Chú giải chương
Romans Chương 1
서론
Không có tiêu đề
繁體中文
bản gốc tiếng anh
In this chapter we may observe, I. The preface and introduction to the whole epistle, to Ac 1:1-16. II. A description of the deplorable condition of the Gentile world, which begins the proof of the doctrine of justification by faith, here laid down at Ac 1:17. The first is according to the then usual formality of a letter, but intermixed with very excellent and savoury expressions.
1-7
The Apostle's Commission (58 AD)
繁體中文
使徒的職任(公元58年)
¹ 耶穌基督的僕人保羅,奉召為使徒,特派傳神的福音。 ² 這福音是神從前藉眾先知在聖經上所應許的, ³ 論到他兒子我主耶穌基督。按肉體說,是從大衛後裔生的; ⁴ 按聖善的靈說,因從死裏復活,以大能顯明是神的兒子。 ⁵ 我們從他受了恩惠並使徒的職分,在萬國之中叫人為他的名信服真道; ⁶ 其中也有你們這蒙召屬耶穌基督的人。 ⁷ 我寫信給你們在羅馬、為神所愛、奉召作聖徒的眾人。願恩惠、平安從我們的父神並主耶穌基督歸與你們!
在這段經文中,我們有:
一、寫信人的描述(羅1:1):保羅,耶穌基督的僕人;這是他引以為榮的尊稱,他並不像猶太教師那樣以拉比、拉比自居,而是以僕人——更親近的侍從、家中的管家——自居。奉召為使徒。 有人認為他暗示自己舊名掃羅,意為蒙召的或被尋求的:基督尋找他,為要使他作使徒(徒9:15)。他在此將自己的權威建立在蒙召之上;他沒有像假使徒那樣未蒙差遣就擅自奔走;kletos apostolos——蒙召作使徒,彷彿這就是他願意被人稱呼的名字,雖然他承認自己不配稱為使徒(林前15:9)。特派傳神的福音。 法利賽人之名源於「分別」,因為他們將自己分別出來研究律法,可稱為aphorismenoi eis ton nomon;保羅從前正是這樣的人;但如今他改變了自己的研究方向,成了aphorismenos eis to Euangelion——一個福音的法利賽人,照神的旨意被分別出來(加1:15),從母腹裏分別出來,藉着聖靈直接的引導,並照那引導而有的正規按立(徒13:2-3),藉着將自己獻身於這工作而被分別。他完全獻身於神的福音——以神為其來源的福音,其起源和出處都是屬神屬天的。
二、既提到神的福音,他便離題加以頌讃。
-
其古老性。這福音是從前所應許的(羅1:2);它並非新近冒起的教義,而是在舊約的應許和預言中有古老的根基,這一切預言都一致指向福音,如同引進公義日頭的晨光;而且不僅藉口傳,更在聖經中。
-
其內容:是關乎基督的(羅1:3-4)。眾先知和使徒都為他作見證;他是隱藏在聖經這塊田地裏的真正寶藏。當留意,保羅提到基督時,如何堆疊他的名字和稱號——他兒子我主耶穌基督——如同一個以談論基督為樂的人;既提到他,便不能不在論述中表達愛和尊崇,正如這裏,他在一位格中向我們展示了他兩種不同的本性。(1)他的人性:從大衛後裔生的(羅1:3),即由童女馬利亞所生,馬利亞屬大衛家(路1:27),正如他名義上的父親約瑟一樣(路2:4)。此處提及大衛,是因為對彌賽亞有特別的應許,尤其是他為王的職分(撒下7:12;詩132:11;路1:32-33)。(2)他的神性:顯明是神的兒子(羅1:4),即藉着永恆的受生而為神的兒子,或如這裏所解釋的,按聖善的靈。按肉體——即他的人性——他是大衛後裔生的;但按聖善的靈——即神性(如說他按着靈性說復活了,彼前3:18;林後13:4)——他是神的兒子。這事極大的證據或明證就是他從死裏復活,有效地、無可辯駁地證明了這一點。先知約拿的神蹟——基督的復活——是為着最後的說服而設立的(太12:39-40)。不肯被這說服的人,便再無別的事物能說服他。因此我們在此有了關乎基督一位格中之二性的福音教義的概要。
-
其果子(羅1:5):我們從他——即從在福音中顯明的基督——(保羅和其餘的使徒)受了恩惠並使徒的職分,即蒙恩作使徒的恩惠(弗3:8)。使徒們成了給世界觀看的一臺戲,過着勞苦、患難和危險的生活,終日被殺,然而保羅仍把使徒的職分看作恩惠:我們理當看作神所作的任何服侍和工作為極大的恩惠,無論當中要面對何等艱難或危險。這使徒的職分是為着信服真道而領受的,就是要使人順服真道;正如基督如此,他的僕人也如此,領受是為着賜予。保羅的職分是為着在萬國之中叫人信服真道,因為他是外邦人的使徒(羅11:13)。當留意此處對基督徒信仰的描述:是信服真道。信仰不在於概念的知識或赤裸的同意,更不在於悖逆的爭辯,而在於順服。這對真道的順服,與羅3:27所提的信主之法的原則相對應。信心的行動就是悟性對啟示之神的順服,其結果就是意志對命令之神的順服。為着防止人誤用他將在書信中解釋的因信稱義而不靠律法行為的教義,他在這裏將基督教說成是一種順服。基督有他的軛。其中也有你們(羅1:6)。你們羅馬人在這事上與那些名聲和財富不如你們的外邦民族站在同一水平線上;你們在基督裏都合而為一。福音的救恩是共同的救恩(猶3)。神不偏待待人。蒙召屬耶穌基督的人;唯有那些蒙耶穌基督有效呼召的人,才被帶領信服真道。
三、寫信的對象(羅1:7):寫信給你們在羅馬、為神所愛、奉召作聖徒的眾人;即寫給一切在羅馬的認信的基督徒,無論原本是猶太人還是外邦人,是尊貴還是卑微,是自主的還是為奴的,是有學問的還是無學問的。富足和貧窮在基督耶穌裏都一同相遇。此處有:1. 基督徒的特權:他們是為神所愛的,是那蒙愛的身體——神的所喜悅的——的一分子。我們論到神的愛是藉着他的恩賜和恩惠,如此他對全人類有一種普遍的愛,對真信徒有一種特殊的愛;在這兩者之間,他對一切有形基督徒的全體有一種愛。2. 基督徒的本分,就是成為聖潔,因為他們蒙召正是為此——奉召作聖徒,蒙召藉着成聖而得救。聖徒,惟獨聖徒,才為神以特殊而獨特的愛所愛。Kletois hagiois——蒙召的聖徒,在認信上的聖徒;若一切被稱為聖徒的人都是真正的聖徒就好了。那些被稱為聖徒的人當努力與這稱號相稱;否則,雖然這是尊榮和特權,但到大日的時候,被稱為聖徒卻並非真正如此,對我們便沒有多大益處。
四、使徒的祝福(羅1:7):願恩惠、平安歸與你們。 這是每封書信中的一個記號;它不僅有良好祝願的溫情,更有祝福的權柄。律法之下的祭司要祝福百姓,福音的使者也是如此,要奉主的名而行。在這慣常的祝福中當留意:1. 所求的恩惠:恩惠與平安。 舊約的問安是願你平安;如今加上了恩惠——恩惠,即神對我們的恩寵,或神在我們裏面的工作;兩者都是真正平安所必需的先決條件。一切福音的福分都包含在這兩樣之中:恩惠與平安。平安,就是一切的美好;與神相和,良心平安,與周圍所有的人相和;這一切都以恩惠為根基。2. 這些恩惠的泉源:從我們的父神並主耶穌基督。 一切美善都來自:(1)神作為父;他使自己進入這關係,為要激發並鼓勵我們的盼望和期待;我們受教導,當來求恩惠和平安時,要稱他為我們的父。(2)主耶穌基督作為中保,作為傳遞和確保這些益處的大受託人。我們從他的豐滿中領受——平安從他功勞的豐滿而來,恩惠從他聖靈的豐滿而來。
bản gốc tiếng anh
The Apostle's Commission (58 AD)
¹ Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God,
² (Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures,)
³ Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh;
⁴ And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:
⁵ By whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name:
⁶ Among whom are ye also the called of Jesus Christ:
⁷ To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.
In this paragraph we have,
I. The person who writes the epistle described (Ro 1:1): Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ; this is his title of honour, which he glories in, not as the Jewish teachers, Rabbi, Rabbi; but a servant, a more immediate attendant, a steward in the house. Called to be an apostle. Some think he alludes to his old name Saul, which signifies one called for, or enquired after: Christ sought him to make an apostle of him, Ac 9:15. He here builds his authority upon his call; he did not run without sending, as the false apostles did; kletos apostolos—called an apostle, as if this were the name he would be called by, though he acknowledged himself not meet to be called so, 1Co 15:9. Separated to the gospel of God. The Pharisees had their name from separation, because they separated themselves to the study of the law, and might be called aphorismenoi eis ton nomon; such a one Paul had formerly been; but now he had changed his studies, was aphorismenos eis to Euangelion, a gospel Pharisee, separated by the counsel of God (Ga 1:15), separated from his mother's womb, by an immediate direction of the Spirit, and a regular ordination according to that direction (Ac 13:2,3), by a dedication of himself to this work. He was an entire devotee to the gospel of God, the gospel which has God for its author, the origin and extraction of it divine and heavenly.
II. Having mentioned the gospel of God, he digresses, to give us an encomium of it.
1. The antiquity of it. It was promised before (Ro 1:2); it was no novel upstart doctrine, but of ancient standing in the promises and prophecies of the old Testament, which did all unanimously point at the gospel, the morning-beams that ushered in the sun of righteousness; this not by word of mouth only, but in the scriptures.
2. The subject-matter of it: it is concerning Christ, Ro 1:3,4. The prophets and apostles all bear witness to him; he is the true treasure hid in the field of the scriptures. Observe, When Paul mentions Christ, how he heaps up his names and titles, his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, as one that took a pleasure in speaking of him; and, having mentioned him, he cannot go on in his discourse without some expression of love and honour, as here, where in one person he shows us his two distinct natures. (1.) His human nature: Made of the seed of David (Ro 1:3), that is, born of the virgin Mary, who was of the house of David (Lu 1:27), as was Joseph his supposed father, Lu 2:4. David is here mentioned, because of the special promises made to him concerning the Messiah, especially his kingly office; 2Sa 7:12, Ps 132:11, Lu 1:32,33. (2.) His divine nature: Declared to be the Son of God (Ro 1:4), the Son of God by eternal generation, or, as it is here explained, according to the Spirit of holiness. According to the flesh, that is, his human nature, he was of the seed of David; but, according to the Spirit of holiness, that is, the divine nature (as he is said to be quickened by the Spirit, 1Pe 3:18, 2Co 13:4), he is the Son of God. The great proof or demonstration of this is his resurrection from the dead, which proved it effectually and undeniably. The sign of the prophet Jonas, Christ's resurrection, was intended for the last conviction, Mt 12:39,40. Those that would not be convinced by that would be convinced by nothing. So that we have here a summary of the gospel doctrine concerning Christ's two natures in one person.
3. The fruit of it (Ro 1:5); By whom, that is, by Christ manifested and made known in the gospel, we (Paul and the rest of the ministers) have received grace and apostleship, that is, the favour to be made apostles, Eph 3:8. The apostles were made a spectacle to the world, led a life of toil, and trouble, and hazard, were killed all the day long, and yet Paul reckons the apostleship a favour: we may justly reckon it a great favour to be employed in any work or service for God, whatever difficulties or dangers we may meet with in it. This apostleship was received for obedience to the faith, that is, to bring people to that obedience; as Christ, so his ministers, received that they might give. Paul's was for this obedience among all nations, for he was the apostle of the Gentiles, Ro 11:13. Observe the description here given of the Christian profession: it is obedience to the faith. It does not consist in a notional knowledge or a naked assent, much less does it consist in perverse disputings, but in obedience. This obedience to the faith answers the law of faith, mentioned Ro 3:27. The act of faith is the obedience of the understanding to God revealing, and the product of that is the obedience of the will to God commanding. To anticipate the ill use which might be made of the doctrine of justification by faith without the works of the law, which he was to explain in the following epistle, he here speaks of Christianity as an obedience. Christ has a yoke. "Among whom are you, Ro 1:6. You Romans in this stand upon the same level with other Gentile nations of less fame and wealth; you are all one in Christ." The gospel salvation is a common salvation, Jude 1:3. No respect of persons with God. The called of Jesus Christ; all those, and those only, are brought to an obedience of the faith that are effectually called of Jesus Christ.
III. The persons to whom it is written (Ro 1:7): To all that are in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints; that is, to all the professing Christians that were in Rome, whether Jews or Gentiles originally, whether high or low, bond or free, learned or unlearned. Rich and poor meet together in Christ Jesus. Here is, 1. The privilege of Christians: They are beloved of God, they are members of that body which is beloved, which is God's Hephzibah, in which his delight is. We speak of God's love by his bounty and beneficence, and so he hath a common love to all mankind and a peculiar love for true believers; and between these there is a love he hath for all the body of visible Christians. 2. The duty of Christians; and that is to be holy, for hereunto are they called, called to be saints, called to salvation through sanctification. Saints, and only saints, are beloved of God with a special and peculiar love. Kletois hagiois—called saints, saints in profession; it were well if all that are called saints were saints indeed. Those that are called saints should labour to answer to the name; otherwise, though it is an honour and a privilege, yet it will be of little avail at the great day to have been called saints, if we be not really so.
IV. The apostolical benediction (Ro 1:7): Grace to you and peace. This is one of the tokens in every epistle; and it hath not only the affection of a good wish, but the authority of a blessing. The priests under the law were to bless the people, and so are gospel ministers, in the name of the Lord. In this usual benediction observe, 1. The favours desired: Grace and peace. The Old-Testament salutation was, Peace be to you; but now grace is prefixed—grace, that is, the favour of God towards us or the work of God in us; both are previously requisite to true peace. All gospel blessings are included in these two: grace and peace. Peace, that is all good; peace with God, peace in your own consciences, peace with all that are about you; all these founded in grace. 2. The fountain of those favours, from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ. All good comes, (1.) From God as a Father; he hath put himself into that relation to engage and encourage our desires and expectations; we are taught, when we come for grace and peace, to call him our Father. (2.) From the Lord Jesus Christ, as Mediator, and the great feoffee in trust for the conveying and securing of these benefits. We have them from his fulness, peace from the fulness of his merit, grace from the fulness of his Spirit.
8-15
Paul's Love to the Roman Christians (58 AD)
繁體中文
保羅對羅馬基督徒的愛(主後五十八年)
⁸ 第一,我靠著耶穌基督,為你們眾人感謝我的神,因你們的信德傳遍了天下。
⁹ 我在他兒子福音上,用心靈所事奉的神,可以見證我怎樣不住地提到你們;
¹⁰ 在禱告之間常常懇求,或者照神的旨意,終能得平坦的道路往你們那裏去。
¹¹ 因為我切切地想見你們,要把些屬靈的恩賜分給你們,使你們可以堅固;
¹² 這樣,我在你們中間,因你與我彼此的信心,就可以同得安慰。
¹³ 弟兄們,我不願意你們不知道,我屢次定意往你們那裏去,要在你們中間得些果子,如同在其餘的外邦人中一樣;只是到如今仍有阻隔。
¹⁴ 無論是希臘人、化外人、聰明人、愚拙人,我都欠他們的債,
¹⁵ 所以情願盡我的力量,將福音也傳給你們在羅馬的人。
我們在此可留意,
I. 他為他們的感恩(Ro 1:8):第一,我感謝我的神。以稱頌神作每一件事的開始是好的,使之成為每一首歌的阿拉法和俄梅戛,凡事謝恩。——我的神。他以喜樂和誇勝的口氣說這話。在我們一切的感恩中,仰望神為我們的神是好的;這使每一個憐憫都甘甜,當我們能論到神說「他在約中是我的」。——藉著耶穌基督。我們一切的本分和行為惟獨藉著耶穌基督才蒙神悅納——讚美和禱告都是如此。——為你們眾人。我們對朋友的愛不可僅藉著為他們禱告來表達,更要藉著為他們稱頌神來表達。我們在朋友身上所得的一切安慰,榮耀當歸給神;因為每一個受造之物對我們如此,也不過如此——是神使之如此。這些羅馬人中有許多保羅並不親自認識,他卻能由衷地為他們的恩賜和恩典歡喜。當一些羅馬基督徒來迎接他時(Ac 28:15),他為他們感謝神,並得了安慰;但在此他真正的大公之愛延伸得更廣,他為他們眾人感謝神;不僅為他們中間那些在基督裏作他助手的、為他多受勞苦的人(他在 Ro 16:3,6 論到他們),更為他們全體。——因你們的信德傳遍了。保羅在各處往來行走,無論到哪裏,都聽見對羅馬基督徒的大讚揚,他提及此事,不是要使他們驕傲,而是要激發他們以配合別人對他們的普遍評價、以及別人對他們的普遍期望。一個人因宗教而有的名聲越大,他就越當小心保守,因為一點愚昧也能敗壞那有名望的人,傳 10:1。——傳遍了天下,即羅馬帝國——革老丟下旨將一切猶太人從羅馬驅逐之後,羅馬基督徒散佈其中,但如今已經回來,看來他們無論到過何處,在一切教會中都留下了很好的名聲。他們受苦有這樣的好效果:他們若沒有受逼迫,就不會如此出名。這誠然是好名聲——在神和善良人中因好事而有的名。正如古時的長老,這些羅馬人也是因著信得了美好的證據,Heb 11:2。因信心而聞名是可羨慕的事。羅馬基督徒的信心之所以如此被人談論,不僅因為它本身卓越,更因為它在環境中是傑出而顯著的。羅馬是造在山上的城,在那裏所作的每一件事人人都注意到。如此,那些有許多眼睛注視自己的人需要謹慎行事為人,因為他們所行的——無論善惡——都必被人談論。羅馬教會當時是興旺的教會;但從那時以後,純金何以變暗!極精的金子何以改變!羅馬已非昔日。她當時如貞潔的童女許配給基督,美貌超群;但她後來敗壞了,行了詭詐,投在陌生人的懷裏;所以(正如那本好古書《敬虔之操練》在不下二十六個事例中所表明的)甚至羅馬人書如今也成了反對羅馬人的書信;因此她很少理由誇耀自己從前的聲望。
II. 他為他們的禱告,Ro 1:9。雖然是著名興旺的教會,卻仍需要人為他們禱告;他們尚未完全得著。保羅以此作為他對他們之愛的明證。我們對朋友所能作的最大恩惠,有時也是我們手中能力所及的唯一恩惠,就是藉著禱告將他們推薦給神的慈愛。從保羅在此的榜樣,我們可以學到:1. 禱告的恆常:*常常不住地。*他自己遵守他所給別人的同樣規則,Eph 6:18,帖前 5:17。這不是說保羅除了禱告甚麼也不作,而是他保持規定的時間嚴肅地履行那本分,而且非常頻繁,毫不間斷。2. 禱告中的慈善:*我提到你們。*雖然他沒有親自認識他們,對他們也沒有影響力,他卻為他們禱告;不僅是為眾聖徒一般地禱告,更是明確地提到他們。在禱告中為特定的教會和地方明確提及,有時是合宜的;不是為了告訴神,而是為了感動我們自己。我們為他們禱告最多的那些朋友,我們在其中可能得到最多的安慰。關於這一點,他向察看人心的主發出鄭重的呼籲:*神可以見證。*這是在一件重要的事上,在一件只有神和他自己的心知道的事上,他使用了這誓言。能求神見證我們在履行本分上的真誠和恆常,是非常安慰的。神特別是我們暗中禱告的見證人——其內容、其方式;那時我們的父在暗中察看,Mt 6:6。*神,我在他兒子的福音上用心靈所事奉的。*那些用心靈事奉神的人,可以帶著謙卑的確信向他呼籲;那些停留在身體操練上的假冒為善者則不能。在許多祈求中,他為他們所求的一個特別的禱告,是讓他有機會探訪他們(Ro 1:10):懇求,或者照神的旨意……無論我們渴望從任何受造之物中找到甚麼安慰,我們都必須藉著禱告向神求助;因為我們的時候在於他,我們一切的道路由他安排。此處所用的詞句暗示他非常渴望這樣的機會:或者;暗示他長久屢次失望:終能;然而他將之順服於神聖的護理:照神的旨意得平坦的道路。正如在我們的計劃中,照樣在我們的願望中,我們當記得插入這一句,主若願意,雅 4:15。我們的旅程或順或不順,都在乎神的旨意;舒適與否也在乎他的喜悅。
III. 他極渴望見他們,以及其中的緣由,Ro 1:11-15。他聽了許多關於他們的事,極渴望更認識他們。結果子的基督徒是忠心傳道人的喜樂,正如不結果子的信仰表白者是他們的憂愁。因此,他屢次定意要來,只是到如今仍有阻隔(Ro 1:13),因為人籌劃,神定奪。他被別的事務絆住——他對別的教會的關心,那些教會的事務迫切;保羅要先作最需要的事,而非最愉快的事(那樣他就早已去了羅馬)——這是傳道人的好榜樣,他們不可如此體貼自己的傾向,而當顧及他們會眾靈魂的需要。保羅渴望探訪這些羅馬人,
1. 為使他們得造就(Ro 1:11):*要把些屬靈的恩賜分給你們。他領受,為要傳遞。從未有何豐滿的乳房如此渴望被嬰孩吸吮,如同保羅的頭腦和心靈渴望分賜屬靈的恩賜,即向他們講道。一篇好講章是一個好禮物,更是屬靈的恩賜,因此更加美好。——使你們可以堅固。*他既稱讚了他們的興旺,在此就表達了他渴望他們得堅固——使他們在上面枝子長進的同時,下面根也向下生長。最好的聖徒在如此搖動的世界上,也需要越來越得堅固;而屬靈的恩賜對我們的堅固有特別的用處。
2. 為使他可以同得安慰,Ro 1:12。他所聽見他們在恩典中興旺的事使他如此喜樂,那親眼所見豈不更加如此。保羅能從別的傳道人之勞苦的果子中得安慰。——因你與我彼此的信心,即我們彼此的信實和忠心。傳道人和會眾之間彼此有信心時是非常安慰的——他們信賴他為忠心的傳道人,他信賴他們為忠心的百姓。或者,信心的工作,即愛;他們在彼此之愛的表達中喜樂,或在彼此傳遞信心中喜樂。基督徒將屬靈的事彼此比較,是非常令人振奮的;如此就彼此磨亮,鐵磨鐵,磨出刃來。——要在你們中間得些果子,Ro 1:13。他們的造就將是他的益處,那將是歸入好賬的果子。保羅顧念他的工作,如同一個相信他作越多善工、賞賜就越大的人。
3. 為使他可以盡他作外邦人使徒的託付(Ro 1:14):我都欠他們的債。(1.) 他所領受的使他成為欠債的;因為那些是交託給他為他主人榮耀而經營的銀子。我們當渴慕大事時想到這一點,那就是我們所領受的一切都使我們欠債;我們不過是我們主人的管家。(2.) 他的職分使他成為欠債的。他作使徒就是欠債的;他蒙召受差去作工,並已承諾盡心。保羅已改良了他的銀子,在他的工作中勞苦,作了從未有過的人那樣多的善工,然而在反省時,他仍自稱為欠債的;因為我們作完了一切,不過是無用的僕人。——欠希臘人、化外人的債,即如以下所解釋的,欠聰明人和愚拙人的債。希臘人自認為獨佔智慧,視其餘全世界的人相對而言為化外人——不像他們那樣受學問和藝術的栽培。如今保羅對雙方都欠債,自視有義務盡他所能向雙方行善。因此,我們發現他在講道和寫作中償還他的債——向希臘人和化外人行善,並照各人的容量調整他的講論。你可以觀察他在呂高尼的路司得向純樸的人講的道(Ac 14:15 等)與他在雅典向文雅的哲學家講的道(Ac 17:22 等)之間的區別。他對兩方都如欠債人,各按其分給予。他雖是平易的傳道人,卻如對聰明人欠債,在完全人中講智慧,1Co 2:6。因這些緣故,他若有機會,就情願……將福音傳給在羅馬的人,Ro 1:15。雖然是公開的地方,雖然是危險的地方——在那裏基督信仰遇到極大的反對,保羅卻甘願在羅馬冒這險——若蒙呼召:我情願——prothymon。這表示一種極大的心理預備,他非常樂意前往。他所作的不是為貪財,而是出於樂意的心。預備好迎接每一個行善或得善的機會,是極好的事。
bản gốc tiếng anh
Paul's Love to the Roman Christians (58 AD)
⁸ First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for you all, that your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world.
⁹ For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of his Son, that without ceasing I make mention of you always in my prayers;
¹⁰ Making request, if by any means now at length I might have a prosperous journey by the will of God to come unto you.
¹¹ For I long to see you, that I may impart unto you some spiritual gift, to the end ye may be established;
¹² That is, that I may be comforted together with you by the mutual faith both of you and me.
¹³ Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed to come unto you, (but was let hitherto,) that I might have some fruit among you also, even as among other Gentiles.
¹⁴ I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to the wise, and to the unwise.
¹⁵ So, as much as in me is, I am ready to preach the gospel to you that are at Rome also.
We may here observe,
I. His thanksgivings for them (Ro 1:8): First, I thank my God. It is good to begin every thing with blessing God, to make that the alpha and omega of every song, in every thing to give thanks.—My God. He speaks this with delight and triumph. In all our thanksgivings, it is good for us to eye God as our God; this makes every mercy sweet, when we can say of God, "He is mine in covenant."—Through Jesus Christ. All our duties and performances are pleasing to God only through Jesus Christ, praises as well as prayers.—For you all. We must express our love to our friends, not only by praying for them, but by praising God for them. God must have the glory of all the comfort we have in our friends; for every creature is that to us, and no more, which God makes it to be. Many of these Romans Paul had no personal acquaintance with, and yet he could heartily rejoice in their gifts and graces. When some of the Roman Christians met him (Ac 28:15), he thanked God for them, and took courage; but here his true catholic love extends itself further, and he thanks God for them all; not only for those among them that were his helpers in Christ, and that bestowed much labour upon him (of whom he speaks Ro 16:3,6), but for them all.—That your faith is spoken of. Paul travelled up and down from place to place, and, wherever he came, he heard great commendations of the Christians at Rome, which he mentions, not to make them proud, but to quicken them to answer the general character people gave of them, and the general expectation people had from them. The greater reputation a man hath for religion, the more careful he should be to preserve it, because a little folly spoils him that is in reputation, Ec 10:1.—Throughout the whole world, that is, the Roman empire, into which the Roman Christians, upon Claudius's edict to banish all the Jews from Rome, were scattered abroad, but had now returned, and, it seems, left a very good report behind them, wherever they had been, in all the churches. There was this good effect of their sufferings: if they had not been persecuted, they had not been famous. This was indeed a good name, a name for good things with God and good people. As the elders of old, so these Romans, obtained a good report through faith, Heb 11:2. It is a desirable thing to be famous for faith. The faith of the Roman Christians came to be thus talked of, not only because it was excelling in itself, but because it was eminent and observable in its circumstances. Rome was a city upon a hill, every one took notice of what was done there. Thus those who have many eyes upon them have need to walk circumspectly, for what they do, good or bad, will be spoken of. The church of Rome was then a flourishing church; but since that time how is the gold become dim! How is the most fine gold changed! Rome is not what it was. She was then espoused a chaste virgin to Christ, and excelled in beauty; but she has since degenerated, dealt treacherously, and embraced the bosom of a stranger; so that (as that good old book, the Practice of Piety, makes appear in no less than twenty-six instances) even the epistle to the Romans is now an epistle against the Romans; little reason has she therefore to boast of her former credit.
II. His prayer for them, Ro 1:9. Though a famous flourishing church, yet they had need to be prayed for; they had not yet attained. Paul mentions this as an instance of his love to them. One of the greatest kindnesses we can do our friends, and sometimes the only kindness that is in the power of our hands, is, by prayer to recommend them to the loving-kindness of God. From Paul's example here we may learn, 1. Constancy in prayer: Always without ceasing. He did himself observe the same rules he gave to others, Eph 6:18, 1Th 5:17. Not that Paul did nothing else but pray, but he kept up stated times for the solemn performance of that duty, and those very frequent, and observed without fail. 2. Charity in prayer: I make mention of you. Though he had not particular acquaintance with them, nor interest in them, yet he prayed for them; not only for all saints in general, but he made express mention of them. It is not unfit sometimes to be express in our prayers for particular churches and places; not to inform God, but to affect ourselves. We are likely to have the most comfort in those friends that we pray most for. Concerning this he makes a solemn appeal to the searcher of hearts: For God is my witness. It was in a weighty matter, and in a thing known only to God and his own heart, that he used this asseveration. It is very comfortable to be able to call God to witness to our sincerity and constancy in the discharge of a duty. God is particularly a witness to our secret prayers, the matter of them, the manner of the performance; then our Father sees in secret, Mt 6:6. God, whom I serve with my spirit. Those that serve God with their spirits may, with a humble confidence, appeal to him; hypocrites who rest in bodily exercise cannot. His particular prayer, among many other petitions he put up for them, was that he might have an opportunity of paying them a visit (Ro 1:10): Making request, if by any means, etc. Whatever comfort we desire to find in any creature, we must have recourse to God for it by prayer; for our times are in his hand, and all our ways at his disposal. The expressions here used intimate that he was very desirous of such an opportunity: if by any means; that he had long and often been disappointed: now at length; and yet that he submitted it to the divine Providence: a prosperous journey by the will of God. As in our purposes, so in our desires, we must still remember to insert this, if the Lord will, Jam 4:15. Our journeys are prosperous or otherwise according to the will of God, comfortable or not as he pleases.
III. His great desire to see them, with the reasons of it, Ro 1:11-15. He had heard so much of them that he had a great desire to be better acquainted with them. Fruitful Christians are as much the joy as barren professors are the grief of faithful ministers. Accordingly, he often purposed to come, but was let hitherto (Ro 1:13), for man purposeth, but God disposeth. He was hindered by other business that took him off, by his care of other churches, whose affairs were pressing; and Paul was for doing that first, not which was most pleasant (then he would have gone to Rome), but which was most needful—a good example to ministers, who must not consult their own inclinations so much as the necessity of their people's souls. Paul desired to visit these Romans,
1. That they might be edified (Ro 1:11): That I may impart unto you. He received, that he might communicate. Never were full breasts so desirous to be drawn out to the sucking infant as Paul's head and heart were to be imparting spiritual gifts, that is, preaching to them. A good sermon is a good gift, so much the better for being a spiritual gift.—To the end you may be established. Having commended their flourishing he here expresses his desire of their establishment, that as they grew upward in the branches they might grow downward in the root. The best saints, while they are in such a shaking world as this, have need to be more and more established; and spiritual gifts are of special use for our establishment.
2. That he might be comforted, Ro 1:12. What he heard of their flourishing in grace was so much a joy to him that it must needs be much more so to behold it. Paul could take comfort in the fruit of the labours of other ministers.—By the mutual faith both of you and me, that is, our mutual faithfulness and fidelity. It is very comfortable when there is a mutual confidence between minister and people, they confiding in him as a faithful minister, and he in them as a faithful people. Or, the mutual work of faith, which is love; they rejoiced in the expressions of one another's love, or communicating their faith one to another. It is very refreshing to Christians to compare notes about their spiritual concerns; thus are they sharpened, as iron sharpens iron.—That I might have some fruit, Ro 1:13. Their edification would be his advantage, it would be fruit abounding to a good account. Paul minded his work, as one that believed the more good he did the greater would his reward be.
3. That he might discharge his trust as the apostle of the Gentiles (Ro 1:14): I am a debtor. (1.) His receivings made him a debtor; for they were talents he was entrusted with to trade for his Master's honour. We should think of this when we covet great things, that all our receivings put us in debt; we are but stewards of our Lord's goods. (2.) His office made him a debtor. He was a debtor as he was an apostle; he was called and sent to work, and had engaged to mind it. Paul had improved his talent, and laboured in his work, and done as much good as ever any man did, and yet, in reflection upon it, he still writes himself debtor; for, when we have done all, we are but unprofitable servants.—Debtor to the Greeks, and to the barbarians, that is, as the following words explain it, to the wise and to the unwise. The Greeks fancied themselves to have the monopoly of wisdom, and looked upon all the rest of the world as barbarians, comparatively so; not cultivated with learning and arts as they were. Now Paul was a debtor to both, looked upon himself as obliged to do all the good he could both to the one and to the other. Accordingly, we find him paying his debt, both in his preaching and in his writing, doing good both to Greeks and barbarians, and suiting his discourse to the capacity of each. You may observe a difference between his sermon at Lystra among the plain Lycaonians (Ac 14:15, etc.) and his sermon at Athens among the polite philosophers, Ac 17:22, etc. He delivered both as debtor to each, giving to each their portion. Though a plain preacher, yet, as debtor to the wise, he speaks wisdom among those that are perfect, 1Co 2:6. For these reasons he was ready, if he had an opportunity, to preach the gospel at Rome, Ro 1:15. Though a public place, though a perilous place, where Christianity met with a great deal of opposition, yet Paul was ready to run the risk at Rome, if called to it: I am ready—prothymon. It denotes a great readiness of mind, and that he was very forward to it. What he did was not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind. It is an excellent thing to be ready to meet every opportunity of doing or getting good.
16-18
Paul's Discourse on Justification (58 AD)
繁體中文
保羅論稱義的講論(主後五十八年)
¹⁶ 我不以福音為恥;這福音本是神的大能,要救一切相信的,先是猶太人,後是希臘人。
¹⁷ 因為神的義正在這福音上顯明出來;這義是本於信,以至於信。如經上所記:「義人必因信得生。」
¹⁸ 原來,神的忿怒從天上顯明在一切不虔不義的人身上,就是那些行不義阻擋真理的人。
保羅於此進入一段關於稱義的詳盡論述,在本章後半陳明他的命題,並為證明它而描述外邦世界可悲的狀態。他的過渡十分精巧,如同演說家:他情願在羅馬傳福音,雖然那是一個福音被那些自稱智者之人貶低的地方;因為,他說,我不以這福音為恥,Ro 1:16。在福音中有許多事可能使像保羅這樣的人受試探以之為恥,特別是這福音所論的那位是被掛在木頭上的人,其教訓是平易的,在學者中沒有甚麼可誇口的,其信仰表白者卑微被人藐視,在各處被人毀謗;然而保羅不以承認它為恥。我認為那既不以福音為恥、也不成為福音之恥的人,才是真正的基督徒。這放膽表白的理由,從福音的性質和卓越而取,引入了他的論述。
I. 命題,Ro 1:16,17。福音的卓越在於它向我們啟示了,
1. 信徒的拯救作為目的:這福音本是神的大能。保羅不以福音為恥——無論它在屬肉體的眼中看來如何卑微和可鄙;因為神的大能藉著它作成一切信的人的拯救;它向我們指明得救的道路(Ac 16:17),是拯救被傳遞和歸於我們的大特許狀。但是,(1.) 這是藉著神的大能;沒有那大能,福音不過是死的字句;福音的啟示是主的膀臂的啟示(賽 53:1),正如能力隨基督的話而出醫治疾病。(2.) 這是對那些、且只對那些信的人。信使我們有分於福音的拯救;對別人它是隱藏的。所預備的藥若不被服用,就不能醫治病人。——先是猶太人。以色列家迷失的羊最先得著供應,既從基督也從他的使徒。你們先得(Ac 3:26),但在他們拒絕之後,使徒轉向外邦人,Ac 13:46。如今猶太人和外邦人站在同一水平上——沒有救主都同樣悲慘,也都同樣歡迎到救主這裏來,Col 3:11。這樣的教訓對猶太人是驚奇的,他們迄今一直是獨特的子民,並輕視外邦世界;但那久候的彌賽亞證明既是照亮外邦人的光,也是他百姓以色列的榮耀。
2. 信徒的稱義作為道路(Ro 1:17):因為,即在這保羅所大肆誇勝的福音中,神的義正在……顯明出來。我們的苦難和毀壞既是我們罪孽的產品和後果,那要向我們指明得救之路的,也必向我們指明稱義之路,而福音正是如此行。福音啟示了一種義。神既是公義聖潔的神,我們又是有罪的罪人,我們就必有可以藉以在他面前顯現的義;感謝神,有這樣一種義由彌賽亞君王帶入(但 9:24),並在福音中顯明;一種義——即一種恩惠的和好和悅納的方法,不顧我們罪的罪咎。這福音的義,(1.) 被稱為神的義;是神所指定、神所悅納和承認的。如此稱呼是為要切斷一切對由我們自己行為之功德而來的義的託辭。這是基督——他是神——的義,是從無限價值的滿足而來的。(2.) 被說是本於信,以至於信——從啟示之神的信實到領受之人的信心(有人如此理解);從倚靠神、直接與神交往的信心(如亞當墮落前),到倚靠中保、如此與神交往的信心(另有人如此理解);從我們被置於稱義狀態的頭一個信心,到我們藉以活著並被維持在那狀態中的隨後的信心:而使我們稱義的信心不過是我們以基督為我們的救主、成為真基督徒——照著洗禮之約的要旨;從使我們接枝於基督的信心,到從他為我們的根汲取功效的信心:兩者都包含在下一句話中:義人必因信得生。*義人因信——那裏有使我們稱義的信心;得生因信——那裏有維持我們的信心;所以有本於信以至於信的義。信心在基督徒生活的開始和長進中都是一切的一切。不是從信到行,好像信心使我們處於稱義狀態,然後行為在其中保存並維持我們;而是一直從信到信,如 2Co 3:18 所言,從榮耀到榮耀;那是增長的、持續的、堅忍的信心,是向前推進、勝過不信的信心。為表明這不是新起的怪論,他為之引用了舊約中那段著名的經文——在新約中如此常被提及(哈 2:4):義人必因信得生。既因信稱義,他就藉著信過恩典和榮耀的生活。先知在那裏站在守望樓上,期望一些特別的啟示(Ro 1:1),而那啟示是關乎所應許的彌賽亞在時候滿足時必然顯現——儘管看似遲延。這在那裏被稱為默示(卓越地),如同在別處被稱為應許*;而當那時候將到、以及已經來到時,*義人必因信得生。*如此福音的義是本於信以至於信——從舊約對將要來之基督的信,到新約對已經來之基督的信。
II. 這命題的證明——猶太人和外邦人都需要一種可以藉以在神面前顯現的義,而兩者都沒有自己可訴諸的。稱義必是因信或因行為。不能因行為,這他藉著描述猶太人和外邦人的行為而詳盡證明;所以他總結必是因信,Ro 3:20,28。使徒如同技巧熟練的外科醫生,在敷上膏藥之前,先探查傷口——先努力使人知罪和知怒,然後指明得救之路。這使福音更受歡迎。我們必須先看見定罪之神的義,然後稱義之神的義才顯得配得一切悅納。一般地(Ro 1:18),*神的忿怒……顯明。*自然之光和律法之光從罪到罪顯明神的忿怒。我們有幸,福音從信到信顯明稱義之神的義。這反差值得留意。在此有,
1. 人罪的描述;他將之歸結為兩大類——不虔和不義;不虔是違背第一塊法版的律法,不義是違背第二塊法版的。
2. 那罪惡的成因,那就是行不義阻擋真理。他們有一些communes notitæ——關於神的存在以及善惡之分的一些觀念;但他們在不義中持守它們,即他們在與邪惡行徑一致的情況下知道並承認它們。他們把真理當作俘虜或囚犯拘禁,使之不能影響他們——如同它本會影響他們的那樣。一個不義邪惡的心是許多美好真理被拘留和埋葬的地牢。你從我聽的那純正話語的規模……用在信心和愛心上牢牢守著是一切宗教的根(提後 1:13),但在不義中牢牢守著卻是一切罪的根。
3. 神對此的不悅:神的忿怒從天上顯明;不僅在寫下來的道中——這道是神所默示的(外邦人沒有那個),更在神的護理中——他對罪人施行的審判,這些不是從塵土中發出,也不是偶然發生,更不可歸於次要原因,而是從天上的啟示。或者從天上顯明忿怒;那不是像我們自己一樣之人的忿怒,而是從天上來的忿怒,因此更可怕、更不可避免。
bản gốc tiếng anh
Paul's Discourse on Justification (58 AD)
¹⁶ For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.
¹⁷ For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.
¹⁸ For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
Paul here enters upon a large discourse of justification, in the latter part of this chapter laying down his thesis, and, in order to the proof of it, describing the deplorable condition of the Gentile world. His transition is very handsome, and like an orator: he was ready to preach the gospel at Rome, though a place where the gospel was run down by those that called themselves the wits; for, saith he, I am not ashamed of it, Ro 1:16. There is a great deal in the gospel which such a man as Paul might be tempted to be ashamed of, especially that he whose gospel it is was a man hanged upon a tree, that the doctrine of it was plain, had little in it to set it off among scholars, the professors of it were mean and despised, and every where spoken against; yet Paul was not ashamed to own it. I reckon him a Christian indeed that is neither ashamed of the gospel nor a shame to it. The reason of this bold profession, taken from the nature and excellency of the gospel, introduces his dissertation.
I. The proposition, Ro 1:16,17. The excellency of the gospel lies in this, that it reveals to us,
1. The salvation of believers as the end: It is the power of God unto salvation. Paul is not ashamed of the gospel, how mean and contemptible soever it may appear to a carnal eye; for the power of God works by it the salvation of all that believe; it shows us the way of salvation (Ac 16:17), and is the great charter by which salvation is conveyed and made over to us. But, (1.) It is through the power of God; without that power the gospel is but a dead letter; the revelation of the gospel is the revelation of the arm of the Lord (Isa 53:1), as power went along with the word of Christ to heal diseases. (2.) It is to those, and those only, that believe. Believing interests us in the gospel salvation; to others it is hidden. The medicine prepared will not cure the patient if it be not taken.—To the Jew first. The lost sheep of the house of Israel had the first offer made them, both by Christ and his apostles. You first (Ac 3:26), but upon their refusal the apostles turned to the Gentiles, Ac 13:46. Jews and Gentiles now stand upon the same level, both equally miserable without a Saviour, and both equally welcome to the Saviour, Col 3:11. Such doctrine as this was surprising to the Jews, who had hitherto been the peculiar people, and had looked with scorn upon the Gentile world; but the long-expected Messiah proves a light to enlighten the Gentiles, as well as the glory of his people Israel.
2. The justification of believers as the way (Ro 1:17): For therein, that is, in this gospel, which Paul so much triumphs in, is the righteousness of God revealed. Our misery and ruin being the product and consequent of our iniquity, that which will show us the way of salvation must needs show us the way of justification, and this the gospel does. The gospel makes known a righteousness. While God is a just and holy God, and we are guilty sinners, it is necessary we should have a righteousness wherein to appear before him; and, blessed be God, there is such a righteousness brought in by Messiah the prince (Da 9:24) and revealed in the gospel; a righteousness, that is, a gracious method of reconciliation and acceptance, notwithstanding the guilt of our sins. This evangelical righteousness, (1.) Is called the righteousness of God; it is of God's appointing, of God's approving and accepting. It is so called to cut off all pretensions to a righteousness resulting from the merit of our own works. It is the righteousness of Christ, who is God, resulting from a satisfaction of infinite value. (2.) It is said to be from faith to faith, from the faithfulness of God revealing to the faith of man receiving (so some); from the faith of dependence upon God, and dealing with him immediately, as Adam before the fall, to the faith of dependence upon a Mediator, and so dealing with God (so others); from the first faith, by which we are put into a justified state, to after faith, by which we live, and are continued in that state: and the faith that justifies us is no less than our taking Christ for our Saviour, and becoming true Christians, according to the tenour of the baptismal covenant; from faith engrafting us into Christ, to faith deriving virtue from him as our root: both implied in the next words, The just shall live by faith. Just by faith, there is faith justifying us; live by faith, there is faith maintaining us; and so there is a righteousness from faith to faith. Faith is all in all, both in the beginning and progress of a Christian life. It is not from faith to works, as if faith put us into a justified state, and then works preserved and maintained us in it, but it is all along from faith to faith, as 2Co 3:18, from glory to glory; it is increasing, continuing, persevering faith, faith pressing forward, and getting ground of unbelief. To show that this is no novel upstart doctrine, he quotes for it that famous scripture in the Old Testament, so often mentioned in the New (Hab 2:4): The just shall live by faith. Being justified by faith he shall live by it both the life of grace and of glory. The prophet there had placed himself upon the watch-tower, expecting some extraordinary discoveries (Ro 1:1), and the discovery was of the certainty of the appearance of the promised Messiah in the fulness of time, not withstanding seeming delays. This is there called the vision, by way of eminence, as elsewhere the promise; and while that time is coming, as well as when it has come, the just shall live by faith. Thus is the evangelical righteousness from faith to faith—from Old-Testament faith in a Christ to come to New-Testament faith in a Christ already come.
II. The proof of this proposition, that both Jews and Gentiles stand in need of a righteousness wherein to appear before God, and that neither the one nor the other have nay of their own to plead. Justification must be either by faith or works. It cannot be by works, which he proves at large by describing the works both of Jews and Gentiles; and therefore he concludes it must be by faith, Ro 3:20,38. The apostle, like a skilful surgeon, before he applies the plaster, searches the wound—endeavours first to convince of guilt and wrath, and then to show the way of salvation. This makes the gospel the more welcome. We must first see the righteousness of God condemning, and then the righteousness of God justifying will appear worthy of all acceptation. In general (Ro 1:18), the wrath of God is revealed. The light of nature and the light of the law reveal the wrath of God from sin to sin. It is well for us that the gospel reveals the justifying righteousness of God from faith to faith. The antithesis is observable. Here is,
1. The sinfulness of man described; he reduceth it to two heads, ungodliness and unrighteousness; ungodliness against the laws of the first table, unrighteousness against those of the second.
2. The cause of that sinfulness, and that is, holding the truth in unrighteousness. Some communes notitæ, some ideas they had of the being of God, and of the difference of good and evil; but they held them in unrighteousness, that is, they knew and professed them in a consistency with their wicked courses. They held the truth as a captive or prisoner, that it should not influence them, as otherwise it would. An unrighteous wicked heart is the dungeon in which many a good truth is detained and buried. Holding fast the form of sound words in faith and love is the root of all religion (2Ti 1:13), but holding it fast in unrighteousness is the root of all sin.
3. The displeasure of God against it: The wrath of God is revealed from heaven; not only in the written word, which is given by inspiration of God (the Gentiles had not that), but in the providences of God, his judgments executed upon sinners, which do not spring out of the dust, or fall out by chance, nor are they to be ascribed to second causes, but they are a revelation from heaven. Or wrath from heaven is revealed; it is not the wrath of a man like ourselves, but wrath from heaven, therefore the more terrible and the more unavoidable.
19-32
The Excellency of the Gospel (58 AD)
繁體中文
福音的卓越(主後五十八年)
¹⁹ 神的事情,人所能知道的,原顯明在人心裏,因為神已經給他們顯明。
²⁰ 自從造天地以來,神的永能和神性是明明可知的,雖是眼不能見,但藉著所造之物就可以曉得,叫人無可推諉。
²¹ 因為,他們雖然知道神,卻不當作神榮耀他,也不感謝他。他們的思念變為虛妄,無知的心就昏暗了。
²² 自稱為聰明,反成了愚拙,
²³ 將不能朽壞之神的榮耀變為偶像,彷彿必朽壞的人和飛禽、走獸、昆蟲的樣式。
²⁴ 所以,神任憑他們逞著心裏的情慾行污穢,以致彼此玷辱自己的身體。
²⁵ 他們將神的真實變為虛謊,去敬拜事奉受造之物,不敬奉那造物的主;主乃是可稱頌的,直到永遠。阿們!
²⁶ 因此,神任憑他們放縱可羞恥的情慾。他們的女人把順性的用處變為逆性的用處;
²⁷ 男人也是如此,棄了女人順性的用處,慾火攻心,彼此貪戀,男和男行可羞恥的事,在自己身上受這妄為當得的報應。
²⁸ 他們既然故意不認識神,神就任憑他們存邪僻的心,行那些不合理的事;
²⁹ 裝滿了各樣的不義、邪惡、貪婪、惡毒;滿心是嫉妒、凶殺、爭競、詭詐、毒恨;又是讒毀的、
³⁰ 背後說人的、怨恨神的、侮慢人的、狂傲的、自誇的、捏造惡事的、違背父母的、
³¹ 無知的、背約的、無親情的、不憐憫人的。
³² 他們雖知道神判定行這樣事的人是當死的,然而他們不但自己去行,還喜歡別人去行。
在這章的最後部分,使徒將他所說的特別應用於外邦世界,在其中我們可留意,
I. 他們所擁有藉以認識神的途徑和幫助。雖然他們沒有如雅各和以色列那樣對神律法的認識(詩 147:20),然而在他們中間他未嘗不為自己顯出證據來(徒 14:17):因為神的事情,人所能知道的,原顯明等,Ro 1:19,20。當留意,
1. 他們有什麼發現:神的事情,人所能知道的,原顯明——en autois——在他們中間;即,他們中間甚至有一些認識神的,確信一位至高的神明之存在。畢達哥拉斯、柏拉圖和斯多葛派的哲學,發現了大量關於神的知識,正如許多見證所表明的。人所能知道的,這暗示有許多是不能知道的。神的存在可以被領會,卻不能被完全理解。我們不能考查而測透他,伯 11:7-9。有限的理解不能完全認識無限的存在;但感謝神,有可以知道的,足以引導我們達到我們的首要目的——榮耀他和享受他;而這些啟示的事屬於我們和我們的子孫,至於隱秘的事則不可窺探,申 29:29。
2. 他們從何處得到這些發現:神已經給他們顯明。他們對神那些普通的、自然的觀念,是由自然之神自己——他是眾光之父——印在他們心上的。對一種神性的意識,以及對那神性的敬畏,是與人性如此與生俱來,以致有人認為我們當用這些而非理性來區別人與走獸。
3. 藉著什麼途徑和方法,他們所擁有的這些發現和通知得以證實和提高,即藉著創造之工(Ro 1:20);自從造天地以來,神的永能和神性是明明可知的等。
(1.) 當留意他們認識了什麼:他的永能和神性。雖然神不是感官的對象,他卻藉著那些可感的事物發現並顯明了自己。神的權能和神性是不可見的事物,卻在其產物中清楚可見。他在隱秘中行事(伯 23:8,9,詩 139:15,傳 11:5),卻彰顯了他所作成的,在其中表明他的權能和神性,以及自然之光在神這觀念中所領會的他其他屬性。他們不能藉自然之光認識神格中三位格(雖然有人自以為在柏拉圖的著作中找到了這事的痕跡),但他們確實認識了神性,至少足夠使他們免於偶像崇拜。這就是他們所持守的真理。
(2.) 他們如何認識:藉著所造之物——這些不能自己造自己,也不能靠任何偶然的碰撞落入如此精確的秩序和和諧之中;因此必是某種第一因或有理智的行動者所產生的,而這第一因不可能是別的,只能是永遠有權能的神。見詩 19:1,賽 40:26,徒 17:24。匠人可由他的作品認出。所造之物的繁多、眾多、秩序、美麗、和諧、不同的本性,以及精巧的設計,它們對某些目的的指向,以及一切部分對整體之善和美的匯合,都豐富地證明了一位造物主及其永遠的權能和神性。如此光照在黑暗中。而這是自從造天地以來。可如此理解,[1.] 作為認識它們所由出的來源。為證明這真理,我們訴諸創造的大工。有人認為這ktisis kosmou——這世界的受造物(如此可讀)——當理解為人,即較低世界最顯著的受造物,稱為受造物,可 16:15。人體的結構和構造,尤其是人靈魂最卓越的機能、官能和容量,豐富地證明有一位造物主,並且他就是神。或,[2.] 作為這發現的日期。它與世界的創造一樣古老。在這意義上apo ktiseos在聖經中最常如此使用。這些關乎神的通知不是什麼近代的發現、近日才碰上的,而是從起初就有的古老真理。承認神的道路是一條古道;它從起初就有。真理比錯謬領先。
II. 儘管神向他們如此顯明了自己,他們卻大行偶像崇拜;此處描述於 Ro 1:21-23,25。我們若記得甚至那些有聖經光照引導的猶太人是何等傾向偶像崇拜,就會較不驚奇這些自然的發現在防止外邦人的偶像崇拜上之無效;墮落之人如此悲慘地沉沒在感官的泥沼中。當留意,
1. 他們偶像崇拜的內在原因,Ro 1:21,22。他們因此無可推諉,因為他們確實認識神,並且從他們所知的可以容易推斷:敬拜他、唯獨敬拜他,乃是他們的本分。雖然有人比別人有更大的光照和認識的途徑,然而所有人都有足夠的使他們無可推諉。但問題在於,(1.) 他們不當作神榮耀他。他們對他的情感、他們對他的敬畏和崇拜,沒有與他們的認識同步。當作神榮耀他就是唯獨榮耀他;因為無限的只能有一位:但他們沒有如此榮耀他,因為他們設立了許多別的神明。當作神榮耀他就是以屬靈的敬拜敬拜他;但他們為他造了形像。不當作神榮耀神,實際上就是完全不榮耀他;將他當作受造物來尊重不是榮耀他,而是褻瀆他。(2.) 也不感謝他;不為他們從神所領受的一般恩惠感謝他(對神恩典的麻木,是我們罪惡地偏離他的根源);特別不為神樂意向他們顯明自己而感謝他。那些不改善認識和恩典之途徑的人,正當地被算為對它們不感恩。(3.) 他們的思念變為虛妄——en tois dialogismois——在他們的推理中,在他們實際的推斷中。他們對一般真理有許多認識(Ro 1:19),卻沒有智慧將之應用於特殊情形。或,在他們關乎神、世界創造、人類起源和至善的觀念上;在這些事上,當他們放棄了樸素的真理,他們很快就爭辯自己陷入千百種虛妄愚蠢的幻想之中。各派哲學家對這些事的各種意見和假設,就是許多的虛妄思念。真理既被離棄,錯謬就無限增多。(4.) 無知的心就昏暗了。心的愚昧和實際的邪惡遮蔽並昏暗了理智的機能和官能。沒有什麼比意志和情感的敗壞和腐化更傾向於蒙蔽和扭曲理智的了。(5.) 自稱為聰明,反成了愚拙,Ro 1:22。這對哲學家——那些自稱智慧並以此為業的人——是難堪的。那些在最豐富想像中為自己塑造神的觀念的人,陷入了最粗鄙荒謬的見解:這是他們驕傲和自負當得的刑罰。有人觀察到,那些最文雅、最炫耀智慧的國家,在宗教上是最徹底的愚拙人。化外人敬拜日月,這在一切之中是最貌似有理的偶像崇拜;而博學的埃及人卻敬拜牛和洋蔥。在智慧上勝過他們的希臘人,卻敬拜疾病和人類的情感。最智慧的羅馬人,卻敬拜復仇女神。而如今可憐的美洲人敬拜雷聲;而靈巧的中國人卻敬拜魔鬼。如此世人憑自己的智慧,既不認識神,林前 1:21。正如智慧的誇耀是愚拙的加重,照樣對智慧驕傲的自負也是許多愚拙的根源。所以我們讀到很少有哲學家歸向基督信仰;而保羅的講道沒有在任何地方如在博學的雅典人中那樣被嘲笑和譏誚,徒 17:18-32。Phaskontes einai——自稱為聰明。神存在的樸素真理不能滿足他們;他們自以為高於此,於是陷入了最大的錯誤。
2. 他們偶像崇拜的外在行動,Ro 1:23-25。(1.) 為神造像(Ro 1:23),藉此他們盡其所能地將不能朽壞之神的榮耀變為偶像。與詩 106:20,耶 2:11 比較。他們將神性歸給最可鄙的受造物,並藉它們來描繪神。神照自己的形像造人,是他賜給人最大的尊榮;但人照自己的形像造神,是人向神所作的最大褻瀆。這正是神如此嚴厲警告猶太人防備的,申 4:15 等。使徒在雅典的講道中表明了這事的愚妄,徒 17:29。見賽 40:18,44:10 等。這被稱為(Ro 1:25)將神的真實變為虛謊。正如它褻瀆了他的榮耀,照樣它歪曲了他的存在。偶像被稱為謊言,因為它們對神說謊,彷彿他有身體,而他是靈,耶 23:14,何 7:1。虛假的教師,哈 2:18。(2.) 將神聖的敬拜歸給受造物:去敬拜事奉受造之物——para ton ktisavta——過於造物的主。他們在名義上確實承認一位至高的神明,卻藉他們對受造物的敬拜實際上否認了他;因為神要麼是一切,要麼什麼也不是。或,過於造物的主,將更虔誠的尊敬歸給他們較低的神明——星辰、英雄、鬼魔,以為至高的神不能接近,或超乎他們的敬拜。罪本身是他們敬拜受造物這事實;但這被提及作為罪的加重情節——他們敬拜受造物過於造物的主。這是外邦世界的普遍罪惡,並且與他們的法律和政府交織在一起;為了遷就這些,甚至他們中的智者——那些認識並承認一位至高的神、並確信他們多神論和偶像崇拜之荒謬的人——卻仍照他們鄰舍那樣行。辛尼加(Seneca)在他的《論迷信》(De Superstitione)一書中——正如奧古斯丁《上帝之城》(Aug. de Civit. Dei)卷六第十章所引用的(因為那本書已失傳)——在詳盡地以多個實例說明了通俗宗教的極大愚妄和不敬之後,卻如此結論:Quæ omnia sapiens servabit tanquam legibus jussa, non tanquam diis grata——這一切智者將遵守,視為法律所命定的,而非以為是神所喜悅的。其後又說:Omnem istam ignobilem deorum turbam, quam longo ævo longa superstitio congessit, sic adorabimus, ut meminerimus cultum ejus magis ad morem quam ad rem pertinere——這一切卑賤的神明群眾,是古老的迷信藉長期的沿襲所積聚的,我們將如此敬拜,同時記得對它的敬拜不過是隨從風俗,而非實質之事。對此奧古斯丁觀察到:Colebat quod reprehendebat, agebat quod arguebat, quod culpabat adorabat——他敬拜他所指責的,行他所證為非的,崇拜他所非議的。我如此詳盡提及此事,因為在我看來它完全解釋了使徒在此所說的(Ro 1:18):他們以不義阻擋真理。值得留意的是,當提到外邦人的偶像崇拜對神所行的褻瀆時,使徒在論述中間以對神可敬畏的敬拜表達自己:*主乃是可稱頌的,直到永遠。阿們!*當我們看見或聽見對神或他名的任何藐視時,我們當藉此機會高尚地、尊榮地思想並論到他。在這事上,如在別的事上一樣,別人越壞,我們當越好。直到永遠可稱頌的,儘管對他的名行了這些褻瀆:雖然有人不榮耀他,然而他是得榮耀的,並且將永遠得榮耀。
III. 神對他們這偶像崇拜的審判;不是許多暫時的審判(偶像崇拜的國家乃是世界中征服統治的國家),而是屬靈的審判——任憑他們放縱最如畜類和反自然的情慾。Paredoken autous——任憑他們;此處三次重複,Ro 1:24,26,28。屬靈的審判是一切審判中最嚴厲的,最當敬畏。當留意,
1. 是誰任憑了他們。神任憑他們,以公義審判的方式,作為他們偶像崇拜當得的刑罰——取下約束之恩的嚼環——任憑他們自己——由他們去;因為他的恩典是他自己的,他不欠任何人,他可隨意賜予或扣留他的恩典。這任憑是神積極的作為還是僅僅消極的,我們留待學院去爭論:但我們確知的是,神任憑人順著心裏的情慾、賜他們強烈的迷惑、放撒但在他們身上、甚至將絆腳石擺在他們面前,並非新事。然而神不是罪的作者,在此他無限公義聖潔;因為,雖然這任憑之後隨之而來的是極大的邪惡,那過錯當歸於罪人邪惡的心。若病人頑固,不肯順從所定的治法,卻故意服用和行對他有害的東西,醫生若將他視為絕望而放棄,就不當受責備;隨之一切致命的症狀不當歸咎於醫生,而當歸咎於疾病本身和病人的愚妄和頑梗。
2. 任憑他們作什麼。
(1.) 行污穢和放縱可羞恥的情慾,Ro 1:24,26,27。那些不願接受自然之光更純潔更精緻的通知(這些通知有助於保持神的尊榮)的人,正當地喪失了那些更粗俗更明顯的觀念(這些觀念保持人性的尊嚴)。人在尊貴中,卻拒絕認識造他的神,如此就成為比必死的畜類更壞的(詩 49:20)。如此,一人因神的許可成為另一人的刑罰;但這是(如此處所說)逞著心裏的情慾——一切的過錯都當歸在那裏。那些褻瀆神的人被任憑去玷辱自己。人不能被交託給比被任憑順從自己的私慾更大的奴役。如此的人被交出去,如同埃及人(賽 19:4)交在殘忍之主的手中。他們污穢和可恥情慾的特殊實例,是他們反自然的情慾——為此許多外邦人,甚至他們中被視為智者的,如梭倫和芝諾,也聲名狼藉——違背了自然之光最明顯最顯而易見的指示。所多瑪和蛾摩拉大聲呼喊的罪孽——神為此從天降火於他們——在異教國家中不僅普遍實行,而且公開承認。也許使徒特別指在他們敬拜偶像時所犯的可憎之事——在其中最惡劣的污穢被規定為對他們神的尊榮:糞堆的服事為糞堆的神明;污穢的靈喜愛這樣的事奉。在羅馬教會中,異教的偶像崇拜在那裏復甦,形像被敬拜,聖徒不過取代了鬼魔的位置,我們聽聞同樣的可憎之事公然橫行——為教皇所許可(福克斯《殉道錄》〔Fox's Acts and Monuments〕卷一第 808 頁),不僅普遍犯下,更為他們一些樞機主教所辯護和力爭:同樣的屬靈災禍出於同樣的屬靈邪惡。看人性中有何等的邪惡。人是何等可憎污穢!主啊,人是什麼?大衛說;當他被任憑自己時,他是何等卑鄙的受造物!我們何等蒙神的約束之恩,得以保持人性任何的尊榮和端莊!因為若不是為此,那被造只比天使微小一點的人,必使自己遠低於魔鬼。這被稱為這妄為當得的報應。審判全地的主行公義,在罪與其刑罰之間觀察到一種相稱。
(2.) 在這些可憎之事中被任憑存邪僻的心,Ro 1:28。
[1.] 他們故意不認識神。他們悟性的盲目,是由他們意志和情感的故意背逆所造成的。他們不認識神,因為他們不喜歡如此。他們既不願知道、也不願行任何事,只行那取悅自己的。這正是屬肉體之心的性情;取悅自己是他们的最高目的。有許多人在他們的認識中有神,他們無法不如此,因為光照如此充滿地照在他們臉上;但他們不存留他在其中。他們對全能者說:離開我們吧(伯 21:14),他們所以不存留神在他們的認識中,因為這攔阻並反對他們的情慾;他們不喜歡如此。在他們的認識中——en epignosei。gnosis(認識)和epignosis(承認)之間有區別;異教徒認識神,卻不、也不願承認他。
[2.] 與他們在反對真理上的這種故意相稱,神任憑他們在最粗鄙的罪中故意而行,此處稱為邪僻的心——eis adokimon noun,一種完全失去分辨是非之感覺和判斷力的心,以致在屬靈的事上他們不能分辨左右手。看犯罪的路引向何處,至終將罪人投入何等的深淵;肉體的情慾正是直接趨向這深淵。滿眼是淫色,止不住犯罪,彼後 2:14。這邪僻的心是盲目、被烙過的良心,無知覺,弗 4:19。當判斷一旦與罪和好,那人就在地獄的郊外了。起先法老自己硬著心,後來神使法老的心剛硬。如此故意的剛硬正當地被審判性的剛硬所刑罰。——行那些不合理的事。這說法看來似乎指一件微小的惡,但此處它表示最粗鄙的重大罪惡;那些不合宜的事,違背了自然之光和律法本身。此處他附上一張黑名單,列出那些被任憑存邪僻之心的外邦人所犯的不合理之事。沒有一種邪惡如此重大、如此違背自然之光、萬國的法律和人類的一切利益,是邪僻的心不肯順從的。從那些時代的歷史——尤其是我們所擁有關於羅馬人當時盛行的性情和行為的記載(當那共和國的古老美德如此敗壞之時)——看來,此處所提的這些罪在當時當地乃是盛行的全國之罪。此處指定了不少於二十三種不同的罪和罪人,Ro 1:29-31。魔鬼的座位在此;他的名叫群,因為它們很多。是時候在他們中間傳福音了,因為世界需要改革。
第一,違背第一塊法版的罪:怨恨神的。這是魔鬼以其本來面目出現,罪顯為罪。豈能想像有理性的受造物竟會恨惡至善,依賴的受造物竟會厭惡他們存在的源頭?然而事實如此。每一項罪中都含有對神的恨惡;但有些罪人比別人更公開更公然地與他為敵,亞 11:8。狂傲的人和自誇的人與神自己較量,將那些必須擲在他寶座前的冠冕戴在自己頭上。
第二,違背第二塊法版的罪。這些特別被提及,因為在這些事上他們有更清楚的光照。這裏普遍有不義的指控。這被放在首位,因為每一項罪都是不義;它是扣留所當給的,歪曲所當正的;它特別指第二塊法版的罪——己所不欲反施於人。違背第五條誡命:違背父母的,和無親情的——astorgous,即父母對兒女無慈愛、殘忍。如此,當本分在一邊失落時,通常也在另一邊失落。悖逆的兒女正當地被不近人情的父母所刑罰;反之,不近人情的父母也以悖逆的兒女受罰。違背第六條誡命:邪惡(為惡而作惡)、惡毒、嫉妒、凶殺、爭競(eridos——紛爭)、毒恨、侮慢人的、不能和睦的、不憐憫人的;這一切都是對弟兄之恨惡的表現,這恨惡是心中的凶殺。違背第七條誡命:淫亂;他不提更多,因先前已論到別的污穢。違背第八條誡命:不義、貪婪。違背第九條誡命:詭詐、讒毀的、背後說人的、背約的——說謊和誹謗。此處有兩個一般性的未先提及的——捏造惡事的,和無知的;在作惡上有智慧,卻在行善上毫無認識。罪人越深思熟慮、越有策略地發明惡事,他的罪就越大:在罪上如此敏於發明,在對神的思想上卻毫無聰明(徹底的愚昧人)。此處足以使我們眾人在認識我們原初的敗壞上謙卑;因為每一顆本性中的心都含有這一切罪的種子和雛形。在結尾他提到罪的加重情節,Ro 1:32。1. 他們知道神判定;即,(1.) 他們知道律法。神的判定就是他的公義所要求的,他既是公義的,就判定為當行的。(2.) 他們知道刑罰;如此此處解釋:他們知道行這樣事的人是當死的——永遠的死;他們自己的良心不能不向他們暗示這一點,然而他們仍冒險去作。當罪是明知而犯時(雅 4:17),尤其是違背對神判定的認識而犯時,這是罪的大大加重情節。冒著劍尖衝上去是大膽的放肆。這表明心極為剛硬,極堅決地定意犯罪。2. 他們不但自己去行,還喜歡別人去行。某種眼前試探的猛烈可能將人驅使到犯這些罪——敗壞的食慾可能從中取樂;但為別人的罪而喜樂,是為罪本身的緣故愛罪:是為魔鬼的國度和利益結盟。Syneudokousi:他們不僅犯罪,更辯護和為之辯解,並鼓勵別人照樣行。我們自己的罪因我們對別人之罪的附和和喜樂而大大加重。
如今將這一切放在一起,然後說外邦世界既落在如此多的罪咎和敗壞之下,能否憑自己的任何行為在神面前稱義。
bản gốc tiếng anh
The Excellency of the Gospel (58 AD)
¹⁹ Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath showed it unto them.
²⁰ For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
²¹ Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
²² Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
²³ And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four footed beasts, and creeping things.
²⁴ Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
²⁵ Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
²⁶ For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
²⁷ And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
²⁸ And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
²⁹ Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
³⁰ Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
³¹ Without understanding, covenant-breakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
³² Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
In this last part of the chapter the apostle applies what he had said particularly to the Gentile world, in which we may observe,
I. The means and helps they had to come to the knowledge of God. Though they had not such a knowledge of his law as Jacob and Israel had (Ps 147:20), yet among them he left not himself without witness (Ac 14:17): For that which may be known, etc., Ro 1:19,20. Observe,
1. What discoveries they had: That which may be known of God is manifest, en autois—among them; that is, there were some even among them that had the knowledge of God, were convinced of the existence of one supreme Numen. The philosophy of Pythagoras, Plato, and the Stoics, discovered a great deal of the knowledge of God, as appears by abundance of testimonies. That which may be known, which implies that there is a great deal which may not be known. The being of God may be apprehended, but cannot be comprehended. We cannot by searching find him out, Job 11:7-9. Finite understandings cannot perfectly know an infinite being; but, blessed be God, there is that which may be known, enough to lead us to our chief end, the glorifying and enjoying of him; and these things revealed belong to us and to our children, while secret things are not to be pried into, De 29:29.
2. Whence they had these discoveries: God hath shown it to them. Those common natural notions which they had of God were imprinted upon their hearts by the God of nature himself, who is the Father of lights. This sense of a Deity, and a regard to that Deity, are so connate with the human nature that some think we are to distinguish men from brutes by these rather than by reason.
3. By what way and means these discoveries and notices which they had were confirmed and improved, namely, by the work of creation (Ro 1:20); For the invisible things of God, etc.
(1.) Observe what they knew: The invisible things of him, even his eternal power and Godhead. Though God be not the object of sense, yet he hath discovered and made known himself by those things that are sensible. The power and Godhead of God are invisible things, and yet are clearly seen in their products. He works in secret (Job 23:8,9, Ps 139:15, Ec 11:15), but manifests what he has wrought, and therein makes known his power and Godhead, and others of his attributes which natural light apprehends in the idea of a God. They could not come by natural light to the knowledge of the three persons in the Godhead (though some fancy they have found footsteps of this in Plato's writings), but they did come to the knowledge of the Godhead, at least so much knowledge as was sufficient to have kept them from idolatry. This was that truth which they held in unrighteousness.
(2.) How they knew it: By the things that are made, which could not make themselves, nor fall into such an exact order and harmony by any casual hits; and therefore must have been produced by some first cause or intelligent agent, which first cause could be no other than an eternal powerful God. See Ps 19:1, Isa 40:26, Ac 17:24. The workman is known by his work. The variety, multitude, order, beauty, harmony, different nature, and excellent contrivance, of the things that are made, the direction of them to certain ends, and the concurrence of all the parts to the good and beauty of the whole, do abundantly prove a Creator and his eternal power and Godhead. Thus did the light shine in the darkness. And this from the creation of the world. Understand it either, [1.] As the topic from which the knowledge of them is drawn. To evince this truth, we have recourse to the great work of creation. And some think this ktisis kosmou, this creature of the world (as it may be read), is to be understood of man, the ktisis kat exochen—the most remarkable creature of the lower world, called ktisis, Mk 16:15. The frame and structure of human bodies, and especially the most excellent powers, faculties, and capacities of human souls, do abundantly prove that there is a Creator, and that he is God. Or, [2.] As the date of the discovery. It as old as the creation of the world. In this sense apo ktiseos is most frequently used in scripture. These notices concerning God are not any modern discoveries, hit upon of late, but ancient truths, which were from the beginning. The way of the acknowledgement of God is a good old way; it was from the beginning. Truth got the start of error.
II. Their gross idolatry, notwithstanding these discoveries that God made to them of himself; described here, Ro 1:21-23,25. We shall the less wonder at the inefficacy of these natural discoveries to prevent the idolatry of the Gentiles if we remember how prone even the Jews, who had scripture light to guide them, were to idolatry; so miserably are the degenerate sons of men plunged in the mire of sense. Observe,
1. The inward cause of their idolatry, Ro 1:21,22. They are therefore without excuse, in that they did know God, and from what they knew might easily infer that it was their duty to worship him, and him only. Though some have greater light and means of knowledge than others, yet all have enough to leave them inexcusable. But the mischief of it was that, (1.) They glorified him not as God. Their affections towards him, and their awe and adoration of him, did not keep pace with their knowledge. To glorify him as God is to glorify him only; for there can be but one infinite: but they did not so glorify him, for they set up a multitude of other deities. To glorify him as God is to worship him with spiritual worship; but they made images of him. Not to glorify God as God is in effect not to glorify him at all; to respect him as a creature is not to glorify him, but to dishonour him. (2.) Neither were they thankful; not thankful for the favours in general they received from God (insensibleness of God's mercies is at the bottom of our sinful departures from him); not thankful in particular for the discoveries God was pleased to make of himself to them. Those that do not improve the means of knowledge and grace are justly reckoned unthankful for them. (3.) But they became vain in their imaginations, en tois dialogismois—in their reasonings, in their practical inferences. They had a great deal of knowledge of general truths (Ro 1:19), but no prudence to apply them to particular cases. Or, in their notions of God, and the creation of the world, and the origination of mankind, and the chief good; in these things, when they quitted the plain truth, they soon disputed themselves into a thousand vain and foolish fancies. The several opinions and hypotheses of the various sects of philosophers concerning these things were so many vain imaginations. When truth is forsaken, errors multiply in infinitum—infinitely. (4.) And their foolish heart was darkened. The foolishness and practical wickedness of the heart cloud and darken the intellectual powers and faculties. Nothing tends more to the blinding and perverting of the understanding than the corruption and depravedness of the will and affections. (5.) Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, Ro 1:22. This looks black upon the philosophers, the pretenders to wisdom and professors of it. Those that had the most luxuriant fancy, in framing to themselves the idea of a God, fell into the most gross and absurd conceits: and it was the just punishment of their pride and self-conceitedness. It has been observed that the most refined nations, that made the greatest show of wisdom, were the arrantest fools in religion. The barbarians adored the sun and moon, which of all others was the most specious idolatry; while the learned Egyptians worshipped an ox and an onion. The Grecians, who excelled them in wisdom, adored diseases and human passions. The Romans, the wisest of all, worshipped the furies. And at this day the poor Americans worship the thunder; while the ingenious Chinese adore the devil. Thus the world by wisdom knew not God, 1Co 1:21. As a profession of wisdom is an aggravation of folly, so a proud conceit of wisdom is the cause of a great deal of folly. Hence we read of few philosophers who were converted to Christianity; and Paul's preaching was no where so laughed at and ridiculed as among the learned Athenians, Ac 17:18-32. Phaskontes einai—conceiting themselves to be wise. The plain truth of the being of God would not content them; they thought themselves above that, and so fell into the greatest errors.
2. The outward acts of their idolatry, Ro 1:23-25. (1.) Making images of God (Ro 1:23), by which, as much as in them lay, they changed the glory of the incorruptible God. Compare Ps 106:20, Jer 2:11. They ascribed a deity to the most contemptible creatures, and by them represented God. It was the greatest honour God did to man that he made man in the image of God; but it is the greatest dishonour man has done to God that he has made God in the image of man. This was what God so strictly warned the Jews against, De 4:15, etc. This the apostle shows the folly of in his sermon at Athens, Ac 17:29. See Isa 40:18,44:10, etc. This is called (Ro 1:25) changing the truth of God into a lie. As it did dishonour his glory, so it did misrepresent his being. Idols are called lies, for they belie God, as if he had a body, whereas he is a Spirit, Jer 23:14, Ho 7:1. Teachers of lies, Hab 2:18. (2.) Giving divine honour to the creature: Worshipped and served the creature, para ton ktisavta—besides the Creator. They did own a supreme Numen in their profession, but they did in effect disown him by the worship they paid to the creature; for God will be all or none. Or, above the Creator, paying more devout respect to their inferior deities, stars, heroes, demons, thinking the supreme God inaccessible, or above their worship. The sin itself was their worshipping the creature at all; but this is mentioned as an aggravation of the sin, that they worshipped the creature more than the Creator. This was the general wickedness of the Gentile world, and became twisted in with their laws and government; in compliance with which even the wise men among them, who knew and owned a supreme God and were convinced of the nonsense and absurdity of their polytheism and idolatry, yet did as the rest of their neighbours did. Seneca, in his book De Superstitione, as it is quoted by Aug. de Civit. Dei, lib. 6, cap. 10 (for the book itself is lost), after he had largely shown the great folly and impiety of the vulgar religion, in divers instances of it, yet concludes, Quæ omnia sapiens servabit tanquam legibus jussa, non tanquam diis grata—All which a wise man will observe as established by law, not imagining them grateful to the gods. And afterwards, Omnem istam ignobilem deorum turbam, quam longo ævo longa superstitio congessit, sic adorabimus, ut meminerimus cultum ejus magis ad morem quam ad rem pertinere—All this ignoble rout of gods, which ancient superstition has amassed together by long prescription, we will so adore as to remember that the worship of them is rather a compliance with custom than material in itself. Upon which Augustine observes, Coleb at quod reprehendebat, agebat quod arguebat, quod culpabat adorabat—He worshipped that which he censured, he did that which he had proved wrong, and he adored what he found fault with. I mention this thus largely because methinks it doth fully explain that of the apostle here (Ro 1:18): Who hold the truth in unrighteousness. It is observable that upon the mention of the dishonour done to God by the idolatry of the Gentiles the apostle, in the midst of his discourse, expresses himself in an awful adoration of God: Who is blessed for ever. Amen. When we see or hear of any contempt cast upon God or his name, we should thence take occasion to think and speak highly and honourably of him. In this, as in other things, the worse others are, the better we should be. Blessed for ever, notwithstanding these dishonours done to his name: though there are those that do not glorify him, yet he is glorified, and will be glorified to eternity.
III. The judgments of God upon them for this idolatry; not many temporal judgments (the idolatrous nations were the conquering ruling nations of the world), but spiritual judgments, giving them up to the most brutish and unnatural lusts. Paredoken autous—He gave them up; it is thrice repeated here, Ro 1:24,26,28. Spiritual judgments are of all judgments the sorest, and to be most dreaded. Observe,
1. By whom they were given up. God gave them up, in a way of righteous judgment, as the just punishment of their idolatry—taking off the bridle of restraining grace—leaving them to themselves—letting them alone; for his grace is his own, he is debtor to no man, he may give or withhold his grace at pleasure. Whether this giving up be a positive act of God or only privative we leave to the schools to dispute: but this we are sure of that it is no new thing for God to give men up to their own hearts' lusts, to send them strong delusions, to let Satan loose upon them, nay, to lay stumbling-blocks before them. And yet God is not the author of sin, but herein infinitely just and holy; for, though the greatest wickedness follow upon this giving up, the fault of that is to be laid upon the sinner's wicked heart. If the patient be obstinate, and will not submit to the methods prescribed, but wilfully takes and does that which is prejudicial to him, the physician is not to be blamed if he give him up as in a desperate condition; and all the fatal symptoms that follow are not to be imputed to the physician, but to the disease itself and to the folly and wilfulness of the patient.
2. To what they were given up.
(1.) To uncleanness and vile affections, Ro 1:24,26,27. Those that would not entertain the more pure and refined notices of natural light, which tend to preserve the honour of God, justly forfeited those more gross and palpable sentiments which preserve the honour of human nature. Man being in honour, and refusing to understand the God that made him, thus becomes worse than the beasts that perish, Ps 49:20. Thus one, by the divine permission, becomes the punishment of another; but it is (as it said here) through the lusts of their own hearts—there all the fault is to be laid. Those who dishonoured God were given up to dishonour themselves. A man cannot be delivered up to a greater slavery than to be given up to his own lusts. Such are given over, like the Egyptians (Isa 19:4), into the hand of a cruel lord. The particular instances of their uncleanness and vile affections are their unnatural lusts, for which many of the heathen, even of those among them who passed for wisemen, as Solon and Zeno, were infamous, against the plainest and most obvious dictates of natural light. The crying iniquity of Sodom and Gomorrah, for which God rained hell from heaven upon them, became not only commonly practised, but avowed, in the pagan nations. Perhaps the apostle especially refers to the abominations that were committed in the worship of their idol-gods, in which the worst of uncleannesses were prescribed for the honour of their gods; dunghill service for dunghill gods: the unclean spirits delight in such ministrations. In the church of Rome, where the pagan idolatries are revived, images worshipped, and saints only substituted in the room of demons, we hear of these same abominations going barefaced, licensed by the pope (Fox's Acts and Monuments, vol. 1, p. 808), and not only commonly perpetrated, but justified and pleaded for by some of their cardinals: the same spiritual plagues for the same spiritual wickednesses. See what wickedness there is in the nature of man. How abominable and filthy is man! Lord, what is man? says David; what a vile creature is he when left to himself! How much are we beholden to the restraining grace of God for the preserving any thing of the honour and decency of the human nature! For, were it not for this, man, who was made but little lower than the angels, would make himself a great deal lower than the devils. This is said to be that recompence of their error which was meet. The Judge of all the earth does right, and observes a meetness between the sin and the punishment of it.
(2.) To a reprobate mind in these abominations, Ro 1:28.
[1.] They did not like to retain God in their knowledge. The blindness of their understandings was caused by the wilful aversion of their wills and affections. They did not retain God in their knowledge, because they did not like it. They would neither know nor do any thing but just what pleased themselves. It is just the temper of carnal hearts; the pleasing of themselves is their highest end. There are many that have God in their knowledge, they cannot help it, the light shines so fully in their faces; but they do not retain him there. They say to the Almighty, Depart (Job 21:14), and they therefore do not retain God in their knowledge because it thwarts and contradicts their lusts; they do not like it. In their knowledge—en epignosei. There is a difference between gnosis and epignosis, the knowledge and the acknowledgement of God; the pagans knew God, but did not, would not, acknowledge him.
[2.] Answerable to this wilfulness of theirs, in gainsaying the truth, God gave them over to a wilfulness in the grossest sins, here called a reprobate mind—eis adokimon noun, a mind void of all sense and judgment to discern things that differ, so that they could not distinguish their right hand from their left in spiritual things. See whither a course of sin leads, and into what a gulf it plunges the sinner at last; hither fleshly lusts have a direct tendency. Eyes full of adultery cannot cease from sin, 2Pe 2:14. This reprobate mind was a blind scared conscience, past feeling, Eph 4:19. When the judgment is once reconciled to sin, the man is in the suburbs of hell. At first Pharaoh hardened his heart, but afterwards God hardened Pharaoh's heart. Thus wilful hardness is justly punished with judicial hardness.—To do those things which are not convenient. This phrase may seem to bespeak a diminutive evil, but here it is expressive of the grossest enormities; things that are not agreeable to men, but contradict the very light and law of nature. And here he subjoins a black list of those unbecoming things which the Gentiles were guilty of, being delivered up to a reprobate mind. No wickedness so heinous, so contrary to the light of nature, to the law of nations, and to all the interests of mankind, but a reprobate mind will comply with it. By the histories of those times, especially the accounts we have of the then prevailing dispositions and practices of the Romans when the ancient virtue of that commonwealth was so degenerated, it appears that these sins here mentioned were then and there reigning national sins. No fewer than twenty-three several sorts of sins and sinners are here specified, Ro 1:29-31. Here the devil's seat is; his name is legion, for they are many. It was time to have the gospel preached among them, for the world had need of reformation.
First, Sins against the first table: Haters of God. Here is the devil in his own colours, sin appearing sin. Could it be imagined that rational creatures should hate the chief good, and depending creatures abhor the fountain of their being? And yet so it is. Every sin has in it a hatred of God; but some sinners are more open and avowed enemies to him than others, Zec 11:8. Proud men and boasters cope with God himself, and put those crowns upon their own heads which must be cast before his throne.
Secondly, Sins against the second table. These are especially mentioned, because in these things they had a clearer light. In general here is a charge of unrighteousness. This is put first, for every sin is unrighteousness; it is withholding that which is due, perverting that which is right; it is especially put for second-table sins, doing as we would not be done by. Against the fifth commandment: Disobedient to parents, and without natural affection—astorgous, that is parents unkind and cruel to their children. Thus, when duty fails on one side, it commonly fails on the other. Disobedient children are justly punished with unnatural parents; and, on the contrary, unnatural parents with disobedient children. Against the sixth commandment: Wickedness (doing mischief for mischief's sake), maliciousness, envy, murder, debate (eridos—contention), malignity, despiteful, implacable, unmerciful; all expressions of that hatred of our brother which is heart-murder. Against the seventh commandment: Fornication; he mentions no more, having spoken before of other uncleannesses. Against the eighth commandment: Unrighteousness, covetousness. Against the ninth commandment: Deceit, whisperers, back-biters, covenant-breakers, lying and slandering. Here are two generals not before mentioned—inventors of evil things, and without understanding; wise to do evil, and yet having no knowledge to do good. The more deliberate and politic sinners are in inventing evil things, the greater is their sin: so quick of invention in sin, and yet without understanding (stark fools) in the thoughts of God. Here is enough to humble us all, in the sense of our original corruption; for every heart by nature has in it the seed and spawn of all these sins. In the close he mentions the aggravations of the sins, Ro 1:32. 1. They knew the judgment of God; that is, (1.) They knew the law. The judgment of God is that which his justice requires, which, because he is just, he judgeth meet to be done. (2.) They knew the penalty; so it is explained here: They knew that those who commit such things were worthy of death, eternal death; their own consciences could not but suggest this to them, and yet they ventured upon it. It is a great aggravation of sin when it is committed against knowledge (Jam 4:17), especially against the knowledge of the judgment of God. It is daring presumption to run upon the sword's point. It argues the heart much hardened, and very resolutely set upon sin. 2. They not only do the same, but have pleasure in those that do them. The violence of some present temptation may hurry a man into the commission of such sins himself in which the vitiated appetite may take a pleasure; but to be pleased with other people's sins is to love sin for sin's sake: it is joining in a confederacy for the devil's kingdom and interest. Syneudokousi: they do not only commit sin, but they defend and justify it, and encourage others to do the like. Our own sins are much aggravated by our concurrence with, and complacency in, the sins of others.
Now lay all this together, and then say whether the Gentile world, lying under so much guilt and corruption, could be justified before God by any works of their own.
在本章中我們可以留意:一、全書信的序言和引言(徒1:1-16〔即羅1:1-16〕)。二、對外邦世界可悲境況的描述,由此開始了對因信稱義教義的證明——這教義是在徒1:17〔即羅1:17〕處提出的。第一部分按照當時書信的慣常格式,卻夾雜着極為優美而令人回味無窮的言辭。