Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible · Romans 第8章

註釋閱讀最佳化

分章註釋

Romans 第 8 章

1

Ro 8:1-39.

開啟正文

Ro 8:1-39.

全論證之總結——在基督耶穌裡之人那榮耀的完全。

在這超越的一章中,前文論證的各條水流匯合為一,成為"一道生命水的河,明亮如水晶,從神和羔羊的寶座流出來",直到似乎消失於有福永恒的海洋之中。

第一:信徒的成聖

(Ro 8:1-13)。

1. 如今,那些等——指緊接的上文[奥尔肖森OLSHAUSEN、腓力比PHILIPPI、迈尔MEYER、阿尔福特ALFORD等]。第七章末了的主題仍在討論之中。

Ro 8:1-4

的宗旨,是要表明"罪和死的律"如何被奪去使信徒再度被轄制的力量,以及神聖潔的律法如何在他們裡面得著活潑順服的敬意[加爾文CALVIN、弗雷澤FRASER、腓力比PHILIPPI、邁爾MEYER、阿爾福特ALFORD等]。

在基督耶穌裡的就不定罪了——基督"不知罪",卻在律法一切效果上"替我們成為罪";照樣我們這信他的人,在律法一切效果上也"在他裡面成為神的義"

(2Co 5:21);

如此,我們在神的計算中與他合而為一,對這樣的人就"不被定罪"。(參

Joh 3:18; 5:24; Ro 5:18, 19)。

但這不僅僅是律法上的安排:這是一種生命上的聯合;信徒借著基督之靈住在他們裡面,與他有同一生命,正如頭與同一身體的肢體同有一個生命一樣真實。

不隨從肉體、只隨從聖靈——手抄本的證據似乎表明,這子句並非本節原文的一部分,而是其前半早年被加入,後半更晚才從

Ro 8:4

引入,大概是作為解釋性的註解,並為向

Ro 8:2

的過渡提供方便。

英文原文

Ro 8:1-39.

CONCLUSION OF THE WHOLE ARGUMENT--THE GLORIOUS COMPLETENESS OF THEM THAT ARE IN CHRIST JESUS.

In this surpassing chapter the several streams of the preceding argument meet and flow in one "river of the water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb," until it seems to lose itself in the ocean of a blissful eternity.

FIRST: The Sanctification of Believers

(Ro 8:1-13).

1. There is therefore now, &c.--referring to the immediately preceding context [OLSHAUSEN, PHILIPPI, MEYER, ALFORD, &c.]. The subject with which the seventh chapter concludes is still under consideration. The scope of

Ro 8:1-4

is to show how "the law of sin and death" is deprived of its power to bring believers again into bondage, and how the holy law of God receives in them the homage of a living obedience [CALVIN, FRASER, PHILIPPI, MEYER, ALFORD, &c.].

no condemnation: to them which are in Christ Jesus--As Christ, who "knew no sin," was, to all legal effects, "made sin for us," so are we, who believe in Him, to all legal effects, "made the righteousness of God in Him"

(2Co 5:21);

and thus, one with Him in the divine reckoning. there is to such "NO CONDEMNATION." (Compare

Joh 3:18; 5:24; Ro 5:18, 19).

But this is no mere legal arrangement: it is a union in life; believers, through the indwelling of Christ's Spirit in them, having one life with Him, as truly as the head and the members of the same body have one life.

who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit--The evidence of manuscripts seems to show that this clause formed no part of the original text of this verse, but that the first part of it was early introduced, and the second later, from

Ro 8:4,

probably as an explanatory comment, and to make the transition to

Ro 8:2

easier.

2

無標題

開啟正文

2. 因為賜生命聖靈的律,在基督耶穌裡已經——更確切地說:"釋放了我"——指他歸信之時,就是他第一次相信之時。

釋放了我——

脫離罪和死的律了——此處被稱為"賜生命之聖靈"的,就是聖靈,因為他在信徒靈魂中開啟了屬靈生命的泉源(參

Joh 7:38, 39);

正如他被稱為"真理的聖靈",因為他"引導他們進入一切的真理"

(Joh 16:13),

又被稱為"謀略和能力的靈、知識和敬畏耶和華的靈"

(Isa 11:2),

因為他是這些品質的賜予者。他被稱為"在基督耶穌裡賜生命之靈",是因為他以基督肢體的身分住在信徒裡面,信徒因此與他們的元首同有一個生命。而此處的"律"字與

Ro 7:23

含義相同,即"一種內在的行動原則,如律法一般固定而有規律地運行",因此可知"在基督耶穌裡賜生命之靈的律"在此意指"基督之靈在我們裡面所開啟的那新的行動原則——我們新生命的律"。這"釋放了我們",一旦它佔有我們裡面的人,便使我們"脫離罪和死的律",即脫離那懷著死亡之腐敗原則的奴役之勢。"披掛整齊的壯士"被"比他更壯的"勝過;較弱的原則被更有力的原則廢黜並逐出;屬靈生命的原則勝過並擄掠屬靈死亡的原則——"擄掠了擄掠者"。若這是使徒的意思,全節的要旨便是:信徒借著基督之靈在他們裡面的大能勝過內住的腐敗,便證明他們是在基督耶穌裡,並且因此已脫離定罪。但這一點如今要更完全地加以解釋。

英文原文

2. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free--rather, "freed me"--referring to the time of his conversion, when first he believed.

from the law of sin and death--It is the Holy Ghost who is here called "the Spirit of life," as opening up in the souls of believers a fountain of spiritual life (see on

Joh 7:38, 39);

just as He is called "the Spirit of truth," as "guiding them into all truth"

(Joh 16:13),

and "the Spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord"

(Isa 11:2),

as the inspirer of these qualities. And He is called "the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus," because it is as members of Christ that He takes up His abode in believers, who in consequence of this have one life with their Head. And as the word "law" here has the same meaning as in

Ro 7:23,

namely, "an inward principle of action, operating with the fixedness and regularity of a law," it thus appears that "the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus" here means, "that new principle of action which the Spirit of Christ has opened up within us--the law of our new being." This "sets us free," as soon as it takes possession of our inner man, "from the law of sin and death" that is, from the enslaving power of that corrupt principle which carries death in its bosom. The "strong man armed" is overpowered by the "stronger than he"; the weaker principle is dethroned and expelled by the more powerful; the principle of spiritual life prevails against and brings into captivity the principle of spiritual death--"leading captivity captive." If this be the apostle's meaning, the whole verse is to this effect: That the triumph of believers over their inward corruption, through the power of Christ's Spirit in them, proves them to be in Christ Jesus, and as such absolved from condemnation. But this is now explained more fully.

3

無標題

開啟正文

3、4. 律法既因肉體軟弱等——這是一節難解而爭論甚多的經文。但我們認為使徒所指的,顯然是律法不能救我們脫離罪的轄制;這一點前面已部分顯出(參

Ro 8:2),

下文將更完全地顯明。律法能激惹我們罪惡的本性,使其更猛烈地發作,如我們在

Ro 7:5

所見,但它不能保證自己的成全。如今要說明那成全是如何作成的。

有所不能行的——即必須通過一個腐敗的本性來對我們說話,而這本性太強,不能僅受命令和威脅所影響。

……就有——這句子結構上有點不完整,造成某種晦澀。其意為:既然律法因所述的理由無力保證自己的成全,神便採取了現在所要描述的方法,以達成此目的。

神——"已經"

……差遣——這一表達和類似的表達明顯暗示,基督在被差遣之前就是神"自己的兒子"——即在他自己的位格上,獨立於他的使命和在肉身中的顯現(參

Ro 8:32

及

Ga 4:4);

若是如此,他不僅如兒子之於父親一樣有神相同的本性,而且在本質上是出於父的——雖然其意義過於深奥,我們的言語無法適當界定(參第一章至第四章)。此處將這獨特的關係擺出來,為要強調所預備之救濟的偉大,並界定其性質——這救濟完全來自罪惡人類範圍之外,是的,直接來自神自己。

自己的兒子——

成為——字面作"罪之肉體";這是一個非常值得注意、含義豐富的表達。他真實地取了我們的肉身,卻只在樣式上與其罪惡狀態相同。他取了我們的本性——正如我們裡面的那樣,被軟弱所環繞,除罪之外,沒有什麼使他作為人與罪人有所分別。但這並不意味著他取了我們的本性以及其一切屬性,只少了一樣;因為罪根本不是人性的屬性,只不過是我們作為亞當墮落家族之靈魂的失調狀態;這失調雖然影響並蔓延我們整個本性,卻仍純粹是我們自己的。

罪肉體的形狀——

……作了——字面作"關於罪";即"在對付罪的事上"。這表達故意的用詞比較籠統,因為此處的目的不是要論述基督的使命為罪贖罪,而是要借著那贖罪毀滅罪的權勢,並從信徒身上將其連根拔除。因此我們認為(如旁注所言)譯為"作為贖罪祭"(受七十士譯本語言的啟發,並為加爾文CALVIN等所贊同)是錯的;因為這個意義過於確定,使贖罪之意過於突出。

贖罪祭——"定了它的罪,使之失去對人的權勢"[伯撒BEZA、本格爾BENGEL、弗雷澤FRASER、邁爾MEYER、托路克THOLUCK、腓力比PHILIPPI、阿爾福特ALFORD]。在這榮耀的意義上,我們的主論到他將近的死

(Joh 12:31)

說:"現在這世界受審判;這世界的王要被趕出去",又說(參

Joh 16:11),

"他(聖靈)來了,就要叫世人為……審判自己責備自己,因為這世界的王受了審判"——即被定罪,要放鬆他對人的掌握,使那些借著十字架得釋放的人,得以進入成為聖潔的自由與能力。

在肉體中——即在人性裡——這人性從此脫離了罪的掌握。

英文原文

3, 4. For what the law could not do, &c.--a difficult and much controverted verse. But it is clearly, we think, the law's inability to free us from the dominion of sin that the apostle has in view; as has partly appeared already (see on

Ro 8:2),

and will more fully appear presently. The law could irritate our sinful nature into more virulent action, as we have seen in

Ro 7:5,

but it could not secure its own fulfilment. How that is accomplished comes now to be shown.

in that it was weak through the flesh--that is, having to address itself to us through a corrupt nature, too strong to be influenced by mere commands and threatenings.

God, &c.--The sentence is somewhat imperfect in its structure, which occasions a certain obscurity. The meaning is, that whereas the law was powerless to secure its own fulfilment for the reason given, God took the method now to be described for attaining that end.

sending--"having sent"

his own Son--This and similar expressions plainly imply that Christ was God's "OWN SON" before He was sent--that is, in His own proper Person, and independently of His mission and appearance in the flesh (see on

Ro 8:32

and

Ga 4:4);

and if so, He not only has the very nature of God, even as a son of his father, but is essentially of the Father, though in a sense too mysterious for any language of ours properly to define (see on the first through fourth chapters). And this peculiar relationship is put forward here to enhance the greatness and define the nature of the relief provided, as coming from beyond the precincts of sinful humanity altogether, yea, immediately from the Godhead itself.

in the likeness of sinful flesh--literally, "of the flesh of sin"; a very remarkable and pregnant expression. He was made in the reality of our flesh, but only in the likeness of its sinful condition. He took our nature as it is in us, compassed with infirmities, with nothing to distinguish Him as man from sinful men, save that He was without sin. Nor does this mean that He took our nature with all its properties save one; for sin is no property of humanity at all, but only the disordered state of our souls, as the fallen family of Adam; a disorder affecting, indeed, and overspreading our entire nature, but still purely our own.

and for sin--literally, "and about sin"; that is, "on the business of sin." The expression is purposely a general one, because the design was not to speak of Christ's mission to atone for sin, but in virtue of that atonement to destroy its dominion and extirpate it altogether from believers. We think it wrong, therefore, to render the words (as in the Margin) "by a sacrifice for sin" (suggested by the language of the Septuagint and approved by CALVIN, &c.); for this sense is too definite, and makes the idea of expiation more prominent than it is.

condemned sin--"condemned it to lose its power over men" [BEZA, BENGEL, FRASER, MEYER, THOLUCK, PHILIPPI, ALFORD]. In this glorious sense our Lord says of His approaching death

(Joh 12:31),

"Now is the judgment of this world; now shall the prince of this world be cast out," and again (see on

Joh 16:11),

"When He (the Spirit) shall come, He shall convince the world of . . . judgment, because the prince of this world is judged," that is, condemned to let go his hold of men, who, through the Cross, shall be emancipated into the liberty and power to be holy.

in the flesh--that is, in human nature, henceforth set free from the grasp of sin.

4

無標題

開啟正文

4. 使——"那公義的要求"、"那要求"[阿爾福特ALFORD],或律法的"那命令";因為這並非本書信中屢次用以指"稱義之義"

(Ro 1:17; 3:21; 4:5, 6; 5:17, 18, 21)

的那個詞,而是同一詞的另一形式,意在表達律法的規定,此處我們相信是指律法所要求的實際順服。

律法的義——

成就在我們——或如我們所說:"在我們裡面實現"。

……身上——

不隨——即按照……的指示。

……肉體——聖經中最古老的表達,用以指一個人一生的傾向——無論是傾向善或傾向惡

(Ge 48:15; Ps 1:1; Isa 2:5; Mic 4:5; Eph 4:17; 1Jo 1:6, 7)。

從——

肉體——

只隨——從

Ro 8:9

看來,此處"靈"更直接所指的,似乎是我們自己的心——被聖靈更新並推動的心。

聖靈——

英文原文

4. That the righteousness of the law--"the righteous demand," "the requirement" [ALFORD], Or "the precept" of the law; for it is not precisely the word so often used in this Epistle to denote "the righteousness which justifies"

(Ro 1:17; 3:21; 4:5, 6; 5:17, 18, 21),

but another form of the same word, intended to express the enactment of the law, meaning here, we believe, the practical obedience which the law calls for.

might be fulfilled in us--or, as we say, "realized in us."

who walk--the most ancient expression of the bent of one's life, whether in the direction of good or of evil

(Ge 48:15; Ps 1:1; Isa 2:5; Mic 4:5; Eph 4:17; 1Jo 1:6, 7).

not after--that is, according to the dictates of

the flesh, but after the spirit--From

Ro 8:9

it would seem that what is more immediately intended by "the spirit" here is our own mind as renewed and actuated by the Holy Ghost.

5

無標題

開啟正文

5. 因為——即受肉體原則影響之下的人。

……隨從肉體的人——

……體貼——將注意力獻給

(Php 3:19)。

肉體的事等——人必定受這兩個原則中之一的支配性影響,並且根據哪一個作主,他們生活的色調、他們行動的品格便如何。

英文原文

5. For they that are after the flesh--that is, under the influence of the fleshly principle.

do mind--give their attention to

(Php 3:19).

the things of the flesh, &c.--Men must be under the predominating influence of one or other of these two principles, and, according as the one or the other has the mastery, will be the complexion of their life, the character of their actions.

6

無標題

開啟正文

6. 體貼——此處不過是一個過渡的助詞[托路克THOLUCK],如"但"或"如今"。

……肉體的——字面作"肉體的心思"或意向(旁注);即追求肉體目的。

……就是——

……死——不僅"結局是"[阿爾福特ALFORD等],甚至如今"就是";將死亡懷在胸中,以致這樣的人"活著的時候也是死的"

(1Ti 5:6; Eph 2:1, 5)

[腓力比PHILIPPI]。

……聖靈的——"靈的心思"或"意向";即追求屬靈的事。

……乃是——

生命、——

平安——不僅是"生命"——與另一追求中的"死"相對——更是"平安";這乃是靈魂最深的安息與真實福樂的元素。

英文原文

6. For--a mere particle of transition here [THOLUCK], like "but" or "now."

to be carnally minded--literally, "the mind" or "minding of the flesh" (Margin); that is, the pursuit of fleshly ends.

is death--not only "ends in" [ALFORD, &c.], but even now "is"; carrying death into its bosom, so that such are "dead while they live"

(1Ti 5:6; Eph 2:1, 5)

[PHILIPPI].

but to be spiritually minded--"the mind" or "minding of the spirit"; that is, the pursuit of spiritual objects.

is life and peace--not "life" only, in contrast with the "death" that is in the other pursuit, but "peace"; it is the very element of the soul's deepest repose and true bliss.

7

無標題

開啟正文

7. 原來——對肉體目的的渴望和追求,乃是與神為仇的狀態,與靈魂裡的真實生命和平安完全不相容。

……體貼肉體的,就是與神為仇——

……因為——"不服"。

……不順服神的律——

……也不能——在這樣的心思狀態中,既沒有、也不可能對神的律有絲毫的順服。律法所要求的許多事可能作了,卻沒有一件是因為神的律要求而去作的,也沒有一件是純粹為討神喜悅而作的。

……服。——

英文原文

7. Because the carnal mind is enmity against God--The desire and pursuit of carnal ends is a state of enmity to God, wholly incompatible with true life and peace in the soul.

for it is not subject--"doth not submit itself."

to the law of God, neither indeed can be--In such a state of mind there neither is nor can be the least subjection to the law of God. Many things may be done which the law requires, but nothing either is or can be done because God's law requires it, or purely to please God.

8

無標題

開啟正文

8. 屬肉體的人不能得神的喜歡。——因為沒有順從的原則,沒有討神喜悅的願望。

而且——

體貼肉體的就是與神為仇,——

所以——近於"於是"。

屬肉體的——即與肉體為伴、生活在肉體之中,因此便在肉體的管治之下。

英文原文

8. So then--nearly equivalent to "And so."

they that are in--and, therefore, under the government of

the flesh cannot please God--having no obediential principle, no desire to please Him.

9

無標題

開啟正文

9. 如果——

……神的靈——這並非意為"神的心意或志向"住在你們裡面,而是"如果聖靈住在你們裡面"(見

1Co 6:11, 19; 3:16

等)。(由此可知,此處"在聖靈裡"意為處於我們自己更新了的心志的管治之下;因為神之靈的內住被當作我們"在聖靈裡"的證據。)

……住在你們——

……心裡,——

……你們就不在肉體——

……乃在聖靈裡了。——

然而——"但是"。

……人若——

……沒有——

……基督的靈,——這也不是指"基督的心意或志向",而是指聖靈;此處稱為"基督的靈",正如祂被稱為"在基督耶穌裡的生命之靈"一樣(見

Ro 8:2 的註解)。

聖靈正是作為"基督的靈"來佔有信徒,將那住在祂裡面一切柔和如鴿子的恩典性情引入他們心中

(Mt 3:16;

Joh 3:34)。

若任何人的心裡缺少的不是這些性情,而是這些性情的蒙福之源"基督的靈"——

……就不是屬基督的。——即使他在理智上確信基督教的真理,並在某種一般意義上受其靈的影響。這是何等嚴厲、何等莊嚴的宣告!

英文原文

9. But ye are not in the flesh, but in the spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you--This does not mean, "if the disposition or mind of God dwell in you"; but "if the Holy Ghost dwell in you" (see

1Co 6:11, 19; 3:16,

&c.). (It thus appears that to be "in the spirit" means here to be under the dominion of our own renewed mind; because the indwelling of God's Spirit is given as the evidence that we are "in the spirit").

Now--"But."

if any man have not the Spirit of Christ--Again, this does not mean "the disposition or mind of Christ," but the Holy Ghost; here called "the Spirit of Christ," just as He is called "the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus" (see on

Ro 8:2).

It is as "the Spirit of Christ" that the Holy Ghost takes possession of believers, introducing into them all the gracious, dove-like disposition which dwelt in Him

(Mt 3:16; Joh 3:34).

Now if any man's heart be void, not of such dispositions, but of the blessed Author of them, "the Spirit of Christ."

he is none of his--even though intellectually convinced of the truth of Christianity, and in a general sense influence by its spirit. Sharp, solemn statement this!

10

無標題

開啟正文

10, 11. 基督若在你們——

……心裡,——

……身體就因——"身體誠然"。

……罪——"因"。

……而死,——

……心靈卻因——或作"因"。

……義——原文所要求的"誠然"一詞,具有讓步的性質——"我承認身體是死的……而救贖到此為止尚未完成,但"等語;即"基督若因祂內住的靈在你們裡面,雖然你們的'身體'因著首先的亞當的'罪'必須經過'死'的階段,你們的靈卻因著末後亞當的'義'滿有了新而永存的'生命'"[托路克THOLUCK、邁爾MEYER,以及阿爾福特ALFORD(部分),惟獨霍治HODGE完全如此解]。

……而是——

……活的了。——藉著祂內住的靈,我們因此與祂有同一生命。

英文原文

10, 11. And if Christ be in you--by His indwelling Spirit in virtue of which we have one life with him.

the body--"the body indeed."

is dead because of--"by reason of"

sin; but the spirit is life because--or, "by reason"

of righteousness--The word "indeed," which the original requires, is of the nature of a concession--"I grant you that the body is dead . . . and so far redemption is incomplete, but," &c.; that is, "If Christ be in you by His indwelling Spirit, though your 'bodies' have to pass through the stage of 'death' in consequence of the first Adam's 'sin,' your spirit is instinct with new and undying 'life,' brought in by the 'righteousness' of the second Adam" [THOLUCK, MEYER, and ALFORD in part, but only HODGE entirely].

11

無標題

開啟正文

11. 然而,叫耶穌——

……從死裡——

……復活者的——

……靈——

……若——"並且"。

……住在你們心裡,那叫基督耶穌從死裡復活的,——意即"如果祂作為叫基督復活之者的靈住在你們裡面",或"以祂在叫耶穌復活時所運用的全部復活大能住在你們裡面"。

……也必——更佳:"也必藉著"。

……住——

……在你們心裡的——

……聖靈,——

……賜生命給你們必死的身體。——"你們的身體誠然不能免於罪所引入的死;但你們的靈如今已有不死的生命在其中,若叫耶穌從死裡復活者的靈住在你們裡面,那麼連你們這些身體——雖然它們屈服於最後的仇敵,其塵土也歸於塵土——卻仍將經歷與其活著的元首相同的復活,因為那叫祂活過來的同一聖靈也住在你們裡面。" 請注意名字的變更:從耶穌——作為神叫祂從死裡復活的歷史人物——變為基督——同一人物,被視為祂一切肢體、即蒙贖之人類的主和元首[阿爾福特ALFORD]。

按原文,"賜生命給你們……的身體"等字句,最佳讀法似乎是"因著"。

英文原文

11. But--"And."

if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you--that is, "If He dwell in you as the Spirit of the Christ-raising One," or, "in all the resurrection-power which He put forth in raising Jesus."

he that raised up Christ from the dead--Observe the change of name from Jesus, as the historical Individual whom God raised from the dead, to CHRIST, the same Individual, considered as the Lord and Head of all His members, or of redeemed Humanity [ALFORD].

shall also quicken--rather, "shall quicken even"

your mortal bodies by--the true reading appears to be "by reason of."

his Spirit that dwelleth in you--"Your bodies indeed are not exempt from the death which sin brought in; but your spirits even now have in them an undying life, and if the Spirit of Him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, even these bodies of yours, though they yield to the last enemy and the dust of them return to the dust as it was, shall yet experience the same resurrection as that of their living Head, in virtue of the indwelling of same Spirit in you that quickened Him."

12

無標題

開啟正文

12, 13. 弟兄們,這樣看來,我們並不欠肉體的債,去順從肉體活著。——"我們從前被賣給罪

(Ro 7:14);

但如今我們既已從那嚴酷的主人手下得釋放,作了義的僕人

(Ro 6:22),

我們對肉體並不欠甚麼,我們否認它不義的要求,也不聽它專橫的命令。" 何等榮耀的宣告!

英文原文

12, 13. Therefore, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh--"Once we were sold under sin

(Ro 7:14);

but now that we have been set free from that hard master and become servants to Righteousness

(Ro 6:22),

we owe nothing to the flesh, we disown its unrighteous claims and are deaf to its imperious demands." Glorious sentiment!

13

無標題

開啟正文

13. 你們若——

……順從肉體活著,必要死;——即

Ro 6:21

意義上的死。

……你們若——

……靠著——(見

Ro 7:23 的註解。)

……聖靈——

……治死身體的惡行,必要活著。——即

Ro 6:22

意義上的活。使徒並不滿足於向他們保證他們對肉體並無義務去聽從它的建議,而不提醒他們若聽從的結局如何;他用"治死"(殺死)一詞,與前面剛說的"死"字相對照。"你們若不殺罪,罪必殺你們。" 但他以光明的另一面來緩和這話:他們若靠著聖靈治死身體的惡行,這條道路必定以永遠的"生命"為終。這便引領使徒進入一條新的思路,通往他最後的主題——那等候著被稱義之信徒的"榮耀"。

註,(一)"在基督之外的人沒有安全,沒有聖潔,沒有福樂:沒有'安全',因為這樣的人都在律法的定罪之下

(Ro 8:1);

沒有聖潔,因為只有與基督聯合的人才有基督的靈

(Ro 8:9);

沒有福樂,因為'體貼肉體的就是死'

(Ro 8:6)"

[霍治HODGE]。

(二)信徒的成聖,其全部根基在於贖罪之死,其活潑的泉源在於基督之靈的內住

(Ro 8:2-4)。

(三)"思想、情感和追求的傾向,是品格惟一決定性的考驗

(Ro 8:5)"

[霍治HODGE]。

(四)肉體之心的任何人為精煉都不能使它成為屬靈,也不能補償屬靈性的缺乏。"肉體"和"靈"在本質上、在不變上是彼此對立的;肉體之心本身也不能真正服在神的律法之下

(Ro 8:5-7)。

因此(五)神與罪人之間的疏離是相互的。因為罪人的心態既是"與神為仇"

(Ro 8:7),

在這狀態中他便"不能得神的喜歡"

(Ro 8:8)。

(六)既然聖靈在同一口氣中被無分別地稱為"神的靈"、"基督的靈",以及"基督"自己(作為信徒內住的生命),那麼父、子、聖靈在獨一可敬之神格中的本質合一以及位格上的彼此有別,便必須被相信,作為此類話語唯一一致的解釋

(Ro 8:9-11)。

(七)我們更新的靈魂中屬靈生命的意識,也是身體復活生命的榮耀保證,憑藉我們已經享受其內住的同一賜生命之靈

(Ro 8:11)。

(八)無論人對屬靈生命有何承認,"我們若順從肉體活著必要死",惟有"我們若靠著聖靈治死身體的惡行,必要活著"——這話永遠真實

(Ro 8:13,

並比較

Ga 6:7, 8;

Eph 5:6;

Php 3:18, 19;

1Jo 3:7, 8)。

英文原文

13. For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die--in the sense of

Ro 6:21.

but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body--(See on

Ro 7:23).

ye shall live--in the sense of

Ro 6:22.

The apostle is not satisfied with assuring them that they are under no obligations to the flesh, to hearken to its suggestions, without reminding them where it will end if they do; and he uses the word "mortify" (put to death) as a kind of play upon the word "die" just before. "If ye do not kill sin, it will kill you." But he tempers this by the bright alternative, that if they do, through the Spirit, mortify the deeds of the body, such a course will infallibly terminate in "life" everlasting. And this leads the apostle into a new line of thought, opening into his final subject, the "glory" awaiting the justified believer.

Note, (1) "There can be no safety, no holiness, no happiness, to those who are out of Christ: No "safety," because all such are under the condemnation of the law

(Ro 8:1);

no holiness, because such only as are united to Christ have the spirit of Christ

(Ro 8:9);

no happiness, because to be "carnally minded is death"

(Ro 8:6)"

[HODGE]. (2) The sanctification of believers, as it has its whole foundation in the atoning death, so it has its living spring in the indwelling of the Spirit of Christ

(Ro 8:2-4).

(3) "The bent of the thoughts, affections, and pursuits, is the only decisive test of character

(Ro 8:5)"

[HODGE]. (4) No human refinement of the carnal mind will make it spiritual, or compensate for the absence of spirituality. "Flesh" and "spirit" are essentially and unchangeably opposed; nor can the carnal mind, as such, be brought into real subjection to the law of God

(Ro 8:5-7).

Hence (5) the estrangement of God and the sinner is mutual. For as the sinner's state of mind is "enmity against God"

(Ro 8:7),

so in this state he "cannot please God"

(Ro 8:8).

(6) Since the Holy Ghost is, in the same breath, called indiscriminately "the Spirit of God," "the Spirit of Christ," and "Christ" Himself (as an indwelling life in believers), the essential unity and yet Personal distinctness of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, m the one adorable Godhead must be believed, as the only consistent explanation of such language

(Ro 8:9-11).

(7) The consciousness of spiritual life in our renewed souls is a glorious assurance of resurrection life in the body also, in virtue of the same quickening Spirit whose inhabitation we already enjoy

(Ro 8:11).

(8) Whatever professions of spiritual life men may make, it remains eternally true that "if we live after the flesh we shall die," and only "if we through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body we shall live"

(Ro 8:13,

and compare

Ga 6:7, 8; Eph 5:6; Php 3:18, 19; 1Jo 3:7, 8).

14

無標題

開啟正文

第二:信徒作神兒子的名分——他們未來的產業——聖靈為他們代求

(Ro 8:14-27)。

14. 因為凡被——

……神的靈——

……引導的,都是——

……神的兒子。——"這些就是神的兒子。" 使徒迄今只把聖靈當作信徒用以治死罪的能力來論;如今他把聖靈當作一位滿有恩典、滿有慈愛的引導者,祂的"引導"——為凡有神愛子之靈在裡面的人所享受——表明他們也是"神的兒子"。

……引導的,都是神的兒子。——

英文原文

SECOND: The Sonship of Believers--Their Future Inheritance--The Intercession of the Spirit for Them

(Ro 8:14-27).

14. For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God, they, &c.--"these are sons of God." Hitherto the apostle has spoken of the Spirit simply as a power through which believers mortify sin: now he speaks of Him as a gracious, loving Guide, whose "leading"--enjoyed by all in whom is the Spirit of God's dear Son--shows that they also are "sons of God."

15

無標題

開啟正文

15. 你們所受的,不是奴僕的——"因為你們所受的(在你們歸主之時),不是奴僕的靈",意即"你們所受的靈,不是奴僕的靈"。

……心,——

……仍舊——產生。

……害怕;——如在"惹動忿怒"的律法之下,意即"這是你們信主以前的狀況,活在律法的捆綁中,因著未蒙赦免之罪的感覺而不斷被預感所折磨。但你們受聖靈,並非為要延續那悲慘的狀態。"

……所受的乃是——"你們受了"。

……兒子的——

……心,——

……因此我們——更佳:"在其中"。

……呼叫:——"呼叫"一詞是強調的,表達這最終情感的自發、力量和豐盛。在

Ga 4:6

中,這呼叫據說出於聖靈在我們裡面,引發我們心中兒女的呼喊。此處則說它出於我們自己的心,在聖靈賜生命的能量之下,作為信徒新生命中的要素(比較

Mt 10:19, 20;

並見

Ro 8:4 的註解)。

……'阿爸!父!' ——"阿爸"是敘利亞迦勒底語"父"的字眼;附上希臘文同義詞,當然不是為告訴讀者二者意義相同,而是為著與基督自己在客西馬尼園痛苦中從口中發出這雙重稱呼同樣的原因

(Mr 14:36)。

祂無疑喜愛以兩種習慣的形式稱呼父的名;先以其珍愛的母語,再附以學者的語言。從這角度看,此處兩詞的並用具有迷人的純樸和溫暖。

英文原文

15. For, &c.--"For ye received not (at the time of your conversion) the spirit of bondage," that is, "The spirit ye received was not a spirit of bondage."

again--gendering.

to fear--as under the law which "worketh wrath," that is, "Such was your condition before ye believed, living in legal bondage, haunted with incessant forebodings under a sense of unpardoned sin. But it was not to perpetuate that wretched state that ye received the Spirit."

but ye have received--"ye received."

the spirit of adoption, whereby--rather, "wherein."

we cry, Abba, Father--The word "cry" is emphatic, expressing the spontaneousness, the strength, and the exuberance of the final emotions. In

Ga 4:6

this cry is said to proceed from the Spirit in us, drawing forth the filial exclamation in our hearts. Here, it is said to proceed from our own hearts under the vitalizing energy of the Spirit, as the very element of the new life in believers (compare

Mt 10:19, 20;

and see on

Ro 8:4).

"Abba" is the Syro-Chaldaic word for "Father"; and the Greek word for that is added, not surely to tell the reader that both mean the same thing, but for the same reason which drew both words from the lips of Christ Himself during his agony in the garden

(Mr 14:36).

He, doubtless, loved to utter His Father's name in both the accustomed forms; beginning with His cherished mother tongue, and adding that of the learned. In this view the use of both words here has a charming simplicity and warmth.

16

無標題

開啟正文

16. 聖靈——應作"祂自己"(見

Ro 8:26 的註解)。

……與——

……我們的心——

……同作——

……見證,——

……證明——"是"。

……我們是神的——

……兒女。——我們自己的心所作的見證,在自覺為兒子的呼喊——"阿爸、父"——中發出;但我們並不孤單;因為在我們裡面的聖靈,甚至在祂所引發的那呼喊之中,也加上祂自己的印記印證我們的;這樣,"憑兩三個人的口作見證",事情就定了。使徒從前稱我們為"神的兒子",指我們的收養;此處改用"兒女",指我們的重生。前者表達我們所得蒙的尊貴;後者表達我們所領受的新生命。後者在此更為合適;因為收養的兒子未必是產業的後嗣,而親生的兒子必定是,這正是使徒如今要說到的。

英文原文

16. The Spirit itself--It should be "Himself" (see on

Ro 8:26).

beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children--"are children"

of God--The testimony of our own spirit is borne in that cry of conscious sonship, "Abba, Father"; but we are not therein alone; for the Holy Ghost within us, yea, even in that very cry which it is His to draw forth, sets His own distinct seal to ours; and thus, "in the mouth of two witnesses" the thing is established. The apostle had before called us "sons of God," referring to our adoption; here the word changes to "children," referring to our new birth. The one expresses the dignity to which we are admitted; the other the new life which we receive. The latter is more suitable here; because a son by adoption might not be heir of the property, whereas a son by birth certainly is, and this is what the apostle is now coming to.

17

無標題

開啟正文

17. 既是兒女,便是後嗣,——"也是後嗣"。

……就是神的後嗣,——我們父之國的後嗣。

……和基督同作後嗣。——作為"在許多弟兄中作長子的"

(Ro 8:29),

並作為"承受萬有的"

(Heb 1:2)。

……我們——"只要我們與祂一同受苦"。

……若——

……和他一同受苦,也必和他一同得榮耀。——與祂一同。在受苦上效法基督以便在祂的榮耀上有分,這一必要性為基督自己和祂的使徒所同教

(Joh 12:24-26;

Mt 16:24, 25;

2Ti 2:12)。

……也必和他一同——

……得榮耀。——

英文原文

17. And if children, then heirs--"heirs also."

heirs of God--of our Father's kingdom.

and joint-heirs with Christ--as the "First-born among many brethren"

(Ro 8:29),

and as "Heir of all things"

(Heb 1:2).

if so be that we suffer--"provided we be suffering with Him."

that we may be also glorified together--with Him. This necessity of conformity to Christ in suffering in order to participate in His glory, is taught alike by Christ Himself and by His apostles

(Joh 12:24-26; Mt 16:24, 25; 2Ti 2:12).

18

無標題

開啟正文

18. 我想,現在的——意即"誠然,我們若要與基督同得榮耀,就必須與祂一同受苦;但這又如何?因為若把這些苦難與將來的榮耀相比,苦難便微不足道了。"

……苦楚若比將來要顯於我們的榮耀,就不足介意了。——

英文原文

18. For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us--that is, "True, we must suffer with Christ, if we would partake of His glory; but what of that? For if such sufferings are set over against the coming glory, they sink into insignificance."

19

無標題

開啟正文

19-22. 受造之物切望等候神的眾子顯出來。——"使徒被聖徒未來榮耀的思想所激發,傾瀉出這段華美的話,在其中他描繪整個受造之物在現今的敗壞下歎息,指望並渴慕這榮耀的彰顯,作為其存在的目標和完成"[霍治HODGE]。

……受造之物——更佳:"受造之物"。

……切望——(比較

Php 1:20)。

……等候神的——"正在等候……的彰顯"。

……眾子顯出來。——意即"等候他們的身體從墳墓中得贖"

(Ro 8:23),

那將彰顯他們如今隱藏的兒子名分(比較

Lu 20:36;

Re 21:7)。

英文原文

19-22. For, &c.--"The apostle, fired with the thought of the future glory of the saints, pours forth this splendid passage, in which he represents the whole creation groaning under its present degradation, and looking and longing for the revelation of this glory as the end and consummation of its existence" [HODGE].

the earnest expectation--(compare

Php 1:20).

of the creature--rather, "the creation."

waiteth for the manifestation--"is waiting for the revelation"

of the sons of God--that is, "for the redemption of their bodies" from the grave

(Ro 8:23),

which will reveal their sonship, now hidden (compare

Lu 20:36; Re 21:7).

20

無標題

開啟正文

20. 因為受造之物——"受造之物"。

……服在——即並非藉著任何天然的衰敗原則。使徒將受造之物擬人化,描繪它只是因人的緣故、順服那將其命運與人的命運神秘相連的更高權能,才屈服於它所受的虛空之下。所以他又加說

……虛空之下,不是自己願意,——

……乃是因那叫他如此的。——"使它如此的那位"。

……但——

……因為——

……(受造之物仍然——

……指望)——或"盼望"。

……(仍然指望脫離敗壞的轄制,得享神兒女自由的榮耀)。——

英文原文

20. For the creature--"the creation."

was made subject to vanity, not willingly--that is, through no natural principle of decay. The apostle, personifying creation, represents it as only submitting to the vanity with which it was smitten, on man's account, in obedience to that superior power which had mysteriously linked its destinies with man's. And so he adds

but by reason of him who hath subjected the same--"who subjected it."

in hope--or "in hope that."

21

無標題

開啟正文

21. 但受造之物——"甚至受造之物本身"。

……仍然——

……指望脫離——它對衰敗原則的奴役。

……敗壞的——

……轄制,——

……得享神兒女——更佳:"榮耀的自由"。

……自由的——意即受造之物本身將在榮耀的意義上被救入那種免於軟弱和衰敗的自由中——神的兒女在榮耀中被復起時將在其中悠遊:受造之物本身也將在榮耀的意義上被救入這種免於朽壞的自由中(如此者:加爾文CALVIN、伯撒BEZA、本格爾BENGEL、托路克THOLUCK、奥尔肖森OLSHAUSEN、德維特DE WETTE、邁爾MEYER、腓力比PHILIPPI、霍治HODGE、阿爾福特ALFORD等)。

……榮耀。——

英文原文

21. Because the creature itself also--"even the creation itself."

shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption--its bondage to the principle of decay.

into the glorious liberty--rather, "the liberty of the glory."

of the children of God--that is, the creation itself shall, in a glorious sense, be delivered into that freedom from debility and decay in which the children of God, when raised up in glory, shall expatiate: into this freedom from corruptibility the creation itself shall, in a glorious sense, be delivered (So CALVIN, BEZA, BENGEL, THOLUCK, OLSHAUSEN, DE WETTE, MEYER, PHILIPPI, HODGE, ALFORD, &c.).

22

無標題

開啟正文

22. 我們知道一切受造之物一同歎息、勞苦,直到如今。——若地是因人的緣故受咒詛,它也有分於人的恢復便不足為奇。若如此,描繪它與人的苦難同情、並展望人的完全救贖作為它本身從現今為罪所枯之狀況中得釋放的時期,便是一個美麗的思想,並與聖經關於此題目的整體教訓相符。(見

2Pe 3:13 的註解。)

英文原文

22. For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now--If for man's sake alone the earth was cursed, it cannot surprise us that it should share in his recovery. And if so, to represent it as sympathizing with man's miseries, and as looking forward to his complete redemption as the period of its own emancipation from its present sin-blighted condition, is a beautiful thought, and in harmony with the general teaching of Scripture on the subject. (See on

2Pe 3:13).

23

無標題

開啟正文

23. 不但如此,——或作"不但[如此],甚至我們自己"——即除了無生氣的受造之物之外。

……就是我們這有聖靈初熟果子的,——或作"聖靈作為我們完全救贖的初熟果子"(比較

2Co 1:22),

將心塑造成屬天的格調,並使之與其未來的環境相調。

……也是自己心裡——雖然我們裡面已有如此多的屬天之物。

……歎息,——在這"罪和死的身體"之下,並在寫在日光之下每一物件、每一追求、每一享受之上的種種"虛空和心靈的煩惱"之下。

……等候得著——我們的。

……兒子的名分,乃是我們的身體得贖。——從墳墓中:"不是(請注意)我們從身體中得釋放,而是身體本身從墳墓中得贖"[本格爾BENGEL]。

英文原文

23. And not only they, but ourselves also--or "not only [so], but even we ourselves"--that is, besides the inanimate creation.

which have the first-fruits of the Spirit--or, "the Spirit as the first-fruits" of our full redemption (compare

2Co 1:22),

moulding the heart to a heavenly frame and attempering it to its future element.

even we ourselves--though we have so much of heaven already within us.

groan within ourselves--under this "body of sin and death," and under the manifold "vanity and vexation of spirit" that are written upon every object and every pursuit and every enjoyment under the sun.

waiting for the--manifestation of our

adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body--from the grave: "not (be it observed) the deliverance of ourselves from the body, but the redemption of the body itself from the grave" [BENGEL].

24

無標題

開啟正文

24. 我們因盼望而得救——更當譯作「我們是在盼望中得救的」;

也就是說,這拯救與其說是已經實際擁有的,不如說更是存於盼望之中的。

只是所見的盼望不是盼望——因為盼望的意義本來就是期待那現今仍為未來的事成為現在的。

人既看見了,為甚麼還盼望呢?——後者在另一樣來到之時便要結束。

英文原文

24. For we are saved by hope--rather, "For in hope we are saved"; that is, it is more a salvation in hope than as yet in actual possession.

but hope that is seen is not hope--for the very meaning of hope is, the expectation that something now future will become present.

for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for?--the latter ending when the other comes.

25

無標題

開啟正文

25. 但我們若盼望那所不見的,就必忍耐等候,——那麼,忍耐等候就是我們合宜的態度。

英文原文

25. But if we hope for that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it--that is, then, patient waiting for it is our fitting attitude.

26

無標題

開啟正文

*26, 27. 況且我們的軟弱有聖靈幫助,*等等——或作「聖靈也照樣親自幫助」。

我們的軟弱,——更當按正確的讀法作「我們的軟弱」;不只是此處所指的那一項軟弱,而是現今狀態中屬靈生命的整體軟弱,此處所舉的只是其中一個例子。

我們本不曉得當怎樣禱告,——信徒所困惑的,並不是禱告當有的正確內容,因為在這方面已給了最充分的指引;而是在於要「當怎樣」求對的事。這部分是由於我們在現今被遮蔽的狀態中屬靈視力的朦朧,因為我們必須「憑信心不憑眼見而行」(參

1Co 13:9

及

2Co 5:7

的註解),也是由於我們已更新本性中最好的看見與情感裏,仍大量攙雜著從感官那短暫之物所生的觀念和感受;部分也是由於人類一切語言作為表達心中精微屬靈感受的工具時,必然有的不完美。在這種情形下,我們一切屬靈操練怎可能不被許多不確定所環繞?我們在最親近地就近神、最自由地向天上的父傾心吐意之時,心中又怎會不生出疑問,不知道我們在這樣的操練中心思的狀態是否完全合宜、蒙神喜悅?而且這些焦慮並不隨著屬靈經歷的深度與成熟度而消退,反而更加深。

只是聖靈——更當譯作「聖靈親自」。(參

Ro 8:27

末了。)

親自用說不出來的歎息為我們代求,——即不能用清晰話語表達的。何等崇高而動人的思想,我們唯獨因這段經文才得著!「當我們掙扎著要用清晰的話語表達心中的願望,卻發現我們最深的情感最是無法言傳,我們便因這自覺的無能而『歎息』。然而這些歎息並非徒然。因為『聖靈親自』就在其中,把祂自己所點燃的情感賜下它們所能有的唯一語言;所以這些歎息從我們這方面說,雖是我們不能表達所感的無能之果,卻同時是聖靈親自為我們所作的代求。」

英文原文

26, 27. Likewise the Spirit also, &c.--or, "But after the like manner doth the Spirit also help.

our infirmities--rather (according to the true reading), "our infirmity"; not merely the one infirmity here specified, but the general weakness of the spiritual life in its present state, of which one example is here given.

for we know not what we should pray for as we ought--It is not the proper matter of prayer that believers are at so much loss about, for the fullest directions are given them on this head: but to ask for the right things "as they ought" is the difficulty. This arises partly from the dimness of our spiritual vision in the present veiled state, while we have to "walk by faith, not by sight" (see on

1Co 13:9

and

2Co 5:7),

and the large admixture of the ideas and feelings which spring from the fleeting objects of sense that there is in the very best views and affections of our renewed nature; partly also from the necessary imperfection of all human language as a vehicle for expressing the subtle spiritual feelings of the heart. In these circumstances, how can it be but that much uncertainty should surround all our spiritual exercises, and that in our nearest approaches and in the freest outpourings of our hearts to our Father in heaven, doubts should spring up within us whether our frame of mind in such exercises is altogether befitting and well pleasing to God? Nor do these anxieties subside, but rather deepen, with the depth and ripeness of our spiritual experience.

but the Spirit itself--rather, "Himself." (See end of

Ro 8:27).

maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered--that is, which cannot be expressed in articulate language. Sublime and affecting ideas, for which we are indebted to this passage alone! "As we struggle to express in articulate language the desires of our hearts and find that our deepest emotions are the most inexpressible, we 'groan' under this felt inability. But not in vain are these groanings. For 'the Spirit Himself' is in them, giving to the emotions which He Himself has kindled the only language of which they are capable; so that though on our part they are the fruit of impotence to utter what we feel, they are at the same time the intercession of the Spirit Himself in our behalf."

27

無標題

開啟正文

27. 並且——更當譯作「但是」,這些歎息雖然不能用言語表達出來。

鑒察人心的,曉得聖靈的意思,因為——聖靈

照著神的旨意替聖徒祈求,——祂作為那鑒察人心的,注視著他們禱告時翻騰的情感,完全曉得聖靈藉著在我們裏面所引出的歎息所要表達的是甚麼,因為那位蒙福的代求者藉著這些歎息所求的,正是神自己所定意要賜下的。

附註,(一)信徒是否「被神的靈引導」(參

Ro 8:14)?

那麼他們當何等小心,不可「叫神的聖靈擔憂」(參

Eph 4:30)!

可比較

Ps 32:8, 9:

「我要……用我的眼引導你。不可像那無知的騾馬」等等。(二)許多更正教徒「一生因怕死而為奴僕」所受的那「奴僕的靈」,以及羅馬天主教所系統教導的「疑惑的信心」,都在此被責備,因為它們與那「兒子的靈」、並那聖靈與我們的靈同證我們得兒子名分這一事實,形成了直接而令人痛楚的對比——而此處說這正是神的兒女作為兒女所享受的(參

Ro 8:15, 16)。

(三)既與基督同受苦是為著有分於這榮耀而定的預備,那麼前者與後者相比所顯出的微不足道,無論那苦難多麼沉重、多麼漫長,都不能不減輕對它的感受(參

Ro 8:17, 18)。

(四)想到外在的自然界既因人的墮落而神秘地受了邪惡的影響,便只等候他在復活時完全的恢復,好叫它也得著相應的脫離,從那受咒詛的光景進入不朽的生命和不衰的美麗,這怎能不使每一個有見識的基督徒心胸澎湃(參

Ro 8:19-23)。

(五)信徒並不是在因著犯罪的「消滅聖靈的感動」而對天家有最少最淡薄的一瞥之時,最為熱切地歎息渴望要到那裏去;相反,正是在聖靈在他們心中暢通無阻地運行、使所要顯明之榮耀的「初熟的果子」最豐厚最頻繁地被嘗到之時,正是為此緣故,他們才「自己在心裏歎息」,等候完全的救贖(參

Ro 8:23)。

因為他們這樣推論:若是滴下來的已是如此,那湧成的海洋又將如何?若是這樣「對著鏡子觀看,模糊不清」就已如此甘甜,那麼「面對面」觀看又將如何?若是「我的良人隔著牆壁觀看,從窗櫺往裏窺探,從格子窗往裏顯現」(參

So 2:9)——那一層隔開可見與不可見的薄幔——若是祂即使這樣對我也是「比世人更美」,那麼當祂在我那不被炫目的視線前站立被認出來,作為在我自己性情中的父獨生子,而我也要像祂,因為我要見祂的本體,那又將如何呢?(六)「盼望的忍耐」(參

1Th 1:3)

對於那些既喜樂地意識到自己已經「得救」(參

2Ti 1:9;

Tit 3:5),

卻又痛苦地意識到自己只是部分得救的人,是合宜的態度;或者說,「我們既因祂的恩典得稱為義,(在現今狀態下)便可憑著(單單)永生的盼望成為後嗣」(參

Tit 3:7)(參

Ro 8:24, 25)。

(七)禱告既是屬靈生命的呼吸,又是信徒在他今生整個處境所附帶的「軟弱」之下惟一有效的解脫,那麼能得著保證——那位蒙福的聖靈完全知道這一切,並在這一切上來幫助——是何等令人得安慰;特別是當信徒不能把案情向神清楚陳明,有時只能在主面前「歎息」躺臥之時,這些無法言傳的歎息正是聖靈親自用以將他們整個案情傳入「萬軍之主的耳中」的憑藉;它們作為聖靈親自為他們的代求升到那聽禱告的主面前,並被坐在寶座上的那位認定為只不過具體表達了祂自己的「旨意」早已定意要賜給他們的(參

Ro 8:26, 27),

是何等的事!(八)這兩節經文(參

Ro 8:26, 27)

對在救贖的安排中神聖位格之間所存在的關係,以及他們在每一個蒙贖者身上各自運行的和諧,給了我們何等的看見!

英文原文

27. And--rather, "But," inarticulate though these groanings be.

he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he--the Spirit

maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God--As the Searcher of hearts, He watches the surging emotions of them in prayer, and knows perfectly what the Spirit means by the groanings which He draws forth within us, because that blessed Intercessor pleads by them only for what God Himself designs to bestow.

Note, (1) Are believers "led by the Spirit of God"

(Ro 8:14)?

How careful then should they be not to "grieve the Holy Spirit of God"

(Eph 4:30)!

Compare

Ps 32:8, 9:

"I will . . . guide thee with Mine eye. Be not (then) as the horse, or as the mule," &c. (2) "The spirit of bondage," to which many Protestants are "all their lifetime subject," and the "doubtsome faith" which the Popish Church systematically inculcates, are both rebuked here, being in direct and painful contrast to that "spirit of adoption," and that witness of the Spirit, along with our own spirit, to the fact of our sonship, which it is here said the children of God, as such, enjoy

(Ro 8:15, 16).

(3) As suffering with Christ is the ordained preparation for participating in this glory, so the insignificance of the one as compared with the other cannot fail to lighten the sense of it, however bitter and protracted

(Ro 8:17, 18).

(4) It cannot but swell the heart of every intelligent Christian to think that if external nature has been mysteriously affected for evil by the fall of man, it only awaits his completed recovery, at the resurrection, to experience a corresponding emancipation from its blighted condition into undecaying life and unfading beauty

(Ro 8:19-23).

(5) It is not when believers, through sinful "quenching of the Spirit," have the fewest and faintest glimpses of heaven, that they sigh most fervently to be there; but, on the contrary, when through the unobstructed working of the Spirit in their hearts, "the first-fruits" of the glory to be revealed are most largely and frequently tasted, then, and just for that reason, is it that they "groan within themselves" for full redemption

(Ro 8:23).

For thus they reason: If such be the drops, what will the ocean be? If thus "to see through a glass darkly" be so very sweet, what will it be to "see face to face?" If when "my Beloved stands behind our wall, looking forth at the windows, showing Himself through the lattice"

(So 2:9)

--that thin veil which parts the seen from the unseen--if He is even thus to me "Fairer than the children of men," what shall He be when He stands confessed before my undazzled vision, the Only-begotten of the Father in my own nature, and I shall be like Him, for I shall see Him as He is? (6) "The patience of hope"

(1Th 1:3)

is the fitting attitude for those who with the joyful consciousness that they are already "saved"

(2Ti 1:9; Tit 3:5),

have yet the painful consciousness that they are saved but in part: or, "that being justified by His grace, they are made (in the present state) heirs according to the hope (only) of eternal life,"

Tit 3:7

(Ro 8:24, 25).

(7) As prayer is the breath of the spiritual life, and the believer's only effectual relief under the "infirmity" which attaches to his whole condition here below, how cheering is it to be assured that the blessed Spirit, cognizant of it all, comes in aid of it all; and in particular, that when believers, unable to articulate their case before God, can at times do nothing but lie "groaning" before the Lord, these inarticulate groanings are the Spirit's own vehicle for conveying into "the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth" their whole case; and come up before the Hearer of prayer as the Spirit's own intercession in their behalf, and that they are recognized by Him that sitteth on the Throne, as embodying only what His own "will" determined before to bestow upon them

(Ro 8:26, 27)!

(8) What a view do these two verses

(Ro 8:26, 27)

give of the relations subsisting between the Divine Persons in the economy of redemption, and the harmony of their respective operations in the case of each of the redeemed!

28

無標題

開啟正文

第三:整個論證的得勝總結(參

Ro 8:28-39)。

*28. 我們曉得,*等等——原文的次序更為有力:「我們曉得,對於那些愛神的人」(比較

1Co 2:9;

Eph 6:24;

Jas 1:12; 2:5)

「萬事都一同效力,叫愛神的人——就是按祂(永恆的)旨意蒙召(更當作『被召』)的人——得益處。」何等榮耀的保證!而這在信徒中間似乎乃是「家常話」,是「人所共知」的事。這萬事為益處的效力,對於那些「愛神的人」是極其自然的事,因為這樣的心靈既深信那將自己的兒子為他們捨了的主,在祂一切作為上必是存心善意待他們,便學會這樣以善意領受祂所送來的一切,無論對肉體而言多麼難受;而對於那些按著「祂的旨意」蒙召的人,萬事也以同樣可理解的方式「一同效力,叫他們得益處」;因為即使在「祂在旋風暴風中行事」之時,他們仍看見「祂的車輦是以愛鋪成的」(參

So 3:10)。

他們既知道自己是按著一個永恆之愛的「旨意」而被「召進祂兒子耶穌基督的交通裏」(參

1Co 1:9),

便自然在心裏說:「那位『萬有都是本於祂、倚靠祂、歸於祂』的,決不可能容許這旨意被任何對我們真正不利的事所挫折,也不可能不叫一切事情——無論是黑暗的或光明的、是彎曲的或正直的——都互相效力,以促進並最終完成祂崇高的計劃。」

英文原文

THIRD: Triumphant Summary of the Whole Argument

(Ro 8:28-39).

28. And--or, "Moreover," or "Now"; noting a transition to a new particular.

we know, &c.--The order in the original is more striking: "We know that to them that love God" (compare

1Co 2:9; Eph 6:24; Jas 1:12; 2:5)

"all things work together for good [even] to them who are the called (rather, 'who are called') according to His (eternal) purpose." Glorious assurance! And this, it seems, was a "household word," a "known" thing, among believers. This working of all things for good is done quite naturally to "them that love God," because such souls, persuaded that He who gave His own Son for them cannot but mean them well in all His procedure, learn thus to take in good part whatever He sends them, however trying to flesh and blood: and to them who are the called, according to "His purpose," all things do in the same intelligible way "work together for good"; for, even when "He hath His way in the whirlwind," they see "His chariot paved with love"

(So 3:10).

And knowing that it is in pursuance of an eternal "purpose" of love that they have been "called into the fellowship of His Son Jesus Christ"

(1Co 1:9),

they naturally say within themselves, "It cannot be that He 'of whom, and through whom, and to whom are all things,' should suffer that purpose to be thwarted by anything really adverse to us, or that He should not make all things, dark as well as light, crooked as well as straight, to co-operate to the furtherance and final completion of His high design."

29

無標題

開啟正文

29. 因為——論到這「按祂旨意被召」(參

Ro 8:28)。

祂所預先知道的人,就預先定下,——預先命定。此處「預先知道」當怎樣理解?「那些祂預先知道會悔改相信的人」,各時代各派的伯拉糾主義者都如此說。但這是把與使徒整個教訓的精神甚至字句相反的東西硬塞進經文裏(參

Ro 9:11;

2Ti 1:9)。

在

Ro 11:2

與

Ps 1:6

中,神對祂子民的「認識」不能被局限於對未來事件的預見,或對世上所發生之事的熟悉。那麼,「祂所預先知道的人」是否就是「祂所預先命定的人」呢?也不盡然,因為「預知」和「預定」在此都被提及,並且一個是另一個的原因。要叫我們有限的心思分辨它們作為神對人心中狀態的區別,確實困難;特別由於在

Ac 2:23

「旨意」被置於「神的預知」之前,而在

1Pe 1:2

「揀選」卻被說成「照著神的預知」。但神對自己子民的預知,大概是指祂對他們那「特殊、恩典的喜悅」,而祂對他們的「預定」或「預先命定」,則是指祂因這喜悅而流出的固定旨意,要「拯救他們、以聖召召他們」(參

2Ti 1:9)。

效法祂兒子的模樣,——即在祂於我們人性中的兒子名分之樣式、模型或形像之後,成為眾子。

使祂兒子在許多弟兄中作長子,——「長子」,乃按本性為子;祂的「許多弟兄」,乃是因收養為子:祂在父獨生子之人性中,於受咒詛的木頭上擔當了我們的罪;他們則在那因罪將要滅亡之平常人的本性中,卻因祂的血從定罪與烈怒中蒙了救贖,並被改變成為祂的樣式:祂是「從死裏復活的長子」;他們是「在耶穌裏睡了的人」,到了時候要「與祂一同帶來」;「長子」如今「得了尊貴榮耀為冠冕」;祂的「許多弟兄」則「當祂顯現的時候,必要像祂,因為必得見祂的真體」。

英文原文

29. For--as touching this "calling according to his purpose"

(Ro 8:28).

whom he did foreknow he also did predestinate--foreordain. In what sense are we to take the word "foreknow" here? "Those who He foreknew would repent and believe," say Pelagians of every age and every hue. But this is to thrust into the text what is contrary to the whole spirit, and even letter, of the apostle's teaching (see

Ro 9:11; 2Ti 1:9).

In

Ro 11:2, and Ps 1:6,

God's "knowledge" of His people cannot be restricted to a mere foresight of future events, or acquaintance with what is passing here below. Does "whom He did foreknow," then, mean "whom He foreordained?" Scarcely, because both "foreknowledge" and "foreordination" are here mentioned, and the one as the cause of the other. It is difficult indeed for our limited minds to distinguish them as states of the Divine Mind towards men; especially since in

Ac 2:23

"the counsel" is put before "the foreknowledge of God," while in

1Pe 1:2

"election" is said to be "according to the foreknowledge of God." But probably God's foreknowledge of His own people means His "peculiar, gracious, complacency in them," while His "predestinating" or "foreordaining" them signifies His fixed purpose, flowing from this, to "save them and call them with an holy calling"

(2Ti 1:9).

to be conformed to the image of his Son--that is, to be His sons after the pattern, model, or image of His Sonship in our nature.

that he might be the first-born among many brethren--"The First-born," the Son by nature; His "many brethren," sons by adoption: He, in the Humanity of the Only-begotten of the Father, bearing our sins on the accursed tree; they in that of mere men ready to perish by reason of sin, but redeemed by His blood from condemnation and wrath, and transformed into His likeness: He "the First-born from the dead"; they "that sleep in Jesus," to be in due time "brought with Him"; "The First-born," now "crowned with glory and honor"; His "many brethren," "when He shall appear, to be like Him, for they shall see Him as He is."

30

無標題

開啟正文

30. 並且——「而」或「如今」;解釋

Ro 8:29

——在「預定我們效法祂兒子的形像」以進入最終的榮耀上,祂把這一切相繼的步驟都一次定妥了。所以

祂所預定的人,又召他們來,——「召」字(如 HODGE 等人正確指出)在新約書信中從未用於那些只不過受了福音外在邀請的人(如

Mt 20:16; 22:14)。

它總是指「內在的、有效的、拯救性的蒙召」。它標誌著個人得救的頭一個大步,相當於「歸正」。只不過「歸正」一詞表達了那時所發生的品格改變,而這「呼召」則表達了這改變的神聖作者,以及那把我們如同馬太一樣、撒該一樣,從我們舊日悲慘的、將亡的境地召出來進入新的、安全的、蒙福之生命中的主權大能。

所召來的人,——這樣召來的人。

又稱他們為義,——帶入那已經充分描寫過的明確的復和狀態中。

所稱為義的人,又叫他們得榮耀,——帶入最終的榮耀(參

Ro 8:17, 18)。

何等崇高的頂峰,且用如此富節奏的語言表達出來!而這一切都被視為過去的事;因為從那過去的「預定效法神兒子形像」的旨意出發——其餘的步驟不過是它的相繼展開——整個便被看作是一個完整的、永遠已經完成的救恩。

英文原文

30. Moreover--"And," or "Now"; explanatory of

Ro 8:29

--In "predestinating us to be conformed to the image of His Son" in final glory, He settled all the successive steps of it. Thus

whom he did predestinate, them he also called--The word "called" (as HODGE and others truly observe) is never in the Epistles of the New Testament applied to those who have only the outward invitation of the Gospel (as in

Mt 20:16; 22:14).

It always means "internally, effectually, savingly called." It denotes the first great step in personal salvation and answers to "conversion." Only the word conversion expresses the change of character which then takes place, whereas this "calling" expresses the divine authorship of the change, and the sovereign power by which we are summoned, Matthew-like, Zaccheus-like, out of our old, wretched, perishing condition, into a new, safe, blessed life.

and whom he called--thus.

them he also justified--brought into the definite state of reconciliation already so fully described.

and whom he justified, them he also glorified--brought to final glory

(Ro 8:17, 18).

Noble climax, and so rhythmically expressed! And all this is viewed as past; because, starting from the past decree of "predestination to be conformed to the image of God's Son" of which the other steps are but the successive unfoldings--all is beheld as one entire, eternally completed salvation.

31

無標題

開啟正文

31. 既是這樣,對這些事我們可說甚麼呢?——「我們不能再進一步走、想、求」[BENGEL]。

從這裏到

Ro 8:34、

甚至到本章末了的整段經文,在一切有思想的譯者和讀者看來,都幾乎超越了語言所能表達的,而 OLSHAUSEN 注意到這思想的「深邃與宏偉」。

神若幫助我們,誰能敵擋我們呢?——神若決意並立約要把我們帶過去,我們一切的仇敵便都是祂的仇敵;而且「誰肯設荊棘蒺藜與他交戰呢?他必前往攻擊他們,把他們一同焚燒」(參

Isa 27:4)。

這裏有何等大的安慰!不僅如此,那最大的憑據業已賜下;因為——

英文原文

31. What shall we then say to these things?--"We can no farther go, think, wish" [BENGEL]. This whole passage, to

Ro 8:34,

and even to the end of the chapter, strikes all thoughtful interpreters and readers, as transcending almost every thing in language, while OLSHAUSEN notices the "profound and colossal" character of the thought.

If God be for us, who can be against us?--If God be resolved and engaged to bring us through, all our enemies must be His; and "Who would set the briers and thorns against Him in battle? He would go through them. He would burn them together"

(Isa 27:4).

What strong consolation is here! Nay, but the great Pledge of all has already been given; for,

32

無標題

開啟正文

32. 神既——更當作「神既確然」。(原文這強調的質詞失掉實在可惜)。

不愛惜,——「不留住」、「不扣下」。這動人的表達、連同整個思想,都是引自

Ge 22:12——

在那裏耶和華對亞伯拉罕關乎其子以撒之行為的動人稱許,似乎正是為要對祂自己在交出自己兒子這事上的心靈作一瞥。「你帶著你的兒子,就是你獨生的兒子,你所愛的……把他獻為燔祭」(參

Ge 22:2);

直到亞伯拉罕幾乎要完成那最高的捨己之舉時,主才介入說:「現在我知道你是敬畏神的了,因為你沒有將你的兒子,就是你獨生的兒子,留下不給我。」在那件事和那話語的光中,我們的使徒所要傳達的,無非就是:神在「不愛惜自己的兒子,反倒把他交出來」、即把他交出的事上,憑其父親的身分,行了一件神秘的捨己之舉;這雖然不包含我們捨己之舉所不可分的痛苦和損失,卻並不更不真實,反倒遠超過我們任何這類舉動,正如祂的本性超過受造者的本性一樣。但若基督不是神「自己的(或固有的)兒子」、不是像以撒之於亞伯拉罕那樣實實在在有分於祂的本性的,這便是不可思議的。猶太人正是在這意義上控告我們的主「將自己和神當作平等」(參

Joh 5:18

的註解),

而祂在回答中立即進一步說明的,不是否認,而是加以說明和證實。如此理解基督的兒子名分,聖經論及它的話便清晰而和諧;但若把它看作一種人為的關係——是因祂神蹟的降生、或祂從死裏復活、或祂作為的偉大、或這一切合在一起而歸給祂的——那麼論及它的經文既不能自行解釋,也不能彼此和諧。

交出來,——不只是交給死(如許多人所理解的),因為此處這觀念太窄,而是按最廣泛的意義「把祂交出來」;比較

Joh 3:16:

「神愛世人,甚至將祂的獨生子賜給他們。」

為我們眾人,——即為一切信徒;這裏的意思幾乎如每一位優秀的解經家所承認的,必須如此理解。

豈不也——我們怎能設想祂不。

把萬物和他——更當作「也把萬物與祂」。(「也」字在我們的譯本中常常如此放置,以致意義暗昧;參

Heb 12:1

的註解)。

一同白白地賜給我們嗎?——因為其他一切恩賜不但比這恩賜中的恩賜無可比擬地小,而且實際上包含在它裏面。

英文原文

32. He--rather, "He surely." (It is a pity to lose the emphatic particle of the original).

that spared not--"withheld not," "kept not back." This expressive phrase, as well as the whole thought, is suggested by

Ge 22:12,

where Jehovah's touching commendation of Abraham's conduct regarding his son Isaac seems designed to furnish something like a glimpse into the spirit of His own act in surrendering His own Son. "Take now (said the Lord to Abraham) thy son, thine only, whom thou lovest, and . . . offer him for a burnt offering"

(Ge 22:2);

and only when Abraham had all but performed that loftiest act of self-sacrifice, the Lord interposed, saying, "Now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou HAST NOT WITHHELD THY SON, THINE ONLY SON, from Me." In the light of this incident, then, and of this language, our apostle can mean to convey nothing less than this, that in "not sparing His own Son, but delivering Him up," or surrendering Him, God exercised, in His Paternal character, a mysterious act of Self-sacrifice, which, though involving none of the pain and none of the loss which are inseparable from the very idea of self-sacrifice on our part, was not less real, but, on the contrary, as far transcended any such acts of ours as His nature is above the creature's. But this is inconceivable if Christ be not God's "own (or proper) Son," partaker of His very nature, as really as Isaac was of his father Abraham's. In that sense, certainly, the Jews charged our Lord with making Himself "equal with God" (see on

Joh 5:18),

which He in reply forthwith proceeded, not to disown, but to illustrate and confirm. Understand Christ's Sonship thus, and the language of Scripture regarding it is intelligible and harmonious; but take it to be an artificial relationship, ascribed to Him in virtue either of His miraculous birth, or His resurrection from the dead, or the grandeur of His works, or all of these together--and the passages which speak of it neither explain of themselves nor harmonize with each other.

delivered him up--not to death merely (as many take it), for that is too narrow an idea here, but "surrendered Him" in the most comprehensive sense; compare

Joh 3:16,

"God so loved the world that He GAVE His only-begotten Son."

for us all--that is, for all believers alike; as nearly every good interpreter admits must be the meaning here.

how shall he not--how can we conceive that He should not.

with him also--rather, "also with Him." (The word "also" is often so placed in our version as to obscure the sense; see on

Heb 12:1).

freely give us all things?--all other gifts being not only immeasurably less than this Gift of gifts, but virtually included in it.

33

無標題

開啟正文

33, 34. 誰能控告——或作「提出任何控告」

神所揀選的人呢?——這是本書信中頭一處稱信徒為「選民」的。其意義為何,下一章便要說明。

英文原文

33, 34. Who shall lay anything to the charge of--or, "bring any charge against."

God's elect?--the first place in this Epistle where believers are styled "the elect." In what sense this is meant will appear in next chapter.

34

無標題

開啟正文

34. 誰能定他們的罪呢?有基督耶穌已經死了,——為要成就祂死的目的。這裏正如別處一樣,使徒愉快地更正自己(參

Ga 4:9;

並參

Ro 1:12

的註解);

他的意思不是說基督的復活比祂的死更有拯救的價值,而是說:祂既「把自己獻為祭,好除掉罪」——這對我們雖是寶貴,對祂卻是純一的苦澀——想到祂如今活著,並且活著要看顧祂的死在我們身上發生效力,這實在是無可比擬地更令人喜樂。

現今在神的右邊,——「也」

也替我們祈求,——王的右手古時是尊榮的座位(比較

1Sa 20:25;

1Ki 2:19;

Ps 45:9),

並表示有分於王權和榮耀(參

Mt 20:21)。

古典著作中也有類似的暗示。因此基督坐在神的右邊——在

Ps 110:1

中預言,在

Mr 16:19;

Ac 2:33; 7:56;

Eph 1:20;

Col 3:1;

1Pe 3:22;

Re 3:21

中有歷史的記載——乃意味著這位得高舉之人子的榮耀,以及祂在其中同受的治理世界的權能。所以這被稱為坐在「權能的右邊」(參

Mt 26:64),

和坐在高天至大者的「威嚴」的右邊(參

Heb 1:3)

[PHILIPPI]。

也替我們祈求,——運用祂對神一切無限的影響力來為我們求。這是這頂峰的頂端。「祂坐在神的右邊,表示祂有拯救我們的能力;祂的代求,表示祂有拯救我們的心意」[BENGEL]。

但我們當怎樣理解這代求呢?當然不是如一位屈膝俯伏、伸開雙臂懇求的——借用 CALVIN 那動人的話說。

但同樣也不是僅僅比喻地暗示基督救贖的能力繼續不斷地運行 [THOLUCK],也不是僅僅表明祂對我們之愛的熱切與激烈 [CHRYSOSTOM]。

它所表達的,不能少於這個:那得榮耀的救贖主,既知道自己的權利,便明確地表示祂的旨意,要祂死的功效能發揮到極致;並且是用某種帝王般的語氣表示,正如我們在祂那段榮耀的代求禱文中所見的——那是祂如同在幔子內所說的(參

Joh 17:11, 12

的註解):「父啊,我願你所賜給我的人,也同我在那裏」(參

Joh 17:24

的註解)。至於這旨意是以甚麼形式表達的,則既不可查考,也無關重要。

英文原文

34. yea rather, that is risen again--to make good the purposes of His death. Here, as in some other cases, the apostle delightfully corrects himself (see

Ga 4:9;

and see on

Ro 1:12);

not meaning that the resurrection of Christ was of more saving value than His death, but that having "put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself"--which though precious to us was to Him of unmingled bitterness--it was incomparably more delightful to think that He was again alive, and living to see to the efficacy of His death in our behalf.

who is even--"also"

at the right hand of God--The right hand of the king was anciently the seat of honor (compare

1Sa 20:25; 1Ki 2:19; Ps 45:9),

and denoted participation in the royal power and glory

(Mt 20:21).

The classical writings contain similar allusions. Accordingly Christ's sitting at the right hand of God--predicted in

Ps 110:1,

and historically referred to in

Mr 16:19; Ac 2:33; 7:56; Eph 1:20; Col 3:1; 1Pe 3:22; Re 3:21

--signifies the glory of the exalted Son of man, and the power in the government of the world in which He participates. Hence it is called "sitting on the right hand of Power"

(Mt 26:64),

and "sitting on the right hand of the Majesty on high"

(Heb 1:3)

[PHILIPPI].

who also maketh intercession for us--using all His boundless interest with God in our behalf. This is the top of the climax. "His Session at God's right hand denotes His power to save us; His Intercession, His will to do it" [BENGEL]. But how are we to conceive of this intercession? Not certainly as of one pleading "on bended knees and with outstretched arms," to use the expressive language of CALVIN. But yet, neither is it merely a figurative intimation that the power of Christ's redemption is continually operative [THOLUCK], or merely to show the fervor and vehemence of His love for us [CHRYSOSTOM]. It cannot be taken to mean less than this: that the glorified Redeemer, conscious of His claims, expressly signifies His will that the efficacy of His death should be made good to the uttermost, and signifies it in some such royal style as we find Him employing in that wonderful Intercessory Prayer which He spoke as from within the veil (see on

Joh 17:11, 12):

"Father, I WILL that they also whom Thou hast given Me be with Me where I am" (see on

Joh 17:24).

But in what form this will is expressed is as undiscoverable as it is unimportant.

35

無標題

開啟正文

35, 36. 誰能使我們與基督的愛隔絕呢?——這不是指「我們對基督的愛」,好像問誰能阻擋我們愛基督似的;而是指「基督對我們的愛」,這從本章末了的話便清楚可見,因為那裏論到的是同一個題目。另一個意義也不合乎本章的範圍,本章乃是要彰顯信徒對基督有充足信心的根基。「斷言甚至感覺我們總不離棄基督,這並不是信心的根基;但確信祂的愛永不改變,卻是最堅強的保證根基」[HODGE]。

*難道是患難嗎?*等等——「這一切,或合起來,無論對肉體多麼可怕,都不是神烈怒的記號,也不是懷疑祂之愛的最小依據。這樣的問題,再沒有比一位自己既為基督緣故受了如此多苦難的人提出更合適的了。」(參

2Co 11:11-33;

1Co 4:10-13)。

(CALVIN 說得好)使徒不是說「甚麼」,乃是說「誰」,正如一切受造之物和一切苦難都是許多上陣攻擊基督徒的鬥士一樣 [THOLUCK]。

英文原文

35, 36. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?--This does not mean "our love to Christ," as if, Who shall hinder us from loving Christ? but "Christ's love to us," as is clear from the closing words of the chapter, which refer to the same subject. Nor would the other sense harmonize with the scope of the chapter, which is to exhibit the ample ground of the believer's confidence in Christ. "It is no ground of confidence to assert, or even to feel, that we will never forsake Christ; but it is the strongest ground of assurance to be convinced that His love will never change" [HODGE].

shall tribulation, &c.--"None of these, nor all together, how terrible soever to the flesh, are tokens of God's wrath, or the least ground for doubt of His love. From whom could such a question come better than from one who had himself for Christ's sake endured so much? (See

2Co 11:11-33; 1Co 4:10-13).

The apostle says not (remarks CALVIN nobly) "What," but "Who," just as if all creatures and all afflictions were so many gladiators taking arms against the Christians [THOLUCK].

36

無標題

開啟正文

*36. 如經上所記:我們為你的緣故,*等等——

(Ps 44:22)

——引用來描寫神的忠心子民在仇敵對義的仇恨被激起而又無所約束之時,在任何時代都可能從仇敵手中遭受的事(參

Ga 4:29)。

英文原文

36. As it is written, For thy sake, &c.--

(Ps 44:22)

--quoted as descriptive of what God's faithful people may expect from their enemies at any period when their hatred of righteousness is roused, and there is nothing to restrain it (see

Ga 4:29).

37

無標題

開啟正文

37. 然而,靠著愛我們的主,在這一切的事上已經得勝有餘了,——不是「我們不但不被它們征服,反而它們對我們大有益處」[HODGE];因為這雖是真實的,這詞的意思卻不過是「我們格外得勝」。參

Ro 5:20

的註解。它們不但不能「使我們與基督的愛隔絕」,反倒正是「靠著那愛我們的主」,我們才得以勝過它們。

英文原文

37. Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors, through him that loved us--not, "We are so far from being conquered by them, that they do us much good" [HODGE]; for though this be true, the word means simply, "We are pre-eminently conquerors." See on

Ro 5:20.

And so far are they from "separating us from Christ's love," that it is just "through Him that loved us" that we are victorious over them.

38

無標題

開啟正文

38, 39. 因為我深信無論是死,是生,是天使,是掌權的,是有能的,——無論善的或惡的。但因為惡的不被稱為「天使」、「掌權的」或「有能的」,除非加上某些字眼表明所指的是這些(參

Mt 25:41;

Col 2:15;

Eph 6:12;

2Pe 2:4——

或許

1Co 6:3

例外),

所以此處所指的可能是善天使,不過是正如同一位使徒所設想的,若有天上來的天使傳另一個福音那樣。(最優秀的解經家多如此主張。)

是現在的事,是將來的事,——即今生的任何狀況和來生一切未知的可能性。

英文原文

38, 39. For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers--whether good or bad. But as the bad are not called "angels," or "principalities," or "powers," save with some addition to show that such are meant

(Mt 25:41; Col 2:15; Eph 6:12; 2Pe 2:4

--except perhaps

1Co 6:3),

probably the good are meant here, but merely as the same apostle supposes an angel from heaven to preach a false gospel. (So the best interpreters).

nor things present, nor things to come--no condition of the present life and none of the unknown possibilities of the life to come.

39

無標題

開啟正文

39. 是別的受造之物,——更當作「受造之物」——在神所造整個宇宙中的任何別的事物

都不能叫我們與神的愛隔絕;等等——「這裏所有的詞都當按其最廣泛的意義理解,不需更嚴密的限定。這些不定式的表達是要表示一切所能想到的事,不過是對萬有這觀念的一種修辭性的轉述」[OLSHAUSEN]。

這愛是在我們的主基督耶穌裏的,——這奇妙的一章——本書信的論證實際上在此告終——就這樣把「因信稱義」的我們留在那永遠之愛的懷抱中,任何仇敵的勢力或所能想像的事件都不能把我們從其中奪去。「你看父賜給我們是何等的慈愛?」而我們這樣「在基督裏蒙賜各樣屬靈福氣」的人,「當潔淨自己,像他潔淨一樣」,又當是何等樣的人呢?

附註,(一)神永遠的旨意與人的自由意志之間,有一種榮耀的一致性,雖然其連結之紐超出人的、或許也超出受造者的領會(參

Ro 8:28)。

(二)想到神對世界那複雜的治理作為,都安排得明明是為促進祂選民的「益處」,這思想何等使人高尚(參

Ro 8:28)!

(三)信徒無論如今或日後被升到何等地步與神的兒子同尊同榮,每一個人都必以「使祂在凡事上居首位」(參

Col 1:18)

為樂——這也是最美不過的(參

Ro 8:29)。

(四)「正如恩典的各樣教訓之間有美麗的和諧與必然的關聯,照樣基督徒的品格中也必有同樣的和諧。他不能經歷那從蒙揀選而來的喜樂與信心,而不生發那因思及其白白賜予之性質而必產生的謙卑;他也不能有那稱義之人的平安,而沒有那得救之人的聖潔」(參

Ro 8:29, 30)

[HODGE]。(五)要有限的心思明白神聖心意中的情感雖然困難,卻讓我們一刻也不要懷疑:神在「不愛惜自己的兒子,反倒為我們眾人把他交出來」的事上,確實把祂心中最寶貴的獻上了;並且祂如此行,是要永遠向祂的百姓保證:他們所需的其他一切——既與這巨大恩賜相比微不足道,且實際上不過是這恩賜必有的結果——到了時候都必賜下(參

Ro 8:32)。

(六)神既作出如此犧牲,我們這一方面有甚麼可算是太大的呢?(七)若還有人對本書信中極其重要的「稱義」一詞的意義有所懷疑——究竟是如羅馬教會所教導、也有許多人所主張的,意為「把義注入到不聖潔的人裏面,好叫他們成為義」,還是按照更正教的教訓,意為「赦免、宣告無罪、或宣告有罪的人為義」——

Ro 8:33

就當完全止息這疑問。因為使徒在此節的問題是:「誰能控告神的選民呢?」換言之,「誰能宣告或視他們為有罪呢?」既然「神稱他們為義」;這就超越一切疑問地表明,「稱義」所要表達的正是「視為有罪」的相反;因此(如 CALVIN 得勝地論證的)它的意思是「解除罪的控告」。(八)若對基督的死在本書信中當如何看待還有合理的疑問,

Ro 8:34

就當完全止息這疑問。因為在那裏使徒的問題是:誰能「定神的選民為有罪呢」?既然「基督已經死了」;這就超越一切疑問地表明(如 PHILIPPI 正確地論證的),使徒所注重的乃是那死的贖罪(性質)。(九)得知基督對神最大的親近和最強的影響力——如「坐在祂的右邊」——竟用以為地下屬祂的百姓代求,這給了我們對基督之愛何等動人的看見(參

Ro 8:34)!

(十)「整個宇宙及其中所有的一切,只要是善的,便都是基督徒的朋友和盟友;只要是惡的,便都已遠超征服而過」(參

Ro 8:35-39)

[HODGE]。

(十一)我們這「已嘗過主恩滋味」的人,既「蒙神大能保守、因信以至於拯救」(參

1Pe 1:5),

又被那不征服之愛所擁抱,那麼我們在「在至聖的真道上造就自己」,並「在聖靈裏禱告」之時,豈不更加覺得受約束要「保守自己常在神的愛中,仰望我們主耶穌基督的憐憫,直到永生」(參

Jude 20, 21)嗎?

英文原文

39. nor any other creature--rather, "created thing"--any other thing in the whole created universe of God

shall be able to separate us, &c.--"All the terms here are to be taken in their most general sense, and need no closer definition. The indefinite expressions are meant to denote all that can be thought of, and are only a rhetorical paraphrase of the conception of allness" [OLSHAUSEN].

from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord--Thus does this wonderful chapter, with which the argument of the Epistle properly closes, leave us who are "justified by faith" in the arms of everlasting Love, whence no hostile power or conceivable event can ever tear us. "Behold what manner of love is this?" And "what manner of persons ought we to be," who are thus "blessed with all spiritual blessings in Christ?"

Note, (1) There is a glorious consistency between the eternal purposes of God and the free agency of men, though the link of connection is beyond human, perhaps created, apprehension

(Ro 8:28).

(2) How ennobling is the thought that the complicated movements of the divine government of the world are all arranged in expressed furtherance of the "good" of God's chosen

(Ro 8:28)!

(3) To whatever conformity to the Son of God in dignity and glory, believers are or shall hereafter be raised, it will be the joy of everyone of them, as it is most fitting, "that in all things He should have the pre-eminence"

(Col 1:18),

(Ro 8:29).

(4) "As there is a beautiful harmony and necessary connection between the several doctrines of grace, so must there be a like harmony in the character of the Christian. He cannot experience the joy and confidence flowing from his election without the humility which" the consideration of its being gratuitous must produce; nor can he have the peace of one who is justified without the holiness of one who is saved"

(Ro 8:29, 30)

[HODGE]. (5) However difficult it may be for finite minds to comprehend the emotions of the Divine Mind, let us never for a moment doubt that in "not sparing His own Son, but delivering Him up for us all," God made a real sacrifice of all that was dearest to His heart, and that in so doing He meant for ever to assure His people that all other things which they need--inasmuch as they are nothing to this stupendous gift, and indeed but the necessary sequel of it--will in due time be forthcoming

(Ro 8:32).

(6) In return for such a sacrifice on God's part, what can be considered too great on ours? (7) If there could be any doubt as to the meaning of the all-important word "JUSTIFICATION" in this Epistle--whether, as the Church of Rome teaches, and many others affirm, it means "infusing righteousness into the unholy, so as to make them righteous," or, according to Protestant teaching, "absolving, acquitting, or pronouncing righteous the guilty"

Ro 8:33

ought to set such doubt entirely at rest. For the apostle's question in this verse is, "Who shall bring a charge against God's elect?" In other words, "Who shall pronounce" or "hold them guilty?" seeing that "God justifies" them: showing beyond all doubt, that to "justify" was intended to express precisely the opposite of "holding guilty"; and consequently (as CALVIN triumphantly argues) that it means "to absolve from the charge of guilt." (8) If there could be any reasonable doubt in what light the death of Christ is to be regarded in this Epistle,

Ro 8:34

ought to set that doubt entirely at rest. For there the apostle's question is, Who shall "condemn" God's elect, since "Christ died" for them; showing beyond all doubt (as PHILIPPI justly argues) that it was the expiatory (character of that death which the apostle had in view). (9) What an affecting view of the love of Christ does it give us to learn that His greatest nearness to God and most powerful interest with Him--as "seated on His right hand"--is employed in behalf of His people here below

(Ro 8:34)!

(10) "The whole universe, with all that it contains, so far as it is good, is the friend and ally of the Christian; and, so far as it is evil, is more than a conquered foe"

(Ro 8:35-39)

[HODGE]. (11) Are we who "have tasted that the Lord is gracious," both "kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation"

(1Pe 1:5),

and embraced in the arms of Invincible Love? Then surely, while "building ourselves up on our most holy faith," and "praying in the Holy Ghost," only the more should we feel constrained to "keep ourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life"

(Jude 20, 21).