1
1Co 3:1-23.
英文原文
1Co 3:1-23.
PAUL COULD NOT SPEAK TO THEM OF DEEP SPIRITUAL TRUTHS, AS THEY WERE CARNAL, CONTENDING FOR THEIR SEVERAL TEACHERS; THESE ARE NOTHING BUT WORKERS FOR GOD, TO WHOM THEY MUST GIVE ACCOUNT IN THE DAY OF FIERY JUDGMENT. THE HEARERS ARE GOD'S TEMPLE, WHICH THEY MUST NOT DEFILE BY CONTENTIONS FOR TEACHERS, WHO, AS WELL AS ALL THINGS, ARE THEIRS, BEING CHRIST'S.
1. And I--that is, as the natural (animal) man cannot receive, so I also could not speak unto you the deep things of God, as I would to the spiritual; but I was compelled to speak to you as I would to MEN OF FLESH. The oldest manuscripts read this for "carnal." The former (literally, "fleshy") implies men wholly of flesh, or natural. Carnal, or fleshly, implies not they were wholly natural or unregenerate
(1Co 2:14),
but that they had much of a carnal tendency; for example their divisions. Paul had to speak to them as he would to men wholly natural, inasmuch as they are still carnal
(1Co 3:3)
in many respects, notwithstanding their conversion
(1Co 1:4-9).
babes--contrasted with the perfect (fully matured) in Christ
(Col 1:28;
compare
Heb 5:13, 14).
This implies they were not men wholly of flesh, though carnal in tendencies. They had life in Christ, but it was weak. He blames them for being still in a degree (not altogether, compare
1Co 1:5, 7;
therefore he says as) babes in Christ, when by this time they ought to have "come unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ"
(Eph 4:13).
In
Ro 7:14,
also the oldest manuscripts read, "I am a man of flesh."
2
無標題
2.
(來5:12)。
奶——"基督道理的開端"這基本的"原則"。
英文原文
2.
(Heb 5:12).
milk--the elementary "principles of the doctrine of Christ."
3
無標題
3. 嫉妒——即嫉妒、爭競。此處指他們的感受,"紛爭"指他們的言語,"分黨"指他們的行動"〔本格爾〕。這是一個遞進的層次:嫉妒產生紛爭*,紛爭產生分黨(結黨之事)〔格羅提烏〕。他的語氣隨著論述的推進而更加嚴厲;在
林前1:11
他只說"紛爭",如今卻加多了字眼(參看
林前4:6
所用比
林前3:21
更重的詞)。
屬肉體——因"紛爭"是"情慾的事"
(加5:20)。
"肉體"包括一切不以神的榮耀和鄰舍的益處為目標、而以满足自己為目標的情感。
照世人——即如未重生的人(參看
太16:23)。
"隨從肉體,不隨從"神的"靈",這與你們已蒙聖靈重生之身分不符
(羅8:4; 加5:25, 26)。
英文原文
3. envying--jealousy, rivalry. As this refers to their feelings, "strife" refers to their words, and "divisions" to their actions [BENGEL]. There is a gradation, or ascending climax: envying had produced strife, and strife divisions (factious parties) [GROTIUS]. His language becomes severer now as He proceeds; in
1Co 1:11
he had only said "contentions," he now multiplies the words (compare the stronger term,
1Co 4:6,
than in
1Co 3:21).
carnal--For "strife" is a "work of the flesh"
(Ga 5:20).
The "flesh" includes all feelings that aim not at the glory of God, and the good of our neighbor, but at gratifying self.
walk as men--as unregenerate men (compare
Mt 16:23).
"After the flesh, not after the Spirit" of God, as becomes you as regenerate by the Spirit
(Ro 8:4; Ga 5:25, 26).
4
無標題
4.
(林前1:12)。
你們不是屬肉體——最古抄本讀作"你們不是屬乎肉體的嗎"?即"照世人而行",未重生
(林前3:3)。
英文原文
4.
(1Co 1:12).
are ye not carnal--The oldest manuscripts read, "Are ye not men?" that is, "walking as men" unregenerate
(1Co 3:3).
5
無標題
5. 亞波羅算甚麼——既然你們各人如此為自己所喜愛的教師力爭,"保羅是甚麼(有何內在的能力與尊嚴)?"若如此偉大的使徒對自己尚且這樣論到,何況普通的傳道人,更當以謙卑而非自求為宜!
保羅……亞波羅——最古抄本次序相反:"亞波羅"等"保羅"。他出於謙卑,把亞波羅放在自己前面。
執事等——最古抄本沒有"但"字。"亞波羅……保羅是甚麼?(不過是)執事(一個在此恰當使用的謙卑字眼,即僕人),你們藉著他們(不是"在他們裡面";是藉著他們的服事')信了。"
主所賜給各人的——即賜給各個聽者,因為賜生命的是神
(林前3:6)。
英文原文
5. Who then--Seeing then that ye severally strive so for your favorite teachers, "Who is (of what intrinsic power and dignity) Paul?" If so great an apostle reasons so of himself, how much more does humility, rather than self-seeking, become ordinary ministers!
Paul . . . Apollos--The oldest manuscripts read in the reverse order, "Apollos," &c. Paul." He puts Apollos before himself in humility.
but ministers, &c.--The oldest manuscripts have no "but." "Who is Apollos . . . Paul? (mere) ministers (a lowly word appropriate here, servants), by whom (not "in whom"; by whose ministrations) ye believed."
as . . . Lord gave to every man--that is, to the several hearers, for it was GOD that "gave the increase"
(1Co 3:6).
6
無標題
6. 我……栽種了,亞波羅澆灌了——
(徒18:1;19:1)。
亞波羅應自己的請求
(徒18:27)
被弟兄們打發到哥林多,在那裡接續保羅所開始的工作。
叫他生長——即增長
(林前3:10; 徒18:27)。
"因恩相信。"傳道人算不得甚麼,神是一切之中的全部;然而神藉器作工,並應許在忠心使用方法時賜下聖靈。這就是聖靈的時代,而我們的事奉是聖靈的職事。
英文原文
6. I . . . planted, Apollos watered--
(Ac 18:1; 19:1).
Apollos at his own desire
(Ac 18:27)
was sent by the brethren to Corinth, and there followed up the work which Paul had begun.
God gave the increase--that is, the growth
(1Co 3:10; Ac 18:27).
"Believed through grace." Though ministers are nothing, and God all in all, yet God works by instruments, and promises the Holy Spirit in the faithful use of means. This is the dispensation of the Spirit, and ours is the ministry of the Spirit.
7
無標題
7. 可見——即神是一切之中的全部。"神"在希臘文中強烈地居於最後:"那叫他生長的(就是)神"。以下是一段括號
林前3:8-21,
那裡"不可拿人誇口"與此處的"神"形成對照。
英文原文
7. neither is he that . . . anything . . . but God--namely, is all in all. "God" is emphatically last in the Greek, "He that giveth the increase (namely), GOD." Here follows a parenthesis,
1Co 3:8-21,
where "Let no man glory in men" stands in antithetic contrast to "God" here.
8
無標題
8. 一——在他們的目標上本質上是一的,從事同一的職事;因此不當被你們拿來作結黨的藉口。
各人——宜作"但各人"。雖然在他們的服事或職事上本質上是"一",然而每位傳道人在"自己的"工作上分別負責,並要"按自己的"勞碌,得自己的"賞賜("自己的"強調重複)。這賞賜*是超越個人得救之上的
(林前3:14, 15; 約貳8)。
他得賞賜不是按他的成功或所作工的數量,而是"按自己的勞碌"。將對他說:"好,你這良善又(不是成功的,而是)忠心的僕人,可以進來享受你主人的快樂"
(太25:23)。
英文原文
8. one--essentially in their aim they are one, engaged in one and the same ministry; therefore they ought not to be made by you the occasion of forming separate parties.
and every man--rather "but every man." Though in their service or ministry, they are essentially "one," yet every minister is separately responsible in "his own" work, and "shall receive his own (emphatically repeated) reward, according to his own labor." The reward is something over and above personal salvation
(1Co 3:14, 15; 2Jo 8).
He shall be rewarded according to, not his success or the amount of work done, but "according to his own labor." It shall be said to him, "Well done, thou good and (not successful, but) faithful servant, enter thou into the joy of thy Lord"
(Mt 25:23).
9
無標題
9. 按希臘文的詞序,以及"神"一詞三次重複的強調,當譯作:"因為(證明"各人要照自己的勞苦得自己的賞賜",即從神而得)我們是神的同工(與祂同工,卻在祂之下並屬於祂為祂的僕人
林後5:20;6:1;
參看
徒15:4;
見
帖前3:2
的解釋),你們是神的田地(或耕地),你們是神的房屋"〔阿爾福德〕。"房屋"在此引入一個新的比喻,因為它比農作的比喻更適合表明他即將討論的不同教導及其結果。"建立"或"建造"基督的教會,也有類似的用法
(弗2:21, 22;4:29)。
英文原文
9. Translate, as the Greek collocation of words, and the emphasis on "God" thrice repeated, requires, "For (in proof that "each shall receive reward according to his own labor," namely, from God) it is of God that we are the fellow workers (laboring with, but under, and belonging to Him as His servants,
2Co 5:20; 6:1;
compare
Ac 15:4;
see on
1Th 3:2)
of God that ye are the field (or tillage), of God that ye are the building" [ALFORD]. "Building" is a new image introduced here, as suited better than that of husbandry, to set forth the different kinds of teaching and their results, which he is now about to discuss. "To edify" or "build up" the Church of Christ is similarly used
(Eph 2:21, 22; 4:29).
10
無標題
10. 神……賜給我的恩——保羅將此置於前頭,為防備下文自稱"聰明的工頭"時顯得缺乏謙卑〔屈梭多模〕。這"恩"是賜給他與所有基督徒共有的
(林前3:5),
只是按神所派定給他的工作而分配〔阿爾福德〕。
聰明——即有技巧。他的技巧顯於他立好了根基。無技巧的建造者則不立根基
(路6:49)。
基督是根基
(林前3:11)。
別人——即在我以後來的任何人。他不提亞波羅的名;因為他是概括地論到一切後繼者,無論是誰。他的警告"各人(每個教師)應當怎樣",是針對其他後繼者,而不是亞波羅;亞波羅無疑不像他們那樣用草木禾秸等建造在根基上(參看
林前4:15)。
"我已盡了我的本分,讓跟隨我的人留心(希臘文如此)他們的本分"〔本格爾〕。
怎樣——用甚麼材料〔阿爾福德〕。多麼有智慧,並且按建造者的方式
(彼前4:11)。
在上面建造——此處在保羅
(林前2:2)
所立的基督這"根基"上建造的建築物或上層結構,不像
弗2:20, 21
那樣是指由信徒——"活石"
(彼前2:5)
——所構成的基督教會,而是指繼保羅之後的教師在其最初的教導之上所加增的教義與實踐的教訓;不是說他們教導錯謬,而是他們的教訓是精微思辨的推理,而非堅實簡明的真理。
英文原文
10. grace . . . given unto me--Paul puts this first, to guard against seeming to want humility, in pronouncing himself "a WISE master builder," in the clause following [CHRYSOSTOM]. The "grace" is that "given" to him in common with all Christians
(1Co 3:5),
only proportioned to the work which God had for him to do [ALFORD].
wise--that is, skilful. His skill is shown in his laying a foundation. The unskilful builder lays none
(Lu 6:49).
Christ is the foundation
(1Co 3:11).
another--who ever comes after me. He does not name Apollos; for he speaks generally of all successors, whoever they be. His warning, "Let every man (every teacher) take heed how," &c., refers to other successors rather than Apollos, who doubtless did not, as they, build wood, hay, &c., on the foundation (compare
1Co 4:15).
"I have done my part, let them who follow me see (so the Greek for 'take heed') to theirs" [BENGEL].
how--with what material [ALFORD]. How far wisely, and in builder-like style
(1Pe 4:11).
buildeth thereupon--Here the building or superstructure raised on Christ the "foundation," laid by Paul
(1Co 2:2)
is not, as in
Eph 2:20, 21,
the Christian Church made up of believers, the "lively stones"
(1Pe 2:5),
but the doctrinal and practical teaching which the teachers who succeeded Paul, superadded to his first teaching; not that they taught what was false, but their teaching was subtle and speculative reasoning, rather than solid and simple truth.
11
無標題
11.
(賽28:16; 徒4:12; 弗2:20)。
因為——我的警告("謹慎怎樣建造"等
林前3:10)
是關於上層結構("在上面建造"),不是關於根基:"因為根基(已經由神)立好了,那就是耶穌基督,此外沒有人能立別的根基"——指祂的位格,不僅是關乎祂的抽象教義,雖然後者也包括在內;耶穌,即神-救主;基督,即彌賽亞或受膏者。
能——人不能立別的,因為神所認可的惟一根基已經立好了。
英文原文
11.
(Isa 28:16; Ac 4:12; Eph 2:20).
For--my warning ("take heed," &c.
1Co 3:10)
is as to the superstructure ("buildeth thereupon"), not as to the foundation: "For other foundation can no man lay, than that which has (already) been laid (by God) Jesus Christ," the person, not the mere abstract doctrine about Him, though the latter also is included; Jesus, GOD-SAVIOUR; Christ, MESSIAH or ANOINTED.
can--A man can not lay any other, since the only one recognized by God has been already laid.
12
無標題
12. 若——宜作"但"。這比喻是一座建造在堅固根基上的建築物,部分由耐久而貴重的、部分由易朽壞的材料構成。"金、銀、寶石"都能經火
(啟21:18, 19),
代表能通過審判之火試驗的教訓;"草木禾秸"則是不能通過的;不是正面的異端,因為那會毀壞根基,而是混雜了人的哲學與猶太教、好奇而非有用的教訓。除了教訓之外,這上層結構也代表藉著這些教訓而黏合於教會的人,他們歸信的真實性(雖然是藉著教師為媒介)將在最後一日受試驗。哪裡有最微小的真實信心之金粒,就永不會失喪
(彼前1:7;
參看
林前4:12)。
反之,最輕的稻草也助長火勢〔本格爾〕
(太5:19)。
英文原文
12. Now--rather, "But." The image is that of a building on a solid foundation, and partly composed of durable and precious, partly of perishable, materials. The "gold, silver, precious stones," which all can withstand fire
(Re 21:18, 19),
are teachings that will stand the fiery test of judgment; "wood, hay, stubble," are those which cannot stand it; not positive heresy, for that would destroy the foundation, but teaching mixed up with human philosophy and Judaism, curious rather than useful. Besides the teachings, the superstructure represents also the persons cemented to the Church by them, the reality of whose conversion, through the teachers' instrumentality, will be tested at the last day. Where there is the least grain of real gold of faith, it shall never be lost
(1Pe 1:7;
compare
1Co 4:12).
On the other hand, the lightest straw feeds the fire [BENGEL]
(Mt 5:19).
13
無標題
13. 各人的工程——即每位教師在根基上建造的上層結構。
那日子——指主的日子
(林前1:8; 來10:25; 帖前5:4)。
冠詞帶強調,"那日子",即日子中的日子,久所期盼的那日子。
表明——古英文作"使之清楚"
(林前4:4)。
有火發現——即"各人的工程"。宜作"*祂"——即那日子屬於祂的主
(帖後1:7, 8)。
直譯作"正被顯明(希臘文的現在式暗示這事的確實性與臨近
啟22:10, 20)
在火中"
(瑪3:3;4:1)。
這火(大概此處是喻意,正如金、禾秸等一樣)不是煉獄(如羅馬教會所教導,即潔淨性兼刑罰性的),而是試驗性的,不局限於那些死於"可恕之罪"的人;不是設想中介於那些立即進天堂的人與死於死罪而下地獄者之間的中間階級,而是普世性的,同樣試驗敬虔的人與不敬虔的人
(林後5:10;
參看
可9:49)。
這火直到末日才有,而設想的煉獄之火則從死時開始。保羅的火是要試驗工程,煉獄的火是要試驗人的人。保羅的火使受苦者"受虧損";羅馬的煉獄卻帶來極大的益處,即最終為那些被煉淨的人帶來天堂——若這是真的的話。因此,這段被羅馬教會用來支持煉獄的經文,其實是完全反對煉獄的。"不是這個教義產生了為死人禱告;而是為死人禱告的實行(因生者出於情感但錯誤的關懷而潛入)產生了這個教義"〔惠特利〕。
英文原文
13. Every man's work--each teacher's superstructure on the foundation.
the day--of the Lord
(1Co 1:8; Heb 10:25; 1Th 5:4).
The article is emphatic, "The day," that is, the great day of days, the long expected day.
declare it--old English for "make it clear"
(1Co 4:4).
it shall be revealed by fire--it, that is, "every man's work." Rather, "He," the Lord, whose day it is
(2Th 1:7, 8).
Translate literally, "is being revealed (the present in the Greek implies the certainty and nearness of the event,
Re 22:10, 20)
in fire"
(Mal 3:3; 4:1).
The fire (probably figurative here, as the gold, hay, &c.) is not purgatory (as Rome teaches, that is, purificatory and punitive), but probatory, not restricted to those dying in "venial sin"; the supposed intermediate class between those entering heaven at once, and those dying in mortal sin who go to hell, but universal, testing the godly and ungodly alike
(2Co 5:10;
compare
Mr 9:49).
This fire is not till the last day, the supposed fire of purgatory begins at death. The fire of Paul is to try the works, the fire of purgatory the persons, of men. Paul's fire causes "loss" to the sufferers; Rome's purgatory, great gain, namely, heaven at last to those purged by it, if only it were true. Thus this passage, quoted by Rome for, is altogether against, purgatory. "It was not this doctrine that gave rise to prayers for the dead; but the practice of praying for the dead [which crept in from the affectionate but mistaken solicitude of survivors] gave rise to the doctrine" [WHATELY].
14
無標題
14. 存得住——存得住試驗的火
(太3:11, 12)。
他在這根基上所建造的——即他在根基上所建造的。
賞賜——即作為建造者(即教師)的工價。他因忠心教導而建立在基督這根基上的歸信者,要成為他的"喜樂冠冕"
(林後1:14; 腓2:16; 帖前2:19)。
英文原文
14. abide--abide the testing fire
(Mt 3:11, 12).
which he hath built thereupon--which he built on the foundation.
reward--wages, as a builder, that is, teacher. His converts built on Christ the foundation, through his faithful teaching, shall be his "crown of rejoicing"
(2Co 1:14; Php 2:16; 1Th 2:19).
15
無標題
15. 若被燒了——若任何教師的工程由會被火毀壞的材料構成〔阿爾福德〕。
受虧損——即失去那特別的"賞賜";不是失去救恩(救恩完全是白白的恩賜,不是"賞賜"或工價),因為他仍然在根基上
(林前3:12; 約貳6)。
卻要得救,雖然像從火裡經過一樣——宜作"像從火中經過一樣"
(亞3:2; 摩4:11; 猶23)。
"得救,卻非經過火不可"
(羅2:27)
〔本格爾〕。如同一個建造者,他的建築物(不是根基)被火焚毀,他本人逃脫了,卻損失了他的工程〔阿爾福德〕;如同遇船難的商人,雖然失去貨物,卻得救了,雖然必須穿過波浪〔本格爾〕;
瑪3:1, 2;4:1
提供瞭解釋這比喻的鑰匙。"主忽然進入祂的殿",在熾烈的"火"中,建築物中一切不能經火的都將被燒毀;建造者們將帶著個人的救恩逃脫,卻失去他們的工程,是從大火中穿過〔阿爾福德〕。再者,次要教義與基要教義之間的區分也得到承認(若我們將上層結構視為在基本要素之上加增的教義);人可能在次要教義上錯誤,卻仍得救,但在基要教義上卻非如此(參看
腓3:15)。
英文原文
15. If . . . be burnt--if any teacher's work consist of such materials as the fire will destroy [ALFORD].
suffer loss--that is, forfeit the special "reward"; not that he shall lose salvation (which is altogether a free gift, not a "reward" or wages), for he remains still on the foundation
(1Co 3:12; 2Jo 6).
saved; yet so as by fire--rather, "so as through fire"
(Zec 3:2; Am 4:11; Jude 23).
"Saved, yet not without fire"
(Ro 2:27)
[BENGEL]. As a builder whose building, not the foundation, is consumed by fire, escapes, but with the loss of his work [ALFORD]; as the shipwrecked merchant, though he has lost his merchandise, is saved, though having to pass through the waves [BENGEL];
Mal 3:1, 2; 4:1,
give the key to explain the imagery. The "Lord suddenly coming to His temple" in flaming "fire," all the parts of the building which will not stand that fire will be consumed; the builders will escape with personal salvation, but with the loss of their work, through the midst of the conflagration [ALFORD]. Again, a distinction is recognized between minor and fundamental doctrines (if we regard the superstructure as representing the doctrines superadded to the elementary essentials); a man may err as to the former, and yet be saved, but not so as to the latter (compare
Php 3:15).
16
無標題
16. 豈不知——我稱你們為「神的房屋」,對你們並非新事;你們知道,也當記得,你們是最尊貴的房屋——「神的殿」。
你們——所有基督徒共同構成一個宏大的殿。這裏不是說「你們是眾殿」,而是「你們(集合體)是那殿」,個別地是「活石」(
彼前 2:5)。
神……聖靈——神的內住與聖靈的內住是一件事;因此聖靈就是神。新約不承認基督教會中有任何字面上的「殿」。唯一的殿乃是屬靈的殿——聖靈居住其中的全體敬拜信徒(
林前 6:19; 約 4:23, 24)。
會堂,而非聖殿,才是基督教聚會場所的模型。聖殿是獻祭之所,而非禱告之所。聖殿中的禱告是無聲而個人的(
路 1:10; 18:10-13),
不是共同的、公開的,也沒有如會堂中那樣的誦讀聖經。殿,正如其名(源自希臘文字根「居住」),是神在地上的居所,是祂唯獨立名之處。會堂(如其名所指——聚集)是人聚集的場所。神如今在地上也有祂的殿,不是木石之殿,而是信徒的會眾——「靈宮」上的「活石」。信徒在其中都是屬靈的祭司。我們的大祭司耶穌基督才有唯一字面上的祭司職任(
瑪 1:11; 太 18:20; 彼前 2:5)
〔維特林加(VITRINGA)〕。
英文原文
16. Know ye not--It is no new thing I tell you, in calling you "God's building"; ye know and ought to remember, ye are the noblest kind of building, "the temple of God."
ye--all Christians form together one vast temple. The expression is not, "ye are temples," but "ye are the temple" collectively, and "lively stones"
(1Pe 2:5)
individually.
God . . . Spirit--God's indwelling, and that of the Holy Spirit, are one; therefore the Holy Spirit is God. No literal "temple" is recognized by the New Testament in the Christian Church. The only one is the spiritual temple, the whole body of believing worshippers in which the Holy Spirit dwells
(1Co 6:19; Joh 4:23, 24).
The synagogue, not the temple, was the model of the Christian house of worship. The temple was the house of sacrifice, rather than of prayer. Prayers in the temple were silent and individual
(Lu 1:10; 18:10-13),
not joint and public, nor with reading of Scripture, as in the synagogue. The temple, as the name means (from a Greek root "to dwell"), was the earthly dwelling-place of God, where alone He put His name. The synagogue (as the name means an assembly) was the place for assembling men. God now too has His earthly temple, not one of wood and stone, but the congregation of believers, the "living stones" on the "spiritual house." Believers are all spiritual priests in it. Jesus Christ, our High Priest, has the only literal priesthood
(Mal 1:11; Mt 18:20; 1Pe 2:5)
[VITRINGA].
17
無標題
17. 若有人……毀壞……毀壞——更當如希臘文所示,兩處動詞相同,作「毀壞……毀壞」。神以公義的報應,同類相報。毀壞者自己必被毀壞。正如毀壞物質的殿以今生的死亡為刑罰(
利 16:2; 但 5:2, 3, 30),
照樣毀壞屬靈的殿——教會——以永死為刑罰。此處的毀壞者(
林前 3:16, 17)
與那些愚昧或拙劣的建造者(
林前 3:12, 15)
有別;後者持守「根基」(
林前 3:11),
因此雖然失去了其上層結構的工程與特別的賞賜,自己卻仍得救;毀壞者則相反,以虛假的教訓攻擊根基,從而傾覆了殿本身,因此必被毀壞。(參
林前 3:10
的註釋)〔埃斯提烏(ESTIUS)與尼安德(NEANDER)〕。我認為保羅在此從教師轉到教會的所有成員——他們因信仰宣告而「作祭司歸於神」(
出 19:6; 彼前 2:9; 啟 1:6)。
正如亞倫祭司若褻瀆舊殿便註定要死(
出 28:43),
照樣任何基督徒若褻瀆屬靈之殿的聖潔,必永遠滅亡(
來 12:14; 10:26, 31)。
聖——不可侵犯的(
哈 2:20)。
這殿就是你們——更當作「你們就是那(即聖的)」〔阿福德(ALFORD)〕,因此你們任何人缺乏聖潔(或如埃斯提烏〔ESTIUS〕所說:「在教導上篡改根基」),就是褻瀆了殿,斷不能免於懲罰。格羅提烏(GROTIUS)支持《英文欽定本》的譯法。
英文原文
17. If any . . . defile . . . destroy--rather as the Greek verb is the same in both cases, "destroy . . . destroy." God repays in kind by a righteous retaliation. The destroyer shall himself be destroyed. As temporal death was the penalty of marring the material temple
(Le 16:2; Da 5:2, 3, 30),
so eternal death is the penalty of marring the spiritual temple--the Church. The destroyers here
(1Co 3:16, 17),
are distinct from the unwise or unskilful builders
(1Co 3:12, 15);
the latter held fast the "foundation"
(1Co 3:11),
and, therefore, though they lose their work of superstructure and the special reward, yet they are themselves saved; the destroyers, on the contrary, assailed with false teaching the foundation, and so subvert the temple itself, and shall therefore be destroyed. (See on
1Co 3:10),
[ESTIUS and NEANDER]. I think Paul passes here from the teachers to all the members of the Church, who, by profession, are "priests unto God"
(Ex 19:6; 1Pe 2:9; Re 1:6).
As the Aaronic priests were doomed to die if they violated the old temple
(Ex 28:43),
so any Christian who violates the sanctity of the spiritual temple, shall perish eternally
(Heb 12:14; 10:26, 31).
holy--inviolable
(Hab 2:20).
which temple ye are--rather, "the which (that is, holy) are ye" [ALFORD], and, therefore, want of holiness on the part of any of you (or, as ESTIUS, "to tamper with the foundation in teaching you") is a violation of the temple, which cannot be let to pass with impunity. GROTIUS supports English Version.
18
無標題
18. 看來——即是,並被他自己與他人視為。
這世上的——即在僅僅屬世智慧上有智慧的(
林前 1:20)。
要變作愚拙人——以接受那不屬世之單純的福音,從而在世人眼中成為愚拙人〔阿福德(ALFORD)〕。
要他不再自以為有智慧,而要從神那裏尋求真正的智慧,將自己的悟性擄來順服信心的順服〔埃斯提烏(ESTIUS)〕。
英文原文
18. seemeth--that is, is, and is regarded by himself and others.
wise in this world--wise in mere worldly wisdom
(1Co 1:20).
let him become a fool--by receiving the Gospel in its unworldly simplicity, and so becoming a fool in the world's sight [ALFORD]. Let him no longer think himself wise, but seek the true wisdom from God, bringing his understanding into captivity to the obedience of faith [ESTIUS].
19
無標題
19. 在神面前——即在神的判斷中。
如經上記著說——見於
伯 5:13。
此處引用聖經所用的格式,確立了約伯記的正典地位。
主叫……有智慧的,中了自己的詭計——證明這世界的智慧是「愚拙」的,因為神使之成為捕捉那些自以為有智慧之人的網羅。按字面意義為「那叫……的」,整句並未全引,僅引用了適合保羅目的的部分。
英文原文
19. with God--in the judgment of God.
it is written--in
Job 5:13.
The formula of quoting SCRIPTURE used here, establishes the canonicity of Job.
He taketh . . . wise in . . . own craftiness--proving the "foolishness" of the world's wisdom, since it is made by God the very snare to catch those who think themselves so wise. Literally, "He who taketh . . . the whole of the sentence not being quoted, but only the part which suited Paul's purpose.
20
無標題
20. 引自
詩 94:11。
那裏是「人」;此處是「智慧人」。保羅受默示指出聖靈在詩篇中所稱為「虛妄」的「意念」(或更恰當地說「議論」——這符合希臘文與上下文的意義)是哪一類人,即「驕傲人」(
詩 94:2)
與屬世的有智慧者——神在
詩 94:8
中稱之為「愚頑人」,儘管他們在謀求私利上自誇其智慧(
詩 94:4)。
英文原文
20. Quotation from
Ps 94:11.
There it is of men; here it is "of the wise." Paul by inspiration states the class of men whose "thoughts" (or rather, "reasonings," as suits the Greek and the sense of the context) the Spirit designated in the Psalm, "vanity," namely, the "proud"
(Ps 94:2)
and worldly-wise, whom God in
Ps 94:8
calls "fools," though they "boast themselves" of their wisdom in pushing their interests
(Ps 94:4).
21
無標題
21. 所以無論誰都不可拿人誇口——從
林前 3:4
恢復主題;比較
林前 1:12, 31,
那裏指出了真正誇口的對象:「誇口的,當指著主誇口」。還有
林前 4:6,
「免得你們因一個人而自高自大,看不起另一個」。
因為萬有——不僅所有人。你們拿人誇口,便是貶低了自己作為萬有繼承者的高貴身分。所有人(包括你們的教師)都屬基督,因此也屬你們——因你們與祂聯合;祂使他們和萬有都互相效力,叫你們得益處(
羅 8:28)。
你們不是為他們而存在,而是他們為你們而存在(
林後 4:5, 15)。
他們屬你們,不是你們屬他們。
英文原文
21. let no man glory in men--resuming the subject from
1Co 3:4;
compare
1Co 1:12, 31,
where the true object of glorying is stated: "He that glorieth, let him glory in THE LORD." Also
1Co 4:6,
"That no one of you be puffed up for one against another."
For all things--not only all men. For you to glory thus in men, is lowering yourselves from your high position as heirs of all things. All men (including your teachers) belong to Christ, and therefore to you, by your union with Him; He makes them and all things work together for your good
(Ro 8:28).
Ye are not for the sake of them, but they for the sake of you
(2Co 4:5, 15).
They belong to you, not you to them.
22
無標題
22. 列舉「萬有」中的一些。他首先提到他們所誇口的教師(
林前 1:12)。
他在「磯法」之後省略了或基督(哥林多有些人自稱唯獨屬祂,
林前 1:12);
取而代之,他說「你們是屬基督的」(
林前 3:23)。
世界……生命……死亡……現在的事……將來的事——這些不僅不能「叫你們與神的愛隔絕,這愛是在基督裏的」(
羅 8:38, 39),
而且「全是你們的」,即是為你們(
羅 8:28),
屬於你們——正如屬於你們的元首基督(
來 1:2)。
現在的事——即「實際臨在之事」〔阿福德(ALFORD)〕。
英文原文
22. Enumeration of some of the "all things." The teachers, in whom they gloried, he puts first
(1Co 1:12).
He omits after "Cephas" or Christ (to whom exclusively some at Corinth,
1Co 1:12,
professed to belong); but, instead, substitutes "ye are Christ's"
(1Co 3:23).
world . . . life . . . death . . . things present . . . things to come--Not only shall they not "separate you from the love of God in Christ"
(Ro 8:38, 39),
but they "all are yours," that is, are for you
(Ro 8:28),
and belong to you, as they belong to Christ your Head
(Heb 1:2).
things present--"things actually present" [ALFORD].
23
無標題
23. 你們是屬基督的——不是屬保羅、屬亞波羅、或屬磯法的(
林前 11:3; 太 23:8-10)。
「也不要受師尊的稱呼;因為只有一位是你們的師尊,就是基督」(
羅 14:8)。
不僅你們中間的某一派,而是你們全體都是屬基督的(
林前 1:12)。
基督又是屬神的——
(林前 11:3)。
神是一切的終極目的,甚至也是基督——祂同等的兒子——的終極目的(
林前 15:28; 腓 2:6-11)。
英文原文
23. ye are Christ's--not Paul's, or Apollos,' or Cephas'
(1Co 11:3; Mt 23:8-10).
"Neither be ye called masters; for one is your Master, even Christ"
(Ro 14:8).
Not merely a particular section of you, but ye all are Christ's
(1Co 1:12).
Christ is God's--
(1Co 11:3).
God is the ultimate end of all, even of Christ, His co-equal Son
(1Co 15:28; Php 2:6-11).
林前3:1-23。
保羅不能向他們講深的屬靈真理,因他們屬肉體,為各自的教師紛爭;這些不過是神的工作者,必須在火的審判之日向祂交帳。聽者本是神的殿,不可因教師而結黨玷污——教師與萬有既屬基督,也就屬他們。
1. 弟兄們,我從前——即如屬血氣的人不能領受,照樣我也不能把神深奧的事如對屬靈的人那樣對你們說;我只得如對屬肉體的人那樣對你們說。最古抄本如此讀,代替"屬肉體的"。前者(直譯"肉體的")指完全屬肉體、屬血氣的人。"屬肉體的"或"屬肉體"暗示他們並非完全屬血氣或未重生
(林前2:14),
而是有許多屬肉體的傾向;例如他們的紛爭。保羅不得不如對完全屬血氣的人那樣對他們說話,因為他們在許多方面仍屬肉體
(林前3:3),
儘管他們已歸信
(林前1:4-9)。
嬰孩——與完全(完全成熟的)在基督裡的人相對
(西1:28;
參看來5:13, 14)。
這暗示他們並非完全屬肉體的人,雖然在傾向上屬肉體。他們在基督裡有生命,但很弱。他責備他們在某一程度上(不是完全,參看
林前1:5, 7;
因此他說如同)仍是基督裡的嬰孩,而此時他們本應"長大成人,滿有基督長成的身量"
(弗4:13)。
在
羅7:14
中,最古抄本也讀作"我是屬肉體的人"。