Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary
Matthew Henry · 1714
Matthew Henry 사후(1714) 공개 도메인. 디지털판 CC0-1.0.
- 翻譯進度
- 4,537 / 4,537
- 原文語言
- en
目前註釋書
全部註釋書
23 本註釋書
全部項目
307,288
翻譯 81,431 筆
授權
依來源顯示
來源與授權
依來源區分顯示註釋書原文、作者、翻譯進度、授權資訊。scripture.how 的中文翻譯·編輯物會與原文資料分開管理。
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, David Brown · 1871
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871). CCEL expanded electronic edition states it is in the public domain.
- 翻譯進度
- 19,831 / 19,831
- 原文語言
- en
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Albert Barnes · 1834
Albert Barnes' Notes on Revelation Of St. John The Divine (New Testament, English original, public domain). Sourced from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library (CCEL). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes.
- 翻譯進度
- 22,781 / 22,781
- 原文語言
- en
Adam Clarke's Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Adam Clarke · 1831
Public domain English commentary by Adam Clarke, normalized from Wikisource book pages for scripture.how. Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke.
- 翻譯進度
- 21,603 / 22,101
- 原文語言
- en
John Gill's Exposition of the Bible
John Gill · 1763
John Gill(1697-1771), Exposition of the Old and New Testament(1746-1763). Public domain. Retrieval mirror: biblehub.com/commentaries/gill.
- 翻譯進度
- 12,528 / 30,759
- 原文語言
- en
Calvin's Commentaries
John Calvin · 1850
종교개혁 신학 원천 (영역본 PD, 대부분 — 전권 아님)
- 翻譯進度
- 144 / 7,385
- 原文語言
- en
Matthew Poole's Annotations upon the Holy Bible
Matthew Poole · 1685
간결 절별 전권 개혁주의 주석
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 31,092
- 原文語言
- en
The Pulpit Commentary
ed. H.D.M. Spence & Joseph S. Exell · 1890
전권 강해·설교·예화 풍부 (항목 대량)
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 25,592
- 原文語言
- en
Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
Carl F. Keil, Franz Delitzsch · 1866
구약 학술 표준 — 히브리어·문헌비평·고대근동 배경
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 2,044
- 原文語言
- en
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers
ed. Charles J. Ellicott · 1878
학술+가독 균형 전권 주석
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 23,497
- 原文語言
- en
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Cambridge (다저자) · 1900
준전권 준학술 (권별 저자·연도 확인)
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 27,176
- 原文語言
- en
Vincent's Word Studies in the New Testament
Marvin R. Vincent · 1887
신약 헬라어 단어 연구
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 5,763
- 原文語言
- en
Word Pictures in the New Testament
A.T. Robertson · 1933
헬라어 시제·문법 해설 결정판 (KR PD / US 1931+ 권별)
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 6,935
- 原文語言
- en
The Expositor's Greek Testament
ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (다저자) · 1910
헬라어 신약 학술 (권별 저자 PD 확인 필요)
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 7,010
- 原文語言
- en
Meyer's Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament
Heinrich A.W. Meyer · 1880
신약 학술 정밀주해 (독일 — K&D 대응)
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 5,340
- 原文語言
- en
Wesley's Explanatory Notes
John Wesley · 1755
간결 실용 전권(NT 1755 / OT 1765) 웨슬리안
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 5,643
- 原文語言
- en
Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments
Joseph Benson · 1815
웨슬리안 전권 주석
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 14,675
- 原文語言
- en
The Treasury of David
Charles H. Spurgeon · 1885
시편 주석 고전 (설교 자료 풍부)
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 2,290
- 原文語言
- en
MacLaren's Expositions of Holy Scripture
Alexander Maclaren · 1910
설교형 강해 명저 (전권, 절별 가공 필요)
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 1,144
- 原文語言
- en
The People's New Testament
B.W. Johnson · 1891
평이 절별 신약 해설 (일반신자·모바일)
- 翻譯進度
- 7 / 3,477
- 原文語言
- en
Coke's Commentary on the Holy Bible
Thomas Coke · 1803
감리교 전권 주석
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 10,808
- 原文語言
- en
Trapp's Complete Commentary
John Trapp · 1660
청교도 전권 주석 — Henry/Gill 보완
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 26,397
- 原文語言
- en
Hodge's Commentary on the New Testament
Charles Hodge · 1860
프린스턴 조직신학 관점 신약 정밀 주석 (롬·고전후·엡)
- 翻譯進度
- 0 / 1,011
- 原文語言
- en
Christ teaches his disciples to pray, Luke 11:1-4. Shows the necessity of importunity in prayer, Luke 11:5-13. Casts out a dumb demon, Luke 11:14. The Jews ascribe this to the power of Beelzebub; our Lord vindicates his conduct, Luke 11:15-23. Miserable state of the Jews, Luke 11:24-26. Who they are that are truly blessed, Luke 11:27, Luke 11:28. He preaches to the people, Luke 11:29-36. A Pharisee invites him to dine with him, who takes offense because he washed not his hands, Luke 11:37, Luke 11:38. Our Lord exposes their hypocrisy, Luke 11:39-44. He denounces woes against the lawyers, Luke 11:45-52. The scribes and Pharisees are greatly offended, and strive to entangle him in his words, Luke 11:53, Luke 11:54.
CHAPTER 11.
LESSON ON PRAYER. DISCOURSES IN SELF-DEFENCE.
CHAPTER 11
Luke 11:2-4. Elz. and Scholz have after πάτερ: ἡμῶν ὁ ἐν τοῖς οὐρανοῖς, and after βασιλ. σου: γενηθήτω τὸ θέλημά σου, ὡς ἐν οὐρανῷ, καὶ ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς. After πειρασμόν Elz. has ἀλλὰ ῥῦσαι ἡμᾶς ἀπὸ τοῦ πονηροῦ. Lachm. also (not Tisch.) reads all this; but he has ὡς ἐν οὐρανῷ καὶ ἐπὶ γῆς (without τῆς) in brackets. The important authorities both for and against these additions lead us to regard them as supplements taken from the usual form of the Lord’s Prayer in Matthew 6:6; Matthew 6:9 ff. According to Gregory of Nyssa (comp. Maxim.), instead of ἐλθέτω … σου Luke must have Written ἐλθέτω τὸ ἅγιον πνεῦμά σου ἐφʼ ἡμᾶς καὶ καθαρισάτω ἡμᾶς. An ancient gloss.[140]
Luke 11:4. The form ἀφίομεν is, on decisive evidence, to be adopted, with Lachm. and Tisch.
Luke 11:9-10. The authorities for ἀνοιγήσεται and ἀνοιχθήσεται are about equally balanced. Tisch. has rightly adopted the latter. The Recepta is from Matthew 7:7 f.
Luke 11:11. Instead of ἐξ ὑμῶν ELz. has simply ὑμῶν, in opposition to decisive evidence. On similar evidence, moreover, ἤ is subsequently adopted instead of εἰ (Elz.), and at Luke 11:13 δόματα ἀγαθά (reversed in Elz.).
Luke 11:12. Instead of ἢ καὶ ἐάν Tisch. has merely ἢ καί, following B L א, min. But ἐάν was the more easily omitted, since it does not occur in the foregoing verse. On the other hand, αἰτήσει is so decisively attested that it is, with Tisch., to be adopted instead of the Recepta ΑἸΤΉΣῌ.
Luke 11:15. Τῷ before ἌΡΧΟΝΤΙ is wanting in Elz. Scholz, but is decisively attested; the omission is explained from Matthew 12:24.
Luke 11:19. ΚΡΙΤΑῚ ὙΜῶΝ ΑὐΤΟΊ] B D, Lachm. Tisch. have ΑὐΤΟῚ ὙΜῶΝ ΚΡΙΤΑΊ. A C K L M U, min. Vulg. It. have ΑὐΤΟῚ ΚΡΙΤΑῚ ὙΜῶΝ. So also has א, which, however, places ἜΣΟΝΤΑΙ before ὙΜ. [Tisch. 8 has adopted the reading of א]. Accordingly, the evidence is decisive against the Recepta. The omission of αὐτοί (it is wanting still in 113) occasioned its being very variously placed when it was reintroduced. The place assigned to it by Lachm. is the rather to be preferred, as B D, the authorities in its favour, have in Matthew 12:27 : αὐτοὶ κριταὶ ἔσοντ. ὑμῶν, and have not therefore borrowed their arrangement in this passage from Matthew. The Vulgate, on the other hand, has also in Matt. l.c.: ΑὐΤΟῚ ΚΡΙΤΑῚ ὙΜῶΝ ἜΣΟΝΤΑΙ; hence the reading of A C, etc., is probably due to a conformity with Matthew.
Luke 11:22. The article before ἸΣΧΥΡΌΤ. is wanting in B D L Γ א, and is, with Lachm. and Tisch., to be deleted. It was introduced in accordance with Ὁ ἸΣΧΥΡΌς, Luke 11:21.
Luke 11:25. Instead of ἘΛΘΌΝ, important authorities (but not A B L א) have ἘΛΘΏΝ. Rightly; see on Matthew 12:44.
Luke 11:29. After ἸΩΝᾶ Elz. Scholz have ΤΟῦ ΠΡΟΦΉΤΟΥ, in opposition to important evidence. It is from Matthew 12:39, whence, however, the Recepta ἐπιζητεῖ was also derived, instead of which ζητεῖ, with Tisch., is to be read. Moreover, in accordance with Lachm. and Tisch., γενεά is again to be inserted before πονηρά.
Luke 11:32. Νινευΐ] A B C E** G L M U X Γ Δ א, min. Syr. Vulg. It. have Νινευῖται. Recommended by Griesb., adopted by Scholz, Lachm. [Tisch. 8 has Νινευεῖται]. Rightly; Luke has followed Matthew (Luke 12:41) verbatim.
Luke 11:34. After the first ὈΦΘΑΛΜΌς, Griesb. and the later editors have rightly added ΣΟΥ. The omission is explained from Matthew 6:22; its insertion, however, is decisively attested.
ΟὖΝ] after ὍΤΑΝ is wanting in preponderating authorities. Suspected by Griesb., deleted by Lachm. and Tisch. It is an addition from Matthew 6:23.
Luke 11:42. After ΤΑῦΤΑ Griesb. has inserted ΔΈ, which Lachm. brackets, while Tisch. has deleted it; it is too weakly attested, and is from Matthew 23:23.
ἈΦΙΈΝΑΙ] Lachm. and Tisch. have ΠΑΡΕῖΝΑΙ, in accordance with B* L א** min. The Recepta is from Matthew. A has a fusion of the two: παραφιέναι; D, 11 :have not got the word at all.
Luke 11:44. After ὑμῖν Elz. (and Lachm. in brackets) has γραμματεῖς κ. Φαρισαῖοι, ὑποκριταί. So also Scholz, but in opposition to evidence so important, that it can only be regarded as an addition from Matthew 23:27.
οἱ before περιπ. is, on preponderating evidence, to be deleted. It arose from the preceding syllable. Suspected by Griesb., deleted by Lachm. [retained by Tisch. 8].
Luke 11:48. μαρτυρεῖτε] Tisch. has μάρτυρές ἐστε, in accordance with B L א, Or. The Recepta is from Matthew 23:31.
ΑὐΤῶΝ ΤᾺ ΜΝΗΜΕῖΑ] is not found in B D L א, Cant. 11 :Verc. Rd. Vind. Condemned by Griesb., bracketed by Lachm. deleted by Tisch. The words, both read and arranged differently by different authorities, are a supplement, in accordance with Matthew.
Luke 11:51. The article before ΑἽΜΑΤΟς in both cases is, with Lachm. and Tisch., in accordance with important evidence, to be struck out as an addition.
Luke 11:53. ΛΈΓΟΝΤΟς ΔῈ ΑὐΤΟῦ ΤΑῦΤΑ ΠΡῸς ΑὐΤΟΎς] B C L א, 33, Copt. have ΚἈΚΕῖΘΕΝ ἘΞΕΛΘΌΝΤΟς ΑὐΤΟῦ. This is, with Tisch., to be adopted. The authorities in favour of the Recepta have variations and additions, which indicate that they have originated as glosses.
Luke 11:54. Many variations in the form of glosses. Lachm. follows the Recepta, only omitting ΚΑΊ before ΞΗΤ. Tisch. has simply ἘΝΕΔΡ., ΘΗΡΕῦΣΑΊ ΤΙ ἘΚ ΤΟῦ ΣΤΌΜΑΤΟς ΑὐΤΟῦ, founding it mainly on B L א. All the rest consists of additions for the sake of more explicit statement.
[140] Thus or similarly Marcion read the first petition, and Hilgenfeld, Kritik. Unters. p. 470, and Volkmar, p. 196, regard the petition in this place about the Holy Ghost as original (because specifically Pauline), and the canonical text as an alteration in accordance with Matthew; see also Hilgenfeld in the Theol. Jahrb. 1853, p. 222 f., and in his Evangel. p. 187 f.; Zeller, Apostelgesch. p. 14. But ver. 13 easily occasioned the alteration, welcome as it was to the one-sided Paulinism, seeing that by its means the Holy Spirit was represented as the chief of what was to be asked for from God. Comp. Tholuck, Bergpred. p. 347 f.
尚無翻譯。
路 11:1-13.
門徒受教禱告。
1. 有一個人等語——被主禱告的內容或方式所深深觸動。
像約翰等語——從這一處提及約翰來看，這門徒可能未曾聽過登山寶訓。約翰私下對自己門徒的教導，雖無片言隻字流傳下來，但我們可以確定，他從未教導門徒說「我們的父」。
耶穌在禱告的時候——路加曾多次記載我們救主的禱告。例如：在祂受洗時（Luke 3:21）；在曠野中（Luke 5:16）；在設立使徒之前，祂整夜禱告（Luke 6:12）；祂獨自禱告的時候（Luke 9:18）；祂的登山變像也是發生在祂上山禱告之時（Luke 9:28-29）。
求主教導我們禱告——他們大概是深深感受到祂禱告的卓越與懇切，又想起「約翰」曾教導他的門徒禱告，便求祂也教導「他們」。由此我們可以學到：
-
別人的恩賜與恩典，應當激發我們也渴慕同樣的恩賜。
-
禱告的正確方法，惟有藉著適切的教導才能學會。誠然，若不是神教我們怎樣禱告，我們根本無法作出蒙悅納的禱告。
-
我們當先默想所要向神求的事，並整理自己的心思，免得毫無準備、輕率地來到祂面前。
Teach us to pray - See the nature of prayer, with an ample explanation of the different parts of the Lord's Prayer, treated of in Matthew 6:5-16 (note). The prayer related here by Luke is not precisely the same as that mentioned by Matthew; and indeed it is not likely that it was given at the same time. That in Matthew seems to have been given after the second passover; and this in Luke was given probably after the third passover, between the feasts of tabernacles, and the dedication. It is thus that Bishop Newcome places them in his Greek Harmony of the Gospels.
There are many variations in the MSS. in this prayer; but they seem to have proceeded principally from the desire of rendering this similar to that in Matthew. Attempts of this nature have given birth to multitudes of the various readings in the MSS. of the New Testament. It should be remarked, also, that there is no vestige of the doxology found in Matthew, in any copy of St. Luke's Gospel.
在本章中：一、基督教導門徒禱告，並激發鼓勵他們時常、迫切、不住地禱告（路十一1-13）。二、他充分回應了法利賽人褻瀆的指控——他們誣指他是靠着與鬼王別西卜結盟、勾結而趕鬼——並指出這指控的荒謬與邪惡（路十一14-26）。三、他表明順服之門徒所得的尊榮，比他親生母親所得的更大（路十一27-28）。四、他責備那世代的人不信與頑梗，儘管他們已蒙賜一切足以叫他們知罪的手段（路十一29-36）。五、他嚴厲責備法利賽人，以及那些順從法利賽人之人的良心，並責備他們恨惡、逼迫那些見證反對他們惡行的人（路十一37-54）。