1
Col 2:1-23.
英文原文
Col 2:1-23.
HIS STRIVINGS IN PRAYER FOR THEIR STEADFASTNESS IN CHRIST; FROM WHOM HE WARNS THEM NOT TO BE LED AWAY BY FALSE WISDOM.
1. For--He explains in what respect he "labored striving"
(Col 1:29).
Translate as Greek, "I wish you to know how great a conflict (the same Greek word as in
Col 1:29,
"agony of a conflict" of fervent, anxious prayer; not conflict with the false teachers, which would have been impossible for him now in prison) I have for you."
them at Laodicea--exposed to the same danger from false teachers as the Colossians (compare
Col 4:16).
This danger was probably the cause of his writing to Laodicea, as well as to Colosse.
not seen my face in the flesh--including those in Hierapolis
(Col 4:13).
Paul considered himself a "debtor" to all the Gentiles
(Ro 1:14).
"His face" and presence would have been a "comfort"
(Col 2:2; Ac 20:38).
Compare
Col 1:4, 7, 8,
in proof that he had not seen, but only heard of the Colossians. Hence he strives by earnest conflict with God in anxious prayer for them, to make up for the loss of his bodily presence among them. Though "absent in the flesh, I am with you in the Spirit"
(Col 2:5).
2
無標題
2. 譯作:「要叫他們的心得安慰。」「他們的」一詞與「你們」
(西 2:4)
相比對,便證明 西 2:1 中「沒有見過我面的人」乃是保羅聲稱為之「竭力」之人的概括稱呼,其中包括特定的子類——「你們(歌羅西人)和老底嘉人」。因為顯而易見,「叫他們的心得到安慰」這個禱告,必定包含他明言「我為之竭力」的歌羅西人在內。因此這是一種縮略的表達方式,意即「叫你們和他們的心得安慰」。阿爾福德(Alford)譯作「堅固」,或允許「安慰」取其原初字根之意,即堅固。但希臘文支持英文譯本的譯法,意義也清晰:即因着保羅未曾見面的人而得安慰——正因如此,他為他們在代求的爭戰中更加熱切;因為我們對不在身邊的朋友,往往比對在身邊的更為掛念〔達文南特(Davenant)〕。他們的心必因「知道他為他們有何等的竭力」、以及他何等關切他們的益處而得安慰;也必因從使徒得知他們從以巴弗所聽見的教訓是真實確定的,而得以從疑慮中釋放出來。寫信給他當面教導過的教會時,他便論及關乎他們的具體細節,如同父親指教兒女。但對於那些他未曾親身到過的人,他便論及救恩較普遍的真理。
彼此——按最古老的抄本之希臘文譯作「他們聯絡齊整」。
在愛心裏——這是完全聯絡的紐帶與要素,是抵消錯謬教訓那分裂之效力的解藥。即在基督裏對神並對彼此的愛。
以致——他們「聯絡齊整」的目標與目的。
豐豐足足——希臘文作「這(基督徒)悟性上
(帖前 1:5;
來 6:11; 10:22)
滿足之信心的一切**豐盛」。措辭的層層遞進——不僅是「悟性」,更是「悟性上的滿足信心」;不僅如此,更是其「豐盛」;不僅如此,更是「一切豐盛」——暗示他何等渴望讓他們深感眼前這主題的關鍵重要。
滿心——譯作「以致」。
知道——希臘文意指「充分而準確的認識」。這與 西 2:3 的「知識」是不同的希臘文詞。阿爾福德(Alford)譯作「透徹的……認識」。單說知道力度不足;他們在某種程度上已承認真理;他們所缺乏的,是對真理的充分而準確的認識(比較註釋,參
西 1:9, 10;
腓 1:9
註釋)。
神……父……基督——最古老的抄本省略「和父,和」;於是譯作「神的(即)基督」。兩份極古的抄本和武加大譯本(Vulgate)讀作「神,就是基督的父」。
英文原文
2. Translate, "That their hearts may be comforted." The "their," compared with "you"
(Col 2:4),
proves that in
Col 2:1
the words, "have not seen my face in the flesh," is a general designation of those for whom Paul declares he has "conflict," including the particular species, "you (Colossians) and them at Laodicea." For it is plain, the prayer "that their hearts may be comforted," must include in it the Colossians for whom he expressly says, "I have conflict." Thus it is an abbreviated mode of expression for, "That your and their hearts may be comforted." ALFORD translates, "confirmed," or allows "comforted" in its original radical sense strengthened. But the Greek supports English Version: the sense, too, is clear: comforted with the consolation of those whom Paul had not seen, and for whom, in consequence, he strove in prayerful conflict the more fervently; inasmuch as we are more anxious in behalf of absent, than present, friends [DAVENANT]. Their hearts would be comforted by "knowing what conflict he had for" them, and how much he is interested for their welfare; and also by being released from doubts on learning from the apostle, that the doctrine which they had heard from Epaphras was true and certain. In writing to churches which he had instructed face to face, he enters into particular details concerning them, as a father directing his children. But to those among whom he had not been in person, he treats of the more general truths of salvation.
being--Translate as Greek in oldest manuscripts, "They being knit together."
in love--the bond and element of perfect knitting together; the antidote to the dividing schismatical effect of false doctrine. Love to God and to one another in Christ.
unto--the object and end of their being "knit together."
all riches--Greek, "all the riches of the full assurance
(1Th 1:5; Heb 6:11; 10:22)
of the (Christian) understanding." The accumulation of phrases, not only "understanding," but "the full assurance of understanding"; not only this, but "the riches of," &c., not only this, but "all the riches of," &c., implies how he desires to impress them with the momentous importance of the subject in hand.
to--Translate "unto."
acknowledgment--The Greek implies, "full and accurate knowledge." It is a distinct Greek word from "knowledge,"
Col 2:3.
ALFORD translates, "thorough . . . knowledge." Acknowledgment hardly is strong enough; they did in a measure acknowledge the truth; what they wanted was the full and accurate knowledge of it (compare Notes, see on
Col 1:9, 10;
Php 1:9).
of God, and of the Father and of Christ--The oldest manuscripts omit "and of the Father, and of"; then translate, "Of God (namely), Christ." Two very old manuscripts and Vulgate read, "Of God the Father of Christ."
3
無標題
3. 按希臘文語序譯作:「一切智慧和知識的財富,都藏在祂裏面(不是阿爾福德〔Alford〕所譯的『在其中』之奧祕;基督自己就是那『奧祕』
〔西 2:2;
提前 3:16〕,
關係代名詞所指的正是基督)。」這裏的「一切」,對應 西 2:2 的「一切」;「財富」對應「豐盛」;豐盛(西 2:2)正源於這些財富。「在」是句子的謂語;一切財富都在祂裏面;藏則說明它們在祂裏面的狀態或方式。如同一座蘊藏未知且取之不盡財富的礦藏,智慧之財富全都藏在祂裏面,但並非為了長久如此隱藏;你們只要去探索,便可從其中獲得「豐盛」
(西 2:2);
但你們歌羅西人若不追求對這些財富的充分認識(參 西 2:2 註釋),它們就仍「隱藏着」。比較 太 13:44 的比喻:「藏在地裏的財寶」。這一意義符合使徒的思路,也排除了阿爾福德(Alford)的反對——他以為「這些財富並非隱藏,而是已經顯明的」。「隱藏」顯然對應於「奧祕」
(西 2:2),
這奧祕是神所命定的——我們若忠於所蒙的恩典,它便不應繼續隱藏,而要顯明出來(比較
林前 2:7, 8)。
然而,這礦藏既深不可測,在永恒之中,也必常有新的財富從其隱藏的狀態中被開採出來。
智慧——是普遍性的,關乎經歷性與實踐性的真理;由此而來的是「悟性」
(西 2:2)。
知識——是特殊而理智性的,關乎教義性的真理;由此而來的是「充分的認識」
(西 2:2)。
英文原文
3. Translate in the Greek order, "In whom (not as ALFORD, 'in which') mystery; Christ is Himself the 'mystery'
(Col 2:2; 1Ti 3:16),
and to Christ the relative refers) are all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge hidden." The "all" here, answers to "all" in
Col 2:2;
as "treasures" answer to the "riches"; it is from the treasures that the riches
(Col 2:2)
are derived. "Are" is the predicate of the sentence; all the treasures ARE in Him; hidden is predicated of the state or manner in which they are in Him. Like a mine of unknown and inexhaustible wealth, the treasures of wisdom are all in Him hidden, but not in order to remain so; they only need to be explored for you to attain "unto the riches" in them
(Col 2:2);
but until you, Colossians, press after attaining the full knowledge (see on
Col 2:2)
of them, they remain "hidden." Compare the parable,
Mt 13:44,
"treasure hid." This sense suits the scope of the apostle, and sets aside ALFORD'S objection that "the treasures are not hidden, but revealed." "Hidden" plainly answers to "mystery"
(Col 2:2),
which is designed by God, if we be faithful to our privileges, not to remain hidden, but to be revealed (compare
1Co 2:7, 8).
Still as the mine is unfathomable, there will, through eternity, be always fresh treasures in Him to be drawn forth from their hidden state.
wisdom--general, and as to experimental and practical truth; whence comes "understanding"
(Col 2:2).
knowledge--special and intellectual, in regard to doctrinal truth; whence comes "the full knowledge"
(Col 2:2).
4
無標題
4. 我說這話——「如今」。將「免得有人」等與
西 2:8, 16, 18
比較。他指的是猶太教與東方哲學的攙雜,以及這混合物與基督教的結合。
花言巧語——以智慧和謙卑的外貌為包裝,顯得頗有道理
(西 2:18, 23)。
英文原文
4. And--"Now." Compare with "lest any man," &c.
Col 2:8, 16, 18.
He refers to the blending of Judaism with Oriental philosophy, and the combination of this mixture with Christianity.
enticing words--plausible as wearing the guise of wisdom and humility
(Col 2:18, 23).
5
無標題
5. 因為——這是反對他們任憑自己被迷惑的論證,是出於對他個人權柄的敬重,彷彿他親身在場一樣。
歡喜並且看見——歡喜地看見。
規矩——你們的好秩序;對應於「聯絡齊整」
(西 2:2),
如同一個組織良好的身體;表示聯絡的那個希臘文詞,在
弗 4:16
中用來描述教會這身體「聯絡得合式」。比較
林前 14:33, 40。
堅固——希臘文作「堅固(或『堅實』)的根基」。「規矩」表達的是教會外在的樣式;「堅固」則表達其教會所倚靠的內在根基。希臘文字面所指的不是抽象的性質,而是具體的實物;因此此處他們的「信」就是那構成其教會根基的堅實之物。
英文原文
5. For--argument against their suffering themselves to be beguiled, drawn from a regard to his personal authority as though he were present.
joying and beholding--beholding with joy.
order--your good order; answering to "knit together"
(Col 2:2)
as a well-organized body; the same Greek as that for knit together, is used of the body" of the Church compacted," in
Eph 4:16.
Compare
1Co 14:33, 40.
steadfastness--Greek, "the firm (or 'solid') foundation." As "order" expresses the outward aspect of the Church; so "steadfastness" expresses the inner basis on which their Church rested. The Greek literally implies not an abstract quality, but the thing in the concrete; thus their "faith" here is the solid thing which constituted the basis of their Church.
6
無標題
6. 「你們既然(一次接受;過去時態;從以巴弗)接受了基督耶穌為你們的主
(比較
林前 12:3;
林後 4:5;
腓 3:8),
就當在祂裏面行事為人。」他所說的不僅是「你們接受了」基督的教訓,而是「耶穌」自己;這正是信心的本質
(約 14:21, 23;
加 1:16)。
你們已經一次領受了基督裏生命的靈;就當在你們的行事為人中將這生命付諸實行
(加 5:25)。
這正是本書信的主旨。
英文原文
6. "As therefore ye received (once for all; the aorist tense; from Epaphras) Jesus the Christ as your Lord (compare
1Co 12:3; 2Co 4:5; Php 3:8),
so walk in Him." He says not merely, "Ye received" the doctrine of Christ, but "Jesus" Himself; this is the essence of faith
(Joh 14:21, 23; Ga 1:16).
Ye have received once for all the Spirit of life in Christ; carry into practice that life in your walk
(Ga 5:25).
This is the main scope of the Epistle.
7
無標題
7. 根基立住——
(弗 3:17)。
建造——希臘文作「正被建造」。正如「扎根」暗示他們的生命力;照樣「建造」暗示厚實的堅固性。正如在雅歌中,當一個意象不足以表達神聖真理的多重層面時,便用另一個意象來補足所需的觀念。因此,「行事為人」這第三個意象
(西 2:6)
表達了「扎根」與「建造」二者雖各有所指、卻無法表達的思想,即向前的運動。「扎根」是過去時態,暗示他們初次歸信並在生命上被嫁接「在祂裏面」。「建造」是現在時態(希臘文),暗示他們藉着與祂聯合而在信仰上漸進的增長
(徒 20:32)。
弗 2:20
論及教會;但此處論及他們個人在造就上的長進。
堅固——得着印證。
正如——「正如」。
感謝的心——在信仰上邁向更完全的成熟(比較
西 2:2),
「带着感謝」歸與神——這整個福分的恩慈賜予者。
英文原文
7. Rooted--
(Eph 3:17).
built up--Greek, "being builded up." As "rooted" implies their vitality; so "builded up," massive solidity. As in the Song of Solomon, when one image is not sufficient to express the varied aspects of divine truth, another is employed to supply the idea required. Thus "walking," a third image
(Col 2:6),
expresses the thought which "rooted" and "built," though each suggesting a thought peculiar to itself, could not express, namely, onward motion. "Rooted" is in the past tense, implying their first conversion and vital grafting "in Him." "Built up" is present (in the Greek), implying their progressive increase in religion by union with Him.
Eph 2:20
refers to the Church; but the passage here to their individual progress in edification
(Ac 20:32).
stablished--confirmed.
as--"even as."
abounding therein with thanksgiving--advancing to fuller maturity (compare
Col 2:2)
in the faith, "with thanksgiving" to God as the gracious Author of this whole blessing.
8
無標題
8. 譯作:「你們要謹慎(字面作『注意觀看』),免得有人(希臘文直陳語氣表達:如我所懼怕的那樣,實際上已有;即指某個已知的邪惡黨羽,
加 1:7)
擄去你們(不僅僅從你們身上擄掠,而是把你們自己當作他的擄物),藉着(透過)他的哲學」等等。使徒並非譴責一切的哲學,而是歌羅西猶太化—東方派異端者那種「那哲學」(希臘文如此),這哲學日後發展為諾斯底主義。你們既有「滿足之信心的豐盛」和「智慧之財富」,就不該任憑自己被空虛的、欺騙人的哲學擄去:「豐盛」與擄物相對;「滿足」與「虛妄」即空虛相對
(西 2:2, 3, 9)。
照着——「按照」。
人的遺傳——與「神本性的豐盛」相對。指拉比的遺傳,
可 7:8。
當人無法使啟示看似論及他們所好奇探究的深邃奧祕時,便引進人間的哲學和自稱的遺傳來加以輔助,好比有人提着燈籠到日晷前去辨認時辰一樣〔時代的警語, p. 85〕。假教師在理論上自詡更高深的智慧,在入門者之間以傳統傳遞;在實行上則要求禁慾,彷彿物質與身體乃是邪惡的源頭。弗呂家(歌羅西在其中)對神祕與法術有着天然的偏好,這在他們敬拜西布莉及後來的孟他努主義(Montanism)中有所表現〔尼安德(Neander)〕。
世上的小學——(參
加 4:3
註釋。)「(外在)世上的『小學』或初步課程」,如律例條文;我們在猶太教幼兒時期所學的功課
(西 2:11, 16, 20;
加 4:1-3)。
但尼安德(Neander)譯作「世上的元素」,意即屬地的、屬肉體的、外在的事物,而非猶太教與異教中「信仰的初步」。
不照着基督——「他們」所誇耀的更高深的「哲學」,不過是人的遺傳,是對屬肉體與屬世事物的依附,而非對基督的依附。他們在名義上承認基督,在實質上卻以他們的教訓否認祂。
英文原文
8. Translate, "Beware (literally, 'Look' well) lest there shall be (as I fear there is: the Greek indicative expresses this) any man (pointing to some known emissary of evil,
Ga 1:7)
leading you away as his spoil (not merely gaining spoil out of you, but making yourselves his spoil) through (by means of) his philosophy," &c. The apostle does not condemn all philosophy, but "the philosophy" (so Greek) of the Judaic-oriental heretics at Colosse, which afterwards was developed into Gnosticism. You, who may have "the riches of full assurance" and "the treasures of wisdom," should not suffer yourselves to be led away as a spoil by empty, deceitful philosophy: "riches" are contrasted with spoil; "full" with "vain," or empty
(Col 2:2, 3, 9).
after--"according to."
tradition of men--opposed to, "the fulness of the Godhead." Applied to Rabbinical traditions,
Mr 7:8.
When men could not make revelation even seem to tell about deep mysteries which they were curious to pry into, they brought in human philosophy and pretended traditions to help it, as if one should bring a lamp to the sundial to find the hour [Cauations for Times, p. 85]. The false teachers boasted of a higher wisdom in theory, transmitted by tradition among the initiated; in practice they enjoined asceticism, as though matter and the body were the sources of evil. Phrygia (in which was Colosse) had a propensity for the mystical and magical, which appeared in their worship of Cybele and subsequent Montanism [NEANDER].
rudiments of the world--(See on
Ga 4:3).
"The rudiments" or elementary lessons "of the (outward) world," such as legal ordinances; our Judaic childhood's lessons
(Col 2:11, 16, 20; Ga 4:1-3).
But NEANDER, "the elements of the world," in the sense, what is earthly, carnal and outward, not "the rudiments of religion," in Judaism and heathenism.
not after Christ--"Their" boasted higher "philosophy" is but human tradition, and a cleaving to the carnal and worldly, and not to Christ. Though acknowledging Christ nominally, in spirit they by their doctrine deny Him.
9
無標題
9. 因為——「因為」。「他們」的「哲學」
(西 2:8)
並不「照着基督」,而一切真正的哲學都是照着基督的;凡不是出於祂、又不歸於祂的事物,都是迷惑;「因為神本性一切的豐盛都有形有體地居住在祂(惟獨在祂)裏面」,如居住在聖殿中等等。
豐盛——
(西 1:19;
約 14:10)。
神本性——希臘文(theotes)意指神格的本質與本性,而不僅僅是神性的屬性和特徵(希臘文作「theiotes」)。祂作為人,不僅是「像神」,更是完完全全的神。
有形有體地——不僅如祂道成肉身之前,而是如今「有形有體地在祂裏面」,作為道成了肉身
(約 1:14, 18)。
信徒藉着與祂聯合,就得與祂神性的豐盛有分
(約 1:16;
彼後 1:4;
參 弗 3:19
註釋)。
英文原文
9. For--"Because." Their "philosophy"
(Col 2:8)
is not "after Christ," as all true philosophy is, everything which comes not from, and tends not to, Him, being a delusion; "For in Him (alone) dwelleth" as in a temple, &c.
the fulness--
(Col 1:19; Joh 14:10).
of the Godhead--The Greek (theotes) means the ESSENCE and NATURE of the Godhead, not merely the divine perfections and attributes of Divinity (Greek, "theiotes"). He, as man, was not merely God-like, but in the fullest sense, God.
bodily--not merely as before His incarnation, but now "bodily in Him" as the incarnate word
(Joh 1:14, 18).
Believers, by union with Him, partake of His fulness of the divine nature
(Joh 1:16; 2Pe 1:4;
see on
Eph 3:19).
10
無標題
10. 你們——並且因此;如此。按希臘文語序譯作:「你們在祂裏面(因着與祂聯合)得了豐盛」的一切所需
(約 1:16)。
信徒從他們神聖的元首與大祭司那裏領受那流注下來的屬神膏抹
(詩 133:2)。
祂充滿「豐盛」的本身;我們則從祂得着充滿。保羅暗示:因此你們歌羅西人不需要假教師所夢想的任何補充恩典之源。基督是「一切執政者和掌權者的元首」(希臘文如此),
弗 1:10;
因此惟獨祂,而非這些附屬的「掌權者」,才當受敬拜
(西 2:18)。
英文原文
10. And--And therefore; and so. Translate in the Greek order, "Ye are in Him (by virtue of union with Him) filled full" of all that you need
(Joh 1:16).
Believers receive of the divine unction which flows down from their Divine Head and High Priest
(Ps 133:2).
He is full of the "fulness" itself; we, filled from Him. Paul implies, Therefore ye Colossians need no supplementary sources of grace, such as the false teachers dream of. Christ is "the Head of all rule and authority" (so the Greek),
Eph 1:10;
He, therefore, alone, not these subject "authorities" also, is to be adored
(Col 2:18).
11
無標題
11. 暗示他們並不需要猶太化者所教導的割禮外在儀式,因為他們已經擁有割禮內在屬靈的實際。
受了——更準確地,按希臘文,「你們曾(一次)受割禮(屬靈上,在你們歸信與受洗之時,
羅 2:28, 29;
腓 3:3)
受了(希臘文如此)不是人手所行的割禮」;與「人手所行在肉身上的割禮」
(弗 2:11)
相對。基督自己的身體——信徒藉以成聖的——被稱為「不是人手所造的」
(可 14:58;
來 9:11;
比較
但 2:45)。
脫去——更準確地,按希臘文作「在你們脫去」;如同脫去舊衣服
(弗 4:22);
暗指割禮中割去包皮。
肉體罪惡之身——最古老的抄本讀作「肉體之身」,省略「罪惡」,即「那身體」,其顯著特徵是肉體性(比較
羅 8:13,
那裏「肉體」與「身體」彼此對應)。這肉體之身在其罪惡的層面上,於洗禮中(洗禮在此符合理想)被脫去,作為重生的印記——前提是洗禮是在悔改與信心中領受的。在割禮中,只脫去了包皮;而在基督徒的重生中,「肉體之身」在屬靈上被脫去,至少在其理想構想中是如此——儘管信徒對這理想的實現並不完美。
藉着——希臘文作「在……中」。這屬靈的割禮是在與基督聯合中、或藉着與基督聯合而成就的。基督藉着祂的「割禮」(祂因此為我們承擔遵守全律法的責任)被歸算給信徒作稱義之用;而與祂在祂一切代贖性順服——包括祂的割禮——中的聯合,則是我們成聖的源頭。阿爾福德(Alford)則將之解為對前一句「不是人手所行的割禮」的解釋,即「因你們與基督聯合而成就的割禮」。前一種看法似乎更符合
西 2:12; 3:1, 3, 4,
那些經文同樣使信徒藉着與基督屬靈的聯合,得以在基督的各種狀態——即祂的死、復活和榮耀中顯現——有親身的相交。我們的中保作為中保所行或所受的一切,都可以在我們的魂中重演、在我們的靈中表明。然而皮爾遜(Pearson)的看法與阿爾福德(Alford)相同。約書亞這預表(不是在曠野中的摩西),曾在迦南第二次為以色列人行割禮
(書 5:2-9):
從埃及出來的百姓既已受割禮,其後死在曠野;但出埃及之後出生的則未曾如此。耶穌這 antitype,乃是真割禮的創始者,因此真割禮被稱為「基督的割禮」
(羅 2:29)。
正如約書亞是「摩西的幫手」,照樣耶穌是「為神真理……作了受割禮人的執事」(向外邦人)
(羅 15:8)。
英文原文
11. Implying that they did not need, as the Judaizers taught, the outward rite of circumcision, since they had already the inward spiritual reality of it.
are--rather, as the Greek, "Ye were (once for all) circumcised (spiritually, at your conversion and baptism,
Ro 2:28, 29; Php 3:3)
with a (so the Greek) circumcision made without hands"; opposed to "the circumcision in the flesh made by hands"
(Eph 2:11).
Christ's own body, by which the believer is sanctified, is said to be "not made with hands"
(Mr 14:58; Heb 9:11;
compare
Da 2:45).
in putting off--rather as Greek, "in your putting off"; as an old garment
(Eph 4:22);
alluding to the putting off the foreskin in circumcision.
the body of the sins of the flesh--The oldest manuscripts read, "the body of the flesh," omitting "of the sins," that is, "the body," of which the prominent feature is fleshiness (compare
Ro 8:13,
where "flesh" and "the body" mutually correspond). This fleshly body, in its sinful aspect, is put off in baptism (where baptism answers its ideal) as the seal of regeneration where received in repentance and faith. In circumcision the foreskin only was put off; in Christian regeneration "the body of the flesh" is spiritually put off, at least it is so in its ideal conception, however imperfectly believers realize that ideal.
by--Greek, "in." This spiritual circumcision is realized in, or by, union with Christ, whose "circumcision," whereby He became responsible for us to keep the whole law, is imputed to believers for justification; and union with whom, in all His vicarious obedience, including HIS CIRCUMCISION, is the source of our sanctification. ALFORD makes it explanatory of the previous, "a circumcision made without hands," namely, "the circumcision brought about by your union with Christ." The former view seems to me better to accord with
Col 2:12; 3:1, 3, 4,
which similarly makes the believer, by spiritual union with Christ, to have personal fellowship in the several states of Christ, namely, His death, resurrection, and appearing in glory. Nothing was done or suffered by our Mediator as such, but may be acted in our souls and represented in our spirits. PEARSON'S view, however, is that of ALFORD. JOSHUA, the type (not Moses in the wilderness), circumcised the Israelites in Canaan
(Jos 5:2-9)
the second time: the people that came out of Egypt having been circumcised, and afterwards having died in the wilderness; but those born after the Exodus not having been so. Jesus, the Antitype, is the author of the true circumcision, which is therefore called "the circumcision of Christ"
(Ro 2:29).
As Joshua was "Moses' minister," so Jesus, "minister of the circumcision for the truth of God" unto the Gentiles
(Ro 15:8).
12
無標題
12. 譯作:「你們既受洗與祂一同埋葬。」過去分詞在時間上與前一個動詞「你們(希臘文)受割禮」同時。洗禮被視為舊有屬肉體生命的埋葬,浸入的動作即象徵性地與之對應;在氣候溫暖、浸禮安全之處,這種方式最符合該禮儀的意義;但在浸禮不便或危險之處,澆水也保持了該禮儀的精神;在一切情況下堅持字面的浸禮,不過是律法式的儀文主義而已
(羅 6:3, 4)。
復活——更準確地,按希臘文作「與祂一同復活」。
因着……信——藉着你們的信進入神的運行;即「屬……的信」意即「進入……的信」
(弗 3:12;
腓 3:9)。
信神叫耶穌從死裏復活的大能作為,乃是使人得救的信
(羅 4:24; 10:9);
而這信是祂那使「耶穌從死裏復活」的同一「大能運行」在人心裏所造成的
(弗 1:19, 20)。
本格爾(Bengel)(不像阿爾福德〔Alford〕所理解的那樣)所表達的似乎正是後一種意思,即「藉着那作為神運行之工的信」。
弗 1:19, 20
與此相符:神使一個屬靈上死去的人活過來、得着信心的生命,所運用的同一大能,正是祂「在基督身上所運行,叫祂從死裏字面地復活」的能力。不過,「屬……的信」通常即「進入……的信」
(羅 3:22);
但從語法上說,把它理解為「那作為神運行之效果的信」也並無不當
(弗 2:8;
帖前 2:13)。
正如祂字面的復活是如今我們屬靈復活中所釋放能力的根基,照樣它也是我們日後字面復活的憑據
(羅 8:11)。
英文原文
12. Translate, "Having been buried with Him in your baptism." The past participle is here coincident in time with the preceding verb, "ye were (Greek) circumcised." Baptism is regarded as the burial of the old carnal life, to which the act of immersion symbolically corresponds; and in warm climates where immersion is safe, it is the mode most accordant with the significance of the ordinance; but the spirit of the ordinance is kept by affusion, where immersion would be inconvenient or dangerous; to insist on literal immersion in all cases would be mere legal ceremonialism
(Ro 6:3, 4).
are risen--rather as Greek, "were raised with Him."
through the faith, &c.--by means of your faith in the operation of God; so "faith of," for "faith in"
(Eph 3:12; Php 3:9).
Faith in God's mighty operation in raising again Jesus, is saving faith
(Ro 4:24; 10:9);
and it is wrought in the soul by His same "mighty working" whereby He "raised Jesus from the dead"
(Eph 1:19, 20).
BENGEL seems to me (not as ALFORD understands him) to express the latter sense, namely, "Through the faith which is a work of the operation of God who," &c.
Eph 1:19, 20
accords with this; the same mighty power of God is exercised in raising one spiritually dead to the life of faith, as was "wrought in Christ when God raised Him literally from the dead." However, "faith of" usually is "faith in"
(Ro 3:22);
but there is no grammatical impropriety in understanding it "the faith which is the effect of the operation of God"
(Eph 2:8; 1Th 2:13).
As His literal resurrection is the ground of the power put forth in our spiritual resurrection now, so it is a pledge of our literal resurrection hereafter
(Ro 8:11).
13
無標題
13. 你們從前死了——
(弗 2:1, 2);
正如基督在神使祂「從死裏復活」之前,也是列在死人之中
(西 2:12)。
罪——更準確地,按希臘文如本節末所譯,「過犯」,字面作「從神的道路上偏離」;實際的違背,正如亞當的那一次。
肉體未受割禮——你們未曾脫去舊的肉體本性,即屬肉體的包皮,或原罪;這如今因屬靈的割禮——即歸信與洗禮——你們已經脫去了。
便叫你們與基督一同活過來——神「與祂(基督)一同活過來」。正如基督的復活證明祂已脫離了所歸於祂的罪,照樣我們屬靈的活過來證明我們的罪已蒙赦免
(彼前 3:22; 4:1, 2)。
赦免了你們——如此武加大譯本(Vulgate)和希拉流(Hilary)所讀。但最古老的抄本讀作「我們」,從特定的歌羅西人轉而論到普遍的教會
(西 1:14;
弗 1:7)。
一切過犯——希臘文作「我們一切過犯」。
英文原文
13. you, being dead--formerly
(Eph 2:1, 2);
even as Christ was among the dead, before that God raised Him "from the dead"
(Col 2:12).
sins--rather as Greek is translated at end of this verse, "trespasses," literally, "failings aside" from God's ways; actual transgressions, as that of Adam.
uncircumcision of your flesh--your not having put off the old fleshly nature, the carnal foreskin, or original sin, which now by spiritual circumcision, that is, conversion and baptism, you have put off.
he quickened--GOD "quickened together with Him (CHRIST)." Just as Christ's resurrection proved that He was delivered from the sin laid on Him, so our spiritual quickening proves that we have been forgiven our sins
(1Pe 3:22; 4:1, 2).
forgiven you--So Vulgate and HILARY. But the oldest manuscripts read, "us," passing from the particular persons, the Colossians, to the general Church
(Col 1:14; Eph 1:7).
all trespasses--Greek, "all our trespasses."
14
無標題
14. 塗抹——希臘文作「已經擦去」;在時間上與「已經赦免了你們」
(西 2:13)
同時;藉此撤銷了律法對你們的控訴。律法(尤其包含道德律——而這正是遵守上的主要難處)對信徒而言已被廢去,就其作為強制性、控訴性的法典而言,以及就人藉律法尋求「義」(稱義)和「生命」而言,確是如此。律法只能產生外在的行為,不能產生意志的內在順服;而在信徒裏面,內在意志的順服是從住在他裏面的聖靈流出來的
(羅 3:21; 7:2, 4;
加 2:19)。
有礙於我們的律例——更準確地,「在律例中」(參 弗 2:15 註釋);「記在律例上之誡命的律法」。「字據」(暗指十誡——律法的代表,由神的手所寫)即整個律法,是眾人都在其下的約束性債券;猶太人首先在其下,但在這方面他們是世界的代表民族
(羅 3:19);
而他們不能遵守律法,也就包含了外邦人也不能遵守;因為「律法的功用」也刻在外邦人心裏
(羅 2:15);
他們既沒有遵守,就因此被律法定罪。
攻擊我們……有礙於我們——希臘文作「反對我們」;如此譯於
來 10:27。
「律法不僅因其要求而反對我們,更因其指控而作仇敵對付我們」〔本格爾(Bengel)〕。蒂特曼(Tittmann)把希臘文解釋為「對我們有潛在的敵意」;不是公開故意的敵對,而是因我們的軟弱而有的實質上非故意的對立;並非律法本身對我們有益之事的反對
(羅 7:7-12, 14;
林前 15:56;
加 3:21;
來 10:3)。
這「字據」是「那反對我們之物」的一部分;因為「那字句是叫人死」(參 林後 3:6 註釋)。
撤去——希臘文作「已經把它撤去」(使之不再作我們的障礙),方法是把它「釘在十字架上」。基督因擔當了被違反之律法的咒詛,就救贖我們脫離那咒詛
(加 3:13)。
在祂釘十字架的位格上,律法本身也被釘在其上。撤銷債券的一種古法,是用釘穿透字據:這在當時的亞西亞似曾有過〔格羅提烏(Grotius)〕。此處被撤銷的債券,是猶太人作為世界代表所承擔的義務,並由他們的「阿們」所印證——即在咒詛的刑罰之下遵守全律法
(申 27:26;
尼 10:29)。
英文原文
14. Blotting out--Greek, "Having wiped out"; coincident in time with "having forgiven you"
(Col 2:13);
hereby having cancelled the law's indictment against you. The law (including especially the moral law, wherein lay the chief difficulty in obeying) is abrogated to the believer, as far as it was a compulsory, accusing code, and as far as "righteousness" (justification) and "life" were sought for by it. It can only produce outward works, not inward obedience of the will, which in the believer flows from the Holy Spirit in Him
(Ro 3:21; 7:2, 4; Ga 2:19).
the handwriting of ordinances--rather, "IN ordinances" (see on
Eph 2:15);
"the law of commandments contained in ordinances." "The handwriting" (alluding to the Decalogue, the representative of the law, written by the hand of God) is the whole law, the obligatory bond, under which all lay; the Jews primarily were under the bond, but they in this respect were the representative people of the world
(Ro 3:19);
and in their inability to keep the law was involved the inability of the Gentiles also, in whose hearts "the work of the law was written"
(Ro 2:15);
and as they did not keep this, they were condemned by it.
that was against us . . . contrary to us--Greek "adversary to us"; so it is translated,
Heb 10:27.
"Not only was the law against us by its demands, but also an adversary to us by its accusations" [BENGEL]. TITTMANN explains the Greek, "having a latent contrariety to us"; not open designed hostility, but virtual unintentional opposition through our frailty; not through any opposition in the law itself to our good
(Ro 7:7-12, 14; 1Co 15:56; Ga 3:21; Heb 10:3).
The "WRITING" is part of "that which was contrary to us"; for "the letter killeth" (see on
2Co 3:6).
and took it--Greek, and hath taken it out of the way" (so as to be no longer a hindrance to us), by "nailing it to the cross." Christ, by bearing the curse of the broken law, has redeemed us from its curse
(Ga 3:13).
In His person nailed to the cross, the law itself was nailed to it. One ancient mode of cancelling bonds was by striking a nail through the writing: this seems at that time to have existed in Asia [GROTIUS]. The bond cancelled in the present case was the obligation lying against the Jews as representatives of the world, and attested by their amen, to keep the whole law under penalty of the curse
(De 27:26; Ne 10:29).
15
無標題
15. 阿爾福德(Alford)、艾利科特(Ellicott)等人按希臘文翻譯,使之與同一希臘文
西 3:9
的翻譯一致:「將一切執政的、掌權的從自己身上脫去」:神把天使從自己身上脫去——即脫去他們的事奉,不再使用他們作福音的傳佈者,如同祂從前藉着天使的「安排」或事奉頒賜律法
(徒 7:53;
加 3:19;
來 2:2, 5):
神在耶穌裏毫無遮蔽地將自己顯明出來。「那執政的與那掌權的」可追溯至
西 2:10,
耶穌是「各樣執政掌權者的元首」,以及
西 1:16。
在耶穌釘十字架的祭中,神使一切執政的等等都服在耶穌之下,宣告他們在祂的工作和祂的子民面前毫無能力
(弗 1:21)。
因此,保羅反對那些把猶太儀文與天使崇拜一同嫁接到基督教上之人的論證便是:無論天使在律法之下可被假定扮演過甚麼角色,如今都已終止,因為神已經把整個律法的時代廢去了。但反對的意見認為:上下文似乎指對邪惡天使的勝利;然而在
林後 2:14
中,基督對那些服在祂之下之人的得勝,並非為了毁滅而得勝,而是為了他們的拯救,因此也可能是指善良的天使
(西 1:20)。
但希臘文的中間語態可取英文譯本之譯,「既已擄掠」,或字面作〔蒂特曼(Tittmann)〕「既已完全剝去」,或「為自己擄掠」(比較
羅 8:38;
林前 15:24;
弗 6:2)。
英文譯本與
太 12:29;
路 11:22;
來 2:14
相符。按希臘文譯作「那些執政的與掌權的」。
明顯給眾人看——在祂升天之時(參 弗 4:8 註釋;這證實了本節的英文譯本)。
明顯地——約 7:4; 11:54 支持英文譯本,反對阿爾福德(Alford)所譯的「言辭上的坦白」。
在十字架上——即祂的十字架,或釘十字架:希臘教父們如此翻譯。許多拉丁教父譯作「在自己裏面」或「在祂裏面」。
弗 2:16
支持英文譯本:「藉着十字架……滅了冤仇」。即使讀作「在祂裏面」即基督,十字架仍是神在基督裏勝過執政掌權者的地點與手段
(弗 1:20; 2:5)。
鬼魔和其他天使一樣,在基督升天前都在天上,並從他們天上的居所影響地上。正如天在基督之前尚未向人開啟
(約 3:13),
照樣也未對鬼魔關閉
(伯 1:6; 2:1)。
但在升天之時,撒但和他的鬼魔因基督順服至死而被「審判」並「趕出去」
(約 12:31; 16:11;
來 2:14;
啟 12:5-10),
人子也被舉到神的寶座上;因此祂的復活與升天,乃是對死亡執政掌權者公開而莊嚴的得勝。值得注意的是,外邦的鬼神諭在基督升天之後不久便歸於沉寂。
英文原文
15. ALFORD, ELLICOTT, and others translate the Greek to accord with the translation of the same Greek,
Col 3:9,
"Stripping off from Himself the principalities and the powers: " GOD put off from Himself the angels, that is, their ministry, not employing them to be promulgators of the Gospel in the way that He had given the law by their "disposition" or ministry
(Ac 7:53; Ga 3:19; Heb 2:2, 5):
God manifested Himself without a veil in Jesus. "THE principalities and THE powers" refers back to
Col 2:10,
Jesus, "the Head of all principality and power," and
Col 1:16.
In the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross, God subjected all the principalities, &c., to Jesus, declaring them to be powerless as to His work and His people
(Eph 1:21).
Thus Paul's argument against those grafting on Christianity Jewish observances, along with angel-worship, is, whatever part angels may be supposed to have had under the law, now at an end, God having put the legal dispensation itself away. But the objection is, that the context seems to refer to a triumph over bad angels: in
2Co 2:14,
however, Christ's triumph over those subjected to Him, is not a triumph for destruction, but for their salvation, so that good angels may be referred to
(Col 1:20).
But the Greek middle is susceptible of English Version, "having spoiled," or, literally [TITTMANN], "having completely stripped," or "despoiled" for Himself (compare
Ro 8:38; 1Co 15:24; Eph 6:2).
English Version accords with
Mt 12:29; Lu 11:22; Heb 2:14.
Translate as the Greek, "The rules and authorities."
made a show of them--at His ascension (see on
Eph 4:8;
confirming English Version of this verse).
openly--Joh 7:4; 11:54,
support English Version against ALFORD'S translation, "in openness of speech."
in it--namely, His cross, or crucifixion: so the Greek fathers translate. Many of the Latins, "In Himself" or "in Him."
Eph 2:16
favors English Version, "reconcile . . . by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby." If "in Him," that is, Christ, be read, still the Cross will be the place and means of God's triumph in Christ over the principalities
(Eph 1:20; 2:5).
Demons, like other angels, were in heaven up to Christ's ascension, and influenced earth from their heavenly abodes. As heaven was not yet opened to man before Christ
(Joh 3:13),
so it was not yet shut against demons
(Job 1:6; 2:1).
But at the ascension Satan and his demons were "judged" and "cast out" by Christ's obedience unto death
(Joh 12:31; 16:11; Heb 2:14; Re 12:5-10),
and the Son of man was raised to the throne of God; thus His resurrection and ascension are a public solemn triumph over the principalities and powers of death. It is striking that the heathen oracles were silenced soon after Christ's ascension.
16
無標題
16. 所以——因為你們在基督裏已經完全,而神在祂裏面已經廢去了所有附屬媒介作為蒙悅納的必需條件。
吃喝——希臘文作「吃……喝」
(羅 14:1-17)。
不要理會任何在食物的律法儀文上審判你們的人。
節期——年度的節日。比較三者,
代上 23:31。
月朔——每月的。
安息日——當省略定冠詞,希臘文中並無此字(比較註釋,參 加 4:10 註釋)。「安息日」(非「那些安息日」)——如贖罪日和住棚節的安息日,已隨着它們所屬的猶太禮儀一同終止了
(利 23:32, 37-39)。
每週的安息日則立於更永久的根基上,因為它是在樂園中設立的,為紀念六日之內創造之工的完成。
利 23:38
明確地把「耶和華的安息日」與其他安息日區別開來。積極的誡命因被吩咐而為對,一旦廢止就不再有約束力;道德的誡命則是永遠因它本身永遠為對而被吩咐。倘若我們能守一個持續的安息日——正如我們將來必如此——那麼每週一次的安息日積極誡命就不需要了。
來 4:9,
「安息」,希臘文作「守安息」
(賽 66:23)。
但我們不能如此,因為連無罪的亞當在他地上的職事中也需要安息日;因此安息日仍是必需的,也仍與其餘九條誡命相連,在精意上仍具約束力,儘管律法的字句已被那更高的愛的精意所取代——而愛乃是律法與福音共同的精髓
(羅 13:8-10)。
英文原文
16. therefore--because ye are complete in Christ, and God in Him has dispensed with all subordinate means as essential to acceptance with Him.
meat . . . drink--Greek, "eating . . . drinking"
(Ro 14:1-17).
Pay no regard to any one who sits in judgment on you as to legal observances in respect to foods.
holyday--a feast yearly. Compare the three,
1Ch 23:31.
new moon--monthly.
the sabbath--Omit "THE," which is not in the Greek (compare Note, see on
Ga 4:10).
"SABBATHS" (not "the sabbaths") of the day of atonement and feast of tabernacles have come to an end with the Jewish services to which they belonged
(Le 23:32, 37-39).
The weekly sabbath rests on a more permanent foundation, having been instituted in Paradise to commemorate the completion of creation in six days.
Le 23:38
expressly distinguished "the sabbath of the Lord" from the other sabbaths. A positive precept is right because it is commanded, and ceases to be obligatory when abrogated; a moral precept is commanded eternally, because it is eternally right. If we could keep a perpetual sabbath, as we shall hereafter, the positive precept of the sabbath, one in each week, would not be needed.
Heb 4:9,
"rests," Greek, "keeping of sabbath"
(Isa 66:23).
But we cannot, since even Adam, in innocence, needed one amidst his earthly employments; therefore the sabbath is still needed and is therefore still linked with the other nine commandments, as obligatory in the spirit, though the letter of the law has been superseded by that higher spirit of love which is the essence of law and Gospel alike
(Ro 13:8-10).
17
無標題
17. 這些原是後事的影兒——基督徒盟約的福氣,而猶太儀文不過是其預表。比較「將來的世代」,即福音時代
(弗 2:7)。
來 2:5,
「將來的世界」。
那形體卻是基督——真實的本體(即律法所預表之福氣的本體)屬乎基督
(來 8:5; 10:1)。
英文原文
17. things to come--the blessings of the Christian covenant, the substance of which Jewish ordinances were but the type. Compare "ages to come," that is, the Gospel dispensation
(Eph 2:7).
Heb 2:5,
"the world to come."
the body is of Christ--The real substance (of the blessings typified by the law) belongs to Christ
(Heb 8:5; 10:1).
18
無標題
18. 不可讓人——譯作「奪去你們的獎賞」,字面作「出於敵意,從那應得獎賞者身上判定獎賞歸於他人」〔特倫奇(Trench)〕。「在一場比賽中作裁判,使其中一方受損。」歌羅西人所要承受的這獎賞被奪,是因他們任憑任何自封的仲裁者或裁判(即假教師)把他們從「那公義的審判者」、獎賞的頒賜者基督
(提後 4:8;
雅 1:12;
彼前 5:4)
那裏引開,轉去敬拜天使。
故意謙虛——正如「私意崇拜」
(西 2:23)。
字面作「在謙卑中自得其樂」〔瓦爾(Wahl)〕;喜愛(希臘文如此譯,
可 12:38,
「喜愛穿長衣遊行」)在自己強加的謙卑中放縱自己:謙卑中的自願者〔達萊烏(Dallaeus)〕。不像阿爾福德(Alford)所譯「不要讓人故意奪去你們的獎賞」等等。也不像格羅提烏(Grotius)所譯「他無論多麼想」奪去你們的獎賞。因為「願意」或「以……為樂」這個分詞是同一系列中的一個,與「自高自大」、「無故自高」、「不持定」同屬一類;其中所暗示的自我取悅,與那(虛假的)謙卑形成巧妙的對照——在我看來,因此它是與那謙卑相連的。他那所謂的「謙卑」,實際上是一種自我取悅;因此它與「他肉體的心意」(這才是它的真名,雖然他稱之為「謙卑」)平行,正如「願意」或「以……為樂」與「自高自大」平行一樣。希臘文「謙卑」字面作「心思的卑微」,這與「因他肉體的心意而自高」構成更清晰的平行。在謙卑的藉口下,他們不敢直接來到神和基督面前(如同現代的羅馬教會),便祈求天使;作為猶太化者,他們以律法是由天使傳的為理由來為此辯護。這錯誤在弗呂家(歌羅西和老底嘉所在之地)存留甚久,以至老底嘉會議(主後 360 年)特地制定其第三十五條法規,對付「敬天使派(Angelici)」(如奧古斯丁〔Augustine〕〔異端史, 39〕所稱)或「求告天使的人」。甚至到狄奧多勒(Theodoret)的時代,仍有奉獻給天使長米迦勒的禮拜堂。現代希臘人有一個傳說:米迦勒曾開了一道裂縫以排去威脅歌羅西基督徒的洪水。一旦人承認較低的權能可與至高者分享祈求,前者便逐漸獨攬了一切嚴肅的敬拜,幾乎完全取代了後者;因此外邦人從在敬拜至高者之外加上對其他神明的敬拜開始,最終完全停止敬拜祂。而且我們是把這些權能視為直接控制我們(外邦人的觀點),還是只在我們的事上影響至高者(羅馬教會的觀點),也沒有多大分別;因為我期望從誰得福或受禍,誰就在我心中成為最高的對象,不論他是親自賜予,還是僅僅代為取得〔時代的警語〕。聖經反對「保護人」或「代求者」的觀念
(提前 2:5, 6)。
真正的基督徒謙卑,把對自身完全不配的體認,與藉着基督有分於神聖生命、並被神收養的尊嚴的意識結合起來。若不認識後者,便會產生虛假的自我貶抑,表現於儀式和禁慾式的自我卑微
(西 2:23),
而這一切不過是在謙卑虛飾之下的屬靈驕傲。比較「在主裏誇口」
(林前 1:31)。
敬拜……他所沒有見過的——極古的抄本、武加大譯本(Vulgate)和俄利根(Origen)如此讀。但最古老的抄本和路西弗(Lucifer)省略「沒有」;於是譯作「傲然踐踏(『站在』〔阿爾福德(Alford)〕)他所見過的事物」。特格利斯(Tregelles)認為這指的是對天使的虛幻異象。但保羅若指的是虛幻的看見,他必會用某種限定的詞,如「他似乎見到的」,而不是「他已經見過的」。顯然這些事物是他實際上見過的,無論是出於鬼魔的作為
(撒上 28:11-20),
還是自然原因所產生的現象被他誤當作超自然。保羅不停下來討論這些所見事物的性質,而是直指根本的錯誤:這樣的人在這一切事上傾向於憑感官(即他引以為豪地所已見過的)行事,而不是憑對那不可見之「元首」的信心
(西 2:19;
比較
約 20:29;
林後 5:7;
來 11:1)。
於是平行對應便成立:「虛空地自高」對應「傲然踐踏」或「踩在腳下」;「他肉體的心意」對應「他所見過的事物」,因為他的肉體性正是暴露在他以所見過的事物自誇、而非以信心的不可見對象自誇的事上。這些所見的事物可能出於鬼魔的作為,這點可從
提前 4:1
看出:「有人會離棄真道,聽從那引誘人的邪靈和鬼魔的道理」(希臘文作「鬼魔」)。這也是對現代招魂術者的警告。
自高自大——暗示先前那所謂的「謙卑」(希臘文作「心思的卑微」)實際上是「自誇」。
肉體的心意——希臘文作「憑他自己肉體的心意」。肉體,或感官的原則,是他心思渴望追求可見的宗教對象的源頭,而非在真正的謙卑中作為肢體「持定那(不可見的)元首」。
英文原文
18. beguile--Translate, "Defraud you of your prize," literally, "to adjudge a prize out of hostility away from him who deserves it" [TRENCH]. "To be umpire in a contest to the detriment of one." This defrauding of their prize the Colossians would suffer, by letting any self-constituted arbitrator or judge (that is, false teacher) draw them away from Christ," the righteous Judge" and Awarder of the prize
(2Ti 4:8; Jas 1:12; 1Pe 5:4),
to angel-worship.
in a voluntary humility--So "will-worship"
(Col 2:23).
Literally, "Delighting ([WAHL]) in humility"; loving (so the Greek is translated,
Mr 12:38,
"love to go in long clothing") to indulge himself in a humility of his own imposing: a volunteer in humility [DALLÆUS]. Not as ALFORD, "Let no one of purpose defraud you," &c. Not as GROTIUS, "If he ever so much wish" (to defraud you). For the participle "wishing" or "delighting," is one of the series, and stands in the same category as "intruding," "puffed up," "not holding"; and the self-pleasing implied in it stands in happy contrast to the (mock) humility with which it seems to me, therefore, to be connected. His "humility," so called, is a pleasing of self: thus it stands in parallelism to "his fleshly mind" (its real name, though he styles it "humility"), as "wishing" or "delighting" does to "puffed up." The Greek for "humility" is literally, "lowliness of mind," which forms a clearer parallel to "puffed up by his fleshly mind." Under pretext of humility, as if they durst not come directly to God and Christ (like the modern Church of Rome), they invoked angels: as Judaizers, they justified this on the ground that the law was given by angels. This error continued long in Phrygia (where Colosse and Laodicea were), so that the Council of Laodicea (A.D. 360) expressly framed its thirty-fifth canon against the "Angelici" (as AUGUSTINE [Heresies, 39], calls them) or "invokers of angels." Even as late as THEODORET'S time, there were oratories to Michael the archangel. The modern Greeks have a legend that Michael opened a chasm to draw off an inundation threatening the Colossian Christians. Once men admit the inferior powers to share invocation with the Supreme, the former gradually engrosses all our serious worship, almost to the exclusion of the latter; thus the heathen, beginning with adding the worship of other deities to that of the Supreme, ended with ceasing to worship Him at all. Nor does it signify much, whether we regard such as directly controlling us (the pagan view), or as only influencing the Supreme in our behalf (the Church of Rome's view); because he from whom I expect happiness or misery, becomes the uppermost object in my mind, whether he give, or only procure it [Cautions for Times]. Scripture opposes the idea of "patrons" or "intercessors"
(1Ti 2:5, 6).
True Christian humility joins consciousness of utter personal demerit, with a sense of participation in the divine life through Christ, and in the dignity of our adoption by God. Without the latter being realized, a false self-humiliation results, which displays itself in ceremonies and ascetic self-abasement
(Col 2:23),
which after all is but spiritual pride under the mock guise of humility. Contrast "glorying in the Lord"
(1Co 1:31).
intruding into . . . things which he hath not seen--So very old manuscripts and Vulgate and ORIGEN read. But the oldest manuscripts and LUCIFER omit "not"; then translate, "haughtily treading on ('Standing on' [ALFORD]) the things which he hath seen." TREGELLES refers this to fancied visions of angels. But if Paul had meant a fancied seeing, he would have used some qualifying word, as, "which he seemed to see," not "which he hath seen." Plainly the things were actually seen by him, whether of demoniacal origination
(1Sa 28:11-20),
or phenomena resulting from natural causation, mistaken by him as if supernatural. Paul, not stopping to discuss the nature of the things so seen, fixes on the radical error, the tendency of such a one in all this to walk by SENSE (namely, what he haughtily prides himself on having SEEN), rather than by FAITH in the UNSEEN "Head"
(Col 2:19;
compare
Joh 20:29; 2Co 5:7; Heb 11:1).
Thus is the parallelism, "vainly puffed up" answers to "haughtily treading on," or "setting his foot on"; "his fleshly mind" answers to the things which he hath seen," since his fleshliness betrays itself in priding himself on what he hath seen, rather than on the unseen objects of faith. That the things seen may have been of demoniacal origination, appears from
1Ti 4:1,
"Some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils" (Greek, "demons"). A warning to modern spiritualists.
puffed up--implying that the previous so called "humility" (Greek, "lowliness of mind") was really a "puffing up."
fleshly mind--Greek, "By the mind of his own flesh." The flesh, or sensuous principle, is the fountain head whence his mind draws its craving after religious objects of sight, instead of, in true humility as a member, "holding fast the (unseen) Head."
19
無標題
19. 譯作:「不持定元首」。凡不惟獨高舉基督超乎一切之上的,就根本沒有持定基督〔本格爾(Bengel)〕。正因沒有牢牢持定基督,他才得以放縱(去窺探,因而)「傲然踐踏(自誇)他所見過的事」。每個人都必須為自己持定元首,而不僅僅依附於身體上的其他肢體,無論那些肢體在身體中的地位有多高〔阿爾福德(Alford)〕。
從他——更準確地,「從誰」。
全身——即身體所有的肢體
(弗 4:16)。
節——營養供應傳遞到各肢體的連接點,為身體提供生長的原料。
筋——把肢體與肢體連結在一起的筋腱與神經。信、愛、平安是屬靈的筋。比較「在愛心裏聯絡齊整」
(西 2:2;
西 3:14;
弗 4:3)。
得着供應——即不斷地領受供給。「接受供應」。
聯絡——希臘文譯作「聯絡得合式」,
弗 4:16:
暗示堅固的鞏固。
照着神所賜的長進——
(弗 4:16);
即由神——信徒屬靈生命的創始者與維繫者——在與元首基督的聯合中所成就的
(林前 3:6);
並且趨向神的榮耀,因它配得作為其創始者的祂。
英文原文
19. Translate, "Not holding fast the Head." He who does not hold Christ solely and supremely above all others, does not hold Him at all [BENGEL]. The want of firm holding of Christ has set him loose to (pry into, and so) "tread haughtily on (pride himself on) things which he hath seen." Each must hold fast the Head for himself, not merely be attached to the other members, however high in the body [ALFORD].
from which--rather, "from whom."
the body--that is, all the members of the body
(Eph 4:16).
joints--the points of union where the supply of nourishment passes to the different members, furnishing the body with the materials of growth.
bands--the sinews and nerves which bind together limb and limb. Faith, love, and peace, are the spiritual bands. Compare "knit together in love"
(Col 2:2; Col 3:14; Eph 4:3).
having nourishment ministered--that is, supplied to it continually. "Receiving ministration."
knit together--The Greek is translated, "compacted,"
Eph 4:16:
implying firm consolidation.
with the increase of God--
(Eph 4:16);
that is, wrought by God, the Author and Sustainer of the believer's spiritual life, in union with Christ, the Head
(1Co 3:6);
and tending to the honor of God, being worthy of Him, its Author.
20
無標題
20. 所以——最古老的抄本省略「所以」。
與基督同死——希臘文作「你們若(如此被釋放而)死了」(比較
羅 6:2; 7:2, 3;
加 2:19)。
世上的小學——
(西 2:8)。
屬肉體的、外在的、屬世的、律法的條文。
好像在世俗中活着——好像你們沒有像你們被釘的主那樣向世界死——你們是埋葬入祂的死中
(加 6:14;
彼前 4:1, 2)。
服從那規條——你們為何仍要服從規條?指
西 2:14:
你們再次被置於「規條」之下,而那些規條的「字據」已被「塗抹」
(西 2:14)。
英文原文
20. Wherefore--The oldest manuscripts omit "Wherefore."
if ye be dead--Greek, "if ye died (so as to be freed) from," &c. (compare
Ro 6:2; 7:2, 3; Ga 2:19).
rudiments of the world--
(Col 2:8).
Carnal, outward, worldly, legal ordinances.
as though living--as though you were not dead to the world like your crucified Lord, into whose death ye were buried
(Ga 6:14; 1Pe 4:1, 2).
are ye subject to ordinances--By do ye submit to be made subject to ordinances? Referring to
Col 2:14:
you are again being made subject to "ordinances," the "handwriting" of which had been "blotted out"
(Col 2:14).
21
無標題
21. 比較
西 2:16,
「吃……喝」。他以頒布者的口吻舉出「規條」
(西 2:20)
的實例。迷信的禁令呈遞升的高潮。第一個希臘文詞(hapse)與第三個(thiges)不同:前者指緊密的接觸與持握;後者指瞬間的接觸(比較
林前 7:1;
約 20:17,
希臘文「不要摸我;不要 cling to me」)。譯作:「不可摸,也不可嘗,也不可碰。」三個詞都指食物。「不可摸」(比「甚至不可碰」更強的詞),「不可嘗」(用舌頭),「甚至不可碰」,無論接觸多麼輕微。
英文原文
21. Compare
Col 2:16,
"meat . . . drink." He gives instances of the "ordinances"
(Col 2:20)
in the words of their imposers. There is an ascending climax of superstitious prohibitions. The first Greek word (hapse) is distinguished from the third (thiges), in that the former means close contact and retention: the latter, momentary contact (compare
1Co 7:1; Joh 20:17,
Greek, "Hold me not"; cling not to me"). Translate, "Handle not, neither taste, nor even touch." The three refer to meats. "Handle not" (a stronger term than "nor even touch"), "nor taste" with the tongue, "nor even touch," however slight the contact.
22
無標題
22. 這些規條——即那三件可摸、可碰、可嘗的事物。
都是要敗壞的——字面作「按其本性(被造得)注定(在)用盡(消耗時)敗壞(或『因腐朽而毀壞』)」。因此它們不能真正而持久地污穢人
(太 15:17;
林前 6:13)。
照着——即按照。指
西 2:20, 21。
這一切「規條」都是照着人的、而非神的命令。
規條——希臘文作「教訓」。阿爾福德(Alford)譯作「(教義性)體系」。
英文原文
22. Which--things, namely, the three things handled, touched, and tasted.
are to perish--literally, "are constituted (by their very nature) for perishing (or 'destruction by corruption') in (or 'with') their using up (consumption)." Therefore they cannot really and lastingly defile a man
(Mt 15:17; 1Co 6:13).
after--according to. Referring to
Col 2:20, 21.
All these "ordinances" are according to human, not divine, injunction.
doctrines--Greek, teachings." ALFORD translates, "(doctrinal) systems."
23
無標題
23. 有——希臘文作「正有」;暗示這些規條被假定具有的恆久特徵。
智慧的外貌——更準確地,「智慧的名聲」〔阿爾福德(Alford)〕。
私意崇拜——擅自發明的崇拜:自以為是的崇拜,由人自己的意志而非神的意志所設計。神如此嫉妒人的私意崇拜,以至於拿答和亞比戶因獻凡火而被擊殺
(利 10:1-3)。
烏西雅也因擅自行祭司的職任而被擊打長大痲瘋
(代下 26:16-21)。
比較掃羅的私意崇拜
(撒上 13:8-14),
他因此被判定失去王位。這「私意的崇拜」與他們「故意的謙卑」
(西 2:18)
相對應:兩者表面上都頗有道理,前者看似在宗教上甚至做得比神所要求的更多(一如羅馬與希臘教會的教條);實際上卻是以人的意志取代神的意志;後者看似自我卑微,實際上卻因人擅自定的「謙卑」(希臘文作「心思的卑微」)而驕傲,同時實際上拒絕了與元首基督直接相交的尊嚴——轉而敬拜天使。
苦待己身——希臘文作「不顧惜身體」。這種禁慾主義似乎建立在東方認為物質是邪惡之源的理論上。這同樣看起來頗有道理(比較
林前 9:27)。
毫不尊重——對身體的尊重。正如「苦待己身」從積極方面描述禁慾主義;照樣這子句從消極方面描述。即不付上任何當歸給身體——這身體既由基督的血如此重價所贖——的「尊重」。我們不當貶低自己,而當對自己有正當的估價——不是在自己裏面,而是在基督裏面
(徒 13:46;
林前 3:21; 6:15; 7:23; 12:23, 24;
帖前 4:4)。
真正的捨己關乎靈,而不是禁慾式苦修的形式——「在那等食物上,並不能叫行的人得着益處」
(來 13:9),
且與基督徒的自尊——即那屬於信徒作為獻給主之人的「尊重」——相一致。比較「虛空地」,
西 2:18。
使肉體……滿足——這表達了他們那些屬肉體的禁慾、故意的謙卑和私意敬拜天使的條規的真實趨勢。他們看似克己並克苦己身,實際上卻是在放縱肉體。因此「使肉體滿足」對應「因他肉體的心意而自高」
(西 2:18),
故此「肉體」是在其倫理意義上使用——指與「屬靈的」相對的「屬肉體的本性」,而非指「身體」。希臘文「滿足」一詞暗示使飽足至飽膩,或至過量。「屬肉體感官的過飽乃人的遺傳」〔執事希拉流〔Hilary the Deacon〕,見於本格爾〔Bengel〕〕。遺傳使人自高;它阻塞屬天的領悟。他們放下真正的「尊重」,好叫他們「把肉體使到飽足」。自加的規條滿足了肉體(即自以為義),儘管表面看來是在治死它。
英文原文
23. have--Greek, "are having"; implying the permanent characteristic which these ordinances are supposed to have.
show of wisdom--rather, "a reputation of wisdom" [ALFORD].
will-worship--arbitrarily invented worship: would-be worship, devised by man's own will, not God's. So jealous is God of human will-worship, that He struck Nadab and Abihu dead for burning strange incense
(Le 10:1-3).
So Uzziah was stricken with leprosy for usurping the office of priest
(2Ch 26:16-21).
Compare the will-worship of Saul
(1Sa 13:8-14)
for which he was doomed to lose his throne. This "voluntary worship" is the counterpart to their "voluntary humility"
(Col 2:18):
both specious in appearance, the former seeming in religion to do even more than God requires (as in the dogmas of the Roman and Greek churches); but really setting aside God's will for man's own; the latter seemingly self-abasing, but really proud of man's self-willed "humility" (Greek, "lowliness of mind"), while virtually rejecting the dignity of direct communion with Christ, the Head; by worshipping of angels.
neglecting of the body--Greek, "not sparing of the body." This asceticism seems to have rested on the Oriental theory that matter is the source of evil. This also looked plausible (compare
1Co 9:27).
not in any honour--of the body. As "neglecting of the body" describes asceticism positively; so this clause, negatively. Not paying any of that "honor" which is due to the body as redeemed by such a price as the blood of Christ. We should not degrade, but have a just estimation of ourselves, not in ourselves, but in Christ
(Ac 13:46; 1Co 3:21; 6:15; 7:23; 12:23, 24; 1Th 4:4).
True self-denial regards the spirit, and not the forms of ascetical self-mortification in "meats which profit not those occupied therein"
(Heb 13:9),
and is consistent with Christian self-respect, the "honor" which belongs to the believer as dedicated to the Lord. Compare "vainly,"
Col 2:18.
to the satisfying of the flesh--This expresses the real tendency of their human ordinances of bodily asceticism, voluntary humility, and will-worship of angels. While seeming to deny self and the body, they really are pampering the flesh. Thus "satisfying of the flesh" answers to "puffed up by his fleshly mind"
(Col 2:18),
so that "flesh" is used in its ethical sense, "the carnal nature" as opposed to the "spiritual"; not in the sense, "body." The Greek for "satisfying" implies satiating to repletion, or to excess. "A surfeit of the carnal sense is human tradition" [HILARY THE DEACON, in BENGEL]. Tradition puffs up; it clogs the heavenly perceptions. They put away true "honor" that they may "satiate to the full THE FLESH." Self-imposed ordinances gratify the flesh (namely, self-righteousness), though seeming to mortify it.
西 2:1-23.
他為他們在基督裏堅定而竭力祈求;他警告他們不可被虛妄的智慧引誘偏離基督。
1. 因為——他解釋他在何事上「勞苦,竭力」
(西 1:29)。
按希臘文譯作:「我願意你們曉得我為你們是何等竭力」(同一個希臘文詞見於
西 1:29,
指熱切、焦慱之代求的「較力爭戰」;並非與假教師爭戰,因他如今身陷獄中,不可能如此)。
老底嘉人——他們與歌羅西人一樣,同受假教師的危險(比較
西 4:16)。
這危險大概也是他致書老底嘉、一如致書歌羅西的原因。
沒有見過我面的人——包括在希拉波立的人
(西 4:13)。
保羅看自己是所有外邦人的「欠債人」
(羅 1:14)。
「他的面貌」與同在原會成為一種「安慰」
(西 2:2;
徒 20:38)。
比較
西 1:4, 7, 8,
便可證明他未曾見過歌羅西人,只是聽見他們。因此他藉着在神面前焦慱代求的熱切爭戰,來彌補他不能親身在場的缺失。「我身子雖與你們相離,心卻與你們同在」
(西 2:5)。