Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary · 1 Samuel 第4章

註釋閱讀最佳化

分章註釋

1 Samuel 第 4 章

서론

無標題

開啟正文

繁體中文

前幾章關於以利家族敗落的預言,在此開始應驗;相隔多久並未說明,但想必不長。神對這樣的罪人常常速速施行審判。本章內容如下:I. 以色列人與非利士人交鋒時所受的羞辱與損失(1Sa 4:1,2)。II. 他們想用約櫃來鞏固營壘的愚妄計謀——由何弗尼與非尼哈抬著神的約櫃進入營中(1Sa 4:3,4),這使他們壯膽(1Sa 4:5),也使非利士人驚恐,但那種驚恐反而激起了他們的鬥志(1Sa 4:6-9)。III. 其致命的後果:以色列人敗北,約櫃被擄(1Sa 4:10,11)。IV. 這噩耗傳到示羅,以及人們如何接待這噩耗。1. 全城陷入混亂(1Sa 4:12,13)。2. 以利昏厥跌倒,折斷頸項而死(1Sa 4:14-18)。3. 他的兒媳聽見所發生的事,臨產生子,随即去世(1Sa 4:19-22)。這些事都必使聽見的人耳朵發癢。

英文原文

The predictions in the foregoing chapters concerning the ruin of Eli's house here begin to be fulfilled; how long after does not appear, but certainly not long. Such sinners God often makes quick work with. Here is, I. The disgrace and loss Israel sustained in an encounter with the Philistines, 1Sa 4:1,2. II. Their foolish project to fortify themselves by bringing the ark of God into their camp upon the shoulders of Hophni and Phinehas (1Sa 4:3,4), which made them secure (1Sa 4:5) and struck a fear into the Philistines, but such a fear as roused them, 1Sa 4:6-9. III. The fatal consequences of it: Israel was beaten, and the ark taken prisoner, 1Sa 4:10,11. IV. The tidings of this brought to Shiloh, and the sad reception of those tidings. 1. The city was put into confusion, 1Sa 4:12,13. 2. Eli fainted away, fell, and broke his neck, 1Sa 4:14-18. 3. Upon hearing what had occurred his daughter-in-law fell in labour, bore a son, but died immediately, 1Sa 4:19-22. These were the things which would make the ears of those that heard them to tingle.

1-9

The War with the Philistines (1120 BC)

開啟正文

繁體中文

與非利士人的戰爭(主前1120年)

¹ 以色列人出去迎戰非利士人,在以便以謝安營;非利士人在亞弗安營。 ² 非利士人向以色列人擺陣。兩軍交戰的時候,以色列人敗在非利士人面前;非利士人在戰場上殺了他們的軍兵約有四千人。 ³ 百姓回到營裡,以色列的長老說:「耶和華今日為何使我們敗在非利士人面前呢?我們不如將耶和華的約櫃從示羅抬到我們這裡來,好在我們中間救我們脫離仇敵的手。」 ⁴ 於是百姓打發人到示羅,從那裡將坐在二基路伯上萬軍之耶和華的約櫃抬來。以利的兩個兒子何弗尼、非尼哈與神的約櫃同在。 ⁵ 耶和華的約櫃到了營中,以色列眾人就大聲歡呼,地便呼應震動。 ⁶ 非利士人聽見歡呼的聲音,就說:「在希伯來人營裡這樣大聲呼喊,是甚麼緣故呢?」隨後他們明白了,是耶和華的約櫃到了營中。 ⁷ 非利士人就懼怕,說:「神到了他們營中。」又說:「我們有禍了!向來不曾有過這樣的事。 ⁸ 我們有禍了!誰能救我們脫離這些大能之神的手呢?從前在曠野用各樣災殃擊打埃及人的,就是這些神。 ⁹ 非利士人哪,你們要剛強,要作大丈夫,免得作希伯來人的奴僕,如同他們作你們的奴僕一樣。你們要作大丈夫,與他們爭戰。」

本段起首論到撒母耳的話——「他的話傳遍了以色列」,似乎與隨後的故事並無關聯,好像以色列人出去與非利士人爭戰是出於他的指示。其實他們若請教他,縱然他剛剛被設立為先知,他的謀略也必比約櫃的同在更有益於他們;但以色列的領袖們或許輕看他年幼,不願以他為神諭求問,而他此時也尚未插手公共事務。此後直到數年之後(撒上七3),我們才再見他的名字;只是「他的話傳遍了以色列」,就是說各地敬虔的人都來到他那裡,以他為先知求問他。或許這話是指著他論以利家的預言說的。這預言已經廣為人知、人所談論;凡認真留意的人,等到這裡所記的事件發生之時,便將之與預言相比對,看見預言在其中應驗了。此處可見:

一、與非利士人開戰(撒上四1)。這是企圖擺脫他們壓迫之軛的一次嘗試;他們若先悔改改革,從正確的起頭開始,必然更為順利。據推算,這事大約發生於非利士人統治以色列四十年期間的中段(士十三1),也就是參孫死後不久;這是帕特里克主教的見解,他認為參孫死時所殺的非利士人或許激發了這次嘗試;但萊特富特博士則認為是在參孫死後四十年,因為以利作以色列的士師共有四十年(撒上四18)。

二、以色列在那場戰爭中失敗(撒上四2)。以色列人是主動出擊的,卻被擊敗,當場陣亡四千人。神曾應許他們中間一人能追趕千人;如今卻相反,「以色列人敗在非利士人面前」。罪——那當咒詛之物——在他們營中,給了他們的仇敵一切他們所能期望的便宜。

三、他們為再戰而策劃的對策。他們召開了軍事會議,卻沒有決定禁食、禱告、改過自新——他們所受的教導實在太差(有這樣的教師,原不足為奇)——反倒:1. 他們向神發怨言,怪他起來攻擊他們(撒上四3):「耶和華為何擊打我們呢?」他們若以此為查究神不悅之因的問題,便不必遠求其答案;這事明顯不過——以色列人犯了罪,只是他們不願看見、不肯承認罷了。但他們更像是放膽與神爭論,對神的作為不滿,要與他理論。他們承認在患難中神的手(這一點是對的):「擊打我們的是耶和華」;但他們不是順服,反而與之爭辯,說話如同對他和他的護理發怒的人,並不覺察自己對他有甚麼正當的得罪:「我們以色列人為何要在非利士人面前被擊殺?這是何等荒謬、何等不公!」請注意,「人的愚昧傾覆自己的道,他的心便向耶和華發怒」(箴十九3),並向他挑毛病。2. 他們以為把約櫃抬到他們營中,便能使神下次為他們出戰。以色列的長老竟如此無知愚蠢,提出了這個建議(撒上四3),百姓也很快付諸實行(撒上四4)。他們打發人往示羅去取約櫃;以利卻沒有足夠的勇氣留住它,反而差他兩個不敬虔的兒子何弗尼、非尼哈與之同去,至少是容讓他們去——雖然他知道他們無論到哪裡,神的咒詛也隨之而去。如今請看,(一)百姓對約櫃有極深的敬畏。「啊,打發人去取那約櫃來,它必為我們行奇事。」約櫃按設立原是神同在的有形記號。神曾說他要住在二基路伯之間——這二基路伯在約櫃之上,也與約櫃同行;如今他們以為只要對這神聖的箱子大加尊敬,便能證明自己真是以色列人,並有效地使全能神為他們爭戰。請注意,那些遠離宗教精意的人,常對其禮儀和外表規條表現極大的依戀;那些甚至否認敬虔之實的人,不但持有敬虔之形,還對之欽羨備至。人喊著「耶和華的殿」,為「耶和華的約櫃」大發熱心,看似極其熱誠——其實對殿的主、約櫃的神毫不尊重,彷彿為基督教之名大發烈怒,便可贖他對基督教之實的褻瀆輕蔑。其實他們不過是把約櫃當作偶像,看它為以色列神的像,正如外邦人所拜的偶像是他們神的像一樣。敬拜真神而不以神來敬拜他,實際上就等於根本不敬拜他。(二)他們極其愚妄,以為約櫃只要在他們營中,便「必救他們脫離仇敵的手」,使勝利回到他們一邊。因為:[1] 約櫃前行之時,摩西禱告說:「耶和華啊,求你起來,使你的仇敵四散」;他深知使他們得勝的不是約櫃與他們同行,而是神為他們出戰;此處他們卻沒有採用正當的方法使神喜悅與他們同在;那麼約櫃對他們有何用處呢?這不過是去核存殼罷了。[2] 他們並沒有神的許可去移動他的約櫃;神早在他們的律法中明明指示:他們在迦南安定之後,約櫃當安放在他所選擇的地方(申十二5、11),他們當到約櫃那裡去,不是約櫃到他們這裡來。他們既沒有合法正當的擁有權,也沒有任何憑據將約櫃從其所在之處移走,又怎能指望從約櫃得著益處呢?他們如此行不但沒有尊榮神,反倒實際上得罪了他。[3] 即便沒有別的因素使他們對約櫃的期望落空,何弗尼、非尼哈既是抬約櫃的人,他們又怎能指望約櫃帶來祝福呢?約櫃在那兩個不敬虔的祭司手中若對以色列施了恩,便等於太過認可了他們的惡行。

四、約櫃被抬進以色列營中時,營中所發的大喜樂(撒上四5):「他們大聲歡呼,地便呼應震動。」他們如今自以為必勝無疑,所以戰前便發出得勝的呼喊,彷彿那日必是他們的;他們指望藉著這大聲的呼喊激勵自己的軍隊,並威嚇敵人。請注意,屬肉體的人在宗教的外表特權和表現上大為誇勝,並以此為倚靠,彷彿這些必能拯救他們;彷彿約櫃——神的寶座——在他們營中,便能帶他們上天堂,縱然他們心中所坐寶座的是世界和肉體。

五、約櫃被抬進以色列營中,使非利士人所陷入的驚惶。兩軍相距甚近,非利士人聽見以色列人在這重大時刻所發的呼喊。他們很快便明白以色列人所誇的是甚麼(撒上四6),並為其後果而懼怕。因為:1. 在他們的日子裡從未發生過這樣的事:「神到了他們營中」,因此「我們有禍了」(撒上四7),又一次說「我們有禍了」(撒上四8)。以色列神的名連那些敬拜別神的人也覺可畏;就是不信的人也對與他們相爭的危險有幾分概念。天然的良心提示人:與神為敵的人,處境實在可悲。然而請看他們對神的同在有何等粗淺的觀念,好像以色列的神在約櫃未到之前並不在營中似的——這一點在他們身上尚可原諒,因為以色列人自己對那同在的觀念也好不了多少。「啊,」他們說,「這是針對我們的新計謀,比他們一切策略更可怕,『從來不曾有過這樣的事』;這是他們所能採取最有效的辦法,要使我們的人喪膽、削弱力量。」2. 往日曾有過這樣的事時,便行了奇事:「從前在曠野用各樣災殃擊打埃及人的,就是這些神」(撒上四8)。他們在歷史上和神學上同樣錯了:埃及的災殃是在約櫃造成之前、以色列人未進曠野之前降下的;但他們有一些關於這約櫃在他們前頭行時所行、或為以色列所行之奇事的模糊傳統,他們不歸給耶和華,卻歸給約櫃。如今他們說:「誰能救我們脫離這些大能之神的手呢?」將約櫃當作神——其實以色列人自己既將約櫃偶像化,他們如此作也不足為怪。然而他們如此可畏地談論「這些大能之神」時,似乎連自己也不太相信,不過是戲言罷了;因為他們非但沒有撤退、也沒有提出講和的條件(他們若真信以色列神的大能,必會如此行),反倒彼此激勵更要奮勇作戰;這出人意外的難處反倒更加磨礪他們的決心(撒上四9):「你們要剛強,要作大丈夫。」將領們把勇敢高尚的思想灌輸到士兵心中,提醒他們從前如何轄管以色列,如今若畏縮不前、任憑以色列反過來轄管他們,將是何等難忍的痛苦和羞辱。

英文原文

The War with the Philistines (1120 BC)

¹ And the word of Samuel came to all Israel. Now Israel went out against the Philistines to battle, and pitched beside Ebenezer: and the Philistines pitched in Aphek.
² And the Philistines put themselves in array against Israel: and when they joined battle, Israel was smitten before the Philistines: and they slew of the army in the field about four thousand men.
³ And when the people were come into the camp, the elders of Israel said, Wherefore hath the LORD smitten us to day before the Philistines? Let us fetch the ark of the covenant of the LORD out of Shiloh unto us, that, when it cometh among us, it may save us out of the hand of our enemies.
⁴ So the people sent to Shiloh, that they might bring from thence the ark of the covenant of the LORD of hosts, which dwelleth between the cherubims: and the two sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, were there with the ark of the covenant of God.
⁵ And when the ark of the covenant of the LORD came into the camp, all Israel shouted with a great shout, so that the earth rang again.
⁶ And when the Philistines heard the noise of the shout, they said, What meaneth the noise of this great shout in the camp of the Hebrews? And they understood that the ark of the LORD was come into the camp.
⁷ And the Philistines were afraid, for they said, God is come into the camp. And they said, Woe unto us! for there hath not been such a thing heretofore.
⁸ Woe unto us! who shall deliver us out of the hand of these mighty Gods? these are the Gods that smote the Egyptians with all the plagues in the wilderness.
⁹ Be strong, and quit yourselves like men, O ye Philistines, that ye be not servants unto the Hebrews, as they have been to you: quit yourselves like men, and fight.

The first words of this paragraph, which relate to Samuel, that his word came to all Israel, seem not to have any reference to the following story, as if it was by any direction of his that the Israelites went out against the Philistines. Had they consulted him, though but newly initiated as a prophet, his counsel might have stood them in more stead than the presence of the ark did; but perhaps the princes of Israel despised his youth, and would not have recourse to him as an oracle, and he did not as yet interpose in public affairs; nor do we find any mention of his name henceforward till some years after (1Sa 7:3), only his word came to all Israel, that is, people from all parts that were piously disposed had recourse to him as a prophet and consulted him. Perhaps it is meant of his prophecy against the house of Eli. This was generally known and talked of, and all that were serious and observing compared the events here related, when they came to pass, with the prophecy, and saw it accomplished in them. Here is,

I. A war entered into with the Philistines, 1Sa 4:1. It was an attempt to throw off the yoke of their oppression, and would have succeeded better if they had first repented and reformed, and so begun their work at the right end. It is computed that this was about the middle of the forty years' dominion that the Philistines had over Israel (Jdg 13:1) and soon after the death of Samson; so bishop Patrick, who thinks the slaughter he made at his death might encourage this attempt; but Dr. Lightfoot reckons it forty years after Samson's death, for so long Eli judged, 1Sa 4:18.

II. The defeat of Israel in that war, 1Sa 4:2. Israel, who were the aggressors, were smitten, and had 4000 men killed upon the spot. God had promised that one of them should chase a thousand; but now, on the contrary, Israel is smitten before the Philistines. Sin, the accursed thing, was in the camp, and gave their enemies all the advantage against them they could wish for.

III. The measures they concerted for another engagement. A council of war was called, and, instead of resolving to fast and pray and amend their lives, so ill taught were they (and no wonder when they had such teachers) that, 1. They quarrelled with God for appearing against them (1Sa 4:3): Wherefore has the Lord smitten us? If they meant this as an enquiry into the cause of God's displeasure, they needed not go far to find that out. It was plain enough; Israel had sinned, though they were not willing to see it and own it. But it rather seems that they expostulate boldly with God about it, are displeased at what God has done, and dispute the matter with him. They own the hand of God in their trouble (so far was right): "It is the Lord that has smitten us;" but, instead of submitting to it, they quarrel with it, and speak as those that are angry at him and his providence, and not aware of any just provocation they have given him: "Wherefore shall we, that are Israelites, be smitten before the Philistines? How absurd and unjust is it!" Note, The foolishness of man perverts his way, and then his heart frets against the Lord (Pr 19:3) and finds fault with him. 2. They imagined that they could oblige him to appear for them the next time by bringing the ark into their camp. The elders of Israel were so ignorant and foolish as to make the proposal (1Sa 4:3), and the people soon put it in execution, 1Sa 4:4. They sent to Shiloh for the ark, and Eli had not courage enough to detain it, but sent his ungodly sons, Hophni and Phinehas, along with it, at least permitted them to go, though he knew that wherever they went the curse of God went along with them. Now see here, (1.) The profound veneration the people had for the ark. "O send for that, and it will do wonders for us." The ark was, by institution, a visible token of God's presence. God had said that he would dwell between the cherubim, which were over the ark and were carried along with it; now they thought that, by paying a great respect to this sacred chest, they should prove themselves to be Israelites indeed, and effectually engage God Almighty to appear in their favour. Note, It is common for those that have estranged themselves from the vitals of religion to discover a great fondness for the rituals and external observances of it, for those that even deny the power of godliness not only to have, but to have in admiration, the form of it. The temple of the Lord is cried up, and the ark of the Lord stickled for with a great deal of seeming zeal by multitudes that have no regard at all for the Lord of the temple and the God of the ark, as if a fiery concern for the name of Christianity would atone for a profane contempt of the thing. And yet indeed they did but make an idol of the ark, and looked upon it to be as much an image of the God of Israel as those idols which the heathen worshipped were of their gods. To worship the true God, and not to worship him as God, is in effect not to worship him at all. (2.) Their egregious folly in thinking that the ark, if they had it in their camp, would certainly save them out of the hand of their enemies, and bring victory back to their side. For, [1.] When the ark set forward Moses prayed, Rise up, Lord, and let thy enemies be scattered, well knowing that it was not the ark moving with them, but God appearing for them, that must give them success; and here were no proper means used to engage God to favour them with his presence; what good then would the ark do them, the shell without the kernel? [2.] They were so far from having God's leave to remove his ark that he had plainly enough intimated to them in his law that when they were settled in Canaan his ark should be settled in the place that he should choose (De 12:5,11), and that they must come to it, not it to them. How then could they expect any advantage by it when they had not a just and legal possession of it, nor any warrant to remove it from its place? Instead of honouring God by what they did, they really affronted him. Nay, [3.] If there had been nothing else to invalidate their expectations from the ark, how could they expect it should bring a blessing when Hophni and Phinehas were the men that carried it? It would have given too much countenance to their villany if the ark had done any kindness to Israel while it was in the hands of those graceless priests.

IV. The great joy there was in the camp of Israel when the ark was brought into it (1Sa 4:5): They shouted, so that the earth rang again. Now they thought themselves sure of victory, and therefore gave a triumphant shout before the battle, as if the day was without fail their own, intending, by this mighty shout, to animate themselves and their own forces, and to intimidate their adversaries. Note, Carnal people triumph much in the external privileges and performances of religion, and build much upon them, as if these would infallibly save them, and as if the ark, God's throne, in the camp, would bring them to heaven, though the world and the flesh should be upon the throne in the heart.

V. The consternation into which the bringing of the ark into the camp of Israel put the Philistines. The two armies lay so near encamped that the Philistines heard the shout the Israelites gave on this great occasion. They soon understood what it was they triumphed in (1Sa 4:6), and were afraid of the consequences. For, 1. It had never been done before in their days: God has come into their camp, and therefore woe unto us (1Sa 4:7), and again, woe unto us, 1Sa 4:8. The name of the God of Israel was formidable even to those that worshipped other gods, and some apprehensions even the infidels had of the danger of contending with them. Natural conscience suggests this, that those are in a woeful condition who have God against them. Yet see what gross notions they had of the divine presence, as if the God of Israel were not as much in the camp before the ark came thither, which may very well be excused in them, since the notions the Israelites themselves had of that presence were no better. "O," say they, "this is a new design upon us, more frightful than all their stratagems, for there has not been such a thing heretofore; this was the most effectual course they could take to dispirit our men and weaken their hands." 2. When it had been done in the days of old, it had wrought wonders: These are the gods that smote the Egyptians with all the plagues in the wilderness, 1Sa 4:8. Here they were as much out in their history as in their divinity: the plagues of Egypt were inflicted before the ark was made and before Israel came into the wilderness; but some confused traditions they had of wonders wrought by or for Israel when this ark was carried before them, which they attributed, not to Jehovah, but to the ark. Now, say they, Who shall deliver us out of the hand of these mighty gods? taking the ark for God, as well they might when the Israelites themselves idolized it. Yet, it should seem, they scarcely believed themselves when they spoke thus formidably of these mighty gods, but only bantered; for instead of retreating, or proposing conditions of peace, which they would have done had they been really convinced of the power of Israel's God, they stirred up one another to fight so much the more stoutly; this surprising difficulty did but sharpen their resolution (1Sa 4:9): Be strong, and quit yourselves like men. The commanders inspired bold and generous thoughts into the minds of their soldiers when they bade them remember how they had lorded it over Israel, and what an intolerable grief and shame it would be if they flinched now, and suffered Israel to lord it over them.

10-11

The Defeat of the Israelites (1120 BC)

開啟正文

繁體中文

以色列人被打敗(公元前1120年)

¹⁰ 非利士人和以色列人打仗,以色列人敗了,各向各家奔逃;被殺的人甚多,以色列的步兵仆倒了三萬。
¹¹ 神的約櫃被擄去,以利的兩個兒子何弗尼、非尼哈也都被殺了。

這裏簡述了這場戰役的結局。

I. 以色列人被打敗,軍隊潰散,全軍覆沒,不是像前次那樣退回營中(1Sa 4:2),指望重新集結,而是各回各家,人人只顧自己逃命,再無重整旗鼓的希望;陣亡的有三萬人(1Sa 4:10)。以色列人落敗,1. 雖然他們的事業更為正義,他們是神的百姓,而非利士人是未受割禮的;他們是為維護自己正當的權利和自由,抵禦侵略者而戰,卻仍告失敗,因為他們的磐石已經把他們賣了。正當的事業常因承擔它的人敗壞而受累。2. 雖然他們更有把握,更為勇敢。他們歡呼,而非利士人戰兢;然而當神如此安排時,非利士人的驚恐變成了勝利,以色列人的歡呼變成了哀號。3. 雖然他們有神的約櫃同在。外在的特權不能保護那些濫用它、不照著它生活的人。營中有約櫃,若營中有亞干,就不能增添它的力量。

II. 約櫃本身被非利士人擄去;何弗尼和非尼哈——他們也許緊緊守在約櫃旁邊,約櫃遇險時冒險上前護衛,因為他們靠約櫃得生計——二人都被殺了(1Sa 4:11)。詩人論到這悲慘的事件說(詩78:61,64):他又將他的能力交與人擄去,將他的榮耀交在敵人手中。祭司倒在刀下。1. 兩個祭司被殺,考慮到他們敗壞的品行,對以色列而言並非大損失,但對以利家卻是可怕的審判。神所說的話在此應驗了(1Sa 2:34):這要作你的證據——所宣告審判的憑據——你的兩個兒子必一日同死;又說你家所增添的人必死在中年(1Sa 2:33)。以利若盡了本分,像被玷污的人一樣將他們從祭司的職任上革除(尼7:64),他們雖蒙羞卻也許可以存活;但如今神親自接手這事,用未受割禮之人的刀劍把他們趕出世界。耶和華藉著他所施的審判被人認識。誠然刀劍吞滅此人和那人並無分別,但這二人卻是刀劍所等候的,是為報復而被標記的。他們本不在其位;他們在軍營中有何可作?人離開本分的道路,便使自己被關在神的保護之外。但這還不是全部;他們沒有神的指示就把約櫃帶入險境,這就出賣了約櫃,使他們罪惡滿盈。但2. 約櫃被擄,對以色列是極大的審判,是神對他們烈怒的確實記號。如今他們被迫看見自己的愚妄:他們信靠自己所因罪惡而喪失的外在特權,又幻想神的約櫃能拯救他們,其實神已經離開他們了。如今他們以極度的懊悔反省自己的魯莽和放肆——把約櫃帶進軍營,使之暴露於危險之中——巴不得一千次他們把它留在神所安置的地方。如今他們被說服:神不容虛妄愚昧的人來指使他;他雖然把我們繫於他的約櫃,卻沒有把自己繫於約櫃;他寧可把約櫃交在他起誓的仇敵手中,也不容它被虛假的朋友褻瀆,更不容他們的迷信得著支持。不要有人以為可以躲在可見的信仰表白的外衣之下,逃避神的烈怒,因為將有在基督面前吃喝過的人被趕到外邊的黑暗裏去(太7:23,原文意)。

英文原文

The Defeat of the Israelites (1120 BC)

¹⁰ And the Philistines fought, and Israel was smitten, and they fled every man into his tent: and there was a very great slaughter; for there fell of Israel thirty thousand footmen.
¹¹ And the ark of God was taken; and the two sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, were slain.

Here is a short account of the issue of this battle.

I. Israel was smitten, the army dispersed and totally routed, not retiring into the camp, as before (1Sa 4:2) when they hoped to rally again, but returning to their tents, every man shifting for his own safety and making the best of his way home, despairing to make head any more; and 30,000 were slain in the field of battle, 1Sa 4:10. Israel was put to the worse, 1. Though they had the better cause, were the people of God and the Philistines were uncircumcised; they stood up in necessary defence of their just rights and liberties against invaders, and yet they failed of success, for their rock had sold them. A good cause often suffers for the sake of the bad men that undertake it. 2. Though they had the greater confidence, and were the more courageous. They shouted, while the Philistines trembled, and yet, when God pleased so to order it, the Philistines' terrors were turned into triumphs, and Israel's shouts into lamentations. 3. Though they had the ark of God with them. External privileges will secure none that abuse them and do not live up to them. The ark in the camp will add nothing to its strength when there is an Achan in it.

II. The ark itself was taken by the Philistines; and Hophni and Phinehas, who it is likely kept close to it, and when it was in danger ventured far in the defense of it, because by it they got their living, were both slain, 1Sa 4:11. To this sad event the Psalmist refers, Ps 78:61,64, He delivered his strength into captivity, and his glory into the enemy's hands. Their priests fell by the sword. 1. The slaughter of the priests, considering their bad character, was no great loss to Israel, but it was a dreadful judgment upon the house of Eli. The word which God had spoken was fulfilled in it (1Sa 2:34): This shall be a sign unto thee, an earnest of the judgments threatened, thy two sons shall die both in one day, and so shall all the increase of thy house die in the flower of their age, 1Sa 2:33. If Eli had done his duty, and put them, as polluted, from the priesthood (Ne 7:64), they might have lived, though in disgrace; but now God takes the work into his own hands, and chases them out of the world by the sword of the uncircumcised. The Lord is known by those judgments which he executeth. It is true the sword devours one as well as another, but these were waited for of the sword, marked for vengeance. They were out of the place; what had they to do in the camp? When men leave the way of their duty they shut themselves out of God's protection. But this was not all; they had betrayed the ark, by bringing it into danger, without a warrant from God, and this filled the measure of their iniquities. But, 2. The taking of the ark was a very great judgment upon Israel, and a certain token of God's hot displeasure against them. Now they are made to see their folly in trusting to their external privileges which they had by their wickedness forfeited them, and fancying that the ark would save them when God had departed from them. Now they are made to reflect, with the utmost regret, upon their own rashness and presumption in bringing the ark into the camp and so exposing it, and wish a thousand times they had left it where God had fixed it. Now they are convinced that God will not be prescribed to by vain and foolish men, and that though he has bound us to his ark he has not bound himself to it, but will rather deliver it into the hands of his sworn enemies than suffer it to be profaned by his false friends, and countenance their superstition. Let none think to shelter themselves from the wrath of God under the cloak of a visible profession, for there will be those cast into outer darkness that have eaten and drunk in Christ's presence.

12-18

The Death of Eli (1120 BC)

開啟正文

繁體中文

以利之死(主前1120年)

¹² 當日,有一個便雅憫人從陣營逃跑,來到示羅,衣服撕裂,頭蒙灰塵。
¹³ 他到的時候,以利正坐在路旁的座位上觀望,因他為神的約櫃心裏戰兢。那人進城報信,合城的人都呼喊起來。
¹⁴ 以利聽見呼喊的聲音,就說:「這喧嚷是怎麼回事?」那人急忙進來報信給以利。
¹⁵ 那時以利九十八歲了,眼目昏花,不能看見。
¹⁶ 那人對以利說:「我是從陣營出來的,今日我從陣營逃走。」以利說:「我兒,事情如何?」
¹⁷ 報信的回答說:「以色列人在非利士人面前逃跑,百姓中被殺的甚多;你的兩個兒子何弗尼、非尼哈也都死了;神的約櫃也被擄去。」
¹⁸ 他一提神的約櫃,以利就從座位上往後跌倒,在門旁跌斷了頸項而死;因為他年紀老邁,身體沉重。以利作以色列士師四十年。

此處將以色列人與非利士人交戰的慘烈結局的消息帶到了示羅。壞消息傳得最快。這消息很快傳遍了以色列全地;每一個逃回自己帳棚的人都帶著這消息,以及太過明顯的證據,告訴了他的鄰舍。但沒有一個地方比示羅更切身相關。因此,一名信差立刻飛奔前往示羅;他是個便雅憫人——猶太人幻想他是掃羅。他撕裂衣服,頭蒙灰塵,藉這些記號向所有看見他奔跑的人宣告這悲痛的消息,並表明他自己何等為之動容(1Sa 4:12)。他徑直趕往示羅。此處告訴我們:I. 那城如何領受這消息。以利坐在城門口(1Sa 4:13,18),但報信的人不願先告訴他,便越過他,在城中將消息傳開,連同一切加重打擊的情節;於是每一個聽見的人兩耳都嗡嗡作響,正如先前所預言的(1Sa 3:11)。他們的心戰兢,每一張臉都佈滿陰霾。合城的人都呼喊起來(1Sa 4:13)——他們理當如此,因為這不僅是以色列全國的災難,更是示羅的特別損失,是那地方的毀滅;因為約櫃雖然很快從非利士人手中被救回,卻再也沒有回到示羅;他們的燈臺從原處被挪去,因為他們離棄了起初的愛心;他們的城日漸衰落、沉淪、歸於無有。如今神離棄了示羅的帳幕——是他們先將神從自己中間趕走的;那三百四十年來因約櫃同在而蒙福的以法蓮支派,失去了這尊榮(Ps 78:60,67);過了些時候,這尊榮被轉歸猶大支派——那祂所愛的錫安山,如詩篇隨後所言(Ps 78:68)——因為示羅的人不認識他們眷顧的日子。示羅之被棄絕,日後耶路撒冷被長久提醒,並被告誡要引以為鑑(Jer 7:12):「你們且去看我所行於示羅的事。」從這日起,從這致命之日,示羅的荒涼當被記念。因此,他們聽見約櫃被擄,實在有足夠的理由呼喊哀哭。II. 這消息對年邁的以利是何等致命的一擊。讓我們來看:1. 他是何等恐懼地等待著消息。他雖年老、失明、身軀沉重,卻在知道以色列的榮耀面臨危殆之時無法安坐內室,而是坐在路旁,要最先得到消息;因為他的心為神的約櫃戰兢(1Sa 4:13)。他細心的思慮向他描繪出一幅景象:若約櫃落入非利士人之手,將是何等虧缺神的榮耀,對以色列又是何等無法挽回的損失;這消息會在迦特被人以何等褻瀆的誇耀傳講,在亞實基倫的街市上被何等宣揚。他也預感到約櫃面臨何等迫切的危險。以色列已經使約櫃失去了神的保護(他的兒子們尤其如此),而非利士人必定覬覦它;如今那威脅浮現在他腦海——他將看見仇敵在神的居所中(1Sa 2:32);也許他自己的心也在責備他,沒有運用權柄阻止將約櫃抬到營中。這一切使他戰兢不已。須知,一切敬虔的人都將神教會的利益看得比任何屬世的利益或個人的掛慮更為切身;若神的教會在任何時候面臨危險,他們不能不為之憂心恐懼。約櫃若不安全,我們怎能安息呢?2. 他是何等悲慟地領受了這消息。他雖不能看見,卻能聽見城中的喧嚷和呼喊,覺察出那是哀號、哭泣和禍患之聲;他如同一位盡責的士師,問道:「這喧嚷是怎麼回事?」(1Sa 4:14)有人告訴他陣營中來了信差,那人便非常清晰地將事情經過向他講述,因他自己是目擊證人,所以說得十分確切(1Sa 4:16,17)。軍隊戰敗、眾多兵士被殺的消息,作為士師的他深感悲痛;兩個兒子陣亡的噩耗——他對他們如此溺愛,又有理由擔心他們死時未曾悔改——作為父親,更深深刺痛了他的心;然而使他的心戰兢的並不是這些:有一個更大的憂慮籠罩著他的心,將其餘的憂愁都吞沒了;他沒有為兒子們的事打斷敘述,像大衛為押沙龍那樣發出激情的哀號,而是等候故事講完,深信那信差既是以色列人,不必追問也必會提到約櫃;倘若他能說「然而神的約櫃平安無事,我們正將它運回來」,那麼他為此而有的喜樂便足以勝過他為其他一切災禍而有的憂愁,使他安心;然而,當報信的人以「神的約櫃也被擄去」作為故事結尾之時,他如遭雷擊,心碎了,氣力盡失——看來他昏厥過去,從座位上跌了下來,部分因昏厥、部分因跌倒,他便當場氣絕,再也沒有說過一句話。他的心先碎了,然後頸項也斷了。以色列的大祭司兼士師就這樣倒下了;當他活到距一百歲只差兩年之時,他沉重的頭顱就這樣倒下了;當他作以色列士師約四十年之後,他頭上的冠冕就這樣落地了:他的太陽就這樣在烏雲之下落下;他所溺愛的兒子們的愚妄和邪惡,至終成了他的毀滅。神有時就是這樣在今世向那些行為失當的敬虔之人留下不悅的記號,好叫別人聽見、懼怕、引以為鑑。一個人可能死得悲慘,卻不至於永遠滅亡;可能英年早逝,結局卻是平安。萊特富特博士指出,以利之死如同一頭未代贖的驢一般——那驢的頸項本當被打斷(Ex 13:13)。然而我們必須留意,以利可稱讚之處在於:使他喪命的是約櫃的失落,而非兒子們的被殺。他實際上等於在說:「讓我與約櫃同死吧——當神的典章被挪去,敬虔的以色列人怎能安然度日呢?」約櫃若已不在,今世一切盡可別矣,連性命本身亦然。

英文原文

The Death of Eli (1120 BC)

¹² And there ran a man of Benjamin out of the army, and came to Shiloh the same day with his clothes rent, and with earth upon his head.
¹³ And when he came, lo, Eli sat upon a seat by the wayside watching: for his heart trembled for the ark of God. And when the man came into the city, and told it, all the city cried out.
¹⁴ And when Eli heard the noise of the crying, he said, What meaneth the noise of this tumult? And the man came in hastily, and told Eli.
¹⁵ Now Eli was ninety and eight years old; and his eyes were dim, that he could not see.
¹⁶ And the man said unto Eli, I am he that came out of the army, and I fled to day out of the army. And he said, What is there done, my son?
¹⁷ And the messenger answered and said, Israel is fled before the Philistines, and there hath been also a great slaughter among the people, and thy two sons also, Hophni and Phinehas, are dead, and the ark of God is taken.
¹⁸ And it came to pass, when he made mention of the ark of God, that he fell from off the seat backward by the side of the gate, and his neck brake, and he died: for he was an old man, and heavy. And he had judged Israel forty years.

Tidings are here brought to Shiloh of the fatal issue of their battle with the Philistines. Bad news flies fast. This soon spread through all Israel; every man that fled to his tent brought it, with too plain a proof of it, to his neighbours. But no place was so nearly concerned as Shiloh. Thither therefore an express posted away immediately; it was a man of Benjamin; the Jews fancy it was Saul. He rent his clothes, and put earth upon his head, by these signs to proclaim the sorrowful news to all that saw him as he ran, and to show how much he himself was affected with it, 1Sa 4:12. He went straight to Shiloh with it; and here we are told,

I. How the city received it. Eli sat in the gate (1Sa 4:13,18), but the messenger was loth to tell him first, and therefore passed him by, and told it in the city, with all the aggravating circumstances; and now both the ears of every one that heard it tingled, as was foretold, 1Sa 3:11. Their hearts trembled, and every face gathered blackness. All the city cried out (1Sa 4:13), and well they might, for, besides that this was a calamity to all Israel, it was a particular loss to Shiloh, and the ruin of that place; for, though the ark was soon rescued out of the hands of the Philistines, yet it never returned to Shiloh again; their candlestick was removed out of its place, because they had left their first love, and their city dwindled, and sunk, and came to nothing. Now God forsook the tabernacle of Shiloh, they having driven him from them; and the tribe of Ephraim, which had for 340 years been blessed with the presence of the ark in it, lost the honour (Ps 78:60,67), and, some time after, it was transferred to the tribe of Judah, the Mount Sion which he loved, as it follows there (Ps 78:68), because the men of Shiloh knew not the day of their visitation. This abandoning of Shiloh Jerusalem is long afterwards reminded of, and told to take warning by. Jer 7:12, "Go see what I did to Shiloh. From this day, this fatal day, let the desolations of Shiloh be dated." They had therefore reason enough to cry out when they heard that the ark was taken.

II. What a fatal blow it was to old Eli. Let us see, 1. With what fear he expected the tidings. Though old, and blind, and heavy, yet he could not keep his chamber when he was sensible the glory of Israel lay at stake, but placed himself by the way-side, to receive the first intelligence; for his heart trembled for the ark of God, 1Sa 4:13. His careful thoughts represented to him what a dishonour it would be to God, and what an irreparable loss to Israel, if the ark should fall into the Philistines' hands, with what profane triumphs the tidings would be told in Gath and published in the streets of Ashkelon. He also apprehended what imminent danger there was of it. Israel had forfeited the ark (his own sons especially) and the Philistines would aim at it; and now the threatening comes to his mind, that he should see an enemy in God's habitation (1Sa 2:32); and perhaps his own heart reproached him for not using his authority to prevent the carrying of the ark into the camp. All these things made him tremble. Note, All good men lay the interests of God's church nearer their hearts than any secular interest or concern of their own, and cannot but be in pain and fear for them if at any time they are in peril. How can we be easy if the ark be not safe? 2. With what grief he received the tidings. Though he could not see, he could hear the tumult and crying of the city, and perceived it to be the voice of lamentation, and mourning, and woe; like a careful magistrate, he asks, What means the noise of this tumult? 1Sa 4:14. He is told there is an express come from the army, who relates the story to him very distinctly, and with great confidence, having himself been an eye-witness of it, 1Sa 4:16,17. The account of the defeat of the army, and the slaughter of a great number of the soldiers, was very grievous to him as a judge; the tidings of the death of his two sons, of whom he had been so indulgent, and who, he had reason to fear, died impenitent, touched him in a tender part as a father; yet it was not for these that his heart trembled: there is a greater concern upon his spirit, which swallows up the less; he does not interrupt the narrative with any passionate lamentations for his sons, like David for Absalom, but waits for the end of the story, not doubting but that the messenger, being an Israelite, would, without being asked, say something of the ark; and if he could but have said, "Yet the ark of God is safe, and we are bringing that home," his joy for that would have overcome his grief for all the other disasters, and have made him easy; but, when the messenger concludes his story with, The ark of God is taken, he is struck to the heart, his spirits fail, and, it should seem, he swooned away, fell off his seat, and partly with the fainting, and partly with the fall, he died immediately, and never spoke a word more. His heart was broken first, and then his neck. So fell the high priest and judge of Israel, so fell his heavy head when he had lived within two of 100 years, so fell the crown from his head when he had judged Israel about forty years: thus did his sun set under a cloud, thus were the folly and wickedness of those sons of his, whom he had indulged, his ruin at last. Thus does God sometimes set marks of his displeasure in this life upon good men who have misconducted themselves, that others may hear, and fear, and take warning. A man may die miserably and yet not die eternally, may come to an untimely end and yet the end be peace. Dr. Lightfoot observes that Eli died the death of an unredeemed ass, whose neck was to be broken, Ex 13:13. Yet we must observe, to Eli's praise, that it was the loss of the ark that was his death, not the slaughter of his sons. He does, in effect, say, "Let me fall with the ark, for what pious Israelite can live with any comfort when God's ordinances are removed?" Farewell all in this world, even life itself, if the ark be gone.

19-22

The Death of Phinehas' Wife (1120 BC)

開啟正文

繁體中文

非尼哈之妻的死(主前1120年)

¹⁹ 他的兒婦非尼哈的妻懷孕將產,聽見神的約櫃被擄去、公公和丈夫都死了的消息,就猛然疼痛,曲身生產。
²⁰ 她將要死的時候,旁邊站著的婦人們對她說:「不要怕,你生了兒子了。」她卻不回答,也不放在心上。
²¹ 她給孩子起名叫以迦博,說:「榮耀離開以色列了。」這是因為神的約櫃被擄去,又因她公公和丈夫都死了。
²² 她又說:「榮耀離開以色列了,因為神的約櫃被擄去了。」

此處我們又看到一個悲慘的故事,延續了以利家的毀滅,以及約櫃被擄的消息所引起的悲痛感受。這故事是關於非尼哈的妻子——非尼哈就是以利那兩個不敬虔的兒子之一,正是他們將這一切災禍帶到了以色列。這消息奪去了她的性命——她雖年輕,正如她年邁的公公一樣;因為許多青絲之頭與許多白髮之頭一樣,都因憂愁被帶入了墳墓:憂愁能致人於死。從此處關於她的記載可以看出:I. 她是個心性極其柔細的女子。神的護理如此安排,使她在這個時候正臨近產期;我們的主曾說:當那些日子,懷孕的和奶孩子的有禍了(Mt 24:19)。那時,即使生了一個男孩也幾乎毫無喜樂可言,甚至要說:不生育的子宮是有福的(Lu 23:29)。這驚人的消息恰在此不幸的時刻臨到,使她進入了產程——極大的驚嚇或其他強烈的情緒有時會產生這樣的效果。當她聽見她所敬重的公公、以及她所愛的丈夫(他雖敗壞,她仍然愛他)——尤其是約櫃被擄——的消息之時,她就猛然疼痛,曲身生產(1Sa 4:19);這消息在她最需要一切支持的時刻抓住了她的心神,使她雖有力量生下孩子,不久卻昏厥氣絕——她既失去了生命中最大的安慰,便情願將生命也一併交出。那些正臨近這艱難時刻的人,需要在恩典之約中為自己積存安慰,不僅用以抵消平常的憂愁,更用以抵消任何他們所預料不到的、可能加增悲傷的意外之事。在這樣的時刻,信心能使人不至昏厥(Ps 27:13)。II. 她雖嫁給了一個惡人,卻是個滿有恩惠之靈的女子。她為公公和丈夫的死而憂愁,證明了她天然的感情;但她為約櫃的失落而遠遠更深地憂傷,則證明了她對神和聖事的敬虔之心。前者加速了她的生產,但從她臨終的話可以看出,後者更貼近她的心(1Sa 4:22):她說,榮耀離開以色列了——她不是那麼哀歎自己所屬的那個家族的沒落,而是為約櫃被擄之以色列的普遍災禍而哀歎。這才是她的悲傷所在,這才是她的死因。1. 這使她對自己的孩子毫不在意。伺候她的婦人們——大概是城中一些頭面人物——鼓勵她,以為她的憂慮主要是關乎生產的結果,便在孩子出生之時對她說:「不要怕,最難的已過去了,你生了兒子了」(也許是她的頭胎),但她不回答,也不放在心上。她若沒有別的憂愁,僅僅生產的痛苦也會因為世上添了一個男丁而被忘記的(Joh 16:21)。但這喜樂對她有何意義:(1.) 對一個感到自己將死的人?在那時,除了屬靈和屬神的喜樂之外,沒有任何喜樂對我們有益。死亡是太過嚴肅的事,容不下任何世俗歡樂的滋味;在那時,一切都淡而無味了。(2.) 對一個正在為約櫃失落而哀哭的人?當約櫃失落在非利士人之地作俘虜時,在以色列、在示羅生了一個孩子,對她又有甚麼安慰呢?我們若沒有神的話語和典章——尤其是若失去了祂恩惠同在的安慰和祂臉上的光照——我們還能從受造之物帶來的安慰和享受中得著甚麼快樂呢?對著憂傷的心唱歌,就像鹼上倒醋一樣格格不入。2. 這使她為孩子取了一個永遠記念這災禍和她對此之感受的名字。她對孩子無話可說,只是按照慣例——如今她丈夫既已死了,由她來為孩子命名——她吩咐他們叫孩子以迦博,即「榮耀在哪裏?」或作「榮耀啊,可歎!」或「沒有榮耀了」(1Sa 4:21)。她以臨終的嘴唇如此解釋(1Sa 4:22):「*榮耀離開以色列了,因為神的約櫃被擄去了。*給孩子取一個沒有榮耀的名字吧,因為他確實如此;以色列的秀美已經失去了,看來毫無恢復的希望;既然約櫃已被擄去,以色列人的名字——更不用說祭司的名字——再也不可帶著榮耀了。」須知:(1.) 神典章的純全和豐富,以及祂在其中同在的記號,是任何民族的榮耀——遠勝於他們在列國中的財富、貿易和勢力。(2.) 對一個忠誠的以色列人而言,沒有甚麼比失去這些更令人痛心、更致命的了。神若離去,榮耀便離去,一切美善也隨之離去。祂若離開我們,我們有禍了!

英文原文

The Death of Phinehas' Wife (1120 BC)

¹⁹ And his daughter in law, Phinehas' wife, was with child, near to be delivered: and when she heard the tidings that the ark of God was taken, and that her father in law and her husband were dead, she bowed herself and travailed; for her pains came upon her.
²⁰ And about the time of her death the women that stood by her said unto her, Fear not; for thou hast born a son. But she answered not, neither did she regard it.
²¹ And she named the child Ichabod, saying, The glory is departed from Israel: because the ark of God was taken, and because of her father in law and her husband.
²² And she said, The glory is departed from Israel: for the ark of God is taken.

We have here another melancholy story, that carries on the desolations of Eli's house, and the sorrowful feeling which the tidings of the ark's captivity excited. It is concerning the wife of Phinehas, one of those ungracious sons of Eli that had brought all this mischief on Israel. It cost her her life, though young, as well as that of her father-in-law, that was old; for many a green head, as well as many a hoary head, has been brought by sorrow to the grave: it worketh death. By what is here related of her it appears,

I. That she was a woman of a very tender spirit. Providence so ordered it that, just at this time, she was near her time; and our Saviour hath said, Woe to those that are with child, or give suck, in such days as these, Mt 24:19. So little joy will there then be in the birth, even of a man-child, that it will be said, Blessed are the wombs that bear not, Lu 23:29. The amazing news coming at this unhappy juncture, it put her into labour, as great frights or other strong passions sometimes do. When she heard of the death of her father-in-law whom she reverenced, and her husband whom, bad as he was, she loved, but especially of the loss of the ark, she travailed, for her pains came thickly upon her (1Sa 4:19), and the tidings so seized her spirits, at a time when they needed all possible supports, that, though she had strength to bear the child, she, soon after, fainted and died away, being very willing to let life go when she had lost the greatest comforts of her life. Those who are drawing near to that trying hour have need to treasure up for themselves comforts from the covenant of grace, to balance, not only the usual sorrows, but any thing extraordinary that may add to the grief which they do not foresee. Faith, at such a time, will keep from fainting, Ps 27:13.

II. That she was a woman of a very gracious spirit though matched to a wicked husband. Her concern for the death of her husband and father-in-law was an evidence of her natural affection; but her much greater concern for the loss of the ark was an evidence of her pious and devout affection to God and sacred things. The former helped to hasten her travail, but it appears by her dying words that the latter lay nearer her heart (1Sa 4:22): She said, The glory has departed from Israel, not lamenting so much the sinking of that particular family to which she was related as the general calamity of Israel in the captivity of the ark. This, this was it that was her grief, that was her death.

1. This made her regardless of her child. The women that attended her, who it is likely were some of the first rank in the city, encouraged her, and, thinking that the concern was mostly about the issue of her pains, when the child was born, said unto her, Fear not, now the worst is past, for thou has borne a son (and perhaps it was her first-born), but she answered not, neither did she regard it. The sorrows of her travail, if she had no other, would have been forgotten, for joy that a man-child was born into the world. Joh 16:21. But what is that joy, (1.) To one that feels herself dying? No joy but that which is spiritual and divine will stand us in any stead then. Death is too serious a thing to admit the relish of any earthly joy; it is all flat and sapless then. (2.) What is it to one that is lamenting the loss of the ark? Small comfort could she have of a child born in Israel, in Shiloh, when the ark is lost, and is a prisoner in the land of the Philistines. What pleasure can we take in our creature-comforts and enjoyments if we want God's word and ordinances, especially if we want the comfort of his gracious presence and the light of his countenance? As vinegar upon nitre, so is he that sings songs so such heavy hearts.

2. This made her give her child a name which should perpetuate the remembrance of the calamity and her sense of it. She has nothing to say to the child, only it being her province, now that her husband was dead, to name the child, she orders them to call it I-chabod, that is, Where is the glory? Or, Alas for the glory! or, There is no glory (1Sa 4:21), which she thus explains with her dying lips (1Sa 4:22): "The glory has departed from Israel; for the ark of God is taken. Call the child inglorious, for so he is; the beauty of Israel is lost, and there appears no hope of ever retrieving it; never let the name of an Israelite, must less a priest, carry glory in it any more, now that the ark is taken." Note, (1.) The purity and plenty of God's ordinances, and the tokens of his presence in them, are the glory of any people, much more so than their wealth, and trade, and interest, among the nations. 2. Nothing is more cutting, more killing, to a faithful Israelite, than the want and loss of these. If God go, the glory goes, and all good goes. Woe unto us if he depart!