서론
無標題
繁體中文
英文原文
David, having several times narrowly escaped Saul's fury, begins to consider at last whether it may not be necessary for him to retire into the country and to take up arms in his own defence. But he will not do so daring a thing without consulting his faithful friend Jonathan; how he did this, and what passed between them, we have an account in this chapter, where we have as surprising instances of supernatural love as we had in the chapter before of unnatural hatred. I. David complains to Jonathan of his present distress, and engages him to be his friend, 1Sa 20:1-8. II. Jonathan faithfully promises to get and give him intelligence how his father stood affected to him, and renews the covenant of friendship with him, 1Sa 20:9-23. III. Jonathan, upon trial, finds, to his grief, that his father was implacably enraged against David, 1Sa 20:24-34. IV. He gives David notice of this, according to the appointment between them, 1Sa 20:35-42.
1-8
David Consults Jonathan (1058 BC)
繁體中文
大衛與約拿單商議(主前 1058 年)
¹ 大衛從拉瑪的拿約逃跑,來到約拿單那裏,對他說:「我做了甚麼?有甚麼罪孽呢?在你父親面前我犯了甚麼罪,他竟尋索我的性命?」
² 約拿單回答說:「斷乎不是!你必不至死。我父親作事,無論大小,沒有不叫我知道的,為甚麼獨有這事隱瞞我呢?決不如此。」
³ 大衛又起誓說:「你父親準知道我在你眼前蒙恩;他心裏說:『不要叫約拿單知道,恐怕他愁煩。』我指著永生的耶和華,又指著你的性命起誓:我與死只差一步。」
⁴ 約拿單對大衛說:「你心裏所求的,我必為你成就。」
⁵ 大衛對約拿單說:「明日是初一,我當與王同席,求你容我去藏在田間,直到第三日晚上。
⁶ 你父親若見我不在席上,你就說:『大衛切切懇求我容他回本城伯利恆去,因為在那裏全家獻年祭。』
⁷ 他若說『好』,僕人就平安了;他若發怒,你就知道他決意害我。
⁸ 求你恩待僕人,因你曾使僕人在耶和華面前與你立約;我若有罪,不如你自己殺我,何必把我交給你父親呢?」
此處我們看見:一、大衛把自己眼前的苦難向約拿單陳明。掃羅既在拿約被那恍惚狀態所困,大衛便逃到朝廷,得以與約拿單說話。當王位上有這樣的仇敵之時,朝廷裏竟有這樣的朋友,實在是他的福氣。若有恨惡藐視我們的人,我們不必為此難過,因為也有愛護尊重我們的人。「神使這個與那個並列」,我們也當如此看。約拿單是「時常愛護」的朋友,如今大衛在患難中,他愛他一如從前,歡迎他入自己懷中,正如大衛得勝之時所作的(撒上 18:1);他是「為患難而生」的弟兄(箴 17:17)。如今:1. 大衛就自己的無辜向約拿單本人申訴;他不必多說來證明,只求約拿單若知道自己對他父親有甚麼正當的得罪,便告訴他,好使他自卑求饒:「我做了甚麼呢?」(撒上 20:1)2. 他盡力使約拿單相信:儘管自己無辜,掃羅卻尋索他的命。約拿單出於對父親的孝敬,極不願相信父親會設計或行這般惡事(撒上 20:2)。他更是如此盼望,因為他對這等計謀毫不知情,而父親素常把他引入一切謀略之中。約拿單作為孝順的兒子,盡力遮蓋父親的羞恥——只要這與對大衛的公義和忠誠不相衝突。愛心不輕易以為人有惡,尤其是對父母(林前 13:5)。因此大衛以起誓向自己面臨的危險作保,就著掃羅發出「保平安的誓言」,表明自己正懼怕性命喪在他手中:「我指著永生的耶和華起誓」——再沒有比這更確實的了——「又指著你的性命起誓」——再沒有比這對你更確定的了——「無論你怎麼想,我與死只差一步」(撒上 20:3)。至於掃羅向約拿單隱瞞此事,也容易解釋:他知道約拿單與大衛之間的友誼,因此雖在別的事上與他商議,這事上卻不。要協助他行一切公義體面之計,再沒有比約拿單更合適的;但他知道約拿單的美德超過肯作這般卑鄙計謀——殺害大衛——的同謀。
二、約拿單慷慨地向他獻上自己的效力(撒上 20:4):「你心裏所求的,我必為你成就。」他不必加上「只要合法誠實」這個附帶條件(因為他知道大衛不會求別的),「我必為你成就。」這才是真正的友誼。基督也是這樣向我們見證祂的愛:「你們求,就必為你們成就」;我們也當藉著遵守祂的命令來見證我們對祂的愛。
三、大衛只求約拿單先使自己滿足,再使他滿足——到底掃羅是否真的決意要害死他。也許大衛提議這事,更是為約拿單的確信,而不是為自己,因他自己已經十分清楚了。1. 他所提的試驗方法十分自然,必能查明掃羅對他的態度。接下來兩天掃羅要公開設席,因是月朔的節期——那時要獻特別的祭,並在祭肉上設筵。掃羅雖已被神棄絕,耶和華的靈也已離開他,他卻仍持守對聖節期的遵守。可能有外在敬虔的殘餘,其中卻不過是真美德的廢墟。在這些節期的筵席上,掃羅或許讓一切兒女與他同席,而大衛也得了一個座位如同他們之中的一位;又或許讓一切臣宰與他同席,而大衛得了一個座位如同他們之中的一位。無論如何,大衛決定那兩天讓自己的座位空著(在聖潔的節期這是從未有過的事)(撒上 20:5),並要藏匿到節期過去;事情就以此為斷:若掃羅接受他缺席的理由,並通融不追究,他便斷定掃羅已改變心意、與他和好;若掃羅因此發怒、被激動,就容易斷定他決意要害他——因為既確知他並非愛他到要他同席的地步(除了要得機會害他,再無別的目的)(撒上 20:7)。2. 他請約拿單為他缺席所說的託辭,我們有理由相信是真實的——他被長兄請回本城伯利恆,與親屬同守這月朔;因為除了每月與全以色列共同守的節期之外,他們此時還有為「全家」所獻的年祭,並在其上設聖筵(撒上 20:6)。他們在家庭中守一個感恩之日,為所得的安慰感恩,並為其持續禱告。由此可見大衛出於一個極其敬虔的家庭,是個家中有教會的家。3. 他用以勸約拿單為他作這善事的理由,十分懇切(撒上 20:8):(一)他已與他結為友誼之盟,且這原是約拿單自己的提議:「你曾使僕人在耶和華面前與你立約。」(二)他斷不肯勉強約拿單站在自己一邊,除非確知這是公義的事:「我若有罪,我斷不願我們之間的約束縛你成為我罪惡的同黨;我情願釋放你,並願我自己的手先加在我身上——你自己殺我罷。」誠實的人斷不會勉強朋友為自己的緣故去作不誠實的事。
英文原文
David Consults Jonathan (1058 BC)
¹ And David fled from Naioth in Ramah, and came and said before Jonathan, What have I done? what is mine iniquity? and what is my sin before thy father, that he seeketh my life?
² And he said unto him, God forbid; thou shalt not die: behold, my father will do nothing either great or small, but that he will shew it me: and why should my father hide this thing from me? it is not so.
³ And David sware moreover, and said, Thy father certainly knoweth that I have found grace in thine eyes; and he saith, Let not Jonathan know this, lest he be grieved: but truly as the LORD liveth, and as thy soul liveth, there is but a step between me and death.
⁴ Then said Jonathan unto David, Whatsoever thy soul desireth, I will even do it for thee.
⁵ And David said unto Jonathan, Behold, to morrow is the new moon, and I should not fail to sit with the king at meat: but let me go, that I may hide myself in the field unto the third day at even.
⁶ If thy father at all miss me, then say, David earnestly asked leave of me that he might run to Bethlehem his city: for there is a yearly sacrifice there for all the family.
⁷ If he say thus, It is well; thy servant shall have peace: but if he be very wroth, then be sure that evil is determined by him.
⁸ Therefore thou shalt deal kindly with thy servant; for thou hast brought thy servant into a covenant of the LORD with thee: notwithstanding, if there be in me iniquity, slay me thyself; for why shouldest thou bring me to thy father?
Here, I. David makes a representation to Jonathan of his present troubles. While Saul lay bound by his trance at Naioth David escaped to the court, and got to speak with Jonathan. And it was happy for him that he had such a friend at court, when he had such an enemy on the throne. If there be those that hate and despise us, let us not be disturbed at that, for there are those also that love and respect us. God hath set the one over against the other, and so must we. Jonathan was a friend that loved at all times, loved David as well now in his distress, and bade him as welcome into his arms, as he had done when he was in his triumph (1Sa 18:1), and he was a brother that was born for adversity, Pr 17:17. Now, 1. David appeals to Jonathan himself concerning his innocency, and he needed not say much to him for the proof of it, only he desired him that if he knew of any just offence he had given his father he would tell him, that he might humble himself and beg his pardon: What have I done? 1Sa 20:1. 2. He endeavors to convince him that, notwithstanding his innocency, Saul sought his life. Jonathan, from a principal of filial respect to his father, was very loth to believe that he designed or would ever do so wicked a thing, 1Sa 20:2. He the rather hoped so because he knew nothing of any such design, and he had usually been made privy to all his counsels. Jonathan, as became a dutiful son, endeavored to cover his father's shame, as far as was consistent with justice and fidelity to David. Charity is not forward to think evil of any, especially of a parent, 1Co 13:5. David therefore gives him the assurance of an oath concerning his own danger, swears the peace upon Saul, that he was in fear of his life by him: "As the Lord liveth, than which nothing more sure in itself, and as thy soul liveth, than which nothing more certain to thee, whatever thou thinkest, there is but a step between me and death," 1Sa 20:3. And, as for Saul's concealing it from Jonathan, it was easy to account for that; he knew the friendship between him and David, and therefore, though in other things he advised with him, yet not in that. None more fit than Jonathan to serve him in every design that was just and honourable, but he knew him to be a man of more virtue than to be his confidant in so base a design as the murder of David.
II. Jonathan generously offers him his service (1Sa 20:4): Whatsoever thou desirest, he needed not insert the proviso of lawful and honest (for he knew David too well to think he would ask any thing that was otherwise), I will even do it for thee. This is true friendship. Thus Christ testifies his love to us: Ask, and it shall be done for you; and we must testify ours to him by keeping his commandments.
III. David only desires him to satisfy himself, and then to satisfy him whether Saul did really design his death or no. Perhaps David proposed this more for Jonathan's conviction than his own, for he himself was well satisfied. 1. The method of trial he proposed was very natural, and would certainly discover how Saul stood affected to him. The two next days Saul was to dine publicly, upon occasion of the solemnities of the new moon, when extraordinary sacrifices were offered and feasts made upon the sacrifices. Saul was rejected of God, and the Spirit of the Lord had departed from him, yet he kept up his observance of the holy feasts. There may be the remains of external devotion where there is nothing but the ruins of real virtue. At these solemn feasts Saul had either all his children to sit with him, and David had a seat as one of them, or all his great officers, and David had a seat as one of them. However it was, David resolved his seat should be empty (and that it never used to be at a sacred feast) those two days (1Sa 20:5), and he would abscond till the solemnity was over, and put it upon this issue: if Saul admitted an excuse for his absence, and dispensed with it, he would conclude he had changed his mind and was reconciled to him; but if he resented it, and was put into a passion by it, it was easy to conclude he designed him a mischief, since it was certain he did not love him so well as to desire his presence for any other end than that he might have an opportunity to do him a mischief, 1Sa 20:7. 2. The excuse he desired Jonathan to make for his absence, we have reason to think, was true, that he was invited by his elder brother to Bethlehem, his own city, to celebrate this new moon with his relations there, because, besides the monthly solemnity in which they held communion with all Israel, they had now a yearly sacrifice, and a holy feast upon it, for all the family, 1Sa 20:6. They kept a day of thanksgiving in their family for the comforts they enjoyed, and of prayer for the continuance of them. By this it appears that the family David was of was a very religious family, a house that had a church in it. 3. The arguments he used with Jonathan to persuade him to do this kindness for him were very pressing, 1Sa 20:8. (1.) That he had entered into a league of friendship with him, and it was Jonathan's own proposal: Thou hast brought thy servant into a covenant of the Lord with thee. (2.) That he would by no means urge him to espouse his cause if he was not sure that it was a righteous cause: "If there be iniquity in me, I am so far from desiring or expecting that the covenant between us should bind thee to be a confederate with me in that iniquity that I freely release thee from it, and wish that my hand may be first upon me: Slay me thyself." No honest man will urge his friend to do a dishonest thing for his sake.
9-23
Jonathan's Covenant with David (1058 BC)
繁體中文
約拿單與大衛立約(公元前1058年)
⁹ 約拿單說:斷無此事。若是我確實知道災禍必臨到我父親身上,我豈不告訴你呢?
¹⁰ 大衛對約拿單說:你父親若用強言回答你,誰告訴我呢?
¹¹ 約拿單對大衛說:你我且往田野去。二人就往田野去了。
¹² 約拿單對大衛說:願耶和華以色列的神為證。明日或後日這時候,我若探出我父親的意思,見他對大衛有好意,我若不打發人告訴你,
¹³ 願耶和華重重地降罰與約拿單。但我父親若有意要害你,我必告訴你,打發你平平安安地走。願耶和華與你同在,如同從前與我父親同在一樣。
¹⁴ 你要照耶和華的慈愛恩待我,不但我活著的時候使我免死,
¹⁵ 就是我死後,耶和華從地上剪除大衛一切的仇敵之時,你也不可向我家永斷恩惠。
¹⁶ 於是約拿單與大衛家結盟,說:願耶和華藉大衛仇敵的手追討背約的罪。
¹⁷ 約拿單因愛大衛如同愛自己的性命,就使他再起誓。
¹⁸ 約拿單對大衛說:明日是初一。你的座位空著,人必發覺你不在。
¹⁹ 你等三日,要速速下去,到你從前遇見事藏身的那地方,在以便石旁邊等候。
²⁰ 我要向石頭旁邊射三箭,如同射靶子一樣。
²¹ 我要打發童子去說:去把箭找來。我若對童子說:看哪,箭在這邊,你拿來。這樣你就可以來。我指著永生的耶和華起誓,你必平安無事。
²² 我若對童子這樣說:看哪,箭在前頭。你就要走,因為是耶和華打發你去的。
²³ 至於你我今日所說的話,看哪,有耶和華在你我中間為證,直到永遠。
這裏包含:I. 約拿單在患難中向大衛申明自己的忠誠。雖然大衛對約拿單大有信心,但因為他可能有理由懼怕他父親的影響力和他自身的利益會使他動搖,或對他冷淡,約拿單便認為有必要鄭重重申他對大衛友誼的表示(1Sa 20:9):斷無此事——你不要以為我懷疑你有甚麼罪,使我當親手殺你或把你交給我父親;不,你若對此有任何疑慮,我們且往田野去(1Sa 20:11),把事情更充分地談一談。他不是向他挑戰、要他在田間為侮辱決鬥,而是要在田間堅固他與他的友誼。他忠實地應許他,必在試驗之後把他所發現的父親對他的心意告訴他,既不添油加醋,也不有所隱瞞。「我父親若對你有好意,我必告訴你,使你安心(1Sa 20:12);若有意害你,我必打發你走,使你得安全」(1Sa 20:13);這樣,他便要幫助他脫離實在的禍患,或脫離對禍患的恐懼——若那禍患不過是想像的。為證實他的應許,他向神呼籲:1. 作見證人(1Sa 20:12):耶和華以色列的神啊,你知道我是真心誠意,心口一致。他激情的強烈使他說話的方式簡潔而跳躍。2. 作審判官(1Sa 20:13):願耶和華重重地降罰與約拿單——若我說謊,或對朋友失信。他如此鄭重地表達,為要使大衛對他的真心大有把握。神也是如此堅定了他對我們的應許,使我們可以得大勉勵(來6:17-18)。約拿單在他的申明之上又加上他懇切的禱告:願耶和華與你同在——保護你、使你亨通——如同從前與我父親同在一樣,雖然如今他已經收回。這表明他相信大衛將站在他父親的位置上,又表明他善良的願望,盼望大衛在那位置上比他父親如今更加亨通。
II. 他設法使與大衛的友誼之約延及他的後裔(1Sa 20:14-16)。他要大衛應許在他離世之後作他家的朋友(1Sa 20:15):你不可——你當應許——向我家永斷恩惠。他這樣說,是出於對兒女天生的愛心,盼望他們在他死後凡事順遂,又為兒女日後的福祉,願意利用自己眼前的影響力。這也表明他堅信大衛必被高舉,且必在他手中行事有權能,可以向他的後裔行善或行惡;因為日後耶和華必剪除他的仇敵——掃羅自己也不能例外——那時你不可向我家斷絕恩惠,也不可把我父親的過錯報復在我兒女身上。大衛家也同樣當受約束,代代與約拿單家相連;他與大衛家結了盟(1Sa 20:16)。注意:真正的朋友不能不渴望把自己彼此的情誼傳給後代。你的朋友和你父親的朋友,你不可離棄。這恩惠:1. 他稱之為耶和華的慈愛,因為這是神向那些他帶領與自己立約之人所顯的那種慈愛;他作他們和他們後裔的神,他們因列祖的緣故蒙愛。2. 他以咒詛來保全這約(1Sa 20:16):願耶和華藉大衛仇敵的手追討——他對大衛本人毫無疑心——若大衛的後裔如此與大衛為敵,竟向約拿單(大衛的朋友)的後裔行事不義。他恐怕大衛或他的子孫日後為了澄清並鞏固自己對王位的權利,受試探要對約拿單的後裔行事,如同亞比米勒對待基甸的眾子那樣(士9:5);他想要有效地防止這事。但這裏所給的理由(1Sa 20:17),說明約拿單如此懇切要使友誼延及後代,完全是出於慷慨,毫無私心;那是因為他愛大衛如同愛自己的性命,因此盼望自己和自己的後裔都蒙他所愛。大衛雖然如今在宮中失寵、身處患難,在約拿單眼中卻一如既往地可親;他父親雖然恨大衛,他卻毫不因此減少對大衛的愛——他的友誼所建立的原則是如此純潔。他自己既已向大衛起誓,便使大衛也向他起誓,並且(照我們的讀法)再起誓——大衛同意了(因為心存正直的人不會因保證而驚訝),憑著他對大衛的愛起誓,他把這愛視為神聖之物。約拿單的心如此放在這事上,以致這次分別時,他以對神鄭重的呼籲作為結束:願耶和華在你我中間為證,直到永遠(1Sa 20:23),就是說:「神自己永遠在你我兩家之間作審判官,若這友誼之盟有任何一方違背。」大衛正是記念這約,才恩待米非波設(撒下9:7,21:7)。與神所喜愛的人結交,使他們的朋友成為我們的朋友,這對我們自己和自己的後裔都是恩惠。
III. 他安排了通信的方法,以及用甚麼暗號和標記通知大衛他父親對他懷怎樣的心意。大衛在初一的第一日,至少在第二日,必被人發覺缺席,並被問起(1Sa 20:18)。到第三日——那時他必已從伯利恆回來——他要到一個指定的地方(1Sa 20:19),約拿單要帶著弓箭朝那地方走去射箭取樂(1Sa 20:20);他要打發童子去取箭,若箭射在童子面前,大衛就當以此為安全的記號,可以放心露面(1Sa 20:21);但若箭射在童子那邊,那就是危險的記號,他當為自己的安全設法(1Sa 20:22)。他定下這個權宜之計,是怕他沒有機會——結果他倒有了這機會——與大衛交談,當面報告。
英文原文
Jonathan's Covenant with David (1058 BC)
⁹ And Jonathan said, Far be it from thee: for if I knew certainly that evil were determined by my father to come upon thee, then would not I tell it thee?
¹⁰ Then said David to Jonathan, Who shall tell me? or what if thy father answer thee roughly?
¹¹ And Jonathan said unto David, Come, and let us go out into the field. And they went out both of them into the field.
¹² And Jonathan said unto David, O LORD God of Israel, when I have sounded my father about to morrow any time, or the third day, and, behold, if there be good toward David, and I then send not unto thee, and shew it thee;
¹³ The LORD do so and much more to Jonathan: but if it please my father to do thee evil, then I will shew it thee, and send thee away, that thou mayest go in peace: and the LORD be with thee, as he hath been with my father.
¹⁴ And thou shalt not only while yet I live shew me the kindness of the LORD, that I die not:
¹⁵ But also thou shalt not cut off thy kindness from my house for ever: no, not when the LORD hath cut off the enemies of David every one from the face of the earth.
¹⁶ So Jonathan made a covenant with the house of David, saying, Let the LORD even require it at the hand of David's enemies.
¹⁷ And Jonathan caused David to swear again, because he loved him: for he loved him as he loved his own soul.
¹⁸ Then Jonathan said to David, To morrow is the new moon: and thou shalt be missed, because thy seat will be empty.
¹⁹ And when thou hast stayed three days, then thou shalt go down quickly, and come to the place where thou didst hide thyself when the business was in hand, and shalt remain by the stone Ezel.
²⁰ And I will shoot three arrows on the side thereof, as though I shot at a mark.
²¹ And, behold, I will send a lad, saying, Go, find out the arrows. If I expressly say unto the lad, Behold, the arrows are on this side of thee, take them; then come thou: for there is peace to thee, and no hurt; as the LORD liveth.
²² But if I say thus unto the young man, Behold, the arrows are beyond thee; go thy way: for the LORD hath sent thee away.
²³ And as touching the matter which thou and I have spoken of, behold, the LORD be between thee and me for ever.
Here, I. Jonathan protests his fidelity to David in his distress. Notwithstanding the strong confidence David had in Jonathan, yet, because he might have some reason to fear that his father's influence, and his own interest, should make him warp, or grow cool towards him, Jonathan thought it requisite solemnly to renew the professions of his friendship to him (1Sa 20:9): "Far be it from thee to think that I suspect thee of any crime for which I should either slay thee myself or deliver thee to my father; no, if thou hast any jealousy of that, Come let us go into the field (1Sa 20:11), and talk it over more fully." He did not challenge him to the field to fight him for an affront, but to fix him in his friendship. He faithfully promised him that he would let him know how, upon trial, he found his father affected towards him, and would make the matter neither better nor worse than it was. "If there be good towards thee, I will show it thee, that thou mayest be easy (1Sa 20:12), if evil, I will send thee away, that thou mayest be safe" (1Sa 20:13); and thus he would help to deliver him from the evil if it were real and from the fear of evil if it were but imaginary. For the confirmation of his promise he appeals to God, 1. As a witness (1Sa 20:12): "O Lord God of Israel, thou knowest I mean sincerely, and think as I speak." The strength of his passion made the manner of his speaking concise and abrupt. 2. As a judge: "The Lord do so and much more to Jonathan (1Sa 20:13), if I speak deceitfully, or break my word with my friend." He expressed himself thus solemnly that David might be abundantly assured of his sincerity. And thus God has confirmed his promises to us, that we might have strong consolation, Heb 6:17,18. Jonathan adds to his protestations his hearty prayers: "The Lord be with thee, to protect and prosper thee, as he has been formerly with my father, though now he has withdrawn." Thus he imitates his belief that David would be in his father's place, and his good wishes that he might prosper in it better than his father now did.
II. He provides for the entail of the covenant of friendship with David upon his posterity, 1Sa 20:14-16. He engages David to be a friend to his family when he was gone (1Sa 20:15): Thou shalt promise that thou wilt not cut off thy kindness from my house for ever. This he spoke from a natural affection he had to his children, whom he desired it might go well with after his decease, and for whose future welfare he desired to improve his present interest. It also intimates his firm belief of David's advancement, and that it would be in the power of his hand to do a kindness or unkindness to his seed; for, in process of time, the Lord would cut off his enemies, Saul himself was not expected; then "Do not thou cut off thy kindness from my house, nor revenge my father's wrongs upon my children." The house of David must likewise be bound to the house of Jonathan from generation to generation; he made a covenant (1Sa 20:16) with the house of David. Note, True friends cannot but covet to transmit to theirs after them their mutual affections. Thy own friend, and thy father's friend, forsake not. This kindness, 1. He calls the kindness of the Lord, because it is such kindness as God shows to those he takes into covenant with himself; for he is a God to them and to their seed; they are beloved for the fathers' sakes. 2. He secures it by an imprecation (1Sa 20:16): The Lord require it at the hand of David's seed (for of David himself he had no suspicion) if they prove so far David's enemies as to deal wrongfully with the posterity of Jonathan, David's friend. He feared lest David, or some of his, should hereafter be tempted, for the clearing and confirming of their title to the throne, to do by his seed as Abimelech had done by the sons of Gideon (Jdg 9:5), and this he would effectually prevent; but the reason given (1Sa 20:17) why Jonathan was so earnest to have the friendship entailed is purely generous, and has nothing of self in it; it was because he loved him as he loved his own soul, and therefore desired that he and his might be beloved by him. David, though now in disgrace at court and in distress, was as amiable in the eyes of Jonathan as ever he had been, and he loved him never the less for his father's hating him, so pure were the principles on which his friendship was built. Having himself sworn to David, he caused David to swear to him, and (as we read it) to swear again, which David consented to (for he that bears an honest mind does not startle at assurances), to swear by his love to him, which he looked upon as a sacred thing. Jonathan's heart was so much upon it that, when they parted this time, he concluded with a solemn appeal to God: The Lord be between me and thee for ever (1Sa 20:23), that is, "God himself be judge between us and our families for ever, if on either side this league of friendship be violated." It was in remembrance of this covenant that David was kind to Mephibosheth, 2Sa 9:7,21:7. It will be a kindness to ourselves and ours to secure an interest in those whom God favours and to make his friends ours.
III. He settles the method of intelligence, and by what signs and tokens he would give him notice how his father stood affected towards him. David would be missed the first day, or at least the second day, of the new moon, and would be enquired after, 1Sa 20:18. On the third day, by which time he would have returned from Bethlehem, he must be at such a place (1Sa 20:19), and Jonathan would come towards that place with his bow and arrows to shoot for diversion (1Sa 20:20), would send his lad to fetch his arrows, and, if they were shot short of the lad, David must take it for a signal of safety, and not be afraid to show his head (1Sa 20:21); but, if he shot beyond the lad, it was a signal of danger, and he must shift for his safety, 1Sa 20:22. This expedient he fixed lest he should not have the opportunity, which yet it proved he had, of talking with David, and making the report by word of mouth.
24-34
Jonathan Excuses David to Saul (1058 BC)
繁體中文
約拿單向掃羅為大衛辯解(主前1058年)
²⁴ 大衛就去藏在田野。到了初一日,王坐席要吃飯。
²⁵ 王照常坐在靠牆的座位上,約拿單侍立,押尼珥坐在掃羅旁邊,大衛的座位空設。
²⁶ 然而這日掃羅沒有說甚麼,他想:或許他有意外的事,他必不潔淨,他必是不潔淨。
²⁷ 初二日,大衛的座位還空設。掃羅對他兒子約拿單說:「耶西的兒子為何昨日今日都沒有來吃飯呢?」
²⁸ 約拿單回答掃羅說:「大衛切切懇求我容他回伯利恆去。
²⁹ 他說:求你容我去吧,因為我本城有獻祭的事;我哥哥吩咐我回去。如今你若施恩於我,求你容我起身去見我哥哥。因此他沒有來赴王的席。」
³⁰ 掃羅向約拿單發怒,對他說:「你這頑梗悖逆之婦人所生的,我豈不知道你喜悅耶西的兒子,自取羞辱,連你母親的赤體也蒙羞嗎?
³¹ 耶西的兒子若在世間活著,你和你的國位必站立不住。現在你要打發人去把他抓來交給我,他是該死的。」
³² 約拿單回答他父親掃羅說:「他為甚麼該死呢?他作了甚麼事呢?」
³³ 掃羅就把槍擲向約拿單,想要刺死他。約拿單便知道他父親決意要殺大衛。
³⁴ 於是約拿單氣忿忿地從席上起來,初二日沒有吃飯;他因見父親羞辱大衛,為大衛感到愁煩。
約拿單在此徹底確信了他極不情願相信的事——他父親對大衛懷有不共戴天的仇恨,若有能力,必將置之於死地;而他自己也差點為這番確信付出了慘痛的代價。I. 大衛在第一日的筵席上缺席,卻無人提起。王坐在自己的座位上,要享用平安祭的筵席,照常如此行(1Sa 20:25);然而他的心中卻滿了對大衛的嫉妒和惡意。他本該先與大衛和好,再來獻祭;但他非但沒有如此,反倒在這筵席上指望喝大衛的血。帶著如此邪惡的心思所獻的祭是何等可憎!(Pr 21:27)當王入座之時,約拿單便起身——既尊他為父,又尊他為王;每人都知道自己的位子,惟獨大衛的位子空著。素來不是這樣的。在參與聖潔的敬拜上,沒有人比他更甘心樂意;他如今缺席,不過是因為若赴席便有喪命之虞——保全性命的需要迫使他退避。在迫在眉睫的危險中,眼前的機會可以放棄;我們更不當自己投身於危險的口中。基督自己也常常躲藏,直到知道祂的時候到了。但那日掃羅沒有注意到大衛缺席,心裏說:「他必是不潔淨了」(1Sa 20:26)。「他必定遇到了甚麼禮儀上的玷污,使他不能吃聖物,直到他洗衣服、用水洗澡,到了晚上才潔淨。」掃羅深知大衛是何等看重律法,他寧可缺席聖潔的筵席,也不願帶著不潔而來。願神受稱頌——如今再沒有任何不潔能限制我們,只要我們藉著信心和悔改,在那開了的泉源中洗淨(Ps 26:6)。II. 第二日,他被追問(1Sa 20:27)。掃羅問約拿單——他知道約拿單是大衛的心腹——耶西的兒子為何沒有來吃飯呢?大衛是他的女婿,他卻鄙夷地稱他為「耶西的兒子」。他查問大衛的缺席,似乎對他不來赴這敬虔的筵席感到不悅——這倒可作為一家之主的榜樣,要看顧自己手下的人不缺席神的敬拜,無論是公開的還是家庭的。除非必要,放棄在莊嚴的典章中按時侍立神的機會,是件不好的事。多馬只因一次缺席了門徒的聚會,便錯失了見基督的機會。但使掃羅不悅的,其實是他因此錯失了他所期待的加害大衛的機會。III. 約拿單為大衛辯解(1Sa 20:28,29)。1. 他辯稱大衛缺席是因正當的緣由——在別處(雖不是此地)守節,是受他哥哥之召前去;他哥哥如今對他比從前(1Sa 17:28)更為敬重。他又去探望親屬,為維繫兄弟之情;任何主人都不會在合宜之時拒絕僕人這樣的請假。2. 他辯稱大衛離去是經過他正式請准的——他作為上司,是理所當然的請假對象。如此他將大衛描繪為一個在各方面都尊敬政府、盡忠職守的人。IV. 掃羅因此勃然大怒,如同一頭被奪去獵物的獅子般暴跳如雷。大衛已在他夠不到之處,他便遷怒於約拿單(1Sa 20:30,31),用卑劣的話罵他——那些話連對一個紳士、一個平民說都不相宜,更何況對他自己的兒子——王位的繼承人、服事他的兒子、他家族中最大的支柱和榮耀——又是在眾多賓客之前、在筵席之上、在大家都當心情愉快之時、在這聖潔的筵席上(一切不規矩的激情本當在此被治死和降服)。然而他實際上等於罵他:1. 私生子:「你這頑梗悖逆之婦人所生的」——即按著人獸性怒氣中如今常說的污穢話語,「你這娼妓之子」。他告訴他,他生來就是使他母親蒙羞的——也就是說,他給了世人懷疑他不是掃羅合法兒子的理由,因為他愛掃羅所恨的人,支持那將要毀滅他們家族的人。2. 叛徒:「你這頑梗悖逆之子」(原文如此),即「你這頑梗的叛逆」。在別的時候,他看約拿單是他最信賴、最鍾愛的謀士和統帥;如今在這怒氣之中,卻將他描繪成對自己的王冠和性命構成威脅的危險人物。3. 愚人:「你選擇了耶西的兒子作你的朋友,自取羞辱,因為他活著一日,你就永不得堅立。」約拿單為自己和家族著想,在已被天命定為王的大衛身上建立利益關係,其實是十分明智之舉;然而他卻因此被視為最不懂謀略之人而被嘲笑。以神的百姓為自己的百姓,與有神同在的人同行,這是好的。這至終必證明對我們有益——儘管眼下可能被認為有損體面,且有損我們屬世的利益。也許掃羅知道大衛是與他同一人之手所膏立的——既是如此,想要挫败神的旨意的愚人不是約拿單,而是他自己。但他非要大衛死不可,還要約拿單去提他來受刑。請看掃羅的怒氣是何等難看,並以此警告我們,不可在自己裏面放縱任何類似的情形。憤怒就是瘋狂,凡恨他弟兄的,就是殺人的。V. 約拿單因他父親野蠻的暴怒而深感痛苦、方寸大亂,更因他原指望更好的結果(1Sa 20:2)而倍感失望。他為父親憂愁——他竟是如此禽獸不如;他為朋友憂愁——他知道大衛是神的朋友,竟被如此卑劣地辱罵;他為大衛感到愁煩(1Sa 20:34);他也為自己憂愁——因為他父親當眾羞辱了他,雖然那羞辱是極不公義的,他卻必須忍受。看到約拿單的處境,人不禁同情他:1. 他陷入了犯罪的危險。這位明智良善的人費了好大的力氣才克制住自己的脾氣——受到這般挑釁實在不易。他父親對他自己的指責,他沒有還嘴;下屬在長輩發怒時對他們所施的羞辱,當以柔和沉默來承受——當你是鐵砧時,就靜靜地躺著吧。但他父親判大衛死刑,他卻不能忍受;對此他帶著一些激憤回答(1Sa 20:32):他為甚麼該死呢?他作了甚麼事呢?慷慨的心靈忍受自己受辱,遠比聽見朋友受辱容易得多。2. 他陷入了喪命的危險。掃羅此刻暴怒至極,竟把槍擲向約拿單(1Sa 20:33)。他似乎極其關心(1Sa 20:31)約拿單能否在他的國位上堅立,如今卻自己要取他的性命。憤怒使人何等愚蠢,何等如同野獸,甚至比野獸更甚!何等需要給它的鼻子套上鉤子,給它的嘴戴上嚼環!約拿單完全確信了惡事已定要臨到大衛,這使他極其失態:他從席上起來——當自己的性命被攻擊之時,他知道是時候離開了——並且不肯吃飯,因為他們在悲哀之中不可吃聖物。我們可以推想所有的客人都心緒不寧,筵席的歡樂全被破壞了。殘忍的人擾害己身(Pr 11:17)。
英文原文
Jonathan Excuses David to Saul (1058 BC)
²⁴ So David hid himself in the field: and when the new moon was come, the king sat him down to eat meat.
²⁵ And the king sat upon his seat, as at other times, even upon a seat by the wall: and Jonathan arose, and Abner sat by Saul's side, and David's place was empty.
²⁶ Nevertheless Saul spake not any thing that day: for he thought, Something hath befallen him, he is not clean; surely he is not clean.
²⁷ And it came to pass on the morrow, which was the second day of the month, that David's place was empty: and Saul said unto Jonathan his son, Wherefore cometh not the son of Jesse to meat, neither yesterday, nor to day?
²⁸ And Jonathan answered Saul, David earnestly asked leave of me to go to Bethlehem:
²⁹ And he said, Let me go, I pray thee; for our family hath a sacrifice in the city; and my brother, he hath commanded me to be there: and now, if I have found favour in thine eyes, let me get away, I pray thee, and see my brethren. Therefore he cometh not unto the king's table.
³⁰ Then Saul's anger was kindled against Jonathan, and he said unto him, Thou son of the perverse rebellious woman, do not I know that thou hast chosen the son of Jesse to thine own confusion, and unto the confusion of thy mother's nakedness?
³¹ For as long as the son of Jesse liveth upon the ground, thou shalt not be established, nor thy kingdom. Wherefore now send and fetch him unto me, for he shall surely die.
³² And Jonathan answered Saul his father, and said unto him, Wherefore shall he be slain? what hath he done?
³³ And Saul cast a javelin at him to smite him: whereby Jonathan knew that it was determined of his father to slay David.
³⁴ So Jonathan arose from the table in fierce anger, and did eat no meat the second day of the month: for he was grieved for David, because his father had done him shame.
Jonathan is here effectually convinced of that which he was so loth to believe, that his father had an implacable enmity to David, and would certainly be the death of him if it were in his power; and he had like to have paid very dearly himself for the conviction.
I. David is missed from the feast on the first day, but nothing is said of him. The king sat upon his seat, to feast upon the peace-offerings as at other times (1Sa 20:25), and yet had his heart as full of envy and malice against David as it could hold. He should first have been reconciled to him, and then have come and offered his gift; but, instead of that, he hoped, at this feast, to drink the blood of David. What an abomination was that sacrifice which was brought with such a wicked mind as this! Pr 21:27. When the king came to take his seat Jonathan arose, in reverence to him both as a father and as his sovereign; every one knew his place, but David's was empty. It did not use to be so. None more content than he in attending holy duties; nor had he been absent now but that he must have come at the peril of his life; self-preservation obliged him to withdraw. In imminent peril present opportunities may be waived, nay, we ought not to throw ourselves into the mouth of danger. Christ him self absconded often, till he knew that his hour had come. But that day Saul took no notice that he missed David, but said within himself, "Surely he is not clean, 1Sa 20:26. Some ceremonial pollution has befallen him, which forbids him to eat of the holy things till he has washed his clothes, and bathed his flesh in water, and been unclean until the evening." Saul knew what conscience David made of the law, and that he would rather keep away from the holy feast than come in his uncleanness. Blessed be God, no uncleanness is now a restraint upon us, but what we may by faith and repentance be washed from in the fountain opened, Ps 26:6.
II. He is enquired for the second day, 1Sa 20:27. Saul asked Jonathan, who he knew was his confidant, Wherefore cometh not the son of Jesse to meat? He was his own son by marriage, but he calls him in disdain, the son of Jesse. He asks for him as if he were not pleased that he should be absent from a religious feast; and so it should be example to masters of families to see to it that those under their charge be not absent from the worship of God, either in public or in the family. It is a bad thing for us, except in case of necessity, to omit an opportunity of statedly attending on God in solemn ordinances. Thomas lost a sight of Christ by being once absent from a meeting of the disciples. But that which displeased Saul was that hereby he missed the opportunity he expected of doing David a mischief.
III. Jonathan makes his excuse, 1Sa 20:28,29. 1. That he was absent upon a good occasion, keeping the feast in another place, though not here, sent for by his elder brother, who was now more respectful to him than he had been (1Sa 17:28), and that he had gone to pay his respects to his relations, for the keeping up of brotherly love; and no master would deny a servant liberty to do that in due time. He pleads, 2. That he did not go without leave humbly asked and obtained from Jonathan, who, as his superior officer, was proper to be applied to for it. Thus he represents David as not wanting in any instance of respect and duty to the government.
IV. Saul hereupon breaks out into a most extravagant passion, and rages like a lion disappointed of his prey. David was out of his reach, but he falls upon Jonathan for his sake (1Sa 20:30,31), gives him base language, not fit for a gentleman, a prince, to give to any man, especially his own son, heir apparent to his crown, a son that served him, the greatest stay and ornament of his family, before a great deal of company, at a feast, when all should be in good humour, at a sacred feast, by which all irregular passions should be mortified and subdued; yet he does in effect call him, 1. A bastard: Thou son of the perverse rebellious woman; that is, according to the foolish filthy language of men's brutish passion now a day, "Thou son of a whore." He tells him he was born to the confusion of his mother, that is, he had given the world cause to suspect that he was not the legitimate son of Saul, because he loved him whom Saul hated and supported him who would be the destruction of their family. 2. A traitor: Thou son of a perverse rebellion (so the word is), that is, "thou perverse rebel." At other times he reckoned no counsellor or commander that he had more trusty and well-beloved than Jonathan; yet now in this passion he represents him as dangerous to his crown and life. 3. A fool: Thou hast chosen the son of Jesse for thy friend to thy own confusion, for while he lives thou shalt never be established. Jonathan indeed did wisely and well for himself and family to secure an interest in David, whom Heaven had destined to the throne, yet, for this, he is branded as most impolitic. It is good taking God's people for our people and going with those that have him with them. It will prove to our advantage at last, however for the present it may be thought a disparagement, and a prejudice to our secular interest. It is probable Saul knew that David was anointed to the kingdom by the same hand that anointed him, and then not Jonathan, but himself, was the fool, to think to defeat the counsels of God. Yet nothing will serve him but David must die, and Jonathan must fetch him to execution. See how ill Saul's passion looks, and let it warn us against the indulgence of any thing like it in ourselves. Anger is madness, and he that hates his brother is a murderer.
V. Jonathan is sorely grieved and put into disorder by his father's barbarous passion, and the more because he had hoped better things, 1Sa 20:2. He was troubled for his father, that he should be such a brute, troubled for his friend, whom he knew to be a friend of God, that he should be so basely abused; he was grieved for David (1Sa 20:34), and troubled for himself too, because his father had done him shame, and, though most unjustly, yet he must submit to it. One would pity Jonathan to see how he was put, 1. Into the peril of sin. Much ado that wise and good man had to keep his temper, upon such a provocation as this. His father's reflections upon himself made no return to; it becomes inferiors to bear with meekness and silence the contempts put upon them in wrath and passion. When thou art the anvil lie thou still. But his dooming David to die he could not bear: to that he replied with some heat (1Sa 20:32), Wherefore shall he be slain? What has he done? Generous spirits can much more easily bear to be abused themselves than to hear their friends abused. 2. Into the peril of death. Saul was now so outrageous that he threw his javelin at Jonathan, 1Sa 20:33. He seemed to be in great care (1Sa 20:31) than Jonathan should be established in his kingdom, and yet now he himself aims at his life. What fools, what savage beasts and worse does anger make men! How necessary it is to put a hook in its nose and a bridle in its jaws! Jonathan was fully satisfied that evil was determined against David, which put him out of frame exceedingly: he rose from table, thinking it high time when his life was struck at, and would eat no meat, for they were not to eat of the holy things in their mourning. All the guests, we may suppose, were discomposed, and the mirth of the feast was spoiled. He that is cruel troubles his own flesh, Pr 11:17.
35-42
David Informed of His Danger (1058 BC)
繁體中文
大衛得知自己的危險(主前1058年)
³⁵ 次日早晨,約拿單按著與大衛約會的時候出到田間,有一個童子跟隨他。
³⁶ 他對童子說:「你跑去,把我所射的箭找著。」童子跑去的時候,約拿單射箭在童子前頭。
³⁷ 童子到了約拿單所射之箭的地方,約拿單呼叫童子說:「箭不是在你前頭嗎?」
³⁸ 約拿單又呼叫童子說:「速速地去,不要停留。」約拿單的童子就把箭拾起來,回到主人那裏。
³⁹ 童子卻不知道這是甚麼事,只有約拿單和大衛知道。
⁴⁰ 約拿單把器械交給童子,吩咐他說:「你拿到城裏去。」
⁴¹ 童子一去,大衛就從磐石的南邊出來,俯伏在地,拜了三拜。二人親嘴,彼此哭泣,大衛哭得更慟。
⁴² 約拿單對大衛說:「我們二人曾指著耶和華的名起誓說:願耶和華在你我中間,並你我後裔中間為證,直到永遠。現在你平平安安地去吧。」大衛就起身走了;約拿單也回城裏去了。
此處記述:1. 約拿單忠心地履行了他向大衛許下的諾言——通知他那危險試驗的結果。他在約定的時間到約定的地點(1Sa 20:35)——就在他知道大衛藏身之處的視線範圍之內;他打發僕童去拾取他隨意射出的箭(1Sa 20:36),並藉著將箭射在童子前頭給了大衛那致命的信號(1Sa 20:37):箭不是在你前頭嗎?這「前頭」二字,大衛比那童子更明白其中的含意。約拿單打發了毫不知情的童子,見四下無人、不會被發現,便抓住片刻與大衛作一次當面的交談——此前他已叮囑大衛逃命。2. 這兩位摯友最令人心碎的訣別——據我們所知,此後他們再也沒有相見過,除了有一次是偷偷地在樹林中相見(1Sa 23:16)。(1.) 大衛對約拿單所表達的,更像是一個僕人對主人的尊敬,而非朋友之間的隨便:他俯伏在地,拜了三拜——深覺自己欠他的恩情,為他所施的一切善舉而感恩。(2.) 他們以所能想像的最大深情彼此道別——以親吻和眼淚;他們彼此伏在對方的頸項上哭泣,直到大衛哭得更慟(1Sa 20:41)。如此忠誠的兩位朋友之分離,對雙方都是同樣痛苦的事,但大衛的處境更為淒涼;因為約拿單是回到自己的家人和朋友身邊,大衛卻要離開一切安慰——甚至包括神聖所的安慰——因此他的悲痛超過了約拿單;又或許是因為他的心性更為柔細,情感更為強烈。(3.) 他們將自己交託於彼此之間所立的友誼之約——兩人在這令人心碎的分離中都以此自慰:「我們二人曾指著耶和華的名起誓」——為我們自己和我們的後裔起誓——我們和他們將世世代代彼此忠誠、彼此恩待。如此,當我們還在身內、與主分離之時,我們的安慰就是:祂已與我們立了永約。
英文原文
David Informed of His Danger (1058 BC)
³⁵ And it came to pass in the morning, that Jonathan went out into the field at the time appointed with David, and a little lad with him.
³⁶ And he said unto his lad, Run, find out now the arrows which I shoot. And as the lad ran, he shot an arrow beyond him.
³⁷ And when the lad was come to the place of the arrow which Jonathan had shot, Jonathan cried after the lad, and said, Is not the arrow beyond thee?
³⁸ And Jonathan cried after the lad, Make speed, haste, stay not. And Jonathan's lad gathered up the arrows, and came to his master.
³⁹ But the lad knew not any thing: only Jonathan and David knew the matter.
⁴⁰ And Jonathan gave his artillery unto his lad, and said unto him, Go, carry them to the city.
⁴¹ And as soon as the lad was gone, David arose out of a place toward the south, and fell on his face to the ground, and bowed himself three times: and they kissed one another, and wept one with another, until David exceeded.
⁴² And Jonathan said to David, Go in peace, forasmuch as we have sworn both of us in the name of the LORD, saying, The LORD be between me and thee, and between my seed and thy seed for ever. And he arose and departed: and Jonathan went into the city.
Here is, 1. Jonathan's faithful performance of his promise to give David notice of the success of his dangerous experiment. He went at the time and to the place appointed (1Sa 20:35), within sight of which he knew David lay hid, sent his footboy to fetch his arrows, which he would shoot at random (1Sa 20:36), and gave David the fatal signal by shooting an arrow beyond the lad (1Sa 20:37): Is not the arrow beyond thee? That word [beyond] David knew the meaning of better than the lad. Jonathan dismissed the lad, who knew nothing of the matter, and, finding the coast clear and no danger of a discovery, he presumed upon one minute's personal conversation with David after he had bidden him flee for his life. 2. The most sorrowful parting of these two friends, who, for aught that appears, never came together again but once, and that was by stealth in a wood, 1Sa 23:16. (1.) David addressed himself to Jonathan with the reverence of a servant rather than the freedom of a friend: He fell on his face to the ground, and bowed himself three times, as one deeply sensible of his obligations to him for the good services he had done him. (2.) They took leave of each other with the greatest affection imaginable, with kisses and tears; they wept on each other's neck till David exceeded, 1Sa 20:41. The separation of two such faithful friends was equally grievous to them both, but David's case was the more deplorable; for, when Jonathan was returning to his family and friends, David was leaving all his comforts, even those of God's sanctuary, and therefore his grief exceeded Jonathan's, or perhaps it was because his temper was more tender and his passions were stronger. (3.) They referred themselves to the covenant of friendship that was between them, both of them comforting themselves with this in this mournful separation: "We have sworn both of us in the name of the Lord, for ourselves and our heirs, that we and they will be faithful and kind to each other from generation to generation." Thus, while we are at home in the body and absent from the Lord, this is our comfort, that he has made with us an everlasting covenant.
大衛屢次險些落入掃羅怒火之下,便開始考慮是否必須退到鄉間,並武裝自衛。但他不願作如此冒險之事,而不先與摯友約拿單商量;他如何行這事,二人之間又有何來往,本章有所記述。本章所載超自然之愛的實例,與上章反常之恨的實例同樣令人驚奇。I. 大衛向約拿單訴說眼前的困境,並請他作自己的朋友(1Sa 20:1-8)。II. 約拿單忠實應允要探聽父親對他的態度並回報,又與他重新立下友誼之約(1Sa 20:9-23)。III. 約拿單經一試驗,痛心地發現父親對大衛懷恨不可化解(1Sa 20:24-34)。IV. 他按二人所約定的方法將這事通知大衛(1Sa 20:35-42)。