Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary · Leviticus 第18章

註釋閱讀最佳化

分章註釋

Leviticus 第 18 章

서론

無標題

開啟正文

本章內容如下:一、一條總則,禁止效法外邦人一切敗壞的習俗,Le 18:1-5。二、各項具體律法:1. 禁止亂倫,Le 18:6-18。2. 禁止獸慾和野蠻的偶像崇拜,Le 18:19-23。三、以迦南人的毀滅作為這些律法的警戒,Le 18:24-30。

英文原文

Here is, I. A general law against all conformity to the corrupt usages of the heathen, Le 18:1-5. II. Particular laws, 1. Against incest, Le 18:6-18. 2. Against beastly lusts, and barbarous idolatries, Le 18:19-23. III. The enforcement of these laws from the ruin of the Canaanites, Le 18:24-30.

1-5

Cautions against Idolatrous Practices (1490 BC)

開啟正文

防備偶像崇拜之習俗的警戒(主前1490年)

¹ 耶和華對摩西說:
² 「你曉諭以色列人說:我是耶和華你們的神。
³ 你們從前住的埃及地,那裡人的行為,你們不可效法;我要領你們到的迦南地,那裡人的行為,也不可效法,也不可照他們的惡俗行。
⁴ 你們要遵我的典章,守我的律例,按此而行。我是耶和華你們的神。
⁵ 所以,你們要守我的律例、典章;人若遵行,就必因此活著。我是耶和華。

在多項禮儀制度之後,神在此回到對道德誡命的強調。前者作為預表對我們仍有用,後者作為律法仍有約束力。我們在此看到:1. 這些律法所依據的神聖權威:我是耶和華你們的神(Le 18:1,4,30),以及我是耶和華,Le 18:5,6,21。「耶和華——有權統管萬有的;你們的神——有獨特的權利統管你們的。」耶和華是存在的源頭,因此也是權能的源頭;我們屬於祂,我們有義務事奉祂,而祂能刑罰一切不順服。「你們的神——你們已經同意歸屬的,在你們有福的,你們對祂負有想像中最高的義務,也要向祂交賬。」2. 嚴格的警戒:當心保留他們所住之地的埃及偶像崇拜的殘餘,也當心感染他們即將前往的迦南地的偶像崇拜,Le 18:3。如今神正藉摩西教導他們祂的律例,他們有需要忘記的事——那些他們在埃及自幼吸收的東西——埃及是以偶像崇拜聞名的國家:你們不可效法埃及地的行為。對他們為奴之地保留如此的情感,以致在敬拜上也受其習俗支配,這本身就是極大的荒謬,也是對奇妙而恩惠地拯救了他們的神的極大忘恩。不但如此,他們甚至彷彿被悖逆之靈所驅使,在領受了神的這些律例之後,仍有危險接受迦南人的惡習,隨他們的地業一同繼承他們的惡習。他們在此被警戒這種危險:你們也不可照他們的惡俗行。習俗就是如此霸道,以致他們的做法被稱為惡俗(條例),甚至成了神條例的競爭對手,而承認神名的人也有危險受他們的轄制。3. 莊嚴的吩咐:他們要謹守神的典章、律例和條例,Le 18:4,5。大衛在Ps 119中論及神律法的許多禱告和宣告中,似乎正是回應了這個吩咐和許多類似的吩咐。請注意此處:(1)我們順服的大準則——神的律例和典章。這些我們必須謹守遵行。我們必須將它們存在書上,存在手中,好叫我們在心靈和生活中實行出來。記念神的誡命而遵行,Ps 103:18。我們必須在其中行走,當作當行的路;持守它們,當作當循的規則;保守它們如同珍寶,如同眼中的瞳人,以最大的謹慎和重視。(2)我們順服的大益處:人若遵行,就必因此活著,即「他在今生和來世都必蒙福。」我們有理由感謝神:[1.] 這作為應許仍然有效,而且對條件的解釋十分有利。我們若真誠謹守神的誡命,雖然達不到無罪的完全,也必發現盡本分的路就是安慰的路,也是通往幸福的路。敬虔有生命的應許,1Ti 4:8。智慧曾說:遵守我的誡命便存活;而且我們若靠著聖靈治死身體的惡行(那些對我們而言就像埃及的習俗對以色列一樣),就必活著。[2.] 這作為聖約已不再有效,免得最小的過犯就永遠將我們排除在這生命之外。使徒兩次引用此話,作為與福音所啟示之信心相對立的。它是那本乎律法之義的描述——人若遵行,就必因此活著(Ro 10:5),用以證明律法不本乎信,Ga 3:12。福音所作的改變在最後一個字上:仍是遵行的人必活著,但不是因此活著;因為律法不能賜生命,因為我們不能完全遵守它;它是因肉體軟弱而有缺欠,不是它本身有缺欠;但如今遵行的人必因神兒子的信而活著。他的生命當歸功於基督的恩典,而不是自己行為的功勞;見Ga 3:21,22。義人必活著,但他們是因信活著——因他們與那作他們生命的基督聯合。

英文原文

Cautions against Idolatrous Practices (1490 BC)

¹ And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
² Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, I am the LORD your God.
³ After the doings of the land of Egypt, wherein ye dwelt, shall ye not do: and after the doings of the land of Canaan, whither I bring you, shall ye not do: neither shall ye walk in their ordinances.
⁴ Ye shall do my judgments, and keep mine ordinances, to walk therein: I am the LORD your God.
⁵ Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments: which if a man do, he shall live in them: I am the LORD.

After divers ceremonial institutions, God here returns to the enforcement of moral precepts. The former are still of use to us as types, the latter still binding as laws. We have here, 1. The sacred authority by which these laws are enacted: I am the Lord your God (Le 18:1,4,30), and I am the Lord, Le 18:5,6,21. "The Lord, who has a right to rule all; your God, who has a peculiar right to rule you." Jehovah is the fountain of being, and therefore the fountain of power, whose we are, whom we are bound to serve, and who is able to punish all disobedience. "Your God to whom you have consented, in whom you are happy, to whom you lie under the highest obligations imaginable, and to whom you are accountable." 2. A strict caution to take heed of retaining the relics of the idolatries of Egypt, where they had dwelt, and of receiving the infection of the idolatries of Canaan, whither they were now going, Le 18:3. Now that God was by Moses teaching them his ordinances there was aliquid dediscendum—something to be unlearned, which they had sucked in with their milk in Egypt, a country noted for idolatry: You shall not do after the doings of the land of Egypt. It would be the greatest absurdity in itself to retain such an affection for their house of bondage as to be governed in their devotions by the usages of it, and the greatest ingratitude to God, who had so wonderfully and graciously delivered them. Nay, as if governed by a spirit of contradiction, they would be in danger, even after they had received these ordinances of God, of admitting the wicked usages of the Canaanites and of inheriting their vices with their land. Of this danger they are here warned, You shall not walk in their ordinances. Such a tyrant is custom that their practices are called ordinances, and they became rivals even with God's ordinances, and God's professing people were in danger of receiving law from them. 3. A solemn charge to them to keep God's judgments, statutes, and ordinances, Le 18:4,5. To this charge, and many similar ones, David seems to refer in the many prayers and professions he makes relating to God's laws in the Ps 119. Observe here, (1.) The great rule of our obedience—God's statutes and judgments. These we must keep to walk therein. We must keep them in our books, and keep them in our hands, that we may practise them in our hearts and lives. Remember God's commandments to do them, Ps 103:18. We must keep in them as our way to travel in, keep to them as our rule to work by, keep them as our treasure, as the apple of our eye, with the utmost care and value. (2.) The great advantage of our obedience: Which if a man do, he shall live in them, that is, "he shall be happy here and hereafter." We have reason to thank God, [1.] That this is still in force as a promise, with a very favourable construction of the condition. If we keep God's commandments in sincerity, though we come short of sinless perfection, we shall find that the way of duty is the way of comfort, and will be the way to happiness. Godliness has the promise of life, 1Ti 4:8. Wisdom has said, Keep my commandments and live: and if through the Spirit we mortify the deeds of the body (which are to us as the usages of Egypt were to Israel) we shall live. [2.] That it is not so in force in the nature of a covenant as that the least transgression shall for ever exclude us from this life. The apostle quotes this twice as opposite to the faith which the gospel reveals. It is the description of the righteousness which is by the law, the man that doeth them shall live en autois—in them (Ro 10:5), and is urged to prove that the law is not of faith, Ga 3:12. The alteration which the gospel has made is in the last word: still the man that does them shall live, but not live in them; for the law could not give life, because we could not perfectly keep it; it was weak through the flesh, not in itself; but now the man that does them shall live by the faith of the Son of God. He shall owe his life to the grace of Christ, and not to the merit of his own works; see Ga 3:21,22. The just shall live, but they shall live by faith, by virtue of their union with Christ, who is their life.

6-18

Incest Defined and Forbidden; Against Marrying Near Relations (1490 BC)

開啟正文

論近親婚姻與亂倫之禁止(主前 1490 年)

⁶ 你們都不可露骨肉之親的下體,親近他們:我是耶和華。
⁷ 不可露你母親的下體,這是你父親的下體。
⁸ 不可露你繼母的下體,這本是你父親的下體。
⁹ 你的姐妹,不論是異父同母的,或是異母同父的,無論是生在家中生在外的,都不可露她們的下體。
¹⁰ 不可露你孫女或外孫女的下體,因為這是你自己的下體。
¹¹ 你繼母所生的女兒,是你父親的女兒,是你的姐妹,不可露她的下體。
¹² 不可露你姑母的下體:她是你父親的骨肉之親。
¹³ 不可露你姨母的下體:她是你母親的骨肉之親。
¹⁴ 不可露你伯叔之妻的下體,不可親近她:她是你伯叔母。
¹⁵ 不可露你兒婦的下體:她是你兒子的妻,不可露她的下體。
¹⁶ 不可露你弟兄妻子的下體:這本是你弟兄的下體。
¹⁷ 不可露婦人和她女兒的下體,也不可娶她的孫女或外孫女,露她們的下體,因為她們是至近的親屬:這是大惡。
¹⁸ 你妻還在的時候,不可另娶她的姐妹作對頭,露她的下體。

這些律法涉及第七條誡命,無疑在福音之下仍然約束我們,因為它們與自然的光照和律法相吻合:其中一條,即人與繼母同居的,使徒說是連外邦人中也沒有的罪(1Co 5:1)。雖然此處所禁止的某些亂倫行為,在外邦個別人中也有行出來的,但那些行為是受譴責和憎惡的,除非在那些已經變為野蠻、完全被交給可恥的情慾的國民中。請留意,

I. 對此處所列各種親屬關係所禁止的,是親近她們,露她們的下體(Le 18:6)。

1. 這主要是禁止與這些親屬結婚。婚姻是神所設立的制度;這與安息日是地上最古老的制度,與人類在地上有同等的歷史;其目的是為人類生活的舒適,以及人類體面而尊嚴的繁衍,這才相稱於人類天性高於走獸的尊嚴。婚姻在人人都當尊重,而這些律法是為維護婚姻的尊嚴而設。一項神聖的設立,理當受神聖規則的約束和限制,尤其因為在這方面,人敗壞的天性最容易在各樣事上任性放縱、急不可待,難以約束。然而這些禁令,除了由無可置疑的權威所頒佈之外,本身也是極其合理公正的。(1)藉着婚姻,二人要成為一體,因此那些原先在某種意義上因血統關係已是一體的,若再藉着設立而成為一體,就是極大的荒謬;因為這設立的目的,正是要聯合那些原先沒有聯合的人。(2)婚姻使夫妻之間地位平等。「她不是從你身旁取出的配偶嗎?」因此,那些原先有上下之別的人若彼此通婚(這正是此處所列多數情況),就是以一項積極的條例廢除了天然的秩序,這是斷不可容許的。主人與僕人、貴與賤之間的不平等,是建立在同意和風俗之上的,若因婚姻的平等而將其廢除,並無害處;但父母與兒女、叔伯與姪女、姑姨與姪甥之間的不平等,無論是因血統或因婚姻而來,都是建立在天然秩序之上的,因此是永遠的,若因婚姻的平等而將其廢除,必造成混亂;雖然婚姻的設立是古老的,卻是後於天然秩序的。(3)凡是平等的親屬關係都沒有被禁止,惟獨弟兄姐妹無論是全血親或半血親,或因婚姻而成的關係例外;而在這方面沒有前面那些情形的天然荒謬,因為亞當的兒子們必然要娶自己的姐妹為妻;但這必須以一條積極的律法使之成為不合法且可憎的,以防止那些在年輕時被認為同居一室的人之間產生有罪親密的行為,而這些人之間若通婚,就會破壞婚姻的其中一個目的,即擴展友誼和關係。如果人人都娶自己的姐妹為妻(若這是合法的,他們必然一代一代如此行),每個家庭就會自成一個世界,而我們這許多人,在基督裏成為一身,互相聯絡作肢體這句話就會被遺忘。可以肯定,這事一向被較為明智的外邦人視為極其可恥可憎之事;那些沒有這條律法的人,在這事上自己對自己就是律法。利用婚姻的設立來庇護亂倫的結合,不但不能為其辯護或減輕其罪,反而增加了褻瀆神設立的條例之罪,將那為最高尚目的而設立的,用於最卑鄙的目的。但是,

2. 在婚姻之外與這些親屬所犯的不潔,毫無疑問也在此被禁止,且同樣是這段經文的意思:一切放蕩的舉止、輕浮的調戲,以及一切有這罪之嫌疑的事,都包括在內。親屬之間當彼此相愛,可以有自由親密的交往,但必須完全聖潔;別人越少懷疑有惡,當事人自己就越當謹慎,免得撒但趁機勝過我們,因為牠是十分詭詐的仇敵,尋找一切機會攻擊我們。

II. 所禁止的親屬關係大多已清楚說明;這裏定下一條總則:凡男子在自己方面不可娶的親屬關係,在他妻子方面同樣不可娶,因為他們二人是一體的。那條禁止娶弟兄之妻的律法(Le 18:16),在猶太國中有一個特別的例外,即若一個人死了沒有後嗣,他的兄弟或至近的親屬當娶那寡婦,為死者立後(De 25:5),這理由只在那個政體中才成立;因此如今那些理由已經不復存在,這例外也就失效,那條律法仍然有效,即人在任何情況下都不可娶弟兄的遺孀。那條禁止人娶此女為妻,又娶彼女為妻(娶妻與其姐妹)的條例(Le 18:18),暗示當時對多妻制的默許,正如當時其他一些律法所行的一樣(Ex 21:10,De 21:15),但禁止一人娶兩姐妹為妻,像雅各所行的那樣,因為在原先地位平等的姐妹之間,比起沒有這樣親近關係的妻子之間,更容易產生更大的嫉妒和怨恨。若把妻子的姐妹納為妾,或作次妻,在那姐妹一生中,沒有甚麼比這更令她苦惱的了。

英文原文

Incest Defined and Forbidden; Against Marrying Near Relations (1490 BC)

⁶ None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness: I am the LORD.
⁷ The nakedness of thy father, or the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.
⁸ The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness.
⁹ The nakedness of thy sister, the daughter of thy father, or daughter of thy mother, whether she be born at home, or born abroad, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover.
¹⁰ The nakedness of thy son's daughter, or of thy daughter's daughter, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover: for theirs is thine own nakedness.
¹¹ The nakedness of thy father's wife's daughter, begotten of thy father, she is thy sister, thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.
¹² Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy father's sister: she is thy father's near kinswoman.
¹³ Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy mother's sister: for she is thy mother's near kinswoman.
¹⁴ Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy father's brother, thou shalt not approach to his wife: she is thine aunt.
¹⁵ Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy daughter in law: she is thy son's wife; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.
¹⁶ Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy brother's wife: it is thy brother's nakedness.
¹⁷ Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter, neither shalt thou take her son's daughter, or her daughter's daughter, to uncover her nakedness; for they are her near kinswomen: it is wickedness.
¹⁸ Neither shalt thou take a wife to her sister, to vex her, to uncover her nakedness, beside the other in her life time.

These laws relate to the seventh commandment, and, no doubt, are obligatory on us under the gospel, for they are consonant to the very light and law of nature: one of the articles, that of a man's having his father's wife, the apostle speaks of as a sin not so much as named among the Gentiles, 1Co 5:1. Though some of the incests here forbidden were practised by some particular persons among the heathen, yet they were disallowed and detested, unless among those nations who had become barbarous, and were quite given up to vile affections. Observe,

I. That which is forbidden as to the relations here specified is approaching to them to uncover their nakedness, Le 18:6.

1. It is chiefly intended to forbid the marrying of any of these relations. Marriage is a divine institution; this and the sabbath, the eldest of all, of equal standing with man upon the earth: it is intended for the comfort of human life, and the decent and honourable propagation of the human race, such as became the dignity of man's nature above that of the beasts. It is honourable in all, and these laws are for the support of the honour of it. It was requisite that a divine ordinance should be subject to divine rules and restraints, especially because it concerns a thing wherein the corrupt nature of man is as apt as in any thing to be wilful and impetuous in its desires, and impatient of check. Yet these prohibitions, besides their being enacted by an incontestable authority, are in themselves highly reasonable and equitable. (1.) By marriage two were to become one flesh, therefore those that before were in a sense one flesh by nature could not, without the greatest absurdity, become one flesh by institution; for the institution was designed to unite those who before were not united. (2.) Marriage puts an equality between husband and wife. "Is she not thy companion taken out of thy side?" Therefore, if those who before were superior and inferior should intermarry (which is the case in most of the instances here laid down), the order of nature would be taken away by a positive institution, which must by no means be allowed. The inequality between master and servant, noble and ignoble, is founded in consent and custom, and there is no harm done if that be taken away by the equality of marriage; but the inequality between parents and children, uncles and nieces, aunts and nephews, either by blood or marriage, is founded in nature, and is therefore perpetual, and cannot without confusion be taken away by the equality of marriage, the institution of which, though ancient, is subsequent to the order of nature. (3.) No relations that are equals are forbidden, except brothers and sisters, by the whole blood or half blood, or by marriage; and in this there is not the same natural absurdity as in the former, for Adam's sons must of necessity have married their own sisters; but it was requisite that it should be made by a positive law unlawful and detestable, for the preventing of sinful familiarities between those that in the days of their youth are supposed to live in a house together, and yet cannot intermarry without defeating one of the intentions of marriage, which is the enlargement of friendship and interest. If every man married his own sister (as they would be apt to do from generation to generation if it were lawful), each family would be a world to itself, and it would be forgotten that we are members one of another. It is certain that this has always been looked upon by the more sober heathen as a most infamous and abominable thing; and those who had not this law yet were herein a law to themselves. The making use of the ordinance of marriage for the patronizing of incestuous mixtures is so far from justifying them, or extenuating their guilt, that it adds the guilt of profaning an ordinance of God, and prostituting that to the vilest of purposes which was instituted for the noblest ends. But,

2. Uncleanness, committed with any of these relations out of marriage, is likewise, without doubt, forbidden here, and no less intended than the former: as also all lascivious carriage, wanton dalliance, and every thing that has the appearance of this evil. Relations must love one another, and are to have free and familiar converse with each other, but it must be with all purity; and the less it is suspected of evil by others the more care ought the persons themselves to take that Satan do not get advantage against them, for he is a very subtle enemy, and seeks all occasions against us.

II. The relations forbidden are most of them plainly described; and it is generally laid down as a rule that what relations of a man's own he is bound up from marrying the same relations of his wife he is likewise forbidden to marry, for they two are one. That law which forbids marrying a brother's wife (Le 18:16) had an exception peculiar to the Jewish state, that, if a man died without issue, his brother or next of kin should marry the widow, and raise up seed to the deceased (De 25:5), for reasons which held good only in that commonwealth; and therefore now that those reasons have ceased the exception ceases, and the law is in force, that a man must in no case marry his brother's widow. That article (Le 18:18) which forbids a man to take a wife to her sister supposes a connivance at polygamy, as some other laws then did (Ex 21:10, De 21:15), but forbids a man's marrying two sisters, as Jacob did, because between those who had before been equal there would be apt to arise greater jealousies and animosities than between wives that were not so nearly related. If the sister of the wife be taken for the concubine, or secondary wife, nothing can be more vexing in her life, or as long as she lives.

19-30

Laws against Iniquity (1490 BC)

開啟正文

論禁止諸般惡俗(主前 1490 年)

¹⁹ 婦人月經污穢的時候,你不可親近她,露她的下體。
²⁰ 不可與鄰舍的妻同寢交合,以她玷污自己。
²¹ 你不可使你的兒女經火歸於摩洛,也不可褻瀆你神的名:我是耶和華。
²² 不可與男人苟合,像與女人一樣:這本是可憎惡的。
²³ 不可與獸淫合,以它玷污自己;女人也不可站在獸前,與它淫合:這本是逆性的事。
²⁴ 在這一切的事上,你們都不可玷污自己;因為我在你們面前所趕出的國民,都因這一切的事被玷污了;
²⁵ 連地也玷污了;所以我追討那地的罪,那地也把居民吐出去。
²⁶ 故此你們要守我的律例和典章,不可行這一切可憎惡的事,無論是本國人,是寄居在你們中間的外人;
²⁷ (在你們以先居住那地的人,行了這一切可憎惡的事,連地也玷污了;)
²⁸ 免得你們玷污那地的時候,地也把你們吐出去,像吐出在你們以先的國民一樣。
²⁹ 無論何人行了這其中一件可憎惡的事,那些人必從民中被剪除。
³⁰ 所以你們要守我所吩咐的,免得你們隨從這一切可憎的惡俗,就是在你們以先的人所行的,以致你們在其中玷污自己:我是耶和華你們的神。

這裏有:I. 一條維護婚姻之床的尊嚴的律法:它不可在不合宜的時候被使用(Le 18:19),也不可被姦夫侵犯(Le 18:20)。

II. 一條反對最違背天性之偶像崇拜的律法:使兒女經火歸於摩洛(Le 18:21)。摩洛(有人認為)是他們在其中或藉以敬拜太陽——這世界的大火——的偶像;因此在敬拜中,他們或將自己的兒女當作祭物獻給這偶像,在他面前活活燒死,或將他們分別為聖歸於偶像,使他們從兩堆火之間經過——如有人這樣認為——或從一堆火中拋過去,以此尊榮這假神;他們以為只要以這種方式將兒女中的一個獻給摩洛,就能為其餘所有的兒女求得好運。偶像崇拜者尚且這樣將自己的兒女獻給假神,我們難道還有甚麼東西太寶貴,以至於不願獻給真神或不願為真神而捨棄嗎?請看以色列後來所犯的這罪(儘管有這條律法)如何因他們和他們的兒女與神之間的關係而更加嚴重。結 16:20:你將你所生的兒女,就是我為你所生的,將他們獻上了。因此這裏稱之為褻瀆他們神的名;因為這看起來像他們以為自己對摩洛的義務比對耶和華的更大;因為他們只將牲畜獻給耶和華,卻將兒女獻給摩洛。

III. 一條反對逆性情慾的律法:男色和獸淫,這些罪不可提說,也不可想像,除非帶着最大可能的憎惡(Le 18:22,23)。別的罪使人與獸同等,但這些罪使人更低賤。竟然需要制定這樣的律法,而這律法既已公佈,竟然還有人違犯,這是人類天性永遠的恥辱和羞辱;而人被交給這些可恥的情慾,常常是他們拜偶像的刑罰;使徒如此說明(Ro 1:24)。

IV. 反對這些及類似的可憎惡之事的論據。那有無可爭議的權利命令我們的主,卻因要待我們如人,且用人的繩索牽引我們,就屈尊與我們說理。1. 犯罪者以這些可憎的事玷污自己:你們都不可在這一切的事上玷污自己(Le 18:24)。一切的罪都玷污良心,但這些罪尤為特別污穢。我們的天父出於慈愛,要求我們保持清潔,不可在污泥中打滾。2. 犯這些事的人必被剪除(Le 18:29)。這是公義的;因為,若有人毁壞神的殿,神必要毁壞那人(1Co 3:17)。肉體的情慾與靈魂爭戰,若不是神的憐憫和恩典攔阻,必將之毁滅。3. 連地也玷污了(Le 18:25)。若這等罪惡被實行和容忍,那地就不配有神的會幕在其中,那純全聖潔的神也要從中收回祂恩典同在的記號。那地也對居民有害,他們因此被罪感染,遭瘟疫侵襲;那地對其中一切善良的人也實在令人作嘔、可憎,正如所多瑪的罪惡對義人羅得的靈魂一樣。4. 這是從前居民的惡俗(Le 18:24,27)。因此制定這些律法是必要的,正如我們進入疫區時需要防疫和預防的藥物一樣。他們既不可行這些事,因為那行了這些事的國民如今正落在神的咒詛之下,且不久就要倒在以色列人的刀下。他們不能不感覺到那些在這污穢中打滾的人使自己何等可憎,在一切善良的人的鼻孔中何等發臭;難道一個像以色列那樣被分別為聖、被高舉的民族,也要使自己如此卑賤嗎?當我們看到罪在別人身上是何等醜陋時,就當以此作為警惕,格外謹慎地保守自己的純潔。5. 因這些及類似的罪,迦南人將被毁滅;這些罪使亞摩利人的罪孽滿盈(Ge 15:16),並招致了如此多人口眾多的國家被毁滅,而以色列人如今不久就要成為這毁滅的目擊者,更是執行者:所以我追討那地的罪(Le 18:25)。請注意,神對那些膽大妄為、褻瀆無神的人所施行的大而可畏的審判,是要作為警告,提醒那些自稱信仰的人,謹防一切有褻瀆或無神之嫌疑或傾向的事。連迦南人的傾覆也是對以色列人的警戒,不可效法他們。不但如此,為要表明不但創造主被這等可憎之事觸怒,連受造之物也被其重壓,這裏又加了一句(Le 18:25):連地也把居民吐出去。他們所站之地彷彿在他們腳下嘆息,對他們感到厭倦,不將這些耶和華的仇敵吐出就不肯安息(賽 1:24)。這說明罪極其可憎;犯罪的人誠然將罪孽如水吞下,但受造之物中那無辜的部分卻因罪而翻騰、反對。多少房屋和城鎮曾以厭惡之情將惡人「吐出」(Re 3:16)。所以要當心,神說,免得地也把你們吐出去(Le 18:28)。那地已賜給他們為業,但他們必須知道,若將迦南人的惡習當作自己的,他們的結局必與他們的地一樣。請注意,邪惡的以色列人在神眼中與邪惡的迦南人一樣可憎,甚至更甚,也必照樣被吐出,或更早被吐出。使徒也將這樣的警告賜給外邦信徒,論到被棄絕的猶太人——他們取代了猶太人的位置(Ro 11:19 等);他們當防備跟着他們不信的樣子跌倒了(Heb 4:11)。更廣義地應用:讓我們想到罪已經毁滅了多少人,就有效地被攔阻不犯任何罪的途徑。將信心的耳朵貼在無底坑的門口,聽聽沉淪的罪人那悲慘的尖叫和哀號——他們被地吐出,被地獄吞沒,發現自己因罪而滅亡,永遠滅亡了——就當戰兢,免得這至終成為你的分。神的威嚇和審判當使我們因罪而懼怕。

V. 本章以一服預防這瘟疫的靈丹妙藥作結:所以你們要守我所吩咐的,免得你們隨從這一切可憎的惡俗(Le 18:30)。這是所開的良方。請注意,1. 犯罪的風俗就是可憎的風俗;風俗的普遍和時髦並不能使它們減少可憎,反而當使我們更加憎惡它們;因為越普遍就越危險。2. 容忍任何一種犯罪的風俗都是極有害的,因為一個會引發許多個——Uno absurdo dato, mille sequuntur——容讓一個荒謬,就招來一千個。犯罪的道路是下坡路。3. 緊密而持久地遵行神的條例,是預防大罪感染的最有效方法。我們越嘗到聖潔條例的甘甜,越感受其能力,就越少傾向罪人所行的可憎風俗的禁果。惟有神的恩典能保守我們,而這恩典只能在使用恩典的途徑中得着。神也從不將人交在他們心中的私慾裏,直到他們先離棄了祂和祂的設立。

英文原文

Laws against Iniquity (1490 BC)

¹⁹ Also thou shalt not approach unto a woman to uncover her nakedness, as long as she is put apart for her uncleanness.
²⁰ Moreover thou shalt not lie carnally with thy neighbour's wife, to defile thyself with her.
²¹ And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD.
²² Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
²³ Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion.
²⁴ Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things: for in all these the nations are defiled which I cast out before you:
²⁵ And the land is defiled: therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants.
²⁶ Ye shall therefore keep my statutes and my judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations; neither any of your own nation, nor any stranger that sojourneth among you:
²⁷ (For all these abominations have the men of the land done, which were before you, and the land is defiled;)
²⁸ That the land spue not you out also, when ye defile it, as it spued out the nations that were before you.
²⁹ For whosoever shall commit any of these abominations, even the souls that commit them shall be cut off from among their people.
³⁰ Therefore shall ye keep mine ordinance, that ye commit not any one of these abominable customs, which were committed before you, and that ye defile not yourselves therein: I am the LORD your God.

Here is, I. A law to preserve the honour of the marriage-bed, that it should not be unseasonably used (Le 18:19), nor invaded by an adulterer, Le 18:20.

II. A law against that which was the most unnatural idolatry, causing their children to pass through the fire to Moloch, Le 18:21. Moloch (as some think) was the idol in and by which they worshipped the sun, that great fire of the world; and therefore in the worship of it they made their own children either sacrifices to this idol, burning them to death before it, or devotees to it, causing them to pass between two fires, as some think, or to be thrown through one, to the honour of this pretended deity, imagining that the consecrating of but one of their children in this manner to Moloch would procure good fortune for all the rest of their children. Did idolaters thus give their own children to false gods, and shall we think any thing too dear to be dedicated to, or to be parted with for, the true God? See how this sin of Israel (which they were afterwards guilty of, notwithstanding this law) is aggravated by the relation which they and their children stood in to God. Eze 16:20, Thou hast taken thy sons and thy daughters, whom thou hast borne unto me, and these thou hast sacrificed. Therefore it is here called profaning the name of their God; for it looked as if they thought they were under greater obligations to Moloch than to Jehovah; for to him they offered their cattle only, but to Moloch their children.

III. A law against unnatural lusts, sodomy and bestiality, sins not to be named nor thought of without the utmost abhorrence imaginable, Le 18:22,23. Other sins level men with the beasts, but these sink them much lower. That ever there should have been occasion for the making of these laws, and that since they are published they should ever have been broken, is the perpetual reproach and scandal of human nature; and the giving of men up to these vile affections was frequently the punishment of their idolatries; so the apostle shows, Ro 1:24.

IV. Arguments against these and the like abominable wickednesses. He that has an indisputable right to command us, yet because he will deal with us as men, and draw with the cords of a man, condescends to reason with us. 1. Sinners defile themselves with these abominations: Defile not yourselves in any of these things, Le 18:24. All sin is defiling to the conscience, but these are sins that have a peculiar turpitude in them. Our heavenly Father, in kindness to us, requires of us that we keep ourselves clean, and do not wallow in the dirt. 2. The souls that commit them shall be cut off, Le 18:29. And justly; for, if any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy, 1Co 3:17. Fleshly lusts war against the soul, and will certainly be the ruin of it if God's mercy and grace prevent not. 3. The land is defiled, Le 18:25. If such wickednesses as these be practised and connived at, the land is thereby made unfit to have God's tabernacle in it, and the pure and holy God will withdraw the tokens of his gracious presence from it. It is also rendered unwholesome to the inhabitants, who are hereby infected with sin and exposed to plagues and it is really nauseous and loathsome to all good men in it, as the wickedness of Sodom was to the soul of righteous Lot. 4. These have been the abominations of the former inhabitants, Le 18:24,27. Therefore it was necessary that these laws should be made, as antidotes and preservatives from the plague are necessary when we go into an infected place. And therefore they should not practise any such things, because the nations that had practised them now lay under the curse of God, and were shortly to fall by the sword of Israel. They could not but be sensible how odious those people had made themselves who wallowed in this mire, and how they stank in the nostrils of all good men; and shall a people sanctified and dignified as Israel was make themselves thus vile? When we observe how ill sin looks in others we should use this as an argument with ourselves with the utmost care and caution to preserve our purity. 5. For these and the like sins the Canaanites were to be destroyed; these filled the measure of the Amorites' iniquity (Ge 15:16), and brought down that destruction of so many populous kingdoms which the Israelites were now shortly to be not only the spectators, but the instruments of: Therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, Le 18:25. Note, The tremendous judgments of God, executed on those that are daringly profane and atheistical, are intended as warnings to those who profess religion to take heed of every thing that has the least appearance of, or tendency towards, profaneness or atheism. Even the ruin of the Canaanites is an admonition to the Israelites not to do like them. Nay, to show that not only the Creator is provoked, but the creation burdened, by such abominations as these, it is added (Le 18:25), The land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants. The very ground they went upon did, as it were, groan under them, and was sick of them, and not easy till it had discharged itself of these enemies of the Lord, Isa 1:24. This bespeaks the extreme loathsomeness of sin; sinful man indeed drinks in iniquity like water, but the harmless part of the creation even heaves at it, and rises against it. Many a house and many a town have spued out the wicked inhabitants, as it were, with abhorrence, Re 3:16. Therefore take heed, saith God, that the land spue not you out also, Le 18:28. It was secured to them, and entailed upon them, and yet they must expect that, if they made the vices of the Canaanites their own, with their land their fate would be the same. Note, Wicked Israelites are as abominable to God as wicked Canaanites, and more so, and will be as soon spued out, or sooner. Such a warning as was here given to the Israelites is given by the apostle to the Gentile converts, with reference to the rejected Jews, in whose room they were substituted (Ro 11:19, etc.); they must take heed of falling after the same example of unbelief, Heb 4:11. Apply it more generally; and let it deter us effectually from all sinful courses to consider how many they have been the ruin of. Lay the ear of faith to the gates of the bottomless pit, and hear the doleful shrieks and outcries of damned sinners, whom earth has spued out and hell has swallowed, that find themselves undone, for ever undone, by sin; and tremble lest this be your portion at last. God's threatenings and judgments should frighten us from sin.

V. The chapter concludes with a sovereign antidote against this infection: Therefore you shall keep my ordinance that you commit not any one of these abominable customs, Le 18:30. This is the remedy prescribed. Note, 1. Sinful customs are abominable customs, and their being common and fashionable does not make them at all the less abominable nor should we the less abominate them, but the more; because the more customary they are the more dangerous they are. 2. It is of pernicious consequence to admit and allow of any one sinful custom, because one will make way for many, Uno absurdo dato, mille sequuntur—Admit but a single absurdity, you invite a thousand. The way of sin is downhill. 3. A close and constant adherence to God's ordinances is the most effectual preservative from the infection of gross sin. The more we taste of the sweetness and feel of the power of holy ordinances the less inclination we shall have to the forbidden pleasures of sinners' abominable customs. It is the grace of God only that will secure us, and that grace is to be expected only in the use of the means of grace. Nor does God ever leave any to their own hearts' lusts till they have first left him and his institutions.