Barnes' Notes on the Bible · Isaiah 第54章

註釋閱讀最佳化

分章註釋

Isaiah 第 54 章

서론

Isaiah 54 Introduction

開啟正文

本章在意義上大概與前一章緊密相連,並由那裏所啟示關乎彌賽亞工作之偉大真理生發出來,內含神國——特別是在彌賽亞之下——得擴張、得更新、並將來得榮耀的應許。與前後各章一樣,它的首要目的可能是安慰巴比倫的被擄者;但這安慰乃源於彌賽亞之下遙遠年代將要發生的事,以及真宗教的傳揚。他們當時人數稀少、力量微弱;受欺壓、被擄掠;被人藐視、表面看來被撇棄;他們卻蒙准仰望將來的日子,得著保證:外邦世界必有大批人加入,並有永久的榮耀。全章的宗旨是安慰,是應許差彌賽亞為世人受死這一旨意所必有的結果。

本章可視為分為以下幾部分:

一、向神的子民、即向耶路撒冷說話,視她為當時軟弱之身,並應許她必大得擴張(Isaiah 54:1-6)。

  1. 以雙重形像應許人數必大增:第一,一個素來不生育、後來卻兒女眾多的婦人(Isaiah 54:1);第二,一幅要擴張的帳棚,好容納將要住在其中的人(Isaiah 54:2-3)。

  2. 這應許或保證的根基,在於耶和華是祂子民的丈夫和保護者(Isaiah 54:4-6)。

二、耶和華與祂子民所立的約是堅固而不動搖的(Isaiah 54:7, Isaiah 54:10)。

  1. 祂確曾片時離棄他們,但那只是要以永遠不變的恩慈再招聚他們(Isaiah 54:7-8)。

  2. 祂與他們所立的約,必如祂與挪亞所立的約那樣堅定,那約祂一直信守不移(Isaiah 54:9)。

  3. 這約甚至比眾山還堅固(Isaiah 54:10)。眾山將遷移,岡陵將挪動;但祂與祂子民所立的約必永不動搖、存到永遠。

三、直接向祂的子民說話,他們彷彿在翻騰的海上顛簸搖撼;神應許將來必有安定與榮耀(Isaiah 54:11-14)。

  1. 他們當時像狂風巨浪海洋上的一艘船,毫無安慰。

  2. 然而必立下堅固的根基。這些動盪必止息,她必得著安穩。

  3. 祂子民將來的境況必是榮耀的。祂的教會必立在根基上——藍寶石的根基上——如一座寶石砌成的華美宮殿(Isaiah 54:11-12)。

  4. 她的兒女都必受耶和華的教導,大享平安康泰(Isaiah 54:13)。

  5. 她必遠離欺壓,不致害怕(Isaiah 54:14)。

四、她必不受一切仇敵的害。凡為攻擊她而造的兵器必無功用。凡攻擊她的都在祂的掌管之下,神必保護她免受他們一切的攻擊(Isaiah 54:15-17)。

英文原文

This chapter, probably closely connected in sense with the preceding, and growing out of the great truths there revealed respecting the work of the Messiah, contains a promise of the enlargement, the moral renovation, and the future glory of the kingdom of God, especially under the Messiah. Like the preceding and succeeding chapters, it may have been primarily designed to give consolation to the exiles in Babylon, but it was consolation to be derived from what would occur in distant times under the Messiah, and in the spread of the true religion. Few and feeble as they were then; oppressed and captive; despised and apparently forsaken, they were permitted to look forward to future days, and had the assurance of a vast increase from the Gentile world, and of permanent glory. The design of the whole chapter is consolatory, and is a promise of what would certainly result from the purpose of sending the Messiah to die for the world.

The chapter may be regarded as divided into the following portions:

I. An address to the people of God, or to Jerusalem, regarded as then feeble, and promising great enlargement Isaiah 54:1-6.

  1. Promise of a great increase, under a two-fold image; first, Of a woman who had been barren, and who subsequently had many children Isaiah 54:1; and, secondly, Of a tent that was to be enlarged, in order to accommodate those who were to dwell in it Isaiah 54:2-3.

  2. The foundation of this promise or assurance, that Yahweh was the husband and protector of his people Isaiah 54:4-6.

II. The covenant which Yahweh had made with his people was firm and immovable Isaiah 54:7, Isaiah 54:10.

  1. He had indeed forsaken them for a little while, but it was only to gather them again with eternal and unchanging favor Isaiah 54:7-8.

  2. His covenant with them would be as arm as that which he had made with Noah, and which he had so steadily observed Isaiah 54:9.

  3. It would be even more firm than the hills Isaiah 54:10. They would depart, and the mountains would be removed; but his covenant with his people would be unshaken and eternal.

III. A direct address to his people, as if agitated and tossed on a heaving sea, promising future stability and glory Isaiah 54:11-14.

  1. They were then like a ship on the stormy ocean, and without comfort.

  2. Yet there would be a firm foundation laid. These agitations would cease, and she would have stability.

  3. The future condition of his people would be glorious. His church would rise on the foundation - the foundation of sapphires - like a splendid palace made of precious stones Isaiah 54:11-12.

  4. All her children would be taught of Yahweh, and their peace and prosperity be great Isaiah 54:13.

  5. She would be far from oppression and from fear Isaiah 54:14.

IV. She would be safe from all her foes. No weapon that should be formed against her would prosper. All they who made any attack on her were under his control, and God would defend her from all their assaults Isaiah 54:15-17.

1

Isaiah 54:1

開啟正文

你這不懷孕、不生養的要歌唱——意即當歡呼喜樂,揚起誇勝與讚美的聲音。這裏的「不懷孕的」是指舊約之下的神的教會,她被侷限於猶太民族的狹窄界限之內,而就其中真信徒數目極少這一點來說更是如此,並且有時她似乎被神——她的丈夫——所離棄(Lowth)。這裏把她描繪成一個素來沒有兒女的婦人,如今因丈夫與她復和(Isaiah 54:6;Lowth),又因外邦人歸入她的家族,而有了歡喜的緣由。迦勒底譯本把它譯作:「耶路撒冷啊,你這如同不曾生養的不育婦人,要歡喜。」聖經中教會常被比作婦人,神與祂百姓之間的聯合也常被比作夫妻之間的關係(試比較Isaiah 62:5;Ezekiel 16;Revelation 21:2-9;Revelation 22:17)。

你這不生養的——這話或是指教會被侷限於猶太地的狹窄界限之內;或是指教會中真信徒數目稀少;或是當她在巴比倫受欺壓、人數或許不斷減少之時對她說的。我認為它大概是指後者;其觀念是:她親眼看見自己的眾子在耶路撒冷被圍困和毀滅時喪命,在巴比倫的日子也沒有因任何新加入的人而增多,但在她歸回之時,並在彌賽亞之下藉外邦人的加入而有的將來增長之中,她將大有喜樂的緣由。

要發聲歌唱——(試比較Isaiah 14:7;Isaiah 44:23;Isaiah 49:13)。

因為沒有丈夫的兒女更多——這裏的「沒有丈夫的」是指耶路撒冷,或指教會。至於「有丈夫的婦人」,Rosenmuller認為先知所指的是別的國家,它們如同有丈夫的婦人一般興旺繁增。Grotius則認為他所指的是其他有人居住的城邑,而耶路撒冷在其繁榮與人數上都將超過它們一切。但這話似乎帶有幾分諺語的意味,其觀念大概是:將有大增長,遠比她所能預期的還要大。就好像應許一個不生育的婦人,說她將有的兒女比已嫁的婦人通常所生的更多;照樣,耶路撒冷和教會也將大為擴張,遠超列國中通常發生的情形。這話的應驗要在外邦人的加入上尋找(Isaiah 54:3)。「先知始終把外邦人的歸信視為新收納之兒女的加入,他們被接納進入神原本的教會,並與之聯合」(Lowth)。同樣的觀念在Isaiah 49:20-22中有更詳細的陳述。

英文原文

Sing, O barren - That is, shout for joy, lift up the voice of exultation and praise. The 'barren' here denotes the church of God under the Old Testament, confined within the narrow limits of the Jewish nation, and still more so in respect to the very small number of true believers, and which seemed sometimes to be deserted of God, her husband (Lowth). It is here represented under the image of a female who had been destitute of children, and who now has occasion to rejoice on the reconciliation of her husband (Isaiah 54:6; Lowth), and on the accession of the Gentiles to her family. The Chaldee renders it, 'Rejoice, O Jerusalem, who hast been as a sterile woman that did not bear.' The church is often in the Bible compared to a female, and the connection between God and his people is often compared with that between husband and wife (compare Isaiah 62:5; Ezekiel 16; Revelation 21:2-9; Revelation 22:17).

Thou that didst not bear - Either referring to the fact that the church was confined within the narrow limits of Judea; or that there had been in it a small number of true believers; or addressed to it in Babylon when it was oppressed, and perhaps constantly diminishing in number. I think it probable that it refers to the latter; and that the idea is, that she saw her sons destroyed in the siege and destruction of Jerusalem, and that she was not augmented by any accessions while in Babylon, but would have great occasion for rejoicing on her return, and in her future increase under the Messiah by the accession of the Gentiles.

Break forth into singing - (Compare Isaiah 14:7; Isaiah 44:23; Isaiah 49:13).

For more are the children of the desolate - The 'desolate' here refers to Jerusalem, or the church. By the 'married woman,' Rosenmuller supposes the prophet means other nations which flourished and increased like a married woman. Grotius supposes that he means other cities which were inhabited, and that Jerusalem would surpass them all in her prosperity and in numbers. But the phrase seems to have somewhat of a proverbial cast, and probably the idea is that there would be a great increase, a much greater increase than she had any reason to apprehend. As if a promise was made to a barren female that she should have more children than those who were married usually had, so Jerusalem and the church would be greatly enlarged, far beyond what usually occurred among nations. The fulfillment of this is to be looked for in the accession of the Gentiles Isaiah 54:3. 'The conversion of the Gentiles is all along considered by the prophet as a new accession of adopted children, admitted into the original church of God, and united with it' (Lowth). See the same idea presented at greater length in Isaiah 49:20-22.

2

Isaiah 54:2

開啟正文

「要擴張你帳幕之地」——同樣的觀念也出現在 Isaiah 49:19-20(見該章的註釋)。「張大你居所的幔子。」「幔子」一詞在此並不能完全表達原意。在我們通常的用法中,它指掛在床邊或窗前、可隨意拉開或收攏的布,或戲院裏為觀眾遮蔽舞台的幕。但這裏的字指帳幕中所用的罩蓋或布;其意是:教會的疆界將要大大擴張,以容納從異教世界而來的廣大群體。

「不要限止」——在預備材料、大大擴張可居住的帳幕時,不要吝嗇。

「要放長你的繩子」——(見 Isaiah 33:20 的註釋。)

英文原文

Enlarge the place of thy tent - The same idea occurs in Isaiah 49:19-20 (see the notes at that chapter). The curtains of thy habitations. The word 'curtain' does not quite express the sense here. It is commonly with us used to denote the cloth hanging round. a bed or at a window, which may be spread or drawn aside at pleasure, or the hanging in theaters to conceal the stage from the spectators. The word here, however, denotes the canopy or cloth used in a tent; and the idea is, that the boundaries of the church were to be greatly enlarged, in order to accommodate the vast accession from the pagan world.

Spare not - Do not be parsimonious in the provision of the materials for greatly enlarging the tent to dwell in.

Lengthen thy cords - (See the note at Isaiah 33:20).

3

Isaiah 54:3

開啟正文

「你要向左向右開展」——(見 Isaiah 49:19-20 的註釋)。

「使荒涼的城邑有人居住」——(見 Isaiah 44:26 的註釋)。

英文原文

For thou shalt break forth - (See the notes at Isaiah 49:19-20).

And make the desolate cities - (See the notes at Isaiah 44:26).

4

Isaiah 54:4

開啟正文

不要懼怕——(見以賽亞書 41:10、41:14 的註釋)。

因你必不致蒙羞——這一切話的意義實質相同;先知的用意,是以最有力的方式斷言神的教會必大大興旺擴展。不生育之婦人的形像仍然延續;其觀念是:她必不再有那無子之婦所感受的羞辱。

你必忘記幼年的羞愧——在未來世代豐盛的加增與榮耀之中,他們早期歷史所伴隨的羞辱境況必被遺忘。猶太人的「幼年」,無疑指埃及的奴役,以及他們在那裏所遭遇的試煉與災禍。他們將來的繁榮與榮耀必如此宏大,以致這一切都要被忘記。

不再記念你寡居的羞辱——指被擄於巴比倫之時,那時他們如同喪夫失子的婦人(見以賽亞書 49:21 的註釋)。

英文原文

Fear not ... - (See Isaiah 41:10, note, Isaiah 41:14, note).

Neither shalt thou be confounded - All these words mean substantially the same thing; and the design of the prophet is to affirm, in the strongest possible manner, that the church of God should be abundantly prospered and enlarged. The image of the female that was barren is kept up, and the idea is, that there should be no occasion of the shame which she felt who had no children.

For thou shalt forget the shame of thy youth - In the abundant increase and glory of future times, the circumstances of shame which attended their early history shall be forgotten. The 'youth' of the Jewish people refers doubtless to the bondage of Egypt, and the trials and calamities which came upon them there. So great should be their future prosperity and glory, that all this should be forgotten.

The reproach of thy widowhood - The captivity at Babylon, when they were like a woman bereft of her husband and children (see the notes at Isaiah 49:21).

5

Isaiah 54:5

開啟正文

因為造你的是你的丈夫——希伯來文中,「造你的」和「丈夫」這兩個字都是複數。但這形式顯然是卓越複數(pluralis excellentiae)——表示尊貴宏偉的形式(見 1 Samuel 19:13、19:16;Psalm 149:2;Proverbs 9:10;30:3;Ecclesiastes 12:1;Hosea 12:1)。此處指的是「萬軍之耶和華」,必然是單數,因為耶和華是一(Deuteronomy 6:4)。由於這形式顯然常用於單數意義,故不能從這句話引出論據,證明神格內有位格的區分。這兩個字在此本有單數意義,是古代譯者顯然的理解。耶柔米(Jerome)譯作 Quia dominabitur tui qui fecit te——「因為造你的必掌管你」。七十士譯本亦然:Ὅτι κύριος ὁ ποιῶν σε,κ.τ.λ.(Hoti kurios ho poiōn se 等),即「因為造你的是主,萬軍之主」云云。迦勒底語譯本與敘利亞譯本亦然。Lowth 譯作:「因為你的丈夫是你的創造者。」譯作「丈夫」的字出自 בעל(ba‛al),本指任何人的主、創造者或統治者,或某物的所有者;然而它也常意為作丈夫(Deuteronomy 21:13;24:1;Isaiah 62:5;Malachi 2:11),此處顯然正取此義。這思想是:耶和華必以丈夫的身分對待祂的百姓;那造了他們、創立他們一切律法典章、把他們模造為一個民族的(見 Isaiah 43:1 的註釋),如今必把祂的教會置於自己的保護與看顧之下(見 Isaiah 62:5 的註釋)。

你的救贖主——(見 Isaiah 43:1-3 的註釋。)

全地之神——祂必不再被視為猶太人獨有的神,而必被承認為獨一的真神、統管全世界的神。這無疑是指福音時代,那時祂必被承認為外邦人的神,也是猶太人的神(見 Romans 3:29)。

英文原文

For thy Maker is thine husband - Both these words, 'maker' and 'husband,' in the Hebrew are in the plural number. But the form is evidently the pluralis excellentiae - a form denoting majesty and honor (see 1 Samuel 19:13, 1 Samuel 19:16; Psalm 149:2; Proverbs 9:10; Proverbs 30:3; Ecclesiastes 12:1; Hosea 12:1). Here it refers to 'Yahweh of hosts,' necessarily in the singular, as Yahweh is one Deuteronomy 6:4. No argument can be drawn from this phrase to prove that there is a distinction of persons in the Godhead, as the form is so often used evidently with a singular signification. That the words here properly have a singular signification was the evident understanding of the ancient interpreters. Thus Jerome Quia dominabitur tui qui fecit te - 'Because he shall rule ever thee who made thee' So the Septuagint, Ὅτι κύριος ὁ ποιῶν σε, κ.τ.λ. Hoti kurios ho poiōn se, etc. 'For the Lord who made thee, the Lord of Sabaoth,' etc. So the Chaldee and the Syriac. Lowth renders it, 'For thy husband is thy Maker.' The word rendered 'husband,' from בעל ba‛al, denotes properly the lord, maker, or ruler of anyone; or the owner of anything. It often, however, means, to be a husband Deuteronomy 21:13; Deuteronomy 24:1; Isaiah 62:5; Malachi 2:11, and is evidently used in that sense here. The idea is, that Yahweh would sustain to his people the relation of a husband; that he who had made them, who had originated all their laws and institutions, and moulded them as a people (see the note at Isaiah 43:1), would now take his church under his protection and care (see the notes at Isaiah 62:5).

And thy Redeemer - (See Notes on Isaiah 43:1-3.)

The God of the whole earth - He shall no more be regarded as uniquely the God of the Jewish people, but shall be acknowledged as the only true God, the God that rules over all the world. This refers undoubtedly to the times of the gospel, when he should be acknowledged as the God of the Gentiles as well as the Jews (see Romans 3:29).

6

Isaiah 54:6

開啟正文

耶和華召你——這是要證實並說明前一節的意思。神在那裏說,祂必作祂百姓的丈夫;在這裏祂說,雖然祂一時似乎離棄了他們,如同離棄妻子的丈夫,雖然他們如被棄的女子般消沉沮喪,但如今祂必重新恢復他們的恩寵。

召你——即將要召你歸向祂自己——指他們復蒙繁盛的未來日子。

如被離棄的女子——指因自己的過犯而被丈夫離棄的女子。

心中憂傷——因被這樣離棄而憂傷。

幼年所娶的妻——七十士譯本的譯法甚為奇怪:「主召你,不像召被離棄、心中愁苦的妻,也不像召自幼被憎惡的妻」;這確鑿地表明譯者在此不明本段的意思,枉然插入否定詞、強自造出意義來。這裏的觀念是幼年所娶之妻——雖然後來被棄,卻曾早年得著溫柔之愛的妻。神在希伯來民族歷史的初期,已愛他們作祂的子民;後來因他們的拜偶像,祂有理由離棄他們,命定他們長久而痛苦的流亡。但祂終必以從前熾熱的愛再愛他們,並使他們大大加增繁盛。

被棄之時——或作「那被棄的」。Lowth 譯作「但後來被棄」。這可譯作「雖然(כי kı̂y 常有「雖然」之義)你被棄」,或「雖然她被棄」。其意是:她雖在幼年被娶,後來卻被休棄。

英文原文

For the Lord hath called thee - This is designed to confirm and illustrate the sentiment in the previous verse. God there says that he would be a husband to his people. Here he says, that although he had for a time apparently forsaken them, as a husband who had forsaken his wife, and although they were cast down and dejected like a woman who had thus been forsaken, yet he would now restore them to favor.

Hath called thee - That is, will have called thee to himself - referring to the future times when prosperity should be restored to them.

As a woman forsaken - Forsaken by her husband on account of her offence.

And grieved in spirit - Because she was thus forsaken.

And a wife of youth - The Septuagint renders this very strangely, 'The Lord hath not called thee as a wife forsaken and disconsolate; nor as a wife that hath been hated from her youth;' showing conclusively that the translator here did not understand the meaning of the passage, and vainly endeavored to supply a signification by the insertion of thee negatives, and by endeavoring to make a meaning. The idea is that of a wife wedded in youth; a wife toward whom there was early and tender love, though she was afterward rejected. God had loved the Hebrew people as his people in the early days of their history. Yet for their idolatry he had seen occasion afterward to cast them off, and to doom them to a long and painful exile. But he would yet love them with all the former ardor of affection, and would greatly increase and prosper them.

When thou wast refused - Or, that hath been rejected. Lowth, 'But afterward rejected.' It may be rendered, 'Although (כי kı̂y has often the sense of although) thou wert rejected,' or 'although she was rejected.' The idea is, that she had been married in youth, but had been afterward put away.

7

Isaiah 54:7

開啟正文

「我離棄你不過片時」——迦勒底譯本和敘利亞譯本作「在小小的怒氣中」。Lowth 採用了這譯法,但沒有充分的根據。希伯來文的意思是「片時」;很短的時間。這裏大概指巴比倫的被擄——那時他們似乎被耶和華離棄。這在他們看來雖久,但與其後的繁榮相比,不過一瞬。這雖大概首先指當時的被擄,但應用於其他類似情形,也無不妥。它包含一個重要原則:神雖似乎離棄他的百姓,但比較而言不過片刻。他必記念他的約;無論他們的試煉看來多長,與隨之而來的憐憫和恩惠相比,必看似最短暫一瞬的憂傷(可比較 2 Corinthians 4:17)。

「卻要施大恩」——這裏的對比不在長短,而在大小。離棄是「小的」,憐憫必是「大的」。他們有那麼多的過錯和罪惡,仍蒙召回,這本身就是憐憫;而在他們人數加增時所施的憐憫,必大得無法言喻。

「將你收回」——我必從你被分散之處招聚你,把你收歸我自己,作我自己的民。

英文原文

For a small moment - The Chaldee and Syriac render this, 'In a little anger.' Lowth has adopted this, but without sufficient authority. The Hebrew means, 'For a little moment;' a very short time. The reference here is probably to the captivity at Babylon, when they were apparently forsaken by Yahweh. Though to them this appeared long, yet compared with their subsequent prosperity, it was but an instant of time. Though this had probably a primary reference to the captivity then, yet there can be no impropriety in applying it to other similar cases. It contains an important principle; that is, that though God appears to forsake his people, yet it will be comparatively but for a moment. He will remember his covenant, and however long their trials may seem to be, yet compared with the subsequent mercies and the favors which shall result from them, they will seem to be but as the sorrows of the briefest point of duration (compare 2 Corinthians 4:17).

But with great mercies - The contrast here is not that of duration but of magnitude. The forsaking was 'little,' the mercies would be 'great.' It would be mercy that they would be recalled at all after all their faults and crimes; and the mercy which would be bestowed in the enlargement of their numbers would be inexpressibly great.

Will I gather thee - Will I collect thee from thy dispersions, and gather thee to myself as my own people.

8

Isaiah 54:8

開啟正文

「我的怒氣漲溢」——敘利亞譯本把它譯作「在大怒之中」。武加大譯本作「在片刻的憤慨之中」。七十士譯本作「在少許的怒氣之中」(諾伊斯 Noyes 按羅森米勒 Rosenmüller 的見解,譯作「在滿溢的怒氣之中」)。詮釋之所以如此紛紜,是由於不常見的詞 שׁצף shetsep 有多種含義。這詞在聖經中不見於別處。Gesenius 推想它是為與 קצף qetsep(「怒氣」)構成諧音雙關,用以代替 שׁטף sheṭep;後者經常出現,意為湧出、氾濫、漫溢、洪水(Nehemiah 1:8;Job 38:25;Psalm 32:6;Proverbs 27:4)。按此,它便意為「在我滿溢的怒氣之中」,與 Proverbs 27:4「怒氣為狂瀾」的說法相符,邊註更正確地作「一場氾濫」。然而,就對仗而言,似乎要求短暫或片刻之意,因它與「永遠」相對。但要證明這希伯來詞有此意義,是不可能的。羅森米勒贊同 Gesenius,認為應譯作「在滿溢的怒氣之中」;而且由於「永遠」一詞的對仗將由「頃刻之間」一語充分保全,或許可能性偏向於這種解釋。這樣,它的意思便是:那怒氣雖只延續片刻,卻是滿溢的。它如一場洪災;他們的一切體制、他們的城、他們的聖殿、他們所珍愛的財產,都被沖去了。

「向你掩面」——這是不喜悅的表達(見 Isaiah 53:3 的註釋;比較 Job 13:24;Job 34:29;Psalm 30:7;Psalm 44:24;Isaiah 8:17)。此處是指祂在巴比倫懲罰他們之事上所顯的不悅。

「頃刻之間」——(見 Isaiah 54:7 的註釋)。這與祂所要施給他們的「永遠的慈愛」相對。

「卻要以永遠的慈愛」——這是真實的:

  1. 就彌賽亞之下的教會整體而言。教會是神不變之愛與恩惠的對象。

  2. 就每一個別基督徒而言。祂必使他在永恆的天上蒙福。

英文原文

In a little wrath - The Syriac renders this, 'In great wrath.' The Vulgate, 'In a moment of indignation.' The Septuagint, 'In a little wrath.' (Noyes renders it in accordance with the view of Rosenmuller, 'In overflowing wrath.' This variety of interpretation has arisen from the various meanings affixed to the unusual word שׁצף shetsep. This word occurs nowhere else in the Bible. Gesenius supposes that it is used for the sake of paronomasia with קצף qetsep, 'wrath,' instead of שׁטף sheṭep. This word frequently occurs, and means a gushing out, an overflowing, an inundation, a flood Nehemiah 1:8; Job 38:25; Psalm 32:6; Proverbs 27:4. According to this it would mean, 'in my overflowing anger,' in accordance with the expression in Proverbs 27:4, 'anger is outrageous,' more correctly in the margin, 'An overflowing.' The parallelism, however, seems to demand the sense of short or momentary, as it stands opposed to 'everlasting.' But it is not possible to demonstrate that the Hebrew word has this signification. Rosenmuller agrees with Gesenius in the opinion that it should be rendered 'In overflowing wrath;' and perhaps as the parallelism of the word 'everlasting' will be sufficiently secured by the phrase 'for a moment,' the probability is in favor of this interpretation. Then it will mean that the wrath, though it was but for a moment, was overflowing. It was like a deluge; and all their institutions, their city, their temple, their valued possessions, were swept away.

I hid my face from thee - This is expressive of displeasure (see the note at Isaiah 53:3; compare Job 13:24; Job 34:29; Psalm 30:7; Psalm 44:24; Isaiah 8:17). Here it refers to the displeasure which he had manifested in the punishment which he brought on them in Babylon.

For a moment - (See the note at Isaiah 54:7). This stands opposed to the 'everlasting kindness' which he would show to them.

But with everlasting kindness - This is true:

  1. Of the church at large under the Messiah. It is the object of the unchanging affection and favor of God.

  2. Of each individual Christian. He will make him blessed in an eternal heaven.

9

Isaiah 54:9

開啟正文

「這事在我好像挪亞的洪水」——如同洪水的日子怎樣,如今也必怎樣。「那時我鄭重應許,水必不再淹沒大地;這應許我已守住了。如今我以同樣的鄭重應許:我必將恆久的恩寵賜給我真正的子民,必將永恆不變的福傾倒在他們身上。」這裏的「挪亞的洪水」,顯然是指他時代臨到世界、而他與全家蒙拯救的那場洪水。羅斯(Lowth)根據一份抄本以及武加大譯本、敘利亞譯本、西馬庫斯(Symmachus)和 Theodotion 的權威,把這句讀作「在挪亞的日子」。但這權威不足以改動希伯來文本;而且即使不改,意義也同樣清楚。

「我怎樣起誓」——Genesis 8:21-22。神引這事為證,不僅因為那誓言與應許已經立定,也因為它已蒙恪守。

「不再向你發怒」——這裏的意念似乎是:必無任何災禍蔓延全教會而把它沖去,如洪水在挪亞的日子沖沒世界,或如荒涼在被擄巴比倫的時代掃過耶路撒冷和整個迦南地。逼迫與災殃確會有,但教會在這一切試煉中必得安全。神離棄教會、任它滅亡的時候,必永不來到。只要回想神在最危險的時代如何護衛了教會,便可知這話應驗得多麼奇妙。他的約必如與挪亞所立的約那樣確定,也必堅立穩固,直到時間的末了。

英文原文

For this is as the waters of Noah unto me - As it was in the time of the flood of waters, so shall it be now. 'I then solemnly promised that the waters should not again drown the earth, and I have kept that promise. I now promise with equal solemnity that I will bestow perpetual favor on my true people, and will shed upon them eternal and unchanging blessings.' 'The waters of Noah,' here mean evidently the flood that came upon the world in his time, and from which he and his family were saved. Lowth, on the authority of one manuscript and of the Vulgate, Syriac, Symmachus, and Theodotion, reads this, 'In the days of Noah? But the authority is not sufficient to change the Hebrew text, and the sense is as clear as if it were changed.

As I have sworn - Genesis 8:21-22. God appeals to this not only because the oath and promise had been made, but because it had been kept.

That I would not be wroth - The idea seems here to be that no calamities should spread over the whole church, and sweep it away, as the waters swept over the world in the time of Noah, or as desolation swept over Jerusalem and the whole land of Canaan in the time of the exile at Babylon. There would be indeed persecutions and calamities, but the church would be safe amidst all these trials. The period would never arrive when God would forsake the church, and when he would leave it to perish. One has only to recollect how God has guarded the church, even during the most dangerous periods, to see how remarkably this has been fulfilled. His covenant has been as sure as that which was made with Noah, and it will be as secure and firm to the end of time.

10

Isaiah 54:10

開啟正文

「大山可以挪開」——(見 Isaiah 51:6 的註釋。)

「我平安的約」——即我與你所立、應許平安興盛的約。

英文原文

For the mountains shall depart - (See the notes at Isaiah 51:6).

The covenant of my peace - That is, the covenant by which I promise peace and prosperity to thee.

11

Isaiah 54:11

開啟正文

「你這受困苦的」——在前面的經節中,耶和華不過應許保護,並以籠統的話向他們保證他的恩寵。這裡他進一步表明:他們不僅要蒙護衛,他的教會更必以極大的華美興起,妝飾得如同最華美的宮殿或聖殿。這話首先當看作對被擄期將近七十年尾聲時身在巴比倫之人的宣講。但當教會受逼迫、如一艘在翻騰海浪上搖晃的船時,沒有甚麼攔阻我們把它應用於一切類似境況中的教會。

「被風飄蕩」——羅斯(Lowth)譯作「被暴風擊打」。這是一艘被暴風驅逼之船的意象,或任何被旋風吹得東搖西擺之物(סערה so‛ărâh)。參見 Jonah 1:11-13; Hosea 13:3; Habakkuk 3:14。這比喻在東方國家尤為觸目。那裡的暴風與旋風比我們這裡猛烈得多,無物能當(參見哈默〔Harmer〕《觀察記》卷一92頁以下,倫敦1808年版)。

「不得安慰的人哪」——他們遠離故土所享的一切安慰,而且似乎被神離棄。

「看哪,我必安置你的石頭」——聖經中以宏偉的聖殿或宮殿比擬教會的興盛,並非罕見。《多比傳》(Tobit 13:16-17)中有一段關於耶路撒冷的描述,看似抄自本節,至少表明作者心目中有這段經文:「因為耶路撒冷必以藍寶石、綠寶石和寶石建造;你的城牆、城垛與城樓必是純金。耶路撒冷的街道必以綠柱石、紅玉和俄斐的石頭鋪砌。」啟示錄(Rev 21:18-21)中對新耶路撒冷也有類似的描述。約翰或許心目中正有以賽亞書的這一段,只是他把描述大大擴充了。這段經文無疑以比喻的方式描寫神的教會將來的興盛與榮耀。羅斯對此的評語甚為公允:「這些似乎是照東方民族的觀念,用以表達美麗、宏偉、純潔、力量與堅固的一般意象;從來不是要人嚴加推敲,也不是要人細加逐一解說,彷彿它們各有某種確切的道德與屬靈含義。」「我必安置你的石頭」一語,指砌築工程中安放建築物的根基,或以灰漿、膠泥砌合構成建築物的石頭。直譯是「我使之躺臥」。這裡所用的字(רבץ râbâts)通常用於蹲伏或躺臥的牲畜。

「以彩色」——這譯法絲毫沒有傳達原文的觀念。意思不是說石頭會有美麗的色澤,而是說所用的膠泥將是那通常用來製備最貴重顏料的材料。那將建起的建築物,其價值與宏偉,將如同石頭間的膠泥本身即由最貴重的彩料——最純的硃砂——構成一般。這裡譯作「彩色」的字(פוך pûk),本義是海藻,可用以製備鹼性顏料;繼而指顏料本身、染料、海藻紅(fucus),也指希伯來婦女用以染眼睫的那種妝飾品(銻粉 stibium)。它由鉛礦粉末製成,用小木籤沿眼瞼描畫,使眼睫與眼瞼邊緣染上深黑的煙色,被視為優雅的妝飾。這習俗極為古老。

耶洗別曾行這事(參見 2 Kings 9:30,那裡所用的是與此處相同的字);希臘人與羅馬人中間也行這事(色諾芬《居魯士的教育》卷一第11章);非洲至今仍行(參見蕭〔Shaw〕《遊記》294、295頁)。這裡所用的字,在 2 Kings 9:30 與 Jeremiah 22:14 譯作「塗抹」或「妝飾」,在 1 Chronicles 29:2 譯作「光彩的石頭」;別處未再出現。在歷代志那段經文中,它或可指紅玉,正如七十士譯本在那裡所譯的(ἄνθρακα anthraka);但在此處,它無疑指那用作妝飾的貴重顏料或染料。這裡的描述是說,連石頭也要安放在這樣的膠泥之中;這當然等於說:工程必以最昂貴、最宏偉的方式完成。然而還可補充:先知所指的,似乎不只是銻粉構成膠泥這一事實本身;他大概也要暗示,這將大大增添城的美觀。建築物中砌合磚石的膠泥有部分外露可見,若以被視為最高妝飾的材料用作膠泥,建築之美必更增添。

「以藍寶石立定你的根基」——藍寶石是人所熟知的寶石,以美麗與光彩著稱。就硬度而言,僅次於金剛石。其色有藍、紅、紫、綠、白或透明。

英文原文

O thou afflicted - In the previous verses, Yahweh had merely promised protection, and had in general terms assured them of his favor. Here he shows that they should not only be defended, but that his church would rise with great beauty, and be ornamented like a most splendid palace or temple. This is to be regarded as addressed primarily to the exiles in Babylon near to the close of their seventy years' captivity. But nothing forbids us to apply it to the church in all similar circumstances when persecuted, and when she is like a ship rolling on the heaving billows of the ocean.

Tossed with tempest - Lowth, 'Beaten with the storm.' The idea is that of a ship that is driven by the tempest; or any object that is tossed about with a whirlwind (סערה so‛ărâh). See Jonah 1:11-13; Hosea 13:3; Hebrews 3:14. The figure is especially striking in an Oriental country. Tempests and whirlwinds there, are much more violent than they are with us, and nothing there can stand before them (see Harmer's Obs. vol. i. p. 92ff Ed. Loud. 1808).

And not comforted - They were far away from all the comforts which they had enjoyed in their own land, and they were apparently forsaken by God.

Behold, I will lay thy stones - It is not uncommon in the Scriptures to compare the prosperity of the church to a splendid temple or palace. In the book of Tobit (Tobit 13:16, 17) a description of Jerusalem occurs, which has all the appearance of having been copied from this, or at least shows that the writer had this passage in his eye. 'For Jerusalem shall be built up with sapphires, and emeralds, and precious stones; thy walls, and battlements, and towers, of pure gold. And the streets of Jerusalem shall be paved with beryl, and carbuncle, and stones of Ophir.' And in the book of Revelation Rev 21:18-21, a similar description occurs of the New Jerusalem. Possibly John had his eye upon this passage in Isaiah, though he has greatly amplified the description. The passage here undoubtedly contains a figurative description of the future prosperity and glory of the church of God. Lowth remarks on it, justly, 'These seem to be general images to express beauty, magnificence, purity, strength, and solidity, agreeably to the ideas of eastern nations; and to have never been intended to be strictly scrutinized or minutely and particularly explained, as if they had each of them some precise moral and spiritual meaning.' The phrase 'I will lay thy stones,' refers to the work of masonry in laying down the foundation of a building, or the stones of which a building is composed, in mortar or cement. Literally, 'I cause to lie down.' The word here used (רבץ râbâts) is usually appropriated to an animal that crouches or lies down.

With fair colors - This translation by no means conveys the idea of the original. The sense is not that the stones would have fair colors, but that the cement which would be used would be that which was commonly employed to make the most valued colors. The edifice which would be reared would be as costly and magnificent as if the very cement of the stones consisted of the most precious coloring matter; the purest vermilion. The word rendered here 'fair colors' (פוך pûk) denotes properly, seaweed, from which an alkaline paint was prepared; then paint itself, dye, fucus, and also that with which the Hebrew women tinged their eyelashes (stibium). This is composed of the powder of lead ore, and was drawn with a small wooden bodkin through the eyelids, and tinged the hair and the edges of the eyelids with a dark sooty color, and was esteemed to be a graceful ornament. This practice is of great antiquity.

It was practiced by Jezebel (see 2 Kings 9:30, where the same word is used as here); it was practiced among the Greeks and Romans (Xen. Cyr. i. 11); and it is still practiced in Africa (see Shaw's Travels, pp. 294, 295). The word used here is rendered 'paint,' or 'painted' 2 Kings 9:30; Jeremiah 22:14; and 'glistening stones' 1 Chronicles 29:2. It does not occur elsewhere. In the passage in Chronicles it may mean the carbuncle, as it is rendered here by the Septuagint, (ἄνθρακα anthraka); but it here denotes, doubtless, the valued paint or dye which was used as an ornament. The description here is that the very stones should be laid in cement of this description, and is of course equivalent to saying that it would be in the most costly and magnificent manner. It may be added, however, that it would not be the mere fact that the stibium would constitute the cement that the prophet seems to refer to, but probably he also means to intimate that this would contribute greatly to the beauty of the city. The cement in which bricks or stones is laid in a building is partly visible, and the beauty of the structure would be augmented by having that which was regarded as constituting the highest ornament used for cement.

And thy foundations with sapphires - The sapphire is a well-known gem distinguished for its beauty and splendor. In hardness it is inferior to the diamond only. Its colors are blue, red, violet, green, white, or limpid.

12

Isaiah 54:12

開啟正文

「我必造你的女牆」——這裏譯作「窗」的詞,耶柔米(Jerome)譯作 propugnacula——即「堡壘」(fortresses)、壁壘(bulwarks)、胸牆(ramparts);七十士譯本則譯作Επαλξεις Epalcheis——「堡壘」,或更確切地說,是城牆上的堞垛。希伯來文שׁמשׁות shı̂mâshôt顯然出自שׁמשׁ shemesh(太陽),在意義上與太陽有某種關聯——或是因讓光透入,或是因具有像太陽那樣放射的樣式。格塞尼烏斯(Gesenius)譯作「鋸齒形的堞口,與日輪相彷彿」。法伯(Faber),《希伯來考古學》(Hebrew Archaeol.),頁 294——認為這名稱是加給這裏所指的小塔或堞垛的,因為它們與日光的光線有幾分相似。我想,先知所指的大概是建築物上某種放射狀的裝飾,形似太陽,或是城牆上某些鍍金的小塔。在古代譯本中,我看不出這詞指窗戶的證據。

「用紅寶石」——瑪瑙是一類硅質的半透明寶石,種類繁多,由石英晶質燧石、角石、玉髓、紫水晶、碧玉、紅玉髓等構成,帶有斑點、條帶、細紋、枝狀紋理及各種圖案。它們被視為一切寶石中價值最低的,見於岩石之中,用於印章、戒指等(韋氏)。希伯來文כדכד kadekkod出自כדד kâdad(打、搗,繼而指擊火),似指一種閃爍的寶石或紅寶石。這詞並不常用。耶柔米(Jerome)譯作 Jaspidem;七十士譯本作Ιασπιν Iaspin——「碧玉」,一種綠色的寶石。可以留意:這樣的石頭大概不會用來做窗,以讓光透入。

「你的城門」——見啟示錄 21:21——「十二個門是十二顆珍珠,每門是一顆珍珠。」這城的門要用至貴重的寶石做成。

「用紅玉」——紅玉是一種深紅色而帶猩紅的美麗寶石,希臘人稱之為 anthrax,產於東印度,長度通常約四分之一英寸。向著太陽舉起時,它便失去深色,變得恰如燃燒的炭火的顏色(韋氏);其希臘名稱即由此而來。希伯來文名稱אקדח 'eqeddâch出自קדח qâdach(「燃燒」),指一種火焰般或閃爍的寶石。這詞在希伯來文聖經中別處未再出現。

「你的四境」——指你一切的邊界,或你城牆的整個周界。見啟示錄 21:18——「牆是碧玉造的」。其意是:全城要以最壯麗的方式建造。它的根基和一切石頭要用至貴重的泥漿砌築;它的小塔、望樓、堞垛、城門,並城牆的整個周界,都要用至貴重的寶石做成。總的來說,這無疑是要描繪教會在救贖者之下的將來榮耀,或許也是要提供一幅天堂的象徵圖畫(參啟示錄 21:2)。金奇(Kimchi)認為這話也許可以按字面理解,耶路撒冷將來可能真如這裏所描述的那樣。阿巴伯內爾(Abarbanel)則認為,這可能指這些寶石主要出產的東方世界歸信之時;那時他們要前來,合力重建這城和這殿。

但這整段描寫,若應用於神的教會——它在地上的榮耀,以及它在天上的榮耀——實在美不勝收。教會將來的宏偉,必遠超教會歷史上迄今所見的一切,正如一座寶石建造的城,遠比耶路撒冷在最輝煌的日子更為壯觀。本節所用的語言,與東方的表達方式相符。東方人以言語形容空前華美的手法,在那著名的東方故事《阿拉丁》中有很好的說明;阿拉丁這樣吩咐:「材料的選擇,我交給你;就是說,要用斑岩、碧玉、瑪瑙、青金石,以及色彩最為繁多的上等大理石。但我期望你在宮殿最高的一層,為我建造一座帶穹頂、四面勻稱的大廳;牆壁不用磚層,而以厚重的金銀交替砌成;每面要開六扇窗,其中一扇必須留作未完成、不完整,其餘各窗的窗格都要以工藝和勻稱之美,用鑽石、紅寶石和祖母綠加以點綴,使其勝過世上迄今所見的一切同類之物」(《圖解聖經》,Pictorial Bible)。

英文原文

And I will make thy windows - The word rendered here 'windows' is rendered by Jerome propugnacula - 'fortresses,' bulwarks, ramparts; and by the Septuagint, Επαλξεις Epalcheis - 'Bulwarks,' or rather, pinnacles on the walls. The Hebrew word שׁמשׁות shı̂mâshôt) is evidently derived from שׁמשׁ shemesh (the sun); and has some relation in signification to the sun, either as letting in light, or as having a radiated appearance like the sun. Gesenius renders it, 'notched battlements, the same as sun, or rays of the sun.' Faber (Hebrew Archaeol., p. 294) supposes that the name was given to the turrets or battlements here referred to, because they had some resemblance to the rays of the sun. I think it prob able that the prophet refers to some radiated ornament about a building, that had a resemblance to the sun, or to some gilded turrets on the walls of a city. I see no evidence in the ancient versions that the word refers to windows.

Of agates - Agates are a class of silicious, semi-pellucid gems, of many varieties, consisting of quarts-crystal flint, horn-stone, chalcedony, amethyst, jasper, cornelian, etc., variegated with dots, zones, filaments, ramifications, and various figures. They are esteemed the least valuable of all the precious stones. They are found in rocks, and are use, for seals, rings, etc. (Webster.) The Hebrew word כדכד kadekkod, from כדד kâdad, to beat, to pound, and then to strike fire, seems to denote a sparkling gem or ruby. It is not often used. It is rendered by Jerome, Jaspidem. The Septuagint, Ιασπιν Iaspin - 'Jasper,' a gem of a green color. It may be observed that it is not probable that such a stone would be used for a window, for the purpose of letting in light.

And thy gates - See Revelation 21:21 - 'And the twelve gates were twelve pearls; every several gate was of one pearl.' The gates of the city would be made of most precious stones.

Of carbuncles - The carbuncle is a beautiful gem of a deep red color, with a mixture of scarlet, called by the Greeks anthrax, found in the East Indies. It is usually about a quarter of an inch in length. When held up to the sun it loses its deep tinge, and becomes exactly the color of a burning coal (Webster). Hence, its name in Greek. The Hebrew name אקדח 'eqeddâch is derived from קדח qâdach, "to burn," and denotes a flaming or sparkling gem. The word occurs nowhere else in the Hebrew Bible.

And all thy borders - All thy boundaries; or the whole circuit of thy walls. See Revelation 21:18 - 'And the building of the wall of it was of jasper.' The idea is, that the whole city would be built in the most splendid manner. Its foundations and all its stones would be laid in the most precious cement; its turrets, towers, battlements, gates, and the circuit of its walls, would be made of the most precious gems. In general, there can be no doubt that this is designed to represent the future glory of the church under the Redeemer, and perhaps also to furnish an emblematic representation of heaven (compare Revelation 21:2). Kimchi supposes that this may possibly be taken literally, and that Jerusalem may be yet such as is here described. Abarbanel supposes that it may refer to the time when the Oriental world, where these gems are principally found, shall be converted, and come and join in rebuilding the city and the temple.

But the whole description is one of great beauty as applicable to the church of God; to its glories on earth; and to its glory in heaven. Its future magnificence shall be as much greater than anything which has yet occurred in the history of the church, as a city built of gems would be more magnificent than Jerusalem was in the proudest days of its glory. The language used in this verse is in accordance with the Oriental manner. The style of speaking in the East to denote unexampled splendor is well illustrated in the well-known Oriental tale of Aladdin, who thus gives his instructions: 'I leave the choice of materials to you, that is to say, porphyry, jasper, agate, lapis lazuli, and the finest marble of the most varied colors. But I expect that in the highest story of the palace, you shall build me a large hall with a dome, and four equal fronts; and that instead of layers of bricks, the walls be made of massy gold and silver, laid alternately: and that each front shall contain six windows, the lattices of all which, except one, which must be left unfinished and imperfect, shall be so enriched with art and symmetry, with diamonds, rubies, and emeralds, that they shall exceed everything of the kind ever seen in the world' (Pictorial Bible).

13

Isaiah 54:13

開啟正文

你的兒女都要受耶和華的教訓——指這榮美之城的一切居民,即救贖主一切真正的朋友。他們都受神的教訓和引導,這將是他們將來榮耀的一部分。見 Jeremiah 31:34——「他們各人不再教導自己的鄰舍和自己的弟兄說:你該認識耶和華,因為他們從最小的到至大的都必認識我。」

你的兒女必大享平安——見 Isaiah 2:4、Isaiah 9:6 的註釋。

英文原文

And all thy children - All that dwell in this splendid city; all that are the true friends of the Redeemer. It shall be a part of their future glory that they shall be all under divine instruction and guidance. See Jeremiah 31:34 - 'And they shall teach no more every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord, for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them.'

And great shall be the peace of thy children - (See the notes at Isaiah 2:4; Isaiah 9:6).

14

Isaiah 54:14

開啟正文

你必因公義得堅立——這是適合對城邑或邦國說的話。其觀念是:她將不像許多城邑那樣,靠欺詐、掠奪與征服而建立,而是靠公義的盛行而建立。

你必遠離欺壓——即你必遠離受別人欺壓之事。上下文要求這樣理解。希伯來文也可帶主動的意義,因此可讀作「你當遠離欺壓」,即當遠離欺壓別人。但先知的用意在於應許,而非命令;其觀念是:他們將不再有懼怕別人強暴的理由。

因為它必不臨近你——這無疑是指彌賽亞之下教會的安全、永存與繁榮。

英文原文

In righteousness shalt thou be established - This is language which is appropriately addressed to a city or commonwealth. The idea is, that it would not be built up by fraud, and rapine, and conquest, as many cities had been, but by the prevalence of justice.

Thou shalt be far from oppressions - That is, thou shalt be far from being oppressed by others. So the connection demands. The Hebrew would bear an active signification, so that it might be read, 'be thou far from oppression,' that is, be far from oppressing others. But the design of the prophet is rather to promise than to command; and the idea is, that they should have no occasion to fear the violence of others anymore.

For it shall not come near thee - This doubtless refers to the security, perpetuity, and prosperity of the church under the Messiah.

15

Isaiah 54:15

開啟正文

即或有人聚集——這一節的觀念是:神子民的仇敵固然會結盟立約攻擊他們,但那必不是出於神的指示,他們也不能勝過教會。這裏譯作「聚集」的詞(גור gûr)本義為「從路上轉開」,繼而指暫居,再指聚集攻擊某人。它在此大概指敵對勢力集結以締結同盟或發動戰爭。這段經文的解釋歷來衆說紛紜,但其意大概如此。耶柔米譯作「看哪,必有一個素不與我同在的外人前來,那陌生人日後必歸附於你」,似乎是把它理解為將有歸信者產生。這含義明確見於七十士譯本:「看哪,必有歸信者藉着我到你這裏來,他們必與你同住,投奔於你。」迦勒底譯本則作「看哪,你子民的被擄者必聚集歸你;耶路撒冷啊,末後那些聚集來苦待你的列王,必倒在你中間」。但上述的看法才是正確的意思:必有人締結同盟、訂立盟約,神子民的仇敵必結合起來,聚集毀滅教會。這樣的事屢見不鮮。有人為此結成可怕的聯盟,設計周密的計謀要毀滅至高者的朋友。見 Psalm 2:2:「世上的君王一齊起來,臣宰一同商議,要敵擋耶和華並他的受膏者。」歷史不小的部分,就是為把真宗教逐出世界而締結的種種聯盟與同盟的記錄。

卻不由於我——即非出於我的指示,或憑我的命令。

必因你僕倒——希伯來文 עליך(‛âlaı̂yk)意為「必歸向你」。Lowth 譯作「必歸到你這一邊」。這說法似乎指他們必「歸向她」,即撇棄敵意,解散攻擊教會的同盟,轉而歸附教會。為證明這一解釋,羅森米勒引述以下經文:1 Chronicles 12:19-20; 2 Chronicles 15:9; Jeremiah 21:9; Jeremiah 39:9。因此,這段經文展望教會的仇敵將來歸信真道。這無疑已部分應驗於那些曾聯合抵擋救贖主福音之萬民的歸信。在羅馬帝國逼迫基督徒之後的時代,曾有顯著的應驗:帝國傾其全力、連續十次大逼迫要摧毀教會之後,那曾如此敵擋教會的帝國本身竟歸信了基督信仰。當今一切聯合抵擋福音的地上權勢都歸入真宗教的影響之下時,這預言必以更顯著的方式應驗。

英文原文

Behold, they shall surely gather together - The idea in this verse is, that the enemies of the people of God would indeed form alliances and compacts against them, but it would not be under the divine direction, and they would not be able to prevail against the church. The word rendered here 'gather together' (גור gûr) means properly 'to turn aside from the way'; then to sojourn for a time; then to assemble against anyone. It seems here to refer to the gathering together of hostile forces to form an alliance, or to wage war. Great variety, however, has prevailed in the interpretation of the passage, but this seems to be the sense of it. Jerome renders it, 'Lo, a foreigner shall come who was not with me, the stranger shall hereafter be joined to thee,' and seems to understand it of the proselytes that should be made. This sense is found expressly in the Septuagint, 'Lo, proselytes shall come to thee through me, and they shall sojourn with thee, and fly to thee' The Chaldee renders it, 'Lo, the captivity of thy people shall be surely gathered unto thee, and in the end the kings of the people which were assembled to afflict thee, O Jerusalem, shall fall in the midst of thee.' But the above seems to be the correct sense. Alliances would be formed; compacts would be entered into; leagues would be made by the enemies of the people of God, and they would be assembled to destroy the church. This has often been done. Formidable confederations have been entered into for the purpose, and deep-laid plans have been devised to destroy the friends of the Most High. See Psalm 2:2 : 'The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together against the Lord, and against his Anointed.' No small part of history is a record of the combinations and alliances which have been entered into for the purpose of driving the true religion from the world.

But not by me - Not under my direction, or by my command.

Shall fall for thy sake - Hebrew, עליך ‛âlaı̂yk - 'Shall fall unto thee.' Lowth, 'Shall come over to thy side.' The phrase seems to mean that they should 'fall to them,' that is, that they should lay aside their opposition, break up their alliances against the church, and come over to it. In proof of this interpretation, Rosenmuller appeals to the following places: 1 Chronicles 12:19-20; 2 Chronicles 15:9; Jeremiah 21:9; Jeremiah 39:9. The passage, therefore, looks to the future conversion of the enemies of the church to the true faith. It has, doubtless, been partially fulfilled in the conversion of nations that have been leagued against the gospel of the Redeemer. There was a striking fulfillment in the times that succeeded the persecutions of Christians in the Roman empire. After all the power of the empire had been enlisted in ten successive persecutions to destroy the church, the very empire that had thus opposed the church was converted to the Christian faith. In a still more signal manner will this be fulfilled when all the powers of the earth now leagued against the gospel shall be brought under the influences of the true religion.

16

Isaiah 54:16

開啟正文

「看哪,吹噓炭火的鐵匠是我所造」——本節的意義如下:「凡能影響你們福祉的,都在我的掌管之下。製造戰爭或刑具的鐵匠也在我以下。他的生命、力量、技巧都在我手中;凡我看為不宜准許的事,他一概不能作。教會的仇敵本身——那施行毀滅的毀壞者——也是如此。我造了他,他完全在我的掌管與調度之下。」吹噓炭火的鐵匠,指從事鍛造戰具或任何其他器械的人。這裏是指那從事鍛造兵器、要攻擊教會的人;而這話為何不可以也指那製造刑具的人——例如逼迫時代所用的那些刑具呢?

「打造合用的器械」——羅斯(Lowth)譯作「按他的工作」;諾伊斯(Noyes)譯作「憑他的勞碌」。其意念是:他生產出一件器械,作為他工作的成果。

「殘害人、行毀滅的也是我所造」——意即我造了一切借戰爭散布荒涼的人,並且每一個這樣的人都在我的掌管之下(見 Isaiah 10:5-7;Isaiah 37:26-27;Isaiah 46:1-6 註釋)。這裏的意義是:神既掌管這一切征服者,他們所能成就的,便不能超過祂所准許的。

英文原文

Behold, I have created the smith - The sense of this verse is, 'Everything that can effect your welfare is under my control. The smith who manufactures the instruments of war or of torture is under me. His life, his strength, his skill, are all in my hands, and he can do nothing which I shall not deem it best to permit him to do. So with the enemy of the church himself - the waster who destroys. I bare made him, and he is wholly under my control and at my disposal.' The smith who bloweth the coals, denotes the man who is engaged in forging instruments for war, or for any other purpose. Here it refers to him who should be engaged in forging instruments of battle to attack the church; and why should it not refer also to him who should be engaged in making instruments of torture - such as are used in times of persecution?

That bringeth forth an instrument for his work - Lowth, 'According to his work.' Noyes, 'By his labor.' The idea is, that he produces an instrument as the result of his work.

I have created the waster to destroy - I have formed every man who is engaged in spreading desolation by wars, and I have every such man under my control (see the notes at Isaiah 10:5-7; Isaiah 37:26-27; Isaiah 46:1-6). The sense here is, that as God had all such conquerors under his control, they could accomplish no more than he permitted them to do.

17

Isaiah 54:17

開啟正文

「凡為攻擊你造成的器械」——指任何戰爭的器械,任何刀劍或槍矛;任何鐵匠所造、用於逼迫或酷刑的工具(Isaiah 54:16)。

「必不利用」——關於這詞的意義,見 Isaiah 52:13 註釋。這裏的意思是:它必得不到最終、徹底的成功。它也許一時獲准看似興旺——正如逼迫者和壓迫者曾經歷的那樣——但決不會有最終完全的成功。

「凡在審判時興起用舌攻擊你的」——沒有人能以言語和控告傷害你。若有爭辯興起;若有人毀謗你,指控你欺詐行騙,你終必能使他們認錯,並藉著顯明真理而定他們的罪。這裏的言辭大概取自法庭(見 Isaiah 41:1 註釋);其要義是:在一切言語的爭戰中,真理與勝利必站在教會一邊。對於凡曾留心觀察迄今有關真宗教之討論進程的人,不必多說這預言已榮耀地應驗。論證、詭辯、譏誚,都曾被用來推翻基督教的真理;人們曾訴諸天文學、地質學、古物學、歷史學,以及幾乎每一門科學,卻同樣一無所成。詩歌曾借其音律之美助陣;嚴肅的史家在其敘事的線索中織入對聖經暗中的攻擊與狡黠的影射;人們曾勘探大地,要證明「那創造世界、並把世界年代啟示給摩西的主,在世界的年代上弄錯了」;東方各國的典籍——其歷史上溯至比聖經創世記載更遠的多個世代循環——也曾被徵引;但迄今為止,在這一切爭戰中,最終的勝利都宣告站在聖經一邊。而且無論攻擊來自何方,無論聖經的反對者展現了多少學問與才華,神總興起一位華生(Watson)、拉德納(Lardner)、查爾默斯(Chalmers)、巴克蘭(Buckland)、居維葉(Cuvier)或魏斯曼(Wiseman),來迎擊這些指控,使天平傾向真理的一方。凡想查考基督教與科學論戰之成效與結果的人,可在魏斯曼博士的《科學與啟示宗教之關聯》講座(Andover, 1837)中,看到以極大學問與才華所作的詳盡論述。

「這是耶和華僕人的產業」——事奉神之人所等候的產業,乃是真理與勝利。不是黃金,也不是戰場上的凱旋;不是血染之地所贏得的桂冠;而是在一切患難之時蒙神保護;在一切逆境之中得祂為友;在與謬誤及虛假宗教體系的一切爭辯中獲得完全勝利;並在仇敵以任何形式起來、企圖毀滅教會、塗抹其存在與其名之時,蒙保守無恙。

「這是從我得來的」——或更恰當地說:「這是他們從我所得的義,或稱義;這是我賜給他們作他們稱義之分的。」這裏的觀念不是說他們的義出於祂,而是說這出於祂的稱義或辯白,乃是他們產業與分的一部分。

英文原文

No weapon that is formed - No instrument of war, no sword, or spear; no instrument of persecution or torture that is made by the smith, Isaiah 54:16.

Shall prosper - On the meaning of this word, see the notes at Isaiah 52:13. The sense here is, that it shall not have final and ultimate prosperity. It might be permitted for a time to appear to prosper - as persecutors and oppressors have done; but there would not be final and complete success.

And every tongue - No one shall be able to injure you by words and accusations. If a controversy shall arise; if others reproach you and accuse you of imposture and deceit, you will be able ultimately to convince them of error, and, by manifestation of the truth, to condemn them. The language here is derived probably from courts of justice (see the notes at Isaiah 41:1); and the idea is, that truth and victory, in every strife of words, would be on the side of the church. To those who have watched the progress of discussions thus far on the subject of the true religion, it is needless to say that this has been triumphantly fulfilled. Argument, sophism, ridicule, have all been tried to overthrow the truth of the Christian religion. Appeals have been made to astronomy, geology, antiquities, history, and indeed to almost every department of science, and with the same want of success. Poetry has lent the charm of its numbers; the grave historian has interwoven with the thread of his narrative covert attacks and sly insinuations against the Bible; the earth has been explored to prove that' He who made the world and revealed its age to Moses was mistaken in its age;' and the records of Oriental nations, tracing their history up cycles of ages beyond the Scripture account of the creation of the world, have been appealed to, but thus far in all these contests ultimate victory has declared in favor of the Bible. And no matter from what quarter the attack has come, and no matter how much learning and talent have been evinced by the adversaries of the Bible, God has raised up some Watson, or Lardner, or Chalmers, or Buckland, or Cuvier, or Wiseman, to meet these charges, and to turn the scales in favor of the cause of truth. They who are desirous of examining the effects of the controversy of Christianity with science, and the results, can find them detailed with great learning and talent in Dr. Wiseman's Lectures on the connection between Science and Revealed Religion, Andover, 1837.

This is the heritage - The inheritance which awaits those who serve God is truth and victory. It is not gold and the triumph of battle. It is not the laurel won in fields of blood. But it is, the protection of God in all times of trouble; his friendship in all periods of adversity; complete victory in all contests with error and false systems of religion; and preservation when foes rise up in any form and endeavor to destroy the church, and to blot out its existence and its name.

And their righteousness is of me - Or rather, 'this is the righteousness, or the justification which they obtain of me; this is that which I impart to them as their justification.' The idea is not that their righteousness is of him, but that this justification or vindication from him is a part of their inheritance and their portion.