서론
無標題
英文原文
In this chapter, we have, I. Christ's clearing of the law of the fourth commandment concerning the sabbath-day, and vindicating it from some superstitious notions advanced by the Jewish teachers; showing that works of necessity and mercy are to be done on that day, Mt 12:1-13. II. The prudence, humility, and self-denial of our Lord Jesus in working his miracles, Mt 12:14-21. III. Christ's answer to the blasphemous cavils and calumnies of the scribes and Pharisees, who imputed his casting out devils to a compact with the devil, Mt 12:22-37. IV. Christ's reply to a tempting demand of the scribes and Pharisees, challenging him to show them a sign from heaven, Mt 12:38-45. V. Christ's judgment about his kindred and relations, Mt 12:46-50.
1-13
Christ Vindicates His Disciples
基督為門徒辯護
¹ 那時,耶穌在安息日從麥地經過。他的門徒餓了,就掐起麥穗來吃。
² 法利賽人看見,就對他說:看哪,你的門徒做安息日不可做的事了!
³ 耶穌對他們說:經上記著大衛和跟從他的人飢餓之時所做的事,你們沒有念過嗎?
⁴ 他怎麼進了神的殿,吃了陳設餅,這餅他不可以吃,跟從他的人也不可以吃,唯獨祭司才可以吃?
⁵ 再者,律法上所記的,當安息日,祭司在殿裏犯了安息日還是沒有罪的,你們沒有念過嗎?
⁶ 但我告訴你們,在這裏有一人比殿更大。
⁷ 我喜愛憐恤,不喜愛祭祀——你們若明白這話的意思,就不將無罪的當作有罪的了。
⁸ 因為人子是安息日的主。
⁹ 耶穌離開那地方,進了一個會堂。
¹⁰ 那裏有一個人枯乾了一隻手。有人問耶穌說:安息日治病可以不可以?意思是要控告他。
¹¹ 耶穌說:你們中間誰有一隻羊,當安息日掉在坑裏,不把他抓住,拉上來呢?
¹² 人比羊何等貴重呢!所以,在安息日做善事是可以的。
¹³ 於是對那人說:伸出手來!他把手一伸,手就復了原,和那隻手一樣。
猶太教的教師把許多誡命解釋得比原意寬鬆,因而敗壞了它們;這錯誤基督在山上寶訓中(Mt 5:1-48)揭發並糾正了:但關於第四條誡命,他們在另一個極端上犯了錯,把它解釋得過於嚴格。當注意,心存敗壞的人常藉著對禮儀和宗教外在儀式的熱心,來企圖彌補道德上的鬆懈,這是常見的。但那些加添**這書上的話的,和那些刪減的,都受咒詛,Re 22:16,19, Pr 30:6。
如今我們主耶穌在此所確立的是:在安息日作必要和憐憫的工是合法的,這在許多方面是猶太人被教導要當作疑難的。基督對第四條誡命的勤勉解釋,暗示了它對七日中的一日作為聖安息日的宗教遵守有永久的約束力。他不會去解釋一條即將廢除的律法,無疑是打算藉此確立一個對各時代的教會都有用的要點;如此它教導我們,我們基督徒的安息日雖然在第四條誡命的指引下,卻不受猶太長老的條例約束。
通常藉著對實際發生案件的判決來確定律法的意義,這條律法的意義也是如此確立的。這裏有兩段歷史為此目的被放在一起,發生的時間相隔甚遠,性質不同,但都符合這個用意。
I. 基督藉著為門徒在安息日掐麥穗辯護,表明必要的工在那日是*合法的。*如今當注意,
1. 門徒做了甚麼。他們在某個安息日跟著他們的主經過麥田;可能他們正要去會堂(Mt 12:9),因為基督的門徒在那日不宜作*閒逛;而且他們餓了;不要以為這是我們主家的失禮。但我們假設他們如此專注於安息日的事工,以至於忘記了吃餅;在早晨的敬拜上花了太多時間,沒時間吃早飯,空腹出來,因為他們不願遲到會堂。護理安排他們從麥田經過,*在那裏他們得了供應。當注意,神有許多方法在祂百姓需要時為他們帶來合適的供應,並在他們去會堂時格外看顧他們,正如古時看顧那些上耶路撒冷敬拜的人(Ps 84:6,7),為他們的緣故雨水充滿了池子:我們在當盡本分的路上,*耶和華以勒,任憑神為我們預備。他們在麥田裏,就開始掐麥穗;*神的律法允許這事(De 23:25),為要教導人善待鄰舍,不在小事上堅持產權,好叫別人得益處。這對基督和他的門徒不過是微薄的供應,卻是他們所有的最好的,他們也知足。著名的惠特莫爾的鮑爾先生常說,他安息日的午餐有兩道菜,一道熱牛奶,一道冷牛奶,足夠了。
2. 法利賽人為此生了甚麼氣。那不過是一頓乾的早餐,法利賽人卻不讓他們安靜地吃。他們不因他們拿別人的麥子而責備他們(他們不是公義的熱心者),卻因在安息日這樣做而責備;因為長老的遺傳明文禁止在那日掐和搓麥穗,理由是這算為收割。
當注意,基督門徒最無害、最無辜的行為被毀謗、被當作不合法的,尤其是被那些對自己的發明和規條熱心的人,這不是新事。法利賽人向其主人抱怨他們做了*不可做的事。*當注意,那些把神沒有定為不合法的事定為不合法的人,不是基督和他門徒的朋友。
3. 基督對法利賽人這詰難的回答如何。門徒為自己說不了多少話,尤其因為與他們爭論的人似乎站在安息日嚴格遵守的那一邊;而在那方面失之過嚴是最安全的:但基督來是要釋放他的跟從者脫離法利賽人的敗壞,也脫離他們不合聖經的規條,所以為他們有所辯護,為他們所行的辯護,雖然這違反了那規條。
(1)他用法利賽人自己也承認有效的先例為他們辯護。
[1] 他引用大衛的古老先例,大衛在必要時做了他本不該做的事(Mt 12:3,4);你們沒有念過(1Sa 21:6)大衛吃陳設餅的故事嗎?那餅按律法是分別為聖歸給祭司的(Le 24:5-9)。*這是至聖的,歸給亞倫和他的子孫;*而且(Ex 29:33)*外人不可吃;但祭司卻把它給了大衛和他的人;因為雖然必要的例外沒有明文規定,卻隱含在這一條和一切其他禮儀條例中。支持大衛吃陳設餅的不是他的尊貴(烏西雅在心中驕傲時侵入祭司的職任,雖然是王,卻因此被擊打長痲瘋,2Ch 26:16等),而是他的飢餓。最偉大的人不可放縱私慾,但最卑微的人的需要當受看顧。飢餓是自然的欲望,不能治死,只能滿足,而且不能用別的東西來打發,只能用食物;所以我們說,飢餓能衝破石牆。如今主是為身體的,*在窘境中容許祂自己的設置通融;長老的遺傳就更可通融了。當注意,在必要的情形中可以做的事,在別的時候不可做;有些律法必要性無權支配,但必要性本身就是律法。*人……不輕看,倒是憐憫,*那為滿足飢餓的靈魂而偷竊的賊,Pr 6:30。
[2] 他引用祭司每日的先例,這他們也在律法上念過,也是恆常的慣例,Mt 12:5。殿裏的祭司在安息日做了許多勞力的工;宰殺、剝皮、焚燒祭牲,這在平常情形中會褻瀆安息日;卻從來不算違背第四條誡命,因為聖殿的事奉需要並證明它為合理。這暗示,那些為維持生命所必需的、以及為當日的事奉所必需的勞力,在安息日是合法的;如鳴鐘召集會眾、前往教會等。安息日的安息是要促進而非妨礙安息日的敬拜。
(2)他用論證為他們辯護,有三個有力的論證。
[1] 在這裏有一人比殿更大,Mt 12:6。若聖殿的事奉能證明祭司在供職中所行的為合理,基督的事奉就更能證明門徒在跟從他時所行的為合理。猶太人對聖殿極其敬重:它分別為聖使金子成聖;司提反被控褻瀆那聖地(Ac 6:13);但在麥田裏的基督比殿更大,因為在他裏面居住的不是象徵性的神的同在,而是神本性一切的豐盛都有形有體地。當注意,我們若凡事奉基督的名而行,*像是給他作的,*就必蒙神恩悅納,無論人如何批評和詰難。
[2] *神喜愛憐恤,不喜愛祭祀,*Mt 12:7。禮儀的本分當讓位於道德的本分,愛和自保的自然而高貴的法則當凌駕於禮儀的遵守之上。這引自Ho 6:6。先前曾引用過,Mt 9:13,為憐憫人的靈魂辯護;這裏為憐憫人的身體辯護。安息日的安息是為人的益處設立的,為身體的益處,De 5:14。如今沒有一條律法可被解釋為與它本身的目的相抵觸。*你們若明白這話是甚麼意思,*明白甚麼是存憐憫的心腸,就會為他們被迫這樣做來滿足飢餓而感到難過,*就不會將無罪的當作有罪的了。*當注意,*第一,無知是我們對弟兄輕率而不慈善的論斷的原因。第二,我們僅僅知道聖經還不夠,必須努力明白其意思。**讀的須要會意。第三,*不明白聖經的意思,在那些擔起教導別人的人尤其可恥。
[3] 人子是安息日的主,Mt 12:8。那條律法,正如其他一切律法,都交在基督手中,由他隨意更改、執行或通融。世界是神藉著子造的,安息日也是他在人無辜時藉著子設立的;十誡是他藉著子在在西奈山頒賜的,他作為中保受託管理各樣條例,並可隨意更改;特別是作為*安息日的主,他有權對那日作這樣的更改,使之成為主日,主基督的日子。基督若是安息日的主,*那日和其中一切的工作當獻給他是合宜的。憑這權柄,基督在此規定:必要的工——若真是必要的,而非假裝和自造的必要性——在安息日是合法的;這對律法的解釋清楚表明它是永久的。例外證實規則。
基督既如此使法利賽人閉口,擺脫了他們(Mt 12:9),就*離開那裏,進了他們的會堂,*就是這些法利賽人所管理的會堂,也是他正要去的——當他們向他挑起這場爭論時。當注意,第一,我們當謹慎,免得在去聖潔條例的路上發生的任何事使我們不適合或妨礙我們正當地參與。我們當在當盡本分的路上前進,不顧撒但的詭計——牠藉著敗壞之心人的悖逆辯論和許多別的方法,來攪擾和擾亂我們。*第二,我們不可因私人的紛爭和個人的恩怨而從公開敬拜中退縮。雖然法利賽人如此惡意地詰難基督,他卻進了他們的會堂。*撒但若藉著在弟兄中間散播紛爭而使他們或其中任何人離開會堂和信徒的團契,就得著了這一點。
II. 基督藉著*在安息日醫治那枯乾了一隻手的人,表明憐憫的工在那日是合法的、合宜的。必要的工由門徒行了,並由他證明為合理;憐憫的工由他自己行了;憐憫的工就是他必要的工;行善是他的食物。**我必須傳道,*他說,Lu 4:43。這醫治被記錄下來,是因為它發生的時間——在安息日。
這裏有,1. 這可憐人所處的困境;他的手枯乾了,使他完全不能靠用手作工謀生。耶柔米說,拿撒勒人和伊便尼派所用的希伯來文馬太福音,在枯乾手之人的故事中加上了這個細節:他是*Cæmentarius——一個泥瓦匠,*他如此向基督求助:*主,我是個泥瓦匠,一向靠勞力謀生(manibus victum quæritans);求你,耶穌,恢復我手的功能,*使我不至被迫乞食(ne turpiter mendicem cibos)。Hieron. in loc. 這可憐的人在會堂裏。當注意,那些對世界只能做很少、或很少有事可做的人,當更加為自己的靈魂而做;正如富人、老人和體弱者。
2. 法利賽人看見這人後向基督提出的一個惡毒的問題。他們問他說:安息日治病可以不可以?我們在此沒有讀到這可憐的人向基督求醫,但他們注意到基督開始留意他,也知道他通常被那些沒有尋求他的人尋見,所以他們以自己的惡意搶先於他的善意,提出這事作為行善路上的絆腳石;安息日治病可以不可以?且不說醫生在那日治病是否合法——這是他們書中所爭論的——人當以為先知治病無疑是合法的,那位在此類事上顯出神能和良善、表明自己為神所差來的,治病是合法的。曾有人問,神治病合不合法,發出他的話語來醫治?誠然,基督如今*服在律法之下,*是自願順服律法,卻從未服在長老的規條之下。*治病可以不可以?查究行為的合法與否是很好的,我們向誰查問也比不上向基督最合宜;但他們問,不是為要受教,而是為要控告他。*他若說安息日治病合法,他們就要控告他與第四條誡命矛盾;法利賽人把安息日的安息帶到如此迷信的地步,除非有生命危險,他們不允許在安息日施行任何醫療。他若說不合法,他們就要控告他偏心,因為他最近剛為門徒在安息日掐麥穗辯護。
3. 基督對這問題的回答,是藉著向他們自己和他們的意見與實踐上訴,Mt 12:11,12。若有一隻羊(雖然只有一隻,損失不大)在安息日掉在坑裏,*他們豈不抓住它,把它拉上來?無疑他們可以這樣做,第四條誡命允許;他們必須這樣做,因為義人顧惜他牲畜的命,*他們自己也寧可不失一隻羊而行這事;基督顧念羊嗎?是的,他顧念;他保全和供應人與牲畜。但他在這裏是為我們的緣故說的(1Co 9:9,10),由此推論:*人比羊何等貴重呢!*羊不僅無害而且有用,所以受重視和照管;然而人在此被遠遠置於其上。當注意,人在其存在方面比最好的牲畜好得多、有價值得多:人是理性的受造者,能認識、愛慕和榮耀神,所以比羊更好。所以獻一隻羊的祭不能贖一個靈魂的罪。那些對馬和狗的教育、保全和供應比對神的窮人、甚至自己家中的人更上心的人,沒有考慮這點。
由此基督推論出一個真理,初看就顯得非常合理而善良;在安息日做善事是可以的;他們問:治病可以不可以?基督證明做善事是合法的,讓任何人判斷基督所行的醫治是否行善。當注意,在安息日做善事的方法,比直接敬拜神的本分更多;探望病人、救濟窮人、幫助那些忽然陷入困境、急需救助的人;這是*行善;這必須出於愛和慈善的心,帶著謙卑和克己,以及屬天的心境,這才是做得好,**必蒙悅納,*Ge 4:7。
4. 基督醫治那人,不顧他預見法利賽人會因此生的氣,Mt 12:13。雖然他們不能回答基督的論證,卻決心堅持偏見和敵意;但基督仍繼續他的工作。當注意,不可因怕得罪人而放棄當盡的本分,或忽略行善的機會。如今醫治的方式值得注意;他對那人說:伸出手來,盡你所能地用力;他就如此行,手就復了原。這如同基督所行的其他醫治,有屬靈的意義。(1)按本性我們的手是枯乾的,我們自己完全不能做任何善事。(2)惟有基督藉他恩典的能力醫治我們;他藉著把生命注入死靈來醫治枯乾的手,在我們裏面運行,使我們立志行事。(3)為了我們的醫治,他吩咐我們伸出手來,運用我們天生的能力,盡力而為;伸手向神禱告,伸手憑信心抓住基督,伸手作聖潔的努力。如今這人不能自己伸出枯乾的手,正如那癱子不能起來搬動褥子,或拉撒路從墳墓中出來;然而基督吩咐他如此行。神吩咐我們做我們自己所不能做的本分,並不荒謬或不公,正如這吩咐枯乾手的人伸出手來不荒謬一樣;因為與命令同來的,是藉著道所賜的恩典應許。*你們當因我的責備回轉,我要將我的靈澆灌你們,*Pr 1:23。那些滅亡的人與這人本可因不伸手而不被醫治一樣不可推諉。但那些得救的人也沒有比這人因伸手而有分於自己的醫治那樣更多可誇的,他們對基督的能力和恩典的虧欠與他一樣深。
英文原文
Christ Vindicates His Disciples
¹ At that time Jesus went on the sabbath day through the corn; and his disciples were an hungred, and began to pluck the ears of corn, and to eat.
² But when the Pharisees saw it, they said unto him, Behold, thy disciples do that which is not lawful to do upon the sabbath day.
³ But he said unto them, Have ye not read what David did, when he was an hungred, and they that were with him;
⁴ How he entered into the house of God, and did eat the showbread, which was not lawful for him to eat, neither for them which were with him, but only for the priests?
⁵ Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless?
⁶ But I say unto you, That in this place is one greater than the temple.
⁷ But if ye had known what this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless.
⁸ For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day.
⁹ And when he was departed thence, he went into their synagogue:
¹⁰ And, behold, there was a man which had his hand withered. And they asked him, saying, Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath days? that they might accuse him.
¹¹ And he said unto them, What man shall there be among you, that shall have one sheep, and if it fall into a pit on the sabbath day, will he not lay hold on it, and lift it out?
¹² How much then is a man better than a sheep? Wherefore it is lawful to do well on the sabbath days.
¹³ Then saith he to the man, Stretch forth thine hand. And he stretched it forth; and it was restored whole, like as the other.
The Jewish teachers had corrupted many of the commandments, by interpreting them more loosely than they were intended; a mistake which Christ discovered and rectified (Mt 5:1-48) in his sermon on the mount: but concerning the fourth commandment, they had erred in the other extreme, and interpreted it too strictly. Note, it is common for men of corrupt minds, by their zeal in rituals, and the external services of religion, to think to atone for the looseness of their morals. But they are cursed who add to, as well as they who take from, the words of this book, Re 22:16,19, Pr 30:6.
Now that which our Lord Jesus here lays down is, that the works of necessity and mercy are lawful on the sabbath day, which the Jews in many instances were taught to make a scruple of. Christ's industrious explanation of the fourth commandment, intimates its perpetual obligation to the religious observation of one day in seven, as a holy sabbath. He would not expound a law that was immediately to expire, but doubtless intended hereby to settle a point which would be of use to his church in all ages; and so it is to teach us, that our Christian sabbath, though under the direction of the fourth commandment, is not under the injunctions of the Jewish elders.
It is usual to settle the meaning of a law by judgments given upon cases that happen in fact, and in like manner is the meaning of this law settled. Here are two passages of story put together for this purpose, happening at some distance of time from each other, and of a different nature, but both answering this intention.
I. Christ, by justifying his disciples in plucking the ears of corn on the sabbath-day, shows that works of necessity are lawful on that day. Now here observe,
1. What it was that the disciples did. They were following their Master one sabbath day through a corn-field; it is likely they were going to the synagogue (Mt 12:9), for it becomes not Christ's disciples to take idle walks on that day, and they were hungry; let it be no disparagement to our Master's house-keeping. But we will suppose they were so intent upon the sabbath work, that they forgot to eat bread; had spent so much time in their morning worship, that they had no time for their morning meal, but came out fasting, because they would not come late to the synagogue. Providence ordered it that they went through the corn, and there they were supplied. Note, God has many ways of bringing suitable provision to his people when they need it, and will take particular care of them when they are going to the synagogue, as of old for them that went up to Jerusalem to worship (Ps 84:6,7), for whose use the rain filled the pools: while we are in the way of duty, Jehovah-jireh, let God alone to provide for us. Being in the corn-fields, they began to pluck the ears of corn; the law of God allowed this (De 23:25), to teach people to be neighbourly, and not to insist upon property in a small matter, whereby another may be benefited. This was but slender provision for Christ and his disciples, but it was the best they had, and they were content with it. The famous Mr. Ball, of Whitmore, used to say he had two dishes of meat to his sabbath dinner, a dish of hot milk, and a dish of cold, and he had enough and enough.
2. What was the offence that the Pharisees took at this. It was but a dry breakfast, yet the Pharisees would not let them eat that in quietness. They did not quarrel with them for taking another man's corn (they were no great zealots for justice), but for doing it on the sabbath day; for plucking and rubbing the ears of corn of that day was expressly forbidden by the tradition of the elders, for this reason, because it was a kind of reaping.
Note, It is no new thing for the most harmless and innocent actions of Christ's disciples to be evil spoken of, and reflected upon as unlawful, especially by those who are zealous for their own inventions and impositions. The Pharisees complained of them to their Master for doing that which it was not lawful to do. Note, Those are no friends to Christ and his disciples, who make that to be unlawful which God has not made to be so.
3. What was Christ's answer to this cavil of the Pharisees. The disciples could say little for themselves, especially because those who quarrelled with them seemed to have the strictness of the sabbath sanctification on their side; and it is safest to err on that hand: but Christ came to free his followers, not only from the corruptions of the Pharisees, but from their unscriptural impositions, and therefore has something to say for them, and justifies what they did, though it was a transgression of the canon.
(1.) He justifies them by precedents, which were allowed to be good by the Pharisees themselves.
[1.] He urges an ancient instance of David, who in a case of necessity did that which otherwise he ought not to have done (Mt 12:3,4); "Have ye not read the story (1Sa 21:6) of David's eating the show-bread, which by the law was appropriated to the priest?" (Le 24:5-9). It is most holy to Aaron and his sons; and (Ex 29:33) a stranger shall not eat of it; yet the priest gave it to David and his men; for though the exception of a case of necessity was not expressed, yet it was implied in that and all other ritual institutions. That which bore out David in eating the show-bread was not his dignity (Uzziah, that invaded the priest's office in the pride of his heart, though a king, was struck with a leprosy for it, 2Ch 26:16, etc.), but his hunger. The greatest shall not have their lusts indulged, but the meanest shall have their wants considered. Hunger is a natural desire which cannot be mortified, but must be gratified, and cannot be put off with any thing but meat; therefore we say, It will break through stone walls. Now the Lord is for the body, and allowed his own appointment to be dispensed with in a case of distress; much more might the tradition of the elders be dispensed with. Note, That may be done in a case of necessity which may not be done at another time; there are laws which necessity has not, but it is a law to itself. Men do not despise, but pity, a thief that steals to satisfy his soul when he is hungry, Pr 6:30.
[2.] He urges a daily instance of the priests, which they likewise read in the law, and according to which was the constant usage, Mt 12:5. The priests in the temple did a great deal of servile work on the sabbath day; killing, flaying, burning the sacrificed beasts, which in a common case would have been profaning the sabbath; and yet it was never reckoned any transgression of the fourth commandment, because the temple-service required and justified it. This intimates, that those labours are lawful on the sabbath day which are necessary, not only to the support of life, but to the service of the day; as tolling a bell to call the congregation together, travelling to church, and the like. Sabbath rest is to promote, not to hinder, sabbath worship.
(2.) He justifies them by arguments, three cogent ones.
[1.] In this place is one greater than the temple, Mt 12:6. If the temple-service would justify what the priests did in their ministration, the service of Christ would much more justify the disciples in what they did in their attendance upon him. The Jews had an extreme veneration for the temple: it sanctified the gold; Stephen was accused for blaspheming that holy place (Ac 6:13); but Christ, in a corn-field, was greater than the temple, for in him dwelt not the presence of God symbolically, but all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. Note, If whatever we do, we do it in the name of Christ, and as unto him, it shall be graciously accepted of God, however it may be censured and cavilled at by men.
[2.] God will have mercy and not sacrifice, Mt 12:7. Ceremonial duties must give way to moral, and the natural, royal law of love and self-preservation must take place of ritual observances. This is quoted from Ho 6:6. It was used before, Mt 9:13, in vindication of mercy to the souls of men; here, of mercy to their bodies. The rest of the sabbath was ordained for man's good, in favour of the body, De 5:14. Now no law must be construed so as to contradict its own end. If you had known what this means, had known what it is to be of a merciful disposition, you would have been sorry that they were forced to do this to satisfy their hunger, and would not have condemned the guiltless. Note, First, Ignorance is the cause of our rash and uncharitable censures of our brethren. Secondly, It is not enough for us to know the scriptures, but we must labour to know the meaning of them. Let him that readeth understand. Thirdly, Ignorance of the meaning of the scripture is especially shameful in those who take upon them to teach others.
[3.] The Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day, Mt 12:8. That law, as all the rest, is put into the hand of Christ, to be altered, enforced, or dispensed with, as he sees good. It was by the Son that God made the world, and by him he instituted the sabbath in innocency; by him he gave the ten commandments at mount Sinai, and as Mediator he is entrusted with the institution of ordinances, and to make what changes he thought fit; and particularly, as being Lord of the sabbath, he was authorized to make such an alteration of that day, as that it should become the Lord's day, the Lord Christ's day. And if Christ be the Lord of the sabbath, it is fit the day and all the work of it should be dedicated to him. By virtue of this power Christ here enacts, that works of necessity, if they be really such, and not a pretended and self-created necessity, are lawful on the sabbath day; and this explication of the law plainly shows that it was to be perpetual. Exceptio firmat regulam—The exception confirms the rule.
Christ having thus silenced the Pharisees, and got clear of them (Mt 12:9), departed, and went into their synagogue, the synagogue of these Pharisees, in which they presided, and toward which he was going, when they picked this quarrel with him. Note, First, We must take heed lest any thing that occurs in our way to holy ordinances unfit us for, or divert us from, our due attendance on them. Let us proceed in the way of our duty, notwithstanding the artifices of Satan, who endeavours, by the perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and many other ways, to ruffle and discompose us. Secondly, We must not, for the sake of private feuds and personal piques, draw back from public worship. Though the Pharisees had thus maliciously cavilled at Christ, yet he went into their synagogue. Satan gains this point, if, by sowing discord among brethren, he prevail to drive them, or any of them, from the synagogue, and the communion of the faithful.
II. Christ, by healing the man that had the withered hand on the sabbath day, shows that works of mercy are lawful and proper to be done on that day. The work of necessity was done by the disciples, and justified by him; the work of mercy was done by himself; the works of mercy were his works of necessity; it was his meat and drink to do good. I must preach, says he, Lu 4:43. This cure is recorded for the sake of the time when it was wrought, on the sabbath.
Here is, 1. The affliction that this poor man was in; his hand was withered so that he was utterly disabled to get his living by working with his hands. St. Jerome says, that the gospel of Matthew in Hebrew, used by the Nazarenes and Ebionites, adds this circumstance to this story of the man with the withered hand, that he was Cæmentarius—a bricklayer, and applied himself to Christ thus; "Lord, I am a bricklayer, and have got my living by my labour (manibus victum quæritans); I beseech thee, O Jesus, restore me the use of my hand, that I may not be obliged to beg my bread" (ne turpiter mendicem cibos). Hieron. in loc. This poor man was in the synagogue. Note, Those who can do but little, or have but little to do for the world, must do so much the more for their souls; as the rich, the aged, and the infirm.
2. A spiteful question which the Pharisees put to Christ upon the sight of this man. They asked him, saying, Is it lawful to heal? We read not here of any address this poor man made to Christ for a cure, but they observed Christ began to take notice of him, and knew it was usual for him to be found of those that sought him not, and therefore with their badness they anticipated his goodness, and started this case as a stumbling-block in the way of doing good; Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath-day? Whether it was lawful for physicians to heal on that day or not, which was the thing disputed in their books, one would think it past dispute, that it is lawful for prophets to heal, for him to heal who discovered a divine power and goodness in all he did of this kind, and manifested himself to be sent of God. Did ever any ask, whether it is lawful for God to heal, to send his word and heal? It is true, Christ was now made under the law, by a voluntary submission to it, but he was never made under the precepts of the elders. Is it lawful to heal? To enquire into the lawfulness and unlawfulness of actions is very good, and we cannot apply ourselves to any with such enquiries more fitly than to Christ; but they asked here, not that they might be instructed by him, but that they might accuse him. If he should say that it was lawful to heal on the sabbath day, they would accuse him of a contradiction to the fourth commandment; to so great a degree of superstition had the Pharisees brought the sabbath rest, that, unless in peril of life, they allowed not any medicinal operations on the sabbath day. If he should say that it was not lawful, they would accuse him of partiality, having lately justified his disciples in plucking the ears of corn on that day.
3. Christ's answer to this question, by way of appeal to themselves, and their own opinion and practice, Mt 12:11,12. In case a sheep (though but one, of which the loss would not be very great) should fall into a pit on the sabbath day, would they not lift it out? No doubt they might do it, the fourth commandment allows it; they must do it, for a merciful man regardeth the life of his beast, and for their parts they would do it, rather than lose a sheep; does Christ take care for sheep? Yes, he does; he preserves and provides for both man and beast. But here he says it for our sakes (1Co 9:9,10), and hence argues, How much then is a man better than a sheep? Sheep are not only harmless but useful creatures, and are prized and tended accordingly; yet a man is here preferred far before them. Note, Man, in respect of his being, is a great deal better, and more valuable, than the best of the brute creatures: man is a reasonable creature, capable of knowing, loving, and glorifying God, and therefore is better than a sheep. The sacrifice of a sheep could therefore not atone for the sin of a soul. They do not consider this, who are more solicitous for the education, preservation, and supply of their horses and dogs than of God's poor, or perhaps their own household.
Hence Christ infers a truth, which, even at first sight, appears very reasonable and good-natured; that it is lawful to do well on the sabbath days; they had asked, Is it lawful to heal? Christ proves it is lawful to do well, and let any one judge whether healing, as Christ healed, was not doing well. Note, There are more ways of doing well upon sabbath days, than by the duties of God's immediate worship; attending the sick, relieving the poor, helping those who are fallen into sudden distress, and call for speedy relief; this is doing good: and this must be done from a principle of love and charity, with humility and self-denial, and a heavenly frame of spirit, and this is doing well, and it shall be accepted, Ge 4:7.
4. Christ's curing of the man, notwithstanding the offence which he foresaw the Pharisees would take at it, Mt 12:13. Though they could not answer Christ's arguments, they were resolved to persist in their prejudice and enmity; but Christ went on with his work notwithstanding. Note, Duty is not to be left undone, nor opportunities of doing good neglected, for fear of giving offence. Now the manner of the cure is observable; he said to the man, "Stretch forth thy hand, exert thyself as well as thou canst;" and he did so, and it was restored whole. This, as other cures Christ wrought, had a spiritual significancy. (1.) By nature our hands are withered, we are utterly unable of ourselves to doing any thing that is good. (2.) It is Christ only, by the power of his grace, that cures us; he heals the withered hand by putting life into the dead soul, works in us both to will and to do. (3.) In order to our cure, he commands us to stretch forth our hands, to improve our natural powers, and do as well as we can; to stretch them out in prayer to God, to stretch them out to lay hold on Christ by faith, to stretch them out in holy endeavours. Now this man could not stretch forth his withered hand of himself, any more than the impotent man could arise and carry his bed, or Lazarus come forth out of his grave; yet Christ bid him do it. God's commands to us to do the duty which of ourselves we are not able to do are no more absurd or unjust, than this command to the man with the withered hand, to stretch it forth; for with the command, there is a promise of grace which is given by the word. Turn ye at my reproof, and I will pour out my Spirit, Pr 1:23. Those who perish are as inexcusable as this man would have been, if he had not attempted to stretch forth his hand, and so had not been healed. But those who are saved have no more to boast of than this man had of contributing to his own cure, by stretching forth his hand, but are as much indebted to the power and grace of Christ as he was.
14-21
The Malice of the Pharisees; Christ Withdraws Himself
法利賽人的惡意;基督退避
¹⁴ 法利賽人出去,商議怎樣可以除滅耶穌。
¹⁵ 耶穌知道了,就離開那裏,有許多人跟著他,他把其中有病的人都治好了;
¹⁶ 又囑咐他們,不要給他傳名。
¹⁷ 這是要應驗先知以賽亞的話,說:
¹⁸ 「看哪!我的僕人,我所揀選、所親愛、心裏所喜悅的,我要將我的靈賜給他;他必將公理傳給外邦。
¹⁹ 他不爭競,不喧嚷;街上也沒有人聽見他的聲音。
²⁰ 壓傷的蘆葦,他不折斷;將殘的燈火,他不吹滅;等他施行公理,叫公理得勝。
²¹ 外邦人都要仰望他的名。」
正如在基督最大的卑微之中有他尊嚴的憑據,照樣在他最大的榮耀之中,他也顯出了謙卑的憑據;當他所行的異能大作為給了他揚名的機會時,他卻使人看出他倒空了自己,使自己默默無聞。這裏我們看到,
一. 法利賽人對基督那可咒詛的惡意(太12:14);他們因他神蹟那令人信服的證據而惱怒,就出去,商議怎樣可以除滅他。使他們苦惱的,不僅是他的神蹟使他的榮耀遮蔽了他們的榮耀,更是他所傳的教訓直接與他們的驕傲、假冒為善和世俗利益相敵對;但他們卻假裝因他犯了安息日而不悅——按律法這是死罪(出35:2)。注意,最邪惡的行為披上最堂皇的藉口,並非新鮮事。請看他們的詭計;他們為此商議,彼此商討怎樣才能有效地行事;他們在一個秘密的核心會議中商議這事,為要彼此激勵、彼此協助。請看他們的殘忍;他們商議的不是監禁或放逐他,而是除滅他——要置那來要叫我們得生命的於死地。這是對我們主耶穌何等的侮辱,要把他當作亡命之徒來追討(qui caput gerit lupinum——頭頂狼頭),當作他本國的禍患,其實他本是本國最大的福分,是他民以色列的榮耀!
二. 基督在此場合的退避,以及他選擇隱密,為要避開的不是他的工作,而是危險;因為他的時候還沒有到(太12:15),他就離開那裏。他本可以靠神蹟保護自己,卻選擇以逃跑和退隱這一平常方式來避開;因為在這件事上如同在其他事上一樣,他情願順服我們人性中無罪的軟弱。他在此自卑,被逼到那些最無助之人所用的普通方法上;這樣他也為自己的教導立下榜樣:*「他們在這城裏逼迫你們,就逃到那城裏去。」*基督已經說了足夠多的話、行了足夠多的事,足以使那些法利賽人信服,若是理智或神蹟能奏效的話;但他們不但不順服這說服,反而更加剛硬、更加惱怒,因此他把他們當作無可救藥的而離開了他們(耶51:9)。
基督退隱不是為了自己的安逸,也不是尋求藉口停止工作;不,他的退隱時間都充滿了工作,他被迫為同樣的事逃命時,仍在行善。這樣他給他的僕人留下了榜樣:不能作所願意作的時候,要作所能作的;被趕到角落裏時,仍要繼續教導。當法利賽人——那民族的大人物和博士們——把基督從那裏趕走,迫使他退避時,普通百姓卻湧來跟從他;有許多人跟著他並找到了他。有人要把這變成他的羞辱,稱他為烏合之眾的頭目;其實這真是他的榮耀:所有不存偏見、不被世上浮華弄瞎了眼的人,都如此衷心、如此熱切地擁護他,以至於無論他往何處去,無論與他同冒何等危險,他們都情願跟從;這也是他恩典的榮耀:窮人有福音傳給他們;他們既接待他,他就接待他們,並把他們全都治好了。基督來到世上要作總醫師,如同太陽之於下界,翅膀有醫治之能。法利賽人雖因基督行善而逼迫他,他卻繼續行善,沒有讓百姓因他們統治者的邪惡而遭殃。注意,雖然有些人對我們不好,我們卻不可因此對別人也不好。
基督設法兼顧有用與隱密;他把他們全都治好了,卻(太12:16)囑咐他們不要給他傳名;這可從以下幾方面看:1. 作為智慧的舉動;激怒法利賽人的,與其說是神蹟本身,不如說是對神蹟的公開議論(太12:23-24);因此基督雖不願不行善,卻要盡可能少惹注意地行,以避免冒犯他們並危及自己。注意,智慧善良的人雖然渴慕行善,卻決不渴慕行了善以後被人談論;因為他們所求的是神的悅納,不是人的稱讚。而在受苦的時期,我們雖然要勇敢地繼續走在盡責的路上,卻要安排其情況,使之不至於不必要地激怒那些尋機會攻擊我們的人;「你們要靈巧像蛇」(太10:16)。2. 這可看作對法利賽人的公義審判,他們既輕看了已經看見的神蹟,就不配再聽見任何關於他神蹟的事。他們既閉眼不願見光,就喪失了光的益處。3. 作為謙卑和捨己的舉動。雖然基督行神蹟的用意是要證明自己是彌賽亞,藉此使人信他——為此這些神蹟理當被人知道——但他有時卻吩咐百姓不可宣揚,為要給我們留下謙卑的榜樣,教導我們不可宣揚自己的善良或功用,也不可渴慕別人如此宣揚。基督要他的門徒與那些為要叫人看見而行一切事的人截然相反。
三. 這一切應驗了聖經,太12:17。基督退隱到隱密和幽暗之中,為要使他自己雖然被遮蔽,神的話卻得應驗,並因此得著彰顯和榮耀——這才是他心中所切慕的事。這裏所說應驗的經文是賽42:1-4,在太12:18-21被大段引用。其要旨是要表明我們的主耶穌在他的事業中將會何等溫和而安靜,卻又何等有效;這兩方面的實例我們都已在前面的經文裏看到了。請看這裏,
1. 父對基督的喜悅(太12:18);*「看哪!我的僕人,我所揀選、所親愛、心裏所喜悅的。」*由此我們可以學到,
(一)我們的救主在救贖我們的大工中,是神的僕人。他在其中順服了父的旨意(來10:7),並專心事奉他恩典的計畫和他榮耀的利益,為要修補因人的墮落所造成的破口。作為僕人,他被指派了一項偉大的工作,也受託了一個極大的信任。這是他卑微的一部分:他雖不以自己與神同等為強奪的,卻在我們救恩的工作中取了奴僕的形像,受了律法,且來到約束之下。他雖然為兒子,還是因所受的苦難學了順從(來5:8)。這位王子的格言是:Ich dien——我服事。
(二)耶穌基督是神所揀選的,是惟一適合且配擔當我們救贖大工的人。他是我所揀選的僕人,par negotio——足以擔當此任。除了他,沒有人能作救贖主的工作,或配戴救贖主的冠冕。他是從民中所揀選的(詩89:19),被無限的智慧揀選到那個事奉和尊榮的職位上,人和天使都不合格;惟獨基督,好叫他在凡事上居首位。基督並不是擅自承擔這工作,而是正式被選立的;基督之為神所揀選,是要作揀選的元首,作一切其他蒙揀選之人的元首,因為我們是在他裏面蒙揀選的(弗1:4)。
(三)耶穌基督是神的愛子,他所喜悅的兒子;作為神,他從永恆就躺在父的懷裏(約1:18);他日日為父所喜悅(箴8:30)。在萬世以前,父與子之間就有永恆而不可思議的愛的交流與互換,因此耶和華在造化的起頭就有了他(箴8:22)。作為中保,父愛他;當耶和華喜悅將他壓傷,而他順服了,因此父愛他(約10:17)。
(四)耶穌基督是父所喜悅的,是他的靈魂所喜悅的;這表示所能想像最高的喜悅。神從天上發聲宣告,他是他的愛子,他所喜悅的;在他裏面喜悅,因為他是神心中所切慕那奇妙之工的甘心而樂意的承擔者,並且他在他裏面喜悅我們;因為他已使我们在爱子裏蒙悅納(弗1:6)。墮落的人對神所能擁有的一切利益,都是建立在神對耶穌基督的喜悅之上,也是由此而來的;因為若不藉著他,沒有人能到父那裏去(約14:6)。
2. 父對他的應許有兩方面。
(一)他必在各樣都完全配備以擔當他的事業;「我要將我的靈賜給他」,作為智慧和謀略的靈(賽11:2-3)。神所呼召來事奉的人,他必裝備並使他合格;並由此顯明是他呼召了他們,如摩西(出4:12)。基督作為神,在權能和榮耀上與父同等;作為中保,他從父領受了權能和榮耀,領受是為了賜給:而父所賜給他、使他配備以擔當其事業的一切,都總括在這一句話裏:他將他的靈賜給他:這就是他用以膏他,使他勝過同伴的喜樂油(來1:9)。他領受聖靈,不是有限量的,而是無限量地領受(約3:34)。注意,無論神所揀選的是誰,他所喜悅的是誰,他必將他的靈賜給他們。他賜下愛的地方,也必賜下某種程度的相似。
(二)他必在他的工作上大获成功。神所差遣的,他必印證。早已藉著應許向我們的主耶穌保證:耶和華所喜悅的事必在他手中亨通(賽53:10)。這裏我們對那亨通的喜悅之事有所描述。
〔一〕他必將公理傳給外邦。基督親自向那些鄰近外邦的民族傳道(見可3:6-8),並藉著他的使徒將他的福音——此處稱為他的公理——傳給外邦世界。救恩的道路和方法,那交託給子的審判,不但由他作為我們的大祭司成就,更由他作為我們的大先知表明並傳揚。福音作為一套實踐和行為的準則,具有直接改革和改善人的心與生活的趨向,必傳給外邦人。神的判斷原是猶太人特有的(詩147:19),但舊約先知屢次預言,這些必傳給外邦;因此這本不該像對不信的猶太人那樣成為驚奇,更不該成為苦惱。
〔二〕外邦人都要仰望他的名(太12:21)。他必如此將公理傳給他們,使他們留意並遵行他所傳的,並受其影響而倚靠他,將自己獻給他,順服那公理。注意,福音的大旨,是要引人信靠耶穌基督的名;他名叫耶穌——救主——那寶貴的名,他被如此稱呼,這名如同倒出來的膏油;耶和華我們的義。福音書作者在此跟隨七十士譯本(或者七十士譯本的後期版本跟隨了福音書作者);希伯來文(賽42:4)是:海島都等候他的訓誨。論到外邦人的海島(創10:5),是被雅弗的兒子們所居住的,論到他們曾有預言說(創9:27):「神必使雅弗擴張,使他住在閃的帳棚裏」;這時就要應驗了,當海島(先知說)、外邦人(福音書作者說)等候他的訓誨並仰望他的名:把這些放在一起比較,就可看到,他們、也只有他們,才能滿懷信心地仰望基督的名,就是那些等候他的訓誨並決心受其管治的人。也請注意,我們所等候的訓誨是信心的訓誨,是仰望他名的訓誨。這如今是他最大的誡命,就是我們信基督(約壹3:23)。
3. 關於他的預言,以及他對其事業的溫和而安靜的處理,太12:19-20。這段經文之所以在這裏被引用,主要是為了這一點,起因於基督刻意選擇的隱密和遮蔽。
(一)他將成就他的事業,而沒有喧嚷或張揚。「他不爭競,不喧嚷。」基督和他的國來到不是眼所能見的(路17:20-21)。當長子被帶到世上時,並沒有排場和儀式;他沒有公開入城,沒有傳令官宣告他為王。他在世界,世界卻不認識他。那些以為會有一位鋪張顯赫的救主而自我安慰的人錯了。街上也沒有人聽見他的聲音;「看哪,基督在這裏」,或「看哪,他在那裏」:他用微小安靜的聲音說話,這聲音對一切人有吸引力,卻不使任何人懼怕;他不喜歡喧嚷,而是如同甘露靜靜降下。他所說所做的,都帶著極大的謙卑和捨己。他的國是屬靈的,因此不可靠武力或強暴,或靠崇高的宣言來推進。不,神的國不在乎言語,乃在乎權能。
(二)他將成就他的事業,而沒有嚴厲和苛刻(太12:20)。「壓傷的蘆葦,他不折斷。」有人把這理解為他對惡人的忍耐;他本可以輕易地把這些法利賽人像壓傷的蘆葦一樣折斷,像將殘的燈火一樣吹滅;但他不肯這樣做,直到審判的日子,那時他一切的仇敵要作他的腳凳。另有人寧可把這理解為他扶持軟弱者的能力和恩典。一般而言,他福音的宗旨是要確立一種救恩的方法,這方法鼓勵真誠,即便其中有許多軟弱;它不堅持無罪的順服,而是接受正直而甘心的心意。至於那些在溫柔、敬畏和極大戰兢中跟從基督的具體的人,請注意,〔一〕他們的景況在這裏怎樣被描述——他們如同壓傷的蘆葦,和將殘的燈火。宗教上的年幼初學者軟弱如壓傷的蘆葦,他們的軟弱令人不快,如同冒煙的燈火;他們有一點生命,卻像壓傷的蘆葦那樣的一點;他們有一點熱氣,卻像冒煙的燈火那樣的一點。基督的門徒當時還不過軟弱,許多在他家中有分的人也是如此。他們裏面的恩典和善良如同壓傷的蘆葦,他們裏面的敗壞和邪惡如同冒煙的燈火,如同一根蠟燭的燈芯,被吹滅了還在冒煙。〔二〕我們的主耶穌對他們有什麼憐憫?他不會使他們灰心,更不會拒絕他們或撇棄他們;那被壓傷的蘆葦不會被折斷、被踐踏,而要被扶持,變得如香柏樹或繁茂的棕樹一樣強壯。剛點亮的燈,雖然只是冒煙而不發火焰,不會被吹滅,而要被挑旺。微小之物的日子是寶貴之物的日子,因此他不會輕看,而要使它成為大事之日(亞4:10)。注意,我們的主耶穌對待那些有真恩典、即便在恩典上軟弱的人,極其溫柔(賽40:11,來5:2)。他不但記得我們不過是塵土,更記得我們是肉體。〔三〕這事的美好的結局和成功,暗示在那句話裏:「等他施行公理,叫公理得勝。」他傳給外邦的公理必得勝,他必繼續前行,勝了又要勝(啟6:2)。福音在世上的傳揚,和福音在人心中的大能,都必得勝。恩典必勝過敗壞,並最終在榮耀中得以完全。基督的公理必被領到勝利,因為他審判時必得勝。他必憑真實將公理傳開;賽42:3如此說。真實和勝利大體相同,因為真理何其大,必能得勝。
英文原文
The Malice of the Pharisees; Christ Withdraws Himself
¹⁴ Then the Pharisees went out, and held a council against him, how they might destroy him.
¹⁵ But when Jesus knew it, he withdrew himself from thence: and great multitudes followed him, and he healed them all;
¹⁶ And charged them that they should not make him known:
¹⁷ That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet, saying,
¹⁸ Behold my servant, whom I have chosen; my beloved, in whom my soul is well pleased: I will put my spirit upon him, and he shall show judgment to the Gentiles.
¹⁹ He shall not strive, nor cry; neither shall any man hear his voice in the streets.
²⁰ A bruised reed shall he not break, and smoking flax shall he not quench, till he send forth judgment unto victory.
²¹ And in his name shall the Gentiles trust.
As in the midst of Christ's greatest humiliations, there were proofs of his dignity, so in the midst of his greatest honours, he gave proofs of his humility; and when the mighty works he did gave him an opportunity of making a figure, yet he made it appear that he emptied himself, and made himself of no reputation. Here we have,
I. The cursed malice of the Pharisees against Christ (Mt 12:14); being enraged at the convincing evidence of his miracles, they went out, and held a council against him, how they might destroy him. That which vexed them was, not only that by his miracles his honour eclipsed theirs, but that the doctrine he preached was directly opposite to their pride, and hypocrisy, and worldly interest; but they pretended to be displeased at his breaking the sabbath day, which was by the law a capital crime, Ex 35:2. Note, it is no new thing to see the vilest practices cloaked with the most specious pretences. Observe their policy; they took counsel about it, considered with themselves which way to do it effectually; they took counsel together in a close cabal about it, that they might both animate and assist one another. Observe their cruelty; they took counsel, not to imprison or banish him, but to destroy him, to be the death of him who came that we might have life. What an indignity was hereby put upon our Lord Jesus, to run him down as an outlaw (qui caput gerit lupinum—carries a wolf's head), and the plague of his country, who was the greatest blessing of it, the Glory of his people Israel!
II. Christ's absconding upon this occasion, and the privacy he chose, to decline, not his work, but his danger; because his hour was not yet come (Mt 12:15), he withdrew himself from thence. He could have secured himself by miracle, but chose to do it in the ordinary way of flight and retirement; because in this, as in other things, he would submit to the sinless infirmities of our nature. Herein he humbled himself, that he was driven to the common shift of those who are most helpless; thus also he would give an example to his own rule, When they persecute you in one city, flee to another. Christ had said and done enough to convince those Pharisees, if reason or miracles would have done it; but instead of yielding to the conviction, they were hardened and enraged, and therefore he left them as incurable, Jer 51:9.
Christ did not retire for his own ease, nor seek an excuse to leave off his work; no, his retirements were filled up with business, and he was even then doing good, when he was forced to flee for the same. Thus he gave an example to his ministers, to do what they can, when they cannot do what they would, and to continue teaching, even when they are removed into corners. When the Pharisees, the great dons and doctors of the nation, drove Christ from then, and forced him to withdraw himself, yet the common people crowded after him; great multitudes followed him and found him out. This some would turn to his reproach, and call him the ring-leader of the mob; but it was really his honour, that all who were unbiased and unprejudiced, and not blinded by the pomp of the world, were so hearty, so zealous for him, that they would follow him whithersoever he went, and whatever hazards they ran with him; as it was also the honour of his grace, that the poor were evangelized; that when they received him, he received them and healed them all. Christ came into the world to be a Physician-general, as the sun to the lower world, with healing under his wings. Though the Pharisees persecuted Christ for doing good, yet he went on in it, and did not let the people fare the worse for the wickedness of their rulers. Note, Though some are unkind to us, we must not on that account be unkind to others.
Christ studied to reconcile usefulness and privacy; he healed them all, and yet (Mt 12:16), charged them that they should not make him known; which may be looked upon, 1. As an act of prudence; it was not so much the miracles themselves, as the public discourse concerning them, that enraged the Pharisees (Mt 12:23,24); therefore Christ, though he would not omit doing good, yet would do it with as little noise as possible, to avoid offence to them and peril to himself. Note, Wise and good men, though they covet to do good, yet are far from coveting to have it talked of when it is done; because it is God's acceptance, not men's applause, that they aim at. And in suffering times, though we must boldly go on in the way of duty, yet we must contrive the circumstances of it so as not to exasperate, more than is necessary, those who seek occasion against us; Be ye wise as serpents, Mt 10:16. 2. It may be looked upon as an act of righteous judgment upon the Pharisees, who were unworthy to hear of any more of his miracles, having made so light of those they had seen. By shutting their eyes against the light, they had forfeited the benefit of it. 3. As an act of humility and self-denial. Though Christ's intention in his miracles was to prove himself the Messiah, and so to bring men to believe on him, in order to which it was requisite that they should be known, yet sometimes he charged the people to conceal them, to set us an example of humility, and to teach us not to proclaim our own goodness or usefulness, or to desire to have it proclaimed. Christ would have his disciples to be the reverse of those who did all their works to be seen of men.
III. The fulfilling of the scriptures in all this, Mt 12:17. Christ retired into privacy and obscurity, that though he was eclipsed, the word of God might be fulfilled, and so illustrated and glorified, which was the thing his heart was upon. The scripture here said to be fulfilled is Isa 42:1-4, which is quoted at large, Mt 12:18-21. The scope of it is to show how mild and quiet, and yet how successful, our Lord Jesus should be in his undertaking; instances of both which we have in the foregoing passages. Observe here,
1. The pleasure of the Father in Christ (Mt 12:18); Behold, my Servant whom I have chosen, my Beloved in whom my soul is well pleased. Hence we may learn,
(1.) That our Saviour was God's Servant in the great work of our redemption. He therein submitted himself to the Father's will (Heb 10:7), and set himself to serve the design of his grace and the interests of his glory, in repairing the breaches that had been made by man's apostasy. As a Servant, he had a great work appointed him, and a great trust reposed in him. This was a part of his humiliation, that though he thought it not robbery to be equal with God, yet that in the work of our salvation he took upon him the form of a servant, received a law, and came into bonds. Though he were a son, yet learned he this obedience, Heb 5:8. The motto of this Prince is, Ich dien—I serve.
(2.) That Jesus Christ was chosen of God, as the only fit and proper person for the management of the great work of our redemption. He is my Servant whom I have chosen, as par negotio—equal to the undertaking. None but he was able to do the Redeemer's work, or fit to wear the Redeemer's crown. He was one chosen out of the people (Ps 89:19), chosen by Infinite Wisdom to that post of service and honour, for which neither man nor angel was qualified; none but Christ, that he might in all things have the pre-eminence. Christ did not thrust himself upon this work, but was duly chosen into it; Christ was so God's Chosen as to be the head of election, and of all other the Elect, for we are chosen in him, Eph 1:4.
(3.) That Jesus Christ is God's Beloved, his beloved Son; as God, he lay from eternity in his bosom (Joh 1:18); he was daily his delight, (Pr 8:30). Between the Father and the Son there was before all time an eternal and inconceivable intercourse and interchanging of love, and thus the Lord possessed him in the beginning of his way, Pr 8:22. As Mediator, the Father loved him; then when it pleased the Lord to bruise him, and he submitted to it, therefore did the Father love him, Joh 10:17.
(4.) That Jesus Christ is one in whom the Father is well pleased, in whom his soul is pleased; which denotes the highest complacency imaginable. God declared, by a voice from heaven, that he was his beloved Son in whom he is well pleased; well pleased in him, because he was the ready and cheerful Undertaker of that work of wonder which God's heart was so much upon, and he is well pleased with us in him; for he had made us accepted in the Beloved, Eph 1:6. All the interest which fallen man has or can have in God is grounded upon and owing to God's well-pleasedness in Jesus Christ; for there is no coming to the Father but by him, Joh 14:6.
2. The promise of the Father to him in two things.
(1.) That he should be every way well qualified for his undertaking; I will put my Spirit upon him, as a Spirit of wisdom and counsel, Isa 11:2,3. Those whom God calls to any service, he will be sure to fit and qualify for it; and by that it will appear that he called them to it, as Moses, Ex 4:12. Christ, as God, was equal in power and glory with the Father; as Mediator, he received from the Father power and glory, and received that he might give: and all that the Father gave him, to qualify him for his undertaking, was summed up in this, he put his Spirit upon him: this was that oil of gladness with which he was anointed above his fellows, Heb 1:9. He received the Spirit, not by measure, but without measure, Joh 3:34. Note, Whoever they be that God has chosen, and in whim he is well pleased, he will be sure to put his Spirit upon them. Wherever he confers his love, he confers somewhat of his likeness.
(2.) That he should be abundantly successful in his understanding. Those whom God sends he will certainly own. It was long since secured by promise to our Lord Jesus, that the good pleasure of the Lord should prosper in his hand, Isa 53:10. And here we have an account of that prospering good pleasure.
[1.] He shall show judgment to the Gentiles. Christ in his own person preached to those who bordered upon the heathen nations (see Mk 3:6-8), and by his apostle showed his gospel, called here his judgment, to the Gentile world. The way and method of salvation, the judgment which is committed to the Son, is not only wrought out by him as our great High Priest, but showed and published by him as our great Prophet. The gospel, as it is a rule of practice and conversation, which has a direct tendency to the reforming and bettering of men's hearts and lives, shall be showed to the Gentiles. God's judgments had been the Jews' peculiar (Ps 147:19), but it was often foretold, by the Old-Testament prophets, that they should be showed to the Gentiles, which therefore ought not to have been such a surprise as it was to the unbelieving Jews, much less a vexation.
[2.] In his name shall the Gentiles trust, Mt 12:21. He shall so show judgment to them, that they shall heed and observe what he shows them, and be influenced by it to depend upon him, to devote themselves to him, and conform to that judgment. Note, The great design of the gospel, is to bring people to trust in the name of Jesus Christ; his name Jesus, a Saviour, that precious name whereby he is called, and which is as ointment poured forth; The Lord our Righteousness. The evangelist here follows the Septuagint (or perhaps the latter editions of the Septuagint follow the evangelist); the Hebrew (Isa 42:4) is, The isles shall wait for his law. The isles of the Gentiles are spoken of (Ge 10:5), as peopled by the sons of Japhet, of whom it was said (Ge 9:27), God shall persuade Japhet to dwell in the tents of Shem; which was now to be fulfilled, when the isles (says the prophet), the Gentiles (says the evangelist), shall wait for his law, and trust in his name: compare these together, and observe, that they, and they only, can with confidence trust in Christ's name, that wait for his law with a resolution to be ruled by it. Observe also, that the law we wait for is the law of faith, the law of trusting in his name. This is now his great commandment, that we believe in Christ, 1Jo 3:23.
3. The prediction concerning him, and his mild and quiet management of his undertaking, Mt 12:19,20. It is chiefly for the sake of this that it is here quoted, upon occasion of Christ's affected privacy and concealment.
(1.) That he should carry on his undertaking without noise or ostentation. He shall not strive, or make an outcry. Christ and his kingdom come not with observation, Lu 17:20,21. When the First-begotten was brought into the world, it was not with state and ceremony; he made no public entry, had no harbingers to proclaim him King. He was in the world and the world knew him not. Those were mistaken who fed themselves with hopes of a pompous Saviour. His voice was not heard in the streets; "Lo, here is Christ;" or, "Lo, he is there:" he spake in a still small voice, which was alluring to all, but terrifying to none; he did not affect to make a noise, but came down silently like the dew. What he spake and did was with the greatest possible humility and self-denial. His kingdom was spiritual, and therefore not to be advanced by force or violence, or by high pretensions. No, the kingdom of God is not in word, but in power.
(2.) That he should carry on his undertaking without severity and rigour (Mt 12:20). A bruised reed shall he not break. Some understand this of his patience in bearing with the wicked; he could as easily have broken these Pharisees as a bruised reed, and have quenched them as soon as smoking flax; but he will not do it till the judgment-day, when all his enemies shall be made his footstool. Others rather understand it of his power and grace in bearing up the weak. In general, the design of his gospel is to establish such a method of salvation as encourages sincerity, though there be much infirmity; it does not insist upon a sinless obedience, but accepts an upright, willing mind. As to particular persons, that follow Christ in meekness, and in fear, and in much trembling, observe, [1.] How their case is here described—they are like a bruised reed, and smoking flax. Young beginners in religion are weak as a bruised reed, and their weakness offensive like smoking flax; some little life they have, but it is like that of a bruised reed; some little heat, but like that of smoking flax. Christ's disciples were as yet but weak, and many are so that have a place in his family. The grace and goodness in them are as a bruised reed, the corruption and badness in them are as smoking flax, as the wick of a candle when it is put out and is yet smoking. [2.] What is the compassion of our Lord Jesus toward them? He will not discourage them, much less reject them or cast them off; the reed that is bruised shall not be broken and trodden down, but shall be supported, and made as strong as a cedar or flourishing palm-tree. The candle newly lighted, though it only smokes and does not flame, shall not be blown out, but blown up. The day of small things is the day of precious things, and therefore he will not despise it, but make it the day of great things, Zec 4:10. Note, Our Lord Jesus deals very tenderly with those who have true grace, though they be weak in it, Isa 40:11, Heb 5:2. He remembers not only that we are dust, but that we are flesh. [3.] The good issue and success of this, intimated in that, till he send forth judgment unto victory. That judgment which he showed to the Gentiles shall be victorious, he will go on conquering and to conquer, Re 6:2. Both the preaching of the gospel in the world, and the power of the gospel in the heart, shall prevail. Grace shall get the upper hand of corruption, and shall at length be perfected in glory. Christ's judgment will be brought forth to victory, for when he judges he will overcome. He shall bring forth judgment unto truth; so it is, Isa 42:3. Truth and victory are much the same, for great is the truth, and will prevail.
22-37
The Sin against the Holy Ghost
干犯聖靈的罪
²² 當下,有人將一個被鬼附著、又瞎又啞的人,帶到耶穌那裏,耶穌醫治他,甚至那啞巴又能說話,又能看見。
²³ 眾人都驚奇,說:「這不是大衛的子孫嗎?」
²⁴ 但法利賽人聽見,就說:「這個人趕鬼,無非是靠著鬼王別西卜啊。」
²⁵ 耶穌知道他們的意念,就對他們說:「凡一國自相紛爭,就成為荒場;凡一城一家自相紛爭,必站立不住;
²⁶ 若撒但趕逐撒但,就是自相紛爭,他的國怎能站得住呢?
²⁷ 我若靠著別西卜趕鬼,你們的子弟趕鬼又靠著誰呢?這樣,他們就要斷定你們的是非。
²⁸ 我若靠著神的靈趕鬼,這就是神的國臨到你們了。
²⁹ 人怎能進壯士家裏,搶奪他的家具呢?除非先捆住那壯士,才可以搶奪他的家。
³⁰ 不與我相合的,就是敵我的;不與我收聚的,就是分散的。
³¹ 所以我告訴你們:「人一切的罪和褻瀆的話都可得赦免,惟獨褻瀆聖靈,總不得赦免。
³² 凡說話干犯人子的,還可得赦免;惟獨說話干犯聖靈的,今世來世總不得赦免。」
³³ 「你們或以為樹好,果子也好;樹壞,果子也壞;因為看果子就可以知道樹。
³⁴ 毒蛇的種類!你們既是惡人,怎能說出好話來呢?因為心裏所充滿的,口裏就說出來。
³⁵ 善人從他心裏所存的善就發出善來;惡人從他心裏所存的惡就發出惡來。
³⁶ 我又告訴你們,凡人所說的閒話,當審判的日子,必要句句供出來;
³⁷ 因為要憑你的話定你為義,也要憑你的話定你有罪。」
在這些經文中,我們看到,
一. 基督對撒但榮耀的得勝——藉著恩惠地醫治一個因神的許可而在撒但權下、被撒但所附的人(太12:22)。請注意,
1. 那人的情形十分可憐;他被鬼附著。這類情形在基督的時代比平時更多,好使基督的能力更被尊崇,他抵擋和趕出撒但的目的更顯明;也更清楚地顯明他來要除滅魔鬼的作為。這個被鬼附的可憐人又瞎又啞;何等悲慘!他既不能看見以自救,也不能說話以請別人幫助。一個在撒但權下、被他擄去的靈魂,在屬神的事上是瞎的,在施恩座前是啞的——看不見甚麼,也說不出中肯的話。撒但蒙蔽了信心的眼,封住了禱告的唇。
2. 他的醫治十分奇特,且因是突然的更顯奇特;*他醫治他。注意,征服並趕出撒但,就是醫治靈魂。原因既除,效果立即停止;那又瞎又啞的,既能說話,又能看見。*注意,基督的憐憫正與撒但的惡意相反;他的恩惠正與魔鬼的惡作相反。當撒但的權勢在靈魂中被折斷,眼睛就睜開看見神的榮耀,嘴唇就張開述說他的讚美。
二. 這給眾人帶來的確信——給了所有的人:他們都驚奇。基督從前多次行過這類神蹟;但他的作為並不因常常重複而減少奇妙,也不減少令人驚奇。他們由此推論:「這不是大衛的子孫嗎?」所應許的彌賽亞——那要從大衛的腰中出來的?這不就是那將要來的嗎?我們可以這樣理解,1. 作為探問性的問題;他們問:這不是大衛的子孫嗎?但他們不等回答:印象雖然強烈,卻是短暫的。他們所提出的是個好問題;但似乎很快就消逝了,並沒有深究。這樣的確信當被帶到頂點,然後才有可能進入人心。或者,2. 作為肯定性的問題;這不是大衛的子孫嗎?「是的,當然是他,不可能是別人;這樣的神蹟清楚地證明彌賽亞的國度正在建立。」而作出這推論的,是群眾——觀眾中平凡的人。無神論者會說:「那是因為他們不如法利賽人那樣善於查究。」不,事實是明顯的,不需要太多搜尋:而是因為他們不像法利賽人那樣被世俗的利益所偏待和左右。通往基督是彌賽亞和世界救主這一大真理的路,如此清楚易行,以至於平民百姓也不會錯過;行路人雖愚昧,也不至失迷(賽35:8)。尋求的人尋見了它。這是神聖恩典降卑的例證——那些向聰明通達人就藏起來的事,向嬰孩就顯出來。世人憑智慧不認識神,神卻用愚拙的事使有智慧的人羞愧。
三. 法利賽人褻瀆性的挑剔(太12:24)。法利賽人是那種自稱比別人更認識神的律法、更為律法熱心的人;然而他們卻是基督和他教訓最頑固的仇敵。他們以在百姓中間的聲望為傲;那聲望滋養他們的驕傲,維持他們的權力,充滿他們的錢袋;當他們聽見百姓說這不是大衛的子孫嗎時,他們極其惱怒——比對神蹟本身更惱怒;這使他們對我們的主耶穌心生嫉妒,並擔心隨著他在百姓聲望中的地位提升,他們的勢必黯然失色、日漸衰落;因此他們嫉妒他,正如掃羅嫉妒他父親大衛——因為婦女們所唱論他的歌(撒上18:7-8)。注意,那些將自己的幸福寄託在人的稱讚和掌聲上的人,每逢聽見別人受稱讚,就使自己陷入持續的不安。榮譽的影子追隨基督——他逃避它——卻逃避法利賽人——他們卻竭力追逐它。他們說:*「這個人趕鬼,無非是靠著鬼王別西卜啊。」*所以他不是大衛的子孫。請注意,
1. 他們何等輕蔑地論到基督——這個人;好像他那如同倒出來的膏油般寶貴的名,不配掛在他們嘴上。這是他們驕傲和傲慢的表現,也是他們魔鬼般嫉妒的明證——百姓越尊崇基督,他們就越勤奮地詆毀他。因善人貧窮而輕蔑地論到他們,是惡劣的事。
2. 他們何等褻瀆地論到他的神蹟;他們不能否認事實——基督憑一句話趕出鬼,這如同太陽一般明顯;他們也不能否認這是超凡的、超自然的事。既被迫承認前提,他們除了暗示基督靠著別西卜趕鬼之外,別無他法來逃避這是大衛的子孫的結論;暗示基督和魔鬼之間有默契;據此,鬼不是被趕出去的,而是自願退去,憑同意並帶著計謀退讓的;或者好像藉著與統管之鬼的協議,他有能力趕出次要的鬼。沒有甚麼揣測比這更顯然虛假和卑鄙了——那作為真理本體的他,竟與謊言之父勾結欺騙世人。這是頑固不信的最後避難所——或更確切地說是遁詞——那種決心在最清楚的證據面前硬撐到底的不信。請注意,在眾鬼之中有一位首領——背叛神和反叛神的魁首;但這首領是別西卜——蒼蠅之神,或糞堆之神。路西弗啊,你何竟從光明的天使墮落為蒼蠅之主!然而他也是鬼王——地獄靈界幫派之首。
四. 基督對這卑鄙暗示的回答(太12:25-30)。耶穌知道他們的意念。注意,耶穌基督知道我們任何時候在想甚麼,知道人心裏有甚麼;他從遠處知道我們的意念。看來法利賽人因羞愧不敢說出來,卻存記在心;他們不能指望以此滿足群眾;因此他們把它留作封住自己良心之確信的工具。注意,許多人因那羞於承認、卻不能向耶穌基督隱藏的事而遠離本分;然而法利賽人很可能已在彼此之間竊竊私語所想的,好彼此堅固;但基督的回答被說成是針對他們的意念,因為他知道他們以怎樣的心思和從怎樣的原則說這話——他們不是出於匆忙而說,而是出於根深蒂固的惡意。
基督對這指控的回答豐富而有力,好使各人的口在憑悟性和理性被堵住以先,不被硫磺火湖堵住。這裏他用三個論證來證明這暗示的不合理。
1. 撒但若因這樣的協議被趕出,那將極其荒謬、極不可能,因為那樣撒但的國就自相紛爭了;考慮到他的狡猾,這是不可想像的事(太12:25-26)。
(一)這裏設立了一條眾所周知的準則:在一切群體中,彼此相爭的後果是共同的毀滅。凡一國自相紛爭,就成為荒場;凡一家也是如此。Quæ enim domus tam stabilis est, quæ tam firma civitas, quæ non odiis atque dissidiis funditus everti possit?——因為有哪一家如此穩固,哪一城如此堅實,不能被仇恨和紛爭徹底傾覆呢?(西塞羅《論友誼》第7章。)紛爭通常以荒涼告終;我們若相爭,就破裂;我們若彼此分離,就成為共同仇敵輕易的獵物;何況我們若彼此相咬相吞,就彼此消滅了(加5:15)。教會和國家已藉著慘痛的經歷知道了這一點。
(二)將此應用於當前的情形(太12:26):*若撒但趕逐撒但;*若鬼王與次要的鬼相爭,整個國度和利益很快就會崩潰;不但如此,若撒但與基督達成協議,那必是自取滅亡;因為基督傳道和神蹟的明顯目的和趨勢,正是要推翻撒但的國——那黑暗、邪惡和與神為敵的國;並在它的廢墟上建立一個光明、聖潔和愛的國。基督作為背叛神的叛徒和轄制人靈魂的暴君,他的作為已被基督毀壞;因此,想像別西卜會贊同這樣的計畫或參與其中,是再荒謬不過的事了:他若附從基督,*他的國怎能站得住呢?*他自己倒要促成它的傾覆。注意,魔鬼有一個國度——一個與神和基督對立的共同利益,他必盡其全力使它站住,他絕不會進入基督的利益中;他必須被基督征服和擊潰,因此不能向基督屈服順服。*光明與黑暗、基督與彼列、基督與別西卜之間,能有甚麼相和或相交呢?*基督必毀滅魔鬼的國,但他不需要用與別西卜暗中勾結這樣的小手段小計謀來成就;不,這勝利必須用更高尚的方法取得。任憑鬼王召集他一切的力量,任憑他用盡一切的權勢和計謀,使他的利益結成最緊密的聯盟,基督仍要勝過他的聯合之軍,他的國必站立不住。
2. 鬼被神的靈趕出,一點也不荒謬或不可能;因為,
(一)你們的子弟不然是靠著誰趕鬼呢?在猶太人中有人藉著呼求至高神的名——亞伯拉罕、以撒、雅各的神的名——有時趕出鬼。約瑟夫提到他那個時代有人如此行;我們讀到猶太祭司長的兒子們趕鬼(徒19:13),又有人奉基督的名趕鬼,雖然不跟從他(可9:38),或對他不忠心(太7:22)。法利賽人不定罪這些人,反而把他們所作的歸於神的靈,並以此為自己和自己的民族自豪。因此,他們僅僅出於對基督的惡意和嫉妒,才承認別人靠神的靈趕鬼,卻暗示他靠著與別西卜的勾結趕鬼。注意,惡意的人——尤其是基督和基督教惡意的逼迫者——的方法是:在他們所恨的人身上定罪同樣的事,卻在他們所喜愛的人身上稱許讚揚;嫉妒的判斷不是憑事物,而是憑人;不是憑理智,而是憑偏見。但那些在審判中只認面孔、別的甚麼都不認識的人,極不配坐在摩西的座位上:因此他們要斷定你們的是非;「你們這自相矛盾,在末日要起來審判你們,定你們的罪。」注意,在最後的審判中,不僅每一項罪,連每一項加重罪行的情節都要被算在帳上,甚至我們一些正確和好的觀念也要被提出來作證據,定我們偏心的罪。
(二)趕鬼是神國臨近和顯現的確切記號和證據(太12:28);「但我若是靠著神的靈趕鬼——我確實如此——那麼你們就必須斷定,雖然你們不願接受,彌賽亞的國如今正在你們中間建立。」基督所行的別的神蹟證明他是神所差來的,但這一件證明他奉差來是要毀滅魔鬼的國和他的作為。如今那大應許顯然應驗了——女人的後裔要傷蛇的頭(創3:15)。「因此那久已期盼的神國的榮耀時代如今已開始;輕看它,後果自負。」注意,〔一〕魔鬼權勢的毀滅是藉著神的靈成就的;那使人順服信心的靈,推翻了那在不信和不順服的兒女心中運行的靈的利益。〔二〕趕鬼是神國降臨的確切引進。若魔鬼在一個靈魂中的利益不僅被習慣或外在的約束所遏止,而且被神的靈——作為使人成聖者——所粉碎,那麼毫無疑問神的國已臨到那靈魂——恩典的國,榮耀之國的有福憑據。
3. 將基督的神蹟——尤其是趕鬼這一件——與他的教訓和他聖潔宗教的目的和趨勢相比較,證明他非但沒有與撒但結盟,反而與他公開為敵、處於對抗之中(太12:29);人怎能進壯士家裏,搶奪他的家具呢?除非先捆住那壯士,才可以搶奪他的家。那坐在黑暗中、躺在惡行中的世界,在撒但的佔有之下,在一個壯士的權下,如同一所房屋在壯士的佔有和權下;每一個未重生的靈魂也是如此;撒但住在那裏,在那裏掌權。請注意,(一)基督福音的目的是要搶奪魔鬼的家——那個他在世上如同壯士所守衛的家;要使百姓從黑暗中歸向光明,從罪惡中歸向聖潔,從今世歸向更好的,從撒但權下歸向神(徒26:18);改變靈魂的所屬。(二)為了成就這目的,他趕出污鬼之時就捆住了那壯士:這樣他從魔鬼手中奪去刀劍,好從他手中奪去權杖。基督的教訓教導我們如何詮釋他的神蹟;當他展示了他能如此輕而易舉、如此有效地把鬼從人的身體裏趕出,他就鼓勵一切信徒盼望:無論撒但在人靈魂中篡奪和行使怎樣的權勢,基督必以他的恩典將其折斷:他必搶奪他,因為他顯明了他能捆住他。當萬民離棄偶像歸向又真又活的神、當一些最惡的罪人被成聖稱義、成為最好的聖徒之時,基督就搶奪了魔鬼的家,並且還要越來越搶奪。
4. 這裏暗示,基督正積極進行的這場抵擋魔鬼和他國度的聖戰,不容中立(太12:30):不與我相合的,就是敵我的。在基督門徒之間可能發生的小小分歧中,我們受教要縮小事端、尋求和睦,把那些不反對我們的,當作與我們相合的(路9:50);但在基督與魔鬼的大爭論中,不可尋求和平,也不可對任何冷漠作如此有利的解讀;凡不真心為基督的,必被當作真正敵對他的人來對待:在這事業上冷淡的,就被視為仇敵。當爭論在於神和巴力之間時,不可在二者之間躊躇(王上18:21),在基督與彼列之間不可左右逢源;因為基督的國既永遠與魔鬼的國相對,也必永遠勝過它;因此在這事業上不可像約旦河那邊的基列人或海邊的亞設人那樣坐視不理(士4:16-17),我們必須完全地、忠心地、不可動搖地站在基督一邊;那是正確的一邊,也必最終是得勝的一邊。見出32:26。
後半句意思相同:不與我收聚的,就是分散的。注意,(一)基督到世上來的使命是收聚——收聚他的莊稼,收聚父所賜給他的人(約11:52,弗1:10)。(二)基督期望並要求那些與他同在的人與他一同收聚;他們不僅自己收聚歸向他,還要在各自的位置上盡力收聚別人歸向他,從而堅固他的利益。(三)那些不願作基督國度推進者的人,必被視為並當作阻礙者來對待;我們若不與基督收聚,就是分散;不作惡還不夠,我們必須行善。這樣,基督與撒但之間的裂痕就越發擴大,表明他們之間並非法利賽人所竊竊私語的那種勾結。
五. 這裏有基督趁此機會論到舌頭之罪的講論;*所以我告訴你們。*他似乎從法利賽人轉向群眾,從辯論轉向教導;他從法利賽人的罪警告群眾防備三種舌頭之罪;因為別人的鑑戒正是對我們的提醒。
1. 干犯聖靈的褻瀆話是最壞的舌頭之罪,是不可赦免的(太12:31-32)。
(一)這裏有一個恩惠的保證:在福音條件下一切罪都可得赦免;基督對我們所說的,這是安慰人的話——罪再大也不阻擋我們與神和好,只要我們真心悔改信福音:人一切的罪和褻瀆的話都可得赦免。雖然罪曾如朱紅和丹顏(賽1:18),無論其性質何等可憎,其情節何等加重,其重犯何等頻繁,雖然它直達天庭,但在主那裏有慈愛,超過天庭;憐憫甚至要擴展到褻瀆——一項直接觸及神之名和尊榮的罪。保羅雖曾經是褻瀆神的,卻蒙了憐憫(提前1:13)。我們真可以說:神啊,有何神像你,赦免罪孽?(彌7:18)。甚至說話干犯人子的,還可得赦免;正如那些在他受死時辱罵他的人,其中許多人悔改並蒙了憐憫。基督在此為一切世人樹立了榜樣,樂意饒恕那些毀謗他們的話:*我如不聽見的聾子。*請注意,可得赦免——是對人,不是對鬼;這是對全人類世界、超過墮落天使世界的愛——人的一切罪對他們都是可赦免的。
(二)這裏有一個例外——褻瀆聖靈,在此被宣告為惟一不可赦免的罪。請看,
〔一〕這罪是甚麼;就是說話干犯聖靈。請看舌頭之罪中蘊含何等的惡性——惟一不可赦免的罪就是如此。但耶穌知道他們的意念(太12:25)。這裏所指的,不是所有針對聖靈的位格或本體的言論,或他較為隱秘的作為,也不僅僅是抗拒他在罪人心中內在的運行——因為這樣誰能得救呢?在我們的法律中有一條判決:大赦法令當始終按照賜予恩典和寬大的立法本意來解釋;因此法令中的例外不可作超出必要的擴展。福音是一項大赦法令;沒有人被按名豁免,也沒有人被按描述豁免,惟獨那些褻瀆聖靈的人;因此這必須以最狹義來理解;一切擅敢犯罪的人都被赦免的條件——信心和悔改——有效地排除了;因此其他的例外不可過分延伸:而這褻瀆之所以被列為例外,不是因為神的憐憫有缺陷或基督的功勞有不足,而是因為它不可避免地把罪人留在不信和不悔改之中。我們有理由認為,沒有人犯了這罪而仍信基督是神的兒子、並真誠渴望在他的功勞和憐憫中有份:那些害怕自己犯了這罪的人,恰恰表明他們沒有犯。博學的惠特比博士很恰當地指出,基督不是指將來的事(可3:28,路12:10);凡褻瀆的。至於那些基督在世上時褻瀆他、稱他為貪食好酒的人、騙子、褻瀆者等等的人,他們有一些表面的藉口,因為他卑微的顯現和國民對他的偏見;他神聖使命的證據直到他升天之後才完全;因此,他們若悔改,必蒙赦免;並且可以盼望他們因聖靈的澆灌而被說服——正如許多出賣和殺害他的人確實如此。但若聖靈已賜下——在他內在的啟示、說方言等恩賜中,正如使徒中間聖靈的分配——若他們仍繼續褻瀆聖靈,視之為邪靈,那就沒有盼望使他們信基督了;因為第一,使徒中聖靈的這些恩賜,是神為印證福音而計畫使用的最後證據,是在其他方法之後仍保留的。第二,這是最有力的證據,比神蹟本身更能說服人。第三,因此那些褻瀆聖靈這一分配的人,不可能被帶領信基督;那些將之歸於與撒但勾結的人——正如法利賽人對神蹟所作的——有甚麼能說服他們呢?這是一個堅固的不信堡壘,人永遠無法被攻破,因此是不可赦免的,因為藉此悔改從罪人的眼前被隱藏了。
〔二〕對這罪所宣判的是甚麼;總不得赦免,今世來世總不得赦免。正如當時猶太教會的狀態中,沒有為擅敢犯罪的魂獻贖罪祭;照樣在福音恩典的安排下——這在聖經中常被稱為來世——也沒有赦免那些踐踏立約之血、又褻瀆施恩之靈的人:一項如此直接抵擋救法的罪,無藥可醫。我們舊法律中有一條規則:褻瀆聖物者無避難所。或者,今世不得赦免——在罪人的良心中,來世也不得赦免——在赦免被頒佈的大日。或者,這是一項使罪人同時面對今世和永世刑罰、面對現今的憤怒和將來的憤怒的罪。
2. 基督在此論到別的惡言——那由心中作王的敗壞所產生並從中流露出來的(太12:33-35)。前面說(太12:25)耶穌知道他們的意念,這裏他是針對這些意念而說,表明當他們心中滿了仇恨和惡意時,他們說出這樣壞的話並不奇怪;然而他們常常設法掩飾遮蓋,裝作義人。我們的主耶穌因此指向源頭並加以醫治;讓心成聖,就必在言語上顯出來。
(一)心是根,言語是果子(太12:33);若樹的本性好,就必結出相應的果子。恩典是心中作王的原則時,言語就是迦南的言語;反過來,無論甚麼私慾在心中作王,就必爆發出來:有病的肺造成難聞的氣息。人的言語表明他是哪國的人,照樣也表明他是怎樣的靈:「你們或以為樹好,果子也好;要存清潔的心,這樣你們就有清潔的嘴唇和清潔的生活;不然,樹壞,果子也壞。你們可以使一棵野蘋果樹成為好樹——把好樹的枝條接在其上,果子就會好;但若樹仍照舊,無論種在哪裏,怎樣澆灌,果子仍然是壞的。」注意,心若不被改變,生命就永不能徹底被改造。這些法利賽人羞於說出他們對耶穌基督的惡念;但基督在此暗示,他們既從不尋求治死那結出苦膽和茵蔯的苦根,要隱藏它就是何等虛妄。注意,我們當更關心自己真正地好,而不是外表上顯得好。
(二)心是泉源,言語是溪流(太12:34);因為心裏所充滿的,口裏就說出來,正如溪流是泉源的溢出。惡心被說成發出惡事,如同泉源湧出水來(耶6:7)。混濁的泉源和敗壞的水——如所羅門所說的(箴25:26)——必發出渾濁和不悅人的溪流。惡言是惡心自然、真實的產物。惟有恩典的鹽投入泉源中,才能醫治那水,使言語有味,潔淨那敗壞的言談。這正是他們所缺乏的——他們是惡的;你們既是惡人,怎能說出好話來呢?他們是毒蛇的種類;施洗約翰曾如此稱呼他們(太3:7),他們仍然如此;因為古實人豈能改變皮膚呢?百姓看法利賽人為聖人的一代,但基督稱他們為毒蛇的種類、蛇的後裔——對基督和他的福音心懷敵意。那麼,從毒蛇的種類身上,除了有毒和惡性的東西,還能期望甚麼呢?毒蛇豈能不毒?注意,從壞人身上可以預料壞事,正如古人所言:惡事出自惡人(撒上24:13)。卑鄙的人必說卑鄙的話(賽32:6)。那些自己邪惡的人,既無技巧也無意願說出當說的好話。基督要他的門徒知道他們將生活在甚麼樣的人中間,好知道當期望甚麼。他們如以西結在蠍子中間(結2:6),不可因被螫咬而以為希奇。
(三)心是寶庫,言語是從那寶庫中取出來的東西(太12:35);從這裏可以勾勒人的品格,也可以判斷人。
〔一〕這是善人的特徵——他心裏有善的寶庫,並從其中按需發出善來。恩典、安慰、經歷、好的知識、好的情感、好的決心——這是心裏的善寶庫;神的話隱藏在那裏,神的律法寫在那裏,屬神的真理居住在其中並在其中掌權——這是那裏的寶庫,寶貴而合用,安全地保存著、隱密地藏著,如同好管家所積蓄的,卻在各樣場合隨時可用。一個這樣裝備的善人,必如約瑟從他的倉庫中發出——必說話和行善,為神的榮耀和別人的益處。見箴10:11、13、14、20、21、31、32。這就是發出善來。有些人假裝有好的開銷,卻沒有好的寶庫——這樣的很快就會破產;有些人假裝裏面有好的寶庫,卻拿不出證據:他們盼望自己裏面有,感謝神,無論他們的言語和行為如何,他們有好的心;但信心沒有行為是死的;也有些人有智慧和知識的好寶庫,卻不與人分享,不從中發出:他們有才幹,卻不知如何運用。完全的基督徒在這上彰顯神的形像——他既是善的,也行善。
〔二〕這是惡人的特徵——他心裏有惡的寶庫,並從其中發出惡來。住在心中作王的私慾和敗壞是惡的寶庫,罪人從中發出壞話和壞行為,羞辱神、傷害人。見創6:5、12,太15:18-20,雅1:15。但不義的財寶(箴10:2)將成為烈怒的財寶。
3. 基督在此論到閒話,指出其中有何等的惡(太12:36-37);何況法利賽人所說的那樣惡毒的話呢。我們當多想到審判的日子,好使那日成為我們舌頭的約束;讓我們思想,
(一)在那日,對舌頭之罪的審問將何等詳細:甚至凡人所說的閒話,當審判的日子,必要句句供出來。這暗示,〔一〕神留意我們所說的每一句話,甚至我們自己不留意的。見詩139:4。我舌頭上的話,你沒有一句不知道的:雖然是不經意、無目的地說出,神都記錄在案。〔二〕虛妄、閒散、不相干的談話是神所不喜悅的——那些不傾向於任何好目的、不適合任何造就之用的話;這是虛浮輕率之心的產物。這些閒話與那被禁止的淫詞妄語和戲笑的話相同(弗5:4)。這是那在多言之中、在無益的談論中鮮有缺席的罪(伯15:3)。〔三〕我們不久就要為這些閒話交帳;它們要被當作證據提出來反對我們,證明我們是無用的僕人——沒有善用理性和言語的才能,而這些是我們所受託的才幹的一部分。我們若不為閒話悔改,若我們對閒話的帳目不被基督的血所平衡,我們就滅亡了。
(二)根據那帳目,審判將何等嚴格(太12:37);因為要憑你的話定你為義,也要憑你的話定你有罪;這是人審判中的常規,在此應用於神的審判。注意,我們言語一貫的傾向——無論是恩惠的還是不恩惠的——在大日將成為對我們有利或不利 的證據。那些看來虔誠卻不勒住舌頭的人,到那日必被發現是以虛妄的宗教自欺(雅1:26)。有人認為基督在此是指以利法所說的(伯15:6):你自己的口定你有罪,並非是我;或更確切地是指所羅門所說的(箴18:21):生死在舌頭的權下。
英文原文
The Sin against the Holy Ghost
²² Then was brought unto him one possessed with a devil, blind, and dumb: and he healed him, insomuch that the blind and dumb both spake and saw.
²³ And all the people were amazed, and said, Is not this the son of David?
²⁴ But when the Pharisees heard it, they said, This fellow doth not cast out devils, but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils.
²⁵ And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:
²⁶ And if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself; how shall then his kingdom stand?
²⁷ And if I by Beelzebub cast out devils, by whom do your children cast them out? therefore they shall be your judges.
²⁸ But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God is come unto you.
²⁹ Or else how can one enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? and then he will spoil his house.
³⁰ He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.
³¹ Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.
³² And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.
³³ Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by his fruit.
³⁴ O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.
³⁵ A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.
³⁶ But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
³⁷ For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.
In these verses we have,
I. Christ's glorious conquest of Satan, in the gracious cure of one who, by the divine permission, was under his power, and in his possession, Mt 12:22. Here observe,
1. The man's case was very sad; he was possessed with a devil. More cases of this kind occurred in Christ's time than usual, that Christ's power might be the more magnified, and his purpose the more manifested, in opposing and dispossessing Satan; and that it might the more evidently appear, that he came to destroy the works of the devil. This poor man that was possessed was blind and dumb; a miserable case! he could neither see to help himself, nor speak to others to help him. A soul under Satan's power, and led captive by him, is blind in the things of God, and dumb at the throne of grace; sees nothing, and says nothing to the purpose. Satan blinds the eye of faith, and seals up the lips of prayer.
2. His cure was very strange, and the more so, because sudden; he healed him. Note, The conquering and dispossessing of Satan is the healing of souls. And the cause being removed, immediately the effect ceased; the blind and dumb both spake and saw. Note, Christ's mercy is directly opposite to Satan's malice; his favours, to the devil's mischiefs. When Satan's power is broken in the soul, the eyes are opened to see God's glory, and the lips opened to speak his praise.
II. The conviction which this gave to the people to all the people: they were amazed. Christ had wrought divers miracles of this kind before; but his works are not the less wonderful, nor the less to be wondered at, for their being often repeated. They inferred from it, "Is not this the Son of David? The Messiah promised, that was to spring from the loins of David? Is not this he that should come?" We may take this, 1. As an enquiring question; they asked, Is not this the Son of David? But they did not stay for an answer: the impressions were cogent, but they were transient. It was a good question that they started; but, it should seem, it was soon lost, and was not prosecuted. Such convictions as these should be brought to a head, and then they are likely to be brought to the heart. Or, 2. as an affirming question; Is not this the Son of David? "Yes, certainly it is, it can be no other; such miracles as these plainly evince that the kingdom of the Messiah is now setting up." And they were the people, the vulgar sort of the spectators, that drew this inference from Christ's miracles. Atheists will say, "That was because they were less prying than the Pharisees;" no, the matter of fact was obvious, and required not much search: but it was because they were less prejudiced and biassed by worldly interest. So plain and easy was the way made to this great truth of Christ being the Messiah and Saviour of the world, that the common people could not miss it; the wayfaring men, though fools, could not err therein. See Isa 35:8. It was found of them that sought it. It is an instance of the condescensions of divine grace, that the things that were hid from the wise and prudent were revealed unto babes. The world by wisdom knew not God, and by the foolish things the wise were confounded.
III. The blasphemous cavil of the Pharisees, Mt 12:24. The Pharisees were a sort of men that pretended to more knowledge in, and zeal for, the divine law, than other people; yet they were the most inveterate enemies to Christ and his doctrine. They were proud of the reputation they had among the people; that fed their pride, supported their power, and filled their purses; and when they heard the people say, Is not this the Son of David? they were extremely irritated, more at that than at the miracle itself; this made them jealous of our Lord Jesus, and apprehensive, that as his interest in the people's esteem increased, theirs must of course be eclipsed and diminished; therefore they envied him, as Saul did his father David, because of what the women sang of him, 1Sa 18:7,8. Note, Those who bind up their happiness in the praise and applause of men, expose themselves to a perpetual uneasiness upon every favourable word that they hear said of any other. The shadow of honour followed Christ, who fled from it, and fled from the Pharisees, who were eager in the pursuit of it. They said, "This fellow does not cast out devils, but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils, and therefore is not the Son of David." Observe,
1. How scornfully they speak of Christ, this fellow; as if that precious name of his, which is as ointment poured forth, were not worthy to be taken into their lips. It is an instance of their pride and superciliousness, and their diabolical envy, that the more people magnified Christ, the more industrious they were to vilify him. It is a bad thing to speak of good men with disdain because they are poor.
2. How blasphemously they speak of his miracles; they could not deny the matter of fact; it was as plain as the sun, that devils were cast out by the word of Christ; nor could they deny that it was an extraordinary thing, and supernatural. Being thus forced to grant the premises, they had no other way to avoid the conclusion, that this is the Son of David, than by suggesting that Christ cast out devils by Beelzebub; that there was a compact between Christ and the devil; pursuant to that, the devil was not cast out, but did voluntarily retire, and give back by consent and with design: or as if, by an agreement with the ruling devil, he had power to cast out the inferior devils. No surmise could be more palpably false and vile than this; that he, who is Truth itself, should be in combination with the father of lies, to cheat the world. This was the last refuge, or subterfuge rather, or an obstinate infidelity, that was resolved to stand it out against the clearest conviction. Observe, Among the devils there is a prince, the ringleader of the apostasy from God and rebellion against him; but this prince is Beelzebub—the god of a fly, or a dunghill god. How art thou fallen, O Lucifer! from an angel of light, to be a lord of flies! Yet this is the prince of the devils too, the chief of the gang of infernal spirits.
IV. Christ's reply to this base insinuation, Mt 12:25-30. Jesus knew their thoughts. Note, Jesus Christ knows what we are thinking at any time, knows what is in man; he understands our thoughts afar off. It should seem that the Pharisees could not for shame speak it out, but kept it in their minds; they could not expect to satisfy the people with it; they therefore reserved it for the silencing of the convictions of their own consciences. Note, Many are kept off from their duty by that which they are ashamed to own, but which they cannot hide from Jesus Christ: yet it is probable that the Pharisees had whispered what they thought among themselves, to help to harden one another; but Christ's reply is said to be to their thoughts, because he knew with what mind, and from what principle, they said it; that they did not say it in their haste, but that it was the product of a rooted malignity.
Christ's reply to this imputation is copious and cogent, that every mouth may be stopped with sense and reason, before it be stopped with fire and brimstone. Here are three arguments by which he demonstrates the unreasonableness of this suggestion.
1. It would be very strange, and highly improbably, that Satan should be cast out by such a compact, because then Satan's kingdom would be divided against itself; which, considering his subtlety, is not a thing to be imagined, Mt 12:25,26.
(1.) Here is a known rule laid down, that in all societies a common ruin is the consequence of mutual quarrels: Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every family too: Quæ enim domus tam stabilis est, quæ tam firma civitas, quæ non odiis atque dissidiis funditus everti possit?—For what family is so strong, what community so firm, as not to be overturned by enmity and dissension? Cic. Læl. 7. Divisions commonly end in desolations; if we clash, we break; if we divide one from another, we become an easy prey to a common enemy; much more if we bite and devour one another, shall we be consumed one of another, Ga 5:15. Churches and nations have known this by sad experience.
(2.) The application of it to the case in hand (Mt 12:26), If Satan cast out Satan; if the prince of the devils should be at variance with the inferior devils, the whole kingdom and interest would soon be broken; nay, if Satan should come into a compact with Christ, it must be to his own ruin; for the manifest design and tendency of Christ's preaching and miracles was to overthrow the kingdom of Satan, as a kingdom of darkness, wickedness, and enmity to God; and to set up, upon the ruins of it, a kingdom of light, holiness, and love. The works of the devil, as a rebel against God, and a tyrant over the souls of men, were destroyed by Christ; and therefore it was the most absurd thing imaginable, to think that Beelzebub should at all countenance such a design, or come into it: if he should fall in with Christ, how should then his kingdom stand? He would himself contribute to the overthrow of it. Note, The devil has a kingdom, a common interest, in opposition to God and Christ, which, to the utmost of his power, he will make to stand, and he will never come into Christ's interests; he must be conquered and broken by Christ, and therefore cannot submit and bend to him. What concord or communion can there be between light and darkness, Christ and Belial, Christ and Beelzebub? Christ will destroy the devil's kingdom, but he needs not do it by any such little arts and projects as that of a secret compact with Beelzebub; no, this victory must be obtained by nobler methods. Let the prince of the devils muster up all his forces, let him make use of all his powers and politics, and keep his interests in the closest confederacy, yet Christ will be too hard for his united force, and his kingdom shall not stand.
2. It was not at all strange, or improbable, that devils should be cast out by the Spirit of God; for,
(1.) How otherwise do your children cast them out? There were those among the Jews who, by invocation of the name of the most high God, or the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, did sometimes cast out devils. Josephus speaks of some in his time that did it; we read of Jewish exorcists (Ac 19:13), and of some that in Christ's name cast out devils, though they did not follow him (Mk 9:38), or were not faithful to him, Mt 7:22. These the Pharisees condemned not, but imputed what they did to the Spirit of God, and valued themselves and their nation upon it. It was therefore merely from spite and envy to Christ, that they would own that others cast out devils by the Spirit of God, but suggest that he did it by compact with Beelzebub. Note, It is the way of malicious people, especially the malicious persecutors of Christ and Christianity, to condemn the same thing in those they hate, which they approve of and applaud in those they have a kindness for: the judgments of envy are made, not by things, but persons; not by reason, but prejudice. But those were very unfit to sit in Moses's seat, who knew faces, and knew nothing else in judgment: Therefore they shall be your judges; "This contradicting of yourselves will rise up in judgment against you at the last great day, and will condemn you." Note, In the last judgment, not only every sin, but every aggravation of it, will be brought into the account, and some of our notions that were right and good will be brought in evidence against us, to convict us of partiality.
(2.) This casting out of devils was a certain token and indication of the approach and appearance of the kingdom of God (Mt 12:28); "But if it be indeed that I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, as certainly I do, then you must conclude, that though you are unwilling to receive it, yet the kingdom of the Messiah is now about to be set up among you." Other miracles that Christ wrought proved him sent of God, but this proved him sent of God to destroy the devil's kingdom and his works. Now that great promise was evidently fulfilled, that the seed of the woman should break the serpent's head, Ge 3:15. "Therefore that glorious dispensation of the kingdom of God, which has been long expected, is now commenced; slight it at your peril." Note, [1.] The destruction of the devil's power is wrought by the Spirit of God; that Spirit who works to the obedience of faith, overthrows the interest of that spirit who works in the children of unbelief and disobedience. [2.] The casting out of devils is a certain introduction to the kingdom of God. If the devil's interest in a soul be not only checked by custom or external restraints, but sunk and broken by the Spirit of God, as a Sanctifier, no doubt but the kingdom of God is come to that soul, the kingdom of grace, a blessed earnest of the kingdom of the glory.
3. The comparing of Christ's miracles, particularly this of casting out devils, with his doctrine, and the design and tendency of his holy religion, evidenced that he was so far from being in league with Satan, that he was at open enmity and hostility against him (Mt 12:29); How can one enter into a strong man's house, and plunder his goods, and carry them away, except he first bind the strong man? And then he may do what he pleases with his goods. The world, that sat in darkness, and lay in wickedness, was in Satan's possession, and under his power, as a house in the possession and under the power of a strong man; so is every unregenerate soul; there Satan resides, there he rules. Now, (1.) The design of Christ's gospel was to spoil the devil's house, which, as a strong man, he kept in the world; to turn the people from darkness to light, from sin to holiness, from this world to a better, from the power of Satan unto God (Ac 26:18); to alter the property of souls. (2.) Pursuant to this design, he bound the strong man, when he cast out unclean spirits by his word: thus he wrested the sword out of the devil's hand, that he might wrest the sceptre out of it. The doctrine of Christ teaches us how to construe his miracles, and when he showed how easily and effectually he could cast the devil out of people's bodies, he encouraged all believers to hope that, whatever power Satan might usurp and exercise in the souls of men, Christ by his grace would break it: he will spoil him, for it appears that he can bind him. When nations were turned from the service of idols to serve the living God, when some of the worst of sinners were sanctified and justified, and became the best of saints, then Christ spoiled the devil's house, and will spoil it more and more.
4. It is here intimated, that this holy war, which Christ was carrying on with vigour against the devil and his kingdom, was such as would not admit of a neutrality (Mt 12:30), He that is not with me is against me. In the little differences that may arise between the disciples of Christ among themselves, we are taught to lessen the matters in variance, and to seek peace, by accounting those who are not against us, to be with us (Lu 9:50); but in the great quarrel between Christ and the devil, no peace is to be sought, nor any such favourable construction to be made of any indifference in the matter; he that is not hearty for Christ, will be reckoned with as really against him: he that is cold in the cause, is looked upon as an enemy. When the dispute is between God and Baal, there is no halting between two (1Ki 18:21), there is no trimming between Christ and Belial; for the kingdom of Christ, as it is eternally opposite to, so it will be eternally victorious over, the devil's kingdom; and therefore in this cause there is no sitting still with Gilead beyond Jordan, or Asher on the sea-shore, (Jdg 4:16,17), we must be entirely, faithfully, and immovably, on Christ's side; it is the right side, and will at last be the rising side. See Ex 32:26.
The latter clause is to the same purport: He that gathereth not with me scattereth. Note, (1.) Christ's errand into the world was to gather, to gather in his harvest, to gather in those whom the Father had given him, Joh 11:52, Eph 1:10. (2.) Christ expects and requires from those who are with him, that they gather with him; that they not only gather to him themselves, but do all they can in their places to gather others to him, and so to strengthen his interest. (3.) Those who will not appear, and act, as furtherers of Christ's kingdom, will be looked upon, and dealt with, as hinderers of it; if we gather not with Christ, we scatter; it is not enough, not to do hurt, but we must do good. Thus is the breach widened between Christ and Satan, to show that there was no such compact between them as the Pharisees whispered.
V. Here is a discourse of Christ's upon this occasion, concerning tongue-sins; Wherefore I say unto you. He seems to turn from the Pharisees to the people, from disputing to instructing; and from the sin of the Pharisees he warns the people concerning three sorts of tongue-sins; for others' harms are admonitions to us.
1. Blasphemous words against the Holy Ghost are the worst kind of tongue-sins, and unpardonable, Mt 12:31,32.
(1.) Here is a gracious assurance of the pardon of all sin upon gospel terms: this Christ says to us, and it is a comfortable saying, that the greatness of sin shall be no bar to our acceptance with God, if we truly repent and believe the gospel: All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men. Though the sin has been as scarlet and crimson (Isa 1:18), though ever so heinous in its nature, ever so much aggravated by its circumstances, and ever so often repeated, though it reach up to the heavens, yet with the Lord there is mercy, that reacheth beyond the heavens; mercy will be extended even to blasphemy, a sin immediately touching God's name and honour. Paul obtained mercy, who had been a blasphemer, 1Ti 1:13. Well may we say, Who is a God like unto thee, pardoning iniquity? Mic 7:18. Even words spoken against the Son of man shall be forgiven; as theirs were who reviled him at his death, many of whom repented and found mercy. Christ here in has set an example to all the sons of men, to be ready to forgive words spoken against them: I, as a deaf man, heard not. Observe, They shall be forgiven unto men, not to devils; this is love to the whole world of mankind, above the world of fallen angels, that all sin is pardonable to them.
(2.) Here is an exception of the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, which is here declared to be the only unpardonable sin. See here,
[1.] What this sin; it is speaking against the Holy Ghost. See what malignity there is in tongue-sins, when the only unpardonable sin is so. But Jesus knew their thoughts, Mt 12:25. It is not all speaking against the person or essence of the Holy Ghost, or some of his more private operations, or merely the resisting of his internal working in the sinner himself, that is here meant; for who then should be saved? It is adjudged in our law, that an act of indemnity shall always be construed in favour of that grace and clemency which is the intention of the act; and therefore the exceptions in the act are not to be extended further than needs must. The gospel is an act of indemnity; none are excepted by name, nor any by description, but those only that blaspheme the Holy Ghost; which therefore must be construed in the narrowest sense: all presuming sinners are effectually cut off by the conditions of the indemnity, faith and repentance; and therefore the other exceptions must not be stretched far: and this blasphemy is excepted, not for any defect of mercy in God or merit in Christ, but because it inevitably leaves the sinner in infidelity and impenitency. We have reason to think that none are guilty of this sin, who believe that Christ is the Son of God, and sincerely desire to have part in his merit and mercy: and those who fear they have committed this sin, give a good sign that they have not. The learned Dr. Whitby very well observes, that Christ speaks not of what should be (Mk 3:28, Lu 12:10); Whosoever shall blaspheme. As for those who blasphemed Christ when he was here upon earth, and called him a Winebibber, a Deceiver, a Blasphemer, and the like, they had some colour of excuse, because of the meanness of his appearance, and the prejudices of the nation against him; and the proof of his divine mission was not perfected till after his ascension; and therefore, upon their repentance, they shall be pardoned: and it is hoped that they may be convinced by the pouring out of the Spirit, as many of them were, who had been his betrayers and murderers. But if, when the Holy Ghost is given, in his inward gifts of revelation, speaking with tongues, and the like, such as were the distributions of the Spirit among the apostles, if they continue to blaspheme the Spirit likewise, as an evil spirit, there is no hope of them that they will ever be brought to believe in Christ; for First, Those gifts of the Holy Ghost in the apostles were the last proof that God designed to make use of for the confirming of the gospel, and were still kept in reserve, when other methods preceded. Secondly, This was the most powerful evidence, and more apt to convince than miracles themselves. Thirdly, Those therefore who blaspheme this dispensation of the Spirit, cannot possibly be brought to believe in Christ; those who shall impute them to a collusion with Satan, as the Pharisees did the miracles, what can convince them? This is such a strong hold of infidelity as a man can never be beaten out of, and is therefore unpardonable, because hereby repentance is hid from the sinner's eyes.
[2.] What the sentence is that is passed upon it; It shall not be forgiven, neither in this world, nor in the world to come. As in the then present state of the Jewish church, there was no sacrifice of expiation for the soul that sinned presumptuously; so neither under the dispensation of gospel grace, which is often in scripture called the world to come, shall there be any pardon to such as tread underfoot the blood of the covenant, and do despite to the Spirit of grace: there is no cure for a sin so directly against the remedy. It was a rule in our old law, No sanctuary for sacrilege. Or, It shall be forgiven neither now, in the sinner's own conscience, nor in the great day, when the pardon shall be published. Or, this is a sin that exposes the sinner both to temporal and eternal punishment, both to present wrath and the wrath to come.
2. Christ speaks here concerning other wicked words, the products of corruption reigning in the heart, and breaking out thence, Mt 12:33-35. It was said (Mt 12:25) that Jesus knew their thoughts, and here he spoke with an eye to them, showing that it was not strange that they should speak so ill, when their hearts were so full of enmity and malice; which yet they often endeavoured to cloak and cover, by feigning themselves just men. Our Lord Jesus therefore points to the springs and heals them; let the heart be sanctified and it will appear in our words.
(1.) The heart is the root, the language is the fruit (Mt 12:33); if the nature of the tree be good, it will bring forth fruit accordingly. Where grace is the reigning principle in the heart, the language will be the language of Canaan; and, on the contrary, whatever lust reigns in the heart it will break out; diseased lungs make an offensive breath: men's language discovers what country they are of, so likewise what manner of spirit they are of: "Either make the tree good, and then the fruit will be good; get pure hearts and then you will have pure lips and pure lives; or else the tree will be corrupt, and the fruit accordingly. You may make a crab-stock to become a good tree, by grafting into it a shoot from a good tree, and then the fruit will be good; but if the tree be still the same, plant it where you will, and water it how you will, the fruit will be still corrupt." Note, Unless the heart be transformed, the life will never be thoroughly reformed. These Pharisees were shy of speaking out their wicked thoughts of Jesus Christ; but Christ here intimates, how vain it was for them to seek to hide that root of bitterness in them, that bore this gall and wormwood, when they never sought to mortify it. Note, It should be more our care to be good really, than to seem good outwardly.
(2.) The heart is the fountain, the words are the streams (Mt 12:34); Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks, as the streams are the overflowings of the spring. A wicked heart is said to send forth wickedness, as a fountain casts forth her waters, Jer 6:7. A troubled fountain, and a corrupt spring, such as Solomon speaks of (Pr 25:26), must needs send forth muddy and unpleasant streams. Evil words are the natural, genuine product of an evil heart. Nothing but the salt of grace, cast into the spring, will heal the waters, season the speech, and purify the corrupt communications. This they wanted, they were evil; and how can ye, being evil, speak good things? They were a generation of vipers; John Baptist had called them so (Mt 3:7), and they were still the same; for can the Ethiopian change his skin? The people looked upon the Pharisees as a generation of saints, but Christ calls them a generation of vipers, the seed of the serpent, that had an enmity to Christ and his gospel. Now what could be expected from a generation of vipers, but that which is poisonous and malignant? Can the viper be otherwise than venomous? Note, Bad things may be expected from bad people, as said the proverb of the ancients, Wickedness proceedeth from the wicked, 1Sa 24:13. The vile person will speak villany, Isa 32:6. Those who are themselves evil, have neither skill nor will to speak good things, as they should be spoken. Christ would have his disciples know what sort of men they were to live among, that they might know what to look for. They are as Ezekiel among scorpions (Eze 2:6), and must not think it strange if they be stung and bitten.
(3.) The heart is the treasury, the words are the things brought out of that treasury (Mt 12:35); and from hence men's characters may be drawn, and may be judged of.
[1.] It is the character of a good man, that he has a good treasure in his heart, and from thence brings forth good things, as there is occasion. Graces, comforts, experiences, good knowledge, good affections, good resolutions, these are a good treasure in the heart; the word of God hidden there, the law of God written there, divine truths dwelling and ruling thee, are a treasure there, valuable and suitable, kept safe and kept secret, as the stores of the good householder, but ready for use upon all occasions. A good man, thus furnished, will bring forth, as Joseph out of his stores; will be speaking and doing that which is good, for God's glory, and the edification of others. See Pr 10:11,13,14,20,21,31,32. This is bringing forth good things. Some pretend to good expenses that have not a good treasure—such will soon be bankrupts: some pretend to have a good treasure within, but give no proof of it: they hope they have it in them, and thank God, whatever their words and actions are, they have good hearts; but faith without works is dead: and some have a good treasure of wisdom and knowledge, but they are not communicative, they do not bring forth out of it: they have a talent, but know not how to trade with it. The complete Christian in this bears the image of God, that he both is good, and does good.
[2.] It is the character of an evil man, that he has an evil treasure in his heart, and out of it bringeth forth evil things. Lusts and corruptions dwelling and reigning in the heart are an evil treasure, out of which the sinner brings forth bad words and actions, to the dishonour of God, and the hurt of others. See Ge 6:5,12, Mt 15:18-20, Jam 1:15. But treasures of wickedness (Pr 10:2) will be treasures of wrath.
3. Christ speaks here concerning idle words, and shows what evil there is in them (Mt 12:36,37); much more is there in such wicked words as the Pharisees spoke. It concerns us to think much of the day of judgment, that that may be a check upon our tongues; and let us consider,
(1.) How particular the account will be of tongue-sins in that day: even for every idle words, or discourse, that men speak, they shall give account. This intimates, [1.] That God takes notice of every word we say, even that which we ourselves do not notice. See Ps 139:4. Not a word in my tongue but thou knowest it: though spoken without regard or design, God takes cognizance of it. [2.] That vain, idle, impertinent talk is displeasing to God, which tends not to any good purpose, is not good to any use of edifying; it is the product of a vain and trifling heart. These idle words are the same with that foolish talking and jesting which is forbidden, Eph 5:4. This is that sin which is seldom wanting in the multitude of words, unprofitable talk, Job 15:3. [3.] We must shortly account for these idle words; they will be produced in evidence against us, to prove us unprofitable servants, that have not improved the faculties of reason and speech, which are part of the talents we are entrusted with. If we repent not of our idle words, and our account for them be not balanced by the blood of Christ, we are undone.
(2.) How strict the judgment will be upon that account (Mt 12:37); By thy words thou shall be justified or condemned; a common rule in men's judgments, and here applied to God's. Note, The constant tenour of our discourse, according as it is gracious or not gracious, will be an evidence for us, or against us, at the great day. Those who seemed to be religious, but bridled not their tongue, will then be found to have put a cheat upon themselves with a vain religion, Jam 1:26. Some think that Christ here refers to that of Eliphaz (Job 15:6), Thine own mouth condemneth thee, and not I; or, rather, to that of Solomon (Pr 18:21), Death and life are in the power of the tongue.
38-45
The Pharisees Ask a Sign
法利賽人求神蹟
³⁸ 當時,有幾個文士和法利賽人對他說:夫子啊,我們願意你顯個神蹟給我們看。
³⁹ 耶穌回答說:一個邪惡淫亂的世代求看神蹟,除了先知約拿的神蹟以外,再沒有神蹟給他們看。
⁴⁰ 約拿三日三夜在大魚肚腹中,人子也要這樣三日三夜在地裡頭。
⁴¹ 當審判的時候,尼尼微人要起來定這世代的罪,因為尼尼微人聽了約拿所傳的就悔改了。看哪,在這裡有一人比約拿更大。
⁴² 當審判的時候,南方的女王要起來定這世代的罪;因為她從地極而來,要聽所羅門的智慧話。看哪,在這裡有一人比所羅門更大。
⁴³ 污鬼離了人身,就在無水之地過來過去,尋求安歇之處,卻尋不著。
⁴⁴ 於是說:我要回到我所出來的屋裡去。到了,就看見裡面空閒,打掃乾淨,修飾好了,
⁴⁵ 便去另帶了七個比自己更惡的鬼來,都進去住在那裡。那人末後的景況比先前更不好了。這邪惡的世代也要如此。
很可能與基督在此交談的法利賽人,並非那些挑剔他(太 12:24)、又不信他所行神蹟的人;而是另一批人——他們看出沒有理由不信那些神蹟,卻不滿足於他所給的憑證,也不肯接受那些證據,除非他按他們的要求給予進一步的證明。這裡有,
I. 他們對他所說的話(太 12:38)。他們以夫子的稱呼恭維他,假意尊敬他,其實心裡要害他;凡稱呼基督為夫子的,並不都是基督的真僕人。他們的要求是:我們願意你顯個神蹟給我們看。他們要看神蹟,這原是極其合理的——他要藉神蹟證明他的神聖使命:見出 4:8,9。他來要拆毀一個藉神蹟設立的宗教模式,因此他理當出示同樣的憑證;但如今他已經行了如此多的神蹟,充分證明了他是神所差來的,此時再要求神蹟,就極不合理了。請注意,驕傲之人天性喜歡向神預設條件,又以此作為不向神順服的藉口;但人的冒犯永不能作為他的辯護。
II. 他對這番話、這無理要求的回答:
1. 他譴責這要求,稱之為邪惡淫亂的世代的言語(太 12:39)。他將指控不僅加在文士和法利賽人身上,更是加在猶太全族身上;他們都與他們的領袖一樣,是一代接一代作惡的後裔:他們實在是邪惡的世代,不但硬著頸項抵擋基督神蹟的說服力,還蓄意虐待他、輕看他的神蹟。他們是淫亂的世代,(一)作為淫亂的後裔;他們從先祖的信心和順服中敗落到了如此悲慘的地步,以致亞伯拉罕和以色列都不認他們。見賽 57:3。或者,(二)作為淫亂的妻子;他們背棄了那在盟約中與他們訂婚的神:他們不像被擄前那樣犯拜偶像的屬靈淫亂,卻犯了不信和各樣不義的罪,那也是淫亂:他們不是追求自己手所造的神,而是尋求自己設計的神蹟;那就是淫亂。
2. 他拒絕給他們任何別的神蹟,除了先知約拿的神蹟之外。請注意,基督雖然總是樂意聆聽和答覆聖潔的願望與祈求,卻不會滿足敗壞的情慾和脾氣。那些妄求的人,求也得不著。神蹟賜給那些為堅固信心而渴求的人,如亞伯拉罕和基甸;卻拒絕給那些為自己的不信找藉口而強求的人。
基督本可以公義地說:他們必不再看見神蹟;但請看他的奇妙恩慈:(一)他們仍要看見同樣的神蹟重複出現,為的是使他們進一步受益,更充分地被說服。(二)他們要看見一個與這一切都不同的神蹟,那就是基督憑自己的能力從死裡復活,在此稱為先知約拿的神蹟——這仍是為說服他們而保留的,也是神所定意要作為基督是彌賽亞的最大證據;因為藉此他以大能顯明是神的兒子(羅 1:4)。那是一個超越所有其餘神蹟的神蹟,成全並加冕了它們。「他們若不信先前的神蹟,也必信這一個」(出 4:9),「若這個也不能說服他們,就沒有甚麼能了。」然而猶太人的不信仍找到了一個推諉的辦法來擺脫它,說:他的門徒來把他偷去了;因為再也沒有比決心不肯看見的人更無可救藥地瞎眼的了。
如今他在此進一步解釋這先知約拿的神蹟(太 12:40):約拿三日三夜在大魚肚腹中,然後又安全無恙地出來,照樣基督也要在墳墓裡這麼久,然後復活。[1] 墳墓對於基督,如同魚腹之於約拿;他被投在那裡,如同在風暴中為將亡之命的贖價;他在那裡躺臥,如同在陰間的深處(拿 2:2),似乎被趕出了神的眼前。[2] 他在墳墓裡停留的時間,正如約拿在魚腹中停留的時間——三日三夜;不是三個完整的晝夜:約拿大概也沒有在魚腹中躺臥這麼久,而是三個自然日的一部分(希臘人稱之為nychthemerai);他在一週第六日的下午被埋葬,又在第一日的清晨復活;這是一種很常見的說法;見王上 20:29,斯 4:16,5:1,路 2:21。約拿為自己的罪作了這麼久的囚徒,基督也照樣為我們的罪作了這麼久的囚徒。[3] 約拿在魚腹中時,因深信自己終必再仰望耶和華的聖殿(拿 2:4)而得了安慰;照樣基督躺在墳墓裡時,聖經明說他在指望中安息,深信自己必不見朽壞(徒 2:26,27)。[4] 約拿在第三日從囚禁中得了釋放,又回到活人之地,從死人的會中出來(因為死人之物據說從水下形成,伯 26:5),照樣基督在第三日要回到生命之中,從墳墓中出來,將福音傳給外邦人。
3. 基督藉此機會描繪他所生活的這世代悲慘的性情與景況——一個不肯悔改、因而不能不滅亡的世代;他給他們的描述,是按照他們在審判之日——在那日的完全啟示與最終判決之下——所將顯出的樣式。如今人和事都披著虛假的外衣;性情和景況在此都是可變的:因此我們若要作出正確的估量,就必須以末日的審判為標準;事物實際是怎樣,就是它們永遠是怎樣。
如今基督把猶太人描繪為,
(一)將被尼尼微人定罪的一代——尼尼微人因約拿所傳的而悔改,將在審判中起來反對他們(太 12:41)。基督的復活對他們而言將是先知約拿的神蹟:但它對他們不會產生像約拿的神蹟對尼尼微人所產生的那樣美好的效果,因為尼尼微人因此悔改了,避免了毀滅;猶太人卻要在不信中更加剛硬,加速自己的毀滅;在審判之日,尼尼微人的悔改將被提及,作為那些當時聽過基督講道之人的罪、以及如今基督被傳講之處之人的罪的加重情節,因而也是他們被定罪的加重情節;這是因為基督比約拿更大。[1] 約拿不過是人,與我們一樣有情感的軟弱,也有一樣有罪的性情;但基督是神的兒子。[2] 約拿在尼尼微是外人,來到對他的國家懷有偏見的陌生人中間;但基督向猶太人講道時,是來到自己的人中間,更何況基督如今被傳揚在稱為他名下的基督徒中間。[3] 約拿不過傳了一篇簡短的道,而且並不怎麼莊重,只是在街上經過時傳的;基督卻屢次呼召,坐下教訓人,在會堂裡教訓人。[4] 約拿只傳了四十天以內的烈怒與毀滅,沒有給出悔改的指示、方向或勉勵;但基督除了警告我們所面臨的危險之外,還指明了我們當如何悔改,並保證我們悔改時必蒙悅納,因為天國近了。[5] 約拿沒有行神蹟來印證他的教訓,也沒有向尼尼微人表示善意;但基督行了許多神蹟,而且全是憐憫的神蹟:然而尼尼微人因約拿所傳的悔改了,猶太人卻不受基督所傳的感動。請注意,那些在屬靈幫助和優勢較少的人中間,有些人的良善將加重那些擁有更大幫助之人的惡劣。那些在微光中就發現自己平安的事的人,將使那些在正午摸索的人羞愧。
(二)將被南方女王——示巴女王——所定罪的一代(太 12:42)。尼尼微人將因他們不悔改而使他們羞愧,示巴女王將因他們不信基督而使他們羞愧。她從遠方來聽所羅門的智慧;然而人不肯受勸來聽基督的智慧,雖然他在凡事上都比所羅門更大。[1] 示巴女王並沒有蒙邀請去見所羅門,也沒有蒙應許必蒙悅納;我們卻蒙邀請到基督面前來,坐在他腳前聽他的道。[2] 所羅門不過是有智慧的人,但基督就是智慧本身,一切智慧知識的財寶都藏在他裡面。[3] 示巴女王要克服許多困難;她是女人,不適合遠行,旅途漫長而危險;她是女王,她離開期間本國將如何?我們卻沒有這樣的牽掛來阻礙我們。[4] 她不能確定走這趟遠路是否值得;名聲常常是虛浮的,也許她本國本宮中已有足夠的智者教導她;然而她既聽見所羅門的名聲,就要親自來看他;我們卻不是在這樣的不確定中來到基督面前的。[5] 她從地極而來,我們卻有基督在我們中間,他的話離我們不遠:看哪,他站在門外叩門。[6] 似乎示巴女王所求的智慧不過是哲理與治國之道;但從基督那裡可得的是關乎救恩的智慧。[7] 她只能聽所羅門的智慧;他不能賜她智慧:但基督要將智慧賜給凡到他面前來的人;不但如此,他還要親自成為神所賜給他們的智慧;因此,在這一切方面,我們若不聽基督的智慧,示巴女王來聽所羅門智慧的熱心將在審判中起來定我們的罪;因為耶穌基督比所羅門更大。
(三)決意繼續佔有並服在撒但權下的一代,儘管用盡了一切方法要趕出撒但、拯救他們。他們被比作一個曾從身上被趕出污鬼、污鬼卻以雙倍兇猛回來的人(太 12:43-45)。污鬼在此被稱為污靈,因他已失去一切的純潔,並在人中間喜愛並助長各樣的不潔。如今,
[1] 這比喻代表污鬼附人身體的事:基督近來剛趕出了一個鬼,他們卻說他是靠著鬼王趕鬼,這給了基督一個機會來表明他們是何等服在撒但的權下。這進一步證明基督並非與鬼王結盟趕鬼,因為若是這樣,鬼王很快就要回來了;但基督對他的驅逐是最終的,且禁止他再進入:我們見他命令那污靈出去,再不要進去(可 9:25)。很可能污鬼慣常這樣戲弄他所附的人:他出去,然後又以更猛烈的勢頭回來;因此那些人的清醒間歇之後通常伴隨著更劇烈的發作。當污鬼被趕出去時,他不得安寧,因他若不行惡就不能安歇(箴 4:16);他走過乾旱之地,如同十分憂鬱的人;他尋找安歇卻尋不著,直到他再回來。當基督從那人身上趕出群鬼時,群鬼懇求進入豬群,在那裡他們並沒有在乾旱之地停留多久,而是立刻進了湖中。
[2] 這比喻的應用表明它代表猶太教會和民族的整體景況:這邪惡的世代也要如此——他們如今抵擋,並最終要棄絕基督的福音。那藉著基督和他門徒的勞苦已從許多猶太人身上被趕出去的魔鬼,在異教徒中間尋找安歇之處——基督徒要將他從異教徒的人和廟宇中到處驅逐出去:惠特比博士(Dr. Whitby)如此說。或者,他在異教世界中到處找不到像這裡猶太人心中這樣令他滿意的、可喜悅的居所:哈蒙德博士(Dr. Hammond)如此說;因此他要再進入他們裡面,因為基督在他們中間沒有得到接待,而他們因著自己驚人的邪惡和頑梗的不信,比以往更加準備好要接待他;那時他要在此取得持久的據點,這百姓的景況很可能比基督來到他們中間之前,或撒但若從未被趕出去的話,更加絕望地可詛(哈蒙德博士如此說)。
那個民族的整體在此被描繪為,第一,作為一個背道的子民。被擄到巴比倫之後,他們開始改革,離棄偶像,表現出某些宗教的外貌;但他們很快又敗壞了自己:雖然他們從未再回到拜偶像的路上,卻陷入各樣的不敬虔和褻瀆,越變越壞,並在一切其他邪惡之上,又加上了對基督和他福音的蓄意藐視和抵擋。第二,作為一個被標記註定毀滅的子民。一道新的旨意正在蓋印,要對付那假冒為善的國度——神的烈怒之民(如賽 10:6 所記),他們被羅馬人所滅的毀滅將比任何其他民族的更為慘烈,因為他們的罪更為彰顯:那時神的烈怒臨到他們身上,到了極處(帖前 2:15,16)。願這成為對萬國萬教會的警誡——當心離棄起初的愛心,當心放棄在他們中間已開始的改革善工,並回到他們似乎已經離棄的邪惡中;因為那樣的人末後的景況比先前更不好了。
英文原文
The Pharisees Ask a Sign
³⁸ Then certain of the scribes and of the Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign from thee.
³⁹ But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas:
⁴⁰ For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
⁴¹ The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here.
⁴² The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: for she came from the uttermost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a greater than Solomon is here.
⁴³ When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest, and findeth none.
⁴⁴ Then he saith, I will return into my house from whence I came out; and when he is come, he findeth it empty, swept, and garnished.
⁴⁵ Then goeth he, and taketh with himself seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first. Even so shall it be also unto this wicked generation.
It is probable that these Pharisees with whom Christ is here in discourse were not the same that cavilled at him (Mt 12:24), and would not credit the signs he gave; but another set of them, who saw that there was no reason to discredit them, but would not content themselves with the signs he gave, nor admit the evidence of them, unless he would give them such further proof as they should demand. Here is,
I. Their address to him, Mt 12:38. They compliment him with the title of Master, pretending respect for him, when they intended to abuse him; all are not indeed Christ's servants, who call him Master. Their request is, We would see a sign from thee. It was highly reasonable that they should see a sign, that he should by miracles prove his divine mission: see Ex 4:8,9. He came to take down a model of religion that was set up by miracles, and therefore it was requisite he should produce the same credentials; but it was highly unreasonable to demand a sign now, when he had given so many signs already, that did abundantly prove him sent of God. Note, It is natural to proud men to prescribe to God, and then to make that an excuse for not subscribing to him; but a man's offence will never be his defence.
II. His answer to this address, this insolent demand,
1. He condemns the demand, as the language of an evil and adulterous generation, Mt 12:39. He fastens the charge, not only on the scribes and Pharisees, but the whole nation of the Jews; they were all like their leaders, a seed and succession of evil-doers: they were an evil generation indeed, that not only hardened themselves against the conviction of Christ's miracles, but set themselves to abuse him, and put contempt on his miracles. They were an adulterous generation, (1.) As an adulterous brood; so miserably degenerated from the faith and obedience of their ancestors, that Abraham and Israel acknowledged them not. See Isa 57:3. Or, (2.) As an adulterous wife; they departed from that God, to whom by covenant they had been espoused: they were not guilty of the whoredom of idolatry, as they had been before the captivity, but they were guilty of infidelity, and all iniquity, and that is whoredom too: they did not look after gods of their own making, but they looked for signs of their own devising; and that was adultery.
2. He refuses to give them any other sign than he has already given them, but that of the prophet Jonas. Note, Though Christ is always ready to hear and answer holy desires and prayers, yet he will not gratify corrupt lusts and humours. Those who ask amiss, ask, and have not. Signs were granted to those who desired them for the confirmation of their faith, as to Abraham and Gideon; but were denied to those who demanded them for the excuse of their unbelief.
Justly might Christ have said, They shall never see another miracle: but see his wonderful goodness; (1.) They shall have the same signs still repeated, for their further benefit, and more abundant conviction. (2.) They shall have one sign of a different kind from all these, and that is, the resurrection of Christ from the dead by his own power, called here the sign of the prophet Jonas this was yet reserved for their conviction, and was intended to be the great proof of Christ's being the Messiah; for by that he was declared to be the Son of God with power, Ro 1:4. That was such a sign as surpassed all the rest, completed and crowned them. "If they will not believe the former signs, they will believe this (Ex 4:9), and if this will not convince them, nothing will." And yet the unbelief of the Jews found out an evasion to shift off that too, by saying, His disciples came and stole him away; for none are so incurably blind as those who are resolved they will not see.
Now this sign of the prophet Jonas he further explains here; (Mt 12:40) As Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly, and then came out again safe and well, thus Christ shall be so long in the grave, and then shall rise again. [1.] The grave was to Christ as the belly of the fish was to Jonah; thither he was thrown, as a Ransom for lives ready to be lost in a storm; there he lay, as in the belly of hell (Jon 2:2), and seemed to be cast out of God's sight. [2.] He continued in the grave just as long as Jonah continued in the fish's belly, three days and three nights; not three whole days and nights: it is probable, Jonah did not lie so long in the whale's belly, but part of three natural days (nychthemerai, the Greeks called them); he was buried in the afternoon of the sixth day of the week, and rose again in the morning of the first day; it is a manner of speech very usual; see 1Ki 20:29, Es 4:16,5:1, Lu 2:21. So long Jonah was a prisoner for his own sins, so long Christ was a Prisoner for ours. [3.] As Jonah in the whale's belly comforted himself with an assurance that yet he should look again toward God's holy temple (Jon 2:4), so Christ when he lay in the grave, is expressly said to rest in hope, as one assured he should not see corruption, Ac 2:26,27. [4.] As Jonah on the third day was discharged from his prison, and came to the land of the living again, from the congregation of the dead (for dead things are said to be formed from under the waters, Job 26:5), so Christ on the third day should return to life, and rise out of his grave to send abroad the gospel to the Gentiles.
3. Christ takes this occasion to represent the sad character and condition of that generation in which he lived, a generation that would not be reformed, and therefore could not but be ruined; and he gives them their character, as it would stand in the day of judgment, under the full discoveries and final sentences of that day. Persons and things now appear under false colours; characters and conditions are here changeable: if therefore we would make a right estimate, we must take our measures from the last judgment; things are really, what they are eternally.
Now Christ represents the people of the Jews,
(1.) As a generation that would be condemned by the men of Nineveh, whose repenting at the preaching of Jonas would rise up in judgment against them, Mt 12:41. Christ's resurrection will be the sign of the prophet Jonas to them: but it will not have so happy an effect upon them, as that of Jonas had upon the Ninevites, for they were by it brought to such a repentance as prevented their ruin; but the Jews will be hardened in an unbelief that shall hasten their ruin; and in the day of judgment, the repentance of the Ninevites will be mentioned as an aggravation of the sin, and consequently the condemnation of those to whom Christ preached then, and of those to whom Christ is preached now; for this reason, because Christ is greater than Jonah. [1.] Jonah was but a man, subject to like passions, to like sinful passions, as we are; but Christ is the Son of God. [2.] Jonah was a stranger in Nineveh, he came among the strangers that were prejudiced against his country; but Christ came to his own, when he preached to the Jews, and much more when he is preached among professing Christians, that are called by his name. [3.] Jonah preached but one short sermon, and that with no great solemnity, but as he passed along the streets; Christ renews his calls, sat and taught, taught in the synagogues. [4.] Jonah preached nothing but wrath and ruin within forty days, gave no instructions, directions, or encouragements, to repent: but Christ, besides the warning given us of our danger, has shown wherein we must repent, and assured us of acceptance upon our repentance, because the kingdom of heaven is at hand. [5.] Jonah wrought no miracle to confirm his doctrine, showed no good will to the Ninevites; but Christ wrought abundance of miracles, and all miracles of mercy: yet the Ninevites repented at the preaching of Jonas, but the Jews were not wrought upon by Christ's preaching. Note, The goodness of some, who have less helps and advantages for their souls, will aggravate the badness of those who have much greater. Those who by the twilight discover the things that belong to their peace, will shame those who grope at noon-day.
(2.) As a generation that would be condemned by the queen of the south, the queen of Sheba, Mt 12:42. The Ninevites would shame them for not repenting, the queen of Sheba for not believing in Christ. She came from a far country to hear the wisdom of Solomon; yet people will not be persuaded to come and hear the wisdom of Christ, though he is in every thing greater than Solomon. [1.] The queen of Sheba had no invitation to come to Solomon, nor any promise of being welcome; but we are invited to Christ, to sit at his feet and hear his word. [2.] Solomon was but a wise man, but Christ is wisdom itself, in whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom. [3.] The queen of Sheba had many difficulties to break through; she was a woman, unfit for travel, the journey long and perilous; she was a queen, and what would become of her own country in her absence? We have no such cares to hinder us. [4.] She could not be sure that it would be worth her while to go so far on this errand; fame uses to flatter men, and perhaps she might have in her own country or court wise men sufficient to instruct her; yet, having heard of Solomon's fame, she would see him; but we come not to Christ upon such uncertainties. [5.] She came from the uttermost parts of the earth, but we have Christ among us, and his word nigh us: Behold he stands at the door, and knocks. [6.] It should seem the wisdom the queen of Sheba came for was only philosophy and politics; but the wisdom that is to be had with Christ is wisdom to salvation. [7.] She could only hear Solomon's wisdom; he could not give her wisdom: but Christ will give wisdom to those who come to him; nay, he will himself be made of God to them Wisdom; so that, upon all these accounts, if we do not hear the wisdom of Christ, the forwardness of the queen of Sheba to come and hear the wisdom of Solomon will rise up in judgment against us and condemn us; for Jesus Christ is greater than Solomon.
(3.) As a generation that were resolved to continue in the possession, and under the power, of Satan, notwithstanding all the methods that were used to dispossess him and rescue them. They are compared to one out of whom the devil is gone, but returns with double force, Mt 12:43-45. The devil is here called the unclean spirit, for he has lost all his purity, and delights in and promotes all manner of impurity among men. Now,
[1.] The parable represents his possessing men's bodies: Christ having lately cast out a devil, and they having said he had a devil, gave occasion to show how much they were under the power of Satan. This is a further proof that Christ did not cast out devils by compact with the devil, for then he would soon have returned again; but Christ's ejectment of him was final, and such as barred a re-entry: we find him charging the evil spirit to go out, and enter no more, Mk 9:25. Probably the devil was wont sometimes thus to sport with those he had possession of; he would go out, and then return again with more fury; hence the lucid intervals of those in that condition were commonly followed with the more violent fits. When the devil is gone out, he is uneasy, for he sleeps not except he have done mischief (Pr 4:16); he walks in dry places, like one that is very melancholy; he seeks rest but finds none, till he returns again. When Christ cast the legion out of the man, they begged leave to enter into the swine, where they went not long in dry places, but into the lake presently.
[2.] The application of the parable makes it to represent the case of the body of the Jewish church and nation: So shall it be with this wicked generation, that now resist, and will finally reject, the gospel of Christ. The devil, who by the labours of Christ and his disciples had been cast out of many of the Jews, sought for rest among the heathen, from whose persons and temples the Christians would every where expel him: so Dr. Whitby: or finding no where else in the heathen world such pleasant, desirable habitations, to his satisfaction, as here in the heart of the Jews: so Dr. Hammond: he shall therefore enter again into them, for Christ had not found admission among them, and they, by their prodigious wickedness and obstinate unbelief, were still more ready than ever to receive him; and then he shall take a durable possession here, and the state of this people is likely to be more desperately damnable (so Dr. Hammond) than it was before Christ came among them, or would have been if Satan had never been cast out.
The body of that nation is here represented, First, As an apostate people. After the captivity in Babylon, they began to reform, left their idols, and appeared with some face of religion; but they soon corrupted themselves again: though they never relapsed into idolatry, they fell into all manner of impiety and profaneness, grew worse and worse, and added to all the rest of their wickedness a wilful contempt of, and opposition to, Christ and his gospel. Secondly, As a people marked for ruin. A new commission was passing the seals against that hypocritical nation, the people of God's wrath (like that, Isa 10:6), and their destruction by the Romans was likely to be greater than any other, as their sins had been more flagrant: then it was that wrath came upon them to the uttermost, 1Th 2:15,16. Let this be a warning to all nations and churches, to take heed of leaving their first love, of letting fall a good work of reformation begun among them, and returning to that wickedness which they seemed to have forsaken; for the last state of such will be worse than the first.
46-50
Who Are Christ's Relations
誰是基督的親屬
⁴⁶ 耶穌還對眾人說話的時候,不料他母親和他弟兄站在外邊,要與他說話。
⁴⁷ 有人告訴他說:「看哪,你母親和你弟兄站在外邊,要與你說話。」
⁴⁸ 他卻回答那人說:「誰是我的母親?誰是我的弟兄?」
⁴⁹ 就伸手指著門徒,說:「看哪,我的母親,我的弟兄。
⁵⁰ 凡遵行我天父旨意的人,就是我的弟兄姊妹和母親了。」
我們的主耶穌在特殊場合說了許多卓越、有益的話;甚至他的題外之言也像他的正式講論一樣具有教導性。如此處,
請留意,I. 基督的講道如何被他的母親和他的弟兄所打斷——他們站在外邊,要與他說話(太 12:46-47);這意願是透過人群傳達給他的。無須追問與他母親同來的是他哪幾個弟兄(也許是那些不信他的,約 7:5),也不必問他們來做什麼;也許只是想逼他停下來,怕他太累了,或是要提醒他小心,免得他的講道得罪了法利賽人,或使自己陷入困境;彷彿他們能教他智慧似的。
1. 他那時正在對眾人說話。請注意,基督的講道就是說話;是平易、簡單、親切的,適合他們的理解力和處境。基督所傳的道曾被人挑剔,然而他仍繼續。請注意,我們在工作上所遭遇的反對,不可把我們從工作中趕走。他停止了與法利賽人的談話,因為他看出對他們無益;卻繼續對平民百姓說話——他們不像法利賽人那樣自恃有知識,願意學習。
2. 他的母親和弟兄站在外邊要與他說話,而他們本該站在裏面,渴望聽他講道。他們在私下日常的相交中已享有與他同在的益處,因此較少留意參加他公開的講道。請注意,那些最接近知識和恩典之途徑的人,往往最疏忽。熟悉和容易接近會產生某種程度的輕視。我們容易忽略今天的事,以為隨時都可以得到,卻忘了只有現在的時間是我們能確定的;明天不屬於我們。俗話說「離教堂越近,離神越遠」,其中不無道理;可惜竟常常如此。
3. 他們不僅自己不聽他,還打斷了別人——那些樂意聽他的人。魔鬼是我們救主講道的死敵。他曾想藉文士和法利賽人不合理的刁難來破壞他的講論,當那計不成時,就企圖藉親屬不合時宜的來訪將其中斷。請注意,我們常在工作上遇到身邊朋友所造成的阻礙和妨礙,並因世俗的禮節而被從屬靈的事上引開。那些真正關心我們和我們工作的人,有時因他們的不智,反而成了我們盡本分時的絆腳石和妨礙;正如彼得對基督說「主啊,你可憐自己」時以為自己十分殷勤,卻成了基督的絆腳石。我們主的母親想要與他說話;看來她當時還未學會命令她的兒子——如同羅馬教會後來的不義和偶像崇拜所妄稱要教導她的那樣;她也不像他們所描繪的那樣毫無過錯和愚昧。凡事智慧地、妥當地、合時地而行,這是基督的特權,不是他母親的。基督曾對母親說:為什麼找我呢?豈不知我應當以我父的事為念嗎?那時經上記著,她把這一切的事都存在心裏(路 2:49);但她如今若記得這話,就不會在他正做父之事時來打擾他。請注意,有許多好的真理我們在聽見時以為已好好存記了,到要用的時候卻找不到。
II. 他如何對這打斷表示不悅(太 12:48-50)。
1. 他不聽這打斷;他如此專注於自己的工作,以致任何天然的或世俗的顧念都不能使他分心。誰是我的母親?誰是我的弟兄?這不是說天然的感情當被拋棄,也不是說我們可以藉宗教之名對父母不敬或對其他親屬不仁;而是萬事各按其時成為美好,當較大的本分正在履行時,較小的本分當讓步。當我們對親屬的顧念與服事神和善用機會行善相爭時,在這種情形下,我們必須如利未那樣對父親說:我沒有看見他(申 33:9)。最親近的親屬相對而言要被「恨」——即我們必須愛他們少於愛基督(路 14:26),我們對神的本分必須居先。基督在此為我們留下了榜樣;神的殿之熱心如此吞滅他,以致他不僅忘記了自己,也忘記了他最親愛的親屬。我們也不可因朋友將討神的喜悅置於討我們的喜悅之前而生氣,或將此歸咎於他們的惡;倒要甘心饒恕那些可輕易歸因於為神榮耀和別人益處而發的敬虔熱心的疏忽。不但如此,我們寧可捨己、放棄自己的滿足,也不可行任何可能使我們的朋友在向神盡本分時分心或被擾亂的事。
2. 他藉此機會將他的門徒——他屬靈的親屬——置於他天然親屬之上:這正是他不願停止講道去與弟兄說話的好理由。他情願使門徒得益處,過於使親屬喜悅。請留意,
(1)基督門徒的描述。他們是遵行他父旨意的人;不僅聽見、知道、談論,更是遵行;因為遵行神的旨意是作門徒最好的預備(約 7:17),也是最好的證明(太 7:21);那才真是我們作他門徒的標記。基督不是說「凡遵行我旨意的人」,因為他來不是要尋求或行自己的旨意而與父有別:他的旨意與父的旨意相同;但他將我們指向父的旨意,因為他如今在他的狀態和工作中也順服於此(約 6:38)。
(2)基督門徒的尊嚴:他就是我的弟兄和姊妹和母親了。他的門徒——那些為跟從他而撇下一切、接受他教訓的人——比任何按肉身與他有親屬關係的人更為親愛。他們將基督置於親屬之上;他們撇下父親(太 4:22,10:37);如今作為補償,也為表明並非白白的愛,他將他們置於自己的親屬之上。他們在尊榮上豈不是在此得著了百倍嗎?(太 19:29)。基督說看哪,我的母親,我的弟兄,這是何等親切、何等鼓舞人心的話;然而這不僅是他們獨有的特權,這榮耀所有聖徒都有分。請注意,一切順服的信徒都與耶穌基督親近。他們戴他的名,有他的形像,有他的性情,屬他的家。他愛他們,如親屬般與他們自由相交。他歡迎他們到他的席上,照顧他們,為他們預備,使他們一無所缺;他死時為他們留下了豐富的遺產,如今在天上與他們保持聯絡,終必將他們全都接到他那裏,且必在凡事上盡至近親屬的本分(得 3:13),永不以他的窮親屬為恥,卻要在人面前、在天使面前、在父面前認他們。
英文原文
Who Are Christ's Relations
⁴⁶ While he yet talked to the people, behold, his mother and his brethren stood without, desiring to speak with him.
⁴⁷ Then one said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to speak with thee.
⁴⁸ But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren?
⁴⁹ And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren!
⁵⁰ For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.
Many excellent, useful sayings came from the mouth of our Lord Jesus upon particular occasions; even his digressions were instructive, as well as his set discourses: as here,
Observe, I. How Christ was interrupted in his preaching by his mother and his brethren, that stood without, desiring to speak with him (Mt 12:40,47); which desire of theirs was conveyed to him through the crowd. It is needless to enquire which of his brethren they were that came along with his mother (perhaps they were those who did not believe in him, Joh 7:5); or what their business was; perhaps it was only designed to oblige him to break off, for fear he should fatigue himself, or to caution him to take heed of giving offence by his discourse to the Pharisees, and or involving himself in a difficulty; as if they could teach him wisdom.
1. He was as yet talking to the people. Note, Christ's preaching was talking; it was plain, easy, and familiar, and suited to their capacity and case. What Christ had delivered had been cavilled at, and yet he went on. Note, The opposition we meet within our work, must not drive us from it. He left off talking with the Pharisees, for he saw he could do no good with them; but continued to talk to the common people, who, not having such a conceit of their knowledge as the Pharisees had, were willing to learn.
2. His mother and brethren stood without, desiring to speak with him, when they should have been standing within, desiring to hear him. They had the advantage of his daily converse in private, and therefore were less mindful to attend upon his public preaching. Note, Frequently those who are nearest to the means of knowledge and grace, are most negligent. Familiarity and easiness of access breed some degree of contempt. We are apt to neglect that this day, which we think we may have any day, for getting that it is only the present time we can be sure of; tomorrow is none of ours. There is too much truth in that common proverb, "The nearer the church, the further from God;" it is pity it should be so.
3. They not only would not hear him themselves, but they interrupted others that heard him gladly. The devil was a sworn enemy to our Saviour's preaching. He had sought to baffle his discourse by the unreasonable cavils of the scribes and Pharisees, and when he could not gain his point that way, he endeavoured to break it off by the unseasonable visits of relations. Note, We often meet with hindrances and obstructions in our work, by our friends that are about us, and are taken off by civil respects from our spiritual concerns. Those who really wish well to us and to our work, may sometimes, by their indiscretion, prove our back-friends, and impediments to us in our duty; as Peter was offensive to Christ, with his, "Master, spare thyself," when he thought himself very officious. The mother of our Lord desired to speak with him; it seemed she had not then learned to command her Son, as the iniquity and idolatry of the church of Rome has since pretended to teach her: nor was she so free from fault and folly as they would make her. It was Christ's prerogative, and not his mother's, to do every thing wisely, and well, and in its season. Christ once said to his mother, How is it that ye sought me? Wist he not, that I must be about my Father's business? And it was then said, she laid up that saying in her heart (Lu 2:49); but if she had remembered it now, she would not have given him this interruption when he was about his Father's business. Note, There is many a good truth that we thought was well laid up when we heard it, which yet is out of the way when we have occasion to use it.
II. How he resented this interruption, Mt 12:48-50.
1. He would not hearken to it; he was so intent upon his work, that no natural or civil respects should take him off from it. Who is my mother and who are my brethren? Not that natural affection is to be put off, or that, under pretence of religion, we may be disrespectful to parents, or unkind to other relations; but every thing is beautiful in its season, and the less duty must stand by, while the greater is done. When our regard to our relations comes in competition with the service of God, and the improving of an opportunity to do good, in such a case, we must say to our Father, I have not seen him, as Levi did, De 33:9. The nearest relations must be comparatively hated, that is, we must love them less than Christ (Lu 14:26), and our duty to God must have the preference. This Christ has here given us an example of; the zeal of God's house did so far eat him up, that it made him not only forget himself, but forget his dearest relations. And we must not take it ill of our friends, nor put it upon the score of their wickedness, if they prefer the pleasing of God before the pleasing of us; but we must readily forgive those neglects which may be easily imputed to a pious zeal for God's glory and others' good. Nay, we must deny ourselves and our own satisfaction, rather than do that which may any way divert our friends from, or distract them in, their duty to God.
2. He took that occasion to prefer his disciples, who were his spiritual kindred, before his natural relations as such: which was a good reason why he would not leave preaching to speak with his brethren. He would rather be profiting his disciples, than pleasing his relations. Observe,
(1.) The description of Christ's disciples. They are such as do the will of his Father; not only hear it, and know it, and talk of it, but do it; for doing the will of God is the best preparative for discipleship (Joh 7:17), and the best proof of it (Mt 7:21); that denominates us his disciples indeed. Christ does not say, "Whosoever shall do my will," for he came not to seek or do his own will distinct from his Father's: his will and his Father's are the same; but he refers us to his Father's will, because now in his present state and work he referred himself to it, Joh 6:38.
(2.) The dignity of Christ's disciples: The same is my brother, and sister, and mother. His disciples, that had left all to follow him, and embraced his doctrine, were dearer to him than any that were akin to him according to the flesh. They had preferred Christ before their relations; they left their father (Mt 4:22,10:37); and now to make them amends, and to show that there was no love lost, he preferred them before his relations. Did not they hereby receive, in point of honour, a hundred fold? Mt 19:29. It was very endearing and very encouraging for Christ to say, Behold my mother and my brethren; yet it was not their privilege alone, this honour have all the saints. Note, All obedient believers are near akin to Jesus Christ. They wear his name, bear his image, have his nature, are of his family. He loves them, converses freely with them as his relations. He bids them welcome to his table, takes care of them, provides for them, sees that they want nothing that is fit for them: when he died he left them rich legacies, now he is in heaven he keeps up a correspondence with them, and will have them all with him at last, and will in nothing fail to do the kinsman's part (Ru 3:13), nor will ever be ashamed of his poor relations, but will confess them before men, before the angels, and before his Father.
在本章我們看到:一、基督澄清了第四誡關乎安息日的律法,為它辯護,使它免受猶太教師所提出的某些迷信觀念的玷污;他表明在那日當作的是必要之事和憐憫之工,太 12:1-13。二、我們的主耶穌在行神蹟上所顯出的謹慎、謙卑和捨己,太 12:14-21。三、基督對文士和法利賽人褻瀆的詰難和毀謗的回答——他們把他趕鬼的事歸於他與鬼王結盟,太 12:22-37。四、基督對文士和法利賽人試探性要求的回應——他們要求他顯個從天上來的神蹟給他們看,太 12:38-45。五、基督對他的親屬和家人的判語,太 12:46-50。