Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary · 1 Samuel 第22章

註釋閱讀最佳化

分章註釋

1 Samuel 第 22 章

서론

無標題

開啟正文

大衛被亞吉逐出後,便回到以色列地,受掃羅追獵。I. 大衛在亞杜蘭洞立起旗幟,款待親屬(1Sa 22:1),招募兵丁(1Sa 22:2),又把年邁的父母遷往更安寧之處安置(1Sa 22:3,4),並得先知迦得作他的謀士(1Sa 22:5)。掃羅決意追捕他、尋獲他,又抱怨臣僕與約拿單(1Sa 22:6-8);後因多益告密,得知亞希米勒曾恩待大衛,便下令將亞希米勒和與他同在的祭司——共八十五人——盡數處死,又毀滅屬他們的一切(1Sa 22:9-19)。在這場野蠻的屠殺中,亞比亞他逃脫,投奔大衛(1Sa 22:20-23)。

英文原文

David, being driven from Achish, returns into the land of Israel to be hunted by Saul. I. David sets up his standard in the cave of Adullam, entertains his relations (1Sa 22:1), enlists soldiers (1Sa 22:2), but removes his aged parents to a more quiet settlement (1Sa 22:3,4), and has the prophet Gad for his counsellor, 1Sa 22:5. Saul resolves to pursue him and find him out, complains of his servants and Jonathan (1Sa 22:6-8), and, finding by Doeg's information that Ahimelech had been kind to David, he ordered him and all the priests that were with him, eighty-five in all, to be put to death, and all that belonged to them destroyed (1Sa 22:9-19) from the barbarous execution of which sentence Abiathar escaped to David, 1Sa 22:20-23.

1-5

David in the Cave of Adullam (1057 BC)

開啟正文

大衛在亞杜蘭洞(主前 1057 年)

¹ 大衛就離開那裏,逃到亞杜蘭洞。他的弟兄和他父親的全家聽見了,都下到他那裏。
² 凡受窘迫的、欠債的、心裏苦惱的,都聚集到他那裏;大衛就作他們的頭目,跟隨他的約有四百人。
³ 大衛從那裏往摩押的米斯巴去,對摩押王說:「求你容我父母搬來,住在你們這裏,等我知道神要為我怎樣行。」
⁴ 大衛領他父母到摩押王面前。大衛住山寨多少日子,他父母也住摩押王那裏多少日子。
⁵ 先知迦得對大衛說:「你不要住在山寨,要往猶大地去。」大衛就離開那裏,進入哈列的樹林。

此處我們看見:一、大衛在亞杜蘭洞中藏身(撒上 22:1)。這洞是天然險阻還是人工開鑿,並不清楚;但進入其中的路想必極其難行,以至於大衛認為自己憑著歌利亞的刀,就能抵擋掃羅全軍,因此在那洞中把自己如同活埋了一般,等候觀看(他在此處也說,撒上 22:3)神要怎樣待他。國度的應許已暗示了得蒙保全直到那日的應許,然而大衛仍用合宜的方法為自己求安全,否則便是試探神。他並未作任何旨在除滅掃羅的事,只是要保全自己。一個本可作士師或元帥為國效力的人,如今竟被關在洞中,被擱置一旁,如同無人喜悅的器皿。有時連明亮的燈光也這樣被遮蔽、藏在斗底下,我們不可引以為怪。也許使徒論到舊約聖徒中那些「在曠野、山嶺、山洞、地穴,飄流無定」(來 11:38)之時,所指的也包括大衛這事在內。正是在此時,大衛寫下詩篇 142 篇,其題註為「大衛在洞裏的禱告」;他在其中訴說「無人承認他」,避難所也歸於失敗,卻盼望不久「義人必環繞他」。

二、他的親屬都投奔他而來——「他的弟兄和他父親的全家」——為要得他的保護,為要給他助力,也為要與他同甘共苦。「弟兄為患難而生。」此時約押、亞比篩並其餘的親屬都來到他這裏,與他同受苦難、共冒危險,盼望不久能與他同得高升;他們果然如此。他最初的勇士三人,正是在他居洞之時最先歸他的(代上 11:15-25 等)。

三、他在此開始為自衛而招聚兵力(撒上 22:2)。他從近來的經歷知道,逃命並不能救自己,因此迫不得已要靠武力;然而他從未採取攻勢,從未對君王施暴,也未擾亂國度的平安,只把兵力作為自己的人身護衛。可是無論他的兵丁怎樣護衛他,卻並未給他帶來甚麼光彩,因為他這一團人並非由達官顯貴、富戶、勇士,甚至不是好人組成,而是「受窘迫的、欠債的、心裏苦惱的」——家道敗落、心緒不寧的人,走投無路,不知如何是好。大衛既在亞杜蘭洞立了大本營,他們便紛紛前來入伍,人數約有四百。請看神有時用何等軟弱的器皿來成就祂自己的旨意。大衛的子孫(基督)也樂意收留困苦的靈魂,只要他們願意奉祂為元帥、受祂統帥。

四、他用心安置雙親於安全之所。當掃羅如此痛恨他、並因他的緣故痛恨一切屬他之人時,他在以色列全地竟找不到這樣一個安全之處;於是他帶著雙親往摩押王那裏去,把他們安置在他的保護之下(撒上 22:3,4)。請留意此處:1. 他懷著何等體恤之心照應年邁的雙親。在與掃羅周旋期間所要面對的驚嚇與勞頓,斷不是他們所能承受的(他們的年紀無論如何擔當不起);因此他所作的頭一件事,便是為他們找一個安靜的居所,至於自己則無暇顧及。願兒女從此學會「在家裏盡孝,報答親恩」(提前 5:4),凡事顧及他們的安舒與滿足。無論自己如何尊貴、如何忙碌,都不可忘記年邁的父母。2. 他以何等謙卑的信心等候眼前患難的結局:「等我知道神要為我怎樣行。」他把自己的盼望表達得極為含蓄,如同一個完全把自己交託給神、把道路交在神手中的人,所期待的善果不是出於自己的謀略、兵力或功勞,而是出於神的智慧、能力與良善所要為他成就的。大衛的父母離棄了他,神卻沒有(詩 27:10)。

五、他得到先知迦得的忠告與幫助——迦得大概是撒母耳門下先知學校的門徒之一,由撒母耳推薦給大衛,作他的隨軍牧師或屬靈引導者。他既是先知,就為他禱告,又把神的心意指教他;大衛雖自己也是先知,卻樂意接受他的幫助。迦得勸他往猶大地去(撒上 22:5),因深信自己是無辜的,又深信神的保護,更渴望即便在眼前的逆境中,仍能為自己的支派和國家盡點心力。讓他不要以自己的事業為恥,也不要拒絕別人所要給他的援助。受這話激勵,他便決定在那裏公開露面。如此「義人的步伐被耶和華所定」。

英文原文

David in the Cave of Adullam (1057 BC)

¹ David therefore departed thence, and escaped to the cave Adullam: and when his brethren and all his father's house heard it, they went down thither to him.
² And every one that was in distress, and every one that was in debt, and every one that was discontented, gathered themselves unto him; and he became a captain over them: and there were with him about four hundred men.
³ And David went thence to Mizpeh of Moab: and he said unto the king of Moab, Let my father and my mother, I pray thee, come forth, and be with you, till I know what God will do for me.
⁴ And he brought them before the king of Moab: and they dwelt with him all the while that David was in the hold.
⁵ And the prophet Gad said unto David, Abide not in the hold; depart, and get thee into the land of Judah. Then David departed, and came into the forest of Hareth.

Here, I. David shelters himself in the cave of Adullam, 1Sa 22:1. Whether it was a natural or artificial fastness does not appear; it is probable that the access to it was so difficult that David thought himself able, with Goliath's sword, to keep it against all the forces of Saul, and therefore buried himself alive in it, while he was waiting to see (and he says here, 1Sa 22:3) what God would do with him. The promise of the kingdom implied a promise of preservation to it, and yet David used proper means for his own safety, otherwise he would have tempted God. He did not do any thing that aimed to destroy Saul, but only to secure himself. He that might have done great service to his country as a judge or general is here shut up in a cave, and thrown by as a vessel in which there was no pleasure. We must not think it strange if sometimes shining lights be thus eclipsed and hidden under a bushel. Perhaps the apostle refers to this instance of David, among others, when he speaks of some of the Old-Testament worthies that wandered in deserts, in dens and caves of the earth, Heb 11:38. It was at this time that David penned Ps 142:1-7, which is entitled, A prayer when David was in the cave; and there he complains that no man would know him and that refuge failed him, but hopes that shortly the righteous would compass him about.

II. Thither his relations flocked to him, his brethren and all his father's house, to be protected by him, to give assistance to him, and to take their lot with him. A brother is born for adversity. Now, Joab, and Abishai, and the rest of his relations, came to him, to suffer and venture with him, in hopes shortly to be advanced with him; and they were so. The first three of his worthies were those that first owed him when he was in the cave, 1Ch 11:15-25, etc.

III. Here he began to raise forces in his own defence, 1Sa 22:2. He found by the late experiments he had made that he could not save himself by flight, and therefore was necessitated to do it by force, wherein he never acted offensively, never offered any violence to his prince nor gave any disturbance to the peace of the kingdom, but only used his forces as a guard to his own person. But, whatever defence his soldiers were to him, they did him no great credit, for the regiment he had was made up not of great men, nor rich men, nor stout men, no, nor good men, but men in distress, in debt, and discontented, men of broken fortunes and restless spirits, that were put to their shifts, and knew not well what to do with themselves. When David had fixed his headquarters in the cave of Adullam, they came and enlisted themselves under him to the number of about 400. See what weak instruments God sometimes makes use of, by which to bring about his own purposes. The Son of David is ready to receive distressed souls, that will appoint him their captain and be commanded by him.

IV. He took care to settle his parents in a place of safety. No such place could he find in all the land of Israel while Saul was so bitterly enraged against him and all that belonged to him for his sake; he therefore goes with them to the king of Moab, and puts them under his protection, 1Sa 22:3,4. Observe here, 1. With what a tender concern he provided for his aged parents. It was not fit they should be exposed either to the frights or to the fatigues which he must expect during his struggle with Saul (their age would by no means bear such exposure); therefore the first thing he does is to find them a quiet habitation, whatever became of himself. Let children learn from this to show pity at home and requite their parents (1Ti 5:4), in every thing consulting their ease and satisfaction. Though ever so highly preferred, and ever so much employed, let them not forget their aged parents. 2. With what a humble faith he expects the issue of his present distresses: Till I know what God will do for me. He expresses his hopes very modestly, as one that had entirely cast himself upon God and committed his way to him, expecting a good issue, not from his own arts, or arms, or merits, but from what the wisdom, power, and goodness of God would do for him. Now David's father and mother forsook him, but God did not, Ps 27:10.

V. He had the advice and assistance of the prophet Gad, who probably was one of the sons of the prophets that were brought up under Samuel, and was by him recommended to David for his chaplain or spiritual guide. Being a prophet, he would pray for him and instruct him in the mind of God; and David, though he was himself a prophet, was glad of his assistance. He advised him to go into the land of Judah (1Sa 22:5), as one that was confident of his own innocency, and was well assured of the divine protection, and was desirous, even in his present hard circumstances, to do some service to his tribe and country. Let him not be ashamed to own his own cause nor decline the succours that would be offered him. Animated by this word, there he determined to appear publicly. Thus are the steps of a good man ordered by the Lord.

6-19

Saul Destroys the Lord's Priests; the City of Nob Destroyed (1057 BC)

開啟正文

掃羅屠殺耶和華的祭司;挪伯城被滅(主前1057年)

⁶ 掃羅聽見大衛和跟隨他的人被發現了。那時掃羅坐在基比亞、拉瑪的一棵樹下,手裏拿著槍,眾臣僕都侍立在左右。
⁷ 掃羅就對侍立的臣僕說:「便雅憫人哪,你們聽著:耶西的兒子能將田地和葡萄園賜給你們各人嗎?能立你們各人作千夫長、百夫長嗎?
⁸ 你們竟都結黨害我。我的兒子與耶西的兒子立約,無人告訴我;你們無人為我憂愁,也無人告訴我我的兒子煽動我的臣僕伺機埋伏害我,到了今日這地步。」
⁹ 那時以東人多益站在掃羅的臣僕中,對他說:「我曾看見耶西的兒子到了挪伯,到了亞希突的兒子亞希米勒那裏。
¹⁰ 亞希米勒為他求問耶和華,又給他食物,並將非利士人歌利亞的刀給了他。」
¹¹ 王就打發人將祭司亞希突的兒子亞希米勒,和他父家在挪伯的眾祭司都召了來。他們就都來見王。
¹² 掃羅說:「亞希突的兒子啊,你聽著。」他回答說:「我主在這裏。」
¹³ 掃羅對他說:「你為甚麼與耶西的兒子結黨害我,將餅和刀給他,又為他求問神,使他起來背叛我,伺機埋伏害我,到了今日這地步呢?」
¹⁴ 亞希米勒回答王說:「王的眾僕人中,有誰像大衛那樣忠心呢?他是王的女婿,又是王的參謀,在王家極受尊榮。
¹⁵ 我豈是從今日才為他求問神呢?斷不是這樣。王不要將罪歸我和我父全家;因為僕人對這一切事,無論大小,都一概不知。」
¹⁶ 王說:「亞希米勒啊,你和你父家的人必都當死。」
¹⁷ 王又對左右侍立的護衛說:「你們轉過去,殺耶和華的祭司;因為他們也幫助大衛,又知道大衛逃走卻不告訴我。」但王的臣僕不肯伸手殺耶和華的祭司。
¹⁸ 王對多益說:「你轉過去殺祭司吧。」以東人多益就轉過去殺祭司,那日殺了穿細麻布以弗得的八十五人。
¹⁹ 又用刀擊殺了祭司城挪伯,無論男女、孩童、吃奶的,以及牛、驢、羊,都用刀殺盡。

我們已看見大衛苦難的發展;如今此處我們看見掃羅惡行的發展。他似乎已放下了一切其他事務的念頭,全心投入追捕大衛之中。他終於從鄉間的普遍傳聞中得知大衛被發現了(即他公開露面並招募人手歸入自己旗下);他便召集所有的臣僕圍繞自己,坐在基比亞高處的一棵樹下或一片樹林中,手裏拿著槍當作權杖——暗示他以武力來維持統治,也表明他當前的心境(更準確地說是心境的病態)——要殺盡一切阻擋他的人。在這個血腥的異端裁判所中:

I. 掃羅尋求關於大衛和約拿單的罪證(1Sa 22:7,8)。他樂意懷疑、又渴望證實兩件事,好將他的惡意發洩在他身邊兩個最好、最優秀的人身上:1. 他的臣僕大衛伺機埋伏害他、要取他的性命——這完全是虛假的。實際上是他自己尋索大衛的性命,卻假稱大衛尋索他的性命,儘管他無法以任何具體行為來指控他,連最起碼的嫌疑影子也沒有。2. 他的兒子約拿單煽動他如此行,並與他同謀圖謀弒君篡位。這也是眾所周知的虛假。大衛和約拿單之間確有友誼之約,卻從未在甚麼惡事上同謀;他們盟約的任何條款都不包含對掃羅的傷害。約拿單若同意在掃羅死後按神已啟示的旨意將王位讓給大衛,這對掃羅有何損害呢?然而,對君王和國家最好的朋友,往往就是這樣被可憎地描繪為兩者的敵人;基督自己也是如此。掃羅認定約拿單和大衛在密謀反對他、反對他的冠冕和尊榮,又因臣僕們不將此事稟告他而不悅——他以為他們不可能不知道;其實根本沒有這回事。請看嫉妒的惡意是何等本性,以及它為了逼出並不存在之事的供詞而採取的可憐手段。他把身邊所有的人都看作仇敵,因為他們不跟他說一模一樣的話。他告訴他們:(1.) 他們非常愚蠢,行事與自己支派(他們是便雅憫人,而大衛若被高舉,必將如今在便雅憫的尊榮帶到猶大去)和家族的利益相悖——因為大衛絕不能給他們像他所給的那樣的賞賜,即田地和葡萄園,以及作千夫長百夫長的晉升。(2.) 他們不忠誠:*你們都結黨害我。*那些放縱嫉妒之靈的人,內心是何等不得安寧、何等受折磨!君王若聽謊言,他一切臣僕都成為惡人(Pr 29:12)——就是說,在他眼中看來如此。(3.) 他們非常無情。他以為可以用這句話來打動他們的良心:你們中間無人為我憂愁,或如有人讀作「無人為我掛慮」。他藉這些說辭激動他們,要他們作他惡意的工具,好除去他對他們的疑心。

II. 他雖然從臣僕那裏查不出任何反對大衛或約拿單的事,卻從多益那裏得了控告亞希米勒祭司的情報。

  1. 多益對亞希米勒提出控告,他自己就是控方證人(1Sa 22:9,10)。多益雖然壞,若不是掃羅逼出來的,也許不會提供這個情報——因為他若很急切,早就說了;但如今他認為,若他們中間沒有一個人作控告者,就必都被視為叛徒,於是便告訴掃羅亞希米勒對大衛所施的善行——而他自己恰巧是目擊者。亞希米勒曾為他求問神(祭司通常只為公眾人物和公眾事務如此行),又供應了他食物和刀。這一切都是真的;但這不是全部的真相。他本該進一步告訴掃羅,大衛曾使亞希米勒相信他當時正奉王命辦事;因此他所為大衛作的服事,無論結果如何,原意是為尊榮掃羅而作的。如此便可為亞希米勒開脫——他已在掃羅的掌握之中——並將一切過失推到掃羅夠不到的大衛身上。

  2. 亞希米勒被拿獲——更準確地說是被傳喚到王面前——並根據這項控告被起訴。王派人召他和所有當時在聖所事奉的祭司來,懷疑他們是幫兇。他們因不自覺有罪,所以不畏懼任何危險,全都來見王(1Sa 22:11),沒有一個人企圖逃跑或投奔大衛求庇護——若他們真如掃羅所懷疑的那樣與大衛關係密切,如今他既已豎起大旗,他們必會如此行。掃羅以極大的輕蔑和憤怒對亞希米勒提起訴訟(1Sa 22:12):亞希突的兒子啊,你聽著——連他的名字都不提,更不用說給他應有的尊稱了。由此可見他已丟棄了對神的敬畏,對祂的祭司毫不尊重,反以侮辱他們、踐踏他們為樂。亞希米勒在審判台前應訊說:我主在這裏——預備聽取控罪,知道自己沒有行惡。他不反對掃羅法庭的管轄權,也不堅持祭司的豁免權——即使他是大祭司(而士師或行政長官的職位不久前才從大祭司的職位上分離出來),也不如此;只是掃羅如今掌握著最高主權,在有關王室的事務上,連大祭司也將自己置於與普通以色列人同等的地位。人人都當順服(連教牧人員也當順服)在上有權柄的。

  3. 他的控罪被宣讀(1Sa 22:13):他身為叛徒,與耶西的兒子結黨,密謀廢黜謀害君王。「他的圖謀」(掃羅說)是起來背叛我,而你以糧食和武器資助了他。請看最無辜的行為會遭受何等惡意的曲解,生活在暴虐統治下的人是何等不安全,我們又當如何為自己所享有的良好憲政和施政而感恩。

  4. 對這項控告他答辯說:無罪(1Sa 22:14,15)。他承認事實,卻否認他如此行帶有叛國或惡意的意圖,或有任何反對王的圖謀。他申辯說,他非但不知道掃羅和大衛之間有任何嫌隙,反而真的以為大衛當時在朝廷中一如既往地受寵。請注意:他沒有申辯說大衛欺騙了他、以此蒙蔽了他——雖然實情確實如此——因為他不願宣揚這樣一個好人的軟弱,即使為自己辯白也不願,尤其是在掃羅面前——掃羅正尋找一切機會對付他。他反而以大衛素來作為掃羅最忠心的僕人所享有的聲譽、王將女兒嫁給他所賜的尊榮、王常常使用他並對他委以重任等事實來申辯:「他凡事遵王命而行,在王家極受尊榮;因此任何人都會認為尊重他是對王家效忠的功勞,決不會想到這是罪行。」他申辯說,從前大衛奉掃羅差遣出征之時,他一向都為他求問神,如今也像往常一樣無辜地行了。他聲明自己絕無參與任何反對王的陰謀之心:*斷不是這樣。我只管自己的本分,不插手政務。*他懇求王的恩待:不要將罪歸到我們身上;最後以宣告自己的無辜作結:*僕人對這一切事一概不知。*有誰能帶著更多真誠的證據來申辯呢?他若由一群正直的以色列人組成的陪審團來審判,必無疑被宣告無罪,因為誰能在他身上找到任何過失呢?然而:

  5. 掃羅親自對他宣判(1Sa 22:16):亞希米勒啊,你和你父家的人必都當死——以叛國罪論處。還有甚麼比這更不公正的呢?我又見日光之下,在審判之處有奸惡(Ec 3:16)。(1.) 掃羅竟獨自一人、在自己案子中自行宣判,不求助於士師或先知、不請教樞密院或軍事會議,這是不公正的。(2.) 如此合理的申辯竟被駁回、不予採納,既不說理由,也不嘗試駁斥其中的論據,純粹以強權行事,這是不公正的。(3.) 判決如此倉促草率,法官自己不花時間考慮,也不給囚犯時間請求緩刑,這是不公正的。(4.) 判決不僅針對亞希米勒本人——他是惟一被多益控告的人——更牽連他父家所有人,而對他們並無任何指控:豈可因父親的罪處死兒女呢?這是不公正的。(5.) 判決是在激情中作出的,不是為維護正義,而是為發洩他獸性的暴怒,這是不公正的。

  6. 他發出了(僅是口頭的)命令,要立即執行這項血腥的判決。

(1.) 他命令他的護衛作這判決的劊子手,但他們拒絕了(1Sa 22:17)。他如此行是要進一步羞辱祭司;他們不可死在軍兵的手下(如1Ki 2:29那樣)或他慣常的執法人員手中,而要由他的護衛來凌辱他們、在他們血中洗手。[1.] 君王的命令從未有比這更野蠻的:你們轉過去殺耶和華的祭司。這話帶著一種幾乎無可比擬的不敬之氣。他若似乎忘記了他們神聖的職分或與神的關係、對此隻字不提,那至少暗示他對身分如此的人竟落在他的不悅之下感到些許遺憾;但他竟稱他們為耶和華的祭司的同時,吩咐護衛去割他們的喉嚨,這看來正是因為這身分,他才恨惡他們。神既已棄絕他、吩咐另立一人代替他,他似乎樂得有此機會向耶和華的祭司報復,因為神自己他夠不著。當惡靈得了主權之時,他會把人驅使到何等邪惡的地步!他在命令中所指控的——他們知道大衛逃走之事——是完全虛假、未經證實的;其實他們對此事一無所知。但惡意和謀殺常常用謊言來支撐。[2.] 君王的命令從未有比這更光榮地被違抗的。護衛比他們的主人更有見識和恩典。雖然他們可能預料自己會因此被革職,甚至受罰、被處死,但無論後果如何,他們決不肯動手加害耶和華的祭司——他們如此尊重祭司的職分,又如此確信他們是無辜的。

(2.) 他命令多益(控告者)作劊子手,他便服從了。人本以為護衛的拒絕會喚醒掃羅的良心,使他不再堅持行這護衛都為之震驚的野蠻之事。但他的心思已被蒙蔽、心地已經剛硬,他們若不肯行,見證人的手就要加在受害者身上(De 17:7)。最血腥的暴君總能找到與自己一樣野蠻的殘酷工具。多益一受命去擊殺祭司,便欣然從命,且未遇抵抗,便在那日親手(就我們所見)殺了八十五名年屆事奉年齡——二十至五十歲之間——的祭司,因為他們穿著細麻布以弗得(1Sa 22:18),也許他們此時正是穿著聖衣來到掃羅面前的,就穿著這衣服被殺了。這(人必以為)足以使最嗜血的人滿足了;但迫害的螞蟥仍喊著:「給呀,給呀。」多益無疑是奉掃羅之命,在屠殺了祭司之後,又到他們的城挪伯,用刀殺盡那裏的一切(1Sa 22:19)——無論男女、孩童,連牲畜也不例外。何等野蠻的殘忍,令人思之不寒而慄!人心竟能如此不虔不仁,實在令人驚奇!我們從中可以看到:[1.] 當耶和華的靈離開掃羅之後,他是何等絕望地敗壞。那些因惹動神任憑他們逞心中情慾的人,沒有甚麼卑鄙之事是行不出來的。他先前如此富有同情心,竟違背神的命令饒了亞甲和亞瑪力人的牲畜,如今卻能鐵石心腸地眼看耶和華的祭司被殺,他們的一切盡被滅絕。正因那罪,神才任憑他行這事。[2.] 從前向以利家所宣告的刑罰在此應驗了;因為亞希米勒和他的家族正是以利的後裔。掃羅如此行雖是不義,但神容許此事發生卻是公義的。如今神應驗了那使聽見的人耳鳴的預言——正如祂從前告訴以利,祂必永遠審判他的家(1Sa 3:11-13)。神的話語一句也不落空。[3.] 這也可被看作是以色列的一大審判,是對他們在神所定的時間之前要求立王的公正懲罰。此時以色列的宗教狀況是何等可悲!雖然約櫃長久隱沒,但他們至少還有祭壇、有祭司在壇前事奉,這算是他們的安慰;但如今看見祭司倒在血泊之中——而且是祭司職分的繼承人——又看見祭司之城成為荒場,使神的祭壇因無人事奉而必被荒廢,而這一切都是出於他們自己君王的不義和殘暴之命,為要發洩他的獸性暴怒——這怎能不使一切敬虔的以色列人心碎,使他們千萬次地懊悔當初沒有滿足於撒母耳和他兒子們的治理呢。他們民族最大的仇敵也不能對他們造成更大的傷害了。

英文原文

Saul Destroys the Lord's Priests; the City of Nob Destroyed (1057 BC)

⁶ When Saul heard that David was discovered, and the men that were with him, (now Saul abode in Gibeah under a tree in Ramah, having his spear in his hand, and all his servants were standing about him;)
⁷ Then Saul said unto his servants that stood about him, Hear now, ye Benjamites; will the son of Jesse give every one of you fields and vineyards, and make you all captains of thousands, and captains of hundreds;
⁸ That all of you have conspired against me, and there is none that sheweth me that my son hath made a league with the son of Jesse, and there is none of you that is sorry for me, or sheweth unto me that my son hath stirred up my servant against me, to lie in wait, as at this day?
⁹ Then answered Doeg the Edomite, which was set over the servants of Saul, and said, I saw the son of Jesse coming to Nob, to Ahimelech the son of Ahitub.
¹⁰ And he enquired of the LORD for him, and gave him victuals, and gave him the sword of Goliath the Philistine.
¹¹ Then the king sent to call Ahimelech the priest, the son of Ahitub, and all his father's house, the priests that were in Nob: and they came all of them to the king.
¹² And Saul said, Hear now, thou son of Ahitub. And he answered, Here I am, my lord.
¹³ And Saul said unto him, Why have ye conspired against me, thou and the son of Jesse, in that thou hast given him bread, and a sword, and hast enquired of God for him, that he should rise against me, to lie in wait, as at this day?
¹⁴ Then Ahimelech answered the king, and said, And who is so faithful among all thy servants as David, which is the king's son in law, and goeth at thy bidding, and is honourable in thine house?
¹⁵ Did I then begin to enquire of God for him? be it far from me: let not the king impute any thing unto his servant, nor to all the house of my father: for thy servant knew nothing of all this, less or more.
¹⁶ And the king said, Thou shalt surely die, Ahimelech, thou, and all thy father's house.
¹⁷ And the king said unto the footmen that stood about him, Turn, and slay the priests of the LORD; because their hand also is with David, and because they knew when he fled, and did not shew it to me. But the servants of the king would not put forth their hand to fall upon the priests of the LORD.
¹⁸ And the king said to Doeg, Turn thou, and fall upon the priests. And Doeg the Edomite turned, and he fell upon the priests, and slew on that day fourscore and five persons that did wear a linen ephod.
¹⁹ And Nob, the city of the priests, smote he with the edge of the sword, both men and women, children and sucklings, and oxen, and asses, and sheep, with the edge of the sword.

We have seen the progress of David's troubles; now here we have the progress of Saul's wickedness. He seems to have laid aside the thoughts of all other business and to have devoted himself wholly to the pursuit of David. He heard at length, by the common fame of the country, that David was discovered (that is, that he appeared publicly and enlisted men into his service); and hereupon he called all his servants about him, and sat down under a tree, or grove, in the high place at Gibeah, with his spear in his hand for a sceptre, intimating the force by which he designed to rule, and the present temper of his spirit, or its distemper rather, which was to kill all that stood in his way. In this bloody court of inquisition,

I. Saul seeks for information against David and Jonathan, 1Sa 22:7,8. Two things he was willing to suspect and desirous to see proved, that he might wreak his malice upon two of the best and most excellent men he had about him:—1. That his servant David did lie in wait for him and seek his life, which was utterly false. He really sought David's life, and therefore pretended that David sought his life, though he could not charge him with any overt act that gave the least shadow of suspicion. 2. That his son Jonathan stirred him up to do so, and was confederate with him in compassing and imagining the death of the king. This also was notoriously false. A league of friendship there was between David and Jonathan, but no conspiracy in any evil thing; none of the articles of their covenant carried any mischief to Saul. If Jonathan had agreed, after the death of Saul, to resign to David, in compliance with the revealed will of God, what harm would that do to Saul? Yet thus the best friends to their prince and country have often been odiously represented as enemies to both; even Christ himself was so. Saul took it for granted that Jonathan and David were in a plot against him, his crown and dignity, and was displeased with his servants that they did not give him information of it, supposing that they could not but know it; whereas really there was no such thing. See the nature of a jealous malice, and its pitiful arts to extort discoveries of things that are not. He looked upon all about him as his enemies because they did not say just as he said; and told them, (1.) That they were very unwise, and acted against the interest both of their tribe (for they were Benjamites, and David, if he were advanced, would bring the honour into Judah which was now in Benjamin) and of their families; for David would never be able to give them such rewards as he had for them, of fields and vineyards, and such preferments, to be colonels and captains. (2.) That they were unfaithful: You have conspired against me. What a continual agitation and torment are those in that give way to a spirit of jealousy! If a ruler hearken to lies, all his servants are wicked (Pr 29:12), that is, they seem to be so in his eyes. (3.) That they were very unkind. He thought to work upon their good nature with that word: There is none of you that is so much as sorry for me, or solicitous for me, as some read it. By these reasonings he stirred them up to act vigorously, as the instruments of his malice, that they might take away his suspicions of them.

II. Though he could not learn any thing from his servants against David or Jonathan, yet he got information from Doeg against Ahimelech the priest.

1. An indictment is brought against Ahimelech by Doeg, and he himself is evidence against him, 1Sa 22:9,10. Perhaps Doeg, as bad as he was, would not have given this information if Saul had not extorted it, for had he been very forward to it he would have done it sooner: but now he thinks they must be all deemed traitors if none of them be accusers, and therefore tells Saul what kindness Ahimelech had shown to David, which he himself happened to be an eye-witness of. He had enquired of God for him (which the priest used not to do but for public persons and about public affairs) and he had furnished him with bread and a sword. All this was true; but it was not the whole truth. He ought to have told Saul further that David had made Ahimelech believe he was then going upon the king's business; so that what service he did to David, however it proved, was designed in honour to Saul, and this would have cleared Ahimelech, whom Saul had in his power, and would have thrown all the blame upon David, who was out of his reach.

2. Ahimelech is seized, or summoned rather to appear before the king, and upon this indictment he is arraigned. The king sent for him and all the priests who then attended the sanctuary, whom he supposed to be aiding and abetting; and they, not being conscious of any guilt, and therefore not apprehensive of any danger, came all of them to the king (1Sa 22:11), and none of them attempted to make an escape, or to flee to David for shelter, as they would have done now that he had set up his standard if they had been as much in his interests as Saul suspected they were. Saul arraigns Ahimelech himself with the utmost disdain and indignation (1Sa 22:12): Hear now, thou son of Ahitub; not so much as calling him by his name, much less giving him his title of distinction. By this it appears that he had cast off the fear of God, that he showed no respect at all to his priests, but took a pleasure in affronting them and insulting them. Ahimelech holds up his hand at the bar in those words: "Here I am, my lord, ready to hear my charge, knowing I have done no wrong." He does not object to the jurisdiction of Saul's court, nor insist upon an exemption as a priest, no, not though he is a high priest, to which office that of the judge, or chief magistrate, had not long since been annexed; but Saul having now the sovereignty vested in him, in things pertaining to the king, even the high priest sets himself on a level with common Israelites. Let every soul be subject (even clergymen) to the higher powers.

3. His indictment is read to him (1Sa 22:13), that he, as a false traitor, had joined himself with the son of Jesse in a plot to depose and murder the king. "His design" (says Saul) "was to rise up against me, and thou didst assist him with victuals and arms." See what bad constructions the most innocent actions are liable to, how unsafe those are that live under a tyrannical government, and what reason we have to be thankful for the happy constitution and administration of the government we are under.

4. To this indictment he pleads, Not guilty, 1Sa 22:14,15. He owns the fact, but denies that he did it traitorously or maliciously, or with any design against the king. He pleads that he was so far from knowing of any quarrel between Saul and David that he really took David to have been then as much in favour at court as ever he had been. Observe, He does not plead that David had told him an untruth, and with that had imposed upon him, though really it was so, because he would not proclaim the weakness of so good a man, no, not for his own vindication, especially to Saul, who sought all occasions against him; but he insists upon the settled reputation David had as the most faithful of all the servants of Saul, the honour the king had put upon him in marrying his daughter to him, the use the king had often made of him, and the trust he had reposed on him: "He goes at thy bidding, and is honourable in thy house, and therefore any one would think it a meritorious piece of service to the crown to show him respect, so far from apprehending it to be a crime." He pleads that he had been wont to enquire of God for him when he was sent by Saul upon any expedition, and did it now as innocently as ever he had done it. He protests his abhorrence of the thought of being in a plot against the king: "Be it far from me. I mind my own business, and meddle not with state matters." He begs the king's favour: "Let him not impute any crime to us;" and concludes with a declaration of his innocency: Thy servant knew nothing of all this. Could any man plead with more evidences of sincerity? Had he been tried by a jury of honest Israelites, he would certainly have been acquitted, for who can find any fault in him? But,

5. Saul himself gives judgment against him (1Sa 22:16): Thou shalt surely die, Ahimelech, as a rebel, thou and all thy father's house. What could be more unjust? I saw under the sun the place of judgment, that wickedness was there, Ec 3:16. (1.) It was unjust that Saul should himself, himself alone, give judgment in his own cause, without any appeal to judge or prophet, to his privy council, or to a council of war. (2.) That so fair a plea should be overruled and rejected without any reason given, or any attempt to disprove the allegations of it, but purely with a high hand. (3.) That sentence should be passed so hastily and with so much precipitation, the judge taking no time himself to consider of it, nor allowing the prisoner any time to move in arrest of judgment. (4.) That the sentence should be passed not only on Ahimelech, himself, who was the only person accused by Doeg, but on all his father's house, against whom nothing was alleged: must the children be put to death for the fathers? (5.) That the sentence should be pronounced in passion, not for the support of justice, but for the gratification of his brutish rage.

6. He issues out a warrant (a verbal warrant only) for the immediate execution of this bloody sentence.

(1.) He ordered his footmen to be the executioners of this sentence, but they refused, 1Sa 22:17. Hereby he intended to put a further disgrace upon the priests; they may not die by the hands of the men of war (as 1Ki 2:29) or his usual ministers of justice, but his footmen must triumph over them, and wash their hands in their blood. [1.] Never was the command of a prince more barbarously given: Turn and slay the priests of the Lord. This is spoken with such an air of impiety as can scarcely be paralleled. Had he seemed to forget their sacred office or relation to God, and taken no notice of that, he would thereby have intimated some regret that men of that character should fall under his displeasure; but to call them the priests of the Lord, when he ordered his footmen to cut their throats, looked as if, upon that very account, he hated them. God having rejected him, and ordered another to be anointed in his room, he seems well pleased with this opportunity of being revenged on the priests of the Lord, since God himself was out of his reach. What wickedness will not the evil spirit hurry men to, when he gets the dominion! He alleged, in his order that which was utterly false and unproved to him, that they knew when David fled; whereas they knew nothing of the matter. But malice and murder are commonly supported with lies. [2.] Never was the command of a prince more honourably disobeyed. The footmen had more sense and grace than their master. Though they might expect to be turned out of their places, if not punished and put to death for their refusal, yet, come on them what would, they would not offer to fall upon the priests of the Lord, such a reverence had they for their office, and such a conviction of their innocence.

(2.) He ordered Doeg (the accuser) to be the executioner, and he obeyed. One would have thought that the footmen's refusal would awaken Saul's conscience, and that he would not insist upon the doing of a thing so barbarous as that his footmen startled at the thought of it. But his mind was blinded and his heart hardened, and, if they will not do it, the hands of the witness shall be upon the victims, De 17:7. The most bloody tyrants have found out instruments of their cruelty as barbarous as themselves. Doeg is no sooner commanded to fall upon the priests than he does it willingly enough, and, meeting with no resistance, slays with his own hand (for aught that appears) on that same day eighty-five priests that were of the age of ministration, between twenty and fifty, for they wore a linen ephod (1Sa 22:18), and perhaps appeared at this time before Saul in their habits, and were slain in them. This (one would think) was enough to satiate the most blood-thirsty; but the horseleech of persecution still cries, "Give, give." Doeg, by Saul's order no doubt, having murdered the priests, went to their city Nob, and put all to the sword there (1Sa 22:19), men, women, and children, and the cattle too. Barbarous cruelty, and such as one cannot think of without horror! Strange that ever it should enter into the heart of man to be so impious, so inhuman! We may see in this, [1.] The desperate wickedness of Saul when the Spirit of the Lord had departed from him. Nothing so vile but those may be hurried to it who have provoked God to give them up to their hearts' lusts. He that was so compassionate as to spare Agag and the cattle of the Amalekites, in disobedience to the command of God, could now, with unrelenting bowels, see the priests of the Lord murdered, and nothing spared of all that belonged to them. For that sin God left him to this. [2.] The accomplishment of the threatenings long since pronounced against the house of Eli; for Ahimelech and his family were descendants from him. Though Saul was unrighteous in doing this, yet God was righteous in permitting it. Now God performed against Eli that at which the ears of those that heard it must needs tingle, as he had told him that he would judge his house for ever 1Sa 3:11-13. No word of God shall fall to the ground. [3.] This may be considered as a great judgment upon Israel, and the just punishment of their desiring a king before the time God intended them one. How deplorable was the state of religion at this time in Israel! Though the ark had long been in obscurity, yet it was some comfort to them that they had the altar, and priests to serve at it; but now to see their priests weltering in their own blood, and the heirs of the priesthood too, and the city of the priests made a desolation, so that the altar of God must needs be neglected for want of attendants, and this by the unjust and cruel order of their own king to satisfy his brutish rage—this could not but go to the heart of all pious Israelites, and make them wish a thousand times they had been satisfied with the government of Samuel and his sons. The worst enemies of their nation could not have done them a greater mischief.

20-23

Abiathar's Escape (1057 BC)

開啟正文

亞比亞他逃脫(主前1057年)

²⁰ 亞希突的兒子亞希米勒有一個兒子,名叫亞比亞他,逃出來,投奔大衛。
²¹ 亞比亞他將掃羅殺耶和華祭司的事告訴大衛。
²² 大衛對亞比亞他說:「那日我見以東人多益在那裏,就知道他必告訴掃羅。你父的全家喪命,都是因我的緣故。
²³ 你可以住在我這裏,不要懼怕。因為尋索你命的,就是尋索我命的。你在我這裏可得保全。」

此處記述:1. 亞希米勒的兒子亞比亞他從祭司城的屠殺中逃脫。也許當他父親奉掃羅之召前去應訊之時,他被留在家中看守祭壇,因此躲過了第一波屠殺;在多益和他的幫兇來到挪伯之前,他已得到風聲,有時間為自己的安全設法。他除了投奔大衛,還能到哪裏去呢?(1Sa 22:20)那些為大衛的子孫受苦的人,當將自己靈魂交與祂(1Pe 4:19)。2. 大衛對他所帶來之噩耗的反應。亞比亞他向大衛講述了掃羅在耶和華的祭司中間所行的血腥之事(1Sa 22:21)——正如施洗約翰的門徒在他們的主被斬首之後,「去告訴耶穌」(Mt 14:12)。大衛為這災禍本身大大哀慟,更因自己是其中幫兇而格外痛心:你父的全家喪命,都是因我的緣故(1Sa 22:22)。須知,一個敬虔的人若發現自己在任何意義上成了教會和事奉之災禍的因由,那是極大的痛苦。大衛對多益的為人十分了解,所以當他在聖所看見多益之時,便擔心他會做出這樣的惡事:我知道他必告訴掃羅。他稱他為「以東人多益」,因為他雖然藉著皈依猶太教而披上了以色列人的外衣,內心卻仍是以東人的心。3. 他對亞比亞他的保護。他看出亞比亞他惶恐萬分——這也理所當然——便叫他不要懼怕,他必像看顧自己一樣看顧他:你在我這裏可得保全(1Sa 22:23)。大衛此時既有了時間平復心情,便以對自身安全的確據發話,並應許亞比亞他必完全享受他的保護。論到大衛的子孫,神也曾應許必將祂藏在手掌的蔭蔽下(Isa 49:2);在祂裏面,一切屬祂的人都可以確信自己必得保全(Ps 91:1)。大衛如今不僅有一位先知,更有一位祭司——一位大祭司——與他同在;他對祭司是祝福,祭司對他也是祝福,兩者都是他日後成功的吉兆。然而從(1Sa 28:6)可以看出,掃羅那時也有一位大祭司,因為他有烏陵可供諮詢:據推測,他立了撒督的父親亞希突——屬以利亞撒家族(1Ch 6:8)——因為即使是那些恨惡敬虔之實質的人,也不肯放棄敬虔的形式。此處不可忘記的是,大衛在此時寫下了詩篇第五十二篇——正如該詩的標題所顯示的——他在其中將多益描述為不僅心懷惡意、尖刻毒辣,更是虛謊詭詐的,因為他所說的話雖然在實質上屬實,卻被人為地添油加醋、加以歪曲,目的是要加害於人。然而即使在那時——當祭司制度已如枯萎的枝條——他仍看自己是神殿中的青橄欖樹(Ps 52:8)。在大衛所處的這般持續不斷的紛擾和困迫之中,他仍找到了時間和心思與神相交,並在其中得了安慰。

英文原文

Abiathar's Escape (1057 BC)

²⁰ And one of the sons of Ahimelech the son of Ahitub, named Abiathar, escaped, and fled after David.
²¹ And Abiathar shewed David that Saul had slain the LORD's priests.
²² And David said unto Abiathar, I knew it that day, when Doeg the Edomite was there, that he would surely tell Saul: I have occasioned the death of all the persons of thy father's house.
²³ Abide thou with me, fear not: for he that seeketh my life seeketh thy life: but with me thou shalt be in safeguard.

Here is, 1. The escape of Abiathar, the son of Ahimelech, out of the desolations of the priests' city. Probably when his father went to appear, upon Saul's summons, he was left at home to attend the altar, by which means he escaped the first execution, and, before Doeg and his bloodhounds came to Nob, he had intelligence of the danger, and had time to shift for his own safety. And whither should he go but to David? 1Sa 22:20. Let those that suffer for the Son of David commit the keeping of their souls to him, 1Pe 4:19. 2. David's resentment of the melancholy tidings he brought. He gave David an account of the bloody work Saul had made among the priests of the Lord (1Sa 22:21), as the disciples of John, when their master was beheaded, went and told Jesus, Mt 14:12. And David greatly lamented the calamity itself, but especially his being accessory to it: I have occasioned the death of all the persons of thy father's house, 1Sa 22:22. Note, It is a great trouble to a good man to find himself in any way an occasion of the calamities of the church and ministry. David knew Doeg's character so well that he feared he would do some such mischief as this when he saw him at the sanctuary: I knew he would tell Saul. He calls him Doeg the Edomite, because he retained the heart of an Edomite, though, by embracing the profession of the Jewish religion, he had put on the mask of an Israelite. 3. The protection he granted to Abiathar. He perceived him to be terrified, as he had reason to be, and therefore bade him not to fear, he would be as careful for him as for himself: With me thou shalt be in safeguard, 1Sa 22:23. David, having now time to recollect himself, speaks with assurance of his own safety, and promises that Abiathar shall have the full benefit of his protection. It is promised to the Son of David that God will hide him in the shadow of his hand (Isa 49:2), and, with him, all that are his may be sure that they shall be in safeguard, Ps 91:1. David had now not only a prophet, but a priest, a high-priest, with him, to whom he was a blessing and they to him, and both a happy omen of his success. Yet it appears (by 1Sa 28:6) that Saul had a high priest too, for he had a urim to consult: it is supposed that he preferred Ahitub the father of Zadok, of the family of Eleazar (1Ch 6:8), for even those that hate the power of godliness yet will not be without the form. It must not be forgotten here that David at this time penned Ps 52:1-9, as appears by the title of that psalm, wherein he represents Doeg not only as malicious and spiteful, but as false and deceitful, because though what he said was, for the substance of it, true, yet he put false colours upon it, with a design to do mischief. Yet even then, when the priesthood had become as a withered branch, he looks upon himself as a green olive-tree in the house of God, Ps 52:8. In this great hurry and distraction that David was continually in, yet he found both time and a heart for communion with God, and found comfort in it.