Barnes' Notes on the Bible · Job 第12章

註釋閱讀最佳化

分章註釋

Job 第 12 章

2

Job 12:2

開啟正文

繁體中文

「你們真是子民哪」——即惟一有智慧的人民。你們包辦了世上一切的智慧,其餘的人都當被看作愚昧人。這顯然是嚴厲譏諷的話,顯出一顆被他們的責備激得煩躁的心。約伯輕看他們的推理,有意暗示:他們所如此倚賴的格言,不過是老生常談,是人人熟知的東西。

「智慧也就滅沒了」——這是反話,但這類說法或許在各地都很常見。Roberts 說:「東方人極喜反諷,他們一些譏誚的話非常尖刻。當一位智者暗示自己有超人的智慧,或想嘲笑別人學識淺薄時,他便說:『是啊,是啊,你就是那個人!』『你的智慧如同大海。』『你死了,智慧要往哪裏去呢?』」若取嚴肅的意義,古典作家也用這類話描述卓越的偉人或善人之死,說智慧、勇毅、敬虔或音樂隨他們一同死去。Moschus,Idyll. iii.12 即是如此:

Ὅττι βίων τέθνηκεν ὁ βώκολος, ἔττι σὺν αὐτῷ

Καὶ τὸ μέλος τέθνακε, καὶ ὤλετο Δωρίς ἀειδός.

Hotti biōn tethnēken ho bōkolos, esti sun autō

Kai to melos tethnake, kai ōleto Dōris aeidos.

「牧人 Bion 死了,歌聲

隨他死去,Doris 的歌者也已消逝。」

這類說法很常見。例如《Pleasures of Hope》中有一句:

「當 Kosciusko 倒下,自由發出哀鳴。」

英文原文

No doubt but ye are the people - That is, the only wise people. You have engrossed all the wisdom of the world, and all else are to be regarded as fools. This is evidently the language of severe sarcasm; and it shows a spirit fretted and chafed by their reproaches. Job felt contempt for their reasoning. and meant to intimate that their maxims, on which they placed so much reliance, were common-place, and such as every one was familar with.

And wisdom shall die with you - This is ironical, but it is language such as is common perhaps every where. "The people of the East," says Roberts, "take great pleasure in irony, and some of their satirical sayings are very cutting. When a sage intimates that he has superior wisdom or when he is disposed to rally another for his meagrc attainments, he says, 'Yes, yes, you are the man! ' 'Your wisdom is like the sea.' 'When you die, whither will wisdom go?'" In a serious sense, language like this is used by the Classical writers to describe the death of eminently great or good men. They speak of wisdom, bravery, piety, or music, as dying with them. Thus, Moschus, Idyll. iii.12.

Ὅττι βίων τέθνηκεν ὁ βώκολος, ἔττι σὺν αὐτῷ

Καὶ τὸ μέλος τέθνακε, καὶ ὤλετο Δωρίς ἀειδός.

Hotti biōn tethnēken ho bōkolos, esti sun autō

Kai to melos tethnake, kai ōleto Dōris aeidos.

"Bion the swain is dead, and with him song

Has died, and the Doric muse has perished."

Expressions like these are common. Thus, in the "Pleasures of Hope" it is said:

And Freedom shrieked when Kosciusko fell.

3

Job 12:3

開啟正文

繁體中文

「但我也有聰明,與你們一樣」——邊註按希伯來文作「有心」。聖經中「心」字常用以指悟性或心思。心似乎被視為那稱為生命或靈魂之物的源頭。事實上,我想不起聖經中有哪一處像我們慣常的那樣以「頭」為理智的所在,也想不到聖經何處論及我們中間如此常見的頭與心之區分。在我們看來,心是情感與情緒的所在;在希伯來人看來,心是悟性的所在,而σπλάγχνα splangchna——臟腑,即肚腹——才是情緒的所在;見Isaiah 16:11的註釋。更正確的生理學已教導我們,腦是理智的器官,如今我們便以「心」為情感的所在。羅馬人則視「胸」為靈魂的所在。因此,Virgil論到Lucagus死於Aeneas之手時說:

Tum latebras animae pectus mucrone recludit

Aeneid x. 601.

「並非不及你們」——邊註作「不低於你們」。這是直譯:「我不落於你們之下。」約伯聲稱自己在引用古人言論的能力上與他們相等;為表明這一點,他隨即引述一連串箴言式的話,佔了本章餘下的篇幅,以表明他熟悉這種論理方式,並且在這方面完全可與他們匹敵。這可視為一場技藝的較量,在東方十分常見。智慧在於積存大量格言箴語,並能在一切公開場合敏捷而貼切地加以運用;在這場論辯中,約伯絕不打算向他們讓步。

「你們所說的,誰不知道呢」——邊註作「這樣的事誰沒有呢」。其意是說,他們所提出的見解並非創見,而是想像中最平凡的道理。約伯不僅說自己知道這些,更說若人人不知道這些才是怪事。

英文原文

But I have understanding as well as you - Margin, as in the Hebrew "an heart." The word "heart" in the Scriptures is often used to denote the understanding or mind. It seems to have been regarded as the source of that which was called life or soul. Indeed, I do not recollect a single instance in the Scriptures in which the word "head" is used, as with us, as the seat of the intellect, or where the distinction is adverted to that is so common with us, between the head and the heart. With us, the heart is the seat of the affections and emotions; with the Hebrews, it was the seat of understanding, and the σπλάγχνα splangchna - the viscera, the bowels, were the seat of the emotions; see the notes at Isaiah 16:11. A more correct physiology has taught us that the brain is the organ of the intellect, and we now speak of "the heart" as the seat of the affections. The Romans regarded the "breast" as the seat of the soul. Thus, Virgil, speaking of the death of Lucagus by the hand of Aeneas, says:

Tum latebras animae pectus mucrone recludit

Aeneid x. 601.

I am not inferior to you - Margin, "fall not lower than." This is the literal translation: "I do not fall beneath you." Job claims to be equal to them in the power of quoting the sayings. of the ancients; and in order to show this, he proceeds to adduce a number of proverbial sayings, occupying the remainder of this chapter, to show that he was familiar with that mode of reasoning, and that in this respect he was fully their equal. This may be regarded as a trial of skill, and was quite common in the East. Wisdom consisted in storing up a large amount of proverbs and maxims, and in applying them readily and pertinently on all public occasions; and in this controversy, Job was by no means disposed to yield to them.

Yea, who knoweth not such things as these? - Margin, "With whom" are "not such as these?" The meaning is, that instead of being original, the sentiments which they advanced were the most commonplace imaginable. Job not only said that he knew them, but that it would be strange if every body did not know them.

4

Job 12:4

開啟正文

繁體中文

「竟成了朋友所譏笑的」——這節經文的解釋歷來頗多分歧。大意是:約伯覺得自己成了鄰舍純粹的笑柄。他們待他,彷彿他一文不值;對他的悲傷毫不同情,對他的見解也毫不尊重。Good 博士把這節及以下數節理解為爭論的一部分——約伯要在其中顯示自己辯論的技巧,並效法他朋友的方式引用箴言。但這更可能是論到他自己,是要陳明他覺得自己沒有受到當得的尊重。這裏的關聯一向難以理解。Reiske 力言Job 12:2與Job 12:3之間沒有關聯,Job 12:11-12應插在兩者之間。在我看來,其關聯似乎是這樣:約伯抱怨自己沒有受到當有的敬重。他們對他的理解和身分毫不尊重;他們提出的是最平凡不過的題目,搬出陳腐老套的格言,彷彿他從未聽過;反覆講論連最卑微的人都熟悉的箴言;這樣待他,彷彿他在知識上不過是個孩子。因此,被人以空泛的老生常談、以對小孩子說話的口吻來對待,他視之為侮辱與嘲弄。

「我這求告神、蒙他應允的人」——這短語的解釋也五花八門。Umbreit 譯作「我這曾求告神而蒙他應允的人」,即:我這曾經幸福、蒙神賜福的人。Schultens 譯作「我這求告神的人」——即為受試煉而求告——「並預備回答他」。Rosenmuller 則認為約伯是指朋友們的保證——他若求告神,神必應允他——而面對這提議,他呼喊道:「一個成為鄰舍笑柄的人求告神,神會應允他嗎?」較可能的意思是:他素來是與神不斷相交的人。他曾是全能者所喜愛的人,因為神側耳垂聽他的懇求。如今,一個曾享受這般明顯神恩印記的人,竟受辱罵譏誚——這正是他可以合理抱怨的事。

英文原文

I am as one mocked of his neighbour - There has been considerable variety in the interpretation of this verse. The general sense is, that Job felt himself to be a mere laughing-stock for his neighbors. They treated him as if he were not worth regarding. They had no sympathy for him in his sorrows, and they showed no respect for his opinions. Dr. Good understands this and the following verses as a part of the controversy in which Job proposes to show his skill in debate, and to adduce proverbs after the manner of his friends. But it is more probably an allusion to himself, and is designed to state that he felt that he was not treated with the respect which was due to him. Much difficulty has been felt in understanding the connection. Reiske contends that Job 12:2 has no connection with Job 12:3, and that Job 12:11-12, should be interposed between them. The connection seems to me to be this: Job complains that he was not treated with due deference. They had showed no respect for his understanding and rank. They had urged the most common-place topics; advanced stale and trite apothegms, as if he had never heard them; dwelt on maxims familiar even to the meanest persons; and had treated him in this manner as if he were a mere child in knowledge. Thus, to be approached with vague common-places, and with remarks such as would be used in addressing children, he regarded as insult and mockery.

Who calleth upon God, and he answereth him - This phrase has given occasion to great variety in the interpretation. Umbreit renders it, "I, who once called upon God, and he answered me;" that is, I, who once was a happy man, and blessed of God. Schultens renders it, "I, who call upon God," that is, for trial, "and am ready to answer him.' Rosenmuller supposes that Job has reference to the assurances of his friends, that if he would call upon God, he would answer him, and that in view of that suggestion he exclaims, "Shall a man who is a laughing-stock to his neighbor call upon God, and will he answer him!' The probable meaning is, that he had been a man who had had constant communion with God. He had been a favorite of the Almighty, for he had lent a listening ear to his supplications. It was now a thing of which he might reasonably complain, that a man who had enjoyed such manifest tokens of the divine favor, was treated with reproach and scorn.

5

Job 12:5

開啟正文

繁體中文

「腳步快要滑跌的人」——指兩腳搖晃、站立不穩的人;即身處逆境的人;見 Proverbs 25:19。聖經以站立穩固描繪亨通之人,以搖晃仆倒描繪逆境之人;見 Psalm 73:2。

至於我,我的腳幾乎失閃;

我的腳險些滑跌。

這段經文難處甚多,評論家的辛勞也決未能將其盡除。讀者可參 Rosenmuller、Good 與 Schultens 對本節的註釋,其中有較詳盡的釋義嘗試。Good 博士跟隨 Reiske 與 Parkhurst 的進路,將全節譯作:

義人、完全人竟成了驕傲人的笑柄,

在亨通者的光亮中備受譏誚,

他的腳正要滑跌。

然而在我看來,這譯法實在難以從希伯來文本中公平地推出,我傾向於接受較普遍、較明顯的解釋。按這解釋,其意是:人在逆境之中、從尊榮的高位跌落時,便被看為一盞幾乎熄滅的燈,如今受人藐視,被丟棄一旁。火炬燃燒正旺之時,人視之為有價值;將近熄滅,便被視為無用而遭丟棄。照樣,人在亨通之時,被人尊為嚮導與榜樣;一旦落難,他的謀略便遭拒絕,自己也受人輕看。這裏所提的事實,再沒有比它更確切、更常見的了。富貴顯達之人受人尊重敬仰;他們的言行具有別人所無的影響力。當他們開始傾跌,旁人便樂於加速其倒塌;長久懷藏而隱祕的嫉妒開始顯露;那些想往上爬的人因他們的敗落而歡喜;他們從前愈是尊榮、愈有地位權勢,如今便愈受輕蔑。他們被看為一支熄滅的火炬——毫無價值,被丟棄一旁。

「在心意中」——即在心思裏,或在眼光之中。

「安逸的人」——處於安舒亨通之境的人。他從他們那裏得不到同情。約伯無疑有意將這話應用在他的朋友身上。他們當時安逸亨通,既無疼痛,也不為貧困所壓,便以極度的平靜觀看他——如同觀看一支燃盡的火炬,再無重燃的指望一般。

英文原文

He that is ready to slip with his feet - The man whose feet waver or totter; that is, the man in adversity; see Proverbs 25:19. A man in prosperity is represented as standing firm; one in adversity as wavering, or falling; see Psalm 73:2.

But as for me, my feet were almost gone;

My steps had well nigh slipped.

There is much difficulty in this passage, and it has by no means been removed by the labor of critics. The reader may consult Rosenmuller, Good, and Schultens, on the verse, for a more full attempt to illustrate its meaning. Dr. Good, after Reiske and Parkhurst, has offered an explanation by rendering the whole passage thus:

The just, the perfect man is a laughing-stock to the proud,

A derision amidst the sunshine of the prosperous,

While ready to slip with his foot.

It does not appear to me, however, that this translation can be fairly educed from the Hebrew text, and I am disposed to acquiesce in the more common and obvious interpretation. According to that, the idea is, that a man in adversity, when failing from a high condition of honor, is regarded as an almost extinguished lamp, that is now held in contempt, and is cast away. When the torch was blazing, it was regarded as of value; when nearly extinguished, it would be regarded as worthless, and would be cast away. So when a man was in prosperity, he would be looked up to as a guide and example. In adversity, his counsels would be rejected, and he would be looked upon with contempt. Nothing can be more certain or more common than the fact here adverted to. The rich and the great are looked up to with respect and veneration. Their words and actions have an influence which those of no other men have. When they begin to fall, others are willing to hasten their fall. Long cherished but secret envy begins to show itself; those who wish to rise rejoice in their ruin, and they are looked upon with contempt in proportion to their former honor, rank, and power. They are regarded as an extinguished torch - of no value, and are cast away.

In the thought - In the mind, or the view.

Of him that is at ease - In a state of comfort and prosperity. He finds no sympathy from them. Job doubtless meant to apply this to his friends. They were then at ease, and were prosperous. Not suffering pain, and not overwhelmed with poverty, they now looked with the utmost composure on him - as they would on a torch which was burned out, and which there would be no hope of rekindling.

6

Job 12:6

開啟正文

繁體中文

「強盜的帳棚興旺」——強盜的帳棚(居所)安全穩妥。這是約伯起初提出的命題,也是他始終堅持的:神在今生並非按人的品格對待人。為支持這一點,他如今訴諸強盜帳棚安穩的事實。阿拉伯地必能提供許多這類例證,這是約伯的朋友們不會不知道的。亞拉伯人住帳棚,他們當時正如現在一樣,是流動的劫掠部族;他們在很大程度上靠搶掠為生,約伯無疑可以訴諸朋友們的親眼觀察來證明這點。他肯定說,神非但不按人的品格對待人,反而往往似乎保護公開的強盜和褻瀆祂名的人。

「興旺」——他們安穩、平靜、安逸——希伯來詞的本義正是如此;他們不受攪擾,無人闖入。

「惹神的人穩固」——或更恰當地說:「帳棚對那些惹動神的人是穩妥的。」Dr. Good 譯作「並且是惹動神之人的堡壘」;但真正的意思是:那些以行為惹動神的人,他們的帳棚是安全的;神似乎不理會他們,也不出來審判他們。

「神豐豐富富地賜入他們手中」——Dr. Noyes 譯作「把自己的神握在手中的人」;但據我看,這遠不如他譯本一貫的準確。Eichhorn 的譯法意思與此有些相近:(德文原意)「他們把自己的拳頭當作神明」。Stuhlmann 也這樣譯:(德文原意)「拳頭對誰有效,誰就以拳頭為神」;他說,約伯的意思是:這就是世界的常態。Dr. Good 譯作「那用手創造了萬物的那位」——那就更不準確了;為此他不得不假定經文有誤,卻沒有絲毫根據。Jerome 的譯法與我們的譯本相同。七十士譯本譯作:「他們惹動主,彷彿他們日後不會受審問(ἔτασις αὐτῶν etasis autōn)」——這譯法固然成理,卻決非出自希伯來文。Rosenmuller 譯作:「他們以自己的手——即權力——為神」;他說,這是描寫一個狂暴的惡人,自以為有權任意而行。然而在我看來,最簡單的通行解釋最符合希伯來文,也最符合本段的思路。照這解釋,其意思是:那活在惹動神之中的人是安穩的,而這位神卻不斷把恩慈的憑據豐豐富富地賜到他手中。這正是約伯所堅持的事實——神在今世並不按人真實的品格對待人:惡人興旺,義人受苦。

英文原文

The tabernacles of robbers prosper - The tents or dwellings of robbers are safe and secure. This is Job's original proposition, to which he all along adheres. It is, that God does not deal with people in this life according to their character; and in support of this he now appeals to the fact that the tents or dwellings of robbers are safe. Arabia would furnish many illustrations of this, which could not be unknown to the friends of Job. The Arabs dwelt in tents, and they were then, as now, wandering, predatory tribes. They lived, to a great extent, by plunder, and doubtless Job could appeal to the observation of his friends for the proof of this. He affirms that so far from dealing with people according to their character, God often seemed to protect the public robber, and the blasphemer of his name.

Prosper - They are secure, tranquil, at rest - for so the Hebrew word means. They are not disturbed and broken in upon.

And they that provoke God - Or rather, "the tents are secure to those who provoke God." Dr. Good renders it, "and are fortresses to those who provoke God;" but the true idea is, that the tents of those who provoke God by their conduct are safe. God does not seem to notice them, or to come out in judgment against them.

Into whose hand God bringeth abundantly - Dr. Noyes renders this, "who carry their God in their hand;" but with much less accuracy, as it seems to me, than commonly characterizes his version. Eichhorn renders it in a sense somewhat similar:

Die ihre Faust fur ihre Gottheit achten -

"Who regard their fist as their God."

And so Stuhlman renders it:

Und wem die Faust fur Gottheit gilt -

"And to whom the fist avails for their God;"

That is, says he, Job means that this is the course of the world. Dr. Good renders it, "of him who hath created all these things with his hand" - still less accurately. In order to this, he is obliged to suppose an error in the text, but without the slightest authority. Jerome renders it as in our version. The Septuagint, "who provoke the Lord as if there would be no trial to them - ἔτασις αὐτῶν etasis autōn - here-after;" which certainly makes sense, but it was never obtained from the Hebrew. Rosenmuller renders it, "who have their own hand, that is, power for God;" a description, says he, of a wicked and violent man who thinks it right for him to do as he pleases. It seems to me, however, that the common interpretation, which is the most simple, is most in accordance with the Hebrew, and with the drift of the passage. According to this it means, that there is security to the man who lives to provoke that God who is constantly bringing to him in abundance the tokens of kindness. This is the fact on which Job is insisting - that God does not treat people in this world according to their real character, but that the wicked are prospered and the righteous are afflicted.

7

Job 12:7

開啟正文

繁體中文

「你且問走獸」——Rosenmuller 認為,這段向低等受造之物發出的申訴,應視為與 Job 12:3 相連,而中間的經文屬於插敘。瑣法曾相當自負地論到神的智慧。他說過(Job 11:7 及以下)神的知識高過諸天,又自稱(Job 12:6)對至高者持有崇高的見解。約伯回答說,瑣法所表達的見解,乃是再平凡不過的常識。他無需假裝認識神較崇高的作為,或引以為據,彷彿他的知識與之相稱。就連低等的受造之物——走獸——大地——魚類——也能把牠現今所不知道的教導他。事實上,從牠們的性情、特質與生活方式之中,所能得到的見解,甚至比瑣法所持的更高。另有些人認為,這裏的意思是:在幸福的分配上,神遠非按着道德關係而行;甚至在低等動物之中,兇猛強暴的興旺,溫馴無辜的反而淪為犧牲。獅子、豺狼、豹興旺——綿羊、山羊、羚羊卻成了犧牲品。這兩種解釋都合乎上下文,不過在我看來,後者似乎更為可能。約伯的目的,是要證明賞罰並非按品格分配。這在他看來明顯得幾乎無需論證。全世界都見到這情形——不但在人類之中,甚至在獸類之中也是如此。強者處處吞吃弱者;兇猛的吞吃馴良的;強暴的吞吃膽怯的。然而神並不出來消滅獅子和鬣狗,也不拯救綿羊和羚羊脫離牠們的爪牙。正如強盜一樣(Job 12:6)——獅子、豹和豺狼在地上逡巡獵食;鷹與禿鷲從空中撲擊無防備之物;深海中的大強盜吞吃弱小者,卻仍舊興旺。對人間世事的進程、對義人與惡人相對的境況,這是何等有力的描繪。對約伯的目的而言,沒有比這更貼切的申訴了;也沒有甚麼更合乎全詩論證的結構——在這詩中,智慧主要在於細心觀察的結果。

「走獸必指教你」——牠們要指教你:神並非按各人的品格對待眾人。祂並不保障溫柔、馴良與無辜的,也不懲罰兇殘、嗜血與殘酷的。

「又問空中的飛鳥」——牠們要就有關的論點向你提供說明。那些獵食他者的——如鷹與禿鷲——並未立即招致神的不悅;溫柔無害的也未蒙保護。這普遍的原則在牠們身上得了說明:神的對待並不總是與品格完全一致。

英文原文

But ask now the beasts - Rosenmuller supposes that this appeal to the inferior creation should be regarded as connected with Job 12:3, and that the intermediate verses are parenthetical. Zophar had spoken with considerable parade of the wisdom of God. He had said (Job 11:7 ff) that the knowledge of God was higher than the heavens, and had professed Job 12:6 to have himself exalted views of the Most High. In reply to this, Job says that the views which Zophar had expressed, were the most commonplace imaginable. He need not pretend to be acquainted with the more exalted works of God, or appeal to them as if his knowledge corresponded with them. Even the lower creation - the brutes - the earth - the fishes - could teach him knowledge which he had not now. Even from their nature, properties, and modes of life, higher views might he obtained than Zophar had. Others suppose, that the meaning is, that in the distribution of happiness, God is so far from observing moral relations, that even among the lower animals, the rapacious and the violent are prospered, and the gentle and the innocent are the victims.

Lions, wolves, and panthers are prospered - the lamb, the kid, the gazelle, are the victims. Either of these views may suit the connection, though the latter seems to me to be the more probable interpretation. The object of Job is to show that rewards and punishments are not distributed according to character. This was so plain in his view as scarcely to admit of argument. It was seen all over the world not only among people, but even in the brute creation. Every where the strong prey upon the weak; the fierce upon the tame; the violent upon the timid. Yet God does not come forth to destroy the lion and the hyaena, or to deliver the lamb and the gazelle from their grasp. Like robbers Job 12:6, - lions, panthers, and wolves prowl upon the earth; and the eagle and the vulture from the air pounce upon the defenseless, and the great robbers of the deep prey upon the feeble, and still are prospered. What a striking illustration of the course of events among people, and of the relative condition of the righteous and the wicked. Nothing could be more pertinent to the design of Job than this appeal, and nothing was more in accordance with the whole structure of the argument in the poem, where wisdom is seen mainly to consist in the result of careful observation.

And they shall teach thee - Shall teach thee that God does not treat all according to their character. He does not give security to the gentle, the tame, and the innocent, and punish the ferocious, the blood-thirsty, and the cruel.

And the fowls - They shall give thee information of the point under discussion. Those that prey upon others - as the eagle and the vulture - are not exposed at once to the divine displeasure, and the tender and harmless are not protected. The general principle is illustrated in them, that the dealings of God are not always in exact accordance with character.

8

Job 12:8

開啟正文

繁體中文

「或與地說話,地必指教你」——這向大地的訴求,或如 Stuhlman 所設想,意思是:在兇猛動物身上顯明的事,同樣也顯明在地上的出產中。有害的雜草與無用的植物,比有益的植物長得更茂盛;毒害或惱人之物在地上生長,正說明神待人的事情與此相同——祂的對待並不按事物的實際本性。

「海裏的魚」——同樣的事也顯明於海中:強者吞吃弱者,兇猛殘暴的制伏無力自衛的。其要旨是:兇猛、強壯、邪惡的往往興旺,而軟弱、無助、無辜、敬虔的卻遭遇災禍;神並不按受造之物確切的品格分配祂的對待——這是貫穿萬有的重大原則。無疑,約伯在這一點上是對的;這普遍原則當時正如現在一樣,顯然遍及全世界。

英文原文

Or speak to the earth, and it shall teach thee - Perhaps this appeal to the earth may mean, as Stuhlman supposes, that the same thing is shown in the productions of the earth, as in the case of fierce animals. Noxious weeds and useless plants are more thrifty than the plants which are useful and the growth of poisonous or annoying things on the earth illustrates the same thing as the dealings of God with people - that his dealings are not in accordance with the real nature of objects.

And the fishes of the sea - The same thing is manifested in the sea, where the mighty prey upon the feeble, and the fierce and the ferocious overcome the defenseless. The sentiment is that it is a great principle which pervades all things that the ferocious the strong, the wicked, are often prospered, while the weak, the defenseless, the innocent, the pious, are subject to calamities, and that God does not apportion his dealings to the exact character of his creatures. Undoubtedly Job was right in this. and this general principle might be seen then as now, to pervade the world.

9

Job 12:9

開啟正文

繁體中文

「在這一切之中,誰不知道呢」——在這一切之中,誰看不見同樣屬神而主權之作為的明證呢?誰看不見同一位神的手、同樣偉大的治理原則呢?約伯的意思是:他所辯護的立場顯明到一個地步,甚至可以從神所造的大地和最低等的動物身上學會。

「是主的手行了這事」——在這一處,原文的詞是 יהוה yehovâh。關於這詞的含義,見 Isaiah 1:2 的註釋。迦勒底文譯本在此也把它譯作 יה yâhh。值得注意的是,就印刷的版本而論,這是 yahweh 這名在約伯記詩歌部分出現的唯一地方。在 Job 28:28,若干抄本中有 yahweh,而印刷本所有的卻是 "Adonai" 一詞;見 Eichhorn,Einleit. section 644, Note。在 Job 12:9,yahweh 這詞雖見於印刷諸本,卻為九部古抄本所無;見 John P. Wilson 博士論《不朽的盼望》("Hope of Immortality")第 57 頁。yahweh 這詞在約伯記的歷史部分不斷出現。關於由此就約伯記之古遠所得的論據,見導論第四節。

英文原文

Who knoweth not in all these - Who cannot see in all these the proofs of the same divine and sovereign agency? Who cannot see the hand of the same God and the same great principles of administration? The meaning of Job is, that the position which he defends is so plain, that it may be learned from the very earth and the lowest orders of animals which God has made.

That the hand of the Lord hath wrought this - In this place the original word is יהוה yehovâh. On the meaning of the word see the notes at Isaiah 1:2. The Chaldee also renders it here יה yâhh. It is remarkable that this is the only place where the name yahweh occurs in poetical parts of the book of Job, in the printed editions. In Job 28:28, yahweh is found in some manuscripts, though the word "Adonai" is in the printed copies. Eichhorn, Einleit. section 644, Note. In Job 12:9, the word yahweh, though found in the printed editions, is missing in nine ancient manuscripts. Dr. John P. Wilson on the "Hope of Immortality," p. 57. The word yahweh constantly occurs in the historical parts of the book. On the argument derived from this, in regard to the antiquity of the Book of Job, see the introduction, Section 4.

10

Job 12:10

開啟正文

繁體中文

「凡活物的生命」——旁註作「性命」。旁註是較準確的譯法。其意思是:萬有都在神的掌管之下。祂隨自己的喜悅賜下生命、健康與福樂,也隨自己的定意將其收回。約伯說,祂的主權彰顯於下等受造之物之中——田野的走獸、海裏的魚、並天上的飛鳥之中。

「人類的氣息」——旁註作「人的血肉」。旁註與希伯來文相合。其意思是:人也服在與其餘受造之物相同的法則之下。神是主權者;在祂一切的作為中,都可以看見同樣偉大的治理原則。

英文原文

In whose hand is the soul of every living thing - Margin, "Life." The margin is the more correct rendering. The idea is, that all are under the control of God. He gives life, and health, and happiness when he pleases, and when he chooses he takes them away. His sovereignty is manifested, says Job, in the inferior creation, or among the beasts of the field, the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of heaven.

And the breath of all mankind - Margin, "Flesh of man." The margin is in accordance with the Hebrew. The meaning is, that man is subjected to the same laws as the rest of the creation. God is a sovereign, and the same great principles of administration may be seen in all his works.

11

Job 12:11

開啟正文

繁體中文

「耳朵豈不試驗言語」——這顯然是一句諺語,其字面意義是明白的;但它在此處的應用卻較難確定。字面的意思是:耳朵的本分是辨別聲音的差異,並把意義傳達於心。至於這諺語與眼前之事的確切關係,解經家意見不一。大概意思是:人應當細心留意言語的意義並說話者的用意,正如人細心品嘗食物一樣;而約伯或許有意抱怨,他的朋友們沒有對他話語的真義與用意給予應有的留意。或者,它的意思可能是:人受造而有留意事物性質與品質的能力,在判斷關於神或他作為的教訓時,也當運用這能力。

「上膛」——旁註與希伯來文 חך chêk 同,作「上膛」。這字不僅指上膛,也指口的下部(格塞尼烏斯),尤其用來指味覺的器官或所在;Psalm 119:103;Job 6:30。

「嘗它的食物」——「食物」一詞在古英語中泛指各樣的食物。意思是:人受造而有分辨有益與有害之物的能力;照樣,在道德的題目上,人也當運用神所賜分辨真偽的能力。他不應以為凡已說過的、或所能說的,都必定是真的。他不應以為僅僅把諺語串連起來、說些平凡的意見,便是真智慧的標記。他應當把有價值的與無價值的分開,把真實的與虛假的分開,把有益的與有害的分開。約伯抱怨他的朋友們沒有這樣行。他們沒有顯出分辨或選擇的能力。他們說的是平凡的警句,蒐集前人的格言,毫無分辨,不論切題與否,都在反駁他的辯論中拿來使用。約伯正是因朋友們這類不相干的雜亂言論,感到自己受了他們的譏誚,Job 12:4。

英文原文

Doth not the ear try words? - The literal meaning of this, which is evidently a proverbial expression, is plain; but about its bearing here there is more difficulty. The literal sense is, that it is the office of the ear to mark the distinction of sounds, and to convey the sense to the soul. But in regard to the exact bearing of this proverb on the case in hand, commentators have not been agreed. Probably the sense is, that there ought to be a diligent attention to the signification of words, and to the meaning of a speaker, as one carefully tastes his food; and Job, perhaps, may be disposed to complain that his friends had not given that attention which they ought to have done to the true design and signification of his remarks. Or it may mean that man is endowed with the faculty of attending to the nature and qualities of objects, and that he ought to exercise that faculty in judging of the lessons which are taught respecting God or his works.

And the mouth - Margin, as in the Hebrew חך chêk - "palate." The word means not merely the palate, but the lower part of the mouth (Gesenius), and is especially used to designate the organ or the seat of taste; Psalm 119:103; Job 6:30.

His meat - Its food - the word "meat" being used in Old English to denote all kinds of food. The sense is, man is endowed with the faculty of distinguishing what is wholesome from what is unwholesome, and he should, in like manner, exercise the faculty which God has given him of distinguishing the true from the false on moral subjects. He should not suppose that all that had been said, or that could be said, must necessarily be true. He should not suppose that merely to string together proverbs, and to utter common-place suggestions, was a mark of true wisdom. He should separate the valuable from the worthless, the true from the false, and the wholesome from the injurious. Job complains that his friends had not done this. They had shown no power of discrimination or selection. They had uttered common place apothegms, and they gathered adages of former times, without any discrimination, and had urged them in their arguments against him, whether pertinent or not. It was by this kind of irrelevant and miscellaneous remark that he felt that he had been mocked by his friends, Job 12:4.

12

Job 12:12

開啟正文

繁體中文

年老的智慧——指與年長者同在。此處所用的字 ישׁישׁ yâshı̂ysh 意為老人、白髮之人。這字主要用於詩體,常用以指因年歲而衰弱的人。在 Job 15:10 譯作「年老髮白」;2 Chronicles 36:17 譯作「因年紀老邁而屈身者」;Job 32:6 譯作「年甚老邁」;Job 29:8 譯作「老年人」。七十士譯本(Septuagint)譯作 Ἐν πολλῷ χρόνῳ En pollō chronō——「在長久的歲月裏」。其意是說:凡曾長久有機會觀察世事演變、曾與前代交談、且有時間個人沉思的人,便可期望在他身上尋得智慧。這與古時東方的觀念相符——當時知識主要靠口傳授受,智慧大半繫於親身觀察的機會;參 Job 32:7。

英文原文

With the ancient is wisdom - With the aged. The word ישׁישׁ yâshı̂ysh used here, means an old man, one gray-headed. It is used chiefly in poetry, and is commonly employed in the sense of one who is decrepit by age. It is rendered "very aged" in Job 15:10; "him that stooped for age." 2 Chronicles 36:17; "very old," Job 32:6; and "the aged," Job 29:8 The Septuagint renders it, Ἐν πολλῷ χρόνῳ En pollō chronō "in much time." The sense is, that wisdom might be expected to be found with the man who had had a long opportunity to observe the course of events; who had conversed with a former generation, and who had had time for personal reflection. This was in accordance with the ancient Oriental views, where knowledge was imparted mainly by tradition, and where wisdom depended much on the opportunity of personal observation; compare Job 32:7.

13

Job 12:13

開啟正文

繁體中文

在神有智慧和能力——頁邊註正確地作「神」。無論老年人看來多有智慧,真正的智慧——那至高而配得其名的智慧——惟獨在神裏面可以尋得。約伯的目的,是要把人的思想引到神面前,使他的朋友默想神在其作為中所顯明的智慧。因此他在本章餘下的部分,陳述神所顯明之智慧與大能的幾個例證,特別要表明祂是主權者,在各處行祂所喜悅的事。祂創造萬有,托住萬有,隨己意翻轉人的境遇;祂興起祂所喜悅的人,在祂選定的時候將他們傾覆。祂的作為在許多方面與我們所預期的相反;這一切的要義是:神是聖潔而公義的主權者,在祂的治理之下既有這樣的翻覆,我們便不能推論祂是按人在世上的品格對待各人。

英文原文

With him is wisdom - Margin, correctly, "God." However much wisdom there may seem to be with aged men, yes the true wisdom - that which was supreme and worthy of the name - was to be found in God alone. The object of Job was to lead the thoughts up to God, and to bring his friends to a contemplation of the wisdom which he manifests in his works. Accordingly he goes on in the remainder of this chapter to state some of the illustrations of wisdom and power which God had exhibited, and particularly to show that he was a sovereign, and did his pleasure every where. He made all things; he sustains all things; he reverses the condition of people at his pleasure; he sets up whom he pleases, and when he chooses he casts them down. His works are contrary in many respects to what we should anticipate; and the sense of all is, that God was a holy and a righteous sovereign, and that such were the reverses under his administration that we could not argue that he treated all according to their character on earth.

14

Job 12:14

開啟正文

繁體中文

「看哪,他拆毀的」——他所拆毀的,無人能重建。他能以火、地震或瘟疫使城邑鄉鎮淪為荒廢,把它們徹底毀滅,使它們永不能再建。如今我們可以舉所多瑪、巴比倫、彼特拉、推羅、赫庫蘭尼姆與龐貝等事例,作為此言的確證。

「他捆住人」——他能使人陷入困境與窘迫,無法自拔;見 Job 11:10。迦勒底譯本把它譯作「他把人關在墳墓(בקבורתא)裏,就無人能開」。但更正確的意思是:神對人有完全的掌管,他能封住人的道路,使人無法自救。

英文原文

Behold, he breaketh down - None can repair what he pulls down. Cities and towns he can devote to ruin by fire, or earthquake, or the pestilence, and so completely destroy them that they can never be rebuilt. We may now refer to such illustrations as Sodom, Babylon, Petra, Tyre, Herculaneum, and Pompeii, as full proof of what is here affirmed.

He shutteth up a man - He can shut up a man in such difficulties and straits that he cannot extricate himself; see Job 11:10. The Chaldee renders this, "he shuts up a man in the grave (בקבורתא) and it cannot be opened." But the more correct idea is, that God has complete control over a man, and that he can so hedge up his way that he cannot help himself.

15

Job 12:15

開啟正文

繁體中文

他把水留住 - 從雲與泉源收回水。祂掌管雨水與泉源;這些一旦被留住,江河與湖泊便乾涸。敘利亞譯本將此譯作「祂若斥責眾水」,猜想這裏或許暗指紅海之乾涸,或為以色列人開路之事。但值得注意的是,此處的論證中並沒有暗指任何歷史事實——不論是洪水,是所多瑪、蛾摩拉的毀滅,還是過紅海之事——儘管這些事件本可為討論中的要點提供如此貼切的例證。難道可以推斷約伯從未聽聞過這些事件中的任何一件嗎?抑或這些事件所要傳達的教訓,其實已經包含在他所用的箴言之中,並提供了廣為人知的例證或此類格言的基礎?

他再發出,水便翻倒地 - 這樣的氾濫或許曾出現於阿拉伯暴漲的急流之中,而且實際上在各處都十分常見,足以成為神的大能與主權作為的顯著例證。

英文原文

He withholdeth the waters - From the clouds and springs. He has control over the rains and the fountains; and when these are withheld, rivers and lakes become dry. The Syriac renders this, - "if he rebuke the waters," supposing that there might perhaps be an allusion to the drying up of the Red Sea, or the formation of a passage for the Israelites. But it is remarkable that in the argument here there is no allusion to any historical fact, not to the flood, or to the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, or to the passage through the Red Sea, though these occurrences would have furnished so appropriate illustrations of the points under discussion. Is it to be inferred that Job had never heard of any of those events? Or may it have been that the lessons which they were adapted to teach had been actually embodied in the proverbs which he was using, and furnished well-known illustrations or the basis of such apothegms?

He sendeth them out, and they overturn the earth - Such inundations may have occurred in the swollen torrents of Arabia, and indeed are so common everywhere as to furnish a striking illustration of the power and sovereign agency of God.

16

Job 12:16

開啟正文

繁體中文

被誘惑的和誘惑人的都是屬他 —— 這是要教導人:各階層的人都在祂的掌管之下。所有人都倚靠祂,都服在祂以下。祂有權能保守他們,也能隨意毀滅他們。Good 博士認為,約伯在此是指他自己,以及那些誘使他說出急躁抱怨之言的朋友們。但這更可能是一項概括性的宣告:各階層的人都在神的掌管之下。

英文原文

The deceived and the deceiver are his - This is designed to teach that all classes of people are under his control. All are dependent on him, and all are subject to him. He has power to keep them, and he can destroy them when he pleases. Dr. Good supposes that Job refers here to himself and his friends who had beguiled him into expressions of impatience and complaint. But it is more probably a general declaration that all classes of people were under the control of God.

17

Job 12:17

開啟正文

繁體中文

「他把謀士剝衣擄去」——就是被劫掠、被擄去。意即智慧人和偉人的謀略不能對抗神。那些指望憑自己的計劃得勝的政治家,神使他們失望,把他們擄去。這話的目的,是要表明神超越一切,也表明人並非完全按其品格與等級受到對待。神是主權者;當祂挫敗最有智慧之人的謀略與打算、傾覆強者的計劃時,便顯出祂的主權。

「又使審判官變成愚人」——祂任憑他們陷於紛亂愚昧的計謀,任憑他們採取終必自取滅亡的措施。祂是主權者,掌管偉人的心思,有權能挫敗他們一切的謀略,使他們昏亂。再沒有比這更清楚的事;在列國的歷史中,也再沒有比這更常見印證的事。與這信念相符的,是那句眾所周知的話——「神要毀滅誰,必先使他癲狂。」

英文原文

He leadeth counsellors away spoiled - Plundered or captive. That is, the counsels of wise and great men do not avail against God. Statesmen who promised themselves victory as the result of their plans he disappoints, and leads away into captivity. The object of this is to show that God is superior over all, and also that people are not dealt with in exact accordance with their character and rank. God is a sovereign, and he shows his sovereignty when defeating the counsels and purposes of the wisest of men, and overturning the plans of the mighty.

And maketh the judges fools - He leaves them to distracted and foolish plans. He leaves them to the adoption of measures which result in their own ruin. He is a sovereign, having control over the minds of the great, and power to defeat all their counsels, and to render them infatuated. Nothing can be clearer than this. Nothing has been more frequently illustrated in the history of nations. In accordance with this belief is the well-known expression:

Quem Deus vult perdere prius dementat.

"Whom God purposes to destroy, he first infatuates."

18

Job 12:18

開啟正文

繁體中文

他放鬆君王的綁——這裡君王的綁(מוּסר mûsâr)指他們用來捆綁別人的東西。他們轄制別人的權柄,祂將其解開或奪去。

又用帶子捆他們的腰——就是說,祂用繩索或繩子捆綁他們,像俘虜一樣帶走。這裡一連串的話,都是指人生境遇的逆轉與變遷。這裡的意思是:他們加在別人身上的權柄之縛被解開了,而他們自己的腰反被帶子捆上——不是君王尊嚴與華飾的帶子,而是僕人或行路之人所束的那種帶子(Pict. Bib.)。

英文原文

He looseth the bond of kings - The bond of kings (מוּסר mûsâr) here means that by which they bind others. Their power over others he loosens or takes away.

And girdeth their loins with a girdle - That is, he girds them with a rope or cord, and leads them away as prisoners. The whole series of remarks here refers to the reverses and changes in the conditions of life. The meaning here is, that the bonds of authority which they imposed on others are unbound, and that their own loins are bound with a girdle, not a girdle of royal dignity and ornament, but such a one as they are bound with who are servants, or who travel. "Pict. Bib."

19

Job 12:19

開啟正文

繁體中文

祂使祭司被擄去——就是說,被劫掠。這裡譯作「首領」的詞 כהנים kôhênı̂ym,本義是祭司,聖經中通常也如此翻譯。古代希伯來解經家認為這詞有時也指首領。迦勒底意譯本也不少次這樣翻譯,用 רבא 一詞來表達(Genesis 41:45;Psalm 110:4)。在本節,武加大譯本譯作「sacerdotes」,七十士譯本作 ἱερεῖς hiereis——「祭司」。路德(Luther)也譯作「Priester」,卡斯特利奧(Castellio)亦然。這詞之所以能用於首領或政治家,只因祭司常常參與執行民政官員的職務,實際上在某種程度上就是政府的官員。但在我看來,這裡應按其通常的意義理解,意思是:連宗教的職事也在神的掌管之下,與其他有聲望有權勢的人一樣,同樣會經歷命運的逆轉。

又傾倒——這裡所用的詞(סלף sâlaph)帶有滑跌、滑行的意味。在亞拉伯語中,這詞意為滑過、塗抹;見 Proverbs 13:6:「犯罪的,被邪惡傾覆(תסלף tesâlaph,使之滑跌)」;另比較 Proverbs 21:12;Proverbs 22:12。在此它意為傾覆、擊倒。最強大的首領也不能在祂面前站立得穩,必滑跌仆倒。

英文原文

He leadeth princes away spoiled - That is, plundered. The word here rendered "princes" כהנים kôhênı̂ym means properly priests, and it is usually so rendered in the Scriptures. The ancient Hebrew interpreters suppose that the word sometimes also means prince. The Chaldee paraphrasist has not unfrequently so rendered it, using the word רבא to express it; Genesis 41:45; Psalm 110:4. In this place, the Vulgate renders it, "sacerdotes;" and the Septuagint, ἱερεῖς hiereis, "priests." So Luther renders it, "Priester." So Castellio. It can be applied to princes or statesmen only because priests were frequently engaged in performing the functions of civil officers, and were in fact to a certain extent officers of the government. But it seems to me that it is to be taken in its usual signification, and that it means that even the ministers of religion were at the control of God, and were subject to the same reverses as other people of distinction and power.

And overthroweth - The word used here (סלף sâlaph) has the notion of slipping, or gliding. So in Arabic, the word means to slip by, and to besmear; see Proverbs 13:6 : "Wickedness overthroweth תסלף tesâlaph, causes to slip) the sinner;" compare Proverbs 21:12; Proverbs 22:12. Here it means to overthrow, to prostrate. The most mighty chieftains cannot stand firm before him, but they glide away and fall.

20

Job 12:20

開啟正文

繁體中文

他廢去忠信人的講論——頁邊註作「忠信人的嘴唇」。「祂把嘴唇廢去」,即祂收回給出穩妥指教或良善忠告的能力。這裡的「忠信人」指有年歲與經驗、眾人慣於倚靠其謀略的人。其意是:他們最精明的預料終歸失望,他們最有智慧的籌算終歸挫敗。他們對事態進程的推算盡都失敗;天命的安排如此,使他們無法預料將要發生的事。

又奪去老人的聰明——年輕人慣於敬重仰仗的長者。其意是:那些慣於給出智慧穩健建議的人,若被神離棄,所獻的盡是虛空愚昧的計謀。

英文原文

He removeth away the speech of the trusty - Margin, "lip of the faithful." "He takes away the lip," that is, he takes away the power of giving safe counsel or good advice. The "trusty" or "faithful" here refer to those of age and experience, and on whose counsel men are accustomed to rely. The meaning here is, that their most sagacious anticipations are disappointed, their wisest schemes are foiled. They fail-in their calculations of the coarse of events, and the arrangements of Providence are such that they could not anticipate what was to occur.

The understanding of the aged - To whom the young were accustomed to look up with deference and respect. The meaning here is, that they who were accustomed to give wise and sound advice, if left by God, give vain and foolish counsels.

21

Job 12:21

開啟正文

繁體中文

「他使君王蒙羞被奪」——他有權能把他們從寶座上摔下來,使他們淹沒於恥辱之中。

「放鬆有力之人的腰帶」——邊註照希伯來文作「放鬆強壯者的腰帶」。東方人穿寬鬆下垂的外袍,用腰間的帶子束緊。他們勞作、奔跑或行路時,便用帶子把外袍束起。但這在各處都是常見的。摔跤者、跳躍者與賽跑者束上腰帶,便能比不束帶時成就更多。鬆開那帶子,就是使他們軟弱。約伯照樣說,神有權能鬆開強壯者的力量。他在這裏似乎竭力搜求措辭,以各樣方式變換比喻的形態,要顯明神對人所握有的絕對主權,並顯明他的權能正顯在人世的滄桑翻覆之中。盧克萊修(Lucretius)有一段詩,其大旨與此極為相似:

Usque adeo res humanas vis abdita quaedam Obterit; et pulchros fasces, saevasque secures, Proculcare, atque ludibrio sibi habere, videtur. (Lib. v. 1232.)

這樣,從他那可畏的幽暗之中,某種看不見的權能 推翻一切人間的偉大!把權杖、徽記、王冠—— 國家最自豪的排場——踏成塵土; 並且譏笑狂妄之徒的一切虛榮!

——古德(Good)譯。

英文原文

He poureth contempt upon princes - He has power to hurl them from their thrones, and to overwhelm them with disgrace.

And weakeneth the strength of the mighty - Margin, as in Hebrew "looseth the girdle of the strong." The Orientals wore loose flowing robes, which were secured by a girdle around the loins. When they labored, ran, or traveled, their robes were girded up. But this is common everywhere. Wrestlers, leapers, and runners, put a girdle around them, and are able thus to accomplish much more than they otherwise could. To loosen that, is to weaken them. So Job says that God had power to loosen the strength of the mighty. He here seems to labor for expressions, and varies the form of the image in every way to show the absolute control which God has over people, and the fact that his power is seen in the reverses of mankind. Lucretius has a passage strongly resembling this in the general sentiment:

Usque adeo res humanas vis abdita quaedam

Obterit; et pulchros fasces, saevasque secures,

Proculcare, atque ludibrio sibi habere, videtur.

Lib. v. 1232.

So from his awful shades, some Power unseen

O'erthrows all human greatness! Treads to dust

Rods, ensigns, crowns - the proudest pomps of state;

And laughs at all the mockery of mad!

Good.

22

Job 12:22

開啟正文

繁體中文

「他將深奧的事從黑暗中彰顯」——即:神顯明那些全然超乎人的能力所能發現的真理——那些似乎藏在深沉黑夜之中的真理。這可指神被認為已賜下的啟示,也可指他揭示最隱密的思想與意圖的能力,或指他藉著把未來之事從黑暗中帶到白晝的明光之下而預示它們的能力,或指他偵破陰謀、詭計與叛亂的能力。

「使死蔭顯為光明」——關於譯作「死蔭」的詞的含義,見 Job 3:5 的註釋。這裏它指一切幽暗隱晦之物。這是本詩作者頗愛用的表達(見 Job 10:22;Job 16:16;Job 24:17;Job 34:22;Job 38:17),雖然它也見於聖經別處。最深的黑暗、最晦暗的深夜都以此表示;其意是:即使從最幽暗、最不可穿透的境域,神也能帶出光明與真理。萬物在神的心眼前都是赤露敞開的。

英文原文

He discovereth deep thirsts out of darkness - That is, God discloses truths which are wholly beyond the power of man to discover - truths that seem to be hidden in profound night. This may refer either to the revelation which God was believed to have furnished, or to his power of bringing out the most secret thoughts and purposes, or to his power of predicting future events by bringing them out of darkness to the clear light of day, or to his power of detecting plots, intrigues, and conspiracies.

And bringeth out to light the shadow of death - On the meaning of the word rendered "shadow of death," see the notes at Job 3:5. It here denotes whatever is dark or obscure. It is rather a favorite expression with the author of this poem (see Job 10:22; Job 16:16; Job 24:17; Job 34:22; Job 38:17), though it occurs elsewhere in the Scriptures. The deepest darkness, the obscurest night, are represented by it; and the idea is, that even from the most dark and impenetrable regions God could bring out light and truth. All is naked and open to the mind of God.

23

Job 12:23

開啟正文

繁體中文

他使列國興旺,又毀滅他們——他對列國有完全的掌管。繁榮的源頭都在他手中;他能隨自己的意旨,以饑荒、瘟疫或戰爭臨到他們,削減他們的人數,止住他們的繁榮。Good 博士將這話譯得極不恰當——「他任憑列國放縱」;然而 שׂגא(śâgâ')一詞決無此義。它的意思是使宏大、使繁多、使之加增。

又使他們再收縮——邊註作「引領進來」。נחה(nāchāh)一詞正是此義。其概念是:他使一國興盛,以致其擴展超越尋常的疆界;然後隨自己的意旨,再把他們引回,或將他們局限於他們原先遷出之處的疆界之內。

英文原文

He increaseth the nations, and destroyeth them - He has entire control over them. The sources of prosperity are in his hand, and at his pleasure he can visit them with famine, pestilence, or war, and diminish their numbers and arrest their prosperity. Dr. Good renders this very improperly, "He letteth the nations grow licentious;" but the word שׂגא śâgâ' never has this sense. It means, to make great; to multiply; to increase.

And straiteneth them again - Margin, "leadeth in." So the word נחה nâchâh means. The idea is, that he increases a nation so that it spreads abroad beyond its usual limits, and then at his pleasure leads them back again, or confines them within the limits from where they had emigrated.

24

Job 12:24

開啟正文

繁體中文

他奪去他們的心——這裏的「心」顯然指心智、悟性、智慧;見 Job 12:3 的註釋。

就是地上眾民的首領——希伯來文作「眾民的首領」,即地上的統治者。其意是:他任憑他們陷於愚妄昏亂的謀略。他一從他們中間撤回,就有能力挫敗他們的計謀,任憑他們全然缺乏智慧;見 Job 12:17 的註釋。

使他們在曠野漂流——他們如同置身於無邊沙海之中的人——沒有路標,沒有嚮導,也沒有路徑。地上大人物們的困惑與混亂,再沒有比這迷途旅人的境況描繪得更透徹的了。

英文原文

He taketh away the heart - The word heart here evidently means mind, intelligence, wisdom; see the notes at Job 12:3.

Of the chief of the people - Hebrew "Heads of the people;" that is, of the rulers of the earth. The meaning is, that he leaves them to infatuated and distracted counsels. By withdrawing from them, he has power to frustrate their plans, and to leave them to an entire lack of wisdom; see the notes at Job 12:17.

And causeth them to wander in a wilderness - They are like persons in a vast waste of pathless sands without a waymark, a guide, or a path. The perplexity and confusion of the great ones of the earth could not be more strikingly represented than by the condition of such a lost traveler.

25

Job 12:25

開啟正文

繁體中文

他們在黑暗中摸索——他們好像在黑暗中用手摸索尋路的人一樣;參以賽亞書 59:10 的註釋。

他使他們像醉酒的人一樣東倒西歪——邊註作「游移」。他們動搖不定、茫無頭緒的計謀,正像醉酒之人搖晃蹣跚的樣子;見以賽亞書 19:14 的註釋;以賽亞書 24:20 的註釋。本章至此結束,連同這場關於能否引用貼切而有力之箴言式語句的爭論,也一併告終;見約伯記 12:3 的註釋。約伯已向他們表明,他對論及神的箴言與他們一樣熟悉,對至高者的統治與掌管,也懷有與他們同樣崇高的見解。還可以補充一句:這些都是論及神的崇高而優美的言辭。它們勝過異教著作中所能找到的一切,並且表明,不知何以,在最早的世代,關於神的這些觀念已然流行——而這些觀念,是此後許多世代的人心、即使在最有利的境況中,也無從自行發端的。這些箴言式的說法,無疑是啟示真理的片段;它們藉傳統流傳下來,又以這種便於世代相傳的形式被保存下來。

英文原文

They grope in the dark - They are like persons who attempt to feel their way along in the dark; compare the notes at Isaiah 59:10.

And he maketh them to stagger like a drunken man - Margin, "wander." Their unstable and perplexed counsels are like the reelings of a drunken man; see Isaiah 19:14, note; Isaiah 24:20, note. This closes the chapter, and with it the controversy in regard to the ability to adduce pertinent and striking proverbial expressions; see the notes at Job 12:3. Job had showed them that he was as familiar with proverbs respecting God as they were, and that he entertained as exalted ideas of the control and government of the Most High as they did. It may be added, that these are sublime and beautiful expressions respecting God. They surpass all that can be found in the writings of the pagan; and they show that somehow in the earliest ages there prevailed views of God which the human mind for ages afterward, and in the most favorable circumstances, was not capable of originating. These proverbial sayings were doubtless fragments of revealed truth, which had come down by tradition, and which were thus embodied in a form convenient to be transmitted from age to age.