Barnes' Notes on the Bible · Joshua 第22章

註釋閱讀最佳化

分章註釋

Joshua 第 22 章

1

Joshua 22:1

開啟正文

本章的事件無疑是按其正確的歷史順序記載的。約但河東二支派的援軍並非在對迦南人的戰役一結束就立刻被打發回去。他們是從示羅動身的(Joshua 22:9)——在征服以及猶大子和約瑟的子孫定居於各自產業之後,在利未城邑被指定之後,聖所已遷至示羅(Joshua 18:1)。

英文原文

The events of this chap. are no doubt recorded in their proper historical order. The auxiliary forces of the trans-Jordanic tribes were not sent away immediately after the campaigns against the Canaanites were over. They set forth from Shiloh, Joshua 22:9, to which place the sanctuary had been removed Joshua 18:1 after the conquest and the settlement of the children of Judah and of Joseph in their possessions, and after the appointment of the Levitical cities.

7

Joshua 22:7

開啟正文

插入這段關於半個支派的解釋,並重複約書亞的告別辭,都是極古的作者——希伯來作者尤甚——一個顯著特徵的例子:使故事的每一部分都具有完整與圓滿。猶太史家幾乎從不用引用或提醒的方式處理,而是重複必要的篇幅,好叫他所敘述的事件本身就能完全明白。(另比較 Joshua 13:14、Joshua 13:33;Joshua 14:3;Joshua 18:7。)不過,Joshua 22:8 所特有的細節,也可能出自對整件事的另一記述,與 Joshua 22:5 所屬的記述不同,而是由後來的修訂者編織進去的。

英文原文

The insertion of this explanation about the half tribe, and the repetition of Joshua's farewell, are examples of a marked characteristic of very ancient writers and of Hebrew writers as much as any - that of giving a completeness and finish to each section of their story. The Jewish historian scarcely ever quotes or reminds, but repeats so much as may be necessary to make his account of the transaction in hand fully intelligible by itself. (Compare also Joshua 13:14, Joshua 13:33; Joshua 14:3; Joshua 18:7.) It is quite possible, however, that the particulars special to Joshua 22:8, may be due to some other narrative of the whole event than that to which Joshua 22:5 belongs, and may have been interwoven by a later reviser.

9

Joshua 22:9

開啟正文

基列——在此按最廣的意義使用,指約但河以東的整個地區。

英文原文

Gilead - Here used in the widest sense for the whole trans-Jordanic district.

10

Joshua 22:10

開啟正文

兩個半支派築這座祭壇,是要使他們的主張常存不滅:對於在約但河西岸所設立之神的聖所,他們與其他支派享有同樣的份。並且,為要防堵任何「約但河本身是他們與聖所之間天然隔絕屏障」的論調,他們把祭壇築在約但河的西岸,即迦南一側的河岸,而不是東岸。

譯作「境界」的那個詞值得注意;它的意思是「環繞之地」,即劃定的行政轄區。

英文原文

The two tribes and a half erected this altar in order to keep alive their claim to have the same interest as the other tribes had in the sanctuary of God, which was established on the west side of Jordan: and in order to forestall any assertion that the Jordan itself was a natural barrier of exclusion between them and the sanctuary, they built it on the west or Canaanite bank of the Jordan and not on the east.

The word rendered "borders" is noteworthy; it means circuits, arrondissements.

12

Joshua 22:12

開啟正文

聚集——各支派此前已散歸各自的家園,如今再次被召集起來。

英文原文

Gathered themselves together - The various tribes had already dispersed to their homes, and were now summoned together again.

17

Joshua 22:17

開啟正文

我們到今日還沒有得潔淨——曾在抵擋那些隨從巴力毗珥墮落的人、維護神之事上擔當顯著角色的非尼哈,意思是:刑罰雖然那麼可怕,他們中間仍有人戀慕巴力崇拜,甚至暗中奉行。(比較約書亞的話,Joshua 24:14-23。)

英文原文

From which we are not cleansed until this day - Phinehas, who had borne a conspicuous part in vindicating the cause of God against those who fell away to Baal-peor, means that terrible as the punishment had been, there were still those among them who hankered after Baal worship, and even practiced it in secret. (Compare Joshua's words, Joshua 24:14-23.)

19

Joshua 22:19

開啟正文

不潔淨——意即因為聖所不在那地,而是在約但河彼岸,所以是不聖潔的。

英文原文

Unclean - i. e. unholy because the sanctuary was not in it, but on the other side of Jordan.

22

Joshua 22:22

開啟正文

反覆呼求神,而且是用祂的三個名字——אל 'el、אלהים 'elohiym、יהוה yehovah(比較 Psalm 50:1)——呼求,標誌著這抗辯的懇切。兩個半支派的行事,常被人視為模範。他們完全意想不到地被加上一項重大、足以處死之罪,而對此他們全然無辜;然而在他們的自辯中,沒有一句責備或反控的話。他們只是滿足於否定那虛假的指控,並解釋自己行事的真正動機——這動機或許得自摩西所立的先例(Exodus 17:15)。

今日不要救我們——這話是向神直接的上訴,其效力恰恰相當於我們所說「願神幫助我」的形式。

英文原文

The repeated invocation of God, and that by His three names - אל 'êl, אלהים 'ĕlohı̂ym, יהוה yehovâh: compare Psalm 50:1 - marks the earnestness of the protestation. The conduct of the two tribes and a half has often been noted as exemplary. They had had a grave and capital crime most unexpectedly laid to their charge, of which they were entirely innocent. Yet there is no word of reproach or recrimination in their vindication of themselves. They are contented simply to repudiate the false accusation and to explain the real motives of conduct perhaps suggested to them by a precedent set by Moses Exodus 17:15.

Save us not this day - The words are a direct appeal to God, exactly equivalent in effect to our form "So help me God."

34

Joshua 22:34

開啟正文

「證據」一詞(עד 'ed)在大多數抄本的文本中並不見於「壇」之後,在七十士譯本或武加大譯本中也沒有反映。本節大概應讀作:「呂便子孫和迦得子孫給壇起了名,因為(正如他們所說)它要作……」壇上所置的名稱,也許不過是他們之間的一個見證:耶和華是神(華茲華斯)。

英文原文

The word עד ‛êd is not found after "altar" in the text of most manuscripts, nor is it represented in the Septuagint or Vulgate. The passage should probably run: "the children of Reuben and the children of Gad named the altar, that (as they said) it might be, etc." The title placed on the altar was perhaps simply a witness between them that the Lord was God (Wordsworth).