Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible · Matthew 第6章

註釋閱讀最佳化

分章註釋

Matthew 第 6 章

1

無標題

開啟正文

登山寶訓——續。

Mt 6:1-18. 關於國度之義的 進一步闡釋—— 其不顯揚。

關於宗教本分中要防備顯揚的一般警告

(Mt 6:1)。

1. 你們要小心,不可將善事——但真正的讀法似乎明顯是"你們的義"。兩種讀法的外證幾乎相等;但內證則明顯支持"義"。第二節的主題既是"賙濟",那麼這個希臘文中與另一個如此相似的字,很容易被抄寫者代替;反之則不那麼可能。但更支持"義"的是:我們若在第一節這樣讀,它便成了本段講論整個部分的總題目,教導人在一切義行中不可顯揚——在那種情形下,賙濟、禱告、禁食不過是這義的選出例證;我們若讀"不可將你的賙濟,等等",這第一節便只與那一點有關。此處的"義"是指天國的那同一個義,本篇講論的大目的就是要揭示其主要特徵——是與傳統的曲解相對立的;主說:"你們的義,若不勝於文士和法利賽人的義,斷不能進天國"

(Mt 5:20)。

"行"這義,是一個古老而為人熟知的說法。如"時常行義的,便為有福"

(Ps 106:3)。

它是指生活中義的作為——恩典性情的流露——主後來對門徒說:"你們多結果子,我父就因此得榮耀,你們也就是我的門徒了"

(Joh 15:8)。

行在人的面前,故意叫他們看見——以被他們看見為目的或意圖。相同的說法見

Mt 5:28。

誠然,他曾要求他們的光要這樣照在人前,叫他們看見他們的好行為,便將榮耀歸給他們在天上的父

(Mt 5:16)。

但這與不為自高而炫耀我們的義,完全一致。事實上,行前者必隱含我們不行後者。

否則就不能得你們天父的賞賜了——當一切本分都作在神面前——他以他為起初的頒布者,也為最終的判斷者——他必加以應有的認可;但若是純為顯揚而作,神不能承認它,甚至他的判斷也未被想到——神只悅納那作在他面前的。一般原則如此。以下便是三個例證。

英文原文

SERMON ON THE MOUNT--continued.

Mt 6:1-18. FURTHER ILLUSTRATION OF THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE KINGDOM--ITS UNOSTENTATIOUSNESS.

General Caution against Ostentation in Religious Duties

(Mt 6:1).

1. Take heed that ye do not your alms--But the true reading seems clearly to be "your righteousness." The external authority for both readings is pretty nearly equal; but internal evidence is decidedly in favor of "righteousness." The subject of the second verse being "almsgiving" that word--so like the other in Greek--might easily be substituted for it by the copyist: whereas the opposite would not be so likely. But it is still more in favor of "righteousness," that if we so read the first verse, it then becomes a general heading for this whole section of the discourse, inculcating unostentatiousness in all deeds of righteousness--Almsgiving, Prayer, and Fasting being, in that case, but selected examples of this righteousness; whereas, if we read, "Do not your alms," &c., this first verse will have no reference but to that one point. By "righteousness," in this case, we are to understand that same righteousness of the kingdom of heaven, whose leading features--in opposition to traditional perversions of it--it is the great object of this discourse to open up: that righteousness of which the Lord says, "Except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven"

(Mt 5:20).

To "do" this righteousness, was an old and well-understood expression. Thus, "Blessed is he that doeth righteousness at all times"

(Ps 106:3).

It refers to the actings of righteousness in the life--the outgoings of the gracious nature--of which our Lord afterwards said to His disciples, "Herein is My Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit; so shall ye be My disciples"

(Joh 15:8).

before men, to be seen of them--with the view or intention of being beheld of them. See the same expression in

Mt 5:28.

True, He had required them to let their light so shine before men that they might see their good works, and glorify their Father which is in heaven

(Mt 5:16).

But this is quite consistent with not making a display of our righteousness for self-glorification. In fact, the doing of the former necessarily implies our not doing the latter.

otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven--When all duty is done to God--as primarily enjoining and finally judging of it--He will take care that it be duly recognized; but when done purely for ostentation, God cannot own it, nor is His judgment of it even thought of--God accepts only what is done to Himself. So much for the general principle. Now follow three illustrations of it.

2

無標題

開啟正文

賙濟

(Mt 6:2-4)。

2. 所以你施捨的時候,不可在你前面吹號——這話當比喻地理解為對其加以宣揚。由此有我們"吹號"的說法。

像那假冒為善的人——這詞在聖經中屢見,原意為"演戲的人"——指那些假裝成自己本來不是的人(如此處),或掩飾自己本來所是的人(如

Lu 12:1, 2)。

在會堂裡和十字路口上——宗教與世俗的場所。

故意要得人的榮耀。我實在告訴你們——在這樣威嚴的話語中,我們聽到的乃是立法者與審判者親自向我們說話。

他們已經得了他們的賞賜——他們所要的不過是人的稱讚,他們已經得着了——並且與之一起,他們將來也只得到這些。

英文原文

Almsgiving

(Mt 6:2-4).

2. Therefore, when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee--The expression is to be taken figuratively for blazoning it. Hence our expression to "trumpet."

as the hypocrites do--This word--of such frequent occurrence in Scripture, signifying primarily "one who acts a part"--denotes one who either pretends to be what he is not (as here), or dissembles what he really is (as in

Lu 12:1, 2).

in the synagogues and in the streets--the places of religious and secular resort.

that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you--In such august expressions, it is the Lawgiver and Judge Himself that we hear speaking to us.

They have their reward--All they wanted was human applause, and they have it--and with it, all they will ever get.

3

無標題

開啟正文

3. 你施捨的時候,不要叫左手知道右手所作的——不但不要炫耀它,連自己的思想中也不要停留在其上,免得它助長屬靈的驕傲。

英文原文

3. But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth--So far from making a display of it, dwell not on it even in thine own thoughts, lest it minister to spiritual pride.

4

無標題

開啟正文

4. 要叫你施捨的事行在暗中,你父在暗中察看,必然親自報答你——"親自"一詞似乎是對經文未經授權的加添,無疑是因意義而提示的。(見

1Ti 5:25; Ro 2:16; 1Co 4:5)。

英文原文

4. That thine alms may be in secret, and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly--The word "Himself" appears to be an unauthorized addition to the text, which the sense no doubt suggested. (See

1Ti 5:25; Ro 2:16; 1Co 4:5).

5

無標題

開啟正文

禱告

(Mt 6:5, 6)。

5. 你們禱告的時候,不可——更可譯作「你們禱告的時候,不可」。

像那假冒為善的人一樣,因為他們愛站在會堂裡和十字路口上禱告——(參見

Mt 6:2)。

故意叫人看見。我實在告訴你們,他們已經等——禱告時站立的姿勢是古代的慣例,猶太教會和早期基督教會都是如此。但當然,這種顯眼的姿勢也為炫誇者大開了方便之門。

英文原文

Prayer

(Mt 6:5, 6).

5. And when thou prayest, thou shalt--or, preferably, "when ye pray ye shall."

not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets--(See on

Mt 6:2).

that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have, &c.--The standing posture in prayer was the ancient practice, alike in the Jewish and in the early Christian Church. But of course this conspicuous posture opened the way for the ostentatious.

6

無標題

開啟正文

6. 你禱告的時候,要進你的內屋——即退修之所。

關上門,禱告你在暗中的父;你父在暗中察看,必然報答你——當然,這裡所責備的並不是禱告的公開性。禱告可以在任何環境下、不論多麼公開地獻上,只要不是出於炫誇的心理,而是受禱告本身之偉大目的所引導。這裡所教導的是真禱告那隱密的特質。

英文原文

6. But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet--a place of retirement.

and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly--Of course, it is not the simple publicity of prayer which is here condemned. It may be offered in any circumstances, however open, if not prompted by the spirit of ostentation, but dictated by the great ends of prayer itself. It is the retiring character of true prayer which is here taught.

7

無標題

開啟正文

補充指示與模範禱告

(Mt 6:7-15)。

7. 你們禱告,不可像外邦人用許多重複話——譯作「嘮嘮叨叨」更好,無論就其字形(在兩種語言中都是模仿聲音)還是其意義而言,因為它所表達的,不如說是同一詞語的重複,不如說是這些詞語的無意義堆叠;這從下文可以看出。

他們以為話多了必蒙垂聽——這種異教敬虔的方式至今仍為印度教徒和伊斯蘭教徒的修行者所奉行。猶太人中,萊特福特說,有一句格言:「凡多禱告的必蒙垂聽。」在羅馬教會中,這不僅被推到了無恥的地步,而且正如圖路克公正地指出的,主所賜下用以對抗虛妄重複話的那篇禱文本身,恰恰被最濫用於這個迷信的目的;重複的次數越多,功德便越大。這豈不正是主在這裡所責備的異教敬虔的特徵嗎?但多多禱告,有時使用同樣的話語,在此並不被定罪,而且有主自己的榜樣為證。

英文原文

Supplementary Directions and Model Prayer

(Mt 6:7-15).

7. But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions--"Babble not" would be a better rendering, both for the form of the word--which in both languages is intended to imitate the sound--and for the sense, which expresses not so much the repetition of the same words as a senseless multiplication of them; as appears from what follows.

as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking--This method of heathen devotion is still observed by Hindu and Mohammedan devotees. With the Jews, says LIGHTFOOT, it was a maxim, that "Every one who multiplies prayer is heard." In the Church of Rome, not only is it carried to a shameless extent, but, as THOLUCK justly observes, the very prayer which our Lord gave as an antidote to vain repetitions is the most abused to this superstitious end; the number of times it is repeated counting for so much more merit. Is not this just that characteristic feature of heathen devotion which our Lord here condemns? But praying much, and using at times the same words, is not here condemned, and has the example of our Lord Himself in its favor.

8

無標題

開啟正文

8. 你們不可效法他們;因為你們沒有祈求以先,你們所需用的,你們的父早已知道了——所以並不需要我們告知我們的需要,正如不需要我們不停地說話來催促祂留心。這裡對神的描繪何等不同於異教的神明!但當仔細注意,主說「你們的父」在你們求以先就知道你們的需要,不是作為人類普遍的父;因為祂在這篇講論中所論的不是一般的人,而是祂自己的門徒——靈裡貧窮的人、哀慟的人、溫柔的人、飢渴慕義的人、憐恤人的人、清心的人、使人和睦的人,以及那些為人子的緣故任人誣蔑的人——簡言之,就是神重生的兒女;他們以父的事為自己的事,在此也得到保證,他們的父反過來以他們的事為自己的事,既不需要被告知他們的需要,也不需要被提醒。然而祂要祂的兒女向祂禱告,並將祂一切應許的供應與他們的祈求相連;這樣鼓勵我們親近祂、持續親近祂,與祂相交同行,向祂敞開我們每一個情形,並確信這樣祈求就必得著——這樣尋找就必尋見——這樣叩門就必給我們開門。

英文原文

8. Be not ye therefore like unto them: for your Father knoweth what things ye have need of before ye ask him--and so needs not to be informed of our wants, any more than to be roused to attend to them by our incessant speaking. What a view of God is here given, in sharp contrast with the gods of the heathen! But let it be carefully noted that it is not as the general Father of mankind that our Lord says, "Your Father" knoweth what ye need before ye ask it; for it is not men, as such, that He is addressing in this discourse, but His own disciples--the poor in spirit, the mourners, the meek, hungry and thirsty souls, the merciful, the pure in heart, the peacemakers, who allow themselves to have all manner of evil said against them for the Son of man's sake--in short, the new-born children of God, who, making their Father's interests their own, are here assured that their Father, in return, makes their interests His, and needs neither to be told nor to be reminded of their wants. Yet He will have His children pray to Him, and links all His promised supplies to their petitions for them; thus encouraging us to draw near and keep near to Him, to talk and walk with Him, to open our every case to Him, and assure ourselves that thus asking we shall receive--thus seeking we shall find--thus knocking it shall be opened to us.

9

無標題

開啟正文

9. 所以,你們禱告要這樣說——更簡潔地說,「這樣」。

你們禱告——「你們」在此是強調語氣,與異教的禱告形成對比。這篇無可比擬的禱告不僅被賜下作為模範,也作為形式,這一點可從其本質得出結論。倘若它只包含禱告的提示或指導,它就只能用作指南;但既然它是一篇真實的禱告——的確是為要表明真正的禱告可以壓縮到最少的話語中,但仍作為一篇禱告而更加無可比擬——那麼我們是否應當照這話禱告,竟會有疑問,實在奇怪。誠然,我們在

Lu 11:2

中所看到的它第二次、略有不同的形式中,那介紹它的話應當足以使這一點塵埃落定:「你們禱告的時候,要說:我們在天上的父。」然而,由於第二種形式與第一種有相當大的差異,又由於新約後續沒有實際使用它的例子,也沒有明文引用其措辭,我們應當防範對其迷信的使用。它何時開始出現在教會禮拜中,後來又被推到何種地步,凡是熟悉教會歷史的人都知道。滋生這種濫用的靈也並未完全離開新教教會的某些分支,儘管相反的、同樣可責的另一極端也存在於其他分支。

模範禱告

(Mt 6:9-13)。

根據拉丁教父和路德宗的看法,主禱文的請求共有七個;根據希臘教父、改革宗教會和威斯敏斯特神學家的看法,只有六個;最後兩個被視為——我們認為較不正確地——一個。前三個請求專門與神有關:「願你的名為聖」——「願你的國降臨」——「願你的旨意行」。而且它們以下降的順序出現——從祂自己到祂在自己國度中的彰顯;從祂的國度到其子民的完全順服,或祂旨意的完全遵行。其餘四個請求與我們自己有關:「賜給我們日用的飲食」——「免我們的債」——「不叫我們遇見試探」——「救我們脫離兇惡」。但這些後面的請求以上升的順序出現——從每日的身體需要,一直到我們最終脫離一切罪惡。

呼召:

我們在天上的父——在前一子句中我們表達祂與我們的親近;在後一子句中,祂與我們的距離。(見

Ec 5:2; Isa 66:1)。

聖潔、慈愛的親密提示前者;可敬畏的敬畏提示後者。我們稱祂為「父」,表達一個我們自幼就知道並感受到包圍我們的關係;但我們稱祂為「在天上的」我們的父,便將祂與我們在地上都有的父親作對比,從而將我們的靈魂提升到祂所居住的那個「天上」,以及那裡的尊嚴和榮耀——那些在那裡才是在正當的家。主禱文的這頭幾句話——它開頭的這個呼召——為整篇禱告投下何等的光輝與溫暖,並將那禱告的信徒——神的兒女——引進何等寧靜的境界,因他是這樣來到神面前!神的確對祂百姓的父性關係,對舊約來說絕不陌生。(見

De 32:6; Ps 103:13; Isa 63:16; Jer 3:4, 19; Mal 1:6; 2:10)。

但這些不過是一瞥——如果我們可以這樣說的話,是「背面」(見

Ex 33:23),

相比之下,我們的父在耶穌裡所啟示的「敞開的臉」就大不相同了。(參見

2Co 3:18)。

我們甚至可以說,主在這頭一篇長篇講論中對「我們在天上的父」所給的看見,使神自己的話語中從前關於這主題的一切教導——甚至聖徒從前所想到的——都相形見細。

第一個請求:

願人尊——即「被尊崇」;被視為和對待為聖。

你的名為聖——神的名意為「祂自己,如所啟示和彰顯的」。聖經各處,神都藉著祂對人的啟示來界定並標明祂要人對祂有的信、愛、敬畏和順服;既要排除對祂的錯誤觀念,又要使一切敬虔具有祂自己教導的形狀和色彩。這一點無論如何重視都不為過。

英文原文

9. After this manner--more simply "Thus."

therefore pray ye--The "ye" is emphatic here, in contrast with the heathen prayers. That this matchless prayer was given not only as a model, but as a form, might be concluded from its very nature. Did it consist only of hints or directions for prayer, it could only be used as a directory; but seeing it is an actual prayer--designed, indeed, to show how much real prayer could be compressed into the fewest words, but still, as a prayer, only the more incomparable for that--it is strange that there should be a doubt whether we ought to pray that very prayer. Surely the words with which it is introduced, in the second utterance and varied form of it which we have in

Lu 11:2,

ought to set this at rest: "When ye pray, say, Our Father." Nevertheless, since the second form of it varies considerably from the first, and since no example of its actual use, or express quotation of its phraseology, occurs in the sequel of the New Testament, we are to guard against a superstitious use of it. How early this began to appear in the church services, and to what extent it was afterwards carried, is known to every one versed in Church History. Nor has the spirit which bred this abuse quite departed from some branches of the Protestant Church, though the opposite and equally condemnable extreme is to be found in other branches of it.

Model Prayer

(Mt 6:9-13).

According to the Latin fathers and the Lutheran Church, the petitions of the Lord's Prayer are seven in number; according to the Greek fathers, the Reformed Church and the Westminster divines, they are only six; the two last being regarded--we think, less correctly--as one. The first three petitions have to do exclusively with God: "Thy name be hallowed"--"Thy kingdom come"--"Thy will be done." And they occur in a descending scale--from Himself down to the manifestation of Himself in His kingdom; and from His kingdom to the entire subjection of its subjects, or the complete doing of His will. The remaining four petitions have to do with OURSELVES: "Give us our daily bread"--"Forgive us our debts"--"Lead us not into temptation"--"Deliver us from evil." But these latter petitions occur in an ascending scale--from the bodily wants of every day up to our final deliverance from all evil.

Invocation:

Our Father which art in heaven--In the former clause we express His nearness to us; in the latter, His distance from us. (See

Ec 5:2; Isa 66:1).

Holy, loving familiarity suggests the one; awful reverence the other. In calling Him "Father" we express a relationship we have all known and felt surrounding us even from our infancy; but in calling Him our Father "who art in heaven," we contrast Him with the fathers we all have here below, and so raise our souls to that "heaven" where He dwells, and that Majesty and Glory which are there as in their proper home. These first words of the Lord's Prayer--this invocation with which it opens--what a brightness and warmth does it throw over the whole prayer, and into what a serene region does it introduce the praying believer, the child of God, as he thus approaches Him! It is true that the paternal relationship of God to His people is by no means strange to the Old Testament. (See

De 32:6; Ps 103:13; Isa 63:16; Jer 3:4, 19; Mal 1:6; 2:10).

But these are only glimpses--the "back parts"

(Ex 33:23),

if we may so say, in comparison with the "open face" of our Father revealed in Jesus. (See on

2Co 3:18).

Nor is it too much to say, that the view which our Lord gives, throughout this His very first lengthened discourse, of "our Father in heaven," beggars all that was ever taught, even in God's own Word, or conceived before by His saints, on this subject.

First Petition:

Hallowed be--that is, "Be held in reverence"; regarded and treated as holy.

thy name--God's name means "Himself as revealed and manifested." Everywhere in Scripture God defines and marks off the faith and love and reverence and obedience He will have from men by the disclosures which He makes to them of what He is; both to shut out false conceptions of Him, and to make all their devotion take the shape and hue of His own teaching. Too much attention cannot be paid to this.

10

無標題

開啟正文

第二個請求:

10. 願你的國降臨——神的國是恩典之神在這墮落的世界中所設立的那個道德和屬靈的國度,其子民由所有那些被帶到甘心順服祂恩典權杖之下的人組成,而祂的兒子耶穌是這國度的榮耀元首。就其內在的真實而言,這國度自從有「與神同行」(見

Ge 5:24)、

「等候祂的救恩」(見

Ge 49:18)、

「常與祂同在,被祂的右手扶持」(見

Ps 73:23)、

甚至「行過死蔭的幽谷,也不怕遭害,因為祂與他們同在」(見

Ps 23:4)

的人以來,就已經存在了。當彌賽亞自己顯現時,這國作為可見的國度,「近了」。祂的死奠定了它深厚的根基。祂升上高天,「擄掠了仇敵,將各樣的恩賜賞給人,甚至給那些悖逆的人,使主神可以住在他們中間」,以及五旬節聖靈的澆灌——藉此那些給人的恩賜降臨到悖逆者身上,主神在成千上萬人的身上被看見「住」在人中間——便是這國度一次榮耀的「降臨」。但它仍在要來之中,而「願你的國降臨」這個請求,只要還有一個子民未被帶進來,就不可停止上達。但這禱告豈不是更往前展望——展望到「將要顯現的榮耀」,或那被稱為「我們主救主耶穌基督永遠的國」(見

2Pe 1:11)

的那個階段嗎?

也許不是直接的,因為緊隨其後的請求——「願你的旨意行在地上,如同行在天上」——便會把我們帶回這個目前不完美的狀態。然而,心思拒絕被階段和程度所限制,在禱告「願你的國降臨」時,它不由自主地將信心、渴望和喜樂期望的翅膀伸向神國最終的榮耀成全。

第三個請求:

願你的旨意行在地上,如同行在天上——或如路加所載的同樣的話,「如同在天上,也在地上」(見

Lu 11:2)

——那樣甘心,那樣恒常,那樣完全。但有人會問,這會實現嗎?我們回答,如果「新天新地」只不過是我們現今的物質系統經火潔淨並變形,那當然會。但我們傾向於認為,這篇美麗的請求中所教導我們呼出的渴望,並沒有直接指向任何這種整體性的應驗,而只是重生靈魂自發而不可抗拒的渴望——化為言語——要看見整個有人居住的大地完全順服神的旨意。它不問是否會實現——也不問是否能實現——然後才這樣禱告。它必須把它神聖的渴望呼出來,而這不過是這些渴望的坦然而簡樸的表達。舊約中也不乏與此非常接近的禱告(見

Ps 7:9; 67:1-7; 72:19

等)。

英文原文

Second Petition:

10. Thy kingdom come--The kingdom of God is that moral and spiritual kingdom which the God of grace is setting up in this fallen world, whose subjects consist of as many as have been brought into hearty subjection to His gracious scepter, and of which His Son Jesus is the glorious Head. In the inward reality of it, this kingdom existed ever since there were men who "walked with God"

(Ge 5:24),

and "waited for His salvation"

(Ge 49:18);

who were "continually with Him, holden by His right hand"

(Ps 73:23),

and who, even in the valley of the shadow of death, feared no evil when He was with them

(Ps 23:4).

When Messiah Himself appeared, it was, as a visible kingdom, "at hand." His death laid the deep foundations of it. His ascension on high, "leading captivity captive and receiving gifts for men, yea, for the rebellious, that the Lord God might dwell among them," and the Pentecostal effusion of the Spirit, by which those gifts for men descended upon the rebellious, and the Lord God was beheld, in the persons of thousands upon thousands, "dwelling" among men--was a glorious "coming" of this kingdom. But it is still to come, and this petition, "Thy kingdom come," must not cease to ascend so long as one subject of it remains to be brought in. But does not this prayer stretch further forward--to "the glory to be revealed," or that stage of the kingdom called "the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ"

(2Pe 1:11)?

Not directly, perhaps, since the petition that follows this--"Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven"--would then bring us back to this present state of imperfection. Still, the mind refuses to be so bounded by stages and degrees, and in the act of praying, "Thy kingdom come," it irresistibly stretches the wings of its faith, and longing, and joyous expectation out to the final and glorious consummation of the kingdom of God.

Third Petition:

Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven--or, as the same words are rendered in Luke, "as in heaven, so upon earth"

(Lu 11:2)

--as cheerfully, as constantly, as perfectly. But some will ask, Will this ever be? We answer, If the "new heavens and new earth" are to be just our present material system purified by fire and transfigured, of course it will. But we incline to think that the aspiration which we are taught in this beautiful petition to breathe forth has no direct reference to any such organic fulfilment, and is only the spontaneous and resistless longing of the renewed soul--put into words--to see the whole inhabited earth in entire conformity to the will of God. It asks not if ever it shall be--or if ever it can be--in order to pray this prayer. It must have its holy yearnings breathed forth, and this is just the bold yet simple expression of them. Nor is the Old Testament without prayers which come very near to this

(Ps 7:9; 67:1-7; 72:19,

&c.).

11

無標題

開啟正文

第四個請求:

11. 我們日用的飲食,今日賜給我們——這裡譯作「日用」的複合詞,在古典或神聖的希臘文中別處均未出現,因此必須根據其組成部分的類比來解釋。但批評家們對此意見分歧。對於那些想將它理解為「今日賜我們明天的飲食」的人——仿佛意義就這樣滑入路加的「天天賜給我們」(見

Lu 11:2)

那樣(如本格爾、邁爾等)——可以回答說:這樣得出的意義幾乎是難以理解的,甚至更少;「明天的飲食」這個表達與「從一天到一天」的飲食完全不同;而且這樣理解,似乎與

Mt 6:34

矛盾。

絕大多數優秀的批評家(將這個詞理解為由 ousia「實體」或「存在」複合而成)把它理解為「生命之杖」——維持生存的飲食,因此意義就是:「今日賜我們今日所需用的飲食。」在這種情況下,我們授權譯本(跟從《武加大譯本》、路德和一些最優秀的近代批評家)的譯法——「我們日用的飲食」——在意義上相當準確。(見

Pr 30:8)。

在解經家中,早就有將這理解為對天上飲食、即屬靈滋養的禱告的傾向;在這一點上,許多傑出的解經家,甚至直到我們這個時代,都跟從了他們。但這既很不自然,又剝奪了基督徒最甘甜的特權之一——藉著這短短的禱告中一個簡單的請求,將他身體的需要交託給他的天父。毫無疑問,屬靈的心思會從「必壞的食物」自然地想到「存到永生的食物」。但讓這個關於身體需要的請求不可抗拒地暗示一個更高的請求就夠了;讓我們不要——出於病態的屬靈觀念——剝奪自己在這篇禱告中為身體供應的那唯一的一個請求——這篇講論的緊接下文表明,這正是我們天父極為關心的。然而,在將我們的請求限於今日的供應上,主所要求和所要生發的,是何等孩童般依賴的靈!

英文原文

Fourth Petition:

11. Give us this day our daily bread--The compound word here rendered "daily" occurs nowhere else, either in classical or sacred Greek, and so must be interpreted by the analogy of its component parts. But on this critics are divided. To those who would understand it to mean, "Give us this day the bread of to-morrow"--as if the sense thus slid into that of Luke "Give us day by day"

(Lu 11:2,

(as BENGEL, MEYER, &c.) it may be answered that the sense thus brought out is scarcely intelligible, if not something less; that the expression "bread of to-morrow" is not at all the same as bread "from day to day," and that, so understood, it would seem to contradict

Mt 6:34.

The great majority of the best critics (taking the word to be compounded of ousia, "substance," or "being") understand by it the "staff of life," the bread of subsistence, and so the sense will be, "Give us this day the bread which this day's necessities require." In this case, the rendering of our authorized version (after the Vulgate, LUTHER and some of the best modern critics)--"our daily bread"--is, in sense, accurate enough. (See

Pr 30:8).

Among commentators, there was early shown an inclination to understand this as a prayer for the heavenly bread, or spiritual nourishment; and in this they have been followed by many superior expositors, even down to our own times. But as this is quite unnatural, so it deprives the Christian of one of the sweetest of his privileges--to cast his bodily wants in this short prayer, by one simple petition, upon his heavenly Father. No doubt the spiritual mind will, from "the meat that perisheth," naturally rise in thought to "that meat which endureth to everlasting life." But let it be enough that the petition about bodily wants irresistibly suggests a higher petition; and let us not rob ourselves--out of a morbid spirituality--of our one petition in this prayer for that bodily provision which the immediate sequel of this discourse shows that our heavenly Father has so much at heart. In limiting our petitions, however, to provision for the day, what a spirit of childlike dependence does the Lord both demand and beget!

12

無標題

開啟正文

第五個請求:

12. 免我們的債——這是對罪的一個極為重要的看法——罪是得罪神,要求對我們被虧損的、神對我們絕對主權的聲望予以補償。如同債戶在債主手中,罪人也是如此在神手中。這個罪的觀念確實在這篇講論中先前已經出現過——在那個警告中,要我們趕快與對頭和好,免得被判刑,判我們還清最後一文錢,並在那之前被下在監裡(見

Mt 5:25, 26)。

它也一次又一次地出現在我們主後來的教導中——如在債主和兩個欠債者的比喻(見

Lu 7:41, 42

等),以及不憐恤人之欠債者的比喻(見

Mt 18:23

等)。但藉著將它融入這篇簡短的、蒙悅納的禱告模範中,並作為三個或多或少涉及罪的請求中的第一個,我們主以最強調的方式教導我們,要把這個對罪的看法視為首要的和根本的。與此相應的,是這請求引導我們尋求的「赦免」——不是從我們自己心中除去罪的污點,也不是除去我們對神怒氣的正當恐懼,或對祂的愛的不當懷疑——而這是一些人告訴我們我們所需要關心的全部——而是從神自己的心中除去祂因罪而對我們的不悅,或者保留這個比喻,從祂的「記念冊」上塗抹或勾銷因此緣故而對我們的一切記錄。

如同我們免了人的債——與先前同樣的對罪的看法;只是如今轉移到人與人之間冒犯的範圍。在

Mt 5:7

所說的話之後,不會有人認為我們主在這裡教導,我們對得罪我們之同胞的赦免行使絕對先於、並且是神赦免我們的正當根基。祂的全部教導——正如整本聖經——恰恰相反。但正如沒有人能合理地想像自己是神赦免的對象,卻同時故意而習慣性地不肯赦免同胞,同樣,這也是一個美好的安排:我們每日求告和期望每日過犯得蒙每日赦免的權利,以及在大日進入神國時最終的釋放和無罪判定,取決於我們意識到自己對同胞有赦免的性情,以及我們預備好在那察驗人心者面前宣告,我們確實赦免了他們。(見

Mr 11:25, 26)。

神在祂赦免的兒女身上看到祂自己的形像反射;但向我們自己所拒絕給人的事物求神,就是侮辱祂。我們主如此強調這一點,以致在這篇禱告結束之後,祂所回到的就是這唯一的一點(見

Mt 6:14, 15),

為要莊嚴地向我們保證,神在赦免這件事上的程序將與我們的完全一致。

英文原文

Fifth Petition:

12. And forgive us our debts--A vitally important view of sin, this--as an offense against God demanding reparation to His dishonored claims upon our absolute subjection. As the debtor in the creditor's hand, so is the sinner in the hands of God. This idea of sin had indeed come up before in this discourse--in the warning to agree with our adversary quickly, in case of sentence being passed upon us, adjudging us to payment of the last farthing, and to imprisonment till then

(Mt 5:25, 26).

And it comes up once and again in our Lord's subsequent teaching--as in the parable of the creditor and his two debtors

(Lu 7:41, 42,

&c.), and in the parable of the unmerciful debtor

(Mt 18:23,

&c.). But by embodying it in this brief model of acceptable prayer, and as the first of three petitions more or less bearing upon sin, our Lord teaches us, in the most emphatic manner conceivable, to regard this view of sin as the primary and fundamental one. Answering to this is the "forgiveness" which it directs us to seek--not the removal from our own hearts of the stain of sin, nor yet the removal of our just dread of God's anger, or of unworthy suspicions of His love, which is all that some tell us we have to care about--but the removal from God's own mind of His displeasure against us on account of sin, or, to retain the figure, the wiping or crossing out from His "book of remembrance" of all entries against us on this account.

as we forgive our debtors--the same view of sin as before; only now transferred to the region of offenses given and received between man and man. After what has been said on

Mt 5:7,

it will not be thought that our Lord here teaches that our exercise of forgiveness towards our offending fellow men absolutely precedes and is the proper ground of God's forgiveness of us. His whole teaching, indeed--as of all Scripture--is the reverse of this. But as no one can reasonably imagine himself to be the object of divine forgiveness who is deliberately and habitually unforgiving towards his fellow men, so it is a beautiful provision to make our right to ask and expect daily forgiveness of our daily shortcomings and our final absolution and acquittal at the great day of admission into the kingdom, dependent upon our consciousness of a forgiving disposition towards our fellows, and our preparedness to protest before the Searcher of hearts that we do actually forgive them. (See

Mr 11:25, 26).

God sees His own image reflected in His forgiving children; but to ask God for what we ourselves refuse to men, is to insult Him. So much stress does our Lord put upon this, that immediately after the close of this prayer, it is the one point in it which He comes back upon

(Mt 6:14, 15),

for the purpose of solemnly assuring us that the divine procedure in this matter of forgiveness will be exactly what our own is.

13

無標題

開啟正文

第六個請求:

13. 不叫我們遇見試探——誠實尋求並確信已得著過犯赦免的人,會努力將來避免再犯。但既然意識到「我們願意行善時,惡就與我們同在」,我們便受教導獻上這第六個請求,它自然緊接前一個,並且確實發自一切認真基督徒的心。這個請求的形式有一些困難,因為可以肯定,神確實將祂的百姓——如同祂對待亞伯拉罕和基督自己——帶入既適合又旨在試驗他們或考驗他們信心強度的環境。有些人將這請求視為不過是自卑和不由自主地對危險的退縮;但這似乎太弱。另一些人將它理解為對屈服於試探的禱告,因此等同於求在受試探時的支持和搭救;但這似乎超過了確切所指的。我們傾向於將它理解為對憑自己的意思被拉入或捲入試探的禱告,這裡所用的詞似乎支持這一點——「不要領我們進入」。這個觀點既不使我們口中說出反對受試探的禱告——這似乎超過了神聖程序所能保證的——另一方面,也不將這個請求的意義改為在試探之下求支持,這是這些詞幾乎不能承受的;但它給了我們一個關於試探的、最明確、最需要的禱告主題。這正是彼得當時需要求卻沒有求的——當他自願、不顧困難地堅持進入大祭司的院宇,而一旦被捲入試探的場景和氣氛中,他便如此可恥地跌倒了。如果如此,我們主在園中對門徒說——「總要警醒禱告,免得入了迷惑」——豈不是相當清楚正是要他們禱告抵擋這一點嗎?(見

Mt 26:41)。

第七個請求:

救我們脫離凶惡——我們看不到充分的理由將這僅僅視為第六個請求的下半句。第二個和第三個請求同樣有更好的理由被視為一個。連接兩個請求的「但」不足以作為將它們視為一個的理由,雖然足以表明一個念頭自然緊隨另一個。由於「脫離凶惡」這個表達也可以同樣譯作「脫離那惡者」,許多傑出的批評家認為所指的是魔鬼,特別是因為它緊接在「試探」的主題之後。但這些簡短請求的全面性質,以及這一個所佔的位置——作為我們一切渴望消散於其上的那個——在我們看來,反對如此狹隘的觀點。也不可否認地,使徒在他被帶出去為他的主受苦之前所寫的最後幾句話之一,平靜而確信的話語中,暗示了這個請求——「主必救我脫離諸般的凶惡(比較兩段經文的希臘文),也必救我進他的天國」(見

2Ti 4:18)。

因此,這最後一個請求只有被視為求從各種凶惡中得拯救——不僅從罪,也從罪的一切後果——完全而最終的拯救——才能正確把握。因此,我們的禱告以這個結束是合宜的。因為我們所能渴望的,有哪一樣不包含在其中呢?

因為國度、權柄、榮耀,全是你的,直到永遠。阿們!——如果對外在證據有任何信賴,我們認為這個頌詞幾乎不能被視為原文的一部分。它在所有最古老的抄本中都沒有;它在《古拉丁譯本》和《武加大譯本》中都沒有:前者可追溯到第二世紀中葉,後者是耶柔米在第四世紀對前者的修訂——耶柔米是一位極其敬虔而保守,又能幹而公正的批評家。正如可以預期的,最早的拉丁教父對它隻字不提;但甚至希臘解經家在講解這篇禱告時,也略過這個頌詞。另一方面,它見於多數抄本,雖然不是最古老的;它見於所有敘利亞文譯本,甚至《別西大譯本》——可能可追溯到第二世紀——雖然這個譯本缺少「阿們」,而頌詞若為真品,幾乎不可能沒有「阿們」;它見於為上埃及基督徒所譯的* Sahidic* 或* Thebaic* 譯本,可能與古拉丁譯本同樣早;而且它見於或許大多數的後來譯本。綜合考慮證據,我們認為它極可能不是原文的一部分。

英文原文

Sixth Petition:

13. And lead us not into temptation--He who honestly seeks and has the assurance of, forgiveness for past sin, will strive to avoid committing it for the future. But conscious that "when we would do good evil is present with us," we are taught to offer this sixth petition, which comes naturally close upon the preceding, and flows, indeed, instinctively from it in the hearts of all earnest Christians. There is some difficulty in the form of the petition, as it is certain that God does bring His people--as He did Abraham, and Christ Himself--into circumstances both fitted and designed to try them, or test the strength of their faith. Some meet this by regarding the petition as simply an humble expression of self-distrust and instinctive shrinking from danger; but this seems too weak. Others take it as a prayer against yielding to temptation, and so equivalent to a prayer for support and deliverance when we are tempted; but this seems to go beyond the precise thing intended. We incline to take it as a prayer against being drawn or sucked, of our own will, into temptation, to which the word here used seems to lend some countenance--"Introduce us not." This view, while it does not put into our mouths a prayer against being tempted--which is more than the divine procedure would seem to warrant--does not, on the other hand, change the sense of the petition into one for support under temptation, which the words will hardly bear; but it gives us a subject for prayer, in regard to temptation, most definite, and of all others most needful. It was precisely this which Peter needed to ask, but did not ask, when--of his own accord, and in spite of difficulties--he pressed for entrance into the palace hall of the high priest, and where, once sucked into the scene and atmosphere of temptation, he fell so foully. And if so, does it not seem pretty clear that this was exactly what our Lord meant His disciples to pray against when He said in the garden--"Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation"?

(Mt 26:41).

Seventh Petition:

But deliver us from evil--We can see no good reason for regarding this as but the second half of the sixth petition. With far better ground might the second and third petitions be regarded as one. The "but" connecting the two petitions is an insufficient reason for regarding them as one, though enough to show that the one thought naturally follows close upon the other. As the expression "from evil" may be equally well rendered "from the evil one," a number or superior critics think the devil is intended, especially from its following close upon the subject of "temptation." But the comprehensive character of these brief petitions, and the place which this one occupies, as that on which all our desires die away, seems to us against so contracted a view of it. Nor can there be a reasonable doubt that the apostle, in some of the last sentences which he penned before he was brought forth to suffer for his Lord, alludes to this very petition in the language of calm assurance--"And the Lord shall deliver me from every evil work (compare the Greek of the two passages), and will preserve me unto his heavenly kingdom"

(2Ti 4:18).

The final petition, then, is only rightly grasped when regarded as a prayer for deliverance from all evil of whatever kind--not only from sin, but from all its consequences--fully and finally. Fitly, then, are our prayers ended with this. For what can we desire which this does not carry with it?

For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen--If any reliance is to be placed on external evidence, this doxology, we think, can hardly be considered part of the original text. It is wanting in all the most ancient manuscripts; it is wanting in the Old Latin version and in the Vulgate: the former mounting up to about the middle of the second century, and the latter being a revision of it in the fourth century by JEROME, a most reverential and conservative as well as able and impartial critic. As might be expected from this, it is passed by in silence by the earliest Latin fathers; but even the Greek commentators, when expounding this prayer, pass by the doxology. On the other hand, it is found in a majority of manuscripts, though not the oldest; it is found in all the Syriac versions, even the Peschito--dating probably as early as the second century--although this version lacks the "Amen," which the doxology, if genuine, could hardly have wanted; it is found in the Sahidic or Thebaic version made for the Christians of Upper Egypt, possibly as early as the Old Latin; and it is found in perhaps most of the later versions. On a review of the evidence, the strong probability, we think, is that it was no part of the original text.

14

無標題

開啟正文

14. 你們饒恕人的過犯等——見

Mt 6:12。

英文原文

14. For if ye forgive men, &c.--See on

Mt 6:12.

15

無標題

開啟正文

15. 你們不饒恕人的過犯等——見

Mt 6:12。

英文原文

15. But if ye forgive not, &c.--See on

Mt 6:12.

16

無標題

開啟正文

禁食

(Mt 6:16-18)。

我們主以這神聖模範結束了關於禱告的補充指示之後,如今回到我們的義行中不炫誇的主題,為要在禁食的事上再舉一個例證。

16. 你們禁食的時候——可能是指私人自願的禁食,這由每個人自己規定;雖然在精神上它適用於任何禁食。

不可像那假冒為善的人,臉上帶著愁容;因為他們把臉弄得——原文作「使不被看見」;譯作「弄得」非常好。他們帶著邋遢的樣子四處走動,頭上撒著灰。

難看,故意叫人看出他們是禁食——他們所尋求的不是行為本身,而是行為的名聲;為此,那些假冒為善的人增多了他們的禁食。羅馬教會和親羅馬的新教徒那些令人筋疲力盡的禁食,難道沒有這種污點嗎?

我實在告訴你們,他們已經得了他們的賞賜。

英文原文

Fasting

(Mt 6:16-18).

Having concluded His supplementary directions on the subject of prayer with this Divine Pattern, our Lord now returns to the subject of Unostentatiousness in our deeds of righteousness, in order to give one more illustration of it, in the matter of fasting.

16. Moreover, when ye fast--referring, probably, to private and voluntary fasting, which was to be regulated by each individual for himself; though in spirit it would apply to any fast.

be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces--literally, "make unseen"; very well rendered "disfigure." They went about with a slovenly appearance, and ashes sprinkled on their head.

that they may appear unto men to fast--It was not the deed, but reputation for the deed which they sought; and with this view those hypocrites multiplied their fasts. And are the exhausting fasts of the Church of Rome, and of Romanizing Protestants, free from this taint?

Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.

17

無標題

開啟正文

17. 你禁食的時候,要梳頭洗臉——正如猶太人慣常所作的,哀悼之時則為例外(Da 10:3);所以意思是「照常出現」——出現時不引人注意。

英文原文

17. But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thine head, and wash thy face--as the Jews did, except when mourning

(Da 10:3);

so that the meaning is, "Appear as usual"--appear so as to attract no notice.

18

無標題

開啟正文

18. 不叫人看出你禁食來,只叫你暗中的父看見;你父在暗中察看,必然報答你——「明顯地」一語,顯然是後來從 Mt 6:4, 7 加進本節經文的,當然這意思本是包含在內的。

英文原文

18. That thou appear not unto men to fast, but unto thy Father which is in secret: and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly--The "openly" seems evidently a later addition to the text of this verse from

Mt 6:4, 7,

though of course the idea is implied.

19

Mt 6:19-34.

開啟正文

Mt 6:19-34。

天國之義的結論性例證——屬天的心志與兒子的信靠

19. 不要為自己積攢財寶在地上——不要囤積。

地上有蟲子——「蛀衣蟲」。東方的財寶,一部分由儲藏的昂貴衣裳構成(Job 27:16),易為蛀蟲所蝕(Job 13:28;Isa 50:9;51:8)。Jas 5:2 顯然引用了我們主這裏的話。

咬——任何「蝕入」或「消耗」;此處大概是「磨損」之意。

能壞——使消失。藉著對蟲子和鏽的提及,我們主要教導這類地上財寶何等易朽壞。

也有賊挖窟窿來偷——這些財寶何等不可靠!

英文原文

Mt 6:19-34.

CONCLUDING ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE KINGDOM--HEAVENLY-MINDEDNESS AND FILIAL CONFIDENCE.

19. Lay not up for ourselves treasures upon earth--hoard not.

where moth--a "clothes-moth." Eastern treasures, consisting partly in costly dresses stored up

(Job 27:16),

were liable to be consumed by moths

(Job 13:28; Isa 50:9; 51:8).

In

Jas 5:2

there is an evident reference to our Lord's words here.

and rust--any "eating into" or "consuming"; here, probably, "wear and tear."

doth corrupt--cause to disappear. By this reference to moth and rust our Lord would teach how perishable are such earthly treasures.

and where thieves break through and steal--Treasures these, how precarious!

20

無標題

開啟正文

20. 只要積攢財寶在天上——路加(Lu 12:33)的措辭極為大膽——「變賣所有的賙濟人,為自己預備永不壞的錢囊,用不盡的財寶在天上」等。

天上沒有蟲子咬,不能鏽壞,也沒有賊挖窟窿來偷——這些財寶何等不朽壞、何等不能侵犯!(比較 Col 3:2)。

英文原文

20. But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven--The language in Luke

(Lu 12:33)

is very bold--"Sell that ye have, and give alms; provide yourselves bags which wax not old, a treasure in the heavens that faileth not," &c.

where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal--Treasures these, imperishable and unassailable! (Compare

Col 3:2).

21

無標題

開啟正文

21. 因為你的財寶在哪裏——即你所最看重之處。

你的心也在那裏——「你的財寶——你的心」大概是此處的真實讀法:Lu 12:34 作「你們的」,似乎由此處引入。

這格言雖然顯而易見,卻被多少口稱順服基督教訓的人在實際上忽視了!路德(為 THOLUCK 所引)說:「人所愛的,那就是他的神。因為他將之帶在心中,日夜與之相伴,睡醒都與之同在;那可能是甚麼——財富或錢財、享樂或名聲。」但因「積攢」本身並非有罪,在某些情形下反被吩咐(2Co 12:14),而誠實的勤勞和精明的進取通常以繁榮為報償,許多人便自欺,以為自己與神之間一切都好;其實他們最密切的注意、憂慮、熱誠和時間,都已耗盡在這些屬地的追求上。為要糾正這一點,我們主加上以下所說的,其中蘊含著極深的實踐智慧。

英文原文

21. For where your treasure is--that which ye value most.

there will your heart be also--"Thy treasure--thy heart" is probably the true reading here: "your," in

Lu 12:34,

from which it seems to have come in here. Obvious though this maxim be, by what multitudes who profess to bow to the teaching of Christ is it practically disregarded! "What a man loves," says LUTHER, quoted by THOLUCK, "that is his God. For he carries it in his heart, he goes about with it night and day, he sleeps and wakes with it; be it what it may--wealth or pelf, pleasure or renown." But because "laying up" is not in itself sinful, nay, in some cases enjoined

(2Co 12:14),

and honest industry and sagacious enterprise are usually rewarded with prosperity, many flatter themselves that all is right between them and God, while their closest attention, anxiety, zeal, and time are exhausted upon these earthly pursuits. To put this right, our Lord adds what follows, in which there is profound practical wisdom.

22

無標題

開啟正文

22. 燈——更恰當作「燈」。

就是身上的眼睛;若你的眼睛瞭亮——單純、清澈。應用於外在的眼睛,這指一般的健全;特別是不兩面看。

此處如古典希臘文一樣,這詞用作比喻,指心眼的單純、專一的目的、正視其對象,與心存兩個目的相對。(見 Pr 4:25-27)。

你全身就光明——被照亮。正如肉身的視覺,人以良好健全的眼睛觀看,就行在光中,看得清每一物件;照樣,在一切事上服事並討神喜悅的單一而持久的目的,會使整個品格一致而明亮。

英文原文

22. The light--rather, "the lamp."

of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single--simple, clear. As applied to the outward eye, this means general soundness; particularly, not looking two ways. Here, as also in classical Greek, it is used figuratively to denote the simplicity of the mind's eye, singleness of purpose, looking right at its object, as opposed to having two ends in view. (See

Pr 4:25-27).

thy whole body shall be full of light--illuminated. As with the bodily vision, the man who looks with a good, sound eye, walks in light, seeing every object clear; so a simple and persistent purpose to serve and please God in everything will make the whole character consistent and bright.

23

無標題

開啟正文

23. 你的眼睛若昏花——失調,或如我們所說,若我們有了一隻壞眼睛。

你全身就黑暗——被黑暗籠罩。正如敗壞的眼睛,或不正視其對象的眼睛,甚麼也看不真切;照樣,在天與地之間分裂的心思和心靈全然黑暗。

你裏頭的光若黑暗了,那黑暗是何等大呢!——良心既是調節性的官能,而人內在的目的、方向、一生的目標決定其品格——若這些不單純、不向天,而是扭曲而分裂的,那麼我們本性中一切從這些得著方向和品格的其他官能和原則,又當如何?整個人和整個人生,除了黑暗一團,又當如何?

在路加(Lu 11:36)中,這話的反面非常引人注目地表達了內在眼睛的清明所賜予那些純粹、美麗、廣闊的洞察:「若是你全身光明,毫無黑暗,就全然光明,如同燈的明光照亮你一般。」如今來看這話的應用。

英文原文

23. But if thine eye be evil--distempered, or, as we should say, If we have got a bad eye.

thy whole body shall be full of darkness--darkened. As a vitiated eye, or an eye that looks not straight and full at its object, sees nothing as it is, so a mind and heart divided between heaven and earth is all dark.

If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!--As the conscience is the regulative faculty, and a man's inward purpose, scope, aim in life, determines his character--if these be not simple and heavenward, but distorted and double, what must all the other faculties and principles of our nature be which take their direction and character from these, and what must the whole man and the whole life be but a mass of darkness? In Luke

(Lu 11:36)

the converse of this statement very strikingly expresses what pure, beautiful, broad perceptions the clarity of the inward eye imparts: "If thy whole body therefore be full of light, having no part dark, the whole shall be full of light, as when the bright shining of a candle doth give thee light." But now for the application of this.

24

無標題

開啟正文

24. 一個人不能事奉——這詞意為「完全屬於、並完全在一人的指揮之下」。

兩個主;不是惡這個愛那個,就是重這個輕那個——即使兩個主性格相同、目標只有一個,僕人仍必須從其中一位領受命令:雖然他可以作討二者喜悅的事,但按事物的本性,他不能作超過一位的僕人。何況如目前情形,二者的利益完全不同,甚至衝突。在這種情形下,若我們的情感在於事奉其中一位——若我們「愛這個」——我們便必須「惡那個」;若我們堅決定意「重這個」,我們便必須同時忽視,並(若他堅持他對我們的要求)甚至「輕那個」。

你們不能又事奉神,又事奉瑪門——「瑪門」一詞——以一個 m 拼寫更佳——是外來詞,其確切來源不能確定,雖然最可能的來源給它「人所信靠之物」之意。此處它無疑用於指財富,視之為偶像的主、或人心中的神。事奉這位神和真神二者同時進行,在此以一種憤慨的簡短被宣告為不可能。但前面幾節的教訓似乎可能危及我們今生所需之物的獲得,以至於淪為缺乏,所以我們主如今來論到這一點。

英文原文

24. No man can serve--The word means to "belong wholly and be entirely under command to."

two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other--Even if the two masters be of one character and have but one object, the servant must take law from one or the other: though he may do what is agreeable to both, he cannot, in the nature of the thing, be servant to more than one. Much less if, as in the present case, their interests are quite different, and even conflicting. In this case, if our affections be in the service of the one--if we "love the one"--we must of necessity "hate the other"; if we determine resolutely to "hold to the one," we must at the same time disregard, and (if he insist on his claims upon us) even "despise the other."

Ye cannot serve God and mammon--The word "mamon"--better written with one m--is a foreign one, whose precise derivation cannot certainly be determined, though the most probable one gives it the sense of "what one trusts in." Here, there can be no doubt it is used for riches, considered as an idol master, or god of the heart. The service of this god and the true God together is here, with a kind of indignant curtness, pronounced impossible. But since the teaching of the preceding verses might seem to endanger our falling short of what is requisite for the present life, and so being left destitute, our Lord now comes to speak to that point.

25

無標題

開啟正文

25. 所以我告訴你們,不要——「不要憂慮」。

為生命憂慮——「憂慮」一詞,在我們的譯本製作時,表達了「掛慮」、「焦急的關切」的意思——這可從任何古英文經典中看出;1Sa 9:5 等處也是在此意義上使用。但這詞的此種意義如今幾乎已消失,所以單讀英文的讀者容易困惑。

為屬世之物的思想或預謀——在反思、考慮的意義上——是聖經和常識同樣要求的。此處所譴責的,只是那源於不信之疑惑和不安的焦急掛慮,那種壓迫性的擔憂。(見 Php 4:6)。

吃甚麼、喝甚麼;為身體憂慮,穿甚麼——路加(Lu 12:29)中我們主加上「也不要心裏不安」——不是我們譯本的「疑惑不定」。

當「應當一無掛慮」,只要凡事藉著禱告、祈求和感謝,將你們所要的告訴神,使徒保證「神所賜出人意外的平安,必在基督耶穌裏,保守你們的心懷意念」(Php 4:6-7);即保守我們的感情和思想免受不當的激蕩,使它們存於聖潔的平靜中。

但當我們將整個屬世的境況交託給自己心思的機智,我們便落入我們主勸戒門徒所不可有的那種「不安」狀態。

生命不勝於飲食麼——食物。

身體不勝於衣裳麼?——那麼,神既賜予並維持那更大的——生命、身體——祂會吝惜那較小的、維持生命的食物和遮蔽身體的衣裳麼?

英文原文

25. Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought--"Be not solicitous." The English word "thought," when our version was made, expressed this idea of "solicitude," "anxious concern"--as may be seen in any old English classic; and in the same sense it is used in

1Sa 9:5,

&c. But this sense of the word has now nearly gone out, and so the mere English reader is apt to be perplexed. Thought or forethought, for temporal things--in the sense of reflection, consideration--is required alike by Scripture and common sense. It is that anxious solicitude, that oppressive care, which springs from unbelieving doubts and misgivings, which alone is here condemned. (See

Php 4:6).

for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on--In Luke

(Lu 12:29)

our Lord adds, "neither be ye unsettled"--not "of doubtful mind," as in our version. When "careful (or 'full of care') about nothing," but committing all in prayer and supplication with thanksgiving unto God, the apostle assures us that "the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep our hearts and minds in Christ Jesus"

(Php 4:6, 7);

that is, shall guard both our feelings and our thoughts from undue agitation, and keep them in a holy calm. But when we commit our whole temporal condition to the wit of our own minds, we get into that "unsettled" state against which our Lord exhorts His disciples.

Is not the life more than meat--food.

and the body than raiment?--If God, then, gives and keeps up the greater--the life, the body--will He withhold the less, food to sustain life and raiment to clothe the body?

26

無標題

開啟正文

26. 你們看天上的飛鳥——Mt 6:28 作「仔細觀察」,Lu 12:24 作「想想」——如此從牠們學智慧。

也不種,也不收,也不積蓄在倉裏;你們的天父尚且養活牠。你們不比飛鳥貴重得多麼?——在你們自己更尊貴,對神更親愛。

此處的論證是從大到小;但細節何等豐富!受造的走獸——無理性——不能撒種、收割、儲藏:但你們的天父卻不容牠們無助地滅亡,而是在沒有這一切過程的情況下維持牠們。那麼,祂會看著自己的兒女運用理性所指示的一切方法來獲取身體所需之物——每一步都仰望祂——卻任憑他們餓死麼?

英文原文

26. Behold the fowls of the air--in

Mt 6:28,

"observe well," and in

Lu 12:24,

"consider"--so as to learn wisdom from them.

for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?--nobler in yourselves and dearer to God. The argument here is from the greater to the less; but how rich in detail! The brute creation--void of reason--are incapable of sowing, reaping, and storing: yet your heavenly Father suffers them not helplessly to perish, but sustains them without any of those processes. Will He see, then, His own children using all the means which reason dictates for procuring the things needful for the body--looking up to Himself at every step--and yet leave them to starve?

27

無標題

開啟正文

27. 你們哪一個能用思慮——焦急的掛慮。

使身量多加一肘呢?——此處所指的大概不是「身量」:首先,因為主題是藉供應衣食所需來延長壽命;其次,因為沒有人會夢想將身量加增一肘——即一呎半——而在路加平行經文(Lu 12:25-26)中,所指之事被描述為「那最小的事」。

但我們若取這詞「年歲」的首要意義(因為「身量」不過是次要意義),意思便是:「你們哪一個,無論多麼焦急地為此煩擾,能為你們生命旅程的長度加增一步呢?」將壽命的長度比作這類度量,並非與聖經的語言不合(比較 Ps 39:5;2Ti 4:7 等)。如此理解,意思便清楚,聯繫也自然。這是如今最優秀的批評家們所同意的。

英文原文

27. Which of you, by taking thought--anxious solicitude.

can add one cubit unto his stature?--"Stature" can hardly be the thing intended here: first, because the subject is the prolongation of life, by the supply of its necessaries of food and clothing: and next, because no one would dream of adding a cubit--or a foot and a half--to his stature, while in the corresponding passage in Luke

(Lu 12:25, 26)

the thing intended is represented as "that thing which is least." But if we take the word in its primary sense of "age" (for "stature" is but a secondary sense) the idea will be this, "Which of you, however anxiously you vex yourselves about it, can add so much as a step to the length of your life's journey?" To compare the length of life to measures of this nature is not foreign to the language of Scripture (compare

Ps 39:5; 2Ti 4:7,

&c.). So understood, the meaning is clear and the connection natural. In this the best critics now agree.

28

無標題

開啟正文

28. 何必為衣裳憂慮呢?你想——仔細觀察。

野地裏的百合花,怎麼長起來:它也不勞苦——像人那樣種植和預備麻。

也不紡線——像婦人那樣。

英文原文

28. And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider--observe well.

the lilies of the field, how they grow: they toil not--as men, planting and preparing the flax.

neither do they spin--as women.

29

無標題

開啟正文

29. 然而我告訴你們:就是所羅門極榮華的時候,他所穿戴的,還不如這花一朵呢——何等無與倫比的教訓!最好任其留在其本身透明的清澈和豐富的簡樸中。

英文原文

29. And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these--What incomparable teaching!--best left in its own transparent clearness and rich simplicity.

30

無標題

開啟正文

30. 野地裏的草——「草本植物」。

今天還在,明天就丟在爐裏——與草一同割下的野花,因炎熱而枯萎,用作燃料。(見 Jas 1:11)。

神還給它這樣的妝飾,何況你們呢,你們這小信的人——此處的論證有些新意。裝飾田野的花朵固然絢麗,超越一切人工的華美,卻只為短暫的時刻;你今日為之著迷,明日它便消失;你自己的手已將它抓住丟入爐中:那麼,神的兒女——對祂如此親愛、且充滿不能死之生命——會被撇下赤身露體麼?

祂不是說:他們豈不要被裝飾得更美麗?而是說:豈不更當給他們穿?因為這是祂要他們看為已蒙確保的一切(比較 Heb 13:5)。

「小信的人哪」這話——我們主一而再地用於祂的門徒(Mt 8:26;14:31;16:8)——很難被視為責備那麼早期、在那樣的聽眾面前不信的實際表現。這是祂溫和地責備不信之靈的方式——這靈即使對最好的人也是自然的,因為他們被感官的世界所環繞;也是激發人慷慨地渴望將之擺脫。

英文原文

30. Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass--the "herbage."

of the field, which to-day is, and to-morrow is cast into the oven--wild flowers cut with the grass, withering by the heat, and used for fuel. (See

Jas 1:11).

shall He not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?--The argument here is something fresh. Gorgeous as is the array of the flowers that deck the fields, surpassing all artificial human grandeur, it is for but a brief moment; you are ravished with it to-day, and to-morrow it is gone; your own hands have seized and cast it into the oven: Shall, then, God's children, so dear to Him, and instinct with a life that cannot die, be left naked? He does not say, Shall they not be more beauteously arrayed? but, Shall He not much more clothe them? that being all He will have them regard as secured to them (compare

Heb 13:5).

The expression, "Little-faithed ones," which our Lord applies once and again to His disciples

(Mt 8:26; 14:31; 16:8),

can hardly be regarded as rebuking any actual manifestations of unbelief at that early period, and before such an audience. It is His way of gently chiding the spirit of unbelief, so natural even to the best, who are surrounded by a world of sense, and of kindling a generous desire to shake it off.

31

無標題

開啟正文

31. 所以不要憂慮——掛慮。

說:吃甚麼?喝甚麼?穿甚麼?

英文原文

31. Therefore take no thought--solicitude.

saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?

32

無標題

開啟正文

32. (這都是外邦人所求的)——更恰當作「追逐」。外邦人既不確切地認識今生以外的事以激發其熱望、吸引其至高的注意,自然以現今的事物為其主要、甚至惟一的好而追逐。耶穌在此將祂的門徒提升到何等超越他們的高度!

你們需用的這一切東西,你們的天父是知道的——這話何等寶貴!食物和衣裳被宣告為神兒女所必需的;而那位能說「除了子和子所願意指示的,沒有人知道父」(Mt 11:27)的,以只有祂自己才能宣稱的權柄說:「你們的天父知道你們需用這一切東西。」這還不足以滿足你們麼,阿,信家之家中貧乏的人?

英文原文

32. (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek)--rather, "pursue." Knowing nothing definitely beyond the present life to kindle their aspirations and engage their supreme attention, the heathen naturally pursue present objects as their chief, their only good. To what an elevation above these does Jesus here lift His disciples!

for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things--How precious this word! Food and raiment are pronounced needful to God's children; and He who could say, "No man knoweth the Father but the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal Him"

(Mt 11:27),

says with an authority which none but Himself could claim, "Your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things." Will not that suffice you, O ye needy ones of the household of faith?

33

無標題

開啟正文

33. 你們要先求祂的國和祂的義;這些東西都要加給你們了——這是偉大的總結。嚴格說來,它只涉及本段的主題——心對屬天和屬地之事的正確狀態;但既以簡短的一般性指引形式表達,其涵蓋之廣足以擁抱整篇講論的主題。

彷彿為使這一點更明顯,這篇偉大講章的兩個基調似乎刻意在其中響起——「國度」和國度的「義」——作為至高追求的宏大對象,在其中今生所需的一切都要加給我們。

這金句中每一個詞的確切意義都當仔細衡量。「神的國」是登山寶訓的首要主題——那是天上的神在這墮落的世界中所建立的國度,其中包含亞當家族中一切屬靈恢復、內心順服的部分,在彌賽亞這位神聖的元首和君王之下。「祂的義」是這一切人的品格,在本講論前文已如此豐富地描述和多方面地說明。對這些的「求」是使之成為至高選擇和追求的對象;而「先」求它們,是在一切以先、在一切之上求它們。

在那種情形下要加給我們的「這一切東西」,正是 Mt 6:32 末了的話所保證「我們的天父知道我們所需用」的「這一切東西」;即我們今生所需的一切。當我們主說它們要被「加給」,當然暗示國度及其義的尋求者要以這些為其正當而首要的份:其餘的是他們因不求這些而得的恩典賞賜。(見 2Ch 1:11-12 中這原則的一個例證)。

接下來的不過是將這偉大的一般性指引化為日常使用的實用而便於掌握的形式。

英文原文

33. But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you--This is the great summing up. Strictly speaking, it has to do only with the subject of the present section--the right state of the heart with reference to heavenly and earthly things; but being couched in the form of a brief general directory, it is so comprehensive in its grasp as to embrace the whole subject of this discourse. And, as if to make this the more evident, the two keynotes of this great sermon seem purposely struck in it--"the KINGDOM" and "the RIGHTEOUSNESS" of the kingdom--as the grand objects, in the supreme pursuit of which all things needful for the present life will be added to us. The precise sense of every word in this golden verse should be carefully weighed. "The kingdom of God" is the primary subject of the Sermon on the Mount--that kingdom which the God of heaven is erecting in this fallen world, within which are all the spiritually recovered and inwardly subject portion of the family of Adam, under Messiah as its Divine Head and King. "The righteousness thereof" is the character of all such, so amply described and variously illustrated in the foregoing portions of this discourse. The "seeking" of these is the making them the object of supreme choice and pursuit; and the seeking of them "first" is the seeking of them before and above all else. The "all these things" which shall in that case be added to us are just the "all these things" which the last words of

Mt 6:32

assured us "our heavenly Father knoweth that we have need of"; that is, all we require for the present life. And when our Lord says they shall be "added," it is implied, as a matter of course, that the seekers of the kingdom and its righteousness shall have these as their proper and primary portion: the rest being their gracious reward for not seeking them. (See an illustration of the principle of this in

2Ch 1:11, 12).

What follows is but a reduction of this great general direction into a practical and ready form for daily use.

34

無標題

開啟正文

34. 所以不要為明天憂慮——焦急的掛慮。

因為明天自有明天的憂慮——(或按其他權威作「為自己」)——將有它自己的憂慮原因。

一天的難處一天當就夠了——一條極佳的實用格言,在我們的譯本中譯得比幾乎任何其他譯本都好,連之前的英文譯本也不例外。每一天都帶來它自己的憂慮;預先去擔憂不過是將憂慮加倍。

英文原文

34. Take therefore no thought--anxious care.

for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself--(or, according to other authorities, "for itself")--shall have its own causes of anxiety.

Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof--An admirable practical maxim, and better rendered in our version than in almost any other, not excepting the preceding English ones. Every day brings its own cares; and to anticipate is only to double them.