight in the law, but we must serve the law; our souls must be entirely delivered up into the obedience of it. Thus it was with Paul's mind; thus it is with every sanctified renewed mind; this is the ordinary course and way; thitherward goes the bent of the soul. I myself—autos ego, plainly intimating that he speaks in his own person, and not in the person of another.

(2.) That the fault lay in that corruption of his nature which he did really bewail and strive against: It is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. This he mentions twice (Ro 7:17,20), not as an excuse for the guilt of his sin (it is enough to condemn us, if we were under the law, that the sin which does the evil dwelleth in us), but as a salvo for his evidences, that he might not sink in despair, but take comfort from the covenant of grace, which accepts the willingness of the spirit, and has provided pardon for the weakness of the flesh. He likewise herein enters a protestation against all that which this indwelling sin produced. Having professed his consent to the law of God, he here professes his dissent from the law of sin. "It is not I; I disown the fact; it is against my mind that it is done." As when in the senate the major part are bad, and carry every thing the wrong way, it is indeed the act of the senate, but the honest party strive against it, bewail what is done, and enter their protestation against it; so that it is no more they that do it.—Dwelleth in me, as the Canaanites among the Israelites, though they were put under tribute: dwelleth in me, and is likely to dwell there, while I live.

(3.) His great comfort lay in Jesus Christ (Ro 7:25): I thank God, through Jesus Christ our Lord. In the midst of his complaints he breaks out into praises. It is a special remedy against fears and sorrows to be much in praise: many a poor drooping soul hath found it so. And, in all our praises, this should be the burden of the son, "Blessed be God for Jesus Christ." Who shall deliver me? says he (Ro 7:24), as one at a loss for help. At length he finds an all-sufficient friend, even Jesus Christ. When we are under the sense of the remaining power of sin and corruption, we shall see reason to bless God through Christ (for, as he is the mediator of all our prayers, so he is of all our praises)—to bless God for Christ; it is he that stands between us and the wrath due to us for this sin. If it were not for Christ, this iniquity that dwells in us would certainly be our ruin. He is our advocate with the Father, and through him God pities, and spares, and pardons, and lays not our iniquities to our charge. It is Christ that has purchased deliverance for us in due time. Through Christ death will put an end to all these complaints, and waft us to an eternity which we shall spend without sin or sigh. Blessed be God that giveth us this victory through our Lord Jesus Christ!