서론
無題
英語原文
We have done with the visions, but not with the revelations of this book; the prophet sees no more such signs as he had seen, but still "the word of the Lord came to him." In this chapter we have, I. A case of conscience proposed to the prophet by the children of the captivity concerning fasting, whether they should continue their solemn fasts which they had religiously observed during the seventy years of their captivity, Zec 7:1-3. II. The answer to this question, which is given in this and the next chapter; and this answer was given not all at once, but by piece-meal, and, it should seem, at several times, for here are four distinct discourses which have all of them reference to this case, each of them prefaced with "the word of the Lord came," Zec 4:8,8:1,18. The method of them is very observable. In this chapter, 1. The prophet sharply reproves them for the mismanagements of their fasts, Zec 7:4-7. 2. He exhorts them to reform their lives, which would be the best way of fasting, and to take heed of those sins which brought those judgments upon them which they kept these fasts in memory of, Zec 7:8-14. And then in the next chapter, having searched the wound, he binds it up, and heals it, with gracious assurances of great mercy God had yet in store for them, by which he would turn their fasts into feasts.
1-7
An Enquiry Concerning Fasting; Hypocrisy Reproved (520 BC)
断食に関する問い合わせ;偽善の責め (紀元前520年)
¹ ダリヨス王の第四年に、主のことばがゼカリヤに臨んだ。それは第九の月、すなわちキスレウの月の四日であった。
² 彼らがシャレゼルとレゲム・メレク、およびその従者たちを、主の前に祈るために神の宮に遣わしたとき、
³ また主の宮にいる祭司たちと預言者たちに語って言った。私は第五の月に、このように長年してきたように、嘆き悲しんで、自分を聖別すべきでしょうか。
⁴ そのとき、万軍の主のことばが私に臨んで、こう言われた。
⁵ 「この地のすべての民と祭司たちに語って言え。あなたがたが第五の月と第七の月に断食して嘆き悲しんだ、あの七十年の間、あなたがたは全く私のために、真に私のために断食したのか。
⁶ あなたがたが食べ、また飲んだとき、それは自分自身のために食べ、自分自身のために飲んだのではないか。
⁷ エルサレムが住民を持ち、栄え、その周囲の町々もそうであり、南と低地にも人が住んでいたころ、主が先の預言者たちによって叫ばれたことばを、あなたがたは聞くべきではなかったか。
預言者が説教し、この章と次の章に記録されているこの折々の説教は、彼が彼らに自分の幻を説明した前のものより二年以上後のことであった。これの日付(Zec 7:1)、ダリヨスの第四年の第九の月と、あれの日付(Zec 1:1)、ダリヨスの第二年の第八の月とを比べると分かる。それはゼカリヤがその間ずっと怠けていたからではない(彼とハガイはダリヨスの第六年に宮が完成するまで預言を続けたと明確に書かれている。Ezr 6:14,15)。しかしその間、彼はこのように後に公にされ、記録として残されたような説教はしなかった。神は、書き物によるのと同様に口頭によっても、また新しいものを進めるのと同様に、すでに教えられたことを繰り返し強調することによっても、あがめられ、そのわざがなされ、その関心事に仕えることができる。さてここに次のことがある。
I. 断食に関する提起された事例。人々が、每年の断食、特に第五の月のものを、これまで通り守り続けるべきかどうか、祭司たちと預言者たちに伺いを立てるために遣わされた。その事例を提起したのが、神の定めによって定められた荘厳な祭りの益を奪われていたため、神の摂理が彼らを招いた荘厳な断食によってその欠如を補っていた、なおバビロンに残っていた者たちであったか、それとも帰還はしたが田舎に住んでいた者たちであったか(彼らはこの地の民と呼ばれているから、Zec 7:5、こちらの方を好む者もいる)。しかし、その点については、捕囚のユダヤ人たちの使いに与えられた答えは、彼らだけに向けられるのではなく、すべての民に向けられた可能性がある。御注意、
-
この問い合わせに来たのがだれであったか――シャレゼルとレゲム・メレク。ある身分と資格のある人々で、その従者たちと共に来た。この使いをすることを自分たちの下にあることとも、自分たちの誉れを損なうこととも考えず、むしろ、(1.) 神の宮での奉仕者として、そこで務めを行い、命令を受けることは、自分たちの誉れの増し加わりであると考えた。最も偉大な人も、イエス・キリストの定めの最も小さいものよりは小さい。(2.) 神の民の代理人として、彼らの事柄を取り計らうことは、地歩のある人々の誉れを増す。財産のある人は、仕事に追われる人々より暇があり、その時間を公共の奉仕に用いるべきである。善を行うことによって、自分たちを真に偉大な者とする。教会の使者はキリストの栄光であった、2Co 8:23。
-
彼らが来た使いが何であったか。おそらく金と銀(Zec 6:10,11にあるような)を持ってきたのではなく、たとえ持ってきたとしてもそれは言及されていない。むしろ、私たちすべてを神の宮に導くべき二つの大いなる使いについてであった。(1.) 神のあわれみのために神にとりなすこと。彼らは主の前に祈るために遣わされ、ある者は(当時の慣習に従い)犠牲を献げ、それと共に祈りを献げたと考える。捕囚のユダヤ人は宮に向かって祈った(Da 6:10参照)。しかし今やそれが再建に向かっているので、彼らは自分たちの代表者をそこに祈るために遣わした。神がその宮をすべての民の祈りの家と呼ばれると言われたことを思い出して、Isa 56:7。祈りにおいては、私たちは主の前に自分自身を置き、神の目が私たちの上にあるのを見、私たちの目を神に上げなければならない。(2.) 神のみこころについて神に伺うこと。御注意。私たちが願いを神に献げる時、神からの教えを受ける準備と共にそうしなければならない。もし私たちが耳をそむけて神の律法を聞くことを拒むなら、私たちの祈りが神に受け入れられることを期待できない。それゆえ私たちは、尋ね求めるために、いのちの日のずっと主の宮に住むことを願う(Ps 27:4)。「主よ、私のために何をしてくださるのか」だけでなく、「主よ、私に何をしてほしいのか」と尋ねる。
-
彼らがだれに相談したか。彼らは主の宮にいる祭司たちと預言者たちに語った。前者は普通の事柄のための神託であり、後者は特別な事柄のためであった。彼らは両方の祝福を受けており、どちらかがこの事例において神のみこころを知らせてくれるか試みようとした。御注意。神が人々に様々な賜物をお与えになり、すべて益のためであるから、私たちは機会あるごとにすべてを用いるべきである。彼らは定任の牧者である祭司たちに固執して、教会に仕える資格のある賜物を現した預言者たちを疑うようなことはしなかった。かといって預言者たちに夢中になって祭司たちを軽んじるようなこともせず、祭司たちにも預言者たちにも語り、両者に相談することによって、イスラエルの神と、すべてのうちにすべてをなさるその一つの霊に栄光を帰した。神はウリムによっても預言者によっても(1Sa 28:6)彼らに語り得た。それゆえ彼らはどちらをもなおざりにしなかった。祭司たちと預言者たちは互いにねたまず、彼らの間に何の相違もなかった。それゆえ民が彼らの間に違いを作らないようにしよう。両方を持っていることを神に感謝せよ。預言者たちは確かに祭司たちの悪いところを責めたが、同時に祭司の唇は知識を守るべきであり、民はその口から律法を尋ねるべきである、彼は万軍の主の使いだからと人々に告げた、Mal 2:7。御注意。神のみこころを知りたい者は神の牧者たちに相談し、疑わしい事例では、聖書を調べることを特別な務めとする者たちに助言を求めるべきである。
-
彼らが満足を得たいと願った事例は何か(Zec 7:3)。*私は第五の月に、このように長年してきたように、嘆き悲しんで、自分を聖別すべきでしょうか。*御注意。(1.) 彼らの過去の習慣は何であったか。捕囚の七十年の間だけでなく、彼らが解放を宣言されてから二十年後のこの時まで、彼らはへりくだりと祈りのための荘厳な定まった断食を守り、自室で、家族で、あるいは持っていた礼拝の集会で、機会に応じて敬虔に守った。ここでは一つ、第五の月のものだけが言及されている。しかしZec 8:19によれば、彼らは四つの記念断食を守っていたことが分かる。第四の月(六月17日)――エルサレムの城壁が破られた記念(Jer 52:6)。第五の月(七月4日)――宮が焼かれた記念(Jer 52:12,13)。第七の月(九月3日)――ゲダリヤが殺されたこと、それが彼らの散らされることを完成した記念。第十の月(十二月10日)――エルサレムの包囲の始まった記念、2Ki 25:1。さて、彼らがこれらの断食を守り、このように、彼らを嘆き悲しむへりくだりに招いた摂理の下でへりくだったことは、大いに称賛すべきであった。こうして自分たちを悩みに合わせ、救いの備えをした。また、自分たちの上に出た主のみ手を子どもたちに早くから感じさせる手段ともなった。(2.) 彼らの現在の疑いは何か――これらの断食を続けるべきかどうか。事例は一人の人のように提示されている。私は嘆くべきか。しかしそれは多くの人の事例であり、一人の満足は他のすべての人の満足となった。あるいは多くの者がそれをやめていたかもしれないが、問う者は他の人々の習慣によって決定されない。もし神が続けさせようとされるなら、他の人が何をしようと彼は続ける。彼の断食は嘆き、自分を聖別することによって描写されている。敬虔な断食は、ここで生活の普通の合法的な慰めから自分たちを聖別することと呼ばれる節制だけでなく、ここで嘆きによって表される罪に対する敬虔な悲しみによって荘厳に行われなければならない。「私がこれまで長年してきたように、魂を悩ます日々を、私はまだ守つべきでしょうか。」それは(Zec 7:5で)七十年であると言われ、前のように最後の捕囚から計算される、Zec 1:12。この問いは、もしそう神が定められるなら、肉にとって苦痛であってもそれを続ける用意があることを示唆する。[1.] これらの断食の続行について言うべきことがある。断食と祈りはいつでも良いわざであり、良いことをする。私たちは常に神の前にへりくだる十分な原因と必要とを持つ。これらの断食を捨てることは、彼らがあまりにも安心している証拠となり、またそうならせる原因となる。彼らはなお苦しみの中にあり、神の不快感のしるしの下にあった。そして患者が自分の病の残りを感じている間に薬の服用をやめるのは賢明ではない。しかし、[2.] これらの断食をやめることについても言うべきことがある。神は彼らに対する摂理の方法を変え、あわれみの道をもって彼らに戻られた。それなら彼らはその務めの方法を変えるべきではないか。花婿が帰ってきた今、*花婿の仲間はなぜ断食するのか。*すべてはその季節に美しい。第五の月の断食(彼らが特に尋ねているもの)については、宮が焼かれた記念として守られるものであったから、他のどれよりも取って代わられるべきように思われた。なぜなら宮は今や再建に向かっていたからである。しかし長くこの断食を守ってきた彼らは、助言なしに、またこの事例について神のみこころを尋ね知ることなく、それをやめようとはしなかった。御注意。自分自身や他者に有益であると分かった敬虔な奉仕の良い方法は、良い理由なしに、それゆえ熟考なしには変えるべきではない。
II. この事例に与えられた答え。その質問は十分もっともらしく見えたが、それを提起した者たちはそれにおいて誠実ではなかったようである。なぜなら彼らは実質よりも儀式に関心があったからである。彼らは自分たちの断食を誇り、それをもって全能の神を責めるようであった。神がもっと早くあわれみをもって彼らに戻られなかったと。「これほど長年私たちはやってきたのだから。」Isa 58:3の者たちのように、「私たちが断食したのに、あなたはお気づきにならなかったのか。」また不信仰と神の約束への不信が彼らの問いの底にあったと考える者もいる。なぜなら、もし彼らがその約束にふさわしい信用を与えていたなら、その機会が過ぎた今、断食を捨てるべきであることを疑う必要はなかったからである。それゆえ彼らの問いへの最初の答えは、彼らの偽善に対する非常に鋭い責めである。それはこの地の民だけでなく、これらの断食を定めた祭司たちにも向けられ、おそらくその一部は自分たちの何らかの目的のためにそれを続けたがっていた。彼らすべてに気をつけさせよ。彼らはこれらの断食によって神を自分の債権者にしたと思っていたが、大いに思い違いをしていた。より良い仕方で、より良い目的のために守られない限り、それは神に受け入れられないからである。
-
彼らが行った良いことは正しく行われなかった(Zec 7:5)。あなたがたは断食し、嘆き悲しんだ。彼らは務めの怠慢や無視の責めを負わなかった(あなたの断食は常に私の前にあった、Ps 50:8)。しかし彼らはそれを正しく管理していなかった。御注意。自分の務めについて伺いを立てに来る者は、まず自分の過ちを告げられることを喜んで受け入れなければならない。そして務めの外側に熱心なように見える者は、その内側に対して当然払うべき注意を払っているか、忠実に自分自身を調べなければならない。(1.) 彼らは断食において神に目を向けていなかった。あなたがたは全く私のために、真に私のために断食したのか。神は彼ら自身の良心に訴える。良心は彼らに反して証しする。彼らがそれに誠実でなかったと。ましてすべてを知り、心よりも大きい神はなおさらである。あなたがたは全く私のために断食しなかったことをよく知っている。断食において、あなたがたは私のために断食したのか。そこには務めの死骸と形はあったが、いのちも魂も力もなかった。私のために、真に私のためにであったか。その繰り返しは、そのことや他の聖なる務めにおいて、神のみことばを規則として、神の栄光を目的として神に、すなわち神になされること、神を喜ばせ、神の恵みを得ようと努め、意図の誠実さによって神に認められることを、主要な事柄としてどれほど重きが置かれているかを示している。これが欠けている時、すべての断食は単なる笑いであった。断食して神のために断食しないことは、神をあざけり、神を怒らせることであり、神を喜ばせることはできなかった。イゼベルの断食のように断食を罪の隠れ蓑にする者、パリサイ人のように人々の称賛のためにへつらう者、アハブのように心がへりくだらないまま外側の嘆きの表現に安住する者、彼らは神のために、真に神のために断食しているのか。これが神が選ばれた断食か。Isa 58:5。もし私たちの断食の荘厳さが、たとえ頻繁で、長く、厳しくても、敬虔な感情を鋭くし、祈りを活気づけ、敬虔な悲しみを増し加え、私たちの心の性質と生活の歩みをより良く変えるのに役立たないなら、それは全くその目的に応えておらず、神はそれが神に、真に神になされたものとして受け入れられない。(2.) 彼らは食べて飲むのと同じ目を断食に向けていた(Zec 7:6)。「あなたがたが食べ、また飲んだとき、他の日々に(いや、おそらく断食の日々に、その遵守において、理由があれば自分たちを許し、食べ飲みする自由を取ったが)、自分自身のために食べ、自分自身のために飲んだのではないか。あなたがたは常に自分の思いのままにしてきたのではないか。それならなぜ今、神のみこころを知りたいと偽るのか。あなたがたの敬虔な祭りと感謝において、断食においてと同様に神に目を向けていなかった。」あるいはむしろ、それは彼らの普通の食事を指す。彼らは断食や祈りにおいて神の栄光を意図する以上に、食べたり飲んだりすることにおいて意図していなかった。肉身は、自然的・公民的・宗教的なすべての行動の線の集まる中心であった。彼らはもっとよく断食を守っていたのでなければ、その続続についてこれほど心配する必要はなかった。御注意。私たちは神の栄光のために食べ飲むべき(1Co 10:31)のに、自分自身のために食べ自分自身のために飲む時、食べ飲みにおいて目的を外す。それは私たちのからだが神の奉仕において魂に仕えるのにふさわしくなるためである。
-
彼らがなすべきであった主要な良いことがなされていなかった(Zec 7:7)。「主が先の預言者たちによって叫ばれたことばを、あなたがたは聞くべきではなかったか。そうだ、それを断食の日にすべきであった。自分たちの下にあるさばきへの悲しみのしるしとして断食の日に嘆き**自分を聖別するだけでなく、預言者たちの聖書を調べて、神があなたがたの父祖たちと争われる根拠が何であったかを知り、彼らの不義の足跡を踏まないように彼らの悲惨さによって警告を受けるべきであった。あなたがたは尋ねる、断食においてこれまで通りにすべきかと。いや、あなたがたはまだしなかったことをしなければならない。自分の罪を悔い、生活を改めなければならない。これが私たちが今あなたがたを招くことであり、それは先の預言者たちがあなたがたの父祖たちを招いたことと同じである。」罪が彼らにもたらした害を彼らにいっそう感じさせ、悔いに導くため、預言者は彼らの国の先の栄えた状態を思い出させる。エルサレムはその時住民があり栄えていた、今は荒廃し苦しんでいる。今は廃墟である周囲の町々も、その時は住民があり平安であった。国もまた非常に人口が多かった。南と低地に人が住んでいた、それは少しも防御されていなかったが安全に暮らし、豊かであったので豊かに暮らした。しかしその時、神は預言者たちによって、真剣に、切に彼らに叫ばれ、その道と行いを改めなければ、その繁栄は間もなく終わるであろうと。さて、と預言者は言う、あなたがたはそれに気づき、さばきを防ぐために彼らに求められ、彼らがしなかったことが、さばきを取り除くためにあなたがたに求められると推論すべきであった。そしてもししないなら、あなたがたのすべての断食と嘆きは何の意味もない。御注意。後の預言者たちのことばは先の預言者たちのものと一致する。そして人々が栄えている時も苦境にある時も、彼らは罪を離れ、務めを果たすよう招かれなければならない。これが常にすべての歌の重荷でなければならない。
英語原文
An Enquiry Concerning Fasting; Hypocrisy Reproved (520 BC)
¹ And it came to pass in the fourth year of king Darius, that the word of the LORD came unto Zechariah in the fourth day of the ninth month, even in Chisleu;
² When they had sent unto the house of God Sherezer and Regem-melech, and their men, to pray before the LORD,
³ And to speak unto the priests which were in the house of the LORD of hosts, and to the prophets, saying, Should I weep in the fifth month, separating myself, as I have done these so many years?
⁴ Then came the word of the LORD of hosts unto me, saying,
⁵ Speak unto all the people of the land, and to the priests, saying, When ye fasted and mourned in the fifth and seventh month, even those seventy years, did ye at all fast unto me, even to me?
⁶ And when ye did eat, and when ye did drink, did not ye eat for yourselves, and drink for yourselves?
⁷ Should ye not hear the words which the LORD hath cried by the former prophets, when Jerusalem was inhabited and in prosperity, and the cities thereof round about her, when men inhabited the south and the plain?
This occasional sermon, which the prophet preached, and which is recorded in this and the next chapter, was above two years after the former, in which he gave them an account of his visions, as appears by comparing the date of this (Zec 7:1), in the ninth month of the fourth year of Darius, with the date of that (Zec 1:1), in the eighth month of the second year of Darius; not that Zechariah was idle all that while (it is expressly said that he and Haggai continued prophesying till the temple was finished in the sixth year of Darius; Ezr 6:14,15), but during that time he did not preach any sermon that was afterwards published, and left upon record, as this is. God may be honoured, his work done, and his interest served, by word of mouth as well as by writing; and by inculcating and pressing what has been taught, as well as by advancing something new. Now here we have,
I. A case proposed concerning fasting. Some persons were sent to enquire of the priests and prophets whether they should continue to observe their yearly fasts, particularly that in the fifth month, as they had done. It is uncertain whether the case was put by those that yet remained in Babylon, who, being deprived of the benefit of the solemn feasts which God's ordinance appointed them, made up the want by the solemn fasts which God's providences called them to; or by those that had returned, but lived in the country, as some rather incline to think, because they are called the people of the land, Zec 7:5. But, as to that, the answer given to the messengers of the captive Jews might be directed, not to them only, but to all the people. Observe,
1. Who they were that came with this enquiry—Sherezer and Regem-melech, persons of some rank and figure, for they came with their men, and did not think it below them, or any disparagement to them, to be sent on this errand, but rather an addition to their honour to be, (1.) Attendants in God's house, there to do duty and receive orders. The greatest of men are less than the least of the ordinances of Jesus Christ. (2.) Agents for God's people, to negotiate their affairs. Men of estates, having more leisure than men of business, ought to employ their time in the service of the public, and by doing good they make themselves truly great; the messengers of the churches were the glory of Christ, 2Co 8:23.
2. What the errand was upon which they came. They were sent perhaps not with gold and silver (as those, Zec 6:10,11), or, if they were, that is not mentioned, but upon the two great errands which should bring us all to the house of God, (1.) to intercede with God for his mercy. They were sent to pray before the Lord, and, some think (according to the usage then), to offer sacrifice, with which they offered up their prayers. The Jews, in captivity, prayed towards the temple (as appears Da 6:10); but now that it was in a fair way to be rebuilt they sent their representatives to pray in it, remembering that God had said that his house should be called a house of prayer for all people, Isa 56:7. In prayer we must set ourselves as before the Lord, must see his eye upon us and have our eye up to him. (2.) To enquire of God concerning his mind. Note, When we offer up our requests to God it must be with a readiness to receive instructions from him; for, if we turn away our ear from hearing his law, we cannot expect that our prayers should be acceptable to him. We must therefore desire to dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of our life that we may enquire there (Ps 27:4), asking, not only, Lord, what wilt thou do for me? but, Lord what wilt thou have me to do?
3. Whom they consulted. They spoke to the priests that were in the house of the Lord and to the prophets; the former were an oracle for ordinary cases, the latter for extraordinary; they were blessed with both, and would try if either could acquaint them with the mind of God in this case. Note, God having given diversities of gifts to men, and all to profit with, we should make use of all as there is occasion. They were not so wedded to the priests, their stated ministers, as to distrust the prophets, who appeared, by the gifts given them, well qualified to serve the church; nor yet were they so much enamoured with the prophets as to despise the priests, but they spoke both to the priests and to the prophets, and, in consulting both, gave glory to the God of Israel, and that one Spirit who works all in all. God might speak to them either by urim or by prophets (1Sa 28:6), and therefore they would not neglect either. The priests and the prophets were not jealous one of another, nor had any difference among themselves; let not the people then make differences between them, but thank God they had both. The prophets did indeed reprove what was amiss in the priests, but at the same time told the people that the priest's lips should keep knowledge, and they must enquire the law at his mouth, for he is the messenger of the Lord of hosts, Mal 2:7. Note, Those that would know God's mind should consult God's ministers, and in doubtful cases ask advice of those whose special business it is to search the scriptures.
4. What the case was which they desired satisfaction in (Zec 7:3): Should I weep in the fifth month, separating myself, as I have done these so many years. Observe, (1.) What had been their past practice, not only during the seventy years of the captivity but to this time, which was twenty years after the liberty proclaimed them; they kept up solemn stated fasts for humiliation and prayer, which they religiously observed, according as their opportunities were, in their closets, families, or such assemblies for worship as they had. In the case here, they mention only one, that of the fifth month; but it appears, by Zec 8:19, that they observed four anniversary fasts, one in the fourth month (June 17), in remembrance of the breaking up of the wall of Jerusalem (Jer 52:6), another in the fifth month (July 4), in remembrance of the burning of the temple (Jer 52:12,13), another in the seventh month (September 3), in remembrance of the killing of Gedaliah, which completed their dispersion, and another in the tenth month (December 10), in remembrance of the beginning of the siege of Jerusalem, 2Ki 25:1. Now it was very commendable in them to keep those fasts, thus to humble themselves under those humbling providences, by which God called them to weeping and mourning, thus to accommodate themselves to their troubles, and prepare themselves for deliverance. It would likewise be a means of possessing their children betimes with a due sense of the hand of the Lord gone out against them. (2.) What was their present doubt-whether they should continue these fasts or no. The case is put as by a single person: Should I weep? But it was the case of many, and the satisfaction of one would be a satisfaction to the rest. Or perhaps many had left it off, but the querist will not be determined by the practice of others; if God will have him continue it, he will, whatever others do. His fasting is described by his weeping, separating himself. A religious fast must be solemnized, not only by abstinence, here called a separating ourselves from the ordinary lawful comforts of life, but by a godly sorrow for sin, here expressed by weeping. "Should I still keep such days to afflict the soul as I have done these so many years?" It is said (Zec 7:5) to be seventy years, computed from the last captivity, as before, Zec 1:12. The enquiry intimates a readiness to continue it, if God so appoint, though it be a mortification to the flesh. [1.] Something is to be said for the continuance of these fasts. Fasting and praying are good work at any time, and do good; we have always both cause enough and need enough to humble ourselves before God. To throw off these fasts would be an evidence of their being too secure, and a cause of their being more so. They were still in distress, and under the tokens of God's displeasure; and it is unwise for the patient to break off his course of physic while he is sensible of such remains of his distemper. But, [2.] There is something to be said for the letting fall of these fasts. God had changed the method of his providences concerning them, and returned in ways of mercy to them; and ought not they then to change the method of their duties? Now that the bridegroom has returned, why should the children of the bride-chamber fast? Every thing is beautiful in its season. And as to the fast of the fifth month (which is that they particularly enquire about), that, being kept in remembrance of the burning of the temple, might seem to be superseded rather than any of the other, because the temple was now in a fair way to be rebuilt. But, having long kept up this fast, they would not leave it off without advice, and without asking and knowing God's mind in the case. Note, A good method of religious services, which we have found beneficial to ourselves and others, ought not to be altered without good reason, and therefore not without mature deliberation.
II. An answer given to this case. It should seem that, though the question looked plausible enough, those who proposed it were not conscientious in it, for they were more concerned about the ceremony than about the substance; they seemed to boast of their fasting, and to upbraid God Almighty with it, that he had not sooner returned in mercy to them; "for we have done it these so many years." As those, Isa 58:3, Wherefore have we fasted, and thou seest not? And some think that unbelief, and distrust of the promises of God, were at the bottom of their enquiry; for, if they had given them the credit that was due to them, they needed not to doubt but that their fasts ought to be laid aside, now that the occasion of them was over. And therefore the first answer to their enquiry is a very sharp reproof of their hypocrisy, directed, not only to the people of the land, but to the priests, who had set up these fasts, and perhaps some of them were for keeping them up, to serve some purpose of their own. Let them all take notice that, whereas they thought they had made God very much their debtor by these fasts, they were much mistaken, for they were not acceptable to him, unless they had been observed in a better manner and to better purpose.
1. What they did that was good was not done aright (Zec 7:5): You fasted and mourned. They were not chargeable with the omission or neglect of the duty, though it was displeasing to the body (thy fasts were continually before me, Ps 50:8), but they had not managed them aright. Note, Those that come to enquire of their duty must be willing first to be told of their faults. And those that seem zealous for the outside of a duty ought to examine themselves faithfully whether they have the regard they ought to have to the inside of it. (1.) They had not an eye to God in their fasting: Did you at all fast unto me, even to me? He appeals to their own consciences; they will witness against them that they had not been sincere in it, much more will God, who is greater than the heart and knows all things. You know very well that you did not at all fast to me; in fasting did you fast to me? There was the carcase and form of the duty, but none of the life, and soul, and power of it. Was it to me, even to me? The repetition intimates what a great deal of stress is laid upon this as the main matter, in that and other holy exercises, that they be done to God, even to him, with an eye to his word as our rule, and his glory as our end, in them, seeking to please him and to obtain his favour, and studious by the sincerity of our intention to approve ourselves to him. When this was wanting every fast was but a jest. To fast, and not fast to God, was to mock him and provoke him, and could not be pleasing to him. Those that make fasting a cloak for sin, as Jezebel's fast, or by it make their court to men for their applause, as the Pharisees, or that rest in outward expressions of humiliation while their hearts are unhumbled, as Ahab, do they fast to God, even to him? Is this the fast that God has chosen? Isa 58:5. If the solemnities of our fasting, though frequent, long, and severe, do not serve to put an edge upon devout affections, to quicken prayer, to increase godly sorrow, and to alter the temper of our minds and the course of our lives for the better, they do not at all answer the intention, and God will not accept them as performed to him, even to him. (2.) They had the same eye to themselves in their fasting that they had in their eating and drinking (Zec 7:6): "When you did eat, and when you did drink, on other days (nay, perhaps on your fast-days, in the observation of which you could, when you saw cause, dispense with yourselves, and take a liberty to eat and drink), did you not eat for yourselves and drink for yourselves? Have you not always done as you had a mind yourselves? Why then do you now pretend a desire to know the mind of God? In your religious feasts and thanksgivings you have had no more an eye to God than in your fasts." Or, rather, it refers to their common meals; they did no more design the honour of God in their fasting and praying than they did in their eating and drinking; but self was still the centre in which the lines of all their actions, natural, civil, and religious, met. They needed not be in such care about the continuance of their fasts, unless they had kept them better. Note, We miss our end in eating and drinking when we eat to ourselves and drink to ourselves, whereas we should eat and drink to the glory of God (1Co 10:31), that our bodies may be fit to serve our souls in his service.
2. The principal good thing they should have done was left undone (Zec 7:7): "Should you not hear the words which the Lord has cried by the former prophets? Yes, that you should have done on your fast-days; it was not enough to weep and separate yourselves on your fast-days, in token of your sorrow for the judgments you were under, but you should have searched the scriptures of the prophets, that you might have seen what was the ground of God's controversy with your fathers, and might have taken warning by their miseries not to tread in the steps of their iniquities. You ask, Shall we do as we have done, in fasting? No, you must do that which you have not yet done; you must repent of your sins and reform you lives. This is what we now call you to, and it is the same that the former prophets called your fathers to." To affect them the more with the mischief that sin had done them, that they might be brought to repent of it, he puts them in mind of the former flourishing state of their country: Jerusalem was then inhabited and in prosperity, that is now desolate and in distress. The cities round about, that are now in ruins, were then inhabited too and in peace. The country likewise was very populous: Men inhabited the south of the plain, which was not at all fortified, and yet they lived safely, and which was fruitful, and so they lived plentifully. But then God by the prophets cried to them, as one in earnest, and importunate with them, to amend their ways and doings, or else their prosperity would soon be at an end. "Now," says the prophet, "you should have taken notice of that, and have inferred that what was required of them for the preventing of the judgments, and which they did not, is required of you for the removal of the judgments; and, if you do it not, all your fasting and weeping signify nothing." Note, The words of the later prophets agree with those of the former; and, whether people are in prosperity or adversity, they must be called upon to leave their sins and do their duty; this must still be the burden of every song.
8-14
Wilful Disobedience of Israel; Consequences of Disobedience (520 BC)
イスラエルの頑なな不従順、不従順の結果(紀元前520年)
⁸ 主の言葉がゼカリヤに臨んだ。
⁹ 万軍の主はこう仰せられる。真実のさばきを行え。おのおのその兄弟にあわれみと、慈しみを示せ。
¹⁰ やもめとみなしご、在留異国人と貧しい者をしえたげてはならない。あなたがたのうち、だれもその心の中で兄弟に向かって悪をたくらんではならない。
¹¹ しかし彼らは聞くことを拒み、肩をそびやかし、聞くことがないように耳をふさいだ。
¹² また彼らはその心を金剛石のように硬くし、律法と、万軍の主がその御霊によって先の預言者たちを通して語った言葉を聞くことがないようにした。それゆえ、万軍の主から大いなる怒りが来た。
¹³ それゆえ、彼が呼ばわったのに彼らが聞かなかったように、彼らが呼ばわってもわたしは聞かないと、万軍の主は仰せられる。
¹⁴ しかしわたしは彼らを、彼らの知らないすべての民の中に、つむじ風で散らした。こうして彼らの後、その地は荒れ果てて、そこを通り過ぎる者も、帰る者もなかった。彼らが快い地を荒れ果てさせたからである。
Zec 7:7で言われたこと、彼らが先の預言者たちの言葉を聞くべきであったことが、ここで詳しく述べられる。彼らがその断食を続けるべきかどうかを大いに厳密に尋ねながら、その罪を続けていたこれらの偽善的な探求者への警告として。この預言者は前に彼らの先祖たちの預言者たちの招きへの不従順とその結果を思い出させた(Zec 1:4-6)。そしてここでも再び。他者の害はわたしたちの警告となるべきだからである。昔のイスラエルに対するその罪のための神のさばきは、わたしたちキリスト者への訓戒のために書かれた(1Co 10:11)。そしてわたしたちは自分の時代における類似の摂理から同じ用をなすべきである。
I. この預言者はここで、先の預言者たちがその先祖たちに宣べた説教の要点を繰り返す(Zec 7:9,10)。まさに同じことが今彼らに求められているからである。「万軍の主は今あなたがたにこう語り、またあなたがたの先祖に語った。真実のさばきを行え」。ここで彼らに求められた義務、それはその先祖たちの安らぎの延長となり、その安らぎの回復とならなければならなかったものは、断食を守り犠牲をささげることではなく、正義を行い**あわれみを愛することであった。預言者たちがそれらを強調するために遣わされなかったとしても、自然の光と律法によって彼らが縛られていた義務。公の福祉と平和に直接向かう傾向のある義務。そして彼ら自身が得をするものであり、神ではない。1. 行政官は法の原則と事件の是非にしたがい、人を偏り見ずに公平に正義を行わなければならない。「真実のさばきをさばき、さばいたときそれを行え」。2. 隣人は互いに優しい配慮を持ち、互いに害を与えないだけでなく、その力の及ぶ限り互いにすべての善き奉仕を行う準備がなければならない。彼らは事が求めるにしたがって、おのおのその兄弟にあわれみと慈しみを示さなければならない。他者の弱さも、その災いと同じように、あわれみをもって見られなければならない。3. 彼らは自分たちが優位に立ち、助けることができないと知っている者に対して厳しくしてはならない。彼らは商取引でも法の手続きでも、やもめ、みなしご、在留異国人、貧しい者をしえたげてはならない(Zec 7:10)。最も弱い者だからといって彼らを壁に押し付けてはならない。それを要求し取り戻す能力のある者に権利を否定しないことは、人として感謝すべきことではない。しかしわたしたちは怒りのためだけでなく、良心のために、力ずくで取り戻す力のない者に彼らのものを与えなければならない。あるいはそれは、他者には正確であっても、やもめとみなしごには搾取であることを暗示する。いや、彼らを助け、救うべきところをしないことは、実質的に彼らをしえたげることである。4. 彼らはだれにも害を与えてはならないだけでなく、それを望み、考えることすらしてはならない。「あなたがたのうち、だれもその心の中で兄弟に向かって悪をたくらんではならない。それを計画するな。それを願うな。いや、その空想を楽しむことすらするな」。神の律法は心に制限を加え、悪意ある、意地悪な、性根の悪い思いを持つこと、それを許すことを禁じる(De 15:9)。
II. 彼はその先祖たちの頑なさと不従順を描写する。彼らは神の御名において頻繁に与えられたこれらの勧めと訓戒にもかかわらず、あらゆる種類の邪悪さと不義の中に固執した。これに沿う様々な表現がここに積み重ねられる(Zec 7:11,12)。神に対する敵意であり、神の律法に服従せず、実際に服従できない肉の思いの頑なさを示す。彼らは強情で手に負えず、律法への矛盾の霊から純粋に律法への違反に固執した。1. 彼らはもし避けられるなら預言者たちの聞く範囲内に入ることを欲し、距離を置いた。あるいは、彼らの語ることを避けられないとしても、それに注意を払わないと決心した。「彼らは聞くことを拒み」、まるで語りかけられなかったかのように別の方を見た。2. もしその語ることを聞き、最初は従うように傾いたように見えても、いざ実行という段になると離れ、軛に慣れていない雄牛のように肩をそびやかし、神のいましめの易い軛と軽い荷に服そうとしなかった。彼らはそびやかす肩を与えた(その言葉はそうである)。彼らは肩をわざに当てたように見えたが、すぐに再びそれを引っ込めた。Jer 34:10,11の者たちのように。彼らは欺く弓のように、行きます、主よと言いながら行かなかった子のようであった。3. 彼らは神の言葉に対する偏見で自分の心を満たし、聞くすべての説教に対して身を守る何らかの異議を用意していた。彼らは聞くことがないように耳をふさいだ。耳しいのへびのように(Ps 58:4)。そして聞こうとしない者ほど耳しい者はいない。自分の耳を重くする者(その言葉はそうである)。4. 彼らはこれらのいましめを強制するために彼らに語られた何ものも、彼らに印象を与えないと決心した。彼らはその心を金剛石のように硬くした。ダイヤモンドのように、加工するのに最も硬い石。あるいは火打石のように、石工が採石場の他の石のように整形できないもの。思い上がった罪人の心ほど硬く、打ち延ばしにくく、屈しないものはない。そして心の硬い者は自分自身を感謝できる。それは自分で硬くしたものであり、神が彼らを退廃した思い、自分の心のかたくなさと悔い改めのなさにゆだねるのは正しい。これらのかたくなな罪人たちは、聞くことがないように、自分の心を硬くした。書かれた言葉、モーセの律法によって、また彼らに宣べた預言者たちの言葉によって、神が彼らに語られたことを聞くことがないように。彼らはモーセと預言者たちを持っていたが、どちらも聞かないと決心し、たとえ死人の中から誰かが遣わされても説得されなかったであろう。預言者の言葉は彼らによって顧みられなかった。たとえそれが万軍の主が送り、彼らに向けられた言葉であっても。たとえ主がその御霊によって預言者たちを通してすぐに送られたとしても。それゆえに彼らは神ご自身を辱め、聖霊に抵抗した。注意せよ。人が良くない理由は、良くありたいと欲しないからである。彼らは考えようとせず、従おうとしない。それゆえもしあなたがあざけるなら、あなたひとりがそれを負うであろう。
III. 彼はその先祖たちへの致命的な結果を示す。「それゆえ、万軍の主から大いなる怒りが来た」。神は彼らに大いに不快感を抱かれ、正当にであった。神は彼らに、それ自体合理的で彼らに有益なもの以外何も求められなかった。しかし彼らは拒絶し、しかも最も不遜なしかたで。どの主人が自分のしもべにこのように乱用されることに耐えられるだろうか。律法と預言者に対するこのような福音への容赦のない敵意は、ユダヤの教会の最後の世代に極みまでの怒りをもたらしたものであった(1Th 2:16)。権威が議論の余地のない万軍の主に対する大いなる罪は、力が抵抗できない万軍の主から大いなる怒りをもたらす。そしてその結果は、1. 彼らが神の言葉に耳しい耳を向けたように、神も彼らの祈りに耳しい耳を向けられた(Zec 7:13)。彼が彼らの繁栄の中で彼らの罪を離れるように呼ばわっても、彼らは聞かなかったが、不義の中に固執した。そのように彼らがその悩みの日にさばきを取り除くように彼に呼ばわしても、神は聞かれず、その災いを長引かされた。高ぶりの極みにおいて神をあざける者たちも、苦しみが来たとき彼に叫んだ。「主よ、悩みの中で彼らはあなたを訪れた」。しかし神はそれを言い、それに固執される。律法を聞くことから耳をそむける者、その祈りでさえ忌み嫌われる(Pr 28:9、Pr 1:24以下)。心に留められた不義は、祈りの成功を確実に損なう(Ps 66:18)。2. 彼らがその義務と神への忠誠から離れ、不安定で落ち着きのない霊であったように、神も彼らを散らし、つむじ風の前のもみがらのように投げられた。「神は彼らを、彼らの知らないすべての民の中に散らした」。それゆえ何の親切も受けられないと期待できなかった民の中に(Zec 7:14)。3. 彼らがその地のすべての律法に違反したように、神もそのすべての栄光を取り去られた。「彼らの地は彼らの後荒れ果て、だれも通り過ぎず、帰らなかった」。ゲダリヤの殺害の後、残りのユダヤ人が離散した後、二部族の王国であったその国の全域は完全に無人となった。七十年の捕囚の終わりにユダヤ人が帰還するまで、そこには男も女も子もいなかった。いや、その国を通る道でさえ見捨てられたようである(だれも通らず、行き来しなかった)。それは mercy の示唆を含んでいた(彼らがそこから追い出されても、彼らの帰還のために空けておかれた)。しかしその当座においてはさばきをさらに凄惨なものとした。何年もの間無人であった地がどれほど恐ろしい荒野でなければならなかったか。そして彼らは自分自身に感謝できる。彼ら自身の邪悪さによって快い地を荒れ果てさせたのは彼らであった。それはカルデヤ人がしたのではなかったのである。いや、彼ら自身がしたのである。地の荒廃はその住民の邪悪さによる(Ps 107:34)。これは彼らの神の律法への頑なな不従順から来た。そして現在の世代は、罪がその快い地をどれほど荒れ果てさせたかを見ながら、警告を受けようとしなかった。
英語原文
Wilful Disobedience of Israel; Consequences of Disobedience (520 BC)
⁸ And the word of the LORD came unto Zechariah, saying,
⁹ Thus speaketh the LORD of hosts, saying, Execute true judgment, and shew mercy and compassions every man to his brother:
¹⁰ And oppress not the widow, nor the fatherless, the stranger, nor the poor; and let none of you imagine evil against his brother in your heart.
¹¹ But they refused to hearken, and pulled away the shoulder, and stopped their ears, that they should not hear.
¹² Yea, they made their hearts as an adamant stone, lest they should hear the law, and the words which the LORD of hosts hath sent in his spirit by the former prophets: therefore came a great wrath from the LORD of hosts.
¹³ Therefore it is come to pass, that as he cried, and they would not hear; so they cried, and I would not hear, saith the LORD of hosts:
¹⁴ But I scattered them with a whirlwind among all the nations whom they knew not. Thus the land was desolate after them, that no man passed through nor returned: for they laid the pleasant land desolate.
What was said Zec 7:7, that they should have heard the words of the former prophets, is here enlarged upon, for warning to these hypocritical enquirers, who continued their sins when they asked with great preciseness whether they should continue their fasts. This prophet had before put them in mind of their fathers' disobedience to the calls of the prophets, and what was the consequence of it (Zec 1:4-6), and now here again; for others' harms should be our warnings. God's judgments upon Israel of old for their sins were written for admonition to us Christians (1Co 10:11), and the same use we should make of similar providences in our own day.
I. This prophet here repeats the heads of the sermons which the former prophets preached to their fathers (Zec 7:9,10), because the very same things were required of them now. "Thus does the Lord of hosts speak to you now, and thus he did speak to your fathers, saying, Execute true judgment." The duties here required of them, which would have been the lengthening of the tranquillity of their fathers and must be the restoring of their tranquillity, are not keeping fasts and offering sacrifices, but doing justly and loving mercy, duties which they were bound to by the light and law of nature, though there had been no prophets sent to insist upon them, duties which had a direct tendency to the public welfare and peace, and which they themselves would be the gainers by, and not God. 1. Magistrates must administer justice impartially, according to the maxims of the law and the merits of the cause, without respect of persons: "Judge judgment of truth, and execute it when you have judged it." 2. Neighbours must have a tender concern for one another, and must not only do one another no wrong, but must be ready to do one another all the good offices that lie in their power. They must show mercy and compassion every man to his brother, as the case called for it. The infirmities of others, as well as their calamities, are to be looked upon with compassion. Hanc veniam petimusque damusque vicissim—This kindness we ask and exercise. 3. They must not bear hard upon those whom they have advantage against, and who, they know, are not able to help themselves. They must not, either in commerce or in course of law, oppress the widow, the fatherless, the stranger, and the poor, Zec 7:10. The weakest must not be thrust to the wall because they are weakest. No thanks to men not to deny right to those who are in a capacity to demand it and recover it; but we must, not only for wrath, but also for conscience' sake, give those their own who have not power to force it from us. Or it intimates that that which is but exactness with others is exaction upon the widows and the fatherless; nay, that not relieving and helping them as we ought is, in effect, oppressing them. 4. They must not only not do wrong to any, but they must not so much as desire it nor think of it: "Let none of you imagine evil against his brother in your heart. Do not project it; do not wish it; nay do not so much as please yourself with the fancy of it." The law of God lays a restraint upon the heart, and forbids the entertaining, forbids the admitting, of a malicious, spiteful, ill-natured thought. De 15:9, Beware that there be not a thought in thy Belial heart against thy brother.
II. He describes the wilfulness and disobedience of their fathers, who persisted in all manner of wickedness and injustice, notwithstanding these exhortations and admonitions frequently given them in God's name; various expressions to this purport are here heaped up (Zec 7:11,12), setting forth the stubbornness of that carnal mind which is enmity against God, and is not in subjection to the law of God, neither indeed can be. They were obstinate and refractory, and persisted in their transgressions of the law purely from a spirit of contradiction to the law. 1. They would not, if they could help it, come within hearing of the prophets, but kept at a distance; or, if they could not avoid hearing what they said, yet they resolved they would not heed it: They refused to hearken, and looked another way as if they had not been spoken to. 2. If they did hear what was said to them, and, as it seemed, inclined at first to comply with it, yet they flew off when it came to the setting to, and, like a bullock unaccustomed to the yoke, they pulled away the shoulder, and would not submit to the easy yoke and the light burden of God's commandments. They gave a withdrawing shoulder (so the word is); they seemed to lay their shoulder to the work, but they presently withdrew it again, as those Jer 34:10,11. They were like a deceitful bow, as that son that said, I go, sir, but went not. 3. They filled their own minds with prejudices against the word of God, and had some objection or other ready wherewith to fortify themselves against every sermon they heard. They stopped their ears, that they should not hear, as the deaf adder (Ps 58:4), and none are so deaf as those that will not hear, that make their own ear heavy, as the word is. 4. They resolved that nothing which was said to them, for the enforcing of these injunctions, should make any impression upon them: They made their hearts as an adamant-stone, as a diamond, the hardest of stones to be wrought upon, or as a flint, which the mason cannot hew into shape as he can other stone out of the quarry. Nothing is so hard, so unmalleable, so inflexible, as the heart of a presumptuous sinner; and those whose hearts are hard may thank themselves; they are of their own hardening, and it is just with God to give them over to a reprobate sense, to the hardness and impenitence of their own hearts. These stubborn sinners hardened their hearts on purpose lest they should hear what God said to them by the written word, by the law of Moses, and by the words of the prophets that preached to them; they had Moses and the prophets, but resolved they would hear neither, nor would they have been persuaded though one had been sent to them from the dead. The words of the prophet were not regarded by them, though they were words which the Lord of hosts sent and directed to them, though he sent them immediately by his Spirit in the prophets; so that in despising them they affronted God himself and resisted the Holy Ghost. Note, The reason why men are not good is because they will not be so; they will not consider, will not comply; and therefore, if thou scornest, thou alone shalt bear it.
III. He shows the fatal consequences of it to their fathers: Therefore came great wrath from the Lord of hosts. God was highly displeased with them, and justly; he required nothing of them but what was reasonable in itself and beneficial to them; and yet they refused, and in a most insolent manner too. What master could bear to be so abused by his own servant? Such an implacable enmity to the gospel as this was to the law and the prophets was that which brought wrath to the uttermost upon the last generation of the Jewish church, 1Th 2:16. Great sins against the Lord of hosts, whose authority is incontestable, bring great wrath from the Lord of hosts, whose power is irresistible. And the effect was, 1. As they had turned a deaf ear to God's word, so God turned a deaf ear to their prayers, Zec 7:13. As he cried to them in their prosperity to leave their sins, and they would not hear, but persisted in their iniquities, so they cried to him in the day of their trouble to remove his judgments, and he would not hear, but lengthened out their calamities. Those that set God at defiance, in the height of their pride, when pangs came upon them cried unto him. Lord, in trouble have they visited thee. But God has said it, and will abide by it, He that turns away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer shall be an abomination, Pr 28:9, Pr 1:24, etc. Iniquity, regarded in the heart, will certainly spoil the success of prayer, Ps 66:18. 2. As they flew off from their duty and allegiance to God, and were of desultory and unsettled spirits, so God dissipated them and threw them about as chaff before a whirlwind: He scattered them among all the nations whom they knew not, and whom therefore they could not expect to receive any kindness from, Zec 7:14. 3. As they violated all the laws of their land, so God took away all the glories of it: Their land was desolate after them, and no man passed through or returned. All that country that was the kingdom of the two tribes, after the dispersion of the remaining Jews, upon the slaughter of Gedaliah, was left utterly uninhabited; there was not man, woman, or child, in it, till the Jews returned at the end of seventy years' captivity; nay, it should seem, the very roads that lay through the country were deserted (none passed or repassed), which, as it had an intimation of mercy in it (though they were cast out of it, yet it was kept empty for their return), so for the present it made the judgment appear much the more dismal; for what a horrid wilderness must a land be that had been so many years uninhabited! And they might thank themselves; it was they that by their own wickedness laid the pleasant land desolate. It was not so much the Chaldeans that did it. No; they did it themselves. The desolations of a land are owing to the wickedness of its inhabitants, Ps 107:34. This came of their wilful disobedience to the law of God. And the present generation saw how desolate sin had made that pleasant land, and yet would not take warning.
私たちは幻を終えたが、この書の啓示を終えたわけではない。預言者はこれまで見たようなしるしをもはや見ないが、それでも「主のことばが彼に臨んだ」。この章には次のことがある。I. 捕囚の子らによって断食に関して預言者に提起された良心の事例。彼らが捕囚の七十年の間に敬虔に守ってきた荘厳な断食を続けるべきかどうか(Zec 7:1-3)。II. この質問への答え。それはこの章と次の章で与えられ、一度にではなく、少しずつ、そしてどうやら幾度かにわたって与えられたようである。なぜならここにすべてこの事例に関係する四つの異なる説教があり、それぞれに「主のことばが臨んだ」(Zec 4:8,8:1,18)という前書きがあるからである。その方法は非常に注目すべきである。この章で、1. 預言者は彼らの断食の不手際を鋭く責める(Zec 7:4-7)。2. 彼らに生活を改めるよう、それが最善の断食の道であり、彼らがその断食を記念として守るようなさばきをもたらしたそれらの罪に気をつけるよう勧める(Zec 7:8-14)。そして次の章で、傷を探った後、それを包扎し、神がなお彼らのために備えておられる大いなるあわれみの恵み深い保証によってそれを癒し、彼らの断食を祝いに変える。