Barnes' Notes on the Bible · Isaiah 第29章

註釋閱讀最佳化

分章註釋

Isaiah 第 29 章

서론

Isaiah 29 Introduction

開啟正文

本章唯獨論到耶路撒冷——這裡稱之為亞利伊勒(見 Isaiah 29:1 的註釋)。它與前後兩章並無直接的關連,不過它們大概是在相近的時候傳講的,這也並非不可能。這預言傳講的確切時間已不可考,但顯然是在西拿基立入侵之前,或許也在希西家時代之前。本章的預言由兩部分構成:(一)西拿基立對猶大的入侵及其突然的解救(Isaiah 29:1-8);(二)責備猶太人的不忠與不敬虔。

一、猶大遭入侵、耶路撒冷將臨的困苦,及其突然的解救(Isaiah 29:1-8)。

  1. 亞利伊勒必充滿悲哀與困苦(Isaiah 29:1-2)。

  2. 耶和華必安營攻擊它、四面圍困它,它必大受壓制而降卑(Isaiah 29:3-4)。

  3. 然而圍困的大軍必忽然遭災禍與毀滅——這裡以雷轟、暴風與火焰來表徵(Isaiah 29:5-6)。

  4. 仇敵必如夢一般消散,他的一切盼望必歸幻滅,正如飢渴之人夢見得以解飢解渴、其盼望終成虛空(Isaiah 29:7-8)。

我想,這部分預言無疑是指西拿基立大軍突然而可怖的傾覆;這部分預言的用意,是要給人確據:耶路撒冷雖將處於極大的危險之中,卻必忽然得著解救。

二、第二部分是對耶路撒冷居民不忠與不敬虔的責備。

  1. 他們滿了錯謬,各階層的人都偏離了神——在錯謬中搖搖晃晃,如同醉酒的人(Isaiah 29:9)。

  2. 盲目與冥頑的靈在民中處處盛行(Isaiah 29:10-12)。

  3. 徒有形式與外在的宗教儀文,卻缺少其中的生命與能力(Isaiah 29:13)。

  4. 他們企圖設下深密巧妙的計謀,向耶和華隱藏自己的惡行(Isaiah 29:15)。

  5. 他們判斷不公,因一句話就定人有罪,顛倒公正的判斷(Isaiah 29:21)。

  6. 因這一切,他們必受懲罰。

(a)智慧人的智慧必消沒(Isaiah 29:14)。

(b)褻慢人必被除滅(Isaiah 29:20)。

  1. 必有一次翻轉,百姓必得以認識神的律法,真正敬虔的人必得安慰(Isaiah 29:16-19)。那些走迷的人必蒙改正,得以認識真神(Isaiah 29:22-24)。
英文原文

This chapter relates solely to Jerusalem - here called Ariel (see the note at Isaiah 29:1). It is not immediately connected with the preceding or the following chapters, though it is not improbable they were delivered about the same time. At what time this was delivered is not known, though it is evident that it was before the invasion by Sennacherib, and probably before the time of Hezekiah. The prophecy in the chapter consists of two parts: (I) The invasion of Judea by Sennacherib, and its sudden deliverance Isaiah 29:1-8. (II) A reproof of the Jews for their infidelity and impiety.

I. The invasion of Judea, and the distress that would be brought upon Jerusalem, and its sudden deliverance Isaiah 29:1-8.

  1. Ariel would be filled with grief and distress Isaiah 29:1-2.

  2. Yahweh would encamp against it and besiege it, and it would be greatly straitened and humbled Isaiah 29:3-4.

  3. Yet the besieging army would be visited with sudden calamity and destruction - represented here by thunder, and tempest, and flame Isaiah 29:5-6.

  4. The enemy would vanish as a dream, and all his hopes would be disappointed, as the hopes of a hungry and thirsty man are disappointed who dreams of having satisfied his hunger and thirst Isaiah 29:7-8.

There can be no doubt, I think, that this portion of the prophecy refers to the sudden and dreadful overthrow of Sennacherib; and the design of this portion of the prophecy is to give the assurance, that though Jerusalem would be in imminent danger, yet it would be suddenly delivered.

II. The second part consists of reproofs of the inhabitants of Jerusalem for their infidelity and impiety.

  1. They were full of error, and all classes of people were wandering from God - reeling under error like a drunken man Isaiah 29:9.

  2. A spirit of blindness and stupidity everywhere prevailed among the people Isaiah 29:10-12.

  3. Formality and external regard for the institutions of religion prevailed, but without its life and power Isaiah 29:13.

  4. They attempted to lay deep and skillful plans to hide their wickedness from Yahweh Isaiah 29:15.

  5. They were unjust in their judgments, making a man an offender for a word, and perverting just judgment Isaiah 29:21.

  6. For all this they should be punished.

(a) The wisdom of their wise men should fail Isaiah 29:14.

(b) The scorner would be consumed Isaiah 29:20.

  1. There would be an overturning, and the people would be made acquainted with the law of God, and the truly pious would be comforted Isaiah 29:16-19. Those who had erred would be reformed, and would come to the true knowledge of God Isaiah 29:22-24.

1

Isaiah 29:1

開啟正文

唉——(試比較Isaiah 18:1的註釋)。

亞利伊勒啊——此處所指的毫無疑問是耶路撒冷。宣告它是大衛居住的城,以及整段預言的範圍,都證明這一點。但這城在此為何稱為「亞利伊勒」,仍不十分清楚。旁註讀作:「亞利伊勒啊,就是神的獅子。」這詞(אריאל 'ărı̂y'ēl)由兩個詞複合而成,通常被認為由ארי 'ărı̂y(「獅子」)與אל 'ēl(神)組成;若這解釋正確,它就等於一頭強壯、有力、兇猛的獅子——「神」一詞在此用來表達巨大,正如利巴嫩的高大香柏樹被稱為「神的香柏樹」,即高大的香柏樹。「獅子」是力量的象徵,強壯的獅子則是大能戰士或英雄的象徵。2 Samuel 23:20:「他殺了兩個獅一般的(אריאל 'ărı̂y'êl)摩押人」(1 Chronicles 11:22)。用這詞指英雄,在亞拉伯文中很常見(見Bachart的Hieroz.,卷一第3篇第1節)。

若此處正是取這意義,那麼它是把耶路撒冷當作英雄來稱呼,特別是作為在大衛治下以戰功著稱之王國的顯赫京都。然而「亞利伊勒」一詞在聖經中另有別的用法,指「祭壇」(Ezekiel 43:15-16),那裏希伯來文的詞正是「亞利伊勒」。Bachart以為(Hieroz.,卷一第3篇第1節),這名加於祭壇,是因為燔祭壇彷彿「吞吃」祭物,如獅子吞吃獵物。然而Gesenius對這詞加於祭壇另提出一個理由:他說 ארי 'ărı̂y 一詞與亞拉伯文中指火爐的一個詞相同,祭壇所以如此稱呼,是因它是永續燔祭之處。「亞利伊勒」之名在以西結書中無疑是加於祭壇的;此處加於耶路撒冷,可能是因它是祭壇之地,即敬拜神之地。迦勒底意譯本譯作:「禍哉,那在大衛居住之城中建造的祭壇。」在我看來,這觀點比認為這名加於耶路撒冷是因它如獅子的說法,更切合上下文,特別是Isaiah 29:2(見該處註釋)。若這是正確的解釋,那麼它所以如此稱呼,是因耶路撒冷是燔祭之地,是敬拜神之地,是那火如爐中火一般、在祭壇上不斷燃燒的地方。

大衛安營的城——大衛從耶布斯人手中奪取錫安山,立為他王國的京都(2 Samuel 5:6-9)。Lowth譯作「大衛所圍攻的城」。七十士譯本亦然:Ἐπολέμησε Epolemēse;武加大譯本作Expugnavit。חנה chânâh一詞本義是「紮營、支搭帳棚」(Genesis 26:17),「駐紮」。它也用於對某人「安營攻擊」之意,即向其開戰或攻擊(見Isaiah 29:3及Psalm 27:3;2 Samuel 12:28);耶柔米與另一些人認為,它在此正取這意義,與七十士譯本和武加大譯本的解釋一致。但更正確的觀念大概仍如我們的譯本,即大衛在那裏支搭帳棚,也就是以它為居所。

任憑你年上加年——就是說:「一年又一年地繼續下去吧,讓一年接著一年在你們現今所行的路上流逝。」這似乎是諷刺的用法,表示他們年復一年謹守節期,循著外在儀文的常軌行走,彷彿大衛曾住在那裏、那裏又是敬拜大祭壇之所在這一事實,便構成了完全的保障。本章指控他們的罪之一,正是在敬拜上的「形式化」與「無心」(Isaiah 29:13);此處所指的似乎就是這事。

節期照常周流——旁註作「割下頭來」。英文譯作「殺」的詞(נקף nâqaph)可指擊打、砍伐、砍倒(Isaiah 10:34;Job 19:26)。但它另有更切合本處的意義。它指畫成圓圈、旋轉、繞行一處(Joshua 6:3、Joshua 6:11);指包圍(1 Kings 7:24;2 Kings 6:14;Psalm 17:9;Psalm 22:17;Psalm 88:18)。譯作「祭牲」的詞(חגים chagiym)可指祭物(Exodus 23:18;Psalm 118:27;Malachi 2:3),但它更常見、更本然的意義是節期或節日(Exodus 10:9;Exodus 12:14;Leviticus 23:39;Deuteronomy 16:10、Deuteronomy 16:16;1 Kings 8:2、1 Kings 8:65;2 Chronicles 7:8-9;Nehemiah 8:14;Hosea 2:11、Hosea 2:13)。此處的意思是:「讓節期循行」;即讓它們彷彿在永無止境、毫無意義的循環中流轉,直到這種無心事奉所當得的審判臨到你們。這整段話顯然是諷刺的,旨在表明他們的一切事奉不過是無心形式的不斷重複。

英文原文

Wo - (compare the note at Isaiah 18:1).

To Ariel - There can be no doubt that Jerusalem is here intended. The declaration that it was the city where David dwelt, as well as the entire scope of the prophecy, proves this. But still, it is not quiet clear why the city is here called "Ariel." The margin reads, 'O Ariel, that is, the lion of God.' The word (אריאל 'ărı̂y'ēl) is compounded of two words, and is usually supposed to be made up of ארי 'ărı̂y, "a lion," and אל 'ēl, God; and if this interpretation is correct, it is equivalent to a strong, mighty, fierce lion - where the word 'God' is used to denote greatness in the same way as the lofty cedars of Lebanon are called cedars of God; that is, lofty cedars. The "lion" is an emblem of strength, and a strong lion is an emblem of a mighty warrior or hero. 2 Samuel 23:20 : 'He slew two "lion-like" אריאל 'ărı̂y'êl men of Moab' 1 Chronicles 11:22. This use of the word to denote a hero is common in Arabic (see Bachart, "Hieroz.," i. 3. 1).

If this be the sense in which it is used here, then it is applied to Jerusalem under the image of a hero, and particularly as the place which was distinguished under David as the capital of a kingdom that was so celebrated for its triumphs in war. The word 'Ariel' is, however, used in another sense in the Scriptures, to denote an "altar" Ezekiel 43:15-16, where in the Hebrew the word is "Ariel." This name is given to the altar, Bachart supposes ("Hieroz.," i. 3. 1), because the altar of burnt-offering "devours" as it were the sacrifices as a lion devours its prey. Gesenius, however, has suggested another reason why the word is given to the altar, since he says that the word ארי 'ărı̂y is the same as one used in Arabic to denote a fire-hearth, and that the altar was so called because it was the place of perpetual burnt-offering. The name "Ariel," is, doubtless, given in Ezekiel to an altar; and it may be given here to Jerusalem because it was the place of the altar, or of the public worship of God. The Chaldee renders it, 'Wo to the altar, the altar which was constructed in the city where David dwelt.' It seems to me that this view better suits the connection, and particularly Isaiah 29:2 (see Note), than to suppose that the name is given to Jerusalem because it was like a lion. If this be the true interpretation, then it is so called because Jerusalem was the place of the burnt-offering, or of the public worship of God; the place where the fire, as on a hearth, continually burned on the altar.

The city where David dwelt - David took the hill of Zion from the Jebusites, and made it the capital of his kingdom 2 Samuel 5:6-9. Lowth renders this, 'The city which David besieged.' So the Septuagint: Ἐπολέμησε Epolemēse; and so the Vulgate, Expugnavit. The word חנה chânâh properly means "to encamp, to pitch one's tent" Genesis 26:17, "to station oneself." It is also used in the sense of encamping "against" anyone, that is, to make war upon or to attack (see Isaiah 29:3, and Psalm 27:3; 2 Samuel 12:28); and Jerome and others have supposed that it has this meaning here in accordance with the interpretation of the Septuagint and the Vulgate. But the more correct idea is probably that in our translation, that David pitched his tent there; that is, that he made it his dwelling-place.

Add ye year to year - That is, 'go on year after year, suffer one year to glide on after another in the course which you are pursuing.' This seems to be used ironically, and to denote that they were going on one year after another in the observance of the feasts; walking the round of external ceremonies as if the fact that David had dwelt there, and that that was the place of the great altar of worship, constituted perfect security. One of the sins charged on them in this chapter was "formality" and "heartlessness" in their devotions Isaiah 29:13, and this seems to be referred to here.

Let them kill sacrifices - Margin, 'Cut off the heads.' The word here rendered 'kill' (נקף nâqaph) may mean to smite; to hew; to cut down Isaiah 10:34; Job 19:26. But it has also another signification which better accords with this place. It denotes to make a circle, to revolve; to go round a place Joshua 6:3, Joshua 6:11; to surround 1 Kings 7:24; 2 Kings 6:14; Psalm 17:9; Psalm 22:17; Psalm 88:18. The word rendered 'sacrifices' (חגים chagiym) may mean a sacrifice Exodus 23:18; Psalm 118:27; Malachi 2:3, but it more commonly and properly denotes feasts or festivals Exodus 10:9; Exodus 12:14; Leviticus 23:39; Deuteronomy 16:10, Deuteronomy 16:16; 1 Kings 8:2, 1 Kings 8:65; 2 Chronicles 7:8-9; Nehemiah 8:14; Hosea 2:11, Hosea 2:13. Here the sense is, 'let the festivals go round;' that is, let them revolve as it were in a perpetual, unmeaning circle, until the judgments due to such heartless service shall come upon you. The whole address is evidently ironical, and designed to denote that all their service was an unvarying repetition of heartless forms.

2

Isaiah 29:2

開啟正文

「我必使亞利伊勒遭難」——這裏所指的,無疑是神說祂要帶到這有罪而徒具形式之城的那場圍困(Isaiah 29:3)。

「他必悲傷哀號」——這在本節大概所指的西拿基立圍城之時,確實應驗在這城身上。雖然這城以突然而奇特的方式得了拯救(見 Isaiah 29:7-8 的註釋),但它陷入極大困境也是事實(見 Isaiah 36;Isaiah 37)。

「我卻仍必使他像亞利伊勒一樣」——這句話表明,Isaiah 29:1 稱耶路撒冷為「亞利伊勒」,是因為城中有大祭壇,是獻祭之地。這裏的「亞利伊勒」一詞,當理解為「大祭壇的爐床」之意;其意思是:「我確實要使耶路撒冷如大祭壇一般;我要使它成為烈怒的焚燒之地,我的仇敵要在那裏被消滅,如同放在燔祭壇上被焚一樣。」照樣,Isaiah 31:9 論到耶和華說,祂的「火必在錫安,祂的爐必在耶路撒冷」。這是表達將臨災禍的強烈說法;這整段經文主要指西拿基立入侵時臨到他們的困苦,但我們可以合理地認為,先知在異象中也看見了這城日後被迦勒底人全然毀滅的景象——那時聖殿、宮殿、和大衛之城的一切華美居所都必陷於火焰,如同一座巨大的焚燒祭壇,吞滅其上所放的一切。

英文原文

Yet I will distress Ariel - The reference here is doubtless to the siege which God says Isaiah 29:3 he would bring upon the guilty and formal city.

And there shall be heaviness and sorrow - This was true of the city in the siege of Sennacherib, to which this probably refers. Though the city was delivered in a sudden and remarkable manner (see the note at Isaiah 29:7-8), yet it was also true that it was reduced to great distress (see Isaiah 36; 37)

And it shall be unto me as Ariel - This phrase shows that in Isaiah 29:1 Jerusalem is called 'Ariel,' because it contained the great altar, and was the place of sacrifice. The word "Ariel" here is to be understood in the sense "of the hearth of the great altar;" and the meaning is, 'I will indeed make Jerusalem like the great altar; I will make it the burning place of wrath where my enemies shall be consumed as if they were on the altar of burnt sacrifice.' Thus in Isaiah 30:9, it is said of Yahweh that his 'fire is in Zion, and his furnace in Jerusalem.' This is a strong expression, denoting the calamity that was approaching; and though the main reference in this whole passage is to the distress that would come upon them in the invasion of Sennacherib, yet there is no impropriety in supposing that there was presented to the mind of the prophet in vision the image of the total ruin that would come yet upon the city by the Chaldeans - when the temple, the palaces, and the dwellings of the magnificent city of David would be in flames, and like a vast blazing altar consuming that which was laid upon it.

3

Isaiah 29:3

開啟正文

「安營攻擊你」——即我必使一支軍隊在那裏支搭帳棚施行圍困。神看他所要使用的軍隊為在他統管之下,並且說話,彷彿他自己要親自行這事(見 Isaiah 10:5 的註釋)。

「四圍」——(כדוּר kadûr)。如同一個圓圈;就是說,他要環繞、包圍這城。這裏所用的字 דור(dûr)在 Isaiah 22:18 意為「球」,但在這裏顯然意為「圓圈」;其意義是:圍攻的軍隊要環繞這城。關於耶路撒冷,Luke 19:43 也有類似的表達:「因為日子將到,你的仇敵必築起土壘(χάρακα charaka——「堡壘」、「土壘」),周圍環繞你(σοί soi,「攻擊你」),四面困住你(περικυκλώτονσί σε perikuklōsousi se,「環繞你」)」。Luke 21:20 也是如此。七十士譯本把這裏譯作「我必如大衛曾行的環繞你」,顯然是把它讀作 כדוּד(kadûd);羅斯(Lowth)指出有兩份抄本正是這樣讀,他自己也採用這讀法。但以此更正希伯來文本的權威並不充分,也無此必要。現有讀法的意義很清楚,顯然是指西拿基立的軍隊要包圍這城。

「屯兵」——即堡壘、防禦工事。或者更可能,מצב(mutsâb)一字意為「哨所、軍事駐地」,出自 יצב(yâtsab,「放置、駐紮」)。這形式的字不見於聖經他處,但 מצב(matsâb)在 1 Samuel 13:23; 1 Samuel 14:1, 1 Samuel 14:4; 2 Samuel 23:14 中以「軍事哨所或防營」的意義出現。

「築壘」——即堡壘,就是通常為攻擊被圍之城而堆起的土壘,意指這城將經受正規圍攻的過程。七十士譯本讀作 Πύργου(Purgou),「樓塔」;有兩份抄本把希伯來字母 ד(d)改作希伯來字母 ר(r),也是這樣讀。但沒有必要更改希伯來文本。羅斯(Lowth)偏好七十士譯本的讀法。

英文原文

And I will camp against thee - That is, I will cause an army to pitch their tents there for a siege. God regards the armies which he would employ as under his control, and speaks of them as if he would do it himself (see the note at Isaiah 10:5).

Round about - (כדוּר kadûr). As in a circle; that is, he would encompass or encircle the city. The word used here דור dûr in Isaiah 22:18, means a ball, but here it evidently means a circle; and the sense is, that the army of the besiegers would encompass the city. A similar form of expression occurs in regard to Jerusalem in Luke 19:43 : 'For the days shall come upon thee, than thine enemies shall cast a trench (χάρακα charaka - "a rampart," a "mound") about thee σοί soi "against thee"), and "compass thee round" περικυκλώτονσί σε perikuklōsousi se, "encircle thee").' So also Luke 21:20. The Septuagint renders this, 'I will encompass thee as David did;' evidently reading it as if it were כדוּד kadûd; and Lowth observes that two manuscripts thus read it, and he himself adopts it. But the authority for correcting the Hebrew text in this way is not sufficient, nor is it necessary. The idea in the present reading is a clear one, and evidently means that the armies of Sennacherib would encompass the city.

With a mount - A rampart; a fortification. Or, rather, perhaps, the word מצב mutsâb means a post, a military station, from יצב yâtsab, "to place, to station." The word in this form occurs nowhere else in the Scriptures, but the word מצב matsâb occurs in 1 Samuel 13:23; 1 Samuel 14:1, 1 Samuel 14:4; 2 Samuel 23:14, in the sense of a military post, or garrison.

I will rise forts - That is, ramparts, such as were usually thrown up against a besieged city, meaning that it should be subjected to the regular process of a siege. The Septuagint reads, Πύργου Purgou; 'Towers;' and so also two manuscripts by changing the Hebrew letter ד (d) into the Hebrew letter ר (r). But there is no necessity for altering the Hebrew text. Lowth prefers the reading of the Septuagint.

4

Isaiah 29:4

開啟正文

你必敗落,從地中說話——(見以賽亞書 8:19 的註釋)。此處的意思是:那素來誇耀自己力量的耶路撒冷,必大遭屈辱而被制服。它高亢傲慢的語調必改變;它必使用因恐懼和驚惶而被壓抑的言語,如同從塵土中說話,或以尖細微弱的聲音,像那些假冒與死人交談的人一樣。

你的言語必微細出於塵埃——邊註作「啾鳴」或「唧唧作聲」(見以賽亞書 8:19 的註釋)。

英文原文

And shalt speak out of the ground - (see the note at Isaiah 8:19). The sense here is, that Jerusalem, that had been accustomed to pride itself on its strength I would be greatly humbled and subdued. Its loud and lofty tone would be changed. It would use the suppressed language of fear and alarm as if it spoke from the dust, or in a shrill small voice, like the pretended conversers with the dead.

And thy speech shall whisper out of the dust - Margin, 'Peep,' or 'Chirp,' (see the note at Isaiah 8:19).

5

Isaiah 29:5

開啟正文

然而——Isaiah 29:5、29:7-8 對西拿基立大軍的傾覆作了美妙的描述。他們雖已定下正規圍城的計劃;這城本身雖無力抵擋他們,城內一片驚惶、自覺無能;但轉眼之間,圍困必解,亞述進逼的大軍必蕩然無存。

你仇敵的群眾——指將圍困你的外邦群眾;稱為「你的仇敵(陌生人)」,是因他們圍困、欺壓你。「陌生人」在此如別處一樣,意指「外人」(見 Isaiah 1:7 的註釋;試比較 Isaiah 2:6;5:17;14:1;25:2、25:5;29:5;60:10)。

卻要像細塵——指輕細的塵埃,風一吹便消散。

強暴人的群眾——指令人聞風喪膽的入侵圍城大軍。

也要像飛糠——(見 Isaiah 17:13 的註釋)。以風前飛糠比喻仇敵猝然徹底的潰敗,是聖經常見的形象(見 Job 21:18;Psalm 1:4;35:5;Hosea 13:3)。

這必在頃刻之間忽然臨到——西拿基立的大軍在一夜之間被耶和華的使者殲滅(Isaiah 37:36;見 Isaiah 10:12、10:28-34 的註釋),耶路撒冷的圍困自然隨即解除。

英文原文

Moreover - These verses Isaiah 29:5, Isaiah 29:7-8 contain a beautiful description of the destruction of the army of Sennacherib. Though they had laid the plan of a regular siege; though the city, in itself, would not be able to hold out against them, and all was alarm and conscious imbecility within; yet in an instant the siege would be raised, and the advancing hosts of the Assyrians would all be gone.

The multitude of thy strangers - The multitude of the strangers that shall besiege thee; called 'thy strangers,' because they besieged, or oppressed thee. The word 'strangers' here, as elsewhere, means "foreigners" (see the note at Isaiah 1:7; compare Isaiah 2:6; Isaiah 5:17; Isaiah 14:1; Isaiah 25:2, Isaiah 25:5; Isaiah 29:5; Isaiah 60:10).

Shall be like small dust - Light, fine dust that is easily dissipated by the wind.

Of the terrible ones - Of the invading, besieging army, that is so much the object of dread.

As chaff that passeth away - (see the note at Isaiah 17:13). This image of chaff driven before the wind, to denote the sudden and entire discomfiture of enemies, is common in the Scriptures (see Job 21:18; Psalm 1:4; Psalm 35:5; Hosea 13:13).

Yea, it shall be at an instant suddenly - The forces of Sennacherib were destroyed in a single night by the angel of the Lord (Isaiah 37:36; the note at Isaiah 10:12, Isaiah 10:28-34, note), and the siege of Jerusalem was of course immediately raised.

6

Isaiah 29:6

開啟正文

你必受罰——這是對亞述強大軍隊說的話。以賽亞的著作中這種轉換並不罕見。他在異象中似已看見西拿基立的大軍及其猝然的潰散毀滅(Isaiah 29:5);隨即以突兀而不失自然的轉換,轉而向這軍隊本身說話,宣告它必受罰(試比較 Isaiah 30:30)。

用雷轟——亞述的軍隊是被神差來的使者殲滅的(Isaiah 37:36)。這裏所提的一切媒介,雖未在史載中特別指明,卻「可能」都用於亞述大軍的毀滅。但本節未必必須如此理解。雷轟、地震、閃電的形象,是把以任何方式突如其來的可畏審判作生動的描繪。其意是:他們必因神直接的臨到而猝然滅亡(見 Isaiah 9:5;26:11)。

並吞滅的火焰——指彷彿「吞噬」、猝然燒盡的閃電。

英文原文

Thou shalt be visited - This is an address to the mighty army of the Assyrian. Such transitions are not uncommon in the writings of Isaiah. His eye seems to have been directed in vision to the hosts of Sennacherib, and to their sudden dispersion and destruction Isaiah 29:5, and by a sudden, but not unnatural transition, he turns and addresses the army itself, with the assurance that it should be punished (compare Isaiah 30:30).

With thunder ... - The army of the Assyrian was cut off by an angel sent forth from God Isaiah 37:36. It is "possible" that all the agents here referred to may have been employed in the destruction of the Assyrian host, though they are not particularly specified in the history. But it is not absolutely. necessary to understand this verse in this manner. The image of thunder, earthquakes, and lightning, is an impressive representation of sudden and awful judgment in any manner. The sense is, that they should be suddenly destroyed by the direct visitation of God (see Isaiah 9:5; Isaiah 26:11).

And the flame of devouring fire - Lightning, that seems to "devour," or that suddenly consumes.

7

Isaiah 29:7

開啟正文

「攻擊亞利伊勒列國的群眾」——即亞述人和與他們結盟的軍隊。

「他的保障」——即他的堡壘、營壘、堅固之地(2 Samuel 5:7;Ecclesiastes 9:14;Ezekiel 19:9)。

「必如夢景,如夜間的異象」——在夢中,我們所思想的事物看來如在醒時一樣真實,因此夢被稱為異象、夜間的異象(Genesis 46:2;Job 4:13;Job 7:14;Daniel 2:28;Daniel 4:5;Daniel 7:1, Daniel 7:7, Daniel 7:13, Daniel 7:15)。這裏的具體意思,不是夢中事物顯現又消失的那種「突然性」,而是 Isaiah 29:8 所描述的情形:有人夢見吃喝,醒來卻仍飢餓乾渴。亞述也必如此。他一心想得耶路撒冷的財富。他熱切渴望佔有那城——如同飢餓的人渴望滿足食慾一樣。但這必如夜間的異象;在他從美夢中醒來的那致命早晨(Isaiah 37:36),他必發現自己一切的指望化為烏有,心中久所渴想的仍然不得滿足。

英文原文

And the multitude of all the nations - The Assyrians, and their allied hosts.

And her munition - Her fortresses, castles, places of strength 2 Samuel 5:7; Ecclesiastes 9:14; Ezekiel 19:9.

Shall be as a dream of a night vision - In a dream we seem to see the objects of which we think as really as when awake, and hence, they are called visions, and visions of the night Genesis 46:2; Job 4:13; Job 7:14; Daniel 2:28; Daniel 4:5; Daniel 7:1, Daniel 7:7, Daniel 7:13, Daniel 7:15. The specific idea here is not that of the "suddenness" with which objects seen in a dream appear and then vanish, but it is that which occurs in Isaiah 29:8, of one who dreams of eating and drinking, but who awakes, and is hungry and thirsty still. So it was with the Assyrian. He had set his heart on the wealth of Jerusalem. He had earnestly desired to possess that city - as a hungry man desires to satisfy the cravings of his appetite. But it would be like the vision of the night; and on that fatal morning on which he should awake from his fond dream Isaiah 37:36, he would find all his hopes dissipated, and the longcherished desire of his soul unsatisfied still.

8

Isaiah 29:8

開啟正文

「甚至如此」——這是一個極其生動的比喻,描繪亞述人渴望佔據耶路撒冷城的熱切,以及他徹底的失望。這比較優雅動人至極,運用得爐火純青,完美地說明了眼前的主旨。古典作家中實質上也有同樣的形象。Lowth 說,就美致與巧思而論,這段足以與維吉爾(Virgil)最優雅的段落之一(由荷馬《伊利亞特》"Iliad" xxii. 119 大加發揮而來)相媲美;維吉爾把夢中想象徒然運作的同一形象用在別的用處上,卻不及以賽亞這樣成功:

Ac veluti in somnis oculos ubi languida pressit

Nocte quies, nequicquam avidos extendere cursus

Velle videmur, et in mediis conatibus aegri

Succidimus; non lingua valet, non corpore notae

Sufficiunt vires; nec, vox, nec verba scquuniur.

《埃涅阿斯記》xii. 908。

睡眼方被闔上之時,

病中狂亂的幻想在夜裏勞碌,

我們逃避某個可怕如幻的仇敵,

邁着虛空的步伐,卻徒然想奔跑;

無力的肢體枉然施展力量,

我們昏倒、掙扎、下沉、跌倒;

力氣耗盡,既不能戰,也不能逃,

掙扎的話音在舌上消逝。

皮特(Pitt)。

又見 Lucretius(iv. 10-19),他也表達了與以賽亞相同的形象。先知的比喻既取自自然,引一段描述這類境況實際發生的記錄,當會令人快慰。Park 說:「布巴克這裏的水荒比貝農更甚。井旁晝夜擠滿了牛群,哞哞哀鳴,彼此爭鬥着要擠到水槽前。極度的乾渴使許多牲畜狂躁起來;另一些太弱、無力爭水的,便設法吞吃井旁溝裏的黑泥解渴;雖然這通常使它們喪命,它們卻吃得極其貪婪。全營的人都感受到這嚴重的水荒,而沒有人比我更甚。我向隨營的黑奴討水,卻少有所獲;雖然我不放過任何機會,懇切地向摩爾人和黑人求討,所得仍然微薄,常常像坦塔羅斯(Tantalus)一樣度過長夜。我一閤眼,幻想便把我帶到故鄉的溪流江河那裏;我在青蔥的岸邊徘徊,欣喜地凝望清澈的水流,急忙要吞下那可暢懷的甘飲;可是唉!失望使我驚醒,我發現自己竟是孤獨的俘虜,在非洲的荒野中因乾渴而瀕死。」(《非洲遊記》"Travels in Africa")。

英文原文

It shall even be ... - This is a most striking figure representing the earnest desire of the Assyrian to possess the city of Jerusalem, and his utter disappointment. The comparison is elegant and beautiful in the highest degree. It is performed up to great perfection; and is perfectly suited to illustrate the object in view. The same image substantially is found in the classic writers; and this, says Lowth, may, for beauty and ingenuity, fairly come in competition with one of the most elegant of Virgil (greatly improved from Homer, "Iliad" xxii. 119), where he has applied to a different purpose, but not so happily, the same image of the ineffectual workings of the imagination in a dream:

Ac veluti in somnis oculos ubi languida pressit

Nocte quies, nequicquam avidos extendere cursus

Velle videmur, et in mediis conatibus aegri

Succidimus; non lingua valet, non corpore notae

Sufficiunt vires; nec, vox, nec verba scquuniur.

AEniad xii. 908.

And as when slumber seals the closing sight,

The sick wild fancy labors in the night,

Some dreadful visionary foe we shun,

With airy strides, but strive in vain to run;

In vain our baffled limbs their powers essay,

We faint, we struggle, sink, and fall away;

Drained of our strength we neither fight nor fly,

And on the tongue the struggling accents die.

Pitt.

See also Lucretius (iv. 10-19), who also expresses the same image as Isaiah. As the simile of the prophet is drawn from nature, an extract which describes the actual occurrence of such a circumstance will be agreeable. 'The scarcity of water,' says Park, 'was greater here at Bubaker than at Benown. Day and night the wells were crowded with cattle lowing, and fighting with each other to come at the trough. Excessive thirst made many of them furious; others being too weak to contend for the water, endeavored to quench their thirst by devouring the black mud from the gutters near the wells; which they did with great avidity, though it was commonly fatal to them. This great scarcity of water was felt by all the people of the camp; and by none more than myself. I begged water from the negro slaves that attended the camp, but with very indifferent success, for though I let no opportunity slip, and was very urgent in my solicitations both to the Moors and to the negroes, I was but ill supplied, and frequently passed the night in the situation of Tantalus. No sooner had I shut my eyes, than fancy would convey me to the streams and rivera of my native land; there, as I wandered along the verdant bank, I surveyed the clear stream with transport, and hastened to swallow the delightful draught; but alas! disappointment awakened me, and I found myself a lonely captive, perishing of thirst amid the wilds of Africa.' ("Travels in Africa").

9

Isaiah 29:9

開啟正文

「你們等候驚奇吧」——到此為止,先知描述了西拿基立圍攻耶路撒冷及其突然傾覆。如今他轉向猶大人,責備他們的愚昧、形式主義與虛偽;本章其餘的部分,陳述這些罪的盛行、隨之必來的審判,以及日後仍將有廣泛的改革並歸向耶和華的事實。譯作「等候」的(התמהמהוּ hı̂temahemehû)一詞,本義是「逗留」、停留、遲延(Genesis 19:16; Genesis 43:10; 2 Samuel 15:28)。這裏它似乎指一種「凝立於詫異之中」的心境——人停下來,瞪視某件奇異而意外的事。先知認為會引起詫異的對象,乃是這樣特別蒙恩之民的愚昧、遲鈍與虛偽(參較 Habakkuk 1:5)。

「你們宴樂昏迷吧」——原文在此有一種無法在翻譯中傳達的雙關語。所用的詞(השׁתעשׁעוּ hı̂sheta‛ashe‛û)是動詞 שׁעע(shâ‛a‛)的一種形式;這動詞通常意為使平滑、摩擦、鋪覆;故在此所用的 Hithpael 形式中,意為被鋪覆;因此應用於眼睛(Isaiah 6:10),表示失明,彷彿眼睛被某物遮蔽而不能看見。這裏它的意思大概是「你們眼目昏花而失明吧」,即你們詫異,如本節前半所說。這觀念似乎是指某種突然而令人驚愕的對象,使視線昏暗,奪去一切視能。這詞在 Isaiah 32:3 中也以同義使用;參較 Isaiah 35:5; Isaiah 42:19。這裏的意思或許可以用「瞪視」一詞恰當表達:「瞪着眼,帶着遲鈍的驚愕觀看」——描寫人對某奇特意外景象感到錯愕的姿態與狀態。

「他們醉了,卻非因酒」——指耶路撒冷的居民。他們搖晃踉蹌,原因卻不在於他們醉酒。這乃是道德與屬靈層面的沉醉與搖晃。他們在教義與行事上都偏謬;他們的光景如同醉漢——看甚麼都不清晰正確,行走也不平穩。他們歪曲了一切教義,在對神和祂真理的認識上錯謬,行為放縱敗壞。

英文原文

Stay yourselves - Thus far the prophet had given a description of the siege of Jerusalem by Sennacherib, and of his sudden overthrow. He now turns to the Jews, and reproves their stupidity, formality, and hypocrisy; and the remainder of the chapter is occupied with a statement of the prevalence of these sins, of the judgments that must follow, and of the fact that there should yet be an extensive reformation, and turning to the Lord. The word rendered 'stay yourselves' (התמהמהוּ hı̂temahemehû) means properly "to linger," tarry, delay Genesis 19:16; Genesis 43:10; 2 Samuel 15:28. Here it seems to denote that state of mind in which anyone is "fixed in astonishment;" in which one stops, and stares at some strange and unexpected occurrence. The object of amazement which the prophet supposes would excite astonishment, was the stupidity, dulness, and hypocrisy of a people who had been so signally favored (compare Habakkuk 1:5).

Cry ye out, and cry - There is in the original here a paronomasia which cannot be conveyed in a translation. The word which is used (השׁתעשׁעוּ hı̂sheta‛ashe‛û) is one form of the verb שׁעע shâ‛a‛, which means, usually, to make smooth, rub, spread over; hence, in the Hithpael form which is used here, to be spread over; and hence, is applied to the eyes Isaiah 6:10, to denote blindness, as if they were overspread with something by reason of which they could not see. Here it probably means, 'be ye dazzled and blinded,' that is, ye be astonished, as in the former part of the verse. The idea seems to be that of some object of sudden astonishment that dims the sights and takes away all the powers of vision. The word is used in the same sense in Isaiah 32:3; compare Isaiah 35:5; Isaiah 42:19. Probably the idea here would be well expressed by our word "stare," 'stare and look with a stupid surprise;' denoting the attitude and condition of a man who is amazed at some remarkable and unlooked for spectacle.

They are drunken, but not with wine - The people of Jerusalem. They reel and stagger, but the cause is not that they are drunken with wine. It is a moral and spiritual intoxication and reeling. They err in their doctrines and practice; and it is with them as it is with a drunken man that sees nothing clearly or correctly, and cannot walk steadily. They have perverted all doctrines; they err in their views of God and his truth, and they are irregular and corrupt in their conduct.

10

Isaiah 29:10

開啟正文

「耶和華將沉睡的靈澆灌你們」——譯作「澆灌」的字(נסך nâsak)通常指在敬拜中澆奠祭或奠酒的舉動(Exodus 30:9;Hosea 9:4;Isaiah 30:1)。這裏的意思是:耶和華彷彿以昏迷的靈「浸透他們」(七十士譯本作 πεπότικε pepotike)。這事歸於神,是按聖經一貫的慣例——在一切事件中都承認他護理的作為(見 Isaiah 6:9-10 的註釋)。並比較 Romans 11:8 的註釋;那裏從七十士譯本引這節,應用於使徒保羅時代的猶太人。

「沉睡的靈」——譯作「沉睡」的字,與 Genesis 2:21 用於神使亞當沉睡的字相同;也與 Genesis 15:12 用於亞伯拉罕沉睡、有大黑暗的恐懼落在他身上時的字相同;也與 1 Samuel 26:12 用於大衛走近、從掃羅枕旁拿走槍和水瓶時、落在掃羅身上之沉睡的字相同。這裏指屬靈的怠惰、遲鈍和不活動,在宗教的事上普遍瀰漫於百姓中間。

「先見」——即見異象的人,是先知的別名(見 Isaiah 1:1 的註釋)。

「蒙蓋你們的頭」——即他蒙閉了他們的眼;他們全都瞎了。

英文原文

For the Lord hath poured out upon you - The word rendered 'hath poured out' (נסך nâsak) is usually referred to the act of pouring out a libation, or drink-offering in worship Exodus 30:9; Hosea 9:4; Isaiah 30:1. Here it means that Yahweh had, as it were, "drenched them" (Septuagint, πεπότικε pepotike) with a spirit of stupefaction. This is traced to God in accordance with the usual custom in the Bible, by which his providential agency is recognized in all events (see the notes at Isaiah 6:9-10). Compare the notes at Romans 11:8), where this passage is quoted from the Septuagint, and is applied to the Jews in the time of the apostle Paul.

The spirit of deep, sleep - The word rendered 'deep sleep,' is the same as is used in Genesis 2:21, to denote the sleep that God brought on Adam; and in Genesis 15:12, to denote the deep sleep that fell on Abraham, and when a horror of great darkness fell upon him; and in 1 Samuel 26:12, to denote the deep sleep that came upon Saul when David approached and took away the spear and the cruise of water from his bolster. Here it means spiritual sluggishness, inactivity, stupidity, that prevailed everywhere among the people in regard to the things of religion.

The seers - Those that see visions, another name for the prophets (see the note at Isaiah 1:1).

Hath he covered - That is, he has covered their eyes; or they are all blind.

11

Isaiah 29:11

開啟正文

「所有的默示」——即眾先知的一切默示;就是神向你們所作的一切啟示(見 Isaiah 1:1 的註釋)。先知不僅指自己的傳講,也指他同時代的人和一切在他以前之人的傳講。其意是:他們雖有神賜給他們的啟示,卻不明白;他們對其真義的無知,如同識字的人對封緘書信的內容、或不識字的人對遞到他手中之書的內容一樣。

「書卷的話」——邊註作「書信」。ספר sêpher 一字兩者皆可指。它本指任何「寫成」之物(Deuteronomy 24:1, 3;Jeremiah 32:11;Daniel 1:4),但通常用於書(Exodus 17:14;Joshua 1:8;Joshua 8:34;Psalm 40:8)。

「封住的」——(見 Isaiah 8:16 的註釋。)

英文原文

And the vision of all - The vision of all the prophets; that is, all the revelations which God has made to you (see the note at Isaiah 1:1). The prophet refers not only to his own communications, but to those of his contemporaries, and of all who had gone before him. The sense is, that although they had the communications which God had made to them, yet they did not understand them. They were as ignorant of their true nature as a man who can read is of the contents of a letter that is sealed up, or as a man who cannot read is of the contents of a book that is handed to him.

As the words of a book - Margin, 'Letter.' The word ספר sêpher may mean either. It properly means anything which is "written" (Deuteronomy 24:1, Deuteronomy 24:3; Jeremiah 32:11; Daniel 1:4), but is commonly applied to a book Exodus 17:14; Joshua 1:8; Joshua 8:34; Psalm 40:8.

That is sealed - (see the note at Isaiah 8:16).

12

Isaiah 29:12

開啟正文

「又將書卷交給不識字的人……」——意思是:他們對神啟示的真性質與真意義,正像一個完全不識字的人對一本書的內容一樣,一無所知。

英文原文

And the book is delivered ... - That is, they are just as ignorant of the true nature and meaning of the revelations of God as a man is of the contents of a book who is utterly unable to read.

13

Isaiah 29:13

開啟正文

主說——這一節和下一節,是要對他們徒具形式的敬拜宣告神的審判。他們維持著宗教的外形,心裡的感情卻離開了神;因此,祂說要對他們施行足為鑒戒、又理所當然的刑罰。

這百姓親近我——即在聖殿裡,在外表敬拜的形式中親近我。

用嘴唇尊敬我——他們口裡稱頌我,在敬拜的形式中承認我。

心卻遠離我——他們沒有把心裡的感情獻上。

他們敬畏我——敬拜神常以「敬畏」來表達(Job 28:28; Psalm 19:9; Psalm 34:11; Proverbs 1:7)。

不過是領受人的吩咐——即他們的觀念不是出於聖經,而是出於人的道理。我們的救主曾引用這段經文,應用於祂那時代的偽善者(Matthew 15:8-9)。其中後半部分不是按希伯來文或七十士譯本逐字引用,但保留了原意:「他們將人的吩咐當作道理教導人,所以拜我也是枉然。」祂引用它,是因它生動地描寫了祂當時的百姓,而不是說以賽亞直接指向祂的時代。

英文原文

Wherefore the Lord said - This verse, with the following, is designed to denounce the divine judgment on their formality of worship. They kept up the forms of religion, but they witcheld the affections of their hearts from God; and he, therefore, says that he will proceed to inflict on them exemplary and deserved punishment.

This people draw near me - That is, in the temple, and in the forms of external devotion.

And with their lips do honor me - They professedly celebrate my praise, and acknowledge me in the forms of devotion.

But have removed their heart - Have witcheld the affections of their hearts.

And their fear toward me - The worship of God is often represented as "fear" Job 28:28; Psalm 19:9; Psalm 34:11; Proverbs 1:7.

Is taught by the precept of men - That is, their views, instead of having been derived from the Scriptures, were drawn from the doctrines of mankind. Our Saviour referred to this passage, and applied it to the hypocrites of his own time Matthew 15:8-9. The latter part of it is, however, not quoted literally from the Hebrew, nor from the Septuagint, but retains the sense: 'But in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.' He quoted it as strikingly descriptive of the people when he lived, not as saying that Isaiah referred directly to his times.

14

Isaiah 29:14

開啟正文

我必再行事 —— 希伯來文作「我必再加上行」,意即:我必實在行出這事。

智慧人的智慧必然消滅 —— 意即:我必降災於他們,這災必挫敗他們智慧人的一切技巧與智慧。

必然隱藏 —— 意即不再顯露,必歸消失;他們的智慧不足以攔阻那將臨到這民的災禍。

英文原文

I will proceed to do - Hebrew, 'I will add to do;' that is, I will do it.

For the wisdom of their wise men shall perish - I will bring calamity upon them which shall baffle all the skill and wisdom of their wise men.

Shall be hid - That is, shall not appear; shall vanish. It shall not be sufficient to prevent the calamities that shall come upon the nation.

15

Isaiah 29:15

開啟正文

禍哉!那些向耶和華深藏謀略的——即那些企圖以貌似合理的外表和端正的外在行為,掩飾其「真實」意圖的人。這最貼切地描繪了偽善者的品格:他企圖把自己的計謀和目的向人的眼目和神的眼目隱藏。他外表的行為無可指摘;他對宗教義務的遵守堪作榜樣;他對恩典之道與敬拜神的聚會按時參與;他的信仰表白響亮而恆常——但這一切的設計,都是為了「掩蓋」他真實的心思,並藉此成就某種隱祕而邪惡的目的。

從耶和華——這證明偽善者的企圖並不總是欺騙同胞,他甚至也想欺騙神。

英文原文

Woe unto them that seek deep ... - That is, who attempt to conceal their "real" intentions under a plausible exterior, and correct outward deportment. This is most strikingly descriptive of the character of a hypocrite who seeks to conceal his plans and his purposes from the eyes of people and of God. His external conduct is fair; his observance of the duties of religion exemplary; his attendance on the means of grace and the worship of God regular; his professions loud and constant, but the whole design is to "conceal" his real sentiments, and to accomplish some sinister and wicked purpose by it.

From the Lord - This proves that the design of the hypocrite is not always to attempt to deceive his fellowmen, but that he also aims to deceive God.

16

Isaiah 29:16

開啟正文

「你們把事顛倒了」—— 即你們對一切事物的敗壞。他們對真理沒有正確的見解。他們以為單憑形式便已足夠。他們甚至企圖向耶和華隱藏自己的計謀;這民族在見解和行為上的一切都已敗壞錯謬。這短語的譯法向來眾說紛紜。路德譯作「你們何等悖逆」。洛斯譯作:

「你們何等悖逆!窯匠豈可被看作如泥一樣?」

羅森米勒也贊同這解釋,譯作「你們的悖逆啊」等。這段經文的意思似乎是這樣:「你們『顛倒事物』,正如受造之物對造它的說『你為何這樣造我』一樣荒謬。你們挑剔神的治理,正如泥抱怨窯匠手藝不精一樣荒謬。你們抱怨神的律法,卻照人的吩咐敬拜他。你們抱怨他的要求,向他獻上口和嘴唇的事奉,卻把心扣留住。你們以為神看不見你們,就在黑暗中行你們的事。這一切都假定神沒有智慧、看不見所行的事,這正如泥抱怨捏造它的窯匠沒有聰明一樣荒謬。」

「豈可看窯匠如泥嗎」—— 這段經文的「字面」翻譯是:「你們的悖逆,就像把窯匠看作與泥同等」;即彷彿他並不比泥本身更有資格塑造任何東西。

「被造的物豈可論造物的」—— 這段經文被使徒保羅引用(Romans 9:20-21),以表明神有權照他眼中看為好的對待他的受造之物,並表明人抱怨他隨己意揀選人得生命的分別恩慈是不當的。這段經文的意思是:受造之物抱怨造它的沒有智力、無權把它造成這樣,乃是荒謬的。陶器抱怨窯匠彷彿他沒有手藝,是荒謬的;人抱怨神、或視神為沒有智慧,也同樣荒謬。

英文原文

Surely your turning of things upside down - Your perversion of all things. They had no just views of truth. They deemed mere formality to be all that was required. They attempted to conceal their plans even from Yahweh; and everything in the opinions and practice of the nation had become perverted and erroneous. There has been much diversity in rendering this phrase. Luther renders it, 'O how perverse ye are.' Lowth renders it,

'Perverse as ye are! shall the potter be esteemed as the clay?'

Rosenmuller also accords with this interpretation, and renders it, 'O your perversity,' etc. The sense of the passage seems to be this: 'Your "changing of things" is just as absurd as it would be for the thing formed to say to him that formed it, why hast thou made me thus? It is as absurd for you to find fault with the government of God as it would be for the clay to complain of want of skill in the potter. You complain of God's laws, and worship Him according to the commandments of people. You complain of his requirements, and offer to him the service of the mouth and the lip, and witchold the heart. You suppose that God does not see you, and do your deeds in darkness. All this supposes that God is destitute of wisdom, and cannot see what is done, and it is just as absurd as it would be in the clay to complain that the potter who fashions it has no understanding.'

Shall be esteemed ... - The "literal" translation of this passage would be, 'Your perverseness is as if the potter should be esteemed as the clay;' that is, as if he was no more qualified to form anything than the clay itself.

For shall the work ... - This passage is quoted by the apostle Paul Romans 9:20-21 to show the right which God has to do with his creatures as shall seem good in his sight, and the impropriety of complaining of his distinguishing mercy in choosing to life those whom he pleases. The sense of the passage is, that it would be absurd for that which is made to complain of the maker as having no intelligence, and no right to make it as he does. It would be absurd in the piece of pottery to complain of the potter as if he had no skill; and it is equally absurd in a man to complain of God, or to regard him as destitute of wisdom.

17

Isaiah 29:17

開啟正文

「不是只有一點點時候嗎?」——這裏的思想是:「你們在耶路撒冷大大顛倒了是非。時候將到,必另有『一番』傾覆——惡人必被剪除,必有如此重大的審判傾倒在國民身上,以致聾子必聽見,瞎子必看見,心中迷誤的必得以明白」(Isaiah 29:18-24)。

「利巴嫩變為肥田」——這顯然是一句諺語式的說法,表示任何巨大的變革。由於「肥田」在此與它相對使用,以賽亞的時代利巴嫩整條山脈大概都未經耕種(見 Isaiah 2:13 註釋)。譯作「肥田」的 כרמל karmel 一詞,本義是「肥沃的田」,或一片精耕細作的地區(見 Isaiah 10:18)。它也用指地中海上一座著名的山或海岬,位於亞設支派南界。它沿耶斯列平原西北延伸,盡頭成一海岬,形成亞柯灣。那山(海岬)高約一千五百呎,洞穴眾多,曾因是先知以利亞和以利沙的居所而聞名(見 1 Kings 18:19;1 Kings 18:42;2 Kings 2:25;2 Kings 4:25;2 Kings 19:23;比較 Isaiah 35:2 註釋)。據說山的西側有一千多個洞穴,從前有修士居住其中。但這裏的用詞,毫無疑問當照我們的譯本,指一片精耕的地區。如今荒涼不耕的利巴嫩,必快成為肥沃多產的田。意即:猶太人中必發生巨大的改變,大到如同利巴嫩變成果樹、葡萄與莊稼豐盛的廣大耕作區域一般。其思想是:「這民如今悖逆、罪惡、徒有形式而虛偽。但改變的時候必到。惡人必受改正;敬虔的人數必加增;對神純正的敬拜必接續這普遍的形式主義與虛偽。」先知沒有說這事何時發生;他只斷言那必在「不多時」之內——或許可以指被擄之後的時期(比較 Isaiah 32:15;Isaiah 35:1-10;Isaiah 1:6)。

「肥田看如樹林」——意即國中必有大改變,如同精耕的田被棄置,長成樹林一般。這或許是說:當時看似繁榮的必被傾覆,那地變為荒涼。那些表面昌盛的人必降卑受罰。這變革的結果記在以下數節。

英文原文

Is it not yet a very little while - The idea here is, 'you have greatly perverted things in Jerusalem. The time is at hand when there shall be "other" overturnings - when the wicked shall be cut off, and when there shall be poured out upon the nation such judgments that the deaf shall hear, and the blind see, and when those who have erred in spirit shall come to understanding' Isaiah 29:18-24.

And Lebanon shall be tutored into a fruitful field - This is evidently a proverbial expression, denoting any great revolution of things. It is probable that in the times of Isaiah the whole chain of Lebanon was uncultivated, as the word is evidently used here in opposition to a fruitful field (see the note at Isaiah 2:13). The word which is rendered 'fruitful field' (כרמל karmel) properly denotes "a fruitful field," or a finely cultivated country (see Isaiah 10:18). It is also applied to a celebrated mountain or promontory on the Mediterranean Sea, on the southern boundary of the tribe of Asher. It runs northwest of the plain of Esdraelon, and ends in a promontory or cape, and forms the bay of Acco. The mountain or promontory is about 1500 feet high; and abounds in caves or grottoes, and was celebrated as being the residence of the prophets Elijah and Elisha (see 1 Kings 18:19, 1 Kings 18:42; 2 Kings 2:25; 2 Kings 4:25; 2 Kings 19:23; compare the note at Isaiah 35:2). More than a thousand caves are said to exist on the west side of the mountain, which it is said were formerly inhabited by monks. But the word here is to be taken, doubtless, as it is in our translation, as denoting a well-cultivated country. Lebanon, that is now barren and uncultivated, shall soon become a fertile and productive field. That is, there shall be changes among the Jews that shall be as great as if Lebanon should become an extensively cultivated region, abounding in fruits, and vines, and harvests. The idea is this: 'The nation is now perverse, sinful, formal, and hypocritical. But the time of change shall come. The wicked shall be reformed; the number of the pious shall be increased; and the pure worship of God shall succeed this general formality and hypocrisy. The prophet does not say when this would be. He simply affirms that it would be before "a great while" - and it may, perhaps, be referred to the times succeeding the captivity (compare Isaiah 32:15; Isaiah 35:1-10; Isaiah 1:6).

And the fruitful field be esteemed as a forest - That is, there shall be great changes in the nation, as if a well-cultivated field should be allowed to lie waste, and grow up into a forest. Perhaps it means that that which was then apparently flourishing would be overthrown, and the land lie waste. Those who were apparently in prosperity, would be humbled and punished. The effect of this revolution is stated in the following verses.

18

Isaiah 29:18

開啟正文

「聾子必聽見這書上的話」——那些如今擁有律法卻不明白的人,那些對神所說的一切似乎充耳不聞的人,必聽見並明白這書上的話。

「看出黑暗中的……」——即黑暗既被除去,他們必清楚看見神的真理,辨識並愛慕其美。他們的眼睛如今瞎了,但那時必看得清楚。

英文原文

Shall the deaf hear the words of the book - They who now have the law and do not understand it, the people who seem to be deaf to all that God says, shall hear and understand it.

Shall see out of obscurity ... - That is, the darkness being removed, they shall see clearly the truth of God, and discern and love its beauty. Their eyes are now blinded, but then they shall see clearly.

19

Isaiah 29:19

開啟正文

「謙卑人」——「謙卑」一詞通常指忍受傷害時忍耐的人;但這裏所用的希伯來詞(ענוים ‛ănâviym)本指受壓的、受苦的、不幸的人(Psalm 9:13;Psalm 10:12、Psalm 10:17;Proverbs 3:34;Isaiah 11:4)。它通常包含謙卑或「有美德之受苦」的觀念(比較 Psalm 25:9;Psalm 37:11;Psalm 69:33)。這裏可指那地上受壓制、遭患難的敬虔人。

「必增加」——旁註按希伯來文作「增添」。意思是:他們必因耶和華大大喜樂。他們必看見祂預言應驗的證據;必看見欺壓者受罰(Isaiah 29:20-21),並耶和華出來作他們的保護者和辯護者(Isaiah 29:22-24)。

「人間的貧窮人」——即貧窮的人,或窮乏的人。無疑是指敬虔的窮人:那些敬畏神、飽受壓迫與貧窮試煉的人。

英文原文

The meek - The word 'meek' usually refers to those who are patient in the reception of injuries, but the Hebrew word used here (ענוים ‛ănâviym) means properly the oppressed, the afflicted, the unhappy Psalm 9:13; Psalm 10:12, Psalm 10:17; Proverbs 3:34; Isaiah 11:4. It involves usually the idea of humility or "virtuous suffering" (compare Psalm 25:9; Psalm 37:11; Psalm 69:33). Here it may denote the pious of the land who were oppressed, and subjected to trials.

Shall increase - Margin, as in Hebrew, 'Add.' It means, that they should greatly rejoice in the Lord. They should see the evidence of the fulfillment of his predictions; they should see the oppressors punished Isaiah 29:20-21, and Yahweh coming forth to be their protector and defender Isaiah 29:22-24.

And the poor among men - The poor people; or the needy. Doubtless the idea is that of the pious poor; those who feared God, and who had been subjected to the trials of oppression and poverty.

20

Isaiah 29:20

開啟正文

強暴的人——兇暴之徒(עריץ ‛ârı̂yts),即曾向他們施行殘虐的壓迫者。據我推想,這是指猶太人自己中間的驕傲人,就是那些身居權位、卻濫用權柄欺壓貧窮困苦人的人。

褻慢的人——(見 Isaiah 28:14, Isaiah 28:22)。

必歸無有——意即必全然被除滅。

一切尋找機會作孽的——就是急切伺機行不義的人。

英文原文

For the terrible one - The violent one (עריץ ‛ârı̂yts), the oppressor, who had exercised cruelty over them. This, I suppose, refers to the haughty among the Jews themselves; to those who held offices of power, and who abused them to oppress the poor and needy.

And the scorner - (see Isaiah 28:14, Isaiah 28:22).

Is consumed - Shall be entirely destroyed.

And all that watch for iniquity - That is, who anxiously seek for opportunities to commit iniquity.

21

Isaiah 29:21

開啟正文

那使人成為罪犯的——按字面作「使人犯罪」(מחטיאי machăṭı̂y'ēy);即視人為有罪、視之為罪犯。羅特(Lowth)的譯法相當特別:「使窮人在言語上迷惑。」格勞秀斯(Grotius)認為它的意思是:「因神的言語——即真預言——而視人為有罪。」加爾文(Calvin)認為它的意思是:「不能忍受先知的責備和宣告,並竭力曲解、歪曲他們的意思」;因此他推想,他們提出巧妙刁鑽的問題,為要陷害先知。另有人認為這是指他們以新道理和錯謬的見解引人陷入罪中。然而,上下文似乎要求把這話理解為司法的審理;諾伊斯(Noyes)的譯法大概正確地表達了這個意思:「在爭訟上定窮人為有罪。」這也是羅森米勒(Rosenmuller)和格塞尼烏斯(Gesenius)所提出的解釋。按上述解釋,譯作「使人成為罪犯」的字,意思等同於「視人為有罪」,即定罪。

人——(אדם 'âdâm)。眾所周知,這字與 אישׁ 'ı̂ysh 相對,通常指窮人、地位卑微的人,與富人或階層較高的人相對。這大概就是此處的意思;意即他們定窮人的罪;也就是說,他們的審判有偏私。

為一句話——(בדבר bedâbâr)。「在」一句話上;指在法庭上受審的「一件事」。如 Exodus 18:16:「他們有『事』(דבר dâbâr,「話」)來見我。」又 Exodus 18:22:「凡難斷的『事』(希伯來文作凡大的『話』)要呈到我這裡。」又 Exodus 22:8(英文聖經作第 9 節):「凡是過犯」,希伯來文作「凡過犯的話」;即凡關乎背信的訴訟。又 Exodus 24:14:「誰有『爭訟的事』(希伯來文作『話』)」,即誰有訴訟。

並設下網羅——設網羅就是設計騙人的計謀,或把人置於自己的掌握之中,如同飛鳥因隱藏的網羅而被捉住。

責備人的——或更恰當地說,那「爭辯的」、「抗辯的」;即有訴訟的人。יכח yâkach 一字常指與人爭辯、力爭、設法駁倒;或如法庭上設法辯護或證明無罪(Job 13:15; Job 19:5; Job 16:21; Job 22:4);也用於在法律上裁決案件、宣判(Isaiah 11:3-4; Genesis 31:37; Job 9:33)。這裡指提起訴訟的人,或涉訟的人。

在城門口——城門是眾人聚集之處,通常是辦理事務的地方,法庭也通常設在那裡(Genesis 23:10, 23:18; Deuteronomy 17:5, 17:8; Deuteronomy 21:19; Deuteronomy 22:15; Deuteronomy 25:6-7; Ruth 4:1)。意思是:他們竭力歪曲公正,要把那有訴訟的人完全置於他們的權下,好在表面上秉公斷案的同時,利用他達到自己的目的。

屈枉義人——指有正當公義的訴訟理由的人。

用虛無的事——即空洞、虛妄的判決(בתהו batôhû),是當視為無效作廢的。

英文原文

That make a man an offender - literally, 'who cause a man to sin' (מחטיאי machăṭı̂y'ēy); that is, who hold a man to be guilty, or a criminal. Lowth renders this singularly enough:

'Who bewildered the poor man in speaking.'

Grotius supposes it means, 'Who on account of the word of God, that is, the true prophecy, treat men as guilty of crime.' Calvin supposes it means, 'Who bear with impatience the reproofs and denunciation of the prophets, and who endeavor to pervert and distort their meaning.' Hence, he supposes, they proposed artful and captious questions by which they might ensnare them. Others suppose that it refers to the fact that they led people into sin by their new doctrines and false views. The connection, however, seems to require that it should be understood of judicial proceedings, and the sense is probably correctly expressed by Noyes:

'Who condemned the poor man in his cause.'

This interpretation is also that which is proposed by Rosenmuller and Gesenius. According to the interpretation above suggested, the word rendered 'who make an offender,' means the same as who holds one guilty, that is, condemns.

A man - (אדם 'âdâm). It is well known that this word stands in contradistinction to אישׁ 'ı̂ysh, and denotes usually a poor man, a man in humble life, in opposition to one who is rich or of more elevated rank. This is probably the sense here, and the meaning is, that they condemned the poor man; that is, that they were partial in their judgments.

For a word - (בדבר bedâbâr). "In" a word; denoting the same as "a cause" that is tried before a court of justice. So Exodus 18:16 : 'When they have "a matter" (דבר dâbâr "a word"), they come unto me.' So Exodus 18:22 : 'And it shoji be that every great "matter" (Hebrew every great "word") that they shall bring unto me.' So Exodus 22:8 (in the English version 9): 'For all manner of trespass,' Hebrew for every word of trespass; that is, for every suit concerning a breach of trust. So also Exodus 24:14 : 'If any man have "any matters" to do,' (Hebrew, 'any "words, '") that is, if anyone has a law suit.

And lay a snare - To lay a snare is to devise a plan to deceive, or get into their possession; as birds are caught in snares that are concealed from their view.

That reproveth - Or rather, that "contended" or "pleaded;" that is, that had a cause. The word יכח yâkach means often to contend with any one; to strive; to seek to confute; to attempt to defend or justify, as in a court of law Job 13:15; Job 19:5; Job 16:21; Job 22:4. It is also applied to deciding a case in law, or pronouncing a decision Isaiah 11:3-4; Genesis 31:37; Job 9:33. Here it means one who has brought a suit, or who is engaged in a legal cause.

In the gate - Gates of cities being places of concourse, were usually resorted to for transacting business, and courts were usually held in them Genesis 23:10, Genesis 23:18; Deuteronomy 17:5, Deuteronomy 17:8; Deuteronomy 21:19; Deuteronomy 22:15; Deuteronomy 25:6-7; Ruth 4:1. The sense is, they endeavored to pervert justice, and to bring the man who had a cause before them, completely within their power, so that they might use him for their own purposes, at the same time that they seemed to be deciding the cause justly.

And turn aside the just - The man who has a just or righteous cause.

For a thing of nought - Or a decision which is empty, vain (בתהו batôhû), and which should be regarded as null and void,

22

Isaiah 29:22

開啟正文

「所以」——由於當欺壓者被除滅(以賽亞書29:20-21)、謙卑人復增喜樂(以賽亞書29:19)、無知者得蒙訓誨(以賽亞書29:18)之時,這國中將要發生的可喜改變,雅各必不再像從前那樣為他的後裔羞愧,也不再因他的子孫而臉紅。

「救贖亞伯拉罕的耶和華」——就是那位把他從拜偶像之地帶出來、救他脫離偶像可憎之事的。「救贖」一詞(פדה pâdâh)嚴格指付贖價贖回俘虜或囚犯(Exodus 13:13;Exodus 34:20)。但它也用作一般性的拯救之意,不涉及贖價,指以任何方式釋放、恢復(2 Samuel 4:9;1 Kings 1:29;Job 5:20;Psalm 71:23)。它在這裏正是取這一般性的意思;指耶和華曾救亞伯拉罕脫離偶像之惡,使他成為自己的朋友。上下文似乎也暗示,這裏提到了曾向亞伯拉罕所發、他必有多數後裔的應許(見以賽亞書29:23)。

「雅各必不再羞愧」——這是詩體的筆法,把雅各作為猶太人的先祖引入,彷彿這位可敬的先祖正觀看他的兒女。他們的行為素來足以使父親滿面羞慚;此後,在那將要發生的改革中,他必「不」再以他們為恥,反要以嘉許的眼光看他們。

「面容也不再變色」——面容通常因懼怕而變白;但它也可以因任何強烈的情緒而發白。失望也能如恐懼一般使面色慘白;這裏的意思或許是:雅各的面容必不再變得蒼白,「彷彿」他對眾子所懷的期望落了空一般。

英文原文

Therefore - In consequence of the happy change which shall take place in the nation when the oppressor shall be removed Isaiah 29:20-21, and when the poor and the meek shall rejoice Isaiah 29:19, and the ignorant shall be instructed Isaiah 29:18, Jacob shall not be ashamed of his descendants as he was before, nor have cause to blush in regard to his posterity.

Who redeemed Abraham - That is, who brought him out of a land of idolaters, and rescued him from the abominations of idolatry. The word 'redeem,' here (פדה pâdâh), properly denotes "to ransom, that is, to redeem a captive, or a prisoner with a price paid Exodus 13:13; Exodus 34:20. But it is also used as meaning to deliver in general, without reference to a price, to free in any manner, to recover 2 Samuel 4:9; 1 Kings 1:29; Job 5:20; Psalm 71:23. It is used in this general sense here; and means that Yahweh had rescued Abraham from the evils of idolatry, and made him his friend. The connection, also, would seem to imply that there was a reference to the promise which was made to Abraham that he should have a numerous posterity (see Isaiah 29:23).

Jacob shall not now be ashamed - This is a poetical introduction of Jacob as the ancestor of the Jewish people, as if the venerable patriarch were looking upon his children. Their deportment had been such as would suffuse a father's cheeks with shame; henceforward in the reformation that would occur he would "not" be ashamed of them, but would look on them with approbation.

Neither shall his face wax pale - The face usually becomes pale with fear: but this may also occur from any strong emotion. Disappointment may produce paleness as well as fear; and perhaps the idea may be that the face of Jacob should no more become pallid as "if" he had been disappointed in regard to the hopes which he had cherished of his sons.

23

Isaiah 29:23

開啟正文

「但當他看見他的兒女」——其意是:「他必不因他的眾子蒙羞,因為他此後必看見他們行在敬虔與美德之路上。」

「我手的工作」——就是說,這改變(Isaiah 29:17-19)——藉此全國必得更新——必由神自己的作為所成。這思想與聖經各處的教義一致:人惟靠神的作為才能從罪中復原(試比較 Isaiah 60:21;Ephesians 2:10)。

「在他那裏」——在他百姓中間。雅各這名常用來指他全體的後裔,即整個猶太民族。

英文原文

But when he seeth his children - The sense is, 'he shall not be ashamed of his sons, for he shall see them henceforward walking in the ways of piety and virtue.'

The work of my hands - That is, this change Isaiah 29:17-19 by which the nation will be reformed, will be produced by the agency of God himself. The sentiment is in accordance with the doctrines of the Scriptures everywhere, that people are recovered from sin by the agency of God alone (compare Isaiah 60:21; Ephesians 2:10).

In the midst of him - In the midst of his people. The name Jacob is often employed to denote all his posterity, or the whole nation of the Jews.

24

Isaiah 29:24

開啟正文

「心中迷糊的」——(見 Isaiah 29:9-10)。

「必受訓誨」——這事何時發生,先知並沒有說明。它可以指希西家的時代,或被擄之後的時代,或許也可能指彌賽亞之下的時代。先知所教導的只是:在猶太人歷史將來的某個時期,必出現這樣的革新,使他們被視為敬虔先祖雅各配得稱許的後裔。

英文原文

They also that erred in spirit - (see Isaiah 29:9-10).

Shall learn doctrine - When" this would occur the prophet does not state. It "may" be intended to denote the times of Hezekiah; or the times subsequent to the captivity; or possibly it may refer to the times under the Messiah. All that the prophet teaches is, that at some future period in the history of the Jews, there would be such a reform that they should be regarded as the worthy descendants of the pious patriarch Jacob.