신학자료 전용 사이트

샤프-헤르초크 종교백과

Schaff-Herzog Religious Encyclopaedia

백과사전 Schaff et al. 1882 general

지원 언어 현황

영 한1%

영 6639/6639 원문 · 한 75/6639 번역 · 0 검수

6639개 항목

한영 비교 보기
CHRISTOLOGY Christology

한

기독론은 예수 그리스도가 어떤 분이신지를 다루는 교리 분야로, 특히 그분 안에서 신성과 인성이 어떻게 하나로 연합되는지를 묻는다. 그리스도가 무슨 일을 이루셨는지를 다루는 구원론과 달리, 기독론은 그리스도가 본래 누구이신지에 초점을 둔다. 고전 신조는 이를 참 하나님이자 참 사람이신 한 위격 안의 두 본성으로 정리한다.

영

Christology is the part of doctrine that treats the person of Jesus Christ, especially how the divine and the human are united in him. It asks who Christ is in himself, as distinct from soteriology, which asks what he accomplishes. The classic creeds frame it as one person in two natures, truly God and truly man.
SOTERIOLOGY Soteriology

한

구원론은 구원에 관한 교리로, 하나님이 어떻게 죄인을 건지시고 그리스도의 구원 사역을 그들에게 적용하시는지를 다룬다. 구원의 근거가 되는 그리스도의 속죄 사역과, 그 사역이 은혜와 믿음으로 받아들여지는 길을 함께 설명한다. 조직신학의 한 분야로서 구원자의 위격을 다루는 기독론과 나란히 선다.

영

Soteriology is the doctrine of salvation, treating how God rescues sinners and applies the saving work of Christ to them. It covers the grounds of salvation in Christ's atoning work and the way that work is received through grace and faith. As a locus of systematic theology it stands beside Christology, which concerns the Savior's person.
ESCHATOLOGY Eschatology

한

종말론은 마지막 일들에 관한 교리로, 죽음, 그리스도의 재림, 부활, 심판, 그리고 의인과 악인의 최종 상태를 다룬다. 역사 속에서 하나님의 목적이 완성될 것을 바라보는 교회의 소망을 한데 모은다. 이 용어는 죽음 이후 개인의 운명과 하나님 나라의 우주적 완성을 함께 포괄한다.

영

Eschatology is the doctrine of the last things, treating death, the return of Christ, resurrection, judgment, and the final state of the righteous and the wicked. It gathers the church's hope for the consummation of God's purpose in history. The term covers both individual destiny after death and the cosmic completion of the kingdom of God.
PNEUMATOLOGY Pneumatology

한

성령론은 성령에 관한 교리로, 그분의 위격과 신성, 삼위일체 안에서의 나오심, 그리고 창조와 계시와 구원의 적용에서 행하시는 사역을 다룬다. 성령께서 어떻게 신자를 중생시키고 그 안에 거하시며 거룩하게 하시고 교회를 모으시는지를 살핀다. 성령의 온전한 신성을 둘러싼 초대 교회의 논쟁이 이 교리 분야를 형성하였다.

영

Pneumatology is the doctrine of the Holy Spirit, treating his person, his deity, and his procession within the Trinity, as well as his work in creation, revelation, and the application of salvation. It considers how the Spirit regenerates, indwells, and sanctifies believers and gathers the church. The early controversies over the Spirit's full deity shaped this part of doctrine.
THEISM Theism

한

유신론은 세상과 구별되시면서도 창조주이자 주로서 세상 안에 능동적으로 임재하시는 한 인격적 하나님을 믿는 입장이다. 하나님을 부정하는 무신론과, 하나님을 세상과 동일시하는 범신론에 맞선다. 기독교 유신론은 이 하나님이 자신을 계시하시고 역사 속에서 일하시는 살아 계신 주이심을 덧붙인다.

영

Theism is the belief in one personal God who is both distinct from the world and actively present in it as Creator and Lord. It stands against atheism, which denies God, and against pantheism, which identifies God with the world. Christian theism adds that this God is the living Lord who reveals himself and acts in history.
DEISM Deism

한

이신론은 하나님이 세상을 창조하시고 그 법칙을 세우셨으나, 기적이나 계시나 섭리로 세상에 개입하지는 않으신다고 본다. 종교를 이성과 자연적 도덕으로 축소하려는 경향이 있어, 특별 계시와 예언을 제쳐 둔다. 주로 17세기와 18세기 영국과 유럽 대륙의 사상가들 사이에서 일어났다.

영

Deism holds that God created the world and established its laws but does not intervene in it by miracle, revelation, or providence. It tends to reduce religion to reason and natural morality, setting aside special revelation and prophecy. It arose chiefly among English and continental thinkers of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.
PANTHEISM Pantheism

한

범신론은 하나님을 세상 전체와 동일시하여, 하나님과 자연이 같은 하나의 실재라고 본다. 자기 피조물과 구별되시는 인격적 창조주를 부정하고, 우주 자체를 신적인 것으로 여긴다. 기독교 신학은 이를 거부하는데, 성경은 하나님을 그분이 지으신 세상을 초월하시면서도 그 안에 임재하시는 분으로 제시하기 때문이다.

영

Pantheism identifies God with the totality of the world, so that God and nature are one and the same reality. It denies a personal Creator who is distinct from his creation, treating the universe itself as divine. Christian theology rejects it because Scripture presents God as transcendent over the world he made while also present within it.
THEODICY Theodicy

한

신정론은 세상에 존재하는 악과 고난에 비추어 하나님의 선하심과 공의를 변호하려는 시도다. 전능하시고 선하신 하나님이 어떻게 악의 존재를 허용하실 수 있는지를 묻는다. 이 논의는 인간의 자유, 죄의 결과, 그리고 하나님의 더 큰 목적을 함께 저울질하되, 그 신비를 다 풀어 없애지는 않는다.

영

Theodicy is the attempt to justify the goodness and justice of God in view of the evil and suffering present in the world. It asks how a God who is both almighty and good can permit evil to exist. The discussion weighs human freedom, the consequences of sin, and the larger purposes of God without explaining the mystery away.
HYPOSTATIC UNION Hypostatic Union

한

위격적 연합은 신성과 인성이 예수 그리스도라는 한 위격 안에서 결합된 것을 가리킨다. 두 본성은 섞이거나 변하거나 나뉘거나 분리되지 않은 채 연합되어, 그리스도는 동시에 온전한 하나님이시며 온전한 사람이시다. 칼케돈 공의회(451년)는 양극단의 오류에 맞서 이 가르침을 고전적으로 정식화하였다.

영

The hypostatic union is the joining of the divine and human natures in the one person of Jesus Christ. The two natures are united without being mixed, changed, divided, or separated, so that Christ is at once fully God and fully man. The Council of Chalcedon (451) gave this teaching its classic formulation against errors on either side.
KENOSIS Kenosis

한

케노시스는 하나님의 아들이 사람이 되시면서 자기를 비우시고 종의 형체를 취하신 것을 가리킨다. 그리스도가 자기를 비우셨다는 바울의 말에서 나온 표현으로, 신학자들은 그분이 성육신에서 무엇을 내려놓으셨는지를 두고 논의한다. 정통적인 설명은 그분이 참 하나님이시기를 그치지 않으신 채 자기 영광의 행사를 가리거나 절제하셨다고 본다.

영

Kenosis refers to the self-emptying of the Son of God in becoming man, taking the form of a servant. It is drawn from Paul's statement that Christ emptied himself, and theologians debate exactly what he laid aside in the incarnation. Orthodox accounts hold that he veiled or restrained the exercise of his glory without ceasing to be truly God.
INCARNATION Incarnation

한

성육신은 영원하신 하나님의 아들이 인성을 취하셔서, 말씀이 육신이 되어 우리 가운데 거하신 일을 가리킨다. 한 위격 안에서 아들은 참되고 온전한 인성을 자신의 변치 않는 신성에 연합하셨으며, 동정녀 마리아에게서 나셨다. 이 일은 그분이 중보자로서 행하시는 사역과 복음 전체의 토대가 된다.

영

The incarnation is the taking of human nature by the eternal Son of God, so that the Word became flesh and dwelt among us. In one person the Son united true and complete manhood to his unchanging deity, born of the virgin Mary. This act is the foundation of his work as Mediator and of the whole gospel.
SUPRALAPSARIANISM Supralapsarianism

한

타락전 선택설은 하나님의 영원한 작정의 순서에 관한 견해로, 하나님이 먼저 어떤 이를 택하고 다른 이를 버리기로 작정하신 다음, 그 목적을 이루는 수단으로 타락을 허용하기로 작정하셨다고 본다. 이 도식에서는 선택의 작정이 창조와 타락에 관한 작정보다 논리적으로 앞선다. 논리적 순서에서 타락을 선택보다 앞에 두는 타락후 선택설과 대비된다.

영

Supralapsarianism is a view of the order of God's eternal decrees holding that God first decreed to elect some and reject others, and only then decreed to permit the fall as the means to that end. In this scheme the decree of election logically precedes the decree concerning creation and the fall. It contrasts with infralapsarianism, which places the fall before election in the logical order.
INFRALAPSARIANISM Infralapsarianism

한

타락후 선택설은 하나님의 영원한 작정의 순서에 관한 견해로, 하나님이 세상을 창조하고 타락을 허용하기로 작정하신 뒤에, 타락한 인류 가운데서 어떤 이를 택하고 다른 이를 버리기로 작정하셨다고 본다. 여기서는 선택이 타락에 관한 작정 다음에 논리적으로 오므로, 선택의 대상이 이미 죄인으로 여겨진다. 더 일반적인 개혁주의 입장으로, 타락전 선택설과 대비된다.

영

Infralapsarianism is a view of the order of God's eternal decrees holding that God decreed to create the world and permit the fall before decreeing to elect some from among fallen mankind and to leave others. Here election logically follows the decree concerning the fall, so that the objects of election are already considered as sinners. It is the more common Reformed position and stands over against supralapsarianism.
MONOPHYSITISM Monophysitism

한

단성론은 그리스도 안에 오직 한 본성만 있으며, 연합 이후 신성이 인성을 흡수하거나 압도하였다고 보는 가르침이다. 그리스도의 위격을 나누는 데 대한 지나친 반작용으로 5세기에 일어났고, 칼케돈 공의회에서 정죄되었다. 교회는 이것이 그리스도의 참 인성의 실재성과 영속성을 훼손한다는 이유로 거부하였다.

영

Monophysitism is the teaching that in Christ there is only one nature, the divine having absorbed or overwhelmed the human after the union. It arose in the fifth century as an over-reaction against dividing Christ's person and was condemned at the Council of Chalcedon. The church rejected it for compromising the reality and permanence of Christ's true humanity.
NESTORIANISM Nestorianism

한

네스토리우스주의는 네스토리우스와 결부된 가르침으로, 그리스도의 두 본성을 지나치게 구분하여 한 위격이 아니라 분리된 두 위격을 함축하는 데 이른다. 마리아를 하나님을 낳은 이로 부르기를 주저하였고, 그리스도 안의 신성과 인성을 참으로 연합시키기보다 나란히 두려는 경향이 있었다. 주의 한 위격을 나눈다는 이유로 에베소 공의회(431년)에서 정죄되었다.

영

Nestorianism is the teaching associated with Nestorius that so distinguishes the two natures of Christ as to imply two separate persons rather than one. It hesitated to call Mary the bearer of God and tended to set the divine and human in Christ side by side instead of truly united. It was condemned at the Council of Ephesus (431) for dividing the one person of the Lord.
ARIANISM Arianism

한

아리우스주의는 알렉산드리아의 장로 아리우스와 결부된 4세기 가르침으로, 아들이 영원하지 않고 시작을 가진 피조된 존재라고 본다. 이 견해에서 아들은 피조물 가운데 첫째이자 가장 높은 자이되 아버지와 본질이 다르므로 온전한 신성을 지니지 않는다. 니케아 공의회(325)는 이를 배척하고 아들이 아버지와 한 본질이심을 고백하였다.

영

I'll correct the OCR text while preserving all content, meaning, and formatting. Arianism is the fourth-century teaching, associated with the presbyter Arius of Alexandria, that the Son is not eternal but a created being who had a beginning. On this view the Son is the first and highest of creatures, of a different substance than the Father, and therefore not fully divine. The Council of Nicaea (325) rejected it and confessed the Son as of one substance with the Father.
APOLLINARIANISM Apollinarianism

한

아폴리나리우스주의는 라오디게아의 아폴리나리우스가 가르친 기독론적 오류로, 그리스도 안에서 신적 로고스가 이성적 인간 영혼 곧 정신의 자리를 대신했다고 본다. 이는 그리스도에게 온전한 인성을 부정함으로써 그분 위격의 통일성과 무죄성을 지키려 한 것이다. 콘스탄티노플 공의회(381)는 취해지지 않은 것은 치유되지 않으며 그리스도가 인류를 구속하시려면 온전한 사람이셔야 한다는 근거로 이를 정죄하였다.

영

I'll correct the OCR text while preserving its meaning and theological content. Apollinarianism is the christological error, taught by Apollinaris of Laodicea, that in Christ the divine Logos took the place of a rational human soul or mind. By denying Christ a complete human nature it sought to safeguard the unity of his person and his sinlessness. The Council of Constantinople (381) condemned it, holding that what is not assumed is not healed and that Christ must be fully human to redeem humanity.
ADOPTIONISM Adoptionism

한

양자론은 예수가 한낱 사람으로 태어났다가 세례 때 혹은 특별한 신적 은총으로 양자가 되어 하나님의 아들이 되었다고 보는 기독론적 견해다. 따라서 아들이 본성상 영원히 신적이심을 부정하고, 그분의 아들 되심을 본질적인 것이 아니라 수여된 것으로 다룬다. 교회는 이를 아들의 영원한 출생 및 선재하신 말씀의 성육신과 양립할 수 없는 것으로 배척하였다.

영

Adoptionism is the christological view that Jesus was born a mere man and became the Son of God by adoption, whether at his baptism or by special divine favor. It thus denies that the Son is eternally and by nature divine, treating his sonship as conferred rather than essential. The church rejected it as incompatible with the eternal generation of the Son and the incarnation of the pre-existent Word.
SABELLIANISM Sabellianism

한

사벨리우스주의는 사벨리우스의 이름을 딴 양태론적 단일신론의 한 형태로, 아버지와 아들과 성령이 세 구별된 위격이 아니라 한 하나님이 차례로 나타나는 세 양태 곧 역할이라고 본다. 이는 하나님의 단일성을 지키되 신격 안의 실재하고 영원한 구별을 희생한다. 교회는 이것이 세 위격을 가면만 바꾸는 한 위격으로 환원시킨다는 이유로 배척하였다.

영

Sabellianism, a form of modalistic monarchianism named after Sabellius, holds that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are not three distinct persons but three modes or roles in which the one God successively appears. It guards the unity of God at the cost of the real and eternal distinctions within the Godhead. The church rejected it for collapsing the three persons into a single person who merely changes masks.
SUBORDINATIONISM Subordinationism

한

종속론은 아들을, 흔히 성령까지도, 신성에서 아버지와 동등하지 않고 존재나 위엄에서 열등한 것으로 만드는 경향이다. 위격들 사이에 기원의 질서가 있다는 것은 정통이지만, 종속론은 아들의 온전하고 동등한 신성을 부정하는 데로 넘어갈 때 오류가 된다. 니케아 신학은 위격들이 관계에서는 구별되되 본질과 영광과 영원성에서는 하나이며 동등하다고 확언한다.

영

Subordinationism is the tendency to make the Son, and often the Spirit, inferior in being or dignity to the Father rather than equal in deity. While an ordering of origin among the persons is orthodox, subordinationism crosses into error when it denies the Son's full and equal divinity. Nicene theology affirms the persons as distinct in relation but one and equal in essence, glory, and eternity.
COMMUNICATIO IDIOMATUM Communicatio Idiomatum

한

속성의 교류는 두 본성이 그리스도의 한 위격 안에 연합되어 있으므로 각 본성의 속성을 그 한 위격에 돌려 말할 수 있다는 원리다. 따라서 성경은 하나님의 아들이 고난받으셨다거나 사람 예수가 하늘에서 오셨다고 말할 수 있으니, 이는 단일한 주체에 대해 진술되기 때문이다. 이는 본성 자체가 서로 속성을 주고받는다는 뜻이 아니며, 두 본성은 혼합되지 않은 채로 남는다.

영

Communicatio idiomatum, the communication of properties, is the principle that because the two natures are united in the one person of Christ, the attributes of each nature may be predicated of the one person. Thus Scripture can say that the Son of God suffered or that the man Jesus is from heaven, since these are spoken of the single subject. It does not mean the natures themselves exchange their properties, which remain unmixed.
PERICHORESIS Perichoresis

한

상호내주는 삼위일체의 세 위격이 혼동이나 분리 없이 각기 다른 위격 안에 온전히 거하는 상호 내재를 가리킨다. 이는 아버지와 아들과 성령이 나뉘지 않은 한 신적 생명 안에서 함께 거하시어 한 위격을 모시는 것이 곧 모두를 모시는 것임을 표현한다. 같은 용어는 그리스도 안에서 서로 침투하면서도 구별된 채로 있는 두 본성의 연합에도 적용된다.

영

Perichoresis is the mutual indwelling of the three persons of the Trinity, each fully in the others without confusion or division. It expresses how Father, Son, and Spirit coinhere in one undivided divine life, so that to have one is to have all. The same term is also applied to the union of the two natures in Christ, which interpenetrate yet remain distinct.
FILIOQUE Filioque

한

필리오케는 라틴어로 '그리고 아들에게서'라는 뜻이며, 서방 교회가 니케아 신경에 덧붙인 어구로 성령이 아버지와 아들에게서 나오신다고 가르친다. 라틴 교회는 이것이 성령께서 아버지와 아들 모두에 대해 갖는 영원한 관계를 표현한다고 보았으나, 동방 교회는 그 첨가가 권위 없는 것이며 위격들을 혼동시킨다고 배척하였다. 이 논쟁은 동서 교회 분열의 주된 원인이 되었다.

영

I'll correct the OCR text per the rules. Filioque, Latin for "and the Son," is the clause added in the West to the Nicene Creed, teaching that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son. The Latin church held it to express the Spirit's eternal relation to both Father and Son, while the Eastern church rejected the addition as unauthorized and as confusing the persons. The dispute became a principal cause of the division between East and West.
IMMUTABILITY OF GOD Immutability of God

한

하나님의 불변성은 하나님이 그 존재와 완전성과 작정과 약속에서 변하지 않으심을 가리키는 신적 속성이다. 하나님은 무한히 완전하시므로 더해지거나 덜해지실 수 없으며, 그분께는 어떤 변화도 보태거나 빼앗을 수 없다. 이 불변성은 그분 경륜의 항구성과 백성을 향한 언약적 신실하심의 확실성의 근거가 된다.

영

The immutability of God is the divine attribute by which God is unchangeable in his being, perfections, purposes, and promises. Because God is infinitely perfect, he can neither increase nor decrease, and no alteration can be added to or taken from him. This unchangeableness grounds the constancy of his counsel and the reliability of his covenant faithfulness toward his people.
IMPASSIBILITY Impassibility

한

무감수성은 하나님이 그 신적 본성에서 고난이나 정념에 종속되지 않으시며 자신 밖의 어떤 것에 의해 작용받지 않으심을 뜻하는 교리다. 이는 하나님의 복되심과 사랑이 밖에서 강요된 변화하는 감정 상태의 산물이 아님을 확언한다. 그리스도 안에서 고난은 인성에 속하며, 신적 본성은 감수되지 않은 채로 남는다.

영

Impassibility is the doctrine that God in his divine nature is not subject to suffering, passions, or being acted upon by anything outside himself. It affirms that God's blessedness and love are not the product of changing emotional states forced upon him from without. In Christ the suffering belongs to the human nature, while the divine nature remains impassible.
ASEITY Aseity

한

자존성은 하나님이 스스로 계시며 그 존재나 생명을 위해 자신 밖의 어떤 것에도 의존하지 않으심을 뜻하는 신적 속성이다. 자신의 존재를 다른 것에서 얻는 모든 피조물과 달리, 하나님은 자기 존재의 원인 없는 근거이시며 존재하는 모든 것의 원천이시다. 이 완전성은 그분의 독립성과 그분이 자신 안에 지니신 생명의 충만함의 토대가 된다.

영

Aseity is the divine attribute of self-existence, meaning that God exists of himself and depends on nothing outside himself for his being or life. Unlike all creatures, who derive their existence from another, God is the uncaused ground of his own being and the source of all that is. This perfection underlies his independence and the fullness of life he possesses in himself.
SIMPLICITY OF GOD Simplicity of God

한

하나님의 단순성은 하나님이 부분들로 합성되지 않으시고 자신의 속성들과 동일한 하나의 나뉘지 않은 본질이심을 뜻하는 교리다. 그분의 지혜와 선하심과 능력과 존재는 따로 더해진 분리 가능한 구성 요소가 아니라, 서로 다른 측면에서 고찰된 하나의 단순한 하나님이시다. 이 가르침은 하나님을 나뉘거나 해체될 수 있는 복합물로 생각하는 것을 막아 준다.

영

The simplicity of God is the doctrine that God is not composed of parts but is one undivided essence, identical with his own attributes. His wisdom, goodness, power, and being are not separable components added together but the one simple God considered under different aspects. This teaching guards against conceiving God as a compound that could be divided or dissolved.
IMAGO DEI Image of God

한

하나님의 형상 곧 이마고 데이는 인간이 하나님의 모양대로 지음받아 이성적·도덕적·영적 능력 안에 그분 성품의 반영을 지닌다고 보는 교리다. 이는 인간 피조물의 독특한 존엄과 지식·의·거룩함으로의 부르심을 나타낸다. 형상은 타락으로 훼손되었으나, 그 형상의 완전한 표현이신 그리스도를 본받는 자들 안에서 새롭게 되어 간다.

영

The image of God, or imago Dei, is the doctrine that humanity was created in God's likeness, bearing a reflection of his character in rational, moral, and spiritual capacities. It marks the unique dignity of the human creature and his calling to knowledge, righteousness, and holiness. Though defaced by the fall, the image is being renewed in those conformed to Christ, who is its perfect expression.
TRADUCIANISM Traducianism

한

유전설은 인간의 영혼이 몸과 마찬가지로 출생의 행위 안에서 부모로부터 전해지며, 개인마다 하나님에 의해 직접 창조되는 것이 아니라고 보는 견해다. 그 주창자들은 이것이 아담으로부터 후손에게 원죄가 전달되는 것을 가장 잘 설명한다고 보았다. 이는 하나님이 각 영혼을 직접 창조하신다고 가르치는 영혼창조설과 대립한다.

영

Traducianism is the view that the human soul, like the body, is propagated from the parents in the act of generation, rather than created immediately by God for each individual. Its advocates held that it best explains the transmission of original sin from Adam to his posterity. It stands opposed to creationism, which teaches that God creates each soul directly.
ANNIHILATIONISM Annihilationism

한

절멸설은 끝까지 회개하지 않는 자들이 끝없는 의식적 형벌을 받는 것이 아니라 완전히 멸절되어 존재하기를 그친다고 보는 견해다. 어떤 이들은 영혼이 본래 죽을 수밖에 없어 그리스도 안의 생명의 선물 없이는 소멸한다고 보고, 다른 이들은 멸절을 심판의 결과로 본다. 이는 잃은 자들이 영원히 의식적으로 형벌받는다는 전통적 교리와 대립한다.

영

Annihilationism is the view that the finally impenitent are not subjected to endless conscious punishment but are utterly destroyed, ceasing to exist. Some hold that the soul is naturally mortal and perishes apart from the gift of life in Christ, while others see destruction as the outcome of judgment. It stands opposed to the traditional doctrine of the eternal, conscious punishment of the lost.
ETERNITY OF GOD Eternity of God

한

하나님의 영원성은 그분이 시작과 시간적 계기(繼起)와 끝을 갖지 않고 자신의 존재 전체를 분할되지 않는 현재 안에서 소유하시는 속성을 가리킨다. 이는 무한히 연장된 시간이 아니라 시간적 계기 자체를 초월하는 존재 양식을 의미한다. 여기서 그분의 불변성과 모든 역사적 순간에 대한 주권적 관계가 따라 나온다.

영

The eternity of God is the attribute by which He is without beginning, succession, or end, possessing His whole being in an undivided present. Unlike created duration, divine eternity is not endless time but a mode of existence that transcends temporal succession altogether. From it follow His unchangeableness and His sovereign relation to all moments of history.
OMNIPRESENCE Omnipresence

한

편재(遍在)는 하나님이 공간의 모든 지점에 자신의 존재 전체로 온전히 임재하시되 물체처럼 펼쳐지거나 분산되지 않는 속성을 가리킨다. 그분은 부분으로가 아니라 분할되지 않는 본질로 하늘과 땅을 충만케 하시며, 만물을 붙드시되 그것들과 구별되신다. 이 임재는 권능으로, 심판으로, 은혜로운 가까이하심으로 다양하게 나타난다.

영

Omnipresence is the attribute whereby God is wholly present at every point of space with His entire being, not extended or diffused as a body. He fills heaven and earth not by parts but in His undivided essence, sustaining all things while remaining distinct from them. This presence is variously manifested in power, in judgment, and in gracious nearness.
FOREKNOWLEDGE Foreknowledge

한

예지(豫知)는 피조물의 자유로운 행위를 포함하여 미래의 모든 일을 향한 하나님의 영원하고 확실한 앎을 가리킨다. 신학에서는 단순한 사건의 예견과 구별되며, 흔히 그분의 작정과 결합되어 예지하시는 바를 또한 의지하거나 허용하신다고 본다. 논쟁은 예지가 작정에 근거하는가, 아니면 예견된 행위를 단지 전제하는가에 집중된다.

영

Foreknowledge denotes God's eternal and certain knowledge of all things future, including the free acts of creatures. In theology it is distinguished from the bare prevision of events and is often joined to His decree, so that what He foreknows He also wills or permits. Debate centers on whether foreknowledge is grounded in the decree or merely presupposes the foreseen act.
DIVINE DECREE Divine Decree

한

신적 작정은 하나님이 자신의 지혜와 의지에 근거하여 일어나는 모든 일을 영원 전에 정하신 영원한 목적을 가리킨다. 이는 목적과 수단을 모두 포괄하는 하나의 종합적이고 자유로우며 무조건적이고 불변하는 계획이다. 작정은 모든 사건을 확실하게 만들면서도 제2원인의 자유와 책임을 폐기하지 않고 도리어 확립하는 것으로 이해된다.

영

The divine decree is God's eternal purpose, founded in His wisdom and will, by which He has foreordained whatsoever comes to pass. It is one comprehensive plan, free, unconditional, and unchangeable, embracing both ends and means. While it renders all events certain, it is held to establish rather than abolish the liberty and responsibility of second causes.
CONCURRENCE Concurrence

한

협동(協同), 곧 콘쿠르수스는 하나님이 피조물의 모든 행위에 함께 작용하시어 동일한 행위가 제1원인이신 하나님에게서 온전히, 또한 제2원인인 피조물에게서 온전히 비롯되게 하시는 섭리의 사역을 가리킨다. 이는 모든 활동의 하나님께 대한 의존과 피조 행위자의 참된 인과성을 함께 보존한다. 신학자들은 특히 죄된 행위와 관련하여 그 정확한 양식을 두고 논쟁한다.

영

Concurrence, or concursus, is that work of providence by which God cooperates with every action of His creatures, so that the same act proceeds wholly from God as first cause and wholly from the creature as second cause. It preserves both the dependence of all activity upon God and the genuine causality of created agents. Theologians dispute its exact mode, especially in relation to sinful acts.
PRESERVATION Preservation

한

보존(保存)은 하나님이 창조하신 모든 것을 존재 안에 붙드시어 그것들이 계속 존재하며 그 능력을 보유하게 하시는 섭리의 한 측면을 가리킨다. 이는 매 순간 새로 창조하는 것이 아니라 신적 의지로 피조물의 존재를 지속적으로 유지하는 사역이다. 이 붙드심의 사역이 없으면 만물은 무(無)로 돌아갈 것이다.

영

Preservation is that aspect of providence by which God upholds in being all things He has created, so that they continue to exist and to possess their powers. It is not a renewed creation at each moment but the continuous maintenance of the creature's existence by the divine will. Apart from this sustaining act all things would lapse into nothingness.
MIRACLE Miracle

한

기적은 가시적 질서 안에서 이루어지는 하나님의 비범한 사역으로, 자연의 통상적 진행을 초월하며 신적 계시의 표징으로 기능한다. 이는 자연의 위반이라기보다 구속적 목적을 위해 더 높은 원인이 자연 영역에 들어오는 사건이다. 성경에서 기적은 하나님의 사자와 그분의 메시지를 입증한다.

영

A miracle is an extraordinary work of God, wrought in the visible order, which transcends the ordinary course of nature and serves as a sign of divine revelation. It is not a violation of nature so much as the entrance of a higher cause into the natural sphere for a redemptive end. In Scripture miracles authenticate the messengers and the message of God.
GENERAL REVELATION General Revelation

한

일반 계시는 하나님이 창조의 사역과 역사의 섭리적 질서, 그리고 인간 정신의 도덕적 구조를 통하여 모든 사람에게 자신을 알리시는 계시를 가리킨다. 이는 하나님의 존재와 권능과 의로운 통치의 실재를 전달하여 사람을 핑계할 수 없게 만든다. 그러나 구원의 길은 전달하지 못하며, 이는 한층 더한 특별 계시를 요구한다.

영

General revelation is that disclosure of God which He makes to all men through the works of creation, the providential ordering of history, and the moral constitution of the human mind. It conveys the reality of God's existence, power, and righteous government, leaving men without excuse. Yet it does not communicate the way of salvation, which requires a further and special revelation.
SPECIAL REVELATION Special Revelation

한

특별 계시는 하나님이 말씀과 행위로 자신을 초자연적으로 드러내심을 가리키며, 그리스도의 인격에서 정점에 이르고 성경에 기록되어 구속의 길을 알린다. 이는 일반 계시를 보완하고 해석하며 자연적 정신이 발견할 수 없는 진리를 전달한다. 그 목적은 죄인의 구원과 하나님에 대한 참된 지식의 회복이다.

영

Special revelation is the supernatural self-disclosure of God in word and deed, culminating in the person of Christ and recorded in the Scriptures, by which the way of redemption is made known. It supplements and interprets general revelation, communicating truths the natural mind could not discover. Its end is the salvation of sinners and the restoration of true knowledge of God.
PLENARY INSPIRATION Plenary Inspiration

한

완전 영감은 성경의 일부가 아니라 전체가 하나님의 영감으로 주어졌으므로 그 모든 부분이 신적 권위를 지닌다는 교리를 가리킨다. 이는 흔히 신적 감독이 바로 그 단어들에까지 미친다고 보는 축자 영감과 결합된다. 이 용어는 영감을 종교적·교리적 사안에만 국한하는 이론에 맞서 영감의 충만함을 단언한다.

영

Plenary inspiration is the doctrine that the whole of Scripture, and not merely portions of it, is given by the inspiration of God, so that all its parts possess divine authority. It is commonly joined with verbal inspiration, which extends the divine superintendence to the very words. The term affirms the fulness of inspiration against theories that confine it to religious or doctrinal matters alone.
ANALOGY OF FAITH Analogy of Faith

한

신앙의 유비는 성경의 모든 본문을 성경 전체 가르침의 일반적 흐름과 조화롭게 해석하여 모호한 본문을 분명한 본문의 빛 아래 읽어야 한다는 원리를 가리킨다. 이는 계시의 통일성과 자기 일관성에 근거하며 성경을 성경 자신의 해석자로 삼는다. 이 규칙은 교리 전체와 모순되는 사적인 해석을 방지한다.

영

The analogy of faith is the principle that every passage of Scripture is to be interpreted in harmony with the general tenor of biblical teaching, so that obscure texts are read in the light of clear ones. It rests on the unity and self-consistency of revelation, treating Scripture as its own interpreter. The rule guards against private constructions that contradict the whole body of doctrine.
NATURAL THEOLOGY Natural Theology

한

자연 신학은 초자연적 계시와 무관하게 창조와 양심의 증거로부터 인간 이성이 얻을 수 있는 하나님에 대한 지식을 가리킨다. 이는 자연의 구조와 진행에서 추론된 하나님의 존재와 속성을 다룬다. 비록 실재하나 제한된 지식을 산출하지만 구원에는 불충분한 것으로 간주되며, 계시 신학으로 완성되어야 한다.

영

Natural theology is the knowledge of God which is attainable by human reason from the evidences of creation and conscience, apart from supernatural revelation. It treats of the existence and attributes of God as inferred from the constitution and course of nature. While it yields a real though limited knowledge, it is held insufficient for salvation and is to be completed by revealed theology.
ANTHROPOMORPHISM Anthropomorphism

한

신인동형론은 하나님을 인간의 형상, 곧 신체 부위나 정념이나 행위로 표현하는 것을 가리키며, 성경이 신적 실재를 사람에게 이해시키기 위해 사용한다. 이러한 언어는 비유적이고 적응적인 것으로, 비물체적이신 하나님에 대한 문자적 서술로 강요되어서는 안 된다. 바르게 이해될 때 이는 그분의 영성을 손상시키지 않으면서 하나님과 세계의 관계에 관한 참된 진리를 전달한다.

영

Anthropomorphism is the representation of God in human form, with bodily members, passions, or actions, employed in Scripture to make the divine intelligible to men. Such language is figurative and accommodated, not to be pressed as literal description of the incorporeal God. Rightly understood, it conveys real truth concerning God's relations to the world without compromising His spirituality.
TRICHOTOMY Trichotomy

한

삼분설은 인간 본성이 몸과 혼과 영이라는 세 구성 요소로 이루어진다고 보는 견해로, 혼은 동물적 생명의 자리이며 영은 더 높은 이성적·종교적 생명의 자리로 본다. 이는 몸과 혼과 영을 함께 거론하는 본문들에 호소한다. 이는 혼과 영을 단일한 비물질적 원리의 두 측면으로 보는 이분설과 대립한다.

영

Trichotomy is the view of human nature which holds it to consist of three distinct constituents, namely body, soul, and spirit, the soul being the seat of the animal life and the spirit of the higher rational and religious life. It appeals to passages that name body, soul, and spirit together. It stands opposed to dichotomy, which reckons soul and spirit as two aspects of a single immaterial principle.
INTERMEDIATE STATE Intermediate State

한

중간 상태는 죽음과 부활 사이의 간격 동안 영혼이 몸에서 분리된 채 존재하는 상태를 가리킨다. 성경은 의인이 그리스도와 함께 의식적으로 안식하며 악인은 최후 심판을 기다리며 의식적 고통 가운데 있다고 묘사한다. 이 교리는 영혼의 수면과 연옥적 진보를 모두 배제하며, 영원한 운명은 죽음의 순간에 이미 확정된다고 본다.

영

The intermediate state is the condition of the soul in the interval between death and the resurrection, when it exists apart from the body. Scripture represents the righteous as consciously at rest with Christ and the wicked as in conscious misery, awaiting the final judgment. The doctrine excludes both the sleep of the soul and any purgatorial advancement, the eternal destiny being already fixed at death.
INCOMMUNICABLE ATTRIBUTES Incommunicable Attributes

한

비공유적 속성이란 자존성·무한성·영원성·불변성처럼 오직 하나님께만 속하며 피조물에게는 어떤 유비도 없는 완전성을 가리킨다. 이 속성들은 창조주와 모든 피조 존재 사이의 절대적 구분을 드러낸다. 신학은 이것을 하나님이 하나님으로 구별되게 하며 피조물이 공유하거나 모방할 수 없는 속성으로 다룬다.

영

The incommunicable attributes are those perfections of God which belong to him alone and have no analogue in the creature, such as self-existence, infinity, eternity, and immutability. They mark the absolute distinction between the Creator and all created being. Theology treats them as the attributes by which God is set apart as God, incapable of being shared with or imitated by his creatures.
COMMUNICABLE ATTRIBUTES Communicable Attributes

한

공유적 속성이란 지혜·선하심·거룩하심·공의·진리처럼 하나님의 형상으로 지음받은 피조물 안에 희미한 반영이나 유비가 발견될 수 있는 하나님의 완전성을 가리킨다. 하나님 안에서는 절대적이고 무한하게 존재하지만, 사람 안에서는 유한하고 파생된 정도로 나타난다. 이 구분은 하나님의 초월성과 사람이 창조주를 닮은 참된 유사성을 함께 지켜준다.

영

The communicable attributes are those perfections of God of which a faint reflection or analogy may be found in the creature made in his image, such as wisdom, goodness, holiness, justice, and truth. While in God they exist absolutely and infinitely, in man they appear in a finite and derived measure. The distinction guards both God's transcendence and the genuine likeness man bears to his Maker.
INFINITY OF GOD Infinity of God

한

하나님의 무한성은 그분이 존재의 모든 한계로부터 자유로우시며 본질과 속성에서 제한이 없으심을 가리키는 완전성이다. 이는 단순히 끝없는 연장이 아니라 그분의 완전성에 어떤 척도나 제약도 없음을 뜻한다. 공간과 관련해서는 광대하심으로, 시간과 관련해서는 영원성으로 표현된다.

영

The infinity of God is the perfection by which he is free from every limitation of being, and is unbounded in his essence and attributes. It is not mere endless extension but the absence of all measure or restriction in his perfection. In relation to space it is expressed as immensity, and in relation to time as eternity.
SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD Sovereignty of God

한

하나님의 주권은 그분의 거룩한 뜻을 따라 모든 것을 다스리실 최고의 권리와 권능으로서, 창조·섭리·구속을 그분이 기뻐하시는 대로 정하신다. 절대적 주로서 그분은 누구에게도 책임지지 않으시며 보편적이고 무조건적인 권위를 행사하신다. 그러나 그 통치는 결코 자의적이지 않으니, 지혜롭고 의로우며 선하신 뜻의 행사이기 때문이다.

영

The sovereignty of God is his supreme right and power to rule over all things according to his own holy will, ordering creation, providence, and redemption as he pleases. As the absolute Lord he is accountable to none and exercises an authority that is both universal and unconditioned. Yet his rule is never arbitrary, for it is the exercise of a will that is wise, righteous, and good.
LOVE OF GOD Love of God

한

하나님의 사랑은 그분이 선하심 가운데 자신을 영원히 내어주시며 피조물을 기뻐하시는 완전성으로서, 구속을 위해 아들을 주신 일에서 최고로 나타난다. 이는 연약한 감정이 아니라 그분의 본성 자체에 뿌리박은 거룩하고 자기를 내어주는 성향이니, 하나님은 사랑이시기 때문이다. 속성으로서 이 사랑은 그분의 공의·거룩하심과 조화롭게 행사되며 결코 그것들과 분리되지 않는다.

영

The love of God is that perfection by which he eternally communicates himself in goodness and delights in his creatures, supremely in the gift of his Son for their redemption. It is not a weak sentiment but a holy and self-giving disposition rooted in his very nature, for God is love. As an attribute it is exercised in harmony with his justice and holiness, never apart from them.
TRANSCENDENCE Transcendence

한

초월성은 하나님이 창조된 세계 위에 높이 계시며 그것과 구별되어 존재와 완전성에서 무한히 능가하신다는 진리를 가리킨다. 초월하신 분으로서 그분은 우주와 혼동되거나 그 과정과 동일시될 수 없으니, 이는 범신론에 맞선다. 이 교리는 창조주와 피조물의 구분을 지키면서도 그분이 세계 안에 내재하여 임재하실 여지를 남겨둔다.

영

Transcendence denotes the truth that God is exalted above and distinct from the created world, infinitely surpassing it in being and perfection. As transcendent he is not to be confused with the universe or identified with its processes, against pantheism. The doctrine safeguards the Creator-creature distinction while leaving room for his immanent presence within the world.
IMMANENCE Immanence

한

내재성은 하나님이 창조된 세계 안에 임재하시며 활동하셔서 그분의 권능으로 만물을 붙드시고 두루 채우신다는 진리를 가리킨다. 이는 초월성에 대한 필수적 보완으로서, 창조 위에 높이 계신 하나님이 또한 그것에 가까이 계셔서 그 안에서 일하시기 때문이다. 초월성과 분리되면 이 교리는 범신론으로 무너지지만, 바르게 균형 잡히면 하나님이 그분의 일에 끊임없이 가까이 계심을 확증한다.

영

Immanence denotes the truth that God is present and active within the created world, sustaining and pervading all things by his power. It is the necessary complement to transcendence, for the God who is exalted above creation is also near to it and works within it. Held apart from transcendence the doctrine collapses into pantheism, but rightly balanced it affirms God's continual nearness to his works.
PROGRESSIVE REVELATION Progressive Revelation

한

점진적 계시는 하나님이 자신의 진리를 한꺼번에가 아니라 구속사의 경로를 통해 단계적으로 드러내셨으며, 뒤의 각 단계가 앞의 것 위에 세워지고 그것을 더 분명히 한다는 교리이다. 족장들로부터 모세와 선지자들을 거치며 빛이 점점 더해지다가 그리스도 안에서 그 충만함에 이르렀다. 앞선 계시들은 그래서 거짓이 아니라 부분적이고 예비적이며 그 완성을 향해 신적으로 질서지어진 것이다.

영

Progressive revelation is the doctrine that God disclosed his truth not all at once but by stages through the course of redemptive history, each later stage building upon and clarifying the earlier. From the patriarchs through Moses and the prophets the light increased until its fulness came in Christ. The earlier disclosures are not thereby false but partial, preparatory, and divinely ordered toward their completion.
VERBAL INSPIRATION Verbal Inspiration

한

축자 영감은 성령의 영감하시는 영향이 성경 기자들의 사상뿐 아니라 그 사상을 표현한 단어들에까지 미쳤다는 교리이다. 성경의 언어 자체가 각 인간 저자의 특색을 지니면서도 하나님의 진리를 담는 합당하고 신뢰할 만한 그릇이 되도록 인도되었다고 본다. 이는 기자들의 자유와 개성을 보존한다는 점에서 단순한 받아쓰기 이론과 구별된다.

영

Verbal inspiration is the doctrine that the inspiring influence of the Holy Spirit extended not only to the thoughts of the sacred writers but also to the words in which those thoughts were expressed. It holds that the very language of Scripture, while bearing the marks of each human author, was so guided as to be the fitting and trustworthy vehicle of God's truth. It is distinguished from a mere dictation theory, since it preserves the writers' freedom and individuality.
DICTATION THEORY Dictation Theory

한

받아쓰기 이론은 성경의 인간 저자들이 자신의 정신을 작동시키지 않은 채 성령이 불러주신 단어를 기계적으로 받아 적는 수동적 필사자로 행동했다는 견해이다. 이는 영감을 단순한 옮겨 적기로 축소하고 각 기자의 독특한 문체·어휘·정황을 지워버린다. 대다수 신학자는 이를 거부하고, 성령이 기자들의 온전한 인간 기능을 사용하셨다는 유기적 견해를 지지한다.

영

The dictation theory is the view that the human authors of Scripture acted as passive amanuenses, mechanically writing down words dictated by the Holy Spirit without the engagement of their own minds. It reduces inspiration to a mere transcription and effaces the distinct style, vocabulary, and circumstance of each writer. Most theologians reject it in favor of an organic view in which the Spirit employed the writers' full human faculties.
DOGMATICS Dogmatics

한

교의학은 기독교 신앙의 교리들을 성경에서 이끌어 내고 교회의 신앙고백의 인도 아래 정리하여 그 체계적 연관 속에 제시하는 신학 분과이다. 이는 단순한 교의들의 모음과 달리 그것들의 내적 일관성과 상호 관계를 통일된 진리의 체계로 드러낸다. 학문으로서 교의학은 믿음을 전제하며 교회가 믿는 바를 논리적이고 질서 있게 설명하는 것을 목표로 한다.

영

Dogmatics is the theological discipline that sets forth the doctrines of the Christian faith in their systematic connection, drawn from Scripture and ordered under the guidance of the church's confession. It differs from a bare collection of dogmas by exhibiting their inner coherence and mutual relations as a unified body of truth. As a science it presupposes faith and aims to give a reasoned and orderly account of what the church believes.
PROLEGOMENA Prolegomena

한

서론(프롤레고메나)은 신학 체계를 도입하는 예비적 논의로서, 교리 자체를 설명하기에 앞서 신학의 본질·원천·방법·전제를 다룬다. 이는 신학을 학문으로 정립하고 그 자료를 정리할 원리를 분명히 한다. 교의학의 문턱으로서 서론은 전체 체계가 취할 형태를 상당 부분 결정한다.

영

Prolegomena are the preliminary discussions that introduce a system of theology, treating its nature, sources, method, and presuppositions before the doctrines themselves are expounded. They establish the standing of theology as a science and clarify the principles by which its material is to be ordered. As the threshold of dogmatics they determine in large measure the shape that the whole system will take.
APOLOGETICS Apologetics

한

변증학은 기독교 신앙의 진리성과 합리성을 반론과 불신앙에 맞서 변호하고 그것을 사람들의 이성과 양심에 권하는 신학의 한 분과이다. 하나님의 존재, 계시의 신빙성, 기독교의 신적 기원과 같은 주제를 다룬다. 적극적 분과로서 변증학은 공격에 답할 뿐 아니라 신앙을 받아들일 수 있는 합리적 근거를 제시한다.

영

Apologetics is the branch of theology that defends the truth and reasonableness of the Christian faith against objections and unbelief, and commends it to the reason and conscience of men. It treats such themes as the existence of God, the credibility of revelation, and the divine origin of Christianity. As a positive discipline it not only answers attacks but sets forth the rational grounds on which faith may be embraced.
BEATIFIC VISION Beatific Vision

한

지복직관은 완성된 상태에서 구속받은 자들에게 허락되는 하나님에 대한 직접적이고 복된 봄으로서, 그들이 그분을 얼굴과 얼굴을 마주하여 뵙고 그분의 임재를 누리는 가운데 온전케 됨을 가리킨다. 이는 영화의 면류관이요 성도의 가장 높은 상급으로서, 이 생에서 얻을 수 있는 하나님에 대한 모든 지식을 능가한다. 그 안에서 영혼의 갈망은 마침내 그 안식과 만족을 찾는다.

영

The beatific vision is the immediate and blessed sight of God granted to the redeemed in the consummated state, in which they behold him face to face and are perfected in the enjoyment of his presence. It is the crown of glorification and the highest reward of the saints, surpassing every knowledge of God attainable in this life. Therein the longing of the soul finds its final rest and satisfaction.
MORAL INABILITY Moral Inability

한

도덕적 무능은 타락한 사람이 지성과 의지라는 본성적 기능은 보유하면서도 본성의 부패로 인하여 스스로는 영적으로 선한 것을 원하고 행할 수 없다는 교리이다. 이는 행위에 필요한 능력이 결여된 것이 아니라 하나님을 향한 마음의 고질적 반감이어서, 은혜를 떠나서는 바르게 의지함을 불가능하게 한다. 이 구분은 인간의 책임을 지키는 동시에 사람이 새롭게 하는 은혜를 필요로 함을 확증한다.

영

Moral inability is the doctrine that fallen man, while retaining the natural faculties of understanding and will, is by reason of the corruption of his nature unable of himself to will and do what is spiritually good. It is not a want of the powers requisite to act, but a settled aversion of the heart toward God which renders right willing impossible apart from grace. The distinction guards human responsibility while affirming man's need of renewing grace.
VISIBLE CHURCH Visible Church

한

유형 교회는 참된 신앙을 고백하는 모든 사람과 그 자녀들을 포함하는, 이 땅에서 외적으로 분별되는 교회를 가리킨다. 말씀의 순수한 선포·성례의 바른 집행·권징의 시행이라는 외적 표지로 식별되며, 고백이 반드시 내적 믿음과 일치하지는 않으므로 그 안에는 신자와 외식하는 자가 섞여 있다. 따라서 유형 교회는 무형 교회와 구별되되 분리되지 않는 동일 교회의 외적 측면으로 이해된다.

영

The visible Church is the company of all who throughout the world profess the true religion, together with their children. It is discerned by outward marks such as the pure preaching of the Word, the right administration of the sacraments, and the exercise of discipline. Because profession does not infallibly correspond to inward faith, the visible Church on earth contains both believers and hypocrites mingled together.
INVISIBLE CHURCH Invisible Church

한

무형 교회는 머리 되신 그리스도 아래 하나로 모인, 과거·현재·미래의 모든 택함받은 자의 총수를 가리킨다. 그 참된 구성원은 내적 중생과 그리스도와의 연합에 근거하므로 오직 하나님께만 확실히 알려져 있어 '무형'이라 불린다. 이 구분은 외적으로 교회에 속한 모든 자가 내적으로 그리스도의 몸에 속한 것은 아님을 보존하는 교의적 장치이다.

영

The invisible Church is the whole number of the elect who have been, are, or shall be gathered into one under Christ its Head. It is called invisible because its true membership, resting upon inward regeneration and union with Christ, is known with certainty to God alone. The distinction guards the truth that not all who are outwardly in the Church belong inwardly to the body of Christ.
MARKS OF THE CHURCH Marks of the Church

한

교회의 표지(notae ecclesiae)는 참된 교회를 세상에서 식별하는 기준을 가리킨다. 개신교 신학은 고전적으로 복음의 순수한 선포와 성례의 바른 집행을 들며, 개혁파는 흔히 권징의 신실한 시행을 더한다. 이 표지들은 제도적 계승보다 기능에 근거하므로, 통일성·거룩성·보편성·사도성에 호소하는 로마 가톨릭의 표지론과 구별된다.

영

The marks of the Church (notae ecclesiae) are the criteria by which the true Church may be recognized in the world. Protestant theology classically names the pure preaching of the gospel and the right administration of the sacraments, to which the Reformed often add the faithful exercise of discipline. These marks rest upon function rather than upon institutional succession, distinguishing the Reformation account from the Roman appeal to unity, holiness, catholicity, and apostolicity.
CHURCH MILITANT Church Militant

한

전투하는 교회는 이 땅에 존재하면서 죄와 세상과 어둠의 권세에 맞서 끊임없이 싸우는 교회를 가리킨다. 이 용어는 이미 구속받았으나 죽음이나 그리스도의 재림까지 영적 전쟁 가운데 인내해야 하는 신자들의 현재적 순례 상태를 표현한다. 이는 영광 가운데 안식하는 동일한 무리를 가리키는 승리하는 교회와 상관 관계를 이룬다.

영

The Church militant is the Church as it exists on earth, engaged in continual conflict against sin, the world, and the powers of darkness. The term expresses the present pilgrim condition of believers who, though already redeemed, must persevere in spiritual warfare until death or the return of Christ. It stands in correlation with the Church triumphant, the same company at rest in glory.
CHURCH TRIUMPHANT Church Triumphant

한

승리하는 교회는 지상의 여정을 마치고 온전케 되어 하나님의 임재 가운데 안식하는 구속받은 무리를 가리킨다. 어린양의 피로 이긴 그들은 더 이상 영적 전쟁을 치르지 않고 하늘의 승리와 예배에 참여한다. 이 교리는 죽음의 경계를 넘어 한 교회가 지속적 통일성을 유지함을 확증한다.

영

The Church triumphant is the company of the redeemed who, having finished their earthly course, are perfected and at rest in the presence of God. Having overcome through the blood of the Lamb, they no longer wage spiritual warfare but share in the victory and worship of heaven. The doctrine affirms the abiding unity of the one Church across the boundary of death.
COMMUNION OF SAINTS Communion of Saints

한

성도의 교제는 머리 되신 그리스도와 연합한 모든 참 신자가 그분 및 서로와 누리는 영적 사귐을 가리킨다. 한 신비적 몸의 지체로서 그들은 그분의 은혜와 은사에 함께 참여하며, 사랑으로 서로의 유익을 위해 섬길 의무를 진다. 사도신경에서 고백되는 이 조항은 지상의 성도와 이미 영광에 들어간 자들을 함께 포괄한다.

영

The communion of saints denotes the spiritual fellowship which all true believers, united to Christ their Head, have with one another and with him. As members of one mystical body they share in his graces and gifts and are bound to minister to one another's good in love. The article, confessed in the Apostles' Creed, embraces both the saints on earth and those who have gone before into glory.
PAROUSIA Parousia

한

파루시아는 '임재' 또는 '도래'를 뜻하는 헬라어로, 영광 가운데 이루어지는 그리스도의 재림을 가리키는 신약의 용어이다. 이는 죽은 자를 일으키고 세상을 심판하며 그분의 나라를 완성하시기 위한 주님의 인격적·가시적·신체적 재림을 의미한다. 기독교 종말론의 중심에 서 있는 파루시아는 교회의 소망의 대상이자 구속사가 향해 나아가는 목표이다.

영

Parousia, a Greek term meaning presence or arrival, is the New Testament designation for the second coming of Christ in glory. It signifies the personal, visible, and bodily return of the Lord to raise the dead, judge the world, and consummate his kingdom. Standing at the centre of Christian eschatology, the parousia is the object of the Church's hope and the goal toward which redemptive history moves.
GENERAL JUDGMENT General Judgment

한

일반 심판은 영광 가운데 재림하시는 그리스도께서 마지막 날에 모든 사람을 함께 심판하시는 최종적·공적 재판을 가리킨다. 죽음의 순간에 각 영혼이 받는 개별 심판과 구별되며, 그 범위가 보편적이고 구원받은 자와 멸망하는 자의 운명 속에서 하나님의 공의를 공개적으로 드러낸다. 이는 역사의 완성이자 의인과 악인의 최종적 분리를 표시한다.

영

The general judgment is the final, public assize at which Christ, returning in glory, will judge all men together at the last day. Distinguished from the particular judgment of each soul at death, it is universal in scope and openly manifests the righteousness of God in the destinies of the saved and the lost. It marks the consummation of history and the final separation of the righteous from the wicked.
GENERAL RESURRECTION General Resurrection

한

일반 부활은 마지막 날에 의인과 불의한 자를 막론하고 모든 죽은 자가 하나님의 능력으로 몸을 입고 다시 살아난다는 교리이다. 구속받은 자의 몸은 영광 가운데 일으켜져 부활하신 그리스도의 몸을 본받게 되며, 불의한 자는 심판을 받기 위해 일으켜진다. 이 교리는 장차 올 상태에서 전인(全人)의 동일성과 연속성을 확보한다.

영

The general resurrection is the doctrine that at the last day all the dead, both the just and the unjust, shall be raised bodily by the power of God. The bodies of the redeemed shall be raised in glory and conformed to the body of the risen Christ, while the unjust are raised to judgment. The doctrine secures the identity and continuity of the whole person in the future state.
ETERNAL BLESSEDNESS Eternal Blessedness

한

영원한 복락은 하나님의 직접적 임재와 향유 가운데 구속받은 자들이 누리는 최종적이고 완전한 행복을 가리킨다. 그것은 하나님을 온전히 알고 사랑하며 예배하는 데 있으며, 죄와 슬픔과 죽음으로부터의 자유가 동반되고, 그리스도 및 구원받은 모든 무리와의 교제 가운데 향유된다. 이 완성된 상태는 구원이 지향하는 정해진 목적이자 모든 복음 약속의 결실이다.

영

Eternal blessedness is the final and perfect happiness of the redeemed in the immediate presence and enjoyment of God. It consists in the full knowledge, love, and worship of God, accompanied by freedom from sin, sorrow, and death, and is enjoyed in fellowship with Christ and the whole company of the saved. This consummate state is the appointed end of salvation and the fruition of every gospel promise.
SACRAMENTAL GRACE Sacramental Grace

한

성례적 은혜는 바르게 집행된 성례를 통해 믿음으로 받는 자에게 베풀어지고 인쳐지는 영적 유익을 가리킨다. 개신교 신학은 성례가 은혜의 효력 있는 표징임을 주장하되, 그것은 요소 자체에 내재한 능력이 아니라 성령의 사역과 그리스도께서 자신이 정하신 예식에 주시는 복으로 말미암는다고 본다. 따라서 표징이 가리키는 은혜는 말씀 및 믿음과 분리될 수 없으며, 표징 자체가 자동으로 은혜를 전달한다는 견해에 맞선다.

영

Sacramental grace is the spiritual benefit conferred and sealed through the rightly administered sacraments to those who receive them in faith. Protestant theology holds that the sacraments are effectual signs of grace, not by any power inherent in the elements, but by the work of the Spirit and the blessing of Christ upon his appointed ordinances. The grace signified is thus inseparable from the Word and from faith, against a view that the sign itself automatically conveys it.
EX OPERE OPERATO Ex Opere Operato

한

엑스 오페레 오페라토는 성례가 집행자나 수령자의 공로와 무관하게, 대죄의 장애가 놓이지 않는 한 예식의 시행 그 자체로 은혜를 베푼다고 가르치는 스콜라 신학의 정식이다. 트리엔트 공의회는 로마 교회를 위해 이 원리를 확정하였다. 종교개혁자들은 이것이 은혜를 믿음 및 말씀에서 떼어 놓는다고 보아 거부하였으며, 성례는 오직 믿음으로 받는 자에게만 유익이 된다고 주장하였다.

영

Ex opere operato is the scholastic formula teaching that the sacraments confer grace by the very performance of the rite, apart from the merit of the minister or recipient, provided no obstacle of mortal sin is placed in the way. The Council of Trent affirmed this principle for the Roman Church. The Reformers rejected it as detaching grace from faith and the Word, insisting that the sacraments benefit only those who receive them believingly.
REGULATIVE PRINCIPLE OF WORSHIP Regulative Principle of Worship

한

예배의 규정적 원리는 하나님께 드리는 공적 예배가 하나님께서 친히 성경에서 정하신 요소만을 포함해야 한다는 입장이다. 직접적 명령이든 선하고 필연적인 추론이든 명해지지 않은 것은 신적 예배에서 배제된다. 개혁파 전통의 특징인 이 원리는, 성경이 금하지 않은 것은 무엇이든 예배에 자유롭게 도입할 수 있다는 견해에 맞서 선다.

영

The regulative principle holds that the public worship of God is to include only those elements which God himself has appointed in Scripture. Whatever is not commanded, whether by direct precept or good and necessary inference, is excluded from divine worship. Characteristic of the Reformed tradition, the principle stands over against the view that whatever Scripture does not forbid may be freely introduced into worship.
DECRETIVE WILL Decretive Will of God

한

하나님의 작정적 의지는 일어나는 모든 일을 정하시는 그분의 주권적·영원한 목적으로, 그 성취에 있어 확실하고 효력이 있다. 이는 하나님께서 사람에게 행하라 명하시는 바를 표현하는 명령적 의지와 구별되며, 섭리 가운데 펼쳐질 때에야 알려지므로 때로 그분의 은밀한 의지라 불린다. 이 구분은 하나님의 절대 주권과 그분의 명령이 지니는 참된 의무를 동시에 확증할 수 있게 한다.

영

The decretive will of God is his sovereign, eternal purpose by which he determines whatsoever comes to pass, certain and efficacious in its accomplishment. It is distinguished from the preceptive will, which expresses what God commands men to do, and is sometimes called his secret will because it is known only as it unfolds in providence. The distinction enables theology to affirm both the absolute sovereignty of God and the genuine obligation of his commands.
PRECEPTIVE WILL Preceptive Will of God

한

하나님의 명령적 의지는 그분의 율법과 계명에 표현된 계시된 의지로서, 무엇이 의무이며 그분께 기쁨이 되는지를 선언한다. 작정적 의지와 달리 피조물에 의해 불순종될 수 있는데, 이는 반드시 일어날 일이 아니라 마땅히 행해야 할 바를 제시하기 때문이다. 이 구분은 하나님의 명령 아래 있는 인간의 책임을 보존하는 동시에 그분의 영원한 목적의 성취를 온전히 확고하게 둔다.

영

The preceptive will of God is his revealed will as expressed in his law and commandments, declaring what is duty and pleasing to him. Unlike the decretive will, it may be disobeyed by creatures, for it sets forth what ought to be done rather than what shall certainly come to pass. The distinction safeguards human responsibility under God's commands while leaving the accomplishment of his eternal purpose wholly secure.
AACHEN, SYNODS OF Aachen, Synods of

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**AACHEN, a'ken, SYNODS OF:** The political importance of the town of Aachen (Latin *Aquis-granum;* French, *Aix-la-Chapelle)* under Charlemagne and his successors made it a favorite meeting-place for various assemblies. The first synod of Aachen (or Aix) is usually reckoned as having met on Mar. 23, 789, and there is no doubt that a gathering took place on that day; but its results are known only from two royal decrees, the so-called *Admonitio generalis* (*MGH, Leg.,* i., *Capitularia regum Francorum,* ed. A. Boretius, i., 1883, cap. 22), and the instructions for the royal representatives (cap. 23). The former repeats a summary of the earlier canonical legislation on the duties of the clergy, and adds further regulations for the improvement of clerical and social life, dealing with diligence in preaching, the education of the clergy, the observance of the Lord's Day, just judgment, equal weights and measures, hospitality, and the prevention of witchcraft and perjury. The other document treats of monastic discipline and the regulation of civil society. It is questionable if this gathering can be properly called a synod; and still less can the name be applied to that of 797 (cap. 27), which regulated the condition of the conquered Saxons. On the other hand, the assembly of June, 799, in which Alcuin disputed with Felix of Urgel (see ADOPTIONISM) may be so called, and likewise the three meetings in the years 801 and 802. Their deliberations led to a series of decrees (cap. 33-35 and 36-41) which throw light on Charlemagne's endeavors to elevate clergy and laity. The most important is the great instruction for the *missi dominici* sent out in the spring of 802, dealing with the discipline of bishops, clergy, monks, and nuns, the faithful performance of their duties by public officials, and the establishment of justice throughout the empire. Among the results of the autumn synod of 802, cap. 36 and 38 deserve special attention; they deal with the duty of intercession for the emperor and bishops, the education of the people, tithes, divine worship and the sacraments, clerical discipline, and the system of ecclesiastical visitations. The next synod (Nov. 809), was occupied with the doctrine of the procession of the Holy Ghost. In the autumn of 816, or the summer of 817, Louis le Débonnaire assembled his first synod at Aachen, when the bishops laid down new regulations for the community life, both of canons and nuns. In the summer of 817 an assembly of abbots discussed the observance of the Benedictine rule. The diets of 819 and 825 and similar later assemblies can again scarcely be counted as synods, though the one held in the sacristy of the cathedral, Feb. 6, 835, has a synodical character. It adopted a thoroughgoing pronouncement on the life and teaching of bishops and inferior clergy, and on the position of the king, his family, and his ministers, with a view to regulating the confusion which the strife between Louis and his sons had caused. It also required of Pépin of Aquitaine that he should restore the church property which he had appropriated. For the synod held at Aachen in connection with the question of Lothaire's divorce, see NICHOLAS I. The last two synods of Aachen were held under Henry II, one in the year 1000 in connection with the restoration of the bishopric of Merseburg (see WILLIGIS); the other, in 1023, when the contest between the dioceses of Cologne and Liége for the possession of the monastery of Burtscheid was decided in favor of the latter. (A. Hauck) BIBLIOGRAPHY: *Fragmentum historicum de concilio Aquisgranensi,* in Mabillon, *Analecta,* i. 52, Paris, 1723, and in Bouquet, *Recueil,* vi. 415-443; *Epistola Synodi Aquisgranensis ad Pippin,* in Labbe, *Concilia,* vii. 1728, and in Bouquet, *Recueil,* vi. 354; A. J. Binterim, *Pragmatische Geschichte der deutschen . . . Concilien,* ii., iii., Mains, 1836-37; *MGH, Leg.* i. (1835) 465; ib. *Capitularia reg. Franc.,* ii. 2 (1893), 463-466; Hauck, *KD,* ii.; Hefele, *Conciliengeschichte,* vols. iii., iv.; *MGH, Leg. sectio iii., Concilia,* i. 1 (1904).
AARON Aaron

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**AARON:** The brother of Moses. In the Yahwistic sources of the Pentateuch he is called "Aaron, the *Levite,*" i.e., the priest. He is first mentioned when Yahweh appoints him as spokesman for Moses in the mission to Pharaoh (Ex. iv. 10-17, 27-31); and consistently he always appears with Moses before the Egyptian king. Later Aaron and Hur support Moses during the battle with the Amalekites (Ex. xvii. 8-13). When the covenant was made at Sinai, Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, with seventy elders, accompanied Moses to the mountain; but Moses alone "went up into the mount of God" (Ex. xxiv. 1-2, 9-18; cf. xix. 24). While Moses delayed on the mountain Aaron made the golden calf; and later he sought to excuse himself by saying that he had acted under compulsion of the people, who were impatient at the long absence of their leader (Ex. xxxii.). In the narrative of Num. xii., Aaron again appears in an unfavorable light. He is said to have died at Mosera, in the wilderness, and Eleazar, his son, took his place as priest (Deut. x. 6). Finally, he is incidentally mentioned in Josh. xxiv. 5 and 33. The significant fact in all these notices is that the Yahwistic sources recognize Aaron as *priest*. In the Priestly code Aaron's genealogy and family are given in detail (Ex. vi. 20, 23). He is three years older than Moses (Ex. vii. 7). He is made Moses's "prophet" before Pharaoh (Ex. vii. 1-2), and, accordingly, plays an important part in all transactions at the Egyptian court. By means of his rod the miracles are performed (Ex. vii., viii.). During the wandering Aaron retains his prominent position, although subordinate to Moses. The hungry people murmur against both brothers, and, at Moses's command, Aaron replies to them, and later preserves a pot of manna before Yahweh (Ex. xvi.). The priesthood is instituted at Sinai and solemnly conferred upon Aaron, his four sons, and their descendants (Ex. xxviii.). Of these four sons, only Eleazar and Ithamar remain after the destruction of Nadab and Abihu (Lev. x. 1-7). Aaron is not only original ancestor and type of the priests as distinguished from the Levites, but also, in narrower sense, prototype of the high priest, who was always from his family and apparently the first-born son in direct line. A few of the laws of P are delivered to Aaron as well as Moses (Lev. xi. 1, xiii. 1, xiv. 33, xv. 1; Num. xix. 1). After the departure from Sinai, Korah and his followers rebel against Moses and Aaron; and Yahweh miraculously vindicates the supremacy of the latter (Num. xvi.-xvii.; the narrative is amplified by an account of the uprising of Dathan and Abiram and a contest between Levites and priests). Aaron dies on Mount Hor, and Eleazar becomes priest in his stead (Num. xx. 22-29, xxxiii. 38-39). Of other Old Testament passages in which Aaron is mentioned none is noteworthy except Mic. vi. 4, where he is joined with Moses and Miriam. (F. BUHL.) It is important for the history of the priesthood in Israel to notice that in the narratives of J and E (called "Yahwistic" above) the priestly function of Aaron is quite subordinate, he being mainly represented there as the spokesman and the minister of Moses and, along with Hur, as his representative - a "judge" of the people (Ex. xxiv. 13, 14). It is in the priestly tradition that the idea of Aaron's sacerdotal functions is elaborately developed. J. F. M. BIBLIOGRAPHY: S. Baring-Gould, *Legends of O. T. Characters*, 2 vols., London, 1871; J. Wellhausen, *Geschichte Israels*, chap. iv., Berlin, 1878; H. van Oort, *Die Aaroneiden* in *ThT*, xviii. (1884) 289 and 235; J. Benzinger, *Hebraische Archaologie*, pp. 405-428, Freiburg, 1894; W. Nowack, *Archaologie*, ii. 87-130, ib. 1894; A. Kuenen in *ThT*, xxiv. (1890) 1-42; A. van Hoonacker, *Le Sacerdoce Levitique dans la loi et dans l'histoire des Hebreux*, Louvain, 1899; S. I. Curtiss, *The Levitical Priests*, Edinburgh, 1877.
AARON AND JULIUS: ENGLISH MARTYRS AARON AND JULIUS: English Martyrs

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**AARON AND JULIUS: English Martyrs. See ALBAN, SAINT, OF VERULAM.**
ABADDON Abaddon

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABADDON,** a-bad'en (" Destruction "): In the Old Testament a poetic name for the kingdom of the dead, Hades, or Sheol (Job xxvi. 6; Prov. xv. 11, where Abaddon is parallel to Sheol). The rabbis used the name for the nethermost part of hell. In Rev. ix. 11 the " angel of the bottomless pit " is called Abaddon, which is there explained as the Greek Apollyon (" destroyer "); and he is described as king of the locusts which rose at the sounding of the fifth trumpet. In like manner, in Rev. vi. 8, Hades is personified following after death to conquer the fourth part of the earth. In rabbinical writings Abaddon and Death are also personified (cf. Job xxvii. 22).
AB'ADIM Ab'adim

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**AB'ADIM. See TALMUD.**
A-BAR'BA-NEL A-bar'ba-nel

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**A-BAR'BA-NEL. See ABRABANEL.**
ABAUZIT FIRMIN Abauzit Firmin

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABAUZIT**, a"bo"zi', **FIRMIN**: French Reformed scholar; b. of Huguenot parentage at Uzes (20 m. w.n.w. of Avignon), Languedoc, Nov. 11, 1679; d. at Geneva, Mar. 20, 1767. After the revocation of the Edict of Nantes (1685) an attempt was made to bring him up as a Roman Catholic, but it was frustrated by his mother. After some hardships and sufferings, mother and son settled in Geneva, where Abauzit was educated and where, with the exception of visits to Holland and England in 1698, he spent his long life devoted to study and the service of the city library. He was one of the most learned men of his time, possessed much versatility, and enjoyed the friendship of scholars like Bayle, Jurieu, Basnage, and Newton. Nevertheless, he published practically nothing; and after his death many of his manuscripts were destroyed by his heirs. A volume of *Oeuvres diverses* appeared at Geneva in 1770; and a different edition in two volumes at London and Amsterdam in 1770-73. They include essays against the doctrine of the Trinity as commonly received, upon the Book of Daniel, and the Apocalypse. He rendered much service to a society for the translation of the New Testament into French (published 1726). Many of his theological writings are translated in E. Harwood's *Miscellanies* (London, 1774), with memoir; and seven essays are reprinted thence in Sparks's *Collection of Essays and Tracts in Theology*, vol. i. (Boston, 1823). BIBLIOGRAPHY: J. Senebier, *Histoire litteraire de Geneve*, Geneva, 1786; E. and E. Haag, *La France protestante*, ed. H. L. Bordier, i. 2, Paris, 1877; A. Gibert, *Abauzit et sa Theologie*, Strasburg, 1865.
ABBADIE, JACQUES Abbadie, Jacques

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBADIE**, a"ba"di', **JACQUES**: Protestant apologist; b. at Nay (10 m. s. by e. of Pau), France, 1654 (?); d. at Marylebone, London, 1727. He studied in the French Reformed Church academies of Saumur and Sedan, and early showed much talent. On invitation of the elector of Brandenburg, he became pastor of the French Reformed congregation in Berlin in 1680; after the death of the elector (1688), he followed Marshal Schomberg to England; and became pastor of the French church in the Savoy, London, in 1689. In 1699 he was made dean of Killaloe, Ireland. His *Traite de la verite de la religion Chretienne* (vols. i. and ii., Rotterdam, 1684; vol. iii., 1689; Eng. transl., 2 vols., London, 1694), became one of the standard apologetic works in French literature. Of his other works, *L'Art de se connaitre soi-meme* (Rotterdam, 1692), giving an outline of his moral system, attracted much attention and was warmly defended by Malebranche. BIBLIOGRAPHY: For full list of his writings, consult E. and E. Haag, *La France protestante*, i., s.v., Paris, 1846; for his life, the collection of his sermons, Amsterdam, 1760, iii., and D. C. A. Agnew, *Protestant Exiles from France*, pp. 223-228, Edinburgh, 1886; on his work, R. Elliott, *The Consistent Protestant . . . with some observations on a treatise . . . by J. Abbadie*, London, 1777, and M. Hilaire, *Etude sur J. Abbadie considere comme predicateur*, Strasburg, 1858.
ABBATE; ABBE Abbate; Abbe

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBATE; ABBE.** See **ABBOT.**
ABBESS Abbess

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBESS:** The title of the head of many monastic communities of women, even in some orders where the head of the monasteries for men does not bear the title of abbot. An abbess is commonly elected by the community. Cases of appointment by the pope on the nomination of the sovereign have occurred less frequently than in the case of abbots. By the ruling of the Council of Trent, only those are eligible who have been eight years professed and reached the age of forty, except, in exceptional circumstances, when a dispensation is granted by the pope. An absolute majority on a secret ballot is required. The election must be confirmed by the bishop (or, in certain cases of exemption, by the pope, or the head of the order), before the new abbess possesses full jurisdiction. A formal benediction, for which there is a form in the *Pontificale Romanum*, is also given by the bishop in many cases. The power thus assigned to the abbess is merely that requisite to rule her community, and in no sense a spiritual jurisdiction; she can not commute or dispense from vows, laws of the Church, or statutes of the order. She may inflict light punishments in the spirit of the rule; but the more severe ones are reserved to the ecclesiastical superior of the convent, who has jurisdiction in the *forum externum*. In general it may be said that the power of an abbess has been and is much more restricted than that of an abbot. For the peculiarly wide jurisdiction of abbesses over men as well as women in the order of Fontevraud (not without precedent in the Celtic monastic system), see **FONTEVRAUD, ORDER OF**. See also **ABBOT: MONASTICISM.**
ABBEY Abbey

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBEY**: A monastic house under the rule of an abbot or an abbess. The name is strictly applicable only to the houses of those orders in which these titles are borne by the superiors. While in the East the free form of a group of scattered cells (known as a laura) continued side by side with the common dwelling of a cenobite community, the West developed a distinct style of its own in monastic architecture. The extant plan of the monastery of St. Gall (820) may be taken as typical of the construction of Western monasteries in the early Middle Ages. The center of the entire group of buildings was occupied by an open rectangular space, on the north side of which was the church, while on the other three sides ran the cloister or ambulatory, a vaulted passage open on the inner side, and serving both as a means of communication and as a place for exercise in bad weather. Connected with the cloister, on the ground floor, were the refectory and kitchen; the chapter-house, in which the reading and exposition of the rule and the chapter of faults took place; the *calefactarium* or winter dining-room; and the *parlatorium* or reception-room of outsiders. On the floor above, opening on a similar passage which connected with the choir of the church or the organ-loft, were the *vestiarium,* where the clothes were kept, the library, the dormitory, the infirmary, the rooms for the novices, and the apartments of the abbot, which were supposed to be accessible from outside without passing through the enclosure into which strangers were not allowed to penetrate. The kitchen, which lay within this enclosure, had in like manner a connection with the house for the reception of pilgrims, and with the various farm-buildings, which usually formed a separate quadrangle. The entire group of buildings was surrounded by a high, solid wall, which in some cases was fortified against the dangers of rude times by towers and strong gates. The monks' burying-ground was also within the enclosure. This system was preserved, with slight modifications, throughout the Middle Ages, the Cistercians adhering to it with especial closeness, as may be seen at Clairvaux and Maulbronn. Sometimes it was enriched by architectural decoration, as in the high-vaulted double refectories of St. Martin at Paris and of Maulbronn, or adorned with painting, as the world-famous "Last Supper" of Leonardo da Vinci in the refectory of Santa Maria delle Grazie at Milan. In houses occupied by female religious the extensive farm-buildings were naturally lacking. The combination of hermit and community life among the Carthusians required a larger space, which was obtained by adding to the original quadrangle, on the basis of the church, a second larger one, commonly surrounded also by a cloister, with an open space or garden (containing a cemetery) in the center, and with individual dwellings for the monks around it. The mendicant orders strove for simplicity in building as in other things, and were forced by their situation in towns to a more restricted plan. The teaching orders added a wing or a separate house for their pupils. The Jesuits completely abandoned the traditional plan, and built themselves large palatial houses, while modern monasteries have little to differentiate them from other large institutions. For a more detailed treatment of the structural system of abbeys and monastic buildings, consult the exhaustive monograph by Venables in the *Encyclopaedia Britannica*, s.v. Abbey. See **MONASTICISM.** BIBLIOGRAPHY: In general: DCA, ii. (1880) 1243-88 (gives a list of 1,481 monasteries founded before 814); *DACL*, i. 26-39; A. Ballu, *Le Monastere de Tebessa*, Paris, 1897 (valuable for detailed description of a typical abbey); AUSTRIA: G. Wolfsgruber, A. Hubl, and O. Schmidt, *Abteien und Kloster in Osterreich*, Vienna, 1902. FRANCE: L. P. Herard, *Etudes archeologiques sur les abbayes de l'ancien diocese de Paris*, Paris, 1852; M. F. de Montrond, *Dictionnaire des abbayes et monasteres*, ib. 1856; J. J. Bourasse, *Abbayes et monasteres; histoire, monuments, souvenirs et ruines*, ib. 1869; E. P. M. Sauvage, *Histoire litteraire des abbayes Normandes*, ib. 1872; A. Peigne-Delacourt, *Tableau des abbayes et des monasteres d'hommes en France* . . . . 1768, ib. 1875; J. M. Besse, *Les premiers monasteres de la Gaule,* in *Revue des questions historiques*, Apr., 1902. GERMANY: O. Grote, *Lexicon deutscher Stifte, Kloster, und Ordenshauer*, 5 parts, Osterwieck, 1874-80; H. G. Hasse, *Geschichte der sachrischen Kloster in der Mark Meissen und Oberlausitz*, Gotha, 1887; H. H. Koch, *Die Karmelitenkloster der niederdeutschen Provinz, 13-16 Jahrhundert*, Freiburg, 1889; H. Hauntinger, *Suddeutsche Kloster vor 100 Jahren*, Cologne, 1889; L. Sutter, *Die Dominican-Kloster auf die Gebiete d. heutigen deutschen Schweitz im 13 Jahrhundert*, Lucerne, 1893; A. Hohenegger, *Das Kapuziner-Kloster zu Meran*, Innsbruck, 1898; F. M. Herhagen, *Die Kloster-Ruinen zu Himmerod in der Eifel*, Treves, 1900. GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND: M. Archdall, *Monasticon Hibernicon; . . . the Abbeys, Priories . . . in Ireland*, London, 1788, ed. by P. F. Moran, Dublin, 1871; W. Beattie, *Castles and Abbeys of England,* 2 vols., London, 1851; M. E. C. Walcott, *Minster and Abbey Ruins of the United Kingdom*, ib. 1860; W. and M. Howitt, *Ruined Abbeys and Castles of Great Britain*, 2 ser., ib. 1862-64; *Religious Houses of the United Kingdom,* ib. 1887; T. G. Bonney, *Cathedrals, Abbeys and Churches of England and Wales,* 2 vols., ib. 1888-91 (revised, 1898); W. C. Lefroy, *Ruined Abbeys of Yorkshire,* ib. 1890; J. Timbs, *Abbeys, Castles and Ancient Halls of England and Wales*, 3 vols., ib. 1890; W. A. J. Archbold, *Somerset Religious Houses,* ib. 1892.
ABBO OF FLEURY Abbo of Fleury

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBO OF FLEURY**, flu"ri': French abbot of the tenth century, one of the few men of that time who strove to cultivate learning and led the way for the later scholasticism; b. near Orleans; d. Nov. 13, 1004. He was brought up in the Benedictine abbey of Fleury (25 m. e.s.e. of Orleans); studied at Paris and Reims; in 985-987 was in England, on invitation of Archbishop Oswald of York, and taught in the school of the abbey of Ramsey; was chosen abbot of Fleury in 988, and brought the school there to a flourishing condition. He upheld the rights of his abbey against the Bishop of Orleans, and at the synod of St. Denis (995) took the part of the monks against the bishops. He twice represented King Robert the Pious as ambassador at Rome, and gained the favor of Pope Gregory V. He upheld strict monastic discipline; and an attempt to introduce reforms in the monastery of La Reole (in Gascony, 30 m. s.e. of Bordeaux), a dependency of Fleury, led to a mutiny by the monks in which he was fatally wounded. He wrote upon such diverse subjects as dialectics, astronomy, and canon law; and his extant letters are of much value for the history of the time. BIBLIOGRAPHY: For his works, and his life by his pupil Aimoin, consult *MPL,* cxxxix.; for his *Epistolae*, Bouquet, *Recueil*; for his life, J. B. Pardiae, *Histoire de St. Abbon,* Paris, 1872.
ABBOT Abbot

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBOT:** The head of one of the larger houses in the Benedictine and other older Western monastic orders. The term originated in the East, where it was frequently used as a title of respect for any monk (being derived from the Aramaic *abba*, " father "); but there it was replaced, as the title of the superior of a monastery, by archimandrite and other titles. In the Western orders founded before the end of the eleventh century the title is still in use. According to the present system, abbots are divided into secular and regular; the former are secular clerics who are incumbents of benefices originally bearing the title of abbey but since secularized; the latter are classified according as they have authority only over the members of their house, or over certain of the faithful, or enjoy a quasi-episcopal jurisdiction over a definite territory, or are merely titular abbots, their houses having fallen into decay. They are further divided according to the term of their office, which may be either for life or for three years. A special class known as mitered abbots have permission to wear episcopal insignia. The election of an abbot is commonly by vote of the professed brothers, in most cases only those in holy orders. The candidate must be twenty-five years of age, a professed brother of the order, and a priest. Actual jurisdiction is not conferred until his confirmation either by the bishop or, in the case of exempt abbeys, by the superior in the case, frequently the pope. His benediction is the next step, which takes place according to the office in the *Pontificale Romanum*, usually at the hands of the bishop of the diocese. He has the power to regulate the entire inner life of the abbey in accordance with the rule, and to require obedience from his subordinates; according to the rule of St. Benedict, however, abbots are required not to exercise their authority in an arbitrary manner, but to seek the counsel of their brethren. In many particulars a quasi-episcopal jurisdiction has in course of time been conceded to them. Since the eighth century they have been allowed to confer the tonsure and minor orders on their subjects, to bless their churches, cemeteries, sacred vessels, etc., to take rank as prelates, and, if generals exercising quasi-episcopal jurisdiction, to sit and vote in general councils. The practise of granting abbeys in *commendam* to deserving clerics, or even to laymen, led to the creation of a class of merely titular abbots, who had nothing of this character but the name and the revenues. This practise, which was the source of many abuses, was regulated by the Council of Trent: From it sprang the custom in France of applying the title *abbe* to any prominent clergyman who might, according to the custom of the time, lay claim to such an appointment, and then to the secular clergy in general. A somewhat analogous custom existed in Italy, where many professional men, lawyers, doctors, etc., though laymen and even married men, retained some marks of the clerical character which had earlier distinguished the majority of scholars in their dress and in the title of *abbate*. In some Protestant countries the title of abbot still clung to the heads of institutions that had grown out of monasteries suppressed at the Reformation. See MONASTICISM.
ABBOT, EZRA Abbot, Ezra

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBOT, EZRA:** Unitarian layman; b. at Jackson, Waldo County, Me., Apr. 28, 1819; d. at Cambridge, Mass., Mar. 21, 1884. He was fitted for college at Phillips Academy, Exeter, N. H., and was graduated at Bowdoin, 1840. He then taught in Maine and, after 1847, in Cambridge, Mass., also rendering service in the Harvard and Boston Athenaeum libraries. In 1856 he was appointed assistant librarian of Harvard University, in 1871 he was university lecturer on the textual criticism of the New Testament, and in 1872 he became Bussey professor of New Testament criticism and interpretation in the Harvard Divinity School. From 1853 he was secretary of the American Oriental Society. He was one of the original members of the American New Testament Revision Company (1871), and in 1880 he aided in organizing the Society of Biblical Literature and Exegesis. He was a scholar of rare talents and attainments. He stood first and foremost among the textual critics of the Greek Testament in America; and for microscopic accuracy of biblical scholarship he had no superior in the world. On account of the extreme attention he paid to minute details, the number of his independent publications was small, and the results of his labors have gone into books of other writers, to which he was willing to contribute without regard to reward or adequate recognition. His *Literature of the Doctrine of a Future Life,* first published as an appendix to Alger's *History of the Doctrine of a Future Life* (Philadelphia, 1864), and afterward separately (New York, 1871), is a model of bibliographical accuracy and completeness, embracing more than 5,300 titles. He enriched Smith's *Bible Dictionary* (Am. ed., 1867-70) with careful bibliographical lists on the most important topics, besides silently correcting innumerable errors in references and in typography. His most valuable and independent labors, however, were devoted to textual criticism and are in part incorporated in Gregory's *Prolegomena* to the *Ed. viii. critica major* of Tischendorf's Greek Testament; the chapter *De versibus* (pp. 167-182) is by him, and he read the manuscript and proofs of the entire work. His services to the American Bible Revision Committee were invaluable. The critical papers which he prepared on disputed passages were uncommonly thorough, and had no small influence in determining the text finally accepted. His defense of the Johannean authorship of the fourth Gospel *(The Authorship of the Fourth Gospel; External Evidences,* Boston, 1880; reprinted by his successor in the Harvard Divinity School, J. H. Thayer, 1888) is an invaluable contribution to the solution of that question. Of his writings, besides those already adduced, may be mentioned: an edition of *Orme's Memoir of the Controversy respecting the Three Heavenly Witnesses* (New York, 1866); work upon G. R. Noyes's (posthumous) *Translation of the New Testament from the Greek Text of Tischendorf* (1869); work upon C. F. Hudson's *Greek and English Concordance of the New Testament* (1870); *The Late Professor Tischendorf,* in *The Unitarian Review,* Mar. 1875; *On the Reading " an only begotten God," or " God only begotten," John i. 18, * ib. June 1875; *On the Reading " Church of God," Acts. xx. 28, * in the *Bibliotheca Sacra,* Apr. 1876 (like the preceding, first privately printed for the American Bible Revision Committee); *Recent Discussions of Romans ix. 5,* an exhaustive article on the punctuation of this passage in *Journal of the Society of Biblical Literature and Exegesis,* June and Dec. 1883. The four articles mentioned last, together with that on the fourth Gospel and seventeen others, were published in 1888, under the editorship of J. H. Thayer. (PHILIP SCHAFF.) D. S. SCHAFF. BIBLIOGRAPHY: *Ezra Abbot*, a memoir edited by S. J. Barrows, Cambridge, 1884; *Andover Review, i.* (1884) 554; *Literary World*, xv. (1884) 113.
ABBOT Abbot

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBOT, GEORGE:** Archbishop of Canterbury; b. at Guildford (30 m. s.w. of London) Oct. 29, 1562; d. at Croydon (10 m. s. of London) Aug. 4, 1633. He studied at Balliol College, Oxford (B.A., 1582; probationer fellow, 1583; M.A., 1585; B.D., 1593; D.D., 1597), took orders in 1585, remained at Oxford as tutor, and became known as an able preacher and lecturer with strong Puritan sympathies. He was made master of University College 1597; dean of Winchester 1600; vice-chancellor of the university 1600, 1603, 1605; bishop of Coventry and Lichfield, 1609; bishop of London 1610; archbishop of Canterbury 1611. His learning and sincerity can not be questioned; but he was austere, narrow, almost a fanatic. His one great idea was to crush "popery," not only in England, but in all Europe; and popery to him meant every theological system except that of Calvin. To further his purposes abroad, he meddled persistently in the foreign policy of the State and chose arbitrary, high-handed, and cruel means to accomplish his ends at home. His principles allowed him to flatter the king, to help him generously in money matters, and to serve him in certain political undertakings, such as the restoration of episcopacy in Scotland in 1608-10. At other times his conscience compelled him to be just, and consequently he could not retain the royal favor. A Presbyterian at heart, he accepted episcopacy only from a love of order and sense of loyalty to constituted authority; and his appointment as archbishop was displeasing to the Anglican party, who had wanted Launcelot Andrewes (q.v.). His undiplomatic course incensed his opponents, and they pursued him relentlessly and cruelly. In 1621 he killed a gamekeeper while hunting. It was purely accidental, and he was deeply shocked and grieved; nevertheless, William Laud (his successor as archbishop and his personal enemy for years) and others seized upon the incident to annoy him and weaken his influence. Charles I., after his accession, favored Laud, who brought about Abbot's sequestration for a year (1627-28) because he had refused to sanction a sermon by Dr. Robert Sibthorp, vicar of Brackley, indorsing an unlawful attempt by the king to raise money, and showing little sympathy with Abbot's favorite policy of support to the German Protestants. After this his public acts were few. But with all his faults and disappointments he was faithful to duty as he understood it; and he was generous with money, charitable to the poor, and a patron of learning. He was a member of the Oxford New Testament Company for the version of 1611; and through him Cyril Lucar (q.v.) presented the *Codex Alexandrinus* to Charles I. With other works, he published *A Brief Description of the Whole World* (London, 1599; 5th ed., 1664), a geography prepared for his pupils at Oxford, containing an interesting description of America; and *An Exposition upon the Prophet Jonah* (1600), which was reprinted in 1845 with a life by Grace Webster. BIBLIOGRAPHY: T. Fuller, *Church History,* 6 parts, London, 1655 (ed. Brewer, 1845); *Biographia Britannica,* 6 vols., ib. 1747-66 (contains his life by W. Oldys, reprinted by Arthur Onslow, Guildford, 1777); W. F. Hook, *Ecclesiastical Biography,* 8 vols., London, 1845-52; idem, *Lives of* *Archbishops*, 12 vols., ib. 1860-72; S. R. Gardiner, *History of England, 1603-1642,* 10 vols., ib. 1883-84; *DNB,* i. 5.
ABBOT, ROBERT Abbot, Robert

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBOT, ROBERT:** 1. Bishop of Salisbury; elder brother of George Abbot, Archbishop of Canterbury; b. at Guildford (30 m. s.w. of London) about 1560; d. at Salisbury Mar. 2, 1618. He studied at Balliol College, Oxford (fellow, 1581; M.A., 1582; D.D., 1597), and held several important livings. In 1609 he became master of Balliol; in 1612 regius professor of divinity at Oxford; in 1615 bishop of Salisbury. He was a learned man, an able preacher, and a prolific writer, holding in general the same views as his brother, but advocating them with more discretion and tact. His works include two treatises in reply to Bellarmine, *A Mirror of Popish Subtilties* (London, 1594), and *Antichristi demonstratio* (1603); and *A Defence of the Reformed Catholic of Mr. William Perkins* (3 parts, 1606-09), which won him royal favor and a promise of preferment. BIBLIOGRAPHY: Thos. Fuller, *Abel Redevivus,* London, 1651 (ed. W. Nichols, 2 vols., 1867); idem, *Church History,* 6 pts., ib. 1655 (ed. by Brewer, 1845); A. Wood, *Athena Oxonienses*, ii. 224-227, ib. 1692; *Biographia Britannica*, 6 vols., ib. 1747-66 (life reprinted by A. Onslow, Guildford, 1777); *Criminal Trials, illustrative of British History,* ii. 366-367, ib. 1837 (deals with Abbot's part in the controversy over the Gunpowder Plot); *DNB,* i. 24. 2. Vicar of Cranbrook, Kent, 1616-43 ; b. probably, 1588; d. about 1657. He studied at Cambridge (college unknown), took the degree of M.A. there, and was incorporated at Oxford. Parliament having decided against pluralities of ecclesiastical offices, he resigned his Cranbrook vicarage in 1643, retaining that of Southwick, Hampshire, although much smaller. He was afterward rector of St. Austin's, London. He was a strong churchman; and engaged in many controversies, particularly with the Brownists, to whom he was not always fair. Many of his writings, as his *Milk for Babes, or a Mother's Catechism for her Children* (London, 1646), were very popular. BIBLIOGRAPHY: A. Wood, *Fasti,* appended to *Athena Oxonienses,* London, 1691-92 (ed. P. Bliss, i. 323, Oxford, 1848); John Walker, *Sufferings of the Clergy,* ii. 183, London, 1714; B. Brook, *Lives of the Puritans*, iii. 182, ib. 1813; *DNB*, i. 25-26.
ABBOTT, EDWARD Abbott, Edward

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBOTT, EDWARD:** Protestant Episcopalian; b. at Farmington, Me., July 15, 1841. He was educated at the University of the City of New York (B.A., 1860) and at Andover Theological Seminary (1860-62; did not graduate). In 1862-63 he was an agent of the United States Sanitary Commission, and in the latter year was ordained to the Congregational ministry. Two years later he founded the Stearns Chapel Congregational Church (now the Pilgrim Church) at Cambridge, Mass., of which he was pastor four years. In 1872-73 he was chaplain of the Massachusetts Senate. In 1879 he was ordered deacon in the Protestant Episcopal Church, and priested in 1880, his parish being that of St. James, Cambridge, which he still holds. He refused the proffered missionary bishopric of Japan in 1889. At various times he has been a member of the Board of Visitors of Wellesley College, trustee of the Society for the Relief of the Widows and Orphans of Clergymen of the Protestant Episcopal Church, director and president of the Associated Charities of Cambridge, vice-dean and dean of the Eastern Convocation of the Diocese of Massachusetts, president of the Cambridge Branch of the Indian Rights Association, member of the Missionary Council of the Protestant Episcopal Church, secretary of the Standing Committee of the Diocese of Massachusetts, member of the Provisional Committee on Church Work in Mexico, president of the Indian Industries League, president of the Cambridge City Mission, and has been active in other religious and philanthropic movements. His theological position is that of the Broad Church, sympathizing neither with the extreme of medievalism nor higher criticism. In 1869-78 he was associate editor of the Boston *Congregationalist,* and was joint proprietor and editor of the *Boston Literary World* from 1877 to 1888, again editing it in 1895-1903. His principal works are *The Baby's Things: A Story in Verse* (New York, 1871); *Paragraph History of the United States* (Boston, 1875); *Paragraph History of the American Revolution* (1876); *Revolutionary Times* (1876); *History of Cambridge* (1880); *Phillips Brooks* (Cambridge, 1900); and *Meet for the Master's Use: An Allegory (1900).*
ABBOTT, EDWIN ABBOTT Abbott, Edwin Abbott

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBOTT, EDWIN ABBOTT:** Church of England, author and educator, b. in London Dec. 20, 1838. He studied at St. John's College, Cambridge (B.A., 1861), where he was elected fellow in 1862. He was assistant master at King Edward's School, Birmingham, in 1862-64, and at Clifton College in the following year, while from 1865 to 1889 he was headmaster at City of London School. He was Hulsean lecturer at Cambridge in 1876 and select preacher at Oxford in the succeeding year. His works include *Bible Lessons* (London, 1872); *Cambridge Sermons* (1875); *Through Nature to Christ* (1877); *Oxford Sermons* (1879); the article *Gospels * in the 9th ed. of the *Encyclopaedia Britannica; The Common Tradition of the Synoptic Gospels* (1884; in collaboration with W. G. Rushbrooke); *The Good Voices, or A Child's Guide to the Bible, and Parables for Children* (1875); *Bacon and Essex* (1877); *Philochristus* (1878); *Onesimus* (1882); *Flatland, or A Romance of Many Dimensions* (1884); *Francis Bacon, an Account of his Life and Works* (1885); *The Kernel and the Husk* (1886); *The Anglican Career of Cardinal Newman* (1892); *The Spirit on the Waters* (1897); *St. Thomas of Canterbury* (Edinburgh, 1898); *Corrections of Mark Adopted by Matthew and Luke* (1901); *From Letter to Spirit* (1903); *Paradosis* (1904) ; *Johannine Vocabulary, A Comparison of the Words of the Fourth Gospel with Those of the Three* (1905); and *Silanus the Christian* (1906).
ABBOTT, JACOB Abbott, Jacob

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBOTT, JACOB:** American Congregationalist; b. at Hallowell, Me., Nov. 14, 1803; d. at Farmington, Me., Oct. 31, 1879. He was graduated at Bowdoin, 1820; studied theology at Andover, 1822-24; was tutor and professor of mathematics and natural philosophy at Amherst, 1824-29; principal of the Mount Vernon School for Girls, Boston, 1829-33; ordained evangelist and pastor of the Eliot Congregational Church, Roxbury, Mass., 1834. In 1839 he removed to Farmington, Me., and spent the remainder of his life there and in New York devoted to literary work and teaching. He wrote many story-books which had a wide circulation, such as the *Young Christian* series (4 vols.; new edition of the *Young Christian, * with life, New York, 1882), the *Rollo Books* (14 vols.) and *Rollo's Tour in Europe* (10 vols.), the *Franconia Stories* (10 vols.), *Science for the Young* (4 vols.).
ABBOTT, JUSTIN EDWARDS Abbott, Justin Edwards

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBOTT, JUSTIN EDWARDS:** Presbyterian; b. at Portsmouth, N. H., Dec. 25, 1853. He was educated at Dartmouth College (A.B., 1876) and Union Theological Seminary, from which he was graduated in 1879. He was ordained to the Congregational ministry in the following year, and after acting as stated supply at the Presbyterian church at Norwood, N. J., in 1881-82, went to India under the auspices of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions. Since that time he has been stationed at Bombay in the Maratha Mission, and has contributed a number of monographs to scientific periodicals on the epigraphy and numismatics of India, in addition to preparing religious works in Marathi for the use of Hindu converts.
ABBOTT, LYMAN Abbott, Lyman

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBOTT, LYMAN:** American Congregationalist; b. at Roxbury, Mass., Dec. 18, 1835. He was educated at New York University (B.A., 1853), and after practising law for a time was ordained a minister in the Congregational Church in 1860. He was pastor in Terre Haute, Ind., from 1860 to 1865, after which he held the pastorate of the New England Church, New York City, for four years, resigning to devote himself to literary work. In 1888 he succeeded Henry Ward Beecher as pastor of Plymouth Church, Brooklyn, but resigned in 1898. He was secretary of the American Union Commission from 1865 to 1869, and later was a member of the New York Child Labor Committee and of the National Child Labor Committee. Among other societies, he is a member of the Bar Association of New York, New York State Historical Association, National Conference of Charities and Correction, Indian Rights Association, New York Association for the Blind, Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor, The Religious Education Association, American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, American Institute of Sacred Literature, American Peace Society, New York State Conference of Religion, and the Universal Peace Union. His theological position is that of a Congregationalist of the Liberal Evangelical type. In addition to editing the " Literary Record" of *Harper's Magazine,* he edited *The Illustrated Christian Weekly* (1871-76) and since 1876 *The Christian Union* (with Henry Ward Beecher till 1881; name changed to *The Outlook,* 1893). He has written *Jesus of Nazareth* (New York, 1869); *Old Testament Shadows of New Testament Truth* (1870); *Illustrated Commentary on the New Testament* (New York, 1875); *Dictionary of Religious Knowledge* (Boston, 1876; in collaboration with T. J. Conant); *How to Study the Bible* (1877); *In Aid of Faith* (New York, 1886); *Evolution of Christianity* (Boston, 1896); *The Theology of an Evolutionist* (1897); *Christianity and Social Problems* (1897); *Life and Letters of Paul* (1898); *Problems of Life* (New York, 1900); *Life and Literature of the Ancient Hebrews* (Boston, 1900); *The Rights of Man* (1901); *Henry Ward Beecher* (1903); *The Other Room* (New York, 1903); *The Great Companion* (1904); *Christian Ministry* (Boston, 1905); *Personality of God* (New York, 1905); and *Industrial Problems* (Philadelphia, 1905).
ABBOTT, THOMAS KINGSMILL Abbott, Thomas Kingsmill

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBOTT, THOMAS KINGSMILL:** Church of Ireland, author and professor; b. at Dublin Mar. 26, 1829. He was educated at Trinity College, Dublin (B.A., 1851; M.A., 1856; B.D., 1879), where he was elected fellow in 1854. From 1867 to 1872 he was professor of Moral Philosophy at Trinity College, of Biblical Greek from 1875 to 1888, and of Hebrew from 1879 to 1900, and has also been librarian of the College since 1887. He has been chairman of the Governors of Sir P. Dun's Hospital since 1897. In theology he is a Broad Churchman. His works include *Sight and Touch, an Attempt to Disprove the Berkeleian Theory of Vision * (Dublin, 1864); *Par palimpsestorum Dublinensium* (1880); *Elements of Logic* (1883); *Evangeliorum versio Antihieronymiana* (2 vols., 1884); *Theory of the Tides* (1888); *Celtic Ornaments from the Book of Kells* (1892); *Notes on St. Paul's Epistles* (1892); *Essays, Chiefly on the Original Texts of the Old and New Testaments* (Edinburgh, 1897); *Catalogue of Manuscripts in the Library of Trinity College, Dublin* (Dublin, 1900); and *Catalogue of Incunabula in the Library of Trinity College, Dublin*(1905), in addition to *Kant's Theory of Ethics,* a translation (1873).
ABBREVIATORS Abbreviators

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABBREVIATORS:** Officials of the papal chancery whose duty it is to prepare apostolic letters expedited through that office. The name is derived from the fact that part of their work consists in taking minutes of the petitions addressed to the Holy See and of the answers to be returned. Formerly they were divided into two classes, *di parco maggiore* and *di parco minore,* but the latter class has long been abolished. In the College of Abbreviators at the present time there are twelve clerics and seventeen laymen. Legislation of Feb. 13, 1904, defines their duties anew. The office dates from the early part of the fourteenth century, and has been filled by many distinguished prelates. In 1466 Paul II. abolished it because it had been corrupted, but it was restored by Sixtus IV. in 1471. There is also an *abbreviatore di curia* attached to the datary, who prepares minutes of papal letters addressed *motu proprio* to the entire Church. JOHN T. CREAGH.
ABDIAS Abdias

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABDIAS,** ab'di-as: Legendary first bishop of Babylon. Under the title, *De historia certaminis apostolici* there exists a collection of myths, legends, and traditions relating to the lives and works of the apostles, and pretending to be the Latin translation of the Greek translation of the Hebrew work of Abdias. Neither the book nor its author was known to Eusebius or to Jerome, nor do they find mention before Ordericus Vitalis (12th cent.). BIBLIOGRAPHY: W. Lazius, *De historia certaminis apostolici, * Paris, 1560, and often reprinted; Fabricius, *Codex apocryphus,* ii. (1st ed., 1703), and ii., iii. (2d ed., 1719); C. Oudin, *Commentarius de scriptoribus ecclesiasticis,* ii. 418-421, Leipsic, 1722; G. J. Voss, *De historicis Graecis, * p. 243, ib. 1838; J. A. Giles, *Codex apocryphus Novi Testamenti,* London, 1852; Migne, *Troisieme et derniere encyclopedie theologique,* xxiv. (66 vols., Paris, 1855-66); S. C. Malan, *Conflicts of the Holy Apostles . . . translated from an Ethiopic MS.,* London, 1871; *DCB,* i. 1-4.
ABEEL, DAVID Abeel, David

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

**ABEEL, DAVID:** Missionary; b. at New Brunswick, N. J., June 12, 1804; d. at Albany, N. Y., Sept. 4, 1846. He was graduated at the New Brunswick Theological Seminary in 1826; in 1829 he went to Canton as chaplain of the Seaman's Friend Society; and in 1831-33 he visited Java, Singapore, and Siam for the American Board. Returning to America by way of Europe in 1833, he aided in founding in England a society for promoting the education of women in the East. He went back to China in 1838 and founded the Amoy mission in 1842. He published a *Journal* of his first residence in China (New York, 1835), *The Missionary Convention at Jerusalem* (1838), *Claims of the World to the Gospel* (1838). BIBLIOGRAPHY: G. R. Williamson, *David Abeel,* New York, 1849.
출처: public_domain